• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effect of disturbance on biomass, production and carbon dynamics in moist tropical forest of eastern Nepal

    2016-11-24 05:36:01TilakPrasadGautamandTejNarayanMandal
    Forest Ecosystems 2016年3期

    Tilak Prasad Gautamand Tej Narayan Mandal

    Effect of disturbance on biomass, production and carbon dynamics in moist tropical forest of eastern Nepal

    Tilak Prasad Gautam1*and Tej Narayan Mandal2

    Background:Forest biomass is helpful to assess its productivity and carbon(C)sequestration capacity.Several disturbance activities in tropical forests have reduced the biomass and net primary production(NPP)leading to climate change.Therefore,an accurate estimation of forest biomass and C cycling in context of disturbances is required for implementing REDD(Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation)policy.

    Methods:Biomass and NPP of trees and shrubs were estimated by using allometric equations while herbaceous biomass was estimated by harvest method.Fine root biomass was determined from soil monolith.The C stock in vegetation was calculated by multiplying C concentration to dry weight.

    Results:Total stand biomass(Mg·ha-1)in undisturbed forest stand(US)was 960.4 while in disturbed forest stand(DS)it was 449.1.The biomass(Mg·ha-1)of trees,shrubs and herbs in US was 948.0,4.4 and 1.4, respectively,while in DS they were 438.4,6.1 and 1.2,respectively.Total NPP(Mg·ha-1·yr-1)was 26.58 (equivalent to 12.26 Mg C·ha-1·yr-1)in US and 14.91(6.88 Mg C·ha-1·yr-1)in DS.Total C input into soil through litter plus root turnover was 6.78 and 3.35 Mg·ha-1·yr-1in US and DS,respectively.

    Conclusions:Several disturbance activities resulted in the significant loss in stand biomass(53%),NPP (44%),and C sequestration capacity of tropical forest in eastern Nepal.The net uptake of carbon by the vegetation is far greater than that returned to the soil by the turnover of fine root and litter.Therefore,both stands of present forest act as carbon accumulating systems.Moreover,disturbance reflects higher C emissions which can be reduced by better management.

    Tropical forest,Disturbance,Biomass,Production,Carbon cycling,Nepal

    Background

    Tropical forests play an important role in the global C cycle.They contain about 55%of global forest C (Pan et al.2011)and account for 34%of terrestrial gross primary production(Beer et al.2010).Carbon is stored in forests mainly in biomass and soils.The C dynamics of a forest reflects environmental conditions such as climate,soil,structure,nutrient availability and disturbance(Chave et al.2001).Forest disturbances often lead to the changes in species composition,structure,stand biomass,productivity and C cycling.Therefore,a small disruption in tropical forests might result in a significant change in the global C cycle.

    Biomass and production are important parameters for understanding the functioning of a forest ecosystem.Studies on biomass help to assess the effect of disturbances on productivity,C dynamics,nutrient cycling and stability of forest stands.Primary production is usually regulated by the availability of nutrients.Decomposed fine roots and aboveground litter are the sources of nutrients in the soil.The contribution of fine roots in the C and nutrients input to soil is equivalent or even higher to that from leaf litter in tropical moist forests(Roderstein et al.2005).

    Precise quantification of forest biomass,production,and C stock demands the careful estimation of boththeabovegroundandbelowgroundaspects. Despite this requirement,most of the past studies in tropical forests are found to be limited to analyzing the aboveground systems(Chave et al.2008;Djomo et al.2011;Malhi et al.2011;Doughty et al.2013; Ngo et al.2013;Girardin et al.2014;Malhi et al. 2014)and only a few studies concern to the belowground aspects(Ibrahima et al.2010;Powers and Perez-Aviles 2013;Noguchi et al.2014).

    In Nepal,only few studies have been conducted regarding the biomass,production,and C sequestration in tropical forests(Mandal 1999;Baral et al. 2009).More information is required to understand the structure and functioning of the forests.Present studywasdesignedintropicalforestofeastern Nepal with the following specific objectives:a)to estimate the biomass and production of herb,shrub and tree species;b)to find out the effect of disturbance on biomass,production and C dynamics.

    Methods

    Study area

    The study was conducted in a Sal(Shorea robusta) dominated moist tropical forest of Sunsari District, eastern Nepal(latitude 26°41’N to 26°50’N and longitude 87°09’E to 87°21’E),within the altitude range of 220 to 370 m above msl(Fig.1).The forest lies in the catchment area of Koshi River,one of the largest rivers in Nepal.The total area occupied by the forest is 11394 ha.

    The central part(core area)of the forest is relatively undisturbed,while the peripheral part is affected by disturbance activities as removal of timber, livestock grazing,fuel-wood and litter collection,tree lopping,removal of poles for house-hold constructions and forest fires.These disturbances have caused deforestation,forest fragmentation and degradation and subsequent invasion of exotic species like Mikania micrantha,Lantana camara,and Chromolaena odorata,which adversely affect the native plant diversity in the forest.

