• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Optimal terminal guidance for exoatmospheric interception

    2016-11-24 00:49:02YuWenbinChenWanchunYangLiangLiuXiaomingZhouHao
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS 2016年4期

    Yu Wenbin,Chen Wanchun,Yang Liang,Liu Xiaoming,Zhou Hao

    School of Astronautics,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China

    Optimal terminal guidance for exoatmospheric interception

    Yu Wenbin,Chen Wanchun,Yang Liang*,Liu Xiaoming,Zhou Hao

    School of Astronautics,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China

    In this study,two optimal terminal guidance(OTG)laws,one of which takes into account the final velocity vector constraint,are developed for exoatmospheric interception using optimal control theory.In exoatmospheric interception,because the proposed guidance laws givefull consideration to the effect of gravity,they consume much less fuel than the traditional guidance laws while requiring a light computational load.In the development of the guidance laws,a unified optimal guidance problem is put forward,where the final velocity vector constraint can be considered or neglected by properly adjusting a parameter in the cost function.To make this problem analytically solvable,a linear model is used to approximate the gravity difference,the difference of the gravitational accelerations of the target and interceptor.Additionally,an example is provided to show that some achievements of this study can be used to significantly improve thefuel efficiency of the pulsed guidance employed by the interceptor whose divert thrust level is fixed.

    1.Introduction

    As the maximum speed of intercontinental ballistic missile(ICBM)is greater than 7 km/s and sometimes its apogee altitude can be up to 2000 km,currently only the ground-based midcourse defense(GMD)system equipped with groundbased interceptor(GBI)missile has the capability of intercepting ICBM.Theflight of GBI generally has three phases:boost,coast,and terminal guidance phases.After launch,the booster tries to put its warhead,which is commonly called kinetic kill vehicle(KKV)and destroys its intended target by direct collision,on a collision course,which means that if the KKV and target are only governed by gravity,the KKV can just hit the target directly.After the booster is turned of f,the KKV is separated from the booster and enters the coast phase in which the KKV flies to the predicted intercept point(PIP)without control.When the distance between the KKV and target reduces to a specified value,the terminal guidance phase begins.At this phase,the KKV uses the divert thrusters to per form lateral maneuvers in order to eliminate the PIP error.When these thrusters work,they consume much fuel.There fore,one main concern of designing the terminal guidance law is to minimize the maneuvering energy so as to savefuel.Additionally,sometimes it is desired that the KKV collides head-on with the target to increase the chances of success.There fore,the paper is aimed at designing two fuel-saving terminal guidance laws for exoatmospheric interception,one of which further considers thefinal velocity vector constraint.

    The most widely used guidance law is proportional navigation(PN)because of its simplicity,effectiveness,and ease of implementation.1Yuan first put forward the basic principle of PN:2if the interceptor turns at a rate proportional to that of the line of sight(LOS),the interceptor can successfully hit the target travelling in uniform linear motion,and the angular velocity of the LOS will become zero finally.Adler extended PN to a 3D one using the tool of solid geometry.3Bryson and Ho demonstrated the optimality of PN.4Zarchan evaluated the performance of PN thoroughly and deeply.1In Refs.5–11,the variants of PN and their closed form solutions were presented.Graber developed the so-called augmented proportional navigation(APN)by adding an extra term to PN to account for the constant maneuvering acceleration of target.12In Ref.13,the guidance law considering the response lags was presented.Turetsky and Shinar proposed the guidance laws based on pursuit-evasion game formulations.14Ge et al.developed a head-pursuit guidance law for 3D hypervelocity interception using Lyapunov stability theory.15

    For some special missions,the guidance laws capable of shaping trajectory are needed.These guidance laws are collectively referred to as trajectory shaping guidance(TSG).Cherry proposed a simple and effective TSG,called explicit guidance(E Guidance), for the first time by assuming that the commanded acceleration is a polynomial function of time.16E Guidance can be treated as an extension of PN because its expression consists of two terms:one is PN used to steer missile to destination,the other is used to control the final velocity vector.Ohlmeyer and Phillips obtained a series of the E Guidance coefficients by solving an optimal control problem with time-to-go weighted cost function.17Yu and Chen obtained the generalized closed form solutions of E Guidance where the closing speed can be an arbitrary positivefunction of time.18Further,by analyzing these generalized solutions,the stability domain of the guidance coefficients was obtained,in which E Guidance is stable and the commanded accelerations tend to be zero finally.Wang et al.improved E Guidance by considering the constant maneuvering acceleration of target.19In Refs.20–24,other types of TSG were presented.Yu and Chen proposed a novel guidance law for guiding missile against a maneuvering target while satisfying a circular no-fly-zone constraint.7In this guidance law,the real space is distorted such that the boundary of the no fly zone becomes a straight line,and then PN is used to steer the missile to the virtual target in the distorted space.

    The widely-used terminal guidance laws for exoatmospheric interception are PN,APN,and predictive guidance(PG).Here,PG1is a guidance law that conducts the trajectory simulation once in each guidance cycle to predict the zero-effort miss(ZEM),and then uses the predicted ZEM to generate acceleration command.Zarchan evaluated their performance.1Simulation results show that PG consumes the least fuel because PG uses the accurate gravity model,but requires the heaviest computational load due to the real-time onboard trajectory simulations.PN and APN cause the interceptor to per form unnecessary maneuvers even if the interceptor has already been on a collision course.This is because they use the inaccurate gravity models:PN implies that the gravity difference is zero,whereas APN assumes that the gravity difference is constant.Simulation results show that the amount of the wasted fuel of APN is about half that of PN.

