• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts symptomatic anastomotic leakage in elderly colon cancer patients: Multicenter propensity score-matched analysis

    2024-03-11 08:55:20ChaoYangWangXiaoLongLiXiaoLongMaXiongFeiYangYongYongLiuYongJiangYu

    Chao-Yang Wang, Xiao-Long Li, Xiao-Long Ma, Xiong-Fei Yang, Yong-Yong Liu, Yong-Jiang Yu

    Abstract BACKGROUND The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a composite inflammatory biomarker, is associated with the prognosis in patients with colorectal tumors. However, whether the NLR can be used as a predictor of symptomatic postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) in elderly patients with colon cancer is unclear.AIM To assess the role of the NLR in predicting the occurrence of symptomatic AL after surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer.METHODS Data from elderly colon cancer patients who underwent elective radical colectomy with anastomosis at three centers between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the best predictive cutoff value for the NLR. Twenty-two covariates were matched using a 1:1 propensity score matching method, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for the development of postoperative AL.RESULTS Of the 577 patients included, 36 (6.2%) had symptomatic AL. The optimal cutoff value of the NLR for predicting AL was 2.66. After propensity score matching, the incidence of AL was significantly greater in the ≥ 2.66 NLR subgroup than in the < 2.66 NLR subgroup (11.5% vs 2.5%; P = 0.012). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed statistically significant correlations between blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively, preoperative albumin concentration, preoperative prognostic nutritional index, and preoperative NLR and AL occurrence (P < 0.05); multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an NLR ≥ 2.66 [odds ratio (OR) = 5.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50-20.26; P = 0.010] and blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively (OR = 2.52; 95%CI: 0.88-7.25; P = 0.049) were risk factors for the occurrence of symptomatic AL.CONCLUSION A preoperative NLR ≥ 2.66 and blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively are associated with a higher incidence of postoperative symptomatic AL in elderly patients with colon cancer. The preoperative NLR has predictive value for postoperative symptomatic AL after elective surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer.

    Key Words: Age; Colon cancer; Anastomotic leak; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; Propensity score-matched

    INTRODUCTION

    Older patients with colon cancer are becoming more common as the global elderly population continues to grow[1]. Increasing age also increases the risk of complications during and after colorectal surgery. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after colorectal surgery and may increase the risk of postoperative death in elderly patients[2] and severely affect the prognosis. Therefore, early prediction of the probability of AL occurrence and timely preventive measures are important for ensuring surgical safety and patient prognosis.

    In recent years, various inflammatory response markers, such as the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, platelet-tolymphocyte ratio, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), have been shown to be highly useful for predicting postoperative complications and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer[3-5]. The effect of elevated peripheral blood NLRs on postoperative complications, cancer prognosis, and patient survival related to colorectal cancer has been confirmed by previous studies[6-9]. However, there are few data related to the role of the NLR in predicting the postoperative occurrence of AL in elderly patients with colon cancer. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the role of the preoperative NLR as a predictive marker for symptomatic AL after radical resection in elderly patients with colon cancer.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients and data collection

    Clinical data from elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with primary colon cancer who underwent radical colon cancer surgery at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, or Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. The clinicopathologic characteristics of these patients included the following: Basic information including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, history of abdominal surgery, nonsteroidal drug use, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy; surgical information including the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, surgical approach (open/laparoscopic/robotic), anastomotic approach (end-to-end/end-to-lateral/lateral-to-lateral), and blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively; tumor pathological characteristics including tumor location, T-stage, N-stage, and tumor diameter; and serological examination including preoperative neutrophil count, preoperative lymphocyte count, preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative serum albumin (ALB) concentration, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The relevant preoperative serological indices were collected within 1 wk before surgery. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (leading center of the study, approval No. LDYYLL-2023-363). The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University due to the retrospective nature of the study and the absence of any risk.

