• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Modeling some long-term implications of CO2fertilization for global forests and forest industries

    2016-07-05 08:09:13JosephBuongiorno
    Forest Ecosystems 2016年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:潛意識陪伴

    Joseph Buongiorno

    ?

    Modeling some long-term implications of CO2fertilization for global forests and forest industries

    Joseph Buongiorno

    Abstract

    Background:This paper explored the long-term,ceteris-paribus effects of potential CO2fertilization on the global forest sector. Based on the findings of Norby et al.(PNAS 2005,102(50))about forest response to elevated[CO2].

    Methods:Forest productivity was increased in the Global Forest Products Model(GFPM)in proportion to the rising [CO2]projected in the IPCC scenario A1B,A2,and B2. Projections of the forest area and forest stock and of the production,consumption,prices,and trade of products ranging from fuelwood to paper and paperboard were obtained with the GFPM for each scenario,with and without CO2fertilization beginning in 2011 and up to 2065.

    Results:CO2 fertilization increased wood supply,leading to lower wood prices which in turn induced modest lower prices of end products and higher global consumption. However,production and value added in industries decreased in some regions due to the relative competitive advantages and to the varying regional effects of CO2fertilization.

    Conclusion:The main effect of CO2fertilization was to raise the level of the world forest stock in 2065 by 9 to 10%for scenarios A2 and B2 and by 20%for scenario A1B. The rise in forest stock induced by fertilization was in part counteracted by its stimulation of the wood supply which resulted in lower wood prices and increased harvests.

    Keywords:CO2fertilization,Climate change,Prices,Supply,Demand,International trade

    Correspondence:jbuongio@wisc.edu

    Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,WI,USA

    ?2015 Buongiorno. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproduction in any medium,provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s)and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license,and indicate if changes were made.

    Background

    The CO2content of the atmosphere has been rising steadily,from a global average of approximately 340 ppm(parts per million)in 1980 to 400 ppm in 2013(NOAA-ESRL 2015). The[CO2]is expected to increase faster in the next century. According to the International Panel on Climate Change,atmospheric[CO2]could reach 600 to 900 ppm in 2100,depending on varying scenarios concerning economic and demographic growth,and mitigation policies (IPCC 2013). This rise in[CO2]has consequences for climate change as it influences directly global temperature levels(IPCC 2012,Zickfeld et al. 2012). In this context,forests are a potential source of CO2emissions especially due to deforestation(Woodwell et al. 1983).

    On the other hand,forests also act as carbon sinks accumulating carbon in trees through photosynthesis. This later role means that forests can be part of a negative feedback working against atmospheric CO2accumulation. In this process,net primary productivity(NPP)can be stimulated by the increase in atmospheric CO2. This phenomenon,referred to as“CO2fertilization”,has been incorporated into vegetation models to predict its consequences for climate change and carbon dynamics (Thompson et al. 2004). Another consequence of CO2fertilization is its impact on forest stock and thus on wood supply and forest industries which is addressed in this study.

    The general issue of climate change and forestry has received wide attention(see Kirilenko and Sedjo 2007 for a review). Several studies have used projections of biological consequences of climate change in economicforest sector models,for countries(McCarl et al. 2000),regions(Solberg et al. 2003),or the world(Perez-Garcia et al. 2002,Sohngen and Sedjo 2005). Some studies assume higher growth of forests due to elevated CO2concentrations,higher temperatures and longer growing seasons(Nabuurs et al. 2002). Faster growth in turn leads to increased timber inventories and supply,and hence lower timber prices(Sohngen and Mendelsohn 1998,Perez-Garcia et al. 2002,Solberg et al. 2003,Sohngen and Sedjo 2005);although this may be limited by the propagation of pests,diseases,and invasive species (Sohngen and Sedjo 2005).

    In view of the difficulty of determining the effect of multi-factor climate change on forests this study concentrated on the partial,ceteris-paribus,effect of CO2fertilization alone. Specifically,it used the findings of Norby et al.(2005)to predict their long-term consequences for the forest sector,other things being held constant including other parameters of climate change such as temperature and precipitation. Special attention was given to the possibility that the impact could vary considerably depending on the context;that is on different scenarios concerning world economic,demographic growth,and policy.

    The next section of the paper describes the theory,models,and data used to in the study. This is followed by the results for the main countries and regions,by product group,consumption,production and prices,forest stock,and value added in forest industries. The conclusion summarizes the main results,and their limitations and potential improvements.

