• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Toward a History of Cross-Cultural Written Symbols

    2017-09-18 01:12:17JavierTerradoPablo
    Language and Semiotic Studies 2017年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:和平

    Javier Terrado-Pablo

    University of Lleida, Spain

    Toward a History of Cross-Cultural Written Symbols

    Javier Terrado-Pablo

    University of Lleida, Spain

    It is our assumption that the goal of primitive written symbols was to create suprasubjective representations. We feel that this has continued to be the case throughout the course of history. In an increasingly globalised world, this goal seems even more evident, and we could highlight that symbolic representations tend to be supraregional, supranational, supracultural, and supraideological. Arabic, Chinese, and Suzhou numerals are nowadays restricted to specific uses and regions. Instead, Hindu-Arabic numerals, widely spread by modern computers, are commonly used everywhere. Millions of people know the meaning of symbols such as 2, 3, 4, 5, =, ≠ , ≥ ,√, and ∞. Almost everybody is able to recognize the usual iconic signs that mean‘disabled person’ or ‘smoking is forbidden’. And in spite of its importance in contemporary society, a project devoted to the study of the origins, spreading, and evolution of those symbols is still lacking. The aim of our paper is to point out the theoretical and methodological assumptions upon which a history of cross-cultural written symbols should be undertaken. In this essay we consider the opportunity to study the history of written symbols a chapter in the evolution of mankind marked by a twofold1process: on the one side, the divergence of symbolic systems all around the world in past times, and on the other, the symptoms of a convergence of these systems at present, or we might say,the willof convergence toward new, unified systems.

    semiotics, symbols, written systems, evolution, cross-cultural, history

    1. Introduction

    There are three good reasons to speak of symbols. First, we feel that our world is full of significance. The universe is bursting with significance and we, the human beings in it, are becoming more and more aware of this. And the bearers, the carriers of significance,are the symbols. Therefore, the better we know the way these tools function, the better we will manage them, and as a result we will be in an easier position to understand the human phenomenon and to improve relations between humans.

    There is a second reason to speak about this issue, and more specifically about crosscultural symbols. Understanding between people and cultures depends on knowledge and wisdom, and knowledge and wisdom are the heritage of all humanity. They are not a privilege linked to one specific culture. We could even speak of an overall culture, crossing any kind of borders, for the human species is one and the same. That is why symbols, which are the tools that open the way to knowledge, tend to be cross-cultural.

    A third reason to speak about symbols, and to do so from a diachronic point of view, is that history can reveal to us many aspects that otherwise, from our flat position in time and space, might go unnoticed. How could we know the functioning of contemporary symbols without knowing the way in which symbols have operated in the past? Our generation is only one stage of many; one phase in the evolutionary process of mankind.

    This study is placed within the general framework ofsemiosis, the action of signs and symbols in our world. Upon this basis, a fundamental question is to be posed from the beginning: Issemiosisthe consequence of evolution, or rather, does it cause evolution? Are symbols a mere product of a process, or are they the driving force that pushes humans forward? The response could be a determinant for future policies in the field of culture and education. Hence, there is a responsibility for semioticians to give a well-founded explanation of the role played by symbols, and to act as advisors to the leaders of countries.

    It is apparent that mankind is striving for a closer understanding between nations and cultures. The Chinese system of characters is used across the whole of China, not to mention Malaysia, Singapore, the US, Canada, Europe, parts of Myanmar, and partially in Vietnam, South Korea, and Japan, while the rest of world’s population has recourse to other ways of written expression. This fact leads millions of Chinese youth to learn the Roman alphabet in order to learn languages like English, French, or Spanish. Conversely, millions of international students are benefitting from the approach to Chinese language and culture through the character system. In the course of this cultural, cross border exercise, many of the best minds feel themselves discouraged by the distance perceived between the ways of expression chosen in different writing traditions. The gap seems too wide, too deep. How can we manage to bridge this gap? Obviously, the abyss is there and will be there; it is our duty to provide a realistic approach. It is possible to help, by showing that we all are using, in our daily business, a series of symbols which are not privative of our own culture. Figures and emojis offer a simple example, though this is not a sudden phenomenon of the 21st century. As we expect to demonstrate, in previous millenniums and centuries it is apparent that human beings had an interest in creating supraindividual and supraregional representations. Even more important is mankind’s capacity to transmit knowledge from generation to generation. As Sir Julian Huxley states:

    He has developed a new method of evolution: the transmission of organized experience by way of tradition, which supplements and largely overrides the automatic process of natural selection as the agency of change. (Huxley, 1953, p. 149)

    When we ask about the networks and lines of transmission for organized experience, we can find an answer in the same book just quoted: “symbols, transmissible skills, beliefs, works of art: these seem to be the chief articles of this transmission” (Huxley, 1953, p. 153). Among them, the only objects within our scope of action are symbols, because we have been working for many years in the field of linguistics from a diachronic perspective. Consequently, we are going to deal with symbols, and the first issue to be addressed is: What is a symbol?

