• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Cloud microphysical differences with precipitation intensity in a torrential rainfall event in Sichuan, China

    2016-11-23 01:55:49HUANGYongJieCUIXiaoPengandWANGYaPing
    關(guān)鍵詞:物理

    HUANG Yong-Jie, CUI Xiao-Pengand WANG Ya-Ping

    aKey Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Severe Storms, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;bCollege of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;cCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    Cloud microphysical differences with precipitation intensity in a torrential rainfall event in Sichuan, China

    HUANG Yong-Jiea,b, CUI Xiao-Penga,cand WANG Ya-Pinga,b

    aKey Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Severe Storms, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;bCollege of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;cCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    High-resolution data of a torrential rainfall event in Sichuan, China, simulated by the WRF model,were used to analyze the cloud microphysical differences with precipitation intensity. Sixhourly accumulated rainfall was classified into five bins based on rainfall intensity, and the cloud microphysical characteristics and processes in different bins were studied. The results show that:(1) Hydrometeor content differed distinctly among different bins. Mixing ratios of cloud water, rain water, and graupel enhanced significantly and monotonously with increasing rainfall intensity. With increasing precipitation intensity, the monotonous increase in cloud water number concentration was significant. Meanwhile, number concentrations of rain water and graupel increased at first and then decreased or increased slowly in larger rainfall bins. (2) With precipitation intensity increasing,cloud microphysical conversion processes closely related to the production of rainwater, directly(accretion of cloud water by rain (QCLcr) and melting of graupel (QMLgr)) or indirectly (water vapor condensation and accretion of cloud water by graupel), increased significantly. (3) As the two main sources of rainwater, QCLcrincreased monotonously with increasing precipitation intensity, while QMLgrincreased slowly, even tending to cease increasing in larger rainfall bins.

    ARTICLE HISTORY

    Revised 12 November 2015

    Accepted 18 December 2015

    Cloud microphysics; cloud microphysical processes;

    torrential rainfall; numerical simulation

    降水是由復(fù)雜的動(dòng)力、熱力和云微物理過(guò)程相互作用產(chǎn)生。為了揭示四川暴雨過(guò)程的云微物理特征,利用WRF模式對(duì)四川一次暴雨過(guò)程的高分辨率模擬資料,研究不同強(qiáng)度降水中云微物理特征和過(guò)程的差異。結(jié)果顯示,水凝物含量在不同強(qiáng)度降水中顯著不同;隨著降水強(qiáng)度增強(qiáng),與雨水產(chǎn)生直接或間接相關(guān)的云微物理轉(zhuǎn)化過(guò)程明顯增強(qiáng);作為雨水的兩個(gè)主要源項(xiàng),云水被雨水碰并收集(QCLcr)隨著降水強(qiáng)度增強(qiáng)而單調(diào)遞增,而霰融化(QMLgr)增長(zhǎng)較為緩慢。

    1. Introduction

    Torrential rainfall can cause floods, debris flows, and other natural disasters. In Sichuan Province, China, where the terrain is complex, heavy rainfall is more likely to cause floods and other disasters. Thus, accurate forecasting of rainstorms in this region is very important. During the past 20 years, the development of high-resolution mesoscale numerical models, such as MM5 and the WRF model,have led to improved understanding and prediction of local weather, especially precipitation. However, precipitation is produced from the interaction among complex dynamic, thermodynamic, and cloud microphysical processes. Thus, accurate quantitative precipitation forecasts remain a huge challenge to researchers and forecasters. Over the past few decades, the dynamic and thermodynamic processes affecting precipitation have become well understood (Neiman et al. 2002; Jiang 2003; Mapes, Warner, and Xu 2003; Galewsky and Sobel 2005; Medina et al. 2005; Garvert, Smull, and Mass 2007; Colle, Smith, and Wesley 2013; Siler and Roe 2014), but the mechanisms of cloud microphysical processes in precipitation cloud lack an in-depth and comprehensive understanding, meaning more detailed and comprehensive studies on cloud microphysical processes and budgets associated with heavy rainfall are required (Colle and Zeng 2004a, 2004b;Colle et al. 2005).

