• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Assessment of genetic effects on important breeding traits in reciprocal DH populations of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

    2018-01-04 02:04:27LaurencjaSzaTeresaCegielskaTarasElbietaAdamskaZygmuntKaczmarek
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年1期

    Laurencja Sza?a, Teresa Cegielska-Taras, El?bieta Adamska, Zygmunt Kaczmarek

    1 Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, National Research Institute, Poznań 60-479, Poland

    2 Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań 60-479, Poland

    RESEARCH ARTICLE

    Assessment of genetic effects on important breeding traits in reciprocal DH populations of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

    Laurencja Sza?a1, Teresa Cegielska-Taras1, El?bieta Adamska2, Zygmunt Kaczmarek2

    1 Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, National Research Institute, Poznań 60-479, Poland

    2 Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań 60-479, Poland

    Here we present a study on the genetic effects of agronomic and seed quality traits in double haploid (DH) populations,which were developed by microspore culture from reciprocal F1hybrids produced between cultivar Californium and DH W-15. Each of the populations consisted of 25 DH lines. The field experiments were conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications during three growing seasons. Field observations were recorded on seed yield and its structure: the number of branches and pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, the 1 000-seed weight, the content of fat in the seeds, and three unsaturated fatty acids (oleic, linoleic, linolenic) in the seed oil. In order to investigate the in fluence of cross direction on the studied traits, parental effects were evaluated on the basis of differences between reciprocal DH populations. The maternal effect was revealed on the number of seeds per pod and the effect of the paternal form on linolenic acid content. The occurrence of transgression effects also depended on the direction of crossing and this was particularly noticeable in terms of the number of seeds per pod. The use of multivariate statistical methods allowed for the simultaneous characterization and grouping of tested lines in terms of several traits. Graphic images of the distribution of DH lines in the space of the two first canonical variates showed a great variation between the two reciprocal populations,both in terms of yield and its components, as well as fat and those unsaturated fatty acids.

    DH line, reciprocal cross, oilseed rape, multivariate analysis, transgression

    1. Introduction

    In recent years, increased global interest in oilseed rape has focused on the widespread use of canola oil in different branches of industry. The dynamic development of the cultivation of oilseed rape was due to the enormous progress in breeding high quality varieties with a zero erucic acid and low-reduced glucosinolate content. Today, oilseed rape is not only a source of high nutritional quality oil with a balanced fatty acid composition, but also a valuable material for many other products ranging from methyl ester to industrial lubricants and hydraulic oils, tensides for detergent and soap production and biodegradable plastics (Friedt et al. 2007).

    Modern breeding programs use state-of-the art biotechnology techniques. The doubled haploid (DH)method in winter oilseed rape, with the use of an in vitro androgenesis process, has become a routine way to produce completely homozygous and genetically fully stable lines within one generation. The bene fits of the DH lines mainly lie both in the accelerated breeding process and in increasing the ef ficiency of selection in the early generations.

    Genetic information on the gene expression of quantitative traits in DH populations can help breeders to create an effective strategy for the development of new varieties of oilseed rape. Determination of the in fluence of the cytoplasmic and nuclear genetic maternal effects or the embryo effects for given traits allows the selection of the appropriate direction of crossing.

    Transgressive segregation is a common mechanism in plant hybrids (Rieseberg et al. 1999) and is the result of complementary gene action (De Vincente and Taksley 1993; Monforte et al. 1997; Rieseberg et al. 2003). The frequency of occurrence of transgressive genotypes depends on the genetic differentiation of parental components and phenotypic similarity. Phenotypically similar species are more likely to produce transgressive hybrid offspring than dissimilar species (Stelkens and Seehausen 2009). However, Kuczyńska et al. (2007)reported that the occurrence of transgressive segregants in barley in a homozygous population depended on several factors characterizing parental genotypes, such as gene distribution, phenotypic diversity and genetic distance.

