• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Modeling some long-term implications of CO2fertilization for global forests and forest industries

    2016-07-05 08:09:13JosephBuongiorno
    Forest Ecosystems 2016年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:潛意識陪伴

    Joseph Buongiorno

    ?

    Modeling some long-term implications of CO2fertilization for global forests and forest industries

    Joseph Buongiorno

    Abstract

    Background:This paper explored the long-term,ceteris-paribus effects of potential CO2fertilization on the global forest sector. Based on the findings of Norby et al.(PNAS 2005,102(50))about forest response to elevated[CO2].

    Methods:Forest productivity was increased in the Global Forest Products Model(GFPM)in proportion to the rising [CO2]projected in the IPCC scenario A1B,A2,and B2. Projections of the forest area and forest stock and of the production,consumption,prices,and trade of products ranging from fuelwood to paper and paperboard were obtained with the GFPM for each scenario,with and without CO2fertilization beginning in 2011 and up to 2065.

    Results:CO2 fertilization increased wood supply,leading to lower wood prices which in turn induced modest lower prices of end products and higher global consumption. However,production and value added in industries decreased in some regions due to the relative competitive advantages and to the varying regional effects of CO2fertilization.

    Conclusion:The main effect of CO2fertilization was to raise the level of the world forest stock in 2065 by 9 to 10%for scenarios A2 and B2 and by 20%for scenario A1B. The rise in forest stock induced by fertilization was in part counteracted by its stimulation of the wood supply which resulted in lower wood prices and increased harvests.

    Keywords:CO2fertilization,Climate change,Prices,Supply,Demand,International trade

    Correspondence:jbuongio@wisc.edu

    Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,WI,USA

    ?2015 Buongiorno. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproduction in any medium,provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s)and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license,and indicate if changes were made.

    Background

    The CO2content of the atmosphere has been rising steadily,from a global average of approximately 340 ppm(parts per million)in 1980 to 400 ppm in 2013(NOAA-ESRL 2015). The[CO2]is expected to increase faster in the next century. According to the International Panel on Climate Change,atmospheric[CO2]could reach 600 to 900 ppm in 2100,depending on varying scenarios concerning economic and demographic growth,and mitigation policies (IPCC 2013). This rise in[CO2]has consequences for climate change as it influences directly global temperature levels(IPCC 2012,Zickfeld et al. 2012). In this context,forests are a potential source of CO2emissions especially due to deforestation(Woodwell et al. 1983).

    On the other hand,forests also act as carbon sinks accumulating carbon in trees through photosynthesis. This later role means that forests can be part of a negative feedback working against atmospheric CO2accumulation. In this process,net primary productivity(NPP)can be stimulated by the increase in atmospheric CO2. This phenomenon,referred to as“CO2fertilization”,has been incorporated into vegetation models to predict its consequences for climate change and carbon dynamics (Thompson et al. 2004). Another consequence of CO2fertilization is its impact on forest stock and thus on wood supply and forest industries which is addressed in this study.

    The general issue of climate change and forestry has received wide attention(see Kirilenko and Sedjo 2007 for a review). Several studies have used projections of biological consequences of climate change in economicforest sector models,for countries(McCarl et al. 2000),regions(Solberg et al. 2003),or the world(Perez-Garcia et al. 2002,Sohngen and Sedjo 2005). Some studies assume higher growth of forests due to elevated CO2concentrations,higher temperatures and longer growing seasons(Nabuurs et al. 2002). Faster growth in turn leads to increased timber inventories and supply,and hence lower timber prices(Sohngen and Mendelsohn 1998,Perez-Garcia et al. 2002,Solberg et al. 2003,Sohngen and Sedjo 2005);although this may be limited by the propagation of pests,diseases,and invasive species (Sohngen and Sedjo 2005).

    In view of the difficulty of determining the effect of multi-factor climate change on forests this study concentrated on the partial,ceteris-paribus,effect of CO2fertilization alone. Specifically,it used the findings of Norby et al.(2005)to predict their long-term consequences for the forest sector,other things being held constant including other parameters of climate change such as temperature and precipitation. Special attention was given to the possibility that the impact could vary considerably depending on the context;that is on different scenarios concerning world economic,demographic growth,and policy.

    The next section of the paper describes the theory,models,and data used to in the study. This is followed by the results for the main countries and regions,by product group,consumption,production and prices,forest stock,and value added in forest industries. The conclusion summarizes the main results,and their limitations and potential improvements.