    Methods

    Theory

    The market equilibrium principles that underlie the analysis are illustrated in Fig. 1. It describes the demand,supply,trade,and prices for one commodity,wood,with and without CO2fertilization of forests,in a world divided in two regions,at a particular point in time. Without CO2fertilization Region 1,with demand schedule D1 and supply schedule S1,is a net exporter and Region 2,with demand schedule D2 and supply schedule S2 is a net importer. In Fig. 1,the transport cost is ignored,and as a result the price,P,is the same in Region 1 and Region 2. In the exporting Region 1 the price P is higher than the autarky price at the intersection of D1 and S1 that would prevail without trade,while in the importing Region 2 it is lower. With CO2fertilization the forest stock increases in both regions and as a result the supply schedules shift to the right to S1' and S2'. Consequently,the price decreases from P to P'. Other things being equal,the demand is unchanged by the CO2fertilization. However,in accord with the lower price,the quantities consumed increase from C1to C1' in region 1 and from C2to C2' in region 1. The lower price also induces lower production but with the assumption of Fig. 1 this is more than compensated by the supply shifts so that the quantity produced also increases from Q1to Q1' in region 1 and Q2to Q2' in region 2. For trade,in this Figure,the result of the CO2fertilization is a slight decrease in exports from region 1 and correspondingly lower imports in region 2.

    However,the magnitude and even the direction of change may differ depending on the demand and supply curves and on the magnitude of the shifts. For example,in response to CO2fertilization,production may decrease in a region if the price effect(movement along the supply curve)exceeds the effect of the supply shift. Also,net trade may increase if the differential in CO2fertilization change the comparative advantage of a region relative to the other. Thus,in a multi-region,multiproducts situation,the adjustment of the global equilibrium due to CO2fertilization is hard to predict from purely theoretical considerations,and requires a more elaborate model of the forest sector.

    Global forest products model(GFPM)

    The GFPM adapted for this study calculates every year a global equilibrium across countries and products,linked dynamically to past equilibria. The static phase refers to the calculation of the equilibrium in a given year. The dynamic phase simulates the change in equilibrium conditions from year to year. More details concerning the formulation and the computer implementation are available in Buongiorno and Zhu(2014a). The current model deals with 180 countries,forest area and stock,and 14 wood products.

    In the static phase,the spatial global economic equilibrium in a given year is obtained by solving a quadratic programming problem in which the objective function is the social surplus in the global forest sector in a given year,which competitive markets maximize(Samuelson 1952,Takayama and Judge 1971). This surplus is equal to the value of the products to consumers(area under all the demand curves),minus the cost of supplying the raw materials(area under their supply curves),minus the transformation cost from raw materials,such as industrial roundwood to sawnwood,and minus the transport cost between countries including trade taxes. The main constraints define the material balance for each country and product:The quantity imported plus the domestic supply and the manufactured quantity must equal the domestic demand plus the quantity used in manufacturing other products and exports. Upon solution of this quadratic problem the shadow prices of the material balance constraints give the market-clearing prices for each commodity and country.

    The dynamic phase of the GFPM describes the changes in the condition of the global equilibrium from one period to the next. The demand equations shift over time as a function of the GDP periodic growth rate,and the lagged consumption growth rate,in accord with adaptive expectations or imperfect foresight(Johnston,1984 p. 348). The shifts of roundwood supply are determined by the rate of change of forest stock(endogenous,see below). There is one equation of this type for industrial roundwood(logs and pulpwood),fuelwood,and other industrial roundwood. The supply shifts of waste paper and other fiber pulp depend on GDP growth.

    The changes in national forest area depend on the level of income per capita,according to a Kuznet's curve (Koop and Tole 1999,Buongiorno 2014). For each country,the curve is calibrated so that in the base year the observed rate of forest area change is equal to the predicted,given the income per capita. The national forest stock evolves over time according to a growth-drain equation:

    where I is the forest stock at the beginning of the current period,S?1is the harvest during the previous period and G?1is the change of forest stock,without harvest,during the previous period,such that:

    Where gais the forest area growth rate,and guis the periodic rate of forest growth on a given area without harvest. In this application gu* is the relative change of the periodic rate of forest growth due to CO2fertilization. The periodic rate of forest growth,gu,is inversely related to the stock per unit area(Buongiorno 2014). For each country this relationship is calibrated so that in the base year the observed guis equal to the predicted given the stock per unit area. Equation(1)then gives the periodic rate of change of forest stock net of harvest,which determines the shift of the wood supply curves.

    Other dynamic elements include the changes in the input-output coefficients,for example to reflect increasing use of recycled paper in paper manufacturing,and the changes in manufacturing cost(Buongiorno and Zhu,2014b).

