• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    In fl uenceofFutureTropicalCycloneTrackChangesonTheirBasin-WideIntensity over the Western North Paci fi c:Downscaled CMIP5 Projections

    2015-02-24 06:21:36WANGChaoandWULiguang
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2015年5期

    WANG Chao and WU Liguang

    Earth System Modeling Center and Paci fi c Typhoon Research Center,Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of the Ministry of Education,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing210044

    In fl uenceofFutureTropicalCycloneTrackChangesonTheirBasin-WideIntensity over the Western North Paci fi c:Downscaled CMIP5 Projections

    WANG Chao and WU Liguang?

    Earth System Modeling Center and Paci fi c Typhoon Research Center,Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of the Ministry of Education,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing210044

    The possible changes of tropical cyclone(TC)tracks and their in fl uence on the future basin-wide intensity of TCs over the western North Paci fi c(WNP)are examined based on the projected large-scale environments derived from a selection of CMIP5(Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5)models.Speci fi c attention is paid to the performance of the CMIP5 climate models in simulating the large-scale environment for TC development over the WNP.A downscaling system including individual models for simulating the TC track and intensity is used to select the CMIP5 models and to simulate the TC activity in the future.

    tropical cyclone track and intensity,climate change,downscaling,CMIP5

    1. Introduction

    Tropical cyclones(TCs)account for the majority of loss of life and property induced by natural disasters,especially in the western North Paci fi c(WNP),which is the most active basin of TCs on Earth(Zhang et al.,2009).Thus,it is very important to know how TC activity responds to global climate change.Emanuel(1987)suggested that the maximum intensity of TCs would increase under a warmer climate.On the other hand,Wu and Wang(2008)found that the changes in TC genesis location and prevailing tracks are closely associated with increases in the percentage of intense TCs,suggesting that shifts in TC prevailing tracks play an important role in changes of basin-wide TC intensity. Kossin and Camargo(2009)demonstrated the importance of TC track change in recent increases in Atlantic TC activity,and suggested that track changes may offset the effect

    ?Corresponding author:WU Liguang

    Email:liguang@nuist.edu.cn of increasing maximum potential intensity(MPI).Wing et al.(2007)found that changes in tracks play an importance role in intensity changes on the interannual time scale.Studies have shown that climate change will likely alter the TC tracks over the WNP(e.g.,Wu and Wang,2004;Wu et al., 2005;Li et al.,2010;Murakami et al.,2011).Considering the in fl uence of changes in TC tracks on basin-wide intensity(Wing et al.,2007;Wu and Wang,2008;Kossin and Camargo,2009),it is necessary to assess its contribution to TC intensity.

    Despite signi fi cant improvements in climate models,considerable biases in the simulated large-scale environment exist in current climate models(IPCC,2007;Reichler and Kim, 2008;Knutson et al.,2013).It is clear that the reliability of the large-scale environment for TC activity simulated by each global climate model should be evaluated when the future changes of TC activity are assessed.Thus far,few studies have paid attention to evaluating the capability of CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5)models in terms of the simulated large-scale environment important toTC activity(Knutson et al.,2007,2008;Emanuel et al.,2008; Benderetal.,2010;Emanuel,2013).Giventhedominantrole of the large-scale environment on TC activity(Gray,1968),it is clear that the selection of climate models is very important when downscaling TC activity with the climate model output. Recently,Knutson et al.(2013)demonstrated a large spread exists among individual models in their future projection experiment results.In a previous paper,Wang and Wu(2012) explored this issue using a theoretical dynamic downscaling system and suggested that large differences exist in the simulated large-scale conditions important for TC development.

    In the above context,the primary objective of this study is to address the role of future TC track changes in TC intensity change using the model outputs from CMIP5(Taylor et al., 2012).

    2. Data and methods

    2.1.Data

    WuandZhao(2012)indicatedthattheintensityrecordsin the Joint Typhoon Warning Center(JTWC)best-track dataset are more reliable than those from the Shanghai Typhoon Institute(STI)of theChinaMeteorological Administration,and the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center(RSMC)of Tokyo.For this reason,The JTWC best-track dataset for the period 1975–2005 is used to represent the observed TC activity.In this study,TCs refer to those in the JTWC dataset with at least tropical storm intensity(maximum wind speed exceeding 17.2 m s-1),and our analysis is focused on the typhoon peak season(July–September).Monthly sea surface temperature(SST)from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA)(ERSSTV3b;Smith et al.,2008)is used in this study.Monthly atmospheric data are from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research(NCEP–NCAR) reanalysis(Kalnay et al.,1996)dataset.