    The climate is tropical and monsoon type with three distinct seasons:dry and warm summer(March to May), wet and warm rainy(June to October),and dry and cool winter(November to February).The mean monthly minimum and maximum air temperature during 2005–2014 ranged from 10.9°C to 25.3°C and 22.6°C to 33.2°C,respectively.The average annual rainfall for the period was 1998.6 mm(Fig.2).Relative humidity was higher in rainy season with highest value in August(92%).

    The forest is bordered by the Siwalik hill in the north and the Gangetic alluvial plains in the south.The area has been formed from soft erodible sediments of the Siwaliks and is characterized by the presence of boulder beds mixed with sand,silt,clay imparting a porous nature.The soil mainly consists of deep alfisols.

    The forest tree layer is dominated by Sal.Other main associates are Haldina cordifolia,Lagerstroemia parviflora,and Terminalia alata.Clerodendron viscosum and Murraya koenigii are some of the main shrub species while Chromolaena odorata and Achyranthes aspera are dominant herbs.

    Plant biomass estimation

    The forest was divided into 2 parts:i)the relatively undisturbed core area(treated as undisturbed stand; US),and ii)the disturbed peripheral area(treated as disturbed stand;DS).Because of the following characters the core area was considered as US:canopy area ranged between 153.8 and 226.9 m2,crown cover ranged from 70–80%,density of the tree was 466.4 individuals?ha?1and tree stumps were absent. The peripheral part of the forest is disturbed because of following characters:canopy area ranged between 28.3 and 77.5 m2,crown cover ranged from 30–40%,tree density was 234.3 individuals·ha?1and tree stump density was 70 stumps·ha?1.

    The tree biomass contained within US was estimated using 35 randomly established sample plots of 20 m×20 m size determined by species-area curve method.Same size was applied for DS as well.For the estimation of shrub and herb biomass nested quadrats of 5 m×5 m and 1 m×1 m were used,respectively.Girths of all the trees(>10 cm gbh)at breast height(1.37 cm above the soil)and of shrubs (10 cm above the ground level)present in each of the sample plots were measured.Density(individual per hectare)and basal area(girth2·(4π)?1)of the trees within plots were determined.Biomass of trees wasestimatedbyusinggirth:biomassallometric equations(Singh and Singh 1992;Mandal 1999).For estimating coarse root biomass,root:shoot ratio of 0.21 proposed for lowland tropical forests was used (Malhi et al.2009;Malhi et al.2014).

    The aboveground herbaceous biomass present in the sampling plots was harvested twice,in summer (May 2012)and at the end of rainy season(September 2012).Summer and rainy season values were averaged to obtain annual mean herbaceous biomass.

    Fine roots(<5 mm diameter)were collected from seventy randomly established sample plots,thirty five each in US and DS.Fine root biomass(FRB)was determined from soil monolith(10 cm×10 cm× 30 cm),divided into two depth ranges(upper:0–15 cm and lower:15–30 cm)at each sample plot in summer(May 2011),rainy(September 2011)andwinter(January 2012)seasons.Summer,rainy and winter season values were averaged to obtain annual mean FRB.

    Litterfall and litter mass

    For the estimation of litterfall one litter trap(1 m× 1 m)was fixed on the forest floor at each of the seventysamplingplots.Litterfallwascollectedat monthly intervals from April 2011 to March 2012 and categorized into leaf and non-leaf components. Litter mass accumulated at each sampling plot was collected once every season from one 1 m×1 m plot. The turnover rate of litter was calculated according to Jenny et al.(1949).

    Net production

    Using the allometric equations,the aboveground biomass (AGB)of different components of marked trees/shrubs in permanent sampling plots was computed for 2011(B1) and 2012(B2)from respective girth measurements.The net changes in biomass(ΔB=B2–B1)of components yielded annual biomass increments which were summed to get the net AGB accretion in the trees/shrubs.Aboveground herbaceous net production was estimated as thedifferences between maximum and minimum biomass values through the year.

    The annual leaf fall was added to the foliage biomass accumulation to represent leaf production,and wood and miscellaneous litterfall values were added to the biomass accumulation in twigs(Singh et al. 1994).Coarse root production was estimated as a fraction of stem production(Malhi et al.2009;Malhi et al.2014).Fine root production(FRP)was estimated as the differences between maximum(rainy season values)and minimum(summer season values) biomass values.The fine root turnover was calculated as a ratio of its production and annual mean biomass(Srivastava et al.1986).

    Carbon estimation in vegetation and litter

    Samples of different tree,shrub and herb(aboveground)components of all species were collected from each sampling plot.The litter(leaf and nonleaf)and fine root(<2 and 2–5 mm diameter)samples were also collected.All the samples were oven dried at 80°C to constant weight,powdered and used separately for C analyses.

