• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of Meiofaunal Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China

    2015-03-15 01:43:48ZHOUXipingCAILizheandFUSujing
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2015年5期

    ZHOU Xiping, CAI Lizhe, and FU Sujing

    1) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou 363105, P. R. China

    2) Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    3) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    Comparison of Meiofaunal Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China

    ZHOU Xiping1), CAI Lizhe2),3),*, and FU Sujing2),3)

    1) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou 363105, P. R. China

    2) Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    3) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

    To compare meiofaunal community in the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China, and probe the response of meiofauna to high organic matter, sampling was carried out in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands in the bay. The results showed that the Ne/Co ratio (nematode to benthic copepod) and organic matter in Fenglin mangrove wetland were higher than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. The meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was all lower than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in summer, autumn and spring, while the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was higher than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in winter. Two-way ANOVA results showed that the meiofaunal abundance and nematode abundance were significantly different between regions, seasons and region×season. With all the results in the present study, we confirmed that the positive response of meiofaunal and nematode abundance were only detected for medium organic matter contents according to the Xiang’an wetland’s level, and that the distribution of meiofaunal abundance would be influenced by sand content. Higher copepod abundance and lower N/C value usually suggest better environmental quality.

    meiofauna; nematodes; copepods; mangrove wetland; Tong’an Bay

    1 Introduction

    Mangroves are well-known for their diverse, worldwide environmental value (Saenger, 2003). Many of them may be close to coastal cities or areas with large human populations and be affected by anthropogenic disturbance, such as pollution, cutting down trees for wood products, clearing of forests for aquaculture, fishing, and so on (Levings et al., 1994; Rasolofo, 1997; Kairo et al., 2001). Such activities frequently alter the sediment structure in mangroves. Mangroves have a positive effect on the production of detritus and organic matter, the recycling of nutrients, enriching coastal water, and supporting the benthic population of the sea (Shah et al., 2005). Since quite a diversity of benthos living on or in the sediment, it becomes an ideal approach to examine the relationships between fauna and sediments at multiple scales and in multiple habitats (Chapman and Tolhurst, 2007). These habitats are relatively well-studied with regard to the trees themselves and larger fauna such as fish, birds, crabs and mollusks. Less is known about the small invertebrates dwelling in the sediments associated with the mangroves(Erséus, 2002).

    Meiofauna, which are smaller benthic organisms, are known to utilize surface-derived material, either directly by feeding on phytodetritus, or indirectly by feeding on decomposing material and the associated bacteria (Hicks and Coull, 1983; Heip et al., 1985), had patchy patterns of distribution that are related to the availability of resources (Pinto et al., 2013). Despite the small body size of the meiofauna, they are considered to be an important link for the energy flow in the benthic food chains (Gallucci et al., 2005; Moens, et al. 2005). Furthermore, their short biological cycles and the high stability of the populations, produce in this community a rapid and unequivocal reaction to environmental changes (Coull and Chandler, 1992). The abundance, distribution, and composition of the meiofauna are sensitive to environmental perturbations, and thus, the meiofauna has become one of the major bio-indicators and is widely applied to monitor the marine environment (Zhang and Zhou, 2004; Balsamo et al., 2010; Moreno et al., 2011).

    Studies on the distribution and biodiversity of meiofauna in mangrove sediments have been conducted in southern African (Dye, 1983), southeast coast of India (Ansar et al., 2014), southeastern Australia (Gwyther, 2000), west coast of Zanbibar (Olafsson et al., 2000),southeast coast of India (Chinnadurai and Fernando, 2007), Vietnam (Xuan et al., 2007), southwestern of Puerto Rico (Torres-Pratts and Schizas, 2007), even in different tropical habitats and oceanic regions such as the Caribbean, Celebes and Red Seas where there are seagrass, mangrove and reef sediments (Pusceddu et al., 2014). Some information on meiofauna in mangrove habitat has also been reported in China. Cai et al. (2000) studied the free-living marine nematodes on the mudflat in Shenzhen estuary and found that nematodes prefer to live and breed in mudflats with high content of organic matter. Guo (2008) studied the number of meiofauna and the community of nematode in Fenglin, which happens to be the place of present study, and revealed that the highest abundance of meiofauna appears at bare mudflat where waste water flows, contributing high organic matter content in the sediment (Guo, 2008). He investigated the community of free-living marine nematodes in different types of mangroves at Fenglin and demonstrated that the abundance of meiofauna in Avicennia marina mangroves is the lowest, while at the bare mudflat, an area with organic discharge, the abundance is the highest.