    The output of the global climate simulations is from the CMIP5 multi-model dataset.In this study,the monthly data of two experiments[the historical experiment and Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5(RCP4.5)experiment]are used for each model.The historical experiment is forced by observed conditions,which include changes in atmospheric composition,solarforcing,naturaloranthropogenicaerosols, and so on.The radiative forcing in RCP4.5 experiment stabilizes at 4.5 W m-2in 2100(Taylor et al.,2012).To evaluate the performance of GCMs in their historical experiments against the reanalysis,all of the datasets are interpolated into 2.5°×2.5°grids.

    2.2.Downscaling technique

    A downscaling technique has developed over the past 15 years or so that involves embedding a high-resolution regional model in the atmosphere–ocean conditions derived from low-resolution global climate model output to study future intensity change(e.g.,Knutson et al.,1998;Knutson and Tuleya,2004;Knutson et al.,2007,2008;Bender et al.,2010; Knutson et al.,2013).Currently,two speci fi c approaches are used within this downscaling technique.One is to run a high-resolution regional model or hurricane model driven by large-scale conditions from climate models,and the TC climatology is determined by the activity of TC-like vortices simulated in the regional climate or hurricane model(Knutson et al.,2007,2008;Bender et al.,2010,Knutson et al., 2013).The other is the theoretical dynamic system proposed by Emanuel et al.(2008).This system simulates TC activity by integrating the genesis,track and intensity models,forced by the large-scale conditions from reanalysis data or outputs from climate model simulations.Emanuel et al.(2008)applied this approach to simulate the global TC activities in the period 1980–2005 and assess the impact of climate change on TC climatology.The approach provides us with an ef fi cient tool for assessing the impact of climate change on TC activity,enablingevaluationsofthereliabilityofclimatemodelsin terms of the large-scale conditions for TC activity,and examinations of the contributions of each change in the large-scale conditions(Wang and Wu,2012).Thus,the second approach is adopted in this study to investigate the roles of TC track changes in future TC intensity.

    A similar downscaling approach to that described by Emanuel(2006)and Emanuel et al.(2008)is used in this study,and the TC characteristics are determined by the outputs of genesis,track and intensity models.Nevertheless,we use the TC genesis distribution derived from the JTWC besttrack dataset in this study owing to the poor understanding of how such a distribution would change in a warmer climate (Emanuel,2006;Knutson et al.,2010),especially in individual basins.The track model in the downscaling approach is adopted from Wu and Wang(2004).In this model,a TC is treated as a rigid body,and moves with the translation vector determined by the sum of mean beta drift and large-scale steering fl ow(pressure-weighted average wind from 850 to 300 hPa).Furthermore,random synoptic-scale disturbances are put into the translation vectors to take into account the possible effect of synoptic-scale weather systems on TC motion.The integration of the track model stops while the simulated TC location is out of the simulation domain(0°–40°N, 100°–180°E).The TC intensity model is an axisymmetric atmospheric model adopted from Emanuel et al.(2008).In this downscaling system,TC tracks are simulated by the track model with the genesis location and translation vectors,while the intensity evolution of TCs is calculated by the intensity model along the simulated tracks with the surrounding largescale conditions(SST and vertical wind shear).The vertical wind shear is de fi ned as the magnitude of the vector difference between monthly mean wind speeds at 850 hPa and 200 hPa.Further information about this technique can be found in Wang and Wu(2012).

    3. Veri fi cation of the downscaling technique

    The downscaling technique shows appreciable skill in reproducing the observed distributions of TC intensity andtracks(Wang and Wu,2012).To verify the downscaling technique,we fi rst compare the observed and simulated TC track and intensity climatology.With the observed TC formation locations from JTWC,vertical wind shear,large-scale steering fl ows from NCEP–NCAR,and SST from NOAA,the track and intensity models are integrated to simulate the climatology of TC activity during the period 1975–2005.Note that the simulated TC track and intensity are independent of the observations from JTWC.