    Carbon present in plant materials was estimated by ash content method.Carbon concentrations were assumed to be approximately 50%of ash free weight (McBrayer and Cromack 1980).In this method oven dried plant components(stem,branch,root,leaf, and litter)were burnt separately in electric furnace at 400°C.Ash content(inorganic elements in the form of oxides)left after burning was weighed and carbon concentration was calculated by using the following equation:

    The C stock in vegetation was calculated by multiplying C concentration(a conversion factor)to dry weight. A conversion factor of 0.470 was used to convert aboveground and coarse root biomass to C.To obtain C stock in fine roots a conversion factor of 0.430 and 0.455 was used for<2 and 2–5 mm size class,respectively.The conversion factors of 0.453 and 0.468 were used for leaf and non-leaf litter,respectively.

    Soil sampling and carbon estimation

    Soil samples were collected from 70 randomly selected pots(35 each in US and DS).Soil was collected from three pits(10 cm×10 cm×30 cm each) from each plot.The soils of three pits were mixed and pooled as one replicate(Singh et al.2001).Bulk density(BD)was determined by using a metallic tube while soil organic carbon(SOC)by dichromate oxidation method(Kalembasa and Jenkinson 1973).Carbon content in soil(Mg C·ha?1soil)was calculated using the formula:

    where SOC is soil organic carbon in%and BD is bulk density(g·cm?3).

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical tests were carried out in MS excel 2007 and SPSS(IBM Statistics,ver.20)packages.All the data were normally distributed except that of basal area of trees which were log transformed before analysis.Pearson’s correlation coefficients were obtained between normal and linear data of biomass,net production,stand density and basal area of trees.Students T-test was performed to compare the mean biomass and production of trees between US and DS.

    Results

    Plant biomass

    The biomass and C stocks of trees,shrubs,herbs and fine roots are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.The estimated total biomass for the US was 960.4 Mg·ha–1(equivalent to 452.06 Mg C·ha–1),while for DS it was 449.1 Mg·ha–1(equivalent to 211.33 Mg C·ha–1).

    The total biomass(Mg·ha–1)of the tree layer in US and DS was found to be 948.0 and 438.4,respectively. The tree biomass in the US and DS was significantly different(P<0.001 at 95%confidence level).Of the total tree biomass,83%was aboveground and 17%belowground(excluding fine root)in both the stands.The maximum contribution to tree AGB was made by bole in both stands(64%each)and minimum by foliage(2% each in both stands).

    The shrub biomass(Mg·ha–1)showed increasing trend from 4.4 at US to 6.1 at DS.Contribution of shrub biomass to the total stand biomass was higher in DS (1.4%)than US(0.5%).The aboveground herbaceous biomass contributed 0.1%in US and 0.3%in DS.The fine roots shared 0.7–0.8%to total stand biomass.The annual FRB was lower in DS by 49.5%.

    Table 1 Oven-dried stand biomass(Mg·ha?1)and carbon stock(Mg C·ha?1)in moist tropical forest of eastern Nepal

    Litterfall

    The total annual litterfall(Mg·ha?1·yr?1)was 11.8 in US and 5.4 in DS.Leaves accounted for 69%(US) to 76%(DS)of total litterfall while non-leaf litter formed the rest.The total litter mass(Mg·ha?1) comprised 6.7 in US and 3.6 in DS.The turnover rate(per yr)of the total litter ranged from 0.79 in DS to 0.83 in US.

    Net production

    The total NPP(Mg·ha–1·yr–1)of the forest was 26.6 (equivalent to an annual C sequestration of 12.26 Mg C·ha–1·yr–1)in US and 14.9(i.e.6.88 Mg C·ha–1·yr–1)in DS(Table 3).Among the different life forms:tree,shrub, and herb comprised 72%,2%,and 6%of NPP in US and 67%,5%,and 9%in DS,respectively;while rest 20%NPP in US and 19%in DS were contributed by stand fine root.

    The contribution in NPP by different components of trees was in the order leaf>bole>twig>coarse root>branch,in both stands(Table 4).The most prominent C sink was found to be leaf that accounted for 42–43%of the total NPP.For shrub,maximum contribution to NPP was made by stem in both stands and minimum by foliage.The NPP of herbs(aboveground)ranged between 1.3 and 1.7 Mg·ha–1·yr–1in DS and US,respectively(Table 3).

    Total aboveground NPP(Mg·ha–1·yr–1)combining tree,shrub and herb were 19.93 in US and 10.97 in DS. In belowground parts,percentage allocation of NPP was up to 25%of total NPP(26.58 Mg·ha–1·yr–1)in US and 26%(3.94 Mg·ha–1·yr–1)in DS(Table 5).Of this,both tree and shrub’s coarse root contributed about 21 and 26%to total belowground NPP in US and DS,respectively;whereas fine root comprised nearly 79%of belowground NPP in US and 74%in DS.