    The breeding programs of many plant species have found a parallel improvement in a number of features that take into account both aspects of productivity, as well as the quality of the crop. The starting materials are evaluated for many of these traits in the early stages of the plant breeding process. Multivariate statistical methods provide a comprehensive assessment of breeding lines,while considering many important characteristics from an agronomic point of view. They also allow for the separation of groups of similar genotypes in respect to many traits and the identi fication of groups of varieties of high value. Analyses of this type are widely used for the characterization of germplasm collections of cultivated plants (Nassir and Ariyo 2007; Tucak et al. 2009) and in the search for parents in the breeding of many species of plants. Multivariate analysis of variance has been applied to the culture, for example, of peppers (Lahbib et al. 2013)and barley (Setotaw et al. 2010) or soybean resistance breeding (Gravina et al. 2004). In a study of oilseed rape,multivariate statistical methods were applied by Kaczmarek et al. (2005) for evaluation of the DH lines in terms of the content of five fatty acids, while Adamska et al. (2007)evaluated the combining ability of DH lines in terms of the characteristics of yield and fat content and Shara fiet al.(2015) assessed 28 winter oilseed cultivars for genetic variation and investigated relationships between 11 agromorphological characters. Based on a multi-trait analysis,Bocianowski et al. (2016) assessed the genetic crossing potential of eight inbred lines of the spring oilseed rape.

    In the present study, univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to estimate the effect of cross direction on the seed yield and the yield structure, the fat content as well as three fatty acids. This estimation was based on the differences between two reciprocal DH populations without the F1generation, and on the frequency of occurrence of transgressive DH lines in the reciprocal populations.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials

    The materials consisted of two DH populations obtained from F1hybrids of reciprocal crosses between cultivar Californium and DH W-15 line derived from cultivar Wotan and the parental forms. The population, marked as CW, consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1hybrid, cultivar Californium×DH W-15. The population marked as WC also consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1hybrid, DH W-15×cultivar Californium.

    2.2. Experimental conditions

    This study was performed in the growing seasons of 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 at the Experimental Station of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Cerekwica near Poznań, Poland. The soil type at Cerekwica is sandy clay. Mean temperature for the growing season at the experimental site was 9.2, 8.5 and 7.0°C for the first, the second and the third years, respectively. Precipitation was 442.8 mm from August 2010 to July 2011, 354.5 mm from August 2011 to July 2012, and 303.1 mm from August 2012 to July 2013. Full chemical protection of plants was applied.Other agronomical practices were similar to the commercial planting in the area.

    Field experiments including 50 DH lines and parental forms were conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications and a plot size of 1.2 m×5.0 m.The following observations and evaluations of seed yield and its structure were performed: the number of branches and pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod and the 1 000-seed weight and the content of fat in the seeds and of the three unsaturated fatty acids with 18-carbon atoms in the seed oil.

    Approximately three weeks before harvesting, five plants were randomly selected from each plot to record data of the number of branches and pods per plant. Twenty- five welldeveloped pods were taken from the middle main stems of each material to measure the number of seeds per pod.Two months after the harvest, the 1 000-seed weight was calculated as the average of five replicate samples from the mixed seeds for each plot.

    The fat content in dry seeds (about 5% moisture)was determined via pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR, 7005 MOA Oxford Instruments, UK). The fatty acid composition of the oil was determined by gas chromatography (GC, Agilent Technologies 6890N, USA).

    2.3. Statistical analysis

    The experimental data were analyzed with uni- and multivariate statistical methods (Morrison 1976; Gomez and Gomez 1984). Two-factor analysis of variance was carried out to test the hypotheses of no differences between genotypes and between years. The F-statistic was used to compare the average value for traits between the populations and the parental forms for an examination of the direction crossing effect on given traits. Each DH line from the CW and WC populations was compared with both parents to identify those DH lines with advantageous and signi ficant effects of transgression for the studied traits. For seed yield, yield structure and fat content, positive effects of transgression were sought as well as for oleic and linoleic acid, and negative transgression effects were investigated for linolenic acid content.

    Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to study the differences and interrelations between genotypes and to formulate the characteristics of the DH lines of both studied populations in terms of two sets of traits. The first set consisted of yield and its components, and the second consisted of the content of fat and the three fatty acids: oleic, linoleic and linolenic acid. Canonical variate analysis enabled the creation of a graphical representation on a plane of the location of the CW and WC DH lines and their relation to parental forms. In order to determine the characteristics with the most powerful discrimination in the study, the simple correlation coef ficients between the first two canonical variates and the values of the individual original traits were calculated.

    3. Results

    3.1. Mean values of characteristics of the DH populations and parental forms

    The mean values of the studied characteristics of the parental forms (cultivar Californium and DH W-15), and the two populations of the DH lines (CW and WC) are presented in Table 1. The general hypothesis of no difference between genotypes was rejected for all traits at least P=0.05. The effect of years on the expression on these traits turned out to be signi ficant as well, except for the number of seeds per pod and fat content. Hypotheses concerning no genotype by year interaction were rejected only for yield of seeds,number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod.

    3.2. Maternal and paternal effects

    The estimation and the results of testing of the means for yield and yield components between CW and WC populations and parental forms are presented as contrasts(Table 2). Signi ficant contrast values were found for all the studied traits, except for the number of branches. CW and WC populations did not differ signi ficantly from one another in terms of yield, number of branches or 1 000-seed weight.A signi ficantly higher number of pods per plant and fewer seeds per pod characterized the CW population compared to the WC population, but the direction of crossing revealed an in fluence of maternal effects only on the number of seeds per pod.

    Among traits of the second set, signi ficant values for the contrast between the studied DH populations were obtained for the contents of linoleic acid and linolenic acid (Table 3). The estimates for the CW population were signi ficantly positive in terms of the results of the contrast with the WC population for linoleic acid content, while they were signi ficantly negative for the results of the contrast with the WC population for linolenic acid content. CultivarCalifornium contained more linoleic acid than the line DH W-15, and therefore linolenic acid content continued to be signi ficantly in fluenced by the paternal parent.

    Table 1 Mean values of studied traits for cultivar Californium, DH W-15, and CW and WC populations

    Table 2 Estimates and results of testing the contrast estimation among CW and WC populations, cultivar Californium, and DH W-15 for yield and yield components

    Table 3 Estimates and results of contrasts test between each pair of CW and WC populations, cultivar Californium, and DH line W-15 for fat and three fatty acid contents

    3.3. Transgression effects

    Each DH from the CW and WC populations was compared with the better parent to identify the transgressive DH lines(Table 4). Among the traits of yield structure, the most transgressive lines were found in terms of the 1 000-seed weight, seven out of the 50 DH lines tested. In the case of the number of pods per plant, six DH lines with positive effects of transgression were found. For the number of seeds per pod, six transgressive DH lines were also recorded. In terms of yield, only three DH lines signi ficantly exceeded their better parent (DH W-15). The direction of crossing played a certain role in the frequency of transgression effects; this was particularly so in the case of the number of seeds per pod. Positive effects of transgression were observed only in the WC population where the female parent contained more seeds per pod. The in fluence of maternal effects was also revealed in the case of the 1 000-seed weight. Out of the seven transgressive lines demonstrating this effect, five belonged to the CW population, where the maternal form was cultivar Californium.

    Among the biochemical traits, 13 DH lines showed positive effects of transgression on the content of linoleic acid, eight DH lines belonged to the CW population, and five to the WC population. Signi ficantly lower linolenic acid content was found in two DH lines, one from each population.The increase in linoleic acid and reduction in linolenic acid content, although statistically signi ficant, did not lead to any important change in the fatty acid pro file in the tested lines from the point of view of the breeding. Five DH lines were characterized by signi ficantly increased fat content.

    In the analyzed DH populations, two lines can be particularly distinguished, line WC-53 with the effects of transgression on yield, fat content and the 1 000-seed weight and line CW-36, in which there were positive effects of transgression in terms of yield, number of pods per plant,fat and linoleic acid content simultaneously.