    A field colonization experiment in subtropical Hong Kong was carried out to better understand the relationship of major meiofaunal taxa and nematode species assemblage to the decaying leaf litter of the mangrove Kandelia candel, testifying the important role of meiofauna in the process of detritus decomposition (Zhou, 2001).

    However, further proof needs to be provided to confirm the response of meiofauna to mangrove habitat. The aim of the present study is to: 1) understand the distribution of meiofaunal abundance in mangrove wetlands, including nematode and copepod abundance, and 2) compare the meiofaunal abundance in the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay. A minor purpose of this study is to find if the meiofauna is affected by different organic matter supplies.

    2 Materials

    2.1 Study Sites

    Tong’an Bay is located to the northeast of Xiamen Island, China, with a semi-diurnal tide. It covers an area of 91.7 km2, including 50.4 km2of tidal flat (Zhan et al., 2003). Two sampling sites, Fenglin (FL, 118?06′E, 24?34′N) and Xiang’an (XA, 118?11′E, 24?38′N), are located on the west coast and northeast coast of Tong’an Bay, respectively. A published study was carried out in old Fenglin mangrove area (Guo, 2008), which is near to our sampling station. Fenglin area is also near to a residential district with more freshwater inflow. Additionally, the Jimei Sewage Treatment Plant is located near the Fenglin mangrove area.

    At Fenglin, five mangrove species (Kandelia obovata, Sonneratia caseolaria, S. apetala, Acanthus ilicifolius and Rhizophora stylosa) were planted in April 2004, while at Xiang’an, Kandelia obovata was planted in 2005. Five sampling stations were set in Tong’an Bay, three of them (FL1, FL2 and XA-A) were in the mangrove habitat, and the other two (FL3, XA-B) were in the non-mangrove habitat (Fig.1). All these stations were intertidal, and the three mangrove sampling stations were located on the edge of the shoreline with shorter flooding periods due to higher intertidal elevation, while the other two non-mangrove sampling stations were located between the mangrove forest and the aquacultural mudflat. There is a (Jimei) Sewage Treatment Plant and many living quarters surrounding Fenglin mangrove wetland.

    Fig.1 Meiofaunal sampling stations at the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay (FL = Fenglin; XA = Xiang’an).

    2.2 Sampling Procedures

    Meiofauna was collected in four surveys in summer (July) 2006, autumn (October) 2007, winter (January) 2007 and spring (April) 2007. At each sampling station during each surveys, four replicate sediment sampling were collected using a 0.05 m2box corer. Undisturbed meiofaunal cores were taken using a cut-off syringe (Ф= 2.9 cm) to 10 cm depth, then divided into three layers, 0-2 cm, 2 - 5 cm, and 5 - 10 cm. Each layer was immediately placed in a 250 mL jar, and fixed in a 5% formalin and seawater solution. Back to the laboratory, samples of meiofauna were sieved using 0.5 mm and 0.042 mm mesh size; material retained on the smaller mesh size was collected. Sorting of meiofauna from the sediment was done using a flotation technique in Ludox HS40 solution (Heipet al., 1985). All meiofaunal individuals were sorted into major groups and counted under a stereoscopic microscope.

    Samples for sediment analysis were also acquired in spring (April) 2007. In order to analyze the total organic matter (TOM) of the sediment, freeze-dried and homogenized sediment was first acidified with 10% HCl overnight to remove carbonate, then dried at 60℃ and analyzed (Hedges and Stren, 1984) using an EA1110 element analyzer (Carlo-Erba Co., Italy). Finally, the result was converted to TOM content. The grain composition in the sediment was analyzed using a Mastersizer 2000 (Malvern Instruments, UK). Mudflat water salinity was determined using a YS130S-C-T meter at each sampling station during the meiobenthic sampling.

