• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Optimal terminal guidance for exoatmospheric interception

    2016-11-24 00:49:02YuWenbinChenWanchunYangLiangLiuXiaomingZhouHao
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS 2016年4期

    Yu Wenbin,Chen Wanchun,Yang Liang,Liu Xiaoming,Zhou Hao

    School of Astronautics,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China

    Optimal terminal guidance for exoatmospheric interception

    Yu Wenbin,Chen Wanchun,Yang Liang*,Liu Xiaoming,Zhou Hao

    School of Astronautics,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China

    In this study,two optimal terminal guidance(OTG)laws,one of which takes into account the final velocity vector constraint,are developed for exoatmospheric interception using optimal control theory.In exoatmospheric interception,because the proposed guidance laws givefull consideration to the effect of gravity,they consume much less fuel than the traditional guidance laws while requiring a light computational load.In the development of the guidance laws,a unified optimal guidance problem is put forward,where the final velocity vector constraint can be considered or neglected by properly adjusting a parameter in the cost function.To make this problem analytically solvable,a linear model is used to approximate the gravity difference,the difference of the gravitational accelerations of the target and interceptor.Additionally,an example is provided to show that some achievements of this study can be used to significantly improve thefuel efficiency of the pulsed guidance employed by the interceptor whose divert thrust level is fixed.

    1.Introduction

    As the maximum speed of intercontinental ballistic missile(ICBM)is greater than 7 km/s and sometimes its apogee altitude can be up to 2000 km,currently only the ground-based midcourse defense(GMD)system equipped with groundbased interceptor(GBI)missile has the capability of intercepting ICBM.Theflight of GBI generally has three phases:boost,coast,and terminal guidance phases.After launch,the booster tries to put its warhead,which is commonly called kinetic kill vehicle(KKV)and destroys its intended target by direct collision,on a collision course,which means that if the KKV and target are only governed by gravity,the KKV can just hit the target directly.After the booster is turned of f,the KKV is separated from the booster and enters the coast phase in which the KKV flies to the predicted intercept point(PIP)without control.When the distance between the KKV and target reduces to a specified value,the terminal guidance phase begins.At this phase,the KKV uses the divert thrusters to per form lateral maneuvers in order to eliminate the PIP error.When these thrusters work,they consume much fuel.There fore,one main concern of designing the terminal guidance law is to minimize the maneuvering energy so as to savefuel.Additionally,sometimes it is desired that the KKV collides head-on with the target to increase the chances of success.There fore,the paper is aimed at designing two fuel-saving terminal guidance laws for exoatmospheric interception,one of which further considers thefinal velocity vector constraint.

    The most widely used guidance law is proportional navigation(PN)because of its simplicity,effectiveness,and ease of implementation.1Yuan first put forward the basic principle of PN:2if the interceptor turns at a rate proportional to that of the line of sight(LOS),the interceptor can successfully hit the target travelling in uniform linear motion,and the angular velocity of the LOS will become zero finally.Adler extended PN to a 3D one using the tool of solid geometry.3Bryson and Ho demonstrated the optimality of PN.4Zarchan evaluated the performance of PN thoroughly and deeply.1In Refs.5–11,the variants of PN and their closed form solutions were presented.Graber developed the so-called augmented proportional navigation(APN)by adding an extra term to PN to account for the constant maneuvering acceleration of target.12In Ref.13,the guidance law considering the response lags was presented.Turetsky and Shinar proposed the guidance laws based on pursuit-evasion game formulations.14Ge et al.developed a head-pursuit guidance law for 3D hypervelocity interception using Lyapunov stability theory.15

    For some special missions,the guidance laws capable of shaping trajectory are needed.These guidance laws are collectively referred to as trajectory shaping guidance(TSG).Cherry proposed a simple and effective TSG,called explicit guidance(E Guidance), for the first time by assuming that the commanded acceleration is a polynomial function of time.16E Guidance can be treated as an extension of PN because its expression consists of two terms:one is PN used to steer missile to destination,the other is used to control the final velocity vector.Ohlmeyer and Phillips obtained a series of the E Guidance coefficients by solving an optimal control problem with time-to-go weighted cost function.17Yu and Chen obtained the generalized closed form solutions of E Guidance where the closing speed can be an arbitrary positivefunction of time.18Further,by analyzing these generalized solutions,the stability domain of the guidance coefficients was obtained,in which E Guidance is stable and the commanded accelerations tend to be zero finally.Wang et al.improved E Guidance by considering the constant maneuvering acceleration of target.19In Refs.20–24,other types of TSG were presented.Yu and Chen proposed a novel guidance law for guiding missile against a maneuvering target while satisfying a circular no-fly-zone constraint.7In this guidance law,the real space is distorted such that the boundary of the no fly zone becomes a straight line,and then PN is used to steer the missile to the virtual target in the distorted space.

    The widely-used terminal guidance laws for exoatmospheric interception are PN,APN,and predictive guidance(PG).Here,PG1is a guidance law that conducts the trajectory simulation once in each guidance cycle to predict the zero-effort miss(ZEM),and then uses the predicted ZEM to generate acceleration command.Zarchan evaluated their performance.1Simulation results show that PG consumes the least fuel because PG uses the accurate gravity model,but requires the heaviest computational load due to the real-time onboard trajectory simulations.PN and APN cause the interceptor to per form unnecessary maneuvers even if the interceptor has already been on a collision course.This is because they use the inaccurate gravity models:PN implies that the gravity difference is zero,whereas APN assumes that the gravity difference is constant.Simulation results show that the amount of the wasted fuel of APN is about half that of PN.

