• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Recent Russian remote sensing investigations in Antarctica within the framework of scientific traverses

    2015-02-06 08:30:17SergeyPopov
    Advances in Polar Science 2015年2期

    Sergey V. Popov*

    Polar Marine Geosurvey Expedition (PMGE), 24 Pobeda Str., St.-Petersburg, Lomonosov, 198412, Russia

    1 Preface: retrospective view to the first traverses

    For many centuries, the geographers of the antiquity and the Middle Ages assumed that an uncharted continent lay to the south of the known world. That continent was named Terra Incognita. On the map of Claudius Ptolemaeus (c. 90–168 AD), one of the greatest scientists of ancient Greece, this land mass extended as far south as the latitude of the African Great Lakes[1]. As years passed, the Age of Discovery pushed the boundary of the unknown continent farther and farther south. In 1773, the expedition of James Cook crossed the Antarctic Circle for the first time and casted doubt on the very existence of the Southern Land[2]. It was not until January 27 (January 15 on the Julian calendar), 1820 that Antarctica was first seen by human eyes[3-4]. On that auspicious day two Russian ships,Vostokcaptained by Faddey Bellingshausen,andMirnycaptained by Mikhail Lazarev, came very close to the new continent. The ships approached the Bellingshausen Ice Shelf on the Princess Martha Coast[4], but sea ice blocked their progress beyond 69°21′28′′S, 2°14′50′′W.

    The current phase of Russian Antarctic research started on November 30, 1955 when the shipObleft Kaliningrad for Antarctica. It was the first vessel of the First Complex Antarctic Expedition. The leader of the expedition was Mikhail Somov. On January 5, 1956 the ship reached Antarctica, and about a month later, on February 13, 1956, the Soviet Union state flag flew over the construction site of the first Soviet Antarctic station, Mirny. The station was named in honor of one of the first Russian ships to enter Antarctic waters[4-5]. Since that time Soviet, and later Russian, scientists have continuously studied the icy continent.

    The logistics and the scientific activities during the first decade fundamentally impacted the future Soviet, and later Russian, scientific research. Keystone stations and field bases were established at that time. They provided the foundation for geophysical, geological, and glaciological studies, and some of the stations are still operational today.

    The primary goal of the initial expeditions was the opening of Mirny Station along with three more stations located at two Antarctic poles: Vostok Station at the Geomagnetic Pole and Sovetskaya and Pole of Inaccessibility stations in the vicinity of the Pole of Inaccessibility. After preparatory work and reconnaissance flights, on April 2, 1956 the first Soviet traverse, led by Mikhail Somov, left Mirny for the inland (Figure 1a). This traverse (and most of the later traverses) combined logistics with basic scientific research.The vehicles stopped on May 4, 1956 having crossed about 400 km of the snowy and windy desert of the Antarctic plateau. Three weeks later, on May 27, 1956, the first Soviet inland Antarctic station Pionerskaya was opened[5]. Although providing logistics solutions was the main objective of the expedition, the implementation of the research program was also given high priority because ultimately, the primary goal of Antarctic expeditions is fundamental scientific research.Meteorological, glaciological, and geophysical studies were implemented during the traverse. Andrey Kapitsa performed 11 reflection seismic soundings between Mirny and Pionerskaya stations. He used analogue output seismographs with 24 channels[5]. Those surveys initiated Russian studies of the Antarctic bedrock and subglacial morphology. This first inland traverse during the austral autumn provided the pioneering scientists and logisticians with important experience for future projects.

    The goal of the Second Complex Antarctic Expedition was the opening of new inland stations and commencement of the expansive scientific investigations within the framework of the International Geophysical Year. The leader of the continental part of the expedition was Alexey Treshnikov.Three more stations were opened: Vostok-1 on April 12,1957; Komsomolskaya on November 6, 1957; and Vostok on December 16, 1957. Vostok-1 Station was initially set up as a stopover station on the route to the Geomagnetic Pole,to provide shelter from the harsh weather conditions in the Antarctic inland during the winter. At the end of the austral spring, the logistic traverse moved Vostok-1 Station to its target location (the Geomagnetic Pole) and it was renamed Vostok Station. However, for more than 50 years the original location of Vostok-1 continued to serve as a site for short recovery stopovers during logistic traverses supplying Vostok from Mirny.A number of scientific programs were performed during the traverse to move Vostok-1 Station to the Geomagnetic Pole[4,6-7].

    In retrospect, it is interesting to note that Vostok Station was fortuitously located. If that historical traverse had moved only 10 km farther, or had stopped 90 km earlier, the station would have been built beside the lake rather than over the lake. The borehole drilling performed by Russian scientists would have hit the lakeshore and Lake Vostok may not have been discovered for many years.

