• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A Microsatellite Genetic Linkage Map of Black Rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli)

    2014-04-26 10:55:01CHUGuannanJIANGLimingHEYanYUHaiyangWANGZhigangJIANGHaibinandZHANGQuanqi
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2014年6期

    CHU Guannan, JIANG Liming, HE Yan, YU Haiyang,, WANG Zhigang, JIANG Haibin, and ZHANG Quanqi

    1) College of Marine Life Science, Key Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, P. R. China

    2) Shandong Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Yantai 264006, P. R. China

    A Microsatellite Genetic Linkage Map of Black Rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli)

    CHU Guannan1), JIANG Liming1), HE Yan1), YU Haiyang1),*, WANG Zhigang1), JIANG Haibin2), and ZHANG Quanqi1)

    1) College of Marine Life Science, Key Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, P. R. China

    2) Shandong Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Yantai 264006, P. R. China

    Ovoviviparous black rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli) is an important marine fish species for aquaculture and fisheries in China. Genetic information of this species is scarce because of the lack of microsatellite markers. In this study, a large number of microsatellite markers of black rockfish were isolated by constructing microsatellite-enriched libraries. Female- and male-specific genetic linkage maps were constructed using 435 microsatellite markers genotyped in a full-sib family of the fish species. The female linkage map contained 140 microsatellite markers, in which 23 linkage groups had a total genetic length of 1334.1 cM and average inter-marker space of 13.3 cM. The male linkage map contained 156 microsatellite markers, in which 25 linkage groups had a total genetic length of 1359.6 cM and average inter-marker distance of 12.4 cM. The genome coverage of the female and male linkage maps was 68.6% and 69.3%, respectively. The female-to-male ratio of the recombination rate was approximately 1.07:1 in adjacent microsatellite markers. This paper presents the first genetic linkage map of microsatellites in black rockfish. The collection of polymorphic markers and sex-specific linkage maps of black rockfish could be useful for further investigations on parental assignment, population genetics, quantitative trait loci mapping, and marker-assisted selection in related breeding programs.

    black rockfish; Sebastes schlegeli; microsatellite; genetic linkage map

    1 Introduction

    Black rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli, family Sebastinae) is an economically important fish species for fisheries and aquaculture in eastern Asia. In the past decade, research on black rockfish has primarily focused on the extent of stocking and impact of water pollution on indigenous populations. Black rockfish has become an important aquaculture species in China, especially in Shandong Peninsula, because of its high commercial value (Xie et al., 2004). The embryonic development of black rockfish, an ovoviviparous fish species, had been studied (Yamada et al., 1991). Mature female individuals of black rockfish mate with male individuals in autumn; the fertilized eggs are stored in female ovaries and developed for hatching throughout winter and spring; the ‘pregnant’ females spawn once a year to give birth to fry in May and June (Zhu et al., 1999). Artificial fingerling production and aquaculture of black rockfish have been successful in China and Korea.

    Assaying the genetic structure of wild fish populations is essential for long-term resource management, and monitoring the genetic variability of cultured stocks has implications for sustainable aquaculture (Hamrick et al., 1991). In addition, good breeds with high growth rates and/or disease resistance can be selected to enhance aquaculture efficiency. Therefore, numerous genetic breeding programs have been initiated to promote commercial cultivation (Bentsen et al., 1994). To develop the breeding and management plans, genetic knowledge regarding the karyotype, population structure, and genetic diversities is useful in marine animals. A karyotype study has demonstrated that the diploid number of black rockfish is 2n=48 (Zhu et al., 2006). Recent studies attempted to develop microsatellite markers for assessing the genetic diversity and population structure of black rockfish (Yoshida et al., 2005; An et al., 2009, 2012). As of this writing, research on black rockfish using molecular markers is lacking, and genetic information of this fish species is limited.

    Selective breeding programs aim to improve the economic traits of a species, such as growth and disease resistance (Danzmann et al., 2001; Haidle et al., 2008). Such economic traits are generally controlled by more than one locus (O’Connel and Wright, 1997), which are inherited quantitatively. Traditional genetic breeding requires multiple generations of selection, which takes asubstantially long time because of the long generation periods of most marine fish species. Comparatively, marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a promising approach (Fuji et al., 2007) that is expected to increase the genetic response by affecting the selection intensity and accuracy (Bentsen and Gjerde, 1994). Thus, construction of genetic linkage maps and mapping of related quantitative trait loci (QTL) are important for MAS of aquatic species (Danzmann and Gharbi, 2001; Haidle et al., 2008).