    2.3 Data Analysis

    Meiofaunal abundance was expressed as inds·10cm-2and calculated for each mangrove wetland during each season. Univariate two-way ANOVA was used to investigate differences between the regions (Fenglin and Xiang’an), and the seasons (summer, autumn, winter and spring) for meiofaunal abundance, Pearson-Correlation analysis was applied to reveal the correlation between the abundance of total meiofauna and nematodes, with the SPSS V.16 statistical software package. The Tukey HSD multiple comparisons test was used in pair-wise comparisons of samples to explore statistically significant differences of meiofaunal abundance. MDS was carried out to analyze the meiofauna assemblages from the five stations in four seasons with PRIMER 5.0 package, the densities of genera were square root transformed based on the Bray-Curtis similarity measure.

    3 Results

    3.1 The Environmental Factors in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The salinity at the Fenglin was lower than that at the Xiang’an mangrove area. Additionally, the Jimei Sewage Treatment Plant is located near the Fenglin mangrove area. Based on the ‘Evaluation Standard for Sediment Pollutants’ from the ‘Concise Regulations of National Sea Island Resource Comprehensive Survey’, the critical threshold for TOM is 3.4%. Our study showed that TOM values at the three Fenglin sampling stations exceeded the critical threshold, while those of the two Xiang’an sampling stations did not. In addition, the TOM in the mangrove stations was higher than that in the non-mangrove stations (Table 1).

    Table 1 The sediment salinity, median particle diameter and TOM at five stations

    3.2 The Meiofaunal Community in Two Mangrove Wetlands and MDS Analysis of Meiofauna at Five Stations and in Four Seasons

    The annual mean abundance of meiofauna at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 1378.4 ± 1712.2 inds·10 cm-2and 1214.1± 682.8 inds·10 cm-2, respectively. The seasonal variations of meiofaunal abundance at these two mangrove wetlands were not the same. The meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove wetland was the highest in winter, but the meiofaunal abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland was the highest in spring. In summer, autumn and spring, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove were all lower than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. But in winter, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was the highest among all the stations (Fig.2).

    Two-way ANOVA results showed that the distribution of meiofaunal individuals was significantly influenced by region, season and region×season (Table 2).

    Fig.2 Meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    Table 2 The F and P values between regions and seasons for meiofaunal abundance in Tong’an Bay

    The ordination of samples by MDS analysis showed that the regional and seasonal changes for meiofaunal assemblages were observed in most sampling stations (Fig.3).

    Fig.3 MDS analysis of meiofaunal assemblages based on square root transformed data of numbers of genera from the five stations and four seasons.

    3.3 The Nematode Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The annual average abundance of nematodes at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 1289.7±565.3 inds·10cm-2and 1138.5±346.7 inds·10cm-2, respectively.

    Fig.4 Nematode abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    The seasonal variations of nematode abundance in two mangrove wetlands were not the same. The nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove wetland was the highest in winter, but the nematode abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland was the highest in spring. In summer, autumn and spring, the nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove was all lower than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. But in winter, the nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove was higher than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland (Fig.4).

    Pearson-Correlation analysis showed a very significant positive correlation between the abundance of total meiofauna and nematodes (R=0.988, P<0.01). Two-way ANOVA results showed that there were very significant seasonal variation (ANOVA, F3,68=50.321, P<0.01) and significant temporal variation (ANOVA, F4,68= 2.948, P<0.05) in the density of nematodes. In addition, a significant interaction effect between region×season was detected (ANOVA, F12,68= 15.242, P<0.01) (Table 2).

    3.4 The Benthic Copepod Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The annual average benthic copepod abundance at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 25.3 ± 9.4 inds·10cm-2and 66.0 ± 7.0 inds·10cm-2, respectively (Fig.5). Pearson-Correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between the abundance of the total meiofauna and the benthic copepod (R = -0.542, P=0.345>0.05). Two-way ANOVA results showed that there was no significant seasonal variation (ANOVA, F3,68=2.490, P>0.05) but there was a significant spatial variation (ANOVA, F4,68= 3.986, P<0.01) in benthic copepod abundance. In addition, no significant interaction effect between region×season was detected (ANOVA, F12,68=0.736, P>0.05) (Table 2).

