Ag-NaTaO3-RGO復(fù)合物的合成及其改進的光催化制氫性能

何慧娟 張 斌 鐘梓俊 譚紹早 黃浪歡

（暨南大學(xué)化學(xué)系，廣州 510632）

0 Introduction

In recent decades，energy deficiency and environment pollution has been becoming severe issues and challenges for humanity.Because of its environmental benignity，recyclability，hydrogen energy has been considered as one of the most promising replacement energy resources and photocatalytic water splitting over photocatalysts to generate hydrogen has attracted intensive interest[1-5].Therefore，the research of new highly active photocatalysts that could make full use of solar energy by transforming it to hydrogen energy has become a research focus in photocatalysis field.Due to their excellent photocatalytic properties，Alkali tantalite has attracted considerable attention in photocatalytic applications[6-9].In particular，Perovskite NaTaO3exhibited fairly high activity for splitting of pure waterbecause ofitsappropriate bandgap.However，the efficiency of NaTaO3was far from satisfaction due to its inherent high recombination rate of photogenerated electron-hole pairs.So far，various strategies to improve the photocatalytic activity of NaTaO3have been developed，including deposition of noble metal[10-11]， doping with metal ion[12-14]，and coupling with semiconductor materials[15-16]，etc.Among these strategies，coupling NaTaO3with other materials to form a composite photocatalyst has been proved to be an effective way for improving the photoconversion efficiency[17].

Graphene，a single layer of graphite，shows many intriguing electronic and optoelectronic properties and has been regarded as ideal 2D supports for making various functional composite materials[18-20].In particular，graphene is widely recognized to serve as an electron collector and transporter to efficiently hinder electron-hole recombination and lengthen the lifetime of the photo-generated charge carriers from semiconductor[21-23].Coupling graphene with photocatalyst for enhancing their photocatalytic performance has been paid extensive attention.For instance，Zhu et al.[24]recently demonstrated that ZnS nanoparticles exhibited a high photocatalytic H2-production activity by combining with graphene.Hou et al.[25]reported thatnitrogen-doped graphene could improve the photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic activity of graphitic carbon nitride （g-C3N4）nanosheet.On the other hand，coupling with novel metal nanoparticles Ag also has been proven as a promising method to improve the photocatalytic activity of semiconductor[26].For example，Yu et al.[27]reported that Ag-TiO2nanocomposites exhibit excellent performance in photocatalytic degradation of dyes under the UV illumination since silver particles could act as electron traps aiding electron-hole separation.According to their report，when the concentration of AgNO3increased to 0.03 mol·L-1，the photocatalytic activity of Ag-TiO2composite significantly increased and was 6.3 times higher than that of TiO2thin films.

However，to the best of our knowledge，so far there is no report on coupling NaTaO3with Ag and RGO atthesametime.Herein，wereportthe preparation and characterization of Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composite through a three-step method for the first time.Such architecture provides improved separation rate of photo-generated electron-hole pairs.As a result，the composite is anticipated to exhibit enhanced photocatalytic activity under UV irradiation.

1 Experimental

1.1 Preparation of Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composite

All chemicals were analytical grade and were used without further purification.Deionized water （DI）was used in all experiments.Graphene oxide was prepared from natural graphite powders through the modified Hummers′method[28].NaTaO3were synthesized by the hydrothermal method based on our previous work with modifications[29].Typically，Ta2O5（0.442 0 g），CH3COONa·3H2O （0.544 0 g），NaOH（0.120 0 g）and DI water （30 mL）were added into a beaker （100 mL）and stirred for 2 h then transferred to a 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave.Finally，the autoclave was maintained at 180 ℃ for 24 h and then allowed to cool to room temperature naturally.After filtering，washing，and drying，the NaTaO3samples were obtained.