    Methods

    Theory

    The market equilibrium principles that underlie the analysis are illustrated in Fig. 1. It describes the demand,supply,trade,and prices for one commodity,wood,with and without CO2fertilization of forests,in a world divided in two regions,at a particular point in time. Without CO2fertilization Region 1,with demand schedule D1 and supply schedule S1,is a net exporter and Region 2,with demand schedule D2 and supply schedule S2 is a net importer. In Fig. 1,the transport cost is ignored,and as a result the price,P,is the same in Region 1 and Region 2. In the exporting Region 1 the price P is higher than the autarky price at the intersection of D1 and S1 that would prevail without trade,while in the importing Region 2 it is lower. With CO2fertilization the forest stock increases in both regions and as a result the supply schedules shift to the right to S1' and S2'. Consequently,the price decreases from P to P'. Other things being equal,the demand is unchanged by the CO2fertilization. However,in accord with the lower price,the quantities consumed increase from C1to C1' in region 1 and from C2to C2' in region 1. The lower price also induces lower production but with the assumption of Fig. 1 this is more than compensated by the supply shifts so that the quantity produced also increases from Q1to Q1' in region 1 and Q2to Q2' in region 2. For trade,in this Figure,the result of the CO2fertilization is a slight decrease in exports from region 1 and correspondingly lower imports in region 2.

    However,the magnitude and even the direction of change may differ depending on the demand and supply curves and on the magnitude of the shifts. For example,in response to CO2fertilization,production may decrease in a region if the price effect(movement along the supply curve)exceeds the effect of the supply shift. Also,net trade may increase if the differential in CO2fertilization change the comparative advantage of a region relative to the other. Thus,in a multi-region,multiproducts situation,the adjustment of the global equilibrium due to CO2fertilization is hard to predict from purely theoretical considerations,and requires a more elaborate model of the forest sector.

    Global forest products model(GFPM)

    The GFPM adapted for this study calculates every year a global equilibrium across countries and products,linked dynamically to past equilibria. The static phase refers to the calculation of the equilibrium in a given year. The dynamic phase simulates the change in equilibrium conditions from year to year. More details concerning the formulation and the computer implementation are available in Buongiorno and Zhu(2014a). The current model deals with 180 countries,forest area and stock,and 14 wood products.

    In the static phase,the spatial global economic equilibrium in a given year is obtained by solving a quadratic programming problem in which the objective function is the social surplus in the global forest sector in a given year,which competitive markets maximize(Samuelson 1952,Takayama and Judge 1971). This surplus is equal to the value of the products to consumers(area under all the demand curves),minus the cost of supplying the raw materials(area under their supply curves),minus the transformation cost from raw materials,such as industrial roundwood to sawnwood,and minus the transport cost between countries including trade taxes. The main constraints define the material balance for each country and product:The quantity imported plus the domestic supply and the manufactured quantity must equal the domestic demand plus the quantity used in manufacturing other products and exports. Upon solution of this quadratic problem the shadow prices of the material balance constraints give the market-clearing prices for each commodity and country.

    The dynamic phase of the GFPM describes the changes in the condition of the global equilibrium from one period to the next. The demand equations shift over time as a function of the GDP periodic growth rate,and the lagged consumption growth rate,in accord with adaptive expectations or imperfect foresight(Johnston,1984 p. 348). The shifts of roundwood supply are determined by the rate of change of forest stock(endogenous,see below). There is one equation of this type for industrial roundwood(logs and pulpwood),fuelwood,and other industrial roundwood. The supply shifts of waste paper and other fiber pulp depend on GDP growth.

    The changes in national forest area depend on the level of income per capita,according to a Kuznet's curve (Koop and Tole 1999,Buongiorno 2014). For each country,the curve is calibrated so that in the base year the observed rate of forest area change is equal to the predicted,given the income per capita. The national forest stock evolves over time according to a growth-drain equation:

    where I is the forest stock at the beginning of the current period,S?1is the harvest during the previous period and G?1is the change of forest stock,without harvest,during the previous period,such that:

    Where gais the forest area growth rate,and guis the periodic rate of forest growth on a given area without harvest. In this application gu* is the relative change of the periodic rate of forest growth due to CO2fertilization. The periodic rate of forest growth,gu,is inversely related to the stock per unit area(Buongiorno 2014). For each country this relationship is calibrated so that in the base year the observed guis equal to the predicted given the stock per unit area. Equation(1)then gives the periodic rate of change of forest stock net of harvest,which determines the shift of the wood supply curves.

    Other dynamic elements include the changes in the input-output coefficients,for example to reflect increasing use of recycled paper in paper manufacturing,and the changes in manufacturing cost(Buongiorno and Zhu,2014b).