    In this paper,two optimal terminal guidance(OTG)laws are developed for exoatmospheric interception using the optimal control theory:one considers the final velocity vector constraint,whereas the other does not consider it.Because the developed guidance laws evaluate the effect of gravity more accurately and need not conduct any onboard trajectory simulation,they almost consume as littlefuel as PG while having a light computational load.In the development of the OTG laws,a unified optimal guidance problem is put forward,of which the developed guidance laws are the two special solutions.Because the real gravity is a complex nonlinear function of position,it is impossible to obtain the exact analytical solutions of the problem.However,by observing the simulation trials,it can befound that the gravity difference almost varies linearly with time.There fore,the problem is made analytically solvable by the innovative use of a linear gravity difference model.Additionally,as the angular velocity of LOS can be measured by seeker directly,the OTG laws are re formulated in terms of the angular velocity of LOS using a novel 3D trans formation method based on vector operations,which considers the effect of gravity difference.

    To implement the OTG laws,the position in formation is needed.However,the onboard infrared seeker can only provide the LOS orientation in formation and has a limited detection distance.Thus,in practice,the in formation on the states of motion is mainly provided by the external detection system such as X-band radar.When the interceptor gets close enough to the target,the infrared seeker becomes activated,and the data detected by the infrared seeker and external detection system arefused by Kalman filter to improve the accuracy of data.

    It should be mentioned that some kinds of KKV cannot be throttled.For these KKVs,every time the thruster is turned on,the thrust will reach a fixed level and cannot be adjusted.In such a case,the pulsed guidance laws1,25,26are commonly employed,which use the predicted ZEM to determine the duration time of thrust.However,these guidance laws neglect the effect of gravity when predicting the ZEM.There fore,they will also result in a great waste of fuel in the long-range exoatmospheric interception.In fact,the formula of predicting ZEM proposed in this paper can be applied to the pulsed guidance laws.In Section 6.3,an example is given to demonstrate that this can significantly improve the fuel efficiency of the pulsed guidance laws.

    2.Equations of motion

    Fig.1 depicts the 3D engagement geometry outside the atmosphere of Earth.In this figure,the center of Earth is assumed to be stationary in the inertial space.An inertial frame of reference with origin at the center of Earth is created and called frame FE.As the engagement is outside the atmosphere,the interceptor missile uses the divert thrusters to per form lateral maneuvers where the thrust acceleration vector is denoted as aM= [aMx,aMy,aMz]T.The target is only governed by gravity and thus flies ballistically.In frame FE,the position vectors of the interceptor missile and targetare denoted as XM= [xM,yM,zM]Tand XT= [xT,yT,zT]Trespectively,their velocity vectors are denoted as VM= [VMx,VMy,VMz]Tand VT= [VTx,VTy,VTz]Trespectively,and their gravitational acceleration vectors are denoted as gMand gTrespectively.

    Fig.1 Exoatmospheric interception geometry.

    The equations of motion are

    where μ is a constant of about 3.96272 × 1014m3/s2,and the symbol‘|·|”means the Euclidean norm of vector.

    3.Optimal guidance problem

    To develop the fuel-efficient guidance laws for exoatmospheric interception,the optimal guidance problem is posed where the cost function is

    Here,k is a constant.tfrepresents the end time or flight time and will be discussed in detail in Section 5.tgo=tf-t is the time to go.XTM=XT-XMand VTM=VT-VMare the position and velocity vectors of the target relative to the missile,respectively.XTMfis the final value of XTM,and Eq.(9)makes the missile collide with the target.VTMfis the final value of VTM.is the desired value of VTMf.gTM=gT-gMis the gravity difference.

    The cost function is designed with specific purposes.The first term on the right side of Eq.(6)is proposed for achieving the desired final velocity vector.In this term,the parameter k is used to adjust the contribution of VTMfto the cost function.After obtaining the general analytical solution of the optimal guidance problem,if one lets k=0,the guidance law without constraint on VTMfcan be obtained,but if one lets k go to in finity,the guidance law will be obtained,which makes the missile collide with its target while satisfying VTMf=The second term on the right side of Eq.(6)comes from Ref.17and is used to minimize the lateral divert requirement so as to savefuel.In this term,as t goes to tf,the weighttends to in finity.This makes aMconverge to zero finally,and greater exponent n tends to accelerate the convergence speed.It is emphasized again that different from the previous studies4,12,17,19,the effect of the gravity difference,which varies with position,is considered here.Thus,the proposed guidance laws require much less fuel than the traditional ones in exoatmospheric interception.

    4.Optimal terminal guidance laws

    As gTMis a complex nonlinear vector function of position,the analytical solution of the posed optimal guidance problem cannot be obtained.However,by observing the simulation trials where both the missile and target are only governed by gravity,it can befound that if the missile is just on a collision course,gTMvaries almost linearly with time,and at the collision point,there is gTM=0.As an example,one of these simulation trials is presented in Figs.2 and 3.Here,Fig.2 shows the trajectories of the missile and target,and Fig.3 shows the histories of gTM.