    Fig.5 Benthic copepod abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    3.5 The Ne/Co Ratio (Nematode to Benthic Copepod) in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The seasonal mean Ne/Co ratio in the present study ranged from 9.00 to 154.13. Fenglin mangrove generally showed the higher values of the Ne/Co ratio, with the only exception of the summer. It is interesting that the Ne/Co ratio is higher than 100 in the winter and spring at Fenglin.

    Table 3 Ratio of nematodes to benthic copepods (Ne/Co)

    4 Discussion

    In general, meiobenthic abundance may be impacted by several factors, such as salinity, sediment particle size, organic matter content, chlorophyll content, water temperature, water depth, and self-propagation (Danovaroand Fabiano, 1995; Mirto et al., 2000; Liu, 2005; Khan et al., 2012). Organic pollution may significantly affect the meiofaunal community (Carman et al., 1997; Cai et al., 2000; Guo, 2008). In present study, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove in summer, autumn and spring was all lower than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in the same season. The factor affecting the distribution of meiofauna in present study may relate to organic matter content. By adding extra organic matter to the mud from estuary, Schratzberger and Warwick (1998a) found that low organic matter inflow did not affect the marine nematode abundance, while medium and high amount of organic matter inflow made the abundance of marine nematodes drastically reduced. This phenomenon is not only found at mangrove wetland, but also found in intertidal zone and subtidal zone. The persistently high sediment nutrient levels might limit the colonization of meiofauna leading to lower abundance (Liu et al., 2011). Also, a higher density of nematodes has been found in sediments of sandy nature, whereas there is lower total organic carbon compared to silt/clay composition (Ansari et al., 2014).

    Vanhove (1992) compared meiofauna of five mangrove vegetation types in Gazi Bay and concluded that particle size and oxygen conditions are major factors influencing meiobenthic distribution. Lower meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove in three seasons compared to Xiang’an mangrove wetland might also relate to different sand contents. Raffaelli (1987) pointed out that nematodes could be expected to increase in abundance in both coarse and fine sediment habitats. The sediment in Xiang’an mangrove wetland is finer than in Fenglin mangrove wetland (Table 1), which might help to increase the nematodes abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland.

    But in winter, meiofauna abundance in Fenglin mangrove bloomed and reached the peak in the year. As nematode is the most dominant meiofaunal group in the present study, the change of nematode abundance has the most important effect on total meiofaunal structure. Nematodes have been suggested to become opportunistic species because of their potential rapid reproduction which allows them to dominate the initial stages of faunal succession after a disturbance or adverse condition (Schratzberger and Warwick, 1998b). In general, recolonization of populations of smaller and short-lived organisms is expected to be more rapid than longer lived species (Driskell et al., 1996). As Schratzberger and Warwick (1998b) pointed out, medium frequency of disturbance help marine nematodes reach high abundance, and low frequency and high frequency disturbance results in the decrease of abundance. Following an adverse condition for most invertebrate in winter, nematodes in Fenglin mangrove wetland got medium disturbance and became dominated. Therefore, nematode communities have increasingly been used to assess the effects of environmental perturbations (Gyedu-Ababio et al., 1999; Dye, 2006), even used as indicators of pollution (Moore and Bett, 1989; Essink and Keidel, 1998; Boyd et al., 2000; Moreno, 2011).

    The state of meiofaunal assemblages may better reflect the overall health of the marine benthos, especially for detecting early response to environmental changes (Kennedy and Jacoby, 1999). Different sediment qualities will result in different meiobenthic community composition and different meiobenthic abundance. Whether considering numbers or biomass, benthic copepods is the second commonest dominant group in the meiobenthic community in present study. Compared to some nematodes that are used as indicator species for organic pollution, benthic copepod is more sensitive to environmental pollution than other meiofaunal group (Findlay, 1981; Raffaelli and Mason, 1981; Semprucci et al., 2010; Frontalini et al., 2011). Also, much research has focused on whether the ratio of nematode density to copepod density (the N/C or R ratio) can be an index to the organic pollution status. Raffaelli and Mason (1981) and Warwick (1981) believed that the R ratio can be such an index, but the range of R ratio which indicates the pollution status is still controversial. Anyway, the accuracy and applicability of the Nematode/Copepod index (N/C) in monitoring the effects of environmental disturbances is controversial (Sun et al., 2014).