    Model calibration

    The input-output(I-O)coefficients and manufacturing costs of the GFPM used in this study were determined simultaneously by a calibration procedure based on FAOSTAT data from 2010 to 2012(Buongiorno and Zhu 2014b). Each I-O coefficient in a year and country is the ratio of the amount of input used in making a product to the amount of output. The GFPM calibration procedure estimates the I-O coefficients while adjusting the production of the input or output if needed based on prior knowledge of manufacturing processes. Together with data on local prices the procedure also gives estimates of the manufacturing costs. With input-output coefficients and manufacturing costs determined in this way for all other countries,and the end-product demand and wood supply equations positioned with theprice and quantity in each country,the solution of the global equilibrium closely replicates the base-year input data,in terms of production,consumption,net trade (exports minus imports),and prices.

    The parameters of the dynamic demand equations leading to the elasticities were estimated with panel country-year data from 1992 to 2012,using the fixedeffects method(Wooldridge 2002,p. 265),with the results shown in Table 1. The environmental Kuznets curve for forest area change,and the equation of the growth rate of forest stock were both estimated with data from FAO(2010)as in Buongiorno(2014). The elasticities of fuelwood and industrial roundwood supply with price and growing stock were from Turner et al. (2006). The freight cost between countries was estimated as the difference between unit value of imports and exports. Data on import tariff duties came from the World Trade Organization data base(WTO 2013).

    The solution for each year equilibrium is computed with an interior point solver(BPMPD,Mészáros 1999). The GFPM input and output for calibration and simulation is facilitated by Excel spreadsheets and graphics. A recent version of the complete software,its documentation,and a pre-calibrated data set are available freely for academic research(Buongiorno and Zhu,2014a).

    Table 1 Parameters of demand equations for end products

    IPCC scenarios

    Three global scenarios,A1B,A2,and B2 were used in the projections from 2011 to 2065. The scenarios are based on the IPPC scenarios(Nakicenovic et al.,2000),extended and modified for the purpose of the United States Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment(USDA Forest Service 2012). Each scenario results from a separate IPCC“storyline”about future global social,economic,technical and policy developments. The storylines also reflect different interaction between developing and industrialized countries.

    Scenario A1B,which assumes continuing globalization,leads to high income growth and low population growth,and thus the highest income per capita by the year 2065. Scenario A2 assumes a slowdown of globalization,and the rise of more regional interests. This leads to lower income growth than scenario A1B,and higher population growth,and thus lower income per capita. Scenario B2 has economic and demographic assumptions between scenarios A1B and A2.

    For the GFPM simulations,the three main exogenous variables taken from these scenarios were the growth of GDP and population,and the growth of atmospheric [CO2]. GDP growth from the IPCC was available only by region. National GDP growth was deducted from the regional growth in such a way that the regional growth remained the same as in the IPCC and the growth of individual countries converged towards this average regional growth rate(Buongiorno et al. 2012,p. 117). Table 2 shows the resulting annual growth rates of GDP for each scenario,for selected world regions and countries.

    CO2fertilization and forest growth

    Norby et al.(2005)find that“the response of net primary productivity(NPP)to elevated CO2is highly conserved across a broad range of productivity,with a median response of 23±2%. They define“elevated CO2”as~550 ppm of atmospheric[CO2],which is approximately 180 ppm above the atmospheric[CO2]in 2005. Thus,on average NPP increases by 0.13%per ppm increase in atmospheric[CO2]. Here,it was assumed that the percent increase in NPP was equal to the percent increase in the growth of forest stock in the absence of harvest.

    Figure 2 shows the implication of this assumption for the growth rate of forest stock,given the predicted evolution of atmospheric[CO2]in each IPCC scenario (Table 3). The highest impact was for scenario A2 in which the growth rate was 32%higher in 2070 than in 2006. The lowest was for scenario B2(19%). The effect of scenario A1B was almost the same as that of A2 up to 2050 but somewhat lower in 2070(29%). Accordingly,in the GFPM the endogenous forest growth rate,gu,inequation(2)changed over time by the relative fraction gu* shown in Fig. 2.

    Table 2 Projected annual percent GDP growth rate in selected world regions and countries,by scenario

    Results and discussion

    Price effects

    Table 4shows the world prices,defined by the unit value of imports,in 2011 and projected with the GFPM in 2065 with scenarios A1B,A2 and B2,with or without the cumulative effect of CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065. In accord with theoretical expectations,the price of all products was lower with CO2fertilization. The fertilization effect varied substantially with the scenario. Under the A1B scenario,the price of fuelwood and industrial roundwood was 19%lower in 2065 due to CO2fertilization. The price of sawwood was 9%lower,and the price of wood-based panels was 3%to 6% lower. The price of mechanical and chemical pulp was 4%and 6%lower,respectively. The price of paper andpaperboard was 3%to 6%lower depending on the product.