    Genetic linkage maps have been constructed for commercially important fish species, such as tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (Lee et al., 2005), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Rexroad et al., 2008), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) (Moen et al., 2008), Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) (Coimbra et al., 2003; Cecilia et al., 2010), European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) (Chistiakov et al., 2008), Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) (Moen et al., 2009; Hubert et al., 2010), turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) (Bouza et al., 2007), and half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) (Jiang et al., 2013). Some QTLs have been successfully mapped for the above fish species as well. The QTLs for body size were identified in tilapia (Cnaani et al., 2003). Two QTLs that influence the upper water temperature tolerance were identified in three rainbow trout half-sib families (Jackson et al., 1998). A lymphocystis disease-resistant trait was linked to a microsatellite locus in linkage group 15 in Japanese flounder (Fuji et al., 2006), and this locus was further used in genetic breeding of lymphocystis disease-resistant strains (Fuji et al., 2007). However, the polymorphic markers and genetic linkage maps of black rockfish are still lacking, further limiting the progress of selective breeding of this species.

    In this study, 435 polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed and used to construct the microsatellite-based genetic linkage maps of female and male black rockfish. The constructed maps will lay the foundation for further studies regarding high-density linkage map construction, QTL, and MAS of black rockfish.

    2 Materials and Methods

    2.1 Experimental Population and DNA Extraction

    Individuals of S. schlegeli were obtained from Taihua Mariculture Ltd., Co., Yantai City, Shandong Province, China. Six wild individuals were collected, and a small piece of muscle tissue was dissected from each individual. Genomic DNA was extracted from muscle tissue specimens using the standard phenol-chloroform method (Sambrook et al., 2001). All genomic DNA samples were dissolved in 0.1×TE buffer, and adjusted to 50 ng μL–1for microsatellite-enriched library construction and polymorphism detection of microsatellite markers.

    A total of 300 wild individuals (100 females and 200 males) were reared in an outdoor pond (100 m × 200 m) for natural mating in October 2010. After mating, the female individuals were moved to smaller indoor tanks (5 m × 6 m, 20 individuals each) for overwintering and intensive cultivation until the following April. During the spawning season, each female individual was kept in a separate hatching tank with sufficient aeration and allowed to spawn fry separately. Offspring obtained from one female was called a family.

    Four parent females and their families were randomly selected. A small piece of fin tissue of each female and 30 one-month-old fries from each family were collected and stored in 100% ethanol for DNA extraction. The samples were applied to family assignment using 17 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers. One of the four families was a full-sib family derived from the female mating with a male, whereas the other three were half-sib families produced by the female parent mating with at least two males (Chu et al., 2013). The full-sib family, including 48 individuals, was used as the mapping family for genetic linkage map construction.

    2.2 Microsatellite Markers

    The microsatellite library enriched with AG or AC repeats was constructed as described by Edwards et al. (1996) with slight modifications. The entire method of microsatellite marker isolation was based on the procedure by Jiang et al. (2013). The pre-amplification condition was 25 cycles.

    Sequences containing microsatellites were processed using Lasergene 6.0 (http://www.dnastar.com/), and searched for repeat fragments using Tandem Repeats Finder (version 4.0) (Benson, 1999). Microsatellites with at least six repeats and appropriate flanking sequences were selected for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primer design using Primer Premier 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International) based on the GC content of 45%–65%, melting temperature of 45–65℃, and lack of a secondary structure. All primer pairs were designed to be 18–24 bp in length with an expected product size of 80–350 bp. All designed primers pairs were synthesized by GenScript (Nanjing, China), and tested by temperature-gradient PCR to optimize the annealing temperature.

    Gradient PCR amplification was conducted at an annealing temperature of 45–65℃. The 25 μL PCR reactions contained 1×PCR buffer, 1.5 mmol L-1MgCl2, 0.2 mmol L-1dNTP, 0.4 μmol L-1primer, 0.75 U rTaq DNA polymerase, and 2 ng μL-1template DNA. The PCR conditions were as follows: pre-denaturation at 94℃ for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94℃ for 30 s, annealing at gradient temperature from 45℃ to 65℃for 30 s, extension at 72℃ for 30 s, and a final extension step at 72℃ for 7 min. The PCR amplicons were detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide (EB), and visualized under UV light to confirm the optimal annealing temperature for each primer pair.

    All microsatellite loci were genotyped in six wild individuals for polymorphism assessment. PCR amplification was performed as described above. The PCR products were separated on 10% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels and visualized by EB staining. Among the success-fully amplified primer pairs, the polymorphic markers were designated as ‘SS’ (S. schlegeli). All the polymorphic markers were used to construct the genetic linkage map.