    In this paper,two optimal terminal guidance(OTG)laws are developed for exoatmospheric interception using the optimal control theory:one considers the final velocity vector constraint,whereas the other does not consider it.Because the developed guidance laws evaluate the effect of gravity more accurately and need not conduct any onboard trajectory simulation,they almost consume as littlefuel as PG while having a light computational load.In the development of the OTG laws,a unified optimal guidance problem is put forward,of which the developed guidance laws are the two special solutions.Because the real gravity is a complex nonlinear function of position,it is impossible to obtain the exact analytical solutions of the problem.However,by observing the simulation trials,it can befound that the gravity difference almost varies linearly with time.There fore,the problem is made analytically solvable by the innovative use of a linear gravity difference model.Additionally,as the angular velocity of LOS can be measured by seeker directly,the OTG laws are re formulated in terms of the angular velocity of LOS using a novel 3D trans formation method based on vector operations,which considers the effect of gravity difference.

    To implement the OTG laws,the position in formation is needed.However,the onboard infrared seeker can only provide the LOS orientation in formation and has a limited detection distance.Thus,in practice,the in formation on the states of motion is mainly provided by the external detection system such as X-band radar.When the interceptor gets close enough to the target,the infrared seeker becomes activated,and the data detected by the infrared seeker and external detection system arefused by Kalman filter to improve the accuracy of data.

    It should be mentioned that some kinds of KKV cannot be throttled.For these KKVs,every time the thruster is turned on,the thrust will reach a fixed level and cannot be adjusted.In such a case,the pulsed guidance laws1,25,26are commonly employed,which use the predicted ZEM to determine the duration time of thrust.However,these guidance laws neglect the effect of gravity when predicting the ZEM.There fore,they will also result in a great waste of fuel in the long-range exoatmospheric interception.In fact,the formula of predicting ZEM proposed in this paper can be applied to the pulsed guidance laws.In Section 6.3,an example is given to demonstrate that this can significantly improve the fuel efficiency of the pulsed guidance laws.

    2.Equations of motion

    Fig.1 depicts the 3D engagement geometry outside the atmosphere of Earth.In this figure,the center of Earth is assumed to be stationary in the inertial space.An inertial frame of reference with origin at the center of Earth is created and called frame FE.As the engagement is outside the atmosphere,the interceptor missile uses the divert thrusters to per form lateral maneuvers where the thrust acceleration vector is denoted as aM= [aMx,aMy,aMz]T.The target is only governed by gravity and thus flies ballistically.In frame FE,the position vectors of the interceptor missile and targetare denoted as XM= [xM,yM,zM]Tand XT= [xT,yT,zT]Trespectively,their velocity vectors are denoted as VM= [VMx,VMy,VMz]Tand VT= [VTx,VTy,VTz]Trespectively,and their gravitational acceleration vectors are denoted as gMand gTrespectively.

    Fig.1 Exoatmospheric interception geometry.

    The equations of motion are

    where μ is a constant of about 3.96272 × 1014m3/s2,and the symbol‘|·|”means the Euclidean norm of vector.

    3.Optimal guidance problem

    To develop the fuel-efficient guidance laws for exoatmospheric interception,the optimal guidance problem is posed where the cost function is

    Here,k is a constant.tfrepresents the end time or flight time and will be discussed in detail in Section 5.tgo=tf-t is the time to go.XTM=XT-XMand VTM=VT-VMare the position and velocity vectors of the target relative to the missile,respectively.XTMfis the final value of XTM,and Eq.(9)makes the missile collide with the target.VTMfis the final value of VTM.is the desired value of VTMf.gTM=gT-gMis the gravity difference.

    The cost function is designed with specific purposes.The first term on the right side of Eq.(6)is proposed for achieving the desired final velocity vector.In this term,the parameter k is used to adjust the contribution of VTMfto the cost function.After obtaining the general analytical solution of the optimal guidance problem,if one lets k=0,the guidance law without constraint on VTMfcan be obtained,but if one lets k go to in finity,the guidance law will be obtained,which makes the missile collide with its target while satisfying VTMf=The second term on the right side of Eq.(6)comes from Ref.17and is used to minimize the lateral divert requirement so as to savefuel.In this term,as t goes to tf,the weighttends to in finity.This makes aMconverge to zero finally,and greater exponent n tends to accelerate the convergence speed.It is emphasized again that different from the previous studies4,12,17,19,the effect of the gravity difference,which varies with position,is considered here.Thus,the proposed guidance laws require much less fuel than the traditional ones in exoatmospheric interception.

    4.Optimal terminal guidance laws

    As gTMis a complex nonlinear vector function of position,the analytical solution of the posed optimal guidance problem cannot be obtained.However,by observing the simulation trials where both the missile and target are only governed by gravity,it can befound that if the missile is just on a collision course,gTMvaries almost linearly with time,and at the collision point,there is gTM=0.As an example,one of these simulation trials is presented in Figs.2 and 3.Here,Fig.2 shows the trajectories of the missile and target,and Fig.3 shows the histories of gTM.