    For scenario A2 the price reductions were less than for scenario A1B,and similar to the effects under scenario B2. For scenarios A2 and B2,CO2fertilization decreased the price of fuelwood in 2065 by 12%to 13% and the price of industrial roundwood by 9%to 11%. The price of sawnwood was 4%to 5%lower,and the price of wood-based panels was 1%to 3%lower. The price of wood pulp decreased by 2%to 4%with CO2fertilization,and the price of paper and paperboard decreased by 1%to 3%depending on the product.

    Table 3 Past and projected atmospheric CO2saturation(ppm),by IPCC scenario

    Fuelwood consumption,production,and trade

    In accord with the lower world prices induced by the CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,fuelwood consumption(production+imports-exports)was higher in 2065 in all regions than without fertilization,under all three scenarios. The largest effect of CO2fertilization occurred with scenario A1B,under which world consumption of fuelwood was 8%higher in 2065,while it was 5%to 6% higher under scenarios A2 and B2(Table 5). The effect on fuelwood consumption was most noticeable in developing countries,reaching 13%in Africa under scenario A1B. The smallest relative impact was in Europe and the EU-28:2%with scenario A1B and 1%with A2 and B2.

    The regional effect of CO2fertilization on fuelwood production tended to mirror the effect on consumption,except for the EU-28 where production was somewhat lower than consumption with CO2fertilization under all scenarios. In that case,the movement down the supply curve due to the lower world price(Table 4)exceeded the shift of the supply curve due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,and resulted in lower production,which together with the higher consumption suggested a deterioration of net trade.

    Industrial roundwood consumption,production,and trade

    Industrial roundwood includes logs,pulpwood,and other industrial roundwood(FAO 2014,p. xx). The supply of industrial roundwood is,like that of fuelwood,directly affected by the shift due to CO2fertilization. However,while the demand for fuelwood,an end product,depends ultimately only on GDP and fuelwood price,the demand for industrial roundwood is more involved. Since industrial roundwood is an input in the manufacture of sawnwood,wood-based panels,and wood pulp,its demand depends on the price of these end products,and on the price of industrial roundwood,the price of other inputs and the techniques of production.

    Globally,the positive supply shift of industrial roundwood due to CO2fertilization more than matched the movement down the supply curve due to the price reduction. Consequently,the GFPM-projected world consumption and production of industrial roundwood was 2%to 4%higher,depending on the scenario,with the assumption of CO2fertilization than without it (Table 6).

    其實(shí)他們潛意識里早就知道,從許多許多年前開始,他們就注定了是要互相陪伴的人,不然為什么這么多年來誰也沒有跟其他人戀愛過,誰也沒有遺忘過誰。

    However,the complex derived demand for industrial roundwood,coupled with the shifts of industrial roundwood supply induced by the CO2fertilization led to varying regional effects. Consumption of industrial roundwood tended to be higher with CO2fertilization than without it,except in North/Central America and Asia. Under scenario A1B in particular,industrial roundwood consumption was 10%lower in N/C America,while it was 19%higher in South America and 10%higher in Europe and the EU-28. With this scenario,production was 18%higher in Asia in 2065,while consumption hardly changed,so that the CO2fertilization improved markedly Asia's trade balance of industrial roundwood. The regional pattern of the effects was similar for scenarios A2 and B2,but the magnitudes in both cases were much less than for scenario A1B.

    Table 4 World prices of forest products in 2011 and projected in 2065 under scenarios A1B,A2 and B2,with and without CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065

    Table 5 Projected differences in fuelwood production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Sawnwood and panels consumption,production,and trade

    In the GFPM,sawnwood and wood-based panels(veneer and plywood,particleboard,fiberboard(FAO 2014)),are end products. Their demand depends on GDP,the product price,and lagged consumption. As indicated above,the price of all products in 2065 was lower with CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065. Consequently,the consumption of all end products was higher(Table 7). In particular,under scenario A1B the world consumption of wood-based panels was 1.2%higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization,with the highest relative changes in the range of 2%to 2.5%in Africa and South America. The relative increases in consumption were about half that magnitude under scenarios A2 and B2.