A typical synthesis of Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composite was described as follows：GO （0.015 0 g）and DI water（30 mL）were added into a beaker （100 mL）and sonicated for 30 min，a homogenous GO solution was obtained.Then，2.000 0 g polyvinylpyrrolidone （PVP）was added into the GO water solution and heated in 60℃water bath with vigorous stirring till the PVP being completely dissolved.After that 0.500 0 g NaTaO3was added to the above aqueous solution and stirred for 2 h.Then，the suspension was heated in 60℃water bath for 24 h while maintaining vigorous stirring after added calculated amount of AgNO3（3 mL）.The obtained Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composites were then washed by distilled water to get rid of residual PVP.Finally，the Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composites were freeze-dried at-50℃for 24 h.A series of Ag-NaTaO3-RGO photocatalysts were prepared by changing the concentration of AgNO3（0.1，0.2，0.4，0.6 mol·L-1，respectively）and marked as e.g.0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO.

1.2 Characterizations

X-ray powder diffraction （XRD）patterns were taken on a X-ray diffractometer（MSAL-XRDⅡ）using a Cu Kα radiation （λ=0.154 056 nm）at a scan rate of 8°·min-1（40 kV，20 mA，2θ=10°～80°）.Transmission electron microscopy （TEM）and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy （HRTEM）images were obtained using a PHILIPS TECNAI-10 microscope.Field emission scanning electron microscopy（FESEM）investigations were taken on a Zeiss Ultra 55 field scanning electron microscope atan accelerating voltage of 15 kV，the fracture surface of sample was coated with a thin layer of gold before analysis.The UV-Vis diffuse reflection spectra （DRS） were determined byaShimadzu UV-2501PC UV-Vis spectrophotometer，equipped with an integration sphere attachment for their diffuse reflectance in the range of 200～800 nm.BaSO4was used as the standard in all measurements.Photoluminescence （PL）emission spectra were recorded using a Hitachi F-4500.The excitation wavelength was 250 nm.

1.3 Evaluation of photocatalytic activity

The photocatalytic performance of the obtained samples were evaluated by photocatalytic water splitting hydrogen-evolution under UV irradiation and carried out in a photocatalytic reaction system（CELHX300，Beijing Chinese Education Au-Light Co.，Ltd.）.For photocatalytic hydrogen production，0.1 g catalyst was well dispersed into deionized water（20 mL）placed in the photocatalytic reaction system，then 80 mL Na2S （0.1 mol·L-1）and Na2SO3（0.04 mol·L-1）aqueous solution was added into the suspension as sacrificial agent.After purge the whole system with N2for 30 min，the suspension was illuminated under a 280 W Hg-lamp （λ＞250 nm）continuously and kept stirring.The obtained gas was quantitative analyzed by online analysis with a gas chromatograph （GC9800，Shanghai Kechuang Technology Co.，Ltd.）.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 XRD analysis

The XRD patterns of NaTaO3，Ag-NaTaO3，NaTaO3-RGO and Ag-NaTaO3-RGO with different Ag content were shown in Fig.1.As shown，the X-ray diffraction patterns of NaTaO3-RGO coincide well with that of pure NaTaO3.The peaks at 2θ of 22.85°，32.55°，40.23°，46.67°，52.58°and 58.40°are well assigned to the （020），（200），（022），（202），（222）and （123）crystal planes of cubic NaTaO3，respectively.Noticeably，the peaks for RGO are not observed in the diffraction patterns of NaTaO3-RGO and Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composites，which may be due to the low amount and relatively low diffraction intensity of RGO.However，the presence of RGO could be discerned by SEM and TEM，as discussed later.Moreover，the XRD patterns of Ag-NaTaO3-RGO with different Ag content are similar and no signal about silver can be detected.This may be due to the fact that the Ag nanoparticles were dispersedly loaded on the surface of the NaTaO3and RGO.

