• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Clinical Study of MELD System Direct Assessment theDegree of Hepatic Fibrosis for LT Patient

    2010-01-25 05:01:00ZuoHuaiquanXiaDongQuanYiYanLuNanZengYongXuMingqingWangWentao
    中國腫瘤外科雜志 2010年5期
    關鍵詞:中華醫(yī)學會寄生蟲病學分

    Zuo Huai-quan, Xia Dong, Quan Yi, Yan Lu-Nan, Zeng Yong, Xu Ming-qing, Wang Wen-tao,

    Yang Jia-ying, Wu Hong

    1 Introduction

    The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system was proposed by Malinchoc in 2000 to predict the survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt[1]. Kamath et al[2]in 2001 verified the ability of this model to predict the prognosis of chronic liver disease, and with slight modifications of the original model, they developed the end-stage liver disease formula. This formula is believed to be more accurate and objective to predict the severity and the prognosis of chronic liver disease. Subsequently, MELD was used in donor liver allocation by UNOS[3-4]. However, there have been very few reports to validate objectively the correlation between the MELD score with the degree of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis.

    Hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis are a spectrum of pathological processes which go hand in hand together. Theoretically, the more the hepatic fibrosis, the less are the functional liver cells and the worse is the cirrhosis. The ability to quantitatively assess hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in an individual patient is of paramount importance in clinical practice. Currently there are a number of indirect methods to assess the degree of cirrhosis[5-6]such as serological index, quantitative liver function tests, and imaging techniques using ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. These indirect techniques still need to be validated with histopathological study of the liver.

    Percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver has been used in histopathological researches to assess the degree of hepatic cirrhosis. However, samples taken in liver biopsy only represent 1/50000 of the whole liver. Whether these samples are big and representative enough have been questioned[7]. Furthermore, complications of liver biopsy have made many patients unwilling to accept the procedure, especially for research purposes. These problems can be overcome by taking liver samples from liver resectional specimens. The best and the largest specimen would come from the explanted liver after liver transplantation.

    The Ishak grading, which is based on the Knodell’s score, has been considered to be a good method to determine the degree of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis on histopathological studies[8]. However, this assessment is still affected by the subjectiveness of the assessors, and it has not been accepted universally as a gold standard[9]. The computer imaging analysis of hepatic fibrosis, which has been developed in the past several years, is able to assess the degree of hepatic fibrosis objectively, quantitatively and accurately[8,10-11].

    The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of using MELD score to assess the severity of chronic hepatic disease by correlating the pretransplantation MELD score with the degree of hepatic fibrosis in the explanted liver using the computer imaging analysis method, and the degree of cirrhosis by the Ishak grading.

    2 Patients and Methods

    2.1PatientsThis prospective study was conducted on 58 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation from February to September 2006 at the West China Hospital, Sichuan University. There were 48 men and 10 women. The mean age was 41.8 years (range 24-65). The underlying cirrhosis was due to hepatitis B virus in 56 patients and chronic alcoholism in 2. There were 39 patients with end-stage cirrhosis, 3 with severe chronic hepatitis, and 14 with hepatocellular carcinoma superimposed on cirrhosis. The tumors ranged from 2 to 9 cm in diameter. There were 11 patients with a solitary tumor (4 to 9 cm in diameter), with 8 in the left lobe, 2 in the right lobe and 1 in the caudate lobe; the other 3 patients had multiple tumors (total diameter in each patient was less than 8.5 cm). All the diagnosis accorded with the guidelines set up by the Chinese Medical Association Communicable Diseases and Parasitology Association[12]. The operations performed included the classical orthotopic liver transplantation (n=41), piggyback liver transplantation (n=11), and living donor liver transplantation (n=6, including 5 using a right lobe graft and 1 using a dual graft of the right and the left lobe from two liver donors).

    2.2MELDScoreMELD is a numerical model, and the score usually has a decimal value which is rounded to the nearest integer number. The calculation formula is: 3.8 × loge(serum bilirubin, mg/dl) + 11.2 × loge(international normalized ratio of prothrombin time, INR) + 9.6 × loge(serum creatinine, mg/dl) + 6.4 × etiological factor (0 if caused by alcohol or block of bile and 1 if caused by other reasons).

    Liver function tests, renal function tests and coagulation profile were performed on the patients on admission to hospital, and the scores were calculated (website http://www. unos.org/ resources). According to the classification by Onaca[13], the scores were grouped into 3 grades: ≤15, 15-25, and>25, respectively.

    2.3ComputerImagingAnalysisofHepaticFibrosis

    3 × 2 cm2tissue masses were collected from the left lobe of the liver. The samples were immediately fixed in 10% formaldehyde, paraffin embedded, routinely sliced and H&E stained. Masson staining was then used to demonstrate the collagen fibers in blue. For the computer imaging analysis, the total number of blue pixels (indicating collagen fibers) was divided by the total number of pixels of the whole tissue slice to give the area ratio with collagen fibers. In detail, the images of the tissue slices were taken using an Olympus DP70 microscope with a ×10 object lens. For each slice, five images were captured in random at the four corners and the center, respectively. These images were then transferred to the IPP 5.0 image processing system through an OLYMPUS AX70 color camera. In this system, the blue images were converted to two-level yellow ones and the pixel numbers were computed. The average area ratio of liver fibrosis of the 5 images was then calculated to obtain the area ratio of collagen fiber. These steps were performed on all the specimens under the same conditions by the same technician who had no knowledge of the pathological diagnosis of the specimens.

    2.4IshakPathologicalGradingThe Ishak pathological grading of chronic hepatitis[14]was used to estimate the degree of cirrhosis. The Ishak modified grading[15]was recorded as follows: 0, no fibrosis; 1, fibrous expansion of some portal tract areas, with or without short fibrous septa; 2, fibrous expansion of most portal tract areas; with or without short fibrous septa; 3, fibrous expansion of portal tract areas with occasional portal-portal bridging; 4, fibrosis with portal-portal and portal-central bridging with occasional nodules; 5, pronounced bridging with visible nodules; and 6, extensive fibrosis and nodules. Not knowing the clinical background of the patients, two experienced hepatopathologists ranked the degree of cirrhosis on the tissue slices, and inter-observer variations between them were evaluated using the Kappa index. When their opinions differed, the opinion of another hepatopathologist was sought.

    3 Results

    3.1IshakPathologicalGradingandComputerImagingAnalysisThere were 0, 2, 7, 12, 18, 12 and 7 patients in the 7 Ishak grading (0-6), respectively. Inter-observer consistency between the two hepatopathologists was 0.76 for Kappa index, confirming a strong agreement. Computer imaging analysis showed the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis to range from 23.2% to 88.4%, with a mean of 56.7%. There were 9 patients with an area ratio of hepatic fibrosis of 20% to 40%, 32 patients with an area ratio of 41% to 65%, and 17 patients with an area ratio of over 65%.

    3.2CorrelationbetweenIshakPathologicalGradingandComputerImagingAnalysisA correlation existed between the Ishak pathological grading and the quantitative computer imaging analysis, (r=0.822,P<0.01), indicating that the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis by the computer imaging analysis increased with the severity of the Ishak grading (Table 1, Figure 1). Furthermore, for the various degrees of hepatic fibrosis the corresponding Ishak grading showed significant difference between the groups (P<0.05) (Table 1).

    Table 1 Computer Imaging Analysis and Ishak Pathological Grading

    *Ishak pathological grading was divided into low, middle and heavy ranks for easy comparison.

    **P< 0.05 between any two of the groups.

    Fig.1 Scattered chart of correlation between area ratio of hepatic fibrosis and Ishak pathological grading

    3.3CorrelationsbetweenMELDScoreandIshakPathologicalGrading/ComputerImagingAnalysisThe MELD score ranged from 11 to 38 (mean±SD, 22.85±9.32). In 10 patients with MELD score between 10 and 15, the mean±SD was 12.4±2.1. In 29 patients with MELD score between 15 and 25, the mean±SD was 20.9±3.6. In 19 patients with MELD score of over 25, the mean±SD was 31.2±6.1. On statistical analysis, the correlation between the Ishak pathological grading and the MELD score was significant (r=0.715,P< 0.01) (Figure 2). The corresponding area ratios of hepatic fibrosis for the various MELD scores were 29.4±8.7%, 46.9±11.6% and 74.3±10.7%, respectively (Table 2). Statistically, there was a significant correlation between the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis and the MELD score, (r=0.838,P<0.01). The higher the MELD score, the larger was the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis and the worse was the cirrhosis. The results indicated that the MELD score accurately reflected the severity of the chronic liver disease (Figure 3).

    Table 2 Correlation between MELD Score and Computer Imaging Analysis

    *P<0.05 between any two groups.

    Fig.2 Scattered chart of correlation between MELD score and Ishak pathological grading

    Fig.3 Estimated linear relationship between MELD score and the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis using linear regression

    3.4MELDScoreintheAssessmentoftheDegreeofHepaticFibrosisSpearman′s rank correlation test showed that there were good correlations among the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis as determined by computer imaging, the Ishak pathological grading and the MELD score. Linear regression analysis indicated that there was a linear relationship between the MELD score and the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis (Figure 3), with a regression coefficient b=1.868 (95% CI: 1.558 to 2.179). The results indicated that one point increase of MELD score corresponded to 1.87% increase in area ratio of hepatic fibrosis, (statistical analysis of variance,P<0.001). As a consequence the MELD score could be used to evaluate the severity of hepatic fibrosis. Our results also showed the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis was 30% (20% to 40%) for low MELD scores ≤ 15, 50% (35% to 65%) for middle MELD scores between 15 to ≤ 25, and 70% (60% to 90%) for high MELD scores > 25.

    4 Discussion

    Modern hepatic surgery requires an accurate assessment of the degree of hepatic cirrhosis for prioritization of patients for liver transplantation, for selecting patients for the various treatment strategies, and for prevention and early detection of complications after treatment. Percutaneous needle liver biopsy has been commonly used for the quantitative clinical assessment of hepatic cirrhosis, and it has been considered as a reliable method[9,16-18]. However, it has its inherent limitations. Firstly, liver biopsy is traumatic with its contraindications and complications. Thus, it is not accepted by all patients and it is difficult to repeat again and again. Secondly the sampling process is difficult to standardize. Not long enough or broken specimen often causes error in pathological interpretation and restricts its clinical applications[5,19-21]. Thirdly the uneven distribution of hepatic fibrosis in the liver and the individual variation of the pathologists also limit the accuracy of the assessment of hepatic cirrhosis[8,22]. Other methods, such as radiological techniques and blood biochemical test are helpful, but they have not been validated to be accurate enough to assess the degree of hepatic cirrhosis.

    The amount of tissues obtained after liver resection or transplantation is large enough for more thorough pathological studies and some of the limitations of liver biopsy can be overcome. The explanted liver after liver transplantation is an extreme sample that the whole liver can be studied if required. Developed in the past few years, computer imaging analysis can objectively, quantitatively and accurately assess the degree of hepatic fibrosis. Our results showed that the pretransplantation MELD score correlated well with the Ishak pathological grading and with the computer imaging analysis of the degree of hepatic fibrosis in the explanted liver. As the MELD score became greater, the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis became larger, and the Ishak pathological grading became worse. Furthermore, as the area ratio of hepatic fibrosis correlated well with the Ishak pathological grading, the computer imaging analysis could be used to assess the degree of cirrhosis. A strong linear relationship was observed between the MELD score and the degree of hepatic fibrosis (b=1.87,P<0.01) indicating that the MELD score could be used to evaluate the degree of hepatic fibrosis, thus the degree of cirrhosis.

    Our results also showed a low MELD score (MELD ≤15) corresponded to 30% (20% to 40%) of area ratio of hepatic fibrosis, a mid MELD score (1525) corresponded to 70% (60% to 90%). Thus, the MELD score could be used clinically to reflect the degree of hepatic fibrosis. As the results of our study were based on a limited number of liver specimens, further verification of our findings is necessary.

    [1] Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts[J]. Hepatology, 2000, 31(4): 864- 871.

    [2] Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients with end-stage liver disease[J]. Hepatology, 2001, 33(2):464-470.

    [3] Freeman RB Jr, Wiesner RH, Harper A, et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy[J]. Liver Transpl, 2002, 8(9):851-858.

    [4] Brown RS Jr, Kumar KS, Russo MW, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score as predictors of pretransplantation disease severity, posttransplantation outcome, and resource utilization in United Network for Organ Sharing status 2A patients[J]. Liver Transpl, 2002, 8(3):278-284.

    [5] Han KH, Yoon KT. New diagnostic method for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis[J]. Intervirology, 2008, 51(Suppl 1) :11-16.

    [6] Jaroszewicz J, Rogalska M, Flisiak R. Serum prohepcidin reflects the degree of liver function impairment in liver cirrhosis[J]. Biomarkers, 2008,13(5):478-485.

    [7] Addario L, Scaglione G, Tritto G, et al. Prognostic value of quantitative liver function tests in viral cirrhosis: a prospective study[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2006, 18(7):713-720.

    [8] Beddy P, Lyburn I, Geoghegan T, et al. Outpatient liver biopsy: a prospective evaluation of 500 cases[J]. Gut, 2007, 56(2): 307.

    [9] Drebber U, Mueller JJ, Klein E, et al. Liver biopsy in primary biliary cirrhosis: clinicopathological data and stage[J]. Pathol Int, 2009, 59 (8):546-554.

    [10] O′Brien MJ, Keating NM, Elderiny S, et al. An assessment of digital image analysis to measure fibrosis in liver biopsy specimens of patients with chronic hepatitis C[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2000, 114(5):712-718.

    [11] Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, et al. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007, 5 (10):1207-1213.

    [12] 中華醫(yī)學會傳染病與寄生蟲病學分會, 肝病學分會. 病毒性肝炎防治方案[J]. 中華肝臟病雜志, 2000, 8(6): 324-329.

    [13] Onaca NN, Levy MF, Sanchez EQ, et al. A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2003, 9(2):117-121.

    [14] Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis[J]. J Hepatol, 1995, 22(6):696-699.

    [15] Zaitoun AM, Al Mardini H, Awad S, et al. Quantitative assessment of fibrosis and steatosis in liver biopsies from patients with chronic hepatitis C[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2001, 54(6):461-465.

    [16] Mani H, Kleiner DE. Liver biopsy findings in chronic hepatitis B[J]. Hepatology, 2009, 49 (5 Suppl):S61-71.

    [17] Cadranel JF, Castera L, Cales P. Liver biopsy in management of chronic liver diseases: “EASL monothematic conference highlights”[J].Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 2006, 30 (1):121- 123.

    [18] Sebagh M, Rifai K, Féray C, et al. All liver recipients benefit from the protocol 10-year liver biopsies[J]. Hepatology, 2003, 37(6):1293- 1301.

    [19] Sebastiani G, Halfon P, Castera L,et al. SAFE biopsy: a validated method for large-scale staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C[J]. Hepatology, 2009, 49(6):1821-1827.

    [20] Soncini M, Leo P, Triossi O, et al. Management and outcomes of hepatic cirrhosis: Findings from the RING study[J]. Hepatology Research, 2006, 36(3):176-181.

    [21] Scheuer PJ. Liver biopsy size matters in chronic hepatitis: bigger is better[J]. Hepatology, 2003, 38(6):1356-1358.

    [22] Cholongitas E, Quaglia A, Samonakis D, et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: how good is it for accurate histological interpretation?[J]. Gut, 2006, 55(12):1789-1794.

    猜你喜歡
    中華醫(yī)學會寄生蟲病學分
    如何用學分幣激發(fā)小學生的學習興趣
    甘肅教育(2020年8期)2020-06-11 06:09:46
    中華醫(yī)學會系列雜志對正文中表的要求
    中華醫(yī)學會系列雜志對正文中圖的要求
    學分美食
    中華醫(yī)學會2018年器官移植學年會
    斯皮爾伯格為什么要歷時33年修完學分?
    鴨體內三種寄生蟲病及診治
    中華醫(yī)學會醫(yī)學期刊集群化發(fā)展的模式分析
    出版與印刷(2016年3期)2016-02-02 01:20:10
    寄生蟲病
    頸部淋巴結超聲學分區(qū)
    国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲图色成人| 在现免费观看毛片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产三级在线视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲av熟女| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚州av有码| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国产精品无大码| 国产高潮美女av| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| h日本视频在线播放| 尾随美女入室| 丝袜喷水一区| 高清毛片免费看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 欧美激情在线99| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 色综合站精品国产| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 热99在线观看视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲无线观看免费| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 高清毛片免费看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 高清毛片免费看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 中国美女看黄片| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 免费av毛片视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久久久国产网址| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 99热这里只有是精品50| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲四区av| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲综合色惰| 黄片wwwwww| 国产av在哪里看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 成人精品一区二区免费| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 免费看日本二区| a级毛色黄片| 国产成人aa在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 一级毛片我不卡| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 69人妻影院| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 有码 亚洲区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 男人舔奶头视频| 色在线成人网| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产三级在线视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 午夜福利在线在线| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 热99在线观看视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | av天堂中文字幕网| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 黑人高潮一二区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 天堂动漫精品| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| av在线播放精品| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产成人影院久久av| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 老司机影院成人| 在线免费十八禁| 热99re8久久精品国产| a级毛色黄片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 看黄色毛片网站| 91在线观看av| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 看免费成人av毛片| 小说图片视频综合网站| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| av天堂在线播放| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| a级毛色黄片| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲图色成人| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| av在线老鸭窝| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| av视频在线观看入口| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 我要搜黄色片| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 级片在线观看| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 欧美人与善性xxx| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 午夜福利18| 十八禁网站免费在线| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 日本熟妇午夜| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 深夜精品福利| 我要搜黄色片| 午夜免费激情av| 久久草成人影院| 赤兔流量卡办理| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 午夜影院日韩av| av免费在线看不卡| 综合色丁香网| 久久午夜福利片| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产高潮美女av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 综合色av麻豆| 午夜免费激情av| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 天堂网av新在线| 三级经典国产精品| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 色综合站精品国产| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 色av中文字幕| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 免费高清视频大片| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 在线免费观看的www视频| av视频在线观看入口| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 毛片女人毛片| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲四区av| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲性久久影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 深夜a级毛片| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| av在线亚洲专区| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 黄色一级大片看看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 观看美女的网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 男人舔奶头视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 极品教师在线视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 欧美区成人在线视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 99热这里只有精品一区| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 免费看光身美女| 一a级毛片在线观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| .国产精品久久| 精品一区二区免费观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| ponron亚洲| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 色av中文字幕| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 一a级毛片在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 高清毛片免费看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲av免费在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 不卡一级毛片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 99热全是精品| av在线亚洲专区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 天堂√8在线中文| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产成人freesex在线 | 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 99热这里只有精品一区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 悠悠久久av| 一夜夜www| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产单亲对白刺激| 插逼视频在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 成年av动漫网址| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 一区福利在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产成人freesex在线 | 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| av天堂中文字幕网| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲五月天丁香| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 一进一出抽搐动态| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 成人二区视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲最大成人av| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产成人91sexporn| 午夜激情欧美在线| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| av国产免费在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 床上黄色一级片| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 悠悠久久av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| avwww免费| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 在线观看午夜福利视频| av在线亚洲专区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 夜夜爽天天搞| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 中出人妻视频一区二区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 此物有八面人人有两片| av卡一久久| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日本熟妇午夜| 一级毛片电影观看 | 黄色配什么色好看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| h日本视频在线播放| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 成人欧美大片| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 一级毛片电影观看 | 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 看黄色毛片网站| 波多野结衣高清作品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | av免费在线看不卡| 欧美3d第一页| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| av黄色大香蕉| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 婷婷亚洲欧美| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 最新中文字幕久久久久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产乱人视频| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 色综合站精品国产| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美+日韩+精品| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产视频内射| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 舔av片在线| 国产在线男女| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 99热精品在线国产| 亚洲18禁久久av| 男女那种视频在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 97超视频在线观看视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 一区福利在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 免费av毛片视频| 级片在线观看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 99久久精品热视频| 直男gayav资源| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 观看免费一级毛片| 天堂动漫精品| 成人欧美大片| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 男人舔奶头视频| a级毛色黄片| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 精品久久久噜噜| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 大香蕉久久网|