    Definition

    The diagnosis of AL included three main aspects: Clinical symptoms, drainage fluid characteristics, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients with clinical symptoms (such as fever) and signs of peritonitis underwent CT for further diagnosis. AL was classified as asymptomatic (grade A) or symptomatic (grades B and C) based on severity and clinical signs. Symptomatic AL required aggressive therapeutic intervention (such as drainage and irrigation, antibiotics, and endoscopic surgery) or secondary surgical treatment and was diagnosed if one of the following manifestations was present: (1) Abnormal fluid such as pus and intestinal contents draining from the postoperative abdominal drainage tube; or (2) Fluid or gas collection around the anastomosis seen on abdominal CT or contrast enema. The followup for AL was within 15 d postoperatively. NLR was calculated as neutrophil count (109/L)/lymphocyte count (109/L), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was calculated as serum ALB (g/L) + 5 × lymphocyte count (109/L).

    Inclusion and exclusion criteria

    The inclusion criteria were as follows: ≥ 65 years of age, pathologically confirmed primary colon cancer, elective radical resection of colon cancer with one-stage anastomosis, and complete clinical and pathological data. The exclusion criteria were as follows: Patients with grade A AL without specific clinical management, patients with intraoperative prophylactic stoma, patients with postoperative pathologic results showing M1 stage, and patients with incomplete postoperative data.

    Propensity score matching and statistical analysis

    A database was created in Excel, a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed with R-Studio (2023.03.1 + 446), and the data analysis was performed with SPSS 26.0 software, with the significance set atP< 0.05. In all cohorts, the normality of the continuous variables was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilcoxon test, and continuous variables with a normal distribution are presented as the mean ± SD. Continuous data not conforming to a normal distribution are presented as the median (interquartile range) and were further analyzed by the independent Student’sttest or Mann-WhitneyUtest. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies (percentages), and comparisons were made using theχ2test, Fisher’s exact test, or rank sum test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the best critical value for the NLR prediction of AL.

    A 1:1 PSM analysis was performed using the nearest neighbor method. The caliper value was set to 0.2 times the standard deviation of the propensity score. To reduce selection bias and confounding factors, logistic regression analysis was used to calculate propensity scores for age, sex, BMI, smoking history, abdominal surgery history, nonsteroidal drug use, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, lung disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor location, ASA classification, surgical approach, anastomosis, blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively, T stage, N stage, tumor diameter, CEA, preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative ALB, and preoperative PNI. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was measured to determine the balance between the two groups before and after propensity score matching. An SMD of < 0.2 indicated that an adequate balance was achieved between the two groups. After matching, covariates withP< 0.05 in the univariate logistic regression analysis were entered into the multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative symptomatic AL.

    RESULTS

    Study population and clinical characteristics

    The study population enrollment process is shown in Figure 1. A total of 577 patients were ultimately included in the present study, 36 of whom (6.2%) developed symptomatic AL. The basic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of the patients are shown in Table 1. Sex, blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively, N stage, preoperative ALB level, preoperative NLR, and preoperative PNI were significantly different between the AL group and the group without AL (P< 0.05).

    Figure 1 Study population enrollment process. NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

    Table 1 Patient clinical characteristics, n (%)

    1Variables were tested using Fisher’s exact probability method with no statistical values.AL: Anastomotic leakage; BMI: Body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; NLR: Neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio; PNI: Prognostic nutritional index.

    NLR

    The continuous variable NLR was used as the test variable, and the dichotomous variable AL was used as the outcome variable. ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve for the preoperative NLR was 0.683 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.612-0.755]. For all patients, the sensitivity (0.861), specificity (0.543), and Youden index (0.405) of the NLR in predicting the occurrence of postoperative symptomatic AL in elderly patients undergoing radical resection for colon cancer were highest when the NLR was 2.66 (Figure 2).

    Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the ability of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte to predict symptomatic anastomotic leakage. AUC: Area under the curve; CI: Confidence interval.

    PSM based on the optimal cutoff value for the NLR

    Of the 577 patients, 295 (51.1%) had an NLR < 2.66, and 282 (48.9%) had an NLR ≥ 2.66 (Table 2). After 1:1 PSM, 122 matched pairs were generated, and patients were divided into NLR < 2.66 (n= 122) and NLR ≥ 2.66 (n= 122) groups (Table 2). All covariates were well balanced with an SMD less than 0.2, and the difference between the NLR < 2.66 and NLR ≥ 2.66 groups was not statistically significant (Table 2). Before (1.4%vs11.3%,P< 0.001) (Figure 3A) and after (2.5%vs11.5%,P= 0.012) (Figure 3B) PSM, the incidence of symptomatic AL was significantly lower in the NLR < 2.66 subgroup than in the NLR ≥ 2.66 subgroup.

