甘默爾赫勒魯普體育館，赫勒魯普，丹麥

建筑設(shè)計(jì)：BIG建筑事務(wù)所

甘默爾赫勒魯普體育館，赫勒魯普，丹麥

建筑設(shè)計(jì)：BIG建筑事務(wù)所

甘默爾赫勒魯普高中坐落在哥本哈根的北部，最新的1100m2多功能雙層場(chǎng)館為現(xiàn)有學(xué)生開展社交和創(chuàng)造性活動(dòng)提供了寬敞的空間，同時(shí)也提高了該校的承載力以迎合其日益增長(zhǎng)的人氣。

原先一棟與校園相鄰的建筑使體育設(shè)施得不到充分利用。甘默爾赫勒魯普高中缺少一處供學(xué)生舉行體育活動(dòng)、畢業(yè)典禮和社交聚會(huì)的大型多功能空間。因此，BIG事務(wù)所為學(xué)生設(shè)計(jì)了一座多功能場(chǎng)館供體育教育和社交發(fā)展之用，取材于拋手球的物理現(xiàn)象畫出其標(biāo)志性的曲線設(shè)計(jì)。該館位于學(xué)校的庭院地下5m（16.5英尺）深之處，從而得以被動(dòng)控溫，不影響周邊環(huán)境。地面之上，場(chǎng)館柔和的曲線屋頂可作為日常的聚會(huì)場(chǎng)所。屋頂邊緣被設(shè)計(jì)成整段的社交長(zhǎng)凳，以小型窗戶貫穿為地下提供自然采光。屋頂?shù)男螤罨趶椀阑【€公式進(jìn)行設(shè)計(jì)。

該校在場(chǎng)館的建造期間規(guī)劃了一棟新建筑，坐落在多功能場(chǎng)館和鄰近的足球場(chǎng)之間。這棟新的藝術(shù)大樓將運(yùn)動(dòng)區(qū)和體育館現(xiàn)有的教育設(shè)施連成一體。新大樓的部分區(qū)域被置于足球場(chǎng)下方，使學(xué)生可以穿過學(xué)校庭院中央的下沉式體育館前往教室、食堂，從街面的主入口穿出。另外，地下的新設(shè)施構(gòu)成了新藝術(shù)大樓的屋頂，將足球場(chǎng)延伸至綠色草坪以用于進(jìn)行日?；顒?dòng)和觀看未來體育賽事的休閑坐席。

多功能場(chǎng)館的施工材料和涂飾經(jīng)反向整合，體育館由混凝土墻上下夾木制表面構(gòu)成，而教室則相反——由木墻上下夾混凝土表面構(gòu)成。材料的連續(xù)和重復(fù)使用為學(xué)校創(chuàng)造出連貫的視覺形象。（王單單 譯）

1 體育館屋頂外景/Exterior view, gymnasium roof

2 鳥瞰/Aerial view

3 分析圖/Diagrams ?BIG

4 體育館屋頂夜景/Night view, gymnasium roof

The 1100m2multi-purpose hall and the latest two-level addition to Gammel Hellerup High School just north of Copenhagen, provides existing students with generous spaces for social and creative unfolding, while increasing the capacity of the school in response to its growing popularity.

Originally a building adjacent to the campus, the gymnasium facilities became insufficient; Gammel Hellerup High School lacked a large multifunctional space for physical activities, graduation ceremonies and social gatherings. In response, BIG designed a multi-purpose hall for the physical education and social development of the students, drawing its signature curve from the physics of a handball being thrown. Placed 16.5 feet (5 meters) below ground in the school's courtyard, the hall is passively temperature controlled and does not impose on its context. Above ground, the hall’s softly curved roof is an informal meeting place. The edge of the roof is designed as a long social bench, perforated with small windows to provide natural daylighting below. The shape of the roof is based on the formula for a ballistic arc. Form follows formula!

