• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    The ‘Thucydides Trap' Discourse in China-US Relations

    2016-03-27 09:56:41CaiCuihong
    China International Studies 2016年4期

    Cai Cuihong

    ?

    The ‘Thucydides Trap' Discourse in China-US Relations

    Cai Cuihong

    “Thucydides Trap” is the description about the cause for the war between Athens and Sparta in BC5 in The Peloponnesian War by Thucydides, which states that “it was the increasing of Athenian power and the fear it inspired in Sparta that made the war inevitable.” Thucydides thinks that the competition between a rising power and the existing ruling hegemony mostly ends up with wars. In another word, the “Thucydides Trap” refers to that a rising power is bound to challenge the existing dominant power and the dominant power in turn will certainly make a response to the threat. In the end the war cannot be avoided.

    The application of the “Thucydides Trap” in China-US relations gradually becomes an explicit concept as Graham Allison, a Harvard professor, proposed that “Thucydides's Trap has been sprung in the Pacific.”However, we should seriously consider such problems as whether the concept put forward by Thucydides, which was used to interpret the war between Athens and Sparta, can be applied to today's China-US relations or not, and which misunderstandings will emerge during the application. Only by solving those problems can we refrain from blindly expanding the concept of “Thucydides Trap,” wrongly applying it to China-US relations and even damaging the momentum of the sound development of China-US relations. The article will follow this thread and analyze the application of the“Thucydides Trap” in current China-US relations at a global level and from the aspect of the bilateral relations between China and the US together withthe characteristics of the internet age, with a view to preventing this concept from being the obstacle of developing a new pattern of major-country relations between China and the US.

    The Expansive Tendencies of the “Thucydides Trap” Concept

    The discussion about China-US relations seemingly tended to be collectively pessimistic in 2015. In April when he made his testimony to the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services, Allison quoted the “Thucydides Trap”and reported his findings, “In 12 of 16 cases in the past 500 years when a rising power challenged a ruling power, the outcome was war.” In the speech delivered in the American Symposium of the World Forum on China Studies in May,David M. Lampton, an American scholar, pointed out that “the tipping point is near.” He held that “we are witnessing the erosion of some critical underlying supports for predominantly positive US-China ties.” In his keynote speech delivered to the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong in June, David Shambaugh, another American scholar, indicated that it is getting more and more difficult to balance the relationship between China and the US with its continual deterioration. When President Xi Jinping paid a visit to the US at the end of September, once again Allison published an article entitled “The Thucydides Trap: Are the US and China Headed for War?” in The Atlantic, which argued that one topic would be excluded from the visit agenda, that is “the possibility that the United States and China could find themselves at war in the next decade.” Some academic conferences also have made exclusive investigations on the issue. For instance,Australian National University specially convened an academic conference on “Power Transition and Thucydides Trap in Asia and the Pacific.” Since entering the year 2016, the China Development Forum held in Beijing in March was also themed by “Avoiding Thucydides's Trap” and the dialoguesbetween Henry Kissinger and Dai Bingguo, the former State Councilor, were also arranged. Kissinger was convinced that there was no such Thucydides Trap between China and the US that a rising power was destined to defy the existing power and war is unavoidable. These speeches, reports, articles and conferences have further pushed people of all walks of life in China and the US to doubt, discuss and analyze the odds of conflicts between China and the US, which has boosted the expanded application of this concept whether they are for or against it.

    The concept of “Thucydides Trap” is gradually entering into the text and vocabulary of the Western political and academic circles. Robert Zoellick, the former president of the World Bank, issued an article in The National Interest titled “U.S., China and Thucydides: How can Washington and Beijing avoid typical patterns of distrust and fear?” Zbigniew Brzezinski, an American strategist, had an interview and published an article on “Can China Avoid the Thucydides Trap?” These Western discourses largely imply worries about China-US relations and the China threat. Nevertheless, a small portion of voices have expressed doubt about the concept. For example, in his article on“Beware the ‘Thucydides Trap' Trap: Why the US and China aren't necessarily Athens and Sparta or Britain and Germany before World War I,” James R. Holmes analyzes the differences between the current China-US relations and the relations of Athens and Sparta as well as the relations of Britain-Germany before WWI, the latter two of which ended with wars.

    Within China, the application of the “Thucydides Trap” concept seems to augment. Not only has the media widely used this concept, but many academic reviews also have mentioned it. What is different from the thoughts of the China threat implicit in the Western discourses is that Chinese discourses more often than not include the efforts to clarify that China will not fall into the “Thucydides Trap,” whose major expressions are reactive reviews and analyses. The contents often consist of doubts of the “Thucydides Trap” in China-US relations, discussions on how to surpass the “Thucydides Trap” as well as associative analyses of the new model of major-country relations between China and the US and the “Thucydides Trap.” During theexclusive interview by the first issue of The World Post at the beginning of 2014, President Xi laid special stress on the efforts to avoid being caught in the“Thucydides Trap.”

