吳少翔 周祁娜 湯寶鵬
830054 烏魯木齊,新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)第一附屬醫(yī)院起搏電生理科
?
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停與心房顫動(dòng)相關(guān)性研究進(jìn)展
吳少翔周祁娜湯寶鵬
830054 烏魯木齊,新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)第一附屬醫(yī)院起搏電生理科
【摘要】阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停是常見(jiàn)的呼吸相關(guān)睡眠障礙疾病,研究表明其與心房顫動(dòng)(房顫)的發(fā)生、發(fā)展明顯相關(guān),而胸內(nèi)壓改變、自主神經(jīng)功能紊亂、炎癥反應(yīng)、氧化應(yīng)激及心房重構(gòu)等機(jī)制可能參與其中。上述因素的存在對(duì)房顫的治療提出了新的挑戰(zhàn),而持續(xù)正壓通氣治療對(duì)于抑制房顫進(jìn)展和改善長(zhǎng)期預(yù)后有一定作用,但需要更多前瞻性、多中心、隨機(jī)化的研究進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證。
【關(guān)鍵詞】阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停;心房顫動(dòng);心房重構(gòu)
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停(obstructive sleep apnea,OSA)是最常見(jiàn)的睡眠呼吸障礙性疾病,它影響著所有年齡組的人群,尤其是中老年人,在美國(guó)OSA的患病率約為10%~17%。其主要特點(diǎn)為夜間睡眠期間反復(fù)發(fā)生上氣道完全或部分性阻塞,導(dǎo)致呼吸暫停及低通氣,從而產(chǎn)生反復(fù)間歇性低氧、二氧化碳潴留,可能伴隨有響亮的鼾聲、血氧飽和度下降、頻繁的覺(jué)醒及睡眠片段化等臨床表現(xiàn)[1-2]。OSA與高血壓、心力衰竭、缺血性心臟病、心律失常、卒中等心血管疾病密切相關(guān),增加心血管疾病的發(fā)病率和死亡率[3-4]。心房顫動(dòng)(房顫)是最常見(jiàn)的持續(xù)性心律失常,約270萬(wàn)至610萬(wàn)的美國(guó)成年人患有房顫,且這一數(shù)據(jù)將在未來(lái)25年成倍增長(zhǎng),進(jìn)一步增加醫(yī)療財(cái)政負(fù)擔(dān)[5-6]。
OSA是房顫發(fā)生、發(fā)展的重要危險(xiǎn)因素,OSA增加了房顫藥物治療、電轉(zhuǎn)復(fù)及肺靜脈隔離術(shù)(pulmonary vein isolation, PVI)后房顫復(fù)發(fā)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),降低了房顫射頻消融術(shù)的成功率[5,7]。
1OSA與房顫相關(guān)流行病學(xué)研究
1.1房顫在OSA患者中流行
1983年,Guilleminault等首次報(bào)到了OSA和房顫之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),男性夜間陣發(fā)性心律失常者多見(jiàn),多伴有嚴(yán)重OSA,合并嚴(yán)重OSA的男性患者夜間陣發(fā)性房顫發(fā)生率為3%,而普通人群僅為0.4%~1.0%。1項(xiàng)回顧性隊(duì)列研究納入了3 542例既往或現(xiàn)在無(wú)房顫發(fā)生的OSA患者,平均隨訪了4.7年,評(píng)估新發(fā)房顫的情況。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),133例發(fā)生了房顫(累積概率14%,95%CI:9%~19%),肥胖和夜間血氧飽和度下降程度是年齡<65歲的OSA患者發(fā)生房顫的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素[10]。
