• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Sustainability Evaluation of Different Systems for Sea Cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus) Farming Based on Emergy Theory

    2015-10-13 21:30:04WANGGuodongDONGShuanglinTIANXiangliGAOQinfengandWANGFang
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2015年3期

    WANG Guodong, DONG Shuanglin, TIAN Xiangli, GAO Qinfeng, and WANG Fang

    ?

    Sustainability Evaluation of Different Systems for Sea Cucumber () Farming Based on Emergy Theory

    WANG Guodong, DONG Shuanglin*, TIAN Xiangli, GAO Qinfeng, and WANG Fang

    ,,,266003,

    Emergy analysis is effective for analyzing ecological economic systems. However, the accuracy of the approach is affected by the diversity of economic level, meteorological and hydrological parameters in different regions. The present study evaluated the economic benefits, environmental impact, and sustainability of indoor, semi-intensive and extensive farming systems of sea cucumber () in the same region. The results showed thatindoor farming system was high in input and output (yield) whereas pond extensive farming system was low in input and output. The output/input ratio of indoor farming system was lower than that of pond extensive farming system, and the output/input ratio of semi-intensive farming system fell in between them. The environmental loading ratio ofextensive farming system was lower than that of indoor farming system. In addition, the emergy yield and emergy exchange ratios, and emergy sustainability and emergy indexes for sustainable development were higher in extensive farming system than those in indoor farming system. These results indicated that the current extensive farming system exerted fewer negative influences on the environment, made more efficient use of available resources, and met more sustainable development requirements than the indoor farming system.farming systems showed more emergy benefits than fish farming systems. The pond farming systems ofexploited more free local environmental resources for production, caused less potential pressure on the local environment, and achieved higher sustainability than indoor farming system.

    ; farming systems; emergy theory; sustainability

    1 Introduction

    Sea cucumber is an important mariculture echinoderm species in northeast Asia because of its nutritional and curative properties (Okorie., 2008). Natural resources ofhave declined over the past 20 years because of overexploitation (Conand, 2004).farming has been rapidly developed in recent years because of its high value. In 2010, the farming area ofreached 1.5billionm2and its total production reached 130000 tons, which brought about an annual value of 20 billion Chinese Yuan (CNY) in China (MOAC, 2011).

    At present,land-based farming systems include indoor, semi-intensive, and extensive systems. According to Li. (2013a, 2013b), the total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus contents in the outflow water are less than those in the inflow water ofextensive farming system. Therefore, the sea cucumber farming system is not only a production system of aquatic products but also an environment friendly system. To improve the yield of, many farmers adopt semi-intensive or indoor farming systems with artificial diets. As these patterns increase the inputs of supplemental energy and organic matter, the sustainability of such farming systems has attracted public attention (Ren., 2012a, 2012b).farming systems are semi-artificial ecosystems in which both ecological and economic processes play significant roles. Thus, the ecological and economic natures offarming systems are difficult to determine using only a single ecological or economic method.

    Using the principles of energy systems theory, Odum (1983) developed a comprehensive ecological economic evaluation method for evaluating different energies, materials, and monetary ?ows in terms of their ‘emergy’. Emergy is defined as an available energy used directly or indirectly to produce a product or service (Odum, 1996). Emergy is usually quanti?ed in solar energy equivalents and expressed as solar emjoules (sej) (Ulgiati and Brown, 2009), a conversion factor (transformity) that reflects the qualitative value of energy. By multiplying their respective transformities, the emergy of each resource, service, and corresponding product can be calculated. The resulting values can then be analyzed easily based on the same dimension.

    Following its development and application over the past 30 years, the emergy analysis approach has been proven to be an effective tool for measuring the efficiency and sustainability of a system (Brown and Ulgiati, 2004). Several studies on fish and shrimp farming systems have been reported, including those for(Brown., 1992),(Brown and Bardi, 2001),(Odum, 2001),(Vassallo., 2007),,,,(Li., 2011),,, and(Zhang., 2011). Qin(2009) analyzed the extensive farming system ofusing the emergy approach.

