• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Which trees should be removed in thinning treatments?

    2016-07-05 08:09:20TimoPukkalaErkkihdeandOlaviLaiho
    Forest Ecosystems 2016年1期

    Timo Pukkala,Erkki L?hdeand Olavi Laiho

    ?

    Which trees should be removed in thinning treatments?

    Timo Pukkala1*,Erkki L?hde2and Olavi Laiho2

    Abstract

    Background:In economically optimal management,trees that are removed in a thinning treatment should be selected on the basis of their value,relative value increment and the effect of removal on the growth of remaining trees. Large valuable trees with decreased value increment should be removed,especially when they overtop smaller trees.

    Methods:This study optimized the tree selection rule in the thinning treatments of continuous cover management when the aim is to maximize the profitability of forest management. The weights of three criteria(stem value,relative value increment and effect of removal on the competition of remaining trees)were optimized together with thinning intervals.

    Results and conclusions:The results confirmed the hypothesis that optimal thinning involves removing predominantly large trees. Increasing stumpage value,decreasing relative value increment,and increasing competitive influence increased the likelihood that removal is optimal decision. However,if the spatial distribution of trees is irregular,it is optimal to leave large trees in sparse places and remove somewhat smaller trees from dense places. However,the benefit of optimal thinning,as compared to diameter limit cutting is not usually large in pure one-species stands. On the contrary,removing the smallest trees from the stand may lead to significant (30-40%)reductions in the net present value of harvest incomes.

    Keywords:Continuous cover forestry,Tree selection,High thinning,Optimal management,Spatial distribution,Spatial growth model

    * Correspondence:timo.pukkala@uef.fi

    1University of Eastern Finland,PO Box 111,80101 Joensuu,F(xiàn)inland Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

    ?2015 Pukkala et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproduction in any medium,provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s)and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license,and indicate if changes were made.

    Background

    A tree is financially mature for cutting when its relative value increment falls below the guiding rate of interest (Davis and Johnson 1987;Knoke 2012). However,the value increment may improve in the future,due to e.g. changes in the proportions of timber assortments that can be obtained from the tree. Therefore,Duerr et al. (1956)advice to calculate the relative value increment for several coming time periods and classify the tree as financially mature if the highest projected rate of value increase is smaller than the guiding rate of interest.

    In Finland and many other countries the main timber assortments are pulpwood and saw log,of which saw log is more valuable. Figure 1(bottom)shows that,in Finnish conditions,the consequence of unequal prices of different timber assortments is the existence of peaks in relative value increment when the stem attains sufficient dimensions for pulpwood log,first saw log,second saw log etc. At later ages,when most of the volume is already saw log,the peaks gradually disappear and the relative value increment decreases monotonously with increasing tree age and size. If the tree has passed all the value jumps,it is enough to analyze the current value increment to judge whether the tree is financially mature for cutting. It is noteworthy,however,that different trees of the stand do not reach financial maturity at the same age or diameter (Fig. 1 bottom;Knoke 2012). This is because of genetic variation,spatial variation in site productivity,and differences in the competitive positions of the trees. The last factor can be taken into account in financial analysis if distance-dependent growth models are used to predict increment.

    Figure 1(top)shows that a regular spatial distribution of trees makes it possible to maintain sufficient value increments with larger average tree diameter as comparedto more aggregated spatial arrangements. This means that,on the average,a tree reaches financial maturity at smaller diameter in irregular spatial distribution. However,some of the trees in an aggregated spatial tree distribution,growing in sparsely populated places or being surrounded by small trees,may grow better than a similar tree would grow in a regular stand,which postpones the financial maturity of these trees.

    As Davis and Johnson(1987)pointed out,the effect of tree removal on the growth of remaining trees should also be taken into account when deciding when a tree should be harvested and which trees should be removed. Removing a large tree leads to improved value increment in smaller trees. This calls for cutting large trees earlier than their relative value increment suggests. The removal of a large tree may improve the productivity of several remaining trees and increase the relative value increment of the whole residual stand.

