• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of long-term organic fertilization on soil microbiologic characteristics, yield and sustainable production of winter wheat

    2018-01-04 02:04:46LIChunxiMAShouchenSHAOYunMAShoutianZHANGLingling
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年1期

    LI Chun-xi, MA Shou-chen, SHAO Yun, MA Shou-tian, ZHANG Ling-ling

    1 College of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, P.R.China

    2 Field Scienti fic Observation and Research Base of Land Use, Ministry of Land and Resources/Henan Polytechnic University,Jiaozuo 454000, P.R.China

    RESEARCH ARTICLE

    Effects of long-term organic fertilization on soil microbiologic characteristics, yield and sustainable production of winter wheat

    LI Chun-xi1, MA Shou-chen2, SHAO Yun1, MA Shou-tian1, ZHANG Ling-ling1

    1 College of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, P.R.China

    2 Field Scienti fic Observation and Research Base of Land Use, Ministry of Land and Resources/Henan Polytechnic University,Jiaozuo 454000, P.R.China

    We investigated the soil microbiologic characteristics, and the yield and sustainable production of winter wheat, by conducting a long-term fertilization experiment. A single application of N, P and K (NPK) fertilizer was taken as the control (CK) and three organic fertilization treatments were used: NPK fertilizer+pig manure (T1), NPK fertilizer+straw return (T2), NPK fertilizer+pig manure+straw return (T3). The results showed that all three organic fertilization treatments (T1, T2 and T3)signi ficantly increased both soil total N (STN) and soil organic carbon (SOC) from 2008 onwards. In 2016, the SOC content and soil C/N ratios for T1, T2 and T3 were signi ficantly higher than those for CK. The three organic fertilization treatments increased soil microbial activity. In 2016, the activity of urease (sucrase) and the soil respiration rate (SRS) for T1, T2 and T3 were signi ficantly higher than those under CK. The organic fertilization treatments also increased the content of soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN), the SMBC/SMBN ratio and the microbial quotient (qMB). The yield for T1, T2 and T3 was signi ficantly higher than that of CK, respectively. Over the nine years of the investigation, the average yield increased by 9.9, 13.2 and 17.4% for T1, T2 and T3, respectively, compared to the initial yield for each treatment, whereas the average yield of CK over the same period was reduced by 6.5%. T1, T2, and T3 lowered the coef ficient of variation (CV) of wheat yield and increased the sustainable yield index (SYI). Wheat grain yield was signi ficantly positively correlated with each of the soil microbial properties (P<0.01). These results showed that the long-term application of combined organic and chemical fertilizers can stabilize crop yield and make it more sustainable by improving the properties of the soil.

    winter wheat, long-term organic fertilization, soil microbial features, yield stability, yield sustainability

    1. Introduction

    The Huang-Huai-Hai Plain is the largest wheat-producing region in China. The area of wheat planted in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain is 68% of China’s total wheat acreage. To obtain a high wheat yield, farmers in this area commonly use large amounts of chemical fertilizers. This is not only a waste of resources but also a cause of environmental pollution. Although a single application of chemical fertilizers can increase crop yield and raise the amount of available nutrients in the soil, the application of large amounts of chemical fertilizers over time can lead to a degradation of soil quality and nutrient imbalance (Chen et al. 2014). Thus the long-term application of chemical fertilizers seriously reduces the sustainable production capacity of farmland.Sustainable crop production has become an extremely important and widely researched topic, and receives worldwide attention (Li et al. 2010). Optimal fertilization based on scienti fic understanding can contribute to improved soil quality and sustainable soil use (Yadav et al. 2000). Partially replacing chemical fertilizers with organic manures can not only supply adequate amounts of various trace elements for crops, but it can also regulate soil water, nutrient and air content, as well as soil temperature and microbial activities (Bolan and Adriano 2003). These bene fits are major advantages of the use of organic manure rather than chemical fertilizers, and they are therefore of great signi ficance in promoting sustainable agricultural production(Bolan and Adriano 2003).

    Many researchers have investigated the effects of longterm fertilization on the physicochemical properties and microbial characteristics of soil (Li et al. 2004; Diepeningen et al. 2006; Chu et al. 2007; Ma et al. 2010). Soil microorganisms are the driving force for the transformation and cycling of soil organic matter and nutrients, and also provide a reserve of available nutrients for crops (Xu et al.2016). Soil microbes are directly affected by soil quality and are extremely sensitive to changes in it (Zhou and Ding 2007). They respond quickly to the application of fertilizers, altered cropping systems, and land utilization changes (Livia et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2009; Yusuf et al.2009). Soil characteristics such as soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC), soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN),the microbial quotient (qMB), soil enzyme activity, and soil respiration have been used as indexes to assess changes in soil fertility and soil quality (Harris et al. 2003;Schloter et al. 2003). Many studies have indicated that different fertilization practices have important effects on SMBC and SMBN (Chu et al. 2007; Jangid et al. 2008;Ma et al. 2012). The application of organic fertilizers can signi ficantly increase SMBC and SMBN as well as soil enzyme activity (Timo et al. 2004; Li et al. 2008; Ma et al.2010). The conclusions of the studies cited are mostly derived from comparisons between organic fertilization treatments and no fertilizer application at all. However, in the practice of crop production, it is very rare that farmers do not apply fertilizer. Thus a study which compares the long-term effects of organic fertilization treatments on soil microbiologic characteristics and soil fertility with the longterm effects of a single application of chemical fertilizer can provide a scienti fic basis for the determination of a stable and sustainable soil environment in which a high crop yield can be obtained.

