• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A comparison study on structure-function relationship of polysaccharides obtained from sea buckthorn berries using different methods:antioxidant and bile acid-binding capacity

    2024-02-16 07:15:04QioyunLiZumnDouQingiDunChunChnRuihiLiuYumingJingBoYngXiongFu

    Qioyun Li,Zumn Dou,b,Qingi Dun,Chun Chn,c,d,*,Ruihi Liu,Yuming Jing,Bo Yng,Xiong Fu,b,d,*

    a SCUT-Zhuhai Institute of Modern Industrial Innovation,School of Food Science and Engineering,South China University of Technology,381 Wushan Road,Guangzhou 510640,China

    b Guangzhou Institute of Modern Industrial Technology,Nansha 511458,China

    c Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety,Guangzhou 510640,China

    d Overseas Expertise Introduction Center for Discipline Innovation of Food Nutrition and Human Health (111 Center),Guangzhou 510640,China

    e Department of Food Science,Stocking Hall,Cornell University,Ithaca 14853,USA

    f South China Botanical Garden,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Guangzhou 510650,China

    Keywords:Sea buckthorn Extraction method Structure Rheological properties Antioxidant activity Bile acid binding capacity

    ABSTRACT In this study,the structural characters,antioxidant activities and bile acid-binding ability of sea buckthorn polysaccharides (HRPs) obtained by the commonly used hot water (HRP-W),pressurized hot water (HRP-H),ultrasonic (HRP-U),acid (HRP-C) and alkali (HRP-A) assisted extraction methods were investigated.The results demonstrated that extraction methods had significant effects on extraction yield,monosaccharide composition,molecular weight,particle size,triple-helical structure,and surface morphology of HRPs except for the major linkage bands.Thermogravimetric analysis showed that HRP-U with filamentous reticular microstructure exhibited better thermal stability.The HRP-A with the lowest molecular weight and highest arabinose content possessed the best antioxidant activities.Moreover,the rheological analysis indicated that HRPs with higher galacturonic acid content and molecular weight showed higher viscosity and stronger crosslinking network (HRP-C,HRP-W and HRP-U),which exhibited stronger bile acid binding capacity.The present findings provide scientific evidence in the preparation technology of sea buckthorn polysaccharides with good antioxidant and bile acid binding capacity which are related to the structure affected by the extraction methods.

    1. Introduction

    The abnormal increase in blood lipids such as total cholesterol(TC),triglycerides (TG) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) were the major factors in the occurrence of hypertension,obesity,diabetes and other chronic diseases,which have become one of the main public health problems all over the world[1].Current therapeutic treatments for these chronic diseases usually have adverse side effects or high rates of secondary failure[2,3].Therefore,developing potential natural products to prevent these chronic diseases has attracted increasing attention from the scientific community[4].In recent years,accumulating evidences indicated that the natural polysaccharides could effectively bind to bile acids to promote the excretion of bile acids in the intestine and transformation of cholesterol into bile acids in the liver,leading to the decrease of blood lipids which is good for the cardiovascular diseases[5,6].

    Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoidesL.),as a member of Elaeagnaceae family,is widely planted in different part of Asia and Europe[7].Sea buckthorn can survive in saline-alkali soils due to its ability to resist drought,wind and sand stress,so it is widely used in soil and water conservation and possessed high economic and environmental value.Besides,sea buckthorn,particularly berries,possess good antioxidant,anti-inflammatory and intestinal protection activity for rich in phenolic compounds,polysaccharides,vitamins,unsaturated fatty acids and carotenoids[8,9].Currently,it has been widely used in Chinese,Mongolian and Tibetan traditional medicines for cardiovascular disease[10],and sea buckthorn polysaccharide played an important role.Nevertheless,to our best knowledge,there is limited information on the bile acid binding capacity of sea buckthorn polysaccharides.In addition,previous studies indicated that the binding ability of polysaccharides to bile acids was closely related to the rheological properties of polysaccharides[6,11],which are greatly affected by the extraction method[12],and various extraction solvents were applied to isolate polysaccharide,such as hot buffer (HBSS),chelating agent (CHSS),dilute alkaline (DASS) and concentrated alkaline (CASS),etc.[13-15].For example,polysaccharide extracted from blackberry with higher viscosity exhibited stronger binding ability to bile acids[16],which was consistent with the result reported by Chen et al[17].Chen et al[12]reported that polysaccharides from mulberryfruits obtained by hot water extraction (MFPh) had the highest viscosity,while that extracted with ultrasonic-assisted extraction (MFPu)exhibited relatively low viscosity.Thus,the selection of extraction method is important for the bioactive polysaccharides.Furthermore,the activity of enzyme was easily affected by pH,temperature and storage time ect.,the reproducibility of enzymatic-assisted method was poor.Compared with enzymatic-assisted method,physical and chemical extraction methods exhibited better reproducibility and were more helpful in controlling the molecular weight and yield of polysaccharides[18,19].However,the information on comprehensive evaluation of the relationship between rheological properties and bile acid binding capacity of sea buckthorn polysaccharide extracted with different methods is still limited.

