于洪泉,張 宇,金 宏,趙東海,楊淑艷,齊 玲
(1.吉林大學(xué)第一醫(yī)院神經(jīng)外科,吉林 長春 130021;2.吉林醫(yī)藥學(xué)院病理學(xué)教研室,吉林 吉林 132013)
惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞死亡誘導(dǎo)信號復(fù)合體表達與TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡的關(guān)系
于洪泉1,張 宇1,金 宏2,趙東海2,楊淑艷2,齊 玲2
(1.吉林大學(xué)第一醫(yī)院神經(jīng)外科,吉林 長春 130021;2.吉林醫(yī)藥學(xué)院病理學(xué)教研室,吉林 吉林 132013)
目的:通過研究惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞中死亡誘導(dǎo)信號復(fù)合體(DISC)與腫瘤壞死因子相關(guān)凋亡誘導(dǎo)配體(TRAIL)誘導(dǎo)凋亡的關(guān)系,初步探討TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡抵抗的機制。方法:分離惡性膠質(zhì)瘤組織,獲得和培養(yǎng)原代膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞,用100μg·L-1TRAIL作用后采用酸性磷酸酶法檢測細(xì)胞凋亡水平;Western blotting法檢測細(xì)胞表達死亡誘導(dǎo)信號復(fù)合體的水平。結(jié)果:獲得3株(GC417、GC321、GC125)原代惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞;3株細(xì)胞對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡的敏感程度不同[GC321(0.12±0.01vs0.51±0.02)和GC125(0.22±0.01vs0.36±0.01)],對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡作用敏感,與對照組比較差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.01);而GC417(0.24±0.01vs0.23±0.02)對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡不敏感。Western blotting法檢測結(jié)果顯示,死亡誘導(dǎo)信號復(fù)合體表達不同,GC321和GC125表達增高,GC417表達減少。結(jié)論:不同來源的原代培養(yǎng)惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡的反應(yīng)不同,死亡誘導(dǎo)信號復(fù)合體表達也不同,死亡誘導(dǎo)信號復(fù)合體表達的減少可能與凋亡抵抗的發(fā)生密切相關(guān)。
膠質(zhì)瘤;死亡誘導(dǎo)信號復(fù)合體;腫瘤壞死因子相關(guān)凋亡誘導(dǎo)配體;細(xì)胞凋亡
腫瘤壞死因子相關(guān)凋亡誘導(dǎo)配體(tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand,TRAIL)作用于細(xì)胞后,主要是通過形成死亡誘導(dǎo)信 號 復(fù) 合 體 (death-inducing signaling complex,DISC),使caspase-8活化,使腫瘤細(xì)胞發(fā)生凋亡[1]。所以,DISC中任一成分對TRAIL凋亡信號的傳導(dǎo)都很重要,發(fā)生錯誤時會導(dǎo)致TRAIL凋亡通路阻斷。國內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究[2-3]表明:DISC在TRAIL凋亡傳導(dǎo)通路中占有非常重要的地位,因此,本文作者在此基礎(chǔ)上進一步研究DISC在原代培養(yǎng)的膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞中的作用,為TRAIL作為腫瘤治療新藥提供實驗依據(jù)。
1.1 細(xì)胞培養(yǎng)[4]取新鮮人腦膠質(zhì)瘤組織(吉林大學(xué)第一醫(yī)院提供,病理診斷為Ⅲ-Ⅳ級腦膠質(zhì)瘤)。冷PBS沖洗后將組織剪成小塊(1mm×1mm×1mm),置于離心管中,加入胰酶消化,37℃孵育30min,離心棄上清,培養(yǎng)液重懸細(xì)胞,計數(shù)活細(xì)胞,加入10%DMEM/F12培養(yǎng)液(Gibco公司),以1×106/75cm2細(xì)胞密度接種后將培養(yǎng)瓶置入37℃、5%CO2孵箱、于飽和濕度下進行培養(yǎng),隔日換液,1∶3傳代,獲得3株原代培養(yǎng)的GC417、GC321及GC125惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞。
1.2 酸性磷酸酶法檢測細(xì)胞對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡的敏感性 待細(xì)胞融合至85%,0.25%胰酶消化,計數(shù)活細(xì)胞,以每孔8×103個細(xì)胞接種于96孔板中,培養(yǎng)24h,將細(xì)胞分為4組,每組設(shè)5個復(fù)孔,加入TRAIL(100μg·L-1),對照組使用基礎(chǔ)培養(yǎng)基。作用24h,小心棄上清,PBS洗去培養(yǎng)基,每孔加入酸性磷酸酶底物檢測液(對硝基苯新鮮配制)100μL,繼續(xù)培養(yǎng)90min,加入終止液,室溫下孵育5min。酶標(biāo)儀405nm處測定各孔吸光度(A)值。