    The sustainable yield index (SYI) of a crop indicates whether the soil ecosystem can sustainably grow a crop.The higher the SYI value, the better able is the soil to sustain a particular crop yield over time (Majumder et al. 2007). In recent years the effects of different fertilization treatments on crop yield and the conditioning of soil for sustainable crop production have been widely studied. However, research results are not consistent because of the complexity and diversity of the activities and conditions which affect crop yield and which in fluence sustainable crop production, such as farming practices, soil constitution, and climate (Li et al.2006, 2012; Manna et al. 2007; Ma et al. 2011). Long-term experiments in one particular location can identify possible ways of reducing the effects of such disturbances, but it is dif ficult to observe a single crop variety continuously over the long term. Yield fluctuations are not only due to environmental and climatic conditions, but also to the genetic composition of the crop variety (Chaudhury et al.2005). In long-term experiments, differences or changes in crop variety make it dif ficult to compare yields, and so make it dif ficult for the researcher to form a sound scienti fic judgment concerning the soil’s suitability for sustainable production. Additionally, most long-term fixed-location experiments unfortunately involve different crop varieties.There are few long-term continuous observations of a single crop variety and few robust results.

    The southern part of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, in Henan Province, is an important area of winter wheat production in China. Maintaining the soil’s ability to sustain a stable supply of nutrients can provide the foundation for a high and steady wheat yield. We conducted a long-term field experiment, beginning in 2008, in Huojia County of Henan Province, to study the effects of different organic fertilization treatments on soil fertility and soil microbiologic characteristics. The sustainable production capacity of the soil was analyzed based on long-term observation of the yield of a single wheat variety in order to provide a scienti fic basis for the preparation of fertile soil, and so to ensure sustainable production.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Experimental site description

    Field experiments were conducted at the soil and fertilizer experimental station of Henan Normal University in the town of Zhaojing, in Huojia County, Henan Province (35°11′N,113°41′E). Over the course of the study, the mean annual temperature was 14°C, the mean annual precipitation was 656.3 mm, and the mean annual pan evaporation was 1 748.4 mm. The crop planting was a winter wheat-summer maize rotation, planted in clay loam soil. Immediately prior to the experiment, nutrient content within the tillage layer(0–20 cm deep) of the soil was measured. The values observed were total N 1.28 g kg-1, total P 0.9 g kg-1, and organic matter 18.12 g kg-1.

    2.2. Experimental design

    The experiment started in October 2007 and continued for nine years until 2016. The experimental wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cultivar Bainong AK58), which has been recommended for widespread use, had been grown on the experimental site since 2003. A single application of N,P and K (NPK) fertilizer was taken as a control treatment(CK) and three different treatments of application of NPK fertilizer combined with organic manure were used every year, as follows:

    CK, NPK fertilizer control; T1, NPK fertilizer+pig manure(7 500 kg ha-1); T2, NPK fertilizer+straw return (all corn stalks from the preceding crop were returned to the farmland after chopping); T3, NPK fertilizer+pig manure (7 500 kg ha-1)+straw return (all corn stalks from the preceding crop were returned to the farmland after chopping).

    For each fertilizer treatment, the same quantity of NPK chemical fertilizer was used: N (135 kg ha-1), P2O5(120 kg ha-1), and K2O (180 kg ha-1). The contents of total N (TN)and organic carbon (OC) in the pig manure were 1.65–2.49 and 12.5–15.6%, respectively. The contents of TN and OC in the corn stalks were 0.90–0.95 and 42.3–45.6%,respectively. The area of each treatment and control plot was 35 m2(5 m×7 m). Each treatment was replicated three times. The plant density was 2 250 000 plants ha-1and the soil was deeply tilled (to a depth of 30 cm)before sowing.

    2.3. Measuring items and methods

    Each year at the flowering stage of the wheat, soil samples were collected from the tilled layer (0–30 cm) of each plot using a 5-point random sampling method. The soil samples were sealed in bags, brought to the laboratory and stored in a refrigerator at a temperature of 4°C prior to measurement.

    The following data were obtained for each soil sample: soil total nitrogen (STN), measured using the Kjeldahl method;soil organic carbon (SOC), measured using the potassium dichromate method; SMBC and SMBN, measured using the fumigation extraction method (Vance et al. 1987; Jenkinson 1988); urease activity, measured by colorimetry; and sucrase activity, determined by 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid colorimetry(Yao and Huang 2006).

