• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of Meiofaunal Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China

    2015-03-15 01:43:48ZHOUXipingCAILizheandFUSujing
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2015年5期

    ZHOU Xiping, CAI Lizhe, and FU Sujing

    1) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou 363105, P. R. China

    2) Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    3) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    Comparison of Meiofaunal Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China

    ZHOU Xiping1), CAI Lizhe2),3),*, and FU Sujing2),3)

    1) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou 363105, P. R. China

    2) Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    3) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

    To compare meiofaunal community in the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China, and probe the response of meiofauna to high organic matter, sampling was carried out in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands in the bay. The results showed that the Ne/Co ratio (nematode to benthic copepod) and organic matter in Fenglin mangrove wetland were higher than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. The meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was all lower than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in summer, autumn and spring, while the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was higher than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in winter. Two-way ANOVA results showed that the meiofaunal abundance and nematode abundance were significantly different between regions, seasons and region×season. With all the results in the present study, we confirmed that the positive response of meiofaunal and nematode abundance were only detected for medium organic matter contents according to the Xiang’an wetland’s level, and that the distribution of meiofaunal abundance would be influenced by sand content. Higher copepod abundance and lower N/C value usually suggest better environmental quality.

    meiofauna; nematodes; copepods; mangrove wetland; Tong’an Bay

    1 Introduction

    Mangroves are well-known for their diverse, worldwide environmental value (Saenger, 2003). Many of them may be close to coastal cities or areas with large human populations and be affected by anthropogenic disturbance, such as pollution, cutting down trees for wood products, clearing of forests for aquaculture, fishing, and so on (Levings et al., 1994; Rasolofo, 1997; Kairo et al., 2001). Such activities frequently alter the sediment structure in mangroves. Mangroves have a positive effect on the production of detritus and organic matter, the recycling of nutrients, enriching coastal water, and supporting the benthic population of the sea (Shah et al., 2005). Since quite a diversity of benthos living on or in the sediment, it becomes an ideal approach to examine the relationships between fauna and sediments at multiple scales and in multiple habitats (Chapman and Tolhurst, 2007). These habitats are relatively well-studied with regard to the trees themselves and larger fauna such as fish, birds, crabs and mollusks. Less is known about the small invertebrates dwelling in the sediments associated with the mangroves(Erséus, 2002).

    Meiofauna, which are smaller benthic organisms, are known to utilize surface-derived material, either directly by feeding on phytodetritus, or indirectly by feeding on decomposing material and the associated bacteria (Hicks and Coull, 1983; Heip et al., 1985), had patchy patterns of distribution that are related to the availability of resources (Pinto et al., 2013). Despite the small body size of the meiofauna, they are considered to be an important link for the energy flow in the benthic food chains (Gallucci et al., 2005; Moens, et al. 2005). Furthermore, their short biological cycles and the high stability of the populations, produce in this community a rapid and unequivocal reaction to environmental changes (Coull and Chandler, 1992). The abundance, distribution, and composition of the meiofauna are sensitive to environmental perturbations, and thus, the meiofauna has become one of the major bio-indicators and is widely applied to monitor the marine environment (Zhang and Zhou, 2004; Balsamo et al., 2010; Moreno et al., 2011).

    Studies on the distribution and biodiversity of meiofauna in mangrove sediments have been conducted in southern African (Dye, 1983), southeast coast of India (Ansar et al., 2014), southeastern Australia (Gwyther, 2000), west coast of Zanbibar (Olafsson et al., 2000),southeast coast of India (Chinnadurai and Fernando, 2007), Vietnam (Xuan et al., 2007), southwestern of Puerto Rico (Torres-Pratts and Schizas, 2007), even in different tropical habitats and oceanic regions such as the Caribbean, Celebes and Red Seas where there are seagrass, mangrove and reef sediments (Pusceddu et al., 2014). Some information on meiofauna in mangrove habitat has also been reported in China. Cai et al. (2000) studied the free-living marine nematodes on the mudflat in Shenzhen estuary and found that nematodes prefer to live and breed in mudflats with high content of organic matter. Guo (2008) studied the number of meiofauna and the community of nematode in Fenglin, which happens to be the place of present study, and revealed that the highest abundance of meiofauna appears at bare mudflat where waste water flows, contributing high organic matter content in the sediment (Guo, 2008). He investigated the community of free-living marine nematodes in different types of mangroves at Fenglin and demonstrated that the abundance of meiofauna in Avicennia marina mangroves is the lowest, while at the bare mudflat, an area with organic discharge, the abundance is the highest.

