• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Research on the Formation Mechanism for the Co-agglomeration of Producer Services and Manufacturing in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

    2023-11-05 02:21:44JiaoPingHuangFeibinandLiSusu
    Contemporary Social Sciences 2023年5期

    Jiao Ping,Huang Feibin,and Li Susu

    Guangdong University of Finance &Economics

    Abstract: The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is witnessing a surge in economic development,showcasing robust resilience in the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing industries,along with the increasingly evident impact generated by such co-agglomeration.Based on the panel data collected from ten cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (excluding Zhaoqing)spanning from 2010 to 2020,we examined the formation mechanism for industrial co-agglomeration in the area from three dimensions: industrial correlation,spatial correlation,and policy guidance.Our analysis was based on a vertical correlation model and was validated using the seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR)method.The findings are as follows: (a) There currently exists no spatial correlation between the producer services and manufacturing sectors in the area,and the correlation between the two remains limited to the former providing specialized services to the latter.(b) Policy guidance has a positive impact on the location selection of industries within the area.By implementing a comprehensive range of favorable policies,local governments can provide effective and scientifically guided recommendations regarding the location of producer services and manufacturing sectors.Therefore,it is crucial to foster the collaboration between producer services and manufacturing sectors and further enhance the co-agglomeration between the two sectors.In addition,the government authorities should also strive to enhance its economic governance capacity,thereby facilitating the formation of such co-agglomeration.

    Keywords: Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area,producer services,manufacturing,co-agglomeration,policy guidance

    Currently,the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is witnessing a surge in economic development,showcasing robust resilience in the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors.In the early stages of reform and opening up,the cities in the Pearl River Delta region,by leveraging Hong Kong’s and Macao’s open business environment and convenient transportation conditions,gradually developed a novel economic cooperation model,which involves manufacturing and service sectors.The implementation of this model has facilitated enterprises based in the Pearl River Delta to expand their trade operations globally.However,the producer services sector in the Pearl River Delta relatively lags behind the progress of the manufacturing sector.As a result,these two sectors have yet to establish a robust synergy for complementary development.To transform the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area into a world-class manufacturing hub,it is imperative to actively foster co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors and enhance their spatial correlation so as to generate spillover effects and promote the optimization and upgrading of the manufacturing sector as well as regional economic growth.So,what is the mechanism underlying the formation of the coagglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors? What measures can the Greater Bay Area take to effectively promote such co-agglomeration in order to promote economic development? The response to the aforementioned questions holds immense practical significance for the Greater Bay Area in facilitating the transformation and upgrading of its manufacturing sector,as well as establishing a globally competitive modern services industry system.

    Ellison and Glaeser (1997,pp.889–927) first proposed the co-agglomeration theory,positing that industries characterized by input-output correlation tend to exhibit spatial agglomeration.This phenomenon represents a bidirectional dynamic coordination process between industry and space.Previous studies have primarily focused on the industrial level when examining industrial agglomeration.Some scholars found that the industrial correlation between producer services and manufacturing sectors can facilitate the co-agglomeration of these two sectors (Ke et al.,2014,pp.1829–1841;Ji &Duan,2014,pp.79–84).The producer services sector and the manufacturing sector often demonstrate a significant level of spatial proximity in industrial distribution.The proximity allows producer services enterprises to leverage the customer base of the manufacturing sector while also enabling manufacturing enterprises to access cost-effective services (Coffey &Bailly,1991,pp.95–117;Klaesson,2001,pp.375–394).

    However,with the advancement and refinement of the new economic geography theory,scholars are now able to extend their analysis beyond the industrial level and incorporate spatial factors within the theoretical framework.Chen Na and Gu Naihua(2013,pp.25–44) found a spatial co-agglomeration effect between producer services and manufacturing sectors,which can be primarily attributed to the availability of resources and services.Furthermore,such spatial co-agglomeration varies across different cities.Zhang Hu and Han Aihua (2019,pp.39–50) argued that the interaction and mutual influence between producer services and manufacturing sectors at the industrial level will undoubtedly lead to spatial co-agglomeration or co-location.Chen Guanghan and Ren Xiaoli (2021,pp.143–152) have concluded,based on the center-periphery theory,that the urban agglomeration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area demonstrates a distinctive industrial layout characterized by core cities prioritizing the development of producer services while peripheral regions focus on advancing manufacturing.These two sectors demonstrate a mutually beneficial interactive relationship aimed at achieving coordinated development.