    Soil respiration measurementA baremicro-plot (1.0 m×1.0 m) was set up in each experimental crop plot. It was de fined by embedding impenetrable PVC boards in the soil to a depth of 100 cm to prevent the lateral entry of roots of adjacent plants into the micro-plot. The soil respiration rate of this micro-plot was measured at the wheat flowering stage using an EGM-4 portable environmental gas monitor manufactured by PP Systems International Inc., USA. The weeds and litter on the soil surface were cleared before measurement.

    The sustainable yield index (SYI) was calculated as:

    SYI=(y-σn-1)/Ymax

    Where, y is the average yield, σn-1is the standard deviation, and Ymaxis the maximum yield (Majumder et al.2007).

    The stability of crop yieldThe coef ficient of variation(CV) was used to indicate the stability of the yield and calculated as:

    CV (%)=(σ/μ)×100

    Where, σ is the standard deviation (kg ha–1), and μ is the average yield (kg ha–1) (Gao et al. 2015).

    2.4. Statistical analysis

    Statistical analyses were performed using Excel 2003 and SPSS 13.0. Statistically signi ficant differences were identi fied using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least signi ficant difference (LSD) tests at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.

    3. Results

    3.1. Changes of TN, SOC, and C/N ratios in different fertilization treatments

    Different fertilization treatments had signi ficant in fluences on STN, SOC, and C/N ratios (Fig. 1). Compared with CK, all three organic fertilization treatments (T1, T2, and T3) signi ficantly increased both SOC and STN from 2008 onwards, in particular, SOC increased annually. In 2016,SOC in CK had not changed signi ficantly when compared with 2008, but SOC increased signi ficantly from its 2008 values under treatments T1, T2, and T3 by 25.34, 31.82 and 54.99%, respectively. In 2016, the SOC content under the treatments T1, T2, and T3 showed an increase over that of CK by 22.15, 30.28 and 51.91%, respectively. The soil C/N ratios under the treatments T1, T2, and T3 were lower than those in CK in the early stage (2008–2009),but signi ficantly higher than those in CK after 2012. By 2016, the soil C/N ratios under treatments T1, T2, and T3 had increased over that in CK by 8.07, 9.87 and 16.64%,respectively. These results suggest that the long-term application of organic materials can improve soil fertility by increasing STN and SOC.

    3.2. Changes of soil enzyme activity and soil respiration rate (SRR) in different fertilization treatments

    Fig. 1 Change in soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total N (STN)and C/N under different long-term fertilization practices. CK, N,P and K (NPK) fertilizer control; T1, NPK fertilizer+pig manure;T2, NPK fertilizer+straw return; T3, NPK fertilizer+pig manure+straw return. Vertical bars represent standard error.

    Compared with the CK, the three organic fertilization treatments (T1, T2, and T3) led to signi ficant increases in both urease and sucrase activities. In 2014–2016, the urease activity and sucrose activity under T1, T2 and T3 were signi ficantly greater than those in CK (Fig. 2). In 2016, under T1, T2, and T3, the urease activity increased by 31.0, 33.3, and 57.1%, and the sucrose activity increased by 21.9, 51.2, and 53.6%, respectively, compared to the activity in CK.

    Fig. 2 Effects of different long-term fertilization treatments on soil enzyme activity and soil respiration rate (SRR). CK, N, P and K (NPK) fertilizer control; T1, NPK fertilizer+pig manure; T2,NPK fertilizer+straw return; T3, NPK fertilizer+pig manure+straw return. Values are the means of the three replicates of each treatment. Vertical bars represent standard error and bars with different letters within the same test year indicate that there are signi ficant differences between treatments at P<0.05.

    Soil respiration is an indicator of soil microbial activity.Under treatments T1, T2, and T3, the SRR increased signi ficantly (Fig. 2), and was far greater than that in CK in 2014–2016. By 2016, SRR under treatments T1, T2 and T3 had increased by 18.5, 35.2, and 37.0%, respectively.

    3.3. Changes in SMBC, SMBN and qMB in different fertilization treatments

    The three organic fertilization treatments had signi ficant effects on SMBC, SMBN, the SMBC/SMBN ratio and qMB(SMBC/SOC). Each treatment showed the same change trend for SMBC and SMBN content, namely CK

    3.4. Changes in grain yield and yield sustainability with different fertilization treatments

    Although the winter wheat yield fluctuated greatly from 2008 to 2016, the wheat yield of each of T1, T2, and T3 in each year was signi ficantly higher than that of CK (Fig. 3).Over the nine years, the average yield was 9.9, 13.2,and 17.4% greater under T1, T2, and T3, respectively,compared to the respective initial yields, whereas the average yield of CK over the same period decreased by 6.5%. The yield of T3 increased the most. Thus, while the yield under the control CK treatment decreased overall, the yields from each of the three organic fertilizer treatments increased overall. This indicates that long-term organic fertilization treatments can signi ficantly improve wheat yield. The stability of the wheat yield is indicated by the CV, which is used to measure the variability in the average yield of the same crop cultivar over different years. The lower the CV, the more stable is the yield. As shown in Table 2, the CV values under T1, T2, and T3 were all lower than the CV under CK. This indicates that T1, T2, and T3 all improved the stability of wheat yield. In particular, underT3, the yield was signi ficantly more stable than that for CK,T1 and T2. SYI is a reliable parameter that indicates the sustainability of farmland production. The higher the SYI value, the more sustainable is the crop production. As shown in Table 2, SYI values under T1, T2, and T3 were greater than those under CK. This indicates that long-term combined organic and inorganic fertilizer treatments can sustainably increase crop yield.

