• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Dynamic analysis of buried pipeline with and without barrier system subjected to underground detonation

    2023-12-07 13:22:06ChaidulHaqueChaudhuriDeepankarChoudhury
    Defence Technology 2023年11期

    Chaidul Haque Chaudhuri,Deepankar Choudhury

    Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India

    Keywords: Buried pipeline Subsurface detonation Analytical solution Viscoelastic foundation Protective barrier

    ABSTRACT Failure of pipe networks due to blast loads resulting from terrorist attacks or construction facilities,may cause economic loss,environmental pollution,source of firing or even it may lead to a disaster.The present work develops a closed-form solution of buried pipe with barrier system subjected to subsurface detonation.The solution is derived based on the concept of double-beam system.Euler Bernoulli’s beams are used to simulate the buried pipe and the barrier system.Soil is idealized as viscoelastic foundation along with shear interaction between discrete Winkler springs (advanced soil model).The finite Sine-Fourier transform is employed to solve the coupled partial differential equations.The solution is validated with past studies.A parametric study is conducted to investigate the influence of TNT charge weight,pipe material,damping ratio and TNT offset on the response of buried pipe with and without barrier system.Further a statistical analysis is carried out to get the significant soil and pipe input parameters.It is perceived that peak pipe displacements for both the cases (with and without barrier) are increases with increasing the weight of TNT charge and decreases with increasing the damping ratio and TNT offset.The deformation of pipe also varies with pipe material.Pipe safety against blast loads can be ensured by providing suitable barrier layer.The present study can be utilized in preliminary design stage as an alternative to expensive numerical analysis or field study.

    1.Introduction

    Buried pipelines are widely used for water,gas,and oil transportation.Recently,several terrorist attacks on underground structures including buried pipelines have been reported around the world.If buried pipeline fails owing to detonation resulting from terrorist attacks,places required blasting for construction facilities,or accidental events,it may cause economic loss,environmental pollution,source of firing or even it may lead to a disaster.The intensity of blast load is very high and duration is extremely short compared to earthquake loads.Hence,buried pipelines are more vulnerable to blast loads compared to earthquake loads.So,it is crucial to recognize the behaviour of buried pipelines under blast loads and explore various mitigation methods to protect pipelines from failure.

    Studies have been performed on buried structures under blast loads by many researchers [1-8].Zhang et al.[9]carried out a numerical study to obtain the response of buried pipeline under subsurface explosion.It was observed that the deformation of the pipeline rises with increasing the TNT magnitude and pipe diameter thickness ratio.Chakraborty [3]investigated the performance of hollow steel piles under subsurface explosion.Works have also been accomplished in the area of blast mitigation techniques to protect underground structures such as pipe,tunnel,etc.against explosion loads.Hajiazizi and Kakaci [10]investigated the effectiveness of GFRP (glass fiber reinforced polymer) to reduce the deformation of buried pipelines subjected to underground explosions by performing numerical analysis.It was perceived that the use of the GFRP blanket significantly reduce the deformation of buried pipelines.Yang et al.[11]assessed the influence of blast loads on an underwater tunnel through three-dimensional numerical analysis and observed that CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced polymer)cloth can be effectively used to improve the resistance of tunnel to underwater blast loads.The blast resistance behaviour of CFRP and GFRP sandwich panels are also studied by Arora et al.[12].It was noticed that CFRP panels shown better blast resistance compared to GFRP panels.Colicchio et al.[13]investigated the hydroelastic performance of a structure subjected to underwater explosion.De and Zimmie[14]conducted centrifuge model tests at 70 g to explore the behaviour of buried structures under surface blast loads.From centrifuge tests,it was noticed that compressible geofoam cover can be successfully adopted as a blast barrier system.Further,De et al.[15,16]executed similar kind of study through centrifuge tests and numerical analysis to investigate the effectiveness of both compressible (geofoam) and rigid (concrete) barriers in increasing the stability of underground structures against surface detonation.Baziar et al.[17]performed centrifuge tests to inspect the performance of underground structures subjected to blast loads and utilized geofoam in between blast source and structure as a barrier to reduce the impact of blast loads on underground structures.Researchers [18,19]are also used geosynthetics reinforcement to protect structures against explosions or accidental damage.Further,Hegde et al.[20]explored that combination of geocell and geogrid reinforced soil can be utilized to protect buried pipelines against static loading.Bartlett et al.[21]found that EPS geofoam can be used to protect buried pipelines and culverts under permanent ground deformation.Wei [22]carried out an extensive study on reinforced soil walls to mitigate closerange blast loading.It was observed that geocell walls absorb more blast pressure and the construction procedure is easier and also less time taking compared to geotextile walls.Hence,for closerange blast loading geocell wall is better compared to the geotextile wall.Soude et al.[23]performed experimental and numerical studies on geocell reinforced soil walls subjected to horizontal localized impact.Further,numerical and experimental studies were carried out to investigate the performance of buried pipe in sand with geocell reinforcement under dynamic loading[24-28].It has been found that geocell provides beneficial results in reducing load transfer to pipe and surface settlement.