    Further,it is concerned about whether the missile’s maneuver will seriously worsen the degree of linearity of gTM.There fore,it is needed to analyze the influence of the trajectory adjustment on gTMquantificationally.Defineandas the nominal trajectories of the missile and target respectively where the missile flies without control and can just hit the target.Defineas the gravity difference corresponding to the nominal trajectories.Define ΔXMas the difference of the actual and nominal trajectories of the missile.Thus,the actual missile trajectory is.Then,there is

    Thefirst order Taylor approximation of Eq.(10)is

    Fig.2 Nominal trajectories of missile and target.

    Fig.3 gTMalmost changes linearly with time in nominal case.

    In fact,the PIP error due to the boost guidance will not exceed 50 km.So the terminal guidance only needs to adjust the trajectory slightly but accurately,andis generally less than 50 km.By contrastis greater than the Earth’s radius of about 6356 km.There fore,< 0.01.Meanwhile, μ/has the same order of magnitude as.Thus,the change in gTMdue to the trajectory adjustmentis almost two orders of magnitude smaller than.Thereby,it can be concluded that gTMstill varies almost linearly with time even if the missile trajectory is adjusted by the divert thrusts.Thus,it is reasonable to use the following linear model27to approximate the gravity difference

    where gTM0is the initial value of gTM.This linear model was first proposed by Newman and used to develop an iterative guidance law for steering booster.27However,compared with traditional guidance laws such as Lambert guidance,the developed guidance has a poor performance.For instance,if the initial distance is about 4000 km,the miss distance can be up to 5 km.There fore,Newman further used two more complicated but more accurate models to improve the guidance law.Different from the boost case,the linear model is very suitable for designing the terminal guidance,because(1)the linear model will not result in missing the target since the trajectory correction is always conducted until the collision occurs;(2)the linear model makes the optimal guidance problem analytically solvable,even though the problem-solving process is complicated and full of mathematic tricks;(3)the developed terminal guidance laws are expressed as explicit functions of current states,which are elegant in form and easy to implement;(4)compared with traditional terminal guidance laws,the new guidance laws can significantly reduce thefuel consumption.

    According to optimal control theory4,using the linear model,the Hamiltonian is

    where λ1and λ2are Lagrange multiplier vector functions.To facilitate writing,a new notation for partial derivative is defined as follows.

    If there is a multivariable function z=f(X,Y)wherethen define the partial derivatives of z with respect to X and Y as

    Consequently,the co-state equations are

    The stationarity condition is

    Denote the first term on the right side of the cost function(Eq.(6))as

    As VTMfis not specified in the posed optimal guidance problem,the final value of λ2should satisfy the following condition to minimize the cost function

    Integrating Eqs.(15)and(16)and then using Eq.(19),we obtain

    where C1is a undetermined constant vector.Substituting Eq.(21)into Eq.(17)yields

    Substituting Eqs.(12)and(22)into Eq.(8)and then integrating Eq.(8),we obtain

    Substituting Eq.(23)into Eq.(7)and then integrating Eq.(7),we obtain

    According to the final condition that XTMf=0,from Eq.(24),there is

    Consider two cases:(1)VTMfis unconstrained;(2)VTMfis constrained.

    (1)Optimal terminal guidance without constraint on VTMf

    If k=0,then VTMfhas no effect on the cost function and is thus unconstrained.There fore,let k=0 here.By substituting Eqs.(27)and(28)into Eq.(22)and letting t=0,we obtain

    (2)Optimal terminal guidance with constraint on VTMf

    If one lets k go to positive in finity,then VTMtends tofinally.Otherwise,the cost function would go to in finity.Use Eqs.(27)and(28)to calculate the following two limits related to aM.

    By substituting Eqs.(32)and(33)into Eq.(22)and letting t=0,we obtain

    Note that the second term on the right side of Eq.(34)can be rewritten as

    To facilitate the subsequent derivation,by substituting Eq.(35)into Eq.(34),Eq.(34)can be rewritten as

    5.Flight time

    Fig.4 ZEM prediction considering the effect of gravity.

    Fig.5 Divert thrust is almost normal to LOS.

    As shown in Fig.4,a non-rotating frame is created with origin at the center of mass of the missile and called frame FM.Now we observe the motion of the target from frame FM.If the missile flies without control,i.e.aM=0,then the missile is only governed by gravity and will miss the target.For this case,the corresponding trajectory of the target in frame FMis represented by the curve passing through the target and point P.Thereby,the ZEM is equal to the distance between the missile and point P.Denote the segment between the missile and point P as SMP,and the segment between the missile and target as SMT.The following explains that SMPis perpendicular to SMT.As shown in Fig.5,since the engagement is outside the atmosphere,the missile uses the divert thrusters to per form lateral maneuvers in order to eliminate the ZEM,and uses the attitude control thrusters to adjust its attitude such that the longitudinal axis of the seeker always follows the LOS.Because the divert thrust is normal to the longitudinal axis which approximately coincides with the LOS,the divert thrust is approximately perpendicular to the LOS.Meanwhile,it is assumed that the direction of the LOS remains unchanged throughout the engagement.In fact,the LOS always rotates due to the effect of gTM,even if the missile is just on a collision course.However,the angular displacement of LOS is very small,essentially because gTMis too small to result in a significant change in VTM.The above analysis and assumption indicate that the displacement of the missile due to aM(i.e.,the vector from the missile to the point P)is perpendicular to the initial LOS.Thereby,under these assumptions,the flight time tfcan be determined by analyzing the movement along the initial LOS.