    The leader of the next Antarctic Expedition was Yevgeny Tolstikov. The main logistic achievement of the Third Antarctic Expedition was establishing the stations in the vicinity of the Pole of Inaccessibility. Sovetskaya Station was opened on February 16, 1958 and Pole of Inaccessibility Station on December 14, 1958[8-9]. The former was intended as an intermediate stopover location. The most important scientific achievement of that expedition was the discovery of the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains[8]. This geological discovery was of utmost importance and key to understanding the structure and evolution of East Antarctica and the Antarctic continent as a whole. Further data on the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains were not collected until 30 years later, when regional geophysical flights from the Russian Molodezhnaya Station to the American McMurdo Station commenced in 1987. Two years later, this area became the subject of a regional-scale airborne geophysical survey[10].The location chart is shown in Figure 2.

    Another 20 years passed before researchers returned to this area. The first decade of the new century was marked by the first detailed radio-echo sounding (RES) survey of the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains by Chinese scientists in 2004/05 and 2007/08[11]. On January 27, 2009 the remarkable station Kunlun was established on the top of Argus Dome (Dome A), the highest ice feature in Antarctica and thought to be the coldest place on Earth. The establishment of Kunlun required a large amount of preparatory work and a number of traverses to the Antarctic inland[12]. The next major project was the airborne geophysical survey over the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains (2008/09) within the framework of the international project AGAP (Antarctica’s Gamburtsev Province). Without doubt, the data collected advanced the understanding of the structure of this vast region and East Antarctica as a whole.

    At this point, let’s turn our focus back to the late 1950s.The three early Antarctic Expeditions mentioned above were of utmost importance. Those expeditions initiated the Soviet,and later Russian, Antarctic pursuits and laid the foundation for all future research. The first three Russian expeditions achieved incredible success, even from today’s perspective.Not only was a network of inland stations established and a number of incredibly complex transport operations carried out, but also the methodology and procedures for future fieldwork in inland Antarctica were developed. These principles are still being used today. Regular traverses are carried out to supply the inland research stations. Three more scientific stations were opened during the four years after the third Antarctic Expedition (Lazarev Station on March 10, 1959; Novolazarevskaya Station on January 18, 1961;and Molodezhnaya Station on February 23, 1962). By 1965,a number of regional scientific traverses had been carried out,with the main focus on the structure of the East Antarctic inland.The most challenging traverse was led by Andrey Kapitsa and ran between Vostok and Molodezhnaya stations via Pole of Inaccessibility Station (Figure 2). It lasted 78 d from January 3 to March 21, 1965 and covered 3 300 km[13-14]. Meteorological,glaciological, and geophysical data were collected along the route. Analogue output seismographs with 24 channels were used to collect reflection seismic data. The first Atlas of Antarctica[15]was published in 1969 and is well known and respected in the scientific community. It reflected the knowledge about Antarctica amassed by Russian scientists at that time.

    Up to 1965, the main body of Soviet scientific research was conducted along the routes between Mirny Station and the South Pole via Vostok Station, between Mirny and Pole of Inaccessibility stations via Komsomolskaya Station, and between Vostok and Molodezhnaya stations via Pole of Inaccessibility Station. The data collected along these routes compiled with input from expeditions organized by other countries provided the initial insights into the ice thickness and the structure of the bedrock of Antarctica. Later, the data gathered by the first 10 Soviet expeditions were used to provide exclusive information about this vast area of the Antarctic inland as part of the important international project BEDMAP,which aimed to produce complete maps of the ice sheet and topography of the bedrock of Antarctica[16-17]. The results of the BEDMAP project formed the basis of the comprehensive interpretation charts the Tectonic map of Antarctica[18]and the first Geomorphological Atlas of Antarctica[19].

    Within that first decade of exploration, in January 1964,an ice radar designed by the Russian Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) was tested in Antarctica for the first time. It was an RLS-100 pulse radar with analogue registration. The main frequency was 100 MHz, the following frequency was 100 kHz, the pulse power was 7 W, and the pulse width was 0.3 μs[20]. Since that time, the RES technique has become the most effective geophysical method to study ice sheet structure and sub-ice relief. It has been used by Russian researchers, not only in Antarctica but also in the Arctic and on mountain glaciers.

    The next series of RES investigations was performed from 1978 to 1984 between Mirny and Vostok stations and towards Ridge B, Denman Glacier, and Dome Concordia,under the leadership of A.N. Sheremetiev. These missions identified a number of subglacial water caves in the Ridge B area[20-21]. In addition, RES was used to measure the ice flow velocity in the area at about 1 m·s-1[22]. Wide-angle reflections were performed to measure the velocity of radiowave propagation in Ridge B at 165.9 ± 2.3 m·μs-1[23]. These investigations improved the calculation of the ice thickness based on the RES data. An RLS-60-74 pulse radar with analogue registration was used. The main frequency was 60 MHz, the following frequency was 0.4–2.0 kHz, the pulse power was 1–60 kW, and the pulse width was 0.3–1 μs[22].

    2 Recent ground-based remote sensing investigations in the Lake Vostok area

    Lake Vostok, about 300 km long and 60 km wide and covered by 4 km of ice, is one of the most incredible geological structures on Earth. To date, more than 400 subglacial lakes have been discovered in the Arctic and the Antarctic[24-28],but Lake Vostok remains the largest. The ice temperature in glaciers increases with depth and some of the subglacial lakes in Antarctica could have been formed because the thickness of the covering ice exceeds the limiting thickness.As glaciers become thicker, there is a point at which bottom melting occurs. This process is well described by Robin[29]and Zotikov[30-31]. Some of the lakes could have been formed by neotectonic processes, with local amplification of the heat flux in the area of deep crevasses in the Earth’s crust. Lake Vostok is situated along a rift zone, which was confirmed by airborne geophysical surveys[32-33], seismological observations[34], and geomorphological deductions[35-36].