    Table 1 Effect of different long-term fertilization practices on SMBC, SMBN, SMBC/SMBN and qMB in 20161)

    Fig. 3 Grain yield changes of winter wheat under different long-term fertilization practices. CK, N, P and K (NPK) fertilizer control;T1, NPK fertilizer+pig manure; T2, NPK fertilizer+straw return; T3, NPK fertilizer+pig manure+straw return. Vertical bars represent standard error.

    3.5. Correlative coef ficients between soil microbial properties, soil chemical properties and grain yield

    The soil microbial properties were closely related to the soil chemical properties (Table 3). Soil microbial properties,except qMB and SRR, showed signi ficant positive correlations with SOC, STN and C/N at P<0.01. qMB was signi ficantly positively correlated with STN at P<0.05.However, qMB was not signi ficantly related to SOC or C/N ratio. With the exception of the correlation between SRR and C/N ratio at P<0.05, SRR showed signi ficant positive correlations with SOC and STN at P<0.01. Grain yields of the wheat were affected by all soil microbial properties.Wheat grain yield was signi ficantly positively correlated with each of the soil microbial properties at P<0.01. The correlation coef ficient, which were the greatest between grain yield and SMBC, were then ordered for SMBC/SMBN>SMBN>SRR.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Effects of different fertilization treatments on STN, SOC and the C/N ratio

    SOC and STN are key contributors to soil productivity,both directly, through control of the availability of soil N,and indirectly through regulation of the physicochemical condition of the soil and thus in fluence over its biological properties (Huang et al. 2009). Over the long term, a single application of chemical fertilizer leads to accelerated decomposition of the organic carbon originally in the soil,which eventually results in relatively little SOC being stored in the soil. The single application also results in a decreased C/N ratio in the soil. Thus, over time, soil quality is degraded,a nutrient imbalance develops, and the ability of the soil to sustain a level of crop yield decreases (Zhang et al. 2006).In contrast, the application of organic manure increases the soil organic matter content, which leads to improved soil quality, and so promotes sustainable production (Zhang et al. 2006). Many long-term experiments have shown that organic manure can increase SOC and TN (e.g., Kundu et al. 2001; Hati et al. 2007; Shao et al. 2014). In addition,straw return is bene ficial because it renews and increases SOC and STN, which increase soil fertility and improve the farmland ecosystem in terms of crop growth (Lao et al.2002; Wei et al. 2012). In this study, SOC and STN clearly increased through the application of organic fertilizer (T1, T2,and T3) when compared to the control CK, a finding which is consistent with those of many other studies (e.g., Fan et al.2005; Mando et al. 2005; Ma et al. 2012). This increase is because inorganic N fertilizer tends to be lost from the soil by leaching, volatilization, or runoff. The application of organic fertilizer increases soil microbiomass (Diepeningen et al.2006); increased biomass indicates an increase in N use by microbiota and an increase in N storage in the soil, which leads to a reduction of N runoff. Thus, it is more effective to apply chemical N fertilizer combined with organic material.

    Table 2 Effect of different long-term fertilization practices on yield stability and sustainability of winter wheat

    Table 3 Correlative coef ficients between soil microbial properties and soil chemical properties and grain yield1)

    4.2. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on soil microbial characteristics

    Planned fertilization can improve soil microbial characteristics by increasing SOC and STN (Albiach et al. 2000). Our study showed that soil microbial characteristics except qMB are closely related to SOC, STN, and C/N (Table 3).Among the soil microbial characteristics, SMBC and SMBN represent the storage and source of soil nutrients available for plant growth (Xu et al. 2016). The long-term application of chemical fertilizer combined with organic manure can increase both SMBC and SMBN (Goyal et al. 1999; Li et al. 2015) as well as qMB (Xu et al. 2002). This study also showed that treatments T1, T2, and T3 all increased levels of SMBC, SMBN, and qMB when compared to CK,mainly because the supply of organic matter provided suf ficient C resources for the growth and reproduction of soil microorganisms, which in turn increased the accumulation of SMBC and SMBN (Wang et al. 2011). Under normal circumstances, the SMBC/SMBN ratios for bacteria,actinomycetes, and fungi are approximately 5:1, 6:1, and 10:1, respectively (Paul and Clark 1996). In this study, the SMBC/SMBN ratio for each treatment was approximately 5:1, which indicates that bacteria are the majority biota in soil microorganism communities. Treatments that use organic fertilizers combined with chemical fertilizers promote the growth and reproduction of microorganisms. Thus such treatments increase the microbial biomass and thereby improve the soil microbial community structure, which results in a higher SMBC/SMBN ratio than observed in a chemicalfertilizers-only treatment (Goyal et al. 1999). In this study,the SMBC/SMBN ratios of the T1, T2, and T3 treatments were signi ficantly higher than that of the CK, which shows that the long-term application of chemical fertilizers together with organic manures enriches and diversi fies the soil microbiome.