    From the literature review,it is perceived that commendable numerical and experimental works have been accomplished on buried structures under blast loads.Another way of solving such complex phenomenon in a simplified way is an analytical approach.In most of the soil-structure related problems,soil can be idealized as springs,and structures such as pipe,pile,etc.Can be considered as beam.Such prior mentioned idealizations have been adopted in past studies[29-32]to solve different complex problems related to soil-structure interaction in simplified way.Sun[33,34]carried out analytical studies for beams resting on viscoelastic foundation under harmonic line loads and moving loads respectively without considering the shear interaction between springs.Further,Basu and Rao [35]incorporated the shear interaction in their analytical formulation for beam on viscoelastic foundation subjected to moving load.Hung et al.[36]derived a simplified approach using mass,spring and damper to investigate the seismic behaviour of a wind turbine tower subjected to sea ice.Kouretzis et al.[37]performed an analytical analysis to obtain the response of buried pipelines under surface settlement and heave.The pipeline was simulated by beam element and soil was modelled using springs.Beam on spring foundation concept was also adopted by Karamitros et al.[38]in their analytical study on pipe with curved bend.Chaudhuri and Choudhury [39]examined the behaviour of buried pipelines subjected to ground deformation induced from seismic landslide considering Euler’s beam on Winkler foundation.Considering the concept of beam on two-parameter soil foundation(Winkler along with shear interaction),Chaudhuri and Choudhury[40,41]investigated the impact of horizontal transverse ground deformation on buried pipeline and static pipe bursting induced ground deformation on adjacent pipeline respectively.Kausel et al.[42]investigated the critical speed of high-speed rail considering the theory of beam on elastic foundation.The study did not consider the damping parameter and the shear interaction parameter between springs.Xia et al.[43]examined the response of buried flexible pipe subjected to underground explosion considering pipe as Timoshenko beam and soil as conventional Winkler foundation along with damping but without considering the shear interaction between springs.Further,Chaudhuri et al.[44]proposed an analytical solution for buried pipe subjected to underground explosion simulating soil as Winkler springs along with shear interaction.The effect of damping and self-weight of soil was also incorporated in the study.Some simplified studies[45-47]are also performed for buried pipelines under subsurface explosions considering Euler’s beam resting on Winkler foundation.However,the prior mentioned analytical studies on blast loads did not incorporate the effect of damping or shear layer for interaction between Winkler springs,in their analysis.As per authors knowledge,no closed-form solution is available for underground pipeline with barrier system under subsurface detonation.

    In this regard,the objective of the present study is to develop an analytical formulation for buried pipeline with a barrier system subjected to subsurface explosion incorporating the effect of damping and shear layer for interaction between discrete soil springs.Such prior mentioned generalized closed-form solution is not proposed by any other researcher.Hence,the current study is in this direction.The solution is proposed considering double-beam system where both the barrier layer and pipeline are assumed as Euler beams and soil is idealized as viscoelastic foundation with shear layer for shear interaction between individual soil springs.The proposed analytical formulation also incorporated all the important parameters(such as decay parameter,standoff distance,burial depth of explosive and soil condition)that can influence the pressure distribution of blast wave as mentioned elsewhere [48].The proposed formulation is authenticated with the outcomes procured from previous studies [45,49,50].Further,a parametric study is executed to examine the effect of TNT charge,the pipe material,damping ratio and TNT offset on the response of pipe with and without barrier system.A statistical study is also carrier out to obtain the effect of soil and pipe input parameters on pipe response.