    Table 2 Carbon stock(Mg C·ha?1)estimates for undisturbed and disturbed stands of moist tropical forest of eastern Nepal

    Consideringbothdepths,averageturnoverrate (per yr)of smaller fine roots(0–2 mm diameter) was 0.75 in US and 0.86 in DS,whereas it was 0.74 and 0.76 for larger size class(2–5 mm)in US and DS,respectively.Thebiomassaccumulationratio (biomass/net production)decreased to 30 due to the consequences of forest disturbance in DS,while this value was higher(36)in US.Net production of trees was significantly higher in US than DS(P<0.001). Positive correlations were found between stand density,basal area,biomass and NPP of trees in both stands(Table 5).

    Table 3 Net primary production(NPP;Mg·ha?1·yr?1)and carbon allocation(Mg C·ha?1·yr?1)in different components of vegetation in moist tropical forest of eastern Nepal

    Table 4 Net production(Mg·ha?1·yr?1)of trees and shrubs and their distribution(%)in different components in moist tropical forest of eastern Nepal

    Table 5 Pearson's correlations between stand density,basal area,biomass and net production of trees in undisturbed and disturbed stands of moist tropical forest in eastern Nepal

    Carbon budget and flux

    The dry matter values for standing crops,net production,litterfall etc.of both undisturbed and disturbed stands were converted to C(Figs.3 and 4).Aboveground C storage in both stands was 82%of the total C in vegetation and 64–69%of that stored in stand(vegetation plus soil).The forest received a C input through NPP of 12.26 Mg·ha–1·yr–1in US and 6.88 Mg·ha–1·yr–1in DS. Of this,69%was associated with aboveground and 31% with root NPP in US while in DS,contributions from aboveground and root parts to total NPP was 67 and 33%,respectively.

    Wood(bole plus branch)and roots accounted for 47%(in US)to 53%(in DS)of the total C input,the remaining 53%in US and 47%in DS being utilized forthe extension of the photosynthetic parts(tree and shrub foliage plus herbaceous shoots).The input from the foliage compartment to the litter compartment was 3.90 Mg·ha–1·yr–1(equivalent to 100%of herbaceous aboveground production plus 86%of foliage production) in US while it was 2.17 Mg·ha–1·yr–1for DS.About 14% (0.51 Mg·ha–1·yr–1in US and 0.26 Mg·ha–1·yr–1in DS)of foliage production did not find its way into leaf litterfall.

    Carbon addition to the soil through the turnover of roots and aboveground litter amounted to 1.98 and 4.80 Mg·ha–1·yr–1,respectively in US(fine root and litter turnover were 86 and 83%per yr,respectively). Similarly,C input due to the turnover of roots and aboveground litter was 1.05 and 2.30 Mg·ha–1·yr–1, respectively in DS(fine root and litter turnover were 82 and 79%per yr,respectively).Evidently,contribution of belowground plant parts to soil C is substantial,representing 29 and 32%of the total input in US and DS,respectively.

    Discussion

    Biomass and production

    The average biomass of the vegetation in both US and DS was 704.8 Mg?ha–1(331.7 Mg C?ha–1).More than double biomass in US as compared to DS may be related to the presence of more trees of larger girth classes.The lower biomass in DS may be the result of lower density of trees (234 individuals?ha–1)compared to US(466 individuals?ha–1).It may also be associated with disturbance activities like tree felling and removing for timber,firewood collection, lopping,grazing,and selective logging.

    Biomass allocated to shrub was higher in DS than US.It may be the result of their ability to utilize the space and resource created by disturbances.The higher biomass of herbs in US as compared to DS may be due to the nutrient rich soil at this stand(Gautam and Mandal 2013).The different causes are put forward by different workers regarding the accumulation of biomass in the forest.Mean annual precipitation explains 55%of the variation in biomass in seasonally dry tropical forests(Becknell et al. 2012).The available nutrients,soil,land use history,species composition and stand age are also responsible for the remaining variations(Powers et al.2009).

    Most of the C stock in the forest was associated with AGB(64–69%).Belowground biomass and soil up to the depth of 30 cm contained 31 to 36%C stock.Past study also found 33%C in top soil of 1 m in primary tropical forest of Singapore(Ngo et al.2013).Globally, tropical forests store about 50%C in AGB and next 50%within 1 m soil(Dixon et al.1994).The contribution of these pools to the total C stocks varies among the sites.For example,an African moist tropical forest had more than three times as much C in AGB as in soil to 1 m depth(Djomo et al.2011),while a Peruvian montane forest had twice as much C in soil as in AGB(Gibbon et al.2010).Two Asian forests,a tropical seasonal forest in China(Lü et al.2010)and a lowland dipterocarp forest in Malaysia(Saner et al.2012)store twice as much C in biomass as in soil.The contribution of leaf fall to total litterfall in the present study(69%at US and 76%at DS)is in the range of past studies in tropical forests(72–74%)(Girardin et al.2014;Malhi et al.2014).

    The data obtained for NPP are comparable with the different tropical forests of world(Table 6).Although having higher biomass,the NPP of present forest is relatively low indicating its maturity.Generally,in old growth tropical forests the NPP remains either stationary or decreases with age.The higher NPP of some old tropical forests may be linked to forest dynamics.The more dynamic forests favor faster growing trees and species with lower biomass and maintenance costs(Malhi et al.2009).