    Soil enzyme activity indicates the intensity of both microbial activity and biochemical reactions in the soil.Studies have shown that the application of organic fertilizer signi ficantly increases soil enzyme activity (Plaza et al.2004; Timo et al. 2004; Li et al. 2008; Wei et al. 2012). This study also showed that all three organic fertilizer treatments signi ficantly increased urease and sucrase activities in the soil. In particular, soil enzyme activities under treatment T3 were signi ficantly greater than that under treatments T1 and T2. Organic manure increases soil enzyme activity in the following manner. First, soil enzymes are produced mainly by soil microorganisms and dead plants and animals, and the supply of organic materials increases C sources for soil microorganisms. This increases the energy available to them, which promotes their metabolism and reproduction, which thereby promotes the increase in soil enzyme activity (Ma et al. 2012). Second, the organic matter improves the physicochemical properties of soil, providing a better environment for the growth of microorganisms and soil fauna. The decomposition of organic matter quickens,which in turn provides more substrate for soil enzymes, and thereby induces an increase in soil enzyme activity (Petra et al. 2003; Timo et al. 2006).

    Soil respiration re flects the biological characteristics and the metabolic rate of the soil and its ability to transform and supply nutrients (Singh and Gupta 1997). The application of organic fertilizer increases the amount of organic matter available for soil respiration. Furthermore, it can also signi ficantly increase both the quantity and the activity of soil microorganisms, which will affect both the conversion of SOC and the emission of CO2and thereby increase the intensity of soil respiration (Zang et al. 2015). Thus the three organic fertilizer treatments in our study signi ficantly promoted the emissions of soil CO2and increased soil respiration rates.

    4.3. Effects of different fertilization treatments on crop yield

    Crop yield comprehensively re flects soil fertility. Previous studies have shown signi ficant positive correlations between wheat yield and SMBC, SMBN, and soil enzyme activity (Zhang et al. 2005). The results of this study also show that yield is closely related to soil microbial characteristics. The application of combinations of organic and chemical fertilizers not only replenishes the nutrients needed by the crop, but also increases the source of C for soil microorganisms and promotes their metabolism and reproduction, which in turn improves the physicochemical and microbial properties of soil and so favors root growth and absorption (Wang et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2014).Consequently, grain yield increased signi ficantly.

    Yield stability and sustainability of a crop provide important criteria for assessing the quality of a farmland ecosystem (Chaudhury et al. 2005). Although a single long-term application of chemical fertilizer can supply a large number of the nutrients needed by a crop, the lack of an organic component will result, over time, in the degradation of soil quality and, consequently, large annual fluctuations in crop yield (Hao et al. 2007). The long-term application of organic fertilizers can continuously improve soil fertility and create a healthy soil environment. Because of this, the soil will be able to continually provide the nutrients needed by the crop, and any large fluctuations in crop yield caused by adverse environmental factors will be mitigated (Chen et al.2014). If organic fertilization is maintained over the long term, the farmland will sustainably support crop production.Manna et al. (2007) showed that the long-term application of combined organic and chemical fertilizers could signi ficantly and sustainably increase crop yield. Our study also shows that organic fertilizer treatments can sustainably maintain the stability of crop yield and thereby signi ficantly reduce the inter-annual fluctuations in grain yield.

    5. Conclusion

    Our study showed that three long-term organic fertilization treatments signi ficantly improved both soil nutrients and soil microbial properties. Based on long-term continuous observations of a single wheat variety, three organic fertilization treatments increased the grain yield and SYI of wheat and lowered the CV of wheat yield. These results show that the long-term application of organic fertilization can stabilize crop yield and make it more sustainable by improving the properties of the soil. In addition, our study data and results came from long-term continuous observations of a single wheat variety, which eliminated the confounding effects of differences in crop variety on yield, which ensures that we can make a robust and wellinformed scienti fic judgment on the suitability of the soil for sustainable crop production.

    Acknowledgements

    We acknowledge the financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0301106, 2016YFD0300203-3) and the Science and Technology Innovation Team Support Plan of Universities in Hennan Province, China (18IRTSTHN008).

    Albiach R, Canet R, Pomanes F, Ingelmo F. 2000. Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after the application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil.Bioresource Technology,5, 43–48.