During the construction of the hall, the school planned a new building, located between the school's multi-purpose hall and adjacent football fields. This new arts building seeks to connect the sports areas with the gymnasium's existing educational facilities in one continuous flow. By placing parts of the new building beneath the football fields, the students are able to walk through the sunken sports hall at the center of the school's courtyard, to the classrooms, cafeteria, and out to the main entrance at street level. Additionally, the new facilities situated underground form the roof of the new arts building, extending the football fields into a green carpet for informal activities and to serve as an informal place overlooking future sporting events.

Construction materials and finishes known from the multi-purpose hall are integrated in reverse –where the sports hall is a sandwich of wood above and below with walls of concrete, the classrooms are the opposite – wooden walls spanning between concrete surfaces above and below. The continuity and repetition of the materials creates a coherent visual identity for the school.

項(xiàng)目信息/Credits and Data

客戶/Client: 甘默爾赫勒魯普高中/Gammel Hellerup High School

合作/Collaborators: BIG IDEAS, EKJ, CG Jensen, Jens Lindhe, Midconsult I Herning, Bent Nygaard S?rensen, Grontmij

主管合伙人/Partners in Charge: Bjarke Ingels, Finn N?rkj?r項(xiàng)目負(fù)責(zé)人/Project Leaders: 多功能場(chǎng)館及體育館/Multi-Use Hall & Gymnasium: Ole Schr?der, Ole Elkj?r-Larsen, Frederik Lyng

團(tuán)隊(duì)/Team: 多功能場(chǎng)館及體育館/Multi-Use Hall & Gymnasium: Ana Merino, Anders Hjortn?s, Christian Alvarez, Dennis Rasmussen, Gül Ertekin, Henrick Poulsen, Hjalti Gestsson, Jan Magasanik, Jakob Lange, Jacob Thomsen, Jeppe Ecklon, Ji-young Yoon, Michael Sch?nemann, Narisara Schr?der, Riccardo Mariano, Rune Hansen, Snorre Nash,Thomas Juul-Jensen, Vincent He, Xu Li

項(xiàng)目經(jīng)理/Project Manager: 總體規(guī)劃及教學(xué)樓/Master Plan & Education Building: Ole Elkj?r-Larsen

項(xiàng)目負(fù)責(zé)人/Project Leader: 總體規(guī)劃及教學(xué)樓/Master Plan & Education Building: Tobias Hjortdal

團(tuán)隊(duì)/Team: 總體規(guī)劃及教學(xué)樓/Master Plan & Education Building: Agnete Jukneviciute, Ambra Chiesa, Brigitta Gulyás, Dennis Rasmussen, Enea Michelesio, Greta Krenciute, H?gni Laksáfoss, Isabella Eriksson, Jan Magasanik, Mikkel Marcker Stubgaard, Jeppe Ecklon, Kamilla Heskje, Michael Sch?nemann, Narisara Schr?der,Thomas Juul-Jensen

項(xiàng)目負(fù)責(zé)人/Project Leader: 景觀/Landscape: Ole Elkj?r-Larsen團(tuán)隊(duì)/Team: 景觀/Landscape: Brigitta Gulyás, Enea Michelesio, Jakob Lange, Mikkel Marcker Stubgaard, Narisara Schr?der, Tobias Hjortdal

