• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Dynamic analysis of buried pipeline with and without barrier system subjected to underground detonation

    2023-12-07 13:22:06ChaidulHaqueChaudhuriDeepankarChoudhury
    Defence Technology 2023年11期

    Chaidul Haque Chaudhuri,Deepankar Choudhury

    Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India

    Keywords: Buried pipeline Subsurface detonation Analytical solution Viscoelastic foundation Protective barrier

    ABSTRACT Failure of pipe networks due to blast loads resulting from terrorist attacks or construction facilities,may cause economic loss,environmental pollution,source of firing or even it may lead to a disaster.The present work develops a closed-form solution of buried pipe with barrier system subjected to subsurface detonation.The solution is derived based on the concept of double-beam system.Euler Bernoulli’s beams are used to simulate the buried pipe and the barrier system.Soil is idealized as viscoelastic foundation along with shear interaction between discrete Winkler springs (advanced soil model).The finite Sine-Fourier transform is employed to solve the coupled partial differential equations.The solution is validated with past studies.A parametric study is conducted to investigate the influence of TNT charge weight,pipe material,damping ratio and TNT offset on the response of buried pipe with and without barrier system.Further a statistical analysis is carried out to get the significant soil and pipe input parameters.It is perceived that peak pipe displacements for both the cases (with and without barrier) are increases with increasing the weight of TNT charge and decreases with increasing the damping ratio and TNT offset.The deformation of pipe also varies with pipe material.Pipe safety against blast loads can be ensured by providing suitable barrier layer.The present study can be utilized in preliminary design stage as an alternative to expensive numerical analysis or field study.

    1.Introduction

    Buried pipelines are widely used for water,gas,and oil transportation.Recently,several terrorist attacks on underground structures including buried pipelines have been reported around the world.If buried pipeline fails owing to detonation resulting from terrorist attacks,places required blasting for construction facilities,or accidental events,it may cause economic loss,environmental pollution,source of firing or even it may lead to a disaster.The intensity of blast load is very high and duration is extremely short compared to earthquake loads.Hence,buried pipelines are more vulnerable to blast loads compared to earthquake loads.So,it is crucial to recognize the behaviour of buried pipelines under blast loads and explore various mitigation methods to protect pipelines from failure.

    Studies have been performed on buried structures under blast loads by many researchers [1-8].Zhang et al.[9]carried out a numerical study to obtain the response of buried pipeline under subsurface explosion.It was observed that the deformation of the pipeline rises with increasing the TNT magnitude and pipe diameter thickness ratio.Chakraborty [3]investigated the performance of hollow steel piles under subsurface explosion.Works have also been accomplished in the area of blast mitigation techniques to protect underground structures such as pipe,tunnel,etc.against explosion loads.Hajiazizi and Kakaci [10]investigated the effectiveness of GFRP (glass fiber reinforced polymer) to reduce the deformation of buried pipelines subjected to underground explosions by performing numerical analysis.It was perceived that the use of the GFRP blanket significantly reduce the deformation of buried pipelines.Yang et al.[11]assessed the influence of blast loads on an underwater tunnel through three-dimensional numerical analysis and observed that CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced polymer)cloth can be effectively used to improve the resistance of tunnel to underwater blast loads.The blast resistance behaviour of CFRP and GFRP sandwich panels are also studied by Arora et al.[12].It was noticed that CFRP panels shown better blast resistance compared to GFRP panels.Colicchio et al.[13]investigated the hydroelastic performance of a structure subjected to underwater explosion.De and Zimmie[14]conducted centrifuge model tests at 70 g to explore the behaviour of buried structures under surface blast loads.From centrifuge tests,it was noticed that compressible geofoam cover can be successfully adopted as a blast barrier system.Further,De et al.[15,16]executed similar kind of study through centrifuge tests and numerical analysis to investigate the effectiveness of both compressible (geofoam) and rigid (concrete) barriers in increasing the stability of underground structures against surface detonation.Baziar et al.[17]performed centrifuge tests to inspect the performance of underground structures subjected to blast loads and utilized geofoam in between blast source and structure as a barrier to reduce the impact of blast loads on underground structures.Researchers [18,19]are also used geosynthetics reinforcement to protect structures against explosions or accidental damage.Further,Hegde et al.[20]explored that combination of geocell and geogrid reinforced soil can be utilized to protect buried pipelines against static loading.Bartlett et al.[21]found that EPS geofoam can be used to protect buried pipelines and culverts under permanent ground deformation.Wei [22]carried out an extensive study on reinforced soil walls to mitigate closerange blast loading.It was observed that geocell walls absorb more blast pressure and the construction procedure is easier and also less time taking compared to geotextile walls.Hence,for closerange blast loading geocell wall is better compared to the geotextile wall.Soude et al.[23]performed experimental and numerical studies on geocell reinforced soil walls subjected to horizontal localized impact.Further,numerical and experimental studies were carried out to investigate the performance of buried pipe in sand with geocell reinforcement under dynamic loading[24-28].It has been found that geocell provides beneficial results in reducing load transfer to pipe and surface settlement.