    By carefully examining this concept, it can be seen that now there are following tendencies of expansive application of the “Thucydides Trap”concept, especially in the West.

    First, the ordinary competitions and conflicts in international relations are expanded into the “Thucydides Trap.” It should be mentioned that this concept can be applied in both a narrow and a broad sense. The expansive tendencies have intermixed the two senses. Strictly speaking, the opinion that the “Thucydides Trap” means changes in the international balance of power result in an inevitable war is an understanding in a narrow sense, while a generalized comprehension is that the change of power balance among countries gives rise to conflicts and even unavoidable rivalries. With the negative tendencies of the comments on China-US relations in the American political and thought circles and accompanied by the existing competitions and conflicts in China-US relations, some people assert that China-US relations have fallen into the “Thucydides Trap.” The exemplification employed by Allison in 2012 to illustrate his assertion that “Thucydides Trap has been sprung in the Pacific region” is, in effect, exactly the potential competitions with the US after the rising of China's power in the Pacific. Another example is a review, titled “Thucydides's Trap: US Unwilling to Strike a Compromise with China,” which indicates that the US is caught in a dilemma over containing rising political, economic and military forces of China and avoiding falling into the “Thucydides Trap.” As you see, the normal competitions and conflicts in China-US relations are actually overstated as the“Thucydides Trap.” But historical experiences tell us that rivalries and conflicts is the normality of the world politics, especially among the major powers, and general competitions and conflicts don't necessarily lead to wars.

    Second, the “security dilemma” in the realistic views and even the changes in the international balance of power triggered by the prevailing redistribution of the power structures in the international system are over-interpreted into the “Thucydides Trap.” The “security dilemma” refers to that a sense of insecurity caused by alterations in the power balance among states sparks off the escalation of antagonism. John H. Herz, an American scholar, holds that the international politics is exactly the fight for power and the pursuit of power to a maximum, i.e. hegemony is the best approach to safeguarding national safety in the anarchic international system. In the view of realists, the security dilemma not only exists between the rising power and the established power,but also occurs in all changes of power balance in the international system. The“security dilemma” is most frequently applied to China-US relations. Alastair Iain Johnston, a Harvard professor, even directly puts forward “the emerging US-China security dilemma.” Today, a variety of internationally popular theories about international relations, including the theory on the competition for supremacy, the theory on the decline of the hegemony and the theory on power transition, deem that China-US conflicts cannot be avoided. For instance, a British opinion article says that “Unless China's economy collapses like Japan in the1980s or its political system collapses like USSR in the 1990s, there seems to be no way for it to escape the Thucydides Trap.” The “Thucydides Trap” has become another tool exploited by the realistic school to amplify and elucidate the so-called “security dilemma” in international relations.

    Third, the discourses about the “China threat” theory in the West are expanded into the “Thucydides Trap.” The “Thucydides Trap” has been a word of high frequency in different versions of the “China threat” theory in the last two years. In the eyes of Thucydides, there were two causes for the Peloponnesian War: the rise of Athens and the fear it inspired in Sparta. To put it differently, both the rapid increasing of the rising country and the fear of the established hegemonic state may lead to the emergence and development of conflicts. In testimony to the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services in April 2015, Allison cited Thucydides's assessment that the rise of Athens instilled fear in the dominant Spartans, which pushed them towar. Allison attempted to make the US government fully realize the threat of China by means of the “Thucydides Trap,” which exactly demonstrates the Western discourse strategy of amplifying the China threat to achieve a certain goal. The anxiety, doubt and suspicion many countries in the world entertain toward China's rise are obviously augmenting. At just the right time,the “Thucydides Trap” provides a discourse instrument for all kinds of the“China threat” theory to magnify the threat. For example, New York Times defines the “Thucydides Trap” as “the theory that American anxiety about China's increasing power might evolve into animosity and aggression.” It serves to show that the “China threat” theory is exaggerated as the tendency of the“Thucydides Trap.”

    Why does the “Thucydides Trap,” which has existed for thousands of years, suddenly become a popular concept in international relations in the West and tends to be applied more widely? First and foremost, changes of the international balance of power put pressure on the US. As Allison says in “The Thucydides Trap Project,” that China's rise challenges the US Predominance in Asia today and in the world in the future and thus constitutes today's“Thucydides Trap.” According to the standpoints of classical realism, China is by all means considered to challenge the existing American hegemony with the build-up of China's real power regardless of the subjective intentions of China's leaders. At the same time, Such international architectures as the BRICS system, the SCO, the AIIB with China as the major participator or even leader are also deemed as challenges to the traditional international system dominated by the US.

