• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    An Analysis on Myanmar Government’s Reforms

    2012-08-15 00:42:21HeGuiquan
    China International Studies 2012年6期
    關(guān)鍵詞:百分比計(jì)數(shù)計(jì)量

    He Guiquan

    Since U Thein Sein took office as president of the Union of Myanmar in March 2011, the Myanmar government has executed a range of bold and resolute reform measures which include taking the initiative to have reconciliation with the political opposition and carrying out democratic reform,signing ceasefire agreements with ethic armed organizations to actively push forward national reconciliation, strengthening macro-regulation and improving the environment for economic development, and paying more attention to people’s livelihood.Such bold reforms taken from above exceeded the expectations of the international community. While welcoming the reforms in general, people, both in and outside Myanmar, also have differing views on the motives of the reforms carried out by U Thein Sein, with a few even doubting his sincerity in doing so. This article attempts to make an analysis on the motives,difficulties and prospects of the reforms from the approach of state transition strategy on the basis of reviewing the reform measures adopted by the Myanmar government.

    I. Bold and Pragmatic Reforms

    In his Inaugural Address, President Thein Sein expressed in explicit terms that he would push forward democratic transition of the state, realize national reconciliation, strengthen rule of law and good governance, and improve people’s basic civil rights and social, economic and educational conditions. Such propositions are obviously different from the position of the former military government, but few people both in and outside Myanmar had much hope toward the new government led by U Thein Sein. As free-lance journalist Larry Jagan put it,“A new quasi-civilian government has taken over in Burma, but diplomats, analysts and pro-democracy activists are dismissing it as nothing more than ‘old wine in a new bottle’.”Yet in a short span of one year and more, the Myanmar government led by U Thein Sein has taken a series of reform measures that are beyond one’s expectations.

    Politically, the Thein Sein government adopted a reconciliatory position and earnestly promoted democratization reforms.

    First, the government took the initiative to show favor with the leader of the National League for Democracy (NLD), the biggest opposition party in Myanmar. In August 2011, U Thein Sein held talks with Aung San Suu Kyi and expressed to her his aspiration for sincere reforms. The Thein Sein government also proposed to revise the election law and cancelled the“Aung San Suu Kyi Clause”that forbids persons sentenced to prison to participate in political party, thus enabling the NLD to be reregistered as a legitimate political party. The NLD took part in the parliamentary by-elections on April 1, 2012 and won 43 out of the 45 seats under contention, thus entering the parliament.What is more, Aung San Suu Kyi was historically allowed to attend the East Asia Meeting of the World Economic Forum and visit five European countries and the United States. During his recent visit to the United States, U Thein Sein praised Aung San Suu Kyi in public and said he would accept her as president if the people accept her when talking about the possibility of her becoming president.

    Second, political prisoners have been released. By January 2012, the government had released more than 300 political prisoners. On September 17, another batch of more than 500 prisoners were released, among whom at least 80 were political prisoners.

    Third, press and media censorship has been loosened. The government began to slacken censorship on press and the media not long after U Thein Sein took office, such as narrowing the scope of censorship on publications and opening such banned websites like Skype, Yahoo and YouTube. On August 2012, the Ministry of Information of the Myanmar government announced the abandoning of press censorship and on September 17 it announced the establishment of a more independent ad hoc Press Commission to exercise management over the media pending the enforcement of the new Media Law.

    Fourth, measures were taken to earnestly improve and protect the basic rights of the people. In September 2011, the National Human Rights Commission was set up in Myanmar. In November that year, U Thein Sein signed the Peaceful Gathering and Peaceful Demonstration Law. And in March 2012, the new Labor Law was promulgated and put in force.

    Famous opposition figure Aung Zaw said that the new Myanmar government had taken more political reform measures in the past less than a year than what were taken by the former military regime in 20 years. Political reform is the brightest spot in the entire reform made by the Thein Sein government. It not only unfolded the process of inclusive politics in Myanmar and served as a key step toward national reconciliation but also demonstrated the government’s resolve in pushing forward political reform as more attention has been put on improving and protecting the basic rights of the people.

