• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and metaanalysis

    2023-12-02 08:24:36NitishSoodAnishSangariArnavGoyalChristinaSunMadisonHorinekJosephAndyHaugerLanePerry
    World Journal of Cardiology 2023年10期

    Nitish Sood,Anish Sangari,Arnav Goyal,Christina Sun,Madison Horinek,Joseph Andy Hauger,Lane Perry

    Abstract BACKGROUND Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in America and has increased in the incidence of cases over the last several years.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) increases survival outcomes in cases of cardiac arrest;however,healthcare workers often do not perform CPR within recommended guidelines.Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices improve the quality of CPR performed.This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effect of RTAVFassisted CPR with conventional CPR and to evaluate whether the use of these devices improved outcomes in both in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-ofhospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.AIM To identify the effect of RTAVF-assisted CPR on patient outcomes and CPR quality with in-and OHCA.METHODS We searched PubMed,SCOPUS,the Cochrane Library,and EMBASE from inception to July 27,2020,for studies comparing patient outcomes and/or CPR quality metrics between RTAVF-assisted CPR and conventional CPR in cases of IHCA or OHCA.The primary outcomes of interest were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge (SHD),with secondary outcomes of chest compression rate and chest compression depth.The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane Collaboration’s “risk of bias” tool.Data was analyzed using R statistical software 4.2.0.results were statistically significant if P <0.05.RESULTS Thirteen studies (n=17600) were included.Patients were on average 69 ± 17.5 years old,with 7022 (39.8%) female patients.Overall pooled ROSC in patients in this study was 37% (95% confidence interval=23%-54%).RTAVFassisted CPR significantly improved ROSC,both overall [risk ratio (RR) 1.17 (1.001-1.362);P=0.048] and in cases of IHCA [RR 1.36 (1.06-1.80);P=0.002].There was no significant improvement in ROSC for OHCA (RR 1.04;0.91-1.19;P=0.47).No significant effect was seen in SHD [RR 1.04 (0.91-1.19);P=0.47] or chest compression rate[standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.1;(-4.6-0.5)];P=0.09].A significant improvement was seen in chest compression depth [SMD 1.6;(0.02-3.1);P=0.047].CONCLUSION RTAVF-assisted CPR increases ROSC in cases of IHCA and chest compression depth but has no significant effect on ROSC in cases of OHCA,SHD,or chest compression rate.

    Key Words: Real-time audiovisual feedback;Cardiopulmonary resuscitation;Cardiac arrest;Return of spontaneous circulation;Survival to hospital discharge;Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality

    INTRODUCTION

    Nearly 356000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases and 292200 in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) cases occur annually in the United States,making cardiac arrest one of the leading causes of natural death in America[1-3].In addition,the incidence of cardiac arrest cases has increased over the last twenty years,but little progress has been made in improving survival to hospital discharge (SHD) and functional status including neurological and cardiovascular outcomes[2,4].Consequently,cardiac arrest places a significant burden on public health and society and remains important to research and manage effectively[5,6].

    High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases survival outcomes in cases of cardiac arrest[7-14].The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation guidelines specifically emphasize the quality of manual chest compression,including proper hand position,hands off time,compression rate,and compression depth[15].However,the quality of CPR performed by healthcare workers (HCWs) often does not meet recommended guidelines,with the average rate of chest compressions and compression depth being lower than recommended[16-25].

    Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices have enabled improvement in consistency and quality of CPR both inside and outside the hospital[26,27].The American Heart Association (AHA) and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation have recommended the use of RTAVF devices for CPR training[28-30].Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the effect of RTAVF devices during cardiac arrest cases concluded that RTAVF-assisted CPR resulted in closer adherence to CPR guidelines but not improved patient outcomes[31,32].However,these studies focused on simulation manikin studies,including only three human trials.This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effect of RTAVF-assisted CPR with conventional CPR and to evaluate whether the use of these devices improved outcomes in both in-hospital and OHCA patients.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Search Strategy

    Database searches were performed by two independent authors in PubMed,SCOPUS,the Cochrane Library,and EMBASE with individualized search strategies developed for each database (Supplementary Table 1).The search included all studies from the establishment of the database to July 27,2020 without language,methodology,or document filters.References cited in relevant reviews and included studies were also examined.The current systematic review and meta-analysis was constructed in accordance with the PRISMA 2009 guidelines.

    Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

    Study Eligibility

    Studies were included if HCWs were performing CPR using RTAVF devices,where HCWs were defined as anyone with medical training including physicians,nurses,paramedics,emergency medical services,physician assistants,and medical residents.Studies must compare RTAVF-assisted CPR with CPR performed without any device or disabled audiovisual feedback features on cardiac arrest patients,and complete data must be available with a minimum of two metrics reported with measures of central tendency and variability.Language was restricted to English.Simulation studies,animal studies,case reports,conference abstracts,reviews,trial protocols,and studies with incomplete or missing data were excluded.

    Review Process and Data Collection

    Abstracts of studies were reviewed for relevance by two independent authors.Abstracts with common agreement between reviewers were identified for further review of the full manuscript.Disagreements regarding the inclusion or exclusion of any studies were independently resolved by a third author.Data was extracted from articles selected for inclusion in the present study.Primary outcomes of interest were patient outcomes: return of spontaneous circulation(ROSC) and SHD.Secondary outcomes of interest were CPR quality metrics: chest compression rate and chest compression depth.Mean values and standard deviations were extracted from studies.Methodological quality was reviewed utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale for cohort studies and using the Cochrane Collaboration’s “risk of bias” tool for randomized controlled trials (RCT)[33,34].Methodological quality was assessed by two independent authors with disagreements resolved by a third author.

    Statistical Analysis

    Data was analyzed using R statistical software 4.2.0.Random-effects models were used[35,36].When values were presented as interquartile range or range or median,they were converted into mean and standard deviation for analysis using the methodology presented in Wanetal[37] 2014.Pooled risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD)was calculated for binary and continuous metrics respectively[38-40].Heterogeneity was assessed usingI2[41,42].Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s tests.Results were statistically significant ifP<0.05.

    RESULTS

    Study Selection

    A PRISMA flow diagram is shown in Figure 1.The systematic search of articles identified 9422 results.102 full-text articles were identified as potentially relevant after title and abstract screening.Thirteen studies were included after fulltext review (Figure 1)[8,26,27,43-52].Thirteen studies reported data on ROSC and ten reported data on SHD.Important characteristics for each study are summarized in Table 1.

    Figure 1 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses flow diagram of included and excluded articles.

    Study Characteristics

    A total number of 17600 participants from 13 studies were included for analysis.Patients were on average 69 ± 17.5 years old,with 7022 (39.8%) female patients.All studies were published between the years 2006 and 2020.Six studied the influence of RTAVF devices in OHCA,while six studied their influence in IHCA.One examined both OHCA and IHCA(Table 1)[44].All studies examined adult populations,with Parketal[49] 2018 examining patients greater than 15 years old.

    Risk of Bias

    Risk of bias was assessed in all 13 studies.Of the studies included,four were RCTs[45,46,51,52].Using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool,the risk of bias was assessed to be low risk in three RCTs and medium risk in one RCT (Supplementary Table 2).Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale,the risk of bias was assessed to be low in eight studies and medium in one study(Supplementary Table 3).Egger’s test found no evidence of publication bias in any outcomes of interest (Supplementary Figure 1).

    Outcomes

    Pooled ROSC was 37% (95% confidence interval (CI)=23%-54%) (Supplementary Figure 2A).Parketal[49] 2018 was identified as a potential outlier using leave-one-out sensitivity analysis with the lowest survival rate of 9%.Visual inspection of the associated funnel plot found no clear asymmetry (Supplementary Figure 2B).

    Figure 2 Forest plot of return to spontaneous circulation. ROSC: Return of spontaneous circulation.

    ROSC

    Thirteen trials reported ROSC as an outcome of interest (n=17600).ROSC occurred in 1693 patients (21.0%) in the RTAVF-assisted CPR group and 1602 patients (16.8%) in the conventional CPR group.All studies included data on ROSC in both the RTAVF-assisted CPR group and the conventional CPR group.Using a random-effects model,patients in the RTAVF group were significantly more likely to achieve ROSC than the conventional CPR group (RR 1.17;95%CI=1.001-1.362;P=0.048) (Figure 2).