    2.3 Map Construction

    Forty-eight progenies from the selected full-sib family were used for map construction. Genotype data of the female parent and 48 offspring individuals were transferred to an electronic spreadsheet of cross-pollinating (CP) format that can be recognized by JoinMap? 4.0 (Van Ooijen, 2006). When the genotypes of the female parent and offspring were known, the genotype of the male parent could be inferred. A goodness-of-fit G-test was used to examine segregation ratios of all markers that significantly deviated from the Mendelian expectations (P < 0.01). Markers exhibiting significant deviations were double-checked and either rescored or removed for further analysis. The Morgan’s mapping function, which simply equates genetic distance with recombination rate, was used for distance calculation. The mapping population was considered as a CP population. The markers, excluding those departing from Mendelian expectations, were assigned into linkage maps with a minimum logarithm of odds (LOD) score of 4.0. Once the framework maps were established, the distorted and unlinked markers were added using a less stringent LOD threshold of 3.0. Estimation of the differences in sex-specific recombination rates along the linkage groups was performed on the shared adjacent markers by the chi-square test. For each linkage group (LG), the recombination rates of male and female individuals were compared. Marker distance in centiMorgan was calculated with the Kosambi parameter. Linkage maps were drawn using MapChart 2.1 (Voorrips, 2002).

    2.4 Genome Length and Map Coverage

    Genome length was calculated using two different methods. The genome size 1 (Ge1) was estimated by adding 2s (where ‘s’ is the average spacing of the linkage map) to the length of each group, which accounts for the chromosome ends of framework markers (Postlethwait et al., 1998). The genome size 2 (Ge2) was calculated by multiplying the total length of the linkage groups by the factor (m+1)/(m-1) (where ‘m’ is the number of framework markers in each linkage group) (Chakravarti et al., 1991). The average of the two estimates was used as the estimated genome length of each sex-specific linkage map (Zhang et al., 2007). The observed map length was calculated as the total length of the map excluding unlinked markers. The observed genome coverage was calculated as the ratio of the observed map length to the estimated genome length.

    3 Results

    3.1 Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers

    A total of 1073 positive clones were detected in the microsatellite-enriched library, from which 982 microsatellite sequences were obtained. Targeting the microsatellite sequences, 788 primer pairs were designed. After optimization of the annealing temperature, the polymorphism of these markers was evaluated in six wild individuals, and positive results were obtained with 435 (55.2%) markers.

    Before genetic linkage map construction, the polymorphism of the microsatellite markers was detected in the full-sib family of the female parent and five offspring individuals. The genotype of male individuals was obtained after the genotypes of the female parent and offspring individuals were identified. According to the results of PCR assay, in the full-sib family, 159 microsatellite markers were heterozygous in the female parent and 176 were polymorphic in the male parent. The 335 polymorphic microsatellite markers were used to construct the sex-specific genetic linkage maps. Markers that were homozygous in both parents were removed from further analysis.

    3.2 Linkage Maps

    Genotype analysis of the microsatellite markers (excluding segregation distortion markers) in the mapping family showed that 25 and 27 linkage groups were identified in the female and male linkage maps, respectively, which were constructed at the threshold of LOD=4.0. In consideration of the segregation distortion markers by reducing the LOD score to 3.0, two pairs of linkage groups in the female map merged together and one pair of linkage groups in the male map merged together. The final linkage maps of female and male black rockfish were constructed, which contained 23 and 25 linkage groups, respectively (Figs.1 and 2). The female and male linkage groups were matched according to the common markers, and 20 homologous pairs of linkage groups were found.

    The final length of the female map containing 140 markers was 1334.1 cM, and that of the male map containing 156 markers was 1359.6 cM. The lengths of linkage groups varied from 1.1 cM to 148.0 cM in the female map and 7.8 cM to 125.1 cM in the male map. The resolution of the female map ranged from 1.1 cM to 32.6 cM (average 13.3 cM), whereas that of the male map ranged from 3.9 cM to 45.5 cM (average 12.4 cM). The number of loci per linkage group in the female map was 2–17 (average 6.0), whereas that in the male map was 2–12 (average 6.1) (Table 1). The general characteristics of the sexspecific genetic linkage maps are summarized in Table 2.

    The female and male linkage groups were matched according to the markers detected in both parents. Although the total map length of the female was close to that of the male, it was not consistent along all homologous linkage groups. A total of 20 pairs of homologous linkage groups were found (Figs.1 and 2). LG1 (148.0 cM) in female was matched with LG1 (125.1 cM) and LG21 (47.1 cM) in male, whereas LG15 (65.1 cM) in male was matched with LG15 (18.6 cM) and LG23 (1.1 cM) in female. Obvious differences were observed in certain areas of the chromosomes. A few groups (LGs 2, 5, 9, 12, 16, 17, and 20) were longer in the female map, and some other groups (LGs7, 8, 11, and 19) were longer in the male map.

    3.3 Genome Size and Map Coverage

    Using two different methods, the genome length of the female linkage group was estimated to be 1946.6 and 1942.1 cM with an average of 1944.3 cM, and that of the male was estimated to be 1980.5 and 1942.1 cM with an average of 1961.3 cM. Based on the observed and estimated genome lengths, the genome coverage of the female and male maps was estimated to be 68.6% and 69.3%, respectively (Table 2).