    Benthic copepod abundance in Xiang’an were higher than those in Fenglin mangrove wetland all the four seasons. Higher abundance of benthic copepod and lower N/C value in Xiang’an mangrove in the present study, corresponded with the sediment characteristics, especially with the organic matter. With all the results in the present study, we confirmed the positive response of meiofaunal and nematode abundance to medium organic matter contents (organic matter contents in Xiang’an area was medium, while in Fenglin, the organic matter contents were considered to be high), and showed that the distribution of meiofaunal abundance would be influenced by sand content. Higher copepod abundance and lower R/C value usually suggest better environmental quality.

    Acknowledgements

    The present project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41176089), and also supported by WEL (abbreviation of Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education) Visiting Fellowship Program from Xiamen University. The authors would like to thank the staff and students in the benthic ecology laboratory in Xiamen University for their assistance in the field work and for their help with sampling procedures.

    Ansari, K. G. M. T., Manokaran, S., Raja, S., Lyla, P. S., and Khan, S. A., 2014. Interaction of free-living marine nematodes in the artificial mangrove environment (southeast coast of India). Environmental Monitoring and Assessmen, 186 (1): 293-305.

    Boyd, S. E., Rees, H. L., and Richardson, C. A., 2000. Nematodes as sensitive indicators of change at dreged materialdisposal sites. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 51: 805-819.

    Balsamo, M., Albertelli, G., Ceccherelli, V. U., Coccioni, R., Colangelo, M. A., Curini-Galletti, M., Danovaro, R., D’Addabbof, R., De Leonardisf, C., Fabianob, M., Frontalinia, F., Gallof, M., Gambie, C., Guidia, L., Morenob, M., Pusceddue, A., Sandullig, R., Sempruccia, F., Todaroh, M. A., and Tongiorgih, P., 2010. Meiofauna of the Adriatic Sea: Current state of knowledge and future perspectives. Chemistry and Ecology, 26 (1): 45- 63.

    Cai, L. Z, Li, H. M., and Zou, C. Z., 2000. Species composition and seasonal variation of marine nematodes on Futian mudflat in Shenzhen estuary. Chinese Biodiversity, 8 (4): 385-390 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Carman, K. R., Fleeger, J. W., and Pomarico, S. M., 1997. Response of a benthic food web to hydrocarbon contamination. Limnology and Oceanography, 42: 561-571.

    Chapman, M. G., and Tolhurst, T. J., 2007. Relationships between benthic macrofauna and biogeochemical properties of sediments at different spatial scales and among different habitats in mangrove forests. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 343: 96-109.

    Chinnadurai, G., and Fernando, O. J., 2007. Meiofauna of mangroves of the southeast coast of India with special reference to the free-living marine nematode assemblage. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 72: 329-336.

    Coull, B. C., and Chandler, G. T., 1992. Pollution and meiofauna- field, laboratory, and mesocosm studies. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 30: 191-271.

    Danovaro, R., and Fabiano, M., 1995. Meiofaunal abundance and distribution in bathyal sediments of the Mediterranean Sea: An overview. Biologia Marina Mediterranea, 2: 217-225.

    Driskell, W. B., Fukuyama, A. K., Houghton, J. P., Lees, D. C., Mearns, A. J., and Shigenaka, G., 1996. Recovery of Prince William Sound intertidal infauna from Exxon Valdez oiling and shoreline treatments, 1989 through 1992. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 18: 362-378.

    Dye, A. H., 2006. Persistent effects of physical disturbance on meiofauna in mangrove sediments. Marine Environmental Research, 62: 341-355.

    Dye, A. H., 1983. Composition and seasonal fluctuations of meiofauna in a southern African mangrove estuary. Marine Biology, 73: 165-170.

    Essink, K., and Keidel, H., 1998. Changes in estuarine nematodes communities following a decrease of organic pollution. Aquatic Ecology, 32: 195-202.

    Erséus, C., 2002. Mangroves and marine oligochaete diversity. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 10: 197-202.