來(lái)自臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的大規(guī)模隊(duì)列研究為進(jìn)一步闡明OSA與房顫發(fā)生的關(guān)聯(lián)性提供了更可靠的證據(jù)。該研究納入年齡20~75歲,既往無(wú)心律失常病史,且無(wú)高血壓、糖尿病、心力衰竭、缺血性卒中等重要基礎(chǔ)合并癥的研究對(duì)象共579 521人,其中OSA患者4 082例,其余為對(duì)照,研究終點(diǎn)指標(biāo)為出現(xiàn)新發(fā)房顫,平均隨訪(9.2±2.0)年。與對(duì)照組相比,OSA組新發(fā)房顫發(fā)生率更高(1.3%對(duì)0.7%,P<0.001)。OSA組與對(duì)照組房顫年發(fā)病率分別為1.38‰和0.76‰。調(diào)整年齡、性別等因素后,OSA是房顫發(fā)生的重要危險(xiǎn)因素(HR=1.536),且房顫發(fā)生風(fēng)險(xiǎn)隨OSA嚴(yán)重程度的增加而增加。
1.2OSA在房顫患者中流行
在30~60歲的一般人群中,OSA的男性和女性患病率分別約為24%和9%,而32%~49%的房顫患者合并OSA,高于一般人群[11]。Szymanski等[12]的研究得出了類似的結(jié)論,該研究共納入266例擬行射頻消融手術(shù)的房顫患者,其中合并OSA 的患者121例(45.9%)。與非OSA患者相比,OSA患者發(fā)生陣發(fā)性房顫的可能性更小(62.0%對(duì)75.9%,P=0.02),即OSA患者更易合并持續(xù)性房顫,而無(wú)OSA患者更易發(fā)生陣發(fā)性房顫。然而,近期發(fā)表的ORBIT-AF研究表明,僅18%的房顫患者合并OSA,該研究納入10 132例門診的房顫患者,分析基線水平時(shí)OSA合并情況及CPAP治療情況,隨訪2年。結(jié)果表明,與無(wú)OSA的房顫患者相比,合并OSA的房顫患者伴有更多的臨床癥狀,更加需要節(jié)律控制治療,住院治療風(fēng)險(xiǎn)更高,而在死亡率、主要不良心血管事件、房顫進(jìn)展率方面未見(jiàn)明顯差異[13]。
2OSA介導(dǎo)房顫發(fā)生的可能機(jī)制
2.1胸內(nèi)壓改變
OSA患者夜間睡眠期間反復(fù)出現(xiàn)上氣道部分性或完全性阻塞,為對(duì)抗阻塞的氣道,胸內(nèi)壓發(fā)生了明顯波動(dòng),甚至逐漸達(dá)到-65 mmHg[14]。動(dòng)物研究證實(shí)OSA發(fā)作過(guò)程中存在明顯胸內(nèi)壓改變。Gao等[15]通過(guò)測(cè)量食管內(nèi)壓力以了解兔OSA模型的胸內(nèi)壓改變情況,結(jié)果提示,OSA自誘發(fā)至終止的1 min發(fā)作過(guò)程中,胸內(nèi)負(fù)壓逐漸增大,基線時(shí)為(-6.7±1.2)mmHg,終止時(shí)為(-47.6±1.8)mmHg(P<0.001)。Zhao等[16]的研究得到了類似的結(jié)果。這種逐漸改變的胸內(nèi)壓從胸腔傳導(dǎo)至薄弱的心房壁,所產(chǎn)生的跨壁壓力促進(jìn)了心房腔增大和心肌纖維化的發(fā)生,此兩者皆為房顫發(fā)生的危險(xiǎn)因素。另外,跨壁壓力對(duì)于肺靜脈口組織牽張和重構(gòu)至關(guān)重要,其為房顫發(fā)生的病灶來(lái)源之一[17]。
同時(shí),動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)表明,胸腔內(nèi)負(fù)壓可導(dǎo)致心房有效不應(yīng)期(atrial effective refractory periods, AERP)和動(dòng)作電位時(shí)程縮短,這些心臟電生理的改變?cè)黾恿朔款澋囊赘行訹18]。
2.2炎癥反應(yīng)
薈萃分析表明,OSA患者血清炎癥標(biāo)志物C反應(yīng)蛋白(CRP)、腫瘤壞死因子α(TNFα)、 白細(xì)胞介素-6(IL-6)、白細(xì)胞介素-8(IL-8)、細(xì)胞間黏附分子(ICAM)、血管細(xì)胞黏附分子(VCAM)和選擇蛋白(selectins)顯著升高,其升高水平明顯取決于OSA的嚴(yán)重程度,即呼吸暫停低通氣指數(shù)(apnea hypopnea index,AHI)越高,炎癥標(biāo)志物升高越明顯,CRP水平增加與房顫復(fù)發(fā)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)明顯相關(guān)[19-20]。炎癥反應(yīng)在房顫的發(fā)生和復(fù)發(fā)過(guò)程中發(fā)揮著重要作用[21]。OSA誘導(dǎo)的機(jī)體炎癥狀態(tài)是心房纖維化的重要介導(dǎo)者,而心房纖維化是房顫發(fā)生的重要過(guò)程,其可能導(dǎo)致異常的心房電活動(dòng)[22]。然而,近期Alegret等[23]的研究卻認(rèn)為,升高的血漿CRP本身并不增加房顫發(fā)生風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