    Li, Cui, and Cao (2014) conducted a high-resolution numerical simulation of a torrential rainfall event in Sichuan using the WRF model and discussed the effects of large-scale circulation and mesoscale systems on the rainstorm against the background of complex terrain. Huang and Cui (2015) further studied the dominant cloud microphysical processes of this torrential rainfall event using the same model setup. They found that raindropswere mainly generated via two paths: in the first, water vapor condensed into cloud water, the accretion of cloud water by graupel formed graupel, and then the melting of graupel formed rain water; while in the second, water vapor condensed into cloud water, and the accretion of cloud water by rain water formed rain water. Cui, Wang,and Yu (2015) studied the cloud microphysical differences among various rainfall intensities for severe tropical storm Bilis (2006), and found that the magnitude of accretion of cloud water by rain monotonously increased with increasing precipitation intensity, while the magnitude of graupel melting increased at first and then decreased. As an extension of that work, the present study asks: are there similar characteristics for torrential rainfall in Sichuan, against the background of complex terrain? To answer this question,cloud microphysical differences with precipitation intensity during a torrential rainfall event were analyzed using the same simulation data as Huang and Cui (2015).

    2. Model and methodology

    Huang and Cui (2015) used the WRF model to simulate a torrential rainfall event in Sichuan, China, which occurred from 1800 UTC 17 August to 0000 UTC 20 August 2010. The simulation was integrated for 54 h, using three domains with horizontal resolutions of 27, 9, and 3 km. In the 3-km resolution domain, a cumulus convective parameterization scheme was not used (for details of the model setup and verification, see Li, Cui, and Cao (2014) and Huang and Cui (2015)). The cloud microphysical scheme used in Huang and Cui (2015) was the Milbrandt 2-mom scheme(Milbrandt and Yau 2005a, 2005b), which takes seven kinds of water species into consideration: water vapor (Qvapor),cloud water (Qc), rain water (Qr), cloud ice (Qi), snow (Qs),graupel (Qg), and hail (Qh). Detail regarding the microphysical conversion processes can be found in Milbrandt and Yau (2005b) and the Appendix of the present paper. This study focused on two heavy rainfall periods in the (28—33°N, 100—106°E) region of the 3-km resolution domain: 1800 UTC 18 August to 0000 UTC 19 August 2010, and 0000 to 0600 UTC 19 August 2010. The main reason for selected these two periods was to illustrate whether the results obtained in this study are similar in different rainfall periods. Figure 1 shows observed and simulated radar reflectivity and simulated 6-h accumulated precipitation in the two precipitation periods. The locations of the strong radar echo bands in the simulation are close to those observed (Figures 1a—1d). Due to the radar detection range and the Tibetan Plateau, the observed radar echo covers a smaller range. Heavy rainfall bands orient southwest—northeast in both periods and the distribution of precipitation in the second period is narrower. A number of strong rainfall centers scatter throughout the rainfall belts in both periods.

    Based on the precipitation grading standards used at the National Meteorological Center, China, the 6-h accumulated precipitation amounts (P6 for short) were classified into five bins based on rainfall intensity: 0.1—13, 13—25,25—60, 60—120 mm, and larger than 120 mm. Table 1 shows the grid numbers and mean 6-h accumulated rainfall of each bin. The grid-mean precipitation in the bins of 0.1—13,13—25, 25—60, and 60—120 mm are similar between the two periods. Meanwhile, the grid numbers in the second period are much less than those in the first period in the bins of 25—60, 60—120 mm, and larger than 120 mm, indicating the precipitation system gradually weakened in the second period (Figure 1).

