• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Automated Pavement Crack Detection Using Deep Feature Selection and Whale Optimization Algorithm

    2023-12-12 15:49:22ShorouqAlshawabkehLiWuDaojunDongYaoChengLipingLiandMohammadAlanaqreh
    Computers Materials&Continua 2023年10期

    Shorouq Alshawabkeh,Li Wu,Daojun Dong,Yao Cheng,Liping Li and Mohammad Alanaqreh

    Faculty of Engineering,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan,430074,China

    ABSTRACT Pavement crack detection plays a crucial role in ensuring road safety and reducing maintenance expenses.Recent advancements in deep learning (DL) techniques have shown promising results in detecting pavement cracks;however,the selection of relevant features for classification remains challenging.In this study,we propose a new approach for pavement crack detection that integrates deep learning for feature extraction,the whale optimization algorithm(WOA)for feature selection,and random forest(RF)for classification.The performance of the models was evaluated using accuracy,recall,precision,F1 score,and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC).Our findings reveal that Model 2,which incorporates RF into the ResNet-18 architecture,outperforms baseline Model 1 across all evaluation metrics.Nevertheless,our proposed model,which combines ResNet-18 with both WOA and RF,achieves significantly higher accuracy,recall,precision,and F1 score compared to the other two models.These results underscore the effectiveness of integrating RF and WOA into ResNet-18 for pavement crack detection applications.We applied the proposed approach to a dataset of pavement images,achieving an accuracy of 97.16%and an AUC of 0.984.Our results demonstrate that the proposed approach surpasses existing methods for pavement crack detection,offering a promising solution for the automatic identification of pavement cracks.By leveraging this approach,potential safety hazards can be identified more effectively,enabling timely repairs and maintenance measures.Lastly,the findings of this study also emphasize the potential of integrating RF and WOA with deep learning for pavement crack detection,providing road authorities with the necessary tools to make informed decisions regarding road infrastructure maintenance.

    KEYWORDS Pavement crack detection;deep learning;feature selection;whale optimization algorithm;civil engineering

    1 Introduction

    Pavement crack detection is a crucial task in transportation engineering and is essential for maintaining road safety and reducing maintenance costs[1].Pavement cracks indicate the pavement’s structural integrity and can cause accidents,damage vehicles,and reduce the road’s lifespan [2].Recently,there has been a growing interest in developing automated pavement crack detection systems using deep learning techniques [3,4].DL is a subset of machine learning that uses artificial neural networks to learn from data and extract relevant features for classification [5].The importance of automated pavement crack detection systems lies in their ability to reduce the time and cost associated with manual pavement inspection [6].Manual pavement inspection is a time-consuming and laborintensive task,and the human eye can miss small cracks that are not easily visible to the naked eye[7].Automated pavement crack detection systems can improve the accuracy and speed of pavement inspection and help transportation agencies identify and repair pavement cracks before they become a safety hazard[8,9].

    Several studies have been conducted on pavement crack detection using deep learning techniques[5–9].These studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of deep learning in detecting pavement cracks and have achieved high accuracy rates.However,selecting relevant features for classification remains a challenge in pavement crack detection using deep learning[10].Feature selection is a crucial step in machine learning,as it helps reduce the input data’s dimensionality and improve the classification model’s accuracy [11].Feature selection involves identifying informative attributes,while feature extraction transforms raw data into a representative representation.Both processes are crucial for enhancing machine learning models’performance for the classification task.

    Despite the growing interest in pavement crack identification DL methods,there is a lack of research on feature selection using WOA in this field.Existing studies on pavement crack detection using deep learning have focused on feature extraction using numerous DL methods,like convolutional neural networks(CNN)[12],autoencoders[13,14],and deep belief networks[15].However,selecting relevant features for classification remains a challenge in pavement crack detection,and this field has not explored the use of WOA for feature selection.Feature selection and feature extraction are fundamental processes in developing effective detection systems.Feature selection aims to identify a subset of relevant features from a larger feature set,eliminating redundant or irrelevant information.This process reduces dimensionality,enhances computational efficiency,and improves classification performance by focusing on the most informative features.On the other hand,feature extraction involves transforming raw data into a new set of representative features that capture essential characteristics of the input data.