    A field colonization experiment in subtropical Hong Kong was carried out to better understand the relationship of major meiofaunal taxa and nematode species assemblage to the decaying leaf litter of the mangrove Kandelia candel, testifying the important role of meiofauna in the process of detritus decomposition (Zhou, 2001).

    However, further proof needs to be provided to confirm the response of meiofauna to mangrove habitat. The aim of the present study is to: 1) understand the distribution of meiofaunal abundance in mangrove wetlands, including nematode and copepod abundance, and 2) compare the meiofaunal abundance in the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay. A minor purpose of this study is to find if the meiofauna is affected by different organic matter supplies.

    2 Materials

    2.1 Study Sites

    Tong’an Bay is located to the northeast of Xiamen Island, China, with a semi-diurnal tide. It covers an area of 91.7 km2, including 50.4 km2of tidal flat (Zhan et al., 2003). Two sampling sites, Fenglin (FL, 118?06′E, 24?34′N) and Xiang’an (XA, 118?11′E, 24?38′N), are located on the west coast and northeast coast of Tong’an Bay, respectively. A published study was carried out in old Fenglin mangrove area (Guo, 2008), which is near to our sampling station. Fenglin area is also near to a residential district with more freshwater inflow. Additionally, the Jimei Sewage Treatment Plant is located near the Fenglin mangrove area.

    At Fenglin, five mangrove species (Kandelia obovata, Sonneratia caseolaria, S. apetala, Acanthus ilicifolius and Rhizophora stylosa) were planted in April 2004, while at Xiang’an, Kandelia obovata was planted in 2005. Five sampling stations were set in Tong’an Bay, three of them (FL1, FL2 and XA-A) were in the mangrove habitat, and the other two (FL3, XA-B) were in the non-mangrove habitat (Fig.1). All these stations were intertidal, and the three mangrove sampling stations were located on the edge of the shoreline with shorter flooding periods due to higher intertidal elevation, while the other two non-mangrove sampling stations were located between the mangrove forest and the aquacultural mudflat. There is a (Jimei) Sewage Treatment Plant and many living quarters surrounding Fenglin mangrove wetland.

    Fig.1 Meiofaunal sampling stations at the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay (FL = Fenglin; XA = Xiang’an).

    2.2 Sampling Procedures

    Meiofauna was collected in four surveys in summer (July) 2006, autumn (October) 2007, winter (January) 2007 and spring (April) 2007. At each sampling station during each surveys, four replicate sediment sampling were collected using a 0.05 m2box corer. Undisturbed meiofaunal cores were taken using a cut-off syringe (Ф= 2.9 cm) to 10 cm depth, then divided into three layers, 0-2 cm, 2 - 5 cm, and 5 - 10 cm. Each layer was immediately placed in a 250 mL jar, and fixed in a 5% formalin and seawater solution. Back to the laboratory, samples of meiofauna were sieved using 0.5 mm and 0.042 mm mesh size; material retained on the smaller mesh size was collected. Sorting of meiofauna from the sediment was done using a flotation technique in Ludox HS40 solution (Heipet al., 1985). All meiofaunal individuals were sorted into major groups and counted under a stereoscopic microscope.

    Samples for sediment analysis were also acquired in spring (April) 2007. In order to analyze the total organic matter (TOM) of the sediment, freeze-dried and homogenized sediment was first acidified with 10% HCl overnight to remove carbonate, then dried at 60℃ and analyzed (Hedges and Stren, 1984) using an EA1110 element analyzer (Carlo-Erba Co., Italy). Finally, the result was converted to TOM content. The grain composition in the sediment was analyzed using a Mastersizer 2000 (Malvern Instruments, UK). Mudflat water salinity was determined using a YS130S-C-T meter at each sampling station during the meiobenthic sampling.