    In recent years,some scholars have incorporated policy factors into the analytical framework of industrial co-agglomeration.According to Chen Xiaofeng (2017,pp.89–96),policy guidance is a key factor contributing to the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors.Xu Zhongrong (2022,pp.93–100) posited that the mechanism underlying the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors in metropolitan areas is evidenced through synergies across various dimensions,including policy,structure,space,and quality.Song Xiaoling and Li Jinye (2023,pp.56–65) argued that the policy environment can impose both constraints and incentives on the formation and development of industrial co-agglomeration.Additionally,it can establish a fair competition environment and a robust legal framework for such coagglomeration.

    The existing literature has provided valuable insights and references for this study.However,most studies primarily focus on industrial correlation and spatial correlation when examining the mechanism underlying industrial co-agglomeration.Some studies only explore the impact of policy factors on industrial co-agglomeration.Consequently,there is a lack of research that simultaneously considers all three dimensions of industry,space,and policy.The primary contribution of this paper lies in its comprehensive analysis of the formation mechanism of industrial co-agglomeration,which encompasses three dimensions: industrial relevance,spatial relevance,and policy guidance.Additionally,it employs a vertical correlation model for empirical testing,which significantly enriches the research content of the industrial co-agglomeration theory.

    Analysis of Formation Mechanism

    The present study investigates how industrial co-agglomeration between producer services and manufacturing sectors is formed,considering the three dimensions of industry,space,and policy simultaneously (see Figure 1).

    Figure 1 Roadmap for the formation mechanism of industrial co-agglomeration

    Industrial Correlation

    According to the industrial correlation theory,if one industry utilizes the output of another industry as its raw material,there exists a forward correlation between these two industries;Otherwise,there exists a backward correlation.Inessence,the manufacturing and producer services sectors are the products of the increasing specialization in the industrial division of labor.It is also a process wherein vertical integration of production transitions into vertical specialization.Consequently,there exists a robust upstream and downstream industrial correlation between these two sectors.This is primarily manifested in the fact that producer services contribute to cost reduction and efficiency enhancement in manufacturing,while manufacturing provides demand and material support for producer services (Feng &Liu,2005,pp.51–56).

    The producer services sector,which offers indispensable intermediate inputs to the manufacturing sector,has progressively integrated itself into the core production links of the manufacturing sector through its specialized expertise and cutting-edge technology.Its main service support for the manufacturing industry lies in cost reduction and efficiency improvement,thereby achieving industrial co-agglomeration.From the perspective of production costs,if the internal costs generated by a particular production process exceed the expenses associated with outsourcing,manufacturing enterprises will opt to outsource that process in order to reduce costs and improve efficiency.In terms of capital turnover costs,the producer services can provide an optimal financial service system to address financing challenges faced by the manufacturing sector,such as limited funding channels and slow financing speed.In terms of logistics costs,the producer services can effectively reduce the fixed costs associated with warehousing and transportation for manufacturing enterprises,thereby enhancing the transportation efficiency of products.

    The manufacturing sector generates demand and provides material support for producer services,thereby enhancing the efficiency of producer services to achieve industrial coagglomeration.The producer services sector needs to leverage specific carriers to realize the value of its own service products.The road transport sector,for instance,relies on dedicated trucks from the automobile manufacturing sector to provide freight services.These trucks serve as essential material support provided by the manufacturing sector to facilitate transportation.The manufacturing sector,in its pursuit of industrial transformation and upgrading as well as the enhancement of its competitive advantage,has set a higher standard for producer services.The producer services sector is consistently enhancing its expertise and expanding its scale to meet the growing specialization requirements of the manufacturing sector.This will undoubtedly result in an improvement in both service quality and production efficiency,thereby strengthening industrial co-agglomeration.

    Spatial Correlation

    The spatial layout of producer services and manufacturing sectors exhibits a tendency towards co-agglomeration based on the correlation between these two sectors.The agglomeration of industries within the manufacturing sector can generate significant market demand for the producer services sector.To cater to the diverse needs of numerous manufacturing enterprises,an increasing number of producer services enterprises will inevitably establish their presence in the agglomerative area,thereby giving rise to the phenomenon of intra-industry agglomeration (Ellison &Glaeser,1997,pp.889–927).Jacobs’ externality theory suggests that knowledge spillover has the potential to transpire across diverse industries.The close spatial proximity between the producer services sector and the manufacturing sector facilitates the concentration and efficient flow of resource factors,thereby promoting resource sharing and facilitating knowledge and technology spillovers,ultimately enhancing the level of industrial co-agglomeration.

