• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Afforestation with an age-sequence of Mongolian pine plantation promotes soil microbial residue accumulation in the Horqin Sandy Land, China

    2024-04-22 09:29:28GUOJingwenSONGXueshuWANGXiaoDUZhangliuLUSen
    Journal of Arid Land 2024年4期

    GUO Jingwen, SONG Xueshu, WANG Xiao, DU Zhangliu, LU Sen*

    1 State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;

    2 Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;

    3 College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

    Abstract: Land use change affects the balance of organic carbon (C) reserves and the global C cycle.Microbial residues are essential constituents of stable soil organic C (SOC).However, it remains unclear how microbial residue changes over time following afforestation.In this study, 16-, 23-, 52-, and 62-year-old Mongolian pine stands and 16-year-old cropland were studied in the Horqin Sandy Land,China.We analyzed changes in SOC, amino sugar content, and microbial parameters to assess how microbial communities influence soil C transformation and preservation.The results showed that SOC storage increased with stand age in the early stage of afforestation but remained unchanged at about 1.27-1.29 kg/m2 after 52 a.Moreover, there were consistent increases in amino sugars and microbial residues with increasing stand age.As stand age increased from 16 to 62 a, soil pH decreased from 6.84 to 5.71, and the concentration of total amino sugars increased from 178.53 to 509.99 mg/kg.A significant negative correlation between soil pH and the concentration of specific and total amino sugars was observed, indicating that the effects of soil acidification promote amino sugar stabilization during afforestation.In contrast to the Mongolian pine plantation of the same age, the cropland accumulated more SOC and microbial residues because of fertilizer application.Across Mongolian pine plantation with different ages, there was no significant change in calculated contribution of bacterial or fungal residues to SOC, suggesting that fungi were consistently the dominant contributors to SOC with increasing time.Our results indicate that afforestation in the Horqin Sandy Land promotes efficient microbial growth and residue accumulation in SOC stocks and has a consistent positive impact on SOC persistence.

    Keywords: soil organic matter; stand age; biomarker; amino sugars; microbial residues

    1 Introduction

    Soil organic matter holds more organic carbon (C) than all of the global plants and atmosphere in combination, thus providing a critical ecosystem service (Lehmann and Kleber, 2015; Carvalho et al., 2022).Microbial activities are critical in soil organic C (SOC) pool formation because C dynamics in soils are typically the result of microbial catabolism and anabolism (Gougoulias et al.,2014).Microbial residues can be preferentially retained in soils by the growth of soil microbial biomass and the stability related to soil minerals (Miltner et al., 2012).It is critical to explore microbial residue accumulation and the associated process to understand the formation and stability of organic matter (Chen et al., 2020).Microbial residues (containing bacterial residues and fungal residues) comprise non-biomass microbial metabolites such as exo-enzymes,extracellular polymeric substances, and dead cell remains (Joergensen, 2018).The ratio of fungal residual C to bacterial residual C represents the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to SOC.Microbial residues can be quantified using amino sugars because they are vital components of microbial cell walls, and they are absent in vegetation and relatively stable after microbial cell death (Simpson et al., 2007).Evaluating amino sugar dynamics can assist in determining the preservation of microbial residual C and the perpetual fluctuation in the composition of organic C(Amelung et al., 2002).

    Land use change is an important driver for the balance of organic C stocks and the global C cycle (Poeplau et al., 2011).Previous research has shown that SOC is considerably influenced by changes in land cover (Bouchoms et al., 2017).For example, Poeplau and Don (2013) found that SOC stocks increased by 21 (±13) Mg/hm2after the conversion of cropland to forest land in northern Germany.Soleimani et al.(2019) observed that different land use patterns significantly influenced soil characteristics, and SOC decreased by 53% when a natural forest land was converted to an agricultural land in northern Iran.However, it remains unclear how the transformation of sandy land to agricultural or forest land drives amino sugars and microbial residues and their contribution to SOC.In recent years, most studies have focused on cropland,and only a few studies have investigated the influence of land use change on amino sugars or microbial residues.For example, Murugan et al.(2014) observed that the maize monoculture treatment reduced SOC storage and microbial residues compared with permanent grassland in Germany.Ding et al.(2020) found that the ratio of fungal to bacterial residue C decreased following the transformation of native grassland into cropland in northeastern China.However,detailed studies of microbial residue dynamics and their potential feedback to forest management in plantation ecosystems are scarce.The changes in the contributions of fungi and bacteria to SOC in plantations of different ages are unclear.