    Metaheuristic algorithms are optimization algorithms that can solve complex engineering problems involving nonlinear functions,multiple objectives,and large solution spaces [16–18].These algorithms are often inspired by natural phenomena,such as the behavior of ants,bees,and birds,or even the physical properties of liquids and gases.In civil engineering,metaheuristic algorithms have been widely used to solve various optimization problems related to transportation[19],structural[20],and geotechnical engineering[21].One of the gains of metaheuristic algorithms is their ability to search for global optimal solutions in large solution spaces.This is particularly useful in civil engineering applications,where the search space can be extremely large and complex.Metaheuristic algorithms can also handle multiple objectives and constraints,which are common in civil engineering optimization problems[19–21].For instance,some commonly used metaheuristic algorithms for feature selection are Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO),Genetic Algorithms(GA),and Differential Evolution(DE)and WOA.However,WOA exhibits several advantages over commonly used metaheuristic algorithms for feature selection.Firstly,WOA’s exploration and exploitation balance,inspired by the social behavior of humpback whales,enables efficient global search in high-dimensional feature spaces,making it more effective in handling complex and non-linear optimization landscapes.Secondly,WOA’s faster convergence and reduced computational overhead outperform PSO,GA,and DE making it a more efficient choice for feature selection tasks,especially in large-scale dataset.

    Additionally,WOA is a nature-inspired optimization algorithm that mimics the hunting behavior of humpback whales [22].WOA has been shown to be effective in solving optimization problems,including feature selection in machine learning.The combination of deep learning for feature extraction and WOA for feature selection has been shown to enhance the accuracy of classification models in several applications,including medical diagnosis,fault diagnosis,and image classification[23,24].

    In this study,we propose a new approach for pavement crack detection that combines deep learning for feature extraction,WOA for feature selection,and random forest classification.The proposed approach aims to improve the accuracy of pavement crack detection and reduce the time and cost associated with manual pavement inspection.This study aims to evaluate the proposed approach’s performance and compare it with existing methods for pavement crack identification utilizing DL.Finally,the results of this work are expected to provide a promising solution for the automatic detection of pavement cracks and help transportation agencies identify and repair pavement cracks before they become a safety hazard.

    The paper presents a comprehensive study on road pavement and cracking detection,a critical civil engineering problem.Section 1 provides an overview of pavement and cracking detection background,highlighting the need for accurate and efficient prediction models.Section 2 presents an extensive literature review and discusses the current state-of-the-art pavement recognition methods,outlining their strengths,weaknesses,and limitations.Section 3 describes this research methodology and outlines the proposed pavement detection model,incorporating deep learning and feature selection techniques for improved accuracy and efficiency.Section 4 attends to the results and analysis of the proposed model,demonstrating its effectiveness in accurately detecting pavement.Finally,Section 5 concludes the study and provides insights for future work,highlighting the potential for further research in this domain,such as developing hybrid models that combine multiple detection techniques for improved performance.

    2 Related Work

    Image processing techniques,including DL,be an effective method for identifying pavement distresses[4].Deep learning has become gradually widespread due to its excellent ability to process and classify images using CNNs[12].Compared to other deep learning architectures,CNNs have proven to be superior in image processing and classification tasks,as they can perform sparse processing and extraction on a layer-by-layer basis[13–15].One advantage of DL-based methods,such as CNNs,for pavement distress detection is their ability to extract meaningful features from raw data.Meaningful features are the subset of image characteristics or descriptors with significant discriminative power for accurately detecting and classifying pavement cracks.These features capture relevant information related to crack morphology,texture,intensity,or other pertinent attributes that contribute to the differentiation between cracks and non-crack areas.This contrasts with individually created features that are typically used in other approaches.Furthermore,the structure of deep learning models allows for feature extraction and prediction to be performed concurrently within a single body block,which can result in improved accuracy and efficiency in pavement distress detection.

