• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Reflections and Improvements on China’s Asset-Backed Securities Information Disclosure System

    2024-05-10 07:09:13ZhaoMingxin
    Contemporary Social Sciences 2024年1期

    Zhao Mingxin

    Shenzhen University

    Abstract: Asset-backed securities are developed through complex processes such as asset restructuring and credit enhancement.Therefore,the information asymmetry between issuers and investors is greater compared to traditional securities,which imposes higher requirements on information disclosure for asset-backed securities.Asset-backed securities have characteristics such as diversified disclosers,differentiated disclosure content,and specialized risk factors.China has already formulated a series of rules and regulations regarding information disclosure of asset-backed securities.It is imperative to develop specialized laws and regulations for asset-backed securities,encompass original equity holders and credit enhancement agencies as information disclosers,incorporate information such as underlying asset details,cash flow projections,and credit ratings and enhancements into the disclosure content,and improve the legal liability rules to effectively address false disclosures.

    Keywords: asset-backed securities; asset securitization; information disclosure

    Asset-backed securities (“ABS”) are the products of asset securitization.The so-called “asset securitization” is commonly understood as the process of pooling illiquid assets with future stable cash inflows,structurally restructuring them,and enhancing their creditworthiness,thereby transforming them into securities that can be issued and traded in the securities market to achieve the purpose of financing (Zhou,2020,p.86).From this definition,asset securitization is a process or behavior that results in the creation of ABS.However,some scholars use the terms “asset securitization” and “asset-backed securities” interchangeably,often abbreviating both concepts as ABS.This is not precise,and it is necessary to clarify the distinction.Asset securitization originated in the United States in the 1970s and was embraced by China’s securities market in the early 21st century,quickly becoming one of the market’s hot topics.Over the past decade,although ordinary individual investors have not paid much attention to asset securitization,experts,scholars,and securities practitioners in the fields of economics,finance,and law have increasingly felt its growing influence.As of June 2023,there were a total of 4,311 ABSs listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange,and their market value reached RMB 1,448.365 billion (SSE.Com.,2023),surpassing that of noncorporate bonds.However,due to the late start of asset securitization in China and the limited duration of practice,the institutional development is still in its early stages.As a result,it has not received sufficient attention and extensive research from the academic community.This limitation has not only affected the research level of asset securitization in China but also indirectly impacted the construction of China’s legal system for asset securitization.On December 28,2019,theSecurities Law of the People’s Republic ofChina(“New Securities Law”) underwent its second amendment.In theNew Securities Law,ABS has been officially recognized as a type of securities.①Paragraph 3 of Article 2 of the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China states that “The measures for the administration of the offerings of and trading in asset-backed securities and asset management products shall be developed by the State Council under the principles of this Law.”Although the specific rules for its issuance and trading need to be determined by the State Council in the form of administrative regulations,it has secured a position in China’s fundamental securities law,providing upper-level legal support for the construction of a more operational institutional system.Since ABS is a form of securities,it needs to comply with various rules for the issuance,listing,and trading of securities,including the information disclosure rules.

    Peculiarity of ABS Information Disclosure

    Significance of Information Disclosure for ABS

    One important change in theNew Securities Lawis the expansion of the “information disclosure” section to a whole chapter.②Since the initial promulgation of the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China in 1998,a section entitled “Information Publicity” was included in Chapter III “Trading of Securities”.It was not until the revision of the Securities Law in 2019 that an “Information Disclosure” chapter (i.e.,Chapter V) was formally established.Furthermore,in China’s securities legislation,“information publicity” and “information disclosure” are essentially synonymous terms.This paper also holds the same viewpoint.This demonstrates the legislators’ emphasis on information disclosure.As a part of the capital market,the securities market relies on the distribution and application of pertinent information as one of its fundamental drivers.Effective information transmission serves as one of the important guarantees for the capital market to fulfill its role of resource allocation (Mao et al.,2013).Securities,by their nature,can be regarded as an information product,and investors’ decisions to buy or sell securities are often influenced by certain information.This is particularly true for securities issued through registration,making them highly information-intensive products(Chen,2019).Therefore,the timely,accurate,and complete disclosure of information regarding the operation and management,financial performance,credit status,and other relevant details of the securities issuer has a decisive impact on investors’ investment decisions.It safeguards investors’ rights to know and choose,and it is crucial for protecting investors’ rights to returns.Since the implementation of theNew SecuritiesLaw,China has been shifting from the previous approval-based system to a comprehensive registration-based system for securities listing.This signifies a reduction in the threshold for securities listing.In this context,in order to safeguard investors’ legitimate rights and interests,it is imperative to strengthen the supervision of listed companies’ behavior,and strict regulation of information disclosure is an inevitable outcome of this approach.Therefore,the significance of the information disclosure system in the field of securities law has been increasingly emphasized,to the extent that some scholars have referred to it as the “Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases.Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectant; electric light the most efficient policeman.”(Brandeis,1914) The role of information disclosure in the securities market has been recognized among all circles,requiring no further elaboration.