    Therefore,the present study aims to clarify the effects of five commonly used physical and chemical methods on the physicochemical properties,structure,rheological properties,antioxidant and bile acid-binding capacity of sea buckthorn polysaccharide.The findings provide information on the relationship among structure,property and bioactivities of sea buckthorn polysaccharide extracted with different methods.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1 Materials and chemicals

    Sea buckthorn berries were collected from a local fruit market in horticultural farm in Lvliang (Lvliang,Shanxi province,China).2,2’-Azobis [2-methylpropionamidine] dihydrochloride(AAPH),1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone (PMP),1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH),trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were obtained from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co.,Ltd (Shanghai,China).Monosaccharide standard and Dextrans with different molecular weights were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.(St.Louis,MO,USA).All other regents and chemicals used in the present study were analytical or chromatographic grade.

    2.2 Extraction of sea buckthorn polysaccharides (HRPs)

    The sea buckthorn berries were washed,dried and ground into powder.The oil in the powder (500 g) was removed by petroleum mether,and the ethanol-soluble impurities were removed by 95% (V/V)ethanol.The pretreated sea buckthorn powder was used for further extraction according to previous studies with slight modifications[11,20].The detailed extraction and purification procedures of sea buckthorn polysaccharides are shown in Fig.1.Pressurized hot water extraction was conducted in a high pressure steam sterilizer (YXQ-LS-50A,Shanghai Boxun Industrial Co.,Ltd.Medical Equipment Factory,Shanghai,China),and ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic extraction was performed by an ultrasonic cleaner (KQ-800KDE,Kunshan Ultrasonic Instrument Co.,Ltd,Kunshan,China).The crude sea buckthorn polysaccharides were deproteinization with Sevag reagent(chloroform:n-butylalcohol=4:1) and decolored using macroporous resin AB-8.After dialysis (molecular cut-off 3 500 Da) for 48 h,the solution was freeze-dried and the samples were named HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A,respectively.

    Fig.1 The process of polysaccharide isolated from sea buckthorn with different extraction methods.

    2.3 Chemical analysis of HRPs

    The neutral sugar content in the HRPs was measured by the phenol-sulfuric acid method withD-glucose as a standard[21-23].Contents of uronic acid were quantized by the meta-hydroxydiphenyl method[24,25],and the galacturonic acid (GalA) was used to make a standard curve at a wavelength of 525 nm.The total protein content was analyzed by the method of Coomassie brilliant blue with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard[26].

    2.4 Homogeneity and molecular weight determination

    High performance gel permeation chromatography (Agilent 1260,Agilent Co.,USA) coupled with a refractive index detector (RID,Agilent) was used to analyze the homogeneity and molecular weight of the HRPs.Dextrans with different molecular weights were used to establish molecular weight calibration curve,and the detailed analysis conditions were referred to reported method[27].

    2.5 HPLC analysis of monosaccharide composition

    The monosaccharide composition of HRPs were analyzed by HPLC method after hydrolysis with TFA and pre-column derivatization with PMP[24,28].The chromatographic analysis was performed with an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18column(5 μm,4.6 mm × 250 mm) and the data was collected at 245 nm.The quantitative analysis of monosaccharides was performed by comparing the corresponding calibration curves established by monosaccharide standards.

    2.6 Structural characterization

    2.6.1 Particle size determination

    The particle size distributions of HRPs were determined by a Micron Laser Particle Sizer Mastersizer 3000[29,30].The measurements were conducted at 25 °C with three replicates.The refractive indexes of the continuous phase and dispersed phase were set as 1.330 and 1.414,respectively.

    2.6.2 FT-IR spectroscopy

    The FT-IR spectra of HRPs was analyzed on a Bruker VERTEX 33 spectrometer (Bruker Corporation,Germany),and the spectra were recorded in the region of 4 000-600 cm-1.

    2.6.3 Triple-helix conformation analysis

    The triple-helix conformation of HRPs was analyzed with Congo red method according to the previous report with minor modifications[31].

    2.6.4 XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis

    The amorphous or crystalline structures of HRPs were determined with an X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance,Bruker,Germany) and the spectra were recorded with a scan range from 5° to 70° with a step of 0.01° intervals.

    2.7 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

    The surface micro-structures of the HRPs were observed on a JSM-7500F scanning electron microscopy (JEOL,Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 5.00 kV with magnification at 500× or 1 000×[32,33].