    The observed and simulated TC tracks in the peak season are fi rstcompared(Fig.1).Inordertoquantifythemodelbias in the track simulation,as de fi ned in Wu and Wang(2004), the frequency of TC occurrence is calculated by counting the frequency of TCs entering each 2.5°latitude by 2.5°longitude grid box at 6-h intervals.This indicates the spatial pattern of TC tracks and estimates how frequently a region is in fl uenced by TCs.It can be seen that the simulation reasonably reproduces the observed track climatology.The model slightly overestimates the frequency of occurrence over the ocean to the southeast of Japan and in the South China Sea (Fig.2c),while the frequency of TCs affecting the East China Sea is underestimated.The discrepancies may result from the simpli fi cation of the TC steering fl ow by using monthly wind fi elds in the track model and/or the highly simpli fi ed track model.

    The comparison between the observed and simulated spatial distribution of TC intensity is shown in Fig.3.The TC intensity is de fi ned as the mean surface wind speeds of those TCs that enter a grid box of 2.5°latitude by 2.5°longitude. As shown in Fig.3,the overall spatial pattern of observed TC intensity,including the strong intensity band to the east of Taiwan,is reasonably well reproduced by the downscaling technique,although an overestimation of TC intensity exists in the midlatitude area(Fig.3c).There are two possible sources of this discrepancy:one is owing to the absence of the extratropical transition and terrain effect in the downscalingsystem,andtheothercomesfrom thepossibleuncertainty in the TC intensity of the JTWC dataset(Kossin et al.,2007, 2013).

    Following Wang and Wu(2012),the annual frequency of intense TCs(categories 4 and 5)and the lifetime maximum intensity are used to examine the possible in fl uences of climate change on the basin-wide TC intensity.This is based on the indication by Wu and Zhao(2012)that these two metricsaremoresensitivetothelarge-scaleenvironmentchanges than the basin-wide average intensity(Wu et al.,2008).The annual lifetime maximum intensity is calculated by averaging the lifetime maximum intensity of individual TCs in each year(Wu,2007).Figure 4 displays the differences between the observed and simulated time series of the annual basinwide lifetime maximum intensity and the frequency of intense TCs.As can be seen,the evolution of the basin-wide TCintensityfrom1975to2005isalsofairlywellreproduced. The temporal correlation coef fi cients between the simulation and observation are 0.77 for the basin-wide lifetime maximum intensity,and 0.69 for the annual frequency of intense TCs,signi fi cant at the 95%level.In summary,the downscaling technique driven by the large-scale environment from NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data can reasonably reproduce TC track and intensity features over the WNP.

    4. Selection of CMIP5 models

    To evaluate the performance of CMIP5 climate models, we integrate the downscaling system driven by the largescale environments(steering fl ows,vertical wind shear and SST)in their historical runs for the peak season during 1975–2005.The reliability of the CMIP5 climate models in simulating large-scale conditions for TC development is assessed by comparing the derived spatial distribution of the frequency of TC occurrence and TC intensity against the observation. Following Lee and Wang(2012),we calculate the normalized root-mean-square error(NRMSE)and pattern correlation coef fi cient(PCC)between the observation and simulation for each climate model over the WNP.The NRMSE is the root-mean-square error divided by the observed standard deviation.A higher PCC and smaller NRMSE imply that the simulation is closer to the observation.

    Figure 5 shows the calculated PCCs and NRMSEs of the individual CMIP5 models for the frequency of TC occurrence(Fig.5a)and TC intensity(Fig.5b).The average PCC (NRMSE)for frequency of occurrence is 0.75(0.76),and the average PCC(NRMSE)for TC intensity is 0.64(1.17).As shown in the fi gure,there is considerable inter-model spread in PCC and NRMSE.Considering both the skill of individual climate models and the sample size,the outputs from 11 CMIP5 models are selected(Table 1).Their RMSEs for frequency of TC occurrence(TC intensity)are less than 0.79 (1.21),while their PCCs for frequency of TC occurrence (TC intensity)are greater than 0.73(0.66).Since the projected large-scale fi elds are not available for GFDL-CM2.1 and CMCC-CM,our projections are based on a fi nal selection of nine CMIP5 models.

    5. Projected changes in TC track and intensity

    Compared to 1975–2005,the mean SST increase projected in the nine selected models is 0.6 K during 2010–29, 1.1 K during 2030–69 and 1.4 K during 2070–99 in the WNP basin.A control run is fi rst performed with the large-scale conditions during 1975–2005 from the historical experiments of the selected climate models,followed by three projection runs with the mean large-scale conditions during 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99.In each month,all of the formation locations that occurred in the corresponding month during 1975–2005 are used in the simulation.

    Table 1.Description of the selected CMIP5 models.

