• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Using receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the diagnostic value of the combination of multislice spiral CT and alpha-fetoprotein levels for small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients

    2017-06-19 17:22:12

    Harbin, China

    Using receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the diagnostic value of the combination of multislice spiral CT and alpha-fetoprotein levels for small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients

    Guang-Sheng Jia, Guang-Long Feng, Jin-Ping Li, Hai-Long Xu, Hui Wang, Yi-Peng Cheng, Lin-Lin Yan and Hui-Jie Jiang

    Harbin, China

    BACKGROUND: The various combination of multiphase enhancement multislice spiral CT (MSCT) makes the diagnosis of a small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) on the background of liver cirrhosis possible. This study was to explore whether the combination of MSCT enhancement scan and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level could increase the diagnostic efif ciency for sHCC.

    METHODS: This study included 35 sHCC patients and 52 cirrhotic patients without image evidence of HCC as a control group. The diagnoses were made by three radiologists employing a 5-point rating scale, with postoperative pathologic results as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the three MSCT combination modes (arterial phase+portal-venous phase, arterial phase+delayed phase, arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase) and AFP levels for sHCC on the background of liver cirrhosis.

    RESULTS: The area under ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and speci ficity of the combination of arterial phase+portalvenous phase+delayed phase were 0.93, 93%, and 82%, respectively. The average AUC of the arterial phase+portalvenous phase+delayed phase combination was signi ficantly greater than that of the arterial phase+portal-venous phase(AUC=0.84,P=0.01) and arterial phase+delayed phase (AUC=0.85,P=0.03). Arterial phase+portal-venous phase had a smaller AUC (0.84) than arterial phase+delayed phase (0.85), but the difference was insigni ficant (P=0.15). After combining MSCT enhancement scan with AFP, the AUC, sensitivity, and speci ficity were 0.95, 94%, and 83%, respectively, indicating a greatly increased diagnostic ef ficiency for sHCC.

    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of AFP and 3 phases MSCT enhancement scan could increase the diagnostic ef ficiency for sHCC on the background of liver cirrhosis. The application of ROC curve analysis has provided a new method and reference in HCC diagnosis.

    (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2017;16:303-309)

    hepatocellular carcinoma; receiver operating characteristic; multi-slice spiral CT; alpha-fetoprotein; delayed phase imaging

    Introduction

    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and has shown an increasing incidence in recent years.[1]Liver cirrhotic patients have a far higher risk of HCC than other populations.[2]Small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) refers to HCC measuring less than 3 cm for 1 nodule or 2 nodules together.[3]Early diagnosis of HCC is crucial to improving the prognostic effect of treatments. CT scanning is the primary method for HCC detection and diagnosis, in particular multislice spiral CT (MSCT), which plays an important role in sHCC diagnosis, differentialdiagnosis, and even HCC staging.[4,5]In recent years, some researchers[6-9]have started to focus on the diagnostic value of delayed phase imaging for sHCC. Takayasu et al[8]found that delayed phase imaging could improve diagnostic sensitivity for HCC (especially sHCC). Regarding HCC detection, CT enhancement imaging in the portal-venous phase is usually less sensitive than that in the arterial phase, because the majority of the blood supply of the hepatic parenchyma is through the portal vein. There is also hepatic parenchymal enhancement in the portal-venous phase; because hepatic parenchymal enhancement and tumor enhancement usually present similar densities, tumor detection rate is significantly reduced in the portal-venous phase. However, CT enhancement imaging in the portal-venous phase helps detect hypovascular liver tumors, such as liver metastasis from colorectal cancer, since hepatic parenchyma obtains the maximal level of enhancement in the portal-venous phase, resulting in a clear difference in the CT enhancement level from non-enhancement liver metastasis. In addition, portal-venous enhancement imaging helps identify some portal-venous complications, such as tumor thrombus. sHCCs are usually highly differentiated hypovascular tumors. Compared with large HCC or latestage HCC, sHCC has less arterial blood supply and no enhancement; thus, it does not have obvious enhancement in arterial phase imaging, resulting in a lower detection rate of sHCC in arterial phase than that in latestage HCC.