    Findlay, S. E. G., 1981. Small scale spatial distributions of meiofauna on a mud and sandflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 12: 471-484.

    Frontalini, F., Semprucci, F., Coccioni, R., Balsamo, M., Bittoni, P., and Covazzi-Harriague, A., 2011. On the quantitative distribution and community structure of the meio and macrofaunal communities in the coastal area of the Central Adriatic Sea (Italy). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 180: 325-344.

    Gallucci, F., Steyaert, M., and Moens, T., 2005. Can field distributions of marine predacious nematodes be explained by sediment constraints on their foraging success? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 304: 167-178.

    Gunasekaran, C., and Olivia, J. F., 2007. Meiofauna of mangroves of the southeast coast of India with special reference to the free-living marine nematode assemblage. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 72: 329-336.

    Guo, Y. Q., 2008. The study on the community of free-living marine nematodes in Fenglin mangrove wetlands, Xiamen, China. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 30 (4): 147-153 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Gwyther, J., 2000. Meiofauna in phytal-based and sedimentary habitats of a temperate mangrove ecosystem - A preliminary survey. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 112 (2): 137-151.

    Gwyther, J., and Peter, G. F., 2005. Meiofaunal recruitment to mimic pneumatophores in a cool-temperate mangrove forest: Spatial context and biofilm effects. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 317: 69-85.

    Gyedu-Ababio, T. K., Furstenberg, J. P., Baird, D., and Vanreusel, A., 1999. Nematodes as indicators of pollution: A case study from the Swartkops River system, South Africa. Hydrobiologia, 397: 155-169.

    Heip, C., Vincxm, M., and Vranken, G., 1985. The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 21: 67-175.

    Hedges, J. I., and Stren, J. H., 1984. Carbon and nitrogen determinations of carbonate-containing solids. Limnology and Oceanography, 29: 657-663.

    Hicks, G. R. F., and Coull, B. C., 1983. The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 21: 67-175.

    Kairo, J. G., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Bosire, J., and Koedam, N., 2001. Restoration and management of mangrove systems – A lesson for and from the East African region. South African Journal of Botany, 67: 383-389.

    Kennedy, A. D., and Jacoby, C. A., 1999. Biological indicators of marine environmental health: meiofauna – A neglected benthic component? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 54: 47-68.

    Khan, S. A., S., Ansari, K. G. M. T., and Lyla, P. S., 2012. Organic matter content of sediments in continental shelf area of southeast coast of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184: 7247-7256.

    Levings, S. C., Garrity, S. D., and Burns, K. A., 1994. The Galeta oil spill. III. Chronic recoiling, long-term toxicity of hydrocarbon residues and effects on epibiota in the mangrove fringe. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 38: 365-395.

    Liu, X. S., Zhang, Z. N., and Huang, Y., 2005. Abundance and biomass of meiofauna in the spawning ground of anchovy (Engraulis japanicus) in the southern Huanghai Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 24 (3): 94-104.

    Liu, X. S., Xu, W., Cheung, S. G., and Shin, K. S., 2011. Marine meiobenthic and nematode community structure in Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong upon recovery from sewage pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 63: 318-325.

    Mirto, S., La Rosa, T., Danovaro, R., and Mazzola, A., 2000. Microbial and meiofaunal response to intensive mussel-farm biodeposition in coastal sediments of the western Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40 (3): 244-252.

    Moore, C. G., and Bett, B. J., 1989. The use of meiofauna in marine pollution impact assessment. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 96: 263-280.

    Moens, T., Santos, G. A. P., Thompson, F., Swings, J., Fonsêca-Genevois, V., Vincx, M., and Mesel, I. D., 2005. Do nematode mucus secretions affect bacterial growth? Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 40: 77-83

    Moreno, M., Semprucci, F., Vezzulli, L., Balsamo, M., Fabiano, M., and Albertelli, G., 2011. The use of nematodes in assess-ing ecological quality status in the Mediterranean coastal ecosystems. Ecological Indicators, 11: 328-336.

    Olafsson, E., Carlstrom, S., and Ndaro, S. G. M., 2000. Meiobenthos of hypersaline tropical mangrove sediment in relation to spring tide inundation. Hydrobiologia, 426: 57-64.