    Meanwhile,the production of sawnwood and panels varied much more across regions. For example,under scenario A1B,while production of sawnwood and panels was 21%to 24%in Africa and South America with CO2fertilization,it was 25%lower in N/C America. However,the regional distribution of production varied markedly between scenarios. In particular,while the production of E-28 countries was 4%higher with CO2fertilization under scenario A1B and their trade balance improved as a result,their production decreased slightly with scenarios A2 and B2,implying a slight worsening of net trade.

    Table 6 Projected differences in industrial roundwood production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Wood pulp consumption production and trade

    The production and consumption of wood pulp(mechanical +chemical +semi-chemical pulp(FAO 2014)are determined by its demand and supply. Wood pulp is an input in the manufacture of paper and paperboard,so that its demand depends(negatively)on its own price, and(positively)on the price of paper and paperboard. Meanwhile,the supply of wood pulp is a positive function of the price of wood pulp and a negative function of the price of industrial roundwood(an input in making wood pulp). The CO2fertilization reduces the price of industrial roundwood,and in the process stimulates the demand for wood pulp. As shown in Table 8,under scenario A1B,the world wood pulp consumption(and the matching production)in 2065 was approximately 2%higher with the CO2fertilization than without it. The effect was approximately half that much under scenarios A2 and B2.

    Table 8 Projected differences in wood pulp production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Paper and paperboard consumption production and trade

    The products in the paper and paperboard group:newsprint +printing and writing paper + other paper andpaperboard(FAO 2014)are treated as end products in the GFPM. As for fuelwood,and sawnwood and woodbased panels the national demand is a function of GDP,price,and lagged consumption. Consequently,CO2fertilization influences paper and paperboard consumption through the price effect only. As the relative price reduction induced by CO2fertilization was smallest for paper and paper and paperboard,the effects on consumption were correspondingly small(Table 9). The largest effects,under scenario A1B implied only a 0.5%to 0.8%higher consumption depending on the region. Under the other two scenarios,consumption was practically the same with or without CO2fertilization.

    There were however larger regional impacts on production due to the differences in production cost brought about by the different regional shifts of industrial roundwood supply. In particular,under scenario A1B,paper and paperboard production was nearly 4%lower in South America with CO2fertilization than without it,implying a deterioration of net trade,while in Europe,production was nearly 3%higher,with a corresponding increase of net trade.

    Value added in forest industries

    For the purpose of this paper,value added is defined as the value of the total output of forest industries(sawnwood,wood-based panels,wood pulp,paper and paperboard) minus the cost of the wood and fiber input used by the industries(industrial roundwood,wood pulp,other fiber pulp,and waste paper). The effects of the CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065 on the input cost,value of the output and the resulting value added are summarized in Table 10 by region and scenario. The largest impacts occurred under scenario A1B according to which the CO2fertilization decreased the cost of the world industry inputs in 2065 by nearly $ 94x109or 7%. The reduction in input cost occurred in all regions,and was largest in Asia(?$42 x109). Although the quantity of inputs,for example of industrial roundwood,increased in several regions(Table 6),their lower world prices(Table 4)still led to a reduction in total input cost.

    The value of the industries outputs was also lower in several regions(Table 10)as the higher consumption of end products(e.g. sawnwood and panels)did not compensate for the reduced prices. Under scenario A1B,output value in 2065 was nearly 8%lower in N/C America with CO2fertilization,and nearly 4%lower in Asia. At world level,the reduction in output value came close to the reduction in input cost,leaving only a modest increase of value added($7.6x109,or less than 1%). The effects were similar in direction for scenarios A2 and B2,but smaller in magnitude so that at world level the CO2fertilization had hardly an impact on value added,although the regional differences were more substantial.

    Table 9 Projected differences in paper and paperboard production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Table 10 Projected differences in wood and fiber input cost,output value and value added in forest industries in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Forest stock

    CO2fertilization tended to increase the forest stock,but as observed above a rise in stock shifted the wood supply to the right,increasing wood harvest and thus decreasing the forest stock. These opposite tendencies were further affected by the price decrease induced by the increase in wood supply,which stimulated the demand for wood products and thus the derived demand for wood input and the attendant harvest. Table 11 summarizes the results of the GFPM simulation of these complex interactions for the forest stock in different regions and for the three scenarios.

    For all scenarios and regions the growing stock was higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization than without it. Thus,the added growth due to CO2fertilization more than compensated for the cumulative effects of the increased fuelwood and industrial roundwood harvests observed above. The largest effects of the CO2fertilization on the level of forest stock in 2065were under scenario A1B. This was in part due to the high level of atmospheric[CO2]and also to the rise in forest area,and thus young growing forests,induced by the higher GDP per capita growth assumed in scenario A1B. For this scenario,the forest stock was 20%higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization than without it. The largest relative impacts were in Africa and Asia. Under scenarios A2 and B2 the effect of CO2fertilization were similar,globally(9%to 10%)and by region,with the largest relative impact still in Africa.