    Aboveground NPP of US(8.54 Mg C·ha?1·yr–1,excluding herbs)is comparable with the tropical forests of world while quite low than the eastern Amazonian forest(Doughty et al.2013).Moreover,aboveground NPP of DS(4.54 Mg C·ha?1·yr–1,excluding herb)is near to paleotropical forests,and mean of the world tropical forests.As far as the belowground NPP is concerned(1.77–2.98 Mg C·ha?1·yr–1),it is comparable to the Amazonian tropical forest(Table 6).

    Disturbance affects the NPP either by increasing resource availability or through the changes in functional properties of community.The disturbance results in canopy opening,which increases availability of light, favor new leaf production,and finally above-ground allocation increases(Arag?o et al.2009).But in the present study,percentage allocation to aboveground parts was almost same in both US and DS.It may be the result of severe lopping activities in DS,which is also indicated by less percentage of NPP allocation to twig and leaf,and higher percentage allocation to bole and branch in DS. Relatively higher percentage of NPP in coarse root of DS indicated higher allocation to root to collect more water and nutrients from nutrient deficient soil.

    Among different components of trees,leaf accounted highest percentage(43%in US and 42%in DS)of tree NPP.It was almost similar to the earlier findings for tropical forests(Hertel et al.2009;Doughty et al.2013). A global dataset of NPP allocation in tropical forests reported 34%in canopy,39%in wood,and 27%in fine roots(Malhi et al.2011).Present data of US,excluding herb NPP,also showed almost same pattern of allocation (33%canopy,46%woody tissue including coarse root, and 21%fine roots).

    Higher allocation of NPP in shrubs of DS as compared to that of US may be due to open canopy created as a result of logging and lopping of trees.The higher NPP of herbs in US might be associated with higher moisture and nutrients due to accumulation of more litter on the soil.Fine root,although sharing a very small percentage to total plant biomass,is one of the major belowground components of the NPP.In present study,FRB shared less than 1%to total biomass but contributed 19–20% to total NPP.The estimated FRP in this study was within the ranges of 1.1–6.2 Mg·ha?1·yr–1for global tropical forests(Vogt et al.1986).

    Carbon budget and flux

    Aboveground C storage in both stands was 82%of the total stored in vegetation and 64–69%of that stored in the stand(vegetation plus soil).These values compare with the aboveground storage of 83%vegetation C and 51%stand C in a dry tropical forest in India(Singh and Singh 1991).As in other tropical forests,relatively higher contribution of aboveground parts to the stand C in present case may be due to the presence of large sized trees with wide canopy.

    The contribution of aboveground(74–75%)and root(25–26%)parts to stand NPP in both forest stands is comparable to 72%NPP for aboveground parts(Singh and Singh 1991).The higher contribution of wood parts to the total C input as compared to foliage in DS may be due to the lopping of branches and twigs.On the other hand,closed canopy of trees in US accounted for higher input of foliage C compared to wood.

    The transfer of C from foliage compartment to the litter compartment involved 100%ofherbaceous aboveground production plus 86%of foliage production while the remaining amount,i.e.,about 14%of foliage production did not find its way into leaf litterfall.It happens due to the losses during senescence (Singh and Singh 1991).

    Table 6 Net primary production(NPP)of different forests of the World

    Litterfall and FRB are important vectors of nutrient recycling in forest ecosystems.Their turnover is usually determined by species,age groups,canopy cover, weather conditions and biotic factors.Total C input into soil through litter plus root turnover was 6.78 and 3.35 Mg·ha–1·yr–1in US and DS,respectively, suggesting substantial retention of C in the vegetation over in annual cycle(45%in US and 51%in DS).It indicates that the present forest is C-accumulating system,acting as a significant global C sink,as other wet tropical forests(Pan et al.2011).

    Conclusions

    The present study indicated that various types of anthropogenic disturbances have altered the structure and functioning of the economically important Saldominated forest.Although in having higher biomass,the NPP of present forest is relatively low indicating its maturity.Several disturbance activities like lopping,fodder collection,litter removal,grazing etc.result in the significant loss in stand biomass (53%)and net production(44%).Due to forest disturbance C stock and C sequestration capacity are reduced which reflects the higher C emissions.From the management point of view,better policy to reduce the C emission through vegetation should be formulated as per the objective of REDD+.In spite of this,both stands of this forest appear to act as C-accumulating system,an important global C sink.

    Abbreviations

    AGB:aboveground biomass;DS:disturbed forest stand;NPP:net primary production;US:undisturbed forest stand.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’contributions

    TP carried out field and laboratory works,analyzed data,designed and drafted the manuscript.TN designed and supervised the research.Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Authors’information

    1)TP participated in this research as a doctoral student.At present,he is working as Associate Professor in the Department of Botany,Mahendra Morang Adarsha Multiple Campus,Tribhuvan University,Biratnagar,Nepal. 2)TN is a professor of Botany in Post Graduate Campus,Tribhuvan University,Biratnagar,Nepal.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are grateful to the Head,Department of Botany,Post Graduate Campus,Tribhuvan University,Biratnagar,Nepal for providing laboratory and library facilities.First author is thankful to the University Grants Commission, Nepal for Scholarship.Our heartfelt thanks go to Mr.KP Bhattarai who helped in data collection and laboratory analysis.