    HCC patients usually have relatively elevated alphafetoprotein (AFP) levels, while cirrhotic patients have lower AFP levels.[10]Although AFP level is commonly utilized as a biomarker for sHCC screening, its validity for sHCC diagnosis is still controversial. For instance, the study conducted by Sangiovanni et al found that only 38% of sHCC patients had elevated AFP levels.[2]AFP levels depend on tumor size; late-stage HCC patients have relatively high AFP levels.[11,12]In order to further determine the diagnostic value of AFP levels for sHCC, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve[13]analysis method has been adopted by many researchers. There are currently two types of studies; the first type independently evaluates the diagnostic value for sHCC by calculating sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, the area under ROC curve (AUC). In order to determine the value of AFP levels for diagnosis of sHCC on the background of liver cirrhosis, Sarwar et al[14]plotted the ROC curve and found that the AUC was 0.85 and the best diagnostic threshold of AFP was 20.85 ng/mL. They suggested that although the AFP method has a low sensitivity in sHCC diagnosis, it is still an effective tumor marker for sHCC screening. The second approach determines AFP’s contribution to sHCC diagnosis by comparing sHCC diagnosis indexes between AFP and other tumor markers. Jiang et al[15]performed ROC curve analysis to compare the HCC diagnosis contributions of AFP and AFP-IgM immunocomplex, and the best diagnostic thresholds were determined to be 10 μg/L and 300 AU/mL, respectively. They suggested that AFP has a certain value in sHCC diagnosis, and measuring it in combination with other tumor markers or imaging diagnostic methods would greatly improve the ability of sHCC diagnosis.

    There are so far no studies that have utilized the ROC curve approach to evaluate sHCC diagnosis efficiency by the combination of different MSCT enhancement phases and AFP levels. In this study, ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate three combinations of MSCT enhancement phases (arterial phase+portal-venous phase, arterial phase+delayed phase, arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase) through a 5-point rating scale, in combination with AFP levels, in order to evaluate the diagnostic value for sHCC in cirrhotic patients. This study aimed to provide new methods and references for evaluating the clinical value of different combinations of CT enhancement phases in HCC diagnosis.

    Methods

    General information

    The study group consisted of pathologically proved 47 sHCC in 35 patients in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between January 2013 and December 2014. The study group consisted of 21 men and 14 women, aged 45-80 years old with an average age of 62 years. The control group consisted of 52 cirrhotic patients (patients received an ultrasound examination once every 3 months; each examination was conducted by three experienced radiologists using a double blind method for comprehensive diagnosis, and cancer nodule was never observed), including 30 men and 22 women, aged 34-85 years old with an average age of 61 years. The AFP values of all patients were recorded.

    Instruments and methods

    Lightspeed 64 Slice spiral CT (GE, USA) was used to scan all patients. The scanning range was from the diaphragmatic dome to the lower edge of the liver; the patients were in a supine position for the upper abdomen scan; the tube voltage was 120 kV; effective tube current was 200-300 mA; thread pitch was 1.375:1; and the rotate speed was 0.6-0.8 s/r. As a contrast agent, 80-100 mL of iopromide (Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Germany) was injected through the cubital vein at a flow rate of 3-3.5 mL/s. Enhancement scans of the three phases were per-formed at 20-30 seconds, 50-60 seconds, and 2-3 minutes after contrast agent injection.

