• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of Meiofaunal Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China

    2015-03-15 01:43:48ZHOUXipingCAILizheandFUSujing
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2015年5期

    ZHOU Xiping, CAI Lizhe, and FU Sujing

    1) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou 363105, P. R. China

    2) Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    3) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    Comparison of Meiofaunal Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China

    ZHOU Xiping1), CAI Lizhe2),3),*, and FU Sujing2),3)

    1) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou 363105, P. R. China

    2) Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    3) Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, P. R. China

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

    To compare meiofaunal community in the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay, Xiamen, China, and probe the response of meiofauna to high organic matter, sampling was carried out in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands in the bay. The results showed that the Ne/Co ratio (nematode to benthic copepod) and organic matter in Fenglin mangrove wetland were higher than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. The meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was all lower than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in summer, autumn and spring, while the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was higher than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in winter. Two-way ANOVA results showed that the meiofaunal abundance and nematode abundance were significantly different between regions, seasons and region×season. With all the results in the present study, we confirmed that the positive response of meiofaunal and nematode abundance were only detected for medium organic matter contents according to the Xiang’an wetland’s level, and that the distribution of meiofaunal abundance would be influenced by sand content. Higher copepod abundance and lower N/C value usually suggest better environmental quality.

    meiofauna; nematodes; copepods; mangrove wetland; Tong’an Bay

    1 Introduction

    Mangroves are well-known for their diverse, worldwide environmental value (Saenger, 2003). Many of them may be close to coastal cities or areas with large human populations and be affected by anthropogenic disturbance, such as pollution, cutting down trees for wood products, clearing of forests for aquaculture, fishing, and so on (Levings et al., 1994; Rasolofo, 1997; Kairo et al., 2001). Such activities frequently alter the sediment structure in mangroves. Mangroves have a positive effect on the production of detritus and organic matter, the recycling of nutrients, enriching coastal water, and supporting the benthic population of the sea (Shah et al., 2005). Since quite a diversity of benthos living on or in the sediment, it becomes an ideal approach to examine the relationships between fauna and sediments at multiple scales and in multiple habitats (Chapman and Tolhurst, 2007). These habitats are relatively well-studied with regard to the trees themselves and larger fauna such as fish, birds, crabs and mollusks. Less is known about the small invertebrates dwelling in the sediments associated with the mangroves(Erséus, 2002).

    Meiofauna, which are smaller benthic organisms, are known to utilize surface-derived material, either directly by feeding on phytodetritus, or indirectly by feeding on decomposing material and the associated bacteria (Hicks and Coull, 1983; Heip et al., 1985), had patchy patterns of distribution that are related to the availability of resources (Pinto et al., 2013). Despite the small body size of the meiofauna, they are considered to be an important link for the energy flow in the benthic food chains (Gallucci et al., 2005; Moens, et al. 2005). Furthermore, their short biological cycles and the high stability of the populations, produce in this community a rapid and unequivocal reaction to environmental changes (Coull and Chandler, 1992). The abundance, distribution, and composition of the meiofauna are sensitive to environmental perturbations, and thus, the meiofauna has become one of the major bio-indicators and is widely applied to monitor the marine environment (Zhang and Zhou, 2004; Balsamo et al., 2010; Moreno et al., 2011).

    Studies on the distribution and biodiversity of meiofauna in mangrove sediments have been conducted in southern African (Dye, 1983), southeast coast of India (Ansar et al., 2014), southeastern Australia (Gwyther, 2000), west coast of Zanbibar (Olafsson et al., 2000),southeast coast of India (Chinnadurai and Fernando, 2007), Vietnam (Xuan et al., 2007), southwestern of Puerto Rico (Torres-Pratts and Schizas, 2007), even in different tropical habitats and oceanic regions such as the Caribbean, Celebes and Red Seas where there are seagrass, mangrove and reef sediments (Pusceddu et al., 2014). Some information on meiofauna in mangrove habitat has also been reported in China. Cai et al. (2000) studied the free-living marine nematodes on the mudflat in Shenzhen estuary and found that nematodes prefer to live and breed in mudflats with high content of organic matter. Guo (2008) studied the number of meiofauna and the community of nematode in Fenglin, which happens to be the place of present study, and revealed that the highest abundance of meiofauna appears at bare mudflat where waste water flows, contributing high organic matter content in the sediment (Guo, 2008). He investigated the community of free-living marine nematodes in different types of mangroves at Fenglin and demonstrated that the abundance of meiofauna in Avicennia marina mangroves is the lowest, while at the bare mudflat, an area with organic discharge, the abundance is the highest.