    With regard to the ethnic problem, the Thein Sein government launched the peace process and advocated political solution for the ethnic problem. In August 2011, U Thein Sein called for all ethnic armed groups to take part in peaceful negotiations and set up two peaceful negotiation groups to be in charge of peaceful talks with all major ethnic armed groups. Up till now, armed groups participating in the talks except the Kachin Independence Organization have all signed ceasefire agreement with the government. Similar in contents, these agreements cover the following major elements: ending fighting and realizing ceasefire; setting up a liaison office; informing the other side of any military action outside the area of jurisdiction; and holding further talks in the future.

    The signing of ceasefire agreements is just the first step toward national reconciliation. On March 1, 2012, U Thein Sein put forward in clear-cut terms in his address to the parliament a three-step roadmap for national reconciliation in the spirit of the Panglong Conference: step one, conducting talks at the level of states and realizing ceasefire; step two, holding talks on some major issues at the Union level; and step three,signing agreement in the parliament by all political participants including the government, leaders of various ethnic groups,various parties and political forces, and representatives of the people and making a promise for lasting peace in the principle of mutual understanding, equality and development. The first step has been accomplished by now and the second step has been started. On May 17, the Central Committee for Peace chaired by U Thein Sein and the Work Committee for Peace headed by vice president Sai Mauk Kham were established in Myanmar for the purpose of promoting peace negotiations between the government and various ethnic armed forces to realize lasting peace in the country.

    U Thein Sein showed his utmost sincerity in spite of the fact that considerable differences still exist between the roadmap and demands of the ethnic armed groups. First, he explicitly put forward that national reconciliation must be reached by all interested parties, which is more extensive than the three-party talks (the military, NLD led by Aung San Suu Kyi and ethnic groups) proposed by the ethnic organizations. Second, he clearly proposed the principle of mutual understanding, equality and development, which reflected the ethnic people’s fundamental interests in spite of the fact that the roadmap failed to mention directly the Union spirit and the self-rule principle.

    本研究中所有數(shù)據(jù)經(jīng)過(guò)SPSS20.0軟件處理,以(±s)表示計(jì)量資料,兩組癥狀消失時(shí)間及β-HCG恢復(fù)時(shí)間的比較經(jīng)t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料采用百分比表示,兩組療效及不良反應(yīng)的比較經(jīng)χ2檢驗(yàn)。P<0.05則提示數(shù)據(jù)差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。

    In the economic field, the Thein Sein government has implemented a series of pragmatic reform measures. The first is to encourage export. The government has twice reduced export tariffs, from 10% to 7% in June 2010 and further to 2% in August. The second is to improve people’s livelihood and increase input into education and public health. In late June 2011, the Thein Sein government announced to raise pensions for public servants who retired before January 1, 2010, with the minimum per-month pension raised from 750 Myanmar Kyat(MMK) to 20,000 MMK. Compared with the previous budget,the 2012-2013 budget increased input into education by three times and into public health by two times while reducing military expenditures, whose ratio in the whole budget was lowered from 23.6% to 14.9%. The third is to implement uniform exchange rate. Official exchange rate and black market rate have existed side by side in Myanmar for long, with the official rate fixed at 6.4 MMK to 1 USD while the black market rate at 800 MMK to 1 USD, a difference of more than 120 times.The Myanmar Central Bank announced on March 28 that from April 1, managed floating rate of exchange would be introduced with the official reference rate at 815-820 MMK to 1USD. The fourth is to expand loans to stimulate investment. The banks lowered interest rates in the 2011 fiscal year, with the rates for loans from 17% to 13% and for deposit from 12% to 8%. In September 2011, the parliament adopted the Small Credit Law in order to expand small credits to the farmers. Besides, the revised Foreign Investment Law will soon be promulgated by which foreign investors will get more benefits for investment.

    The economic reform carried out by the Thein Sein government was a bit moderate compared with the political reform, yet there are still a number of bright spots.

    First, the reform measures are pragmatic. The reform of the exchange rate ended the long-existing chaotic exchange rates,which is conducive to the stability and development of the macro economy. The revision of the Foreign Investment Law,which improves the environment for investment, is helpful to attracting investment and boosting economic development.

    Second, more attention is paid to improving people’s livelihood and equal development. Raising the pensions for public servants, increasing input into education and public health, expanding loans to farmers and stimulating export are all conducive to improving people’s livelihood, eliminating poverty and promoting equal development. These measures have resulted in a good momentum for economic development in Myanmar. The GDP growth rate rose from the average 4.9%in the past four years (5.1% in 2010) to 5.5% in 2011, and it is expected that the rate will be 6% in 2012 and 6.3% in 2013;Foreign reserves increased from US$530 billion at end of 2010 to 800 billion by March 2012. The International Monetary Fund holds a favorable view on the prospects of Myanmar’s economic development, asserting that Myanmar was hopeful to become the next economic frontier in Asia.