2.3自主神經(jīng)功能紊亂
自主神經(jīng)調(diào)節(jié)異??赡苁荗SA和房顫之間的相互作用機(jī)制。呼吸暫停所產(chǎn)生的間歇性低氧和高碳酸血癥與交感神經(jīng)和化學(xué)感受器反射激活相關(guān),會(huì)進(jìn)一步導(dǎo)致血管收縮及血壓升高,而高血壓是房顫發(fā)生的危險(xiǎn)因素之一[17]。另一方面,交感神經(jīng)和副交感神經(jīng)張力增加能夠觸發(fā)房顫。交感神經(jīng)緊張可導(dǎo)致心房不應(yīng)期縮短和心肌細(xì)胞鈣超載,此兩者皆可觸發(fā)房顫[24]。在正常睡眠的快速動(dòng)眼期,肺組織牽張感受器的傳入沖動(dòng)能夠抑制陣發(fā)性的副交感神經(jīng)興奮。肺牽張感受器的激活得益于正常通氣時(shí)的肺擴(kuò)張,然而在OSA患者這種反應(yīng)由于呼吸暫停而減弱,不能抑制副交感神經(jīng)興奮,導(dǎo)致陣發(fā)性心動(dòng)過(guò)緩,而心動(dòng)過(guò)緩可以縮短AERP,促進(jìn)肺靜脈口快速局部放電,導(dǎo)致房顫的產(chǎn)生。Cintra等[25]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),氣道阻塞事件引起的低氧可有效刺激交感神經(jīng)系統(tǒng),OSA患者存在交感和副交感神經(jīng)活性的異常波動(dòng),使其易于發(fā)生房性和室性心律失常。迷走神經(jīng)激活被認(rèn)為是氣管內(nèi)負(fù)壓(negative tracheal pressure ,NTP)誘發(fā)AERP縮短的主要機(jī)制。Linz等[18]發(fā)現(xiàn),阿托品對(duì)于正常呼吸或沒(méi)有實(shí)施氣道阻塞的動(dòng)物的AEPR沒(méi)有明顯作用,卻可以阻止NTP誘導(dǎo)的AERP縮短的發(fā)生;而行迷走神經(jīng)切斷術(shù)后,通過(guò)期前收縮或短陣快速起搏,在有NTP存在的氣道阻塞狀況下皆不能誘發(fā)房顫,提示OSA誘導(dǎo)的房顫與自主神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)關(guān)系密切。Gao等[15]發(fā)現(xiàn)對(duì)兔OSA模型給予低水平迷走交感干刺激(low-level vagosympathetic trunk stimulation, LLVS),其后2 h內(nèi),AERP有效延長(zhǎng),幾乎消除了房顫的可誘導(dǎo)性,而在LLVS停止1 h后,其抗心律失常作用仍未消失。LLVS能夠抑制OSA誘導(dǎo)的房顫,可能是通過(guò)抗腎上腺能和抗膽堿能的作用得以實(shí)現(xiàn),為合并OSA的房顫患者提供了一種可能的輔助治療手段。
2.4OSA與心房重構(gòu)
Dimitri等[26]的研究表明,OSA與心房重構(gòu)明顯相關(guān),OSA可引起心房增大、電壓減低、局部及廣泛的傳導(dǎo)異常、竇房結(jié)恢復(fù)時(shí)間延長(zhǎng)。這些改變可能解釋了房顫易在OSA患者中發(fā)生與維持的原因。Ramos等[27]應(yīng)用OSA大鼠模型發(fā)現(xiàn),慢性周期性的呼吸暫??纱龠M(jìn)心房纖維化,間充質(zhì)干細(xì)胞移植治療可阻止心房纖維化發(fā)生。Iwasaki等[28]發(fā)現(xiàn),長(zhǎng)期OSA可明顯增加房顫的易感性,其中包括房顫持續(xù)時(shí)間及可誘導(dǎo)性增加,且長(zhǎng)期OSA導(dǎo)致心房纖維組織含量明顯增加。Zhao等[16]用慢性犬OSA模型發(fā)現(xiàn),OSA能夠促進(jìn)心房重構(gòu)的發(fā)生,并從分子生物學(xué)角度闡述了以下機(jī)制:OSA縮短了心房有效不應(yīng)期,使編碼內(nèi)向整流鉀通道、快速延遲整流鉀通道、緩慢延遲整流鉀通道、瞬時(shí)外向鉀通道、超速激活的延遲整流性鉀通道、乙酰膽堿依賴性鉀通道的基因表達(dá)量增加,同時(shí)減少L-型鈣通道相關(guān)編碼蛋白表達(dá);通過(guò)上調(diào)半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶-9、磷酸化細(xì)胞外信號(hào)調(diào)節(jié)激酶1/2(ERK1/2)、α-平滑肌肌動(dòng)蛋白(α-SMA),引起心房肌細(xì)胞凋亡和纖維化的發(fā)生;通過(guò)上調(diào)β1、β2、M2受體促進(jìn)交感神經(jīng)和副交感神經(jīng)的超神經(jīng)支配。