    Subsequently, it is the need of American realistic policy towards China. Comparing China-US relations to the “Thucydides Trap” seemingly can offer forceful historical and experimental evidences to American realistic policy on China. At the same time, the potential China-US war inferred by the“Thucydides Trap” affords theoretical support for the US military presence in the world and the military enterprises that benefit a number of interest groups.

    Last of all, it is needed by the Western academic circles, the US included,to gain influences and resources. On the one hand, it is difficult to come upwith new great theories and great ideas in the current studies community of international relations. It is no less than raising a new theory to find the“Thucydides Trap” which narrates anecdotes of the past in alluding to the present. Hence it must become the target many scholars and experts compete to analyze. On the other hand, the China-US conflicts indicated by the “Thucydides Trap”can enhance the importance of the relevant studies in all universities and think tanks, thus striving for more resources for the academic circles.

    China-US Relations Can Evade Thucydides Trap

    Undoubtedly, plenty of strategic distrust exists in China-US relations and seems to grow in the past two years. Particularly with the increasing of China's power, the gestures China naturally makes on the issue of safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity appear to further trigger a wave of scholars and experts on China-US relations skepticism. It is not easy for China-US relations to get rid of the “Thucydides Trap” thought. Therefore, we should analyze it at both theoretical and practical levels with a calm mind so as to disprove the wrong analogies of this thought in the current China-US relations with systematical analyses and solid reasons. The purpose of this article is not to overthrow this concept stemming from the West. After all, it has certain explanatory power in history. However, it is not applicable to today's China-US relations. And there are following three reasons why China-US relations can escape from the “Thucydides Trap” irrespective of the various efforts of the two sides to avoid it.

    Global Level

    The globalized environment of complex interdependence

    The European experiences in ancient Greece period cannot be borrowed into the current China-US relations. Unlike the past, the deep integration ofdifferent systems and economic societies in different countries, which did not exist in the Thucydides's age, has appeared today, like the mutual investments of humongous size, trades of scale as well as the labor division of the international industrial chain under the globalized environment. In retrospect of the Europe then, the relations among all countries were maintained only by political interests and national alliances. Hardly were there either mutual trade and investment of scale or economic ties of mutual employment. At the same time, such non-traditional issues as environment hardly occupied any important position in transnational relations.

    Nowadays, the world is stepping into a globalized era, or an era of“complex interdependence” put forward by Robert Keohane and Joseph S. Nye. Prosperity of one country unnecessarily brings along that of others, but damage of one country inevitably harms others. To some extent the globe has become a complex and interdependent community of shared future. The form of the labor division and rivalries about the international industrial chain has tightly tied up the interests of major powers. Military confrontations among any countries will bring harm to both the fundamental interests of the countries concerned, and peace and development of the whole world. Simultaneously, with the increasing prominence of non-traditional security issues and the continual growth of the common challenges confronted by all countries, the governance of any non-traditional security issue, covering international terrorism, ecological unbalance, environmental pollution, and resource shortage, is beyond the capacity of any country and entails global joint efforts to cope with. In the context of complex interdependence among all countries, the willingness of the rising power and the established power to confront each other has been greatly weakened. The risk of conflicts and wars between them also has been significantly reduced. Three most-recent cases of the four given by Allison in which wars don't break out in the end show that the traditional international relations are being reshaped in the globalized age.

    Constraint of the collective security mechanism

    Former US President Wilson once highlighted a variety of prerequisitesfor realizing peace based on national self-determination and modern democratic mechanisms, such as collective security, disarmament and establishment of national alliances. That is to say, international organizations and international law are a kind of mechanism to achieve international peace. However, in ancient Greece period there lacked such mechanisms as international organizations and international law to ensure collective security. It even might be said that there was no formed collective security mechanism in the international community before WWII. Military forces became the most effective tool that was be used most frequently in the era without the constraint of international law. This is also one of the reasons why up to 12 of 16 groups of cases about the relations between challenging countries and hegemonic powers in the past 500 years ended up with wars when Allison reviewed them.

    At present, the increasing rigidification of international law and international organizations plays a role in constraining interstate conflicts. Even though some people may question the actual constraint force of international law and international organizations on major countries, the US in particular, the collective security mechanism at least has reinforced the moral restraint and increased the violation costs of international profile and public opinion. At the same time, the compulsory system of international law has got more rigid with the emergence of the entities of many international organizations. And more and more terms embodying the idea of “direct application” arise in the rules of international organizations. Relevant legislation and arbitration begin to be characterized by enforcement and rigidity. Although the rigidity of international law is not comparable with that of domestic laws, the international community is still able to exert influence in indirect ways so as to realize the goal of its compulsion. For example, the regularization of international organizations enables the rules of institutionalized sanctions to increasingly prevail. It compels all countries to take into consideration the constraint of the international community and potential international sanctions caused by risky actions while making strategic choices.