    Conclusions

    The objective of this paper was to explore the long-term,ceteris-paribus effects of a potential CO2fertilization on the global forest sector. Based on the findings of Norby etal.(2005)about forest response to elevated CO2concentration it was assumed that the effect of CO2fertilization on forest growth would be conserved across a broad range of productivity,with an average stimulation of 23%for a 180 ppm increase of atmospheric[CO2].

    Table 11 Projected differences in growing stock in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    This increased productivity was applied to national forest growth rates in the Global Forest Products Model in proportion to the rising levels of[CO2]projected by the International Panel for Climate Change scenarios A1B,A2,and B2. In addition to different[CO2]levels the three scenarios projected different growth rates of gross domestic product and population,which influence the future demand for forest products,and the evolution of forest area. Projections of the forest area and forest stock,and of the production,consumption,prices,and trade of different products(ranging from fuelwood to paper and paperboard)were obtained with the GFPM for each scenario,with and without the assumption of CO2fertilization beginning in 2011 and up to 2065.

    The results suggested that CO2fertilization would raise the level of the world forest stock by 9 to 10%for scenarios A2 and B2 and by 20%for scenario A1B. The change in forest stock was in part counteracted by the stimulation of the wood supply which resulted in lower wood prices and increased wood harvest. The lower wood prices in turn led to lower prices of end products and increased global consumption. However,production decreased in some regions due to the relative competitive advantages and to the varying regional effects of CO2fertilization.

    These findings rely on strong assumptions;in particular that CO2fertilization can be summarized over very different forest types by the simple number suggested in Norby et al.(2005). Although the homogeneity of response that they observed is striking,and over a wide range of sites,they all are within the temperate zone. It is uncertain that they can be applied to other ecological zones. Hickler et al. (2008)use a dynamic vegetation model which does reproduce the data of Norby et al.(2005),and conclude that the data“might also be representative of forests globally”. But, they also suggest that the NPP enhancement due to CO2fertilization may be much larger in tropical than boreal forests.

    A review of several studies by the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change(2014)does conclude that“CO2fertilization effects strongly increased recent Net Primary Production trends in regional totals”. But,much work is still needed to quantify this effect apart from or in conjunction with changes in temperature and precipitation(Zickfeld et al. 2012). In addition,the methods used in this study require good estimates of current forest growth rates in different countries. This will mean further improvement of the global forest inventory and harvest statistics,which are currently subject to substantial errors due to infrequent and unequal sampling,and differences in definitions and classifications(FAO 2010).

    Keeping these caveats in mind,the present study showed that the impact of CO2fertilization would depend very much on the economic and demographic context in which it occurred,but in all cases the impact on the global value added in the forest sector would be modest. On the other hand,CO2forest fertilization per se might have substantial effects on the long-term level of forest stock,and less on the harvest. There would thus be a net positive effect of CO2fertilization on the amount of carbon stored in forests,a clearly beneficial effect for overall climate change.

    Competing interests

    The author declares that he has no competing interests.

    Author’s information

    Professor Emeritus,University of Wisconsin-Madison,USA,and Foreign Member,F(xiàn)rench Academy of Agriculture,Paris,F(xiàn)rance.

    Acknowledgments

    The research leading to this paper was supported in part by a joint venture agreement with the USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station in

    cooperation with project leader Jeff Prestemon.

    Received:30 June 2015 Accepted:14 October 2015

    References

    Buongiorno J(2014)Global modeling to predict timber production and prices:the GFPM approach. Forestry 88:291-303

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S,Raunikar R,Prestemon JP(2012)Outlook to 2060 for world forest and forest industries:a technical document supporting the Forest Service 210 RPA assessment. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station,General Technical Report SRS-151,Asheville,NC 119p.

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2014a)Using the Global Forest Products Model(GFPM version 2014 with BPMPD). Staff Paper Series # 80. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,35p. http:// labs.russell.wisc.edu/buongiorno/ Accessed 19 Jan 2015.

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2014b)Technical change in forest sector models:The Global Forest Products Model approach. Scandinavian J Forest Res 30:30-48

    Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change(2014)Biospheric Productivity in South America. http://www.co2science.org/subject/g/ summaries/samergreen.php Accessed 15 January 2015.