    From the literature review,it is perceived that commendable numerical and experimental works have been accomplished on buried structures under blast loads.Another way of solving such complex phenomenon in a simplified way is an analytical approach.In most of the soil-structure related problems,soil can be idealized as springs,and structures such as pipe,pile,etc.Can be considered as beam.Such prior mentioned idealizations have been adopted in past studies[29-32]to solve different complex problems related to soil-structure interaction in simplified way.Sun[33,34]carried out analytical studies for beams resting on viscoelastic foundation under harmonic line loads and moving loads respectively without considering the shear interaction between springs.Further,Basu and Rao [35]incorporated the shear interaction in their analytical formulation for beam on viscoelastic foundation subjected to moving load.Hung et al.[36]derived a simplified approach using mass,spring and damper to investigate the seismic behaviour of a wind turbine tower subjected to sea ice.Kouretzis et al.[37]performed an analytical analysis to obtain the response of buried pipelines under surface settlement and heave.The pipeline was simulated by beam element and soil was modelled using springs.Beam on spring foundation concept was also adopted by Karamitros et al.[38]in their analytical study on pipe with curved bend.Chaudhuri and Choudhury [39]examined the behaviour of buried pipelines subjected to ground deformation induced from seismic landslide considering Euler’s beam on Winkler foundation.Considering the concept of beam on two-parameter soil foundation(Winkler along with shear interaction),Chaudhuri and Choudhury[40,41]investigated the impact of horizontal transverse ground deformation on buried pipeline and static pipe bursting induced ground deformation on adjacent pipeline respectively.Kausel et al.[42]investigated the critical speed of high-speed rail considering the theory of beam on elastic foundation.The study did not consider the damping parameter and the shear interaction parameter between springs.Xia et al.[43]examined the response of buried flexible pipe subjected to underground explosion considering pipe as Timoshenko beam and soil as conventional Winkler foundation along with damping but without considering the shear interaction between springs.Further,Chaudhuri et al.[44]proposed an analytical solution for buried pipe subjected to underground explosion simulating soil as Winkler springs along with shear interaction.The effect of damping and self-weight of soil was also incorporated in the study.Some simplified studies[45-47]are also performed for buried pipelines under subsurface explosions considering Euler’s beam resting on Winkler foundation.However,the prior mentioned analytical studies on blast loads did not incorporate the effect of damping or shear layer for interaction between Winkler springs,in their analysis.As per authors knowledge,no closed-form solution is available for underground pipeline with barrier system under subsurface detonation.

    In this regard,the objective of the present study is to develop an analytical formulation for buried pipeline with a barrier system subjected to subsurface explosion incorporating the effect of damping and shear layer for interaction between discrete soil springs.Such prior mentioned generalized closed-form solution is not proposed by any other researcher.Hence,the current study is in this direction.The solution is proposed considering double-beam system where both the barrier layer and pipeline are assumed as Euler beams and soil is idealized as viscoelastic foundation with shear layer for shear interaction between individual soil springs.The proposed analytical formulation also incorporated all the important parameters(such as decay parameter,standoff distance,burial depth of explosive and soil condition)that can influence the pressure distribution of blast wave as mentioned elsewhere [48].The proposed formulation is authenticated with the outcomes procured from previous studies [45,49,50].Further,a parametric study is executed to examine the effect of TNT charge,the pipe material,damping ratio and TNT offset on the response of pipe with and without barrier system.A statistical study is also carrier out to obtain the effect of soil and pipe input parameters on pipe response.