    Subgroup analysis revealed that the location of cardiac arrest was significantly correlated with patient outcomes (Pvalue for interaction=0.02) (Supplementary Figure 3).ROSC in the setting of IHCA was significantly improved in the RTAVF group (RR 1.36;1.06-1.80;P=0.002).However,ROSC in the setting of OHCA was not significantly different between the two groups (RR 1.04;0.91-1.19;P=0.47).

    Figure 3 Forest plot of survival to hospital discharge. SHD: Survival to hospital discharge.

    Potential causes of heterogeneity in ROSC were explored,with subgroup analysis on study type comparing RCTs with non-RCTs,and region comparing studies within Europe,Middle East/Asia,and North America (Supplementary Figure 4).Heterogeneity remained significant within at least one subgroup in both analyses.

    SHD

    Ten trials reported SHD as an outcome of interest (n=16684).SHD was reported in 994 patients (13.1%) in the RTAVFassisted CPR group and in 1028 patients (11.2%) in the conventional CPR group.No significant difference was found in SHD between the two groups (RR 1.23;0.94-1.60;P=0.12) (Figure 3).Subgroup analysis found no significant correlation between SHD and the location of cardiac arrest (Pvalue for interaction=0.26) (Supplementary Figure 5).

    Secondary Outcomes

    Eight studies reported compression rate as an outcome of interest (n=2804).The average compression rate was 107.3 ±9.4 in the RTAVF-assisted CPR group and 117.5 ± 13.8 in the conventional CPR group,with a nationally recommended rate of 100-120 compressions per minute[53].A non-significant difference was seen between the two,with patients in the intervention group receiving a lower compression rate [SMD -2.1;(-4.6-0.5);P=0.09] (Supplementary Figure 6).While both groups had an average compression rate within the nationally recommended guidelines,the proportion of compressions that fell between 100-120 compressions per minute was likely higher in the intervention group than in the control group (Supplementary Figure 6).Eight studies reported compression depth as an outcome of interest (n=2625).The average compression depth was 4.59 cm ± 0.91 cm in the intervention group and 4.24 cm ± 1.29 cm in the control group,with a nationally recommended compression depth of 5-6 cm in the average adult[53].Neither group had an average compression depth that met AHA guidelines.However,a significant difference was seen between the two groups,with patients in the intervention group receiving a higher compression depth,closer to AHA guidelines [SMD 1.6(0.02-3.1);P=0.047] (Supplementary Figure 7).

    DISCUSSION

    This manuscript analyzed the most recent evidence with regards to the efficacy of real-time audiovisual feedback devices in improving CPR quality and patient outcomes.A total of 13 studies (n=17600) were included,making it the largest study of this topic to date.

    Currently,patient outcomes after cardiac arrest remain poor.This meta-analysis found an average ROSC of 37%,which is consistent with previous literature findings ranging between 13% and 72%[54-59].

    The AHA mandated that beginning January 2019,all AHA courses that teach adult CPR will be required to use a realtime audiovisual feedback device.These devices typically measure one or more of the following CPR metrics: Chest compression rate,depth,hand position,recoil,ventilation volume,ventilation rate,and hands-off time.Multiple types of feedback devices exist,including manikins with integrated sensors,devices that can be added to existing manikins,and hand-held devices that can be easily transferred from patient to patient[60].As this meta-analysis examined the effect of using RTAVF devices during CPR on patient outcomes,the only type of RTAVF devices that were analyzed were handheld devices that can be used during CPR on patients,rather than manikin-based RTAVF devices.

    Thirteen studies with a total of 17600 patients were analyzed.These studies were a mixture of 4 RCT,2 non-RCT,4 cohort studies,2 before-after studies,and 1 matched pair registry study.Studies took place across the globe with only 5 in the United States.These studies were both clinically and statistically heterogenous,with varying protocols and outcomes.Despite this heterogeneity,all studies did examine the primary outcome of ROSC with ten of thirteen also examining SHD.

