• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Research on the Formation Mechanism for the Co-agglomeration of Producer Services and Manufacturing in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

    2023-11-05 02:21:44JiaoPingHuangFeibinandLiSusu
    Contemporary Social Sciences 2023年5期

    Jiao Ping,Huang Feibin,and Li Susu

    Guangdong University of Finance &Economics

    Abstract: The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is witnessing a surge in economic development,showcasing robust resilience in the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing industries,along with the increasingly evident impact generated by such co-agglomeration.Based on the panel data collected from ten cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (excluding Zhaoqing)spanning from 2010 to 2020,we examined the formation mechanism for industrial co-agglomeration in the area from three dimensions: industrial correlation,spatial correlation,and policy guidance.Our analysis was based on a vertical correlation model and was validated using the seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR)method.The findings are as follows: (a) There currently exists no spatial correlation between the producer services and manufacturing sectors in the area,and the correlation between the two remains limited to the former providing specialized services to the latter.(b) Policy guidance has a positive impact on the location selection of industries within the area.By implementing a comprehensive range of favorable policies,local governments can provide effective and scientifically guided recommendations regarding the location of producer services and manufacturing sectors.Therefore,it is crucial to foster the collaboration between producer services and manufacturing sectors and further enhance the co-agglomeration between the two sectors.In addition,the government authorities should also strive to enhance its economic governance capacity,thereby facilitating the formation of such co-agglomeration.

    Keywords: Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area,producer services,manufacturing,co-agglomeration,policy guidance

    Currently,the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is witnessing a surge in economic development,showcasing robust resilience in the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors.In the early stages of reform and opening up,the cities in the Pearl River Delta region,by leveraging Hong Kong’s and Macao’s open business environment and convenient transportation conditions,gradually developed a novel economic cooperation model,which involves manufacturing and service sectors.The implementation of this model has facilitated enterprises based in the Pearl River Delta to expand their trade operations globally.However,the producer services sector in the Pearl River Delta relatively lags behind the progress of the manufacturing sector.As a result,these two sectors have yet to establish a robust synergy for complementary development.To transform the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area into a world-class manufacturing hub,it is imperative to actively foster co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors and enhance their spatial correlation so as to generate spillover effects and promote the optimization and upgrading of the manufacturing sector as well as regional economic growth.So,what is the mechanism underlying the formation of the coagglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors? What measures can the Greater Bay Area take to effectively promote such co-agglomeration in order to promote economic development? The response to the aforementioned questions holds immense practical significance for the Greater Bay Area in facilitating the transformation and upgrading of its manufacturing sector,as well as establishing a globally competitive modern services industry system.

    Ellison and Glaeser (1997,pp.889–927) first proposed the co-agglomeration theory,positing that industries characterized by input-output correlation tend to exhibit spatial agglomeration.This phenomenon represents a bidirectional dynamic coordination process between industry and space.Previous studies have primarily focused on the industrial level when examining industrial agglomeration.Some scholars found that the industrial correlation between producer services and manufacturing sectors can facilitate the co-agglomeration of these two sectors (Ke et al.,2014,pp.1829–1841;Ji &Duan,2014,pp.79–84).The producer services sector and the manufacturing sector often demonstrate a significant level of spatial proximity in industrial distribution.The proximity allows producer services enterprises to leverage the customer base of the manufacturing sector while also enabling manufacturing enterprises to access cost-effective services (Coffey &Bailly,1991,pp.95–117;Klaesson,2001,pp.375–394).

    However,with the advancement and refinement of the new economic geography theory,scholars are now able to extend their analysis beyond the industrial level and incorporate spatial factors within the theoretical framework.Chen Na and Gu Naihua(2013,pp.25–44) found a spatial co-agglomeration effect between producer services and manufacturing sectors,which can be primarily attributed to the availability of resources and services.Furthermore,such spatial co-agglomeration varies across different cities.Zhang Hu and Han Aihua (2019,pp.39–50) argued that the interaction and mutual influence between producer services and manufacturing sectors at the industrial level will undoubtedly lead to spatial co-agglomeration or co-location.Chen Guanghan and Ren Xiaoli (2021,pp.143–152) have concluded,based on the center-periphery theory,that the urban agglomeration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area demonstrates a distinctive industrial layout characterized by core cities prioritizing the development of producer services while peripheral regions focus on advancing manufacturing.These two sectors demonstrate a mutually beneficial interactive relationship aimed at achieving coordinated development.