    3.4. Simultaneous multitrait evaluation of DH populations

    Using multivariate statistical analysis, the tested DH lines and their parental forms were simultaneously characterized in terms of several traits.

    The first set of traits included yield and yield structure.The first canonical variate (V1) and the second canonical variate (V2) explained 77.81 and 13.57% of the total variation, respectively. The first two canonical variates explained jointly 91.38% of the total variation of the studied traits, allowing for the arrangement of DH on the planewith only minimal loss of information. The values of the correlation coef ficients between the analyzed characteristics of the first two canonical variates (Table 5) indicate that V1 was highly positively correlated with the 1 000-seed weight(r=0.992***) and signi ficantly negatively correlated with the number of branches (r=-0.423**), number of pods per plant(r=-0.422**) and number of seeds per pod (r=-0.398**).However, V2 was in fluenced by the number of seeds per pod(r=0.681**) and slightly lower and negatively by the number of branches (r=-0.484**) and the number of pods per plant(r=-0.381*). Graphic presentation of the distribution of lines CW (Fig. 1) and WC (Fig. 2) according to the first two canonical variates indicated more diverse CW lines than WC lines in terms of the 1 000-seed weight. However, in the population of WC, variation in the number of seeds per pod was greater than that in the CW population.

    Table 4 Transgression effects in the CW and WC populations

    In the second set of traits, characterized jointly for fat and three fatty acid contents, V1 explained 50.14% of the total variation, and V2 explained 33.11%, V1 and V2 both explaining together 83.25% of the total variability of this set of features. V1 was highly positively correlated with the fat content, r=0.940***(Table 6). There was also a positive correlation between this variate and the content of linolenic acid (r=0.334*) and a negative correlation with the content of linoleic acid (r =–0.334*). In the case of V2, the greatest in fluence on the distribution of genotype objects was shown by linoleic acid (r=–0.568**) and linolenic acid(r=0.533**) in oil, with a smaller effect in fat (r=–0.324*). Thus,both variates simultaneously depend on the same traits.Linolenic acid content had a positive effect, linoleic acid had a negative effect, and oleic acid had no signi ficant effect on either variate. The dominant in fluence on the distribution of the tested lines on the graph was shown by fat content level, whereby on the right side of the graph were lines of the highest fat content, with the left-hand lines indicating the lowest content of this compound. Multivariate assessment including fat and three fatty acids simultaneously indicated a slightly different arrangement of the DH lines from the CW population (Fig. 3) compared to DH lines from the WC population (Fig. 4) in terms of the parental forms in the system of the first two canonical variates.

    Table 5 Correlation coef ficients between two first canonical variates (V1 and V2) and yield and yield components

    Fig. 1 Distribution of double haploid (DH) lines from CW population (consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1 hybrid,cultivar Californium×DH W-15) characterised by yield and its components in the space of the two first canonical variates (V1 and V2).

    Fig. 2 Distribution of double haploid (DH) lines from WC population (consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1 hybrid, DH W-15×cultivar Californium) characterised by yield and its components in the space of the two first canonical variates (V1 and V2).

    Table 6 Correlation coef ficients between the two first canonical variates (V1 and V2) for fat and three fatty acid contents

    4. Discussion

    Fig. 3 Distribution of double haploid (DH) lines from CW population (consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1 hybrid,cultivar Californium×DH W-15) characterised by fat and three fatty acid contents in the space of the two first canonical variates(V1 and V2).

    Fig. 4 Distribution of double haploid (DH) lines from WC population (consisted of 25 DH lines and was derived from a F1 hybrid,DH W-15×cultivar Californium) characterised by fat and three fatty acid content in the space of the two first canonical variates (V1 and V2).