    A field colonization experiment in subtropical Hong Kong was carried out to better understand the relationship of major meiofaunal taxa and nematode species assemblage to the decaying leaf litter of the mangrove Kandelia candel, testifying the important role of meiofauna in the process of detritus decomposition (Zhou, 2001).

    However, further proof needs to be provided to confirm the response of meiofauna to mangrove habitat. The aim of the present study is to: 1) understand the distribution of meiofaunal abundance in mangrove wetlands, including nematode and copepod abundance, and 2) compare the meiofaunal abundance in the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay. A minor purpose of this study is to find if the meiofauna is affected by different organic matter supplies.

    2 Materials

    2.1 Study Sites

    Tong’an Bay is located to the northeast of Xiamen Island, China, with a semi-diurnal tide. It covers an area of 91.7 km2, including 50.4 km2of tidal flat (Zhan et al., 2003). Two sampling sites, Fenglin (FL, 118?06′E, 24?34′N) and Xiang’an (XA, 118?11′E, 24?38′N), are located on the west coast and northeast coast of Tong’an Bay, respectively. A published study was carried out in old Fenglin mangrove area (Guo, 2008), which is near to our sampling station. Fenglin area is also near to a residential district with more freshwater inflow. Additionally, the Jimei Sewage Treatment Plant is located near the Fenglin mangrove area.

    At Fenglin, five mangrove species (Kandelia obovata, Sonneratia caseolaria, S. apetala, Acanthus ilicifolius and Rhizophora stylosa) were planted in April 2004, while at Xiang’an, Kandelia obovata was planted in 2005. Five sampling stations were set in Tong’an Bay, three of them (FL1, FL2 and XA-A) were in the mangrove habitat, and the other two (FL3, XA-B) were in the non-mangrove habitat (Fig.1). All these stations were intertidal, and the three mangrove sampling stations were located on the edge of the shoreline with shorter flooding periods due to higher intertidal elevation, while the other two non-mangrove sampling stations were located between the mangrove forest and the aquacultural mudflat. There is a (Jimei) Sewage Treatment Plant and many living quarters surrounding Fenglin mangrove wetland.

    Fig.1 Meiofaunal sampling stations at the two mangrove wetlands in Tong’an Bay (FL = Fenglin; XA = Xiang’an).

    2.2 Sampling Procedures

    Meiofauna was collected in four surveys in summer (July) 2006, autumn (October) 2007, winter (January) 2007 and spring (April) 2007. At each sampling station during each surveys, four replicate sediment sampling were collected using a 0.05 m2box corer. Undisturbed meiofaunal cores were taken using a cut-off syringe (Ф= 2.9 cm) to 10 cm depth, then divided into three layers, 0-2 cm, 2 - 5 cm, and 5 - 10 cm. Each layer was immediately placed in a 250 mL jar, and fixed in a 5% formalin and seawater solution. Back to the laboratory, samples of meiofauna were sieved using 0.5 mm and 0.042 mm mesh size; material retained on the smaller mesh size was collected. Sorting of meiofauna from the sediment was done using a flotation technique in Ludox HS40 solution (Heipet al., 1985). All meiofaunal individuals were sorted into major groups and counted under a stereoscopic microscope.

    Samples for sediment analysis were also acquired in spring (April) 2007. In order to analyze the total organic matter (TOM) of the sediment, freeze-dried and homogenized sediment was first acidified with 10% HCl overnight to remove carbonate, then dried at 60℃ and analyzed (Hedges and Stren, 1984) using an EA1110 element analyzer (Carlo-Erba Co., Italy). Finally, the result was converted to TOM content. The grain composition in the sediment was analyzed using a Mastersizer 2000 (Malvern Instruments, UK). Mudflat water salinity was determined using a YS130S-C-T meter at each sampling station during the meiobenthic sampling.