    2.8 Thermal analysis

    The thermal properties of the HRPs were investigated by thermogravimetry/differential thermogravimetry on a simultaneous thermal analyzer (Netzach,STA 449 F3 Jupiter,Netzach,Germany).The HRPs samples (3-5 g) were heated from 40 °C to 700 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min with nitrogen as the carrier gas.

    2.9 Rheological characterization

    2.9.1 Apparent viscosity analysis

    A Discovery Hybrid Rheometer-2 (DHR-2) (TA instruments,New Castle DE,USA) equipped with a parallel steel plate (40 mm diameter,1.0 mm gap) was used to investigate the rheological properties of HRPs according to previously reported procedures[34,35].The HRPs samples were dissolved in deionized water and prepared with 50 mg/mL polysaccharide solution.The apparent viscosity was detected at a shear rate range of 1 to 100 s-1at 25 °C.The Power-Law model was applied to fit the flow curves[16,36]:

    Power-Law model equation:η=k(γ)n

    wherenis the flow behavior index;ηis the apparent viscosity;γis the shear rate (s-1);kis the viscosity coefficient (mPa·sn).

    2.9.2 Oscillation frequency sweep analysis

    The dynamic rheological properties of HRPs were determined by oscillation frequency sweep from 0.1 to 100 rad/s at 25 °C with strain of 2%,the oscillation frequency was set as 2 Hz.For comprehensive study on the rheological properties of complex viscosity (η*),elastic(storage) modulus (G’),loss angle tanδ(tanδ=G”/G’),viscous(loss) modulus (G”) and the complex modulus (G*) were measured.The Power-Law model was used to fit the obtained data (G’,G” andG* vsω):

    whereωis the angular frequency;n’ (n”) was frequency exponent;k’ (k”) was intercepts exponent;Aαis the strength of the polysaccharide network in simple shear (Pa·sa) andαis order of relaxion function.

    2.9.3 Temperature sweep analysis

    The gelling properties of the HRPs samples were determined by temperature ramp test.The heating (cooling) temperature range was 20–80 °C (80–20 °C) with a heating (cooling) rate of 10 °C/min.

    2.10 In vitro antioxidant activity assay

    The antioxidant activities of HRPs samples were comprehensively evaluated using DPPH radical,ABTS radical cation scavenging assays and oxygen radical absorption capacity (ORAC) as described previously with slight modifications[33].

    2.11 Bile acid-binding capacity assay

    The hypolipidemic activity of HRPs was determined using bile acid binding assay.The bile acid binding ability of HRPs was calculated according to a standard curve generated from a sodium taurocholate solution at an absorbance of 387 nm.The detailed experiment procedures as described in published literature[16,37].

    2.12 Statistical analysis

    All experiments were replicated at least three times and the data were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD).Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted using the Duncan and LSD test in SPSS 22 software (SPSS Inc.,Chicago,USA).A difference withP<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1 Extraction yields and physicochemical properties of HRPs

    In this study,the extraction yields of HRPs extracted by five different methods were displayed in Table 1.The yields of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were 4.74%,4.54%,6.05%,3.75% and 6.59%,respectively.Obviously,the extraction yields of HRPs were greatly affected by extraction methods.The HRP-A had the highest yield,followed by HRP-U,HRP-W,HRP-H and HRP-C.Evidence has shown that insoluble polysaccharide can be effectively released from the cell wall and converted into soluble polysaccharide by breaking hydrogen bonds between cellulose and hemicellulose during the alkali extraction,thereby increasing the final recovery rate[38],which could explain the highest extraction yield of HRP-A.Ultrasonic wave migration could generate cavitation,resulting in the destruction of cell wall to improve the yield of polysaccharide[12].In addition,the yield of HRP-H was lower than HRP-W,which was contrary to the findings of Gao et al[39]that the extraction yield of polysaccharide fromL.japonicaby pressurized hot water extraction (LP-PH)was higher than that of hot water (LP-H),suggesting extraction methods had different effects on different plant materials,and the high temperature might cause degradation of HRP-H,leading to a lower extraction yield[11].Furthermore,the lowest extraction yield of HRP-C may be due to the fact that the acid solution could degrade polysaccharide into free sugars[40].

    Table 1 Chemical properties and compositions of HRPs extracted from sea buckthorn using different extraction methods.