    5.1.Track changes

    Figures 6a–c show the projected changes in the largescale steering fl ow and the corresponding frequency of TC occurrence.Three climatological TC prevailing tracks are also plotted in this fi gure(Wu et al.,2005).A salient feature in the steering fl ow changes is an anomalous cyclonic circulation centered over the Taiwan Strait during the periods 2010–39 and 2040–69,and over Hainan Island during the period 2070–99.In response to the steering fl ow change,the common features for the three periods include decreasing TC activity in the South China Sea due to the enhanced westerly steering,and increasing TC activity in the East China Sea and northern part of Japan due to changes of the two prevailing tracks over the WNP.Since the annual TC counts are held fi xed,the decreasing TC in fl uence over the South China Sea suggests an increase in TCs that take a northwestward track.Note that the projected track changes are similar to the ensemble projection of fi ve selected CMIP3 climate models under the A1B scenario(Wang et al.,2011).This is also consistent with previous observational analysis.Using the JTWC best-track dataset,Wu et al.(2005)found that the number of TCs affecting subtropical East Asia increased signi fi cantly during 1965–2003,while the South China Sea experienced decreasing typhoon in fl uence.Recently,Tu et al. (2009)found that the in fl uence of typhoons in the vicinity of Taiwan shows an abrupt increase after 2000.It is suggested that the observed track change will generally continue to the end of this century.

    5.2.Intensity changes

    Figures 7a and b show the percentage change in the lifetime maximum intensity and the frequency of intense TCs projected by each selected model for the three periods.The lifetime maximum intensity increases by 2.5%,6.2%and 8.2%as the mean SST increases by 0.6 K,1.1 K and 1.4 K in the periods 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99,respectively(Fig.7a).In agreement with the increased lifetime maximum intensity,the number of intense TCs tends to increase under global warming(Fig.7b).On average,the projected increases are 7.5%,18.4%and 24.8%during the periods 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99,respectively.The increases in the lifetime maximum intensity and the number of intense TCs are qualitatively in accordance with results derived from relatively high-resolution modeling and MPI theory(Emanuel,1987;Knutson and Tuleya,2004;Knutson et al.,2008;Emanuel et al.,2008,Knutson et al.,2010;Bender et al.,2010;Knutson et al.,2013;Emanuel,2013).

    5.3.Contributions of track change

    As described in Wang and Wu(2012),the individual contributions of changes in TC prevailing track,SST and vertical shear to the intensity increase can be quantitatively examined by using a downscaling system.To examine the contribution of individual parameters,we can fi x the other two parameters at their levels in the historical experiments,and only allow the target parameter to change in the 21st century.Although the combined effect of the individual parameters is not linear,it enables us to understand to what extent changes in TC prevailing tracks,SST and vertical wind shear can affect TC intensity changes(Fig.8).

    As shown in Fig.8a,although its relative contributions are different in each model,the warming SST tends to intensify TCs in all of the selected GCMs during all three periods,which agrees with MPI theory(Emanuel,1987;Holland,1983).On average,increases of lifetime maximum intensity forced by SST are 3.5%,6.3%and 8.5%during the periods 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99,respectively.These changes are close to the changes with all parameters considered,suggesting that SST increase is the dominant factor causing increases in lifetime maximum intensity.On average,the changes in lifetime maximum intensity induced by the change of vertical shear(TC track)are-0.4%(-1.1%),-0.7%(-0.7%)and-0.5%(-0.9%)during the three periods,respectively.

    The joint in fl uence of changes in prevailing track and vertical shear on intensity change is negative,accounting on averagefor43%,22%and16.5%ofthein fl uenceofSSTwarming in the three periods,respectively.Obviously,the percentage contribution of change in prevailing track and vertical shear to TC intensity decreases as SST gets warmer.The changes in vertical wind shear and prevailing track could signi fi cantly in fl uence TC intensity in some models.For example,the composite effect of prevailing track and vertical shear change accounts for half of the increase in lifetime maximum intensity in the MPI-ESM-LR model during 2010–39,which is comparable to that of SST change.