    The capital invested in wood production consists of the value of the trees plus the value of bare land. If bare land has a positive value this means that a tree is financially mature at higher relative value increment than indicated by the guiding rate of return. This is because the value increment must be compared to the opportunity cost of the tree and the piece of land occupied by the tree. Bare land value and the effect of tree removal on the growth of remaining trees both increase the rate of value increment at which cutting is optimal decision.

    The above analysis suggests that it is optimal to remove the largest trees in a thinning treatment. However,unequal competitive status of trees,as well as unequal effect of tree removal on the growth of surrounding trees,makes the decision more complicated than for instance applying diameter limit cutting. A detailed analysis of optimal tree selection needs a distance dependent growth model,or at least the calculation of value increments and the effects of tree removal at individual tree level.

    Although the overall principles that should determine tree selection in thinning have been understood and described already several decades ago(Duerr et al. 1956;Davis and Johnson 1987)few studies have actually optimized the selection of removed trees. An exception is the study of Pukkala and Miina(1998)who optimized a tree selection rule which was based on the effect of tree removal on the competitive positions of remaining trees. It was found that it was optimal to thin from above,i.e. remove large trees.

    This study proposed a more straightforward approach to optimizing tree selection:the criteria of the cutting rule were the tree's stumpage value,its value increment,and the effect of removal on the growth of surrounding trees. It was assumed that increasing stumpage value,decreasing relative value increment and increasing competitive effect increase the likelihood of removal. Another hypothesis was that the optimal order of tree removal is less strongly correlated with tree diameter in irregular spatial distributions,as compared to regular tree arrangements. A third hypothesis was that,when net present value is maximized,it is optimal to remove trees at higher relative value increment than the discount rate that is used to calculate net present value.

    Methods

    Three different sample plots of Norway spruce(50 m by 50 m)with the same diameter distribution but different spatial distribution of trees were generated for the analyses. The first plot had a Poisson distribution of trees (henceforth referred to as Poisson stand). The x and y coordinates of trees were drawn from uniform distribution. The second stand was regular,and the third stand was very irregular(aggregated). Regular spatial distributions can be easily achieved by silvicultural treatments and the irregular distribution might be a result of removing all birches from a naturally emerged mixture ofbirch and spruce. Spruces may be very irregularly distributed in such stands. The mean diameter of each initial stand was about 22 cm,stand basal area was 17 m2?ha?1and the number of trees per hectare was 1200. The stands were assumed to grow on mesic site in Central Finland.

    The models of Pukkala et al.(2013)for diameter increment,tree survival and ingrowth were used in simulation. The models are based on about 60,000 diameter increment and survival observations in different stand types. The models can be used in both even-sized and uneven-sized stands. However,the models are not spatial. When the models were used in this study,the predictors which describe competition(stand basal area,G,and basal area in larger trees,BAL)were calculated from trees that were within 10 meters from the tree for which predictions were calculated. This is justified because most of the modelling data of Pukkala et al.(2013)were measured on plots with approximately 10-m radius. However,to make the growth simulator distance dependent,both G and BAL were calculated as the average G (m2?ha?1)or BAL(m2?ha?1)within 10 m,within 10/2 m (5 m),and within 10/3 m(3.33 m). As a result,the closest trees had a larger influence on G and BAL. This is in accordance with several studies,which show that the effect of neighbor trees on the growth of a subject tree decreases with increasing distance(see e.g. Miina and Pukkala 2000).

    Mortality was simulated by comparing the tree's survival probability to random number distributed uniformly between 0 and 1. If the random number was larger than the survival probability,the tree was assigned as dead. Ingrowth(number of ingrowth trees)was predicted with the unmodified model of Pukkala et al.(2013)but spatial criterion was used to choose the places for ingrowth trees. Fifty candidate positions were generated for each ingrowth tree and the competition index proposed by Miina and Pukkala(2000;their Equation 6b)was calculated for each location. The tree was placed to that location which had the lowest completion index. The procedure mimics the observed dynamics of spruce stands(e.g. Eerik?inen et al. 2007)in which ingrowth trees appear in openings and places with little competition by larger trees.

