• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Variability in salt flux and water circulation in Ota River Estuary, Japan

    2013-06-22 13:25:26MohammadSOLTANIASLKiyosiKAWANISIJunkiYANOKazuhikoISHIKAWA
    Water Science and Engineering 2013年3期

    Mohammad SOLTANIASL*, Kiyosi KAWANISI, Junki YANO, Kazuhiko ISHIKAWA

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan

    Variability in salt flux and water circulation in Ota River Estuary, Japan

    Mohammad SOLTANIASL*, Kiyosi KAWANISI, Junki YANO, Kazuhiko ISHIKAWA

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan

    In this study the sub-tidal and intra-tidal variations of salt fluxes in the upstream section of a shallow estuary (with a water depth of less than 3 m) were investigated. The salt fluxes were estimated based on the cross-sectional average salinity and velocity measured by the fluvial acoustic tomography system (FATS). The results indicate that the magnitude of seaward fluxes is approximately two times greater than that of landward fluxes under normal conditions. The results of short-term observation in the study area indicate that there is a phase lag of the bottom and surface salinities between the regions with the largest and smallest depths. The vertical shear flux with a peak value of ?0.7 m2/s during the ebb tide indicated an important contribution to the total salt flux compared with the advective flux. A phase lag occurred between the vertical shear terms in the regions with the largest and smallest depths, which resulted from the correlation between the vertical variations of the salinity and velocity and the existence of transversal velocity circulations.

    salt flux; circulation; fluvial acoustic tomography system (FATS); Ota River Estuary

    1 Introduction

    Salt transport in an estuary is mainly to keep a balance between the seaward advective and landward dispersive fluxes. To date, a great number of field studies have been conducted to calculate the advective and dispersive salt fluxes within estuarine systems characterized by very low to high rates of freshwater discharge (5 to 5 000 m3/s) and mean water depth ranging from 3 to 20 m (Fischer 1972; Hughes and Rattray 1980; Uncles et al. 1985; Kjerfve 1986; Restrepo and Kjerfve 2002; Sylaios et al. 2006; Gong and Shen 2011). Fischer (1972) decomposed the longitudinal flux to distinguish between transverse and vertical effects, but without including the tidal variation of the cross-sectional area, which can be very significant in shallow estuaries with a large tidal range. Hughes and Rattray (1980) applied an improved formulation to the Columbia River Estuary. Kjerfve (1986) found seaward transport through ebb channels and landward transport through mid- and flood channels within the North Sea Inlet, in South Carolina, USA. Restrepo and Kjerfve (2002) investigated salt fluxes through three distributaries within the San Juan River Delta (Columbia) and found that advection andtidal pumping were the dominant processes in salt transport. Sylaios et al. (2006) also identified advection as the main mechanism for salt transport, which was consistently landward. Recently, Gong and Shen (2010) investigated the variability of salt fluxes at the Modaomen Estuary by numerical simulation. The mixing process in estuaries acts mainly in the longitudinal direction. Therefore, a large number of points in cross-sections should be monitored in order to obtain sufficient information. However, in most of the previous studies, the salt fluxes were estimated using the measurements of current and salinity at a few points of a cross-section at one or more stations in a particular estuary. Insufficient data significantly decreases the accuracy of the decomposition method for analyzing the mixing process. Recently, a new method for measuring the cross-sectional average velocity and salinity, which is called the fluvial acoustic tomography system (FATS), has been developed (Kawanisi et al. 2010; Kawanisi et al. 2012). This innovative method can measure the cross-sectional salinity and velocity at a shallow tidal channel with large changes of the water depth and salinity. In this study the salt fluxes within the Ota River Estuary were estimated using FATS measurement data from January to February, 2012, providing an initial understanding of the physical processes in the study area, which is essential to the proper management of water resources in the region. Furthermore, this study contributes to a greater understanding of the physical processes occurring within shallow estuarine systems.