    Model calibration

    The input-output(I-O)coefficients and manufacturing costs of the GFPM used in this study were determined simultaneously by a calibration procedure based on FAOSTAT data from 2010 to 2012(Buongiorno and Zhu 2014b). Each I-O coefficient in a year and country is the ratio of the amount of input used in making a product to the amount of output. The GFPM calibration procedure estimates the I-O coefficients while adjusting the production of the input or output if needed based on prior knowledge of manufacturing processes. Together with data on local prices the procedure also gives estimates of the manufacturing costs. With input-output coefficients and manufacturing costs determined in this way for all other countries,and the end-product demand and wood supply equations positioned with theprice and quantity in each country,the solution of the global equilibrium closely replicates the base-year input data,in terms of production,consumption,net trade (exports minus imports),and prices.

    The parameters of the dynamic demand equations leading to the elasticities were estimated with panel country-year data from 1992 to 2012,using the fixedeffects method(Wooldridge 2002,p. 265),with the results shown in Table 1. The environmental Kuznets curve for forest area change,and the equation of the growth rate of forest stock were both estimated with data from FAO(2010)as in Buongiorno(2014). The elasticities of fuelwood and industrial roundwood supply with price and growing stock were from Turner et al. (2006). The freight cost between countries was estimated as the difference between unit value of imports and exports. Data on import tariff duties came from the World Trade Organization data base(WTO 2013).

    The solution for each year equilibrium is computed with an interior point solver(BPMPD,Mészáros 1999). The GFPM input and output for calibration and simulation is facilitated by Excel spreadsheets and graphics. A recent version of the complete software,its documentation,and a pre-calibrated data set are available freely for academic research(Buongiorno and Zhu,2014a).

    Table 1 Parameters of demand equations for end products

    IPCC scenarios

    Three global scenarios,A1B,A2,and B2 were used in the projections from 2011 to 2065. The scenarios are based on the IPPC scenarios(Nakicenovic et al.,2000),extended and modified for the purpose of the United States Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment(USDA Forest Service 2012). Each scenario results from a separate IPCC“storyline”about future global social,economic,technical and policy developments. The storylines also reflect different interaction between developing and industrialized countries.

    Scenario A1B,which assumes continuing globalization,leads to high income growth and low population growth,and thus the highest income per capita by the year 2065. Scenario A2 assumes a slowdown of globalization,and the rise of more regional interests. This leads to lower income growth than scenario A1B,and higher population growth,and thus lower income per capita. Scenario B2 has economic and demographic assumptions between scenarios A1B and A2.

    For the GFPM simulations,the three main exogenous variables taken from these scenarios were the growth of GDP and population,and the growth of atmospheric [CO2]. GDP growth from the IPCC was available only by region. National GDP growth was deducted from the regional growth in such a way that the regional growth remained the same as in the IPCC and the growth of individual countries converged towards this average regional growth rate(Buongiorno et al. 2012,p. 117). Table 2 shows the resulting annual growth rates of GDP for each scenario,for selected world regions and countries.

    CO2fertilization and forest growth

    Norby et al.(2005)find that“the response of net primary productivity(NPP)to elevated CO2is highly conserved across a broad range of productivity,with a median response of 23±2%. They define“elevated CO2”as~550 ppm of atmospheric[CO2],which is approximately 180 ppm above the atmospheric[CO2]in 2005. Thus,on average NPP increases by 0.13%per ppm increase in atmospheric[CO2]. Here,it was assumed that the percent increase in NPP was equal to the percent increase in the growth of forest stock in the absence of harvest.

    Figure 2 shows the implication of this assumption for the growth rate of forest stock,given the predicted evolution of atmospheric[CO2]in each IPCC scenario (Table 3). The highest impact was for scenario A2 in which the growth rate was 32%higher in 2070 than in 2006. The lowest was for scenario B2(19%). The effect of scenario A1B was almost the same as that of A2 up to 2050 but somewhat lower in 2070(29%). Accordingly,in the GFPM the endogenous forest growth rate,gu,inequation(2)changed over time by the relative fraction gu* shown in Fig. 2.

    Table 2 Projected annual percent GDP growth rate in selected world regions and countries,by scenario

    Results and discussion

    Price effects

    Table 4shows the world prices,defined by the unit value of imports,in 2011 and projected with the GFPM in 2065 with scenarios A1B,A2 and B2,with or without the cumulative effect of CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065. In accord with theoretical expectations,the price of all products was lower with CO2fertilization. The fertilization effect varied substantially with the scenario. Under the A1B scenario,the price of fuelwood and industrial roundwood was 19%lower in 2065 due to CO2fertilization. The price of sawwood was 9%lower,and the price of wood-based panels was 3%to 6% lower. The price of mechanical and chemical pulp was 4%and 6%lower,respectively. The price of paper andpaperboard was 3%to 6%lower depending on the product.