    The optimization problem consisted of selecting the thinning intervals and the weights of the three criteria of the following tree selection rule:

    where Value is the stumpage value of the stem,Relative-ValueIncrement is the predicted 5-year value increment divided by the stumpage value of the stem,BALeffect is the total reduction in the BALs of neighbor trees in case the tree is removed,and w1,w2and w3are optimized parameters which determine the effect of the three criteria on the order of tree removal. The BAL effect was calculated in the same way as BALs were calculated in growth prediction,i.e. by giving more weight to close neighborhood. A removed tree affected most within 3.33 m,somewhat less within 3.33-5 m,still less within 5-10 m and not at all beyond 10 meters.

    The optimized parameters were thinning intervals and parameters w1,w2and w3of the tree selection rule. The problem formulations correspond to continuous cover management since planting was not an option when stand development was simulated. The remaining basal area was calculated with the following model,which is based on 20,583 optimized cuttings of 6,861 stands located in different parts of Finland. All optimizations meet the constraints of Finnish forestry legislation:

    where Gremainis remaining basal area(m2?ha?1),D is basal-area-weighted mean diameter of trees(cm),Gtotalis stand basal area before thinning(m2?ha?1),Gpineis basal area of pine(m2?ha?1),Gspruceis basal area of spruce (m2?ha?1),r is discount rate(%),and MT,VT and CT are indicator variables for mesic,sub-xeric and xeric site,respectively.

    When a thinning was simulated,trees were removed according to their removal score(Eq. 1)until the remaining basal area was equal to the value calculated with Eq. 2. In another set of optimizations,also the remaining basal was optimized. These optimizations may not always meet the current legal limits of Finland.

    A 10-m wide buffer zone was generated around the plot when stand development was simulated(when computing the predictors of the models),and the buffer was removed after completing a simulation time step. The buffer was generated by assuming that the plot was surrounded by similar plots on all sides. Since the models that were used in growth simulation have five-year time step,stand development was simulated in 5-year steps.

    Computation of the removal scores of trees involved the calculation of the stumpage value,5-year value increment and BAL effect for every tree. To obtain the stumpage value,taper models(Laasasenaho 1982)were used to calculate assortment volumes,which were multiplied by their unit prices. The assortments were saw log(50€?m?3,minimum top diameter 16 cm,minimum length 4 m),and pulpwood(15€?m?3,minimum top diameter 9 cm,minimum length 2 m). To calculate value increment,the diameter(dbh)and height of the tree were incremented by five-year growth,and assortment volumes corresponding to the incremented dimensions were calculated with the taper model.

    The obtained stumpage values,value increments and BAL effects were used to calculate the removal scores for all trees,and the tree with the highest score was removed. Since a tree removal may affect the competitive influences,value increments and removal scores of remaining trees,the BAL effects and value increment predictions of all remaining trees were updated after every tree removal. This involved removing the buffer,generating the buffer again,and calculating the BAL effects and value increments again. Removing and adding the buffer after every tree removal was based on the assumption that the forest that surrounds the plot is thinned simultaneously with the plot.

    Three next thinnings were optimized in the analyses of this study. The NPV of the ending growing stock(residual stand after the third thinning)was predicted with the model(see Pukkala 2015b). The model prediction,once discounted to the starting year of simulation,gives the NPV of all incomes and costs that are later than the last optimized cutting. It has been shown(Pukkala 2015a,2015b)that using the model for estimate the NPV of distant cuttings has no major effect on the optimization results for the next cuttings,as compared to a higher number of optimized cuttings.

    Since the simulation involves stochasticity in mortality and ingrowth,every simulation that was conducted during the optimization run was repeated 10 times and the mean NPV of the repeated simulations was used as the objective function(returned to the optimization algorithm). The direct search method of Hooke and Jeeves (1961)was used in optimization. Every optimization was repeated 5 times,each direct search starting from the best of 100 random combinations of optimized variables. The best solution(highest NPV)was taken as the optimal solution. NPV was calculated with 3%discount rate.