此外,OSA可引起左室質(zhì)量指數(shù)和左心房容積的增加。一項(xiàng)臨床研究納入了47例新診斷為OSA(AHI>15次/h)的患者,給予CPAP干預(yù)治療,分別于治療前、治療后6個(gè)月、12個(gè)月通過(guò)心臟核磁影像學(xué)評(píng)估患者心臟功能,結(jié)果表明CPAP治療OSA可明顯減少左室質(zhì)量指數(shù)及左右房的容積指數(shù)[29]。
3OSA對(duì)房顫治療的影響
Kanagala等[30]的研究表明,對(duì)于房顫合并OSA的電轉(zhuǎn)復(fù)患者,CPAP有效干預(yù)OSA 1年后僅42%患者房顫復(fù)發(fā),而未進(jìn)行干預(yù)的患者82%復(fù)發(fā)房顫。
合并OSA的房顫患者不僅電轉(zhuǎn)復(fù)治療的成功率低,而且對(duì)藥物治療的反應(yīng)較差。Monahan等[31]探討了OSA對(duì)抗心律失常藥物(anti-arrhythmic drug,AAD)治療房顫有效性的影響,結(jié)果提示,與合并輕度OSA的房顫患者比較,合并重度OSA的房顫患者更容易對(duì)AAD治療無(wú)反應(yīng)(52% 對(duì) 23%,P<0.05),且AAD治療無(wú)效者比有效者AHI更高。Goyal等[32]研究表明,基因型對(duì)AAD治療房顫的反應(yīng)效果部分依賴于OSA的嚴(yán)重程度,OSA越嚴(yán)重其無(wú)應(yīng)答率越高。
大型前瞻性研究表明,OSA是房顫肺靜脈隔離術(shù)失敗的獨(dú)立預(yù)測(cè)因素。未治療OSA的房顫患者射頻消融術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)率高,CPAP治療可以提高PVI術(shù)的成功率[33-34]。Szymanski等[34]的長(zhǎng)期、前瞻性隊(duì)列研究表明,合并OSA的房顫患者比不合并者房顫消融術(shù)后的復(fù)發(fā)率更高(65.2% 對(duì)45.6%,P=0.003)。在30個(gè)月的隨訪期內(nèi),不同嚴(yán)重程度的OSA患者房顫的復(fù)發(fā)情況不同,不合并OSA、合并輕、中、重度OSA的房顫復(fù)發(fā)率分別為45.6% 、 66.2% 、57.6% 、 81.8%(P=0.005)。Fein等[35]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),CPAP是治療合并OSA并實(shí)施房顫PVI術(shù)患者的重要手段,可改善患者無(wú)心律失常生存期。與未治療OSA的患者相比,CPAP治療可增加患者無(wú)房顫生存率(71.9% 對(duì)36.7%),減少AAD的使用及降低PVI術(shù)后房顫復(fù)發(fā)率。
4結(jié)語(yǔ)
OSA不僅促進(jìn)房顫的發(fā)生、發(fā)展,而且可降低PVI術(shù)的成功率,增加房顫管理難度。未來(lái)需要更多的前瞻性、多中心、隨機(jī)化研究進(jìn)一步闡明兩者之間相互作用的機(jī)制。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]Qaseem A, Dallas P, Owens DK, et al. Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med,2014,161(3):210-220.
[2]Qaseem A, Holty JE, Owens DK, et al.Management of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicianss.Ann Intern Med,2013,159(7):471-483.
[3]Bradley TD, Floras JS. Obstructive sleep apnoea and its cardiovascular consequences.Lancet,2009,373(9657):82-93.
[4]Pietzsch JB, Garner A,Cipriano LE,et al. An integrated health-economic analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the treatment of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea.SLEEP, 2011,34(6):695-709.