    The existence of a large body of water in the area of Vostok Station was first proposed based on the analysis of airborne RES data[37]. However, the data was not investigated further for 20 a. It was only after a satellite altimetry survey by European Remote Sensing Satellite-1 (ERS-1)[38]that scientists reviewed the old data. The old and new data supported the presence of a vast body of water located under the ice to the northwest of Vostok Station[39]. Extensive historical reviews can be found in Zotikov[30]and Siegert et al.[40]

    Just after the discovery of Lake Vostok, the Polar Marine Geosurvey Expedition (PMGE) together with the Russian Antarctic Expedition (RAE) commenced a remote sensing survey to study this natural phenomenon. The mobile scientific laboratory Vityaz (Figure 1b) was established for these investigations. From 1995 to 2008, reflection seismic data were collected to measure the depth of the lake. A total of 318 measurements were carried out[41-42]. A Russian 24-channel SMOV-0-24 seismograph with analogue registration was used from 1995 to 1999. The range of the reflection seismic data acquisition recording was 6 s and 12 s, the noise of the channel was 0.3 pV, the cross-talk was higher than -36 dB, the frequency range of the recording was 10–200 Hz, and the dynamical range was 80 dB. The acoustic wave registration was performed using a Russian SV-20 geophone with an oscillation frequency of 20 Hz,fixed on the surface and covered by the snow. Since 2000, digital seismographs with the same technical specifications have been used[43].

    Between 1998 and 2008, RES investigations were carried out to study bedrock topography and the structure of the ice sheet. The total length of the RES profiles of Lake Vostok is about 5 190 km[44-47]. Since 1998, a 60-MHz RLS-60-98 ice radar with a repetition frequency of 600 Hz, a pulse length of 0.5 μs, a pulse power of 60 kW, a dynamical range of 180 dB, and a 3 MHz reception channel, has been used for ice thickness measurements. The reflected signals are digitized using an analog-digital transformation device (ADC) with a sample interval of 50 ns and a stacking rate of 256 traces[42-44]. Since 2008, a new RLS-60-06 ice radar with the same technical specification but increased power of up to 80 kW and an ADC with a 25 ns sample interval has been used[42].

    American researchers have made an important contribution to the study of Lake Vostok. During the 2000/01 austral summer field season, American scientists conducted an airborne geophysical survey including RES. In total, the flights covered 12 465 km[32]. In the previous year, Italian scientists carried out an airborne geophysical survey and produced a number of geophysical profiles[48]. The areas of the Russian and U.S. geophysical investigations are shown in Figure 3a.

    Two major challenges were faced in the geophysical investigations of the Lake Vostok area. The first was to accurately measure ice thickness in the vicinity of the 5G drilling site. This was crucial to penetrating the lake without incident. The second challenge was to improve RES and reflection seismic data acquisition. To address these challenges it was necessary to measure the velocity of acoustic and electromagnetic wave propagation in the local glacier, because only general estimates of these values were available at that time. Vertical seismic profiling and wide angle reflections were performed and acoustic velocities in meteoric ice and water were measured as 3 920 ± 20 m·s-1and 1 490 m·s-1, respectively. The average acoustic velocity in the glacier was measured as 3 810 ± 20 m·s-1[45], and the average velocity of the electromagnetic wave propagation in the glacier was 168.4 ± 0.5 m·μs-1[46]. Ice thickness in the drilling site vicinity was predicted to be 3 760 ± 30 m based on the seismic data, and 3 775 ± 15 m based on RES data[46]. During the penetration of Lake Vostok on February 5, 2012, the total ice core length was 3 769.3 ± 0.5 m and the ice thickness was 3 759 ± 3 m (V. Lipenkov, 2014; personal communication).Therefore, the reflection seismic data was extremely accurate.However, the RES data was less accurate than expected, and the reason for this requires further investigation.

    Following the completion of the reflection seismic and RES studies, Russian and U.S.[32]remote sensing data collected in the Lake Vostok area were compiled. The data were used to map the ice thickness, the ice base, the depth of the lake, and the bedrock topography[42,44]. The ice thickness in the Lake Vostok area ranges from 1 950 to 4 350 m. Absolute heights of the lake water table range from approximately -600 m in the north to-150 m in the south. The total volume of Lake Vostok is about 6 100 km3, the average depth is about 400 m, and the maximum depth is 1 200 m[42-44]. The most important charts are shown in Figure 3. Based on the bedrock topography, an orographic chart was compiled as the first step in the geomorphological interpretation of this area[35-36]. This was the next step to understanding the structure and evolution of the bedrock.