    2.Analytical formulation

    The present analysis is based on the concept of the double-beam model.Fig.1 illustrates the idealization of the present analysis.The top beam represents the protective barrier layer and the bottom beam represents the buried pipeline.Soil in between the top and bottom beam and below the bottom beam is idealized as viscoelastic foundation with shear interaction between springs.

    Fig.1.Mathematical model of the proposed formulation.

    Both beams are considered as linear elastic Euler Bernoulli’s beam with a uniform cross-section.The concentrated forcef(x,t),resulting from subsurface explosion,is acting on the top beam(barrier) at a distance of x1as shown in Fig.1.For providing a generalized analytical solution it is assumed that the value of soil spring stiffness,damping coefficient and shear value of the shear interaction layer in between top and bottom beam and below the bottom beam are K1,C1,G1and K2,C2,G2respectively.Soil spring stiffness can be evaluated from the ASCE code[51].The location of blast source can be anywhere with regard to buried pipeline and henceforth the equation for spring stiffness will change accordingly as per the ASCE guidelines [51].However,for performing the parametric study it is adopted that blast location,barrier layer and the pipeline are in the same horizontal plane.Hence,following equations are used for calculating the lateral soil stiffness.

    whereNchandNqhare bearing capacity factors,can be obtained from the curves or closed from expressions given by ASCE code[51].c,D,andHare the soil cohesion,pipe outer diameter,effective unit weight of soil and burial depth of pipe centreline respectively.Δh=0.04(H+D/2)≤0.10Dto 0.15D.

    The shear parameter of the shear layer (G) can be calculated from the following equations [35,52]:

    whereEsis Young’s modulus of soil,B is the width of the beam cross-section,γ describes the rate at which the vertical displacement in the ground reduces with depth,and νsis the Poisson’s ratio of soil.The range of γ is generally varied from 1.0 to 2.0 m-1[35,52].In the present study an average value of γ i.e.,1.5 m-1is taken.

    The end boundary conditions of the beam may differ from free to fixed.Thus,as a logical approximation,intermediate boundary condition,i.e.,simply supported beam,is considered for both the beams [53]Hence,the existing boundary conditions are

    However,in the present analysis pipe length is taken sufficient such that the end boundary effects on peak pipe response is negligible.Fig.2 depicts the distribution of blast pressure with time.In the present study,the negative phase of blast pressure is neglected due to very less magnitude of negative pressure compared to positive one.The change of blast pressure with time can be expressed by an exponential decay function [54,55]as follows:

    Fig.2.Distribution of blast pressure with time.

    wherePsis the peak overpressure,Tsis the total time in positive phase for blast pressure distribution,andbis the decay coefficient which will take care the geometric damping while travelling the blast waves from source to point of interest.The decay parameter(b) can be estimated [56]using the following expression

    whereZis the scaled distance and can be expressed as

    soil type and can be attained from Bulson [57].The values ofkparameter for some soil types are listed in Table 1.From Table 1,it is noted that if the soil is saturated the value ofkis substantially increased and hence corresponding blast load will also increase.Eqs.(11) and (12) are in the Imperial unit’s system.

    Table 1 k parameter for different soil conditions [57].

    The blast forcef(x,t)of Eq.(10)can further be expressed in the following shortened form

    3.Governing coupled differential equations and closed-form solutions

    The governing differential equations of top and bottom beam as shown in Fig.1 can be stated as

    where,ris the distance from the center of the TNT charge to the point of interest on beam in meters (m),andwis the mass of the TNT charge in kilograms(kg).

    The blast force per unit length of the beam acting at a point(x=x1) as shown in Fig.1 can be stated as

    whereBis the width of the top beam,which is considered as outside diameter (B=D) of the buried pipe(bottom beam).

    Further,peak overpressure (Ps) and duration of positive phase(Ts) can be estimated [57]from the following expressions:

    wherefdepends on burial depth that can be achieved from the graph given by Bulson[57],thekparameter changes with changing whereD1=E1I1;D2=E2I2;m1andm2are the mass per unit length of the top and bottom beam respectively;y1andy2are the deflections of top and bottom beam respectively.The finite Sine-Fourier transform is employed in the present analysis to solve the prior mentioned coupled partial differential equations (Eqs.(14)and (15)).The finite Sine-Fourier transform is chosen as displacement at both the ends of the beam are known(Dirichlet boundary condition).The finite Sine-Fourier transform for space co-ordinatex(0 ≤x≤L)and its inverse can be expressed as follows:

    wheren=1,2,3,…….