    In recent years,some scholars have incorporated policy factors into the analytical framework of industrial co-agglomeration.According to Chen Xiaofeng (2017,pp.89–96),policy guidance is a key factor contributing to the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors.Xu Zhongrong (2022,pp.93–100) posited that the mechanism underlying the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors in metropolitan areas is evidenced through synergies across various dimensions,including policy,structure,space,and quality.Song Xiaoling and Li Jinye (2023,pp.56–65) argued that the policy environment can impose both constraints and incentives on the formation and development of industrial co-agglomeration.Additionally,it can establish a fair competition environment and a robust legal framework for such coagglomeration.

    The existing literature has provided valuable insights and references for this study.However,most studies primarily focus on industrial correlation and spatial correlation when examining the mechanism underlying industrial co-agglomeration.Some studies only explore the impact of policy factors on industrial co-agglomeration.Consequently,there is a lack of research that simultaneously considers all three dimensions of industry,space,and policy.The primary contribution of this paper lies in its comprehensive analysis of the formation mechanism of industrial co-agglomeration,which encompasses three dimensions: industrial relevance,spatial relevance,and policy guidance.Additionally,it employs a vertical correlation model for empirical testing,which significantly enriches the research content of the industrial co-agglomeration theory.

    Analysis of Formation Mechanism

    The present study investigates how industrial co-agglomeration between producer services and manufacturing sectors is formed,considering the three dimensions of industry,space,and policy simultaneously (see Figure 1).

    Figure 1 Roadmap for the formation mechanism of industrial co-agglomeration

    Industrial Correlation

    According to the industrial correlation theory,if one industry utilizes the output of another industry as its raw material,there exists a forward correlation between these two industries;Otherwise,there exists a backward correlation.Inessence,the manufacturing and producer services sectors are the products of the increasing specialization in the industrial division of labor.It is also a process wherein vertical integration of production transitions into vertical specialization.Consequently,there exists a robust upstream and downstream industrial correlation between these two sectors.This is primarily manifested in the fact that producer services contribute to cost reduction and efficiency enhancement in manufacturing,while manufacturing provides demand and material support for producer services (Feng &Liu,2005,pp.51–56).

    The producer services sector,which offers indispensable intermediate inputs to the manufacturing sector,has progressively integrated itself into the core production links of the manufacturing sector through its specialized expertise and cutting-edge technology.Its main service support for the manufacturing industry lies in cost reduction and efficiency improvement,thereby achieving industrial co-agglomeration.From the perspective of production costs,if the internal costs generated by a particular production process exceed the expenses associated with outsourcing,manufacturing enterprises will opt to outsource that process in order to reduce costs and improve efficiency.In terms of capital turnover costs,the producer services can provide an optimal financial service system to address financing challenges faced by the manufacturing sector,such as limited funding channels and slow financing speed.In terms of logistics costs,the producer services can effectively reduce the fixed costs associated with warehousing and transportation for manufacturing enterprises,thereby enhancing the transportation efficiency of products.

    The manufacturing sector generates demand and provides material support for producer services,thereby enhancing the efficiency of producer services to achieve industrial coagglomeration.The producer services sector needs to leverage specific carriers to realize the value of its own service products.The road transport sector,for instance,relies on dedicated trucks from the automobile manufacturing sector to provide freight services.These trucks serve as essential material support provided by the manufacturing sector to facilitate transportation.The manufacturing sector,in its pursuit of industrial transformation and upgrading as well as the enhancement of its competitive advantage,has set a higher standard for producer services.The producer services sector is consistently enhancing its expertise and expanding its scale to meet the growing specialization requirements of the manufacturing sector.This will undoubtedly result in an improvement in both service quality and production efficiency,thereby strengthening industrial co-agglomeration.

    Spatial Correlation

    The spatial layout of producer services and manufacturing sectors exhibits a tendency towards co-agglomeration based on the correlation between these two sectors.The agglomeration of industries within the manufacturing sector can generate significant market demand for the producer services sector.To cater to the diverse needs of numerous manufacturing enterprises,an increasing number of producer services enterprises will inevitably establish their presence in the agglomerative area,thereby giving rise to the phenomenon of intra-industry agglomeration (Ellison &Glaeser,1997,pp.889–927).Jacobs’ externality theory suggests that knowledge spillover has the potential to transpire across diverse industries.The close spatial proximity between the producer services sector and the manufacturing sector facilitates the concentration and efficient flow of resource factors,thereby promoting resource sharing and facilitating knowledge and technology spillovers,ultimately enhancing the level of industrial co-agglomeration.