    3. Cloud microphysical differences

    3.1 Mixing ratio, number concentration, and mean mass diameter

    Figure 2 shows the variations of spatiotemporally averaged water species' mixing ratios (Figures 2a and 2b),number concentrations (Figures 2c and 2d) and mean mass diameters (Figures 2e and 2f) with rainfall intensity. The mixing ratios of hydrometeors showed distinct differences among different intensities of precipitation, and the hail mixing ratio (Qh) was negligibly small during this event. Although there were some differences between the two periods, similar features existed. The mixing ratios of cloud water (Qc), rain water (Qr), and graupel (Qg) significantly and monotonously increased with increasing rainfall intensity. These features were closely related to the macro dynamic fields. From the vertical velocity profiles in various precipitation bins in the two precipitation periods(Figure 3), vertical velocities substantially increased with increasing precipitation intensity. In the second period,the mixing ratio of solid hydrometeors (the sum of the mixing ratios of cloud ice, snow, and graupel) was much smaller than that in the first period, associated with much weaker updraft velocities above the zero-layer in the second period compared with those in the first period (Figure 3). In the first period, the mixing ratio of solid hydrometeors was larger than that of liquid hydrometeors (the sum of the mixing ratios of cloud water and rainwater) in the first three rainfall bins, and smaller than that of liquid hydrometeors in the largest rainfall bin. This may have been related to the much stronger upward motion above the zero-layer, especially from 9 to 16 km in the largest rainfall bin (Figure 3a). In the second period, the mixing ratio of solid hydrometeors was a little larger than that of liquid hydrometeors in the smallest rainfall bin, but much smaller than that of liquid hydrometeors in larger rainfall bins. Thisresulted from the fact that the vertical velocity in the second period mainly concentrated in the lower troposphere around the zero-layer. Overall, the above discussion shows that both solid and liquid hydrometeors dominated in the first period, while liquid hydrometeors played a greater role in the second period. It should be noted that, in the second period, from the bin of 60—120 mm to the bin of P6 ≥ 120 mm, the mixing ratio of graupel increased sharply and contributed to the sharp overall increase for solid hydrometeors. This implies that, although liquid hydrometeors dominated overall in the second period, graupel concentrated in the largest rainfall bin and contributed to the surface rainfall there. From Huang and Cui (2015),graupel mainly distributed near the zero-layer; and from the present results (Figure 3b), updraft velocities near the zero-layer reached their maximum in the largest rainfall bin in the second precipitation period. Therefore, the probability of collision between graupel and cloud droplets,and graupel and raindrops, increased, and the mixing ratio and diameter of graupel increased significantly (Figures 2b and 2f). It should also be noted that, in the first period(Figure 2a), the mixing ratios of snow and cloud ice were larger than those in the second period. However, since they contributed little to surface rainfall (Huang and Cui 2015), this aspect is discussed no further here. Additionally,their roles mainly involved helping to increase the overall solid hydrometeor mixing ratio in this period. Meanwhile,the water vapor supply and its variation with rainfall intensity was similar in the two periods (Qvapor; blue curves in Figures 2a and 2b, both greater than 0.35 × 10-2kg kg-1,which provided ample moisture for the heavy rainfall in the two periods.

    Figure 1.(a, b) Observed and (c, d) simulated radar composite reflectivity (shaded; units: dBZ). The times for (a) and (c) are 1902 and 1900 UTC 18 August 2010, respectively. The times for (b) and (d) are 0102 and 0100 UTC 19 August 2010, respectively. Distributions of 6-h accumulated precipitation (shaded; units: mm) in the (28—33°N, 100—106°E) region of the 3-km resolution domain: (e) 1800 UTC 18 August to 0000 UTC 19 August 2010; (f) 0000 to 0600 UTC 19 August 2010. The red ‘ + ’ represents Chengdu radar station. Black contours represent the distance from Chengdu radar station.

    Table 1.Grid number and mean six-hourly accumulated precipitation (P6) of each precipitation bin in the (28—33°N, 100—106°E) region of the 3-km resolution domain.