    2.3 Data Analysis

    Meiofaunal abundance was expressed as inds·10cm-2and calculated for each mangrove wetland during each season. Univariate two-way ANOVA was used to investigate differences between the regions (Fenglin and Xiang’an), and the seasons (summer, autumn, winter and spring) for meiofaunal abundance, Pearson-Correlation analysis was applied to reveal the correlation between the abundance of total meiofauna and nematodes, with the SPSS V.16 statistical software package. The Tukey HSD multiple comparisons test was used in pair-wise comparisons of samples to explore statistically significant differences of meiofaunal abundance. MDS was carried out to analyze the meiofauna assemblages from the five stations in four seasons with PRIMER 5.0 package, the densities of genera were square root transformed based on the Bray-Curtis similarity measure.

    3 Results

    3.1 The Environmental Factors in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The salinity at the Fenglin was lower than that at the Xiang’an mangrove area. Additionally, the Jimei Sewage Treatment Plant is located near the Fenglin mangrove area. Based on the ‘Evaluation Standard for Sediment Pollutants’ from the ‘Concise Regulations of National Sea Island Resource Comprehensive Survey’, the critical threshold for TOM is 3.4%. Our study showed that TOM values at the three Fenglin sampling stations exceeded the critical threshold, while those of the two Xiang’an sampling stations did not. In addition, the TOM in the mangrove stations was higher than that in the non-mangrove stations (Table 1).

    Table 1 The sediment salinity, median particle diameter and TOM at five stations

    3.2 The Meiofaunal Community in Two Mangrove Wetlands and MDS Analysis of Meiofauna at Five Stations and in Four Seasons

    The annual mean abundance of meiofauna at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 1378.4 ± 1712.2 inds·10 cm-2and 1214.1± 682.8 inds·10 cm-2, respectively. The seasonal variations of meiofaunal abundance at these two mangrove wetlands were not the same. The meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove wetland was the highest in winter, but the meiofaunal abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland was the highest in spring. In summer, autumn and spring, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove were all lower than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. But in winter, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was the highest among all the stations (Fig.2).

    Two-way ANOVA results showed that the distribution of meiofaunal individuals was significantly influenced by region, season and region×season (Table 2).

    Fig.2 Meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    Table 2 The F and P values between regions and seasons for meiofaunal abundance in Tong’an Bay

    The ordination of samples by MDS analysis showed that the regional and seasonal changes for meiofaunal assemblages were observed in most sampling stations (Fig.3).

    Fig.3 MDS analysis of meiofaunal assemblages based on square root transformed data of numbers of genera from the five stations and four seasons.

    3.3 The Nematode Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The annual average abundance of nematodes at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 1289.7±565.3 inds·10cm-2and 1138.5±346.7 inds·10cm-2, respectively.

    Fig.4 Nematode abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    The seasonal variations of nematode abundance in two mangrove wetlands were not the same. The nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove wetland was the highest in winter, but the nematode abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland was the highest in spring. In summer, autumn and spring, the nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove was all lower than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. But in winter, the nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove was higher than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland (Fig.4).

    Pearson-Correlation analysis showed a very significant positive correlation between the abundance of total meiofauna and nematodes (R=0.988, P<0.01). Two-way ANOVA results showed that there were very significant seasonal variation (ANOVA, F3,68=50.321, P<0.01) and significant temporal variation (ANOVA, F4,68= 2.948, P<0.05) in the density of nematodes. In addition, a significant interaction effect between region×season was detected (ANOVA, F12,68= 15.242, P<0.01) (Table 2).

    3.4 The Benthic Copepod Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The annual average benthic copepod abundance at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 25.3 ± 9.4 inds·10cm-2and 66.0 ± 7.0 inds·10cm-2, respectively (Fig.5). Pearson-Correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between the abundance of the total meiofauna and the benthic copepod (R = -0.542, P=0.345>0.05). Two-way ANOVA results showed that there was no significant seasonal variation (ANOVA, F3,68=2.490, P>0.05) but there was a significant spatial variation (ANOVA, F4,68= 3.986, P<0.01) in benthic copepod abundance. In addition, no significant interaction effect between region×season was detected (ANOVA, F12,68=0.736, P>0.05) (Table 2).