    The reforms implemented from above by the Thein Sein government are bold, pragmatic and unprecedented and have not only shocked the world people but also won wide acclaim from the international community.“Reforms are being introduced so fast that even renowned experts on the country are uncertain about what to make of them,”said economist Joseph E. Stiglitz.Quite few people regarded Myanmar’s reforms as“Spring of Myanmar”and alluded U Thein Sein as“Myanmar’s Gorbachev”or“Myanmar’s de Klerk”. The Thein Sein government’s reforms were also accepted by Western countries which vied each other to improve relations with Myanmar and removed or partly removed sanctions against it that had been in place for over 20 years.

    II. Nature of the Reforms

    Though the reforms made by the Thein Sein government are widely welcomed by the international community, people still hold differing views on the motives of such reforms and some even have doubts on the government’s sincerity in reform.Some people maintained that the reforms originated from the personal promotion by U Thein Sein. Nay Win Maung, who keeps quite good relations with both the government as well as the opposition, said,“The changes have been ad hoc. There’s been no strategy. It’s been personality-based.”Undoubtedly,the reforms carried out by the new Myanmar government are closely associated with U Thein Sein. However, U Thein Sein’s personality alone is unable to breach the bondage of the traditional system in Myanmar since Myanmar has long been under the direct or indirect rule of the military and the New Constitution also guarantees the leading position of the military.

    A review of the development trajectory of Myanmar since the military took power in 1988 demonstrates that the reforms made by the Myanmar government is neither U Thein Sein’s personal extemporal action, nor an expedient measure, but a long-term strategy to deepen the transition of the state already under way during the previous military government.

    Soon after taking power in 1988, the military junta started to make reforms and set forth explicitly the task of transition toward the democratic system of multi-party elections and market economy system. What the military government adopted is a state-led development strategy that insisted on drawing up the constitution before handing over power. The military government expressed this position on several occasions on the eve of the 1990 general election. Khin Nyunt, First Secretary of the State Law and Order Restoration Council, said on April 12,1990 that the military would continue to exercise power until a new constitution was drafted and a powerful government was formed. Following the convening of the National Assembly in 1993, the military government clearly set the basic principles and goals for the National Assembly to draw up the new constitution: non-split of the Union, non-breaking-up of national unity, eternity of state sovereignty, participation by the military in political leadership over the state, etc. The 7-step roadmap for Myanmar’s democratization formulated by the military government in 2003 provided in explicit terms that the constitution must be drawn up according to the basic principles and details fixed by the National Assembly before parliamentary elections would be held and new government be formed. The new 2008 constitution stipulates that the military holds one-fourth of the seats in the parliament, thus ensuring by law the military’s political leadership over the state.

    Due to political strife and disturbances in the country, the state transition strategy of the military government failed to move forward in a smooth way; nevertheless, it toddled along step by step in accordance with the design of the military government.In the economic field, the government promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, encouraged and fostered the development of private economy, expanded foreign trade, and privatized some state enterprises. Politically, it issued the Political Party Registration Law, abandoned one-party rule, held multi-party elections, convened the National Assembly, formulated the new constitution, carried out general election and formed the new government. While pushing forward political and economic transition, the military government also tried to mitigate ethnic contradictions, reaching ceasefire agreements with 17 major ethnic armed organizations and some smaller armed groups from 1989-1997. In essence, the state transition strategy pursued by the Myanmar military government is the model of state-led development of the Indonesian type which emphasizes powerful state leadership and dual security and political duties of the military.