    2 Study area

    The Ota River Estuary is located in Hiroshima City, Japan. The Ota River bifurcates into two main branches about 9 km upstream from the estuary mouth: the Old Ota River and the Ota Diversion Channel (Fig. 1). The freshwater runoff into the Ota Diversion Channel and Old Ota River is usually controlled by an array of floodgates, located near the bifurcation. The Oshiba Floodgate, located in the Old Ota River, consists of a fixed weir and a movable weir with three gates (Fig. 1). These gates are always completely open. The Gion Floodgate, which is located in the Ota Diversion Channel, consists of three movable sluice gates, of which, usually, only one sluice gate is open slightly. The inflow discharge is about 10% to 20% of the total discharge of the Ota River in normal conditions (Kawanisi et al. 2010). The flow at the Yaguchi Station, which is located 14 km upstream from the mouth, is not tidally modulated. The freshwater discharge before the bifurcation can be estimated using the rating curves at this station. The water level fluctuations were measured at the mouth of the Ota Diversion Channel (Kusatsu Station) and near the bifurcation of the Ota River (Gion Station). During flood events, when the discharge at the Yaguchi Station is over 400 m3/s, all sluice gates of the Gion Floodgate are completely open. The upstream border of the tidal compartment, which shows the influenced distance of the tides, is located about 13 km upstream from the mouth (Fig. 1). The tides are primarily semidiurnal, but mixed with a diurnal component. The tidal range at the mouth (Kusatsu Station) varies in a range from 0.3 m to 4 m during neap and spring tides.

    Fig. 1 Sketch of study area

    3 Instruments and methods

    3.1 Measurement principles of FATS

    The measurement principle of FATS is the same as that of an acoustic velocity meter (AVM), which is used to calculate the cross-sectional average velocity along the transmission line using the travel time method. In other words, FATS can estimate the cross-sectional average velocity using multi-ray paths which cover the cross-section. As presented in Fig. 2, a couple of FATS’ transducers (OA and OB) with a central frequency of 30 kHz were installed diagonally on both sides of the Ota Diversion Channel near the Gion Bridge to continuously measure the cross-sectional average velocity and salinity. Based on the measurement principle of FATS, the cross-sectional average velocity (v) in the direction of stream flow is estimated with the following formula:

    whereuabis the velocity along the ray path, andθis the angle between the ray path and the stream flow direction, which was 30° for these observations. The mean discharge across the cross-section at the study site was calculated as

    whereA(h) is the area of the cross-section along the ray path, andhis the water depth. The cross-sectional average salinity (s) can be estimated from the sound speed measured by FATS, and the temperature and water depth (Medwin 1975):

    wheretis the temperature (℃), andcis the sound speed (m/s).

    Fig. 2 Distribution of measurement cross-sections and transducers

    3.2 Decomposition of salt flux

    In general, the total salt flux per cross-sectional width (Fs) can be estimated as

    whereTis the tidal cycle, which is assumed to be 25 hours for this study; andzis the vertical coordinate.vandswere decomposed asandwhereandare the depth-averaged longitudinal velocity and salinity, respectively, andv′ ands′ are the vertical deviation components from the depth-averaged longitudinal velocity and salinity, respectively. The depth-averaged quantities were decomposed into tidally-averaged and time-varying components as follows:

    3.3 Observations

    The observation site is located 245 m downstream of the Gion Floodgate (Fig. 1). Based on bathymetry data from the Japanese Ministry of Land, the mean depth, width, and bed slope of the study area are about 2.3 m, 125 m, and 0.04%, respectively. The cross-section of the channel at the study site has a trapezoidal shape with a deeper zone near the left bank. The results of mean salinity and velocity, which were estimated by FATS from January 13 to February 11, 2012 (29 days), were used for analysis of salt transport variations during the spring-neap tides. Also, in order to investigate the intra-tidal variations of the salinity and velocity, we conducted an observation during the spring tide from January 25 to 26, 2012. In this observation, the current velocity was measured using a 1.2-MHz Teledyne RDI Workhorse ADCP from a moving boat. For this study, all velocity vectors, which were estimated with FATS and ADCP, were transformed to the coordinates in anx-ycoordinate system in which the seaward direction was positive (Fig. 2). The salinity profiles were obtained using an Alec Electronics Compact conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profiler at five stations at an equal distance. These stations, S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5, are shown in Fig. 2. It should be noted that the practical salinity adopted in this study based on the UNESCO/ICES/SCOR/IAPSO Joint Panel on Oceanographic Tables and Standards does not have units.