    Images analysis

    All CT images were uploaded to a workstation with all identification information removed, including patient’s name, age, gender, and hospital record number. These images were evaluated blindly and independently by three experienced radiologists. In order to more accurately evaluate the diagnostic values of the arterial phase, portal-venous phase, and delayed phase for sHCC, the radiologists applied combinations of arterial phase+portal-venous phase, arterial phase+delayed phase, and arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase for separate diagnoses, and the interval between any two diagnoses was set at 2 weeks. In other words, each radiologist needed to wait for 2 weeks after each diagnosis to make a 2nd diagnosis using another combination of CT images in the same patient. In order to ensure the objectivity and repeatability of the analyses in this study, distinguishing criteria for HCC, dysplastic nodules, arterioportal shunt and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) were developed. The criterion for HCC is nodules showing obvious homogeneous or heterogeneous enhancement and appearing hyper-dense compared to surrounding tissue in the arterial phase, iso- or hypo-dense in the portal-venous phase, and hypo-dense in the delayed phase.[16]Many well differentiated sHCCs share the similar enhancement pattern with dysplastic nodules, which is iso- or hypo-dense in the arterial and delayed phases and hypo-dense in the delayed phase.[17]These two types of nodules are generally distinguished by size: the diameter of dysplastic nodules is usually smaller than that of well differentiated sHCC, and 10 mm is the cut-off value; nodules larger than 10 mm are considered HCC, while smaller than 10 mm are considered dysplastic nodules.[18]Meanwhile, differential diagnosis needs to be performed for HCC nodules and arterioportal shunt, because these two usually present similar enhancement patterns: hyper-dense in the arterial phase, hyper- or iso-dense in the portal-venous phase, and iso-dense in the delayed phase. If a focus lesion manifests as a typical wedge shape with or without an internal linear branching structure, it is seen as an arterioportal shunt. If a lesion presents a round shape, it is presumed to be HCC;[19]however, the confidence level was set at 3 (might happen). Since FNH is a benign tumor that is usually confused with HCC, it is necessary to differentiate it from HCC. On contrastenhanced CT, FNH usually presents homogenous hyperenhancement in the arterial and portal-venous phases and iso-enhancement in the delayed phase. A common feature of FNH is its central scar which is visible on contrast-enhanced CT. Therefore, if it manifests the typical stellate scars at the central of the nodule and iso-dense in the delayed phase, the nodule is seen as an FNH. The radiologists used a 5-point rating scale for their diagnosis:“1” corresponds to a definite negative, “2” to a possible negative, “3” to a possible positive, “4” to a highly possible positive, and “5” to a definite positive diagnosis.[20]In order to calculate diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, results equal to or greater than 3 were considered sHCC, otherwise, the diagnosis was liver cirrhosis only. In order to confirm whether measuring AFP levels helps increase the diagnostic value of MSCT enhancement scan for sHCC, the radiologists were asked to re-assess with the 5-point rating scale based on a combination of AFP levels (a study[14]showed that the best diagnostic threshold of AFP for HCC on the background of liver cirrhosis was 20.85 ng/mL; the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 72.2% and 86.2%, respectively) and images of arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase. The 2nd review has to wait for at least 2 weeks after the 1st review. The same 5-point rating scale was used, and follow-up statistical analyses were also performed.

    Statistical analysis

    The detection rate is defined as the ratio of the total number of hyper-dense to hypo-dense foci found in a given MSCT phase. Data analysis was performed with SPSS 18.0 software. Pathological examination of the tumor tissue was employed as the gold standard. Based on the radiologists’ diagnoses and the patients’ pathological results, ROC curves were plotted for the diagnostic results (rescored based on AFP and 3-phase combination images) of MSCT images of arterial phase+portalvenous phase, arterial phase+delayed phase, and arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase, as well as 3-phase combination MSCT+AFP level. AUCs were obtained to evaluate the diagnostic value of different enhancement phase combinations for sHCC on the background of liver cirrhosis. Measurement data were analyzed through Wilcoxon signed-rank test; enumeration data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test; andP〈0.05 was considered statistically significant. The kappa statistic was utilized to assess the consistency of diagnostic results in a pair-wise manner; a kappa value 〈0.4 suggests poor consistency, a kappa value between 0.41 and 0.75 suggests good consistency, and a kappa value >0.75 suggests high consistency.[21]

    Results

    Enhancement patterns of sHCC

    The diameter of sHCC ranged between 7 and 20 mm,with an average of 14 mm. The enhancement patterns of sHCC are shown in Table 1. Through statistical analysis of enhancement patterns, it was found that sHCC usually appeared hyper-dense compared to surrounding tissue in the arterial phase (Fig. 1A), iso- or hypo-dense in the portal-venous phase (Fig. 1B), and hypo-dense in the delayed phase (Fig. 1C). Fisher’s exact test showed significant differences between the enhancement pattern of the arterial phase and that of the portal-venous phase and the delayed phase (bothP〈0.01), as well as a significant difference between the enhancement patterns of the portal-venous phase and the delayed phase (P〈0.01). The detection rates of the arterial, portal-venous and delayed phases were 83.0%, 61.7%, and 87.2%, respectively, with a significant difference in the detection rates of the three phases (P〈0.01). Moreover, the detection rates of the arterial and delayed phases were significantly higher than that of the portal-venous phase (P〈0.05;P〈0.01), and there was no significant difference between the detection rates of the arterial phase and the delayed phase (P=0.77).

    Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the 3 different phase combinations

    In this study, three radiologists participated in the sHCC diagnosis employing 3 phase combination modes of MSCT enhancement scan, while the kappa statistic was adopted to evaluate the diagnostic consistency between pairs of radiologists. The sHCC diagnostic results using any phase combination of MSCT enhancement scan were all highly consistent (kappa: 0.68-0.82). Arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase had the highest kappa value, and arterial phase+delayed phase had a slightly higher consistency than the combination of arterial phase+portal-venous phase (Table 2).

    In Table 3, the arterial phase+portal-venous phase+ delayed phase combination had the highest accuracy (87%), sensitivity (93%), and specificity (82%), and the average AUC was 0.93, significantly greater than that of the arterial phase+portal-venous phase (AUC=0.84,P=0.01) and arterial phase+delayed phase (AUC=0.85,P=0.03). Arterial phase+portal-venous phase had a smaller AUC (0.84) than arterial phase+delayed phase (0.85), but the difference was insignificant (P=0.15).

    In order to evaluate the overall diagnostic value of the 3 MSCT phase combinations (arterial phase+portal-venous phase, arterial phase+delayed phase, arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase) for sHCC on the background of liver cirrhosis, the three radiologists’ scores for each image set were averaged to plot ROC curves (Fig. 2), and the AUC values of arterial phase+portal-venous phase, arterial phase+delayed phase, and arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase were 0.88, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively, indicating that the 3-phase combination had the highest diagnostic accuracy, while the diagnostic accuracy of arterial phase+delayed phase was higher than that of arterial phase+portal-venous phase.

    Table 1. Enhancement pattern of 47 small hepatocellular carcinomas and detection rate

    Table 2. Kappa coefficient of three observers

    Table 3. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC of different phase combinations of MSCT and the combination of three MSCT phases and AFP

    Fig. 1. A 67-year-old male patient with small focus (arrow) on the right lobe of the liver with an approximate size of 15×18 mm. A: Obvious complete enhancement in the arterial phase, hyper-density; B: Iso-density in the portal-venous phase; C: Hypo-density in the delayed phase.

    Fig. 2. Comprehensive ROC curves for 3 combinations from 3 observers (scores from 3 observers were averaged for each combination).

    Fig. 3. ROC curves from 3 observers of the combination of MSCT enhancement scan 3-phase combination mode and AFP for sHCC diagnosis.

    The combination of MSCT enhancement with AFP improves the diagnostic accuracy of sHCC

    The average AFP level of patients in the sHCC group was 165.30 ng/mL, significantly higher than that of the control group (15.40 ng/mL,P〈0.01). The radiologists re-scored based on AFP values and MSCT enhancement scan 3-phase combination images. After ROC curve analysis; the obtained AUC values were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.97 (Fig. 3), all greater than the AUC values obtained using only MSCT enhancement scan 3-phase combination. The sHCC diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy based on both MSCT enhancement scan and AFP are shown in Table 3.

    Discussion

    Most sHCC cases have a “fast-in, fast-out” feature: in the arterial phase, tumors appear hyper-dense compared with surrounding hepatic parenchyma, which is the diagnostic basis of sHCC.[22]In the portal-venous phase, the degree of enhancement rapidly drops and the tumor appears iso- or hypo-dense. In the delayed phase, the enhancement degree keeps dropping and the tumor appears hypo-dense.[23,24]This is because most sHCC cases are hypervascular tumors; a great amount of portalvenous blood is supplied to the liver, resulting in peak values of the enhancement degree of hepatic parenchyma in the portal-venous phase. Because the hypervascular sHCC also presents a high enhancement state, the hepatic parenchyma and sHCC have similar densities, and thus some sHCC cases appear iso-dense in the portalvenous phase.[25]

    Comprehensive ROC curve analysis showed the AUC of arterial phase+portal-venous phase+delayed phase was greater than that of arterial phase+portal-venous phase, or arterial phase+delayed phase. These data indicated that the 3-phase combination for sHCC on the background of liver cirrhosis had the highest diagnostic accuracy. It was pointed out by Choi et al[26]that the diagnostic accuracy of arterial phase+portal-venous phase was not significantly different from that of the 3-phase combination, and the delayed phase had no diagnostic significance for sHCC. However, sHCC cases in Choi’ s study were all hypervascular nodules, whereas many sHCC cases in clinical practice are hypovascular. Arterial phase and portal-venous phase have poor diagnostic value for hypovascular sHCC cases, while the delayed phase plays an important role. MSCT 3-phase enhancement scan can detect the features of sHCC cases with different vascular types, and is favorable for early HCC diagnosis.[27]Combining images of arterial phase, portal-venous phase, and delayed phase not only increase diagnostic accuracy of sHCC, but also improve focal lesion detection rate.