    3.4 Differences in the Recombination Rate Between Sexes

    Twenty homologous linkage groups were found, in which the female and male linkage maps shared more than one microsatellite marker, allowing interlocus comparison of the recombination rate between the sexes. Among the sex-specific linkage groups, the distribution of the markers was not uniform between the sexes (Table 3). Fifty pairs of adjacent markers heterozygous in both parents were selected to compare the sex-specific recombination rates (Table 3). In 10 of the 20 linkage groups (LGs 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 16), the recombination rate in the female was higher than that in the male for the majority of the adjacent markers. However, in the other four linkage groups (LGs 1, 8, 15, and 17), the recombination rate in the female was lower than that in the male for the majority of the adjacent markers. Compared with a tight linkage of markers in the homologous LG1 of the female, the recombination rate generated a gap between the markers in the male, leading to the formation of two sub-groups (LG1 and LG21). Similarly, two subgroups in the female (LG15 and LG23) were in contrast with a linkage (LG15) in the male. These two sub-groups possibly resulted from the artificial absence of linkage caused by the small sample size (48 individuals) or the lack of microsatellite markers. Comparison of the recombination rates in the linkage maps between the sexes showed that the recombination rate in the female was slightly higher than that in the male. The female-to-male ratio of the recombination rate was approximately 1.07:1 in all adjacent microsatellite markers.

    Fig.1 Female-specific genetic linkage map of microsatellites in the black rockfish Sebastes schlegeli.

    Fig.2 Male-specific genetic linkage map of microsatellites in the black rockfish Sebastes schlegeli.

    Table 1 A summary of the female- and male-specific genetic linkage maps of microsatellites in the black rockfish Sebastes schlegeli

    (to be continued)

    (continued)

    Table 2 Characteristics of the male- and female-specific genetic linkage maps of microsatellites in the black rockfish Sebastes schlegeli

    Table 3 Comparison of the recombination rates between female and male genetic linkage maps of microsatellites in the black rockfish Sebastes schlegeli

    SS319SS3203 3 1.1 1.1 SS325SS2604 4 2.0 1.5 SS201SS3245 5 6.8 6.7 SS324SS2205 5 28.4 28.9 SS220SS0205 5 4.6 4.3 SS315SS3055 5 5.8 4.3 SS277SS2406 6 8.5 8.5 SS240SS2786 6 7.0 7.0 SS278SS3436 6 15.4 15.4 SS343SS1626 6 17.1 17.1 SS331SS3487 7 1.5 1.6 SS348SS2117 7 5.9 5.6 SS211SS2697 7 6.9 7.1 SS289SS1148 8 13.1 13.9 SS015SS1969 9 18.8 14.7 SS170SS18310 10 11.4 11.3 SS245SS31310 10 10.4 9.9 SS265SS31310 10 10.4 9.9 SS257SS31310 10 10.4 9.9 SS314SS32911 11 20.8 19.1 SS329SS33611 11 20.6 19.5 SS316SS09412 12 8.8 7.2 SS187SS28313 13 12.1 12.1 SS283SS25313 13 7.0 7.0 SS164SS12714 14 1.1 1.1 SS127SS13214 14 24.4 23.8 SS352SS31715 15 11.1 13.9 SS332SS31116 16 1.1 1.1 SS311SS26416 16 7.0 6.7 SS338SS15717 17 4.4 4.4 SS293SS07417 17 15.8 17.1 SS075SS32618 18 10.4 10.4 Total 486.0 456.1

    4 Discussion

    4.1 Polymorphism of Microsatellite Markers

    Microsatellite markers characterized by co-dominant Mendelian inheritance, high polymorphism rate, and wide ranging abundance have become a preferential choice for constructing framework linkage maps (Zhong et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010). However, related studies on black rockfish have been limited because of the lack of polymorphic molecular markers. A microsatellite-enrichedlibrary of black rockfish was constructed in the present study, and a large number of polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed and characterized. Sex-specific genetic linkage maps of ovoviviparous black rockfish were constructed for the first time. Given the homozygosity of specific markers in both parents, not all the isolated markers were included in the construction of the genetic linkage map. Nevertheless, the collection of markers can be used to evaluate the population structure and genetic diversities of wild and cultured populations, as well as parentage identification of hatchery stocks. Moreover, the microsatellite markers can be applied for effective mapping of QTLs in high-density genetic linkage maps and MAS in breeding programs of black rockfish (Cecilia et al., 2010).