    Based on the obtained results, an estimation was made of the effect of the cross on yield, its components and some biochemical characteristics. In order to conduct such an estimation, note had to be taken of both the signi ficant variation between parental forms in the trait, and the fact that the basis for inferences about the in fluence of maternal or paternal effects was the statistically signi ficant differences between the mean values of the DH lines of the two populations. Both the pair of parental forms and the pair of DH line populations revealed signi ficant differences in the number of seeds per pod, and linolenic acid content.Maternal effects have been revealed for only the number of seeds per pod. Xing et al. (2014) showed that the number of seeds per pod is controlled by maternal genotype,as well as the 1 000-seed weight. They also detected paternal inheritance of pods per plant and seed yield using the contribution ratio of maternal and paternal general combining ability (GCA) variance as well as correlations between GCA and heterosis levels. However, there are few reports about the in fluence of the direction of crossing on the expression of yield and yield components. Rameah et al. (2003) observed signi ficant maternal effects for yield and yield components, except for pod length. Therefore,they considered the direction of crosses to be important for these traits and in crosses with signi ficant negative reciprocal effects. However, the results of the study by Sincik et al. (2011) indicated that the direction of crossing did not in fluence the number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant or 1 000-seed weight. The yield is a complex trait controlled by multiple genes, also strongly subject to the in fluence of the environment. In a study of genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in oilseed rape conducted by Nowosad et al. (2016), the sum of squares for environment as the main effect represented up 69.82% of the total variation, while the differences between genotypes explained only 13.67% of the total yield variation. It is possible that this is why it is dif ficult to determine the genetic effects for this trait from field trial data.

    Differences in linolenic acid content between two reciprocal DH populations and parental forms show that paternal parents have in fluenced this trait. This indicates that nuclear genes may be the main factor controlling expression of this feature. Inheritance of linolenic acid in oilseed rape, however, has been a matter of controversy as the results obtained by different groups of researchers have varied (Rajcan et al. 2002). Pleines and Friedt (1989) noted that linolenic acid concentration is mainly under the control of the nuclear genes of the embryo. They found signi ficant differences in reciprocal F1, BC1, and BC2indicating maternal control, which is realized by interaction between maternal genotypes and nuclear genes of the embryo, but in F2no reciprocal differences were detectable. Similar results were obtained by Rajcan et al. (2002), who observed cytoplasmic effects in the inheritance of linolenic acid concentrations in two reciprocal DH populations based on signi ficant differences between them. However, they did not find any signi ficant differences between the means of this trait in recreated F2populations produced from the same pair of parents. The results of the present study suggested that maternal effects did not exert a distinct effect on the content of the analyzed fatty acid in reciprocal DH populations.Likewise, Coonrod et al. (2008) observed the lack of maternal effects for any of five long chain fatty acid contents in progeny obtained from two parental lines that differed in terms of erucic and oleic acid contents. However, in studies on the heredity of the oleic acid content of oilseed rape,Zhang et al. (2004) concluded that this was simultaneously controlled by diploid embryo nuclear, cytoplasmic and diploid maternal plant nuclear genes.

    The direction of the cross did not affect the percentage of oil. Thus, it can be concluded that nuclear genes, rather than extra nuclear determinants, condition the expression of this trait. Similar results have been reported by Rajcan et al. (2002), who compared two DH populations produced from reciprocal F1made between the cultivar Reston and line LL09. However, there are different models to explain the genetics of oil content in B. napus, because it is a typical quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes and in fluenced by various environmental factors (Si et al. 2003;Zhao et al. 2005; Delourme et al. 2006). Some studies have indicated that oil concentration in F1hybrid seeds is mainly controlled by the maternal genotype (Wang et al.2010). Using two oilseed rape lines with contrasting oil contents, Hua et al. (2012) described an important role of pod wall photosynthesis in the regulation of the oil content of F1seeds in terms of maternal effects. However, in the F2generation derived from reciprocal cross F1seeds, the difference in oil content disappeared. Also in the study by Xing et al. (2014), the contribution of the maternal parent was slightly higher than that of the paternal parent with regard to the fat content. Other studies have indicated that embryo genetic, cytoplasmic and maternal effects as well as genotype×environment interaction effects (Wu et al. 2006;Variath et al. 2010) simultaneously controlled oil content in oilseed rape.