    The SST warming also acts as a predominant factor in the change of the number of intense TCs(Fig.8b).The SST-forced increases in the number of intense TCs are 12%, 18.8%and 25.8%during the periods 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99,respectively.In agreement with the lifetime maximum intensity,changes in prevailing track and vertical shear generally tend to reduce the number of intense TCs.The changes in the number of intense TCs induced by vertical wind shear(prevailing track)are-2.1%(-3.3%),-2.6% (-1.6%)and-1.4%(-3.4%)during the three periods.The combined negative contribution of change in prevailing track and vertical wind shear is on average about 45%,23%and 17.4%of the contribution from SST warming in the three periods,respectively.The large contribution from changes in vertical wind shear and prevailing track suggests that those changes should be taken into account when assessing the impact of climate change on TC intensity.For instance,the majority of the positive contribution of SST warming to the change in frequency of intense TCs is offset by the combined negative contribution from the change in track and vertical shear in the CCSM4 model during 2079–99.In particular, the individual contribution from the prevailing track change in the GFDL-ESM2M model can reduce the number of intense TCs by 16.3%,which is slightly greater than the in-crease(15.6%)due to SST warming during the fi rst period. On average,the mean vertical wind shear over the area(5°–20°N,115°–150°E)increases by 0.34,0.37 and 0.03 m s-1during 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99,respectively,under the RCP4.5 scenario.Such increases in vertical wind shear are unfavorable to TC intensi fi cation,leading to the decreasing TC intensity.As shown in Fig.6,TC in fl uence in the South China Sea tends to decrease,and an increasing number of TCs take a northwestward track under a warmer climate.Considering the meridional SST gradient,the changes in prevailing tracks suggest that an increasing number of TCs wouldremainforlesstimeoverthetropicaloceanwithhigher SST.

    6. Sensitivity to model selection

    In this study,we emphasize the evaluation and choice of the CMIP5 climate models appropriate for assessing the future change in TC activity.To demonstrate the importance, we examine the projected TC activity from the six climate models used in Emanuel(2013)(Table 2).Except for the CCSM4 model,the other fi ve models in this table are not selected based on our criteria.It is shown that there are considerable differences in the projected change in TC track and intensity.

    Figures 6d–f show the projected changes in the largescale steering fl ow and frequency of TC occurrence during the periods 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99.It is of interest to note that an anomalous cyclonic steering fl ow is also projected in these models,but the circulation center is slightly different from that in Figs.6a–c.The center is around Hainan Island during the three periods.Instead of decreasing TC activity,the projection downscaled from the climate models in Emanuel(2013)shows increasing TC activity over the South China Sea,while the TC activity in the East China Sea is more enhanced than that from our selected climate models.

    Figures 7c–d show the projected change in TC lifetime maximum intensity.The mean SST increases from the climate models selected in Emanuel(2013)are 0.7 K,1.4 K and 1.8 K during 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99,respectively,which are larger than the projections in our selection of models.As shown in Figs.8c and d,the increases in lifetime maximum intensity(the number of intense TCs)are 6.2%(21.5%),11.2%(38%)and 13.9%(46.5%)during the periods 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99,respectively,which are nearly twice as much as in our selection of models,despite the fact that the SST increase is not doubled.

    Similar sensitivity experiments to those carried out with the selected CMIP5 models are conducted,and the results are shown in Figs.8c and d.On average,the changes in lifetime maximum intensity(the number of intense TCs)induced by SST are 4.4%(13.2%),9.9%(32.6%)and 12.9%(45.6%) during the periods 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–99.However,contrary to the projection based on our selected nine models,the changes in prevailing track and vertical wind shear in these six models generally tend to increase the TC intensity(Figs.8c and d).The effect of changes in prevailing track can increase the lifetime maximum intensity(the number of intense TCs)by 2.3%(11.2%),2%(8.0%)and 1.6% (2.3%),which are greater than the contribution from vertical shear[0.9%(2.3%),0.6%(0.2%)and 0.7%(2.9%)]during thethreeperiods,respectively.Notethatthecombinedcontribution from the change in prevailing track and vertical shear is comparable to the effect of SST warming during 2010–39.Moreover,the individual contributions of track changes even have a dominant in fl uence on TC intensity change in some models.For example,the track change in the MIROC5 model increases the number of intense TCs by 32.9%,which is much greater than the 23.5%increase due to SST warming in the period 2010–39.In addition,the combined contribution of the change in track and vertical shear in the MIROC5 model is even larger than that of SST warming,which makes the MIROC5 model project the greatest increase in TC lifetime maximum intensity and intense TC numbers during the three periods among all the GCMs.In fact,this model is classi fi ed as one of the worst models for its poor performance in simulating both the spatial pattern of track density and intensity.The different results from these two sets of climate models suggest that a large spread exists in projections of future TC tracks and their contribution to intensity change in CMIP5 models.