    Denote the components of VTMalong and perpendicular to the initial LOS asand,respectively,and denote the components of gTMalong and perpendicular to the initial LOS asand,respectively.Defineas the unit vector of XTM.^xTM0is the initialvalue of x^TM.Let RTM=XTM·x^TM0,VrTM=VTM·x^TM0,and=gTM·^xTM0.Note that since the missile always closes in the target,there is<0.

    Due to the assumption that the direction of the LOS remains unchanged,from Eq.(12),there is

    where RTM0is the initial value of RTM.When t=tf,there is RTMf=0,i.e.

    In practice,due to the careful planning of mission be fore launch,the engagement geometry generally meets the requirement for successful interception,i.e.,the magnitude ofis large enough to satisfy Δ ≥ 0.To determine which root is theflight time and facilitates further derivation,the two roots are rewritten using a mathematical trick as follows:

    Now determine which root is the flight time.According to Eq.(42),if≥ 0,then Δ ≤)2.Thus,it can be concluded from Eqs.(43)and(44)that 0<tf2<tf1.This means that at t=tf2,RTM=0 is met for the first time.There fore,the flight time is tf2.If< 0,then Δ > ()2.Substituting this into Eqs.(43)and(44),we obtain tf1<0<tf2.Thus,the flight time is still tf2.All in all,the flight time is

    Using Eq.(45),the formulas of aM(Eqs.(31)and(36))can be rewritten in terms of the angular velocity of LOS.Substituting Eq.(45)into an expression related to aMyields

    Using the triple product expansion, i.e.(a × b)× c= (a ·c)b- (b ·c)a,we obtain

    where ωLOSis the angular velocity of LOS and its 3-D formula is

    In practice,ωLOSis extracted from the data detected by the infrared seeker.1,28,29Substituting Eq.(45)into another expression related to aMyields

    Using Eqs.(48)and(50),the OTG laws can be expressed in terms of the angular velocity of LOS,as follows:

    (1)Optimal terminal guidance without constraint on VTMf

    Substituting Eq.(48)into Eq.(31)yields

    (2)Optimal terminal guidance with constraint on VTMf

    Substituting Eqs.(48)and(50)into Eq.(36)yields

    In practice,the guidance command is generated in real time by substituting the current states of motion into Eq.(51)or Eq.(52).

    Note that Eqs.(51)and(52)are more suitable for practice than Eqs.(31)and(36);because(1)due to the help of the infrared seeker,the estimation accuracy of the angular velocity of LOS is much higher than that of the remaining flight time(i.e.time to go),especially when the missile is very close to the target;(2)since the time to go appears in the denominators of the guidance formulas,the miss distance is highly sensitive to the estimation error of the time-to-go,especially if there is a bias error in the estimated time-to-go.1,30In addition,because XTM0also appears in a denominator of Eq.(52),if there is a measurement error of the relative position,it can result in a waste of fuel and may even cause the missile to miss the target.Section 6.2 gives an example to show the influence of the measurement error.

    In Ref.1,Zarchan demonstrated that the 2D PN expressed in terms of ZEM and tgois equivalent to that expressed in terms of the angular rate of LOS by geometrically analyzing the relationship between ZEM and the angular rate of LOS.Different from Ref.1,the trans formation method presented here is proposed for 3D guidance laws and based on vector operations,rather than geometric analysis.Additionally,the consideration of gravity greatly increases the difficulty of trans formation and causes the method presented in Ref.1to fail to handle the OTG cases.

    6.Results and discussion

    6.1.OTG without constraint on VTMf

    In this subsection,some examples are given where VTMfis unconstrained.In these examples,the simulation results of OTG are compared with that of PN,APN,and PG.The commands of OTG,PN,and APN can be expressed uniformly as

    where N1=3+n and XZEMis the zero-effort miss vector.In each guidance cycle of PG,the onboard computer lets aM=0 and then integrates Eqs.(1)–(4)numerically.When X9m·VTM=0,the simulation stops.Then,let tgobe equal to the stop time and let XZEMbe equal to the value of XTMat the stop time.PG uses the component of aMperpendicular to the LOS as the guidance command.

    Consider two cases about the PIP here:Case 1.the PIP has no error;Case 2.the PIP has an error of about 50 km.

    In Case 1,the initial states of the KKV are XM0=[786280.91,-1300973.39,7286277.30]Tm and VM0=[2837.72,5409.49,1553.36]Tm/s,and the initial states of the target are XT0=[981407.04,-861312.60,7722585.39]Tm and VT0=[1725.21,-6831.13,-976.11]Tm/s.In this case,let n=0 for all thefour guidance laws.Define the velocity increment ΔV as

    Because the thrust acceleration is proportional to the mass flow rate of fuel,ΔV reflects thefuel consumption.