    Fig.5 Benthic copepod abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    3.5 The Ne/Co Ratio (Nematode to Benthic Copepod) in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The seasonal mean Ne/Co ratio in the present study ranged from 9.00 to 154.13. Fenglin mangrove generally showed the higher values of the Ne/Co ratio, with the only exception of the summer. It is interesting that the Ne/Co ratio is higher than 100 in the winter and spring at Fenglin.

    Table 3 Ratio of nematodes to benthic copepods (Ne/Co)

    4 Discussion

    In general, meiobenthic abundance may be impacted by several factors, such as salinity, sediment particle size, organic matter content, chlorophyll content, water temperature, water depth, and self-propagation (Danovaroand Fabiano, 1995; Mirto et al., 2000; Liu, 2005; Khan et al., 2012). Organic pollution may significantly affect the meiofaunal community (Carman et al., 1997; Cai et al., 2000; Guo, 2008). In present study, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove in summer, autumn and spring was all lower than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in the same season. The factor affecting the distribution of meiofauna in present study may relate to organic matter content. By adding extra organic matter to the mud from estuary, Schratzberger and Warwick (1998a) found that low organic matter inflow did not affect the marine nematode abundance, while medium and high amount of organic matter inflow made the abundance of marine nematodes drastically reduced. This phenomenon is not only found at mangrove wetland, but also found in intertidal zone and subtidal zone. The persistently high sediment nutrient levels might limit the colonization of meiofauna leading to lower abundance (Liu et al., 2011). Also, a higher density of nematodes has been found in sediments of sandy nature, whereas there is lower total organic carbon compared to silt/clay composition (Ansari et al., 2014).

    Vanhove (1992) compared meiofauna of five mangrove vegetation types in Gazi Bay and concluded that particle size and oxygen conditions are major factors influencing meiobenthic distribution. Lower meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove in three seasons compared to Xiang’an mangrove wetland might also relate to different sand contents. Raffaelli (1987) pointed out that nematodes could be expected to increase in abundance in both coarse and fine sediment habitats. The sediment in Xiang’an mangrove wetland is finer than in Fenglin mangrove wetland (Table 1), which might help to increase the nematodes abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland.

    But in winter, meiofauna abundance in Fenglin mangrove bloomed and reached the peak in the year. As nematode is the most dominant meiofaunal group in the present study, the change of nematode abundance has the most important effect on total meiofaunal structure. Nematodes have been suggested to become opportunistic species because of their potential rapid reproduction which allows them to dominate the initial stages of faunal succession after a disturbance or adverse condition (Schratzberger and Warwick, 1998b). In general, recolonization of populations of smaller and short-lived organisms is expected to be more rapid than longer lived species (Driskell et al., 1996). As Schratzberger and Warwick (1998b) pointed out, medium frequency of disturbance help marine nematodes reach high abundance, and low frequency and high frequency disturbance results in the decrease of abundance. Following an adverse condition for most invertebrate in winter, nematodes in Fenglin mangrove wetland got medium disturbance and became dominated. Therefore, nematode communities have increasingly been used to assess the effects of environmental perturbations (Gyedu-Ababio et al., 1999; Dye, 2006), even used as indicators of pollution (Moore and Bett, 1989; Essink and Keidel, 1998; Boyd et al., 2000; Moreno, 2011).

    The state of meiofaunal assemblages may better reflect the overall health of the marine benthos, especially for detecting early response to environmental changes (Kennedy and Jacoby, 1999). Different sediment qualities will result in different meiobenthic community composition and different meiobenthic abundance. Whether considering numbers or biomass, benthic copepods is the second commonest dominant group in the meiobenthic community in present study. Compared to some nematodes that are used as indicator species for organic pollution, benthic copepod is more sensitive to environmental pollution than other meiofaunal group (Findlay, 1981; Raffaelli and Mason, 1981; Semprucci et al., 2010; Frontalini et al., 2011). Also, much research has focused on whether the ratio of nematode density to copepod density (the N/C or R ratio) can be an index to the organic pollution status. Raffaelli and Mason (1981) and Warwick (1981) believed that the R ratio can be such an index, but the range of R ratio which indicates the pollution status is still controversial. Anyway, the accuracy and applicability of the Nematode/Copepod index (N/C) in monitoring the effects of environmental disturbances is controversial (Sun et al., 2014).