    4.2 Linkage Map

    The female linkage map consisted of 140 markers of 23 linkage groups with an average inter-marker spacing of 13.3 cM, whereas the male map contained 16 more markers and 25 linkage groups with an average inter-marker distance of 12.4 cM. The female and male linkage maps constructed at the LOD score of 4.0 had 25 and 27 linkage groups, respectively. When the segregation distortion markers were included by decreasing the LOD score to 3.0, a couple of pairs of linkage groups merged together. Finally, 23 and 25 linkage groups were in the female and male maps, respectively. This result was inconsistent with the number of haploid chromosomes in this species (2n = 48) (Zhu and Cai, 2006), possibly because of the small sample size (48 individuals) or the lack of microsatellite markers. A similar discrepancy between the numbers of linkage groups and haploid chromosomes has been observed in Japanese flounder (Coimbra et al., 2003), turbot (Bouza et al., 2007), common carp (Cheng et al., 2009), and red drum (Portnoy et al., 2010). Of the 435 polymorphic markers identified in the present study, 159 and 176 were heterozygous in the female and male parents, respectively. These heterozygous markers could be used for segregation analysis and map construction. Given that a small proportion of these markers were excluded from the final map, more markers are needed and more individuals should be analyzed to fill the gaps for constructing maps with higher resolution and more accurate QTL allocation. With the development of molecular biology techniques, high-throughput sequencing will soon replace the traditional method (Li et al., 2010). By then, a large number of markers can be obtained in a short term, thereby reducing the experiment cost and improving the work efficiency.

    4.3 Difference in the Recombination Rate Between Sexes

    The relative rates of recombination for both sexes of any species should be known (Singer et al., 2002). The recombination rates of autosomal genes in female and male are commonly different. Significant differences in sex-specific recombination rates have been reported in many fish species. Low recombination rates of males have been identified in zebrafish (2.74:1) (Singer et al., 2002), European sea bass (1.5:1) (Chistiakov et al., 2005), Atlantic halibut (1.89–2.53:1) (Reid et al., 2007), turbot (1.6:1) (Bouza et al., 2007), Japanese flounder (1:0.7) (Cecilia et al., 2010), red drum (1.03:1) (Portnoy et al., 2010), and half-smooth tongue sole (1:1.02) (Jiang et al., 2013). The reduced male recombination rates in teleost fish may vary greatly among the chromosomes and subchromosomal regions. Crossing over is considered less frequent in the heterogametic sex, and most of the vertebrates, including human (Dib et al., 1996) and mouse (Dietrich et al., 1996), comply with this viewpoint (Haldane et al., 1922).

    As of this writing, the sex determination of black rockfish remains unclear. When the linkage maps were compared to examine the recombination differences between sexes, we observed that the homologous linkage groups sharing the same microsatellite markers in the female map had slightly higher recombination rates than those in the male map. Such differences were not consistent in all chromosomes. Compared with the data of other fish species, the sex difference in black rockfish (F:M = 1.07:1) was relatively small. This phenomenon is related to the time spent in meiotic prophase in one sex, transcriptional activity of certain genes during meiosis in one sex, and presence of sequences that are recognized by sex-specific enzymes (Lindahal et al., 1991). Evidence showed that recombination along the chromosome depends on the chromosome structure (Lynn et al., 2004). The recombination rate of zebrafish is higher in centromere-proximal regions in females and telomere-proximal regions in males (Singer et al., 2002). The difference in the recombination rate between sexes remains unclear (Singer et al., 2002; Kukekova et al., 2007).

    5 Conclusions

    In this study, a large number of polymorphic microsatellite markers were isolated from ovoviviparous black rockfish. A microsatellite-based genetic linkage map of black rockfish was constructed for the first time. The female linkage map consisted of 140 markers of 23 linkage groups with an average inter-marker space of 13.3 cM. The male linkage map contained 156 markers of 25 linkage groups with an average inter-marker distance of 12.4 cM. The total length of the female linkage map was 1334.1 cM, which covered 68.6% of the genome. The male linkage map was 1359.6 cM in length, with genome coverage of 69.3%. The recombination rate was higher in females than that in males (female:male = 1.07:1). The constructed linkage map formed the basis for QTL mapping and MAS in genetic breeding programs of black rockfish.

    Acknowledgement

    This study was supported by the National High-Tech Research and Development Program (Grant Nos. 2012AA10A408 and 2012AA10A402).

    An, H. S., Kim, M. J., Park, K., Cho, K., Bae, B., Kim, J., and Myeong, J. I., 2012. Genetic diversity and population structure in the heavily exploited Korean rockfish, Sebastes schlegeli, in Korea. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 43: 73-83.

    An, H. S., Park, J. Y., Kin, M. J., Lee, E. Y., and Kim, K. K., 2009. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for the heavily exploited rockfish Sebastes schlegeli, and cross-species amplification in four related Sebastes spp. Conservation Genetics, 10: 1969-1972.