    Further,it is concerned about whether the missile’s maneuver will seriously worsen the degree of linearity of gTM.There fore,it is needed to analyze the influence of the trajectory adjustment on gTMquantificationally.Defineandas the nominal trajectories of the missile and target respectively where the missile flies without control and can just hit the target.Defineas the gravity difference corresponding to the nominal trajectories.Define ΔXMas the difference of the actual and nominal trajectories of the missile.Thus,the actual missile trajectory is.Then,there is

    Thefirst order Taylor approximation of Eq.(10)is

    Fig.2 Nominal trajectories of missile and target.

    Fig.3 gTMalmost changes linearly with time in nominal case.

    In fact,the PIP error due to the boost guidance will not exceed 50 km.So the terminal guidance only needs to adjust the trajectory slightly but accurately,andis generally less than 50 km.By contrastis greater than the Earth’s radius of about 6356 km.There fore,< 0.01.Meanwhile, μ/has the same order of magnitude as.Thus,the change in gTMdue to the trajectory adjustmentis almost two orders of magnitude smaller than.Thereby,it can be concluded that gTMstill varies almost linearly with time even if the missile trajectory is adjusted by the divert thrusts.Thus,it is reasonable to use the following linear model27to approximate the gravity difference

    where gTM0is the initial value of gTM.This linear model was first proposed by Newman and used to develop an iterative guidance law for steering booster.27However,compared with traditional guidance laws such as Lambert guidance,the developed guidance has a poor performance.For instance,if the initial distance is about 4000 km,the miss distance can be up to 5 km.There fore,Newman further used two more complicated but more accurate models to improve the guidance law.Different from the boost case,the linear model is very suitable for designing the terminal guidance,because(1)the linear model will not result in missing the target since the trajectory correction is always conducted until the collision occurs;(2)the linear model makes the optimal guidance problem analytically solvable,even though the problem-solving process is complicated and full of mathematic tricks;(3)the developed terminal guidance laws are expressed as explicit functions of current states,which are elegant in form and easy to implement;(4)compared with traditional terminal guidance laws,the new guidance laws can significantly reduce thefuel consumption.

    According to optimal control theory4,using the linear model,the Hamiltonian is

    where λ1and λ2are Lagrange multiplier vector functions.To facilitate writing,a new notation for partial derivative is defined as follows.

    If there is a multivariable function z=f(X,Y)wherethen define the partial derivatives of z with respect to X and Y as

    Consequently,the co-state equations are

    The stationarity condition is

    Denote the first term on the right side of the cost function(Eq.(6))as

    As VTMfis not specified in the posed optimal guidance problem,the final value of λ2should satisfy the following condition to minimize the cost function

    Integrating Eqs.(15)and(16)and then using Eq.(19),we obtain

    where C1is a undetermined constant vector.Substituting Eq.(21)into Eq.(17)yields

    Substituting Eqs.(12)and(22)into Eq.(8)and then integrating Eq.(8),we obtain

    Substituting Eq.(23)into Eq.(7)and then integrating Eq.(7),we obtain

    According to the final condition that XTMf=0,from Eq.(24),there is

    Consider two cases:(1)VTMfis unconstrained;(2)VTMfis constrained.

    (1)Optimal terminal guidance without constraint on VTMf

    If k=0,then VTMfhas no effect on the cost function and is thus unconstrained.There fore,let k=0 here.By substituting Eqs.(27)and(28)into Eq.(22)and letting t=0,we obtain

    (2)Optimal terminal guidance with constraint on VTMf

    If one lets k go to positive in finity,then VTMtends tofinally.Otherwise,the cost function would go to in finity.Use Eqs.(27)and(28)to calculate the following two limits related to aM.

    By substituting Eqs.(32)and(33)into Eq.(22)and letting t=0,we obtain

    Note that the second term on the right side of Eq.(34)can be rewritten as

    To facilitate the subsequent derivation,by substituting Eq.(35)into Eq.(34),Eq.(34)can be rewritten as

    5.Flight time

    Fig.4 ZEM prediction considering the effect of gravity.

    Fig.5 Divert thrust is almost normal to LOS.

    As shown in Fig.4,a non-rotating frame is created with origin at the center of mass of the missile and called frame FM.Now we observe the motion of the target from frame FM.If the missile flies without control,i.e.aM=0,then the missile is only governed by gravity and will miss the target.For this case,the corresponding trajectory of the target in frame FMis represented by the curve passing through the target and point P.Thereby,the ZEM is equal to the distance between the missile and point P.Denote the segment between the missile and point P as SMP,and the segment between the missile and target as SMT.The following explains that SMPis perpendicular to SMT.As shown in Fig.5,since the engagement is outside the atmosphere,the missile uses the divert thrusters to per form lateral maneuvers in order to eliminate the ZEM,and uses the attitude control thrusters to adjust its attitude such that the longitudinal axis of the seeker always follows the LOS.Because the divert thrust is normal to the longitudinal axis which approximately coincides with the LOS,the divert thrust is approximately perpendicular to the LOS.Meanwhile,it is assumed that the direction of the LOS remains unchanged throughout the engagement.In fact,the LOS always rotates due to the effect of gTM,even if the missile is just on a collision course.However,the angular displacement of LOS is very small,essentially because gTMis too small to result in a significant change in VTM.The above analysis and assumption indicate that the displacement of the missile due to aM(i.e.,the vector from the missile to the point P)is perpendicular to the initial LOS.Thereby,under these assumptions,the flight time tfcan be determined by analyzing the movement along the initial LOS.