    Contrary to prior literature reviews,this analysis found that the use of real-time audiovisual feedback devices did significantly improve ROSC in cases of IHCA.This may be because prior meta-analyses included only three human intervention studies,while this meta-analysis had a larger number of studies and patients[31,32].In addition,Kirkbrightetal[32] 2013,Gugelmin-Almeidaetal[31] 2021,and Lvetal[61] 2022 included only 1,2,and 5 studies focusing on IHCA,respectively.This meta-analysis found that the location of cardiac arrest played a significant role in whether RTAVF devices influenced ROSC,with a significant increase in ROSC seen in cases of IHCA and no such increase seen in cases of OHCA.This could be another reason why prior reviews found no significant impact of RTAVF devices on ROSC.In particular,Lvetal[61] 2022 found that RTAVF-assisted CPR did not improve ROSC across all studies,but did not differentiate between ROSC outcomes in IHCA and OHCA settings.These findings suggest that hospitals should prioritize the rollout and adoption of RTAVF devices in areas most likely to see IHCA,such as intensive care units,telemetry units,and EDs,rather than with paramedics or ambulances[62,63].This difference in survival may be due to the inherent rushed nature of CPR for patients suffering OHCA.Unlike cases of IHCA where a dedicated HCW can focus exclusively on performing high quality CPR,in cases of OHCA,paramedics may be obligated to multi-task,performing CPR while also keeping track of the other required tasks to bring the patient into the hospital safely.As such,the quality of CPR may be reduced in cases of OHCAvsIHCA.Another explanation could be tied to the fact that the time-to-CPR from arrest is lower in cases of IHCAvsOHCA,and as such CPR quality may play a more important role in IHCA than in OHCA[64,65].

    Despite the increase in ROSC when using RTAVF devices,no similar increase was seen in SHD.This insignificance may relate to how CPR quality plays little role in the improvement of survival after ROSC.It could also be due to the presence of comorbidities including heart failure,sepsis,and myocardial infarction and that effective CPR is one factor among many steps required for improved survival.Without additional improvements in other steps required in the care of post-cardiac arrest patients,the increase in CPR quality may be insufficient to translate into improved SHD.

    Repeated studies in the literature have shown that CPR quality when performed on manikins improves when using a RTAVF device[31,32].Consistent with existing literature,this meta-analysis also found that CPR quality was increased in RTAVF-assisted CPR.The average compression rate in both groups fell within AHA guidelines,while the average compression depth in both groups fell outside of AHA guidelines[53].However,for both compression rate and depth,the RTAVF group was more likely to have a higher proportion of compressions falling within guidelines compared to the conventional CPR group,showing that RTAVF-assisted CPR was superior to conventional CPR.Prior studies have shown the importance of proper compression depth in patient outcomes[10,16,66].In CPR training courses being taught with RTAVF devices,a larger focus should be put on achieving adequate compression depth.

    Overall,the evidence suggests that RTAVF-assisted CPR is of superior quality than conventional CPR.In addition,RTAVF-assisted CPR has a small benefit in patient outcomes,specifically improving ROSC in cases of IHCA.However,this meta-analysis has multiple limitations.First,the studies examined were both statistically and clinically heterogeneous,with varying study parameters,outcomes,and designs,limiting the internal validity of the meta-analysis.This was partially accounted for using a random-effects model and by subgroup analysis,but not all heterogeneity could be accounted for.This may partially be due to the limitations ofI2as a metric for heterogeneity.This study contained relatively larger studies than most examining this topic,and prior literature has documented that as sampling error decreases,I2tends to increase,which can erroneously lead to assumptions that clinical heterogeneity has also increased.In addition,as this meta-analysis examined the class of all RTAVF devices used in CPR,some degree of clinical heterogeneity is expected,as the expected effects of individual devices can vary.Second,nine of these thirteen studies were not RCT,which can introduce sources of both confounding and selection bias.However,ROSC outcomes of cardiac arrest patients are dependent upon many non-controllable factors that cannot undergo randomization including time from arrest to CPR initiation and presence of shockable rhythm which may limit the advantage an RCT would have over other nonrandomized studies designs.Third,this meta-analysis only examined RTAVF devices that could be used during CPR on patients rather than RTAVF devices that are built into manikins.As such,these results cannot be extrapolated to that class of RTAVF devices.Fourth,this meta-analysis only reviewed publications in the literature until 2020,precluding studies published thereafter from inclusion in this analysis.Fifth,this meta-analysis was limited by the evidence that could be extracted from prior reports in the literature,and evidence on long-term patient outcomes and neurological function from RTAVF-assisted CPR is lacking.Future research should examine such cohorts and associated long-term outcomes.In addition,further research into why the improvements seen in ROSC with RTAVF-assisted CPR were not translated into improvements in SHD is warranted,along with research examining which RTAVF device provides the highest improvement in patient outcomes and CPR quality.