    2.3 Data Analysis

    Meiofaunal abundance was expressed as inds·10cm-2and calculated for each mangrove wetland during each season. Univariate two-way ANOVA was used to investigate differences between the regions (Fenglin and Xiang’an), and the seasons (summer, autumn, winter and spring) for meiofaunal abundance, Pearson-Correlation analysis was applied to reveal the correlation between the abundance of total meiofauna and nematodes, with the SPSS V.16 statistical software package. The Tukey HSD multiple comparisons test was used in pair-wise comparisons of samples to explore statistically significant differences of meiofaunal abundance. MDS was carried out to analyze the meiofauna assemblages from the five stations in four seasons with PRIMER 5.0 package, the densities of genera were square root transformed based on the Bray-Curtis similarity measure.

    3 Results

    3.1 The Environmental Factors in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The salinity at the Fenglin was lower than that at the Xiang’an mangrove area. Additionally, the Jimei Sewage Treatment Plant is located near the Fenglin mangrove area. Based on the ‘Evaluation Standard for Sediment Pollutants’ from the ‘Concise Regulations of National Sea Island Resource Comprehensive Survey’, the critical threshold for TOM is 3.4%. Our study showed that TOM values at the three Fenglin sampling stations exceeded the critical threshold, while those of the two Xiang’an sampling stations did not. In addition, the TOM in the mangrove stations was higher than that in the non-mangrove stations (Table 1).

    Table 1 The sediment salinity, median particle diameter and TOM at five stations

    3.2 The Meiofaunal Community in Two Mangrove Wetlands and MDS Analysis of Meiofauna at Five Stations and in Four Seasons

    The annual mean abundance of meiofauna at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 1378.4 ± 1712.2 inds·10 cm-2and 1214.1± 682.8 inds·10 cm-2, respectively. The seasonal variations of meiofaunal abundance at these two mangrove wetlands were not the same. The meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove wetland was the highest in winter, but the meiofaunal abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland was the highest in spring. In summer, autumn and spring, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove were all lower than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. But in winter, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove was the highest among all the stations (Fig.2).

    Two-way ANOVA results showed that the distribution of meiofaunal individuals was significantly influenced by region, season and region×season (Table 2).

    Fig.2 Meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    Table 2 The F and P values between regions and seasons for meiofaunal abundance in Tong’an Bay

    The ordination of samples by MDS analysis showed that the regional and seasonal changes for meiofaunal assemblages were observed in most sampling stations (Fig.3).

    Fig.3 MDS analysis of meiofaunal assemblages based on square root transformed data of numbers of genera from the five stations and four seasons.

    3.3 The Nematode Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The annual average abundance of nematodes at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 1289.7±565.3 inds·10cm-2and 1138.5±346.7 inds·10cm-2, respectively.

    Fig.4 Nematode abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    The seasonal variations of nematode abundance in two mangrove wetlands were not the same. The nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove wetland was the highest in winter, but the nematode abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland was the highest in spring. In summer, autumn and spring, the nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove was all lower than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland. But in winter, the nematode abundance in Fenglin mangrove was higher than that in Xiang’an mangrove wetland (Fig.4).

    Pearson-Correlation analysis showed a very significant positive correlation between the abundance of total meiofauna and nematodes (R=0.988, P<0.01). Two-way ANOVA results showed that there were very significant seasonal variation (ANOVA, F3,68=50.321, P<0.01) and significant temporal variation (ANOVA, F4,68= 2.948, P<0.05) in the density of nematodes. In addition, a significant interaction effect between region×season was detected (ANOVA, F12,68= 15.242, P<0.01) (Table 2).

    3.4 The Benthic Copepod Abundance in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The annual average benthic copepod abundance at Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands were 25.3 ± 9.4 inds·10cm-2and 66.0 ± 7.0 inds·10cm-2, respectively (Fig.5). Pearson-Correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between the abundance of the total meiofauna and the benthic copepod (R = -0.542, P=0.345>0.05). Two-way ANOVA results showed that there was no significant seasonal variation (ANOVA, F3,68=2.490, P>0.05) but there was a significant spatial variation (ANOVA, F4,68= 3.986, P<0.01) in benthic copepod abundance. In addition, no significant interaction effect between region×season was detected (ANOVA, F12,68=0.736, P>0.05) (Table 2).