    Due to the differences in regional economic development levels, as well as meteorological, hydrological, and other natural conditions, the emergy of a production or service may be entirely different. Comparing the different data of different regions may obtain false or infeasible results without the exact emergy data of the production or service. In the present study, emergy analysis methods were applied to evaluate the indoor, semi-intensive, and extensive farming systems ofin the same region with similar economic development levels and meteorological and hydrological conditions to overcome the interference of inaccurate regional parameters. The systems were objectively evaluated in terms of their resource inputs, productivity, environmental impact, economic benefits and sustainability.

    2 Materials and Methods

    2.1 Location and Data Collection

    In the present study differentfarming systems in Qingdao, China were detected. The region had an average annual solar radiation of 4.8×109Jm?2(Wang., 2010), an average annual rainfall of 750mm (WSP, 2009), an average annual wind speed of 4.5ms?1(Wang, 2007), and an average annual tide range of 3.20m (Hu., 1989; Zhang., 2000) (Table 1).

    The indoor farming system studied was a greenhouse wherewere reared in 20 square concrete tanks (approximately 25m2in area, 1m in water depth) in a stocking density of about 1.5kgm?2.were fed twice a day with commercial fermentative feed. Polyethylene corrugated sheets were used as a substrate for. Aeration was provided continuously to maintain adequate dissolved oxygen. Adult(120– 150g) were captured once a year in October with the mortality rate of 20%, and fingerlings were complemented afterward.

    The ponds of the semi-intensive farming system were confined mainly to intertidal zone. The water area of each pond was about 40000m2with an average water depth of 1.5m. The ponds relied on the tides as a means of water exchange. Farmers obtained land use rights through a contract with the local government, paying ‘rent’ during the contract. Stones, tiles or polyethylene cages were used as substrates of. The producers of the semi- intensive farming system relied on the tides and sediment accumulation to provide most of the food for, and supplemented nutrition with formulated feed. The stocking density was about 0.054kgm?2. Aeration was used discontinuously to provide adequate oxygen forin the semi-natural farming system. Adult(120–150g) were harvested twice a year, in March and November, with the mortality rate of 10%, and fingerlings were supplemented into the ponds in spring and autumn.

    The extensive farming system featured characteristics similar to those of the semi-intensive system but operated without artificial feeding and aerators. The stocking density of this system was about 0.046kgm?2.

    During the investigation period in 2012, 3 indoor farming systems (amount to 200 tanks approximately), 4 semi-intensive farming systems and 3 extensive farming systems (amount to 80 ponds approximately) were investigated. All local renewable resource inputs and purchased resource inputs considered in the production systems were provided by farmers working in the three systems, and converted to annual ?ows.

    Among the purchased resource inputs, the energy of the fingerlings was measured with a calorimeter (PARR Instrument Company, USA). The emergy of electricity and coal was calculated by multiplication coefficients of 3.6×106J(kWh)?1and 2.3×1010Jt?1(EC, 2007), respectively. Purchased resource inputs, including direct labor, rent, maintenance, pesticide, feed, and capture, were reported in monetary terms (Odum, 1996).

    2.2 Methods of Emergy Analysis and Evaluation

    Emergy resources included local renewable resource inputs and purchased resource inputs. The former included solar radiation, wind, rain, tides, and sediment accumulation, while the latter comprised fingerlings, electricity, coal, direct labor, rent, maintenance, pesticide, and feed (Table 1). The ‘Maintenance’ included depreciation period of boiler (3 years), substrate (4 years), roof (3 years) and aeration equipment (2 years) in indoor farming system and substrate (4 years), ponds clean (3 years) and aeration equipment (2 years) in semi-intensive and extensive farming systems.

    The total emergy () flow offarming system was calculated using the following equation:

    whereis local renewable resource input,is the renewable fraction of the purchased resource inputs, andnis the non-renewable fraction of the purchased resource inputs. The emergy yield ratio (), an indicator of the production efficiency of a system or process for exploiting local resources, is calculated as follows (Odum, 1996):

    .