    The simulation results are shown in Table 1 and Figs.6–9.As can be seen from Table 1,PG consumes the least fuel,but requires the heaviest computational load.The velocity increment of OTG is almost as small as that of PG,but the computing time of OTG is much shorter than that of PG.Additionally,the velocity increment of APN is almost half that of PN.Fig.6 shows the trajectories and the correspondingground tracks of the missile and target for OTG.Because the trajectories for thefour guidance laws are nearly coincident and not easily distinguishable,only the trajectories for OTG are presented here.Fig.7 shows the histories of the velocity increments for all the guidance laws.Define plane PEMTas the plane containing the Earth center,missile,and target.Define^ynas the unit vector that is perpendicular to the current LOS in plane PEMTand has a positive projection on XM.Define^znas the unit vector perpendicular to plane PEMTand determined byFig.8(a)shows the histories of the components of aMalongy^n,denoted as.Fig.8(b)shows the histories of the components of aMalong^zn,denoted asFrom Fig.8,it can be seen that due to the use of inaccurate gravity models,PN and APN cause the missiles to per form unnecessary maneuvers and thus result in an apparent waste of fuel.Fig.9 shows the histories of gTMand XTMfor OTG.Here,it can be seen that both gTMand XTMvary almost linearly with time.Fig.9(b)indicates that the direction of LOS is almost unchanged during the interception.

    Table 1 Comparisons of simulation results in Case 1.

    Fig.6 Engagement trajectories for OTG in Case 1.

    Fig.7 Histories of velocity increments in Case 1.

    Fig.8 Histories of guidance commands in Case 1.

    Fig.9 Histories of gTMand XTM for OTG in Case 1.

    Table 2 Comparisons of simulation results in Case 2.

    Now Case 2 is considered where there is a large PIP error of about 50 km in the beginning.To show the in fluence of the initial distance on the linearity of the gravity difference,the initial separation is enlarged to about 4000 km.The initial conditions are XM0=[192442.95,-2085138.26,6726394.99]Tm,VM0=[3418.94, 5190.08, 3269.23]Tm/s, XT0=[569875.90,1928987.06,7526018.77]Tm,and VT0=[2262.74,-6806.83,834.46]Tm/s.In this case,the parameter n of the four guidance laws is set to 1.The simulation results are shown in Table 2 and Figs.10–13.From Table 2,it can be seen that the velocity increments for OTG and PG are still significantly smaller than the other two,but the computing time for PG is much longer than the others.Also because the trajectories for the four guidance laws are very similar,Fig.10 only shows the trajectories and the corresponding ground tracks for OTG.Fig.11 shows the histories of the velocity increments.Fig.12 shows the histories of the acceleration commands for the four guidance laws.As can be seen from Fig.12(a),in PN,because the effect of gTMis not considered,the ZEM is underestimated and thus the commanded acceleration is insufficient in the beginning,which results in a large lateral divert requirement in the latter part of the trajectory.On the contrary,APN overestimates the ZEM since it assumes that gTMis constant throughout the remaining flight and equal to the current value.There fore,the maneuvering acceleration is too large in the beginning.This causes that the missile has to change the direction of thrust to the opposite in the latter part of the flight.By contrast,OTG estimates the ZEM accurately and thus control the missile to per form proper maneuvers.There fore,as shown in Fig.11,OTG requires much smaller velocity increment than PN and APN.From Fig.13,it can be seen that although the initial separation is up to 4000 km,gTMand XTMstill vary almost linearly with time.

    Fig.10 Engagement trajectories for OTG in Case 2.

    Fig.11 Histories of velocity increments in Case 2.

    Define RTGPas the distance at which the terminal guidance phase starts.Now observe how RTGPinfluences the velocity increments of PN,APN,and OTG.In the simulations conducted here,there are two flight phases.The first phase is the coast phase where the missile is only governed by gravity and thus flies along a ballistic trajectory.When the distance between the missile and target reduces to RTGP,the terminal guidance phase begins.Here,two cases about the coast phase are considered:(1)the missile is just on a collision course,which means that there is no PIP error,and(2)the trajectory of the missile has a PIP error of about 5 km.By setting RTGPto different values and then conducting a large number of simulations,the profiles of the velocity increments with respect to RTGPcan be obtained,as shown in Fig.14.Here,Fig.14(a)shows the profiles corresponding to the case without PIP error,and Fig.14(b)shows the profiles corresponding to the case with PIP error.As shown in Fig.14(a),it can be seen that OTG has very high fuel efficiency,compared with PN and APN.This figure also shows that the amount of the wastefuel for APN is about half that for PN.As shown in Fig.14(b),shorter RTGPtends to increase the required heading correction and thus increase the lateral divert requirement.Inversely, for OTG,longer RTGPtends to reduce the lateral divert requirement significantly.However,because PN and APN adopt the inaccurate gravity models and thus cause the missile to per form unnecessary maneuvers,longer RTGPtends to increase the lateral divert requirements for PN and APN.

    Fig.12 Histories of the guidance commands in Case 2.

    Fig.13 Histories of gTMand XTM for OTG in Case 2.

    Fig.14 Prof iles of ΔV versus RTGP.

    6.2.OTG with constraint on VTMf

    Now consider the cases with constraint on VTMf,where it is desired that the missile collides head-on with the target.As a comparison,the results of generalized vector explicit guidance(GENEX)17are also given here.Although GENEX is originally expressed in terms of ZEM and tgo,using the trans formation method shown in Section 5,GENEX can also be re formulated in terms of the angular velocity of LOS as follows:

    The parameter n appearing in Eqs.(52)and(57)is set to be 1.Be fore launching the missile,the command and control center can figure out the position of the PIP and the velocity vector of the target at the PIP,where the unit vector of the velocity vector of the target at the PIP is denoted as^vTf.Then, for a head-on collision,let the desired final relative velocity vector be

    A scenario is considered here that although the intercept trajectory has been planned perfectly with^vTf=[-0.1840,-0.9720,-0.1462]T,due to the guidance error at the boost phase,the missile has a heading error of about 0.5°at the beginning of the terminal guidance phase.For this scenario,at the terminal guidance phase,the initial conditions are XM0=[354390.76,-1468209.45,6924581.65]Tm,VM0=[1142.97, 4964.53, 2714.43]Tm/s, XT0=[942888.61,1633401.66, 7406664.03]Tm, and VT0=[-1168.38,-6981.35,680.63]Tm/s.