    Spatial proximity can also reduce the search costs between producer services and manufacturing.It shortens the geographical distance between enterprises,facilitating the manufacturing sector in their search and comparison of intermediate inputs.Additionally,it enables producer services to expand their service scope and conduct market demand research more effectively.For example,the presence of multiple financial institutions in close proximity can greatly benefit a manufacturing enterprise facing financial difficulties.It allows the enterprise to compare and select from various institutions,thereby reducing the financing costs associated with project negotiation.Additionally,these institutions can provide customized services to the specific needs of the manufacturing enterprise and improve their service system,thereby effectively minimizing the search costs of the manufacturing enterprise (Coffey &Bailly,1991,pp.95–117;Klaesson,2001,pp.375–394).

    Policy Guidance

    The deepening of the social division of labor separates the producer services sector from the manufacturing sector,giving rise to a relatively independent new business form.The producer services sector,when confronted with limited market size,can rely on the market mechanism to fulfill development demands owing to its streamlined operational model and a narrower scope of products and services.However,as the manufacturing sector presents increasingly professional and diversified demands,the producer services sector is faced with a complex market environment.In such circumstances,an intermediate organization is needed to regulate the relationship between the market and enterprises,which is typically assumed by local governments whose policy guidance will profoundly impact the layout and development of related industries.

    The rationality and applicability of policy guidance have a positive impact on market order and transaction costs,subsequently influencing the level of co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors.The market environment of inter-industrial agglomeration,which refers to the spatial agglomeration of different industries,is characterized by a higher level of complexity in the market environment in comparison to intra-industry agglomeration.Therefore,the implementation of appropriate policies can effectively optimize market order and mitigate transaction costs.The formulation of appropriate policies should be based on the distinctive characteristics inherent in each industry.For producer services,which primarily offer intangibly specialized services,policies should be formulated with the aim of accurately assessing the market value of such services while establishing a standardized market order for industrial co-agglomeration.Moreover,as manufacturing enterprises often require a significant amount of space for their operations,it has a substantial impact on the spatial planning of cities,particularly in terms of dividing functional areas.The implementation of appropriate policies can effectively guide the transfer of industries within the manufacturing sector to align with urban development needs and promote the growth of the manufacturing sector.In addition,the implementation of rational policies can attract producer services enterprises to establish their presence near the manufacturing agglomeration area,thereby promoting industrial co-agglomeration.This will not only reduce enterprises’ search costs but also enhance connectivity between them,ultimately leading to a decrease in mutual transaction costs.However,the market order may become chaotic,and transaction costs may rise when policies are not that rational or applicable,especially if there are conflicting policies between cities.This can significantly impact the flow of factors and economic exchanges.Therefore,the formulation and implementation of rational policies,such as those aimed at optimizing the regional institutional environment and enhancing marketization,can facilitate the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors (Song &Li,2023,pp.56–65).

    Research Hypotheses

    The manufacturing enterprises in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area are primarily concentrated in the Pearl River Delta,which boasts a robust foundation in manufacturing.The need for production model transformation in the area has led to a growing demand for producer services.The 14th Five-Year Plan in Guangdong province explicitly proposes expediting the establishment of 20 strategic industrial clusters,highlighting the undeniable significance of producer services in shaping the spatial layout of the manufacturing sector.Based on this,we propose the first hypothesis:

    H1: The availability of producer services has a positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector.

    The manufacturing sector in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has not extensively integrated producer services into its core production links.Manufacturing industries closely associated with producer services are primarily concentrated in resourceintensive sectors,and their products do not offer the necessary support for the further development of producer services.In the current market environment,the market demand for producer services is primarily focused on the fundamental production link.Therefore,the second hypothesis of this paper is proposed:

    H2: The availability of the manufacturing sector has a negative impact on the location selection of the producer services sector.

    The nature of the production and operation of producer services and manufacturing sectors indicates that the producer service sector is a knowledge-intensive industry primarily offering intangible services,with labor cost and quality being its main production costs.In comparison,the manufacturing sector predominantly produces tangible products utilizing various production factors such as resources,labor force,and specialized services provided by the producer services sector.Based on the above statement,we propose the third hypothesis:

    H3: Production and transaction costs have a negative impact on the spatial layout of producer services and manufacturing sectors.