    Spatial proximity can also reduce the search costs between producer services and manufacturing.It shortens the geographical distance between enterprises,facilitating the manufacturing sector in their search and comparison of intermediate inputs.Additionally,it enables producer services to expand their service scope and conduct market demand research more effectively.For example,the presence of multiple financial institutions in close proximity can greatly benefit a manufacturing enterprise facing financial difficulties.It allows the enterprise to compare and select from various institutions,thereby reducing the financing costs associated with project negotiation.Additionally,these institutions can provide customized services to the specific needs of the manufacturing enterprise and improve their service system,thereby effectively minimizing the search costs of the manufacturing enterprise (Coffey &Bailly,1991,pp.95–117;Klaesson,2001,pp.375–394).

    Policy Guidance

    The deepening of the social division of labor separates the producer services sector from the manufacturing sector,giving rise to a relatively independent new business form.The producer services sector,when confronted with limited market size,can rely on the market mechanism to fulfill development demands owing to its streamlined operational model and a narrower scope of products and services.However,as the manufacturing sector presents increasingly professional and diversified demands,the producer services sector is faced with a complex market environment.In such circumstances,an intermediate organization is needed to regulate the relationship between the market and enterprises,which is typically assumed by local governments whose policy guidance will profoundly impact the layout and development of related industries.

    The rationality and applicability of policy guidance have a positive impact on market order and transaction costs,subsequently influencing the level of co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors.The market environment of inter-industrial agglomeration,which refers to the spatial agglomeration of different industries,is characterized by a higher level of complexity in the market environment in comparison to intra-industry agglomeration.Therefore,the implementation of appropriate policies can effectively optimize market order and mitigate transaction costs.The formulation of appropriate policies should be based on the distinctive characteristics inherent in each industry.For producer services,which primarily offer intangibly specialized services,policies should be formulated with the aim of accurately assessing the market value of such services while establishing a standardized market order for industrial co-agglomeration.Moreover,as manufacturing enterprises often require a significant amount of space for their operations,it has a substantial impact on the spatial planning of cities,particularly in terms of dividing functional areas.The implementation of appropriate policies can effectively guide the transfer of industries within the manufacturing sector to align with urban development needs and promote the growth of the manufacturing sector.In addition,the implementation of rational policies can attract producer services enterprises to establish their presence near the manufacturing agglomeration area,thereby promoting industrial co-agglomeration.This will not only reduce enterprises’ search costs but also enhance connectivity between them,ultimately leading to a decrease in mutual transaction costs.However,the market order may become chaotic,and transaction costs may rise when policies are not that rational or applicable,especially if there are conflicting policies between cities.This can significantly impact the flow of factors and economic exchanges.Therefore,the formulation and implementation of rational policies,such as those aimed at optimizing the regional institutional environment and enhancing marketization,can facilitate the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors (Song &Li,2023,pp.56–65).

    Research Hypotheses

    The manufacturing enterprises in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area are primarily concentrated in the Pearl River Delta,which boasts a robust foundation in manufacturing.The need for production model transformation in the area has led to a growing demand for producer services.The 14th Five-Year Plan in Guangdong province explicitly proposes expediting the establishment of 20 strategic industrial clusters,highlighting the undeniable significance of producer services in shaping the spatial layout of the manufacturing sector.Based on this,we propose the first hypothesis:

    H1: The availability of producer services has a positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector.

    The manufacturing sector in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has not extensively integrated producer services into its core production links.Manufacturing industries closely associated with producer services are primarily concentrated in resourceintensive sectors,and their products do not offer the necessary support for the further development of producer services.In the current market environment,the market demand for producer services is primarily focused on the fundamental production link.Therefore,the second hypothesis of this paper is proposed:

    H2: The availability of the manufacturing sector has a negative impact on the location selection of the producer services sector.

    The nature of the production and operation of producer services and manufacturing sectors indicates that the producer service sector is a knowledge-intensive industry primarily offering intangible services,with labor cost and quality being its main production costs.In comparison,the manufacturing sector predominantly produces tangible products utilizing various production factors such as resources,labor force,and specialized services provided by the producer services sector.Based on the above statement,we propose the third hypothesis:

    H3: Production and transaction costs have a negative impact on the spatial layout of producer services and manufacturing sectors.