    Pinto, T. K., Austen, M. C. V., Warwick, R. M., Somerfield, P. J., Esteves, A. M., Castro, F. J. V., Fonseca-Genevois, V. G., and Santos, P. J. P., 2013. Nematode diversity in different microhabitats in a mangrove region. Marine Ecology - An Evolutionary Perspective, 34 (3): 257-268.

    Pusceddu, A., Gambi, C., Corinaldesi, C., Scopa, M., and Danovaro, R., 2014. Relationships between meiofaunal miodiversity and prokaryotic heterotrophic production in different tropical habitats and oceanic regions. PLoS ONE 9 (3): e91056, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091056.

    Raffaelli, D. G., and Mason, C. F., 1981. Pollution monitoring with meiofauna: using the ratio of nematodes to copepods. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 12 (5): 158-163.

    Rasolofo, M. V., 1997. Use of mangroves by traditional fishermen in Madagascar. Mangroves and Salt Marshes, 1: 243-253.

    Saenger, P., 2003. Mangrove Ecology, Silviculture and Conservation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1-372.

    Schratzberger, M., and Warwick, R. M., 1998a. Effects of physical disturbance on nematode communities in sand and mud: A microcosm experiment. Marine Biology, 130 (4): 643- 650.

    Schratzberger, M., and Warwick, R. M., 1998b. Effects of the intensity and frequency of organic enrichment on two estuarine nematode communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 164: 83-94

    Semprucci, F., Boi, P., Manti, A., Covazzi, H. A., Rocchi, M., Colantoni, P., Papa, S., and Balsamo, M., 2010. Benthic communities along a littoral of the Central Adriatic Sea (Italy). Helgoland Marine Research, 64 (2): 101-115.

    Shah, D. G., Bahuguna, A., Deshmukh, B., Nayak, S. R., Singh, H. S., and Patel, B. H., 2005. Zoning and monitoring dominant mangrove communities of a part of the Marine National Park, Gulf of Kachch. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33 (1): 155-164.

    Sun, X. Y., Zhou, H., Hua, E., Xu, S. H., Cong, B. Q., and Zhang, Z. N., 2014. Meiofauna and its sedimentary environment as an integrated indication of anthropogenic disturbance to sandy beach ecosystems. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 88: 260-267.

    Torres-Pratts, H., and Schizas, N. V., 2007. Meiofaunal colonization of decaying leaves of the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle, in southwestern Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science, 43 (1): 127-137.

    Vanhove, S., Vincx, M., Van Gansbeke, D., Gijselinck, W., and Schram, D., 1992. The meiofauna of five mangrove vegetation types in Gazi Bay, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 80 (247): 99-108.

    Warwick, R. M., 1981. The Nematode/copepod ratio and its use in pollution ecology. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 12: 329-333.

    Xuan, Q. N., Vanreusel, A., Thanh, N. V., and Smol, N., 2007. Biodiversity of meiofauna in the intertidal Khe Nhan mudflat, Can Gio mangrove forest, Vietnam with special emphasis on free living nematodes. Ocean Science Journal, 42 (3): 135-152.

    Zhang, Z. N., and Zhou, H., 2004. Some progress on the study of meiofauna. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 34 (5): 799-806 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhan, L. Y., Zheng, A. R., and Chen, Z. F., 2003. Estimation of carrying capacity of the oyster in Xiamen Tong’an Bay. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science), 5: 644-647 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhou, H., 2001. Effects of leaf litter addition on meiofaunal colonization of azoic sediments in a subtropical mangrove in Hong Kong. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 256: 99-121.