    Table 1 Net present values and optimal values of decision variables for Poisson,regular and irregular stand in 5 repeated optimizations when the remaining basal area of thinning was calculated with a model(Eq. 2)

    Results and discussion

    Remaining basal area not optimized

    Optimizations in which the remaining basal area was not optimized suggested immediate thinning in all three stands,another thinning after 10 years,and a third thinning 10 years later(Table 1,boldface). However,there was some variation between repeated optimizations in the cutting intervals,especially in the irregular stand. Looking at the NPVs of the solutions suggests that those solutions that propose intervals other than 10 years may be sub-optimal,i.e.,the algorithm has converged to local optimum.

    The ranking of the three stands in terms of NPV was logical. The regular stand produced the highest NPV whereas the highly irregular stand produced clearly smaller economic benefit than the other stands(Table 1).The signs of the parameters of the removal score function were logical:high stem value and high BAL effect (high reduction in the competition of remaining trees)increased the score,and high relative value increment decreased it. Valuable trees with low value increment and strong competitive effect on other trees were the first ones to leave. As a result,thinnings from above were conducted,as can be seen from the maps of Fig. 2.

    A closer inspection of the diameters of the removed and remaining trees(Fig. 3)revealed that the thinnings of the regular stand resembled diameter limit cutting. There were only one or two diameter classes which included both remaining and removed trees. In the first thinning of the Poisson forest,there were 4 diameter classes(8 cm diameter range)having both remaining and removed trees. This range was 12 cm in the irregular stand. Large trees were left in sparse places and rather small trees were removed from dense places.

    The diagrams of Fig. 4(bottom right)show that,in the regular stand,the order of removal followed decreasing breast height diameter fairly closely. The selection score correlated closely with both dbh and relative value increment,suggesting that either of these variables alone could be used as the harvesting criterion in a regular stand. In the other stands,the order of removal did not follow decreasing dbh equally closely. In both Poisson and regular stands,most trees removed in the first thinning were larger than 25 cm.

    The situation was different on the irregular stand,in which several removed trees were smaller than 25 cm. To have a sufficient remaining basal area,some large trees were left to continue growing(Figs. 2 and 3). In the irregular stand,the removal score did not correlate strongly with dbh or relative value increment. In this stand,the BAL effect of tree removal varied much more than in the other stands(Fig. 4 bottom left)and had a stronger influence on the removal score than in the other stands. This cannot be concluded from the weights of BAL effect in Table 1 since the effect of the criterion depends on both the weight and the range of variation in the criterion variable in a particular stand and thinning. As a conclusion,when thinning an irregular stand,more importance should be given to the reduction of competition due to tree removal.

    Table 1shows that repeated optimizations result in different weights of the criteria of the removal score,suggesting that there is much uncertainty in this respect. However,since the three criteria correlate with each other,the removal score may be fairly similar with different weights. This means that,although there is uncertainty about the exact weights of the removal criteria,there is less uncertainty about the removal order of trees. This can be seen from Fig. 5,which shows the locations of trees removed in the first thinning of the Poisson forest when the five different solutions of Table 1 were used to select the trees. Almost the same trees were removed when using different values for weights w1,w2and w3. Three trees were removed in only 1 solution and another three trees were removed in less than five solutions. All the other trees were removed in all solutions. Therefore,high variation in the obtained weights of the removal criteria bring only little uncertainty in tree selection.

    Another simulation was done by applying the optimal weights of the thinning rules(boldface rows in Table 1)of the three different stands to the first thinning of the Poisson stand(Fig. 6). The results show again that nearly the same trees were removed from the Poisson forest when applying the optimal tree selection rule of regular,irregular or Poisson stand. This result implies that the same tree selection rule could be used in all spatial distributions,which may sound counterintuitive in the light of the diagrams of Fig. 4. However,even though theweight of e.g. BAL effect would be the same in all stands,the influence of BAL effect on tree removal would be stronger in the irregular stand,due to greater variation of BAL effect in this stand.