    Another important scientific challenge in the preparation for the penetration of Lake Vostok was the charting of its coastline. It was important to determine whether the lake is isolated and separated from the rest of the Antarctic subglacial hydrological network. If the lake were connected to the network, the entire hydrological system could be contaminated in the case of an unsuccessful penetration of the lake. The grounding line was defined by 621 points from the joint Russian and U.S.[32]dataset. It revealed that the lake is completely isolated (Figure 3), with a total area of 15 790 km2,excluding 365 km2occupied by 11 islands[47].

    Fifty-six isolated subglacial water caves have been identified outside Lake Vostok. Most were represented by just one radio-echo profile that crosses the cave and the typical size of the caves is about 2.8 km[47]. Russian studies used 60 kW and later 80 kW deep-penetrating pulse radars[42].Theoretically, these radars have enough power to register a mirror reflection from the bottom of freshwater basins not deeper than 15 m[49]. However, it was found that only one radio-echo time-section could be interpreted as the bottom of a subglacial water cave (Figure 4). Therefore, there are three main possibilities: (1) the caves are deeper than 15 m,(2) the bottom surface is very rough, or (3) the water is not so fresh. The current level of understanding does not allow us to exclude any of these possibilities.

    It is important to mention the current and future Russian remote sensing projects. Upon the conclusion of reflection seismic studies in 2009, Russian researchers commenced the accumulation of refraction seismic data to measure acoustic velocities in the Lake Vostok area. These data will enable a better understanding of the geological structure of this region.

    A new direction in Russian scientific activity is ground penetrating radar (GPR) investigations. These investigations were carried out for the first time during the 2012/13 austral summer field season to study the structure of the snow-firn layer. The investigations were concentrated in the mega dune area east of Vostok Station and within Lake Vostok. Regional profiles have also been surveyed between Vostok and Progress stations and in the vicinity of Progress Station[50].

    3 Mirny-Vostok scientific traverses

    In 2004, Russian scientists recommenced regional scientific traverses to perform RES and glaciological observations in the East Antarctic inland. Initially they operated between Mirny and Vostok stations (a distance of 1 410 km).Subsequently, the main logistic base was moved from Mirny to Progress Station for the five austral summerfield seasons of the 49th to 53rd Russian Antarctic Expeditions(2004–2008). Old Russian vehicles were used for those traverses (Figures 1b, 1c). During this period about 3 000 km of RES profiles were constructed using the same RLS- 60- 98 and RLS-60- 06 deep-penetrating ice radars used in the Lake Vostok investigations (Figure 2). Almost all of the RES profiles were obtained together with glaciological observations and geodetic measurements conducted to study the ice sheet[51].

    The profile between Mirny and Vostok stations crosses five major orographic regions (Figure 5). The lowland extends from the coast to 205 km inland. The height of this area is just above or below sea level. The bedrock is very rough with a slope of about 7–10 degrees. The Golitsyna Mountains are located south of the lowland in the 205 to 420 km section of the traverse. Two main ridges with peak heights of 850 m and 1 350 m are located in that area. Relative heights are often more than 550 m. A number of deep valleys and canyons (800 m and deeper) cut across the mountains. The Shmidt Subglacial Basin extends to the 990 km point of the traverse. The bedrock is weakly rough and the average height is about 200 m. The Vostok Mountains extend up to Lake Vostok. They also consist of two ridges with peak heights of about 600 m and 820 m, and are crossed by deep valleys and canyons. Lake Vostok and the spurs of the Vostok Mountains lie to the south of the end of the section. This area was well described in earlier studies.

    The most significant outcome of these scientific traverses was the collection of data on the ice sheet structure and the bedrock formation between Mirny and Vostok stations. The radio-echo time-section and the ice sheet section are shown in Figure 5. These studies resulted in the discovery of a lake located about 50 km north of Komsomolskaya Station (Figures 2 and 5). It is 5 km long and is named Komsomolskoe Subglacial Lake[52-53].

    In addition, a system of subglacial lakes was discovered in the vicinity of Pionerskaya Station (Figures 2 and 5).The main lake, which is located underneath the station, is named Pionerskoe Subglacial Lake[54]. During the 2005 and 2006 austral summer field seasons, an area of 17 × 22 km2was superimposed with ground-based survey data with an interval of 2 km between the main profiles[54-55]. The ice thickness in this area ranged from 1 450 to 2 450 m, and the bedrock elevation was estimated to be from 300 to 1 300 m. A reflection seismic sounding survey was carried out in the field season of 2007/08. According to this survey, the depth of the lake is about 30 m and the bottom of the lake is covered by sediments about 300 m thick[55]. The flat tops of the subglacial landforms point toward intensive ice abrasion secondary to relatively fast movement of the ice sheet (about 20 m·a-1)[56].The border of Pionerskoe Subglacial Lake has been plotted at 21 points. The area of the lake is about 26.5 km2, and its dimensions are about 9.0 × 2.5 km2. Four more small water caves have been identified in the area and two of them have been fully mapped[54-55].