    2.Analytical formulation

    The present analysis is based on the concept of the double-beam model.Fig.1 illustrates the idealization of the present analysis.The top beam represents the protective barrier layer and the bottom beam represents the buried pipeline.Soil in between the top and bottom beam and below the bottom beam is idealized as viscoelastic foundation with shear interaction between springs.

    Fig.1.Mathematical model of the proposed formulation.

    Both beams are considered as linear elastic Euler Bernoulli’s beam with a uniform cross-section.The concentrated forcef(x,t),resulting from subsurface explosion,is acting on the top beam(barrier) at a distance of x1as shown in Fig.1.For providing a generalized analytical solution it is assumed that the value of soil spring stiffness,damping coefficient and shear value of the shear interaction layer in between top and bottom beam and below the bottom beam are K1,C1,G1and K2,C2,G2respectively.Soil spring stiffness can be evaluated from the ASCE code[51].The location of blast source can be anywhere with regard to buried pipeline and henceforth the equation for spring stiffness will change accordingly as per the ASCE guidelines [51].However,for performing the parametric study it is adopted that blast location,barrier layer and the pipeline are in the same horizontal plane.Hence,following equations are used for calculating the lateral soil stiffness.

    whereNchandNqhare bearing capacity factors,can be obtained from the curves or closed from expressions given by ASCE code[51].c,D,andHare the soil cohesion,pipe outer diameter,effective unit weight of soil and burial depth of pipe centreline respectively.Δh=0.04(H+D/2)≤0.10Dto 0.15D.

    The shear parameter of the shear layer (G) can be calculated from the following equations [35,52]:

    whereEsis Young’s modulus of soil,B is the width of the beam cross-section,γ describes the rate at which the vertical displacement in the ground reduces with depth,and νsis the Poisson’s ratio of soil.The range of γ is generally varied from 1.0 to 2.0 m-1[35,52].In the present study an average value of γ i.e.,1.5 m-1is taken.

    The end boundary conditions of the beam may differ from free to fixed.Thus,as a logical approximation,intermediate boundary condition,i.e.,simply supported beam,is considered for both the beams [53]Hence,the existing boundary conditions are

    However,in the present analysis pipe length is taken sufficient such that the end boundary effects on peak pipe response is negligible.Fig.2 depicts the distribution of blast pressure with time.In the present study,the negative phase of blast pressure is neglected due to very less magnitude of negative pressure compared to positive one.The change of blast pressure with time can be expressed by an exponential decay function [54,55]as follows:

    Fig.2.Distribution of blast pressure with time.

    wherePsis the peak overpressure,Tsis the total time in positive phase for blast pressure distribution,andbis the decay coefficient which will take care the geometric damping while travelling the blast waves from source to point of interest.The decay parameter(b) can be estimated [56]using the following expression

    whereZis the scaled distance and can be expressed as

    soil type and can be attained from Bulson [57].The values ofkparameter for some soil types are listed in Table 1.From Table 1,it is noted that if the soil is saturated the value ofkis substantially increased and hence corresponding blast load will also increase.Eqs.(11) and (12) are in the Imperial unit’s system.

    Table 1 k parameter for different soil conditions [57].

    The blast forcef(x,t)of Eq.(10)can further be expressed in the following shortened form

    3.Governing coupled differential equations and closed-form solutions

    The governing differential equations of top and bottom beam as shown in Fig.1 can be stated as

    where,ris the distance from the center of the TNT charge to the point of interest on beam in meters (m),andwis the mass of the TNT charge in kilograms(kg).

    The blast force per unit length of the beam acting at a point(x=x1) as shown in Fig.1 can be stated as

    whereBis the width of the top beam,which is considered as outside diameter (B=D) of the buried pipe(bottom beam).

    Further,peak overpressure (Ps) and duration of positive phase(Ts) can be estimated [57]from the following expressions:

    wherefdepends on burial depth that can be achieved from the graph given by Bulson[57],thekparameter changes with changing whereD1=E1I1;D2=E2I2;m1andm2are the mass per unit length of the top and bottom beam respectively;y1andy2are the deflections of top and bottom beam respectively.The finite Sine-Fourier transform is employed in the present analysis to solve the prior mentioned coupled partial differential equations (Eqs.(14)and (15)).The finite Sine-Fourier transform is chosen as displacement at both the ends of the beam are known(Dirichlet boundary condition).The finite Sine-Fourier transform for space co-ordinatex(0 ≤x≤L)and its inverse can be expressed as follows:

    wheren=1,2,3,…….