    Figure 3 Comparison of the incidence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio < 2.66 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 2.66 groups before and after propensity score matching. A: Before propensity score matching; B: After propensity score matching. NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

    Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics before and after propensity score matching, n (%)

    Analysis of risk factors associated with AL after PSM

    According to the univariate logistic regression analysis, blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively, preoperative ALB concentration, preoperative PNI, and preoperative NLR were associated with the occurrence of postoperative AL (Table 3). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative blood transfusion within 2 d [odds ratio (OR) = 2.52; 95%CI: 0.88-7.25;P= 0.049] and a high NLR (≥ 2.66) (OR = 5.51; 95%CI: 1.50-20.26;P= 0.010) were significantly associated with the occurrence of symptomatic AL after radical resection for colon cancer in elderly individuals.

    Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors associated with the occurrence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after propensity score matching

    1Control group.BMI: Body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PNI: Prognostic nutritional index; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

    DISCUSSION

    The main finding of this study was that the incidence of postoperative symptomatic AL in 577 elderly patients who underwent radical colon cancer resection was 6.2%. The optimal cutoff value of the preoperative NLR for predicting symptomatic AL after radical colon cancer resection was determined by the ROC curve to be 2.66. After PSM, the incidence of AL was significantly greater in the ≥ 2.66 NLR subgroup than in the < 2.66 NLR subgroup, and a preoperative NLR ≥ 2.66 was significantly associated with the occurrence of AL after radical colon cancer resection. In addition, the incidence of postoperative symptomatic AL was greater in elderly colon cancer patients who were transfused intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively than in those in the nontransfused group.

    When inflammation and infection occur, neutrophils rapidly migrate to the site of inflammation, responding first to tissue damage and playing a key role in the host’s resistance to infection[10]. Elevated peripheral blood neutrophil levels are characteristic of pathogenesis and are a hallmark of the inflammatory response. However, persistent neutrophilic infiltration is a hallmark of chronic inflammation and leads to tissue damage[11]. Furthermore, in one study, the number of lymphocytes involved in the immune state decreased with the progression of inflammatory disease, and this increase in lymphocyte count was a cause of decreased cellular immune function[12]. That is, cell-mediated immune responses are strongly dependent on lymphocytes. The NLR is an easily accessible marker identified as a good indicator of systemic inflammatory status in the general population[13]. The NLR has a better ability to predict systemic inflammation and prognosis than does the leukocyte, neutrophil, or lymphocyte count alone[14,15].

    Previous studies have suggested that the post-colorectal AL may be associated with the NLR. First, Josseet al[16] reported that a preoperative NLR ≥ 2.3 was significantly associated with postoperative complication rates and that the incidence of AL increased non-significantly. Subsequently, Miyakitaet al[17] showed that a preoperative NLR ≥ 2.21 was significantly associated with postoperative AL in patients with rectal cancer (OR = 4.51;P= 0.0329). In addition, Paliogianniset al[9] showed that a higher NLR was associated with the occurrence of postoperative AL in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. According to our findings, high preoperative NLRs are a risk factor for the development of symptomatic AL after radical resection in elderly patients with colon cancer. The OR for the occurrence of symptomatic AL in the high NLR subgroup (≥ 2.66) was 5.51, indicating that the preoperative NLR may help to predict the risk of postoperative symptomatic AL in elderly patients with colon cancer before surgery, which could allow patients to take effective preventive measures. However, the predictive role of inflammatory indicators should be validated in larger clinical studies. In particular, for more effective prevention of AL occurrence, prevention methods should be explored through interventional prospective studies with risk stratification based on preoperative NLR values.