    2. What We Mean by Symbols

    Everything in the world is pregnant with meaning. Peasants and fishermen have learnt to read the signs of the weather in the sky, on the earth, and on the surface of the sea. When they see a cloud on the top of a mountain that closes their horizon, they say that it is about to rain. If they see their garden all a-bloom with flowers, they know that the spring has just come. If they see the waves beginning to heave and to swirl, they advise not to go out sailing, because a storm is threatening. Interpreting these signs is very useful transmissible knowledge, but we do not consider these to be symbols, because they are not intentional signs.

    Hunting societies have learnt to differentiate the footprints of deer in the mud from those of wild boars, badgers, foxes, or bears. But these footprints are not to be considered symbols.

    Modern scientists know much of the dinosaurs through their footprints. In the neighbourhood of the Spanish village of Areny, much useful information has been provided by the tracks made by the so-calledarenysaurson a sandy beach (now a rocky outcrop) in the Cretacic Period: their weight, the direction of their path (East to West), the conditions of the land 68,000,000 years ago. But once more, these traces are not symbols.

    We will use the conceptsymbolin another and rather broad sense, to refer tointentional signs, created, used, and recognised by human communities. For us, symbols are artificial creations, human inventions. Our terminology does not coincide exactly with that grounded on the American tradition, inspired by Charles S. Pierce. We will sometimes callsymbolsa sort of signs which, in the peircean2terminology, would be calledicons.

    When we find ourselves confronted with an ancient petroglyph carved in sandstone, we have the feeling that someone is speaking from the depths of history. Behind this stone hides a desire to mean, a will of meaning. We do not know exactly what is the content that the author wanted to express, but we are convinced that some human being made it intentionally, for a reason that surpassed his own individuality and probably exceeds our capacity for interpretation. No matter if this petroglyph contains an image-like sign or anon-image-like sign. We will say that there we can observe symbols.

    We are perfectly aware of the different uses of terms such assigns,symbols,indices, andiconsin the specialised literature. Nor is the general wordsignfree of this terminological lability, well defined after Ferdinand de Saussure’s work. A man as learned as Sir Julian Huxley even seemed to ignore sometimes this restricted use. He was probably using the termsignin the sense ofindexwhen he expressed the controversial assertion according to which words are not signs. It is our guess that he was referring to the restricted sense given to this word in collocations as “to recognize the signs of the weather” or “to read the signs of the times”. Leaving aside this use, we agree with him when he affirms that words and symbols are tools for thinking:

    Words, in fact, are symbols instead of signs. They are artificial constructions, tools for dealing more efficiently with the business of existence; so that language is properly speaking a branch of technology. Words are tools for thinking. (Huxley, 1953, p. 120)

    Perhaps some of Huxley’s statements may seem striking, for instance: “the main reason why the men can count better than jackdaws is that they have invented symbols as tools to count with” (Huxley, 1953, p. 117). But one idea should be withheld: symbols are tools available to individuals, thanks to the human effort in creating them and to cultural transmission over time.

    We need to look at the mechanism of semiotic transmission in the broadest possible way. That’s why we will use the wordsymbolin the sense ofintentional sign. And so, what are often named symbols and what are named icons both fall under the scope of our investigation.

    3. What We Mean by Written Symbols

    Every symbol aimed to be perceived by the sense of sight or the sense of touch will be regarded as a written symbol. Engravings, low relief carvings, high relief carvings and sculptures can all be seen and can be touched. No matter if they are made on stone, clay, wood, bone, metal, or any handmade material. The contrast between light and shadow can convey the expression of meaning, and so does the contrast between smooth and rough surfaces, sharp edges, and ridges perceptible by touch. Moreover, effects of visual stimuli caused by the reflection of light from different pigmented surfaces have been, since ancient times, used to represent inner or outer reality. An example of this would be prehistoric cave paintings.

    Writing in the modern sense of the word—documents written in alphabetic systems or in Chinese characters, for instance—is only one of a great many ways of expression. In attempting to set up a history of symbols, we might cast one eye on the origins of writing and another eye on current trends, on the lines that announce what is yet to come.

    Up to the 19th century, some scholars in Spain thought that symbols on Iberianpottery dated a few centuries BCE were simply “ornamental painting”. It was not until the research conducted by Manuel Gómez Moreno Martínez3that these symbols were recognized as pieces of alphabetic and syllabic writing. Today, a great many researchers question whether symbols which appeared in Neolithic settlements of different regions of Europe are to be considered written symbols or not. One of the more conspicuous cases of incomprehension regarding written symbols is that of the Danube script, recalled by Marco Merlini:

    Many signs and their combinations unearthed during the last century’s excavations were not published by their discoverers because, not having a pattern of decoration or symbols, they did not dare speculate that they might be a system of writing. Other archaeologists did not realize that their findings, catalogued and published even from decades before, might have inscriptions. They considered that the strange geometrical, abstract and linear signs were only badly executed decoration scratched by confused artists. Thus, in reproducing and publishing them, they amended and adjusted them in a more fashionable way by regularising their shapes, or imposing symmetry upon their original patterns. A third wave of scholars maintained that the strange signs were magic-religious symbols or ownership/manufacturing marks. If both interpretations failed, the ultimate resource was to consider them simply as random scribbles made by bored and idle potters. (Merlini, 2008, p. 235)