    Applying finite Sine-Fourier transform for both sides of Eqs.(14)and (15) we get

    the solution of Eq.(22) in modal form can be written as

    where φnis the generalized eigenvector and qn(t)is the generalized coordinate vector.Now,substituting the value ofYn(t)from Eq.(28)into Eq.(22)and pre-multiplying by φTnon both sides of Eq.(22),the following expression is obtained.

    now,Eq.(30) can further be reduced to

    The complete solution of Eq.(34)is nothing but the sum of the complementary function (C·F) and particular integral (P·I) of Eq.(34).So,

    it is assumed that beams are originally at rest condition.Hence for zero initial conditions

    with zero initial conditions,the complementary part of Eq.(37)becomes zero.So,Eq.(37) further reduced to

    the particular solution is obtained by adapting Duhamel integral[58].

    Now,from Eqs.(28) and (41)

    where,the expressions off(m,n)are listed in the appendix section(Eqs.(A1)-(A7)).Now,the deflection of both the top and bottom beam can be obtained using Eqs.(18),(19)and(43).Fig.3 depicted the step-by-step procedure of the present analysis.

    Fig.3.Flowchart of the proposed methodology.

    4.Validation of proposed method

    The present formulation is authenticated with the outcomes procured from earlier studies [45,49,50].The validation with Nourzadeh et al.[45]confirms the correctness of blast load simulation and the applicability of the proposed mathematical model considering single beam system subjected to blast load.The validation with Hetenyi’s solution[49],and Maheshwari et al.[50]further confirms the applicability of proposed solution for double beam system.

    Nourzadeh et al.[45]examined the response of buried pipeline to subsurface explosion through a simplified analytical study.The pipe was assumed as beam and soil as Winkler foundation.The study did not incorporate the influence of damping and shear layer for shear interaction between springs.For comparison study,pipe size ‘II’ and soil type ‘D’ are adopted in the present analysis.The detailed parameters about prior mentioned pipe size and soil type are reported by Nourzadeh et al.[45].In the present study,instead of a double-beam,the single beam resting on single parameters Winkler foundation concept is used to simulate the formulation proposed by Nourzadeh et al.[45].The governing differential equation is solved by the finite Sine Fourier transform method.Pipe strains are recorded as an output of the formulation.Under given conditions,the pipe strain of steel pipe,PVC pipe,and PE pipe obtained from Nourzadeh et al.[45]and the present study are 0.01%,0.03%,and 0.30% respectively,and 0.0128%,0.0261%,and 0.3097% respectively.This relative study approves the rationality of the proposed solution.

    Further,Maheshwari et al.[50]proposed a closed-form analytical solution for beam on reinforced granular bed subjected to a concentrated load based on the concept of double-beam system.Both the top foundation and bottom reinforced layer were idealized as beams and the soil was idealized as Winkler springs.However,the solution did not consider the shear interaction between individual springs.Maheshwari et al.[50]validated their analytical formulation with Hetenyi’s solution[49].For the present validation purpose,finite Sine-Fourier transform is employed to solve the governing differential equations of the double-beam system as proposed by Hetenyi[49]and later on adopted by Maheshwari et al.[50].The relative flexural rigidity of beam (D1/D2) and relative stiffness of soil(K1/K2)are 10 and 5 respectively.Where K1and K2are the soil spring stiffness of the top and bottom layer respectively.The results obtained from the present approach and past studies[49,50]are depicted in Fig.4.Results are plotted in normalised form as mentioned by Maheshwari et al.[50].The expressions for normalised distance (Xn) and normalised deflections of the top and bottom beams (i.e.,andrespectively)are as follows:

    Fig.4.Comparison of displacement of top and bottom beams.

    where,Qtis the load applied on the top beam.are the characteristic lengths of the top and bottom beams respectively.

    From Fig.4,it is perceived that the results obtained from the present formulation are identical with the past studies.Hence,this validation further confirms the sanctity of the proposed mathematical model.