    In light of the current situation faced by producer services and manufacturing sectors,the government authorities in the Greater Bay Area have implemented a range of policies.These include initiatives such as theMainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement(CEPA) aimed at promoting trade liberalization in services and trade as well as investment facilitation between the two regions.Additionally,they have adopted a “double transfer strategy” involving the transfer of industry and labor force to guide certain manufacturing industries to relocate to other cities.As a result,these measures have significantly enhanced industrial co-agglomeration in the area.Based on this,we propose the fourth hypothesis:

    H4: Policy guidance has a positive impact on the location selection of industries.

    Model Building and Variable Description

    Model Building and Variable Selection

    The empirical test in this paper is based on Venables’ model of vertically linked industries (Venable,1996,pp.341–359).According to this model,when there exists a correlation between demand and cost in two industries,the two industries exhibit a vertical input-output correlation.When considering the producer service and manufacturing sectors as research subjects,demand correlation refers to one industry providing a robust market for another industry,thereby attracting enterprises to strategically locate themselves.Cost correlation signifies that an industry can effectively reduce its costs by establishing its presence within the vicinity of another industry agglomeration area.The industrial location signifies the extent of industrial agglomeration within a given region.In general,the greater the value of industrial location,the higher the level of industrial agglomeration.According to the derivation of the theoretical model,the location of the manufacturing sector and producer services sector can be depicted through a function incorporating variables such as production cost,consumption expenditure,and transaction cost.Following the principles of comprehensiveness,scientific rigor,and data availability,this study employs the approach of Gao Juemin and Li Xiaohui (2011,pp.151–160) and utilizes seemingly unrelated regression (SUR),which considers both the equation correlation and error term correlation,to estimate the equation set,thereby building the following model:

    Equation (1) reflects the cost correlation within the vertically linked industries.The location of the manufacturing sector is influenced by factors such as the location of producer services,consumption expenditure,and transaction costs.The choice of the availability of the producer services sector as a proxy variable for the production cost of the manufacturing sector is based on the recognition that,with the expansion and excess capacity in traditional manufacturing industries,the knowledge-intensive producer services sector has become a crucial factor in elevating the added value and heterogeneity of products (Glasmeier &Howland,1994,pp.197–229).Therefore,when examining the co-location relationship between producer services and manufacturing sectors,it is appropriate to utilize the availability of producer services as a representation of the production costs of manufacturing.Equation (2) reflects the demand correlation within the vertically linked industries.The location of the producer services sector is influenced by factors such as the location of the manufacturing sector,production expenditure,and transaction costs.Since manufacturing is the main downstream industry of producer services,it is appropriate to express the expenditure of producer services with the availability of the manufacturing sector.The meanings of variables in Equation (1) and Equation (2) are illustrated in Table 1.

    Table 1 Interpretation of Variables in the Equation Set

    Drawing on the practice of Chen Jianjun and Chen Jingjing (2011,pp.141–150) and based on the research content,we selected the following variables.The present study measures the industrial location by utilizing the density of industry-specific employees per square kilometer in the area.Here,Mitrepresents the location of manufacturing;Pitrepresents the location of producer services;Witrepresents the expenditure level of manufacturing,that is,the average expenditure required for each employee employed in the manufacturing sector,which is reflected by the average wage of employees in the area.Under normal circumstances,the average salary of employees in labor-intensive manufacturing industries is typically lower,whereas that in technology-intensive manufacturing industries tends to be higher.Transitrepresents the transaction cost of the manufacturing sector.The higher the volume of transportation and the lower the cost of transportation,the lower the transaction cost.As producer services are predominantly knowledge-intensive industries,the ratio of the number of college students to the number of employees in enterprises at the end of the year is utilized as a proxy variable,with the variablehitserving as an indicator of the level of knowledge intensity in regioni.The transaction cost of producer services (comuit) is measured by the aggregate volume of telecommunications services in the area,as producer services typically involve intangible outputs that are transmitted through channels such as the internet,rather than tangible goods.In general,the larger the aggregate volume of telecommunications services,the higher the level of regional information transmission and the lower the transaction cost.The present study utilized the permanent population of a city as a statistical criterion for measuring the scale of the city,which can effectively reflect the level of economic development and the extent of substance and factor aggregation and diffusion to examine the impact of city size on industrial location.For this paper,a year-end total population was selected as an indicator for measuring city size.The influence of policy guidance is often contingent upon the scale of the local government.The larger the scale of the government,the more robust the implementation of relevant policies.Therefore,the measurement of policy guidance in this paper is based on the scale of government (govit),which is represented by the ratio of government budget expenditure to gross domestic product (GDP).