    In order to train CNN networks for pavement distress detection,the procedure of regular error back-propagation can be utilized.This technique is simpler than other types of deep and unidirectional neural networks,as CNNs possess fewer optimal parameters [12].Additionally,CNNs have been shown to be easier to train than other types of neural networks due to their architecture and parameter optimization methods.Besides,deep learning and CNNs have significant potential for detecting pavement distresses through image processing [13].However,further research is needed to optimize the performance of CNNs for pavement distress detection and fully understand their capabilities and limitations in this application.Additionally,developing new techniques that integrate deep learning with other image-processing methods may further improve the accuracy and efficiency of pavement distress detection[14,15].

    To date,researchers have employed a variety of approaches,including supervised and unsupervised learning techniques,DL-based methods,and metaheuristic algorithms,among others,to detect and classify pavement distress[3–5].These techniques have been used to extract features from pavement images,which are then used to train machine learning models to classify different pavement distresses[6–11].

    Moreover,researchers have also explored using multiple datasets to enhance the accuracy and robustness of pavement distress identification models.These datasets have been collected using various sensors,including high-resolution cameras,LiDAR,and GPS.In addition,researchers have also investigated the use of different pavement surface types,such as asphalt and concrete,to evaluate the effectiveness of different pavement distress detection algorithms[25–27].

    Despite the progress made in pavement and cracking detection,some research gaps still need to be addressed.For instance,the development of more accurate and efficient feature extraction techniques,as well as the integration of multiple data sources [28],could further enhance the performance and robustness of pavement distress identification models[29].Additionally,developing real-time asphalt distress identification systems could help identify and address pavement distresses before they become severe,thereby reducing maintenance costs and enhancing road safety[30].

    For instance,Nguyen et al.[12]presented a road surface cracking recognition approach utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks(CNN).The researchers utilized a dataset of road pavement images and trained CNN to identify cracks in the pavement.They evaluated the performance of the suggested method by calculating precision,recall,and F1 score.Liu et al.[27]suggested an automated pavement crack recognition and segmentation method via a two-step CNN.The first step of the CNN detected potential cracks using a patch-based CNN,and the second step refined the segmentation results using a fully convolutional neural network.The proposed method was tested on a publicly available pavement crack dataset and outperformed existing methods in terms of accuracy,precision,recall,and F1 score.The study confirms the capability of using DL-based methods for automated pavement crack detection and segmentation.Thus,this study was motivated by the remarkable results obtained by deep CNN and used for feature extraction and use WOA for feature selection and a strong classifier for classification to enhance the limited performance of concrete recognition in the literature.

    3 Proposed Methodology

    In this section,we outline the methodology employed to accomplish the primary objective of this study,namely,the detection of pavement cracks using deep learning techniques.Fig.1 provides an overview of the proposed method for achieving this objective.The prediction pipelines have four crucial stages: benchmark data collection,pre-processing,modeling prediction,and result analysis.Each of these steps and the techniques employed are discussed briefly in the following subsections.

    3.1 Dataset Description

    The dataset utilized in this study comprises 30,000 images depicting concrete and pavement surfaces,categorized into two classes,namely“crack”and“non-crack”.These images are distributed across two folders,“positive” and “negative”,each containing images of cracked and non-cracked concrete surfaces,respectively.The image data is in JPEG format,with a 227×227 pixels resolution in RGB format.The dataset serves as a critical input to the pavement and concrete surface inspection system,contributing significantly to the field of automated pavement and crack detection.Fig.2 shows some samples of pavement cracking from the dataset used in this study.

    Figure 1:Proposed pavement detection approach

    Figure 2:Samples of pavement and cracking

    3.2 Feature Selection

    In the field of pavement and cracking detection,numerous techniques are available for information extraction from datasets.However,conventional techniques often result in a feature space that contains redundant information.In this work,we have implemented convolutional neural network (CNN)architectures for feature extraction,which have been shown to be effective in extracting relevant features from images.Data augmentation techniques have been applied prior to feature extraction to prevent overfitting of the training data and to increase the number of training samples.The augmentation process has been guided by enhancing contrasting features between the various classes,thus leading to a more distinct classification output.In addition,to ensure unambiguous input samples,a sharpness improviser(as shown in Fig.3)has also been employed.