    The 2008 constitution not only defined the goal of establishing the system of multi-party democracy and market economy but also ensured the military’s political leadership over the state,thus providing constitutional guarantee for advancing the state transition strategy adopted by the former military government.The Thein Sein government has been formed precisely according to the new constitution, and hence the reforms it has carried out are a deepening of the state transition strategy pursued by the former military government. First, U Thein Sein emphasizes to push forward reform in the framework of the constitution. No reform measures taken so far by the Thein Sein government overstep the constitution and no change has been made regarding the principle of the military exercising political leadership over the state. Second, the purpose of deepening reform is to consolidate the Union, reinforce the party’s rule and justify the military’s political leadership over the state. The referendum on constitution in 2008 and the general election in 2010 were regarded by the outside as unfair and not free and boycotted by the NLD, and hence, the military group, though winning victory on both cases, lost honor and the purpose of consolidating the Union, reinforcing the party’s rule and justifying the military’s political leadership over the state was questioned. Seeking“performance legitimacy”is a common practice of a country in development transition, and a military junta that adopts the state-led model of development naturally hopes the new government will push forward reforms and score good performance to win acceptance and support from the public.

    To the military junta, letting U Thein Sein to serve as president was a good choice. First, honest and clean with broad vision, U Thein Sein was not detested by the people and could present a good image both at home and abroad. Second, with no ambition and no base in the military, U Thein Sein was loyal, disciplined,pragmatic and good at making compromises and thus could do a better job in pushing forward reforms. Quite some people believed that the purpose of Than Shwe in choosing U Thein Sein to carry out reforms is to ensure that he could enjoy a peaceful life in his old age. This demonstrates from one aspect that making reform was an established policy of the Than Shwe military government. Third, the reforms implemented by Un Thein Sein were supported by the parliament. Without such support, the reforms could not be delivered, and especially some of the laws could not be enacted. What’s more, some of the reform proposals were initiated by the parliament. For instance,with the backing of members from the military, the House of Representatives adopted the motion raised by the opposition which requests the president to grant amnesty to political prisoners. All this shows that the Thein Sein government’s reforms are neither acts by any individual person, nor expedient actions but a long-term strategy.

    III. Difficulties and Challenges Faced by the Reforms

    In his address at his first anniversary as president, U Thein Sein,while affirming the achievements scored in the reforms, frankly admitted that state transition remained unaccomplished and Myanmar had not yet become a genuinely democratic country.He said that lots of work remained to be done and bigger steps must be taken. That is indeed the case.

    Politically, Myanmar is far from being transformed into a democracy of multi-party election. Myanmar took the 161st place in the total of 167 countries in Democracy Indicators made by the Information Department of The Economist. The formulation of a constitution that truly reflects public opinion is regarded by the outside as the key to achieving democratic transition by Myanmar. However, U Thein Sein will not face great pressures from the democrats for revising the constitution. The fact that the NLD accepted the Thein Sein government’s reconciliation stand and participated in the government-led political process means that revision of the constitution shall proceed according to procedures set by the constitution. Aung San Suu Kyi said,“We need more than 75 percent of parliament to vote for change,but 25 percent of the parliament is reserved for the Army. So we need at least one soldier to vote for change, as well as the remaining 75 percent.”Hence, revising the constitution will be a difficult task and a long-term project.

    The practical challenge the Then Sein government faces in political reform is how to raise the government’s capability and improve its governance. In the Worldwide Governance Indicators issued by the World Bank in 2011, Myanmar scored a total of 19 points, far lower than its ASEAN neighbors most of which got more than 130 points and even lower than the DPRK that got 41 points. State governance in Myanmar has improved somehow since U Thein Sein took power but problems that could not be resolved in a short period of time still remain.

    First, the bureaucratic institutions are weak in ability.Myanmar has for long been ruled directly or indirectly by the military which practically controlled the whole bureaucracy.The actual powers, from top to locality, of the Thein Sein government, though a civilian government, are in the hands of military men or former military men, which resulted in the feebleness of the Myanmar bureaucratic institutions. On the one hand, the copying of the ranking system and the practices of obeying orders and appointing high-ranking officials to the bureaucratic institutions resulted in the lack of initiative and creativeness on the part of the officials. On the other, the military or former military men who played the decision-making role in the institutions received mainly military education and hence lacked ability in economic management. Even an important advisor to President Thein Sein admitted that we knew we needed change but did not know what should be changed and how to make the change.

    Second, rule of law is deficient. Since 2002, Myanmar has been ranked in the lowest 5% of the total of 213 countries in Governance Indicators issued by the World Bank. On the one hand, Myanmar’s law system is incomplete: laws suiting the market economy and democracy building are lacking and laws becoming obsolete in the present time need to be revised. On the other, Myanmar lacks an independent, just and efficient judiciary system, which is necessary not only for transitioning toward democracy but also for maintaining rule of law.