    In both the studied populations, the highest number of transgressive segregants was observed for linoleic acid in oil. No transgressive line was detected for the number of branches per plant or oleic acid content. Average values for the number of branches as well as the oleic and linoleic acid contents of parental lines were similar. Therefore, in this case, the frequency of occurrence of transgressive lines did not depend on phenotypic similarity. The direction of crossing played a role in the frequency of transgression effects, and this was particularly so in terms of the number of seeds per pod. Positive transgression effects were observed only among the WC lines- in population, which forms the mother, there are more seeds per pod. The in fluence of maternal effects also manifested itself in relation to the 1 000-seed weight. Of the seven transgressive lines in terms of the features, five belonged to the CW population. Multidimensional estimation of the DH lines of winter oilseed rape was conducted in terms of two sets of features. On the basis of canonical variate analysis, it could be concluded that the feature which exerted a very large in fluence on the differentiation of multivariate genotypes of both populations in the first set was the 1 000-seed weight and this was negatively correlated with the number of seeds per pod. In the second set of traits, fat content had the most discriminative power and this was positively correlated with the content of linoleic acid. Multidimensional estimation of DH in terms of the parents showed their high variation in terms of the characteristics of each set. Graphical distribution lines in the system of the first two canonical variables showed recombinant variability, which appeared in the doubled haploid lines. The biggest difference in terms of the studied traits was shown by DH lines: CW-32 and CW-109, WC-3 and WC-64.

    5. Conclusion

    Populations DH lines created from reciprocal F1hybrids provided good material for the assessment of genetic effects associated with the direction of crossing using statistical methods. In our study, the statistical analysis of two reciprocal populations demonstrated the maternal effects on the number of seeds per pod and the paternal effect on the content of linolenic acid. Based on canonical variate analysis, it could be concluded that the 1 000-seed weight was the character which had most in fluence on multivariate variation of genotypes of both populations in the first set of traits, while the fat content was key in the second set of traits. Graphic images of the distribution of DH lines in the space of the two first canonical variates showed a greater differentiation between the lines in the CW population than in the WC population in terms of both sets of traits.This information may be useful for oilseed rape breeding programs. The direction of cross should be considered by oilseed rape breeders for developing genotypes with a large number of seeds per pod and a modi fied content of linolenic acid in Brassica napus L.

    Adamska E, Sza?a L, Cegielska-Taras T, Kaczmarek Z.2007. Multidimensional GCA and SCA effects in doubled haploid lines of winter rape in the analysis of yield structure characteristics and oil content of F1line×tester crosses.Ro?liny Oleiste - Oilseed Crops,28, 97–108.

    Bocianowski J, Nowosad K, Bujak H, ?uczkiewicz T, Piesik D.2016. Evaluation of the breeding value of the spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) inbred lines based on a multi-trait analysis. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding,76, 284–289.

    Coonrod D, Brick M A, Byrne P F, DeBonte L, Chen Z. 2008.Inheritance of long chain fatty content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica,164, 583–592.

    Delourme R, Falentin C, Huteau V, Clouet V, Horvais R, Gandon B, Specel S, Hanneton L, Dheu J E, Deschamps M, Margal E, Vincourt P, Renard M. 2006. Genetic control of oil content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theoretical Applied Genetics,113, 1331–1345.

    Friedt W, Snowdon R, Ordon F, Ahlemeyer J. 2007. Plant breeding: Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants and its exploitation in breeding. Progress in Botany,168,152–177.

    Gomez K A, Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    de Gravina G A, Sediyama C S, Martins Filho S, Moreira M A, de Barros E G, Cruz C D. 2004. Multivariate analysis of combining ability for soybean resistance to Cercospora sojina Hara. Genetics and Molecular Biology,27, 395–399.

    Hua W, Li R J, Zhan G M, Li J, Wang X F, Liu G H, Wang H Z. 2012. Maternal control of seed oil content in Brassica napus: the role of silique wall photosynthesis. The Plant Journal,69, 432–444.