    ABS is a product of financial innovation that emerged half a century ago.This new type of security is crafted around the cash flows generated by specific assets as its return for investors.It involves a series of complex processes such as asset transfer,asset pool construction,credit rating,and credit enhancement.The complexity of its financing structure and the diversity of participants make the risks involved in ABS evidently more hidden and dangerous than traditional securities.Therefore,for ABS,if there is no genuine,accurate,and complete information disclosure,the asymmetry of information between securities issuers and investors will be significantly expanded.Investors may even be trapped in what is called an “information cocoon” and unable to see the true market situation.Hence,to protect investors’ legitimate rights and interests,maintain the healthy and orderly development of the securities market,and ensure the proper issuance and trading of ABS products,it is imperative to impose more rigorous requirements for ABS information disclosure.

    Differences Between ABS and Traditional Securities in Terms of Information Disclosure

    As mentioned earlier,ABS is a financial derivative that emerged as an innovative product in modern times.As a financial technology,ABS is regarded as one of the three major trends in the field of international financial innovation,along with financial liberalization and globalization (Xiong & Wu,2006).Although ABS belongs to the category of securities,there are significant differences in the structure of its products and the issuance models compared to traditional securities.These differences inevitably manifest in the area of information disclosure.

    More Diversified Information Disclosers

    In traditional securities,the primary duty of information disclosure falls upon the issuer.As jointly liable persons,the controlling shareholders,actual controllers,directors,supervisors,senior managers,and other directly responsible persons of the issuer,as well as the sponsors,underwriting securities companies,and their directly responsible persons,are also liable for the truthfulness,accuracy,and completeness of the disclosed information.However,ABS involves more complex issues due to its unique issuance process.The typical issuance process of ABS: First,the original equity holder(originator) of the underlying assets truly sells the loan claims,accounts receivable claims,intellectual property rights,and other assets to a third-party Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV),which ensures the bankruptcy isolation between relevant asset credit and originator credit.Then,the SPV packages multiple assets into an asset pool through a series of fragmentation and combination,and after credit rating and credit enhancement processes,issues them to investors.The funds invested by investors are used for financing by the original equity holders,while the continuous cash flows generated by the asset pool are distributed to investors as investment returns according to the agreed terms.This process involves various participants,including the original equity holder,SPV,securities custodian,fund manager,credit rating agency,credit enhancement institution,and intermediaries.The range of participants in ABS is clearly broader than that in traditional securities.All these participants have some form of obligation towards information disclosure.Any participant that signs the ABS disclosure documents shall be defined as a legal obligor who bears the corresponding liability under the law for ensuring that the disclosed information is not false,materially misleading or omitting any material facts (Huang,2013).