[5]January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014,64(21):2305-2307.
[6]Chao TF, Liu CJ, Chen SJ, et al. Incidence and risk of atrial fibrillation in sleep-disordered breathing without coexistent systemic disease.Circ J,2014,78(9):2182-2187.
[7]Goyal SK, Sharma A. Atrial fibrillation in obstructive sleep apnea.World J Cardiol,2013,5(6):157-163.
[8]Guilleminault C, Connolly SJ, Winkle RA. Cardiac arrhythmia and conduction disturbances during sleep in 400 patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Cardiol,1983,52(5):490-494.
[9]Caples SM, Somers VK. Sleep-disordered breathing and atrial fibrillation.Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2009,51(5):411-415.
[10]Gami AS, Hodge DO, Herges RM, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, and the risk of incident atrialfibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,49(5):565-571.
[11]Gami AS, Friedman PA, Chung MK, et al. Therapy insight: interactions between atrial fibrillation and obstructive sleep apnea.Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med,2005,2(3):145-149.
[12]Szymanski FM, Platek AE, Karpinski G, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with atrial fibrillation: prevalence, determinants and clinical characteristics of patients in Polish population. Kardiol Pol, 2014,72(8):716-724.
[13]Holmqvist F, Guan N, Zhu Z, et al. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation-Results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF).Am Heart J, 2015,169(5):647-654.
[14]Somers VK, White DP, Amin R, et al. Sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease. An American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation scientific statement from the American Heart Association council for high blood pressure research professional education committee, council on clinical cardiology, stroke council,and council on cardiovascular nursing council.Circulation,2008,118(10):1080-1111.
[15]Gao M, Zhang L, Scherlag BJ, et al. Low-level vagosympathetic trunk stimulation inhibits atrial fibrillation in a rabbit model of obstructive sleep apnea.Heart Rhythm,2015,12(4):818-824.