    This study revealed that blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively was associated with the occurrence of postoperative symptomatic AL, which is consistent with previous findings[18,19]. Most of the transfusions were due to excessive surgical blood loss or severe anemia. Hemoglobin is associated with blood flow and oxygenation at the anastomotic margin and is an important factor in anastomotic healing. However, blood transfusion may lead to impaired blood rheology[20], which adversely affects microcirculation; transfusion may also induce immunosuppression[21], which increases the risk of infectious diseases around the anastomosis. Therefore, careful blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively may be an intervention to reduce the occurrence of postoperative AL in elderly patients undergoing radical colon cancer resection.

    This study has several limitations. First, because this study was retrospective, we could not assess all the covariates that might have influenced the analysis. Therefore, our study may be affected to some extent by unavoidable selection bias. However, we performed a PSM analysis to minimize bias. Second, preoperative NLR values may be influenced by patients’ infectious comorbidities, and there is no standard optimal cutoff value for the NLR. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Third, further studies are needed to validate the relationship between the preoperative NLR and other postsurgical symptomatic ALs, as these parameters have not been specifically evaluated.

    CONCLUSION

    Symptomatic AL is associated with a high preoperative NLR and blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively. In elderly patients who undergo radical colon cancer resection, a preoperative NLR ≥ 2.66 is significantly associated with the likelihood of postoperative symptomatic AL occurrence. We recommend the preoperative use of the NLR as a predictive marker for the risk of AL for better preoperative evaluation and selection of the best surgical and care plan for elderly patients undergoing elective radical colon cancer resection.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a complex inflammatory biomarker that is associated with prognosis in patients with colorectal tumors. However, it is unclear whether NLR can be used as a predictor of postoperative symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL) in elderly colon cancer patients.

    Research motivation

    The discovery of biomarkers able to predict AL early after colorectal surgery would bring consistent advantages in the management and outcomes of this complication. NLR is a low-cost, easy-to-perform, and widely available index. Here, we aimed to investigate the NLR as an early available predictive marker for AL.

    Research objectives

    To assess the role of preoperative NLR in predicting the development of symptomatic AL after surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer by using propensity score matched (PSM) analysis.

    Research methods

    We used a retrospective analysis to examine data from elderly colon cancer patients admitted between January 2018 and December 2022 at three large medical centers. The best predictive cutoff value for NLR was determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve. All covariates were matched using a 1:1 PSM method, and finally, all variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the correlation between NLR and the occurrence of postoperative AL and other associated risk factors.

    Research results

    Among 577 patients, 36 (6.2%) experienced symptomatic AL. The optimal NLR cutoff for predicting AL was 2.66. After propensity score matching, the incidence of AL was significantly higher in the NLR ≥ 2.66 subgroup compared to the NLR < 2.66 subgroup (11.5%vs2.5%;P= 0.012). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed significant differences in blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively, preoperative albumin concentration, preoperative prognostic nutritional index, and preoperative NLR regarding AL occurrence (P< 0.05); multivariate logistic regression analysis identified NLR ≥ 2.66 [odds ratio (OR) = 5.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50-20.26;P= 0.010] and blood transfusion intraoperatively and within 2 d postoperatively (OR = 2.52; 95%CI: 0.88-7.25;P= 0.049) as risk factors for symptomatic AL occurrence.

    Research conclusions

    High preoperative NLR (≥ 2.66) and intraoperative, as well as postoperative (within 2 d), blood transfusions are associated with increased postoperative symptomatic AL in elderly colon cancer patients. Preoperative NLR serves as a predictor for postoperative symptomatic AL after elective surgery for elderly colon cancer patients.

    Research perspectives

    In the future, we plan to further confirm the clinical applicability of NLR using a prospective randomized controlled trial approach.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Wang CY and Li XL performed the study conceptualization and design, statistical analysis, and manuscript preparation; Wang CY, Ma XL, and Liu YY contributed to data acquisition; Yang XF, Liu YY, and Yu YJ contributed to data quality assessment; Li XL contributed to data interpretation; Wang CY drafted the initial manuscript; Yu YJ reviewed and revised the paper; and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    Supported bythe Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China, No. 21JR1RA075 and No. 22JR5RA895; and Lanzhou Science and Technology Program, China, No. 2021-1-109.

    Institutional review board statement:The study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (leading center of the study, approval No. LDYYLL-2023-363).

