賀克強(qiáng),謝言虎,凡小慶,王德龍,柴小青
[中國科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué)附屬第一醫(yī)院(安徽省立醫(yī)院)麻醉科,合肥 230001]
全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)(TKA)是關(guān)節(jié)骨科最大的手術(shù)之一,創(chuàng)傷較大。近年來,隨著加速康復(fù)外科理念的推廣[1-4],術(shù)后患者早期下床進(jìn)行功能鍛煉是常規(guī)手段之一,但是患者術(shù)后傷口局部的炎性反應(yīng)[5]以及疼痛常常阻礙康復(fù)進(jìn)程。單純的股神經(jīng)阻滯雖然能減少患者術(shù)后疼痛,但是對其術(shù)后局部炎性因子的生成并無太大影響[6]。右美托咪啶(DEX)被發(fā)現(xiàn)具有局部抗炎效果[7]。本研究旨在探討DEX復(fù)合羅哌卡因在超聲引導(dǎo)下行單次股神經(jīng)阻滯對TKA患者術(shù)后局部炎性反應(yīng)以及術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛的影響。
1.1 研究對象 選取2017年1至8月,擇期行TKA患者60例,年齡43~64歲,平均(56±11)歲,體質(zhì)量50~81 kg,性別不限。納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):ASA分級I或Ⅱ級,術(shù)前72 h內(nèi)未使用非甾體抗炎藥物。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①凝血功能障礙,術(shù)中大出血;②血栓,栓塞;③急性感染;④病態(tài)竇房結(jié)綜合征;⑤腦出血或者腦梗死恢復(fù)期。用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法將患者分為羅哌卡因組(R組)和DEX復(fù)合羅哌卡因組(DR組),每組30例。兩組患者性別、年齡、身高、體質(zhì)量、ASA分級等指標(biāo)比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。本研究得到本院醫(yī)學(xué)倫理委員會批準(zhǔn),并且患者家屬均簽署知情同意書。
1.2 方法 所有患者入室后,常規(guī)監(jiān)測無創(chuàng)血壓、心電圖(ECG),血氧飽和度(SPO2)、體溫、Narcrotrend腦電監(jiān)測。在局部麻醉下,按照文獻(xiàn)[8]的方法,進(jìn)行手術(shù)側(cè)超聲引導(dǎo)下股神經(jīng)阻滯。R組患者注射0.5%羅哌卡因20 mL(阿斯利康瑞典有限公司產(chǎn),批號:NATM),DR組患者注射0.5%羅哌卡因20 mL +DEX 1 μg/kg[9](四川國瑞藥業(yè)有限責(zé)任公司產(chǎn),批號:1609211)。麻醉誘導(dǎo):靜脈注射咪達(dá)唑侖0.03~0.04 mg/kg、依托咪酯0.2~0.3 mg/kg、舒芬太尼0.4~0.5 μg/kg、羅庫溴銨0.6~0.9 mg/kg,氣管插管后連接麻醉機(jī)行機(jī)械通氣,維持呼氣末二氧化碳分壓(PETCO2)35~45 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)。然后行橈動脈穿刺置管,術(shù)中監(jiān)測有創(chuàng)動脈血壓。麻醉維持:術(shù)中泵注丙泊酚4~6 mg·kg-1·h-1,瑞芬太尼6~10 μg·kg-1·h-1,間斷給予順式阿曲庫銨,酌情吸入七氟醚1%~2%,維持Narcotrend值于37~50。術(shù)畢連接靜脈自控鎮(zhèn)痛泵(PCIA),PICA配方為舒芬太尼2 μg/kg+托烷司瓊12 mg,0.9%氯化鈉注射溶液稀釋至100 mL;設(shè)置參數(shù):無負(fù)荷量,背景劑量2 mL/h,按壓單次劑量0.5 mL,鎖定時間為20 min。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo) 分別于術(shù)后6 h(T1)、12 h(T2)、24 h(T3)、48 h(T4)時,采集患者膝關(guān)節(jié)腔引流袋中引流液5 mL,離心取上清液,使用ELISA方法,檢測細(xì)胞因子IL-6和TNF-α的濃度;在上述同樣時間點,評估記錄患者靜息和運動情況下的視覺模擬評分(VAS);記錄PCIA鎮(zhèn)痛泵按壓次數(shù);記錄患者股神經(jīng)阻滯并發(fā)癥的情況。
2.1 兩組患者術(shù)后不同時點膝關(guān)節(jié)腔引流液IL-6和TNF-α指標(biāo)比較 兩組患者術(shù)后IL-6和TNF-α指標(biāo)變化都是在術(shù)后12 h達(dá)到峰值,然后再緩慢下降的一個過程。與R組比較,DR組患者的IL-6和TNF-α指標(biāo)在術(shù)后12 h、24 h和48 h的值都低于R組患者,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見表1。