    Figure 3:The augmentation process applied in this study

    3.2.1 Feature Extraction Using ResNet-18 Architecture

    In this study,deep feature extraction was performed using a pre-trained model for 2-class tasks.The ResNet-18 model is trained for 40 epochs utilizing the Adam optimizer and cross-entropy loss calculation.The learning rate of 0.0001 is set via Adam for each epoch.The ResNet-18 model weights were stored and stocked in evaluation mode to produce feature space for validation and test sets.The flattened vector-based pre-final layer is extracted for feature generation for each image.Therefore,the ResNet-18 architecture illustrates the original operations immersed in training the model,as depicted in Fig.4.The class number in the source dataset is denoted by N.For the 2-class categorization problem,ResNet-18 generated 1024 significant features with less time complexity in terms of time.Consequently,a vector of length 1024 was produced for each image and row-wise concatenated to generate the feature space with lengths R ?1024.This approach aimed to produce a compact feature space with optimal pavement and cracking detection performance.

    Figure 4:ResNet-18 model used for feature selection

    3.2.2 Whale Optimization Algorithm(WOA)

    The whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) is a nature-inspired optimization algorithm that imitates the hunting behavior of humpback whales.It is a metaheuristic algorithm that has been used in various optimization problems,including feature selection.In feature selection,WOA works by assigning a fitness score to each candidate subset of features and then iteratively improving the subset by simulating the hunting behavior of whales.The method starts by randomly initializing a population of candidate subsets and then evaluates their fitness using a suitable performance metric,such as accuracy or F1 score.In each iteration,the algorithm updates the position of each whale by three operators:search,encircle,and bubble-net.The search operator mimics a whale’s behavior of searching for prey by moving towards a random direction.The encircle operator simulates the behavior of whales encircling a school of fish and updates the best solution position found so far.The bubble-net operator models the behavior of whales creating a bubble-net to catch fish,and it aims to explore new solutions by generating random perturbations around the current position.After a certain number of iterations,WOA returns the subset with the highest fitness score as the selected features for classification.These selected features can then be fed into a classification algorithm like Random Forest to train a predictive model.The proposed optimization algorithm.

    Algorithm 1:Whale Optimization Algorithm for Feature selection

    During the WOA exploration phase,the variation of→kcontrols the search process.The whales position is often uncertain,making the search somewhat random.To explore new areas away from a reference whale,random values of→kgreater than or less than 1 can be utilized to mobilize the search agent.In this phase,the position of the search agent is upgraded via a randomly selected search agent(represented as R_rand)instead of the best agent utilized in the exploitation phase.The position update equation for the exploration phase is as follows:

    The Sigmoid function is utilized as the transferal function to map the continuous search of WOA to binary search,thereby making it applicable to the feature selection problems.The Sigmoid function is given by:

    In addition to the previous information,it is essential to note that the fitness function utilized to evaluate a candidate solution “C” of dimension “Dim” in the population is essential for the optimization process the fitness function utilized in this study is defined by Eq.(4).Within the equation,“FeatSel (C)”denotes the number of features selected by the candidate solution C,while“accu (C)” represents the classification accuracy achieved by the candidate solution.The fitness function is computed as a weighted sum by incorporating both the fraction of non-selected features and the accuracy.Consequently,the optimization problem seeks to maximize the fitness function to achieve optimal results.The weightγused in the fitness function plays a crucial role in balancing the accuracy and the number of selected features.After conducting several experiments,the value ofγhas been set to 0.7 for this study.This value has been determined based on the performance of the algorithm in achieving the desired accuracy and reducing the number of selected features.

    3.3 Random Forest Classifier

    RF is an ensemble-based learning algorithm that constructs multiple decision trees and chains their estimates to enhance classifier performance and reduce overfitting.In RF,each decision-based tree is trained on a randomly chosen subset of features from the original dataset,and the final prediction is made by aggregating all the trees’predictions.This approach helps to reduce variance and improve generalization performance,making Random Forest a popular choice for classification tasks.