    Benson, G., 1999. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 27: 573-580.

    Bentsen, H. H., and Gjerde, B., 1994. Design of fish breeding programs. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Guelph, Canada, 19: 352-359.

    Bouza, C., Hermida, M., Pardo, B. G., Fernández, C., Fortes, G. G., Castro, J., Sánchez, L., Presa, P., Pérez, M., Sanjuán, A., de Carlos, A., Alvarez-Dios, J. A., Ezcurra, S., Cal, R. M., Piferrer, F., and Martínez, P., 2007. A microsatellite genetic map of the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Genetics, 177: 2457-2467.

    Cecilia, C., Fuji, K., Ozaki, A., Hasegawa, O., Sakamoto, T., Morishima, K., Nakayama, I., Fujiwara, A., Masaoka, T., Okamoto, H., Hayashida, K., Tagami, M., Kawai, J., Hayashizaki, Y., and Okamoto, N., 2010. A second generation genetic linkage map of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). BMC Genomics, 11: 554-564.

    Chakravarti, A., Lasher, L. K., and Reefer, J. E., 1991. A maximum likelihood method for estimating genome length using genetic linkage data. Genetics, 128: 175-182.

    Cheng, L., Liu, L., Yu, X., Wang, D., and Tong, J., 2009. A linkage map of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Animal Genetics, 41: 191-198.

    Chistiakov, D. A., Hellemans, B., Haley, C. S., Law, A. S., Tsigenopoulos, C. S., Kotoulas, G., Bertotto, D., Libertini, A., and Volckaert, F. A., 2005. A microsatellite linkage map of the European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax L. Genetics, 170: 1821-1826.

    Chistiakov, D. A., Tsigenopoulos, C. S., Lagnel, J., Guo, Y. M., Hellemans, B., Haley, C. S., Volckaert, F. A. M., and Kotoulas, G., 2008. A combined AFLP and microsatellite linkage map and pilot comparative genomic analysis of European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax L. Animal Genetics, 39: 623-634.

    Chu, G. N., Jiang, L. M., Yu, H. Y., Wang, Y. N., Jiang, H. B., and Zhang, Q. Q., 2013. Family assessment with microsatellite markers in the ovoviviparous black rock fish Sebastes schlegelii. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 44 (3): 670-676 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Cnaani, A., Hallerman, E. M., Ron, M., Weller, J. I., Indelmanc M., Kshic, Y., Galld, G. A. E., and Hulata, G., 2003. Detection of a chromosomal region with two quantitative trait loci, affecting cold tolerance and fish size, in an F2tilapia hybrid. Aquaculture, 223: 117-128

    Coimbra, M. R. M., Kobayashi, K., Koretsugu, S., Hasegawa, O., Ohara, E., Ozaki, A., Sakamoto, T., Naruse, K., and Okamoto, N., 2003. A genetic linkage map of the Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture, 220: 203-218.

    Coimbra, M. R. M., Kobayashi, K., Koretsugu, S., Hasegawa, O., Ohara, E., Ozaki, A., Sakamoto, T., Naruse, K., and Okamoto, N., 2003. A genetic linkage map of the Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture, 220: 203-218.

    Danzmann, R. G., and Gharbi, K., 2001. Gene mapping in fishes: A means to an end. Genetica, 111: 3-23.

    Dib, C., Fauré, S., Fizames, C., Samson, D., Drouot, N., Vignal, A., Millasseau, P., Marc, S., Kazan, J., Seboun, E., Lathrop, M., Gyapay, G., Morissette, J., and Weissenbach, J., 1996. A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5264 microsatellites. Nature, 380: 152-154.

    Dietrich, W. F., Miller, J., Steen, R., Merchant, M. A., and Damron-Boles, D., 1996. A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome. Nature, 380: 149-152.

    Edwards, K., Baker, J. J. H., and Daly, A., 1996. Microsatellite libraries enriched for several microsatellite sequences in plants. Biotechniques, 20: 758-760.

    Fuji, K., Hasegawa, O., Honda, K., Kumasaka, K., Sakamoto, T., and Okamoto, N,. 2007. Marker-assisted breeding of a lymphocystis disease-resistant Japanese flounder (Pralichthys olivaceus). Aquaculture, 272: 291-295.

    Fuji, K., Kobayashi, K., Hasegawa, O., Coimbra, M. R. M., Sakamoto, T., and Okamoto, N., 2006. Identification of a single major genetic locus controlling the resistance to lymphocystis disease in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquaculture, 254: 203-210.

    Haidle, L., Janssen, J. E., Gharbi, K., Moghadam, H. K., Rerguson, M. M., and Danzmann, R. G., 2008. Determination of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for early maturation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Marine Biotechnology, 10: 579-592.