    As a common HCC diagnostic method, MSCT multiphase enhancement scan has been frequently investigated by researchers, and selection of the best phase combination has become a research focus. Kim et al[28]compared the diagnostic values of dynamic enhancement CT 3-phase scan (arterial phase, portal-venous phase and delayed phase) and 4-phase scan (early arterial phase, arterial phase, portal-venous phase and delayed phase) for HCC, and found no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, AUC between 3-phase scan and 4-phase scan. They concluded that 4-phase enhancement scan does not improve diagnostic accuracy for HCC. Denecke et al[23]performed MSCT plain scans and 3-phase scans (arte-rial phase, portal-venous phase and venous phase), calculated and compared the detection rates of plain scan and different phases of enhancement scan, and found all nodules were visible in the arterial or portal-venous phases, and that the detections rates of the arterial phase and the portal-venous phase were both signi ficantly higher than that of the plain scan and the venous phase.

    Table 1 showed that the detection rate of the delayed phase (87.2%) was higher than that of the portal-venous phase (61.7%), indicating that the delayed phase played an important role in improving diagnostic accuracy for sHCC. This is consistent with the research finding of Iannaccone et al,[6]who compared the sensitivities and positive predictive values of MSCT enhancement images of different phase combinations in diagnosing sHCC on the background of liver cirrhosis, they found that the delayed phase could signi ficantly increase diagnostic sensitivity, presenting a supporting effect on CT dual-phase scan for HCC diagnosis. Lim et al[29]compared AUCs of the 3-phase combination and the arterial phase+portalvenous phase combination, and reached a similar conclusion: adding delayed phase imaging into dual-phase CT scan helps describe HCC features and improves diagnostic accuracy. Although adding delayed phase imaging will increase the patient’s exposure to radiation and add extra scanning time, it can improve detection rate and diagnostic accuracy for HCC, thus offsetting the cost of radiation exposure to some extent.

    While imaging examination has many advantages, AFP is a speci fic tumor marker for HCC and has an important value in early sHCC diagnosis.[10,30]In this study, the combination of AFP and MSCT enhancement scan for sHCC diagnosis had an AUC of 0.95, higher than that of the AUC of the MSCT 3-phase combination (0.93). Through ROC curve analysis, this study further confirmed the important role of the combination of MSCT enhancement scan and AFP in improving the diagnostic accuracy for sHCC.

    Although certain signi ficant results have been obtained, there are still some shortcomings in this study. First, although all patients in this study underwent the same 64-slice spiral CT scan, there have been some changes to the technology over time; since the examinations were performed at different times, there might have been an in fluence on sHCC detection. Second, parameters such as the dose and injection rate of contrast agent, and the scanning time of each phase were not customized, but were rather set as fixed values due to the limitations of clinical practice, which could also affect the results.

    In conclusion, the combination of arterial phase+ portal-venous phase+delayed phase and AFP is the most accurate approach for the diagnosis of sHCC on the background of liver cirrhosis, with the highest AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. Compared with the combination of arterial phase+portal-venous phase, the combination of arterial phase+delayed phase had greater AUC in sHCC diagnosis, indicating that the delayed phase has an important role in sHCC diagnosis that should not be overlooked.

    Contributors:JHJ proposed the study. JGS, FGL, LJP and XHL performed the research and wrote the first draft. WH, CYP and YLL collected and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the design and interpretation of the study and to further drafts. JHJ is the guarantor.

    Funding:This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81301275, 81471736 and 81671760), the National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan Period (2015BAI01B09), and Heilongjiang Province Foundation for Returness (LC2013C38).

    Ethical approval:This study was approved by the institutional review board of Harbin Medical University.

    Competing interest:No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

    1 Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69-90.

    2 Sangiovanni A, Del Ninno E, Fasani P, De Fazio C, Ronchi G, Romeo R, et al. Increased survival of cirrhotic patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma detected during surveillance. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1005-1014.

    3 Hernandez-Gea V, Turon F, Berzigotti A, Villanueva A. Management of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: focus on portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:1193-1199.

    4 Hennedige T, Venkatesh SK. Advances in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:205-220.

    5 Hennedige T, Venkatesh SK. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, staging and treatment monitoring. Cancer Imaging 2013;12:530-547.