    Bolan N S, Adriano D C. 2003. Effects of organic amendments on the reduction and phytoavailability of chromate in mineral soil. Journal of Environmental Quality,32, 120–128.

    Chaudhury J, Mandal U K, Sharma K L, Ghosh H, Mandal B.2005. Assessing soil quality under long-term rice based cropping system. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,36, 1141–1161.

    Chen H, Cao C F, Kong L C, Zhang C L, Li W, Qiao Y Q, Du S Z,Zhao Z. 2014. Study on wheat yield stability in Huaibei lime concretion black soil area based on long-term fertilization experiment. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,47, 2580–2590.(in Chinese)

    Chu H Y, Lin X, Fu J T, Morimoto S, Yagi K, Hu J L, Zhang J B. 2007. Soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity,bacterial community structure in response to long-term fertilizer management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,39,2971–2976.

    Diepeningen A D, Vos O J, Gerard G W, Bruggen A H C. 2006.Effects of organic versus conventional management on chemical and biological parameters in agricultural soils.Applied Soil Ecology,31, 120–135.

    Fan T L, Stewart B A, Payne W A, Wang Y, Luo J J, GaoY F.2005. Long-term fertilizer and water availability effects on cereal yield and soil inorganic properties in northwest China.Soil Science Society of America Journal,69, 842–855.

    Gao H J, Peng C, Zhang X Z, Li Q, Zhu P. 2015. Effect of long-term different fertilization on maize yield stability in the northeast black soil region. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,48, 4790–4799. (in Chinese)

    Goyal S, Chander K, Mundra M C, Kapoor K K. 1999. In fluence of inorganic fertilizers and organic amendments on soil organic matter and soil microbial properties under tropical conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils,29, 196–200.

    Hao M D, Fan J, Wang Q J, Dang T H, Guo S L, Wang J J. 2007.Wheat yield and yield stability in a long-term fertilization experiment on the loess plateau. Pedosphere,17, 257–246.

    Harris J A. 2003. Measurements of the soil microbial community for estimating the success of restoration. European Journal of Soil Science,54, 801–808.

    Hati K M, Swarup A, Dwivedi A K, Misra A K, Bandyopadhyay K K. 2007. Changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon status at the topsoil horizon of a vertisol of central India after 28 years of continuous cropping, fertilization and manuring. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,119, 127–134.

    Huang Q R, Hu F, Huang S, Li H X, Yuan Y H, Pan G X, Zhang W J. 2009. Effect of long-term fertilization on organic carbon and nitrogen in subtropical paddy soil. Pedosphere,19,727–734.

    Jangid K, Williams M A, Franzluebbers A J, Sanderlin J S, Reeves J H, Jenkins M B, Endale D M, Coleman D C, Whitman W B. 2008. Relative impacts of land-use,management intensity and fertilization upon soil microbioal community structure in agricultural systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,40, 2843–2853.

    Jenkinson D S. 1988. The determination of microbial biomass carbon andnitrogen in soil. In: Advances in Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford.pp. 368–386.

    Kundu S, Singh M, Saha J K, Biswas A, Tripathi A K, Acharya C L. 2001. Relationship between C addition and storage in a Vertisol under soybean-wheat cropping system in subtropical Central India. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,164, 483–486.

    Lao X R, Wu Z Y, Gao Y C. 2002. Effect of long-term returning straw to soil on soil fertility. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,18, 49–51. (in Chinese)

    Li D P, Chen L J, Wu Z J, Zhu P, Ren J, Liang C H, Peng C,Gao H J. 2004. Dynamics of microbial biomass N in different fertilized black soil and its related factors. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,15, 1891–1896. (in Chinese)

    Li J, Zhao B Q, Li X Y, Hwat B S. 2008. Effect of long-term combined application of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil microbiological properties and fertility. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,41, 144–152. (in Chinese)

    Li Q, Xu M X, Liu G B, Qi Z J, Wang H W. 2012. Evaluation of crop rotation system sustainability in slope land under longterm chemical fertilization based on geometry method. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science,18, 884–892. (in Chinese)

    Li W J, Peng B F, Yang Q Y. 2015. Effects of long-term fertilization on organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation and activity in a paddy soil in double cropping rice area in Dongting Lake of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,48,488–500. (in Chinese)

    Li X Y, Li Y T, Zhao B Q, Li X P, Wang L X, Zhang Z S. 2006.The dynamics of crop yields under different fertilization systems in drab fluvoaquic soil. Acta Agronomica Sinica,32, 683–689. (in Chinese)

    Li Z F, Xu M G, Zhang H M, Zhang S X, Zhang W J. 2010.Sustainability of crop yields in China under long-term fertilization and different ecological conditions. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,21, 1264–1269. (in Chinese)

    Livia B, Uwe L, Frank B. 2005. Microbial biomass, enzyme activities and microbial community structure in two European long-term field experiments. Agriculture Eecosystems &Environment,109, 141–152.