    Remaining basal area optimized

    When the remaining basal area was optimized together with the thinning intervals and tree selection rule,the NPV of the optimal schedule increased by 4-5%as compared to optimizations in which remaining basal area was calculated with Eq. 2(Tables 1 and 2). The remaining basal areas were now 6.5-8.9 m2?ha?1whereas they were 10-11 m2?ha?1when calculated with the model. The thinning intervals became longer in the Poisson and regular stands. It can be concluded that the requirement for a certain minimum residual basal area decreased the profitability of forest management in the three analyzed stands.

    As a consequence of stronger thinnings,more ingrowth appeared in the stands,especially in the Poisson and regular stands,as compared to previous optimizations(Fig. 7). The thinning was extended to smaller diameters(Fig. 8),and the diameter range that had both remaining and removed trees,became narrower. This means that when remaining basal area was not restricted,optimal thinning resembled more diameter limit cutting,also in the aggregated spatial distribution.

    The optimality of diameter limit cutting was further inspected by removing the trees according to dbh,starting from the largest tree(‘High thinning' in Fig. 9). For comparison,simulations were also conducted so that the smallest trees were removed in the thinning treatments(‘Low thinning' in Fig. 9). The results show that systematic diameter limit cutting was not much worse than optimal tree selection. Thinning from below would be a clearly inferior management approach.

    Effect of discount rate

    The previous optimizations used 3%discount rate. When remaining basal area was optimized in the Poisson stand (together with thinning intervals and tree selection rule),lower discount rate(1%)led to clearly longer thinning intervals,higher pre-thinning basal areas,larger mean tree diameters,and slightly higher post-thinning basal areas and mean diameters,compared to 3%discount rate(Fig. 10). Increased discount rate(5%)resulted in 10-year thinning interval,lower remaining basal area and smaller mean tree size of the residual stand. When the discount rate was 1%,the largest trees of the stand were 35 cm in dbh when the thinning was conducted. With 5%discount rate the thinning was conducted when the largest trees reached 25 cm breast height diameter.

    The effect of discount rate was the most clear in growing stock value(Fig. 10,bottom left). When the discount rate was 1%,the stumpage value of the growing stock was 8000€?ha?1at the second thinning and 13 000€?ha?1at the third thinning. With 5%discount rate the prethinning growing stock value was only about 2200€?ha?1.

    When NPV was maximized with 1%discount rate,it was optimal to thin the stand when its relative value increment was 2-3%. With 3%discount rate the stand was thinned at 4.5-6%value increment,and at with 5% discount rate at 8%value increment. When the discount rate was 3%,in the first thinning of the Poisson stand about half if the removed trees had a relative value increment of about 2%and the rest had 3-6%rate of value increment(Fig. 11,top). However,the first thinning,which was immediately,was most probably later than its optimal timing would have been. In later thinnings,50%of removed trees were removed at about 4% rate of value increment and the rest were removed at higher,up to 7%value increment.

    In the second thinning of the Poisson stand,trees were removed at 2-7%value increments when discount rate was 1%,at 3-7%increments when discount rate was 3%and at 5-14%value increments when discount rate was 5%(Fig. 11,bottom). This is in line with the hypothesis of the study,according to which it is optimal to remove a tree at higher relative value increment than the guiding rate of interest. This is because of the opportunity cost of bare land and the fact that tree removal improves the relative value increment of remaining trees.

    Table 2 Net present values and optimal values of decision variables for Poisson,regular and irregular stand when the remaining basal area(G)was optimized together with thinning intervals and tree selection rule

    Conclusions

    The results suggest that it is nearly optimal to select the trees that are removed in a thinning treatment on the basis of breast height diameter,starting from the largest tree. However,in irregular spatial distributions,the competition faced by the tree and the effect of removal onthe growth of surrounding trees should also be taken into account. The degree of irregularity of the irregular stand of this study was so high that such stands are rarely encountered in managed forests. Therefore,diameter limit cutting seems to be a sufficient approach in most stands. However,there are other types of irregularity,which are more common. For example,the stand may have sub-areas of predominantly large trees while other sub-areas are occupied by smaller trees. In this case,diameter limit cutting leads to openings and unutilized growing space. Since decreased competition increases the dbh of financial maturity,it would most probably be better to leave some large trees to continue growing. This means that a tree selection rule that incorporates several criteria is more likely to work better (than dbh alone)in a wide range of stand structures. In mixed stands,relative value increment or a more complicated tree selection rule is certainly better than using only dbh to select the removed trees(Knoke 2012). This is because of differences in the inherent growth rates,assortments dimensions,and assortment prices of different species.

