校園城市村落

業(yè)主單位：阿爾托大學

設計單位：ALA建筑師事務所

設計團隊：Juho Gr?nholm， Antti Nousjoki， Janne Ter?svirta and Samuli Woolston with

Willem Barendregt， Vladimir Ilic， Julius Kekoni， Auvo Lindroos， Aleksi Niemel?inen， Pekka Sivula， Pekka Tainio， Jussi Vuori， Haley Zhou， and Erika ?sterlund

景觀設計：MASU規(guī)劃設計公司

結構工程：奧雅納

交通設計：Trafix

項目年份：2015年

項目圖片：由ALA建筑師事務所提供

Client： Aalto University Properties

Architects： ALA Architects

Design Team： Juho Gr?nholm， Antti Nousjoki， Janne Ter?svirta and Samuli Woolston with

Willem Barendregt， Vladimir Ilic， Julius Kekoni， Auvo Lindroos， Aleksi Niemel?inen， Pekka Sivula， Pekka Tainio， Jussi Vuori， Haley Zhou， and Erika ?sterlund

Landscape Architects： MASU Planning

Structural Engineer： Arup

Traffic Design： Trafix

Renderings： VIZarchScale

Model： Stoltmodels

Project Year： 2015

Photographs： Courtesy of ALA Architects

ALA建筑師事務所在阿爾托大學的2015校園國際設計競賽中提出了“大型聯(lián)合建筑群——活動孵化器”的理念。他們的目標是連接現(xiàn)有的結構和項目，創(chuàng)建一個新的區(qū)域熱點，一個充滿街道生活氣息的城市集中區(qū)，促進創(chuàng)造力的展示。

該競賽吸引了來自世界各地的189個參賽作品，ALA也是其中之一，其設計重點是：緊密的街道網(wǎng)絡，支持包括學習區(qū)、商店、酒吧和自助餐廳在內的開放公共空間。他們的設計方法與阿爾托大學的總體規(guī)劃非常接近——通過創(chuàng)建三個主要的戶外實體，使主樓東側獲得軟硬綠色環(huán)境，而主樓西側則更具結構性和粗獷，其中Metro-Poli廣場有一種莊嚴肅穆的感覺，Alvarinaukio擴建廣場擁有公園校區(qū)的環(huán)境，新中央小區(qū)的街道則成為新的城市元素。

該設計利用奧塔涅米校區(qū)所缺乏的元素——鼓勵自發(fā)創(chuàng)造力的密集城市環(huán)境，試圖遠離千篇一律的同類校園建筑風格，轉向多元化與多樣化的結合。競賽評委認為，在所有參賽作品中，Hipsterkasbah城市村落的概念是獨一無二的。其獨創(chuàng)性在于“設計強度”。然而，盡管對整體設計做出巨大改進，競賽第二階段仍揭露了概念中固有的困難和弱點。

ALA Architect's submission for Aalto University's Campus 2015 international design competition proposed a "conglomerate of buildings to form an incubator of activity." Their aim was to connect existing structures and projects to create a new areal hotspot， an urban concentration with vivid street life in order to nurture an open display of creativity.

ALA's entry to the competition， which attracted a total of 189 entries from around the world， focused on a tight street web allowing most learning spaces， shops， bars and cafeterias to open to public space. Their approach to the design was sensitive to the Aalto master plan - soft against hard - green environment to the east of the main building against a more structured and rough environment to the west - by creating three major outdoor entities， the Metro-Poli Square with a grand formal feel， the extended Alvarinaukio square with park-campus-like atmosphere， and the streets of the New Central Campus as a new urban ingredient.

The design， which attempted to move away from an all-embracing homogenous campus architectural style towards a more pluralistic and diverse concoction made use of something lacking in Otaniemi： a dense urban environment that encourages spontaneous creativity. According to the jury， Hipsterkasbah was unique among the entries in its urban village concept， the originality of which was the design's strength. In spite of this， the second phase of the competition revealed the difficulties and weaknesses inherent in the concept despite the tremendous improvements made to the overall design.