    Deep dread of war in view of historical experiences

    Historical experiences have greatly changed people's attitude toward the war. Ancient Greeks generally thought that wars were predestined. In reality,the perception that the war is ineluctable is often the important cause for the war. What's more, before WWI, the majority of Europeans did not come to realize that the war would bring about tremendous devastation. Instead, they even considered a great war as a healthy and beneficial exercise for society. Yet this kind of optimistic attitude disappeared in the ruins of the two world wars. There is victory and defeat in the battlefield, but no winner in the war. These memories of wars prompt the international community to more advocate competition rather than war, promote to gain wealth and power by adopting legal means rather than violent approaches, and emphasize the legitimacy and conditionality of preparing and applying rules.

    Both Immanuel Kant and Louis L. Ludlow suppose that wars would have been dramatically reduced if those who suffered from wars had directly expressed their opinions. The costs of suffering from all previous wars lead to deep fear of war and extreme desire for peace of all governments and people. The international relations after WWII become calmer and more rational due to learning from the historical lessons. All countries are encouraged to solve interstate conflicts through consultation and avoid imposing one's own will on others with military threats. Just as the article “Thucydides Trap 2.0: Superpower Suicide?” indicates, it is clear to both China and the US that the China-US confrontation predicated by the “Thucydides Trap” will not only menace their own interests, but also damage all other countries that maintain a cooperative relationship with China and the US and even the whole environment of the international system.

    Bilateral Level

    “Structural common interests” greater than “structural contradictions”

    China-US structural contradictions still exist due to the differencesin the social system, values and priorities of national interests. There seems to be many contradictory points between China and the US including the South China Sea issue, TPP and the Internet security. The two countries increasingly believe that the other side is the major competitor in political,economic and security fields. On the other hand, their interdependence is further strengthened, not weakened. China and the US are progressing toward“a community of shared interests” with the addition of their structural common interests. After being swelled to a certain extent, any detrimental factor will be crushed by intertwined economy and interlinked finances, interdependent trades, exchanges of people, mutual visits of leaders and wide communications in education, culture and arts. Such heavy interdependence in economy and society between today's China and the US has never appeared among countries that fought against each other for hegemony in history. Besides, since domestic political and economic development are the common focus of China and the US, mutual confrontation will only disturb the respective domestic priorities and central tasks.

    Economic interdependence is usually recognized as the bedrock of stable China-US relations. In Conflict with China: Prospects, Consequences,and Strategies for Deterrence, four scholars in the Rand Corporation decline to “assess armed conflict between the United States and China as probable in any of these instance” in consideration of the high level of China-US economic interdependence and the unprecedented economic connections among China, the US and the world, because any armed conflict with China would inevitably heavily damage and even destroy American economy even if the danger of nuclear war were set aside and both sides deliberately eschewed employment of economic weapons. Moreover, China and the US have lots of common interests on the issue of global governance. Not only do the two countries serve as inseparable twin engines in promoting globalization and global governance, but they have more cooperation than divergencesin numerous significant issues, such as cooperative agreement on climate change, joint efforts on nuclear non-proliferation, and the roles in achieving the nuclear deal with Iran as well as mutual cooperation on the DPRK nuclear issue.

    “Social evolutionary” strategic rivalry in the place of traditional strategic antagonism

    China-US strategic rivalry in the new era does not take the form of traditional strategic antagonism of security threats and territorial expansion,but is a kind of social evolutionary strategic competition. According to the interpretation of Tang Shiping about social evolutionism of international politics, social evolution is embodied as the long-term and systematic evolution of social elements on the basis of the “variation-selectioninheritance” interactive mechanism. From this perspective, the strategic competition between China and the US is a long-term and systematic race for institutional change and a side-by-side long-distance running which tests basics and endurance, instead of a match that will be won or lost in a limited time. Kissinger once also cited “co-evolution” to describe China-US relations and advised that both China and the US should promote respective interests in cooperation and competition and put co-evolution into reality so as to head for the “Pacific community.” The application of “crossing the river by feeling the stones,” a concept raised by Deng Xiaoping, into China-US relations actually can be understood as co-evolution.