    The derivation for the availability of manufacturing industry and producer services are presented in Equation (3) and Equation (4),respectively:

    θitin Equation (3) and Equation (4) represents the manufacturing (producer services)location of regioni,which is represented by the proportion of the number of employees of an enterprise in the total number of employees of the same industry in the whole region,based on the practice of Chen Jianjun and Chen Jingjing (2011,pp.141–150).tijdenotes the temporal distance between regioniand regionj,and is a distance decay variable.Specifically,the temporal distance refers to the duration required for traveling between two regions by car.In this study,the office addresses of governmental institutions in each city were selected as the starting points,and the temporal distance indicators (tij) were manually collected using AMAP.The value ofλis set to 0.017,based on calculations conducted by Hugosson and Johansson (2001).

    Data Sources and Processing

    The scope of this study is limited to industries represented by 2-digit numeric codes ranging from 13 to 43 within the manufacturing sector,as defined by theIndustrial Classification for National Economic Activities(GB/T 4754-2017).By referring to the revisedStatistical Classification of Producer Services(2019) and calculating the intermediate demand rate of the services and manufacturing sectors classified in theInput-Output Table of Guangdong Province(42 Sectors) in 2017,this study categorized four industries with an intermediate demand rate exceeding 50 percent as producer services industries.These industries encompass wholesale and retail,transportation,warehousing,and postal services,leasing,and business services,as well as finance.We redefined the producer services in Hong Kong and Macao by comprehensively referring to theHong Kong Standard Industrial Classification Version 2.0,the first revision ofMacao Industry Classification,and the statistical standard of the National Bureau of Statistics.The corresponding producer services in Hong Kong encompass transportation,warehousing,postal and courier services,wholesale and retail trade,finance and insurance,and information and communications,while those in Macao include transportation,warehousing and communications,wholesale and retail trade,real estate and business services,and finance.In view of the data availability,a panel dataset comprising ten cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (excluding Zhaoqing) from 2010 to 2020 was selected for research purposes.The data sources include theHong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics,Macao Yearbook of Statistics,Guangdong Statistical Yearbook,and statistical yearbooks of cities in the Pearl River Delta region from 2011 to 2021.

    Empirical Results and Analysis

    Baseline Regression Analysis

    The estimated results of the equation set are shown in Table 2.Among the core explanatory variables,the availability of producer services,which measures the cost of manufacturing production (Pait),has a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector due to its provision of intermediate inputs that enable the latter into subsequent stages of production.On the other hand,the availability of costeffective and easily accessible specialized services offered by producer services in the production process will encourage manufacturing enterprises to strategically plan their layout there.However,the availability of the manufacturing sector,which measures the expenditure of producer services (Mait),significantly inhibits the location selection of producer services,indicating that the integrated development of these two sectors has not yet reached a level of reciprocal demand.Producer services still play a subordinate role in the manufacturing production chain and have yet to fully integrate into the core production processes of the manufacturing sector.As a result,the location of producer services and manufacturing sectors in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has not been strategically aligned,impeding further advancements in industrial coagglomeration within the area.

    Table 2 Estimation of Baseline Regression Results Through SUR

    In the control variables,the expenditure of manufacturing (Wit) has a negative impact on the location of the manufacturing sector.In other words,the increase in the average salary of employees does not promote the concentration of the manufacturing sector,indicating its reliance on low-end labor.This observation also provides insight into recruitment challenges faced in the Pearl River Delta in recent years.The coefficient of manufacturing transaction cost (transit) has a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector;that is,an increase in freight volume stimulates agglomeration within this sector,indicating that the improvement of transportation infrastructure and logistic services can improve transaction efficiency.Although the coefficient of transaction cost (hit) is high at 28.11,its impact on the location of producer services is not significant.This indicates that the increase of human capital investment in the Greater Bay Area is conducive to the agglomeration of producer services,but its impact on the degree of agglomeration remains limited due to its relatively small scale.Transaction costs (comuit) have a significant negative effect on the location of producer services,indicating that the improvement of the regional informatization level is not conducive to the agglomeration of producer services.