    4 Progress-Vostok scientific traverses

    According to the strategy of Russian exploration in Antarctica, the main logistic base has been moved from Mirny Station to Progress Station. The K?ssbohrer Pisten Bully (Figure 1d) is now used for logistic and scientific traverses instead of the older Russian vehicles (Ishimbay,STT-1 Kharkovchanka, STT-2 Kharkovchanka-2, and ATT).In 2007, the first cargo of fuel drums was brought to Vostok Station from Progress Station. In addition to logistic tasks,the extensive glaciological and geodetic scientific program was completed. Since that time, traverses deliver cargo and fuel to Vostok Station twice perfield season. As a rule,scientific research is carried out within the framework of the traverses, and includes RES, glaciological observations, and geodetic measurements. Geophysical profiles are located within the broad band encompassing the main logistic route.The total length of the RES profiles is 4 426 km, and they are concentrated in an area about a 1 000 km from the coast(Figure 2).

    Figure 3 shows a section of the scientific traverse from Komsomolskaya Station to a point about 300 km from the coast. This 550 km section is most interesting because of its novelty. According to the RES data, there is a mountainous area beneath the ice. The bedrock height varies from -200 m to 1 100 m. The subglacial landscape is very rough and some valleys are more than 800 m deep. There is a wide subglacial hill or mountain ridge located between the Grove Mountains and the Vostok Mountains, indicating that perhaps these formations belong to one bigger mountain ridge. Currently,there is insufficient geophysical data to make any definite conclusions but the recently published Antarctic Moho depth map[57]indirectly supports this possibility. The area of the intended subglacial ridge is correlated with increased Moho depth. Antarctic bedrock topography maps compiled within the framework of the BEDMAP2 project[58]provide further support for this expansive mountain ridge.

    5 Concluding remarks

    Scientific traverses are a key component in the study of the Antarctic environment. Glaciological, geodetic,meteorological, and certain geophysical data could not be collected by any other means. Soviet and Russian logistic and scientific traverses (which traditionally run jointly) have a long and glorious history. It is impossible to do justice to this history in one paper. Rather, this is a topic deserving of a book. Nonetheless, here the author has attempted to highlight the most important historical events in Soviet and Russian Antarctic exploration and to provide a snap shot of Soviet and Russian scientific activities from the past to the present.

    AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank the Russian Antarctic Expedition for great help with the acquisition of remote sensing data for the Lake Vostok area and for the framework of the logistic and scientific traverses, the AARI for providing technical reports from storage, and Dr. A.Dyuysekina, my old friend and Dr. J. Horsburgh, for proof reading thefinal text. This paper was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), research project No. 14-05-00234-a.

    1 Thrower N J W. Maps and civilization: cartography in culture and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999, 1–97

    2 Beaglehole J C. The life of captain James cook. Stanford, Calif.:Stanford University Press, 1974, 1–760

    3 Belov M I. Otchetnaya karta pervoy russkoy antarkticheskoy ekspeditsii [Reported map of the first Russian Antarctic Expedition].Bull SAE, 1961, 31: 5–14 (in Russian)

    4 Treshnikov A F. Istoriya otkrytiya i issledovaniya Antarktidy [History of the discovery and exploration of Antarctica]. Moscow: Geografgiz,1963 (in Russian)

    5 Pervaya kontinental'naya ekspeditsiya 1955–57 gg. [The First Continental Expedition of 1955–57]. SAE Reports, 1959, 1: 1–212 (in Russian)

    6 Vtoraya kontinental'naya ekspeditsiya 1956–58 gg. [The second continental expedition of 1956–58]. SAE Reports, 1960, 8: 1–206 (in Russian)

    7 Kondrat'ev O K, Lopatin S S, Manilov S A. Metodika i nekotorye predvaritel'nye rezul'taty seysmoglyatsiologicheskih issledovaniy v Antarktide [The methodology and some preliminary results of the seysmoglaciologial research in Antarctica]. SAE Reports, 1960, 10:37–95 (in Russian)

    8 Tret'ya kontinental'naya ekspeditsiya 1957–59 gg. [The third continental expedition of 1957–59]. SAE Reports, 1962, 16: 1–327 (in Russian)

    9 Otchet o rabote stantsii Sovetskaya i stantsii Polyus Nedostupnosti[Report on the work of the Sovetskaya Station and Pole of Inaccessibility Station]. Technical report No 0–823, Leningrad, AARI,1959 (in Russian)

    10 Popov S V. Overview of Russian Radio Echo Sounding and ground reflection seismic investigations in Antarctica from 1970 to the present day // Antarctica and global change: interactions and impacts.Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 1997: 156

    11 Bo S, Siegert M J, Mudd S M, et al. The Gamburtsev mountains and the origin and early evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Nature,2009, 459(7247): 690–693, doi: 10.1038/nature08024

    12 Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration. Proposed construction and operation of the new Chinese Dome A Station, Dome A,Antarctica. Final comprehensive environmental evaluation. August 2008

    13 Kapitsa A P, Sorohtin O G. Ice thickness measurements on the Vostok-Molodezhnaya scientific traverse [Izmereniya tolshchiny lednikovogo pokrova v pohode po marshrutu Vostok-Molodezhnaya]. Bull SAE,1965, 51: 19–23 (in Russian)