    Applying finite Sine-Fourier transform for both sides of Eqs.(14)and (15) we get

    the solution of Eq.(22) in modal form can be written as

    where φnis the generalized eigenvector and qn(t)is the generalized coordinate vector.Now,substituting the value ofYn(t)from Eq.(28)into Eq.(22)and pre-multiplying by φTnon both sides of Eq.(22),the following expression is obtained.

    now,Eq.(30) can further be reduced to

    The complete solution of Eq.(34)is nothing but the sum of the complementary function (C·F) and particular integral (P·I) of Eq.(34).So,

    it is assumed that beams are originally at rest condition.Hence for zero initial conditions

    with zero initial conditions,the complementary part of Eq.(37)becomes zero.So,Eq.(37) further reduced to

    the particular solution is obtained by adapting Duhamel integral[58].

    Now,from Eqs.(28) and (41)

    where,the expressions off(m,n)are listed in the appendix section(Eqs.(A1)-(A7)).Now,the deflection of both the top and bottom beam can be obtained using Eqs.(18),(19)and(43).Fig.3 depicted the step-by-step procedure of the present analysis.

    Fig.3.Flowchart of the proposed methodology.

    4.Validation of proposed method

    The present formulation is authenticated with the outcomes procured from earlier studies [45,49,50].The validation with Nourzadeh et al.[45]confirms the correctness of blast load simulation and the applicability of the proposed mathematical model considering single beam system subjected to blast load.The validation with Hetenyi’s solution[49],and Maheshwari et al.[50]further confirms the applicability of proposed solution for double beam system.

    Nourzadeh et al.[45]examined the response of buried pipeline to subsurface explosion through a simplified analytical study.The pipe was assumed as beam and soil as Winkler foundation.The study did not incorporate the influence of damping and shear layer for shear interaction between springs.For comparison study,pipe size ‘II’ and soil type ‘D’ are adopted in the present analysis.The detailed parameters about prior mentioned pipe size and soil type are reported by Nourzadeh et al.[45].In the present study,instead of a double-beam,the single beam resting on single parameters Winkler foundation concept is used to simulate the formulation proposed by Nourzadeh et al.[45].The governing differential equation is solved by the finite Sine Fourier transform method.Pipe strains are recorded as an output of the formulation.Under given conditions,the pipe strain of steel pipe,PVC pipe,and PE pipe obtained from Nourzadeh et al.[45]and the present study are 0.01%,0.03%,and 0.30% respectively,and 0.0128%,0.0261%,and 0.3097% respectively.This relative study approves the rationality of the proposed solution.

    Further,Maheshwari et al.[50]proposed a closed-form analytical solution for beam on reinforced granular bed subjected to a concentrated load based on the concept of double-beam system.Both the top foundation and bottom reinforced layer were idealized as beams and the soil was idealized as Winkler springs.However,the solution did not consider the shear interaction between individual springs.Maheshwari et al.[50]validated their analytical formulation with Hetenyi’s solution[49].For the present validation purpose,finite Sine-Fourier transform is employed to solve the governing differential equations of the double-beam system as proposed by Hetenyi[49]and later on adopted by Maheshwari et al.[50].The relative flexural rigidity of beam (D1/D2) and relative stiffness of soil(K1/K2)are 10 and 5 respectively.Where K1and K2are the soil spring stiffness of the top and bottom layer respectively.The results obtained from the present approach and past studies[49,50]are depicted in Fig.4.Results are plotted in normalised form as mentioned by Maheshwari et al.[50].The expressions for normalised distance (Xn) and normalised deflections of the top and bottom beams (i.e.,andrespectively)are as follows:

    Fig.4.Comparison of displacement of top and bottom beams.

    where,Qtis the load applied on the top beam.are the characteristic lengths of the top and bottom beams respectively.

    From Fig.4,it is perceived that the results obtained from the present formulation are identical with the past studies.Hence,this validation further confirms the sanctity of the proposed mathematical model.