    Figure 2.(a, b) Variations of water species’ mixing ratios, (c, d) number concentrations, and (e, f) mean-mass diameters with increasing precipitation intensity during 1800 UTC 18 August to 0000 UTC 19 August 2010 (left column) and 0000 to 0600 UTC 19 August 2010 (right column). Their units are shown in the figures. In (a) and (b), blue curves represent water vapor mixing ratios, red curves represent liquid hydrometeor mixing ratios, and black curves represent solid hydrometeor mixing ratios.

    Figure 3.Vertical velocity profiles in various precipitation bins (units: m s-1). The horizontal dashed lines represent averaged zero-layer height of all precipitation grids: (a) 1800 UTC 18 August to 0000 UTC 19 August 2010; (b) 0000 UTC to 0600 UTC 19 August 2010.

    In Figures 2c and 2d, with increasing precipitation intensity, the change in cloud water number concentration (Nc) was significant, increasing from about 1 × 107kg-1in the 0.1—13 mm bin to about 11.6 × 107kg-1in the P6 ≥ 120 mm bin in the first period, and from approximately 0.8 × 107kg-1in the 0.1—13 mm bin to approximately 12 × 107kg-1in the P6 ≥ 120 mm bin in the second period. The rain water number concentration (Nr) increased at first and then decreased with increasing precipitation intensity in both periods, indicating that raindrops became dense, and collisions with each other resulted in larger raindrops in heavy rainfall (Figures 2c—2f). The graupel number concentration (Ng) also increased at first and then decreased with increasing precipitation intensity in the first period, but increased at first and then lowered its rate of increase in the P6 ≥ 120 mm rainfall bin in the second period. In the second period, Ngwas much larger than that in the first period, especially in larger rainfall bins. This may have been related to the much stronger upward motion in the P6 ≥ 120 mm rainfall bin in the second period than that in the first period (Figure 3).

    From Figures 2e and 2f, the mean-mass diameters of cloud water and cloud ice possessed smaller magnitudes,and those of the other three hydrometeors (rainwater,snow, and graupel) possessed larger magnitudes, identical to their physical natures. The mean-mass diameters of rainwater, snow, and graupel were similar, except in stronger rainfall bins where the mean-mass diameters of rainwater and graupel were more similar and both larger than that of snow. It is noted that, in the second period, the mean-mass diameter of graupel increased sharply from the bin of 60—120 mm to the bin of P6 ≥ 120 mm, similar to the variation in the mixing ratio of graupel (Figure 2b). This implies that, although overall the liquid hydrometeors dominated in the second period, graupel dominated(or concentrated) in the largest rainfall bin (P6 ≥ 120 mm)with a larger mixing ratio and mean-mass diameter due to the strong upward motion near the zero-layer, which increased the probability of collision between graupel and cloud droplets, and graupel and raindrops (Figure 3b).

    Overall, the cloud microphysical characteristics were closely related to large-scale dynamics. Due to different distributions of vertical motion, the development of solid hydrometeor particles and ice-phase processes was more vigorous in the first period, while the growth of liquid hydrometeors and warm cloud processes may have been the key features in the second period.

    3.2 Cloud microphysical conversion processes

    Figure 4 shows the main cloud microphysical conversion processes of water vapor (Figures 4a and 4b), cloud water(Figures 4c and 4d), rain water (Figures 4e) and 4f), cloud ice (Figures 4g and 4h), snow (Figures 4i and 4j), and graupel (Figures 4k and 4l) in various precipitation bins during 1800 UTC 18 August to 0000 UTC 19 August 2010, and 0000 to 0600 UTC 19 August 2010. For the same types of water species, the main source and sink terms in the budgets of the species were similar among different precipitation bins in both periods. For example, in the budget of water vapor, water vapor condensation (QVDvc) was the main sink term in both periods. Furthermore, the accretion of cloud water by rain to form rain (QCLcr) and the melting of graupel to rain (QMLgr) were the two main source terms forthe production of rainwater. These results are consistent with the findings of Huang and Cui (2015).