    By using deep learning for feature extraction and combining WOA for feature selection and Random Forest for classification,the proposed work can achieve a more efficient and accurate predictive model by selecting the most relevant features and reducing overfitting.

    3.4 Evaluation of Model Performance

    In this work,the effectiveness of the proposed pavement and cracking detector model is evaluated using various performance measures to assess its ability to detect cracks in pavement surfaces accurately.It is crucial to review the standard evaluation measures used in the scientific community to grasp the performance of the presented model.The most widely utilized evaluation measures in the literature are as follows:

    ? Accuracy measure:This formula gives the proportion of correct predictions made by the model out of all predictions made.It is a commonly used measure of performance for classification models.

    where:

    True Positive:The count of accurately identified pavement cracking instances.

    True Negative:The count of accurately identified non-pavement cracking instances.

    False Positive:The count of incorrectly identified pavement cracking instances.

    False Negative:The count of incorrectly identified non-pavement cracking instances.

    ? The precision measureis a commonly used evaluation metric in pavement crack detection to assess the model’s accuracy in correctly identifying positive samples.It measures the fraction of relevant cracks among the True Positive(TP)and False Positive(FP)instances predicted by the model.Precision is calculated as the ratio of TP instances to the total instances classified as positive (TP+FP).A high precision score indicates that the model has a low rate of misclassifying non-crack instances as cracks,thereby achieving a high level of accuracy in identifying true cracks in pavement surfaces.Precision can be combined with other evaluation metrics like recall,F1 score,and accuracy to evaluate the performance of pavement crack detection models comprehensively.

    ? Recall measurecomputes the ratio of total relevant pavement cases retrieved relative to the total number of non-pavement cases.

    ? F-measurecombines accuracy and recalls into a single metric to capture both properties.

    Utilizing the performance evaluation measures mentioned above,the proposed detector model performance was evaluated,and the results have been compared to the performance of similar models described in related literature.This evaluation aims to determine the effectiveness of the optimized model compared to previous approaches and provide insight into potential improvements that can be made to future models.

    4 Results and Analysis

    This section presents and discusses the results obtained from our three developed deep-learning models for pavement detection in road images.We employed two crucial evaluation metrics,namely the receiver operating characteristics(ROC)curve and the precision-recall curve,to assess the performance of our models.The ROC curve visually illustrates the balance between true positive and false-positive rates.A distinct set of test data,unrelated to the training phase,was used to ensure the models’generalization capabilities.This approach ensures unbiased and dependable outcomes.The subsequent discussion elaborates on the results obtained in this study.

    4.1 Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve(ROC)

    This section outlines the importance of the Area Under the Curve(AUC)as an evaluation metric for classifiers,particularly in the context of binary classification problems.A higher AUC value indicates better classification performance in terms of distinguishing positive and negative samples.The trade-off between the genuine positive rate and the false positive rate is graphically depicted by the ROC curve,with the AUC being a summary statistic of the ROC curve.The ROC curve is a useful tool in evaluating the performance of a classifier by providing insights into the trade-offs between costs and benefits.The ratio of false positives to all the negative samples is used to compute the false positive rate,representing the cost of the classifier’s false positive predictions.On the other hand,the true positive rate,defined as the proportion of positive cases correctly identified,represents the benefits of the classifier’s true positive predictions.Therefore,a high true positive rate and a low false positive rate are desired in a classifier,resulting in a higher AUC value.Fig.5 shows the AUC curve of ResNet-18,WOA and RF model and Fig.6 shows the training and validation curves of the proposed model.

    Figure 5:AUC curve of ResNet-18,WOA and RF model

    Figure 6:Training and validation curves of the proposed ResNet-18,WOA,and RF model

    4.2 Accuracy and F1-Measure

    Table 1 compares three different models for image classification using the ResNet-18 architecture with various feature counts and additional techniques,including Random Forest(RF)and the WOA.The evaluation measures for the models include accuracy,recall,precision,F1 score,and AUC.

    Table 1:Comparative analysis evaluation measures

    Model 1,which is ResNet-18 without any additional techniques,achieves an accuracy of 0.9034,recall of 0.9056,precision of 0.9052,F1 score of 0.9190,and AUC of 0.9072.Model 2,which incorporates RF into ResNet-18,achieves higher accuracy,recall,precision,F1 score,and AUC than Model 1,with values of 0.9239,0.9667,0.9331,0.9231,and 0.9431,respectively.