    The symbolic creativity of man must have manifested itself very early in human history. There is no reason for doubting a priori the spread of writing among primitive people of all continents. Marco Merlini suggests that the Danube script is the first known writing system4in the world, and asks5if writing was born in Europe. In our opinion, scientists are not yet prepared to provide an answer. But we could adduce examples of symbols of a great antiquity from other regions, for instance, from France6, from the northwest7of Portugal, or from the south8or the north9of the Iberian Peninsula. And of course, China contains, in this respect, an immense amount of information to be discovered. To limit ourselves now just to the Chinese findings, we can consider the Banpo symbols, or the Jangsu signs. The Banpo site is settled near the city of Xi’an, in Shaanxi Province, and offers a good illustration of a Neolithic community linked to the Yangshao culture. This settlement offers a wide sample of materials ranging from about 6,000 to 2,000 years back10. Scratch marks made on ceramic shards are not at all random and similarities with those of Glozel (France) or Vila Pouca de Aguiar (Portugal) are remarkable. It is difficult to know if the engravings of Xinglondong cave in Fengjie, near Chongqing, are really intentional. If they were so, then they would be the first relics of writing found in the world, dating11about 120 ka BP (Before Present). The intentionality of the incisions in the Shuidongou stone12studied by professor Peng Fei and his colleagues, and dated about 30 ka BP, seems to us to be less questionable.

    To come now to the other side of this issue, we have to consider as well the current trends of symbolization in a well-connected world, in which the Internet acts as animmense spider web; a new step leading to this layer that has been called either the noosphere or the semiosphere.

    New symbols are pervading our living space. It is true that many of them remain restricted to specialised domains: the symbols of mathematics, the chemical symbols, the symbols of the language of music, the symbols of meteorology and climatology. However, it is not less true that for the average citizen those symbols are becoming increasingly common. The spreading of education at all levels, not only primary, favours democratisation of culture and the establishment of a shared set of symbols all over the world.

    A classification of overall modern symbols could be attempted according to their function or intention. It is not the goal of this essay to tackle this topic, but we feel that several types could be distinguished:warning symbols(hazard symbols, danger symbols...),information symbols(weather symbols, cartographic symbols...),behavioural symbols(traffic signs, suggestion symbols...),psychological symbols(feeling symbols, affective emojis).The feeling emojis admit the expression of a very wide range of individual emotions: satisfied, surprised, thoughtful, interested, hysterical, happy, disguised, exhausted, curious, disappointed, bored, anxious, confident..., and are often used in combination with verbal written messages.

    In order not to overweight our argument, we give in note number 13 the illustration of these different types13. It must be taken into account that the form of these symbols is subject to diachronic and diatopic variation. Their shape and colour can vary according to times, place, or changing legislation. For instance, in the European Community, hazard chemical symbols could be fashioned until recently in a triangle or square shape. But new pictographic symbols to express chemical hazard appear now in Europe in the shape14of a diamond with a distinctive red border and white background.

    A question can be useful to explain what we are here discussing: Might a map be considered a symbolic written object? The interpretation of a map is nowadays easy, for different cultures have reached a high degree of agreement on the ways of representing rivers, wells, mountains, paths, caves, and houses. Cartographical symbols constitute an almost universal system. But this degree of collectivization of geographical knowledge has not been reached overnight. Spanish scholars found in 1993, in the cave of Abauntz (Navarra, north of Spain), an engraved stone that they interpreted15later as a “Magdalenian map” of a primitive hunting ground. Analytical radiocarbon techniques allowed them to date the finding to 13,660 years ago.

    4. What We Mean by Cross-Cultural Symbols

    Few symbols have the privilege of being completely universal. Those that do belong to the field of fundamental sciences cultivated everywhere. We refer to mathematical symbols like ‘=’, ‘√ ‘, ‘∞’, or ‘∑’, afforded by a science to which Indian, Arab, Chinese, European, and American researchers have contributed. Their work has built a language just formathematics, independent from the natural languages of the individual researchers. Chemical symbols also have an overall acceptance, since the specialists have agreed to use only one linear order, and now a formula like NaCl is commonly used instead of the antiquated ClNa, which could still be found not long ago.

    Nevertheless, we mean cross-cultural symbols in a more comprehensive sense. We speak of symbols that have far surpassed the boundaries of the original communities in which they were created. For us, Hindu-Arabic numerals are to be regarded as nearly universal symbols, since they have been accepted outside the original Indian society from which they emerged. It is supposed that they were introduced to Europe through Spain, a land owned by Arabs in the medieval period.

    In order to know which symbols have been common to different and distant cultures, comparison seems to be the most appropriate way to proceed. The comparative method has proved its adequacy in the field of linguistics, as well as in that of anthropology.

    Even if we do not know the signified of a symbol, we can employ the comparative method, by paying attention to the representamen or material shape of the sign.

    It is worth remarking that many ancient symbols show repeatedly in scripts scattered throughout Europe and Asia: South Spain, North Portugal, the northeast of Spain, central France, the Danube region of Romania, Sichuan province in China. The ‘fork-like’symbol of Xinglondong, engraved in ivory, seems to reappear in the Areny stone, and it can be found in other regions.