    For scenario A2 the price reductions were less than for scenario A1B,and similar to the effects under scenario B2. For scenarios A2 and B2,CO2fertilization decreased the price of fuelwood in 2065 by 12%to 13% and the price of industrial roundwood by 9%to 11%. The price of sawnwood was 4%to 5%lower,and the price of wood-based panels was 1%to 3%lower. The price of wood pulp decreased by 2%to 4%with CO2fertilization,and the price of paper and paperboard decreased by 1%to 3%depending on the product.

    Table 3 Past and projected atmospheric CO2saturation(ppm),by IPCC scenario

    Fuelwood consumption,production,and trade

    In accord with the lower world prices induced by the CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,fuelwood consumption(production+imports-exports)was higher in 2065 in all regions than without fertilization,under all three scenarios. The largest effect of CO2fertilization occurred with scenario A1B,under which world consumption of fuelwood was 8%higher in 2065,while it was 5%to 6% higher under scenarios A2 and B2(Table 5). The effect on fuelwood consumption was most noticeable in developing countries,reaching 13%in Africa under scenario A1B. The smallest relative impact was in Europe and the EU-28:2%with scenario A1B and 1%with A2 and B2.

    The regional effect of CO2fertilization on fuelwood production tended to mirror the effect on consumption,except for the EU-28 where production was somewhat lower than consumption with CO2fertilization under all scenarios. In that case,the movement down the supply curve due to the lower world price(Table 4)exceeded the shift of the supply curve due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,and resulted in lower production,which together with the higher consumption suggested a deterioration of net trade.

    Industrial roundwood consumption,production,and trade

    Industrial roundwood includes logs,pulpwood,and other industrial roundwood(FAO 2014,p. xx). The supply of industrial roundwood is,like that of fuelwood,directly affected by the shift due to CO2fertilization. However,while the demand for fuelwood,an end product,depends ultimately only on GDP and fuelwood price,the demand for industrial roundwood is more involved. Since industrial roundwood is an input in the manufacture of sawnwood,wood-based panels,and wood pulp,its demand depends on the price of these end products,and on the price of industrial roundwood,the price of other inputs and the techniques of production.

    Globally,the positive supply shift of industrial roundwood due to CO2fertilization more than matched the movement down the supply curve due to the price reduction. Consequently,the GFPM-projected world consumption and production of industrial roundwood was 2%to 4%higher,depending on the scenario,with the assumption of CO2fertilization than without it (Table 6).

    其實(shí)他們潛意識里早就知道,從許多許多年前開始,他們就注定了是要互相陪伴的人,不然為什么這么多年來誰也沒有跟其他人戀愛過,誰也沒有遺忘過誰。

    However,the complex derived demand for industrial roundwood,coupled with the shifts of industrial roundwood supply induced by the CO2fertilization led to varying regional effects. Consumption of industrial roundwood tended to be higher with CO2fertilization than without it,except in North/Central America and Asia. Under scenario A1B in particular,industrial roundwood consumption was 10%lower in N/C America,while it was 19%higher in South America and 10%higher in Europe and the EU-28. With this scenario,production was 18%higher in Asia in 2065,while consumption hardly changed,so that the CO2fertilization improved markedly Asia's trade balance of industrial roundwood. The regional pattern of the effects was similar for scenarios A2 and B2,but the magnitudes in both cases were much less than for scenario A1B.

    Table 4 World prices of forest products in 2011 and projected in 2065 under scenarios A1B,A2 and B2,with and without CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065

    Table 5 Projected differences in fuelwood production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Sawnwood and panels consumption,production,and trade

    In the GFPM,sawnwood and wood-based panels(veneer and plywood,particleboard,fiberboard(FAO 2014)),are end products. Their demand depends on GDP,the product price,and lagged consumption. As indicated above,the price of all products in 2065 was lower with CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065. Consequently,the consumption of all end products was higher(Table 7). In particular,under scenario A1B the world consumption of wood-based panels was 1.2%higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization,with the highest relative changes in the range of 2%to 2.5%in Africa and South America. The relative increases in consumption were about half that magnitude under scenarios A2 and B2.