    Denote the components of VTMalong and perpendicular to the initial LOS asand,respectively,and denote the components of gTMalong and perpendicular to the initial LOS asand,respectively.Defineas the unit vector of XTM.^xTM0is the initialvalue of x^TM.Let RTM=XTM·x^TM0,VrTM=VTM·x^TM0,and=gTM·^xTM0.Note that since the missile always closes in the target,there is<0.

    Due to the assumption that the direction of the LOS remains unchanged,from Eq.(12),there is

    where RTM0is the initial value of RTM.When t=tf,there is RTMf=0,i.e.

    In practice,due to the careful planning of mission be fore launch,the engagement geometry generally meets the requirement for successful interception,i.e.,the magnitude ofis large enough to satisfy Δ ≥ 0.To determine which root is theflight time and facilitates further derivation,the two roots are rewritten using a mathematical trick as follows:

    Now determine which root is the flight time.According to Eq.(42),if≥ 0,then Δ ≤)2.Thus,it can be concluded from Eqs.(43)and(44)that 0<tf2<tf1.This means that at t=tf2,RTM=0 is met for the first time.There fore,the flight time is tf2.If< 0,then Δ > ()2.Substituting this into Eqs.(43)and(44),we obtain tf1<0<tf2.Thus,the flight time is still tf2.All in all,the flight time is

    Using Eq.(45),the formulas of aM(Eqs.(31)and(36))can be rewritten in terms of the angular velocity of LOS.Substituting Eq.(45)into an expression related to aMyields

    Using the triple product expansion, i.e.(a × b)× c= (a ·c)b- (b ·c)a,we obtain

    where ωLOSis the angular velocity of LOS and its 3-D formula is

    In practice,ωLOSis extracted from the data detected by the infrared seeker.1,28,29Substituting Eq.(45)into another expression related to aMyields

    Using Eqs.(48)and(50),the OTG laws can be expressed in terms of the angular velocity of LOS,as follows:

    (1)Optimal terminal guidance without constraint on VTMf

    Substituting Eq.(48)into Eq.(31)yields

    (2)Optimal terminal guidance with constraint on VTMf

    Substituting Eqs.(48)and(50)into Eq.(36)yields

    In practice,the guidance command is generated in real time by substituting the current states of motion into Eq.(51)or Eq.(52).

    Note that Eqs.(51)and(52)are more suitable for practice than Eqs.(31)and(36);because(1)due to the help of the infrared seeker,the estimation accuracy of the angular velocity of LOS is much higher than that of the remaining flight time(i.e.time to go),especially when the missile is very close to the target;(2)since the time to go appears in the denominators of the guidance formulas,the miss distance is highly sensitive to the estimation error of the time-to-go,especially if there is a bias error in the estimated time-to-go.1,30In addition,because XTM0also appears in a denominator of Eq.(52),if there is a measurement error of the relative position,it can result in a waste of fuel and may even cause the missile to miss the target.Section 6.2 gives an example to show the influence of the measurement error.

    In Ref.1,Zarchan demonstrated that the 2D PN expressed in terms of ZEM and tgois equivalent to that expressed in terms of the angular rate of LOS by geometrically analyzing the relationship between ZEM and the angular rate of LOS.Different from Ref.1,the trans formation method presented here is proposed for 3D guidance laws and based on vector operations,rather than geometric analysis.Additionally,the consideration of gravity greatly increases the difficulty of trans formation and causes the method presented in Ref.1to fail to handle the OTG cases.

    6.Results and discussion

    6.1.OTG without constraint on VTMf

    In this subsection,some examples are given where VTMfis unconstrained.In these examples,the simulation results of OTG are compared with that of PN,APN,and PG.The commands of OTG,PN,and APN can be expressed uniformly as

    where N1=3+n and XZEMis the zero-effort miss vector.In each guidance cycle of PG,the onboard computer lets aM=0 and then integrates Eqs.(1)–(4)numerically.When X9m·VTM=0,the simulation stops.Then,let tgobe equal to the stop time and let XZEMbe equal to the value of XTMat the stop time.PG uses the component of aMperpendicular to the LOS as the guidance command.

    Consider two cases about the PIP here:Case 1.the PIP has no error;Case 2.the PIP has an error of about 50 km.

    In Case 1,the initial states of the KKV are XM0=[786280.91,-1300973.39,7286277.30]Tm and VM0=[2837.72,5409.49,1553.36]Tm/s,and the initial states of the target are XT0=[981407.04,-861312.60,7722585.39]Tm and VT0=[1725.21,-6831.13,-976.11]Tm/s.In this case,let n=0 for all thefour guidance laws.Define the velocity increment ΔV as

    Because the thrust acceleration is proportional to the mass flow rate of fuel,ΔV reflects thefuel consumption.