    5.Parametric study

    In the subsequent sections,a parametric study is carried out to investigate the response of buried pipe with and without barrier subjected to subsurface explosion by varying TNT charge weight(w),the pipe material,damping ratio(ξ)and TNT offset.The impact of relative barrier-pipe flexural rigidity on pipe response is also studied.The required parameters to perform the parametric study are shown in Table 2.

    Table 2 Soil-pipe-barrier-blast parameters to perform the parametric study.

    5.1. Influence of TNT charge weight

    To understand the influence of charge weight (w) on pipe response,the range ofwis taken from 5 to 30 kg,and other parameters are kept constant as listed in Table 2.The maximum deflection of both double-beam system (pipe with barrier) and single beam system(pipe without barrier)and corresponding peak pipe bending strains are recorded and are shown in Fig.5.

    Fig.5.Influence of TNT charge weight on (a) maximum pipe deflection and (b)maximum pipe bending strain.

    From Fig.5(a),it is seen that the peak displacements for both the cases are increases with increasing charge weight(w).For instance,in the case of double-beam system,the maximum displacement of the pipe (y2-max) is increased from 12.08 to 57.31 mm with increasingwfrom 5 to 30 kg.Similarly,in the case of a single beam system,the maximum displacement of the pipe (yp-max) is raised from 20.25 to 93.15 mm with increasingwfrom 5 to 30 kg.Further,it is perceived that the response of pipe is drastically reduced for pipe with barrier system compared to pipe subjected to explosions without any barrier.For instance,forw=30 kg the maximum displacement of pipe is reduced from 93.15 to 57.31 mm due to the present barrier system.Similar observation is found in case of peak pipe bending strain as well (Fig.5(b)).

    5.2. Influence of pipe material

    In this section,four different types of pipe materials namely X-65 grade of steel,Concrete,polyvinyl chloride (PVC),and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe are considered to examine the impact of pipe materials on peak pipe response.The results are listed in Table 3 in terms of maximum displacement.

    Table 3 Maximum pipe deflection for different pipe material.

    From Table 3,maximum pipe response is observed for HDPE pipe (maximum pipe deflection of 114.64 mm and 272.63 mm for with and without barrier respectively).Whereas,minimum pipe response is calculated for X-65 steel (maximum pipe deflection of 57.31 mm and 93.15 mm for with and without barrier respectively).This is due to the change of bending stiffness with changing the pipe materials.

    5.3. Influence of damping ratio

    Fig.6 shows the effect of damping ratio(ξ)on pipe response.The extent of damping ratio (ξ) is chosen from 5% to 25% with an increment of 5%.

    Fig.6.Influence of damping ratio on maximum pipe deflection.

    From Fig.6,it is apprehended that the maximum pipe deflections are reduces for both the pipe with and without barrier with increasing the value of damping ratio as expected.For instance,in the case of a double-beam system,the maximum displacement of the pipe(y2-max)is reduced from 57.31-45.35 mm with increasing ξ from 5%-25%.Similarly,in the case of single beam system,the maximum displacement of the pipe(yp-max)is reduced from 93.15-75.34 mm with increasing ξ from 5%-25%.

    5.4. Influence of TNT offset

    TNT offset presents the distance from the source of explosion to the top of the barrier layer (top beam).In the present study,four different offsets such as 5 m,7 m,9 m and 12 m are considered.

    From Fig.7,it is shown that peak pipe response(deflection and bending strain) reduces with increasing the explosive offset.With increasing the TNT offset,blast source is moving away from the pipeline,hence peak overpressure is getting reduces while blast waves passing through the soil media.For example,peak pipe displacement is reduced from 57.31 to 5.28 mm and from 93.15 to 9.49 mm for pipe with and without barrier respectively with increasing TNT offset from 5 to 12 m.

    Fig.7.Influence of TNT offset on(a)maximum pipe deflection and(b)maximum pipe bending strain.

    5.5. Influence of relative barrier-pipe flexural rigidity

    In order to obtain the impact of flexibility of barrier system on pipe response,the ratio of barrier to pipe flexural rigidity(D1/D2)is varied from 0.001 to 1000 i.e.,from very flexible barrier to extremely rigid barrier system with respect to pipe.The recorded peak pipe deflection and peak pipe bending strain are normalised with the corresponding maximum values recorded atD1/D2equal to 0.001 and are shown in Fig.8.From Fig.8 it is found that normalised peak pipe deflection and corresponding bending strain reduces with increasing the rigidity of the barrier layer.