    Although there are very few previous studies on optimal tree selection,several recent results on pre-and post-cutting diameter distributions in economically optimal uneven-aged management support the conclusion that optimal cutting resembles diameter-limit cutting (Tahvonen et al. 2010;Tahvonen 2011;Pukkala et al. 2014;Pukkala 2015a,2015b). The American studies conducted during the 1980s lead to similar conclusions (Haight 1985,1987;Haight and Getz 1987). Also longterm silvicultural trials support the conclusion than diameter limit cutting is more profitable than single-tree selection. For example,in the Vessari experiment located in Central Finland,the net present value(calculated with 3%discount rate)of diameter limit cutting was 13750€?ha?1whereas it was only 10250€?ha?1in single tree selection during a 40-year monitoring period. In the nearby Honkam?ki experiment the NPV of diameter limit cutting was 10500€?ha?1and the NPV of single tree selection was 7800€/ha(Pukkala et al. 2012).

    The optimizations of this study were done for continuous cover management. However,the same principles of analyzing the financial maturity of trees also apply toeven-aged management. Several studies have shown that the optimal thinning of a certain stand would be rather similar in even-aged management and continuous cover forestry(e.g. Pukkala 2015b). In the study of Pukkala et al. (2014),which optimized the cuttings of 200 different stands representing different stand structures without the limitation to pursue either even-aged management or continuous cover forestry,97-99%of thinnings were high thinnings similar to those that were found optimal in this study. However,some studies(Valsta 1992;Hyyti?inen et al. 2005;Pukkala 2015b)have found that,in evenaged management when a forced clear-felling belongs to the management schedule,it is sometimes optimal to remove trees from both ends of the diameter distribution.

    Tree quality,health and vigor are additional characteristics which should affect tree selection. However,these criteria are difficult to include in simulation and optimization studies. As suggested already M?ller (1922),trees whose vigor is decreased should be removedin thinnings. If low-quality trees overtop smaller and better-quality individuals,they should also be removed,as commonly done in forestry practice. If the quality of all trees is low(or equal),the criteria proposed in this study can be used.

    The optimal tree selection rules that were developed in this study,all lead to thinning from above. The comparison of Fig. 9 also shows that thinning from below may not be economically justified. This can also be concluded from earlier literature that discusses financial maturity(Duerr et al. 1956;Davis and Johnson 1987;Knoke 2012). Also several optimization studies show that high thinning is in most cases more profitable than low thinning(e.g.,Haight and Monserud 1990;Valsta 1992;Tahvonen et al. 2013). In fact,it is hard to find economic arguments which would justify the use of low thinning.

    The study used a non-spatial model in spatial simulation. It was justified by the fact that the area of computing the competition variables(G and BAL)corresponds to the area of the sample plots in the modelling data of Pukkala et al.(2013). However,there is one difference:in the modelling data,G and BAL were computed within 300-m2plots(around 10 m radius)for all trees of the plot,not only for trees near plot center. These values of G and BAL may not describe the competition that edge trees face in the best possible way because trees outside the plot also create competition. This may be called as“sampling error”in the calculation of G and BAL for the edge trees in individual-tree growth modelling. Sampling error results in weaker relationship(underestimated influence)between growth and G or BAL in the growth model. In the current study,this underestimation was counteracted by the distance-dependent computation of G and BAL,which increased their variation. As a result,the predictions may in fact be better than when calculating G and BAL in the same way as they were computed in the data preparation step of growth modelling.