    Benthic copepod abundance in Xiang’an were higher than those in Fenglin mangrove wetland all the four seasons. Higher abundance of benthic copepod and lower N/C value in Xiang’an mangrove in the present study, corresponded with the sediment characteristics, especially with the organic matter. With all the results in the present study, we confirmed the positive response of meiofaunal and nematode abundance to medium organic matter contents (organic matter contents in Xiang’an area was medium, while in Fenglin, the organic matter contents were considered to be high), and showed that the distribution of meiofaunal abundance would be influenced by sand content. Higher copepod abundance and lower R/C value usually suggest better environmental quality.

    Acknowledgements

    The present project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41176089), and also supported by WEL (abbreviation of Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education) Visiting Fellowship Program from Xiamen University. The authors would like to thank the staff and students in the benthic ecology laboratory in Xiamen University for their assistance in the field work and for their help with sampling procedures.

    Ansari, K. G. M. T., Manokaran, S., Raja, S., Lyla, P. S., and Khan, S. A., 2014. Interaction of free-living marine nematodes in the artificial mangrove environment (southeast coast of India). Environmental Monitoring and Assessmen, 186 (1): 293-305.

    Boyd, S. E., Rees, H. L., and Richardson, C. A., 2000. Nematodes as sensitive indicators of change at dreged materialdisposal sites. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 51: 805-819.

    Balsamo, M., Albertelli, G., Ceccherelli, V. U., Coccioni, R., Colangelo, M. A., Curini-Galletti, M., Danovaro, R., D’Addabbof, R., De Leonardisf, C., Fabianob, M., Frontalinia, F., Gallof, M., Gambie, C., Guidia, L., Morenob, M., Pusceddue, A., Sandullig, R., Sempruccia, F., Todaroh, M. A., and Tongiorgih, P., 2010. Meiofauna of the Adriatic Sea: Current state of knowledge and future perspectives. Chemistry and Ecology, 26 (1): 45- 63.

    Cai, L. Z, Li, H. M., and Zou, C. Z., 2000. Species composition and seasonal variation of marine nematodes on Futian mudflat in Shenzhen estuary. Chinese Biodiversity, 8 (4): 385-390 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Carman, K. R., Fleeger, J. W., and Pomarico, S. M., 1997. Response of a benthic food web to hydrocarbon contamination. Limnology and Oceanography, 42: 561-571.

    Chapman, M. G., and Tolhurst, T. J., 2007. Relationships between benthic macrofauna and biogeochemical properties of sediments at different spatial scales and among different habitats in mangrove forests. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 343: 96-109.

    Chinnadurai, G., and Fernando, O. J., 2007. Meiofauna of mangroves of the southeast coast of India with special reference to the free-living marine nematode assemblage. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 72: 329-336.

    Coull, B. C., and Chandler, G. T., 1992. Pollution and meiofauna- field, laboratory, and mesocosm studies. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 30: 191-271.

    Danovaro, R., and Fabiano, M., 1995. Meiofaunal abundance and distribution in bathyal sediments of the Mediterranean Sea: An overview. Biologia Marina Mediterranea, 2: 217-225.

    Driskell, W. B., Fukuyama, A. K., Houghton, J. P., Lees, D. C., Mearns, A. J., and Shigenaka, G., 1996. Recovery of Prince William Sound intertidal infauna from Exxon Valdez oiling and shoreline treatments, 1989 through 1992. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 18: 362-378.

    Dye, A. H., 2006. Persistent effects of physical disturbance on meiofauna in mangrove sediments. Marine Environmental Research, 62: 341-355.

    Dye, A. H., 1983. Composition and seasonal fluctuations of meiofauna in a southern African mangrove estuary. Marine Biology, 73: 165-170.

    Essink, K., and Keidel, H., 1998. Changes in estuarine nematodes communities following a decrease of organic pollution. Aquatic Ecology, 32: 195-202.