Fig.1 XRD patterns of NaTaO3，Ag-NaTaO3，NaTaO3-RGO and Ag-NaTaO3-RGO with different Ag content

2.2 XPS analysis

To further probe the chemical structure of the asprepared samples，the XPS measurementswere conducted.In Fig.2a，the XPS survey spectrum of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO display the presence of C，N，O，Na，Ag and Ta elements.As shown in Fig.2b，the C1s spectrum of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO could be deconvoluted into two peaks.The peak at 284.78 and 288.29 eV could be attributed to the C-C and oxygen functional groups C-OH.This indicates that most of GO has been reduced to RGO.Two peaks in Fig.2c centered at 367.6 and 373.8 eV could be attributed to Ag3d5/2and Ag3d3/2，respectively.And the Ta4f peak for 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO was shown in Fig.2d，with the value of about 26.1 eV，confirming that Ta exists mainly in the Ta5+chemical state on the sample surface.

Fig.2 XPS spectra of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO：（a）Survey，（b）C1s，（c）Ag3d，and （d）Ta4f

2.3 Microtopography analysis

Fig.3a is the SEM image of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO.As shown，the layered structure of the stacked RGO sheets can be clearly seen.The NaTaO3particles and the Ag nanoparticles are well distributed on RGO nanosheets.The average size of NaTaO3and Ag nanoparticles are about 50～100 nm and 10 nm，respectively.Obviously，the average size of NaTaO3is much bigger than that of Ag，which is consistent with the result of TEM.Fig.3b and Fig.3c showed the TEM imagesofNaTaO3-RGO and 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composite.As shown in Fig.3b，the light-gray thin RGO sheets are observed，and NaTaO3particles are uniformly distributed on the graphene nanosheets.Fig.3c furtherrevealsthata large numberofAg nanoparticles spread uniformly and densely on the surface of graphene，which is consistent with the observation from SEM image.The HRTEM image in Fig.3d reveals the well-defined lattice fringes of NaTaO3and Ag nanoparticle with the spacings of 0.388 and 0.234 nm，corresponding to the （100）and（111）planes of NaTaO3and Ag，respectively.

Fig.3 （a）SEM image of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO，（b）TEM image of NaTaO3-RGO，（c）TEM image of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO，（d）HRTEM image of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO

2.4 Spectra analyses

Fig.4 exhibitsthe UV-Visdiffuse reflection spectra of NaTaO3，Ag-NaTaO3，NaTaO3-RGO and Ag-NaTaO3-RGO with different Ag content.The absorption edge of NaTaO3is at around 300 nm and which indicates thatNaTaO3hardly has photoresponse property under visible light，which is due to the intrinsic large band gap.Compared with pure NaTaO3，a red-shift of the absorption edge is observed for the NaTaO3-RGO composite，which may be attributed to the bonding effect between GO and NaTaO3.Moreover RGO loading enhances its light absorption over the entire range of wavelength，this is a typical behavior of graphene as previously reported[30].Obviously，with the increase of Ag content，the absorption intensity of Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composites over visible light region increases.Such enhanced absorption in the visible light region may be attributed to the surface plasmon resonance （SPR）effect of Ag nanoparticles[11，31].However，the influence of Ag nanoparticles on the band gap of NaTaO3is almost negligible.So the increase of the visible light absorbance is not the main factor for the improvement of the photocatalytic activity.

Fig.4 UV-Vis DRS spectra of NaTaO3，Ag-NaTaO3，NaTaO3-RGO and Ag-NaTaO3-RGOwith different Ag content

PL is an effective strategy to characterize the separation and recombination rates of charge carriers of a photocatalyst.As shown in Fig.5，the PL spectra of NaTaO3exhibit a strong emission peaks centered at around 400 nm，while Ag-NaTaO3and NaTaO3-RGO exhibit a weak fluorescence emission spectrum peak，implying that the photogenerated electrons and holes have better separation in Ag-NaTaO3and NaTaO3-RGO composites.This result reveals that Ag and RGO play an important role in suppressing the recombination of the photogenerated carriers，which efficiently prevented the recombination of electrons and holes.In the case of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO，the photoluminescence intensity of peak at 400 nm further reduced.The results further indicat that the effect of Ag nanoparticles is quite similar to that of RGO，namely Ag can obviously enhance the separation of electrons and holes[10].