    Information Disclosure Content With the Underlying Assets as the Core

    One significant difference between ABS and traditional securities is that the issuance of ABS as a form of asset securitization is backed by assets with stable cash flow income,while the issuance of traditional securities such as stocks and bonds relies on the creditworthiness of the issuer (Zhou,2020,p.86).Therefore,the content of information disclosure for traditional securities primarily focuses on the issuer’s operation and management status,particularly the issuer’s financial condition and changes thereof.In contrast,ABS is a “security” backed by “assets.” The term “backed”here essentially refers to the credit foundation for the issuance and repayment of the securities (Zhou,2020,p.87).In its birthplace,the United States,ABS is considered a part of the fixed-income market and,along with the U.S.Treasury bond,municipal bond,and corporate bond,it has contributed to the establishment of a massive fixedincome market (Fabozzi,2017,p.3).In China,all ABSs have been issued in the form of bonds.Therefore,the focus of information disclosure lies in the repayment ability.Most importantly,such repayment ability does not refer to the issuer’s repayment ability,but rather the cash f low generation capacity of the underlying assets.Thus,the creditworthiness of the ABS issuer does not matter; what matters is the underlying assets stripped from the original equity holder and transferred to the SPV.Underlying assets generally refer to property rights or assets that comply with laws and regulations,have clear ownership,can generate independent and predictable cash flows,and can be specified.These assets should have a high level of homogeneity and the ability to generate predictable cash flow income.①Article 19 of the Measures for Supervising and Administrating the Securitization of Credit Assets by Financial Institutions issued by the former China Banking Regulatory Commission (the former CBRC) stipulates that “The credit assets to be securitized by a sponsoring institution of credit assets securitization shall meet the following conditions: (1) having high homogeneity; (2) being able to produce divinable cash flow yields; and (3) complying with the laws,administrative regulations and the relevant provisions set forth by the CBRC and other supervisory and regulatory authorities.”As a Wall Street saying goes,“If it’s cash flows,it goes (into a securitization).” Therefore,the stripping of underlying assets from the overall assets of the original equity holder to enable the repayment capacity of the assets to be separated from the creditworthiness of the original equity holder is a typical characteristic of ABS.Therefore,the primary focus of ABS information disclosure is not on the relevant information of the security issuer,such as the issuer’s production and operations,financial accounting data,changes in shareholders and management,and major operational decisions.Instead,it focuses on the quality (superior or inferior) of the underlying assets to be securitized,the SPV transaction structure,and the forecasted future cash flow conditions.

    Peculiarity of Risk Factors

    Regardless of the type of securities,an important aspect of information disclosure is to reveal the risk factors associated with such securities.In traditional securities,these risk factors are typically reflected through the issuer’s significant investment projects,major guarantee projects,disposal of important assets,and involvement in large-scale litigation.However,ABS is different.Typically,the original equity holder achieves risk isolation by truly selling the assets to be securitized to the SPV.The SPV,as the issuer,is essentially a “shell entity” that primarily acts as a conduit.Its main function is to acquire and manage the assets transferred by the original equity holder and issue securities backed by the assets (Huang,2013).In this case,due to the risk isolation mechanism for the true sale of assets,the risk factors involved in ABS are generally unrelated to the condition and behavior of the original equity holder.Even if the original equity holder goes bankrupt,the SPV can still achieve bankruptcy isolation between the underlying assets and the original equity holder.Therefore,the risk information on ABS is primarily revealed and reflected through factors such as the rationality of the asset pool construction,the validity of the true sale,the effectiveness of the risk isolation mechanism,and the effectiveness of the credit enhancement mechanism.In summary,ABS differs significantly from traditional securities in terms of information disclosure regarding risk factors.

    Current Status and Challenges of the ABS Information Disclosure System in China

    Current Status of the ABS Information Disclosure System in China

    The development history of asset securitization in China is relatively short.Although the earliest ABS project can be traced back to 1996 when the Zhuhai Expressway construction project commenced,asset securitization did not actually start to develop until 2005.In 2005,the People’s Bank of China issued thePilotAdministrative Measures for the Securitization of Credit Assets(the “Pilot Administrative Measures”),and the former China Banking Regulatory Commission (the former CBRC)①The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) was established in March 2018 by a merger of China’s banking and insurance regulators,namely,the former China Banking Regulatory Commission (the former CBRC) and the China Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC).In March 2023,the CPC Central Committee and the State Council issued the Plan for the Reform of Party and State Institutions.Based on the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC),a new institution called the National Financial Regulatory Administration (NFRA) was established,and the CBIRC was no longer retained.issued a series of regulations,including theMeasures for Supervising and Administrating the Pilot Securitization of Credit Assets by Financial Institutions(the “Supervision and Administration Measures”),to promote the development of credit asset securitization products.However,in 2007,the outbreak of the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States led to widespread criticism of ABS backed by credit assets,causing the development of ABS in China to come to a halt.After a period of dormancy,in 2012,the Chinese government recognized the institutional value of ABS as a new type of security that could reduce financing costs for market participants,change the risk management model in the securities industry,enhance financing security,and potentially help address many challenges during the transformation of the financial market.As a result,there was a need for continued development of ABS in China.Therefore,the People’s Bank of China,the former CBRC,and the Ministry of Finance jointly issued theNotice on Relevant Matters Concerning Further Expandingthe Pilot Securitization of Credit Assets,restarting the development process of ABS in China.Furthermore,the scope of assets involved in ABS was expanded.At that time,there were primarily two types of ABS in China: (a) credit asset securitization,with banks and other financial institutions as originators and trust companies as the SPV for issuance; (b) enterprise receivables asset securitization,with non-financial institutions as originators and securities company asset special management plans as the vehicle for issuance.In 2019,the state issued theOpinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on Supporting Shenzhen in Building a Pioneering Demonstration Zone for Socialism with Chinese Characteristics(the “Opinions”),proposing to vigorously promote intellectual property rights securitization.This significantly enriched the content of ABS in China and accelerated its development process.By 2020,the implementation of theNew Securities Lawofficially recognized ABS as statutory securities.