    Fig.5 Benthic copepod abundance in Fenglin and Xiang’an mangrove wetlands.

    3.5 The Ne/Co Ratio (Nematode to Benthic Copepod) in Two Mangrove Wetlands

    The seasonal mean Ne/Co ratio in the present study ranged from 9.00 to 154.13. Fenglin mangrove generally showed the higher values of the Ne/Co ratio, with the only exception of the summer. It is interesting that the Ne/Co ratio is higher than 100 in the winter and spring at Fenglin.

    Table 3 Ratio of nematodes to benthic copepods (Ne/Co)

    4 Discussion

    In general, meiobenthic abundance may be impacted by several factors, such as salinity, sediment particle size, organic matter content, chlorophyll content, water temperature, water depth, and self-propagation (Danovaroand Fabiano, 1995; Mirto et al., 2000; Liu, 2005; Khan et al., 2012). Organic pollution may significantly affect the meiofaunal community (Carman et al., 1997; Cai et al., 2000; Guo, 2008). In present study, the meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove in summer, autumn and spring was all lower than those in Xiang’an mangrove wetland in the same season. The factor affecting the distribution of meiofauna in present study may relate to organic matter content. By adding extra organic matter to the mud from estuary, Schratzberger and Warwick (1998a) found that low organic matter inflow did not affect the marine nematode abundance, while medium and high amount of organic matter inflow made the abundance of marine nematodes drastically reduced. This phenomenon is not only found at mangrove wetland, but also found in intertidal zone and subtidal zone. The persistently high sediment nutrient levels might limit the colonization of meiofauna leading to lower abundance (Liu et al., 2011). Also, a higher density of nematodes has been found in sediments of sandy nature, whereas there is lower total organic carbon compared to silt/clay composition (Ansari et al., 2014).

    Vanhove (1992) compared meiofauna of five mangrove vegetation types in Gazi Bay and concluded that particle size and oxygen conditions are major factors influencing meiobenthic distribution. Lower meiofaunal abundance in Fenglin mangrove in three seasons compared to Xiang’an mangrove wetland might also relate to different sand contents. Raffaelli (1987) pointed out that nematodes could be expected to increase in abundance in both coarse and fine sediment habitats. The sediment in Xiang’an mangrove wetland is finer than in Fenglin mangrove wetland (Table 1), which might help to increase the nematodes abundance in Xiang’an mangrove wetland.

    But in winter, meiofauna abundance in Fenglin mangrove bloomed and reached the peak in the year. As nematode is the most dominant meiofaunal group in the present study, the change of nematode abundance has the most important effect on total meiofaunal structure. Nematodes have been suggested to become opportunistic species because of their potential rapid reproduction which allows them to dominate the initial stages of faunal succession after a disturbance or adverse condition (Schratzberger and Warwick, 1998b). In general, recolonization of populations of smaller and short-lived organisms is expected to be more rapid than longer lived species (Driskell et al., 1996). As Schratzberger and Warwick (1998b) pointed out, medium frequency of disturbance help marine nematodes reach high abundance, and low frequency and high frequency disturbance results in the decrease of abundance. Following an adverse condition for most invertebrate in winter, nematodes in Fenglin mangrove wetland got medium disturbance and became dominated. Therefore, nematode communities have increasingly been used to assess the effects of environmental perturbations (Gyedu-Ababio et al., 1999; Dye, 2006), even used as indicators of pollution (Moore and Bett, 1989; Essink and Keidel, 1998; Boyd et al., 2000; Moreno, 2011).