    On the one hand, traditional strategic antagonism is rooted in the challenge to the international order posed by the rising power. As an emerging power, China has pursued its development and progress by stressing the continual integration into the international order in peaceful ways, rather than by means of wars or traditional military and territorial expansion. After comparing the development of all civilizations in the world, Arnold Toynbee concluded that China, as an oriental power that is great but never pursues hegemonism, has never demonstrated its imperialistic ambitions beyond its own domain. Additionally Kissinger noted that military imperialism has neverbeen China's style. Chas W. Freeman, the famous American diplomat, deems that “China is different from Germany, Japan, the former USSR, and even the US, because China will neither seek for the so-called ‘living space' put forward by the Germany fascists before WWII, nor pursue what is similar to ‘Manifest Destiny' proposed by the US. China won't export its ideology overseas.” Mr. Lee Kuan Yew once said that China-US relationship is different from USSoviet relations during the Cold War since in nature the former Soviet Union competed for global hegemony with the US while China just takes its national interests as a priority. Hence, the external strategies of China are fundamentally based on its domestic development goals.

    On the other hand, traditional strategic antagonism stems from the so-called “power transition theory” as well. On the ground of the studies of international relations, if the strengths of a “dominant power” and a “rising power” nearly approach the same level, or their difference in strengths becomes unclear, the possibility of power substitution will reach a peak and the chance of conflicts and wars for hegemony will be considerably raised. Nonetheless,no fundamental change occurs to the balance of relative strengths of China and the US in spite of a few variations. The economic bulk of China probably may overtake that of the US in the next decade, but the US will still be ahead of China in the coming decades in terms of military resources and soft power resources. On the other side, some still holds that the US does exert huge influence on the current international order and benefits a lot from it, whereas it has not got in the dominant position assumed by the power transition theory. Hereafter, with the further weakening of the capacity of major countries to impose preferences on others, the impetus of emerging powers to rival the existing order or to establish a parallel order will be accordingly impaired. In practice, some studies find that there is no such phenomenon as a power transition conflict at all. Conflicts involve a multitude of other important factors besides the differences in power growth. In line with the studies, the Peloponnesian War was not inevitable at all, given that the change of the relative strengths between Athens and Sparta at most served as an indirect reason or prerequisite of the war.

    The reason of state under nuclear deterrence in the place of Hobbes's logic

    The reason of state under nuclear deterrence is the core assurance for China and the US not to really get caught into the “Thucydides Trap.” The“Thucydides Trap” is not unavoidable in that the cause for its occurrence is to a great degree the evil consequence of unwise strategies, instead of simply the fear induced by the power growth. Before the destructive weapons came into existence, the international relations were dominated by disordered rivalries with wars and conflicts as the main means for acquiring power and consequently Hobbes's logic continually took up the dominant position in international politics.

    The irrational antagonism at the time of Thucydides has been out of date in modern society. In the nuclear era, notwithstanding that the global politics yet has not broken away from anarchy, the reason of major countries turned up due to the national fear of thorough destruction and the sense for protecting human civilizations, and the world is gradually stepping into a stage of ordered power games. In a sense, the mechanism of a “balance of nuclear terror” is converted into a more substantive “balance of warfare terror.” No countries want the terrible prospect of mutual assured destruction to come into reality caused by the outbreak of a war. China-US relations get into a relatively stable stage with China's entry into the elite nuclear club. The previous political structure that was inclined to disordered games has also change into a political construction featuring ordered competitions. Seeing that the balance of nuclear terror could keep the Cold War under control so that the contest for hegemony between the former Soviet Union and the US in the 20th century didn't evolve into military conflicts, it is also capable of restraining China-US relations in the 21st century so as not to stray into the evil ways of war.

    Features of the Internet Age

    Joined-up thinking in the Internet age

    The joined-up thinking spawned by the Internet age can be perceivedin three aspects. First, it means that the Internet culture shapes the people's holistic thinking. The reform of people's thinking mode and ideas is directly provoked by such an extreme transmission speed that the whole world can be interconnected just by pressing one key, and the interconnection that overcomes the time limit and geographical obstacles. Second, the connectivity of cyberspace itself brings in an overall thinking about behavior and the material world. The connected state of cyberspace penetrates every aspect of the realistic society. Not only does it increasingly reinforce the interdependence and correlation among all countries, but such challenges of cyberspace itself as the issue of network security including cyberterrorism call for global response. Third, the fragility of a shared cyberspace generates a type of integral thinking. The structural characteristics of cyberspace determine that any of the most vulnerable processes may provide chance for attacks. Despite the geographical separation between China and the US with the vast Pacific lying between them, the development of cyberspace and space technologies enables China and the US to share power space again and also contributes to the inseparable integrity of the interests among all countries. This type of joined-up thinking is conducive to both the rational decision-making in the Internet era and the prevention of major-country conflicts.