    Figure 4. Variation in the major cloud microphysical conversion rates with precipitation intensity during 1800 UTC 18 August to 0000 UTC 19 August 2010 (left column) and 0000 to 0600 UTC 19 August 2010 (right column): (a, b) water vapor; (c, d) cloud water; (e, f) rain water; (g, h) cloud ice; (i, j) snow; (k, l) graupel. Black curves represent the sum of each water species’ source and sink terms. Units are 10-6kg kg-1s-1.

    With increasing precipitation intensity, almost all the major cloud microphysical conversion processes, especially those processes closely related to the production of rainwater and surface rainfall, directly (QCLcrand QMLgr)or indirectly (QVDvcand accretion of cloud water by graupel to form graupel (QCLcg)), increased significantly. The net growth rates of cloud ice and snow in the first period increased with precipitation intensity (Figures 4g and 4i), while they changed little, and even reduced, in the second period (Figures 4h and 4j). Meanwhile, they were smaller in the second period than those in the first period. Additionally, it was closely related to the different distributions of updraft velocities (Figure 3) and solid hydrometeors between the two periods (Figures 2a and 2b). Meanwhile, the magnitudes of ice- and snow-related microphysical conversion processes were significantly smaller than those related to cloud water, rain water, and graupel. Therefore, ice-phase microphysics did not play a dominant role in this precipitation process.

    Figure 4. (Continued)

    Water vapor condensation (QVDvc) was the main sink term in the water vapor budget (Figures 4a and 4b), and increased significantly as precipitation intensity enhanced. Abundant water vapor is transported to the rainstorm region and feeds the development of cloud systems and surface rainfall. Cloud water with QVDvcas its main source was mainly consumed by QCLcrand QCLcgto form rainwater and graupel, respectively (Figures 4c and 4d). QVDvcand QCLcrin the bin of P6 ≥ 120 mm in the second period were larger than those in the first period. The vertical velocity below the zero-layer in the bin of P6 ≥ 120 mm in the second period was stronger than that of the first period(Figures 3a and 3b), which may have enhanced the condensation of water vapor and the accretion of cloud water by rain. As the two main sources of rainwater (Figures 4e and 4f), QCLcrincreased monotonously with increasing precipitation intensity, while QMLgrincreased slowly, and even tended to cease increasing or decrease (Figure 4e). These characteristics are similar to those reported for severe tropical storm Bilis (Cui, Wang, and Yu, 2015).

    Compared with the weaker conversion rates associated with cloud ice and snow (Figures 4g—4j), the conversion processes related to graupel were the most important icephase processes (Figures 4k and 4l); plus, QCLcgwas the main source term and QMLgrwas the main sink term in the budget of graupel. With increasing rainfall intensity, QCLcgand QMLgrincreased accordingly in both periods. Besides,the source term of graupel, i.e. collision between graupel and rainwater to form graupel (QCLgrg), consumed graupel(QCLgr), and rain water (QCLrg) simultaneously. Since the absolute values of QCLgrgand QCLgrwere similar in all precipitation bins, the net growth of graupel by graupel—rain collision and coalescence (QCLgrg-QCLgr) was small,indicating that it was not a major source or sink term for graupel (Figures 4k and 4l).

    4. Summary

    By using high-resolution numerical simulation data of a torrential rainfall event in Sichuan, China, two 6-h accumulated rainfalls were classified into five bins based on rainfall intensity, and the cloud microphysical variation with precipitation intensity during the torrential rainfall event was studied. The major findings can be summarized as follows:

    (1) The mixing ratios of water species showed distinct differences among different intensities of precipitation. The water vapor supply and itsvariation with rainfall intensity was similar in the two periods, providing ample moisture for the heavy rainfall. Cloud water (Qc), rain water (Qr),and graupel (Qg) significantly and monotonously increased with increasing rainfall intensity in both periods. In the second period, the mixing ratio of solid hydrometeors was much smaller than that in the first period. Both solid and liquid hydrometeors dominated in the first period, while liquid hydrometeors dominated in the second period. Moreover, in the second period, graupel dominated (or concentrated) in the largest rainfall bin,with larger mixing ratios and mean-mass diameters, and contributed to the surface rainfall there.(2) The cloud water number concentration (Nc)increased significantly with increasing precipitation intensity. However, the rain water number concentration (Nr) increased at first and then decreased with increasing precipitation intensity in both periods. The graupel number concentration (Ng) also increased at first and then decreased with increasing precipitation intensity in the first period, but increased at first and then lowered its rate of increase in the largest rainfall bin in the second period.

    (3) With increasing precipitation intensity, almost all the major cloud microphysical conversion processes in the budgets, especially those processes closely related to the production of rainwater and surface rainfall, directly (QCLcrand QMLgr) or indirectly (QVDvcand QCLcg), increased significantly. In this case, cloud ice and snow contributed little to the surface rainfall and may have mainly contributed to the development of the cloud systems. Water vapor condensation(QVDvc), the main sink in the water vapor budget,increased significantly with the enhanced precipitation intensity. Cloud water, whose main source was from QVDvc, was mainly consumed by QCLcrand QCLcgto form rainwater and graupel, respectively. As the two main sources of rainwater, QCLcrincreased monotonously with increasing precipitation intensity, while QMLgrincreased slowly,and even tended to cease increasing. These results are similar to those reported for severe tropical storm Bilis (Cui, Wang, and Yu, 2015).

    The cloud microphysical variation with precipitation intensity shown in this study was closely related to the distribution of the large-scale vertical motion. Therefore,the combination of large-scale dynamics and cloud microphysics is very important when studying rainfall events. Finally, it is important to note that caution should be exercised in terms of the applicability of the present results, since only one event was analyzed. It is necessary to examine multiple torrential rainfall events to validate the results of this study.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

    Funding

    This work was supported by the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [grant number KZZD-EW-05-01]and the National Basic Research Program of China [973 Program, grant number 2014CB441402]. This work was carried out at the National Supercomputer Center in Tianjin, and the calculations were performed on TianHe-1(A).

    Notes on contributors

    HUANG Yong-Jie is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS). His main research interests are numerical modeling,cloud microphysics, and severe convective systems. His recent publications include papers in Journal of Hydrometeorology,Atmospheric Research, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences,Atmospheric Science Letters, and other journals.

    CUI Xiao-Peng is a professor at IAP, CAS. His main research interests are tropical cyclone, heavy rainfall, dynamics and numerical simulation, surface rainfall processes. His recent publications include papers in Journal of Hydrometeorology, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, Atmospheric Research,Science China: Earth Sciences, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, Atmospheric Science Letters, and other journals.

    WANG Ya-Ping is also a PhD candidate at IAP, CAS. Her main research interests are tropical cyclone simulation and diagnosis. Her recent publications include papers in Atmospheric Science Letters and Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences.

    References

    Colle, B. A., and Y. G. Zeng. 2004a. “Bulk Microphysical Sensitivities within the MM5 for Orographic Precipitation. Part I: The Sierra 1986 Event.” Monthly Weather Review 132 (12): 2780—2801.

    Colle, B. A., and Y. G. Zeng. 2004b. “Bulk Microphysical Sensitivities within the MM5 for Orographic Precipitation. Part II: Impact of Barrier Width and Freezing Level.” Monthly Weather Review 132 (12): 2802—2815.

    Colle, B. A., M. F. Garvert, J. B. Wolfe, C. F. Mass, and C. P. Woods. 2005. “The 13—14 December 2001 IMPROVE-2 Event. Part III: Simulated Microphysical Budgets and Sensitivity Studies.”Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 62 (10): 3535—3558.