    Erséus, C., 2002. Mangroves and marine oligochaete diversity. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 10: 197-202.

    Findlay, S. E. G., 1981. Small scale spatial distributions of meiofauna on a mud and sandflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 12: 471-484.

    Frontalini, F., Semprucci, F., Coccioni, R., Balsamo, M., Bittoni, P., and Covazzi-Harriague, A., 2011. On the quantitative distribution and community structure of the meio and macrofaunal communities in the coastal area of the Central Adriatic Sea (Italy). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 180: 325-344.

    Gallucci, F., Steyaert, M., and Moens, T., 2005. Can field distributions of marine predacious nematodes be explained by sediment constraints on their foraging success? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 304: 167-178.

    Gunasekaran, C., and Olivia, J. F., 2007. Meiofauna of mangroves of the southeast coast of India with special reference to the free-living marine nematode assemblage. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 72: 329-336.

    Guo, Y. Q., 2008. The study on the community of free-living marine nematodes in Fenglin mangrove wetlands, Xiamen, China. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 30 (4): 147-153 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Gwyther, J., 2000. Meiofauna in phytal-based and sedimentary habitats of a temperate mangrove ecosystem - A preliminary survey. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 112 (2): 137-151.

    Gwyther, J., and Peter, G. F., 2005. Meiofaunal recruitment to mimic pneumatophores in a cool-temperate mangrove forest: Spatial context and biofilm effects. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 317: 69-85.

    Gyedu-Ababio, T. K., Furstenberg, J. P., Baird, D., and Vanreusel, A., 1999. Nematodes as indicators of pollution: A case study from the Swartkops River system, South Africa. Hydrobiologia, 397: 155-169.

    Heip, C., Vincxm, M., and Vranken, G., 1985. The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 21: 67-175.

    Hedges, J. I., and Stren, J. H., 1984. Carbon and nitrogen determinations of carbonate-containing solids. Limnology and Oceanography, 29: 657-663.

    Hicks, G. R. F., and Coull, B. C., 1983. The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 21: 67-175.

    Kairo, J. G., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Bosire, J., and Koedam, N., 2001. Restoration and management of mangrove systems – A lesson for and from the East African region. South African Journal of Botany, 67: 383-389.

    Kennedy, A. D., and Jacoby, C. A., 1999. Biological indicators of marine environmental health: meiofauna – A neglected benthic component? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 54: 47-68.

    Khan, S. A., S., Ansari, K. G. M. T., and Lyla, P. S., 2012. Organic matter content of sediments in continental shelf area of southeast coast of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184: 7247-7256.

    Levings, S. C., Garrity, S. D., and Burns, K. A., 1994. The Galeta oil spill. III. Chronic recoiling, long-term toxicity of hydrocarbon residues and effects on epibiota in the mangrove fringe. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 38: 365-395.

    Liu, X. S., Zhang, Z. N., and Huang, Y., 2005. Abundance and biomass of meiofauna in the spawning ground of anchovy (Engraulis japanicus) in the southern Huanghai Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 24 (3): 94-104.

    Liu, X. S., Xu, W., Cheung, S. G., and Shin, K. S., 2011. Marine meiobenthic and nematode community structure in Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong upon recovery from sewage pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 63: 318-325.

    Mirto, S., La Rosa, T., Danovaro, R., and Mazzola, A., 2000. Microbial and meiofaunal response to intensive mussel-farm biodeposition in coastal sediments of the western Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40 (3): 244-252.

    Moore, C. G., and Bett, B. J., 1989. The use of meiofauna in marine pollution impact assessment. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 96: 263-280.

    Moens, T., Santos, G. A. P., Thompson, F., Swings, J., Fonsêca-Genevois, V., Vincx, M., and Mesel, I. D., 2005. Do nematode mucus secretions affect bacterial growth? Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 40: 77-83

    Moreno, M., Semprucci, F., Vezzulli, L., Balsamo, M., Fabiano, M., and Albertelli, G., 2011. The use of nematodes in assess-ing ecological quality status in the Mediterranean coastal ecosystems. Ecological Indicators, 11: 328-336.

    Olafsson, E., Carlstrom, S., and Ndaro, S. G. M., 2000. Meiobenthos of hypersaline tropical mangrove sediment in relation to spring tide inundation. Hydrobiologia, 426: 57-64.