    7. Summary

    The possible responses of TC tracks and their contribution to TC intensity change over the WNP in the future are quantitatively assessed using a downscaling technique based on the projected large-scale environments from CMIP5 cli-mate models under the RCP4.5 scenario.Speci fi c attention is paid to evaluating and selecting the CMIP5 climate models based on the simulated large-scale environment for TC activity in their historical runs.

    Due to changes in large-scale steering fl ows,the TC infl uence is projected to decrease in the South China Sea,with an increase in the number of TCs taking a northwestward track.With these changes in prevailing track,the projected TC lifetime maximum intensity(number of intense TCs)is increased by 2.5%(7.5%),6.1%(18.4%)and 8.2%(24.8%) during the periods 2010–39,2040–69 and 2070–2099,respectively.Meanwhile,the SST warming tends to increase the basin-wide TC intensity change as a dominant factor for most of the selected models;the simulated changes in prevailing tracks generally tend to counteract the effect of SST warming,whichhasasigni fi cantnegativein fl uenceonTCintensity change in some models.The oppositeeffect of change in prevailing track and SST warming indicates that TC intensity cannot increase as estimated by MPI theory due to the contribution of TC track change.

    To address the importance of model selection,we also examine the projected TC activity from the six CMIP5 climate models used in Emanuel(2013).Contrary to our results,increasing TC activity is projected over the South China Sea, with more TCs in fl uencing the East China Sea.Despite the small difference in the projected SST increase,there are signi fi cant differences in the projected increases of the lifetime maximum intensity(number of intense TCs)between the six CMIP5 climate models used in Emanuel(2013)and our selected climate models due to the large positive contribution of the change in track and vertical shear.Since there is considerable inter-model variability in TC track and its contribution to intensity change,we suggest that model selection is important when assessing future TC activity.

    Finally,it should be noted that this study assumes little change in TC formation location and frequency in future. However,several modeling studies have suggested that the global frequency of TCs may decrease under a warmer climate(e.g.,Knutson et al.,2010),and thus caution should be applied when interpreting the results of our study.

    Acknowledgements.TheauthorsthankProf.KerryEMANUEL for allowing us to use his TC intensity model.This research was jointly supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB430103,2015CB452803),the National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC;Grant No.41275093)and the project of the specially-appointed professorship of Jiangsu Province.Chao WANG was also supported by the Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province(Grant No.CXZZ130496). This study is the Earth System Modeling Center Contribution Number 022.

    REFERENCES

    Bender,M.A.,T.R.Knutson,R.E.Tuleya,J.J.Sirutis,G.A. Vecchi,S.T.Garner,and I.Held,2010:Modeled impact of anthropogenic warming on the frequency of intense Atlantic hurricanes.Science,327(5964),454–458,doi:10.1126/science.1180568.

    Emanuel,K.A.,1987:The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate.Nature,326,483–485.

    Emanuel,K.,2006:Climate and Tropical Cyclone Activity:A New Model Downscaling Approach.J.Climate,19,4797–4802.

    Emanuel,K.A.,2013:DownscalingCMIP5climatemodelsshows increased tropical cyclone activity over the 21st century.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,110,12219–12224.

    Emanuel,K.,R.Sundararajan,and J.Williams,2008:Hurricanes and global warming:Results from downscaling IPCC AR4 simulations.Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,89,347–367.

    Gray,W.M.,1968:Global view of the origin of tropical disturbances and storms.Mon.Wea.Rev.,96,669–700.

    Holland,G.J.,1983:Tropical cyclone motion:Environmental interaction plus a beta effect.J.Atmos.Sci.,40,328–342.

    IPCC,2007.Climate Change 2007:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC,S.Solomon et al.,Eds.,Cambridge,UK. Cambridge University Press,996 pp.

    Kalnay,E.,and Coauthors,1996:The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year reanalysis project.Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,77,437–471.

    Knutson,T.R.,and R.E.Tuleya,2004:Impact of CO2-induced warming on simulated hurricane intensity and precipitation: Sensitivity to the choice of climate model and convective parameterization.J.Climate,17,3477–3495.

    Knutson,T.R.,R.E.Tuleya,and Y.Kurihara,1998:Simulated increase of hurricane intensities in a CO2-warmed climate.Science,279,1018–1020.

    Knutson,T.R.,J.J.Sirutis,S.T.Garner,I.M.Held,and R.E. Tuleya,2007:Simulation of the recent multidecadal increase of Atlantic hurricane activity using an 18-km-Grid regional model.Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,88,1549–1565.