Fig.5 PL results of the NaTaO3，Ag-NaTaO3，NaTaO3-RGO and 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composites

2.5 Photocatalytic activity analysis

The photocatalytic activities of the samples were evaluated by photocatalytic water splitting hydrogenevolution in a Na2S/Na2SO3aqueous solution under UV irradiation.As shown in Fig.6，the hydrogen production rate of NaTaO3is about 70 μmol·h-1.The obvious increased of hydrogen production rate over Ag-NaTaO3and NaTaO3-RGO （around 200.4 and 267.4 μmol·h-1）was observed.Obviously，all the Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composites have much higher hydrogen production rate under the identical conditions.Among all the Ag-NaTaO3-RGO samples，the as-prepared 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO exhibits the highest H2production rate （395 μmol·h-1）which is around 5.64，1.97 and 1.48 times higher than that of pure NaTaO3，Ag-NaTaO3and NaTaO3-RGO.We expect that the following factors may be responsible for the much greater photocatalytic activities of 0.2Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composites：（i）the efficient separation of electron-hole pairs originated from the excellent electron transfer property of graphene. （ii）the further improvement of electron-hole separation rate due to Ag nanoparticle acted as electron traps. （iii）the enhancement of light absorption over the entire range of wavelengths with the introduction of graphene[32-33].In conclusion，graphene and Ag nanoparticles play very important roles for the improvement of photocatalytic activity of Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composite.

Fig.6 Photocatalytic H2production curve over various samples

Fig.7 Illustration for effects of RGO and Ag particles on the photocatalytic activity of Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composite under UVvisible light irradiation

From all experimental results mentioned above，a possible reaction mechanism was tentatively illustrated in Fig.7.Under ultraviolet illumination，the VB electrons of NaTaO3are excited to the CB，creating holes in the VB.The holes react with H2O to form O2，and the photogenerated electrons in the CB of NaTaO3transferr to graphene sheets since the redox potential of graphene/graphene-is lower than that of the CB of NaTaO3.During the process，graphene can greatly enhance separation rate of electron-hole pairs due to its excellent electron transfer property，and Ag nanoparticle can further improve the electron-hole separation rate because it can act as electron traps.As a result，the Ag-NaTaO3-RGO composites enhance photocatalytic H2production activity as the recombination of photo-generated electron-hole pairs can be suppressed effectively due to the introduction of graphene and Ag nanoparticles.

3 Conclusions

In summary，we have rationally designed a ternary composite photocatalysts consisting of Ag，RGO and NaTaO3.InthisuniqueternaryAg-NaTaO3-RGO composite，RGO promotes the electron transfer from the CB of NaTaO3to graphene and simultaneously enhances the light absorption over the entire range of wavelengths.At the same time，Ag nanoparticles act as electron traps which can further improve the separation of electron-hole pairs.As a result，Ag-NaTaO3-RGO enhancesphotocatalytic activity for water splitting hydrogen-evolution.This endeavor paves the way to build reliable triple-composites photocatalysts for photocatalysis applications.

[1]Wang X，Maeda K，Thomas A，et al.Nat.Mater.，2009，8（1）：76-80

[2]Ou H H，Lin L H，Zheng Y，et al.Adv.Mater.，2017，29（22）：1700008

[3]Yu J G，Qi L F，Jaroniec M.J.Phys.Chem.C，2010，114（30）：13118-13125

[4]Liu J，Liu Y，Liu N Y，et al.Science，2015，347（6225）：970-974

[5]Godin R，Wang Y，Zwijnenburg M A，et al.J.Am.Chem.Soc.，2017，139（14）：5216-5224

[6]Kato H，Kudo A.J.Phys.Chem.B，2001，105（19）：4285-4292

[7]Li X，Zang J L.J.Phys.Chem.C，2009，113（45）：19411-19418

[8]G?mpel D，Tahir M N，Panth?fer M，et al.J.Mater.Chem.A，2014，2（21）：8033-8040

[9]ZHANG Wei（章薇），TAN Guo-Qiang（談國強），XIA Ao（夏傲），et al.J.Chin.Ceram Soc.（硅酸鹽學(xué)報），2011，39（11）：1724-1728