    The environmental loading ratio (), an index of the potential pressure on the local environment or system stress due to production activity, is calculated as follows (Odum, 1996):

    The emergy sustainability index (), a ratio that measures the contribution of a resource or process to the economy per unit of environmental loading, is calculated as follows (Brown and Ulgiati, 1997):

    .

    The emergy exchange ratio (), an indicator of the emergy benefits or losses from the sale of products, is calculated as follows (Odum, 1996; Lu., 2009):

    ,

    where (income·(sej/CNY)) is the emergy embodied in the received money. The emergy index for sustainable development (), an indicator of the sustainability of the system considering the effects of market exchange on the emergy yield, is calculated as follows (Lu., 2009):

    Table 1 Annual emergy accounting and analysis table for the three farming systems of A. japonicus

    Notes:a, Wang., 2010;b, Wang, 2007;c, WSP (Weather of Shandong Province), 2009;d, Hu., 1989;e, Zhang., 2000;f, Qin., 2009;g, EC (Energy of Coal), 2007.

    3 Results and Discussion

    3.1 Emergy Flows inFarming Systems

    Aggregated system diagrams of the three farming systems ofwere shown in Figs.1 and 2 according to Odum (1996). The diagrams illustrated the boundaries, main components, interactions, and emergy driving sources for the systems. Pathways indicated casual interactions, showed material cycles or carry information, and were always created with some energy. Energy system diagrams included pathways for all energy inflows that might be stored, or flow out as exports, or be drained away through ‘heat sink’, representing used energy (without available energy to do work). Symbols for sources and components in the energy system diagrams were arranged from left to right in increasing order of transformity (Odum and Peterson, 1996).

    No feed, electricity or maintenance costs were noted in the extensive farming system comparing with the semi- intensive farming system. Pesticide and coal were used to maintain the health and fast growth ofin the indoor farming system, but no local renewable resources (., solar radiation, wind, rain and tides) were determined comparing with the semi-intensive and extensive farming systems.

    Fig.1 Summary diagram of the emergy flows in the indoor system for A. japonicus farming.

    Fig.2Summary diagram of the emergy flows in the semi- intensive system forfarming.

    3.2 Economic Accounting and Analysis ofFarming Systems

    Annual economic accounting and analysis table for the three farming systems ofwere presented in Table 2. The indoor farming system had a high input (6530000CNY) and high yield (8000000CNY) features, whereas the extensive farming system had a low input (110000CNY) and low output (181000CNY) features. The output/input ratio of the extensive farming system (1.64) was higher than that of the indoor farming system (1.23). The ratio of the semi-intensive farming system (1.61) was between those of the other two systems.

    Table 2Annual economic accounting and analysis of three farming systems of A. japonicus

    3.3 Emergy Accounting and Analysis ofFarming Systems

    Fig.3 shows the main resource inputs for thesefarming systems. The emergy structures (., the types of supporting emergy sources) each production system were detailed in this figure. The total emergy flows of the indoor, semi-intensive and extensive farming systems were 8.32×1018, 1.91×1017and 1.59×1017sej/annual, respectively.

    Fig.3Structure of detailed emergy inputs into the three farming systems of.

    Table 3 Annual emergy accounting and analysis of the indoor farming system of A. japonicus

    Notes: The data sources area, Odum, 1988;b, Odum, 1996;c, Jiang., 2008;d, Cavalett., 2006.

    As shown in Table 3, in the indoor farming system, the emergies of direct labor, rent and feed showed the same order of magnitude and were higher than those of other purchased resource inputs. To clean the tanks, a large amount of direct labor was needed to movewith substrates from one tank to the neighboring tank every several days. Sediment accumulation was the maximum local renewable resource input in the semi- intensive and extensive farming systems. Rent was the largest purchased emergy input for all the three farming systems (Fig.3).

    The renewable and purchased resource inputs in the three systems were multiplied by their corresponding renewability factors in order to divide them into renewable and non-renewable fractions (Zhang., 2011). The results were showed in Tables 3, 4 and 5.