    Kaczmarek Z, Adamska E, Cegielska-Taras T, Sza?a L. 2005.Multivariate statistical methods used for evaluation of DH lines of winter oilseed rape on account of various fatty acid compositions. Ro?liny Oleiste - Oilseed Crops,26,325–334.

    Kuczyńska A, Surma M, Kaczmarek Z, Adamski T. 2007.Relationship between phenotypic and genetic diversity of parental genotypes and frequency of transgression effects in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Breeding,126, 361–368.

    Lahbib K, Bnejdi F, El Gazzah M. 2013. Selection of pepper parent from a collection of Capsicum annuum landraces based on genetic diversity. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science,5, 68–72.

    Monforte A J, Asins M J, Carbonell E A. 1997. Salt tolerance in Lycopersicon species. V. Does genetic variability at quantitative trait loci affect their analysis? Theoretical Applied Genetics,95, 284–293.

    Morrison D F. 1976. Multivariate Statistical Methods. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd., Tokyo.

    Nasir A L, Ariyo O J. 2007. Multivariate analysis of the variation of field-planted upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in a tropical habitat. Malaysian Applied Biology,36, 47–57.

    Nowosad K, Liersch A, Pop?awska W, Bocianowski J. 2016.Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica,208, 187–194.

    Pleines S, Friedt W. 1989. Genetic control of linolenic acid concentration in seed oil of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.).Theoretical Applied Genetics,78, 793–797.

    Rajcan I, Kasha K J, Kott L S, Beversdorf W D. 2002. Evaluation of cytoplasmic effects on agronomic and seed quality traits in two doubled haploid populations of Brassica napus L.Euphytica,123, 401–409.

    Rameah V, Rezai A, Saeidi G. 2003. Estimation of genetic parameters for yield, yield components and glucosinolate in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,5, 143–151.

    Rieseberg L H, Archer M A, Wayne R K. 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity,83,363–372.

    Rieseberg L H, Widmer A, Arntz A M, Burke J M. 2003.The genetic architecture necessary for transgressive segregation is comma in both natural and domestical populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B,358, 1141–1147.

    Setotaw T A, dos Santos Diaz L A, Missio R F. 2010. Genetic divergence among barley accessions from Ethiopia. Crop Breeding and Applied Bioechnology,10, 116–123.

    Shara fiY, Majidi M M, Jafarzadeh M, Mirlohi A. 2015.Multivariate analysis of genetic variation in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,17, 1319–1331.

    Si P, Mailer R J, Galwey N, Turner D W. 2003. In fluence of genotype and environment on oil and protein concentration of canola (Brassica napus L.) grow across southern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,54,397–407.

    Sincik M, Goksoy A T, Turan Z M. 2011. The heterosis and combining ability of diallel crosses of rapeseed inbred lines. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca,39, 242–248.

    Stelkens R, Seehausen O. 2009. Genetic distance between species predicts novel trait expression in their hybrids.Evolution,63–64, 884–897.

    Tucak M, Popovi? S, ?upi? T, ?imi? G, Gantner R, Megli? V. 2009. Evaluation of alfalfa germplasm collection by multivariate analysis based on phenotypic traits. Romanian Agricultural Research,26, 47–52.

    Variath M T, Wu J, Li Y, Chen G, Shi C. 2010. Temporal patterns of maternal, cytoplasmic and embryo genetics effects for thousand-seed weight and oil content in F1hybrid rapeseed(Brassica napus L.). Crop Pasture Science,61, 945–955.

    De Vincente M C, Tanksley S D. 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspeci fic tomato cross.Genetics,134, 585–596.

    Wang X, Liu G, Yang Q, Hua W, Liu J, Wang H. 2010. Genetic analysis on oil content in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.).Euphytica,173, 17–24.

    Wu J G, Shi C H, Zhang H Z. 2006. Partitioning genetic effects due to embryo, cytoplasm and maternal parent for oil content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Genetic Molecular Biology,29, 533–538.