[10]Xu D，Chen M，Song S，et al.CrystEngComm.，2014，16（7）：1384-1388

[11]Xu D B，Yang S B，Jin Y，et al.Langmuir，2015，31（35）：9694-9699

[12]Kato H，Asakura K，Kudo A.J.Am.Chem.Soc.，2003，125（10）：3082-3089

[13]Kudo A，Niishiro R，Iwase A，et al.Chem.Phys.，2007，339（1/2/3）：104-110

[14]CUI Hua-Nan（崔華楠），SHI Jian-Ying（石建英），LIU Hong（劉鴻）.Chin.J.Catal.（催化學(xué)報），2015，36（7）：969-974

[15]Deng Y Y，Chen Y J，Chen B G，et al.J.Alloys Compd.，2013，559：116-122

[16]Reddy K H，Martha S，Parida K M.RSC Adv.，2012，2（25）：9423-9436

[17]Meyer T，Priebe J B，da Silva R O，et al.Chem.Mater.，2014，26（16）：4705-4711

[18]Geim A K.Science，2009，324（5934）：1530-1534

[19]Bai X J，Sun C P，Liu D，et al.Appl.Catal.,B，2017，204：11-20

[20]Stankovich S，Dikin D A，Dommett G H，et al.Nature，2006，442（7100）：282-286

[21]Li B X，Liu T X，Wang Y F，et al.J.Colloid Interface Sci.，2012，377（1）：114-121

[22]Li Q，Guo B D，Yu J G，et al.J.Am.Chem.Soc.，2011，133（28）：10878-10884

[23]LI Juan（李娟），ZHAO An-Ting（趙安婷），SHAO Jiao-Jing（邵姣婧），et al.Chinese J.Inorg.Chem.（無機化學(xué)學(xué)報），2017，33（7）：1231-1235

[24]Zhu B L，Lin B Z，Zhou Y，et al.J.Mater.Chem.A，2014，2（11）：3819-3827

[25]Hou Y，Wen Z H，Cui S M，et al.Adv.Mater.，2013，25（43）：6291-6297

[26]LI Xiao-Fen（李曉芬），CHEN Meng-Ying（陳夢瑩），LIANG Shi-Jing（梁詩景），et al.Chinese J.Inorg.Chem.（無機化學(xué)學(xué)報），2016，32（11）：1987-1994

[27]Yu J G，Xiong J F，Cheng B，et al.Appl.Catal.,B，2005，60（3/4）：211-221

[28]William S，Hummers J R，Offeman R E.J.Am.Chem.Soc.，1958，80（6）：1339-1339

[29]HUANG Lang-Huan （黃 浪歡），CHAN Qi-Zhong （產(chǎn) 啟 中），ZHANG Bing （張斌），et al.Chin.J.Catal.（催化學(xué)報），2011，32（11）：1822-1830

[30]Xiang Q J，Yu J G，Jaroniec M.J.Am.Chem.Soc.，2012，134（15）：6575-6578

[31]Xu D B，Liu K L，Shi W D，et al.Ceram.Int.，2015，41（3）：4444-4451

[32]Xiang Q J，Yu J G，Jaroniec M.Chem.Soc.Rev.，2012，41（2）：782-796

[33]Hermann J M，Tahiri H，Ait-Ichou Y，et al.Appl.Catal.,B，1997，13（3/4）：219-228