1.3 Western blotting法檢測細(xì)胞中DISC成分細(xì)胞培養(yǎng)3d,待細(xì)胞生長90% 左右,棄去培養(yǎng)液,加入0.01mol·L-1PBS充分洗滌細(xì)胞,棄去PBS,0.25%胰酶消化,將細(xì)胞收集于1.5mL離心管中,3 000r·min-1離心5min,棄上清。PBS充分洗滌細(xì)胞,離心后棄上清,每個樣品加入50μL的細(xì)胞裂解液,細(xì)胞充分裂解后,12 000g、4℃離心15min,上清移于另一管中,棄去沉淀,Braford測定法檢測樣品蛋白濃度,SDS-PAGE電泳分離樣品,4℃轉(zhuǎn)膜封閉后,加入相應(yīng)一抗,4℃孵育過夜后,加入相應(yīng)的二抗,室溫、避光孵育1h,膠片曝光拍照。
1.4 統(tǒng)計學(xué)分析 應(yīng)用SPSS 17.0統(tǒng)計軟件進行數(shù)據(jù)處理,凋亡敏感性數(shù)據(jù)以±s表示,2組間樣本均數(shù)比較采用兩獨立樣本t檢驗。
2.1 惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡敏感性原代培養(yǎng)惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞株,經(jīng)100μg·L-1TRAIL作用后檢測細(xì)胞凋亡情況,發(fā)現(xiàn)3株原代培養(yǎng)的腦膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡的敏感程度不同,GC321(0.12±0.01vs0.51±0.02)和GC125(0.22±0.01vs0.36±0.01)對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡作用敏感,與對照組比較差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.01),而 GC417(0.24±0.01vs0.23±0.02)對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡不敏感
2.2 惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞DISC成分表達情況Western blotting法檢測結(jié)果顯示:在3株原代培養(yǎng)惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞株中,DISC各成分均有表達,但略有不同,對TRAIL敏感的GC321細(xì)胞,DR5、caspase-8和Fas相關(guān)蛋白(FADD)表達均有增高,而對TRAIL不敏感的GC417細(xì)胞表達則明顯減少(圖1)。
圖1 惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞中DISC蛋白的表達Fig.1 Expressions of DISC proteins in glioma cells
膠質(zhì)瘤是中樞神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)最常見的腫瘤,其發(fā)病率并不高,但由于其隱匿性,一經(jīng)發(fā)現(xiàn)絕大多數(shù)均為惡性,所以給臨床治療帶來了很大困難。由于膠質(zhì)瘤在腦內(nèi)呈彌散性分布[5],經(jīng)手術(shù)難以清除,且現(xiàn)有的多種治療方法對患者生存期的延長意義不大。研究[6-7]發(fā)現(xiàn):惡性膠質(zhì)瘤可能是由于激活了細(xì)胞的生長途徑和/或抑制了細(xì)胞的凋亡途徑而對治療產(chǎn)生抵抗。TRAIL是腫瘤壞死因子超家族中的一員[8-9],其在腫瘤免疫監(jiān)視過程中起一定作用[10],能誘導(dǎo)多種腫瘤細(xì)胞凋亡,而對正常組織和細(xì)胞無明顯毒性作用[11],TRAIL的這一特性使之成為腫瘤治療藥物研究的熱點。但研究[12-13]發(fā)現(xiàn):在多種腫瘤細(xì)胞中存在著TRAIL抵抗現(xiàn)象,其發(fā)生抵抗的機制尚不清楚。
本實驗通過對3株原代培養(yǎng)的惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞進行研究,酸性磷酸酶法和Western blotting法檢測結(jié)果顯示:在3株原代培養(yǎng)惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞株中,各細(xì)胞對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡的敏感性不同,DISC各成分表達也不同,對TRAIL敏感的GC321和GC125細(xì)胞中DISC成分表達明顯增高;而對TRAIL不敏感的GC417細(xì)胞中其表達則減少。這說明不同來源的惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)凋亡的反應(yīng)性不同,與DISC表達明顯相關(guān)。因此,DISC的表達量減少可能與凋亡抵抗的發(fā)生密切相關(guān),但其抵抗的機制,還需要進一步研究。
[1]Bellail AC,Qi L,Mulligan P,et al.TRAIL agonists on clinical trials for cancer therapy:The promises and the challenges[J].Rev Recent Clin Trials,2009,4 (1):34-41.
[2]Bellail AC,Tse MC,Song JH,et al.DR5-mediated DISC controls caspase-8cleavage and initiation of apoptosis in human glioblastomas [J].J Cell Mol Med,2010,14 (6A):1303-1317.