    Colle, B. A., R. B. Smith, and D. A. Wesley. 2013. “Theory,Observations, and Predictions of Orographic Precipitation” In Mountain Weather Research and Forecasting: Recent Progress and Current Challenges, edited by Fotini K. Chow, Stephan F.J. De Wekker, and Bradley J. Snyder, 291—344. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Cui, X. P., Y. P. Wang, and H. Yu. 2015. “Microphysical Differences with Rainfall Intensity in Severe Tropical Storm Bilis.”Atmospheric Science Letters 16 (1): 27—31.

    Galewsky, J., and A. Sobel. 2005. “Moist Dynamics and Orographic Precipitation in Northern and Central California during the New Year's Flood of 1997.” Monthly Weather Review 133 (6): 1594—1612.

    Garvert, M. F., B. Smull, and C. Mass. 2007. “Multiscale Mountain Waves Influencing a Major Orographic Precipitation Event.”Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64 (3): 711—737.

    Huang, Y. J., and X. P. Cui. 2015. “Dominant Cloud Microphysical Processes of a Torrential Rainfall Event in Sichuan, China.”Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 32 (3): 389—400.

    Jiang, Q. F. 2003. “Moist Dynamics and Orographic Precipitation.”Tellus A 55 (4): 301—316.

    Li, Q., X. P. Cui, and J. Cao. 2014. “The Observational Analysis and Numerical Simulation of a Heavy Rain Event in Sichuan Province.” Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 38 (6): 1095—1108. doi: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1401.13255 (in Chinese).

    Mapes, B. E., T. T. Warner, and M. Xu. 2003. “Diurnal Patterns of Rainfall in Northwestern South America. Part III: Diurnal Gravity Waves and Nocturnal Convection Offshore.” Monthly Weather Review 131 (5): 830—844.

    Medina, S., B. F. Smull, R. A. Houze, and M. Steiner. 2005. “Crossbarrier Flow during Orographic Precipitation Events: Results from MAP and IMPROVE.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 62 (10): 3580—3598.

    Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau. 2005a. “A Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the Role of the Spectral Shape Parameter.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 62 (9): 3051—3064.

    Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau. 2005b. “A Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Parameterization. Part II: A Proposed Threemoment Closure and Scheme Description.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 62 (9): 3065—3081.

    Neiman, P. J., F. M. Ralph, A. B. White, D. E. Kingsmill, and P. O. G. Persson. 2002. “The Statistical Relationship between Upslope Flow and Rainfall in California's Coastal Mountains: Observations during CALJET.” Monthly Weather Review 130(6): 1468—1492.

    Siler, N., and G. Roe. 2014. “How Will Orographic Precipitation Respond to Surface Warming? An Idealized Thermodynamic Perspective.” Geophysical Research Letters 41 (7): 2606—2613.

    Appendix

    This appendix presents the detailed microphysical conversion processes of the cloud microphysical scheme; namely, the Milbrandt 2-mom scheme (Milbrandt and Yau 2005a, 2005b). The tendencies for the mixing ratios are