    6 Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Rossi P, Mangiapane F, Murakami T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: role of unenhanced and delayed phase multi-detector row helical CT in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 2005;234:460-467.

    7 Lin YY, Chen CM, Huang YH, Lin CY, Chu SY, Hsu MY, et al. Liver metastasis from hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma: Dynamic computed tomography findings. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:13524-13531.

    8 Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y, Mizuguchi Y, Ojima H. CT Imaging of early hepatocellular carcinoma and the natural outcome of hypoattenuating nodular lesions in chronic liver disease. Oncology 2007;72:83-91.

    9 Furlan A, Marin D, Vanzulli A, Patera GP, Ronzoni A, Midiri M, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients at multi-detector CT: hepatic venous phase versus delayed phase for the detection of tumour washout. Br J Radiol 2011;84:403-412.

    10 Bertino G, Neri S, Bruno CM, Ardiri AM, Calvagno GS, Malaguarnera M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of alpha-fetoprotein, des-γ-carboxy prothrombin and squamous cell carcinoma antigen immunoglobulin M complexes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Minerva Med 2011;102:363-371.

    11 Li T, Qin LX, Gong X, Zhou J, Sun HC, Qiu SJ, et al. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen-negative and hepatitis C virus antibody-negative hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical characteristics, outcome, and risk factors for early and late intrahepatic recurrence after resection. Cancer 2013;119:126-135.

    12 Tandon P, Garcia-Tsao G. Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies. Liver Int 2009;29:502-510.

    13 Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med 2013;4:627-635.

    14 Sarwar S, Khan AA, Tarique S. Validity of alpha fetoprotein for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2014;24:18-22.

    15 Jiang J, Wu C, Shen Y, Xu B, Zheng X, Li X, et al. Clinical application of determining serum AFP-IgM complexes for diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2011;31:687-691.

    16 Tang A, Cruite I, Sirlin CB. Toward a standardized system for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis using computed tomography and MRI. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;7:269-279.

    17 Choi BI, Han JK, Hong SH, Kim TK, Song CS, Kim KW, et al. Dysplastic nodules of the liver: imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 1999;24:250-257.

    18 Jang HJ, Lim JH, Lee SJ, Park CK, Park HS, Do YS. Hepatocellular carcinoma: are combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography in addition to triple-phase helical CT all necessary for preoperative evaluation? Radiology 2000;215:373-380.

    19 Wei XB, Xu J, Li N, Yu Y, Shi J, Guo WX, et al. The role of three-dimensional imaging in optimizing diagnosis, classification and surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. HPB (Oxford) 2016;18:287-295.

    20 Sofue K, Tsurusaki M, Kawasaki R, Fujii M, Sugimura K. Evaluation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver: comparison of different concentrations of contrast material with multi-detector row helical CT--a prospective randomized study. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:e237-242.

    21 McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22:276-282.

    22 Marrero JA, Hussain HK, Nghiem HV, Umar R, Fontana RJ, Lok AS. Improving the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with an arterially-enhancing liver mass. Liver Transpl 2005;11:281-289.

    23 Denecke T, Grieser C, Fr?ling V, Steffen IG, Rudolph B, Stelter L, et al. Multislice computed tomography using a triple-phase contrast protocol for preoperative assessment of hepatic tumor load in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2009;22:395-402.

    24 Haberman D, Mela M, Martínez A, Mancinelli A, Laguens R, Gruz F, et al. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis evaluated for liver transplantation. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2011;41:190-198.

    25 Cartier V, Aubé C. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014;95:709-719.

    26 Choi BI, Lee HJ, Han JK, Choi DS, Seo JB, Han MC. Detection of hypervascular nodular hepatocellular carcinomas: value of triphasic helical CT compared with iodized-oil CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:219-224.

    27 Koh TS, Thng CH, Hartono S, Lee PS, Choo SP, Poon DY, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: feasibility of a prolonged dual-phase imaging protocol with tracer kinetics modeling. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1184-1196.

    28 Kim SK, Lim JH, Lee WJ, Kim SH, Choi D, Lee SJ, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of dynamic three-phase computed tomography images and four-phase computed tomography images using multidetector row helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:691-698.

    29 Lim JH, Choi D, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Lee WJ, Lim HK, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of adding delayed phase imaging to dual-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:67-73.

    30 Asrih M, Lenglet S, Mach F, Montecucco F. Alpha-fetoprotein: a controversial prognostic biomarker for small hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:328-330.