    In the across variables,transaction costs and city size have different impacts on industrial location.From the perspective of transaction cost,there is a significant negative correlation between the location of manufacturing and the across variable (transit×Pait) representing manufacturing transaction cost and availability of producer services.This suggests that a reduction in transaction costs (an increase in freight volume) will exert a significant repulsive force on the location selection for manufacturing.This phenomenon can be primarily attributed to the fact that producer services are not reliant on traditional modes of transportation,and any enhancement in traditional freight transport efficiency will stimulate increased allocation towards traditional production factors within the manufacturing sector,consequently leading to crowding out effects on producer services.The across variable(comuit×Mait) representing the transaction cost of producer services and the availability of the manufacturing sector exhibits a significant positive correlation with the location of the producer services sector.This can be attributed to the fact that the reduction of transaction costs (increase of aggregate volume of telecommunications services) establishes an efficient communication channel between the producer service sector and the manufacturing sector,thereby facilitating agglomeration in the producer service sector.From the perspective of city size,the across variable representing city size and availability of producer services (scaleit×Pait) has a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector.This suggests that as cities grow in size and urban land prices rise,it becomes imperative for the manufacturing sector to increase its reliance on producer services as intermediate inputs in order to enhance its value-added capabilities and ensure smooth operations.Consequently,this facilitates the agglomeration of manufacturing activities.As for the location of producer services,the value of the across variable representing city size and manufacturing availability(scaleit × Mait) is negative and not significant,indicating that city size neither alleviates the availability of manufacturing nor has a negative impact on the agglomeration of producer services,but the impact is not obvious.

    Government scale (govit) exhibits a significant positive correlation with the agglomeration of both the producer services and manufacturing sectors.The government scale reflects the extent to which it intervenes in the market.The empirical results indicate that through the implementation of well-designed policies,the Greater Bay Area will significantly enhance the spatial agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing enterprises.This shows that policies such as CEPA and the “double transfer strategy”have played a positive role in the agglomeration and transfer of the producer services and manufacturing sectors in the Greater Bay Area.

    Robustness Test

    The robustness test in this study was conducted using the ordinary least squares (OLS)estimation method and by shortening the research span.First,the robustness test was performed by using the OLS estimation method.As indicated in Table 3,the variable symbols of models (1) and (2) are consistent with the baseline regression results,except for differences in significance.Second,the robustness test was conducted by shortening the research interval.In the baseline regression,the research period spans from 2010 to 2020.The research period is narrowed down to 2014–2020 to mitigate potential interference caused by policies such as the“double transfer strategy” on industrial location.The regression results are presented in models(3) and (4) in Table 3,revealing that there is no significant deviation observed in the estimated results compared to those in baseline regression.Thus,the empirical analysis of the formation mechanism of industrial co-agglomeration in this paper is robust.

    Table 3 Robustness Test

    Analysis of Industry Heterogeneity

    The SUR method was employed in this paper to conduct an empirical analysis of each subindustry within the producer services and manufacturing sectors.The specific findings are presented in Table 4 and Table 5.

    Table 4 Analysis of Industry Heterogeneity

    Table 5 Analysis of Industry Heterogeneity

    Among the core explanatory variables,there exist significant differences in terms of the impact of the availability of various producer services (Pait) on the location of manufacturing,while there is a notable negative correlation between the availability of manufacturing (Mait) and the location of various producer services.In terms of the availability of producer services (Pait),only wholesale and retail trade exhibit a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector,whereas the availability of the financial industry has a significant negative impact on that.This could be attributed to the widespread distribution of wholesale and retail industries,which enables manufacturing industries to have closer proximity to consumer markets.Conversely,areas within the Greater Bay Area with well-developed financial industries,such as Guangzhou,Shenzhen,and Hong Kong,are facing high land prices,which hinders the production operations of the manufacturing sector there.Although the availability of the manufacturing sector(Mait) has a significant negative impact on the location of the producer services sector,the coefficients vary across different subsectors.Notably,the wholesale and retail trade exhibit the lowest coefficient,while the financial industry demonstrates the highest coefficient.These findings suggest that the availability of the manufacturing sector does not necessarily drive or promote the location selection of the producer services sector.From the above analysis,it can be further deduced that the producer services and manufacturing sectors in the Greater Bay Area have not yet formed the co-agglomeration in terms of spatial distribution.