    In light of the current situation faced by producer services and manufacturing sectors,the government authorities in the Greater Bay Area have implemented a range of policies.These include initiatives such as theMainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement(CEPA) aimed at promoting trade liberalization in services and trade as well as investment facilitation between the two regions.Additionally,they have adopted a “double transfer strategy” involving the transfer of industry and labor force to guide certain manufacturing industries to relocate to other cities.As a result,these measures have significantly enhanced industrial co-agglomeration in the area.Based on this,we propose the fourth hypothesis:

    H4: Policy guidance has a positive impact on the location selection of industries.

    Model Building and Variable Description

    Model Building and Variable Selection

    The empirical test in this paper is based on Venables’ model of vertically linked industries (Venable,1996,pp.341–359).According to this model,when there exists a correlation between demand and cost in two industries,the two industries exhibit a vertical input-output correlation.When considering the producer service and manufacturing sectors as research subjects,demand correlation refers to one industry providing a robust market for another industry,thereby attracting enterprises to strategically locate themselves.Cost correlation signifies that an industry can effectively reduce its costs by establishing its presence within the vicinity of another industry agglomeration area.The industrial location signifies the extent of industrial agglomeration within a given region.In general,the greater the value of industrial location,the higher the level of industrial agglomeration.According to the derivation of the theoretical model,the location of the manufacturing sector and producer services sector can be depicted through a function incorporating variables such as production cost,consumption expenditure,and transaction cost.Following the principles of comprehensiveness,scientific rigor,and data availability,this study employs the approach of Gao Juemin and Li Xiaohui (2011,pp.151–160) and utilizes seemingly unrelated regression (SUR),which considers both the equation correlation and error term correlation,to estimate the equation set,thereby building the following model:

    Equation (1) reflects the cost correlation within the vertically linked industries.The location of the manufacturing sector is influenced by factors such as the location of producer services,consumption expenditure,and transaction costs.The choice of the availability of the producer services sector as a proxy variable for the production cost of the manufacturing sector is based on the recognition that,with the expansion and excess capacity in traditional manufacturing industries,the knowledge-intensive producer services sector has become a crucial factor in elevating the added value and heterogeneity of products (Glasmeier &Howland,1994,pp.197–229).Therefore,when examining the co-location relationship between producer services and manufacturing sectors,it is appropriate to utilize the availability of producer services as a representation of the production costs of manufacturing.Equation (2) reflects the demand correlation within the vertically linked industries.The location of the producer services sector is influenced by factors such as the location of the manufacturing sector,production expenditure,and transaction costs.Since manufacturing is the main downstream industry of producer services,it is appropriate to express the expenditure of producer services with the availability of the manufacturing sector.The meanings of variables in Equation (1) and Equation (2) are illustrated in Table 1.

    Table 1 Interpretation of Variables in the Equation Set

    Drawing on the practice of Chen Jianjun and Chen Jingjing (2011,pp.141–150) and based on the research content,we selected the following variables.The present study measures the industrial location by utilizing the density of industry-specific employees per square kilometer in the area.Here,Mitrepresents the location of manufacturing;Pitrepresents the location of producer services;Witrepresents the expenditure level of manufacturing,that is,the average expenditure required for each employee employed in the manufacturing sector,which is reflected by the average wage of employees in the area.Under normal circumstances,the average salary of employees in labor-intensive manufacturing industries is typically lower,whereas that in technology-intensive manufacturing industries tends to be higher.Transitrepresents the transaction cost of the manufacturing sector.The higher the volume of transportation and the lower the cost of transportation,the lower the transaction cost.As producer services are predominantly knowledge-intensive industries,the ratio of the number of college students to the number of employees in enterprises at the end of the year is utilized as a proxy variable,with the variablehitserving as an indicator of the level of knowledge intensity in regioni.The transaction cost of producer services (comuit) is measured by the aggregate volume of telecommunications services in the area,as producer services typically involve intangible outputs that are transmitted through channels such as the internet,rather than tangible goods.In general,the larger the aggregate volume of telecommunications services,the higher the level of regional information transmission and the lower the transaction cost.The present study utilized the permanent population of a city as a statistical criterion for measuring the scale of the city,which can effectively reflect the level of economic development and the extent of substance and factor aggregation and diffusion to examine the impact of city size on industrial location.For this paper,a year-end total population was selected as an indicator for measuring city size.The influence of policy guidance is often contingent upon the scale of the local government.The larger the scale of the government,the more robust the implementation of relevant policies.Therefore,the measurement of policy guidance in this paper is based on the scale of government (govit),which is represented by the ratio of government budget expenditure to gross domestic product (GDP).