    Ma L, Yang L Z, Shen M X, Xia L Z, Li Y D, Liu G H, Yin S X.2011. Study on crop yield stability in a typical region of ricewheat rotation based on long-term fertilization experiment.Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,27, 117–124.(in Chinese)

    Ma N N, Li T L, Wu C C, Zhang E P. 2010. Effects of longterm fertilization on soil enzyme activities and soil physicochemical properties of facility vegetable field.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,21, 1766–1771. (in Chinese)

    Ma X X, Wang L L, Li Q H, Li H, Zhang S L, Sun B H, Yang X Y. 2012. Effects of longterm fertilization on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and enzyme activities during maize growing season. Acta Ecologica Sinica,32, 5502–5511. (in Chinese)

    Majumder B, Mandal B, Bandyopadhyay P K, Chaudhury J. 2007.Soil organic carbon pool sand productivity relationships for a 34 year old rice-wheat-jute agroecosystem under different fertilizer treatments. Plant and Soil,297, 53–67.

    Mando A, Ouattara B, Somado A E, Woperris M C S,Stroosnijder L, Breman H. 2005. Long-term effects of fallow,tillage and manure application on soil organic matter and nitrogen fractions and on sorghum yield under Sudano-Sahelian conditions. Soil Use and Management,21, 25–31.

    Manna M C, Swarup A, Wanjari R H, Mishra B, Shahi D K.2007. Long-term fertilization, manure and liming effects on soil organic matter and crop yields. Soil and Tillage Research,94, 397–409.

    Paul E A, Clark F E. 1996. Components of the soil biota. In: Paul E A, Clark F E, eds., Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry.2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego. pp. 71–107.

    Petra M, Ellen K, Bernd M. 2003. Structure and function of the soil microbial community in a long-term fertilizer experiment.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,35, 453–461.

    Plaza C, Hernadez D, Garea-Gil J C, Polo A. 2004. Microbial activity in pig slurry-amended soil under semiarid conditions.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,36, 1577–1585.

    Schloter M, Dilly O, Munch J C. 2003. Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,98,255–262.

    Shao X F, Xu M G, Zhang W J, Huang M, Zhou X, Zhu P,Gao H J. 2014. Changes of soil carbon and nitrogen and characteristics of nitrogen mineralization under long-term manure fertilization practices in black soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,20, 326 –335. (in Chinese)

    Singh J S, Gupta S R. 1997. Plant decomposition and soil respirationin terrestrial ecosystems. Botany Review,43,449–528.

    Timo K, Cristina L F, Frank E. 2006. Abundance and biodiversity of soil microathropods as in fluenced by different types of organic manure in a long-term field experiment in Central Spain. Applied Soil Ecology,33, 278–285.

    Timo K, Stephan W, Frank E. 2004. Microbial activity in a sandy arable soil is governed by the fertilization regime. European Journal of Soil Biology,40, 87–94.

    Vance E D, Brookes P C, Jenkinson D S. 1987. An extraction method formeasuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,19, 703–707.

    Wang F, Zhang J S, Gao P C, Tong Y A. 2011. Effects of application of different organic materials on soil microbiological properties and soil fertility in Weibei rainfed highland. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science,17,702–709. (in Chinese)

    Wang X L, Jia Y, Li X G, Long R J, Ma Q, Li F M, Song Y J. 2009.Effects of land use on soil total and light fraction organic and microbial biomass C and N in a semi-arid ecosystem of northwest China. Geoderma,153, 285–290.

    Wei T, Han L N, Han Q F, Jia Z K, Zhang R, Nie J F, Yang B P. 2012. Effects of organic fertilization on soil nutrient availability and enzyme activity in arid areas. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science,18, 611–620. (in Chinese)

    Xu Y C, Shen Q R, Ran W. 2002. Effects of zero-tillage and application of manure on soil microbial biomass C, N and P after sixteen years of cropping. Acta Pedologica Sinica,39, 89–96. (in Chinese)

    Xu Y L, Tang H M, Xiao X P, Guo L J, Li W Y, Sun J M. 2016.Effects of different long-term fertilization regimes on the soil microbiological properties of a paddy field. Acta Ecologica Sinica,36, 5847–5855. (in Chinese)

    Yadav R L, Dwivedi B S, Prasad K Tomar O K, Shurpali N J, pandey P S. 2000. Yield trends, and changes in soil organic-C and available NPK in a long-term rice-wheat system under integrated use of manures and fertilizers.Field Crops Research,68, 219–246.

    Yao H Y, Huang C Y. 2006. Soil Microbial Ecologyand its Experimental Technique. Science Press, Beijing. pp.138–192. (in Chinese)

    Yusuf A A, Abaidoo R C, Iwuafor E N, Olufajo O O, Sanginga N. 2009. Rotation effects of grain legumes and fallow on maize yield, microbial biomassand chemical properties of an Al fisol in the Nigerian savanna. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,129, 325–331.