    Knutson,T.R.,J.J.Sirutis,S.T.Garner,G.A.Vecchi,and I.M. Held,2008:Simulated reduction in Atlantic hurricane frequency under twenty- fi rst century warming conditions.Nature Geosci.,1,359–364.

    Knutson,T.R.,and Coauthors,2010:Tropical cyclone and climate change.Nature Geosci.,3,157–163.

    Knutson,T.R.,and Coauthors,2013:Dynamical downscalingprojections of Twenty-First-Century Atlantic hurricane activity: CMIP3 and CMIP5 Model-Based scenarios.J.Climate,26, 6591–6617.

    Kossin,J.P.,and S.J.Camargo,2009:Hurricane track variability and secular potential intensity trends.Climatic Change,97, 329–337.

    Kossin,J.P.,K.R.Knapp,D.J.Vimont,R.J.Murnane,and B. A.Harper,2007:A globally consistent reanalysis of hurricane variability and trends.Geophys.Res.Lett.,34,doi: 10.1029/2006GL028836.

    Kossin,J.P.,T.L.Olander,and K.R.Knapp,2013:Trend analysis with a new global record of tropical cyclone intensity.J. Climate,26,9960–9976.

    Lee,J.-Y.,and B.Wang,2012:Future change of global monsoon in the CMIP5.Climate Dyn.,42,101–119.

    Li,T.,M.Kwon,M.Zhao,J.-S.Kug,J.-J.Luo,and W.Yu,2010: Global warming shifts Paci fi c tropical cyclone location.Geophys.Res.Lett.,37,L21804,doi:10.1029/2010GL045124.

    Murakami,H.,B.Wang,and A.Kitoh,2011:Future change of western North Paci fi c typhoons:Projections by a 20-km-mesh global atmospheric model.J.Climate,24,1154–1169.

    Reichler,T.,and J.Kim,2008:How well do coupled models simulate today’s climate?Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soci.,89,303–311.

    Smith,T.M.,R.W.Reynolds,T.C.Peterson,and J.Lawrimore, 2008:Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land–ocean surface temperature analysis(1880–2006).J.Climate, 21,2283–2296.

    Taylor,K.E.,R.J.Stouffer,and G.A.Meehl,2012:An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design.Bull Am Meteor Soc, 93,485-498.

    Tu,J.-Y.,C.Chou,and P.-S.Chu,2009:The Abrupt Shift of Typhoon Activity in the Vicinity of Taiwan and Its Association with Western North Paci fi c–East Asian Climate Change.J. Climate,22,3617–3628.

    Wing,A.A.,A.H.Sobel,and S.J.Camargo,2007:Relationship between the potential and actual intensities of tropical cyclones on interannual time scales.Geophys.Res.Lett.,34, doi:10.1029/2006GL028581.

    Wang,C.,and L.Wu,2012:Tropical cyclone intensity change in the Western North Paci fi c:Downscaling from IPCC AR4 experiments.J.Meteor.Soc.Japan,90,223–233.

    Wang,R.,L.Wu,and C.Wang,2011:Typhoon track changes associated with global warming.J.Climate,24,3748–3752.

    Wu,L.2007:Impact of Saharan air layer on hurricane peak intensity.Geophys.Res.Lett.,34,doi:10.1029/2007GL029564.

    Wu,L.,and B.Wang,2004:Assessing impacts of global warming on tropical cyclone tracks.J.Climate,17,1686–1698.

    Wu,L.,and B.Wang,2008:What has changed the proportion of intense hurricanes in the last 30 years?J.Climate,21,1432–1439.

    Wu,L.,and H.Zhao,2012:Dynamically derived tropical cyclone intensity changes over the Western North Paci fi c.J.Climate, 25,89–98.

    Wu,L.,B.Wang,and S.Geng,2005:Growing typhoon in fl uence on East Asia.Geophys.Res.Lett.,32,L18703,doi: 10.1029/2005GL022937.

    Wu,L.,B.Wang,and S.A.Braun,2008:Implications of tropical cyclone power dissipation index.Int.J.Climatol.,28,727–731.

    Zhang,Q.,L.Wu,and Q.Liu 2009:Tropical cyclone damages in China 1983–2006.Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,90,489–495.

    :Wang,C.,and L.G.Wu,2015:In fl uence of future tropical cyclone track changes on their basin-wide intensity over the western North Paci fi c:Downscaled CMIP5 projections.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,32(5),613–623,

    10.1007/s00376-014-4105-4.