    The derivation for the availability of manufacturing industry and producer services are presented in Equation (3) and Equation (4),respectively:

    θitin Equation (3) and Equation (4) represents the manufacturing (producer services)location of regioni,which is represented by the proportion of the number of employees of an enterprise in the total number of employees of the same industry in the whole region,based on the practice of Chen Jianjun and Chen Jingjing (2011,pp.141–150).tijdenotes the temporal distance between regioniand regionj,and is a distance decay variable.Specifically,the temporal distance refers to the duration required for traveling between two regions by car.In this study,the office addresses of governmental institutions in each city were selected as the starting points,and the temporal distance indicators (tij) were manually collected using AMAP.The value ofλis set to 0.017,based on calculations conducted by Hugosson and Johansson (2001).

    Data Sources and Processing

    The scope of this study is limited to industries represented by 2-digit numeric codes ranging from 13 to 43 within the manufacturing sector,as defined by theIndustrial Classification for National Economic Activities(GB/T 4754-2017).By referring to the revisedStatistical Classification of Producer Services(2019) and calculating the intermediate demand rate of the services and manufacturing sectors classified in theInput-Output Table of Guangdong Province(42 Sectors) in 2017,this study categorized four industries with an intermediate demand rate exceeding 50 percent as producer services industries.These industries encompass wholesale and retail,transportation,warehousing,and postal services,leasing,and business services,as well as finance.We redefined the producer services in Hong Kong and Macao by comprehensively referring to theHong Kong Standard Industrial Classification Version 2.0,the first revision ofMacao Industry Classification,and the statistical standard of the National Bureau of Statistics.The corresponding producer services in Hong Kong encompass transportation,warehousing,postal and courier services,wholesale and retail trade,finance and insurance,and information and communications,while those in Macao include transportation,warehousing and communications,wholesale and retail trade,real estate and business services,and finance.In view of the data availability,a panel dataset comprising ten cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (excluding Zhaoqing) from 2010 to 2020 was selected for research purposes.The data sources include theHong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics,Macao Yearbook of Statistics,Guangdong Statistical Yearbook,and statistical yearbooks of cities in the Pearl River Delta region from 2011 to 2021.

    Empirical Results and Analysis

    Baseline Regression Analysis

    The estimated results of the equation set are shown in Table 2.Among the core explanatory variables,the availability of producer services,which measures the cost of manufacturing production (Pait),has a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector due to its provision of intermediate inputs that enable the latter into subsequent stages of production.On the other hand,the availability of costeffective and easily accessible specialized services offered by producer services in the production process will encourage manufacturing enterprises to strategically plan their layout there.However,the availability of the manufacturing sector,which measures the expenditure of producer services (Mait),significantly inhibits the location selection of producer services,indicating that the integrated development of these two sectors has not yet reached a level of reciprocal demand.Producer services still play a subordinate role in the manufacturing production chain and have yet to fully integrate into the core production processes of the manufacturing sector.As a result,the location of producer services and manufacturing sectors in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has not been strategically aligned,impeding further advancements in industrial coagglomeration within the area.

    Table 2 Estimation of Baseline Regression Results Through SUR

    In the control variables,the expenditure of manufacturing (Wit) has a negative impact on the location of the manufacturing sector.In other words,the increase in the average salary of employees does not promote the concentration of the manufacturing sector,indicating its reliance on low-end labor.This observation also provides insight into recruitment challenges faced in the Pearl River Delta in recent years.The coefficient of manufacturing transaction cost (transit) has a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector;that is,an increase in freight volume stimulates agglomeration within this sector,indicating that the improvement of transportation infrastructure and logistic services can improve transaction efficiency.Although the coefficient of transaction cost (hit) is high at 28.11,its impact on the location of producer services is not significant.This indicates that the increase of human capital investment in the Greater Bay Area is conducive to the agglomeration of producer services,but its impact on the degree of agglomeration remains limited due to its relatively small scale.Transaction costs (comuit) have a significant negative effect on the location of producer services,indicating that the improvement of the regional informatization level is not conducive to the agglomeration of producer services.