    14 Kapitsa A P. Scientific traverse on the route Vostok-Pole of Inaccessibility-Molodezhnaya in 1964 [Pohod po marshrutu Vostok-Polyus Nedostupnosti-Molodezhnaya v 1964 g]. Bull SAE, 1965, 51:13–18 (in Russian)

    15 Atlas Antarktiki [Atlas of Antarctica]. Moscow-Leningrad: GUGK,Vol. 1, 1966 (in Russian with English Summary)

    16 Lythe M B, Vaughan D G, the BEDMAP Consortium. BEDMAP: A new ice thickness and subglacial topographic model of Antarctica. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106(B6): 11335–11351

    17 Lythe M B, Vaughan D G, the BEDMAP Consortium. BEDMAP- bed topography of the Antarctic, 1: 10 000 000 scale map. BAS (Misc) 9.Cambridge: British Antarctic Survey, 2000

    18 Grikurov G E, Leychenkov G. Tectonic map of Antarctica, scale 1: 10 000 000. CCGM-CGMW 2012

    19 Geomorfologicheskiy atlas Antarktidy [Geomorphological Atlas of Antarctica]. St.-Petersburg: ZAO “Karta”, 2011 (in Russian with English Summary)

    20 Bogorodsky V V, Bentley C R, Gudmandsen P E. Radioglaciology.Berlin: Springer, 1985

    21 Bogorodskiy V V, Sheremet'ev A N. Podlednikovye ozera Antarktidy[Antarctic subglacial lakes]. Priroda, 1981, 12: 49–51 (in Russian)

    22 Sheremet'ev A N. Izmerenie tolshchiny i skorosti dvizheniya lednikovogo pokrova v rayone marshruta Mirnyy – Komsomol'skaya–kupol "B" [Ice thickness and ice movement measurements on the profile of Mirny Komsomolskaya – Ridge B]. SAE Reports, 1986, 78:127–132 (in Russian)

    23 Sheremet'ev A N. Izmerenie skorosti rasprostraneniya elektromagnitnyh voln v lednike na Kupole "B" v Antarktide[Measurements of electromagnetic waves propagation in ice at Ridge B in Antarctica] // Bogorodskiy V V, Gavrilo V P. Elektrofizicheskie i fiziko-mehanicheskie svoystva l'da [Electrical and mechanical properties of ice]. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1989: 59–64 (in Russian)

    24 Siegert M J, Carter S, Tabacco I, et al. A revised inventory of Antarctic subglacial lakes. Antarctic Sci, 2005, 17(3): 453–460

    25 Wright A, Siegert M J. The identification and physiographical setting of Antarctic subglacial lakes: an update based on recent geophysical data for Subglacial Antarctic aquatic environments //Siegert M, Kennicutt C, Bindschadler B. Subglacial Antarctic aquatic environments, AGU Geophysical Monograph 192. Washington DC:AGU, 2011: 9–26

    26 Bj?rnsson H. Subglacial lakes and j?kulhlaups in Iceland. Global Planet Change, 2003, 35(3–4): 255–271, doi: 10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00130-3

    27 Palmer S J, Dowdeswell J A, Christoffersen P, et al. Greenland subglacial lakes detected by radar. Geophys Res Lett, 2013, 40(23):6154–6159, doi: 10.1002/2013GL058383

    28 Wolovick M J, Bell R E, Creyts T T, et al. Identification and control of subglacial water networks under Dome A, Antarctica. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf, 2013, 118(1): 140–154, doi: 10.1029/2012JF002555

    29 Robin G, De Q. Ice movement and temperature distribution in glaciers and ice sheets. J Glaciol, 1955, 2(18): 523–532

    30 Zotikov I A. The Antarctic subglacial Lake Vostok. Berlin,Heidelberg: Springer, 2006, doi: 10.1007/3-540-37723-9

    31 Zotikov I A. Bottom melting in the central zone of Antarctic’s ice sheet and its influence on modern balance. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication, Colloque d’Obergurgle,Belgique, 1963, 1: 36–44

    32 Studinger M, Bell R E, Karner G D, et al. Ice cover, landscape setting and geological framework of Lake Vostok, East Antarctica. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2003, 205(3–4): 195–210

    33 Studinger M, Karner G D, Bell R E, et al. Geophysical models for the tectonic frameworks of the Lake Vostok region, East Antarctica. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2003, 216(4): 663–677

    34 Isanina E V, Krupnova N A, Popov S V, et al. Deep structure of the Vostok Basin, East Antarctica as deduced from seismological observations. Geotectonics, 2009, 43(3): 221–225, doi: 10.1134/S0016852109030042

    35 Popov S V, Lunev P I. Orografiya korennogo rel'efa rayona podlednikovogo ozera Vostok (Vostochnaya Antarktida) [Orography of the bedrock relief of subglacial lake Vostok and its vicinity (East Antarctic)]. Geomorphology, 2012, 1: 81–92 (in Russian with English Summary)