表1 兩組患者術(shù)后不同時點膝關(guān)節(jié)腔引流液中IL-6和TNF-α濃度的比較
注:與T1時比較,aP<0.05;與T2時比較,bP<0.05
2.2 兩組患者術(shù)后不同時點靜息和運動VAS評分比較 兩組患者術(shù)后靜息和運動VAS評分變化都是在術(shù)后12 h達(dá)到峰值,然后再下降的一個過程。與R組比較,DR組患者的VAS評分,不論在靜息還是在運動狀態(tài)下,其術(shù)后12 h、24 h和48 h的值都低于R組患者,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.05),見表2。
表2 兩組患者術(shù)后不同時點靜息和運動VAS評分比較分)
注:與T1時比較,aP<0.05;與T2時比較,bP<0.05
2.3 兩組患者PCIA按壓次數(shù)以及股神經(jīng)阻滯并發(fā)癥比較 與R組比較,DR組患者PCIA按壓次數(shù)[(18±9)次]明顯少于R組[(13±7)次]患者,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(t=2.402,P=0.019);兩組患者均無穿刺點感染、穿刺點血腫、神經(jīng)損傷等明顯的股神經(jīng)阻滯并發(fā)癥。
DEX在動物實驗中已經(jīng)被證實可以延長局部麻醉藥物作用的時間[10],臨床上,已經(jīng)廣泛應(yīng)用于外周神經(jīng)阻滯中[11-17],且使用劑量上也有多篇文獻(xiàn)報道[18-20],本研究綜合了文獻(xiàn)報道的結(jié)果,故選擇文獻(xiàn)9的劑量作為研究劑量。炎性因子TNF-α和IL-6在大手術(shù)、創(chuàng)傷、膿毒癥等條件下生成和釋放,其中TNF-α促炎作用最強(qiáng),IL-6的生成和釋放在一定程度上可以預(yù)測術(shù)后的康復(fù)情況[21],這兩個炎性因子指標(biāo)常被用于評估膝關(guān)節(jié)手術(shù)后的炎性反應(yīng)情況[6]。Rabinow等[22]報道,羅哌卡因大鼠關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射可以減少關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)的炎性反應(yīng);Martin等[6]指出,使用羅哌卡因行外周神經(jīng)阻滯可以降低全身性的炎性反應(yīng)。本研究中,DR組患者關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)的IL-6和TNF-α濃度在術(shù)后的12~48 h,明顯低于R組,說明DEX復(fù)合羅哌卡因可以更好地降低局部組織的炎性反應(yīng)。DEX的這種作用可能是其具有外周的局部抗炎效果[7],并且對外周神經(jīng)具有一定的保護(hù)作用[23]。
本研究中,DR組患者術(shù)后12~48 h的靜息和運動VAS評分,明顯低于R組;DR組患者PCIA按壓次數(shù)也明顯低于R組;說明DEX復(fù)合羅哌卡因可以增強(qiáng)股神經(jīng)阻滯的鎮(zhèn)痛效果[12]和延長作用時間[11],和國外學(xué)者的研究結(jié)果[24]也基本一致。
兩組患者的VAS評分和炎性因子濃度變化都是在術(shù)后12 h達(dá)到高峰,然后再下降的一個過程,印證了局部炎性反應(yīng)可以增加患者對疼痛的敏感性這一觀點。
綜上所述,DEX復(fù)合羅哌卡因超聲引導(dǎo)下股神經(jīng)阻滯可以減輕TKA患者術(shù)后關(guān)節(jié)腔局部炎性反應(yīng)、增強(qiáng)鎮(zhèn)痛效果,值得在臨床上推廣。
[1] 周玲,楊歆璐,隋秀芳,等.超聲引導(dǎo)腹橫肌平面阻滯在直腸癌加速康復(fù)外科手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J].中國臨床保健雜志,2017,20(1):22-25.
[2] 墨勉勉,吳麗娜,夏廣梅.加速康復(fù)外科理念在冠狀動脈搭橋患者中的應(yīng)用[J].全科護(hù)理,2017,15(29):3658-3659.
[3] 呂猛,羅奇,周天健,等.加速康復(fù)外科在肥胖患者膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J].廣東醫(yī)學(xué),2017,38(19):2988-2991.
[4] 段丹,寧寧,李佩芳,等.加速康復(fù)外科下骨科患者圍手術(shù)期深靜脈血栓形成的預(yù)防及管理新進(jìn)展[J].華西醫(yī)學(xué),2017,32(9):1358-1361.
[5] MEMTSOUDIS SG,VALLE AG,JULES-ELYSSE K,et al.Perioperative inflammatory response in total knee arthroplasty patients:impact of limb preconditioning[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2010,35(5):412-416.