    Figure 1. Engravings in stone and ivory of a ‘fork-like’ symbol

    Other symbols are well known16among archaeologists. The ‘X-like’ symbol is found in Glozel and in de Danube region, in scripts dated in both cases to around 5,000 BC. And also Areny, Sierra de Lújar, Vila Pouca de Aguiar, and even Shuidongou have witnessed this sign.

    Figure 2. Engravings of ‘X like’ symbol in different parts of the world

    The ‘chair-like’ symbol shows itself in Areny, Glozel, and Vila Pouca, as can be seen in the following images.

    Figure 3. Engravings of ‘chair- like’ symbol in different parts of Europe

    Between old European and Chinese symbols, many resemblances have been pointed out. Are these resemblances random coincidences? Are the similarities mere chance combinations? A large amount of positive data has to be cumulated before answering these questions. If these similarities are not to be considered random, then the scientists have to build up a theory to explain them. Are they due to mutual influence between cultures? Is there one culture from which the symbols were communicated to the others? Is it possible to fix a relative chronology for the process of expansion of semiotic models? In the process of evolution, which forms reveal previous stages and which subsequent ones? The comparative method leads inevitably to the historical method.

    5. What We Mean by a History of Symbols

    Symbols are cultural objects subject to evolution. All their components evolve, not only their material or external face, but their internal face―their significance―as well. Using Peirce’s triadic view, we could say that not only therepresentamenchanges, but that theinterpretantand thesemioticobjectchange in accordance with it. The semiotic object has necessarily to experience transformations over the course of time, for man, world, and human communities are constantly undergoing changes. However, few people would feel able to describe the metamorphosis ofsemiotic objects. That is why it would be preferable to recast the question in Saussure’s terms ofsignifierandsignified. We will assert that a history of symbols has to undertake the task of describing the evolution of signifier and signified of symbols from their origins until their death or until present, if they are still alive.

    As in historical linguistics, comparison precedes history. In order to be able to trace a causal relationship between phenomena or a chronological precedence of one over the other, we must be able to compare the different facts that are supposedly related.

    We will try to show this with one of our favourite examples: the Chinese character for‘human being’ (pronounced ‘ren’). In a previous work (Terrado, 2016) we have explained our opinion that this symbol takes us back to the ancient times in which humans lived in caves and left their paintings on rocky walls. This character can be considered as the simplification of a picture showing a walking man, a man being alive. The upright position in the vertical longer stroke and the movement implicit in the shorter one make it explicit that the man is not dead.

    If we put side by side the Chinese character and samples of men running or hunting in primitive rupestrian scenes17, the resemblance seems to us apparent.

    Figure 4. A character compared to figurative paintings from Argelia, South Africa, and Spain

    It is remarkable that the comparative images come, not from China or Asia in general, but from Africa and Europe.The Rock Art Research Institute (RARI)of South Africa has kindly allowed us to use several of its images. TheSouth African Rock Art Digital Archive (SARADA)is a very well managed resource open to researchers. Thesignifierhas evolved in the sense of achieving a more abstract representation, leaving aside details that could be very important for primeval hunting societies. Thesignifiedseems to remain close to the value of ‘human being’, although it is difficult to guess which was the real meaning in the minds of the dwellers of ancient Africa. As for thesemiotic object, it is of the utmost importance to realize that we are trying to link a modern Chinese character to ancient suprasubjective representations that show similar features in South Africa, in the Sahara Desert, and in the east of the Iberian Peninsula. What would be the consequences for the history of cultures if this and other links could be proved to be true? The gap between oriental and occidental cultures could appear, in our view, less deep.

    A history of symbols must be both comparative and evolutive. And it would be wise to add a new requisite: it must becritical. A critical18study of an issue is that which offers all information available before giving an interpretation of the facts or defending a thesis to explain them. When we say “all available information” we are referring to documentation, empirical evidence, and literature generated on the subject. Sometimes we deem to know the supposed date, the place of birth, and even the paternity of a symbol. Even in these cases we need to be very cautious before making pronouncements on the origins and meaning of a definite symbol. We will show this using one of the modern symbols for the concept of ‘peace’:

    Figure 5. A symbol for ‘peace’

    It is known that this symbol has a date of birth: the Easter Weekend of 1958, a place of birth: London, and a father: Gerald Herbert Holtom, an English designer. The sign was designed for the Direct Action Committee Against Nuclear War and made its publicappearance in the first anti-nuclear march from London to Aldermaston, where the English nuclear weapons were manufactured. But to know the origin of a symbol is not equal to knowing the history and the value of it. What was the value given to it by Holtom and the organisers of the march, one of whose leaders was Sir Bertrand Russell?

    At first we thought that the shape of this sign had been inspired by the Japanese characterHeiwa‘peace’ or the Chinesehé, very close to this meaning in words likehépíng(和平) orpínghé(平和).

    Figure 6. The Japanese characterHeiwa‘peace’.