    With the development of ABS,China has also begun to establish information disclosure rules for ABS.In thePilot Administrative Measuresand theSupervisionand Administration Measuresissued in 2005,some principled provisions were made for the ABS information disclosure.Shortly afterward,the People’s Bank of China issued theRules for the Information Disclosure of Asset-backed Securities(the “Information Disclosure Rules”),which provided more professional and targeted regulations for the ABS information disclosure.In 2014,the China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”)issued theGuidelines for the Disclosure of Information about the Asset Securitization Business of Securities Companies and the Subsidiaries of Fund Management Companies(the “Information Disclosure Guidelines”),further enhancing China’s ABS information disclosure system.Undoubtedly,the provisions regarding information disclosure in Chinese laws and regulations,such as theCompany Law,theSecurities Law,and theSecurities Investment Fund Lawcan also be applied to the ABS information disclosure.In addition,the Securities Association of China,National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors,Shanghai Stock Exchange,and Shenzhen Stock Exchange have issued a series of self-regulatory rules on the ABS information disclosure,such as theGuidelines for Interim Report Information Disclosure of Asset-backed Securitiesof the Shenzhen Stock Exchange,thus forming a relatively comprehensive system for the ABS information disclosure.

    Challenges of the ABS Information Disclosure System in China

    The aforementioned series of laws,regulations,rules,and normative documents provide a basic legal basis for the ABS information disclosure in China.However,as a system,there are still some challenges in China’s ABS information disclosure rules that need to be addressed to enhance its effectiveness.These mainly include:

    Low Legal Hierarchy and Overlapping Rules

    Judging from the norms summarized above,the rules regarding ABS information disclosure in China lack legislation at the level of laws and administrative regulations.The only regulations that can be included in the legal framework are the regulations issued by financial regulatory authorities such as the People’s Bank of China and the CSRC.More operable norms include self-regulatory rules issued by institutions such as the Securities Association of China,the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors,and stock exchanges.These rules are at a comparatively lower level,which limits their applicability.The makers and publishers of the aforementioned rules include various entities such as financial regulatory authorities,financial industry associations,and stock exchanges.The presence of multiple rule-making bodies in the same domain leads to a fragmented set of ABS information disclosure rules,which poses numerous challenges for practical implementation.

    Insufficient Coverage of Information Disclosers

    TheInformation Disclosure Guidelinesstipulate that the manager and other obligated parties are required to disclose information.Other information disclosure obligors include but are not limited to the custodian and credit rating agencies.In the process of asset securitization,there are other participants involved,such as the original equity holder and other service providers apart from the manager,including asset service agencies,custodians,credit enhancement institutions,law firms,accounting firms,and liquidity support providers.According to theInformation Disclosure Guidelines,these participants have contractual obligations to provide information to the manager and ensure that the information is true,accurate,and complete.It can be seen that the main ABS information discloser is the project management organization,which in practice is the SPV.As the issuer of ABS,the SPV assumes the obligation of information disclosure,which seems reasonable and conforms to the basic rules of the securities law.Nonetheless,this stipulation overlooks the distinctive characteristics of ABS transactions: (a) Although the SPV is the issuer,the actual financier is the original equity holder rather than the SPV.This is different from traditional securities.For traditional securities,the issuer is also the financier who obtains funds through the issuance of securities and uses them for financing purposes.Therefore,it is reasonable for the issuer to assume various obligations,including information disclosure.However,ABS is different.In order to obtain financing funds,the original equity holder needs to “truly sell” its specific assets to the SPV,making the SPV the nominal owner of those assets.The SPV then issues securities based on those assets.However,the funds raised from the issuance of securities do not belong to the SPV but need to be transferred to the original equity holder.This leads to a paradox,i.e.,the original equity holder benefits from the issuance of ABS but bears no obligations of the issuer,while the SPV,which does not receive any benefits,has to assume the obligations of the issuer.This clearly contradicts the principle of correlating rights with their respective obligations.(b) As mentioned earlier,the SPV is not actually a real market participant but rather a “shell participant” or “shadow participant.” This makes it difficult for the SPV to fulfill its information disclosure obligations in practice.In the traditional securities field,the issuer of securities is usually a listed company,which has a complete and effective corporate governance structure and can provide sufficient human,physical,and financial resources to fulfill a series of issuer obligations,including information disclosure.However,the SPV lacks this capability.Its market behavior capability is completely incomparable to that of traditional listed companies,making it extremely difficult for the SPV to assume the issuer’s obligations.Therefore,it is not appropriate to limit the scope of the main ABS information disclosers to the SPV.The scope should be expanded.