    5.Parametric study

    In the subsequent sections,a parametric study is carried out to investigate the response of buried pipe with and without barrier subjected to subsurface explosion by varying TNT charge weight(w),the pipe material,damping ratio(ξ)and TNT offset.The impact of relative barrier-pipe flexural rigidity on pipe response is also studied.The required parameters to perform the parametric study are shown in Table 2.

    Table 2 Soil-pipe-barrier-blast parameters to perform the parametric study.

    5.1. Influence of TNT charge weight

    To understand the influence of charge weight (w) on pipe response,the range ofwis taken from 5 to 30 kg,and other parameters are kept constant as listed in Table 2.The maximum deflection of both double-beam system (pipe with barrier) and single beam system(pipe without barrier)and corresponding peak pipe bending strains are recorded and are shown in Fig.5.

    Fig.5.Influence of TNT charge weight on (a) maximum pipe deflection and (b)maximum pipe bending strain.

    From Fig.5(a),it is seen that the peak displacements for both the cases are increases with increasing charge weight(w).For instance,in the case of double-beam system,the maximum displacement of the pipe (y2-max) is increased from 12.08 to 57.31 mm with increasingwfrom 5 to 30 kg.Similarly,in the case of a single beam system,the maximum displacement of the pipe (yp-max) is raised from 20.25 to 93.15 mm with increasingwfrom 5 to 30 kg.Further,it is perceived that the response of pipe is drastically reduced for pipe with barrier system compared to pipe subjected to explosions without any barrier.For instance,forw=30 kg the maximum displacement of pipe is reduced from 93.15 to 57.31 mm due to the present barrier system.Similar observation is found in case of peak pipe bending strain as well (Fig.5(b)).

    5.2. Influence of pipe material

    In this section,four different types of pipe materials namely X-65 grade of steel,Concrete,polyvinyl chloride (PVC),and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe are considered to examine the impact of pipe materials on peak pipe response.The results are listed in Table 3 in terms of maximum displacement.

    Table 3 Maximum pipe deflection for different pipe material.

    From Table 3,maximum pipe response is observed for HDPE pipe (maximum pipe deflection of 114.64 mm and 272.63 mm for with and without barrier respectively).Whereas,minimum pipe response is calculated for X-65 steel (maximum pipe deflection of 57.31 mm and 93.15 mm for with and without barrier respectively).This is due to the change of bending stiffness with changing the pipe materials.

    5.3. Influence of damping ratio

    Fig.6 shows the effect of damping ratio(ξ)on pipe response.The extent of damping ratio (ξ) is chosen from 5% to 25% with an increment of 5%.

    Fig.6.Influence of damping ratio on maximum pipe deflection.

    From Fig.6,it is apprehended that the maximum pipe deflections are reduces for both the pipe with and without barrier with increasing the value of damping ratio as expected.For instance,in the case of a double-beam system,the maximum displacement of the pipe(y2-max)is reduced from 57.31-45.35 mm with increasing ξ from 5%-25%.Similarly,in the case of single beam system,the maximum displacement of the pipe(yp-max)is reduced from 93.15-75.34 mm with increasing ξ from 5%-25%.

    5.4. Influence of TNT offset

    TNT offset presents the distance from the source of explosion to the top of the barrier layer (top beam).In the present study,four different offsets such as 5 m,7 m,9 m and 12 m are considered.

    From Fig.7,it is shown that peak pipe response(deflection and bending strain) reduces with increasing the explosive offset.With increasing the TNT offset,blast source is moving away from the pipeline,hence peak overpressure is getting reduces while blast waves passing through the soil media.For example,peak pipe displacement is reduced from 57.31 to 5.28 mm and from 93.15 to 9.49 mm for pipe with and without barrier respectively with increasing TNT offset from 5 to 12 m.

    Fig.7.Influence of TNT offset on(a)maximum pipe deflection and(b)maximum pipe bending strain.

    5.5. Influence of relative barrier-pipe flexural rigidity

    In order to obtain the impact of flexibility of barrier system on pipe response,the ratio of barrier to pipe flexural rigidity(D1/D2)is varied from 0.001 to 1000 i.e.,from very flexible barrier to extremely rigid barrier system with respect to pipe.The recorded peak pipe deflection and peak pipe bending strain are normalised with the corresponding maximum values recorded atD1/D2equal to 0.001 and are shown in Fig.8.From Fig.8 it is found that normalised peak pipe deflection and corresponding bending strain reduces with increasing the rigidity of the barrier layer.