    In the arid and semi-arid areas of northern China, including a sizable sandy area, afforestation became an important technique for land improvement (Hu et al., 2008).Horqin Sandy Land,located in the northeastern China, is a typical ecologically fragile area due to the long-term overgrazing and land reclamation (Liu et al., 2015).On primary sandy land, the distribution of sand is relatively uniform and there is almost no vegetation on the surface, leading them to become one of the most serious areas of desertification (Chang et al., 2003).Pine plantation is facilitated for the ability to serve as a net C sink because pine plants have high productivity but low forestation cost (Chapela et al., 2001).Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestrisvar.mongholicaLitv.)naturally grows in the Da Hinggan Ling Mountains and sand plains of Hulunbuir grassland (Song et al., 2016a, b).Because of its cold and drought resistance, Mongolian pine was initially introduced to the Horqin Sandy Land in the 1950s and quickly proved to be beneficial.This tree species has become a leading contender for the afforestation of sandy and semi-arid areas (Zhu et al., 2008).Accordingly, a massive amount of Mongolian pine has been planted in the northern areas of China over time, producing stands of different ages.These plantations act as windbreaks,fix sand, and conserve soil and water.However, as the age of Mongolian pine forests increases, it is unknown how the amino sugar and microbial residue accumulation will change and what the relative contributions of fungi and bacteria to SOC will be.Analyzing the changes in amino sugars and microbial residues, as well as their contributions during land use change, can provide insights for scientifically assessing the impact of afforestation on soil quality and carbon sequestration potential.The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to examine whether SOC accumulation was positive following afforestation; (2) to investigate the changes of amino sugars and microbial residues in cropland and Mongolian pine stands of different ages; and (3) to evaluate the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to SOC after afforestation.

    2 Materials and methods

    2.1 Study area and materials

    The study area is located in Liaoning Province, southeastern Horqin Sandy Land, northeastern China (42°43′N, 122°29′E; 242 m a.s.l.).The climate in this area is classified as a typical temperate continental monsoon with an annual average temperature of 6.64°C and an average annual precipitation of 481.70 mm (Song et al., 2016b).The main soil is aeolian sandy soil, the terrain is relatively flat, and the soil is uniform.Before afforestation, this area was a typical sandy land with almost no vegetation.In 1953, planting experiments with Mongolian pine were started in this area.After afforestation in different years, artificial plantations of Mongolian pine of different ages were formed.

    In April 2021, 16-, 23-, 52-, and 62-year-old Mongolian pine stands (hereafter MP16, MP23,MP52, and MP62) and a 16-year-old cropland (CL16) adjacent to MP16 were selected for this study.All treatments were established in the original sandy land, and MP16 and CL16 stands were planted in the same year.Each of the sample sites has a radius of less than 2 km.The initial planting density of Mongolian pine in all sites was approximately 1200 plants/hm2.Due to continuous growth and competition among trees, some weak and dead trees were thinned.The surveyed tree densities in 2021 were 850, 775, 675, and 550 plants/hm2in MP16, MP23, MP52,and MP62, respectively.Over the past 7 a, none of these experimental sites were artificially disturbed.The dominant understory herbaceous species includeDigitaria sanguinalis(L.) Scop.,Chloris virgataSw.,Setaria viridis(L.) P.Beauv.,Artemisia scopariaWaldst.& Kit., andAxyris amaranthoidesL.

    For the cropland, the crop system was corn (Zea maysL.).In the spring of each year, the cropland was tilled to a 20-cm depth before planting.During the entire growing season, the N-P2O5-K2O compound fertilizer (EZhong Corp., Hubei, China) was applied by local farmers:108 kg/hm2N, 108 kg/hm2P2O5, and 108 kg/hm2K2O per year.A small amount of straw was returned to the cropland in autumn.

    2.2 Soil sampling

    In each land use pattern, five plots (10 m×10 m) were selected and each plot included two subplots (2 m×2 m).In April 2021, three soil cores were randomly sampled at the 0-10 cm layer using a hand auger (4 cm in diameter) in each subplot and homogenized to form a mixed sample.Sampled soils were rapidly transported to the laboratory and screened via a 2-mm sieve.Parts of the soil samples were freeze-dried and parts of the air-dried soil samples were utilized to measure SOC.In addition, we collected extra soil samples from 10 subplots to determine bulk density(BD).For each land use pattern, 10 standard trees were selected to measure tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH) using a Blume-Leiss altimeter and tape measure.Detailed information for the sampling plots is provided in Table 1.