    Pinto, T. K., Austen, M. C. V., Warwick, R. M., Somerfield, P. J., Esteves, A. M., Castro, F. J. V., Fonseca-Genevois, V. G., and Santos, P. J. P., 2013. Nematode diversity in different microhabitats in a mangrove region. Marine Ecology - An Evolutionary Perspective, 34 (3): 257-268.

    Pusceddu, A., Gambi, C., Corinaldesi, C., Scopa, M., and Danovaro, R., 2014. Relationships between meiofaunal miodiversity and prokaryotic heterotrophic production in different tropical habitats and oceanic regions. PLoS ONE 9 (3): e91056, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091056.

    Raffaelli, D. G., and Mason, C. F., 1981. Pollution monitoring with meiofauna: using the ratio of nematodes to copepods. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 12 (5): 158-163.

    Rasolofo, M. V., 1997. Use of mangroves by traditional fishermen in Madagascar. Mangroves and Salt Marshes, 1: 243-253.

    Saenger, P., 2003. Mangrove Ecology, Silviculture and Conservation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1-372.

    Schratzberger, M., and Warwick, R. M., 1998a. Effects of physical disturbance on nematode communities in sand and mud: A microcosm experiment. Marine Biology, 130 (4): 643- 650.

    Schratzberger, M., and Warwick, R. M., 1998b. Effects of the intensity and frequency of organic enrichment on two estuarine nematode communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 164: 83-94

    Semprucci, F., Boi, P., Manti, A., Covazzi, H. A., Rocchi, M., Colantoni, P., Papa, S., and Balsamo, M., 2010. Benthic communities along a littoral of the Central Adriatic Sea (Italy). Helgoland Marine Research, 64 (2): 101-115.

    Shah, D. G., Bahuguna, A., Deshmukh, B., Nayak, S. R., Singh, H. S., and Patel, B. H., 2005. Zoning and monitoring dominant mangrove communities of a part of the Marine National Park, Gulf of Kachch. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33 (1): 155-164.

    Sun, X. Y., Zhou, H., Hua, E., Xu, S. H., Cong, B. Q., and Zhang, Z. N., 2014. Meiofauna and its sedimentary environment as an integrated indication of anthropogenic disturbance to sandy beach ecosystems. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 88: 260-267.

    Torres-Pratts, H., and Schizas, N. V., 2007. Meiofaunal colonization of decaying leaves of the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle, in southwestern Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science, 43 (1): 127-137.

    Vanhove, S., Vincx, M., Van Gansbeke, D., Gijselinck, W., and Schram, D., 1992. The meiofauna of five mangrove vegetation types in Gazi Bay, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 80 (247): 99-108.

    Warwick, R. M., 1981. The Nematode/copepod ratio and its use in pollution ecology. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 12: 329-333.

    Xuan, Q. N., Vanreusel, A., Thanh, N. V., and Smol, N., 2007. Biodiversity of meiofauna in the intertidal Khe Nhan mudflat, Can Gio mangrove forest, Vietnam with special emphasis on free living nematodes. Ocean Science Journal, 42 (3): 135-152.

    Zhang, Z. N., and Zhou, H., 2004. Some progress on the study of meiofauna. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 34 (5): 799-806 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhan, L. Y., Zheng, A. R., and Chen, Z. F., 2003. Estimation of carrying capacity of the oyster in Xiamen Tong’an Bay. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science), 5: 644-647 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhou, H., 2001. Effects of leaf litter addition on meiofaunal colonization of azoic sediments in a subtropical mangrove in Hong Kong. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 256: 99-121.