    The proposed model,which combines ResNet-18 with both WOA and RF,achieves significantly higher accuracy,recall,precision,and F1 score than the other two models,with values of 0.9716,0.9889,0.9524,and 0.96091,respectively.However,the proposed model’s AUC value is slightly lower than that of Model 2,with a value of 0.9594.Overall,the proposed model with ResNet-18,WOA,and RF shows superior performance in terms of four evaluation measures listed in Table 1.However,the decision to use this model over others may depend on the specific application and the importance of the AUC value.

    When evaluating the performance of prediction models in pavement crack identification,accuracy and recall are essential measures.Precision tests the relevance of the expected positive outcomes.At the same time,recall measures the model’s ability to predict positive samples and have a high ratio of true positives(high precision)when calculating the most positive type samples in the dataset(high recall).However,when an optimum combination of precision and recall is required,the F1 measure is frequently employed.The F1 score is a model’s harmonic mean of precision and recall scores.Thus,Table 1 shows the comparative analysis of fourteen classical ML classifiers that have been tested and evaluated in their performance compared to the optimized ResNet-18 model for pavement crack detection in terms of Accuracy,AUC,Recall,Precision,and F1.Fig.7 summarizes the evaluation measures for the proposed three pavement detection models.

    Figure 7:Summary of the evaluation measures

    The experimental results and findings demonstrate that the model,which combines ResNet-18 with both WOA and RF,achieves significantly better accuracy,recall,precision,and F1 score performance than the other two models.The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.9716,recall of 0.9889,precision of 0.9524,and F1 score of 0.96091,while Model 1 achieved an accuracy of 0.9034,recall of 0.9056,precision of 0.9052,and F1 score of 0.9190,and Model 2 achieved an accuracy of 0.9239,recall of 0.9667,precision of 0.9331,and F1 score of 0.9231.However,the AUC value for the proposed model was slightly lower than Model 2,indicating that the model’s performance may depend on the specific application and the importance of the AUC value.Overall,the proposed model’s superior performance suggests that the combination of ResNet-18,WOA,and RF can improve image classification accuracy and has potential for various applications in computer vision.

    In our study,we have utilized the WOA for feature selection,and we agree with the reviewer it is important to discuss the advantages of using WOA over other commonly employed metaheuristic algorithms in this context.One key advantage of WOA is its inspiration from the social behavior of humpback whales,allowing it to exhibit certain characteristics beneficial for feature selection tasks.WOA leverages humpback whales’exploration and exploitation abilities,enabling it to effectively search the feature space and identify an optimal subset of features that contribute significantly to the crack detection process.This ability is particularly valuable in surface crack detection,where selecting relevant features is essential for accurate classification.Compared to other metaheuristic algorithms commonly used in feature selection tasks,such as Genetic Algorithms (GA),Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO),and Ant Colony Optimization(ACO),WOA offers several advantages.Firstly,WOA has a simpler and more intuitive mechanism,which makes it easier to implement and understand.This simplicity can be advantageous in crack detection applications,where interpretability and transparency of the feature selection process are essential.Secondly,WOA exhibits a fast convergence rate,enabling efficient exploration and exploitation of the feature space.This is particularly beneficial in surface crack detection,where timely detection and classification of cracks are crucial for effective maintenance planning and ensuring road safety.The fast convergence rate of WOA allows quicker identification of a subset of features that yield optimal classification performance.Additionally,WOA demonstrates good global search capabilities,allowing it to explore a wide range of feature combinations and search for the most informative features for crack detection.This global search capability helps to mitigate the risk of getting trapped in local optima,which can be a challenge in feature selection tasks.