    Figure 7. The Chinese characterhé

    We imagined that the peace symbol was the abstract figure of a man with open arms, showing that there was no reason to fear him. Moreover, all in this sign would fit, if we would be allowed to interpret the additional strokes as indices of eventual presents. Furthermore, the relation to a Japanese sign could be interpreted as a wink or an affectionate nod to Japanese society, that had suffered in Hiroshima and Nagasaki the worst moment of its history.

    Many fantasies like this have arisen. But Holtom himself wanted to disallow them by explaining19the design process: “I drew myself: the representative of an individual in despair, with hands palm outstretching outwards and downwards in the manner of Goya’s peasant before the firing squad. I formalized the drawing into a line and put a circle round it”.

    To explain the design process is not yet the goal of a symbol’s explanation. It is fair to ask: Whom does the interpretant (the signified) of the symbol belong to? Or in other words: Is the intended meaning given by the author the only real meaning? When a sign becomes a community sign, up to the moment it is socialised, it ceases to belong to its creator. The interpreters of the sign will use it and will pour into it their own meaning.

    To sum up. Therepresentamenis a cross-like sign embodied in a circle and with arms outstretching downwards. Theinterpretantis ‘peace’. Thesemiotic objectis a very complex cognitive construct, adaptative and malleable across time, space and cultures. What does the concept of ‘peace’ really mean? For the anti-nuclear members of the DAC,‘peace’ could have meant the absence of nuclear threat. For a Budhist monk, ‘peace’could mean a balanced inner state of soul. For people subject to bullying, the cessation of different kinds of physical and psychological violence. For others, a welfare state based on social justice. And maybe the Japanese speakers and readers will fill the symbol with the value of theHeiwacharacter, and so coming close to Holtom’s first intuition: a man with outstretched arms.

    6. Conclusion

    Tools for human expression are the product of a grounded semiotic activity undertaken over time. We agree with Ray Jackendoff when he affirms20that the mind does not manufacture abstract concepts out of thin air. And we think that symbols are the seeds of speech, sown in the field of human cognition, with the expectation of the fruits of knowledge and wisdom.

    In the previous pages it has been demonstrated that a great many symbols have very remote origins and are the result of the work of the human species over centuries and even millennia. A scientific history of symbols would improve our knowledge of the human being, would help in tracing the birth of concepts, and would demonstrate the crosscultural condition of human thinking.

    Because of its traditionally conservative nature, the Chinese writing system is called to be one of the key pieces in the setting up of a history of symbols. In accordance with its historical relevance, the Chinese culture may offer clues to solve very crucial problems.

    Contemporary humanity has achieved a high degree of solidarity, and few minds could consider man “an erratic object in a disjointed world”21.That is why we propose to study those symbols that serve witness to the efforts made by our ancestors to build bridges between cultures. In doing so, perhaps we will be able to bring out new trends for future symbolic systems, and somehow forecast a little piece of the world that is to come. We have not given a response to the question stated in the introduction: Issemiosisthe consequence of evolution, or rather does it cause evolution? We are not yet in a position to answer, but we would like to close the previous reflexions with a sentence from John Deely:

    “Semiosis is at the heart of evolution throughout our universe from its beginning”(Deely, 2015, p. 84).

    Notes

    1 In this respect we endorse the thesis of Sir Julian Huxley when he says in his playEvolution in Action: “The same process of divergence followed by convergence occurred on the cultural level” (Huxley, 1953, p. 157).

    2 Per Aage Brandt synthesizes the distinction between icons, symbols, and indices in the following words: “All signs bind some signifier to some signified, that is, an expression (a content of possible perception) to a meaning (a content of conceptualization). Different types of signs then differ by the charter of the binding principle (the interpretant: the cognitive activity that ‘binds’ signifier and signified). The traditions describe these types in many ways, one of which, stemming from the American philosopher C. S. Peirce, distinguishes image-like signs (icons), non-image-like signs (symbols), and thing-like signs (indices)” (Brandt, 2015, p. 41).

    3 As far back as the 1940s, Manuel Gómez Moreno Martínez managed to decipher the Iberian writing system, and developed a detailed list of correspondences of the Iberian symbols withthe Roman letters.

    4 “The Danube script appeared in South-East Europe around 5,300 BC, some two thousand years earlier than any other known writing. It originally appeared in the central Balkan area and developed locally. It quickly spread to the Danube valley, southern Hungary, Macedonia, Transylvania, and northern Greece. It flourished up to 3,500 BC, when a social upheaval occurred: according to some, there was an invasion of new populations, whilst others hypothesise the merge of new elite” (Merlini, 2008, p. 235).

    5 Cf. Merlini, Marco (2004).La scrittura e nata in Europa?. Rome: Avverbi Editore.

    6 It is remarkable that there exists in France the so-calledGlozel Finds: relics of ancient human occupation, some of them dating back to the Neolithic Age. Glozel is a small village in central France where these relics were unearthed. However, they have been put under suspicion of being fake, which makes it difficult to use them to support any theory. Nevertheless, in our opinion, there are strong arguments in favour of their authenticity.