攝影/Photos: Rasmus Hjortshoj, Iwan Baan, Jens Lindhe

5 體育館屋頂外景/Exterior view, gymnasium roof

6.7 剖面/Sections ?BIG

8.9 體育館內(nèi)景/Interior views, gymnasium

10 體育館屋頂邊緣長(zhǎng)凳/A long bench at the edge of the gymnasium roof

11 體育館街面主入口/Main entrance of the gymnasium at street level

評(píng)論

陳屹峰：BIG建筑事務(wù)所在設(shè)計(jì)中把“多功能”這個(gè)意圖貫徹得淋漓盡致。體育館的主體做下沉處理，因而可以堂而皇之地坐落在學(xué)校的主庭院內(nèi)，除了室內(nèi)空間的物盡其用外，它在地下把學(xué)校的既有建筑連成一個(gè)整體。體育館拱起的屋面露出地面，成為主庭院內(nèi)的核心景觀，同時(shí)又是師生的交往和非正式集會(huì)場(chǎng)所。體育館西側(cè)的藝術(shù)樓的設(shè)計(jì)也遵循了同樣的思路，建筑朝著足球場(chǎng)單側(cè)下沉，球場(chǎng)順其自然斜向上延伸至藝術(shù)樓的屋頂，延伸部分用作活動(dòng)場(chǎng)和看臺(tái)。而藝術(shù)樓朝向主庭院的一側(cè)不下沉，主庭院空間得以維持，但又能與足球場(chǎng)遙相呼應(yīng)。在這個(gè)項(xiàng)目中，建筑師的視野并不囿于建筑自身，可謂非常積極。這種姿態(tài)使得兩幢新建筑的介入，激活了整個(gè)校園。

Comments

CHEN Yifeng: BIG presents the concept of "multi-functionality" clearly and vividly in this design. The main body of the sunken gymnasium has a stately and powerful presence in the prime courtyard. Besides fully using its interior space, it links the existing buildings on campus, uniting them into one whole under the ground. Meanwhile, the arched roofline of the gymnasium comes to the surface, becoming the center of attention in the prime courtyard and also a place for interaction and social gathering of students and faculty. The design of the Arts building on the west of the gymnasium follows the same pattern: the building sinks into the ground on the side next to the football field; the football field extends upward all the way to the roof of the Arts building, and the extended part is used as activity and audience area. The side of the Arts building facing the prime courtyard is level with the ground to maintain the space of the courtyard, but at the same time, it echoes the football field in a distance. In this project, the view of the architect is not restricted to architecture itself, which can be seen as very positive. With such a gesture, the presence of the two buildings activates the whole campus.

青鋒： BIG建筑事務(wù)所采用了與貝聿銘設(shè)計(jì)盧浮宮加建時(shí)相同的策略，將主要的體量壓到了地面以下。甚至是體育館屋頂?shù)纳角鸲甲屓讼肫鸨R浮宮廣場(chǎng)上的金字塔。這個(gè)設(shè)計(jì)再一次提醒我們修正古典的三段式理念，地面、樓面、頂面等元素并不一定要與場(chǎng)地的地理?xiàng)l件一一對(duì)應(yīng)。近年來日益興起的折板設(shè)計(jì)就起源于對(duì)傳統(tǒng)層級(jí)觀念的動(dòng)搖，BIG建筑事務(wù)所的設(shè)計(jì)仍然是這種手段并未窮盡的潛能的再次展現(xiàn)。重要的是，沒有任何實(shí)質(zhì)性的障礙組織這一設(shè)計(jì)策略在更多的地方實(shí)施，尤其是學(xué)校這種需要大量可擴(kuò)展空間的地方。在未來出現(xiàn)更多的“盧浮宮”式作品應(yīng)該是順理成章的。

QING Feng: BIG chose a similar approach as I. M. Pei in his Louvre project – to push the main volume down into the ground. Even the hillock in the courtyard reminds us of the glass pyramid. This design calls for a revision of the classical 3-part structure of architecture, with ground, floor and roof no longer corresponding to the geological characteristics of the site. The increasingly popular use of folded(-plate) structures just comes from such revision. The project once again demonstrates the endless potential inherent in folded design. Most importantly, this design can be applied to many projects with similar problems – to satisfy the constantly increasing demand for space. We will definitely not be surprised to see more Louvre-like structures emerging in public school projects in the future.

Gammel Hellerup Gymnasium, Hellerup, Denmark, 2015

Architects: BIG

13 教學(xué)樓走廊/Education Building hallway

14 運(yùn)動(dòng)場(chǎng)下沉入口/Sports Field Sunken entrance

15 教學(xué)樓走廊/Education Building hallway