    As shown in Table 1,the neutral sugar and uronic acid content of different HRPs varied significantly (P<0.05).The neutral sugar content in HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were(33.25 ± 0.24)%,(30.58 ± 0.31)%,(32.89 ± 0.22)%,(23.54 ± 0.19)%and (60.05 ± 0.41)%,respectively,indicating the HRP-A contained highest neutral sugars while the HRP-C had the lowest.The uronic acid content of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were 49.21 ± 0.32,52.34 ± 0.35,50.61 ± 0.28,65.51 ± 0.27 and 22.46 ± 0.35,respectively.Clearly,the lowest uronic acid content was observer in HRP-A,which might be due to the destruction of carboxyl groups in uronic acid under alkali conditions[41].The highest protein content was observed in HRP-A,which may be related to the hydrolysis of amide bonds of protein by alkaline media[12],which was consistent with the report by Yan et al[40].Furthermore,the lowest protein content in HRP-H could be explained as theo-glycosidic linkage between the protein and polysaccharide was destroyed by high temperature[42].

    3.2 Monosaccharide composition

    Chromatograms of monosaccharide composition of HRPs were depicted in Table 1.According to the monosaccharide standard,all five HRPs were typical acidic heteropolysaccharide and composed of mannose,rhamnose,glucuronic acid,galacturonic acid,glucose,galactose,xylose and arabinose with different molar ratios.Galacturonic acid,glucose,galactose and arabinose were predominant components in each polysaccharide (Table 1).The HRP-C contained the highest galacturonic acid content (63.05%),while HRP-A possessed highest arabinose content (38.07%),and no obvious difference was observed in monosaccharide composition between HRP-W and HRP-U.The results suggested that extraction methods had significantly impacts on the molar ratios of monosaccharides inHRPs,and similar results were observed in extraction of mulberry fruit and okra polysaccharide by different methods[12,43].The differences in monosaccharide composition suggested differences in structure which may affect the biological activities of HRPs[44].

    3.3 Molecular weight analysis

    The molecular weight of polysaccharide is closely related to its bioactivities that large molecular weight polysaccharide hardly enters into cells while low hardly form advance structures[44].In the present study,the molecular weight distributions of HRPs were determined using HPGPC method,and the results were shown in Table 1.Noteworthily,all five HRPs exhibited a wide signal peak,indicating that the molecular weights of the various polysaccharide were heterogeneous.According to the standard curve of dextrans,the molecular weight distribution of HRP-W,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A ranged from 28.04 to 281.52 kDa,28.04 to 244.63 kDa,7.67 to 289.77 kDa and 6.41 to 116.27 kDa,respectively.In contrast,HRP-H had a narrower molecular weight distribution,showing only a major peak with a molecular weight of 117.55 kDa.In addition,HRP-H and HRP-A showed lower molecular weight,as presented in Table 1.This might be due to the degradation of polysaccharide caused by alkali solution and high temperature during the extraction process[12,24].The results were consistent with previous studies that alkali media and high temperature could effectively decrease glycosidic linkages of polysaccharide[11,24].

    3.4 Particle size determination

    The particle size represents the aggregation degree of polysaccharide molecules in solution,which could indirectly reflect the molecular weight of polysaccharide to a certain extent[24].In general,the high molecular weight polysaccharide tends to have a larger particle size[21].As shown in Fig.2A,all five HRPs polysaccharide solution exhibited a wide particle size distribution,which were consistent with the results of molecular weight determinations.TheZ-average particle size of five HRPs were illustrated in Fig.2B.Noticeably,HRP-C had the largestZ-average particle size of 854.6 nm.Evidence has shown that the crosslinking between galacturonic acids may lead to the aggregation of polysaccharide molecules,resulting in an increase in particle size[24].TheZ-average particle size of HRP-W and HRP-U showed no significant difference,while the HRP-H and HRP-A had a relatively low particle size with 350.3 nm and 188.4 nm,which may be related to the lower molecular weight[21].

    Fig.2 Particle size distributions (A) and Z-average particle size (B) of HRPs;FT-IR spectra of HRPs (C,D).The highlighted part of Fig.2C is enlarged in Fig.2D.

    3.5 FT-IR spectra

    The functional groups of HRPs were identified by FT-IR spectra.As shown in Figs.2C-D,no obvious difference was observed among the characteristic functional groups of HRPs obtained from different extraction methods.A strong and wide absorption peak at 3 353 cm-1was assigned to the O-H stretching vibrations.The absorption peak at 2 917 and 1 441 cm-1was related to the stretching vibrations of C-H[11].The peak at around 1 744 cm-1was contributed to the symmetric stretching vibration of C=O in acetyl groups.The absorption band at approximately 1 640 cm-1was related to the COO-deprotonated carboxylic acid,indicating the presence of uronic acid[45].The strong extensive absorption peaks at 1 227,1 100 and 1 015 cm-1were attributed to asymmetric vibrations (C-O-C,C-O-H and C-C)and ring vibrations[40].Furthermore,the peak at 970 cm-1indicated the presence ofβ-glycosidic linkages[44].The FT-IR spectra revealed that the major linkage bands and functional groups of HRPs were uninfluenced by extraction methods,although the monosaccharide composition was significantly different.