    Information Disclosure Content Needs to Be Enriched

    Compared to traditional securities,ABS has a more complex trading structure,involves more participants,and has greater uncertainties,thereby entailing higher risks.The purpose of information disclosure is to fully disclose the risk factors to investors and help them avoid investment risks.Therefore,the content of ABS information disclosure should be more comprehensive and enriched.Additionally,since asset securitization relies on the assets for repayment,the disclosure content should not focus primarily on the creditworthiness of the issuer like traditional securities.Instead,it should concentrate on the quality and risk factors of the assets,such as the composition of the underlying asset pool and the quality information of the assets included in the pool.These pieces of information are generally unrelated to the financial condition of the issuer and are not reflected on the balance sheet of the company.They constitute off-balance sheet non-financial information,which is not required to be disclosed in traditional securities.However,the core of ABS information disclosure lies in the underlying asset information,which must be disclosed.Another example is cash flow forecast information,also known as “soft information.” In traditional securities law,securities information disclosure is mainly limited to “hard information,” which refers to the description of objective,verifiable historical events.The main characteristic of soft information is that: it is a predictive statement,such as forecasts,expectations,and statements about future prospects.The person making the statement often lacks existing data to verify its accuracy and mainly relies on subjective estimation and evaluation.In terms of results,predictive information may not match the objective situation.In traditional securities law,predictive information falls under voluntary disclosure,meaning that even if the issuer has the right to voluntarily disclose predictive information,it may choose not to disclose such information.Furthermore,according to the “safe harbor” rule,even if there is a significant difference between the predictive information and the actual situation,it,in principle,does not constitute a false statement.However,stable cash flow is a fundamental factor for establishing asset securitization as it represents the source of funds for repaying investors.Therefore,the predictive information about the future trends of cash flow stability is a critical factor for investors to consider when investing in ABS.If the rules of traditional securities information disclosure are applied,it could potentially harm the legitimate rights and interests of investors.

    Legal Liability System for False Information Disclosure

    During the information disclosure process,making false records or misleading statements that contradict the truth regarding major events,or engaging in major omissions or improper disclosure of information,constitutes false disclosure.False disclosure not only harms the rights and interests of investors but also poses serious hidden dangers to a country’s securities market order and economic security (Liu,2016).Therefore,false disclosure carries legal liability,and the same applies to false ABS information disclosure.Legal liabilities mainly include civil liability,administrative liability,and criminal liability.Due to the limitations of theLegislationLaw,criminal liability can only be defined by laws,and its key elements are very strict,resulting in its less frequent application.Therefore,we will not delve into it extensively in this paper.Over the years,in China’s liability system for false disclosures,administrative liability has accounted for the major portion,while civil liability has played a smaller role.This has resulted in a “heavy punishment and light compensation” scenario.Although it effectively punishes the violators,it fails to provide adequate relief to the investors who have suffered losses.Additionally,stock exchanges have the right to impose disciplinary measures such as public criticism,condemnation,or punitive fines against the violators.However,the liability for such violations is insufficient,and the cost of non-compliance is too low.Moreover,the penalties imposed by exchanges do not fall under administrative punishment but are categorized as “non-administrative punishment regulatory measures,” and there is still a gap between their deterrent effect and the legal liability for non-compliant behaviors.In summary,it is necessary to further improve and refine the legal liability rules for false ABS information disclosure.