    Zang Y F, Hao M D, Zhang L Q, Zhang H Q. 2015. Effects of wheat cultivation and fertilization on soil microbial biomass carbon, soil microbial biomass nitrogen and soil basal respiration in 26 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica,35,1445–1451. (in Chinese)

    Zhang D X, Han Z Q, Liu W, Gao S G, Hou D J, Li G F, Chang L S. 2005. Biological effect of maize stalk return to field directly under different accretion decay conditions. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science,11, 742–749. (in Chinese)

    Zhang X W, Zhao G B, Yang R Q, Wang Y. 2006. Comprehensive utilization of agricultural straws in ecycle economy. Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,22(Suppl.), 107–109.

    Zhou L X, Ding M M. 2007. Soil microbial characteristics as bioindicators of soil health. Biodiversity Science,15, 162–171.(in Chinese)

    17 February, 2017 Accepted 11 July, 2017

    LI Chun-xi, E-mail: 13703731637@sina.com; Correspondence MA Shou-chen, E-mail: mashouchen@126.com

    ? 2018 CAAS. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61740-4

    Section editor ZHANG Wei-li

    Managing editor SUN Lu-juan

    大码成人一级视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 午夜免费观看网址| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 午夜激情av网站| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 国产av又大| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 窝窝影院91人妻| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 欧美日韩黄片免| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 黄色女人牲交| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 麻豆av在线久日| 久久久国产成人免费| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 在线视频色国产色| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 麻豆av在线久日| 久99久视频精品免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲第一av免费看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| www国产在线视频色| 9色porny在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 色在线成人网| 亚洲精品一二三| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 91国产中文字幕| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 十八禁网站免费在线| 精品福利永久在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产片内射在线| 久久热在线av| 日日夜夜操网爽| 久久热在线av| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 最好的美女福利视频网| 88av欧美| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一级毛片精品| 少妇 在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 一本综合久久免费| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产成人系列免费观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 欧美在线黄色| 久久中文字幕一级| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| av欧美777| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲精品一二三| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 国产成人影院久久av| 很黄的视频免费| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 欧美日韩av久久| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产色视频综合| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 色播在线永久视频| 超碰成人久久| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产三级黄色录像| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产高清videossex| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产麻豆69| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 午夜福利欧美成人| 满18在线观看网站| 性欧美人与动物交配| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 热re99久久国产66热| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲av美国av| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 超色免费av| 高清av免费在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 日本 av在线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久久久国内视频| 老司机福利观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 丝袜美足系列| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| aaaaa片日本免费| 午夜91福利影院| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 免费不卡黄色视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 五月开心婷婷网| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 无限看片的www在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 国产成人影院久久av| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| avwww免费| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 精品国产亚洲在线| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日本wwww免费看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产高清videossex| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 免费少妇av软件| 中国美女看黄片| 怎么达到女性高潮| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 色在线成人网| 久久中文字幕一级| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 黄色女人牲交| 久久香蕉激情| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久九九热精品免费| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 我的亚洲天堂| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 久久香蕉国产精品| 高清在线国产一区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久精品影院6| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 黄片播放在线免费| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产熟女xx| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美在线黄色| 青草久久国产| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 91国产中文字幕| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 精品福利观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| av免费在线观看网站| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 老司机靠b影院| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久久久久人人人人人| 嫩草影院精品99| www国产在线视频色| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 在线av久久热| 黄色成人免费大全| 日韩欧美三级三区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲精品在线美女| 看免费av毛片| 搡老岳熟女国产| 视频区图区小说| 国产精品免费视频内射| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产成人欧美| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| av网站在线播放免费| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲伊人色综图| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 在线av久久热| 最好的美女福利视频网| tocl精华| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日本免费a在线| 看免费av毛片| av欧美777| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产三级黄色录像| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久久久久久久中文| 91精品三级在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产av又大| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 97碰自拍视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 悠悠久久av| aaaaa片日本免费| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 天堂动漫精品| 国产熟女xx| 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 一区二区三区精品91| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产av精品麻豆| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 老司机福利观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 色在线成人网| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 亚洲成人久久性| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| av有码第一页| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 日本免费a在线| 超碰成人久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 免费看十八禁软件| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产av在哪里看| 在线av久久热| 精品一区二区三卡| 校园春色视频在线观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 免费av毛片视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产高清激情床上av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 不卡一级毛片| 久久性视频一级片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 一区在线观看完整版| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 99久久人妻综合| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 日本三级黄在线观看| 宅男免费午夜| 久久热在线av| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 91在线观看av| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 级片在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 丰满的人妻完整版| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 午夜免费激情av| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 99久久国产精品久久久| 欧美午夜高清在线| 午夜91福利影院| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 免费av中文字幕在线| 成在线人永久免费视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 制服人妻中文乱码| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产精品成人在线| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲九九香蕉| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 麻豆成人av在线观看| www国产在线视频色| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 一夜夜www| www.自偷自拍.com| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| ponron亚洲| 欧美大码av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产av一区在线观看免费| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 丁香六月欧美| 一区二区三区精品91| 一区福利在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看|