    Author details

    1Department of Botany,Mahendra Morang Adarsha Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University,Biratnagar,Nepal.2Department of Botany,Post Graduate Campus,Tribhuvan University,Biratnagar,Nepal.

    References

    Arag?o LEOC,Malhi Y,Metcalfe DB,Silva-Espejo JE,Jiménez E,Navarrete D, Almeida S,Costa ACL,Salinas N,Phillips OL,Anderson LO,Alvarez E,Baker TR,Goncalvez PH,Huamán-Ovalle J,Mamani-Solórzano M,Meir P, Monteagudo A,Pati?o S,Pe?uela MC,Prieto A,Quesada CA,Rozas-Dávila A, Rudas A,Silva JA Jr,Vásquez R(2009)Above-and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils. Biogeosciences 6:2759-2778

    Baral SK,Malla R,Ranabhat S(2009)Above-ground carbon stock assessment in different forest types of Nepal.Banko Jankari 19:10-14

    Becknell JM,Kissing Kucek L,Powers JS(2012)Aboveground biomass in mature and secondary seasonally dry tropical forests:A literature review and global synthesis.For Ecol Manag 276:88-95

    Beer C,Reichstein M,Tomelleri E,Ciais P,Jung M,Carvalhais N,Rodenbeck C, Altaf Arain M,Baldocchi D,Bonan GB,Bondeau A,Cescatti A,Lasslop G, Lindroth A,Lomas M,Luyssaert S,Margolis H,Oleson KW,Roupsard O, Veenendaal E,Viovy N,Williams C,Woodward FI,Papale D(2010)Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake:global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329:834-838

    Bombelli A,Henry M,Castaldi S,Adu-Bredu S,Arneth A,de Grandcourt A,Grieco E,Kutsch WL,Lehsten V,Rasile A,Reichstein M,Tansey K,Weber U,Valentini R(2009)The sub-Saharan Africa carbon balance,an overview.Biogeosci. Discuss 6:2085-2123.

    Chave J,Olivier J,Bongers F,Chatelet P,Forget P-M,van der Meer P,Norden N, Riera B,Charles-Dominique P(2008)Above-ground biomass and productivity in a rain forest of eastern South America.J Trop Ecol 24:355-366

    Chave J,Riera B,Dubois MA(2001)Estimation of biomass in a Neotropical forest of French Guiana:Spatial and temporal variability.J Trop Ecol 17:79-96

    Dixon RK,Solomon AM,Brown S,Houghton RA,Trexler MC,Wisniewski J(1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems.Science 263:185-190

    Djomo AN,Knohl A,Gravenhorst G(2011)Estimations of total ecosystem carbon pools distribution and carbon biomass current annual increment of a moist tropical forest.For Ecol Manag 261:1448-1459

    Doughty CE,Metcalfe DB,da Costa MC,de Oliveira AAR,Neto GFC,Silva JA, Arag?o LEOC,Almeida SS,Quesada CA,Girardin CAJ,Halladay K,da Costa AC,Malhi Y(2013)The production,allocation and cycling of carbon in a forest on fertile terra preta soil in eastern Amazonia compared with a forest on adjacent infertile soil.Plant Ecol Diversity 7:41-53

    Gautam TP,Mandal TN(2013)Soil characteristics in moist tropical forest of Sunsari district,Nepal.Nepal J Sci Tech 14:35-40

    Gibbon A,Silman MR,Malhi Y,Fisher JB,Meir P,Zimmermann M,Dargie GC, Farfan WR,Garcia KC(2010)Ecosystem carbon storage across the grasslandforest transition in the high Andes of Manu National Park,Peru.Ecosystems 13:1097-1111

    Girardin CAJ,Espejob JES,Doughty CE,Huasco WH,Metcalfe DB,Durand-Baca L, Marthews TR,Aragao LEOC,Farfán-Rios W,García-Cabrera K,Halladay K, Fisher JB,Galiano-Cabrera DF,Huaraca-Quispe LP,Alzamora-Taype I,Eguiluz-Mora L,Salinas-Revilla N,Silman MR,Meir P,Malhi Y(2014)Productivity and carbon allocation in a tropical montane cloud forest in the Peruvian Andes. Plant Ecol Diversity 7:107-123

    Hertel D,Moser G,Culmsee H,Erasmi S,Horna V,Schuldt B,Leuschner C(2009) Below-and above-ground biomass and net primary production in a paleotropical natural forest(Sulawesi,Indonesia)as compared to neotropical forests.For Ecol Manag 258:1904-1912