    In the across variables,transaction costs and city size have different impacts on industrial location.From the perspective of transaction cost,there is a significant negative correlation between the location of manufacturing and the across variable (transit×Pait) representing manufacturing transaction cost and availability of producer services.This suggests that a reduction in transaction costs (an increase in freight volume) will exert a significant repulsive force on the location selection for manufacturing.This phenomenon can be primarily attributed to the fact that producer services are not reliant on traditional modes of transportation,and any enhancement in traditional freight transport efficiency will stimulate increased allocation towards traditional production factors within the manufacturing sector,consequently leading to crowding out effects on producer services.The across variable(comuit×Mait) representing the transaction cost of producer services and the availability of the manufacturing sector exhibits a significant positive correlation with the location of the producer services sector.This can be attributed to the fact that the reduction of transaction costs (increase of aggregate volume of telecommunications services) establishes an efficient communication channel between the producer service sector and the manufacturing sector,thereby facilitating agglomeration in the producer service sector.From the perspective of city size,the across variable representing city size and availability of producer services (scaleit×Pait) has a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector.This suggests that as cities grow in size and urban land prices rise,it becomes imperative for the manufacturing sector to increase its reliance on producer services as intermediate inputs in order to enhance its value-added capabilities and ensure smooth operations.Consequently,this facilitates the agglomeration of manufacturing activities.As for the location of producer services,the value of the across variable representing city size and manufacturing availability(scaleit × Mait) is negative and not significant,indicating that city size neither alleviates the availability of manufacturing nor has a negative impact on the agglomeration of producer services,but the impact is not obvious.

    Government scale (govit) exhibits a significant positive correlation with the agglomeration of both the producer services and manufacturing sectors.The government scale reflects the extent to which it intervenes in the market.The empirical results indicate that through the implementation of well-designed policies,the Greater Bay Area will significantly enhance the spatial agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing enterprises.This shows that policies such as CEPA and the “double transfer strategy”have played a positive role in the agglomeration and transfer of the producer services and manufacturing sectors in the Greater Bay Area.

    Robustness Test

    The robustness test in this study was conducted using the ordinary least squares (OLS)estimation method and by shortening the research span.First,the robustness test was performed by using the OLS estimation method.As indicated in Table 3,the variable symbols of models (1) and (2) are consistent with the baseline regression results,except for differences in significance.Second,the robustness test was conducted by shortening the research interval.In the baseline regression,the research period spans from 2010 to 2020.The research period is narrowed down to 2014–2020 to mitigate potential interference caused by policies such as the“double transfer strategy” on industrial location.The regression results are presented in models(3) and (4) in Table 3,revealing that there is no significant deviation observed in the estimated results compared to those in baseline regression.Thus,the empirical analysis of the formation mechanism of industrial co-agglomeration in this paper is robust.

    Table 3 Robustness Test

    Analysis of Industry Heterogeneity

    The SUR method was employed in this paper to conduct an empirical analysis of each subindustry within the producer services and manufacturing sectors.The specific findings are presented in Table 4 and Table 5.

    Table 4 Analysis of Industry Heterogeneity

    Table 5 Analysis of Industry Heterogeneity

    Among the core explanatory variables,there exist significant differences in terms of the impact of the availability of various producer services (Pait) on the location of manufacturing,while there is a notable negative correlation between the availability of manufacturing (Mait) and the location of various producer services.In terms of the availability of producer services (Pait),only wholesale and retail trade exhibit a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector,whereas the availability of the financial industry has a significant negative impact on that.This could be attributed to the widespread distribution of wholesale and retail industries,which enables manufacturing industries to have closer proximity to consumer markets.Conversely,areas within the Greater Bay Area with well-developed financial industries,such as Guangzhou,Shenzhen,and Hong Kong,are facing high land prices,which hinders the production operations of the manufacturing sector there.Although the availability of the manufacturing sector(Mait) has a significant negative impact on the location of the producer services sector,the coefficients vary across different subsectors.Notably,the wholesale and retail trade exhibit the lowest coefficient,while the financial industry demonstrates the highest coefficient.These findings suggest that the availability of the manufacturing sector does not necessarily drive or promote the location selection of the producer services sector.From the above analysis,it can be further deduced that the producer services and manufacturing sectors in the Greater Bay Area have not yet formed the co-agglomeration in terms of spatial distribution.