    Table 1 Stand characteristics of Mongolian pine plantations with different ages

    2.3 Analysis of soil properties

    SOC was identified by dry combustion method using a Vario TOC Cube (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany) (Geiger and Hardy, 1971).Soil pH was determined by the soil slurry method (McLean, 1983).After shaking air-dried soil in distilled water (water:soil (v:m)=2.5:1.0) for 2 min, the slurry was settled and the supernatant was determined with an electrode.SOC storage (kg/m2) was calculated using the following equation:

    whereConis the SOC concentration (g/kg); BD is the bulk density (g/cm3); andLis the calculated layer thickness (10 cm).

    2.4 Amino sugar extractions and related analyses

    Soil amino sugars were extracted following the procedure outlined by Zhang and Amelung (1996)to identify fungal and bacterial residues.In brief, 10.0 mL of 6 M HCl was used to hydrolyze air-dried soil samples that contained around 0.3 mg of nitrogen for 8 h at 105°C.The slurry was filtered, dried, rinsed, and purified using KOH.Then, the filtrate was freeze-dried overnight.The remainder was dissolved with 5.0 mL methanol and dried with N2.The lyophilized remainder was dissolved in 300.0 μL of derivational solution and heated at 75°C-80°C for 35 min.Acetic anhydride was added to the derivatives and heated at 75°C-80°C for 25 min after being cooled to room temperature.Then 1.5 mL of dichloromethane and 1.0 mL of 1 M HCl were added and the anhydride was eliminated using deionized water.The residual organic phase was then dried with N2at 45°C.After being re-dissolved in 200.0 μL of ethylacetate-hexane, the amino sugar derivatives were analyzed by Agilent 6890A Gas Chromatography (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, USA).Chemstation software (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, USA) was used to identify the peaks by contrasting sample retention times to benchmarks for amino sugar standards.

    2.5 Microbial parameters and calculations

    Total amino sugars were estimated by sum of glucosamine (GluN), galactosamine (GalN),muramic acid (MurN), and mannosamine (ManN).The ratios of GluN to MurN and of GluN to GalN were used to express the relative contributions of fungi and bacteria to SOC, respectively(Liang et al., 2007).

    Microbial residues are better indicators of microbial contribution to soil C pools than standing biomass.Bacterial residual C (BRC) was calculated by multiplying the concentration of MurN by 45, a conversion factor for bacterial residues (Appuhn and Joergensen, 2006).We calculated fungal residual C (FRC) using the following equation according to the method described by Joergensen (2018):

    where FRC is the fungal residual carbon; 179.17 is the molecular weight of GluN; 251.23 is the molecular weight of MurN; and 9 is the conversion factor for the concentration of GluN to fungal residues with an estimated ratio of 1:2 between MurN and GluN (Engelking et al., 2007).The sum of FRC and BRC was calculated to represent the total MRC.

    2.6 Statistical analyses

    One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the differences in land use patterns.The ANOVA analyses were conducted using SPSS v.24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).A Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test was used to compare the means when the difference was significant (P<0.050).

    3 Results

    3.1 Soil properties

    Table 2 shows that soil BD of cropland was significantly lower than that of MP16, indicating an obvious decrease in soil BD due to tillage.Results from Mongolian pine plantation with different ages revealed that soil BD remained almost unchanged after 16-, 23-, and 52-year-old of afforestation.However, soil BD decreased significantly after 62 a.Soil pH decreased gradually with increasing stand age, indicating that soil acidification increased during afforestation.

    In the first 16-year-old of afforestation, SOC concentration of Mongolian pine stand was lower than that of cropland (Table 2).Stand age had a significant effect on SOC concentrations after afforestation, which ranged from 3.14 to 8.25 g/kg.SOC concentration increased with increasing stand age, indicating the distinct accumulation process of organic C after afforestation.However,after afforestation for 52 a, SOC concentration did not increase significantly compared with MP62.SOC storage exhibited similar trends that remained nearly constant after 52 a.