    The state of meiofaunal assemblages may better reflect the overall health of the marine benthos, especially for detecting early response to environmental changes (Kennedy and Jacoby, 1999). Different sediment qualities will result in different meiobenthic community composition and different meiobenthic abundance. Whether considering numbers or biomass, benthic copepods is the second commonest dominant group in the meiobenthic community in present study. Compared to some nematodes that are used as indicator species for organic pollution, benthic copepod is more sensitive to environmental pollution than other meiofaunal group (Findlay, 1981; Raffaelli and Mason, 1981; Semprucci et al., 2010; Frontalini et al., 2011). Also, much research has focused on whether the ratio of nematode density to copepod density (the N/C or R ratio) can be an index to the organic pollution status. Raffaelli and Mason (1981) and Warwick (1981) believed that the R ratio can be such an index, but the range of R ratio which indicates the pollution status is still controversial. Anyway, the accuracy and applicability of the Nematode/Copepod index (N/C) in monitoring the effects of environmental disturbances is controversial (Sun et al., 2014).

    Benthic copepod abundance in Xiang’an were higher than those in Fenglin mangrove wetland all the four seasons. Higher abundance of benthic copepod and lower N/C value in Xiang’an mangrove in the present study, corresponded with the sediment characteristics, especially with the organic matter. With all the results in the present study, we confirmed the positive response of meiofaunal and nematode abundance to medium organic matter contents (organic matter contents in Xiang’an area was medium, while in Fenglin, the organic matter contents were considered to be high), and showed that the distribution of meiofaunal abundance would be influenced by sand content. Higher copepod abundance and lower R/C value usually suggest better environmental quality.

    Acknowledgements

    The present project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41176089), and also supported by WEL (abbreviation of Key Laboratory of the Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems, Ministry of Education) Visiting Fellowship Program from Xiamen University. The authors would like to thank the staff and students in the benthic ecology laboratory in Xiamen University for their assistance in the field work and for their help with sampling procedures.

    Ansari, K. G. M. T., Manokaran, S., Raja, S., Lyla, P. S., and Khan, S. A., 2014. Interaction of free-living marine nematodes in the artificial mangrove environment (southeast coast of India). Environmental Monitoring and Assessmen, 186 (1): 293-305.

    Boyd, S. E., Rees, H. L., and Richardson, C. A., 2000. Nematodes as sensitive indicators of change at dreged materialdisposal sites. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 51: 805-819.

    Balsamo, M., Albertelli, G., Ceccherelli, V. U., Coccioni, R., Colangelo, M. A., Curini-Galletti, M., Danovaro, R., D’Addabbof, R., De Leonardisf, C., Fabianob, M., Frontalinia, F., Gallof, M., Gambie, C., Guidia, L., Morenob, M., Pusceddue, A., Sandullig, R., Sempruccia, F., Todaroh, M. A., and Tongiorgih, P., 2010. Meiofauna of the Adriatic Sea: Current state of knowledge and future perspectives. Chemistry and Ecology, 26 (1): 45- 63.

    Cai, L. Z, Li, H. M., and Zou, C. Z., 2000. Species composition and seasonal variation of marine nematodes on Futian mudflat in Shenzhen estuary. Chinese Biodiversity, 8 (4): 385-390 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Carman, K. R., Fleeger, J. W., and Pomarico, S. M., 1997. Response of a benthic food web to hydrocarbon contamination. Limnology and Oceanography, 42: 561-571.

    Chapman, M. G., and Tolhurst, T. J., 2007. Relationships between benthic macrofauna and biogeochemical properties of sediments at different spatial scales and among different habitats in mangrove forests. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 343: 96-109.

    Chinnadurai, G., and Fernando, O. J., 2007. Meiofauna of mangroves of the southeast coast of India with special reference to the free-living marine nematode assemblage. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 72: 329-336.

    Coull, B. C., and Chandler, G. T., 1992. Pollution and meiofauna- field, laboratory, and mesocosm studies. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 30: 191-271.

    Danovaro, R., and Fabiano, M., 1995. Meiofaunal abundance and distribution in bathyal sediments of the Mediterranean Sea: An overview. Biologia Marina Mediterranea, 2: 217-225.

    Driskell, W. B., Fukuyama, A. K., Houghton, J. P., Lees, D. C., Mearns, A. J., and Shigenaka, G., 1996. Recovery of Prince William Sound intertidal infauna from Exxon Valdez oiling and shoreline treatments, 1989 through 1992. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 18: 362-378.