    To show the influence of the measurement error of XTMon OTG,an additional case is considered where it is assumed that the measured magnitude of XTMis 100 m less than its real value and OTG is used as control.

    The simulation results are shown in Table 3 and Figs.15–17,where the solid lines represent the ideal results of OTG,the dashed lines represent the ideal results of GENEX,and the dotted lines represent the results of the case with the measurement error of XTM.As can be seen from Table 3,the velocity increment of OTG is about half that of GENEX,and the measurement error of XTMleads to morefuel consumption.Also because the trajectories for the three cases are very similar,Fig.15 only shows the trajectories and the corresponding ground tracks for OTG.Define θ as the angle between thevelocity vectors of the missile and target.Fig.16 shows the histories of ΔV and θ.From Fig.16(a),it can also be seen that the velocity increment of OTG is much smaller than that of GENEX.From Fig.16(b),it can be seen that θ goes to 180°finally,which means that the missile hits the target from the head-on direction.As can be seen from Fig.17(a),because GENEX does not consider the effect of gravity,GENEX causes the missile to per form some unnecessary maneuvers and thus results in a waste of fuel.In Fig.17(b),because gTMhas no component along^zn,OTG and GENEX are almost the same in this direction and thus generate the similar acceleration commands.In the case with measurement error of XTM,when the missile is close enough to the target where the distance between them is within hundreds of meters,the measurement error results in rapid changes in the guidance command,which leads to fuel waste and a large error in θ.

    Table 3 Comparisons of simulation results with constraint on VTMf.

    Fig.15 Engagement trajectories for OTG with constraint on VTMf.

    6.3.Improved pulsed guidance

    An example is given here to show that some achievements of this paper can be used to improve thefuel efficiency of the pulsed guidance law employed by the missile with fixed thrust level.

    Fig.16 Histories of ΔV and θ for the cases with constraint on VTMf.

    Fig.17 Histories of guidance commands for the cases with constraint on VTMf.

    Zarchan introduced a 2D pulsed guidance law and demonstrated its performance in the long-range exoatmospheric interception.1Here,the guidance is extended to a 3D one and called the basic pulsed guidance(BPG)law.In general,KKV has four divert thrusters in a cruciform con figuration.Assume that the axis of a pair of coaxial thrusters remains along^yn,while the axis of the other pair of coaxial thrusters remains along^zn.The components of XZEMalong^ynand^znare denoted asrespectively.

    As shown in Fig.18,if there is a guidance pulse of magnitude aMlasting for Δt seconds,then the pro file of the lateral maneuvering speed ΔV consists of two segments.In such a case,the lateral maneuvering range is equal to the area of the region enclosed by the time axis and lines depicted in Fig.18(b).

    As the guidance tries to remove the predicted ZEM using one pulse,let the displacement due to thrust be equal to the predicted XZEMas

    Fig.18 Sketch map of pulsed guidance.

    Table 4 Comparisons of simulation results for BPG and IPG.

    Fig.19 Engagement trajectories for IPG.

    Fig.20 Histories of ΔV and predicted ZEM for IPG and BPG.

    Here,Δtynis the commanded duration time for the thrust with the same direction asand Δtznthe commanded duration time for the thrust with the same direction asSolving the above two equations,we obtain Note again that<0.Because the above prediction formulas are inaccurate due to the ignorance of gravity,one trajectory correction cannot eliminate all the real ZEM.There fore,more trajectory corrections are needed.In Ref.1,these corrections are distributed at equal intervals during the flight.To reduce the miss distance,this scheme is slightly modified as:when tgo>30 s,the trajectory correction is conducted every 30 s,but when tgo≤30 s,the trajectory correction is conducted every 5 s.

    Using some achievements of this paper,the prediction formulas of XZEMand tgoconsidering the effect of gravity can be obtained.From Ref.1,there iswhere N1=3+n.By comparing this with Eq.(31),we obtain

    The initial conditions for the current case are the same as those for Case 2 in Section 6.1.The simulation results are shown in Table 4 and Figs.19–21.As can be seen from Table 4 and Fig.20(a),because IPG gives full consideration to the effect of gravity,its miss distance and velocity increment are much smaller than those of BPG.In Fig.19,only the trajectories and the corresponding ground tracks for IPG are presented,also because the trajectories for IPG and BPG are very similar.As shown in Fig.20(b),because IPG predicts the ZEM accurately and controls the missile to per form lateral maneuvers properly,the predicted ZEM of IPG remains nearly zero after the first trajectory correction.Fig.21 shows the histories of the lateral maneuvering accelerations.