    Reflections on Improving China’s ABS Information Disclosure System

    Based on the previous introduction and analysis,we have gained a general understanding of the current status and issues of China’s ABS information disclosure system,and we have briefly analyzed the causes of these issues.This is a necessary prerequisite for us to take measures to solve the problems.Undoubtedly,the ABS information disclosure system is not just a single law or regulation,but rather a system.In this system,theSecurities Law,as the fundamental law regulating the securities industry,needs to establish principled provisions for the ABS information disclosure,thereby providing legislative basis and guidance for the development of lower-level laws.Relevant administrative regulations for ABS formulated by the State Council should include specific rules for ABS information disclosure in a dedicated chapter.The CSRC,the People’s Bank of China,and other relevant institutions should,within the scope of their functions and powers,further refine the provisions of upper-level laws and regulations by formulating administrative regulations,and issue implementation rules,guidelines,and other departmental regulations.This can be supplemented by normative rules,such as industry association rules and securities market rules,to collectively form a systematic and complete ABS information disclosure rule system.Due to the limitations of this paper’s length,it is not possible to conduct a comprehensive study and interpretation of the entire system.Instead,some ideas are proposed to address only a few key issues involved in the system.

    Expanding the Scope of ABS Information Disclosers

    As mentioned earlier,the scope of ABS information disclosers in China is a little narrow,mainly including the SPV,custodians,and credit rating agencies.Other participants are only obliged to provide information to the disclosers but bear no disclosure obligation.Among them,the original equity holder is the direct beneficiary of asset securitization,i.e.,the financier of ABS projects.It should not only enjoy the benefits but also bear obligations.Additionally,the original equity holder has an advantageous position in terms of information concerning issues such as the quality of underlying assets and the stability of cash flows.Therefore,excluding the original equity holder from the scope of information disclosers is not so rational.Considering credit enhancement institutions have stronger capabilities in obtaining and possessing information regarding credit enhancement methods and risk transfer levels than any other participant.Therefore,credit enhancement institutions should also be included in the scope of information disclosers.As for other participants who have access to ABS-related information within the scope of their responsibilities,they must disclose the information as long as the information is relevant to investors (Shen,2008).Therefore,the information disclosure model where the issuer of traditional securities is responsible for information disclosure and other participants provide information to the issuer does not apply to ABS information disclosure.Instead,original equity holders,credit enhancement institutions,and other relevant parties should be directly included as participants in the scope of information disclosers.

    Improving the Content of ABS Information Disclosure

    The core of information disclosure lies in its content,i.e.what information should be disclosed,how it should be disclosed,and to what extent it should be disclosed.As mentioned earlier,ABS information disclosure differs from traditional securities as it focuses more on the information and risk factors related to the “assets” that back the ABS.

    Disclosure of Underlying Asset Information

    As asset securitization involves the fragmentation and combination of underlying assets to construct an asset pool,as well as rating and credit enhancement of assets in the pool,ultimately using the cash flow generated by the underlying assets as the basis for issuing securities.Therefore,the disclosure of relevant information about the underlying assets is undoubtedly an essential aspect of information disclosure.Specifically,the focus of disclosure is on the quality and risk information of the underlying assets.First,it is necessary to determine the type of assets to be securitized,such as whether the assets are superior or inferior.Second,it should be determined whether the asset pool to be disclosed is static or dynamic.If it is determined in the transaction that the principal repayments for a specific period will be used as new assets for reinvestment,then this structure is referred to as a cyclical structure,and the specific period is called a cyclical period.In this structure,the asset pool is essentially dynamic (Fabozzi,2017,p.57).A dynamic asset pool is undoubtedly riskier than a static one.Another important issue is the risk analysis of the asset pool and the proposed structure.These risks include credit risk,interest rate risk,early repayment risk,overdue risk,exchange rate risk,service risk,legal risk,and tax risk (Fabozzi,2017,p.58).When identifying and disclosing risks,it is also important to reveal whether the asset pool is static or dynamic.The former has a constant number of assets and relatively stable risk attributes within the repayment cycle; the latter requires separate identification and disclosure of risks each time during disclosure as there are continuous outflows of old assets and inflows of new assets into the pool.