    April 17, 2016

    Accepted after revision December 7, 2016

    Author Affiliations: Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China (Jia GS, Feng GL, Li JP, Xu HL, Wang H, Cheng YP, Yan LL and Jiang HJ)

    Hui-Jie Jiang, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China (Tel: +86-451-86605576; Email: jhjemail@163.com)

    ? 2017, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. All rights reserved.

    10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60018-3

    Published online May 18, 2017.

    女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 性色avwww在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 99热只有精品国产| 日韩中字成人| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 日本一二三区视频观看| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产精品一及| 久久99热这里只有精品18| www日本黄色视频网| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 免费观看精品视频网站| 精品久久久久久成人av| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 长腿黑丝高跟| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 欧美日韩黄片免| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 小说图片视频综合网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 简卡轻食公司| 很黄的视频免费| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久九九热精品免费| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 午夜精品在线福利| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 身体一侧抽搐| 日韩免费av在线播放| 97碰自拍视频| 国产精品影院久久| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 免费av毛片视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 亚州av有码| 久久香蕉精品热| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 99久国产av精品| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 少妇的逼水好多| 赤兔流量卡办理| 91狼人影院| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久香蕉精品热| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 免费观看人在逋| av视频在线观看入口| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| a在线观看视频网站| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 校园春色视频在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 简卡轻食公司| 色av中文字幕| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 91狼人影院| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 国产不卡一卡二| 免费高清视频大片| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 1024手机看黄色片| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 美女高潮的动态| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日本成人三级电影网站| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 色哟哟·www| 综合色av麻豆| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 亚洲最大成人中文| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 波多野结衣高清作品| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲最大成人中文| 日韩免费av在线播放| 久久久成人免费电影| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| eeuss影院久久| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产三级在线视频| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| av在线天堂中文字幕| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 成人欧美大片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲av成人av| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 免费av不卡在线播放| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲五月天丁香| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产精品一及| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 日本黄色片子视频| av专区在线播放| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲国产色片| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲av一区综合| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产在线男女| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 性欧美人与动物交配| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久亚洲真实| 91av网一区二区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲av美国av| 久久久色成人| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久香蕉精品热| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 一夜夜www| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美午夜高清在线| 嫩草影院入口| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 午夜久久久久精精品| 黄色日韩在线| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| netflix在线观看网站| av天堂在线播放| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 热99re8久久精品国产| 怎么达到女性高潮| 欧美日韩黄片免| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲综合色惰| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| av在线天堂中文字幕| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 香蕉av资源在线| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久6这里有精品| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| avwww免费| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| h日本视频在线播放| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产三级中文精品| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | www日本黄色视频网| 国产精品久久视频播放| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 丁香六月欧美| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 日韩高清综合在线| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 久久6这里有精品| 男女那种视频在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 丁香欧美五月| 亚洲国产色片| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 精品久久久久久,| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 少妇丰满av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 欧美日韩黄片免| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲第一电影网av| av天堂在线播放| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久午夜福利片| 看黄色毛片网站| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 一本综合久久免费| 免费av毛片视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 看免费av毛片| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 一级黄色大片毛片| 有码 亚洲区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 内射极品少妇av片p| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 免费av不卡在线播放| 日本免费a在线| 国产精品野战在线观看| www.色视频.com| 色视频www国产| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产探花极品一区二区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 九色国产91popny在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 1024手机看黄色片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| av在线观看视频网站免费| 久久久色成人| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 老女人水多毛片| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 一本一本综合久久| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 九色成人免费人妻av| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 直男gayav资源| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| www.999成人在线观看| 级片在线观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 欧美激情在线99| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 中文资源天堂在线| 色哟哟·www| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久精品影院6| 日日夜夜操网爽| 色哟哟·www| 中文字幕久久专区| 99热只有精品国产| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 草草在线视频免费看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 午夜a级毛片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久久久性生活片| 国产三级中文精品| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日本黄色片子视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 直男gayav资源| 色吧在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 窝窝影院91人妻| 综合色av麻豆| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| av福利片在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 午夜两性在线视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美日韩黄片免| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 此物有八面人人有两片| xxxwww97欧美| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 午夜福利免费观看在线| netflix在线观看网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲av熟女| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久久久九九精品影院| 1000部很黄的大片| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 午夜福利在线观看吧| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 91狼人影院| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 久99久视频精品免费| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 |