    Dye, A. H., 2006. Persistent effects of physical disturbance on meiofauna in mangrove sediments. Marine Environmental Research, 62: 341-355.

    Dye, A. H., 1983. Composition and seasonal fluctuations of meiofauna in a southern African mangrove estuary. Marine Biology, 73: 165-170.

    Essink, K., and Keidel, H., 1998. Changes in estuarine nematodes communities following a decrease of organic pollution. Aquatic Ecology, 32: 195-202.

    Erséus, C., 2002. Mangroves and marine oligochaete diversity. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 10: 197-202.

    Findlay, S. E. G., 1981. Small scale spatial distributions of meiofauna on a mud and sandflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 12: 471-484.

    Frontalini, F., Semprucci, F., Coccioni, R., Balsamo, M., Bittoni, P., and Covazzi-Harriague, A., 2011. On the quantitative distribution and community structure of the meio and macrofaunal communities in the coastal area of the Central Adriatic Sea (Italy). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 180: 325-344.

    Gallucci, F., Steyaert, M., and Moens, T., 2005. Can field distributions of marine predacious nematodes be explained by sediment constraints on their foraging success? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 304: 167-178.

    Gunasekaran, C., and Olivia, J. F., 2007. Meiofauna of mangroves of the southeast coast of India with special reference to the free-living marine nematode assemblage. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 72: 329-336.

    Guo, Y. Q., 2008. The study on the community of free-living marine nematodes in Fenglin mangrove wetlands, Xiamen, China. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 30 (4): 147-153 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Gwyther, J., 2000. Meiofauna in phytal-based and sedimentary habitats of a temperate mangrove ecosystem - A preliminary survey. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 112 (2): 137-151.

    Gwyther, J., and Peter, G. F., 2005. Meiofaunal recruitment to mimic pneumatophores in a cool-temperate mangrove forest: Spatial context and biofilm effects. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 317: 69-85.

    Gyedu-Ababio, T. K., Furstenberg, J. P., Baird, D., and Vanreusel, A., 1999. Nematodes as indicators of pollution: A case study from the Swartkops River system, South Africa. Hydrobiologia, 397: 155-169.

    Heip, C., Vincxm, M., and Vranken, G., 1985. The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 21: 67-175.

    Hedges, J. I., and Stren, J. H., 1984. Carbon and nitrogen determinations of carbonate-containing solids. Limnology and Oceanography, 29: 657-663.

    Hicks, G. R. F., and Coull, B. C., 1983. The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 21: 67-175.

    Kairo, J. G., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Bosire, J., and Koedam, N., 2001. Restoration and management of mangrove systems – A lesson for and from the East African region. South African Journal of Botany, 67: 383-389.

    Kennedy, A. D., and Jacoby, C. A., 1999. Biological indicators of marine environmental health: meiofauna – A neglected benthic component? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 54: 47-68.

    Khan, S. A., S., Ansari, K. G. M. T., and Lyla, P. S., 2012. Organic matter content of sediments in continental shelf area of southeast coast of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184: 7247-7256.

    Levings, S. C., Garrity, S. D., and Burns, K. A., 1994. The Galeta oil spill. III. Chronic recoiling, long-term toxicity of hydrocarbon residues and effects on epibiota in the mangrove fringe. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 38: 365-395.

    Liu, X. S., Zhang, Z. N., and Huang, Y., 2005. Abundance and biomass of meiofauna in the spawning ground of anchovy (Engraulis japanicus) in the southern Huanghai Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 24 (3): 94-104.

    Liu, X. S., Xu, W., Cheung, S. G., and Shin, K. S., 2011. Marine meiobenthic and nematode community structure in Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong upon recovery from sewage pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 63: 318-325.

    Mirto, S., La Rosa, T., Danovaro, R., and Mazzola, A., 2000. Microbial and meiofaunal response to intensive mussel-farm biodeposition in coastal sediments of the western Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40 (3): 244-252.

    Moore, C. G., and Bett, B. J., 1989. The use of meiofauna in marine pollution impact assessment. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 96: 263-280.