    4 Results and discussion

    4.1 Sub-tidal variations of salinity, velocity, and salt flux

    Fig. 3 shows the time series of the water level (H), discharge (Q), velocity, salinity, and fluxes. As can be seen, the upstream freshwater discharge at the Yaguchi Station was less than 80 m3/s. The salinity fluctuations were noticeably modulated by the spring-neap tidal variations. The semi-diurnal fluctuations of the salinity during the neap tides are greater than during the spring tides, which results from the different tidal mixing. The stronger tidal mixing (larger vertical eddy viscosity) during the spring tides damps down the salt intrusion over the whole observation period. Throughout the observation period, the advective fluxF1was entirely seaward. It generally followed the spring-neap tidal variations, and reached its peak values of 1.03 m2/s and 0.99 m2/s during the two neap tides, respectively. It was also modulated by the variations of the upstream freshwater discharge during the last period of the observation. The tidal sloshing fluxF2was directed landward over the observation period and reached its highest level, ?0.4 m2/s, at the first neap tide. However, it was depressed by decreases in the salinity (e.g., on February 3, 2012).F3was always directed seaward following the same trend as the advective componentF1. The Stokes’ drift dispersion flux (F4) was directed landward, thuspushing saltwater into the estuary.F1andF3were substantial seaward salt fluxes, whereasF2andF4were the most significant mechanisms of landward salt transport during the observation period. The ratio of the seaward-directed fluxes (F1+F3) to the landward-directed fluxes (F2+F4) is presented in Fig. 3(f).

    Fig. 3 Time series of water level, freshwater discharge, velocity, salinity, flux components, and

    As can be seen, the magnitude of the seaward fluxes is approximately two times greater than that of the landward fluxes over the normal variations of the salinity, but this ratio increases due to decreases in the landward fluxes during the last period of the observation.These results suggest that the salt transport is predominantly controlled by the advection mechanisms during both the spring and neap tides. Moreover, both advective and dispersive fluxes are substantially more sensitive to the salinity variations than to the velocity changes.

    4.2 Intra-tidal variations of salinity and velocity

    Fig. 4 shows the temporal variations in the water level, salinity, mean velocity, and mean discharge, where the bottom and surface salinities shown in Fig. 4(b) are obtained from the CTD profiler, and the cross-sectional average salinity is measured with FATS. The results indicate that the differences in the mean velocity and discharge between FATS and ADCP increase during the spring tides, which may be caused by variations in the flow direction and water circulation in the study area. Stations S1 and S2 are located in front of the open sluice gate near the right bank, and station S4 is located in the region with the largest depth (Fig. 2). As can be seen in Fig. 4(b), both the bottom and surface salinities at all stations reached their highest levels after high water level conditions. The pattern of increase in the bottom salinity at all stations was similar throughout the spring tides. However, during the ebb tides the saline water in the region with the largest depth (station S4) left the cross-section around 30 minutes later than the saline water in the region with smaller depth did.

    Fig. 4 Time series of water level, salinity, mean velocity, and mean discharge

    The contour plots of the salinity and velocity at the cross-section along the ADCP path during the second tide are plotted in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, respectively. At 22:00 on January 25, 2012, the current in the region withz> 0.25 m was directed seaward with the highest velocity of 0.11 m/s at the right bank. In contrast, in the region withz< 0.25 m, saline water was directed landward gradually at a velocity of around ?0.15 m/s. At 23:00 on January 25, 2012, the cross-section indicates a highly stratified condition. In this situation, the velocity near the surface region is directed seaward (Fig. 6(b)). At 1:00 on January 26, 2012, the salinity was distributed throughout the cross-section. Finally, at the end of the ebb tide (at 2:00 on January 26, 2012), saltwater was limited in the region with the largest depth.