    36 Popov S V, Lastochkin A N, Masolov V N, et al. Morphology of the subglacial bed relief of Lake Vostok basin area (Central East Antarctica) based on RES and seismic data // Fütterer D K, Damaske D, Kleinschmidt G, et al. Antarctica – Contributions to Global Earth Sciences. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 141–146

    37 Oswald G K A, Robin G de Q. Lakes beneath the Antarctic ice sheet.Nature, 1973, 245(5423): 251–254

    38 Ridley J K, Cudlip W, Laxon W. Identification of subglacial lakes using ERS-1 radar altimeter. J Glaciol, 1993, 73(133): 625–634

    39 Kapitsa A P, Ridley J K, Robin G de Q, et al. A large deep freshwater lake beneath the ice of central East Antarctica. Nature, 1996,381(6584): 684–686

    40 Siegert M, Popov S V, Studinger M. Vostok subglacial lake: a review of geophysical data regarding its physiographical setting. Geophys Monogr Ser, 2011, 192: 45–60

    41 Masolov V N, Popov S V, Lukin V V, et al. The bottom topography and subglacial Lake Vostok water body, East Antarctica. Dokl Earth Sci,2010, 433(2): 1092–1097

    42 Popov S V, Masolov V N, Lukin V V. Ozero Vostok, Vostochnaya Antarktida: moshchnost' lednika, glubina ozera, podlednyy i korennoy rel'ef. [Vostok Lake, East Antarctica: ice thickness, lake depth, ice base and bedrock topography]. Ice and Snow, 2011, 1(113): 25–35 (in Russian with English Summary)

    43 Masolov V N, Popov S V, Lukin V V, et al. Russian geophysical studies of Lake Vostok, Central East Antarctica // Fütterer D K,Damaske D, Kleinschmidt G, et al. Antarctica – Contributions to Global Earth Sciences. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 135–140

    44 Popov S V, Masolov V N, Lukin V V, et al. Otechestvennye seysmicheskie, radiolokatsionnye i seysmologicheskie issledovaniya podlednikovogo ozera Vostok. [Russian seismic, radio-echo and seismological investigations of Vostok Lake], Ice and Snow, 2012,4(120): 31–38 (in Russian with English Summary)

    45 Masolov V N, Lukin V V, Sheremetyev A N, et al. Geophysical investigations of the subglacial lake Vostok in Eastern Antarctica.Dokl Earth Sci, 2001, 379A(6): 734–738

    46 Popov S V, Sheremet'ev A N, Masolov V N, et al. Velocity of radiowave propagation in ice at Vostok station, Antarctica. J Glaciol, 2003,49(165): 179–183

    47 Popov S V, Chernoglazov Yu B. Podlednikovoe ozero Vostok,Vostochnaya Antarktida: beregovaya liniya i okruzhayushchie vodoemy. [Vostok Lake, East Antarctica: shore line and surrounding subglacial water cavities]. Ice and Snow, 2011, 1(113): 13–24 (in Russian with English Summary)

    48 Tabacco I E, Bianchi C, Zirizzotti A, et al. Airborne radar survey above Vostok region, East Antarctica: ice thickness and VSL geometry. J Glaciol, 2002, 48(160): 62–69

    49 Popov S V. Radiolokatsionnoe zondirovanie neglubokih podlednikovyh vodoemov: teoreticheskie predposylki i prakticheskie rezul'taty [Radio-echo sounding of shallow subglacial reservoirs:theoretical background and practical results]. Ice and Snow, 2010,4(112): 5–14 (in Russian with English Summary)

    50 Popov S V, Eberlein L. Opyt primeneniya georadara dlya izucheniya stroeniya snezhno-firnovoy tolshchi i grunta Vostochnoy Antarktidy[Investigation of snow-firn thickness and ground in the East Antarctica by GPR]. Ice and Snow, 2014, 4(128): 95-106 (in Russian with English Summary)

    51 Richter A, Fedorov D V, Dvoryanenko A K, et al. Observation of iceflow vectors on inner-continental traverses in East Antarctica. Ice Snow, 2010, 1(109): 30–35

    52 Popov S V, Masolov V N. Forty-seven new subglacial lakes in the 0°– 110°E sector of East Antarctica. J Glaciol, 2007, 53(181): 289–297

    53 Popov S V, Masolov V N, Lukin V V, et al. Sovremennye otechestvennye seysmo-radiolokatsionnye issledovaniya v Tsentral'noy Antarktide v preddverii Mezhdunarodnogo Polyarnogo Goda 2007–2008 [Modern Russian seismic and radio-echo sounding investigations in Central Antarctica before the International Polar Year 2007–08]. Mater Glaciol Data, 2007, 103: 107–117 (in Russian with English summary)

    54 Popov S V, Chernoglazov Yu B. Ob otkrytii podlednikovogo ozera v rayone stantsii Pionerskaya (Vostochnaya Antarktida) [About discovering the subglacial lake in Pionerskaya Station vicinity (East Antarctica)]. Mater Glaciol Data, 2006, 100: 165–167 (in Russian with English summary)