    (Received 24 May 2014;revised 19 August 2014;accepted 5 September 2014)

    The assessment of the future track and intensity changes of TCs is based on the projected large-scale environment in the 21st century from a selection of nine CMIP5 climate models under the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5(RCP4.5) scenario.Due to changes in mean steering fl ows,the in fl uence of TCs over the South China Sea area is projected to decrease, with an increasing number of TCs taking a northwestward track.Changes in prevailing tracks and their contribution to basin-wide intensity change show considerable inter-model variability.The in fl uences of changes in prevailing track make a marked contribution to TC intensity change in some models,tending to counteract the effect of SST warming.This study suggests that attention should be paid to the simulated large-scale environment when assessing the future changes in regional TC activity based on climate models.In addition,the change in prevailing tracks should be considered when assessing future TC intensity change.

    免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 日韩国内少妇激情av| 露出奶头的视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 久久中文字幕一级| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 91成年电影在线观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 中国美女看黄片| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 一夜夜www| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 69av精品久久久久久| 在线av久久热| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 99re在线观看精品视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 一区二区三区激情视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 黄片播放在线免费| 久久精品人妻少妇| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久青草综合色| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲av美国av| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 超碰成人久久| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 色综合婷婷激情| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 精品久久久久久成人av| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲激情在线av| 午夜免费激情av| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 老司机靠b影院| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 日韩有码中文字幕| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 精品高清国产在线一区| 精品人妻1区二区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 成人国语在线视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产日本99.免费观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 午夜a级毛片| www.www免费av| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 操出白浆在线播放| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 精品第一国产精品| 嫩草影视91久久| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| www日本在线高清视频| 国产av在哪里看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 精品第一国产精品| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 在线视频色国产色| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产三级在线视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 午夜福利18| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久久久国内视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 两个人视频免费观看高清| xxx96com| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 丁香六月欧美| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 美女午夜性视频免费| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 久久久国产精品麻豆| 色av中文字幕| 午夜福利高清视频| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 日本免费a在线| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| av欧美777| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久伊人香网站| 此物有八面人人有两片| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 长腿黑丝高跟| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 色在线成人网| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产色视频综合| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 日本 欧美在线| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 香蕉国产在线看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 手机成人av网站| 久久狼人影院| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产又爽黄色视频| 91国产中文字幕| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 少妇 在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 脱女人内裤的视频| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久亚洲真实| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 久久久国产成人免费| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 极品教师在线免费播放| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲av成人av| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 天堂动漫精品| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 欧美在线黄色| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 午夜福利18| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 热re99久久国产66热| 在线天堂中文资源库| 怎么达到女性高潮| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 黄色视频不卡| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| netflix在线观看网站| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 一级毛片精品| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 1024香蕉在线观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 国产精品二区激情视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产又爽黄色视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产精品影院久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 精品久久久久久,| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 久久 成人 亚洲| 久久久久久大精品| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 搞女人的毛片| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日本五十路高清| 三级毛片av免费| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| avwww免费| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久精品影院6| 成人欧美大片| 天天添夜夜摸| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产成人影院久久av| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 午夜老司机福利片| 美女午夜性视频免费| 在线播放国产精品三级| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 日本一本二区三区精品| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 满18在线观看网站| 熟女电影av网| 午夜老司机福利片| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 日韩欧美三级三区| 色播在线永久视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 在线视频色国产色| 高清在线国产一区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 美女大奶头视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 9191精品国产免费久久| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美日韩黄片免| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久青草综合色| 免费观看人在逋| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久热在线av| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| av天堂在线播放| 日本三级黄在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 观看免费一级毛片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 午夜激情av网站| av福利片在线| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久国产精品影院| 女警被强在线播放| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产激情久久老熟女| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 身体一侧抽搐| 老司机福利观看| 88av欧美| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 日本三级黄在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 成人三级黄色视频| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 欧美日韩黄片免| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 午夜a级毛片| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 成在线人永久免费视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| bbb黄色大片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲 国产 在线| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 日本 av在线| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 看免费av毛片| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 午夜日韩欧美国产| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 丁香六月欧美| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产激情欧美一区二区| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 97碰自拍视频| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美zozozo另类| 午夜福利在线在线| xxx96com| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 免费在线观看日本一区| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 91国产中文字幕| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 久久香蕉精品热| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区|