    (Edited by Ji Dechun)

    (Received April 8, 2014; revised February 12, 2015; accepted March 8, 2015)

    J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research)

    DOI 10.1007/s11802-015-2642-9

    ISSN 1672-5182, 2015 14 (5): 816-822

    http://www.ouc.edu.cn/xbywb/

    E-mail:xbywb@ouc.edu.cn

    * Corresponding author. E-mail: cailizhe@xmu.edu.cn

    纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 高清欧美精品videossex| 99九九在线精品视频| 精品国产国语对白av| www日本在线高清视频| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 午夜日本视频在线| 高清av免费在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 大香蕉久久成人网| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 老司机影院毛片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 人人澡人人妻人| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 黄色一级大片看看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| av在线app专区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲综合色惰| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久久久久人妻| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 高清不卡的av网站| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 各种免费的搞黄视频| av电影中文网址| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 黄频高清免费视频| 高清av免费在线| 国产 精品1| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 男女国产视频网站| 在线 av 中文字幕| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产精品成人在线| av在线播放精品| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产成人精品在线电影| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 老司机影院成人| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 蜜桃在线观看..| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 91成人精品电影| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 一个人免费看片子| 午夜日本视频在线| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久热在线av| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 777米奇影视久久| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲内射少妇av| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产 精品1| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 美国免费a级毛片| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 看免费av毛片| tube8黄色片| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 两个人看的免费小视频| 老女人水多毛片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 观看美女的网站| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 国产1区2区3区精品| av在线app专区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 乱人伦中国视频| 在线看a的网站| 在线观看国产h片| 国产成人欧美| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人欧美| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 老熟女久久久| freevideosex欧美| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 一个人免费看片子| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 精品第一国产精品| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 中文字幕制服av| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产片内射在线| 曰老女人黄片| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲精品视频女| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 看免费av毛片| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 五月开心婷婷网| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 老女人水多毛片| 一区二区三区精品91| 午夜91福利影院| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 最黄视频免费看| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 精品午夜福利在线看| 性色av一级| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 午夜影院在线不卡| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产av精品麻豆| 精品一区在线观看国产| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日韩中字成人| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 大香蕉久久网| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 在线天堂中文资源库| 日本午夜av视频| av在线播放精品| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 男女国产视频网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 9热在线视频观看99| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产 一区精品| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 伦理电影免费视频| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 中国三级夫妇交换| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产精品一国产av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 777米奇影视久久| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久久国产一区二区| 老熟女久久久| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 欧美另类一区| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲av.av天堂| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 日本色播在线视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日本av手机在线免费观看| h视频一区二区三区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 一区二区三区精品91| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| av.在线天堂| 精品少妇内射三级| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 在线天堂中文资源库| av天堂久久9| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 飞空精品影院首页| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 永久免费av网站大全| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 伦精品一区二区三区| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 有码 亚洲区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 自线自在国产av| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美成人午夜精品| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久99一区二区三区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产在线视频一区二区| 人人澡人人妻人| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久婷婷青草| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产又爽黄色视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 丝袜喷水一区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲伊人色综图| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 一级毛片 在线播放| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 中文欧美无线码| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 一级黄片播放器| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产成人精品无人区| www日本在线高清视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 曰老女人黄片| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 五月天丁香电影| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 日本欧美视频一区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| av网站在线播放免费| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 一区福利在线观看| 中国国产av一级| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 制服诱惑二区| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品一国产av| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 日本91视频免费播放| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产色婷婷99| 久久久精品94久久精品| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 午夜91福利影院| 永久网站在线| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 香蕉国产在线看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 性少妇av在线| 日韩电影二区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产成人精品在线电影| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 成年av动漫网址| 成人国语在线视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲成色77777| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲精品第二区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产在视频线精品| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 欧美97在线视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 美女主播在线视频| 一级黄片播放器| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 91成人精品电影| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 18禁观看日本| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 性色av一级| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久青草综合色| 色网站视频免费| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| videos熟女内射| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 男女国产视频网站| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 美女主播在线视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| av天堂久久9| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 99香蕉大伊视频| av在线老鸭窝| 中国国产av一级| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 18禁观看日本| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| av免费观看日本| 日本欧美视频一区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 桃花免费在线播放| 深夜精品福利| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 超色免费av| av在线app专区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日日撸夜夜添| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看 | 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 国产麻豆69| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| videossex国产| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 婷婷成人精品国产| av.在线天堂| 国产一级毛片在线| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| av不卡在线播放| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 日韩电影二区| 精品国产国语对白av| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 丁香六月天网| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产精品 国内视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 18禁观看日本| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 男女免费视频国产| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 日日啪夜夜爽| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片|