    7.Conclusions

    In this paper,using optimal control theory,two optimal terminal guidance laws are developed for exoatmospheric interception:one considers thefinal velocity vector constraint,whereas the other does not consider it.Because the developed guidance laws givefull consideration to the effect of gravity and need not conduct any onboard trajectory simulation,the new guidance laws consume much less fuel than the traditional guidance laws while demanding a light computational load.To convert the OTG laws expressed in terms of XTM,VTMand tgointo that expressed in terms of ωLOS,the 3D trans formation method based on vector operations is proposed,which considers the effect of the gravity difference,especially on theflight time.Additionally,an example is given to show that if the prediction formulas of XZEMand tgoproposed in this study are applied to the pulsed guidance law,the fuel efficiency of the guidance law can be significantly improved.Different from PN,the implement of the OTG laws requires the in formation on the positions of the missile and target in order to calculate the gravity difference and guidance coefficients.

    1.Zarchan P.Tactical and strategic missile guidance.6th ed.Virginia:AIAA Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics;2012.p.299–323.

    2.Yuan CL.Homing and navigation courses of automatic targetseeking devices.J Appl Phys 1948;19(12):1122–8.

    3.Adler FP.Missile guidance by three-dimensional proportional navigation.J Appl Phys 1956;27(5):500–7.

    4.Bryson AE,Ho YC.Applied optimal control.Waltham:Blaisdell;1969.p.148–76.

    5.Guelman M.The closed- form solution of true proportional navigation.IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1976;12(5):472–82.

    6.Becker K.Closed- form solution of pure proportional navigation.IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1990;26(3):526–33.

    7.Yu WB,Chen WC.Guidance law with circular no fly zone constraint.Nonlinear Dyn 2014;78(3):1953–71.

    8.Yang CD,Yang CC.Analytical solution of generalized 3D proportional navigation.In:Proceedings of the 34th conference on decisionamp;control;1995 December 13-15;New Orleans,LA,USA.Piscataway.NJ:IEEE Press;1995.p.3974–9.

    9.Yang CD.Analytical solution of 3D true proportional navigation.IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1996;32(4):1510–22.

    10.Li K,Zhang T,Chen L.Ideal proportional navigation for exoatmospheric interception.Chin J Aeronaut 2013;26(4):976–85.

    11.Su WS,Yao DN,Li KB,Chen L.A novel biased proportional navigation guidance law for close approach phase.Chin J Aeronaut 2016;29(1):228–37.

    12.Garber V.Optimum intercept laws for accelerating targets.AIAA J 1968;6(11):2196–8.

    13.Cottrell RG.Optimal intercept guidance for short-range tactical missiles.AIAA J 1971;9(7):1414–5.

    14.Turetsky V,Shinar J.Missile guidance laws based on pursuitevasion game formulations.Automatica 2003;39(4):607–18.

    15.Ge L,Shen Y,Gao Y,Zhao L.Head pursuit variable structure guidance law for three-dimensional space interception.Chin J Aeronaut 2008;21(3):247–51.

    16.Cherry GW.A general,explicit optimal guidance law for rocketpropelled spacecraft.In:The AIAA/ION astrodynamics guidance and control conference;1964 Aug 24-26;Los Angeles,California,USA.Reston:AIAA;1964.p.1–2.

    17.Ohlmeyer EJ,Phillips CA.Generalized vector explicit guidance.J Guidance Control Dyn 2006;29(2):261–8.

    18.Yu WB,Chen WC.Trajectory shaping guidance with final speed and load factor constraints.ISA Trans 2015;56:42–52.

    19.Wang H,Lin De,Cheng Z.Optimal guidance of extended trajectory shaping.Chin J Aeronaut 2014;27(5):1259–72.

    20.Ben-Asher JZ,Yaesh I.Advances in missile guidance theory.Virginia:AIAA Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics;1998.p.25–88.

    21.Kim M,Grider KV.Terminal guidance for impact attitude angle constrained flight trajectories.IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1973;9(6):852–9.

    22.Ryoo CK,Cho H,Tahk MJ.Time-to-go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraints.IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2006;14(3):483–92.

    23.Zhao J,Zhou R.Three-dimensional cooperative guidance laws against stationary and maneuvering targets.Chin J Aeronaut 2015;28(4):1104–20.

    24.Yang L,Zhou H,Chen WC.Application of linear gauss pseudospectral method in model predictive control.Acta Astronaut 2014;96(1):175–87.

    25.Hablani HB.Endgame guidance and relative navigation of strategic interceptors with delays.J Guidance Control Dyn 2006;29(1):82–94.

    26.Ratnoo A,Ghose D.Collision-geometry-based pulsed guidance law for exoatmospheric interception.J Guidance Control Dyn 2009;32(2):669–74.

    27.Newman B.Strategic Intercept midcourse guidance using modified zero effort miss steering.J Guidance Control Dyn 1996;19(1):107–12.

    28.Lyzhof t J,Wie B.IR telescope and sensor characterization for hypervelocity asteroid intercept guidance.In:AAS/AIAA spaceflight mechanics meeting;2014 Jan 26-30;Santa Fe,New Mexico,USA.Reston:AIAA;2014.p.1–17.

    29.Waldmann J.Line-of -sight rate estimation and linearizing control of an imaging seeker in a tactical missile guided by proportional navigation.IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2002;10(4):556–67.

    30.Ben-Asher JZ,Yaesh I.Optimal guidance with reduced sensitivity to time-to-go estimation errors.J Guidance Control Dyn 1997;20(1):158–63.

    Yu Wenbin received the B.S.degree in aerospace engineering from Beihang University in 2010.After that,he was recommended for pursuing the doctor’s degree directly also in Beihang University and received it in 2016.Now he is a postdoctoral researcher in Beihang University.His main research interests are flight mechanics,guidance and control.