    Among the across variables,the impact of transaction cost and city size on the choices for industrial spatial distribution basically remains consistent with the overall analysis results.From the perspective of transaction cost,the across variables representing transaction cost and productivity availability (transit×Pait) exhibit a negative correlation with the spatial distribution of the manufacturing sector.This is particularly apparent in industries such as wholesale and retail trade,leasing,and business services.On the contrary,the across variable representing transaction cost and the availability of manufacturing (comuit×Mait) exhibits a positive correlation with the location of producer services,and only the coefficient of wholesale and retail trade fails to pass the significance test at one percent.From the perspective of city size,with the expansion of city size,the availability of various producer services (scaleit×Pait) has a significant positive impact on the spatial distribution of the manufacturing sector,of which the financial industry exhibits the highest value.However,the availability of manufacturing (scaleit×Mait) only has a significant positive impact on the wholesale and retail trade.

    Government scale (govit) exhibits a positive correlation with both the producer services and manufacturing sectors.It is worth noting that only when referring specifically to the financial industry within the producer services sector will the impact of government scale on the location of the manufacturing sector become insignificant,while in all other cases,statistical significance is observed at a five percent level.This fully demonstrates that rational government intervention has a positive impact on guiding the location selection of both producer services and manufacturing sectors.During the process of economic development,the government’s efforts to promote the agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors through investment attraction are consistent with the laws of economic development.

    Conclusions and Policy Recommendations

    Our research for this paper analyzed the formation mechanism of industrial coagglomeration from three dimensions: industrial correlation,spatial correlation,and policy guidance,based on the panel data collected from ten cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (excluding Zhaoqing) spanning from 2010 to 2020.The analysis was based on a vertical association model and was validated using the seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) method.Finally,it drew the following conclusions: First,there currently exists no spatial correlation between the producer services and manufacturing sectors in the area,and the correlation between the two remains limited to the former providing specialized services to the latter.Specifically,the availability of producer services,which measures manufacturing production costs,has a significant positive impact on the location selection of the manufacturing sector,while the availability of manufacturing services,which measures the expenditure of producer services,has a significant negative impact on the location selection of the producer services sector.Producer services still play a subordinate role in the manufacturing production chain and have yet to fully integrate into the core production processes of the manufacturing sector.In terms of the availability of producer services,only wholesale and retail services exhibit a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector,whereas the availability of the financial industry has a significant negative impact on that.The availability of the manufacturing sector has a significant negative impact on the location of the producer services sector,but the coefficients vary across different subsectors.Among them,the wholesale and retail trade exhibit the lowest coefficient,while the financial industry demonstrates the highest coefficient.These findings suggest that the availability of the manufacturing sector does not necessarily drive or promote the location selection of the producer services sector.Second,policy guidance has a positive impact on the location selection of industries in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.The empirical results indicate that the government scale,the variable representing policy guidance,exhibits a positive correlation with both the producer services and manufacturing sectors.Moreover,the results remain robust when industry heterogeneity is taken into consideration,indicating that the implementation of a series of appropriate policies in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area can significantly enhance spatial agglomeration in both producer services and manufacturing sectors.Furthermore,it is evident that rational government intervention plays a positive guiding role in determining the location selection of these sectors.

    Based on the research conclusions,we put forward the following policy recommendations: Firstly,it is imperative to foster collaboration in the location selection of producer services and manufacturing sectors,thereby enhancing the level of industrial co-agglomeration.On the one hand,the government authorities should provide guidance to manufacturing enterprises in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area on optimizing their organizational structure and eliminating certain production and service links that have lost their comparative advantages.Efforts should also be made to encourage these enterprises to fully leverage the advantages of the producer services sector to outsource their business.On the other hand,the Greater Bay Area should increase investment in the producer services subsectors,which own comparative advantages in the area,to fully leverage their role in promoting the manufacturing sector.For instance,it is necessary to make full use of Hong Kong and Macao’s robust foundation in the productive services sector to provide specialized services for the manufacturing sector in the Pearl River Delta region and facilitate its transformation and upgrading.Moreover,for service subindustries that are currently at a disadvantage but urgently needed in the area,government authorities can leverage spillover effects from neighboring regions or attract capital investment by enticing enterprises within these subsectors to establish branches in the locality,thereby further enhancing their alignment with the local manufacturing sector.Second,government authorities should constantly improve their economic governance capacity to promote industrial co-agglomeration.On the one hand,governments at all levels in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area should innovate the communication mechanism to facilitate the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors within the area.The coordinated development and rational agglomeration of industries in the Greater Bay Area necessitate collaboration among government authorities across regions,given the interconnected interests among regions.To achieve this,governments at all levels should prioritize their overall interests,remove administrative barriers,clarify urban functions,effectively allocate responsibilities,and guide producer services and manufacturing enterprises to establish their presence in the Greater Bay Area to promote industrial co-agglomeration.