    Fig. 5 Contour plots of salinity at cross-section along ADCP path during second tide

    Fig. 6 Contour plots of longitudinal velocity at cross-section along ADCP path during second tide

    4.3 Evaluation of stratification and shear velocity structure

    Simpson et al. (1990) proposed that the degree of stratification in an estuary is determined primarily by the interaction of two competing mechanisms: the stratifying effects of tidal straining, which tend to increase stratification during the ebb tide and decrease stratification during the flood tide, and the homogenizing effects of tidal mixing which always decrease stratification. The gradient Richardson number, which represents the relative importance of gravitational circulation versus tidal mixing, is defined as

    whereρis the density of water (kg/m3), andgis the acceleration of gravity (m/s2). Here, we used a dimensionless variableψ, which is called stratification parameter, to characterize the stratification variation during a tidal cycle (MacDonald and Horner-Devin 2008):

    whereh75andh25are the 75th and 25th percentiles of the cross-section depth, respectively. The variation ofψthrough the second tidal cycle at five stations is presented in Fig. 7. The high value ofψat the stations at 22:00 on January 25, 2012 indicates a highly stratified situation. Throughout the ebb tideψgradually decreases and tends to a value of 1. In the region of the cross-section with the largest depth (station S4), this parameter is noticeably greater than that in the region with smaller depth throughout the whole tide. The variations ofψat the stations suggest that during the later period of the flood tide (after 22:00 on January 25, 2012) the tidal mixing contributes to the decrease of the stratification throughout the cross-section, and the stratification parameter reached its minimum at 1:00 on January 26, 2012. Eventually, during the later period of the ebb tide (after 1:00 on January 26, 2012), the stratification was enhanced by the straining process. The relative importance of the vertical velocity gradient in affecting stratification can be quantified in terms of the gradient Richardson numberRi. The variation ofRithrough the second tidal cycle is presented in Fig. 8. At hour 22:00 on January 25, 2012, in the upper layer with ds/dz< 0.5, which is separated by a pycnocline, and around the mid-depth of the channel withz≈ 0, the value ofRiis small.Ritends toward large values in the lower layer due to an increase in the density of water and a decrease in the velocity gradient. In the high water level situation (at 23:00 on January 25, 2012), the region with low values ofRinear the surface of the right bank is caused by the greater velocity gradients. However, at the left bank,Riis large. The temporal variations in the vertical salinity gradient over the whole cross-section are approximately equal, so the variation in the velocity distribution at the cross-section plays an important role in the variation ofRi. From 1:00 to 2:00 on January 26, 2012, the magnitudes ofRinear the boundary layer of the upper seaward and the lower landward flow (the depth is about 0.5h) vary around 0.25, while, in the near-bottomlayer,Risignificantly increases due to the higher density of water and lower values of the velocity gradient.

    Fig. 7 Variations of water level at Gion Station and stratification parameter at five stations

    Fig. 8 Transverse variations of gradient Richardson numberRiduring second tide

    4.4 Variations in velocities and flux components

    Fig. 9 Vertical profiles of longitudinal velocity measured with ADCP

    Fig. 10 Vertical profiles of transversal velocity measured with ADCP

    Fig. 11 Vertical profiles of salinity measured with CTD profiler

    Figs. 9, 10, and 11 show the vertical profiles of the longitudinal and transversal velocities and salinity at stations S1, S3, and S4 during the second tidal cycle. At 20:00 on January 25, 2012, the longitudinal velocityvin the region with the largest depth (station S4) shows a seaward movement throughout the water column, having a maximum value of 0.17 m/s near the surface. Meanwhile, in the region with the smallest depth (station S1) the longitudinal velocity is almost zero. This behavior is mostly associated with the freshwater flow, which enters the observation site during the ebb tide. At 21:00 on January 25, 2012, the longitudinalvelocity is completely directed landward over the whole cross-section, and the landward flow is enhanced in the region with the largest depth at 22:00 on January 25, 2012. The contribution of the transversal component of the velocity noticeably increased during the last period of the flood tide (from 22:00 to 23:00 on January 25, 2012). As can be seen in Fig. 10, this component at the center area of the cross-section (station S3) increases to its highest value near the surface and the bottom regions of the water column. This result suggests that the upward flow has a tendency to deviate towards the right bank of the channel (the front of the open sluice gate), especially in the region of the study site with the largest depth (station S4). In the high water level situation (at 23:00 on January 25, 2012) the seaward flow is reinforced in the region with the smallest depth. After that, the seaward flow in the upper layer of the water column gradually moves into the region with the largest depth. However, in the lower layer of the water column the velocity is significantly diminished. These characteristics suggest that the transversal variations in the velocity are significant at the study site, due to both the effect of the local bathymetry conditions and the interaction between the upstream gravitational and downstream tidal forces.