    Table 2 Soil bulk density (BD), pH, soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration, and SOC storage at the 0-10 cm soil layer

    3.2 Amino sugars

    At the early stage, total amino sugars of CL16 were significantly higher than that of MP16 (Fig.1).Similarly, the specific amino sugars, i.e., GluN, GalN, and MurN exhibited the same patterns.For Mongolian pine stands established in different years, the concentrations of total and specific amino sugars both increased as stand age increased.In particular, the total amino sugars of MP62 were 153.1% higher than MP16.GluN, GalN, and MurN concentrations in MP62 significantly increased by 179.1%, 146.2%, and 164.2%, respectively, compared with MP16.

    There was no significant difference in the ratios of GluN/MurN and GluN/GalN between MP16 and CL16 (Fig.2).Moreover, different stand ages had no significant effect on the ratios of GluN/MurN and GluN/GalN, indicating that the contribution of fungi to soil organic matter was consistently dominant.

    3.3 Fungal and bacterial residual C

    Microbial residues are considered major constituents of the relatively stable C pool in soils.Figure 3 shows total MRC, BRC, and FRC concentrations in CL16 were significantly higher than those of the Mongolian pine stand established at the same time.Moreover, the concentrations of MRC, BRC, and FRC were significantly affected by stand age (Fig.3).For example, the concentrations of total MRC, BRC, and FRC in MP62 increased by 175.0%, 164.2%, and 181.8%,respectively, compared with MP16.

    Figure 3 shows that total MRC accounted for 29.0%-4.70% of SOC in the five studied treatments.For Mongolian pine stands with different ages, stand age did not significantly affect the contributions of BRC, FRC, and total MRC/SOC ratio (Fig.3d-f).In addition, the ratio of FRC/BRC was consistently higher than 1 in all treatments (Fig.2).

    3.4 Correlations between soil pH and amino sugars

    Figure 4 shows a significant negative correlation (P<0.001) between soil pH and concentrations of specific and total amino sugars.The concentration of total amino sugars tended to increase as soil pH declined, ranging from 178.53 mg/kg with pH>6.76 to 509.99 mg/kg in soils with pH<5.85 (Fig.4d).

    Fig.1 Concentrations of specific and total amino sugars under different land use patterns.(a), GluN(glucosamine); (b), GalN (galactosamine); (c), MurN (muramic acid); (d), total amino sugars.CL16 is the 16-year-old cropland; MP16, MP23, MP52, and MP62 are the 16-, 23-, 52-, and 62-year-old Mongolian pine plantations, respectively.Bars mean standard errors.Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different land use patterns at P<0.050 level.The abbreviations are the same in the following figures.

    Fig.2 Microbial parameters under different land use patterns.(a), GluN/MurN (ratio of glucosamine to muramic acid); (b), GluN/GalN (ratio of glucosamine to galactosamine); (c), FRC/BRC (ratio of fungal residual C to bacterial residual C).Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different land use patterns at P<0.050 level.

    4 Discussion

    4.1 Effects of afforestation on soil BD, pH, and SOC

    Fig.3 Concentrations of microbial residual carbon (MRC) and their contributions to soil organic carbon (SOC)accumulation under different land use patterns.(a), BRC (bacterial residual carbon); (b), FRC (fungal residual carbon); (c), total MRC; (d), BRC/SOC; (e), FRC/SOC; (f), MRC/SOC.Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different land use patterns at P<0.050 level.

    Fig.4 Correlations between soil pH and concentrations of specific and total amino sugars.(a), GluN(glucosamine); (b), GalN (galactosamine); (c), MurN (muramic acid); (d), total amino sugars.

    In the present study, the effect of afforestation on soil acidification caused soil pH to consistently decrease with increasing Mongolian pine stand age (Table 2).This result is consistent with other studies (Berthrong, et al., 2009; Tew et al., 2021), which showed that afforestation lowered soil pH, especially under conifer forests.The considerable decrease of pH may be related to the redistribution of cations after afforestation, which increases the hydrogen ions in soil because of cation capture by roots or acid precipitation (Jobbágy and Jackson, 2003).Tree root exudates and rhizosphere environment changes may also result in a decrease in soil pH (Hinsinger et al., 2003).Moreover, the increase in acidity with increasing stand age can be attributed to the accumulation of acidic SOC (Mueller et al., 2012).