    Xing N, Fan C, Zhou Y. 2014. Parental selection of hybrid breeding based on maternal and paternal inheritance of traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). PLOS ONE,9,e103165.

    Zhang H, Shi C, Wu J, Ren Y, Li C, Zhang D, Zhang Y. 2004.Analysis of genetic and genotype×environment interaction effects from embryo, cytoplasm and maternal plant for oleic acid content of Brassica napus L. Plant Science,167, 43–48.

    Zhao J, Becker H C, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Ecke W. 2005. Oil content in a European×Chinese rapeseed population:QTL with additive and epistatic effects and their genotypeenvironment interactions. Crop Science,45, 51–59.

    9 December, 2016 Accepted 6 March, 2017

    Correspondence Laurencja Sza?a, Tel: +48-618-464237, Fax:+48-618-233721, E-mail: lszala@nico.ihar.poznan.pl

    ? 2018 CAAS. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61776-3

    Managing editor SHI Hong-liang

    久久草成人影院| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 香蕉久久夜色| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久国产精品影院| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 久久亚洲真实| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 午夜免费观看网址| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 久久久国产精品麻豆| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 日本免费a在线| 国产视频内射| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 级片在线观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久久色成人| 成人欧美大片| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 观看美女的网站| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| h日本视频在线播放| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产成人精品无人区| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 99热只有精品国产| 香蕉国产在线看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 在线播放国产精品三级| 悠悠久久av| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 热99在线观看视频| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产三级中文精品| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 午夜免费观看网址| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲激情在线av| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | 在线国产一区二区在线| 午夜福利18| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 91av网一区二区| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | or卡值多少钱| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| h日本视频在线播放| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 很黄的视频免费| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日韩欧美三级三区| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 极品教师在线免费播放| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产真实乱freesex| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 精品久久久久久久末码| 色综合婷婷激情| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| 久久草成人影院| 精品国产亚洲在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 一本精品99久久精品77| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 搡老岳熟女国产| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产精品影院久久| 俺也久久电影网| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产真实乱freesex| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 嫩草影院入口| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 俺也久久电影网| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 高清在线国产一区| av国产免费在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 草草在线视频免费看| 很黄的视频免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 九色国产91popny在线| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久久精品大字幕| 日本 av在线| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 999久久久国产精品视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 天堂网av新在线| av欧美777| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 午夜福利高清视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 一区福利在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久久成人免费电影| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲成人久久性| 精品久久久久久久末码| h日本视频在线播放| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久精品影院6| 级片在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 亚洲精华国产精华精| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| cao死你这个sao货| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 毛片女人毛片| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 嫩草影院入口| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 欧美日韩精品网址| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产av不卡久久| 免费在线观看日本一区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 免费观看人在逋| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| av福利片在线观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 久9热在线精品视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 18禁观看日本| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久久久性生活片| 精品久久久久久,| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 看免费av毛片| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久9热在线精品视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 91老司机精品| 色综合站精品国产| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| bbb黄色大片| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 不卡av一区二区三区| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 宅男免费午夜| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲国产色片| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 免费看日本二区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 91老司机精品| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 黄色成人免费大全| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲在线观看片| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产高潮美女av| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 久久久久国内视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 嫩草影视91久久| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产日本99.免费观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 1000部很黄的大片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 宅男免费午夜| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产高潮美女av| 免费看日本二区| 国产精品,欧美在线| 久久久久久久久中文| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 制服人妻中文乱码| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲在线观看片| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 国产午夜精品论理片| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日本一二三区视频观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久人妻av系列| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线 | 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲第一电影网av| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 日本免费a在线| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产三级中文精品| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 毛片女人毛片| www日本黄色视频网| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 天堂√8在线中文| 手机成人av网站| 三级毛片av免费| 免费av毛片视频| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美激情在线99| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 日本黄大片高清| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 午夜激情欧美在线| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 在线观看日韩欧美| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 丁香欧美五月| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 一本精品99久久精品77| 一夜夜www| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| or卡值多少钱| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 色av中文字幕| 舔av片在线| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 日韩欧美国产在线观看|