    Third, corruption, which is closely associated with the abovementioned two problems, is most serious. The World Clean Government Indicators issued in 2011 by the Transparency International placed Myanmar on the third from the bottom,just before Somalia and the DPRK. Khin Aung Myint, president of the House of Nationalities of the parliament, admitted frankly that corruption was Myanmar’s biggest problem.

    On the ethnic issue, the thorny problem the Thein Sein government faces is how to achieve true national reconciliation.Though the government has signed ceasefire agreements with the major ethnic armed organizations, it is not at all easy to realize truly comprehensive ceasefire. On the one hand, no formal ceasefire agreement has been reached between the government and the Kachin Independence Organization and armed conflicts between the two sides erupt from time to time. On the other hand,to resettle the forces of the ethnic armed groups after ceasefire remains a hard nut to crack. Under the current situation, the ethnic armed organizations are reluctant to disband the armed forces they possess; yet according to the constitution, the state could only have one and only army, that is, the Union Army.So far as the process of national reconciliation is concerned,reaching ceasefire agreement between the government and the ethnic armed organizations is but a small step while the key lies in reaching political settlement.

    The ethnic problem in Myanmar, which has been longstanding, originates from the apparent differences on nationbuilding between the government and the ethnic organizations.What the ethnic leaders ask for is mainly the four points: One,each of the major ethnic groups, i.e., the Shan, Kachin, Chin,Kayah, Kayin, Mon, and Rakhine will form a state and together with the Bamar State to constitute the Union of Myanmar.Two, the Union Parliament will be composed of two houses -House of Nationalities and House of Representatives - with equal powers, and the states enjoy equal representative power in the House of Nationalities. Three, the states exercise self-rule and all powers, especially the ownership of natural resources,should be transferred to the states with the exception of foreign affairs, national defense and issuance of currency. Four,revenues collected by the Union government should be shared equally by the states. From the above, one can see easily that the union and national equality pursued by the ethnic leaders are based on the principle of“one nationality, one state”and ethnic equality, which could hardly be accepted by the Thein Sein government. First of all, the areas dominant with the Bamar nationality are divided into seven provinces;“one nationality, one state”means the complete alteration of such administrative division. Secondly,“one nationality, one state”means the representation and share from the revenues of the Union government enjoyed by the Bamar nationality shall be drastically reduced, yet the Bamar nationality comprises twothirds of the total population of the country. And thirdly, the total area of the seven ethnic states amounts to two-thirds of the whole territory of the country and is rich in natural resources. If autonomy should be implemented in each state as demanded by the ethnic groups, it would mean the ethnic groups that take a smaller proportion in the total population possess more natural resources.

    Economically, the biggest challenge the Thein Sein government faces is how to save Myanmar from falling into the pit of“resource curse”and eradicate poverty. Rich in natural resources and low in labor cost, Myanmar enjoys big potentials in economic development. However, it may fall into the pit of“resource curse”that plunges the country into poverty if it fails to formulate and implement appropriate policies and execute good management. First, the incomes from resource export have not been turned into production capital. Since 2006, the revenue from natural gas export alone amounted to over US$2 billion a year, yet it failed to enter the account book or budget of the government and nobody from the outside knew the details of its management and use. A popular belief is that these incomes have been actually controlled by the military and spent for military purposes. Second, under the circumstance of unclear ownership system, inadequate legal system and incomplete market regulations, the rich natural resources would induce“opportunist”actions in the use of resources and activities of lease-seeking, which would lead to huge waste of resources and their indiscriminate exploitation, thus undermining the benign development of the resource industry and the normal operation of the macro economy. Third, most of the resources,such as oil, natural gas, precious stones and timber, are in the ethnic areas which are unstable with constant armed conflicts, and new contradictions and conflicts would rise due to interest sharing, forced labor, illegal land requisition and damage to the environment in the course of exploiting the resources.

    Paul Sein Twa from the Myanmar Environmental Working Group said,“Myanmar is now in a peace-building process, and we are only at the first step of initial agreements on ceasefires.We worry that if they push forward with investment in these conflict areas at this fragile stage, it will also contribute to more fighting and conflict and tensions.”The unstable situation would undoubtedly impede economic development.

    IV. Prospects of the Reforms

    Despite the many difficulties and challenges faced by the Then Sein government as well as the differing views within the ruling group and even opposing voices, the general process of reform in Myanmar will not be reversed.