    Table 2 shows that soil BD of cropland was significantly lower than that of Mongolian pine stand of the same age, which was caused by cultivation activities and tillage (Kocyigit and Demirci, 2012).With the exception of MP62, similar soil BD was observed for the plantations,which indicates that the change in BD is minimal with increasing age if there is no artificial interference on soil.A decreased soil BD was only observed in MP62, which may be because the amount of roots and litter increased after 62-year-old of afforestation (Zeng et al., 2014; Rytter,2016).

    The equilibrium of two biotic processes—the productivity of terrestrial plants and the decomposition of organic matter—determines SOC content.The amount of SOC produced by decomposition of vegetation litterfall is largely determined by root turnover and root exudates(Post et al., 1996).In this study, SOC concentration in MP16 was lower than that in CL16 (Table 2), supporting similar results reported by other studies (Poeplau et al., 2011; Lei et al., 2019).In contrast to CL16, a low SOC concentration of MP16 may be the reason that trees at the early growth stage absorb an enormous quantity of soil nutrients (Perron et al., 2021).Moreover, there was limited above-ground C intake because of the low rate of litterfall and low forest biomass(Hu et al., 2008), whereas fertilizer application increased SOC concentration of cropland (Manna et al., 2007).

    For afforestation of sandy land, SOC concentration also increased with increasing stand age(Table 2), indicating that artificial afforestation is an effective approach to C sequestration, which was consistent with the results of Zhang et al.(2019) and Shao et al.(2019).The litter returned to the soil increased with increasing afforestation time, which contributed to SOC accumulation(Mondini et al., 2006).Moreover, the expanding plant cover and growing root systems as stand age increases may promote aggregate formation and reduce soil organic matter loss (Sauer et al.,2012).

    Table 2 also shows that SOC storage remained almost constant after 52-year-old of afforestation, which suggests that Mongolian pine stand at this stage may have reached C saturation, making it difficult to further accumulate C.This result is consistent with previous reports that each mineral matrix has a finite capacity to stabilize organic matter (Bárcena et al.,2014; Shao et al., 2019; Hoover and Smith, 2023).The stabilization of organic materials by soil matrix is influenced by factors such as mineral surfaces, multivalent cations, architecture of soil matrix, and chemical nature of soil mineral fractions.Each mineral soil has a unique and finite capacity to stabilize organic matter, resulting in a saturation limit for the whole soil C (Baldock and Skjemstad, 2000).Moreover, this phenomenon may also be related to the decline of photosynthetic capacity and plant productivity in mature and over-mature Mongolian pine plantations (Wright et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2018).

    4.2 Microbial parameters as indicators of SOC dynamics

    Amino sugars are stable and heterogeneous in soil, and can be used to indicate the microbial response to afforestation (Glaser et al., 2004).In this study, the concentrations of GluN, GalN,and MurN all increased significantly with increasing afforestation age.This finding is consistent with a previous report that suggests amino sugars increase with forest age in broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forests (Shao et al., 2019).The proactive assimilation of C from vegetation into the microbial biomass, which is further enhanced by turnover and preservation of assimilating products underground, may result in increased retention of amino sugars after afforestation(Schimel et al., 2007; Cornwell et al., 2008; Liang et al., 2017).Moreover, three specific and total amino sugar concentrations in CL16 were significantly higher than those in MP16 (Fig.1).This may be due to the addition of fertilizers into cropland, which provides organic C and inorganic nitrogen sources for microbial growth and promotes the proliferation of microorganisms, thus substantially increasing the amino sugar concentrations of cropland (Roberts et al., 2007).

    In addition, amino sugars are also influenced by soil pH.A negative correlation between pH and amino sugars was observed in this study (Fig.4), which suggests that conditions of low soil pH may stimulate the decomposition of complex polymers to amino sugars, particularly chitin(Hu et al., 2018).As pH decreases, amino sugar stabilization may become more effective,particularly when amino sugars are combined with clay minerals to form persistent organo-mineral complexes (Sokol et al., 2019).Furthermore, low soil pH may increase the fungal growth rate, resulting in the accumulation of amino sugars (Rousk et al., 2009).

    The ratios of GluN/MurN and GluN/GalN were used to represent the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to soil organic matter, wherein higher ratio values indicate a more important contribution of fungi to soil organic matter (Liang et al., 2007).Figure 2 showed that either the reclaimed cropland or afforestation on previous sandy land of various ages did not significantly influence the values of GluN/MurN and GluN/GalN.This is probably because the duration of afforestation in the present research was insufficient to disrupt the protection mechanisms of SOC and influenced the structure of microbial community (Weedon et al., 2012).