    Meanwhile,the production of sawnwood and panels varied much more across regions. For example,under scenario A1B,while production of sawnwood and panels was 21%to 24%in Africa and South America with CO2fertilization,it was 25%lower in N/C America. However,the regional distribution of production varied markedly between scenarios. In particular,while the production of E-28 countries was 4%higher with CO2fertilization under scenario A1B and their trade balance improved as a result,their production decreased slightly with scenarios A2 and B2,implying a slight worsening of net trade.

    Table 6 Projected differences in industrial roundwood production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Wood pulp consumption production and trade

    The production and consumption of wood pulp(mechanical +chemical +semi-chemical pulp(FAO 2014)are determined by its demand and supply. Wood pulp is an input in the manufacture of paper and paperboard,so that its demand depends(negatively)on its own price, and(positively)on the price of paper and paperboard. Meanwhile,the supply of wood pulp is a positive function of the price of wood pulp and a negative function of the price of industrial roundwood(an input in making wood pulp). The CO2fertilization reduces the price of industrial roundwood,and in the process stimulates the demand for wood pulp. As shown in Table 8,under scenario A1B,the world wood pulp consumption(and the matching production)in 2065 was approximately 2%higher with the CO2fertilization than without it. The effect was approximately half that much under scenarios A2 and B2.

    Table 8 Projected differences in wood pulp production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Paper and paperboard consumption production and trade

    The products in the paper and paperboard group:newsprint +printing and writing paper + other paper andpaperboard(FAO 2014)are treated as end products in the GFPM. As for fuelwood,and sawnwood and woodbased panels the national demand is a function of GDP,price,and lagged consumption. Consequently,CO2fertilization influences paper and paperboard consumption through the price effect only. As the relative price reduction induced by CO2fertilization was smallest for paper and paper and paperboard,the effects on consumption were correspondingly small(Table 9). The largest effects,under scenario A1B implied only a 0.5%to 0.8%higher consumption depending on the region. Under the other two scenarios,consumption was practically the same with or without CO2fertilization.

    There were however larger regional impacts on production due to the differences in production cost brought about by the different regional shifts of industrial roundwood supply. In particular,under scenario A1B,paper and paperboard production was nearly 4%lower in South America with CO2fertilization than without it,implying a deterioration of net trade,while in Europe,production was nearly 3%higher,with a corresponding increase of net trade.

    Value added in forest industries

    For the purpose of this paper,value added is defined as the value of the total output of forest industries(sawnwood,wood-based panels,wood pulp,paper and paperboard) minus the cost of the wood and fiber input used by the industries(industrial roundwood,wood pulp,other fiber pulp,and waste paper). The effects of the CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065 on the input cost,value of the output and the resulting value added are summarized in Table 10 by region and scenario. The largest impacts occurred under scenario A1B according to which the CO2fertilization decreased the cost of the world industry inputs in 2065 by nearly $ 94x109or 7%. The reduction in input cost occurred in all regions,and was largest in Asia(?$42 x109). Although the quantity of inputs,for example of industrial roundwood,increased in several regions(Table 6),their lower world prices(Table 4)still led to a reduction in total input cost.

    The value of the industries outputs was also lower in several regions(Table 10)as the higher consumption of end products(e.g. sawnwood and panels)did not compensate for the reduced prices. Under scenario A1B,output value in 2065 was nearly 8%lower in N/C America with CO2fertilization,and nearly 4%lower in Asia. At world level,the reduction in output value came close to the reduction in input cost,leaving only a modest increase of value added($7.6x109,or less than 1%). The effects were similar in direction for scenarios A2 and B2,but smaller in magnitude so that at world level the CO2fertilization had hardly an impact on value added,although the regional differences were more substantial.

    Table 9 Projected differences in paper and paperboard production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Table 10 Projected differences in wood and fiber input cost,output value and value added in forest industries in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Forest stock

    CO2fertilization tended to increase the forest stock,but as observed above a rise in stock shifted the wood supply to the right,increasing wood harvest and thus decreasing the forest stock. These opposite tendencies were further affected by the price decrease induced by the increase in wood supply,which stimulated the demand for wood products and thus the derived demand for wood input and the attendant harvest. Table 11 summarizes the results of the GFPM simulation of these complex interactions for the forest stock in different regions and for the three scenarios.

    For all scenarios and regions the growing stock was higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization than without it. Thus,the added growth due to CO2fertilization more than compensated for the cumulative effects of the increased fuelwood and industrial roundwood harvests observed above. The largest effects of the CO2fertilization on the level of forest stock in 2065were under scenario A1B. This was in part due to the high level of atmospheric[CO2]and also to the rise in forest area,and thus young growing forests,induced by the higher GDP per capita growth assumed in scenario A1B. For this scenario,the forest stock was 20%higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization than without it. The largest relative impacts were in Africa and Asia. Under scenarios A2 and B2 the effect of CO2fertilization were similar,globally(9%to 10%)and by region,with the largest relative impact still in Africa.