    6.Identification of influential soil and pipe input parameters

    In this section a range of soil and pipe parameters are chosen as input by keeping all other parameters constant to obtain the influential parameters.The lower and upper limits of the input parameters are listed in Table 4.

    Table 4 Modeling parameters and their lower and upper limits for the central composite design (CCD).

    The central composite design(CCD)methodology is adopted to obtain the optimum number of combinations of seven input parameters.CCD is one type of response surface design and it has the capability of full quadratic model.CCD analysis suggested total 152 combination of seven input parameters.Hence,the response in terms of peak pipe displacement (for with barrier system) are recorded using Matlab corresponding to 152 combination of input parameters.The data are further analysed using statistical program Minitab to get the most influential input parameters.The confidence level is chosen as 95% for the statistical analysis.Statistical results are plotted in terms of Pareto chart and Normal plot of the standardized effects as shown in Figs.9(a) and 9(b) respectively.Fig.9(a)depicts the absolute values of the standardized effects from the maximum effect to the minimum effect.The reference line in the Pareto chart is based on the significance level (α).Significance level can be calculated by deducting confidence level from the unity.The parameters that cross the reference line (1.98 in the present Fig.9(a))are statistically significant.Hence,from Fig.9(a)it is understood that most significant parameter is the bar that represent term‘A’that is nothing but the soil spring stiffness(K).Further,it is noted that parameters A,E,D,B,and G(i.e.,K,E2,D,G and t) are statistically significant.C and F (i.e.,L and ρ) are not significant parameters.Pareto chart is not able to determine whether the change in the value of input parameters increase or decrease the response.However,Normal plot is able to depicts both the magnitude and direction of the effects as shown in Fig.9(b).The parameters those are further from zero on the X-axis are statistically significant.The positive effect indicates that the response increases with increasing the value of the parameter and negative effect indicates that the response decreases with increasing the value of the input parameters.Fig.9(b)it is noticed that parameter D i.e.,pipe diameter(D)has the positive standardized effect and the parameters G,B,E,and A (i.e.,t,G,E2,and K) have negative standardized effects.Hence,peak pipe displacement increases with increasing the value of pipe diameter (D) and peak pipe displacement decreases with increasing the values of pipe wall thickness(t),shear parameter (G),Young’s modulus of pipe (E2),and soil spring stiffness (K).

    Fig.9.(a) Pareto chart and(b)Normal plot of the standardized effects for seven input parameters.

    7.Summary and conclusions

    The present work examined the dynamic response of a doublebeam system subjected to blast loadings to simulate the behaviour of buried pipeline with barrier system under subsurface explosion.Both the buried pipe and the barrier are idealized as Euler Bernoulli’s beams and surrounding soil is idealized as viscoelastic foundation along with shear interaction between isolated Winkler springs.The proposed solution is authenticated with the results procured from previous studies [45,49,50].Further,a parametric study is carried out to inspect the impact of TNT charge weight(w),pipe material,damping ratio (ξ) and TNT offset on the response of buried pipe in terms of peak pipe displacement considering both with and without barrier system.A statistical analysis is also executed to obtain the most influential soil and pipe input parameters.The present analysis involved less input parameters compared to the FEM based three-dimensional numerical analysis,and due to simplified assumptions in the current analytical solution,the present study is less time consuming compared to detailed continuum based analysis.Hence,in the initial design phase,the proposed formulation can be implemented to get quick results with moderate accuracy without performing complex numerical study or expensive experimental work.Following are the salient points based on the present study.

    · The present closed-form analytical study can be utilized to acquire the response of buried pipe with and without barrier system under subsurface detonation.Hence,the proposed formulation can be used as an alternative to costly experimental or numerical study.

    · The barrier system substantially reduces the displacement of buried pipes subjected to underground explosions.Hence,a suitable barrier system can be provided to protect important underground pipeline networks from blast loadings.

    · Pipe deflection magnifies with increasing the weight of the TNT.

    · Pipe deformation varies with changing the pipe material due to the change in pipe bending stiffness with changing pipe material.

    · Pipe deflection decreases with increasing the damping ratio as expected.

    · Pipe deformation reduces with increasing TNT offset.

    · Pipe stability increases with increasing the rigidity of the barrier layer.