    7 It is worth highlighting the inscriptions of the dolmen of Alvao, about which Pedro Bosch-Gimpera pointed out: “Pero lo que presta a los hallazgos de estos dólmenes un interés grandísimo son unos signos que tienen todos los caracteres de un sistema de escritura. Aparecen unas veces aislados, otras en unión de figuras de animales y otras alineados en grandes grupos, de manera que permite hablar de verdaderas inscripciones” (Bosch-Gimpera, 1911, p. 315). It is to be noted as well a written stone found in Vila Pouca de Aguiar, a town in the North Portuguese region of Tras-os-Montes. It shows symbols that are clearly similar to those found in Glozel or in Areny. This engraved Stone is placed in theMuseu de Arqueologia e Numismática de Vila Real.

    8 In South-West Spain, the dolmenic culture of Huelva, in ancient Tartessos, offers examples of writing dated probably 5,000 or 6,000 BP, as has been noted by Ana Maria Vázquez Hoys (Vázquez Hoys, 2008). The so-called “dolmen de la Cúpula” and “dolmen de la Zarzilla”provide enlightening examples. In the South-East, in the Granada province, recent findings in several caves of the Sierra de Lújar (http://www.granadahoy.com/granada/Hallan-grabadosrupestres-Sierra-Lujar_0_1022897924.html) seem to confirm the widespread presence of an ancient symbolic system.

    9 From the northeast of Spain we could show two engraved stone slabs, photographed by Javier Terrado and reproduced herein.

    10 As professor Peng Fei states: “In China, engraved objects from Pleistocene contexts were rarely reported. Until now, the earliest engraved object is found in Xinglongdong cave, South China. This is an engraved ivory and the U-series dating is around 120-150 ka BP [16]. In North China, Pei [36] first found an engraved antler from Upper Cave of Zhoukoudian site. You [14] reported an engraved bone from the Shiyu site which is thought to be about 28-32 ka BP. Bednarik [15, 37] reported an engraved antler from Longgu cave which is about 13,065 ±270 a BP. But the nature of these artifacts is still debated and further analysis is needed [15, 17]. Hence, it is too early to determine whether the non-utilitarian objects are representative of a succession of behaviors or whether the evidence from China supports any particular scenario about the emergence of modern human behavior. In any case, it cannot be denied that in the Early Late Paleolithic of NW China, hominids in SDG1 had considerably evolved cognitive capacities or modern human behavior [38]” (Peng, 2012, p. 4598).

    11 See Gao Xing, et al. (2004). “120-150 ka human tooth and ivory engravings from Xinglongdong Cave, Three Gorges Region, South China”.

    12 The Shuingou little stone, dated 30,000 BP, has been considered evidence for symbolic activity of man in China. An image offered in the work of professor Peng Fei is here reproduced:“Cognition and symbolic thinking are viewed as important features of modern human behavior. Engraved objects are seen as a hallmark of cognition and symbolism, and even as evidence for language […]. Combining all these features, we suggest that the incisions were made by an intentional behavior and were probably of a non-utilitarian character. Because the nature of most other engraved objects in China is debatable, we cannot get a clear scenario of the emergence and progress of modern human behavior in North China. But we infer the possible existence of a counting or recording system, or other symbolic behaviors, which reflect considerably evolved cognitive capacities or modern human behavior in the Early Late Paleolithic of East Asia.”

    13 The figures below are intended to give a rough illustration of these ubiquitous symbols that we find everywhere in our daily life.

    Figure 8. Warning symbols. Hazard symbols.

    Figure 9. Information symbols. Weather symbols.

    Figure 10. Information symbols. Cartographic symbols.

    Figure 11. Information symbols combining verbal and nonverbal signs.

    Figure 12. Behavioural symbols. Traffic signs.

    Figure 13. Behavioural symbols. Suggestion symbols.

    Figure 14. Psychological symbols. Emojis.

    14 As an example we reproduce here the symbol for corrosive products in previous and present forms.

    15 The investigation was conducted by a group led by Pilar Utrilla of the University of Zaragoza. The result was published in 2009 in theJournal of Human Evolution,57(2), 99-111. We reproduce here a part of the abstract: “The engraving seems to reproduce the meandering course of a river crossing the upper part of side A of the block, joined by two tributaries near two mountains. One of these is identical to the mountain that can be seen from the cave, with herds of ibex depicted on its hillsides, on both sides of the gorge in front of which the cave of Abauntz is strategically located. In the southern part of the gorge, there is a completely flat area where the watercourses slow down, forming meanders and flooding in springtime. The following elements are also represented on the block: tangles of concentric strokes and bundles of lines forming very marked meanders. In short, all of these engravings could be a sketch or a simple map of the area around the cave. It could represent the plan for a coming hunt or perhaps a narrative story of one that had already happened”.

    16 It will be useful to visit the following website: http://www.prehistory.it/.

    17 From left to right, the second sample is taken from a scene of hunting of buffaloes in the region of Tassili n’Ajjer, in the Sahara Desert of Algeria. The third one comes from Kwa Zulu-Natal province, South Africa. The fourth one is a fragment of the paintings in the cave of Albocàsser in the province of Castelló, Spain.

    18 Professor Joan Coromines insisted in that our dictionaries had to be critical and etymological at the same time. And he is the author of the best historical dictionary of the Spanish Language written up to now:Diccionario Crítico Etimológio Castellano e Hispánico. Madrid: Gredos (1980-1991).