    55 Popov S V, Popkov A M. Seysmo-radiolokatsionnye issledovaniya rayona podlednikovogo ozera Pionerskoe, Vostochnaya Antarktida[Reflection seismic and radio-echo sounding investigations of the subglacial lake Pionerskoe, East Antarctica]. Earth’s Cryos, 2014 (in Russian with English summary)

    56 Salamatin A N, Smirnov K E, Sheremet'ev A N. Primenenie matematicheskoy modeli statsionarnogo lednika k raschetu termogidrodinamicheskih harakteristik lednikovogo pokrova Antarktidy v rayone ot Mirnogo k kupolu B [Application of the mathematical model to calculate the steady-state hermohydrodynamic characteristics of the Antarctic ice sheet in the area between Mirny and Ridge B]. Mater Glaciol Data, 1982, 44: 39–49 (in Russian with English summary)

    57 Baranov A, Morelli A. The Moho depth map of the Antarctica region.Tectonophysics, 2013, 609: 299–313, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.023

    58 Fretwell P, Pritchard H D, Vaughan D G, et al. Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica. The Cryosphere,2013, 7(1): 375– 393

    59 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. Antarctic Digital Database (ADD), Version 2.0. Manual and bibliography, Cambridge:Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, British Antarctic Survey,1998

    60 Liu H, Jezek K, Li B, et al. Radarsat Antarctic Mapping Project digital elevation model version 2. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center, Digital media. [2001-11-01]. http://nsidc.org/data/docs/daac/nsidc0082_ramp_dem_v2.gd.html

    哪里可以看免费的av片| 一级黄片播放器| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产99白浆流出| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 脱女人内裤的视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 在线观看一区二区三区| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久精品人妻少妇| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 日本熟妇午夜| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 身体一侧抽搐| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 不卡一级毛片| 少妇的逼好多水| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲不卡免费看| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 一本综合久久免费| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| tocl精华| 成人精品一区二区免费| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 一进一出抽搐动态| 无限看片的www在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 久久久久久大精品| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产亚洲欧美98| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 三级毛片av免费| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产av一区在线观看免费| av福利片在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 久久久久性生活片| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 午夜福利欧美成人| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 日本一二三区视频观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 熟女电影av网| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 99热只有精品国产| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 宅男免费午夜| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 欧美午夜高清在线| av在线天堂中文字幕| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 精品日产1卡2卡| 欧美日韩精品网址| 美女大奶头视频| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| aaaaa片日本免费| 免费av观看视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久99久视频精品免费| netflix在线观看网站| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| av片东京热男人的天堂| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久久久久久久大av| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产免费男女视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 欧美zozozo另类| 两个人看的免费小视频| 丁香欧美五月| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产精品野战在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 欧美日本视频| 日本 av在线| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 身体一侧抽搐| 日本 欧美在线| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 少妇丰满av| 久久久国产成人免费| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| avwww免费| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 免费观看精品视频网站| www日本在线高清视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 在线观看舔阴道视频| eeuss影院久久| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 极品教师在线免费播放| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲无线观看免费| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 麻豆成人av在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲av美国av| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 中国美女看黄片| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产三级黄色录像| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 午夜影院日韩av| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 在线视频色国产色| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲激情在线av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲av一区综合| 看免费av毛片| 黄色女人牲交| 色视频www国产| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 99久国产av精品| ponron亚洲| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久久精品大字幕| 色吧在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲国产色片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 露出奶头的视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 香蕉av资源在线| 99热这里只有精品一区| 欧美在线黄色| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产高潮美女av| 禁无遮挡网站| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 热99在线观看视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 午夜两性在线视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 久久人妻av系列| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 久久亚洲真实| 性欧美人与动物交配| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲精品在线美女| 有码 亚洲区| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产成人a区在线观看| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| av在线天堂中文字幕| 高清在线国产一区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 在线天堂最新版资源| 中国美女看黄片| 久久国产精品影院| 中国美女看黄片| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 黄色成人免费大全| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 欧美激情在线99| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 中国美女看黄片| 久久香蕉精品热| 毛片女人毛片| 91久久精品电影网| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 午夜福利在线在线| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 成人18禁在线播放| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 一本一本综合久久| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 午夜精品在线福利| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产视频内射| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 高清在线国产一区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 少妇的逼水好多| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 嫩草影院精品99| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 成人欧美大片| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 美女高潮的动态| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 99热这里只有是精品50| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美日本视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| ponron亚洲| www国产在线视频色| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| av天堂在线播放| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 97超视频在线观看视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 日韩免费av在线播放| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 午夜福利高清视频| 免费看日本二区| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产精品野战在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 在线播放无遮挡| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| ponron亚洲| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 在线播放无遮挡| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 性欧美人与动物交配| 美女黄网站色视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久久久久久久中文| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产成人影院久久av| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 88av欧美| www日本在线高清视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美日韩黄片免| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产黄片美女视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲av美国av| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 此物有八面人人有两片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 极品教师在线免费播放| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产成人福利小说| 在线观看66精品国产| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人av| 少妇高潮的动态图| 51国产日韩欧美| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产在视频线在精品| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 舔av片在线| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 成人18禁在线播放| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 中文字幕久久专区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 免费av观看视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页|