    6.Identification of influential soil and pipe input parameters

    In this section a range of soil and pipe parameters are chosen as input by keeping all other parameters constant to obtain the influential parameters.The lower and upper limits of the input parameters are listed in Table 4.

    Table 4 Modeling parameters and their lower and upper limits for the central composite design (CCD).

    The central composite design(CCD)methodology is adopted to obtain the optimum number of combinations of seven input parameters.CCD is one type of response surface design and it has the capability of full quadratic model.CCD analysis suggested total 152 combination of seven input parameters.Hence,the response in terms of peak pipe displacement (for with barrier system) are recorded using Matlab corresponding to 152 combination of input parameters.The data are further analysed using statistical program Minitab to get the most influential input parameters.The confidence level is chosen as 95% for the statistical analysis.Statistical results are plotted in terms of Pareto chart and Normal plot of the standardized effects as shown in Figs.9(a) and 9(b) respectively.Fig.9(a)depicts the absolute values of the standardized effects from the maximum effect to the minimum effect.The reference line in the Pareto chart is based on the significance level (α).Significance level can be calculated by deducting confidence level from the unity.The parameters that cross the reference line (1.98 in the present Fig.9(a))are statistically significant.Hence,from Fig.9(a)it is understood that most significant parameter is the bar that represent term‘A’that is nothing but the soil spring stiffness(K).Further,it is noted that parameters A,E,D,B,and G(i.e.,K,E2,D,G and t) are statistically significant.C and F (i.e.,L and ρ) are not significant parameters.Pareto chart is not able to determine whether the change in the value of input parameters increase or decrease the response.However,Normal plot is able to depicts both the magnitude and direction of the effects as shown in Fig.9(b).The parameters those are further from zero on the X-axis are statistically significant.The positive effect indicates that the response increases with increasing the value of the parameter and negative effect indicates that the response decreases with increasing the value of the input parameters.Fig.9(b)it is noticed that parameter D i.e.,pipe diameter(D)has the positive standardized effect and the parameters G,B,E,and A (i.e.,t,G,E2,and K) have negative standardized effects.Hence,peak pipe displacement increases with increasing the value of pipe diameter (D) and peak pipe displacement decreases with increasing the values of pipe wall thickness(t),shear parameter (G),Young’s modulus of pipe (E2),and soil spring stiffness (K).

    Fig.9.(a) Pareto chart and(b)Normal plot of the standardized effects for seven input parameters.

    7.Summary and conclusions

    The present work examined the dynamic response of a doublebeam system subjected to blast loadings to simulate the behaviour of buried pipeline with barrier system under subsurface explosion.Both the buried pipe and the barrier are idealized as Euler Bernoulli’s beams and surrounding soil is idealized as viscoelastic foundation along with shear interaction between isolated Winkler springs.The proposed solution is authenticated with the results procured from previous studies [45,49,50].Further,a parametric study is carried out to inspect the impact of TNT charge weight(w),pipe material,damping ratio (ξ) and TNT offset on the response of buried pipe in terms of peak pipe displacement considering both with and without barrier system.A statistical analysis is also executed to obtain the most influential soil and pipe input parameters.The present analysis involved less input parameters compared to the FEM based three-dimensional numerical analysis,and due to simplified assumptions in the current analytical solution,the present study is less time consuming compared to detailed continuum based analysis.Hence,in the initial design phase,the proposed formulation can be implemented to get quick results with moderate accuracy without performing complex numerical study or expensive experimental work.Following are the salient points based on the present study.

    · The present closed-form analytical study can be utilized to acquire the response of buried pipe with and without barrier system under subsurface detonation.Hence,the proposed formulation can be used as an alternative to costly experimental or numerical study.

    · The barrier system substantially reduces the displacement of buried pipes subjected to underground explosions.Hence,a suitable barrier system can be provided to protect important underground pipeline networks from blast loadings.

    · Pipe deflection magnifies with increasing the weight of the TNT.

    · Pipe deformation varies with changing the pipe material due to the change in pipe bending stiffness with changing pipe material.

    · Pipe deflection decreases with increasing the damping ratio as expected.

    · Pipe deformation reduces with increasing TNT offset.