    The simulation results are shown in Table 1 and Figs.6–9.As can be seen from Table 1,PG consumes the least fuel,but requires the heaviest computational load.The velocity increment of OTG is almost as small as that of PG,but the computing time of OTG is much shorter than that of PG.Additionally,the velocity increment of APN is almost half that of PN.Fig.6 shows the trajectories and the correspondingground tracks of the missile and target for OTG.Because the trajectories for thefour guidance laws are nearly coincident and not easily distinguishable,only the trajectories for OTG are presented here.Fig.7 shows the histories of the velocity increments for all the guidance laws.Define plane PEMTas the plane containing the Earth center,missile,and target.Define^ynas the unit vector that is perpendicular to the current LOS in plane PEMTand has a positive projection on XM.Define^znas the unit vector perpendicular to plane PEMTand determined byFig.8(a)shows the histories of the components of aMalongy^n,denoted as.Fig.8(b)shows the histories of the components of aMalong^zn,denoted asFrom Fig.8,it can be seen that due to the use of inaccurate gravity models,PN and APN cause the missiles to per form unnecessary maneuvers and thus result in an apparent waste of fuel.Fig.9 shows the histories of gTMand XTMfor OTG.Here,it can be seen that both gTMand XTMvary almost linearly with time.Fig.9(b)indicates that the direction of LOS is almost unchanged during the interception.

    Table 1 Comparisons of simulation results in Case 1.

    Fig.6 Engagement trajectories for OTG in Case 1.

    Fig.7 Histories of velocity increments in Case 1.

    Fig.8 Histories of guidance commands in Case 1.

    Fig.9 Histories of gTMand XTM for OTG in Case 1.

    Table 2 Comparisons of simulation results in Case 2.

    Now Case 2 is considered where there is a large PIP error of about 50 km in the beginning.To show the in fluence of the initial distance on the linearity of the gravity difference,the initial separation is enlarged to about 4000 km.The initial conditions are XM0=[192442.95,-2085138.26,6726394.99]Tm,VM0=[3418.94, 5190.08, 3269.23]Tm/s, XT0=[569875.90,1928987.06,7526018.77]Tm,and VT0=[2262.74,-6806.83,834.46]Tm/s.In this case,the parameter n of the four guidance laws is set to 1.The simulation results are shown in Table 2 and Figs.10–13.From Table 2,it can be seen that the velocity increments for OTG and PG are still significantly smaller than the other two,but the computing time for PG is much longer than the others.Also because the trajectories for the four guidance laws are very similar,Fig.10 only shows the trajectories and the corresponding ground tracks for OTG.Fig.11 shows the histories of the velocity increments.Fig.12 shows the histories of the acceleration commands for the four guidance laws.As can be seen from Fig.12(a),in PN,because the effect of gTMis not considered,the ZEM is underestimated and thus the commanded acceleration is insufficient in the beginning,which results in a large lateral divert requirement in the latter part of the trajectory.On the contrary,APN overestimates the ZEM since it assumes that gTMis constant throughout the remaining flight and equal to the current value.There fore,the maneuvering acceleration is too large in the beginning.This causes that the missile has to change the direction of thrust to the opposite in the latter part of the flight.By contrast,OTG estimates the ZEM accurately and thus control the missile to per form proper maneuvers.There fore,as shown in Fig.11,OTG requires much smaller velocity increment than PN and APN.From Fig.13,it can be seen that although the initial separation is up to 4000 km,gTMand XTMstill vary almost linearly with time.

    Fig.10 Engagement trajectories for OTG in Case 2.

    Fig.11 Histories of velocity increments in Case 2.

    Define RTGPas the distance at which the terminal guidance phase starts.Now observe how RTGPinfluences the velocity increments of PN,APN,and OTG.In the simulations conducted here,there are two flight phases.The first phase is the coast phase where the missile is only governed by gravity and thus flies along a ballistic trajectory.When the distance between the missile and target reduces to RTGP,the terminal guidance phase begins.Here,two cases about the coast phase are considered:(1)the missile is just on a collision course,which means that there is no PIP error,and(2)the trajectory of the missile has a PIP error of about 5 km.By setting RTGPto different values and then conducting a large number of simulations,the profiles of the velocity increments with respect to RTGPcan be obtained,as shown in Fig.14.Here,Fig.14(a)shows the profiles corresponding to the case without PIP error,and Fig.14(b)shows the profiles corresponding to the case with PIP error.As shown in Fig.14(a),it can be seen that OTG has very high fuel efficiency,compared with PN and APN.This figure also shows that the amount of the wastefuel for APN is about half that for PN.As shown in Fig.14(b),shorter RTGPtends to increase the required heading correction and thus increase the lateral divert requirement.Inversely, for OTG,longer RTGPtends to reduce the lateral divert requirement significantly.However,because PN and APN adopt the inaccurate gravity models and thus cause the missile to per form unnecessary maneuvers,longer RTGPtends to increase the lateral divert requirements for PN and APN.

    Fig.12 Histories of the guidance commands in Case 2.

    Fig.13 Histories of gTMand XTM for OTG in Case 2.

    Fig.14 Prof iles of ΔV versus RTGP.

    6.2.OTG with constraint on VTMf

    Now consider the cases with constraint on VTMf,where it is desired that the missile collides head-on with the target.As a comparison,the results of generalized vector explicit guidance(GENEX)17are also given here.Although GENEX is originally expressed in terms of ZEM and tgo,using the trans formation method shown in Section 5,GENEX can also be re formulated in terms of the angular velocity of LOS as follows:

    The parameter n appearing in Eqs.(52)and(57)is set to be 1.Be fore launching the missile,the command and control center can figure out the position of the PIP and the velocity vector of the target at the PIP,where the unit vector of the velocity vector of the target at the PIP is denoted as^vTf.Then, for a head-on collision,let the desired final relative velocity vector be

    A scenario is considered here that although the intercept trajectory has been planned perfectly with^vTf=[-0.1840,-0.9720,-0.1462]T,due to the guidance error at the boost phase,the missile has a heading error of about 0.5°at the beginning of the terminal guidance phase.For this scenario,at the terminal guidance phase,the initial conditions are XM0=[354390.76,-1468209.45,6924581.65]Tm,VM0=[1142.97, 4964.53, 2714.43]Tm/s, XT0=[942888.61,1633401.66, 7406664.03]Tm, and VT0=[-1168.38,-6981.35,680.63]Tm/s.