    Disclosure of Cash Flow Forecast Information

    As mentioned earlier,ABS information disclosure involves disclosing both historical information and future information on cash flows generated by the underlying assets.Disclosure of cash flow forecast information is one of the core elements of asset securitization,and only by reasonably regulating cash flow forecast information can the goal of ensuring financial security be achieved most effectively (Zhao & Tang,2019).However,the disclosure of cash flow forecast information contradicts the rules for disclosure of “hard information” in traditional securities law,and objectively speaking,there are also significant difficulties faced in practice.Although a series of regulations and normative documents issued in China mandate the disclosure of ABS cash flow forecast information,it is often distorted in reality and presented as voluntary disclosure under the guise of mandatory disclosure.Therefore,the existing rules for disclosing cash flow forecast information still need further optimization.In my opinion,since the cash flow generated by underlying assets is the basis for ABS to deliver returns to investors,the prediction of future cash flow trends should not be considered as“soft information” but rather as crucial “hard information,” and its disclosure should undoubtedly be mandatory.In reality,many SPVs are unwilling to conduct in-depth analysis and forecasting of various factors that may impact the profitability of underlying assets.Instead,they rely more on their own experience to make judgments about factors affecting cash flow,mainly due to cost considerations.Therefore,we need to refine the content of disclosure related to factors influencing predictive information.Also,the “safe harbor” rule should not apply to information disclosers in cases where their intentional or gross negligence leads to significant misrepresentation of cash flow forecast information.This prevents the disclosers from simply being exempted and thus increases their cost of non-compliance,encouraging them to fulfill their disclosure obligations with greater care when disclosing cash flow forecast information.

    Disclosure of Credit Rating and Credit Enhancement Information

    In the process of asset securitization,credit rating and credit enhancement are indispensable steps for ABS to reduce credit risk and improve the credit rating of ABS.Investors are most concerned about the credit level and degree of credit risk associated with ABS.In the ABS field,credit risk includes both participant credit risk and asset credit risk.The former involves the basic information of the original equity holder and the SPV,while the latter refers to the risk inherent in the underlying assets,indicating the possibility that the assets that back the ABS cannot generate a sustained and stable cash flow.Credit rating agencies should conduct a reasonable assessment of participant credit risk and asset credit risk in the trading structure,and provide ABS credit rating information and credit risk information as assessment results to the discloser for classified disclosure.Additionally,credit enhancement is a necessary condition for ABS to pass the issuance review.Typically,ABS without credit enhancement is rated at grade C,which is clearly not an attractive credit level for investors.Therefore,through a series of internal and external credit enhancement techniques,the credit risk faced by investors is transferred to the guarantee institution,thereby reducing the credit risk.This can effectively raise the credit rating of ABS to B+ or even A,allowing ABS to gain recognition from more investors and achieve better issuance performance.As the guarantee institution bears the credit risk,it is more concerned about and sensitive to the risk factors inherent in ABS.Therefore,the disclosure of credit enhancement information,including the qualifications of the guarantee institution,methods of credit enhancement,and the results of credit enhancement,can better reveal the credit level of ABS and the stability of ABS cash flow,thus providing a reference for investors’ choices.

    Improving Legal Liability for False Information Disclosure

    As mentioned earlier,in the past,China imposed “heavy punishment and light compensation” for false disclosures.This approach not only failed to effectively protect investors but also reduced the deterrent effect of legal liability.In fact,for market participants,the deterrent effect of civil compensation liability is no less significant than that of various administrative liabilities.However,under the backdrop of the implementation of theNew Securities Law,civil liability has been strengthened with the support of the securities investor representative litigation system.The high-profile“Kangmei Pharmaceutical case” is a typical example.This case not only set a precedent for high compensation for false statements in China’s securities field but also had a strong demonstration effect on the representative group litigation and the joint liability of directors,supervisors,and senior managers of the issuer.Since theNew SecuritiesLawapplies to the entire securities field,its provisions regarding legal liability for false statements also apply to ABS information disclosure.This largely addresses the previous lack of civil liability.In addition,at the end of 2021,the Supreme People’s Court issued theSeveral Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on the Trial of Civil Cases for Damages for the Tort of Misrepresentation in the Securities Market(“Several Provisions”).These provisions not only classify the legal liability arising from false statements as civil liability but also provide detailed regulations on specific issues related to the process of pursuing civil liability,such as the determination of false statements,materiality,causality,faults,liable participants,and losses.The implementation of theSeveral Provisionshas provided more detailed and operable rules for pursuing civil liability for false statements.However,theSeveral Provisions,in nature,are judicial interpretations rather than laws or regulations.While they can serve as a basis for court judgments,using them as enforcement grounds for law enforcement agencies may be a little strained.The scope of their application is somewhat limited.Therefore,it would be preferable to upgrade the achievements of theSeveral Provisionsinto laws or administrative regulations as soon as possible.