    CONCLUSION

    This meta-analysis examined 13 studies (n=17600) and found that RTAVF-assisted CPR resulted in a significantly increased rate of ROSC,specifically in cases of IHCA but did not improve SHD.This is a novel finding,with prior metaanalyses finding that the use of RTAVF devices did not significantly improve patient outcomes.Consistent with what has been found previously,the use of RTAVF devices resulted in improved CPR quality,as measured by compression rate and depth.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in America and continues to grow in prevalence.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases survival outcomes in cases of cardiac arrest;however,healthcare workers often do not perform CPR within recommended guidelines.Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices provide live feedback on CPR performance and subsequently improves the quality of CPR performed.

    Research motivation

    Effective CPR in cardiac arrest is critical to emergent management and stabilization.RTAVF-assisted CPR devices may improve performance,compliance with recommended guidelines,and survival,therefore,this systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to compare the effect of RTAVF-assisted CPR devices with conventional CPR on patient outcomes in the setting of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

    Research objectives

    To investigate the impact of RTAVF-assisted CPR on patient outcomes and CPR quality with respect to in-and OHCA.

    Research methods

    The literature search was conducted on PubMed,SCOPUS,the Cochrane Library,and EMBASE from inception to July 27,2020,for studies reporting patient outcomes and/or CPR quality metrics between an RTAVF-assisted CPR and conventional CPR in the setting of IHCA or OHCA.The primary outcomes of interest extracted and analyzed were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge (SHD).Data was analyzed using R statistical software 4.2.0.Resultswere statistically significant ifP<0.05.

    Research results

    Thirteen studies (n=17600) were included after deduplication,screening,and full-text analysis.Patients were on average 69 ± 17.5 years old,with 7022 (39.8%) female patients.Overall pooled ROSC was 37% among all studies.RTAVF-assisted CPR significantly improved ROSC in the case of IHCAs and improved chest compression depth.No significant improvements were seen in ROSC in cases of OHCA,SHD,or compression rate.

    Research conclusions

    This meta-analysis found that RTAVF-assisted CPR increases ROSC in the setting of IHCA but has no significant effect on ROSC in the setting of OHCA or SHD.Consistent with previous manikin simulation studies,the meta-analysis found that RTAVF-assisted CPR results in improvements in both chest compression rate and depth.

    Research perspectives

    Cardiac arrest remains a leading cause of mortality with increasing prevalence.The findings of this study suggest that RTAVF-assisted CPR may improve ROSC in the setting of IHCAs but not in the setting of OHCA.Hospitals should prioritize implementing RTAVF devices in areas with the highest rates of IHCA rather than to paramedics or ambulances.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Sood N,Sangari A,and Goyal A contributed equally to this work;Sood N and Sangari A designed the research study;Sood N,Sangari A,and Goyal A performed the research;Sood N performed the statistical analysis;Sood N,Sangari A,Goyal A,Sun C,Horinek M,Hauger JA,and Perry L analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript;Sood N,Sangari A,Goyal A,Sun C,Horinek M,Hauger JA,and Perry L reviewed the manuscript before submission;All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:The authors deny any conflict of interest.

    PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement:The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist,and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers.It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license,which permits others to distribute,remix,adapt,build upon this work non-commercially,and license their derivative works on different terms,provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Country/Territory of origin:United States

    ORCID number:Nitish Sood 0000-0003-1516-0691;Anish Sangari 0000-0002-4388-7620;Arnav Goyal 0000-0002-6346-7690;Christina Sun 0009-0001-4701-4683;Madison Horinek 0009-0008-1748-2831.

    S-Editor:Qu XL

    L-Editor:A

    P-Editor:Xu ZH

    97在线视频观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产成人精品一,二区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 精品一区在线观看国产| 一级片'在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 男女国产视频网站| 51国产日韩欧美| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日韩中字成人| 六月丁香七月| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 欧美+日韩+精品| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产高清三级在线| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 三级国产精品片| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 免费观看av网站的网址| 成人免费观看视频高清| 少妇的逼水好多| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| tube8黄色片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 日日啪夜夜爽| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 免费看光身美女| av免费观看日本| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久久久网色| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 熟女av电影| 日本与韩国留学比较| 搡老乐熟女国产| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 秋霞伦理黄片| 一区二区三区精品91| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 欧美+日韩+精品| 精品人妻视频免费看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 在线观看人妻少妇| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 午夜老司机福利剧场| videos熟女内射| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 禁无遮挡网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 99热网站在线观看| 久久精品夜色国产| 精品酒店卫生间| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久久久国产网址| .国产精品久久| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美3d第一页| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲av福利一区| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 一级片'在线观看视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 深夜a级毛片| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 午夜日本视频在线| 久久6这里有精品| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产极品天堂在线| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 中文欧美无线码| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲最大成人av| 国产一级毛片在线| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 婷婷色综合www| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 欧美区成人在线视频| freevideosex欧美| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美日本视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 色视频www国产| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 日韩视频在线欧美| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久久久久国产网址| 国产成人福利小说| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产 一区精品| 国产老妇女一区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 麻豆成人av视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产在视频线精品| 日本黄色片子视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 婷婷色综合www| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩成人伦理影院| 中文天堂在线官网| 777米奇影视久久| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 永久免费av网站大全| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产av国产精品国产| 免费大片18禁| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 只有这里有精品99| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 看黄色毛片网站| av网站免费在线观看视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 在线观看人妻少妇| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲国产av新网站| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 在线a可以看的网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| eeuss影院久久| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产av不卡久久| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美+日韩+精品| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 精品一区二区三卡| xxx大片免费视频| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 国产av不卡久久| av在线app专区| eeuss影院久久| a级毛色黄片| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 免费看不卡的av| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕制服av| 国产精品成人在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产av国产精品国产| 91狼人影院| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产91av在线免费观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| kizo精华| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲综合色惰| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 亚洲国产精品999| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 日本免费在线观看一区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲av.av天堂| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美97在线视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 丰满少妇做爰视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 成年av动漫网址| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久影院123| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 日本黄大片高清| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 欧美人与善性xxx| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 熟女电影av网| 国产av不卡久久| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 高清毛片免费看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 1000部很黄的大片| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 精品久久久噜噜| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 91狼人影院| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产av不卡久久| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 在线观看三级黄色| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 极品教师在线视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲综合精品二区| av天堂中文字幕网| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 一级毛片我不卡| 尾随美女入室| xxx大片免费视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| av国产精品久久久久影院| 尾随美女入室| av卡一久久| 亚洲国产精品999| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| av在线app专区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 色哟哟·www| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| av专区在线播放| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 草草在线视频免费看| 丝袜喷水一区| xxx大片免费视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 秋霞伦理黄片| 久久影院123| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲综合精品二区| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日日啪夜夜爽| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 99热这里只有是精品50| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 简卡轻食公司| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 岛国毛片在线播放| 免费观看性生交大片5| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产成人一区二区在线| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| www.av在线官网国产| 午夜福利视频精品| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 日韩成人伦理影院| 欧美成人a在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 三级国产精品片| 精品国产三级普通话版| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产av不卡久久| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产亚洲最大av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| av专区在线播放| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产一级毛片在线| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品一二三区在线看| av天堂中文字幕网| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久精品夜色国产| av.在线天堂| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 老司机影院毛片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| av黄色大香蕉| 永久免费av网站大全| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 色哟哟·www| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久热久热在线精品观看| 黄片wwwwww| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 特级一级黄色大片| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产永久视频网站| 久热久热在线精品观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 高清毛片免费看| av免费在线看不卡| 日韩电影二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 国产永久视频网站| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| av在线亚洲专区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 男人舔奶头视频| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 免费看a级黄色片| av线在线观看网站| 精品一区在线观看国产| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日本与韩国留学比较| 一级av片app| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 性色avwww在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产视频内射| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| av线在线观看网站| 在线观看三级黄色| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 免费大片18禁| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 在线免费十八禁| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产淫语在线视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 99热这里只有精品一区| 中国国产av一级| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线|