    To show the influence of the measurement error of XTMon OTG,an additional case is considered where it is assumed that the measured magnitude of XTMis 100 m less than its real value and OTG is used as control.

    The simulation results are shown in Table 3 and Figs.15–17,where the solid lines represent the ideal results of OTG,the dashed lines represent the ideal results of GENEX,and the dotted lines represent the results of the case with the measurement error of XTM.As can be seen from Table 3,the velocity increment of OTG is about half that of GENEX,and the measurement error of XTMleads to morefuel consumption.Also because the trajectories for the three cases are very similar,Fig.15 only shows the trajectories and the corresponding ground tracks for OTG.Define θ as the angle between thevelocity vectors of the missile and target.Fig.16 shows the histories of ΔV and θ.From Fig.16(a),it can also be seen that the velocity increment of OTG is much smaller than that of GENEX.From Fig.16(b),it can be seen that θ goes to 180°finally,which means that the missile hits the target from the head-on direction.As can be seen from Fig.17(a),because GENEX does not consider the effect of gravity,GENEX causes the missile to per form some unnecessary maneuvers and thus results in a waste of fuel.In Fig.17(b),because gTMhas no component along^zn,OTG and GENEX are almost the same in this direction and thus generate the similar acceleration commands.In the case with measurement error of XTM,when the missile is close enough to the target where the distance between them is within hundreds of meters,the measurement error results in rapid changes in the guidance command,which leads to fuel waste and a large error in θ.

    Table 3 Comparisons of simulation results with constraint on VTMf.

    Fig.15 Engagement trajectories for OTG with constraint on VTMf.

    6.3.Improved pulsed guidance

    An example is given here to show that some achievements of this paper can be used to improve thefuel efficiency of the pulsed guidance law employed by the missile with fixed thrust level.

    Fig.16 Histories of ΔV and θ for the cases with constraint on VTMf.

    Fig.17 Histories of guidance commands for the cases with constraint on VTMf.

    Zarchan introduced a 2D pulsed guidance law and demonstrated its performance in the long-range exoatmospheric interception.1Here,the guidance is extended to a 3D one and called the basic pulsed guidance(BPG)law.In general,KKV has four divert thrusters in a cruciform con figuration.Assume that the axis of a pair of coaxial thrusters remains along^yn,while the axis of the other pair of coaxial thrusters remains along^zn.The components of XZEMalong^ynand^znare denoted asrespectively.

    As shown in Fig.18,if there is a guidance pulse of magnitude aMlasting for Δt seconds,then the pro file of the lateral maneuvering speed ΔV consists of two segments.In such a case,the lateral maneuvering range is equal to the area of the region enclosed by the time axis and lines depicted in Fig.18(b).

    As the guidance tries to remove the predicted ZEM using one pulse,let the displacement due to thrust be equal to the predicted XZEMas

    Fig.18 Sketch map of pulsed guidance.

    Table 4 Comparisons of simulation results for BPG and IPG.

    Fig.19 Engagement trajectories for IPG.

    Fig.20 Histories of ΔV and predicted ZEM for IPG and BPG.

    Here,Δtynis the commanded duration time for the thrust with the same direction asand Δtznthe commanded duration time for the thrust with the same direction asSolving the above two equations,we obtain Note again that<0.Because the above prediction formulas are inaccurate due to the ignorance of gravity,one trajectory correction cannot eliminate all the real ZEM.There fore,more trajectory corrections are needed.In Ref.1,these corrections are distributed at equal intervals during the flight.To reduce the miss distance,this scheme is slightly modified as:when tgo>30 s,the trajectory correction is conducted every 30 s,but when tgo≤30 s,the trajectory correction is conducted every 5 s.

    Using some achievements of this paper,the prediction formulas of XZEMand tgoconsidering the effect of gravity can be obtained.From Ref.1,there iswhere N1=3+n.By comparing this with Eq.(31),we obtain

    The initial conditions for the current case are the same as those for Case 2 in Section 6.1.The simulation results are shown in Table 4 and Figs.19–21.As can be seen from Table 4 and Fig.20(a),because IPG gives full consideration to the effect of gravity,its miss distance and velocity increment are much smaller than those of BPG.In Fig.19,only the trajectories and the corresponding ground tracks for IPG are presented,also because the trajectories for IPG and BPG are very similar.As shown in Fig.20(b),because IPG predicts the ZEM accurately and controls the missile to per form lateral maneuvers properly,the predicted ZEM of IPG remains nearly zero after the first trajectory correction.Fig.21 shows the histories of the lateral maneuvering accelerations.