    Table 4Annual emergy accounting and analysis of the semi-intensive farming system of A. japonicus

    Notes: The data sources area, Odum., 2000;b, Brown and Bardi, 2011;c, Qin., 2009;d, Odum, 1988;e, Odum, 1996;f, Jiang., 2008;g, Cavalett., 2006.

    Table 5Annual emergy accounting and analysis of the extensive farming system of A. japonicus

    Notes: The data sources are the same as in Table 4.

    3.4 Comparison of Emergy and Economic Benefits Among ThreeFarming Systems

    The emergy analysis approach was an effective tool for measuring ecological economic systems. However, accurate parameters of economic, meteorological, and hydrological conditions were difficult to obtain. Thus, conducting an ecological economic efficiency analysis among large scale regions was unrealistic. The present study focused on the three farming systems in the same region, Qingdao, to overcome the interference of inaccurate regional parameters. Thus, the systems might be objectively evaluated in terms of their economic benefits, environmental impact, and sustainability.

    Comparison and evaluation of emergy and economic indices for the three farming systems were shown in Table 6. The emergy yield ratio () was the ratio of total emergy to the purchased nonrenewable inputs and showed how efficiently the system uses the available local resources (Vassallo., 2007). According to Table 6, the extensive farming system obtained the highest(2.06), followed by the semi-intensive farming system (1.90) and the indoor farming system (1.18). The conversion efficiency of renewable resource decreased with increasing intensification offarming pattern. Theof the indoor farming system was close to 1, which indicates that the system typically exploits few natural resources and relied on the import of high purchased emergy inputs. In a way, the indoor farming system operated more like an industrial process than as a traditional agricultural one, which was characterized by high ecological efficiency (Zhang., 2011).

    Table 6Comparison and evaluation of emergy and economic indices for the three farming systems of A. japonicus

    If the environmental input ?ows didn’t take economic input flows into account, optimum use of resources could not be achieved, and management decisions would be based on incomplete analyses (Ulgiati., 1994). The emergy exchange ratio () was an indicator and the ratio of emergy exchanged in a trade or purchase (what was received to what was given). The trading partner that received more emergy would receive greater real wealth and greater economic stimulation because of the trade. In the present study the EERs of the indoor system (=1.85), semi-intensive system (2.11), and extensive system (2.17) showed 85%, 111%, and 117% emergy benefits from the market exchange, respectively. The extensive farming system showed more emergy benefit than the indoor and semi-intensive farming systems (Table 6).

    Therevealed the pressure on the environment for evaluating environmental services (Vassallo., 2007). ELR was directly related to the fraction of renewable resources, and was considered a measure of ecosystem stress due to production (Ulgiati and Brown, 2009). A largerusually suggested a higher level of environmental stress. Theof the indoor farming system (=5.50) was about five times greater than those of the extensive farming (0.94) and semi-intensive farming (1.12) systems. The results indicated that the pressure exerted by the indoor farming system on local environment was significantly greater than those exerted by the extensive and semi-intensive farming systems.

    The emergy sustainability index () was a composite ratio that indicated the process trade-off between the emergy advantage and its environmental pressure (Brown and Ulgiati, 1997; Lu., 2009). In other words, theindicated whether a process or a system provided sustainable contribution to the user with low environmental pressure. Thetook both ecological and economic compatibility into account. A largerusually means a higher sustainability of a process or a system. The order of the ESIs in the present study was as follows: extensive farming system (=2.18)>semi-intensive farming system (1.70)>indoor farming system (0.21). These results indicated that the extensive farming system was relatively sustainable whereas the indoor or industrialized farming system was not sustainable relatively.

    After considering the effects of market exchange on output, coupling ofand the emergy index for sustainable development () might be an appropriate approach for measuring sustainability characterized by complex time and spatial scales (Vassallo., 2007). In the present study, the EISDs obtained indicated that the extensive (=4.74) and semi-intensive (3.58) farming systems were more sustainable than the indoor farming system (0.40).