    26 July 2015

    CONTACT CUI Xiao-Peng xpcui@mail.iap.ac.cn

    ? 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    猜你喜歡
    物理
    物理中的影和像
    只因是物理
    井岡教育(2022年2期)2022-10-14 03:11:44
    高考物理模擬試題(五)
    高考物理模擬試題(二)
    高考物理模擬試題(四)
    高考物理模擬試題(三)
    留言板
    如何打造高效物理復(fù)習(xí)課——以“壓強(qiáng)”復(fù)習(xí)課為例
    處處留心皆物理
    我心中的物理
    国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 一本久久精品| 999久久久国产精品视频| 宅男免费午夜| 青草久久国产| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 久久99精品国语久久久| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲精品第二区| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 中文欧美无线码| 久久影院123| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 一区二区av电影网| 一本久久精品| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| av片东京热男人的天堂| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久久欧美国产精品| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 午夜av观看不卡| a级毛片在线看网站| 咕卡用的链子| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 九草在线视频观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 中文欧美无线码| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| av一本久久久久| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 亚洲伊人色综图| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 永久免费av网站大全| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 99香蕉大伊视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 观看美女的网站| 在线 av 中文字幕| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 中文字幕制服av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 久久av网站| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久久久久久精品精品| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 熟女av电影| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲四区av| 秋霞伦理黄片| 一区在线观看完整版| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| xxx大片免费视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲精品视频女| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 久久99一区二区三区| 欧美另类一区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| kizo精华| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 777米奇影视久久| 国产av国产精品国产| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 97在线人人人人妻| kizo精华| 精品福利永久在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 精品第一国产精品| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 中国国产av一级| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 免费观看人在逋| 多毛熟女@视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 成年av动漫网址| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久青草综合色| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 只有这里有精品99| 不卡av一区二区三区| 免费看不卡的av| 视频区图区小说| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 老熟女久久久| 电影成人av| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 捣出白浆h1v1| av一本久久久久| www.自偷自拍.com| 久久性视频一级片| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 看免费av毛片| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 五月天丁香电影| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 男女国产视频网站| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| a级毛片黄视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产 精品1| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 日日啪夜夜爽| av福利片在线| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 香蕉丝袜av| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 精品一区二区三卡| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 少妇人妻 视频| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品无大码| 在线 av 中文字幕| 尾随美女入室| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲精品第二区| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产 精品1| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产又爽黄色视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 秋霞伦理黄片| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 久久久精品94久久精品| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲成人手机| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 天堂8中文在线网| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲中文av在线| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 9热在线视频观看99| 宅男免费午夜| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 精品国产国语对白av| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 多毛熟女@视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 老司机靠b影院| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲精品在线美女| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| av天堂久久9| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产毛片在线视频| 视频区图区小说| www日本在线高清视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 精品一区二区免费观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| av电影中文网址| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 色播在线永久视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲四区av| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 精品少妇内射三级| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 嫩草影院入口| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 一本久久精品| 久久99一区二区三区| 五月天丁香电影| 在线看a的网站| 超碰成人久久| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产乱来视频区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 精品久久久久久电影网| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产成人精品福利久久| 99久久综合免费| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 精品福利永久在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 青草久久国产| 久久久久久人妻| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| av在线app专区| 桃花免费在线播放| 日韩视频在线欧美| 精品一区在线观看国产| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产一区二区 视频在线| e午夜精品久久久久久久| av在线老鸭窝| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产av国产精品国产| videosex国产| 亚洲四区av| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 观看av在线不卡| 老熟女久久久| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 一区福利在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 激情视频va一区二区三区| av福利片在线| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 天天添夜夜摸| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲 国产 在线| www国产在线视频色| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 麻豆av在线久日| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久这里只有精品19| 日本欧美视频一区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 午夜激情av网站| 国产av又大| 最好的美女福利视频网| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 午夜影院日韩av| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 长腿黑丝高跟| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久精品成人免费网站| 自线自在国产av| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| www.999成人在线观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 日本 欧美在线| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 悠悠久久av| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| bbb黄色大片| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产精品永久免费网站| 午夜a级毛片| a级毛片在线看网站| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 电影成人av| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| cao死你这个sao货| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产av精品麻豆| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 美国免费a级毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 久久亚洲真实| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 青草久久国产| ponron亚洲| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 青草久久国产| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 十八禁网站免费在线| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 满18在线观看网站| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| av有码第一页| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 91国产中文字幕| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 看免费av毛片| 日本 欧美在线| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美大码av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 日韩有码中文字幕| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 一区福利在线观看| 91在线观看av| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 欧美在线黄色| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 窝窝影院91人妻| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久久久国内视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 欧美乱色亚洲激情| av福利片在线| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 一进一出抽搐动态| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 超碰成人久久| 精品国产一区二区久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| av免费在线观看网站| 国产区一区二久久| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频|