    First, shaking off poverty is the strongest driving force for reform. Ethnic conflict and poverty are two major problems confronting Myanmar since independence, and the problem of poverty directly affects the stability of the political situation in the country and even endangers the very existence of the regime. The most immediate reason for the ousting of the Socialist Program Party led by U Ne Win was popular discontent resulting from failed economic construction. During the reign of the military, Myanmar remained one of the least developed countries in the world as its economy saw little improvement and people’s livelihood continued to be the principal cause for social disturbances. In August 2007, the State Peace and Development Council government announced without any sign the cancellation of all fuel subsidies, resulting in a 66% rise in diesel and oil prices, 500% rise in natural gas prices and the ensuing rocketing of prices for food, transportation and other commodities, which led to the so-called“saffron revolution”.Myanmar has abundant hydraulic electricity resources yet 75%of the population in the country has no access to electricity.Due to constant blackouts, protests broke out in Mandalay in May 2012, the largest of its kind in Myanmar in the past five years, and spread to other cities. This event shows that there would be no peace at all in Myanmar if poverty could not be thoroughly eradicated and people’s livelihood guaranteed.Therefore, development through reform is the only way-out for Myanmar.

    Second, making reform is the basic consensus of the ruling authorities in Myanmar. The reforms implemented by the Thein Sein government result from the unanimous views reached within the former military government. Even if there are opposing views in the Thein Sein government and within the military, there is no evidence that a hardline group unequivocally opposing the reforms exists in Myanmar. Quite a few people outside Myanmar believe that the military probably does not fully back the reforms. To dispel such doubts, Myanmar’s Defense Minister Hla Min not only stated at the Shangri-La Dialogue on June 4, 2012 that the military supported one hundred percent President Thein Sein’s reform process but also indicated that the stipulation on the military taking one-fourth of the seats in the parliament would be revised at an appropriate time.Furthermore, the position of the reformers in the government has been constantly strengthened and consolidated. In July this year, Vice President Tin Aung Myint Oo, a hardliner, resigned and the parliament elected former naval commander Nyan Tun,a moderate, to succeed him. On September 7, the parliament approved the most extensive cabinet reshuffle since U Thein Sein took office. In this reshuffle, the number of ministers in the president’s office increased to six, nine ministers changed their portfolios and 12 new ministers were appointed, putting professional technocrats and reformist officials in key positions.As renowned Myanmar historian Thant Myint-U put it, the reshuffle was“unquestionably a strengthening of President U Thein Sein’s reformist agenda”.

    Third, reform has entered the track of“pacted transition”.After assuming power, U Thein Sein launched the process of inclusive politics, which allowed the opposition parties represented by the NLD to participate in the parliamentary by-elections and enter the parliament, admitted some ethnic political parties into the parliament, and facilitated the signing of ceasefire agreements between the government and almost all ethnic armed organizations so as to resolve the conflicts and realize national reconciliation by political means. In this way, the three major political forces in Myanmar - the militarybacked government, the democrats headed by the NLD and the ethnic parties and organizations, despite their differences, have practically reached compromise and agreed to work together to push forward the reforms and realize state transition. In U Thein Sein’s words, Myanmar’s transition to constitutional democracy has found a peaceful path in an orderly way. From the theory of transition, Myanmar has stepped onto the road of“pacted transition”. Though pacts are not always necessary for transition from authoritarian rule to democracy, yet in most cases successful transitions inevitably involve this or that kind of pacts, which could play a significant role especially in a gradually but not drastically changing system. Therefore, to Myanmar that has been caught in protracted conflicts between various political forces,“pacted transition”has no doubt laid an initial foundation for further reforms.

    It must be pointed out that contradictions and conflicts still exist among the three major political forces in Myanmar in spite of the compromises already reached and their willingness to push forward state transition together. In particular, the differences between the government and the ethnic political parties and armed organizations are quite big. Therefore, it is imperative for the various parties involved in“pacted transition”to make mutual reconciliation, reduce differences and avoid conflicts so as to ensure the stable and smooth advancement of the reforms.