    3.6 Triple-helix conformation analysis

    The maximum absorption wavelength (λmax) of Congo red-polysaccharide complex will produce red-shift when the polysaccharide had a triple-helix structure.In the present study,the curdlan with typical triple-helix conformation was selected as positive control (Fig.3A).With the increase of the alkaline concentration from 0 to 0.5 mol/L,λmaxof HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A all decreased and the same trend was observed in blank control,suggesting HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A had no triple-helix structure.However,λmaxof HRP-W increased first and then decreased with the alkaline concentration increase,indicating that HRP-W possessed a weak triple-helix structure.

    Fig.3 Triple-helix conformation analysis (A),XRD spectra (B),thermogravimetry (C) and differential thermogravimetry (D) curves of HRPs.

    3.7 Crystal structure analysis

    The amorphous or crystalline structure of HRPs was further characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis.As shown in Fig.3B,all HRPs presented two passivated single bread-like peaks,manifesting that all HRPs were semi-crystalline substances.However,the exact position and intensity of the diffraction peak of HRPs was different,especially HRP-A,suggesting the detailed microcrystalline structure of HRPs was different.Combined with the results of Congo test,the advance structure of HRPs was significantly affected by extraction methods.

    3.8 Morphological characterizations

    Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is an effective tool to investigate the morphologies of polysaccharides.The surface images of five HRPs observed by SEM at magnifications of 500× and 1 000×were shown in Fig.4.The morphologies of HRP-W and HRP-H exhibited a mixture of rough fragments and irregular filaments with some small pores.However,the size of fragments and length of filaments of HRP-H were smaller than that of HRP-W,indicating that the polysaccharide has been degraded during the pressurized assisted extraction,which was consistent with the results of particle size distributions and molecular weight determinations.HRP-U showed a long filamentous network with loose structure.The morphologies of HRP-C exhibited a dense,rough and irregular porous surface with a large sheet-like structure,which could be attributed to the crosslink aggregation of galacturonic acids.Furthermore,a relatively small,smooth and uniform fragment observed in HRP-A might be due to the higher content of neutral sugars.Our findings confirmed that the morphologies and microstructures of polysaccharide could be affected by extraction methods,which might be closely correlated with their physicochemical properties and bioactivities[44].

    Fig.4 SEM images of HRPs from different extraction methods at magnifications of 500× and 1 000×.

    3.9 Thermodynamic properties

    Thermal stability is a vital physicochemical property of polysaccharides for industrial and commercial applications.As shown in Fig.3C,the thermogravimetry curves (TG) indicated that all HRPs had three major weight loss stages.The first stage in TG curves showed a slight decrease in weight,which was due to the evaporation of free and bound water present in the polysaccharide[46].The maximum rate of weight loss was observed in the second stage,which was attributed to the scission of the glycosidic bond together with degradation of side-chain residues of polysaccharides[47].The weight loss of the third stage was related to the further cleavage of the depolymerized polysaccharide fragments[48].The differential thermogravimetry (DTG,Fig.3D) curves showed that all HRPs had three endothermic peaks,except for HRP-A.The first endothermic peak of HRP-C (90 °C) and HRP-U (88 °C) was close,and higher than that of HRP-W (75 °C),HRP-H (76 °C) and HRP-A (75 °C),indicating that HRP-C and HRP-U had stronger free water binding ability,which might be related to higher galacturonic acid contents and filamentous reticular microstructure.Compared with other HRPs,the second and third endothermic peak of HRP-U had higher temperatures of 346 and 533 °C,respectively.This might be related to filamentous reticular microstructure of HRP-U,which might be resistant to the thermal degradation[49].Overall,the results revealed that HRP-U had the better thermal stability.

    3.10 Rheological properties

    3.10.1 Apparent viscosity

    As displayed in Fig.5A,with the increase of shear rate,the apparent viscosity of HRPs declined rapidly,suggesting that all HRPs were pseudoplastic fluids and exhibited shear-thinning behavior[24,50].The parameters of steady flow curves were further calculated by Power-Law model,and theR2values of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were calculated to be 0.840 8,0.879 9,0.852 4,0.883 5 and 0.991 2,respectively.Clearly,theR2values of all HRPs were near to 0.9,indicating that Power-Law model could be used to explain the rheological behavior of HRPs well.In general,the higher thekvalue,the greater the viscosity.In the present study,thekvalue of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were 0.094 5,0.070 3,0.094 3,0.178 7 and 0.062 2,respectively.The HRP-C exhibited the greatest viscosity,possibly due to the higher content of galacturonic acid[24,39].Previous study demonstrated that the viscosity of polysaccharide was closely related to its molecular weight,which may explain the lowest viscosity of HRP-A[21].In addition,the higher the degree of pseudoplasticity of the fluid,the lower thenvalue.The n value of all HRPs were far below 1,showing obvious pseudoplasticity,especially those with low relative molecular weight,such as HRP-H (-0.553 8) and HRP-A (-0.589 4).