[6] MARTIN F,MARTINEZ V,MAZOIT JX,et al.Antiinflammatory effect of peripheral nerve blocks after knee surgery:clinical and biologic evaluation[J].Anesthesiology,2008,109(3):484-490.
[7] PENG M,WANG YL,WANG CY,et al.Dexmedetomidine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced proinflammatory response in primary microglia[J].J Surg Res,2013,179(1):e219-225.
[8] 張云慧,顧新宇,劉清仁,等.超聲引導(dǎo)神經(jīng)阻滯復(fù)合全身麻醉在脛骨骨折手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J].臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志,2015,31(3):228-230.
[9] KWON Y,HWANG SM,LEE JJ,et al.The effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine on the bispectral index for supraclavicular brachial plexus block[J].Korean J Anesthesiol,2015,68(1):32-36.
[10] TREIN TA,FLORIANO BP,WAGATSUMA JT,et al.Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine on sciatic and femoral nerve blockade in dogs[J].Vet Anaesth Analg,2017:S1467-S2987.
[11] RASHMI HD,KOMALA HK.Effect of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.75% ropivacaine in interscalene brachial plexus block using nerve stimulator:a prospective,randomized double-blind study[J].Anesth Essays Res,2017,11(1):134-139.
[12] ORTIZ-GOMEZ JR,PEREPEREZ-CANDEL M,VAZQUEZ-TORRES JM,et al.Postoperative analgesia for elective total knee arthroplasty under subarachnoid anesthesia with opioids:comparison between epidural,femoral block and adductor canal block techniques(with and without perineural adjuvants).A prospective,randomized,clinical trial[J].Minerva Anestesiol,2017,83(1):50-58.
[13] MISHRA M,MISHRA SP,SINGH SP.Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block:What are the benefits of adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine?[J].Saudi J Anaesth,2017,11(1):58-61.
[14] MEMARY E,MIRKHESHTI A,DABBAGH A,et al.The effect of perineural administration of dexmedetomidine on narcotic consumption and pain intensity in patients undergoing femoral shaft fracture surgery;a randomized single-blind clinical trial[J].Chonnam Med J,2017,53(2):127-132.
[15] HU X,LI J,ZHOU R,et al.Dexmedetomidine added to local anesthetic mixture of lidocaine and ropivacaine enhances onset and prolongs duration of a popliteal approach to sciatic nerve blockade[J].Clin Ther,2017,39(1):89-97.
[16] SHARMA B,RUPAL S,SWAMI AC,et al.Effect of addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine 0.2% for femoral nerve block in patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement:A randomised double-blind study[J].Indian J Anaesth,2016,60(6):403-408.
[17] HELAL SM,ESKANDR AM,GABALLAH KM,et al.Effects of perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine in a femoral-sciatic nerve block[J].Saudi J Anaesth,2016,10(1):18-24.
[18] CHAUDHARY SK,VERMA RK,RANA S,et al.Ultrasound-guided femoro-sciatic nerve block for post-operative analgesia after below knee orthopaedic surgeries under subarachnoid block:comparison between clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to levobupivacaine[J].Indian J Anaesth,2016,60(7):484-490.
[19] LU Y,SUN J,ZHUANG X,et al.Perineural dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant reduces the median effective concentration of lidocaine for obturator nerve blocking:a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J].PloS one,2016,11(6):8226.
[20] ABDULATIF M,FAWZY M,NASSAR H,et al.The effects of perineural dexmedetomidine on the pharmacodynamic profile of femoral nerve block:a dose-finding randomised,controlled,double-blind study[J].Anaesthesia,2016,71(10):1177-1185.
[21] HALL GM,PEERBHOY D,SHENKIN A,et al.Relationship of the functional recovery after hip arthroplasty to the neuroendocrine and inflammatory responses[J].Br J Anaesth,2001,87(4):537-542.
[22] RABINOW B,WERLING J,BENDELE A,et al.Intra-articular(IA) ropivacaine microparticle suspensions reduce pain,inflammation,cytokine,and substance p levels significantly more than oral or IA celecoxib in a rat model of arthritis[J].Inflammation,2015,38(1):40-60.
[23] MEMARI E,HOSSEINIAN MA,MIRKHESHTI A,et al.Comparison of histopathological effects of perineural administration of bupivacaine and bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in rat sciatic nerve[J].Exp Toxicol Pathol,2016,68(10):559-564.
[24] ANDERSEN JH,GREVSTAD U,SIEGEL H,et al.Does dexmedetomidine have a perineural mechanism of action when used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine?:A paired,blinded,randomized trial in healthy volunteers[J].Anesthesiology,2017,126(1):66-73.