    As a product of financial innovation in the late 20th century,ABS has become a vibrant branch of China’s securities industry.In the process of its development,investors,as the foundation of the securities market,rely heavily on true,accurate and complete information disclosure for the protection of their rights and interests.Therefore,the ABS information disclosure system is an indispensable component of securities laws and regulations.Only with the gradual establishment and improvement of the ABS information disclosure system can we create a brighter future for the development of asset securitization in China.

    十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久九九热精品免费| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产精品影院久久| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 久久 成人 亚洲| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 午夜激情av网站| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 91麻豆av在线| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| a 毛片基地| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 999精品在线视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| avwww免费| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面 | 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 超碰成人久久| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 青草久久国产| 一级毛片精品| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 午夜91福利影院| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 精品第一国产精品| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 免费观看av网站的网址| 成人三级做爰电影| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 亚洲黑人精品在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲人成电影观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 欧美另类一区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 大香蕉久久网| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 成人手机av| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 91精品三级在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 女警被强在线播放| 曰老女人黄片| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| a在线观看视频网站| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 麻豆av在线久日| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产精品成人在线| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 日本五十路高清| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| h视频一区二区三区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 手机成人av网站| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产精品二区激情视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美日韩黄片免| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 18禁观看日本| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产精品免费视频内射| 日韩欧美免费精品| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 1024香蕉在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久中文看片网| 日本wwww免费看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品免费大片| 乱人伦中国视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 午夜久久久在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 咕卡用的链子| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久久久久国产电影| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| av电影中文网址| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 一本综合久久免费| 久久久久久久国产电影| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 在线观看www视频免费| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产麻豆69| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 男女免费视频国产| 操出白浆在线播放| av网站在线播放免费| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产在线视频一区二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产一级毛片在线| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产av又大| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 宅男免费午夜| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲精品第二区| 在线av久久热| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲av美国av| 国产片内射在线| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 久久免费观看电影| 在线 av 中文字幕| 香蕉丝袜av| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 成年动漫av网址| 91国产中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品九九99| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 午夜福利,免费看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 国产xxxxx性猛交| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 成年人午夜在线观看视频| videosex国产| 久久 成人 亚洲| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 91麻豆av在线| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 精品久久久久久电影网| 中文字幕制服av| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 老司机福利观看| 自线自在国产av| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 人人妻人人澡人人看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 男女免费视频国产| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 人妻一区二区av| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲国产看品久久| 老司机福利观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美成人午夜精品| 中国美女看黄片| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 高清欧美精品videossex| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 9色porny在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 欧美另类一区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 高清av免费在线| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 高清在线国产一区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| svipshipincom国产片| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品免费视频内射| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 超碰97精品在线观看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 两性夫妻黄色片| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| www日本在线高清视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 午夜两性在线视频| 超色免费av| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 飞空精品影院首页| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲精品在线美女| tocl精华| 久久久久久久国产电影| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲伊人色综图| 免费不卡黄色视频| av在线老鸭窝| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 十八禁网站免费在线| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 蜜桃在线观看..| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| 免费在线观看日本一区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 99国产精品99久久久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 99国产精品99久久久久| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 永久免费av网站大全| 久久国产精品影院| 国产成人影院久久av| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 操美女的视频在线观看| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 中文字幕制服av| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 97在线人人人人妻| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| av线在线观看网站| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲精品一二三| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 新久久久久国产一级毛片| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| avwww免费| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产在视频线精品| 麻豆av在线久日| 999精品在线视频| 日本wwww免费看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 美女福利国产在线| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久青草综合色| 香蕉丝袜av| 久热爱精品视频在线9| av福利片在线| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 美女午夜性视频免费| 制服人妻中文乱码| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 三级毛片av免费| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 日韩欧美免费精品| 性色av一级| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 一本久久精品| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 丁香六月天网| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 久热这里只有精品99| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产成人系列免费观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 久久久久久人人人人人| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产精品.久久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲av美国av| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 9191精品国产免费久久| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 成人手机av| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 999久久久国产精品视频| 美女主播在线视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 在线天堂中文资源库| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| av天堂在线播放| 视频区图区小说| 老司机靠b影院| 国产成人av教育| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 一区在线观看完整版| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| cao死你这个sao货| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久中文字幕一级| 欧美成人午夜精品| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 黄色视频不卡| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产色视频综合| 欧美成人午夜精品| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产成人精品无人区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| videos熟女内射| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久|