    久久久欧美国产精品| 1024手机看黄色片| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲无线在线观看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产乱人视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 有码 亚洲区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲性久久影院| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 中国美女看黄片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 精品一区二区免费观看| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 国产免费男女视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 精品久久久久久久久av| av免费在线看不卡| 日韩中字成人| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 看黄色毛片网站| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 六月丁香七月| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲四区av| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产 一区精品| av天堂在线播放| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 黄色配什么色好看| 成年av动漫网址| 69人妻影院| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| avwww免费| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 91av网一区二区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 色综合色国产| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲性久久影院| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产三级中文精品| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 色吧在线观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| ponron亚洲| av在线观看视频网站免费| 日本五十路高清| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产成人精品婷婷| 乱人视频在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 舔av片在线| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美成人a在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| av免费观看日本| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 岛国毛片在线播放| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 一级黄片播放器| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 一区福利在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 综合色av麻豆| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 免费大片18禁| 久久精品影院6| 一级毛片电影观看 | 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 97在线视频观看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 美女大奶头视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲无线观看免费| 深夜精品福利| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚州av有码| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产色婷婷99| 熟女电影av网| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| av在线天堂中文字幕| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 成人欧美大片| 男人舔奶头视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久热精品热| 一级毛片我不卡| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 精品一区二区免费观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 一级毛片我不卡| 特级一级黄色大片| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产免费男女视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产成人精品一,二区 | 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产老妇女一区| 日本免费a在线| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 99久国产av精品| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产色婷婷99| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久中文看片网| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 人妻系列 视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| or卡值多少钱| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 直男gayav资源| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 黑人高潮一二区| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 美女大奶头视频| 我要搜黄色片| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产成人freesex在线| 免费看a级黄色片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲无线观看免费| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲av男天堂| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 69av精品久久久久久| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美性感艳星| 91狼人影院| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 免费av毛片视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 免费看av在线观看网站| 此物有八面人人有两片| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 一级毛片我不卡| av福利片在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产精品.久久久| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 岛国毛片在线播放| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 免费观看人在逋| 日韩成人伦理影院| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 18+在线观看网站| 色哟哟·www| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 午夜视频国产福利| a级毛片a级免费在线| 成人欧美大片| or卡值多少钱| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 大香蕉久久网| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 22中文网久久字幕| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲精品色激情综合| a级毛色黄片| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久中文看片网| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久久精品94久久精品| 搞女人的毛片| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日本五十路高清| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产色婷婷99| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 性欧美人与动物交配| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 男女那种视频在线观看| 男女那种视频在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲在线观看片| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲最大成人av| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久久久网色| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 在线播放无遮挡| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国内精品宾馆在线| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 美女黄网站色视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 色播亚洲综合网| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 免费观看人在逋| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久久久国产网址| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久九九热精品免费| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 日韩高清综合在线| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲第一电影网av| a级毛片a级免费在线| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久久色成人| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产 一区精品| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| h日本视频在线播放| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲av熟女| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 精品久久久噜噜| 观看美女的网站| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲av一区综合| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲av熟女| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲不卡免费看| 综合色av麻豆| 在线天堂最新版资源| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲在线观看片| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产视频内射| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 在线播放国产精品三级| 嫩草影院精品99| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产亚洲欧美98| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 欧美日本视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久热精品热| 在线播放国产精品三级| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 一级毛片电影观看 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 91精品国产九色| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 免费看av在线观看网站| 床上黄色一级片| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久99久视频精品免费| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产成人freesex在线| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 日韩欧美三级三区| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 三级经典国产精品| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产视频内射| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲av二区三区四区|