    4.3 Hyperparameter Tuning

    Hyperparameter tuning is crucial in developing deep learning models for any computer vision task.In this study,we focus on the pavement detection task and propose the use of the Adam optimizer for hyperparameter tuning of the DL models.The Adam optimizer is a popular gradientbased optimization algorithm that has been shown to perform well in deep learning applications.The hyperparameters of the DL model that we tune using the Adam optimizer include the learning rate,number of epochs,batch size,and the number of filters in each convolutional layer.The DL model’s performance is assessed using standard evaluation measures,including accuracy,precision,recall,and F1 score.Hyperparameter tuning is conducted through a grid search approach,where a range of values is defined for each hyperparameter,and the DL model is evaluated for every combination of hyperparameters.We then select the combination of hyperparameters that results in excellent performance based on the evaluation measures.In our approach,grid search involves systematically exploring a predefined range of hyperparameter values for each component of our proposed model.The purpose is to identify the optimal combination of hyperparameters that maximizes the performance metrics.

    On the other hand,for WOA,we considered the population size,maximum iterations,exploration,and exploitation parameters,among others.We conducted extensive experiments to determine the optimal values for these parameters,varying the parameter settings within reasonable ranges.We employed performance evaluation metrics,such as convergence rate and solution quality,to guide our parameter-tuning process.Additionally,we consulted existing literature on WOA and other related metaheuristic algorithms to inform our decision-making.

    4.4 Convergence Curve

    The convergence curve for 2-class classification using the WOA is presented in Fig.8.The average fitness function is in the range of 49–55,and the number of iterations is 50 with WOA and 20 without WOA.It can be observed from the curve that the WOA algorithm significantly improves the convergence speed compared to the standard algorithm without WOA.The convergence curve starts at a high value and quickly drops,indicating that the algorithm rapidly improves the model’s accuracy.However,after a certain point,the curve flattens out,indicating that further iterations may not lead to significant improvements.Hence,the WOA algorithm proves to be an effective optimization technique for 2-class classification tasks,improving convergence speed and accuracy.

    5 Conclusion

    Surface crack detection is a decisive problem in roadway maintenance,and accurate detection can prevent accidents and increase pavement longevity.In this work,we proposed a new approach for surface crack classification using deep learning and metaheuristic optimization techniques.It anticipated an approach for surface crack detection utilizing ResNet-18 for deep feature extraction,whale optimization-based method for the selection of the optimal subset of features,and random forest for classification.The proposed model outperformed the traditional crack-based identification methods in terms of commonly used evaluation measures in the literature.The proposed approach achieved an impressive accuracy of 97.16% and an AUC of 0.984 on a dataset of pavement images.This indicates the effectiveness of our method in automatic identification of pavement cracks.By leveraging deep learning’s powerful feature extraction,WOA’s optimization capabilities,and RF’s classification robustness,we offer a robust and efficient solution for pavement crack detection,contributing significantly to road safety and maintenance cost reduction.The experimental results demonstrated that the ResNet-18 feature extraction approach with the whale optimization algorithm achieved a high classification performance,which is promising for real-world applications.The proposed approach holds significant implications for road maintenance authorities.By automatically identifying pavement cracks,the method enables timely repairs,reducing potential safety hazards and optimizing maintenance resources.The accurate and efficient detection of road surface defects enhances road safety,ultimately benefitting both commuters and road infrastructure stakeholders.However,it is vital to acknowledge the limitations of our study.Firstly,our approach relies on a specific deep learning model (ResNet-18),and future research could explore the use of other deep learning models for feature extraction and compare their performance with the proposed detector.Secondly,while our proposed detector showed effectiveness for surface crack detection,further investigation is needed to evaluate its performance in detecting defects in other materials or objects.In the future work we aim to explore the generalizability of our model to different types of road surfaces and crack patterns.

    Acknowledgement:Not applicable.

    Funding Statement:The authors received no specific funding for this study.

    Author Contributions:Study conception and design: L.Wu,D.Dong;data collection: Y.Cheng;analysis and interpretation of results: S.Alshawabkeh,L.Li;draft manuscript preparation: S.Alshawabkeh,M.Alanqreh.All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Availability of Data and Materials:The data used in the study is publicly available in Kaggle(https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/oluwaseunad/concrete-and-pavement-crack-images).