    Among the across variables,the impact of transaction cost and city size on the choices for industrial spatial distribution basically remains consistent with the overall analysis results.From the perspective of transaction cost,the across variables representing transaction cost and productivity availability (transit×Pait) exhibit a negative correlation with the spatial distribution of the manufacturing sector.This is particularly apparent in industries such as wholesale and retail trade,leasing,and business services.On the contrary,the across variable representing transaction cost and the availability of manufacturing (comuit×Mait) exhibits a positive correlation with the location of producer services,and only the coefficient of wholesale and retail trade fails to pass the significance test at one percent.From the perspective of city size,with the expansion of city size,the availability of various producer services (scaleit×Pait) has a significant positive impact on the spatial distribution of the manufacturing sector,of which the financial industry exhibits the highest value.However,the availability of manufacturing (scaleit×Mait) only has a significant positive impact on the wholesale and retail trade.

    Government scale (govit) exhibits a positive correlation with both the producer services and manufacturing sectors.It is worth noting that only when referring specifically to the financial industry within the producer services sector will the impact of government scale on the location of the manufacturing sector become insignificant,while in all other cases,statistical significance is observed at a five percent level.This fully demonstrates that rational government intervention has a positive impact on guiding the location selection of both producer services and manufacturing sectors.During the process of economic development,the government’s efforts to promote the agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors through investment attraction are consistent with the laws of economic development.

    Conclusions and Policy Recommendations

    Our research for this paper analyzed the formation mechanism of industrial coagglomeration from three dimensions: industrial correlation,spatial correlation,and policy guidance,based on the panel data collected from ten cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (excluding Zhaoqing) spanning from 2010 to 2020.The analysis was based on a vertical association model and was validated using the seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) method.Finally,it drew the following conclusions: First,there currently exists no spatial correlation between the producer services and manufacturing sectors in the area,and the correlation between the two remains limited to the former providing specialized services to the latter.Specifically,the availability of producer services,which measures manufacturing production costs,has a significant positive impact on the location selection of the manufacturing sector,while the availability of manufacturing services,which measures the expenditure of producer services,has a significant negative impact on the location selection of the producer services sector.Producer services still play a subordinate role in the manufacturing production chain and have yet to fully integrate into the core production processes of the manufacturing sector.In terms of the availability of producer services,only wholesale and retail services exhibit a significant positive impact on the location of the manufacturing sector,whereas the availability of the financial industry has a significant negative impact on that.The availability of the manufacturing sector has a significant negative impact on the location of the producer services sector,but the coefficients vary across different subsectors.Among them,the wholesale and retail trade exhibit the lowest coefficient,while the financial industry demonstrates the highest coefficient.These findings suggest that the availability of the manufacturing sector does not necessarily drive or promote the location selection of the producer services sector.Second,policy guidance has a positive impact on the location selection of industries in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.The empirical results indicate that the government scale,the variable representing policy guidance,exhibits a positive correlation with both the producer services and manufacturing sectors.Moreover,the results remain robust when industry heterogeneity is taken into consideration,indicating that the implementation of a series of appropriate policies in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area can significantly enhance spatial agglomeration in both producer services and manufacturing sectors.Furthermore,it is evident that rational government intervention plays a positive guiding role in determining the location selection of these sectors.

    Based on the research conclusions,we put forward the following policy recommendations: Firstly,it is imperative to foster collaboration in the location selection of producer services and manufacturing sectors,thereby enhancing the level of industrial co-agglomeration.On the one hand,the government authorities should provide guidance to manufacturing enterprises in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area on optimizing their organizational structure and eliminating certain production and service links that have lost their comparative advantages.Efforts should also be made to encourage these enterprises to fully leverage the advantages of the producer services sector to outsource their business.On the other hand,the Greater Bay Area should increase investment in the producer services subsectors,which own comparative advantages in the area,to fully leverage their role in promoting the manufacturing sector.For instance,it is necessary to make full use of Hong Kong and Macao’s robust foundation in the productive services sector to provide specialized services for the manufacturing sector in the Pearl River Delta region and facilitate its transformation and upgrading.Moreover,for service subindustries that are currently at a disadvantage but urgently needed in the area,government authorities can leverage spillover effects from neighboring regions or attract capital investment by enticing enterprises within these subsectors to establish branches in the locality,thereby further enhancing their alignment with the local manufacturing sector.Second,government authorities should constantly improve their economic governance capacity to promote industrial co-agglomeration.On the one hand,governments at all levels in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area should innovate the communication mechanism to facilitate the co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing sectors within the area.The coordinated development and rational agglomeration of industries in the Greater Bay Area necessitate collaboration among government authorities across regions,given the interconnected interests among regions.To achieve this,governments at all levels should prioritize their overall interests,remove administrative barriers,clarify urban functions,effectively allocate responsibilities,and guide producer services and manufacturing enterprises to establish their presence in the Greater Bay Area to promote industrial co-agglomeration.