    Fig.5 (A) The apparent viscosity of HRPs;(B) storage modulus (G’),(C) loss modulus (G”),(D) loss angle,(E) complex modulus (G*) and (F) complex viscosity (η*) of HRPs.

    3.10.2 Frequency sweep

    The dynamic rheological properties of HRPs were determined by oscillatory measurements and the results were shown in Figs.5B-F.The modulusG’ andG” values of all HRPs increased with increasing frequency,except for the HRP-U with lowerG’,which could not be detected (Figs.5B-C).The tanδvalue (loss angle) of all HRPs were between 0.1 to 100,including tanδ=1 (G’=G”),indicating all HRPs samples exhibited both liquid viscous and solid elastic properties within the frequency region (0.1-100 rad/s)[51].Complex viscosity (η*)is always used to describe the total resistance to flow of a material considered to be a viscous liquid.As shown in Fig.5F,the complex viscosity of all HRPs declined with the increase in angular frequency,especially lower molecular weight polysaccharide (HRP-H,HRP-A).The behavior was similar to other polysaccharide,which suggested that all HRPs had non-Newtonian shear-thinning behavior[35].

    The intercepts (k’,k”) and frequency (n’,n”) exponents are always used to describe viscoelastic characteristics of food materials[52].Thek’ value of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were 0.005 05,0.001 35,0.003 85,0.007 83 and 0.001 17,respectively.Obviously,thek’ value of HRP-C was highest,andk” exhibited the similar trend,manifesting that HRP-C solution formed the stronger crosslinking network.It has been reported that the stronger the polysaccharide crosslinking network,the stronger the bile acid binding ability[24].Hence,the HRP-C could be used to lower the cholesterol by binding to bile acid.In addition,then’ value of all HRPs were greater than 0,demonstrating that all HRPs solutions could be identified as a viscous solution[52].

    The relationship between complex modulus (G*) and frequency could be used to evaluate the stability of three-dimensional network structures[53],and the results were shown in Fig.5E.The strength of the polysaccharide network of HRPs solutions could be described in terms of theAα.TheAαvalues of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were calculated to be 0.072 97,0.026 44,0.040 88,0.090 39 and 0.008 84,respectively.Compared with other HRPs,the Aα value of HRP-C was highest,manifesting that HRP-C solution formed the strongest crosslinking network,which was consistent with the results ofkvalue analysis.Theαvalue is usually used to evaluate the three-dimensional structure[54].In this study,theαvalue of all HRPs was much higher than 0.1,which indicated that HRPs solutions exhibited pronounced viscous characters[54].

    3.10.3 Temperature sweep

    The thermal stability of rheological properties of HRPs was measured during heating and cooling process.As shown in Fig.6,theG’ andG” of all HRPs samples declined sharply with the temperature increased,andG” of HRP-W,HRP-U and HRP-C was higher thanG’ from 20 to 80 °C,suggesting liquid-like behavior.However,a cross point (G’=G”) was detected at around 65 °C for heating curve of HRP-H and HRP-A.When beyond this temperature,a typical gel-like system would be formed.During the cooling process,theG’ andG” of all HRPs increased and cross point appeared,implying a transition tendency for solid-like behavior.Furthermore,the tanδvalues of HRPs almost all decreased with the increase of temperature,except for HRP-C and HRP-W,while tanδvalues of HRPs remained basically unchanged during the cooling process(Fig.6F).Combined with the results of steady rheological and frequency sweep experiment,the results implied that HRPs could be used as a thickening agent in functional food industry,especially HRP-C with high galacturonic acid content.Besides,the rheological properties of HRPs were greatly affected by extraction methods.

    Fig.6 Variation in storage modulus (G’) and loss modulus (G”) of HRPs during the heating and cooling process (A-E),loss angle (tanδ,G”/G’) of temperature dependence for HRPs (F).A-E represent HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A,respectively.

    3.11 Antioxidant activities of HRPs

    Oxidative stress has been proved to be closely related to cardiovascular disease,neurodegeneration,cancer,diabetes mellitus,aging and other chronic diseases[11,45].It has been reported that plant polysaccharides could effectively remove oxidative stress[31].Hence,in the present study,the antioxidant activity of HRPs was comprehensively investigated by three different methods,including ABTS radical cation,DPPH radical scavenging activity and oxygen radical absorption capacity (ORAC).