    Moens, T., Santos, G. A. P., Thompson, F., Swings, J., Fonsêca-Genevois, V., Vincx, M., and Mesel, I. D., 2005. Do nematode mucus secretions affect bacterial growth? Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 40: 77-83

    Moreno, M., Semprucci, F., Vezzulli, L., Balsamo, M., Fabiano, M., and Albertelli, G., 2011. The use of nematodes in assess-ing ecological quality status in the Mediterranean coastal ecosystems. Ecological Indicators, 11: 328-336.

    Olafsson, E., Carlstrom, S., and Ndaro, S. G. M., 2000. Meiobenthos of hypersaline tropical mangrove sediment in relation to spring tide inundation. Hydrobiologia, 426: 57-64.

    Pinto, T. K., Austen, M. C. V., Warwick, R. M., Somerfield, P. J., Esteves, A. M., Castro, F. J. V., Fonseca-Genevois, V. G., and Santos, P. J. P., 2013. Nematode diversity in different microhabitats in a mangrove region. Marine Ecology - An Evolutionary Perspective, 34 (3): 257-268.

    Pusceddu, A., Gambi, C., Corinaldesi, C., Scopa, M., and Danovaro, R., 2014. Relationships between meiofaunal miodiversity and prokaryotic heterotrophic production in different tropical habitats and oceanic regions. PLoS ONE 9 (3): e91056, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091056.

    Raffaelli, D. G., and Mason, C. F., 1981. Pollution monitoring with meiofauna: using the ratio of nematodes to copepods. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 12 (5): 158-163.

    Rasolofo, M. V., 1997. Use of mangroves by traditional fishermen in Madagascar. Mangroves and Salt Marshes, 1: 243-253.

    Saenger, P., 2003. Mangrove Ecology, Silviculture and Conservation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1-372.

    Schratzberger, M., and Warwick, R. M., 1998a. Effects of physical disturbance on nematode communities in sand and mud: A microcosm experiment. Marine Biology, 130 (4): 643- 650.

    Schratzberger, M., and Warwick, R. M., 1998b. Effects of the intensity and frequency of organic enrichment on two estuarine nematode communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 164: 83-94

    Semprucci, F., Boi, P., Manti, A., Covazzi, H. A., Rocchi, M., Colantoni, P., Papa, S., and Balsamo, M., 2010. Benthic communities along a littoral of the Central Adriatic Sea (Italy). Helgoland Marine Research, 64 (2): 101-115.

    Shah, D. G., Bahuguna, A., Deshmukh, B., Nayak, S. R., Singh, H. S., and Patel, B. H., 2005. Zoning and monitoring dominant mangrove communities of a part of the Marine National Park, Gulf of Kachch. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33 (1): 155-164.

    Sun, X. Y., Zhou, H., Hua, E., Xu, S. H., Cong, B. Q., and Zhang, Z. N., 2014. Meiofauna and its sedimentary environment as an integrated indication of anthropogenic disturbance to sandy beach ecosystems. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 88: 260-267.

    Torres-Pratts, H., and Schizas, N. V., 2007. Meiofaunal colonization of decaying leaves of the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle, in southwestern Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science, 43 (1): 127-137.

    Vanhove, S., Vincx, M., Van Gansbeke, D., Gijselinck, W., and Schram, D., 1992. The meiofauna of five mangrove vegetation types in Gazi Bay, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 80 (247): 99-108.

    Warwick, R. M., 1981. The Nematode/copepod ratio and its use in pollution ecology. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 12: 329-333.

    Xuan, Q. N., Vanreusel, A., Thanh, N. V., and Smol, N., 2007. Biodiversity of meiofauna in the intertidal Khe Nhan mudflat, Can Gio mangrove forest, Vietnam with special emphasis on free living nematodes. Ocean Science Journal, 42 (3): 135-152.

    Zhang, Z. N., and Zhou, H., 2004. Some progress on the study of meiofauna. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 34 (5): 799-806 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhan, L. Y., Zheng, A. R., and Chen, Z. F., 2003. Estimation of carrying capacity of the oyster in Xiamen Tong’an Bay. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science), 5: 644-647 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhou, H., 2001. Effects of leaf litter addition on meiofaunal colonization of azoic sediments in a subtropical mangrove in Hong Kong. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 256: 99-121.