    一a级毛片在线观看| www国产在线视频色| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 床上黄色一级片| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产精品影院久久| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 99久久国产精品久久久| 人人妻人人看人人澡| ponron亚洲| 日韩欧美三级三区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久99久视频精品免费| 三级毛片av免费| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 特级一级黄色大片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 九色国产91popny在线| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美午夜高清在线| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| tocl精华| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲av美国av| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 亚洲国产看品久久| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 亚洲激情在线av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 88av欧美| av片东京热男人的天堂| 超碰成人久久| 午夜福利在线在线| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产亚洲欧美98| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产免费男女视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 久久热在线av| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 成人三级黄色视频| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 日本成人三级电影网站| 天堂动漫精品| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 很黄的视频免费| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 在线观看www视频免费| 最好的美女福利视频网| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品一及| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 在线免费观看的www视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 麻豆av在线久日| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 一区福利在线观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久久久久久人人人人人| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 成年版毛片免费区| 露出奶头的视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 1024手机看黄色片| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 91字幕亚洲| 久久久久久大精品| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 99re在线观看精品视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲五月天丁香| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 免费高清视频大片| 午夜免费激情av| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 香蕉av资源在线| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 操出白浆在线播放| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 黄频高清免费视频| 成人欧美大片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产高清videossex| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| videosex国产| 香蕉国产在线看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 波多野结衣高清作品| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 91麻豆av在线| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 又大又爽又粗| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 在线国产一区二区在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 99国产精品99久久久久| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 美女黄网站色视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 一级毛片精品| 国产精品影院久久| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 制服人妻中文乱码| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲激情在线av| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产av在哪里看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 看免费av毛片| 在线免费观看的www视频| 色av中文字幕| 91国产中文字幕| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 深夜精品福利| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久国产精品影院| 黄色女人牲交| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 十八禁网站免费在线| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 中文字幕久久专区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久精品人妻少妇| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 又大又爽又粗| 久久国产精品影院| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 特级一级黄色大片| 一夜夜www| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国产熟女xx| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| av国产免费在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 很黄的视频免费| 久久香蕉精品热| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产三级在线视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 91麻豆av在线| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| avwww免费| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 99久久精品热视频| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产区一区二久久| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | av在线播放免费不卡| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久伊人香网站| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产1区2区3区精品| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 极品教师在线免费播放| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日本a在线网址| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久精品成人免费网站| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 天堂√8在线中文| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产成人精品无人区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产精品,欧美在线| 午夜久久久久精精品| av欧美777| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 级片在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 日本免费a在线| 精品久久久久久久末码| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产真实乱freesex| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 一级片免费观看大全| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 成人av在线播放网站| av免费在线观看网站| 国产成人影院久久av| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 午夜a级毛片| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产免费男女视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 99热6这里只有精品| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 深夜精品福利| 国产午夜精品论理片| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 美女免费视频网站| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 日本成人三级电影网站| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| www国产在线视频色| 91字幕亚洲| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 欧美日韩精品网址| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 欧美在线黄色| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 91成年电影在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产一区二区激情短视频| www日本在线高清视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 精品电影一区二区在线| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 免费观看人在逋| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| aaaaa片日本免费| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 色综合婷婷激情| 精品久久久久久久末码| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久久久性生活片| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久香蕉精品热| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 看黄色毛片网站| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产熟女xx| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产免费男女视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲色图av天堂| 麻豆av在线久日| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 久久九九热精品免费| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 黄片小视频在线播放| 香蕉久久夜色| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 国产三级在线视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 久久伊人香网站| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 成人国语在线视频| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲片人在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 午夜免费激情av| 在线视频色国产色| 中文字幕久久专区| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 午夜福利18| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 欧美3d第一页| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 久久精品影院6| av福利片在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| av免费在线观看网站| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频|