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

    亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 少妇 在线观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲最大成人中文| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 悠悠久久av| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产成人av教育| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久亚洲真实| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 满18在线观看网站| 级片在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 一夜夜www| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产av在哪里看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美成人午夜精品| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产黄片美女视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品福利观看| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 色在线成人网| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 91老司机精品| 精品日产1卡2卡| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 不卡一级毛片| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 在线国产一区二区在线| 精品电影一区二区在线| 欧美日韩黄片免| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 日本在线视频免费播放| 在线国产一区二区在线| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 大香蕉久久成人网| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 在线观看66精品国产| 99热只有精品国产| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 看免费av毛片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 欧美zozozo另类| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| av电影中文网址| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 香蕉国产在线看| 久久伊人香网站| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 午夜影院日韩av| 天天添夜夜摸| 女警被强在线播放| 一夜夜www| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 91在线观看av| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 亚洲精品色激情综合| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 美国免费a级毛片| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久狼人影院| 极品教师在线免费播放| 久久这里只有精品19| 91老司机精品| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 搡老岳熟女国产| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| av天堂在线播放| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产av不卡久久| 天堂√8在线中文| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产日本99.免费观看| 色av中文字幕| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 午夜视频精品福利| avwww免费| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 欧美zozozo另类| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 久久香蕉国产精品| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲第一青青草原| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久精品91蜜桃| 草草在线视频免费看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 久久久久久久久中文| 日韩免费av在线播放| 天堂动漫精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 精品国产亚洲在线| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| a在线观看视频网站| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 黄片播放在线免费| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 日本a在线网址| 看免费av毛片| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| ponron亚洲| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 88av欧美| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 制服诱惑二区| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 一本综合久久免费| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| av欧美777| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产成人欧美| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 中文字幕久久专区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久精品成人免费网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日本免费a在线| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 两性夫妻黄色片| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久亚洲精品不卡| a级毛片a级免费在线| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 日本免费a在线| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 黄色成人免费大全| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 91在线观看av| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久久国产成人免费| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产成人精品无人区| 级片在线观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 一级黄色大片毛片| a级毛片a级免费在线| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 波多野结衣高清作品| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| av天堂在线播放| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲九九香蕉| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 黄色女人牲交| 女警被强在线播放| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 悠悠久久av| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 草草在线视频免费看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成人欧美大片| 国产不卡一卡二| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 日本a在线网址| 看免费av毛片| 午夜视频精品福利| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 91麻豆av在线| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| av欧美777| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 久久精品91蜜桃| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 男女那种视频在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 精品电影一区二区在线| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产1区2区3区精品| www日本黄色视频网| 一区二区三区精品91| 一本综合久久免费| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品二区激情视频| svipshipincom国产片| 美女免费视频网站| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| a在线观看视频网站| 久久国产精品影院| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 色播在线永久视频| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 两个人看的免费小视频| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 高清在线国产一区| 日本 av在线| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 制服人妻中文乱码| www.999成人在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲第一电影网av| 嫩草影视91久久| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 一区二区三区激情视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 午夜影院日韩av| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 日韩高清综合在线| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| av视频在线观看入口| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 91在线观看av| 亚洲九九香蕉| av电影中文网址| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| av电影中文网址| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 天天添夜夜摸| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 一本精品99久久精品77| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 日本a在线网址| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 91成年电影在线观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产三级黄色录像| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 看免费av毛片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久久大精品| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 日韩欧美三级三区| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 制服人妻中文乱码| 免费高清视频大片| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | av中文乱码字幕在线| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 美国免费a级毛片| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 成人手机av| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 97碰自拍视频| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 久久久久久人人人人人| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 悠悠久久av| 国产成人av教育| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 三级毛片av免费| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观 | 免费看a级黄色片| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 黄色视频不卡| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 满18在线观看网站| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 男女那种视频在线观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美日本视频| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日韩有码中文字幕| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲激情在线av| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久久久久大精品| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产成人欧美| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 国产成人精品无人区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| bbb黄色大片| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 日日夜夜操网爽| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 丁香六月欧美| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| av免费在线观看网站| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 美女大奶头视频| 91老司机精品| 黄频高清免费视频|