    Transparency and convenience for the crisis prevention and communications

    In Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis, the author notes that clear intentions can promote the mutual understanding of citizens in all countries so as to enhance world peace. Similarly, the social adjustment of individual behavior gets improved through reducing despair and a sense of insecurity, which in turn can decrease the frequency of outbreak of wars. Now in the highly networked times, the transparency of the worldnews and information, and the transparency of national strategic dynamics and policy choices are unparalleled. As usual, transparency includes three implications, i.e. policy transparency, information transparency and communication transparency. The contributions made by the Internet mainly lie in two aspects: active transparency (proactive exposure of the policy, relevant information and communications of the states concerned);passive transparency (big data in cyberspace and relative messages contained in massive information). As part of the building of confidence mechanism,transparency makes it possible to diminish and even eliminate the risk of misunderstanding or misjudgment among the international actors.

    The real-time and effectiveness of network exchanges and contacts also provide convenience for crisis prevention and communications. Communications play an important role in the several examples of power transition mentioned by Allison that did not end up with wars. Crises can be classified as the crises under the hostile and conflicting background and the sporadic crises. Under the current circumstance that rational thinking and joined-up thinking predominate, the international crises tend to be incidental and sporadic. As for the crises in a conflicting context, the Internet affords to the interested sides facilities to share core interests and behavioral intentions, which facilitates mutual balance and negotiations. The unofficial and uninterrupted communications and contacts through Internet can ease tensions among countries and search alternative solutions. In regard to the sporadic crises triggered by occasional accidents, the impacts of Internet are more conspicuous. This type of crises is characterized by evident abruptness and entails immediate responses. The real-time and convenience of network communications and diversity in the choices of audio, video and text endow crisis prevention and communications with great facility.

    Check of China-US relations conducted by social forces

    La Bruyere, the French philosopher in the 17th century, is convinced that only peace can guarantee the real interests of all while wars just make the royal interests. Thomas Paine, an American political activist, alsoindicates that people's interests consist in peace whereas monarchical power is the enemy of human race and the root of suffering. In history, the right to initiate a war rested with the decision-makers with limited effects of ordinary people. However, the political engagement through Internet and the function of political mobilization stimulate the growth of social forces. The strong network public opinion that comes out with Internet supervises national power and affects a country's domestic and foreign policies. Furthermore, the fact that Internet provides the general public with a great deal of diplomatic information means the corresponding promotion of public authority with information acquisition as the major source of power. In addition, Internet boosts the birth of We Media so as to exercise influence on the national decision-making in the form of media. All demonstrate the reciprocal restrictions and checks between the country and society in the Internet age.

    China-US relationship is not simply state-to-state relations anymore, but also touches upon the connections between societies. China-US diplomatic relations no longer just matter to government organizations and leaders, but also involve massive social forces. Relations between the Chinese and the US governments will face restraint, adjustment and rectification from social forces if deterioration arises. Wars won't and shouldn't happen between China and the US. Even if there exist interest groups that preach progress towards wars or unavoidable conflicts in two countries, the motivation of the general public,the biggest interest group, for anti-war and the pursuit of peace can smash any petty niggling of all special interest groups. The increasingly frequent and deep cultural exchanges between the ordinary people in the two countries bear the weight of China-US relations like a vast net and they are more like ubiquitous air to maintain the “survival” of China-US relations. The groundwork of China-US relations eventually still depends on “the silent majority.”

    In addition to the three reasons above, we also need to investigate the applicability of this concept from the thoughts and standpoint of the proposer. As a matter of fact, while citing Thucydides Trap in China-US relations presented by Allison, most people just simply refer to his literal point without paying attention to the duality of his personal viewpoints. Theprimary purpose for which he brings up the idea of “Thucydides Trap” is not to suggest that the war between China and the US is inevitable, but to expect that Americans and the US government to be aware of the rising of China's strength and its significance, and remind Americans to watch out for the risk of the outbreak of war between China and the US.

    Additionally, Allison himself is amending this concept. He points out that the four sets of challenging power-hegemonic power relations finally circumvent wars and it is at the price of massive and tough adjustments on both sides, including in the aspects of attitudes and behavior, which is more difficult for the hegemonic power, but China and the US are wise and capable enough to shun the “Thucydides Trap.” Allison also specially wrote an article titled “Don't Worry, the Next World War is Not Upon US…Yet” after comparing the Current China-US military relationship with the situation in 1914. He lists the similarities (like postures of the rising power and the established power, gradually increasing nationalist sentiment, strong military presences directed against archenemy, and interconnected alliance system) between the present circumstances and the situation in 1914. This article mainly displays differences, such as mutual assured destruction of economies between China and the US, “crisis instability” evoked by borderless outer space and cyberspace, “crystal-ball effect” of nuclear weapons, currently incomparable essence of the military power between the two countries,transparency brought about by information technology, as well as other factors including the structure of the world politics. Although the author supposes that the probability of major-country wars still exists, but he holds that wars won't break out in the next decade, and the possibilities for wars will be further lowered if leaders of all countries learn from history.