    Chen Wanchun received the B.S.,M.S.and Ph.D.degrees in aerospace engineering,Beihang University,Beijing,in 1986,1989,and 1995,respectively.Since 1989,he has been with the School of Astronautics,Beihang University,where he is currently a Prof essor and Ph.D.supervisor.His main research interests include flight Mechanics,guidance and control,and trajectory optimization.

    Yang Liang received the Ph.D.degree in Beihang University.His research interests areflight mechanics,guidance and control,and trajectory optimization.

    Liu Xiaoming is a Ph.D.and lecturer in Beihang University.His research interests areflight Mechanics,guidance and control,in formation fusion,and sensors applications.

    Zhou Hao received his Ph.D degree in Beihang University and then became a lecturer there.His research interests areflight mechanics and trajectory optimization.

    1 October 2015;revised 7 December 2015;accepted 7 March 2016

    Available online 23 June 2016

    Exoatmospheric interception;

    Explicit guidance;

    Guidance;

    Optimal control;

    Proportional navigation;

    Pulsed guidance

    ?2016 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.Thisisan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    *Corresponding author.Tel.:+86 10 82339226.

    E-mail address:yangliang.buaa@hotmail.com(L.Yang).

    Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

    Production and hosting by Elsevier

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.04.019

    1000-9361?2016 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    久久久久精品人妻al黑| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 日韩电影二区| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 老司机影院毛片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 曰老女人黄片| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 亚洲av福利一区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| videosex国产| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 99九九在线精品视频| 老熟女久久久| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 超碰成人久久| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 男女边摸边吃奶| 午夜av观看不卡| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 精品国产一区二区久久| 性少妇av在线| 国产男女内射视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产在视频线精品| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 久久久精品94久久精品| xxx大片免费视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 精品国产国语对白av| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 18禁观看日本| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 午夜老司机福利片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| www.精华液| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产激情久久老熟女| 在线观看国产h片| 男女国产视频网站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| av一本久久久久| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 免费观看性生交大片5| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 宅男免费午夜| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产精品三级大全| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 国产精品二区激情视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 操出白浆在线播放| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 午夜福利,免费看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| bbb黄色大片| 色吧在线观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 高清欧美精品videossex| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 最黄视频免费看| 多毛熟女@视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲四区av| 国产成人欧美| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| av网站免费在线观看视频| 99热网站在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 午夜激情av网站| 蜜桃在线观看..| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产成人精品久久久久久| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 午夜av观看不卡| 99香蕉大伊视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 美女福利国产在线| 一级黄片播放器| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产乱来视频区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| xxx大片免费视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产色婷婷99| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久久久久精品性色| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 18禁观看日本| 久久99精品国语久久久| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产激情久久老熟女| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 91国产中文字幕| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 1024香蕉在线观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 日本wwww免费看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产在线免费精品| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 考比视频在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| a级毛片黄视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 亚洲综合色网址| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 欧美97在线视频| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 精品一区在线观看国产| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产 精品1| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| h视频一区二区三区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲成人手机| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美另类一区| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| a级毛片黄视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 赤兔流量卡办理| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 飞空精品影院首页| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 亚洲精品自拍成人| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久久久久网色| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 一个人免费看片子| 99热网站在线观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产一级毛片在线| 日本午夜av视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 婷婷色综合www| 一区福利在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 熟女av电影| 国产亚洲最大av| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成年动漫av网址| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 七月丁香在线播放| av线在线观看网站| 日日撸夜夜添| 一级爰片在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 一区福利在线观看| av一本久久久久| 考比视频在线观看| 久久影院123| 考比视频在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 我的亚洲天堂| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 久久97久久精品| 九草在线视频观看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 1024视频免费在线观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久9热在线精品视频| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲人成电影观看| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 黄片小视频在线播放| 两个人看的免费小视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 无限看片的www在线观看| 一夜夜www| 曰老女人黄片| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 黑人操中国人逼视频| 91av网站免费观看| 9热在线视频观看99| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 精品久久久久久,| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 在线天堂中文资源库| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 一夜夜www| 午夜激情av网站| 午夜免费激情av| 丝袜在线中文字幕| av片东京热男人的天堂| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| tocl精华| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 美女午夜性视频免费| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲第一青青草原| 99热只有精品国产| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 不卡一级毛片| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 99国产精品一区二区三区| 一级片免费观看大全| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产高清激情床上av| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲无线在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 悠悠久久av| 久久这里只有精品19| 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美黑人精品巨大| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 午夜久久久在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 天堂动漫精品| 热re99久久国产66热| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 亚洲激情在线av| 制服人妻中文乱码| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产激情久久老熟女| 久久狼人影院| www.精华液| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久国产成人免费| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 中国美女看黄片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| aaaaa片日本免费| 午夜福利高清视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 最好的美女福利视频网| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产精品永久免费网站| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 级片在线观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 精品高清国产在线一区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 香蕉久久夜色| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 黄色成人免费大全| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 级片在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| av福利片在线| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 不卡一级毛片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 一区福利在线观看| 国产高清videossex| 88av欧美| 热re99久久国产66热| 日本a在线网址| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 黄色成人免费大全| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 国产精品 国内视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 成人手机av| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美日本视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 操出白浆在线播放| 黄片小视频在线播放| 成人国产综合亚洲| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 久久国产精品影院|