    3.5 Comparison BetweenFarming Systems and Other Aquaculture Systems

    Previous studies showed that the EERs of,, andrange from 0.46 to 0.52 (Zhang., 2011), and the EERs of,,ranged from 0.61 to 1.48 (Li., 2011). The EERs of the present farming systems were in the range of 1.85–2.17, which indicates that thefarming systems had more emergy benefits than other fish farming systems.

    Previous studies showed that the EYRs of(Vassallo., 2007),(Odum, 2001), and(Brown., 1992) were 1.20, 1.23 and 1.02, respectively, which were similar to that of the indoor farming system (=1.18) but lower than those of the semi-intensive farming (1.86) and extensive farming (2.06) systems in present study. The ELRs of the mentioned fish farming systems were 5.00, 4.24 and 46.52, respectively, which were also similar to that of the indoor farming system (=5.50) but higher than those of the semi-intensive farming (1.12) and extensive farming (0.94) systems in the present study. ESIs also exhibited similar patterns, which indicated that investment in pond farming systems ofexploited more free local environmental resources, caused less potential pressure on the local environment, and achieved higher sustainability than the fish farming systems. Previous studies showed that total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus contents of the inflow water in the extensive farming system ofwere greater than those of the outflow water (Zheng., 2009; Li., 2013a, 2013b). Thus, theextensive farming system was an environment-friendly farming system.

    4 Conclusions and Suggestion

    indoor farming system was high in input and output whereas pond extensive farming system was low in input and output (Table 2). These characteristics might be a driving force for farmers preferring indoor farming systems under the condition of limited land resources. However, the output/input ratio of the indoor farming system was lower than that of the extensive farming system. The output/input ratio of the semi-inten- sive farming systems was in between them, which might explain why the semi-intensive farming system was generally adopted by farmers.

    The results of emergy analysis demonstrated that theof theextensive farming system was lower than that of the indoor farming system. In addition,,,andwere all higher in the extensive farming system than those in the indoor farming system (Table 6). These results indicated that the current extensive farming system had fewer negative influences on the environment, made more efficient use of available resources, and met more sustainable development requirements.

    farming systems obtained more emergy benefits than other mentioned fish farming systems did. The results of this study indicated that pond farming systems ofexploited more free local environmental resources for production, caused less potential pressure on the local environment, and achieved higher sustainability than indoor farming system.

    Acknowledgements

    This work is supported by the Key R & D Program (2011BAD13B03), the National Marine Public Welfare Project of China (200905020), and the program for Excellent Youth Foundation of Shandong province (Grant No. JQ201009).

    Brown, M. T., and Bardi, E., 2001.,. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Brown, M. T., Green, P., Gonzalez, A., and Venegas, J., 1992.. Center for Wetlands, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 1-405.

    Brown, M. T., and Ulgiati, S., 1997. Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: Monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation., 9: 51-69.

    Brown, M. T., and Ulgiati, S., 2004. Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H. T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems., 178: 201-213.

    Cavalett, O., Queiroz, J. F. D., and Ortega, E., 2006. Emergy assessment of integrated product ion systems of grains, Pig and fish in small farms in the south Brazil., 193: 205-224.

    Conand, C., 2004. Present status of world sea cucumber resources and utilization: An international overview. In:Lovatelli, A.,, eds., FAO, Rome, 13-23.

    Hu, F. X., and Gu, G. C., 1989. Seasonal changes of the mean tidal range along the Chinese coasts., 20: 401-411.

    Jiang, M. M., Zhou, J. B., Chen, B., and Chen, G. Q., 2008. Emergy-based ecological account for the Chinese economy in 2004., 13: 2337-2356.

    Li, J. W., Dong, S. L., and Gao, Q. F., 2013a. Nitrogen and phosphorus budget of integrated aquaculture system of sea cucumber, jellyfishand shrimp., 13: 503-508.

    Li, J. W., Dong, S. L., Gao, Q. F., Wang, F., Tian, X. L., and Zhang, S. S., 2013b. Total organic carbon budget of integrated aquaculture system of sea cucumber, jellyfishand shrimp., 45: 1825-1831.