    Ibrahima A,Mvondo ZEA,Ntonga JC(2010)Fine root production and distribution in the tropical rainforests of south-western Cameroon:effects of soil type and selective logging.iForest:Biogeosc For 3:130-136

    Jenny H,Gessel SP,Bingham FT(1949)Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical region.Soil Sci 68:419-432

    Kalembasa SJ,Jenkinson DS(1973)A comparative study of titremetric and gravimetric methods for the determination of organic carbon in soil.J Sci Food Agri 24:1085-1090

    Lü XT,Yin JX,Jepsen MR,Tang JW(2010)Ecosystem carbon storage and partitioning in a tropical seasonal forest in Southwestern China.For Ecol Manag 260:1798-1803

    Malhi Y,Aragao LEO,Metcalfe DLB,Paiva R,Quesada CA,Almeida S,Anderson L, Brando P,Chambers JQ,Costa ACL,Hutyra L,Oliveira P,Patino S,Pyle EH, Robertson AL,Teixeira LM(2009)Comprehensive assessment of carbonproductivity,allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests.Glob Change Biol 15:1255-1274

    Malhi Y,Doughty C,Galbraith D(2011)The allocation of ecosystem net primary productivity in tropical forests.Philos Trans R Soc B:Biol Sci 366:3225-3245

    Malhi Y,Farfán Amézquita F,Doughty CE,Silva-Espejo JE,Girardin CAJ,Metcalfe DB,Arag?o LEOC,Huaraca-Quispe LP,Alzamora-Taype I,Eguiluz-Mora L, Marthews TR,Halladay K,Quesada CA,Robertson AL,Fisher JB,Zaragoza-Castells J,Rojas-Villagra CM,Pelaez-Tapia Y,Salinas N,Meir P,Phillips OL (2014)The productivity,metabolism and carbon cycle of two lowland tropical forest plots in south-western Amazonia,Peru.Plant Ecol Diversity 7: 85-105

    Mandal T(1999)Ecological analysis of recovery of landslide damaged Sal forest ecosystem in Nepal Himalaya.Dissertation,Banaras Hindu University,Varanasi

    McBrayer JF,Cromack KJ(1980)Effect of snowpack on oak-litter breakdown and nutrient release in a Minnesota forest.Pedobiologia 20:47-54

    Ngo KM,Turner BL,Muller-Landau HC,Davies SJ,Larjavaara M,Nik Hassan NF, Lum S(2013)Carbon stocks in primary and secondary tropical forests in Singapore.For Ecol Manag 296:81-89

    Noguchi H,Suwa R,de Souza CAS,da Silva RP,dos Santos J,Higuchi N,Kajimoto T,Ishizuka M(2014)Examination of vertical distribution of fine root biomass in a tropical moist forest of the Central Amazon,Brazil.Japan Agri Res Quarterly 48:231-235

    Pan Y,Birdsey RA,Fang J,Houghton R,Kauppi PE,Kurz WA,Phillips OL, Shvidenko A,Lewis SL,Canadell JG,Ciais P,Jackson RB,Pacala SW,McGuire AD,Piao S,Rautiainen A,Sitch S,Hayes D(2011)A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.Science 333:988-993

    Powers JS,Becknell JM,Irving J,Pèrez-Aviles D(2009)Diversity and structure of regenerating tropical dry forests in Costa Rica:Geographic patterns and environmental drivers.For Ecol Manag 258:959-970

    Powers JS,Perez-Aviles D(2013)Edaphic factors are a more important control on surface fine roots than stand age in secondary tropical dry forests.Biotropica 45:1-9

    Roderstein M,Hertel D,Leuschner C(2005)Above and below-ground litter production in three tropical montane forests in southern Ecuador.J Trop Ecol 21:483-492

    Saner P,Loh YY,Ong RC,Hector A(2012)Carbon stocks and fluxes in tropical lowland dipterocarp rainforests in Sabah,Malaysian Borneo.PloS One 7.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029642

    Singh JS,Singh SP(1992)Forests of Himalaya.Gyanodaya Prakashan,Nainital

    Singh KP,Mandal TN,Tripathi SK(2001)Patterns of restoration of soil physciochemical properties and microbial biomass in different landslide sites in the sal forest ecosystem of Nepal Himalaya.Ecol Eng 17:385-401

    Singh L,Singh JS(1991)Storage and flux of nutrients in a dry tropical forest in India.Ann Botany 68:275-284

    Singh SP,Adhikari BS,Zobel DB(1994)Biomass,productivity,leaf longevity,and forest structure in the Central Himalaya.Ecol Monogr 64:401-421

    Srivastava SK,Singh KP,Upadhyay RS(1986)Fine root growth dynamics in teak (Tectona grandis Linn.F.).Can J For Res 16:1360-1364

    Vogt KA,Grier CC,Vogt DJ(1986)Production,turnover and nutrient dynamics of above and belowground detritus of world forests.Adv Ecol Res 15:303-377

    *Correspondence:tilakg024@gmail.com

    1Department of Botany,Mahendra Morang Adarsha Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University,Biratnagar,Nepal

    Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

    ?2016 Gautam and Mandal.Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and

    reproduction in any medium,provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s)and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license,and indicate if changes were made.