    ABTS radical cation was scavenged by antioxidants through donation of hydrogen to form a stable ABTS radical cation molecule.As shown in Fig.7A,all HRPs demonstrated scavenging ability in a concentrationdependent manner within the tested concentration range(0.062 5-2 mg/mL).However,the scavenging capacity of each sample was different.The ABTS radical cation scavenging ability of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were 31.0%,35.9%,23.0%,29.4% and 88.6%,respectively,at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL.It is noteworthy that the HRP-H and HRP-A with lower molecular weight exhibited higher ABTS radical cation scavenging activity,which were consistent with the previous study that the antioxidant activity of oka polysaccharide declined as the decrease of molecular weight[43].In addition,Yi et al[42]reported the polysaccharide extracted fromAchyranthis bidentataeradix (ABPS) with higher arabinose content exhibited higher antioxidant activity,which could explain the highest ABTS radical cation scavenging activity of HRP-A.DPPH radical is a stable free radical that has been widely used to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of bioactive compounds[11].As shown in Fig.7B,all HRPs showed significant scavenging ability on DPPH radical in a concentration dependent manner over the concentration range of 0.062 5 to 2 mg/mL.Obviously,the HRP-A and HRP-H exhibited higher DPPH radical scavenging activity compared with other HRPs,which was consistent with the result of ABTS radical cation scavenging assay.

    Fig.7 ABTS radical cation scavenging activity (A),DPPH radical scavenging activity (B) and oxygen radical absorption capacity (C) of HRPs.Different letters are used in the same indicator to show statistical significance (P <0.05).

    ORAC method determines the hydrogen supplying capacity and free radical chain breaking capacity of antioxidants by monitoring their inhibition of peroxy-free radical induced oxidation.As demonstrated in Fig.7C and Table 2,the ORAC value of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were 218.21,221.29,205.48,213.00 and 627.49 μmol TE/g,respectively.The ORAC value of HRP-A was almost 3-fold higher than that of other HRPs,suggesting HRP-A with lowest molecular weight and highest arabinose content possessed strongest oxygen radical absorption capacity.The result was consistent with DPPH radical and ABTS radical cation scavenging ability.

    Table 2 Comparative analysis of different extraction method on ORAC by LSD

    3.12 Bile acid-binding capacity

    In the present study,the bile acid-binding abilities of HRP-W,HRP-H,HRP-U,HRP-C and HRP-A were (0.72 ± 0.02),(0.56 ±0.03),(0.64 ± 0.04),(0.95 ± 0.03) and (0.39 ± 0.08) mmol,respectively.Obviously,HRP-C had the strongest bile acid-binding capacity,followed by HRP-W and HRP-U.In comparison with other HRPs,HRP-H and HRP-A showed the weakest bile acid-binding ability (Fig.8).

    Fig.8 Binding ability of HRPs to bile acids.Different letters are used in the same indicator to show statistical significance (P <0.05).

    The difference between polysaccharides in their ability to bind bile acids may be due to their different structure,such as molecular weight,viscosity and monosaccharide composition[11].Correlations between molecular weight,monosaccharide composition,rheological properties and bile acid binding ability of HRPs were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient,and the results were normalized by column,as shown in Fig.9.Noteworthily,the bile acid binding ability of HRPs was strongly correlated with molecular weight(0.888*),apparent viscosity (0.948*),k(0.962**) andAα(0.965**)values.In addition,a strong correlation was also observed between the molecular weight and the apparent viscosity (0.718),k(0.868)andAα(0.907*) values,which was in agreement with previous reports that the molecular weight of polysaccharide was correlated with its viscosity[16,17].Hu et al.[6]reported that the high molecular weight polysaccharides have hydrodynamic restrictions on bile acid-binding due to their high viscosity.Combined with Pearson correlation analysis results,we deduced the binding mechanism of HRPs to bile acids,as shown in Fig.10.HRPs could effectively bind to bile acids to improve the excretion of bile acids in the intestine and promote the transformation of cholesterol into bile acids in the liver,thus significantly reducing the level of cholesterol,especially,HRP-C with highest molecular weight and galacturonic acid content possessed the highest viscosity and strongest crosslinking network,which showed strongest hydrodynamic restrictions on bile acids,resulting in the strongest binding ability to bile acid.

    Fig.9 Pearson correlation analysis of molecular weight,monosaccharide composition and rheological properties of HRPs with bile acid binding ability.

    Fig.10 The binding mechanism of HRPs to bile acids.