    Li, L. J., Lu, H. F., Ren, H., Kang, W. L., and Chen, F. P., 2011. Emergy evaluations of three aquaculture system on wetlands surrounding the Pearl River estuary, China., 11: 526-534.

    Lu, H. F., Kang, W. L., Campbell, D. E., Ren, H., Tan, Y. W., Feng, R. X., Luo, J. T., and Chen, F. P., 2009. Emergy and economic evaluations of four fruit production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China., 35: 1743-1757.

    MOAC (Ministry of Agriculture, China), 2011.. China Agriculture Publisher, Beijing, 1-129.

    Odum, H. T., 1983.. Wiley, New York, 1-644.

    Odum, H. T., 1988. Self-organization, transformity, and information., 242: 1132-1139.

    Odum, H. T., 1996.. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1-370.

    Odum, H. T., 2001.. University of Florida Press, 1-9.

    Odum, H. T., Brown, M. T., and Brandt-Williams, S., 2000.Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences. University of Florida, Gainesville, 1-16.

    Odum, H. T., and Peterson, N., 1996. Simulation and evaluation with energy systems blocks., 93: 155- 173.

    Okorie, O. E., Ko, S. H., Go, S., Lee, S., Bae, J. Y., Han, K., and Bal, S. C., 2008. Preliminary study of the optimum dietary ascorbic acid level in sea cucumber,(Selenka)., 39: 758- 765.

    Qin, C. X., Dong, S. L., Wang, F., and Tian, X. L., 2009. Sustainability analysis of sea cucumber () culturing in earthen ponds China using the emergy approach., 55: 319-323.

    Ren, Y. C., Dong, S. L., Qin, C. X., Wang, F., Gao, Q. F., and Tian, X. L., 2012a. Ecological effects of co-culturing sea cucumber(Selenka) with scallopin earthen ponds., 30: 71-79.

    Ren, Y. C., Dong, S. L., Wang, X. B., Gao, Q. F., and Jiang, S. H., 2012b. Beneficial co-culture of jellyfish(Kishinouye) and sea cucumber(Selenka): Implications for pelagic-benthic coupling., 45: 177-187.

    Ulgiati, S., and Brown, M. T., 2009. Emergy and ecosystem complexity., 14: 310-321.

    Ulgiati, S., Odum, H. T., and Bastianoni, S., 1994. Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability: An emergy analysis of Italy., 73: 215-268.

    Vassallo, P., Bastianoni, S., Beiso, I., Ridolfi, R., and Fabiano, M. 2007. Emergy analysis for the environmental sustainability of an inshore fish farming system., 7: 290-298.

    Wang, J. X., 2007. The analysis and calculation of the wind Energy resources in Shandong province. Master’s thesis. Lanzhou University, 1-74.

    Wang, J. Y., Zhao, Y. J., Chen, Y. C., and Feng, J. S., 2010. Evaluation on solar radiation resource and photosynthetic and thermal potential productivity in Shandong province., 11: 150-154.

    Zhang, J. W., and Du, B. L., 2000. The trend of tidal range enlarging along the coast of Yellow Sea of China., 19: 1-9.

    Zhang, L. X., Ulgiati S., Yang, Z. F., and Chen, B., 2011. Emergy evaluation and economic analysis of three wetland fish farming systems in Nansi Lake area, China., 92: 683-694.

    Zheng, Z. M., Dong, S. L., Tian, X. L., Wang, F., Gao, Q. F., and Bai, P. F., 2009. Sediment-water fluxes of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon in extensiveculture ponds., 37: 218-224.

    Weather of Shandong Province (WSP), 2009. http://sd.weather. com.cn/sdqh/11/88004.shtml.

    Energy of Coal (EC), 2007. http://iask.sina.com.cn/b/7868133. html.