    7.Conclusions

    In this paper,using optimal control theory,two optimal terminal guidance laws are developed for exoatmospheric interception:one considers thefinal velocity vector constraint,whereas the other does not consider it.Because the developed guidance laws givefull consideration to the effect of gravity and need not conduct any onboard trajectory simulation,the new guidance laws consume much less fuel than the traditional guidance laws while demanding a light computational load.To convert the OTG laws expressed in terms of XTM,VTMand tgointo that expressed in terms of ωLOS,the 3D trans formation method based on vector operations is proposed,which considers the effect of the gravity difference,especially on theflight time.Additionally,an example is given to show that if the prediction formulas of XZEMand tgoproposed in this study are applied to the pulsed guidance law,the fuel efficiency of the guidance law can be significantly improved.Different from PN,the implement of the OTG laws requires the in formation on the positions of the missile and target in order to calculate the gravity difference and guidance coefficients.

    1.Zarchan P.Tactical and strategic missile guidance.6th ed.Virginia:AIAA Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics;2012.p.299–323.

    2.Yuan CL.Homing and navigation courses of automatic targetseeking devices.J Appl Phys 1948;19(12):1122–8.

    3.Adler FP.Missile guidance by three-dimensional proportional navigation.J Appl Phys 1956;27(5):500–7.

    4.Bryson AE,Ho YC.Applied optimal control.Waltham:Blaisdell;1969.p.148–76.

    5.Guelman M.The closed- form solution of true proportional navigation.IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1976;12(5):472–82.

    6.Becker K.Closed- form solution of pure proportional navigation.IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1990;26(3):526–33.

    7.Yu WB,Chen WC.Guidance law with circular no fly zone constraint.Nonlinear Dyn 2014;78(3):1953–71.

    8.Yang CD,Yang CC.Analytical solution of generalized 3D proportional navigation.In:Proceedings of the 34th conference on decisionamp;control;1995 December 13-15;New Orleans,LA,USA.Piscataway.NJ:IEEE Press;1995.p.3974–9.

    9.Yang CD.Analytical solution of 3D true proportional navigation.IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1996;32(4):1510–22.

    10.Li K,Zhang T,Chen L.Ideal proportional navigation for exoatmospheric interception.Chin J Aeronaut 2013;26(4):976–85.

    11.Su WS,Yao DN,Li KB,Chen L.A novel biased proportional navigation guidance law for close approach phase.Chin J Aeronaut 2016;29(1):228–37.

    12.Garber V.Optimum intercept laws for accelerating targets.AIAA J 1968;6(11):2196–8.

    13.Cottrell RG.Optimal intercept guidance for short-range tactical missiles.AIAA J 1971;9(7):1414–5.

    14.Turetsky V,Shinar J.Missile guidance laws based on pursuitevasion game formulations.Automatica 2003;39(4):607–18.

    15.Ge L,Shen Y,Gao Y,Zhao L.Head pursuit variable structure guidance law for three-dimensional space interception.Chin J Aeronaut 2008;21(3):247–51.

    16.Cherry GW.A general,explicit optimal guidance law for rocketpropelled spacecraft.In:The AIAA/ION astrodynamics guidance and control conference;1964 Aug 24-26;Los Angeles,California,USA.Reston:AIAA;1964.p.1–2.

    17.Ohlmeyer EJ,Phillips CA.Generalized vector explicit guidance.J Guidance Control Dyn 2006;29(2):261–8.

    18.Yu WB,Chen WC.Trajectory shaping guidance with final speed and load factor constraints.ISA Trans 2015;56:42–52.

    19.Wang H,Lin De,Cheng Z.Optimal guidance of extended trajectory shaping.Chin J Aeronaut 2014;27(5):1259–72.

    20.Ben-Asher JZ,Yaesh I.Advances in missile guidance theory.Virginia:AIAA Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics;1998.p.25–88.

    21.Kim M,Grider KV.Terminal guidance for impact attitude angle constrained flight trajectories.IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1973;9(6):852–9.

    22.Ryoo CK,Cho H,Tahk MJ.Time-to-go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraints.IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2006;14(3):483–92.

    23.Zhao J,Zhou R.Three-dimensional cooperative guidance laws against stationary and maneuvering targets.Chin J Aeronaut 2015;28(4):1104–20.

    24.Yang L,Zhou H,Chen WC.Application of linear gauss pseudospectral method in model predictive control.Acta Astronaut 2014;96(1):175–87.

    25.Hablani HB.Endgame guidance and relative navigation of strategic interceptors with delays.J Guidance Control Dyn 2006;29(1):82–94.

    26.Ratnoo A,Ghose D.Collision-geometry-based pulsed guidance law for exoatmospheric interception.J Guidance Control Dyn 2009;32(2):669–74.

    27.Newman B.Strategic Intercept midcourse guidance using modified zero effort miss steering.J Guidance Control Dyn 1996;19(1):107–12.

    28.Lyzhof t J,Wie B.IR telescope and sensor characterization for hypervelocity asteroid intercept guidance.In:AAS/AIAA spaceflight mechanics meeting;2014 Jan 26-30;Santa Fe,New Mexico,USA.Reston:AIAA;2014.p.1–17.

    29.Waldmann J.Line-of -sight rate estimation and linearizing control of an imaging seeker in a tactical missile guided by proportional navigation.IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2002;10(4):556–67.

    30.Ben-Asher JZ,Yaesh I.Optimal guidance with reduced sensitivity to time-to-go estimation errors.J Guidance Control Dyn 1997;20(1):158–63.