[3]南栗巖,齊 玲,肖振晶,等.原代培養(yǎng)的惡性膠質(zhì)瘤細(xì)胞表達死亡受體與TRAIL抵抗的關(guān)系 [J].中國老年學(xué)雜志,2011,9 (31):3591-3592.
[4]齊 玲,金 宏,丁麗娟,等.腦腫瘤干細(xì)胞的培養(yǎng)及生物學(xué)特性研究 [J].中國實驗診斷學(xué),2011,15 (2):227-228.
[5]Holland EC.Glioblastoma multiforme:the terminator [J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2000,97 (12):6242-6244.
[6]Giese A,Bjerkvig R,Berens ME,et al.Cost of migration:invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment[J].J Clin Oncol,2003,21 (8):1624-1636.
[7]Lefranc F,Brotchi J,Kiss R.Possible future issues in the treatment of glioblastomas:special emphasis on cell migration and the resistance of migrating glioblastoma cells to apoptosis [J].J Clin Oncol,2005,23 (10):2411-2422.
[8]Wiley SR,Schooley K,Smolak PJ,et al.Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis [J].Immunity,1995,3 (6):673-682.
[9]Pitti RM,Marsters SA,Ruppert S,et al.Induction of apoptosis by Apo-2ligand,a new member of the tumor necrosis factor cytokine family [J].J Biol Chem,1996,271 (22):12687-12690.
[10]Smyth MJ,Takeda K,Hayakawa Y,et al.Nature’s TRAIL-on a path to cancer immunotherapy [J].Immunity,2003,18 (1):1-6.
[11]Griffith TS, Anderson RD, Davidson BL, et al.Adenoviral-mediated transfer of the TNF-related apoptosisinducing ligand/Apo-2ligand gene induces tumor cell apoptosis[J].J Immunol,2000,165 (5):2886-2894.
[12]江亞南,馬俊芳,黃幼田,等.順鉑對TRAIL誘導(dǎo)EC1細(xì)胞凋亡的增敏效應(yīng) [J].鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報:醫(yī)學(xué)版,46(3):346-348.
[13]Guo L,F(xiàn)an L,Pang Z,et al.TRAIL and doxorubicin combination enhances anti-glioblastoma effect based on passive tumor targeting of liposomes[J].J Control Release,2011,154 (1):93-102.
Relationship between expression of death-inducing signaling complex and apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand in malignant glioma cells
YU Hong-quan1,ZHANG Yu1,JIN Hong2,ZHAO Dong-h(huán)ai2,YANG Shu-yan2,QI Ling2
(1.Department of Neurosurgery,F(xiàn)irst Hospital,Jilin University,Changchun 130021,China;2.Department of Pathology,Jilin Medical College,Jilin 132013,China)
Objective To discuss the relationship between the expression of death-inducing signaling complex(DISC)and apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)in malignant glioma cells,and to explore the mechanism of resistance of TRAIL initiated apoptosis.Methods The primary cultured cells were isolated from human malignant glioma tissues,and the level of apoptotsis was detected by acid phosphatase assay after the cells treated with different doses of TRAIL;and the level of DISC protein was determined by Western blotting.Results The primary malignant glioma cells GC417,GC321and GC125were isolated and cultivated,and the sensitivities of the cells to TRAIL were different,GC321(0.12±0.01vs0.51±0.02)and GC125 (0.22±0.01vs0.36±0.01)were sensitive to TRAIL,there were significant differences compared with control group(P<0.01);but GC417(0.24±0.01vs0.23±0.02)was resistant to TRAIL.The results of Western blotting showed that the expressions of DISC proteins were various,and the expressions of GC321and GC125were increased,and the expression of GC417was decreased.Conclusion The responses are different according to the different primary malignant glioma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis,and the expressions of DISC proteins are either different;there is relationship between the decreasing of the expressions of DISC proteins and the resistance of TRAIL initiated apoptosis.
glioma;death-inducing signaling complex;tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand;apoptosis
R739.4
A
1671-587Ⅹ(2012)05-0904-03
2012-06-18
吉林省科技廳自然科學(xué)基金資助課題 (202015242);吉林省教育廳科研基金資助課題 (2012330);吉林醫(yī)藥學(xué)院科研基金資助課題 (201101);吉林省吉林市科技發(fā)展計劃項目資助課題 (201233128)
于洪泉 (1974-),男,吉林省長春市人,主治醫(yī)師,醫(yī)學(xué)博士,主要從事腦腫瘤研究。
齊 玲 (Tel:0431-88782331,E-mail:qiling1718@163.com)