    19 In 1973 Holtom wrote to Hugh Brock, editor ofPeace Newsat the time when the anti-nuclear movement was created, in an attempt to allay doubts about the design decisions. See Joseph Peircy (2013).Symbols. A Universal Language. London: Michael O’Mara .

    20 “The mind does not manufacture abstract concepts out of thin air, either. It adapts machinery that is already available, both in the development of the individual organism and in theevolutionary development of the species” (Jackendoff, 1983, p. 118).

    21 Pierre Theilhard de Chardin highlights the fact that, in the course of evolution, man has discovered man and has developed the sense of being related to mankind, to life, and to the universe. See theForewordto the English edition ofLe phénomène humain, entitledThe Phenomenon of Man(Teilhard de Chardin, 1970, p. 34).

    Aitchison, J. (1996).The seeds of speech: Language origin and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Bednarik, R. G. (2010). An overview of Asian palaeoart of the Pleistocene. In Clottes, J. (dir.),L’art pléistocène dans le monde / Pleistocene art of the world / Arte pleistoceno en el mundo, Actes du Congrès IFRAO, Tarascon-sur-Ariège, septembre 2010, Symposium ? Art pléistocène en Asie ?. N° spécial de Préhistoire, Art et Sociétés, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Ariège-Pyrénées, LXV-LXVI, 2010-2011, CD: pp. 943-954.

    Bosch-Gimpera, P. (1913). El problema de la propagación de la escritura en Europa y los signos alfabéticos de los dólmenes de Alvao. In Real Academia Espa?ola (Ed.),Revista de Archivos, Bibliotecas y Museos(pp. 311-322). Madrid: Tipografía de la RABM.

    Brandt, P. A. (2015). What is culture—A grounding question for cognitive semiotics.Language and Semiotic Studies,1(2), 40-60.

    Deely, J. (2015). What semiotics is.Language and Semiotic Studies,1(1), 63-94.

    Ding, E.-S. (2015). Semiotics turning cross-cultural.Language and Semiotic Studies,1(3), 1-12.

    Ding, E.-S. (2015). Ubiquitous but arbitrary iconicity.Semiotica, (200), 119-135.

    Gao, X., Huang, W.-B., Xu Z.-Q., Ma Z.-B., & Olsen, J. W. (2004). 120-150 ka human tooth and ivory engravings from Xinglongdong Cave, Three Gorges Region, South China.Chinese Science Bulletin.49(2), 175-180.

    G?rdenfors, P. (2014).The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    G?rdenfors, P. (2015). Semantic transformations.Language and Semiotic Studies,1(1), 41-51.

    Huxley, J. (1953).Evolution in action. Madison: Harper.

    Jackendoff, R. (1983).Semantics and cognition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Kolsbun, K., & Sweeney, M. (2008).Peace. The biography of a symbol. Washington: National Geographic.

    Lazarovici, G., Lazarovici, C.-M., & Merlini, M. (2011).Tartaria and the sacred tablets. Cluj-Napoka: Editura Mega.

    Merlini, M. (2004).La scrittura e nata in Europa?Rome: Avverbi Editore.

    Merlini, M. (2005). Semiotic approach to the features of the ‘Danube Script’.Documenta Praehistorica,32, 233-251.

    Merrell, F. (2015). Framing signs involves more than mere words.Language and Semiotic Studies,1(3), 13-34.

    Peircy, J. (2013).Symbols. A universal language. London: Michael O’mara.

    Peng, Fei et al. (2012). An engraved artifact from Shuidongou, an Early Late Paleolithic Site inNorthwest China.Chinese Science Bulletin.57(35), 4594-4599.

    Sanchez Mazas, A. et al. (Eds.). (2008).Past human migrations in East Asia. Matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics. New York: Routledge.

    Saussure, F. de. (1916).Cours de Linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. (Ed., de Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye; Critical Ed., Tullio de Mauro, 1995)

    Sinclair, M. (2014).The untold story of the peace sign. (Published online on 10.02.2014 in https:// www.fastcodesign.com/3036540/the-untold-story-of-the-peace-sign)

    Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1955).Le phénomène humain. Paris: Seuil. (Published in English by Harper Collins, 1970,The Phenomenon of Manand by Sussex Press, 1999,The Human Phenomenon)

    Terrado, J. (2016). The role of abstraction in the evolution of semiotic systems.Language and Semiotic Studies,2(3), 36-47.

    Utrilla, P., & Mazo, C. (2011). Los cantos pintados de la cueva de Abauntz y algunas nuevas lecturas del bloque 1.Príncipe de Viana, (253), 23-41.

    Utrilla, P., Mazo, C., Sopena, M. C., Martínez-Bea, M., & Domingo, R. (2009). A palaeolithic map from 13,660 cal BP: Engraved stone blocks from the Late Magdalenian in Abauntz Cave (Navarra, Spain).Human Evolution Journal,9, 51-67.

    Utrilla, P., & Ramón, N. (1992). Hallazgos prehistóricos en la comarca de la Ribagorza (Huesca).Bolskan,9, 51-67.