    Yu Wenbin received the B.S.degree in aerospace engineering from Beihang University in 2010.After that,he was recommended for pursuing the doctor’s degree directly also in Beihang University and received it in 2016.Now he is a postdoctoral researcher in Beihang University.His main research interests are flight mechanics,guidance and control.

    Chen Wanchun received the B.S.,M.S.and Ph.D.degrees in aerospace engineering,Beihang University,Beijing,in 1986,1989,and 1995,respectively.Since 1989,he has been with the School of Astronautics,Beihang University,where he is currently a Prof essor and Ph.D.supervisor.His main research interests include flight Mechanics,guidance and control,and trajectory optimization.

    Yang Liang received the Ph.D.degree in Beihang University.His research interests areflight mechanics,guidance and control,and trajectory optimization.

    Liu Xiaoming is a Ph.D.and lecturer in Beihang University.His research interests areflight Mechanics,guidance and control,in formation fusion,and sensors applications.

    Zhou Hao received his Ph.D degree in Beihang University and then became a lecturer there.His research interests areflight mechanics and trajectory optimization.

    1 October 2015;revised 7 December 2015;accepted 7 March 2016

    Available online 23 June 2016

    Exoatmospheric interception;

    Explicit guidance;

    Guidance;

    Optimal control;

    Proportional navigation;

    Pulsed guidance

    ?2016 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.Thisisan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    *Corresponding author.Tel.:+86 10 82339226.

    E-mail address:yangliang.buaa@hotmail.com(L.Yang).

    Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

    Production and hosting by Elsevier

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.04.019

    1000-9361?2016 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    日韩欧美免费精品| 日本a在线网址| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 日本黄色片子视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精品三级大全| tocl精华| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| xxxwww97欧美| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产三级中文精品| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 成人av在线播放网站| 男女那种视频在线观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 深夜精品福利| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 我要搜黄色片| 99久国产av精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 欧美在线黄色| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 国产高清三级在线| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 一本一本综合久久| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产乱人伦免费视频| eeuss影院久久| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 小说图片视频综合网站| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 很黄的视频免费| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 日本五十路高清| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 午夜影院日韩av| 日韩欧美免费精品| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| av在线蜜桃| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 女警被强在线播放| 国产午夜精品论理片| 搡老岳熟女国产| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 日韩欧美免费精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 女警被强在线播放| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久久国产成人免费| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| or卡值多少钱| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 色综合站精品国产| 精品日产1卡2卡| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 中国美女看黄片| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 久久国产精品影院| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 久久精品影院6| 热99re8久久精品国产| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产精品久久视频播放| 看免费av毛片| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久性视频一级片| 久久久久久久久中文| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 俺也久久电影网| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 一a级毛片在线观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产亚洲精品av在线| av国产免费在线观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 脱女人内裤的视频| 日本 av在线| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 中国美女看黄片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 内射极品少妇av片p| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产成人影院久久av| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产av不卡久久| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 免费看日本二区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产野战对白在线观看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 午夜视频国产福利| 在线观看一区二区三区| 在线看三级毛片| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 露出奶头的视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 一本精品99久久精品77| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 午夜精品在线福利| 少妇高潮的动态图| 天天添夜夜摸| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日本五十路高清| 一本久久中文字幕| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 欧美大码av| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| tocl精华| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久久精品大字幕| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产免费男女视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| avwww免费| 国产成人影院久久av| 九色国产91popny在线| 美女免费视频网站| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产99白浆流出| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 免费av毛片视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 国产乱人视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 我要搜黄色片| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产av不卡久久| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| xxx96com| www.色视频.com| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产在视频线在精品| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 午夜免费观看网址| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲av熟女| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 中文字幕久久专区| 深夜精品福利| 天堂网av新在线| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 97碰自拍视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 日本黄大片高清| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 观看免费一级毛片| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产高清videossex| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 内射极品少妇av片p| 观看美女的网站| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日本免费a在线| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产免费男女视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 69人妻影院| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲18禁久久av| 内地一区二区视频在线| 午夜影院日韩av| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久久国产成人免费| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲不卡免费看| 91字幕亚洲| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 中文资源天堂在线| 天堂动漫精品| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产精华一区二区三区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 18+在线观看网站| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲av一区综合| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 观看美女的网站| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 在线播放国产精品三级| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 色视频www国产| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 99热精品在线国产| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产黄片美女视频| 午夜免费激情av| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 熟女电影av网| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲18禁久久av| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 日本成人三级电影网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 丰满的人妻完整版| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 中国美女看黄片| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产av不卡久久| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 天天添夜夜摸| 黄色日韩在线| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 一区福利在线观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 观看美女的网站| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产av在哪里看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| www.999成人在线观看| 91在线观看av| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产精品一及| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲五月天丁香| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 色av中文字幕| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 免费看日本二区| 黄片小视频在线播放| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产日本99.免费观看| 黄色女人牲交| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 国产毛片a区久久久久| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 成年版毛片免费区| bbb黄色大片| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 91久久精品电影网| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| a级毛片a级免费在线| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 免费高清视频大片| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲 国产 在线| 午夜久久久久精精品| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 丰满的人妻完整版| 搞女人的毛片| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| www.色视频.com| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 内射极品少妇av片p| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | www.色视频.com| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| www.色视频.com| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| av天堂在线播放| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 美女大奶头视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态|