    10 February 2016 Accepted:18 April 2016

    a级毛色黄片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 欧美3d第一页| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 少妇丰满av| 综合色丁香网| 色视频www国产| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久影院123| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产 精品1| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 高清av免费在线| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 内地一区二区视频在线| 岛国毛片在线播放| www.色视频.com| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 在线播放无遮挡| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| xxx大片免费视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 日本欧美视频一区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 大码成人一级视频| 国产 精品1| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产极品天堂在线| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 99热6这里只有精品| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 一级毛片电影观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲性久久影院| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 99热全是精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 黄片wwwwww| av国产精品久久久久影院| 精品一区二区三卡| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 多毛熟女@视频| 简卡轻食公司| kizo精华| 少妇丰满av| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 一级黄片播放器| kizo精华| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产色婷婷99| 午夜福利在线在线| av卡一久久| 高清毛片免费看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 一个人免费看片子| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 男女国产视频网站| 成年av动漫网址| h日本视频在线播放| 美女国产视频在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 亚洲不卡免费看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 久久97久久精品| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 在线看a的网站| 色哟哟·www| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产成人精品婷婷| 成人二区视频| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 男女免费视频国产| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 美女国产视频在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产在视频线精品| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 少妇人妻 视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 1000部很黄的大片| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 综合色丁香网| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 22中文网久久字幕| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| videos熟女内射| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久久久性生活片| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚州av有码| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一级a做视频免费观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产在线视频一区二区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 天堂8中文在线网| 97在线人人人人妻| 中文欧美无线码| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 日本一二三区视频观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 国产精品免费大片| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日本午夜av视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产 精品1| 看免费成人av毛片| av一本久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 久久精品人妻少妇| 日本一二三区视频观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲性久久影院| 美女国产视频在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产乱人视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 久久久精品94久久精品| 精品久久久噜噜| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 欧美日本视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 欧美性感艳星| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲国产色片| 99热全是精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 老女人水多毛片| 少妇的逼水好多| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 内射极品少妇av片p| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| av福利片在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产精品无大码| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 精品午夜福利在线看| 免费大片18禁| 一本久久精品| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产毛片在线视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产黄色免费在线视频| www.色视频.com| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 精品久久久久久久末码| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 97超视频在线观看视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久久久视频综合| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 香蕉精品网在线| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 欧美区成人在线视频| 中文欧美无线码| 大码成人一级视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| av.在线天堂| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 久久久久久伊人网av| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久久午夜欧美精品| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| av在线app专区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 秋霞伦理黄片| 熟女电影av网| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 天堂8中文在线网| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 极品教师在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 99久久精品一区二区三区| av.在线天堂| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 日韩伦理黄色片| 午夜免费鲁丝| av黄色大香蕉| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 少妇 在线观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 日本欧美国产在线视频| h视频一区二区三区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 亚洲中文av在线| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 身体一侧抽搐| 搡老乐熟女国产| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 伦精品一区二区三区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 韩国av在线不卡| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产一级毛片在线| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久午夜福利片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲性久久影院| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 精品国产三级普通话版| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日本黄色片子视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 多毛熟女@视频| 99久久人妻综合| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 午夜福利视频精品| 少妇的逼水好多| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 99热全是精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久这里有精品视频免费| www.色视频.com| 成人二区视频| 在线看a的网站| 久久97久久精品| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产 精品1| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产精品免费大片| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 久久久久精品性色| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 一个人免费看片子| 国产精品成人在线| 一级毛片我不卡| 内射极品少妇av片p| 有码 亚洲区| 国产91av在线免费观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲在久久综合| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 午夜福利高清视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产综合精华液| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 熟女电影av网| 观看美女的网站| h视频一区二区三区| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 男女边摸边吃奶| 婷婷色综合www| 老司机影院毛片| av国产精品久久久久影院| 欧美日本视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| av黄色大香蕉| 少妇丰满av| 国产视频内射| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| av卡一久久| 国产毛片在线视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 成年av动漫网址| 观看美女的网站| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 成年免费大片在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久av网站| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 中文欧美无线码| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 午夜福利在线在线| 一本久久精品| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 一本久久精品| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| videossex国产| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| .国产精品久久| 国产精品久久久久成人av| .国产精品久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | av在线老鸭窝| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产成人精品婷婷| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产色婷婷99| 色哟哟·www| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 欧美另类一区| 91狼人影院| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 黄色配什么色好看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| av卡一久久| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 国产乱人视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产极品天堂在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| freevideosex欧美| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 久热久热在线精品观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 一区在线观看完整版| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 秋霞伦理黄片| 舔av片在线| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 精品人妻视频免费看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 日日撸夜夜添| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| av专区在线播放| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 免费看光身美女| 中文字幕制服av| 国产 一区精品| 一级av片app| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲第一av免费看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 精品视频人人做人人爽|