    Vázquez-Hoys, A. M. (2008).Las golondrinas deTartessos:sobre el origen de la escritura. Córdoba: Almuzara.

    (Copy editing: Curtis Harrison)

    About the author

    Javier Terrado-Pablo (jterrado@filcef.udl.cat) is Full Professor at the University of Lleida (Spain) and holder of the Chair in Diachronic Linguistics. He worked for the linguist Joan Coromines on several historical dictionaries, mainly on one titledOnomasticon Cataloniae. He was the organiser of the masterThe Building of European Unionand has been the director for the last ten years of theHispanic Studies Diplomfor foreign students. His primary research areas areToponymy,Anthroponymy,Linguistic Studyof Documents, andSpeech Acts Analysis. He is now studying the birth of writing systems in Europe and all over the world.

    猜你喜歡
    和平
    和平之路
    必由之路
    和平萬歲
    青年歌聲(2020年9期)2020-09-27 07:57:12
    和平分手
    意林(2017年24期)2018-01-02 23:55:39
    和平之花綻放
    黃河之聲(2016年12期)2016-11-07 01:02:19
    博弈·和平
    特別文摘(2016年18期)2016-09-26 16:42:36
    和平的宣示
    太空探索(2015年10期)2015-07-18 10:59:20
    期盼和平
    珍惜脆弱的和平
    太空探索(2014年9期)2014-07-10 13:06:26
    和平
    小說月刊(2014年2期)2014-04-18 14:06:40
    久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产在线男女| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | av在线播放精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 床上黄色一级片| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 免费观看av网站的网址| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 成年版毛片免费区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 免费观看性生交大片5| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产在线男女| 国产精品无大码| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产av在哪里看| 综合色av麻豆| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 三级国产精品片| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 777米奇影视久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 91精品国产九色| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美3d第一页| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 69人妻影院| 一级av片app| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 免费看日本二区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 99热全是精品| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 精品一区二区三卡| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 有码 亚洲区| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 中文字幕久久专区| av在线蜜桃| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产成人aa在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 午夜福利在线在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 高清毛片免费看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 精品一区二区三卡| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 人妻系列 视频| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久久久久久久大av| 一本一本综合久久| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| a级毛色黄片| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 在线免费十八禁| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久久久网色| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 看黄色毛片网站| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产一级毛片在线| 1000部很黄的大片| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 777米奇影视久久| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 成人欧美大片| 国产精品一及| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产成人精品一,二区| av播播在线观看一区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 免费av观看视频| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产av码专区亚洲av| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 成人无遮挡网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 人妻一区二区av| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| ponron亚洲| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲成色77777| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 99热全是精品| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 尾随美女入室| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 又爽又黄a免费视频| av播播在线观看一区| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 免费av毛片视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 黄色配什么色好看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产乱来视频区| av.在线天堂| 国产av国产精品国产| 免费看不卡的av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 色视频www国产| 91久久精品电影网| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 99热这里只有精品一区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 国产成人aa在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲国产色片| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产永久视频网站| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 中国国产av一级| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 乱系列少妇在线播放| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 欧美性感艳星| 看黄色毛片网站| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 人妻系列 视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 成人无遮挡网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲av一区综合| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 午夜激情欧美在线| 久久精品人妻少妇| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 日本免费在线观看一区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲av.av天堂| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 一级av片app| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| ponron亚洲| 在现免费观看毛片| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 18+在线观看网站| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | av.在线天堂| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 大香蕉久久网| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | .国产精品久久| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| kizo精华| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 尾随美女入室| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影| av在线亚洲专区| 日韩强制内射视频| 91狼人影院| av在线天堂中文字幕| 免费av观看视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产乱人视频| 三级国产精品片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久人人爽人人片av| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产成人aa在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久精品夜色国产| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 青春草国产在线视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 99久国产av精品| 日韩中字成人| av线在线观看网站| 美女黄网站色视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 有码 亚洲区| 国产在线男女| 国产综合精华液| 日本熟妇午夜| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日本黄大片高清| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲综合色惰| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久久久久久久中文| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产在视频线精品| 91久久精品电影网| 久久久久性生活片| 深夜a级毛片| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 久久久成人免费电影| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产综合懂色| 床上黄色一级片| 在线播放无遮挡| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产av国产精品国产| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 两个人的视频大全免费| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 六月丁香七月| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久久久网色| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 麻豆成人av视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 国产永久视频网站| 美女高潮的动态| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲最大成人中文| 性色avwww在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 少妇熟女欧美另类| av免费观看日本| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 三级国产精品片| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产色婷婷99| 观看美女的网站| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 美女大奶头视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 日本黄大片高清| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产成人福利小说| 免费av观看视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲精品视频女| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 精品国产三级普通话版| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 色吧在线观看| 91狼人影院| 日本一二三区视频观看| 中文欧美无线码| 国产在视频线在精品| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产91av在线免费观看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲国产色片| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产三级在线视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 在线 av 中文字幕| 黄片wwwwww| 成人欧美大片| 久久午夜福利片| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产高潮美女av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产在视频线精品| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 午夜日本视频在线| 丝袜喷水一区| av在线播放精品| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 老女人水多毛片| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 天堂网av新在线| videossex国产|