    4. Conclusion

    In the present study,the structural characterizations,antioxidant activities and bile acid-binding abilities of HRPs prepared by five different extraction methods were investigated.The results indicated that the physicochemical properties,structures,rheological properties and bioactivities of HRPs were greatly affected by extraction methods.Exactly,HRP-A had the highest yield,arabinose and protein content,while HRP-C had the highest galacturonic acid content.The molecular weight determinations and particle size distributions both indicated that the polysaccharide was degraded by alkali solution(HRP-A) and high temperature (HRP-H) during the extraction process.The HRP-U with filamentous reticular microstructure had better thermal stability,and HRP-A with the lowest molecular weight and highest arabinose content exhibited the highest antioxidant activities.Furthermore,HRP-C had the highest binding ability to bile acids due to its highest viscosity and strongest crosslinking network,followed by HRP-W and HRP-U.The results demonstrated that high viscosity and molecular weight had good effects on the bile acid binding ability of sea buckthorn polysaccharides.Generally,the acid extraction was more beneficial to obtain polysaccharides from sea buckthorn with good bile acid binding capacity.

    Conflicts and interest

    Chun Chen is an editorial board member and Ruihai Liu is the founding editor-in-chief forFood Science and Human Wellnessand was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article.All authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    The Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2022A1515010730),National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001647),National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972022),Financial and moral assistance supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2019A1515011996),and 111 Project (B17018) to conduct the project are gratefully acknowledged.

    国产在线视频一区二区| 国产视频首页在线观看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 久久久久网色| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | videosex国产| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 深夜精品福利| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 夫妻午夜视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 精品福利永久在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲在久久综合| av在线观看视频网站免费| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 性色av一级| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 考比视频在线观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产 一区精品| 一区二区av电影网| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 在线观看国产h片| 99久久综合免费| 国产 精品1| 欧美日韩av久久| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 嫩草影院入口| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 99九九在线精品视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 秋霞伦理黄片| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲中文av在线| kizo精华| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| av在线观看视频网站免费| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 午夜91福利影院| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久性视频一级片| 嫩草影院入口| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 99久久综合免费| 日本91视频免费播放| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲第一青青草原| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 咕卡用的链子| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 精品少妇内射三级| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产精品.久久久| av片东京热男人的天堂| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 99久国产av精品国产电影| avwww免费| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 黄频高清免费视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| videosex国产| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 日日啪夜夜爽| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产成人精品无人区| 在线观看国产h片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 深夜精品福利| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 两个人看的免费小视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 老司机靠b影院| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| av线在线观看网站| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 中文字幕制服av| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 午夜免费观看性视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久婷婷青草| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 天天添夜夜摸| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 午夜免费观看性视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产av精品麻豆| 两个人看的免费小视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 91老司机精品| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| avwww免费| av网站免费在线观看视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 在现免费观看毛片| a 毛片基地| 欧美97在线视频| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 一区二区av电影网| 丝袜美足系列| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 成人手机av| 精品久久久久久电影网| 99久久综合免费| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 久久久久久人妻| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 男人操女人黄网站| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久影院123| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 宅男免费午夜| 在线看a的网站| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产色婷婷99| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 777米奇影视久久| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| www日本在线高清视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 午夜免费鲁丝| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产男女内射视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 男人操女人黄网站| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲精品视频女| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 电影成人av| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 久久婷婷青草| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 国产成人av激情在线播放| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 人妻一区二区av| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 黄片小视频在线播放| 制服人妻中文乱码| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久影院123| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 色94色欧美一区二区| 丁香六月欧美| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产在视频线精品| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 一本久久精品| 久久99一区二区三区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | av在线app专区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产野战对白在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 精品一区二区三卡| av一本久久久久| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产成人精品福利久久| 热re99久久国产66热| 色94色欧美一区二区| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| kizo精华| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 深夜精品福利| 中文字幕高清在线视频| av.在线天堂| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲人成电影观看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 丁香六月天网| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 91精品三级在线观看| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产 精品1| 久久99精品国语久久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 色吧在线观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 午夜福利,免费看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| av不卡在线播放| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲精品视频女| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 如何舔出高潮| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲中文av在线| 超碰成人久久| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久久久视频综合| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 久久这里只有精品19| 美女中出高潮动态图| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 老司机影院毛片| a 毛片基地| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 一级爰片在线观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| videos熟女内射| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲在久久综合| 99久久综合免费| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 中文欧美无线码| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 成人手机av| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 欧美中文综合在线视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| av在线播放精品| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 青春草视频在线免费观看| av天堂久久9| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| av在线播放精品| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 视频区图区小说| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| av网站在线播放免费| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 中国国产av一级| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| avwww免费| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 9热在线视频观看99| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 中文欧美无线码| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 99久久人妻综合| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 香蕉丝袜av| 飞空精品影院首页| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 超碰97精品在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 国产男女内射视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 麻豆av在线久日| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 成人国产av品久久久| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产在视频线精品| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 一区二区av电影网| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 色94色欧美一区二区| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区|