    FAO(2010)Global forest resources assessment 2010,main report. FAO Forestry Paper 163,F(xiàn)ood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome

    FAO(2014)FAO yearbook,forest products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome

    Hickler T,Smith B,Prentice IC,Mj?fors K,Miller P,Arneth A,Sykes MT(2008)CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests. Glob Chang Biol 14:1531-1542

    IPCC(2012)Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change expert meeting on economic analysis,costing methods,and ethics. In:Field CB,Barros V,Edenhofer O,Pichs-Madruga R,Sokona Y,Mastrandrea MD,Mach KJ,von Stechow C(eds)IPCC Working Group II Technical Support Unit. Carnegie Institution,Stanford,California

    IPCC(2013)International Panel for Climate Change,working group I:The scientific basis,II.2 Abundances and burdens II.2.1:CO2 abundances(ppm). http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/531.htm Accessed 3 December 2014.

    Johnston J(1984)Econometric methods. McGraw-Hill,New York

    Kirilenko AP,Sedjo RA(2007)Climate change impacts on forestry. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19697-19702

    Koop G,Tole L(1999)Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation?J Dev Econ 58:231-244

    McCarl B,Adams DM,Alig RJ,Burton D,Chen CC(2000)Effects of global climate change on the US forest sector:response functions derived from a dynamic resource and market simulator. Climate Res 15:195-205

    Mészáros C(1999)The BPMPD interior point solver for convex quadratic problems. Optimization Methods Softw 11&12:431-449

    Nabuurs GJ,Prussinen A,Karjalainen T,Herhard M,Kramer K(2002)Stem volume increment changes in European forests due to climate change-a simulation study with the EFISCEN model. Glob Chang Biol 8:304-316

    Nakicenovic N,Davidson O,Davis G,Grübler A,Kram T,Lebre La Rovere E,Metz B,Morita T,Pepper W,Pitcher H,Sankovski A,Shukla P,Swart R,Watson R,Zhou D(2000). Special Report on Emissions Scenarios:A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,U.K.,599 pp. http://www.grida.no/ climate/ipcc/emission/index.htm Accessed 3 Dec 2014.

    Norby RJ,DeLucia EH,Gielen B,Calfapietra C,Giardina CP,King JS,Ledford J,McCarthy HR,Moore DJP,Ceulemans R,De Angelis P,F(xiàn)inzi AC,Karnovsy DF,Kubiske ME,Lukac M,Pregitzer KS,Scarascia-Mugnozza GE,Schlesinger WH,Oren R(2005)Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:18052-18056

    NOAA-ESRL(2015)Annual mean carbon dioxide data. ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ products/trends/co2/co2_annmean_gl.txt Accessed 17 Jan 2015.

    Perez-Garcia J,Joyce LA,McGuire AD,Xiao X(2002)Impacts of climate change on the global forest sector. Clim Change 54:439-461

    Samuelson PA(1952)Spatial price equilibrium with linear programming. Am Econ Rev 42:283-303

    Sohngen B,Mendelsohn R(1998)Valuing the impact of large-scale ecological change in a market:The effect of climate change on U.S. timber. Am Econ Rev 88(4):689-710

    Sohngen B,Sedjo R(2005)Impacts of climate change on forest product markets:Implications for North American producers. The Forestry Chron 81(5):689-674

    Solberg B,Moiseyev A,Kallio AMI(2003)Economic impacts of accelerating forest growth in Europe. Forest Policy Econ 5:157-171

    Takayama T,Judge G(1971)Spatial and temporal price and allocation models. North-Holland Publishing Company,Amsterdam.

    Thompson SL,Govindasamy B,Mirin A,Caldeira K,Delire C,Milovich J,Wickett M,Erickson D(2004)Quantifying the effects of CO2-fertilized vegetation on future global climate and carbon dynamics. Geophysical Research Letters 31(3).

    Turner J,Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2006)An economic model of international wood supply,forest stock and forest area change. Scandinavian J Forest Res 21:73-86

    USDA Forest Service(2012)Future of America’s forest and rangelands:Forest Service 2010 Resources Planning Act Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture,F(xiàn)orest Service,General Technical Report WO-87,Washington DC

    Woodwell GM,Hobbie J,Houghton RA,Melillo JM,Moore B,Peterson BJ,Shaver GR(1983)Global deforestation:Contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 222:1081-1086

    Wooldridge J.(2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press,Cambridge,Massachusetts. 752p.

    WTO 2013. Tariffs data. World trade organization http://tariffdata.wto.org/ ReportersAndProducts.aspx Accessed July 9,2013.