    Fig. 12 shows the variations of the advective and vertical shear fluxes, which were estimated using the ADCP and Compact CTD data. The results indicate that the vertical shear fluxes at both station S1 and station S4 directed landward during the observation period, and the contribution of the vertical shear flux to the total salt flux, compared with the advective flux, was noticeable. In addition, there was a significant difference in the variations of the vertical shear fluxes between the regions with the largest and smallest depths. As can be seen in Fig. 12, the vertical shear flux increased to its highest level of ?0.7 m2/s at station S1 at 24:00 on January 25, 2012, when the velocity in the upper layer of this region was significantly seaward. Similarly, the maximum vertical shear flux at station S4 occurred during the last period of the ebb tide, when the seaward velocity was enhanced in the region with the largest depth. Moreover, in this situation, increases in the vertical salinity gradient reinforced the vertical shear flux. These results suggest that the asymmetry in the variations of the vertical shear flux is mainly due to the high correlation between the vertical variations of the salinity and velocity and the existence of the transversal velocity circulation at the study site.

    Fig. 12 Variations of advective flux and vertical shear fluxes at stations S1 and S4

    5 Conclusions

    In this study, the variations in salinity transport mechanisms during spring-neap tides and the intra-tidal variations in the salinity and velocity in the upstream part of the Ota RiverEstuary were investigated. The results of the salt decomposition at the study site indicated that the advective flux was entirely seaward throughout the observation period. All salt fluxes generally followed the spring-neap tidal variations during normal conditions of upstream freshwater variations. The variations in the stratification parameterψat the stations suggest that during the later period of the spring tide, the tidal mixing contributes to decreasing the stratification over the whole cross-section. The variations of the vertical shear flux indicate that this flux is directed landward during the observation period and have a significant contribution to the total salt flux compared with the advection flux. Moreover, the highest values of the vertical shear fluxes in the regions with the largest and smallest depths occur in the first and last periods of the ebb tide, respectively. These asymmetries in the highest magnitude of the shear flux are consequences of the correlation between the vertical variations of the salinity and velocity and the existence of the transversal velocity circulations.

    Fischer, H. B. 1972. Mass transport mechanisms in partially stratified estuaries.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 53(4), 671-687. [doi:10.1017/S0022112072000412]

    Gong, W. P., and Shen, J. 2011. The response of salt intrusion to changes in river discharge and tidal mixing during the dry season in the Modaomen Estuary, China.Continental Shelf Research, 31(7-8), 769-788. [doi:10.1016/j.csr.2011.01.011]

    Hughes, F. W., and Rattray, M. Jr. 1980. Salt flux and mixing in the Columbia River Estuary.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 10(5), 479-493. [doi:10.1016/S0302-3524(80)80070-3]

    Kawanisi, K., Razaz, M., Kaneko, A., and Watanabe, S. 2010. Long-term measurement of stream flow and salinity in a tidal river by the use of the fluvial acoustic tomography system.Journal of Hydrology, 380(1-2), 74-81. [doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.024]

    Kawanisi, K., Razaz, M., Ishikawa, K., Yano, J., and Soltaniasl, M., 2012. Continuous measurements of flow rate in a shallow gravel-bed river by a new acoustic system.Water Resources Research, [doi:10.1029/2012WR012064].

    Kjerfve, B. 1986. Circulation and salt flux in a well mixed estuary. Van de Kreeke, J. ed.,Physics of Shallow Estuaries and Bays, 22-29. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    MacDonald, D. J., and Horner-Devin, A. R. 2008. Temporal and spatial variability of vertical salt flux in a highly stratified estuary.Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, C09022. [doi:10.1029/2007JC004620]

    Medwin, H. 1975. Speed of sound in water: A simple equation for realistic parameters.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(6), 1318-1319. [doi:10.1121/1.380790]

    Restrepo, J. D. and Kjerfve, B. 2002. The San Juan Delta, Colombia: Tides, circulations, and salt dispersion.Continental Shelf Research, 22(8), 1249-1267, [doi:1016/S0278-4343(01)00105-4]

    Simpson, J. H., Brown, J., Matthews, J., and Allen, G. 1990. Tidal straining, density currents, and stirring in the control of estuarine stratification.Estuaries, 13(2), 125-132.[doi:10.2307/1351581]