    The simulations of this study included stochasticity in mortality and ingrowth. Therefore,every simulationwas repeated 10 times and the mean NPV of the 10 simulations was used as the value of the management schedule. Ten simulations is a small number in stochastic simulation. However,few trees die in managed forests,and dead trees are usually small. Ingrowth begins to affect harvest removals and stand value gradually,its effect being minimal during the first decades although ingrowth is critically important for the long-term sustainability of continuous cover forestry. Therefore,it can be concluded that the two sources of stochasticity(mortality and ingrowth)did not have any significant effect on the results of this study.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’contributions

    TP conducted the analyses. EL and OL participated in the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Author details

    1University of Eastern Finland,PO Box 111,80101 Joensuu,F(xiàn)inland.2Joen Forest Program Consulting,Rauhankatu 41,80100 Joensuu,F(xiàn)inland.

    Received:23 September 2015 Accepted:13 December 2015

    References

    Davis LS,Johnson KN(1987)Forest management. Third edition. McGraw-Hill Inc. p 790

    Duerr WA,F(xiàn)edkiw J,Guttenberg S(1956)Financial maturity:A guide to profitable timber growing. US Dep Agric Tech Bull 1146:74

    Eerik?inen K,Miina J,Valkonen S(2007)Models for the regeneration establishment and the development of established seedlings in uneven-aged,Norway spruce dominated stands of southern Finland. Forest Ecol Manage 242:444-461

    Haight RG(1985)A comparison of dynamic and static economic models of uneven-aged stand management. Forest Sci 31(4):957-974

    Haight RG(1987)Evaluating the efficiency of even-aged uneven-aged stand management. Forest Sci 33(1):116-134

    Haight RG,Getz WM(1987)Fixed and equilibrium problems in uneven-aged stand management. Forest Sci 33(4):908-931

    Haight RG,Monserud RA(1990)Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands:II. Effects of decision criteria. Forest Sci 36(1):125-144

    Hooke R,Jeeves TA(1961)“Direct search”solution of numerical and statistical problems. J ACM 8:212-229

    Hyyti?inen K,Tahvonen O,Valsta L(2005)Optimum juvenile density,harvesting and stand structure in even-aged Scots pine stands. Forest Sci 51:120-133

    Knoke T(2012)The economics of continuous cover forestry. In:Pukkala T,Gadow KV(eds)Continuous Cover Forestry. Springer. ISBN 978-94-007-2201-9. pp 167-193

    Laasasenaho J(1982)Taper curve and volume equations for pine spruce and birch. Communicationes Instuti Forestalis Fenniae 108:1-74

    Miina J,Pukkala T(2000)Using numerical optimization for specifying individual-tree competition models. Forest Sci 46(2):277-281

    M?ller A(1922)Der Dauerwaldgedanke:sein Sinn und seine Bedeutung. Springer,Berlin,p 84

    Pukkala T(2015a)Optimizing continuous cover management of boreal forest when timber prices and tree growth are stochastic. Forest Ecosyst 2(6):1-13

    Pukkala T(2015b)Plenterwald,Dauerwald,or clearcut?Forest Policy Econ 2016(62):125-134,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.09.002

    Pukkala T,Miina J(1998)Tree-selection algorithms for optimizing thinning using a distance-dependent growth model. Can J Forest Res 28:693-702

    Pukkala T,L?hde E,Laiho O(2012)Continuous cover forestry in Finland - Recent research results. In:Pukkala T,Von Gadow K(eds)Continuous Cover Forestry. Springer.,pp 85-128

    Pukkala T,L?hde E,Laiho O(2013)Species interactions in the dynamics of even- and uneven-aged boreal forests. J Sustain Forest 32:1-33

    Pukkala T,L?hde E,Laiho O(2014)Optimizing any-aged management of mixed boreal forest under residual basal area constraints. J Forest Res 23(3):727-636

    Tahvonen O(2011)Optimal structure and development of uneven-aged Norway spruce forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Res 42:2389-2402

    Tahvonen O,Pukkala T,Laiho O,L?hde E,Niinim?ki S(2010)Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. Forest Ecol Manage 260:106-115

    Tahvonen O,Pihlainen S,Niinim?ki S(2013)On the economics of optimal timber production in boreal Scots pine stands. Can J Forest Res 43:719-730

    Valsta L(1992)A scenario approach to stochastic anticipatory optimization in stand management. Forest Sci 38(2):430-447