    Zickfeld K,Arora VK,Gillett NP(2012)Is the climate response to CO2emissions path dependent?Geophys Res Lett 39:L05703

    猜你喜歡
    潛意識陪伴
    你真的會(huì)表揚(yáng)孩子嗎?
    Book Review on Wonders 《奇跡男孩》讀后感
    陪伴
    “疫”路陪伴 架起“僑”梁,心“聯(lián)”你我
    陪伴是一味最好的藥
    海峽姐妹(2020年2期)2020-03-03 13:36:38
    陪伴
    雜文月刊(2019年16期)2019-09-25 06:56:36
    第一眼看到什么動(dòng)物,測試你潛意識下的心理狀態(tài)
    最值得珍惜的,是無聲的陪伴
    文苑(2018年21期)2018-11-09 01:22:38
    潛意識在油畫創(chuàng)作中的運(yùn)用探究
    藝術(shù)家(2017年6期)2017-01-30 19:56:14
    陪伴是最長情的告白
    91成人精品电影| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| av在线播放精品| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 女警被强在线播放| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| av线在线观看网站| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 五月天丁香电影| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 不卡av一区二区三区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| avwww免费| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 美女中出高潮动态图| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美在线黄色| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 手机成人av网站| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 精品一区二区三卡| 麻豆av在线久日| 男女国产视频网站| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产色视频综合| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 在线看a的网站| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 免费观看人在逋| 中文字幕色久视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 宅男免费午夜| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品免费大片| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产成人系列免费观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| tocl精华| 人人澡人人妻人| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产精品 国内视频| 中文欧美无线码| 中文字幕色久视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 一进一出抽搐动态| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 国产成人系列免费观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 两个人免费观看高清视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 黄片播放在线免费| 日本五十路高清| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| av欧美777| 超色免费av| 丁香六月欧美| 美女午夜性视频免费| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久久久国内视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产精品免费大片| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 一个人免费看片子| 人妻一区二区av| 69av精品久久久久久 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲成人手机| 性色av一级| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 一级毛片电影观看| www.精华液| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 99国产精品99久久久久| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 大香蕉久久网| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| av一本久久久久| 午夜福利,免费看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| av网站在线播放免费| 午夜91福利影院| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产精品影院久久| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 岛国在线观看网站| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 老司机靠b影院| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 两个人看的免费小视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久久久国内视频| 五月天丁香电影| 在线天堂中文资源库| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 我的亚洲天堂| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 99热全是精品| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 女警被强在线播放| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 成人国产av品久久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 多毛熟女@视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 成人手机av| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 中国国产av一级| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 一个人免费看片子| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 丁香六月欧美| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 欧美大码av| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲成人手机| 成人免费观看视频高清| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 日本a在线网址| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 欧美另类一区| 久热这里只有精品99| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久久久久人人人人人| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 精品第一国产精品| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 一区二区av电影网| 久久久久久久国产电影| 美女主播在线视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 美女主播在线视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 精品福利观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| av电影中文网址| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲成人手机| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| av网站在线播放免费| 国产成人系列免费观看| 老司机福利观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 91九色精品人成在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产精品九九99| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产精品九九99| 国产av国产精品国产| www.999成人在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 一区二区av电影网| 97在线人人人人妻| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 精品福利永久在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 咕卡用的链子| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 自线自在国产av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 丁香六月天网| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| av视频免费观看在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| svipshipincom国产片| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产精品免费大片| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 色94色欧美一区二区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 日本av手机在线免费观看| 91精品三级在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产精品 国内视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美大码av| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 桃花免费在线播放| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美成人午夜精品| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久中文看片网| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 欧美日韩黄片免| 久久久久国内视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲精品在线美女| 电影成人av| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 午夜老司机福利片| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产麻豆69| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 制服诱惑二区| 丁香六月天网| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| avwww免费| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 91成年电影在线观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 两性夫妻黄色片| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲伊人色综图| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 电影成人av| 悠悠久久av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 日本五十路高清| 多毛熟女@视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 高清欧美精品videossex| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 乱人伦中国视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 久久久久网色| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 一个人免费看片子| 两个人看的免费小视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲av男天堂| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 1024香蕉在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产成人影院久久av| av天堂在线播放| 精品一区在线观看国产| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 另类精品久久| 777米奇影视久久| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 一个人免费看片子| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 日本a在线网址| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 麻豆av在线久日| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 制服人妻中文乱码| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久久久国内视频| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 不卡一级毛片| 国产男女内射视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久人人爽人人片av| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 欧美日韩精品网址| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 在线看a的网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产片内射在线| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 一级片'在线观看视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 性色av一级| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久影院123| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 我的亚洲天堂| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看|