    Conclusions

    The objective of this paper was to explore the long-term,ceteris-paribus effects of a potential CO2fertilization on the global forest sector. Based on the findings of Norby etal.(2005)about forest response to elevated CO2concentration it was assumed that the effect of CO2fertilization on forest growth would be conserved across a broad range of productivity,with an average stimulation of 23%for a 180 ppm increase of atmospheric[CO2].

    Table 11 Projected differences in growing stock in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    This increased productivity was applied to national forest growth rates in the Global Forest Products Model in proportion to the rising levels of[CO2]projected by the International Panel for Climate Change scenarios A1B,A2,and B2. In addition to different[CO2]levels the three scenarios projected different growth rates of gross domestic product and population,which influence the future demand for forest products,and the evolution of forest area. Projections of the forest area and forest stock,and of the production,consumption,prices,and trade of different products(ranging from fuelwood to paper and paperboard)were obtained with the GFPM for each scenario,with and without the assumption of CO2fertilization beginning in 2011 and up to 2065.

    The results suggested that CO2fertilization would raise the level of the world forest stock by 9 to 10%for scenarios A2 and B2 and by 20%for scenario A1B. The change in forest stock was in part counteracted by the stimulation of the wood supply which resulted in lower wood prices and increased wood harvest. The lower wood prices in turn led to lower prices of end products and increased global consumption. However,production decreased in some regions due to the relative competitive advantages and to the varying regional effects of CO2fertilization.

    These findings rely on strong assumptions;in particular that CO2fertilization can be summarized over very different forest types by the simple number suggested in Norby et al.(2005). Although the homogeneity of response that they observed is striking,and over a wide range of sites,they all are within the temperate zone. It is uncertain that they can be applied to other ecological zones. Hickler et al. (2008)use a dynamic vegetation model which does reproduce the data of Norby et al.(2005),and conclude that the data“might also be representative of forests globally”. But, they also suggest that the NPP enhancement due to CO2fertilization may be much larger in tropical than boreal forests.

    A review of several studies by the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change(2014)does conclude that“CO2fertilization effects strongly increased recent Net Primary Production trends in regional totals”. But,much work is still needed to quantify this effect apart from or in conjunction with changes in temperature and precipitation(Zickfeld et al. 2012). In addition,the methods used in this study require good estimates of current forest growth rates in different countries. This will mean further improvement of the global forest inventory and harvest statistics,which are currently subject to substantial errors due to infrequent and unequal sampling,and differences in definitions and classifications(FAO 2010).

    Keeping these caveats in mind,the present study showed that the impact of CO2fertilization would depend very much on the economic and demographic context in which it occurred,but in all cases the impact on the global value added in the forest sector would be modest. On the other hand,CO2forest fertilization per se might have substantial effects on the long-term level of forest stock,and less on the harvest. There would thus be a net positive effect of CO2fertilization on the amount of carbon stored in forests,a clearly beneficial effect for overall climate change.

    Competing interests

    The author declares that he has no competing interests.

    Author’s information

    Professor Emeritus,University of Wisconsin-Madison,USA,and Foreign Member,F(xiàn)rench Academy of Agriculture,Paris,F(xiàn)rance.

    Acknowledgments

    The research leading to this paper was supported in part by a joint venture agreement with the USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station in

    cooperation with project leader Jeff Prestemon.

    Received:30 June 2015 Accepted:14 October 2015

    References

    Buongiorno J(2014)Global modeling to predict timber production and prices:the GFPM approach. Forestry 88:291-303

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S,Raunikar R,Prestemon JP(2012)Outlook to 2060 for world forest and forest industries:a technical document supporting the Forest Service 210 RPA assessment. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station,General Technical Report SRS-151,Asheville,NC 119p.

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2014a)Using the Global Forest Products Model(GFPM version 2014 with BPMPD). Staff Paper Series # 80. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,35p. http:// labs.russell.wisc.edu/buongiorno/ Accessed 19 Jan 2015.

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2014b)Technical change in forest sector models:The Global Forest Products Model approach. Scandinavian J Forest Res 30:30-48

    Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change(2014)Biospheric Productivity in South America. http://www.co2science.org/subject/g/ summaries/samergreen.php Accessed 15 January 2015.