    In addition, two points are noteworthy for the history written by any historian. On the one hand, it is nearly impossible to include all contents and facts of historical events and all history is a simplified version. It may mislead us to ignore some factors that shouldn't have been neglected despite the fact that historians often strive to present the whole a true story. On the other hand, the works of any historian are affected by such factors as his values,preferences and stance during his writing. Just as the purpose of Thucydides's writing was to explore how Athenian to draw a lesson from the war and to criticize the misjudgment of Pericles and Democrats, so more emphasis was put on the “prisoner's dilemma” then. Thucydides's history books neither mean to mislead his posterity nor hold prejudices, but they just intend to show that people's cognition of events is not immutable and each generation is rewriting history. Accordingly, we should avoid any simple historical analogy.

    Hazardness and Inspiration of “Thucydides Trap” Discourses

    The greatest significance of China-US relations avoiding the “Thucydides Trap” is to exclude its disturbance and harmfulness to the new pattern of major-country relations between China and the US, in that there is a good deal of perniciousness by linking the “Thucydides Trap” with China and it will hinder China and the US from energetically explore solutions in the form of cooperation.

    To begin with, for China-US relations, the “Thucydides Trap” discourses easily give rise to aggressive policy leanings on both sides. Allusion to the present by using anecdotes of the past can vividly enlighten the world, but oversimplified historical analogies are likely to mislead people's observation and understanding of the contemporary world. “Bad historical analogies”and “faulty theories” have led some parties in both China and the US to promote more aggressive stances towards the other. Practically, lots of reasons lead to the war between Athens and Sparta. Allison lays undue stress on the expansion of Athens and the fear felt by Sparta and even partially exaggerates the threat of China's rise while further applying the “Thucydides Trap” to China-US relations. He overlooks the exact cause for Sparta's fear and the way of Athenian expansion, ultimately distorting Thucydides's original idea. Thus, Thucydides did not necessarily foresee the trap of China-US conflicts,and yet this concept plays a trick on China-US relations and brings enormous impediment for China to implement the new pattern of major-country relations between China and the US.

    Second, for the regional situation, the “Thucydides Trap” discourses may spur neighboring countries to take sides, which is not conducive to China's neighboring diplomatic environment. The policy of “Asia Pivot” adopted by the US to some extent manifests its fear of and precaution against China's rise, though the US claims that it does not intend to “contain” China, but to“deter” China from damaging the existing Asian order, thereby safeguarding the order and peace in Asia. This kind of psychology and action, if coupled with the simplistic propaganda of the “Thucydides Trap,” is extremely likely to stimulate some countries in Asia to imitate other states in Greece at the age of Thucydides by taking sides between China and the US. Even though some countries are still waiting,a few nations indeed have chosen to take the side of the US to overcome the fear of China's rise, which constitutes an exceedingly unfavorable factor for China's neighboring diplomatic climate.

    Last of all, for the world situation, the “Thucydides Trap” discourses will exercise influence on the world opinion, intensify the division of camps and thus impact the development of the new pattern of major-country relations between China and the US. The “Thucydides Trap” discourses should come as no surprise if we treat the increasing growth of the strength of the other side from the worst preset scenario while judging the complex issue of national security, and they are bound to be marketable. Yet it must be arbitrary and hazard if we simply account for historical terms regardless of the historical context and then attach them to international affairs and academic reviews as a label. Once this kind of erroneous cognition is allowed to shape the world opinion and become a consensus and customary recognition of academic circles, media and the public, it will not only impede the progress of China-US relations, but also immensely hinder the development of the world situation in times of peace.

    Considering the harmfulness of the “Thucydides Trap” discourses,it is necessary for us to refute them from a theoretical point of view in casethat this fallacy would “kidnap” China-US relations and even endanger the future cooperative development pattern of the new pattern of major-country relations between China and the US for mutual benefit and win-win results. The “Thucydides Trap” is not an iron law, not to mention that we should have blind faith in it. Particularly in the present 21st century, we should analyze it objectively on the footing of globalization and the structural features of China-US relations. Judging from the global level, bilateral level between China and the US as well as the traits of the Internet era, the “Thucydides Trap” is not applicable to China-US relations.