    Sylaios, G. K., Tsihrintzis, V. A., Akratos, C., and Haralambidou, K. 2006. Quantification of water, salt and nutrient exchange processes at the mouth of a Mediterranean coastal lagoon.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 119(1-3), 275-301. [doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9026-3]

    Uncles, R. J., Elliott, R. C. A., and Weston, S. A. 1985. Observed fluxes of water, salt and suspended sediment in a partly-mixed estuary.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 20(2), 147-167, [doi:10.1016/ 0272-7714(85)90035-6]

    (Edited by Yan LEI)

    *Corresponding author (e-mail:d101090@Hiroshima-u.ac.jp)

    Nov. 11, 2012; accepted May 20, 2013

    成年人午夜在线观看视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品九九99| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 成人国语在线视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 中国国产av一级| 免费在线观看日本一区| 精品高清国产在线一区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 欧美大码av| 成人影院久久| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 在线 av 中文字幕| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| av线在线观看网站| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日韩欧美免费精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 热re99久久国产66热| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| a级毛片黄视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 欧美午夜高清在线| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久久国产成人免费| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 曰老女人黄片| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产精品 国内视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 超碰成人久久| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 欧美日韩av久久| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 黄频高清免费视频| 国产色视频综合| 女人精品久久久久毛片| av天堂久久9| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲中文av在线| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 大型av网站在线播放| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| www.精华液| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产精品免费视频内射| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产在线视频一区二区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| av网站在线播放免费| 色播在线永久视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 精品一区在线观看国产| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 色94色欧美一区二区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 成年av动漫网址| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 18在线观看网站| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 不卡一级毛片| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 69av精品久久久久久 | 高清av免费在线| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| bbb黄色大片| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 在线看a的网站| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 宅男免费午夜| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| av一本久久久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产麻豆69| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 久久久久视频综合| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 欧美成人午夜精品| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 日本91视频免费播放| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产男女内射视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 午夜免费观看性视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久久久网色| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久精品成人免费网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 91av网站免费观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 日本wwww免费看| 一级毛片精品| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 中文字幕色久视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| av片东京热男人的天堂| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 999精品在线视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 美女中出高潮动态图| 1024视频免费在线观看| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久久精品区二区三区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| av网站在线播放免费| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产三级黄色录像| 大码成人一级视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 久久中文看片网| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 一区福利在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久久精品94久久精品| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 桃花免费在线播放| 窝窝影院91人妻| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 超碰成人久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 91九色精品人成在线观看| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久性视频一级片| 久久 成人 亚洲| 日本欧美视频一区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 久久久欧美国产精品| tocl精华| 99久久综合免费| 天天影视国产精品| 18在线观看网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 91大片在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产激情久久老熟女| 在线观看www视频免费| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久久国产成人免费| 免费av中文字幕在线| 免费在线观看日本一区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| www.999成人在线观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| svipshipincom国产片| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 久久热在线av| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 丝袜脚勾引网站| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 脱女人内裤的视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| av不卡在线播放| av欧美777| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品影院久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 中国国产av一级| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 一级片免费观看大全| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产激情久久老熟女| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 日本五十路高清| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 日本wwww免费看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产成人精品在线电影| 中国国产av一级| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久久欧美国产精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 欧美日韩黄片免| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 高清在线国产一区| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| av福利片在线| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | av天堂在线播放| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 欧美精品av麻豆av| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 一区福利在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产在线免费精品| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| tocl精华| 91成人精品电影| 午夜久久久在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 男人操女人黄网站| 日本五十路高清| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产在线观看jvid| 我的亚洲天堂| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 精品福利观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| av福利片在线| av欧美777| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 五月开心婷婷网| 高清欧美精品videossex| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| av在线app专区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久性视频一级片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产又爽黄色视频| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 黄片小视频在线播放| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 9色porny在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 视频区图区小说| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 一本久久精品| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 老司机靠b影院| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 日本av手机在线免费观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产av精品麻豆| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | www.av在线官网国产| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| av线在线观看网站| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久久久久人人人人人| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 精品福利永久在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产精品九九99| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 五月天丁香电影| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 国产一区二区 视频在线| www.999成人在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 男女午夜视频在线观看|