    (Edited by Ji Dechun)

    (Received April 8, 2014; revised February 12, 2015; accepted March 8, 2015)

    J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research)

    DOI 10.1007/s11802-015-2642-9

    ISSN 1672-5182, 2015 14 (5): 816-822

    http://www.ouc.edu.cn/xbywb/

    E-mail:xbywb@ouc.edu.cn

    * Corresponding author. E-mail: cailizhe@xmu.edu.cn

    成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲五月天丁香| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 91在线观看av| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 又大又爽又粗| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 超碰成人久久| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 香蕉国产在线看| 伦理电影免费视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| www.www免费av| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 曰老女人黄片| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| svipshipincom国产片| www日本在线高清视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产成人av教育| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产99白浆流出| 免费av毛片视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| www.精华液| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久亚洲真实| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 少妇的丰满在线观看| av电影中文网址| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 香蕉丝袜av| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲精品一二三| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜福利,免费看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 丁香欧美五月| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 中文字幕色久视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| av福利片在线| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲 国产 在线| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日本a在线网址| 高清av免费在线| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 免费高清视频大片| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲国产看品久久| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 精品人妻1区二区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| av网站在线播放免费| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 日韩高清综合在线| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 免费看a级黄色片| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 黄色成人免费大全| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产亚洲欧美98| 9热在线视频观看99| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产av在哪里看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲全国av大片| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 免费高清在线观看日韩| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 日本五十路高清| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 黄色女人牲交| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 久久久国产成人免费| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 咕卡用的链子| 黄色视频不卡| 高清在线国产一区| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 国产片内射在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 久久精品成人免费网站| 91在线观看av| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 97碰自拍视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| av天堂在线播放| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 9191精品国产免费久久| 深夜精品福利| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久久影院123| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| av视频免费观看在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 黄色 视频免费看| 一夜夜www| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 91老司机精品| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产av在哪里看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 色综合婷婷激情| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久99一区二区三区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久热这里只有精品99| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 999久久久国产精品视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 超碰成人久久| 免费观看人在逋| 99国产精品99久久久久| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 免费不卡黄色视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| netflix在线观看网站| 天堂√8在线中文| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产不卡一卡二| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 日韩欧美免费精品| 日日夜夜操网爽| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲国产看品久久| 高清av免费在线| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 一区在线观看完整版| av电影中文网址| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 天天影视国产精品| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 日本五十路高清| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲人成电影观看| 91在线观看av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产三级在线视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 久久热在线av| 亚洲av美国av| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 精品第一国产精品| 99热只有精品国产| 看免费av毛片| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| www.999成人在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 久久香蕉国产精品| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 热re99久久国产66热| 十八禁网站免费在线| 91老司机精品| 国产精品九九99| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 麻豆av在线久日| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 91国产中文字幕| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产精品二区激情视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 日本三级黄在线观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日本a在线网址| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| www国产在线视频色| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 亚洲黑人精品在线| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 91精品三级在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 男人操女人黄网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 99久久人妻综合| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| avwww免费| 成人影院久久| 天堂√8在线中文| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 免费在线观看日本一区| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 免费av中文字幕在线| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 超色免费av| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 性少妇av在线| 一a级毛片在线观看| 久久影院123| 国产三级黄色录像| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 91麻豆av在线| 久久中文看片网| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 精品久久久久久电影网| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 天天添夜夜摸| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 色av中文字幕| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 在线播放无遮挡| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 深夜a级毛片| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩有码中文字幕| 永久网站在线| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久人妻av系列| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲国产色片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 久久香蕉精品热| 一级黄片播放器| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 怎么达到女性高潮| 69人妻影院| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 成年免费大片在线观看| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产三级黄色录像| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| av欧美777| 怎么达到女性高潮| av视频在线观看入口| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产乱人视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产综合懂色| 九色成人免费人妻av| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 日韩有码中文字幕| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 精品日产1卡2卡| 久久中文看片网| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久6这里有精品| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产成人a区在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 99国产精品一区二区三区| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产熟女xx| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 色播亚洲综合网| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂|