• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Modeling some long-term implications of CO2fertilization for global forests and forest industries

    2016-07-05 08:09:13JosephBuongiorno
    Forest Ecosystems 2016年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:潛意識陪伴

    Joseph Buongiorno

    ?

    Modeling some long-term implications of CO2fertilization for global forests and forest industries

    Joseph Buongiorno

    Abstract

    Background:This paper explored the long-term,ceteris-paribus effects of potential CO2fertilization on the global forest sector. Based on the findings of Norby et al.(PNAS 2005,102(50))about forest response to elevated[CO2].

    Methods:Forest productivity was increased in the Global Forest Products Model(GFPM)in proportion to the rising [CO2]projected in the IPCC scenario A1B,A2,and B2. Projections of the forest area and forest stock and of the production,consumption,prices,and trade of products ranging from fuelwood to paper and paperboard were obtained with the GFPM for each scenario,with and without CO2fertilization beginning in 2011 and up to 2065.

    Results:CO2 fertilization increased wood supply,leading to lower wood prices which in turn induced modest lower prices of end products and higher global consumption. However,production and value added in industries decreased in some regions due to the relative competitive advantages and to the varying regional effects of CO2fertilization.

    Conclusion:The main effect of CO2fertilization was to raise the level of the world forest stock in 2065 by 9 to 10%for scenarios A2 and B2 and by 20%for scenario A1B. The rise in forest stock induced by fertilization was in part counteracted by its stimulation of the wood supply which resulted in lower wood prices and increased harvests.

    Keywords:CO2fertilization,Climate change,Prices,Supply,Demand,International trade

    Correspondence:jbuongio@wisc.edu

    Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,WI,USA

    ?2015 Buongiorno. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproduction in any medium,provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s)and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license,and indicate if changes were made.

    Background

    The CO2content of the atmosphere has been rising steadily,from a global average of approximately 340 ppm(parts per million)in 1980 to 400 ppm in 2013(NOAA-ESRL 2015). The[CO2]is expected to increase faster in the next century. According to the International Panel on Climate Change,atmospheric[CO2]could reach 600 to 900 ppm in 2100,depending on varying scenarios concerning economic and demographic growth,and mitigation policies (IPCC 2013). This rise in[CO2]has consequences for climate change as it influences directly global temperature levels(IPCC 2012,Zickfeld et al. 2012). In this context,forests are a potential source of CO2emissions especially due to deforestation(Woodwell et al. 1983).

    On the other hand,forests also act as carbon sinks accumulating carbon in trees through photosynthesis. This later role means that forests can be part of a negative feedback working against atmospheric CO2accumulation. In this process,net primary productivity(NPP)can be stimulated by the increase in atmospheric CO2. This phenomenon,referred to as“CO2fertilization”,has been incorporated into vegetation models to predict its consequences for climate change and carbon dynamics (Thompson et al. 2004). Another consequence of CO2fertilization is its impact on forest stock and thus on wood supply and forest industries which is addressed in this study.

    The general issue of climate change and forestry has received wide attention(see Kirilenko and Sedjo 2007 for a review). Several studies have used projections of biological consequences of climate change in economicforest sector models,for countries(McCarl et al. 2000),regions(Solberg et al. 2003),or the world(Perez-Garcia et al. 2002,Sohngen and Sedjo 2005). Some studies assume higher growth of forests due to elevated CO2concentrations,higher temperatures and longer growing seasons(Nabuurs et al. 2002). Faster growth in turn leads to increased timber inventories and supply,and hence lower timber prices(Sohngen and Mendelsohn 1998,Perez-Garcia et al. 2002,Solberg et al. 2003,Sohngen and Sedjo 2005);although this may be limited by the propagation of pests,diseases,and invasive species (Sohngen and Sedjo 2005).

    In view of the difficulty of determining the effect of multi-factor climate change on forests this study concentrated on the partial,ceteris-paribus,effect of CO2fertilization alone. Specifically,it used the findings of Norby et al.(2005)to predict their long-term consequences for the forest sector,other things being held constant including other parameters of climate change such as temperature and precipitation. Special attention was given to the possibility that the impact could vary considerably depending on the context;that is on different scenarios concerning world economic,demographic growth,and policy.

    The next section of the paper describes the theory,models,and data used to in the study. This is followed by the results for the main countries and regions,by product group,consumption,production and prices,forest stock,and value added in forest industries. The conclusion summarizes the main results,and their limitations and potential improvements.

    Methods

    Theory

    The market equilibrium principles that underlie the analysis are illustrated in Fig. 1. It describes the demand,supply,trade,and prices for one commodity,wood,with and without CO2fertilization of forests,in a world divided in two regions,at a particular point in time. Without CO2fertilization Region 1,with demand schedule D1 and supply schedule S1,is a net exporter and Region 2,with demand schedule D2 and supply schedule S2 is a net importer. In Fig. 1,the transport cost is ignored,and as a result the price,P,is the same in Region 1 and Region 2. In the exporting Region 1 the price P is higher than the autarky price at the intersection of D1 and S1 that would prevail without trade,while in the importing Region 2 it is lower. With CO2fertilization the forest stock increases in both regions and as a result the supply schedules shift to the right to S1' and S2'. Consequently,the price decreases from P to P'. Other things being equal,the demand is unchanged by the CO2fertilization. However,in accord with the lower price,the quantities consumed increase from C1to C1' in region 1 and from C2to C2' in region 1. The lower price also induces lower production but with the assumption of Fig. 1 this is more than compensated by the supply shifts so that the quantity produced also increases from Q1to Q1' in region 1 and Q2to Q2' in region 2. For trade,in this Figure,the result of the CO2fertilization is a slight decrease in exports from region 1 and correspondingly lower imports in region 2.

    However,the magnitude and even the direction of change may differ depending on the demand and supply curves and on the magnitude of the shifts. For example,in response to CO2fertilization,production may decrease in a region if the price effect(movement along the supply curve)exceeds the effect of the supply shift. Also,net trade may increase if the differential in CO2fertilization change the comparative advantage of a region relative to the other. Thus,in a multi-region,multiproducts situation,the adjustment of the global equilibrium due to CO2fertilization is hard to predict from purely theoretical considerations,and requires a more elaborate model of the forest sector.

    Global forest products model(GFPM)

    The GFPM adapted for this study calculates every year a global equilibrium across countries and products,linked dynamically to past equilibria. The static phase refers to the calculation of the equilibrium in a given year. The dynamic phase simulates the change in equilibrium conditions from year to year. More details concerning the formulation and the computer implementation are available in Buongiorno and Zhu(2014a). The current model deals with 180 countries,forest area and stock,and 14 wood products.

    In the static phase,the spatial global economic equilibrium in a given year is obtained by solving a quadratic programming problem in which the objective function is the social surplus in the global forest sector in a given year,which competitive markets maximize(Samuelson 1952,Takayama and Judge 1971). This surplus is equal to the value of the products to consumers(area under all the demand curves),minus the cost of supplying the raw materials(area under their supply curves),minus the transformation cost from raw materials,such as industrial roundwood to sawnwood,and minus the transport cost between countries including trade taxes. The main constraints define the material balance for each country and product:The quantity imported plus the domestic supply and the manufactured quantity must equal the domestic demand plus the quantity used in manufacturing other products and exports. Upon solution of this quadratic problem the shadow prices of the material balance constraints give the market-clearing prices for each commodity and country.

    The dynamic phase of the GFPM describes the changes in the condition of the global equilibrium from one period to the next. The demand equations shift over time as a function of the GDP periodic growth rate,and the lagged consumption growth rate,in accord with adaptive expectations or imperfect foresight(Johnston,1984 p. 348). The shifts of roundwood supply are determined by the rate of change of forest stock(endogenous,see below). There is one equation of this type for industrial roundwood(logs and pulpwood),fuelwood,and other industrial roundwood. The supply shifts of waste paper and other fiber pulp depend on GDP growth.

    The changes in national forest area depend on the level of income per capita,according to a Kuznet's curve (Koop and Tole 1999,Buongiorno 2014). For each country,the curve is calibrated so that in the base year the observed rate of forest area change is equal to the predicted,given the income per capita. The national forest stock evolves over time according to a growth-drain equation:

    where I is the forest stock at the beginning of the current period,S?1is the harvest during the previous period and G?1is the change of forest stock,without harvest,during the previous period,such that:

    Where gais the forest area growth rate,and guis the periodic rate of forest growth on a given area without harvest. In this application gu* is the relative change of the periodic rate of forest growth due to CO2fertilization. The periodic rate of forest growth,gu,is inversely related to the stock per unit area(Buongiorno 2014). For each country this relationship is calibrated so that in the base year the observed guis equal to the predicted given the stock per unit area. Equation(1)then gives the periodic rate of change of forest stock net of harvest,which determines the shift of the wood supply curves.

    Other dynamic elements include the changes in the input-output coefficients,for example to reflect increasing use of recycled paper in paper manufacturing,and the changes in manufacturing cost(Buongiorno and Zhu,2014b).

    Model calibration

    The input-output(I-O)coefficients and manufacturing costs of the GFPM used in this study were determined simultaneously by a calibration procedure based on FAOSTAT data from 2010 to 2012(Buongiorno and Zhu 2014b). Each I-O coefficient in a year and country is the ratio of the amount of input used in making a product to the amount of output. The GFPM calibration procedure estimates the I-O coefficients while adjusting the production of the input or output if needed based on prior knowledge of manufacturing processes. Together with data on local prices the procedure also gives estimates of the manufacturing costs. With input-output coefficients and manufacturing costs determined in this way for all other countries,and the end-product demand and wood supply equations positioned with theprice and quantity in each country,the solution of the global equilibrium closely replicates the base-year input data,in terms of production,consumption,net trade (exports minus imports),and prices.

    The parameters of the dynamic demand equations leading to the elasticities were estimated with panel country-year data from 1992 to 2012,using the fixedeffects method(Wooldridge 2002,p. 265),with the results shown in Table 1. The environmental Kuznets curve for forest area change,and the equation of the growth rate of forest stock were both estimated with data from FAO(2010)as in Buongiorno(2014). The elasticities of fuelwood and industrial roundwood supply with price and growing stock were from Turner et al. (2006). The freight cost between countries was estimated as the difference between unit value of imports and exports. Data on import tariff duties came from the World Trade Organization data base(WTO 2013).

    The solution for each year equilibrium is computed with an interior point solver(BPMPD,Mészáros 1999). The GFPM input and output for calibration and simulation is facilitated by Excel spreadsheets and graphics. A recent version of the complete software,its documentation,and a pre-calibrated data set are available freely for academic research(Buongiorno and Zhu,2014a).

    Table 1 Parameters of demand equations for end products

    IPCC scenarios

    Three global scenarios,A1B,A2,and B2 were used in the projections from 2011 to 2065. The scenarios are based on the IPPC scenarios(Nakicenovic et al.,2000),extended and modified for the purpose of the United States Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment(USDA Forest Service 2012). Each scenario results from a separate IPCC“storyline”about future global social,economic,technical and policy developments. The storylines also reflect different interaction between developing and industrialized countries.

    Scenario A1B,which assumes continuing globalization,leads to high income growth and low population growth,and thus the highest income per capita by the year 2065. Scenario A2 assumes a slowdown of globalization,and the rise of more regional interests. This leads to lower income growth than scenario A1B,and higher population growth,and thus lower income per capita. Scenario B2 has economic and demographic assumptions between scenarios A1B and A2.

    For the GFPM simulations,the three main exogenous variables taken from these scenarios were the growth of GDP and population,and the growth of atmospheric [CO2]. GDP growth from the IPCC was available only by region. National GDP growth was deducted from the regional growth in such a way that the regional growth remained the same as in the IPCC and the growth of individual countries converged towards this average regional growth rate(Buongiorno et al. 2012,p. 117). Table 2 shows the resulting annual growth rates of GDP for each scenario,for selected world regions and countries.

    CO2fertilization and forest growth

    Norby et al.(2005)find that“the response of net primary productivity(NPP)to elevated CO2is highly conserved across a broad range of productivity,with a median response of 23±2%. They define“elevated CO2”as~550 ppm of atmospheric[CO2],which is approximately 180 ppm above the atmospheric[CO2]in 2005. Thus,on average NPP increases by 0.13%per ppm increase in atmospheric[CO2]. Here,it was assumed that the percent increase in NPP was equal to the percent increase in the growth of forest stock in the absence of harvest.

    Figure 2 shows the implication of this assumption for the growth rate of forest stock,given the predicted evolution of atmospheric[CO2]in each IPCC scenario (Table 3). The highest impact was for scenario A2 in which the growth rate was 32%higher in 2070 than in 2006. The lowest was for scenario B2(19%). The effect of scenario A1B was almost the same as that of A2 up to 2050 but somewhat lower in 2070(29%). Accordingly,in the GFPM the endogenous forest growth rate,gu,inequation(2)changed over time by the relative fraction gu* shown in Fig. 2.

    Table 2 Projected annual percent GDP growth rate in selected world regions and countries,by scenario

    Results and discussion

    Price effects

    Table 4shows the world prices,defined by the unit value of imports,in 2011 and projected with the GFPM in 2065 with scenarios A1B,A2 and B2,with or without the cumulative effect of CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065. In accord with theoretical expectations,the price of all products was lower with CO2fertilization. The fertilization effect varied substantially with the scenario. Under the A1B scenario,the price of fuelwood and industrial roundwood was 19%lower in 2065 due to CO2fertilization. The price of sawwood was 9%lower,and the price of wood-based panels was 3%to 6% lower. The price of mechanical and chemical pulp was 4%and 6%lower,respectively. The price of paper andpaperboard was 3%to 6%lower depending on the product.

    For scenario A2 the price reductions were less than for scenario A1B,and similar to the effects under scenario B2. For scenarios A2 and B2,CO2fertilization decreased the price of fuelwood in 2065 by 12%to 13% and the price of industrial roundwood by 9%to 11%. The price of sawnwood was 4%to 5%lower,and the price of wood-based panels was 1%to 3%lower. The price of wood pulp decreased by 2%to 4%with CO2fertilization,and the price of paper and paperboard decreased by 1%to 3%depending on the product.

    Table 3 Past and projected atmospheric CO2saturation(ppm),by IPCC scenario

    Fuelwood consumption,production,and trade

    In accord with the lower world prices induced by the CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,fuelwood consumption(production+imports-exports)was higher in 2065 in all regions than without fertilization,under all three scenarios. The largest effect of CO2fertilization occurred with scenario A1B,under which world consumption of fuelwood was 8%higher in 2065,while it was 5%to 6% higher under scenarios A2 and B2(Table 5). The effect on fuelwood consumption was most noticeable in developing countries,reaching 13%in Africa under scenario A1B. The smallest relative impact was in Europe and the EU-28:2%with scenario A1B and 1%with A2 and B2.

    The regional effect of CO2fertilization on fuelwood production tended to mirror the effect on consumption,except for the EU-28 where production was somewhat lower than consumption with CO2fertilization under all scenarios. In that case,the movement down the supply curve due to the lower world price(Table 4)exceeded the shift of the supply curve due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,and resulted in lower production,which together with the higher consumption suggested a deterioration of net trade.

    Industrial roundwood consumption,production,and trade

    Industrial roundwood includes logs,pulpwood,and other industrial roundwood(FAO 2014,p. xx). The supply of industrial roundwood is,like that of fuelwood,directly affected by the shift due to CO2fertilization. However,while the demand for fuelwood,an end product,depends ultimately only on GDP and fuelwood price,the demand for industrial roundwood is more involved. Since industrial roundwood is an input in the manufacture of sawnwood,wood-based panels,and wood pulp,its demand depends on the price of these end products,and on the price of industrial roundwood,the price of other inputs and the techniques of production.

    Globally,the positive supply shift of industrial roundwood due to CO2fertilization more than matched the movement down the supply curve due to the price reduction. Consequently,the GFPM-projected world consumption and production of industrial roundwood was 2%to 4%higher,depending on the scenario,with the assumption of CO2fertilization than without it (Table 6).

    其實(shí)他們潛意識里早就知道,從許多許多年前開始,他們就注定了是要互相陪伴的人,不然為什么這么多年來誰也沒有跟其他人戀愛過,誰也沒有遺忘過誰。

    However,the complex derived demand for industrial roundwood,coupled with the shifts of industrial roundwood supply induced by the CO2fertilization led to varying regional effects. Consumption of industrial roundwood tended to be higher with CO2fertilization than without it,except in North/Central America and Asia. Under scenario A1B in particular,industrial roundwood consumption was 10%lower in N/C America,while it was 19%higher in South America and 10%higher in Europe and the EU-28. With this scenario,production was 18%higher in Asia in 2065,while consumption hardly changed,so that the CO2fertilization improved markedly Asia's trade balance of industrial roundwood. The regional pattern of the effects was similar for scenarios A2 and B2,but the magnitudes in both cases were much less than for scenario A1B.

    Table 4 World prices of forest products in 2011 and projected in 2065 under scenarios A1B,A2 and B2,with and without CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065

    Table 5 Projected differences in fuelwood production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Sawnwood and panels consumption,production,and trade

    In the GFPM,sawnwood and wood-based panels(veneer and plywood,particleboard,fiberboard(FAO 2014)),are end products. Their demand depends on GDP,the product price,and lagged consumption. As indicated above,the price of all products in 2065 was lower with CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065. Consequently,the consumption of all end products was higher(Table 7). In particular,under scenario A1B the world consumption of wood-based panels was 1.2%higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization,with the highest relative changes in the range of 2%to 2.5%in Africa and South America. The relative increases in consumption were about half that magnitude under scenarios A2 and B2.

    Meanwhile,the production of sawnwood and panels varied much more across regions. For example,under scenario A1B,while production of sawnwood and panels was 21%to 24%in Africa and South America with CO2fertilization,it was 25%lower in N/C America. However,the regional distribution of production varied markedly between scenarios. In particular,while the production of E-28 countries was 4%higher with CO2fertilization under scenario A1B and their trade balance improved as a result,their production decreased slightly with scenarios A2 and B2,implying a slight worsening of net trade.

    Table 6 Projected differences in industrial roundwood production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Wood pulp consumption production and trade

    The production and consumption of wood pulp(mechanical +chemical +semi-chemical pulp(FAO 2014)are determined by its demand and supply. Wood pulp is an input in the manufacture of paper and paperboard,so that its demand depends(negatively)on its own price, and(positively)on the price of paper and paperboard. Meanwhile,the supply of wood pulp is a positive function of the price of wood pulp and a negative function of the price of industrial roundwood(an input in making wood pulp). The CO2fertilization reduces the price of industrial roundwood,and in the process stimulates the demand for wood pulp. As shown in Table 8,under scenario A1B,the world wood pulp consumption(and the matching production)in 2065 was approximately 2%higher with the CO2fertilization than without it. The effect was approximately half that much under scenarios A2 and B2.

    Table 8 Projected differences in wood pulp production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Paper and paperboard consumption production and trade

    The products in the paper and paperboard group:newsprint +printing and writing paper + other paper andpaperboard(FAO 2014)are treated as end products in the GFPM. As for fuelwood,and sawnwood and woodbased panels the national demand is a function of GDP,price,and lagged consumption. Consequently,CO2fertilization influences paper and paperboard consumption through the price effect only. As the relative price reduction induced by CO2fertilization was smallest for paper and paper and paperboard,the effects on consumption were correspondingly small(Table 9). The largest effects,under scenario A1B implied only a 0.5%to 0.8%higher consumption depending on the region. Under the other two scenarios,consumption was practically the same with or without CO2fertilization.

    There were however larger regional impacts on production due to the differences in production cost brought about by the different regional shifts of industrial roundwood supply. In particular,under scenario A1B,paper and paperboard production was nearly 4%lower in South America with CO2fertilization than without it,implying a deterioration of net trade,while in Europe,production was nearly 3%higher,with a corresponding increase of net trade.

    Value added in forest industries

    For the purpose of this paper,value added is defined as the value of the total output of forest industries(sawnwood,wood-based panels,wood pulp,paper and paperboard) minus the cost of the wood and fiber input used by the industries(industrial roundwood,wood pulp,other fiber pulp,and waste paper). The effects of the CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065 on the input cost,value of the output and the resulting value added are summarized in Table 10 by region and scenario. The largest impacts occurred under scenario A1B according to which the CO2fertilization decreased the cost of the world industry inputs in 2065 by nearly $ 94x109or 7%. The reduction in input cost occurred in all regions,and was largest in Asia(?$42 x109). Although the quantity of inputs,for example of industrial roundwood,increased in several regions(Table 6),their lower world prices(Table 4)still led to a reduction in total input cost.

    The value of the industries outputs was also lower in several regions(Table 10)as the higher consumption of end products(e.g. sawnwood and panels)did not compensate for the reduced prices. Under scenario A1B,output value in 2065 was nearly 8%lower in N/C America with CO2fertilization,and nearly 4%lower in Asia. At world level,the reduction in output value came close to the reduction in input cost,leaving only a modest increase of value added($7.6x109,or less than 1%). The effects were similar in direction for scenarios A2 and B2,but smaller in magnitude so that at world level the CO2fertilization had hardly an impact on value added,although the regional differences were more substantial.

    Table 9 Projected differences in paper and paperboard production and consumption in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Table 10 Projected differences in wood and fiber input cost,output value and value added in forest industries in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    Forest stock

    CO2fertilization tended to increase the forest stock,but as observed above a rise in stock shifted the wood supply to the right,increasing wood harvest and thus decreasing the forest stock. These opposite tendencies were further affected by the price decrease induced by the increase in wood supply,which stimulated the demand for wood products and thus the derived demand for wood input and the attendant harvest. Table 11 summarizes the results of the GFPM simulation of these complex interactions for the forest stock in different regions and for the three scenarios.

    For all scenarios and regions the growing stock was higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization than without it. Thus,the added growth due to CO2fertilization more than compensated for the cumulative effects of the increased fuelwood and industrial roundwood harvests observed above. The largest effects of the CO2fertilization on the level of forest stock in 2065were under scenario A1B. This was in part due to the high level of atmospheric[CO2]and also to the rise in forest area,and thus young growing forests,induced by the higher GDP per capita growth assumed in scenario A1B. For this scenario,the forest stock was 20%higher in 2065 with CO2fertilization than without it. The largest relative impacts were in Africa and Asia. Under scenarios A2 and B2 the effect of CO2fertilization were similar,globally(9%to 10%)and by region,with the largest relative impact still in Africa.

    Conclusions

    The objective of this paper was to explore the long-term,ceteris-paribus effects of a potential CO2fertilization on the global forest sector. Based on the findings of Norby etal.(2005)about forest response to elevated CO2concentration it was assumed that the effect of CO2fertilization on forest growth would be conserved across a broad range of productivity,with an average stimulation of 23%for a 180 ppm increase of atmospheric[CO2].

    Table 11 Projected differences in growing stock in 2065 due to CO2fertilization from 2011 to 2065,by region and scenario

    This increased productivity was applied to national forest growth rates in the Global Forest Products Model in proportion to the rising levels of[CO2]projected by the International Panel for Climate Change scenarios A1B,A2,and B2. In addition to different[CO2]levels the three scenarios projected different growth rates of gross domestic product and population,which influence the future demand for forest products,and the evolution of forest area. Projections of the forest area and forest stock,and of the production,consumption,prices,and trade of different products(ranging from fuelwood to paper and paperboard)were obtained with the GFPM for each scenario,with and without the assumption of CO2fertilization beginning in 2011 and up to 2065.

    The results suggested that CO2fertilization would raise the level of the world forest stock by 9 to 10%for scenarios A2 and B2 and by 20%for scenario A1B. The change in forest stock was in part counteracted by the stimulation of the wood supply which resulted in lower wood prices and increased wood harvest. The lower wood prices in turn led to lower prices of end products and increased global consumption. However,production decreased in some regions due to the relative competitive advantages and to the varying regional effects of CO2fertilization.

    These findings rely on strong assumptions;in particular that CO2fertilization can be summarized over very different forest types by the simple number suggested in Norby et al.(2005). Although the homogeneity of response that they observed is striking,and over a wide range of sites,they all are within the temperate zone. It is uncertain that they can be applied to other ecological zones. Hickler et al. (2008)use a dynamic vegetation model which does reproduce the data of Norby et al.(2005),and conclude that the data“might also be representative of forests globally”. But, they also suggest that the NPP enhancement due to CO2fertilization may be much larger in tropical than boreal forests.

    A review of several studies by the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change(2014)does conclude that“CO2fertilization effects strongly increased recent Net Primary Production trends in regional totals”. But,much work is still needed to quantify this effect apart from or in conjunction with changes in temperature and precipitation(Zickfeld et al. 2012). In addition,the methods used in this study require good estimates of current forest growth rates in different countries. This will mean further improvement of the global forest inventory and harvest statistics,which are currently subject to substantial errors due to infrequent and unequal sampling,and differences in definitions and classifications(FAO 2010).

    Keeping these caveats in mind,the present study showed that the impact of CO2fertilization would depend very much on the economic and demographic context in which it occurred,but in all cases the impact on the global value added in the forest sector would be modest. On the other hand,CO2forest fertilization per se might have substantial effects on the long-term level of forest stock,and less on the harvest. There would thus be a net positive effect of CO2fertilization on the amount of carbon stored in forests,a clearly beneficial effect for overall climate change.

    Competing interests

    The author declares that he has no competing interests.

    Author’s information

    Professor Emeritus,University of Wisconsin-Madison,USA,and Foreign Member,F(xiàn)rench Academy of Agriculture,Paris,F(xiàn)rance.

    Acknowledgments

    The research leading to this paper was supported in part by a joint venture agreement with the USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station in

    cooperation with project leader Jeff Prestemon.

    Received:30 June 2015 Accepted:14 October 2015

    References

    Buongiorno J(2014)Global modeling to predict timber production and prices:the GFPM approach. Forestry 88:291-303

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S,Raunikar R,Prestemon JP(2012)Outlook to 2060 for world forest and forest industries:a technical document supporting the Forest Service 210 RPA assessment. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station,General Technical Report SRS-151,Asheville,NC 119p.

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2014a)Using the Global Forest Products Model(GFPM version 2014 with BPMPD). Staff Paper Series # 80. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,35p. http:// labs.russell.wisc.edu/buongiorno/ Accessed 19 Jan 2015.

    Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2014b)Technical change in forest sector models:The Global Forest Products Model approach. Scandinavian J Forest Res 30:30-48

    Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change(2014)Biospheric Productivity in South America. http://www.co2science.org/subject/g/ summaries/samergreen.php Accessed 15 January 2015.

    FAO(2010)Global forest resources assessment 2010,main report. FAO Forestry Paper 163,F(xiàn)ood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome

    FAO(2014)FAO yearbook,forest products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome

    Hickler T,Smith B,Prentice IC,Mj?fors K,Miller P,Arneth A,Sykes MT(2008)CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests. Glob Chang Biol 14:1531-1542

    IPCC(2012)Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change expert meeting on economic analysis,costing methods,and ethics. In:Field CB,Barros V,Edenhofer O,Pichs-Madruga R,Sokona Y,Mastrandrea MD,Mach KJ,von Stechow C(eds)IPCC Working Group II Technical Support Unit. Carnegie Institution,Stanford,California

    IPCC(2013)International Panel for Climate Change,working group I:The scientific basis,II.2 Abundances and burdens II.2.1:CO2 abundances(ppm). http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/531.htm Accessed 3 December 2014.

    Johnston J(1984)Econometric methods. McGraw-Hill,New York

    Kirilenko AP,Sedjo RA(2007)Climate change impacts on forestry. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19697-19702

    Koop G,Tole L(1999)Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation?J Dev Econ 58:231-244

    McCarl B,Adams DM,Alig RJ,Burton D,Chen CC(2000)Effects of global climate change on the US forest sector:response functions derived from a dynamic resource and market simulator. Climate Res 15:195-205

    Mészáros C(1999)The BPMPD interior point solver for convex quadratic problems. Optimization Methods Softw 11&12:431-449

    Nabuurs GJ,Prussinen A,Karjalainen T,Herhard M,Kramer K(2002)Stem volume increment changes in European forests due to climate change-a simulation study with the EFISCEN model. Glob Chang Biol 8:304-316

    Nakicenovic N,Davidson O,Davis G,Grübler A,Kram T,Lebre La Rovere E,Metz B,Morita T,Pepper W,Pitcher H,Sankovski A,Shukla P,Swart R,Watson R,Zhou D(2000). Special Report on Emissions Scenarios:A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,U.K.,599 pp. http://www.grida.no/ climate/ipcc/emission/index.htm Accessed 3 Dec 2014.

    Norby RJ,DeLucia EH,Gielen B,Calfapietra C,Giardina CP,King JS,Ledford J,McCarthy HR,Moore DJP,Ceulemans R,De Angelis P,F(xiàn)inzi AC,Karnovsy DF,Kubiske ME,Lukac M,Pregitzer KS,Scarascia-Mugnozza GE,Schlesinger WH,Oren R(2005)Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:18052-18056

    NOAA-ESRL(2015)Annual mean carbon dioxide data. ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ products/trends/co2/co2_annmean_gl.txt Accessed 17 Jan 2015.

    Perez-Garcia J,Joyce LA,McGuire AD,Xiao X(2002)Impacts of climate change on the global forest sector. Clim Change 54:439-461

    Samuelson PA(1952)Spatial price equilibrium with linear programming. Am Econ Rev 42:283-303

    Sohngen B,Mendelsohn R(1998)Valuing the impact of large-scale ecological change in a market:The effect of climate change on U.S. timber. Am Econ Rev 88(4):689-710

    Sohngen B,Sedjo R(2005)Impacts of climate change on forest product markets:Implications for North American producers. The Forestry Chron 81(5):689-674

    Solberg B,Moiseyev A,Kallio AMI(2003)Economic impacts of accelerating forest growth in Europe. Forest Policy Econ 5:157-171

    Takayama T,Judge G(1971)Spatial and temporal price and allocation models. North-Holland Publishing Company,Amsterdam.

    Thompson SL,Govindasamy B,Mirin A,Caldeira K,Delire C,Milovich J,Wickett M,Erickson D(2004)Quantifying the effects of CO2-fertilized vegetation on future global climate and carbon dynamics. Geophysical Research Letters 31(3).

    Turner J,Buongiorno J,Zhu S(2006)An economic model of international wood supply,forest stock and forest area change. Scandinavian J Forest Res 21:73-86

    USDA Forest Service(2012)Future of America’s forest and rangelands:Forest Service 2010 Resources Planning Act Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture,F(xiàn)orest Service,General Technical Report WO-87,Washington DC

    Woodwell GM,Hobbie J,Houghton RA,Melillo JM,Moore B,Peterson BJ,Shaver GR(1983)Global deforestation:Contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 222:1081-1086

    Wooldridge J.(2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press,Cambridge,Massachusetts. 752p.

    WTO 2013. Tariffs data. World trade organization http://tariffdata.wto.org/ ReportersAndProducts.aspx Accessed July 9,2013.

    Zickfeld K,Arora VK,Gillett NP(2012)Is the climate response to CO2emissions path dependent?Geophys Res Lett 39:L05703

    猜你喜歡
    潛意識陪伴
    你真的會(huì)表揚(yáng)孩子嗎?
    Book Review on Wonders 《奇跡男孩》讀后感
    陪伴
    “疫”路陪伴 架起“僑”梁,心“聯(lián)”你我
    陪伴是一味最好的藥
    海峽姐妹(2020年2期)2020-03-03 13:36:38
    陪伴
    雜文月刊(2019年16期)2019-09-25 06:56:36
    第一眼看到什么動(dòng)物,測試你潛意識下的心理狀態(tài)
    最值得珍惜的,是無聲的陪伴
    文苑(2018年21期)2018-11-09 01:22:38
    潛意識在油畫創(chuàng)作中的運(yùn)用探究
    藝術(shù)家(2017年6期)2017-01-30 19:56:14
    陪伴是最長情的告白
    成年人黄色毛片网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 黄色视频不卡| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久热这里只有精品99| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 身体一侧抽搐| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 怎么达到女性高潮| 中文字幕久久专区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 午夜免费激情av| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 成年版毛片免费区| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 搞女人的毛片| 中文字幕久久专区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 三级毛片av免费| 国产色视频综合| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲九九香蕉| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 校园春色视频在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产区一区二久久| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 黄色女人牲交| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 91成年电影在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 午夜免费激情av| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 性欧美人与动物交配| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 最好的美女福利视频网| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱 | 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 99国产精品99久久久久| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美日本视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| 此物有八面人人有两片| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| avwww免费| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲av熟女| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 一级黄色大片毛片| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 一本久久中文字幕| 性少妇av在线| 亚洲第一电影网av| 91在线观看av| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 91字幕亚洲| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲四区av| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 看免费成人av毛片| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 黄片wwwwww| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 国产 一区精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 日本 欧美在线| videossex国产| 一进一出抽搐动态| 如何舔出高潮| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产 一区精品| 少妇的逼好多水| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美激情在线99| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 色综合站精品国产| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产高清三级在线| 免费av观看视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产三级在线视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 97超视频在线观看视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 成人二区视频| 欧美日本视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 51国产日韩欧美| av在线老鸭窝| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 波多野结衣高清作品| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲综合色惰| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 日本五十路高清| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 少妇丰满av| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲成人久久性| 深夜精品福利| 久久久久九九精品影院| 99热这里只有精品一区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 午夜福利在线在线| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧美日韩乱码在线| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产色婷婷99| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 热99在线观看视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 在现免费观看毛片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| av视频在线观看入口| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产日本99.免费观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| eeuss影院久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 在线播放国产精品三级| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 成人无遮挡网站| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 草草在线视频免费看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| eeuss影院久久| 久久久久九九精品影院| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产三级在线视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产高清三级在线| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 黄色日韩在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产色婷婷99| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 简卡轻食公司| 欧美日本视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 精品午夜福利在线看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日日撸夜夜添| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产高清激情床上av| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 97热精品久久久久久| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 香蕉av资源在线| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 免费大片18禁| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 欧美激情在线99| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 美女免费视频网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 看片在线看免费视频| av国产免费在线观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 成人av在线播放网站| 特级一级黄色大片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 成人欧美大片| av中文乱码字幕在线| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 日韩中字成人| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚州av有码| 一级av片app| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 日本 欧美在线| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 尾随美女入室| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 在线观看66精品国产| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| av专区在线播放| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久久久国内视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品久久久久久,| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产高潮美女av| 久久午夜福利片| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲无线观看免费| 久久热精品热| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 久久午夜福利片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 窝窝影院91人妻| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 欧美性感艳星| 久久久久久久久中文| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 精品一区二区免费观看| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 51国产日韩欧美| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 日韩高清综合在线| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲18禁久久av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| av国产免费在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 日本一二三区视频观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 午夜免费激情av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 黄色配什么色好看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 少妇的逼水好多| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 久久精品影院6| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 久久九九热精品免费| 一区二区三区激情视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 色视频www国产| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 香蕉av资源在线| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 天堂动漫精品| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲18禁久久av| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 日本三级黄在线观看| 黄色女人牲交| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 88av欧美| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 久久久久久久久大av| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 91狼人影院| 69人妻影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 成人无遮挡网站| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 毛片女人毛片| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美区成人在线视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | av.在线天堂| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲真实伦在线观看|