    猜你喜歡
    百分比計(jì)數(shù)計(jì)量
    古人計(jì)數(shù)
    遞歸計(jì)數(shù)的六種方式
    《化學(xué)分析計(jì)量》2020年第6期目次
    古代的計(jì)數(shù)方法
    關(guān)注日常 計(jì)量幸福
    特別健康(2018年4期)2018-07-03 00:38:26
    計(jì)量自動(dòng)化在線損異常中的應(yīng)用
    這樣“計(jì)數(shù)”不惱人
    普通照明用自鎮(zhèn)流LED燈閃爍百分比測(cè)量不確定度分析
    電子制作(2017年20期)2017-04-26 06:57:46
    肝癌患者外周血Treg、Th17百分比及IL-17水平觀察
    基于因子分析的人力資本計(jì)量研究
    国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 免费av毛片视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 乱系列少妇在线播放| 观看美女的网站| 有码 亚洲区| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 如何舔出高潮| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 在线免费观看的www视频| 美女免费视频网站| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 老女人水多毛片| 欧美3d第一页| 免费看av在线观看网站| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 91在线观看av| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产 一区精品| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲四区av| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 我要搜黄色片| 丰满的人妻完整版| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 91麻豆av在线| 51国产日韩欧美| 久久久久九九精品影院| videossex国产| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产乱人视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 18+在线观看网站| 九色国产91popny在线| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 露出奶头的视频| 久久精品影院6| 88av欧美| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 99热网站在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 午夜精品在线福利| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 91精品国产九色| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 成人精品一区二区免费| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| www.色视频.com| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| www日本黄色视频网| 香蕉av资源在线| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 在线免费十八禁| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 欧美色视频一区免费| 免费看av在线观看网站| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 午夜精品在线福利| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 成人av在线播放网站| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 少妇的逼水好多| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲 国产 在线| av国产免费在线观看| 亚州av有码| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 嫩草影院入口| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 香蕉av资源在线| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 欧美人与善性xxx| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 美女大奶头视频| 综合色av麻豆| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产色婷婷99| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 久久热精品热| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产精品久久视频播放| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 成人av在线播放网站| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日日啪夜夜撸| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 欧美色视频一区免费| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产在线男女| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产成人av教育| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产精品一及| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产高清三级在线| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产成人福利小说| 国产日本99.免费观看| 搞女人的毛片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| videossex国产| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 免费观看在线日韩| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 精品福利观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲成人久久性| av在线天堂中文字幕| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美成人a在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 精品日产1卡2卡| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 久久6这里有精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 在线播放无遮挡| 天堂√8在线中文| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 九九在线视频观看精品| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 成人国产综合亚洲| 嫩草影院新地址| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 成人av在线播放网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 日本色播在线视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 男人舔奶头视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 一级黄片播放器| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 永久网站在线| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲av熟女| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 色综合婷婷激情| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 看片在线看免费视频| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 中文字幕久久专区| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 午夜久久久久精精品| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 在线免费十八禁| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 悠悠久久av| 午夜精品在线福利| 91久久精品电影网| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 露出奶头的视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产在线男女| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产成人一区二区在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 免费高清视频大片| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲无线观看免费| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲四区av| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 精品人妻1区二区| xxxwww97欧美| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产在线男女| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费av不卡在线播放| 一本久久中文字幕| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产亚洲欧美98| 日本色播在线视频| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 88av欧美| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲 国产 在线| 色视频www国产| 日本色播在线视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 波多野结衣高清作品| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 一夜夜www| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 此物有八面人人有两片| 嫩草影院入口| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 三级毛片av免费| 免费看a级黄色片| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 丰满的人妻完整版| 窝窝影院91人妻| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 精品人妻1区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 尾随美女入室| 97热精品久久久久久| 欧美日韩黄片免| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 热99在线观看视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产精华一区二区三区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 色吧在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美激情在线99| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 舔av片在线| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久久久性生活片| www.色视频.com| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 全区人妻精品视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日日夜夜操网爽| 69人妻影院| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产视频内射| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 1000部很黄的大片| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产乱人视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 91av网一区二区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 春色校园在线视频观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 在线国产一区二区在线| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 亚洲图色成人| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 欧美激情在线99| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| av视频在线观看入口| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 91在线观看av| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 午夜福利欧美成人| 成人精品一区二区免费| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| av黄色大香蕉| 一夜夜www| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 露出奶头的视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 精品久久久久久,| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 日本五十路高清| 成人综合一区亚洲| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 日韩欧美在线乱码| 成年人黄色毛片网站| www日本黄色视频网| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| avwww免费| 尾随美女入室| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级|