    (Edited by Ji Dechun)

    (Received April 8, 2014; revised February 12, 2015; accepted March 8, 2015)

    J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research)

    DOI 10.1007/s11802-015-2642-9

    ISSN 1672-5182, 2015 14 (5): 816-822

    http://www.ouc.edu.cn/xbywb/

    E-mail:xbywb@ouc.edu.cn

    * Corresponding author. E-mail: cailizhe@xmu.edu.cn

    久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲av一区综合| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲国产色片| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久国产网址| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 久久6这里有精品| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 99热精品在线国产| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 内射极品少妇av片p| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 中国国产av一级| av中文乱码字幕在线| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 性色avwww在线观看| 久久久久久大精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国内精品宾馆在线| 露出奶头的视频| www.色视频.com| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| av专区在线播放| 国产日本99.免费观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 精品福利观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 久99久视频精品免费| or卡值多少钱| 国产不卡一卡二| 日日啪夜夜撸| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 免费av毛片视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 日本免费a在线| 插逼视频在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 一级毛片电影观看 | 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| avwww免费| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 亚洲国产欧美人成| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 精品久久久久久久久av| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 赤兔流量卡办理| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 老司机福利观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 一本久久中文字幕| 国产精品,欧美在线| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 美女高潮的动态| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲av一区综合| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 草草在线视频免费看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 如何舔出高潮| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 日韩成人伦理影院| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 深夜a级毛片| 久久热精品热| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲内射少妇av| 午夜a级毛片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲四区av| 中国美女看黄片| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| av在线天堂中文字幕| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 在线观看66精品国产| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美色视频一区免费| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久久色成人| 1024手机看黄色片| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产精华一区二区三区| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 在线播放无遮挡| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 日本熟妇午夜| 三级经典国产精品| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 免费看a级黄色片| 日本五十路高清| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 免费av毛片视频| 精品久久久久久久久av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 免费av观看视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 黄色一级大片看看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 深夜a级毛片| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 久久久久国内视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| 99久国产av精品| 直男gayav资源| 免费观看精品视频网站| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩中字成人| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 性色avwww在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 美女高潮的动态| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日本成人三级电影网站| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| eeuss影院久久| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 舔av片在线| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 大香蕉久久网| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 久久草成人影院| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产在视频线在精品| 99热精品在线国产| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩欧美三级三区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 天堂网av新在线| 大香蕉久久网| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| av免费在线看不卡| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 色在线成人网| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 免费人成在线观看视频色| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产成人福利小说| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 日本 av在线| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 欧美bdsm另类| 乱人视频在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| a级毛色黄片| 老女人水多毛片| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 97碰自拍视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 一级毛片我不卡| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 看片在线看免费视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产精品无大码| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲av成人av| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产精品永久免费网站| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 欧美日本视频| 国产三级中文精品| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 美女黄网站色视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 永久网站在线| 黑人高潮一二区| 久久人人爽人人片av| 免费观看精品视频网站| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲综合色惰| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 免费av观看视频| 97碰自拍视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产成人a区在线观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| 日韩高清综合在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| av视频在线观看入口| 一本精品99久久精品77| 全区人妻精品视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 日本黄大片高清| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 日韩中字成人| 六月丁香七月| 在线播放国产精品三级| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产91av在线免费观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 三级毛片av免费| 国产成人一区二区在线| 午夜a级毛片| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 97热精品久久久久久| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 在现免费观看毛片| videossex国产| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 热99re8久久精品国产| 久久久欧美国产精品| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲五月天丁香| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 久久人人爽人人片av| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 黄色一级大片看看| 97超视频在线观看视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 少妇的逼水好多| 搡老岳熟女国产| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 亚洲成人久久性| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| av天堂中文字幕网| 天堂动漫精品| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲第一电影网av| 在线观看一区二区三区| 色av中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| av黄色大香蕉| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产精品久久视频播放| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久久久久久久大av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久精品影院6| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产老妇女一区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产在视频线在精品| 午夜影院日韩av| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产高清激情床上av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 嫩草影院新地址| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 草草在线视频免费看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 久久久精品大字幕| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 特级一级黄色大片| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久久久性生活片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日韩欧美三级三区| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 不卡一级毛片| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 在现免费观看毛片| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 香蕉av资源在线| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 午夜福利18| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 有码 亚洲区| 国产高清三级在线| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 一级av片app| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 日本与韩国留学比较| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产高潮美女av| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产在线男女| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久av| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲av美国av| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久这里只有精品中国| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产乱人视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | av在线播放精品| 91狼人影院| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产精品一及| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 欧美3d第一页| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | eeuss影院久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 久久这里只有精品中国| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区|