    · Pipe stability increases with increasing the rigidity of the barrier layer.

    · From statistical study,it is observed that among seven input parametersK,E2,D,Gandtare statistically significant.However,Land ρ are not significant parameters.

    The future scope of the present study is to incorporate plasticity and non-linearity of soil and pipe material.

    Funding

    This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,commercial,or not-for-profit sectors.

    Author contributions

    Conceptualization,methodology,validation,writing-original draft preparation,by C·H·C;supervision,writing-review,and editing by D.C.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Appendix

    The expressions off(m,n) of Eq.(43) are given as follows:

    一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 97在线人人人人妻| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 精品一区二区免费观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 美女高潮的动态| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 色哟哟·www| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产亚洲最大av| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 免费少妇av软件| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 观看美女的网站| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产精品一及| 国产 精品1| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | h视频一区二区三区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 成人二区视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 免费av中文字幕在线| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 极品教师在线视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| av天堂中文字幕网| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 欧美97在线视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 高清av免费在线| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久精品性色| 18+在线观看网站| 日本色播在线视频| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 内射极品少妇av片p| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | av在线观看视频网站免费| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 色综合色国产| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 成年av动漫网址| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 日本黄大片高清| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 国产乱来视频区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 免费少妇av软件| av在线观看视频网站免费| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 精品亚洲成国产av| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 一个人免费看片子| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲综合精品二区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 成年av动漫网址| www.av在线官网国产| 精品久久久久久电影网| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 观看免费一级毛片| 日本午夜av视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚州av有码| 色视频www国产| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 多毛熟女@视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 免费看不卡的av| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产乱来视频区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 少妇 在线观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 身体一侧抽搐| 久久午夜福利片| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 97超视频在线观看视频| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 在线观看三级黄色| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 高清av免费在线| 一级av片app| 男女免费视频国产| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产 精品1| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 男女免费视频国产| 精品一区二区免费观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 大码成人一级视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 久久久久视频综合| 老熟女久久久| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久久久精品性色| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| videossex国产| 久久av网站| 97超视频在线观看视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 毛片女人毛片| 三级经典国产精品| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | av在线播放精品| h视频一区二区三区| www.色视频.com| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产 一区精品| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| av福利片在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 久久久久性生活片| 身体一侧抽搐| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 精品午夜福利在线看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 欧美bdsm另类| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 在线 av 中文字幕| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲综合精品二区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲无线观看免费| 日韩强制内射视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 在线观看三级黄色| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 丝袜喷水一区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 最黄视频免费看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 简卡轻食公司| 国产乱人视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产精品三级大全| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产男女内射视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚州av有码| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 熟女av电影| av一本久久久久| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 高清av免费在线| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产乱来视频区| freevideosex欧美| 日本黄色片子视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 美女高潮的动态| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久久99精品国语久久久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 一区在线观看完整版| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 观看av在线不卡| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 性色av一级| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 欧美人与善性xxx| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久久视频综合| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 免费看光身美女| 色吧在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久久久国产网址| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 色网站视频免费| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| freevideosex欧美| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产在视频线精品| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 在线免费十八禁| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 久久久久久久久久成人| 美女福利国产在线 | 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 观看av在线不卡| 亚洲图色成人| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产精品一及| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久热精品热| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美性感艳星| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产 一区精品| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美另类一区| 大香蕉久久网| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| h日本视频在线播放| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 男人舔奶头视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 色吧在线观看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久青草综合色| 在线天堂最新版资源| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产成人a区在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲成色77777| 久久久久网色| 日本午夜av视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 一级毛片电影观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲四区av| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 一级毛片电影观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| videos熟女内射| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产色婷婷99| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 精品久久久久久久久av| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 免费看av在线观看网站| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 少妇高潮的动态图| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 一区二区av电影网| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| www.av在线官网国产| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 大片免费播放器 马上看| freevideosex欧美| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 天堂8中文在线网| 永久网站在线| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 只有这里有精品99| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 在线看a的网站| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 熟女电影av网| 极品教师在线视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| a 毛片基地| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲四区av| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产91av在线免费观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| www.色视频.com| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 丰满少妇做爰视频| 1000部很黄的大片| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 色哟哟·www| 尾随美女入室| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 日韩欧美精品免费久久|