    Haldane, J. B. S., 1922. The part played by recurrent mutation in evolution. American Naturalist, 67: 5-9.

    Hamrick, J. L., Godt, M. J. W., Murawski, D. A., and Loveless, M. D., 1991. Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: Implications for conservation biology. In: Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Falk, D. A., and Holsinger, K. E., eds., Oxford University Press, New York, 75-86.

    Hubert, S., Higgins, B., Borza, T., and Bowman, S., 2010. Development of a SNP resource and a genetic linkage map for Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). BMC Genomics, 11: 191.

    Jackson, T. R., Ferguson, M. M., Danzmann, R. G, Fishback, A. G., Ihssen, P. E., O’Connell, M., and Crease, T. J., 1998. Identification of two QTL influencing upper temperature tolerance in three rainbow trout half-sib families. Heredity, 80: 143-151.

    Jiang, L., Chu, G., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Zhai, J., and Yu, H., 2013. A microsatellite genetic linkage map of half smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). Marine Genomics, 9: 17-23.

    Kukekova, A. V., Trut, L. N., Oskina, I. N., Johnson, J. L., Temnykh, S. V., Kharlamova, A. V., Shepeleva, D. V., Gulievich, R. G., Shikhevich, S. G., Graphodatsky, A. S., Aguirre, G. D., and Aclan, G. M., 2007. A meiotic linkage map of the silver fox, aligned and compared to the canine genome. Genome Research, 17: 387-399.

    Lee, B. Y., Lee, W. J., Streelman, J. T., Carleton, K. L., Howe, A. E., Hulata, G., Slettan, A., Stern, J. E., Terai, Y., and Kocher, T. D., 2005. A second generation genetic linkage map of tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Genetics, 170: 237-244.

    Li, R., Fan, W., and Tian, G., 2010. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature, 463 (7279): 311-317.

    Lindahal, K. F., 1991. His and hers recombinational hotspots. Trends in Genetics, 7: 273-276.

    Lynn, A., Ashley, T., and Hassold, T., 2004. Variation in human meiotic recombination. Annual Review of Genomics Humman Genetics, 5: 317-349.

    Moen, T., Delghandi, M., Wesmajervi, M. S., Westgaard, J. I., and Fjalestad, K. T., 2009. A SNP/microsatellite genetic linkage map of the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Animal Genetics, 40: 993-996.

    Moen, T., Hayes, B., Baranski, M., Berg, P. R., Kj?glum, S., Koop, B. F., Davidson, W. S., Omholt, S. W., and Lien, S., 2008. A linkage map of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) based on EST-derived SNP markers. BMC Genomics, 9: 223.

    O’Connel, M., and Wright, J. M., 1997. Microsatellite DNA in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 7: 331-363.

    Portnoy, D. S., Renshaw, M. A., Hollenbeck, C. M., and Gold, J. R., 2010. A genetic linkage map of red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus. Animal Genetics, 41: 630-641.

    Postlethwait, J. H., Yan, Y. L., Gate, M. A., and Home, S., 1998. Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nature Genet, 18: 345-349.

    Reid, D. P., Smith, C. A., Rommens, M., Blanchard, B., Martin-Robichaud, D., and Reith, M., 2007. A genetic linkage map of Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.). Genetics, 177: 1193-1205.

    Rexroad, C. E., Palti, Y., Gahr, S. A., and Vallejo, R. L., 2008. A second generation genetic map for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). BMC Genetics, 9: 74.

    Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. W., 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 2100pp.

    Singer, A., Perlman, H., Yan, Y., Walker, C., Corley-Smith, G., Brandhorst, B., and Postlethwait, J., 2002. Sex-specific recombination rates in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Genetics, 160: 649-657.

    Voorips, R. E., 2002. Mapchart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. Journal of Heredity, 93: 77-78.

    Wang, J. S., Yu, H. Y., Hui, H., Huang, Z., Wang, X. B., Wang, Z. G., and Zhang, Q. Q., 2010. Isolation and characterization of 21 novel microsatellite markers from spotted halibut (Verasper variegatus). Aquaculture Research, 41: 930-933.

    Xie, S. G., Yang, H. S., Zhou, Y., and Zhang, F. S., 2004. Effects of body weight and water temperature on maximum food consumption of juvenile Sebastodes fuscescens (Houttuyn). Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 22: 83-88.

    Yamada, J., and Kusakari, M., 1991. Staging and the time course of embryonic development in kurosoi, Sebastes schlegeli. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 30: 103-110.

    Yoshida, K., Nakagawa, M., and Wada, S., 2005. Multiplex PCR system applied for analyzing microsatellite loci of Schlegel’s black rockfish, Sebastes schlegeli. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5: 416-418.