    (Edited by Qiu Yantao)

    10.1007/s11802-015-2453-z

    (August 10, 2013; revised October 10, 2013; accepted February 8, 2015)

    . Tel: 0086-532-66782799 E-mail: dongsl@ouc.edu.cn

    ISSN 1672-5182, 2015 14 (3): 503-510

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

    午夜福利欧美成人| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 超色免费av| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 不卡一级毛片| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲五月天丁香| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 精品福利观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 97碰自拍视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久人妻av系列| 91在线观看av| 欧美成人午夜精品| av天堂在线播放| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 男人操女人黄网站| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| av天堂久久9| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 午夜福利欧美成人| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 精品久久久久久电影网| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 成人18禁在线播放| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产麻豆69| 9色porny在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 日本wwww免费看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 天堂√8在线中文| 香蕉丝袜av| 三级毛片av免费| 搡老乐熟女国产| 我的亚洲天堂| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 看免费av毛片| 岛国在线观看网站| 97碰自拍视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 免费观看人在逋| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 中文欧美无线码| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产激情久久老熟女| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 午夜激情av网站| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 精品一区二区三卡| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 99热只有精品国产| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 欧美乱妇无乱码| a在线观看视频网站| 国产成人影院久久av| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 久久久久国内视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| bbb黄色大片| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 午夜免费激情av| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 麻豆成人av在线观看| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 黄色视频不卡| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久人妻av系列| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 国产激情久久老熟女| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 精品电影一区二区在线| 久久中文字幕一级| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲人成电影观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 中文欧美无线码| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 精品日产1卡2卡| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产区一区二久久| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 香蕉国产在线看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| www.精华液| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 女警被强在线播放| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产精品免费视频内射| cao死你这个sao货| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 欧美在线黄色| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产精品 国内视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 免费av毛片视频| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 日本wwww免费看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 制服诱惑二区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久国产精品影院| www.www免费av| 曰老女人黄片| 夜夜爽天天搞| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 满18在线观看网站| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 免费少妇av软件| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 久久久久国内视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 麻豆av在线久日| 精品福利观看| 久久久久国内视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 1024视频免费在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 在线观看日韩欧美| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 久热这里只有精品99| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| xxx96com| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产精品二区激情视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 热re99久久国产66热| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 女警被强在线播放| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 日本五十路高清| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 1024香蕉在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 国产成人欧美在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 丁香六月欧美| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 中国美女看黄片| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 两性夫妻黄色片| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产在线观看jvid| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 天堂√8在线中文| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 无限看片的www在线观看| 满18在线观看网站| 久久香蕉精品热| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 久久精品成人免费网站| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 男人舔女人的私密视频| www国产在线视频色| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 成人18禁在线播放| 免费高清视频大片| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | а√天堂www在线а√下载| 岛国在线观看网站| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 91老司机精品| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 亚洲伊人色综图| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| av天堂久久9| www.999成人在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 精品福利永久在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 欧美色视频一区免费| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 天天添夜夜摸| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 香蕉国产在线看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 91在线观看av| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 美女午夜性视频免费| 欧美大码av| 成人免费观看视频高清| a级毛片黄视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 天堂√8在线中文| 一本综合久久免费| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 久久亚洲真实| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产99白浆流出| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲片人在线观看| 一级毛片精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 女警被强在线播放| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 身体一侧抽搐| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲全国av大片| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲av成人av| 香蕉久久夜色| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 免费少妇av软件| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产区一区二久久| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| av有码第一页| 成年版毛片免费区| 女警被强在线播放| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| videosex国产| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 午夜91福利影院| 国产成人影院久久av| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产三级黄色录像| 精品福利观看| 很黄的视频免费| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 91在线观看av| 国产精华一区二区三区| 成人三级黄色视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 在线国产一区二区在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 午夜免费观看网址| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 久久香蕉激情| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 久久 成人 亚洲| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 久久影院123| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产麻豆69| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 久99久视频精品免费| 黄色女人牲交| 一本综合久久免费| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产高清激情床上av| 午夜91福利影院| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 怎么达到女性高潮| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产高清videossex| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久久国产一区二区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 欧美日韩黄片免| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 宅男免费午夜| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| tocl精华| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 国产av又大| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| avwww免费| 香蕉久久夜色| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 美女 人体艺术 gogo|