    In all treatments, the GluN/MurN ratio value was larger than 0.9 (Fig.2), indicating a continuous dominance of fungal residues.This might be the reason that the soils with a higher organic substrate preferentially retained and accumulated fungal hyphae (Guggenberger et al.,1999).Moreover, some previous reports also proposed that bacterial-derived MurN is less stable and decomposes more quickly than GluN produced by fungi (Solomon et al., 2002).On the other hand, the mineralization rate of bacterial residues is higher than that of fungal residues (Zhang et al., 2010).Compared with bacteria, fungi can use many resistant substances as energy sources(Bahram et al., 2018).As a result, fungi contribute more residues to the overall MRC because of their competitive advantage after afforestation.

    4.3 Microbial residue accumulation and its contribution to SOC

    Figure 3d-f shows a higher contribution of microbial residues to SOC in CL16 compared with MP16.This may be related to the larger amounts of resistant plant remnants in Mongolian pine plantations, such as lignin (Cotrufo et al., 2019).Furthermore, the application of fertilizer in cropland can promote microbial activities (Usmani et al., 2019), and microbial residues in young forests are easily decomposed and utilized by microorganisms without protection from clay particles (Khan et al., 2016).In both CL16 and MP16, FRC was consistently higher than BRC,indicating that the contribution of fungi to soil organic matter is greater than that of bacteria.This result can be the reason that fungal biomass is higher than that of bacteria in most ecosystems,and fungi are more effective than bacteria when utilizing the high C/N substrate (Bailey et al.,2002; Wang et al., 2021).In addition, the chemical resistance of fungal non-living biomass,especially cell wall constituents and pigments, causes a fungi-dominated ecosystem to stabilize more C than a bacteria-dominated population (Throckmorton et al., 2012).

    In Mongolian pine plantation, the measured total MRC accounted for 29%-37% of SOC (Fig.3), which suggests that microbial residues could serve as an immediate path for SOC accumulation in forests (Shao et al., 2019).There were no significant differences in MRC/SOC,BRC/SOC, and FRC/SOC ratios among Mongolian pine stands with different ages, which suggests that the contribution of microbial residues to SOC remained relatively steady (Li et al.,2022).This result may be related to the concurrent increase in the concentration of total and plant-derived SOC (Campo et al., 2019).Figure 3 shows that the concentrations of MRC, FRC,and BRC increase significantly with increasing stand age, which is consistent with previous observations (Maillard et al., 2021).Increased microbial activity in topsoil is the primary driver influencing the accumulation of MRC (Sokol et al., 2019).Therefore, as the years of afforestation increases, higher microbial biomass production and more rapid turnover cause more microbial residues to be continuously retained in top soils (Spohn et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2017).Alternatively, the increased substrate and nutrients from the addition of litter after afforestation may reduce the rate of microbial mortality (Wang et al., 2021), finally leading to increased MRC,FRC, and BRC with increasing stand age.

    5 Conclusions

    This study evaluated changes in SOC and microbial residues following land use changes in the Horqin Sandy Land, China.After the establishment of Mongolian pine plantation on previous sandy land, SOC accumulation increased with stand age, and the phenomenon of soil acidification became increasingly apparent.Amino sugar stabilization became more effective under low soil pH condition after afforestation.

    Increased plantation age also promoted the accumulation of amino sugars and MRC.In contrast to cropland, Mongolian pine plantation accumulated less SOC and MRC at the early stage.Across the five land-use patterns, calculated microbial parameters indicated that fungi, rather than bacteria, were consistently the main contributors to soil organic matter.Moreover, the contribution ratios of bacterial or fungal residues to SOC among Mongolian pine stands remained almost unchanged over time.We found that the duration of afforestation in the present research(16-62 a) was insufficient to disrupt the protection mechanisms of bulk organic C and influence the structure of microbial community.Our findings suggest that afforestation promoted positive compositional changes in soil organic matter by increasing microbial residues, which increases the persistence of SOC in Mongolian pine plantation.

    Conflict of interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds of Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAF)(CAFYBB2020QD002-2).The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their suggestions in improving the manuscript.