    · From statistical study,it is observed that among seven input parametersK,E2,D,Gandtare statistically significant.However,Land ρ are not significant parameters.

    The future scope of the present study is to incorporate plasticity and non-linearity of soil and pipe material.

    Funding

    This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,commercial,or not-for-profit sectors.

    Author contributions

    Conceptualization,methodology,validation,writing-original draft preparation,by C·H·C;supervision,writing-review,and editing by D.C.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Appendix

    The expressions off(m,n) of Eq.(43) are given as follows:

    亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| a在线观看视频网站| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产麻豆69| 身体一侧抽搐| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 精品一区二区三卡| av天堂久久9| 久久中文字幕一级| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 人妻一区二区av| 美国免费a级毛片| bbb黄色大片| 午夜福利,免费看| 精品国产国语对白av| 91国产中文字幕| 国产淫语在线视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产男女内射视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 精品久久久久久,| 成人精品一区二区免费| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 悠悠久久av| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产片内射在线| 久久久久国内视频| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 美女福利国产在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久久精品区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 黄片播放在线免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 成人影院久久| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| av网站在线播放免费| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产麻豆69| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 两个人看的免费小视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 手机成人av网站| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久久久国内视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 9色porny在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| aaaaa片日本免费| 电影成人av| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产精品二区激情视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久久精品区二区三区| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久国产精品影院| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 一本大道久久a久久精品| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 手机成人av网站| 免费观看精品视频网站| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 9热在线视频观看99| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 美女福利国产在线| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品.久久久| ponron亚洲| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 高清在线国产一区| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产精品二区激情视频| 黄色女人牲交| tube8黄色片| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 自线自在国产av| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| av天堂久久9| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 多毛熟女@视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 日本a在线网址| 国产精品影院久久| 手机成人av网站| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲午夜理论影院| 日本wwww免费看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 成年版毛片免费区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产成人精品无人区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲精品一二三| 精品视频人人做人人爽| tube8黄色片| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 一区在线观看完整版| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 99热只有精品国产| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 美国免费a级毛片| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲国产看品久久| 精品电影一区二区在线| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 69av精品久久久久久| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 久久狼人影院| 天天影视国产精品| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 精品国产国语对白av| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| cao死你这个sao货| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 黄色 视频免费看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 国产xxxxx性猛交| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品影院久久| 婷婷成人精品国产| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 99久久人妻综合| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 精品第一国产精品| 日日夜夜操网爽| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 丰满的人妻完整版| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲第一av免费看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产区一区二久久| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 宅男免费午夜| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产单亲对白刺激| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 中文欧美无线码| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 成人精品一区二区免费| av免费在线观看网站| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 国产av又大| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产又爽黄色视频| 成年动漫av网址| 久久狼人影院| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 窝窝影院91人妻| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| a级毛片在线看网站| 很黄的视频免费| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲九九香蕉| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产单亲对白刺激| www.精华液| 香蕉久久夜色| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 在线观看66精品国产| 美女午夜性视频免费| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 日日夜夜操网爽| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 午夜福利欧美成人| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 青草久久国产| www.精华液| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 色综合婷婷激情| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 成人18禁在线播放| 日韩免费av在线播放| 一夜夜www| 精品第一国产精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久亚洲真实| av国产精品久久久久影院| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 免费不卡黄色视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 大香蕉久久网| 国产片内射在线| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产精品九九99| 久久草成人影院| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲综合色网址| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 1024香蕉在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 国产在线观看jvid| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 黄色女人牲交| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| av一本久久久久| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 在线国产一区二区在线| 深夜精品福利| av一本久久久久| 美女午夜性视频免费| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产色视频综合| 欧美日韩精品网址| 黄频高清免费视频| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 精品久久久久久,| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 自线自在国产av| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 午夜免费观看网址| 热99re8久久精品国产| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 看免费av毛片| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 身体一侧抽搐| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 成年版毛片免费区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 69av精品久久久久久| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 99香蕉大伊视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 超碰97精品在线观看| 一夜夜www| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲全国av大片| www.999成人在线观看| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 老熟女久久久| 午夜老司机福利片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 飞空精品影院首页| 亚洲精品自拍成人| av电影中文网址| av有码第一页| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 国产精品av久久久久免费| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 999精品在线视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久久久国内视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看|