    FAO(2010)Global forest resources assessment 2010,main report. FAO Forestry Paper 163,F(xiàn)ood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome

    FAO(2014)FAO yearbook,forest products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome

    Hickler T,Smith B,Prentice IC,Mj?fors K,Miller P,Arneth A,Sykes MT(2008)CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests. Glob Chang Biol 14:1531-1542

    IPCC(2012)Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change expert meeting on economic analysis,costing methods,and ethics. In:Field CB,Barros V,Edenhofer O,Pichs-Madruga R,Sokona Y,Mastrandrea MD,Mach KJ,von Stechow C(eds)IPCC Working Group II Technical Support Unit. Carnegie Institution,Stanford,California

    IPCC(2013)International Panel for Climate Change,working group I:The scientific basis,II.2 Abundances and burdens II.2.1:CO2 abundances(ppm). http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/531.htm Accessed 3 December 2014.

    Johnston J(1984)Econometric methods. McGraw-Hill,New York

    Kirilenko AP,Sedjo RA(2007)Climate change impacts on forestry. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19697-19702

    Koop G,Tole L(1999)Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation?J Dev Econ 58:231-244

    McCarl B,Adams DM,Alig RJ,Burton D,Chen CC(2000)Effects of global climate change on the US forest sector:response functions derived from a dynamic resource and market simulator. Climate Res 15:195-205

    Mészáros C(1999)The BPMPD interior point solver for convex quadratic problems. Optimization Methods Softw 11&12:431-449

    Nabuurs GJ,Prussinen A,Karjalainen T,Herhard M,Kramer K(2002)Stem volume increment changes in European forests due to climate change-a simulation study with the EFISCEN model. Glob Chang Biol 8:304-316

    Nakicenovic N,Davidson O,Davis G,Grübler A,Kram T,Lebre La Rovere E,Metz B,Morita T,Pepper W,Pitcher H,Sankovski A,Shukla P,Swart R,Watson R,Zhou D(2000). Special Report on Emissions Scenarios:A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,U.K.,599 pp. http://www.grida.no/ climate/ipcc/emission/index.htm Accessed 3 Dec 2014.

    Norby RJ,DeLucia EH,Gielen B,Calfapietra C,Giardina CP,King JS,Ledford J,McCarthy HR,Moore DJP,Ceulemans R,De Angelis P,F(xiàn)inzi AC,Karnovsy DF,Kubiske ME,Lukac M,Pregitzer KS,Scarascia-Mugnozza GE,Schlesinger WH,Oren R(2005)Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:18052-18056

    NOAA-ESRL(2015)Annual mean carbon dioxide data. ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ products/trends/co2/co2_annmean_gl.txt Accessed 17 Jan 2015.

    Perez-Garcia J,Joyce LA,McGuire AD,Xiao X(2002)Impacts of climate change on the global forest sector. Clim Change 54:439-461

    Samuelson PA(1952)Spatial price equilibrium with linear programming. Am Econ Rev 42:283-303

    Sohngen B,Mendelsohn R(1998)Valuing the impact of large-scale ecological change in a market:The effect of climate change on U.S. timber. Am Econ Rev 88(4):689-710

    Sohngen B,Sedjo R(2005)Impacts of climate change on forest product markets:Implications for North American producers. The Forestry Chron 81(5):689-674

    Solberg B,Moiseyev A,Kallio AMI(2003)Economic impacts of accelerating forest growth in Europe. Forest Policy Econ 5:157-171

    Takayama T,Judge G(1971)Spatial and temporal price and allocation models. North-Holland Publishing Company,Amsterdam.

    Thompson SL,Govindasamy B,Mirin A,Caldeira K,Delire C,Milovich J,Wickett M,Erickson D(2004)Quantifying the effects of CO2-fertilized vegetation on future global climate and carbon dynamics. Geophysical Research Letters 31(3).

    Turner J,Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2006)An economic model of international wood supply,forest stock and forest area change. Scandinavian J Forest Res 21:73-86

    USDA Forest Service(2012)Future of America’s forest and rangelands:Forest Service 2010 Resources Planning Act Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture,F(xiàn)orest Service,General Technical Report WO-87,Washington DC

    Woodwell GM,Hobbie J,Houghton RA,Melillo JM,Moore B,Peterson BJ,Shaver GR(1983)Global deforestation:Contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 222:1081-1086

    Wooldridge J.(2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press,Cambridge,Massachusetts. 752p.

    WTO 2013. Tariffs data. World trade organization http://tariffdata.wto.org/ ReportersAndProducts.aspx Accessed July 9,2013.