    Zhang, L., Yang, C., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, Q., and Xiang, J., 2007. A genetic linkage map of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei): Sex-linked microsatellite markers and high recombination rates. Genetica, 131: 37-49.

    Zhong, Q. W., Yu, Y., Zhang, Q. Q., Wang, Z. G., Yu, H. Y., and Wang, J. S., 2009. Isolation and characterization of twenty novel microsatellite markers for half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). Conservation Genetics, 10: 1617-1620.

    Zhu, L., and Sui, F. M., 1999. Biology and artificial culture of Sebastes schiegeli Hilgendorf. Modern Fisheries Information, 14: 21-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Zhu, W. T., and Cai, Z. P., 2006. Review on karyotype study of marine fishes in China. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science), 45: 125-131 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    (Edited by Qiu Yantao)

    (Received February 8, 2013; revised April 18, 2013; accepted June 20, 2014)

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

    * Corresponding author. Tel: 0086-532-82031832

    E-mail: yuhaiyang@ouc.edu.cn

    日本午夜av视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 男女免费视频国产| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 全区人妻精品视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久久国产一区二区| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲综合精品二区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 一个人免费看片子| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | av不卡在线播放| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 韩国av在线不卡| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产亚洲最大av| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 精品一区二区三卡| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 一级爰片在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 成人影院久久| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 只有这里有精品99| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 777米奇影视久久| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 免费观看的影片在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 成人二区视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| av专区在线播放| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 韩国av在线不卡| 内射极品少妇av片p| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 嫩草影院入口| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久热精品热| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | av国产精品久久久久影院| 99热这里只有精品一区| 日本免费在线观看一区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产毛片在线视频| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产在线男女| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 99久久综合免费| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 三级国产精品片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 91久久精品电影网| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 熟女电影av网| av一本久久久久| 香蕉精品网在线| 老司机影院毛片| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产毛片在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日本色播在线视频| 老司机影院成人| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| videossex国产| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 黑人高潮一二区| 99热全是精品| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品免费大片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 午夜日本视频在线| 成人无遮挡网站| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲国产色片| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产在视频线精品| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 尾随美女入室| 久久久久视频综合| 91精品国产九色| 在线看a的网站| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 一个人免费看片子| 日本色播在线视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产成人精品久久久久久| av国产精品久久久久影院| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 永久免费av网站大全| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 免费看不卡的av| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 99热网站在线观看| 婷婷色综合www| 中文字幕久久专区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 97超碰精品成人国产| av播播在线观看一区| 国产av国产精品国产| av黄色大香蕉| av.在线天堂| 国产精品一及| 亚洲四区av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产成人a区在线观看| 久久热精品热| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 老女人水多毛片| 久久热精品热| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 性色av一级| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产精品一及| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 麻豆成人av视频| 日本wwww免费看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 久久热精品热| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 日本午夜av视频| 久久久久网色| 欧美+日韩+精品| 中国三级夫妇交换| 美女高潮的动态| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 在线看a的网站| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 老熟女久久久| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美97在线视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 久久热精品热| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 中文天堂在线官网| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 22中文网久久字幕| 51国产日韩欧美| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久午夜福利片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| av在线老鸭窝| 五月开心婷婷网| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚州av有码| 色视频www国产| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 高清av免费在线| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 在线观看国产h片| 熟女av电影| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 全区人妻精品视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 丰满乱子伦码专区| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| av国产精品久久久久影院| 大香蕉久久网| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 午夜福利高清视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 成年av动漫网址| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 熟女av电影| 日韩中字成人| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 日日啪夜夜爽| 男女边摸边吃奶| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 欧美区成人在线视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| h日本视频在线播放| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 美女国产视频在线观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 久久久久精品性色| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 色5月婷婷丁香| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美zozozo另类| 插逼视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 高清av免费在线| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 高清av免费在线| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 性色av一级| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| www.av在线官网国产| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| xxx大片免费视频| 欧美日本视频| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲性久久影院| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 美女中出高潮动态图| 免费大片18禁| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 亚洲av综合色区一区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久久国产一区二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 深夜a级毛片| 老女人水多毛片| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 少妇人妻 视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 91久久精品电影网| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| av播播在线观看一区| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产视频内射| 久久久久视频综合| 国产在线视频一区二区| 在线免费十八禁| 最新中文字幕久久久久| av专区在线播放| av卡一久久| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产视频首页在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 欧美3d第一页| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| av卡一久久| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 99热6这里只有精品| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 97热精品久久久久久| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| videos熟女内射| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 欧美另类一区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 青春草国产在线视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 99热这里只有精品一区| 中国国产av一级| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲内射少妇av| av福利片在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 99久久精品热视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 日韩电影二区| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 赤兔流量卡办理| av不卡在线播放| 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 简卡轻食公司| 99热网站在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看|