    Admittedly, that China-US relations can avert the “Thucydides Trap”doesn't mean that we can rest easy. But after all, the “Thucydides Trap” is just a theoretical hypothesis and unlikely to be self-realized even if all conditions are met. Early in 2005, Joseph Nye suggested that the war was not inevitable though the concerns of Sparta about the strong economic rise of Athens constituted the root of the Peloponnesian War and the war could completely be circumvented through negotiations and people's sensible policies. China and the US are able to realize a long-term stable relationship in these ways. Wars won't and shouldn't occur between the two countries. The leaders of the former Soviet Union and the US could refrain from wars during the Cold War, let alone today's leaders of China and the US. Fortunately, avoiding falling into the “Thucydides Trap” has become the common view at the top levels in China and the US with the explicitation of this conception. Just as President Xi Jinping mentioned in his speech at Seattle during the visit to the US, there is no such thing as the so-called “Thucydides Trap” in the world and both countries shall persist in the correct direction of building a new pattern of major-country relations.

    Cai Cuihong is Associate Research Fellow at the Center for American Studies, Fudan University.

    熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 考比视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 中文字幕制服av| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 精品少妇内射三级| 午夜久久久在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产激情久久老熟女| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 成人二区视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 亚洲在久久综合| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 在线观看三级黄色| 三级国产精品片| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 大码成人一级视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 曰老女人黄片| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 精品酒店卫生间| 视频区图区小说| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| www.色视频.com| 精品少妇内射三级| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| av免费在线看不卡| videossex国产| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 亚洲精品色激情综合| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 18在线观看网站| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 高清不卡的av网站| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 婷婷色综合www| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 插逼视频在线观看| av天堂久久9| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲av.av天堂| av不卡在线播放| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 观看美女的网站| 自线自在国产av| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 搡老乐熟女国产| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产高清三级在线| 国产 一区精品| 久久午夜福利片| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久久久伊人网av| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件 | 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 少妇高潮的动态图| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久热久热在线精品观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 中文字幕制服av| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美性感艳星| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产麻豆69| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲性久久影院| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 中国国产av一级| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 9色porny在线观看| 美女中出高潮动态图| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 色哟哟·www| 另类精品久久| 在线看a的网站| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件 | 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产淫语在线视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 另类精品久久| 国产永久视频网站| 国产在视频线精品| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 18禁观看日本| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产亚洲最大av| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产在线免费精品| 在线观看国产h片| videos熟女内射| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费观看在线日韩| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| kizo精华| 国产男女内射视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 一区二区三区精品91| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 免费少妇av软件| 99香蕉大伊视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 在线观看国产h片| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 99热网站在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 久久97久久精品| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久97久久精品| 蜜桃在线观看..| 亚洲综合色网址| 乱人伦中国视频| 制服诱惑二区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 日韩av免费高清视频| 性色av一级| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| av在线app专区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日本与韩国留学比较| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产av码专区亚洲av| av在线播放精品| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 一级片免费观看大全| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 日韩av免费高清视频| tube8黄色片| 日本wwww免费看| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 美女国产视频在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| av免费在线看不卡| 91成人精品电影| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久av网站| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 午夜免费观看性视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 色哟哟·www| 秋霞伦理黄片| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 一级a做视频免费观看| av在线app专区| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产综合精华液| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 免费看不卡的av| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 天天影视国产精品| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 午夜视频国产福利| 成人影院久久| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 少妇人妻 视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 成人国产av品久久久| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产1区2区3区精品| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 永久网站在线| 五月天丁香电影| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 成人手机av| 婷婷成人精品国产| 精品国产一区二区久久| 日本91视频免费播放| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 韩国av在线不卡| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久久久久久国产电影| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| av一本久久久久| 人妻一区二区av| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 性色av一级| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲精品一二三| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 人人妻人人澡人人看| 男女午夜视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久精品夜色国产| 香蕉国产在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 在线观看人妻少妇| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 春色校园在线视频观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产又爽黄色视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 免费看av在线观看网站| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 美女福利国产在线| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 观看美女的网站| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 51国产日韩欧美| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 超碰97精品在线观看| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 一本久久精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 深夜精品福利| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 一级a做视频免费观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久久久视频综合| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 看免费av毛片| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 免费av中文字幕在线| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 五月天丁香电影| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 熟女电影av网| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 嫩草影院入口| 国产成人精品在线电影| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 咕卡用的链子| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 深夜精品福利| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产毛片在线视频| 欧美另类一区| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久影院123| 欧美+日韩+精品| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产免费现黄频在线看| videossex国产| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 国产色婷婷99| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 成人综合一区亚洲| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产极品天堂在线| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久久久视频综合| 国产成人精品福利久久| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲在久久综合| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产 精品1| 桃花免费在线播放| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| a级毛片黄视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲综合精品二区| av免费观看日本| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 伦精品一区二区三区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产毛片在线视频| 欧美日韩av久久| av免费在线看不卡| 岛国毛片在线播放| 三级国产精品片| 高清av免费在线| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 如何舔出高潮| 成人影院久久| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 天天影视国产精品|