    Zickfeld K,Arora VK,Gillett NP(2012)Is the climate response to CO2emissions path dependent?Geophys Res Lett 39:L05703

    猜你喜歡
    潛意識陪伴
    你真的會(huì)表揚(yáng)孩子嗎?
    Book Review on Wonders 《奇跡男孩》讀后感
    陪伴
    “疫”路陪伴 架起“僑”梁,心“聯(lián)”你我
    陪伴是一味最好的藥
    海峽姐妹(2020年2期)2020-03-03 13:36:38
    陪伴
    雜文月刊(2019年16期)2019-09-25 06:56:36
    第一眼看到什么動(dòng)物,測試你潛意識下的心理狀態(tài)
    最值得珍惜的,是無聲的陪伴
    文苑(2018年21期)2018-11-09 01:22:38
    潛意識在油畫創(chuàng)作中的運(yùn)用探究
    藝術(shù)家(2017年6期)2017-01-30 19:56:14
    陪伴是最長情的告白
    国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| av国产精品久久久久影院| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 久久久久视频综合| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 午夜免费鲁丝| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 美女高潮的动态| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久久色成人| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 色5月婷婷丁香| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 在线观看国产h片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 老司机影院成人| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产成人精品福利久久| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲成人手机| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| av线在线观看网站| 人妻 亚洲 视频| www.av在线官网国产| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 五月开心婷婷网| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 日本一二三区视频观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲国产色片| 直男gayav资源| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| a 毛片基地| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| av国产免费在线观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久久成人免费电影| 丰满少妇做爰视频| h视频一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 精品一区在线观看国产| 如何舔出高潮| av天堂中文字幕网| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品视频女| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 日韩强制内射视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲精品第二区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产 一区精品| 97在线视频观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| av.在线天堂| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 香蕉精品网在线| 色网站视频免费| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 在线免费十八禁| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 日本一二三区视频观看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 精品一区二区三卡| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 99热这里只有精品一区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 一本一本综合久久| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 美女主播在线视频| 综合色丁香网| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 精品国产三级普通话版| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 成人免费观看视频高清| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 全区人妻精品视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 午夜视频国产福利| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产成人91sexporn| 欧美成人a在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久午夜福利片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| av网站免费在线观看视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 在线观看国产h片| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国内精品宾馆在线| av天堂中文字幕网| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 内射极品少妇av片p| 777米奇影视久久| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| av在线app专区| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 欧美区成人在线视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 欧美3d第一页| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 熟女av电影| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久久色成人| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 成人影院久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产成人精品福利久久| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久婷婷青草| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 99热6这里只有精品| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 插逼视频在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产成人freesex在线| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| av黄色大香蕉| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲成色77777| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 伦精品一区二区三区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| www.色视频.com| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产探花极品一区二区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 免费看光身美女| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 日本av免费视频播放| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产综合精华液| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产在线免费精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 黄色一级大片看看| www.色视频.com| 在现免费观看毛片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | av一本久久久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 美女高潮的动态| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 97热精品久久久久久| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 一本久久精品| 男女免费视频国产| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久精品人妻少妇| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 日日啪夜夜爽| 黑人高潮一二区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 大码成人一级视频| av专区在线播放| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 欧美另类一区| 人妻一区二区av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 内射极品少妇av片p| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 老司机影院成人| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲国产色片| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产一级毛片在线| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 永久免费av网站大全| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 日本午夜av视频| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 精品久久久噜噜| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 精品久久久噜噜| 有码 亚洲区| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 麻豆成人av视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产精品一及| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 美女国产视频在线观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 全区人妻精品视频| 少妇 在线观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产色婷婷99| 免费av中文字幕在线| 久久久久久久久久成人| 欧美成人a在线观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产高清三级在线| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久久久国产网址| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 韩国av在线不卡| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 一本一本综合久久| 国产极品天堂在线| 内地一区二区视频在线| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 全区人妻精品视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人影院久久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 女人久久www免费人成看片| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 大码成人一级视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 99热网站在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 在线看a的网站| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 少妇人妻 视频| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 99热全是精品| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| av国产精品久久久久影院| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| av专区在线播放| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 黑人高潮一二区| 91狼人影院| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产 精品1| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 在线免费十八禁| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 黄色日韩在线| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 亚洲精品色激情综合| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 尾随美女入室| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| h视频一区二区三区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 夫妻午夜视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产毛片在线视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日韩强制内射视频| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品免费大片| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 性色avwww在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 黄色日韩在线| 日本黄色片子视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 欧美日本视频| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 五月天丁香电影| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久久久性生活片| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 老熟女久久久| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲中文av在线|