    Author contributions

    Conceptualization: LU Sen, DU Zhangliu; Investigation: GUO Jingwen, SONG Xueshu; Methodology: LU Sen,DU Zhangliu; Formal analysis: GUO Jingwen, WANG Xiao; Writing - original draft preparation: GUO Jingwen;Writing - review and editing: LU Sen, GUO Jingwen; Funding acquisition: LU Sen.All authors approved the manuscript.

    亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 久久久久国内视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产精品影院久久| 国产高清videossex| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 99热国产这里只有精品6| 在线看a的网站| av视频免费观看在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲第一av免费看| 一本综合久久免费| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久狼人影院| 手机成人av网站| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产精品九九99| av天堂在线播放| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 视频区图区小说| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久精品国产综合久久久| xxx96com| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 超碰97精品在线观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产精华一区二区三区| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 怎么达到女性高潮| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产成人系列免费观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| videosex国产| 99热网站在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 电影成人av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 中文欧美无线码| 久久影院123| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久久久久久国产电影| 91av网站免费观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 9热在线视频观看99| 制服人妻中文乱码| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 热re99久久国产66热| 99久久国产精品久久久| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 一本综合久久免费| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 制服诱惑二区| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久久国产成人免费| 窝窝影院91人妻| 日韩免费av在线播放| 在线天堂中文资源库| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 老熟女久久久| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美网| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 十八禁网站免费在线| 免费看a级黄色片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 中文欧美无线码| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 免费观看人在逋| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 制服人妻中文乱码| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 岛国毛片在线播放| 777米奇影视久久| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 一区二区三区精品91| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| av线在线观看网站| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品免费大片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产成人av教育| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 欧美日韩乱码在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 日日夜夜操网爽| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 精品福利观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久九九热精品免费| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| a在线观看视频网站| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 高清在线国产一区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 91字幕亚洲| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| aaaaa片日本免费| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 午夜影院日韩av| 大香蕉久久成人网| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 9色porny在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 久久精品国产综合久久久| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 成人18禁在线播放| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 在线看a的网站| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 91老司机精品| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产男女内射视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产精品成人在线| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲国产欧美网| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 99热网站在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 超碰97精品在线观看| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 黄色成人免费大全| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产高清videossex| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| a级毛片黄视频| 午夜福利,免费看| www.精华液| 亚洲三区欧美一区| a级毛片在线看网站| 午夜免费鲁丝| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 精品亚洲成国产av| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 欧美大码av| 亚洲伊人色综图| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 亚洲av成人av| 男女免费视频国产| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产男女内射视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 手机成人av网站| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 曰老女人黄片| 一a级毛片在线观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| avwww免费| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久国产精品影院| 91精品三级在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产区一区二久久| 国产精品永久免费网站| netflix在线观看网站| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 午夜91福利影院| 999久久久国产精品视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 亚洲在线自拍视频| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 精品久久久精品久久久| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 在线免费观看的www视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 久久草成人影院| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 精品人妻1区二区| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 91老司机精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 美女午夜性视频免费| 黄频高清免费视频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一夜夜www| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| videos熟女内射| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 很黄的视频免费| 午夜91福利影院| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 91老司机精品| 国产又爽黄色视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产成人欧美| 国产成人精品无人区| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲人成电影观看| av不卡在线播放| а√天堂www在线а√下载 | 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 深夜精品福利| 中文字幕色久视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 91老司机精品| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 99久久人妻综合| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 中文欧美无线码| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 男人操女人黄网站| xxx96com| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 精品一区二区三卡| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产单亲对白刺激| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产精品免费大片| 曰老女人黄片| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 满18在线观看网站| av网站在线播放免费| 曰老女人黄片| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品免费大片| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 成年人黄色毛片网站| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产精品国产av在线观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久香蕉精品热| 五月开心婷婷网| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲国产看品久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 久久久久视频综合| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产不卡一卡二| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 免费观看a级毛片全部| av不卡在线播放| 丰满的人妻完整版| 中文欧美无线码| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 视频区图区小说| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 色综合婷婷激情| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 成人免费观看视频高清| 91老司机精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 大码成人一级视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 中文字幕色久视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产精品 国内视频| 丝袜美足系列| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 老熟女久久久| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 99热只有精品国产| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 一级黄色大片毛片| 老司机影院毛片| svipshipincom国产片| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看|