    Informed consent statement:The requirement of informed consent was waived by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University due to the retrospective nature of the study and the absence of any risk.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

    Data sharing statement:The data analyzed in this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Country/Territory of origin:China

    ORCID number:Yong-Jiang Yu 0000-0002-5025-4047.

    S-Editor:Wang JJ

    L-Editor:Wang TQ

    P-Editor:Zhao YQ

    国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 日本一二三区视频观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| .国产精品久久| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久久色成人| 午夜激情欧美在线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 99热网站在线观看| 99热网站在线观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 在现免费观看毛片| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 中文字幕久久专区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲色图av天堂| av天堂中文字幕网| 熟女电影av网| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产男人的电影天堂91| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 欧美色视频一区免费| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产精品永久免费网站| 免费在线观看日本一区| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产成人a区在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 一区福利在线观看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 午夜视频国产福利| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | www.www免费av| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 内射极品少妇av片p| h日本视频在线播放| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 男人舔奶头视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 99热这里只有是精品50| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 午夜福利18| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 露出奶头的视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 亚洲avbb在线观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产午夜精品论理片| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 免费av毛片视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久久久性生活片| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日本在线视频免费播放| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久热精品热| 99久久精品热视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 在线免费十八禁| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产色婷婷99| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 色播亚洲综合网| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 永久网站在线| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 长腿黑丝高跟| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 九色国产91popny在线| 色av中文字幕| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 最好的美女福利视频网| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 日日撸夜夜添| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产老妇女一区| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产成人av教育| 国产综合懂色| 免费看光身美女| 搡老岳熟女国产| 舔av片在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 窝窝影院91人妻| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久久久久久久大av| 精品久久久久久久久av| 日本 欧美在线| 性欧美人与动物交配| 日日夜夜操网爽| 熟女电影av网| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 一进一出抽搐动态| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 草草在线视频免费看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 久久中文看片网| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 热99在线观看视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 欧美区成人在线视频| 99热网站在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 日本免费a在线| xxxwww97欧美| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 精品久久久久久久久av| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲色图av天堂| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 91精品国产九色| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 少妇的逼水好多| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| videossex国产| 老女人水多毛片| 全区人妻精品视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 尾随美女入室| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 特级一级黄色大片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 九色国产91popny在线| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| av在线老鸭窝| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 深夜a级毛片| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产精品三级大全| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| www.色视频.com| 国产精华一区二区三区| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 在线天堂最新版资源| 深夜精品福利| 久久久色成人| 成人综合一区亚洲| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产精品无大码| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 色综合站精品国产| 国产日本99.免费观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 欧美人与善性xxx| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 黄色配什么色好看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 久久精品人妻少妇| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 如何舔出高潮| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| www.色视频.com| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 免费看光身美女| 色吧在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 免费看日本二区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 成年版毛片免费区| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| avwww免费| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 综合色av麻豆| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 色播亚洲综合网| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久香蕉精品热| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| av.在线天堂| 69人妻影院| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| a级毛片a级免费在线| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 简卡轻食公司| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 观看美女的网站| 久久人妻av系列| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| av黄色大香蕉| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 中国美女看黄片| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 在线国产一区二区在线| 精品午夜福利在线看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产成人av教育| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 中文字幕高清在线视频| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日本免费a在线| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 亚州av有码| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 熟女电影av网| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 嫩草影院入口| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 欧美精品国产亚洲| 精品日产1卡2卡| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久久久国内视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 欧美日韩黄片免| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| av在线天堂中文字幕| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产三级在线视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 欧美区成人在线视频| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 尾随美女入室| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 看黄色毛片网站| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲av成人av| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 男女那种视频在线观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 老女人水多毛片| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日韩高清综合在线| .国产精品久久| 欧美成人a在线观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美激情在线99| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲无线观看免费| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 在线播放无遮挡| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 成人综合一区亚洲| 88av欧美| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 88av欧美| 免费在线观看日本一区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 少妇的逼水好多| av在线天堂中文字幕| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 日本a在线网址| 成人国产综合亚洲| 性色avwww在线观看| 日本黄大片高清| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 波多野结衣高清无吗|