[16]Zhao J, Xu W, Yun F, et al. Chronic obstructive sleep apnea causes atrial remodeling in canines: mechanisms and implications.Basic Res Cardiol,2014,109(5):427.
[17]Goudis CA, Korantzopoulos P, Ntalas IV, et al. Obesity and atrial fibrillation: A comprehensive review of the pathophysiological mechanisms and links.J Cardiol,2015,4(2):1016-1025.
[18]Linz D, Schotten U, Neuberger HR, et al. Negative tracheal pressure during obstructive respiratory events promotes atrial fibrillation by vagal activation.Heart Rhythm,2011,8(9):1436-1443.
[19]Nadeem R,Molnar J,Madbouly EM,et al.Serum inflammatory markers in obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis.J Clin Sleep Med, 2013,9(10):1003-1012.
[20]Liu T, Li G, Li L,et al.Association between c-reactive protein and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful electrical cardioversion:a meta analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,49(15):1642-1648.
[21]吳輝, 程海旭, 丁家望, 等. 心房顫動(dòng)的炎癥機(jī)制研究進(jìn)展.國(guó)際心血管病雜志,2013,40(4):196-198.
[22]Maan A, Mansour M, Anter E, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation: Pathophysiology and implications for treatment.Crit Pathw Cardiol,2015,14(2):81-85.
[23]Alegret JM, Aragones G, Elosua R, et al. The relevance of the association between inflammation and atrial fibrillation.Eur J Clin Invest,2013,43(4):324-331.
[24]Sahadevan J, Srinivasan D.Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with cardiac arrhythmias.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med, 2012,14(5):520-528.
[25]Cintra FD, Leite RP, Storti LJ, et al. Sleep Apnea and Nocturnal Cardiac Arrhythmia: A Populational Study.Arq Bras Cardiol, 2014,103(5):368-374.
[26]Dimitri H, Ng M, Brooks AG, et al. Atrial remodeling in obstructive sleep apnea: implications for atrial fibrillation.Heart Rhythm, 2012,9(3):321-327.
[27]Ramos P, Rubies C, Torres M,et al. Atrial fibrosis in a chronic murine model of obstructive sleep apnea:mechanisms and prevention by mesenchymal stem cells. Respir Res,2014,15(1):54-66.
[28]Iwasaki YK, Kato T, Xiong F, et al. Atrial fibrillation promotion with long-term repetitive obstructive sleep apnea in a rat model.J Am Coll Cardiol,2014,64(19):2013-2023.
[29]Colish J, Walker JR, Elmayergi N, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea: effects of continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac remodeling as assessed by cardiac biomarkers, echocardiography, and cardiac MRI. Chest,2012,141(3):674-681.
[30]Kanagala R, Murali NS, Friedman PA, et al.Obstructive sleep apnea and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation.Circulation, 2003,107(20):2589-2594.
[31]Monahan K, Brewster J, Wang L, et al. Relation of the severity of obstructive sleep apnea in response to anti-arrhythmic drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.Am J Cardiol, 2012,110(3):369-372.
[32]Goyal SK, Wang L, Upender R, et al. Severity of obstructive sleep apnea infl uences the effect of genotype on response to anti-arrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation.J Clin Sleep Med, 2014,10(5):503-507.
[33]Patel D, Mohanty P, Di BL, et al.Safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein antral isolation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: the impact of continuous positive airway pressure.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2010,3(5):445-451.
[34]Szymanski FM, Filipiak KJ, Platek AE, et al.Presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea and remote outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablations—a long-term prospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Sleep Breath,2015,19(3):849-856.
[35]Fein AS, Shvilkin A, Shah D, et al. Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation.J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,62(4):300-305.
(收稿:2015-09-29修回:2015-12-03)
(本文編輯:梁英超)
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2016.01.004
基金項(xiàng)目:國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(81460742)
通信作者:湯寶鵬,Email:tangbaopeng@hotmail.com