    人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲图色成人| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| h视频一区二区三区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 永久网站在线| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 亚州av有码| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 熟女av电影| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| h视频一区二区三区| 成人影院久久| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 成人国语在线视频| av在线老鸭窝| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 久久狼人影院| 午夜久久久在线观看| 免费看不卡的av| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产综合精华液| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲综合精品二区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 七月丁香在线播放| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 91精品三级在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 人妻一区二区av| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| xxx大片免费视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久午夜福利片| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产乱来视频区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产高清三级在线| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 免费观看a级毛片全部| videos熟女内射| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品一国产av| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产av国产精品国产| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 9色porny在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| a级毛片黄视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| videosex国产| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 成人免费观看视频高清| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 秋霞伦理黄片| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| kizo精华| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 搡老乐熟女国产| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 欧美+日韩+精品| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 色5月婷婷丁香| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 精品一区二区免费观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 一区二区av电影网| 免费观看av网站的网址| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 另类精品久久| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 高清av免费在线| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久av网站| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲综合色网址| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 精品少妇内射三级| www.色视频.com| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 伦精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 久久97久久精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| av.在线天堂| 国产成人一区二区在线| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 成人无遮挡网站| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | av网站免费在线观看视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 黄片播放在线免费| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲性久久影院| 欧美97在线视频| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 只有这里有精品99| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产探花极品一区二区| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 日韩强制内射视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| av.在线天堂| 精品酒店卫生间| kizo精华| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 热re99久久国产66热| 综合色丁香网| av一本久久久久| 国产成人精品婷婷| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 久久免费观看电影| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 97超碰精品成人国产| 美女中出高潮动态图| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久久精品区二区三区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 久久影院123| 一级毛片电影观看| 一级a做视频免费观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 欧美3d第一页| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 少妇人妻 视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| av不卡在线播放| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 免费少妇av软件| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 丁香六月天网| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 最黄视频免费看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 熟女av电影| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产av国产精品国产| 999精品在线视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产在线视频一区二区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 老司机影院毛片| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产 一区精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 高清不卡的av网站| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产在视频线精品| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久精品夜色国产| 超碰97精品在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 51国产日韩欧美| 性色av一级| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 久久99精品国语久久久| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲综合色网址| 中国国产av一级| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 日本91视频免费播放| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 91精品三级在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 18+在线观看网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 成人手机av| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产精品成人在线| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 精品久久久久久久久av| 黄片播放在线免费| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 高清毛片免费看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 在线播放无遮挡| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 另类精品久久| 日韩电影二区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 草草在线视频免费看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产成人一区二区在线| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 飞空精品影院首页| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| .国产精品久久| 大香蕉久久成人网| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| av卡一久久| 亚洲成人一二三区av| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| www.色视频.com| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| av网站免费在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 中国国产av一级| 考比视频在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日本午夜av视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 91国产中文字幕| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 97在线视频观看| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲综合色惰| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久久久久伊人网av| 91成人精品电影| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 精品少妇内射三级| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| av视频免费观看在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 免费少妇av软件| 夫妻午夜视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日韩伦理黄色片| 如何舔出高潮| 视频区图区小说| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 午夜激情av网站| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 内地一区二区视频在线| www.色视频.com| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美97在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 欧美bdsm另类| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 999精品在线视频| 观看av在线不卡| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产成人91sexporn| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 一级毛片电影观看| kizo精华| 亚洲综合色网址| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 日本与韩国留学比较| 999精品在线视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日本黄大片高清| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲国产色片| av播播在线观看一区| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 免费av不卡在线播放| 午夜91福利影院| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 在线看a的网站| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲av男天堂| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | av在线播放精品| 亚洲av二区三区四区| av不卡在线播放| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 韩国av在线不卡| 制服诱惑二区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 久久狼人影院| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 麻豆成人av视频| 丝袜美足系列| av.在线天堂| 99热全是精品| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲综合色惰| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久久久久久久久成人| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产成人一区二区在线| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 日日撸夜夜添| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 老司机影院成人| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品国产av在线观看|