• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Carbon sequestration rate,nitrogen use efficiency and rice yield responses to long-term substitution of chemical fertilizer by organic manure in a rice–rice cropping system

    2023-09-16 02:36:54NafiuGarbaHAYATULlUYirenHANTianfuNanoAlemuDABAZHANGLuSHENZheLlJiwenHaliruMUAZUSobhiFaidLAMLOMZHANGHuimin
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2023年9期

    Nafiu Garba HAYATU ,LlU Yi-ren,HAN Tian-fuNano Alemu DABAZHANG LuSHEN ZheLl Ji-wenHaliru MUAZU,Sobhi Faid LAMLOM,ZHANG Hui-min#

    1 National Engineering Laboratory for Improving Quality of Arable Land/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,P.R.China

    2 Soil and Fertilizer & Resource and Environment Institute,Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Nanchang 330200,P.R.China

    3 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering,Faculty of Agriculture,Usmanu Danfodiyo University,Sokoto 2346,Nigeria

    4 Plant Production Department,Faculty of Agriculture Saba Basha,Alexandria University,Alexandria 21531,Egypt

    Abstract

    Combined application of chemical fertilizers with organic amendments was recommended as a strategy for improving yield,soil carbon storage,and nutrient use efficiency.However,how the long-term substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure affects rice yield,carbon sequestration rate (CSR),and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) while ensuring environmental safety remains unclear.This study assessed the long-term effect of substituting chemical fertilizer with organic manure on rice yield,CSR,and NUE.It also determined the optimum substitution ratio in the acidic soil of southern China.The treatments were: (i) NPK0,unfertilized control; (ii) NPK1,100% chemical nitrogen,phosphorus,and potassium fertilizer; (iii) NPKM1,70% chemical NPK fertilizer and 30% organic manure; (iv) NPKM2,50% chemical NPK fertilizer and 50% organic manure; and (v) NPKM3,30% chemical NPK fertilizer and 70% organic manure.Milk vetch and pig manure were sources of manure for early and late rice seasons,respectively.The result showed that SOC content was higher in NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3 treatments than in NPK0 and NPK1 treatments.The carbon sequestration rate increased by 140,160,and 280% under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3 treatments,respectively,compared to NPK1 treatment.Grain yield was 86.1,93.1,93.6,and 96.5% higher under NPK1,NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3 treatments,respectively,compared to NPK0 treatment.The NUE in NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3 treatments was higher as compared to NPK1 treatment for both rice seasons.Redundancy analysis revealed close positive relationships of CSR with C input,total N,soil C:N ratio,catalase,and humic acids,whereas NUE was closely related to grain yield,grain N content,and phenol oxidase.Furthermore,CSR and NUE negatively correlated with humin acid and soil C:P and N:P ratios.The technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) showed that NPKM3 treatment was the optimum strategy for improving CSR and NUE.Therefore,substituting 70% of chemical fertilizer with organic manure could be the best management option for increasing CSR and NUE in the paddy fields of southern China.

    Keywords: carbon sequestration,chemical fertilizer,long term,organic manure,nitrogen use efficiency,paddy rice

    1.lntroduction

    Soil organic carbon (SOC) is an index of soil fertility and a sink for carbon sequestration,and its loss can be a source of greenhouse gas emissions (Zhangetal.2012).Therefore,its complex interaction with atmospheres has attracted much attention over the past decades (Lal 2004).Increasing C storage is a global concern since considerable C loss (about 40–133 Pg C) has occurred following land-use change (Hayatuetal.2018),intensive agriculture (Hayatuetal.2020a),and anthropogenic activities (Shahbazetal.2017).Nitrogen status was also found to regulate SOC dynamics (Eastmanetal.2022),implying an interwoven relationship between SOC and nitrogen (N) contents.Freyetal.(2014) found that higher N inputs could slow down the decomposition rate of crop residues and reduce the rate of soil carbon dioxide efflux (Oerteletal.2016),thereby increasing SOC accumulation.Application of different fertilizers with high C inputs (such as organic manure) can increase the C sequestration rate (Caietal.2015) and potentially mitigate C loss (Lal 2010; Wangetal.2018).However,antagonistic effects of different fertilizer regimes on soil C status were documented (Gogoietal.2021),mainly due to changes in tillage practices,crop residues,and fertilizer management and study duration (Suetal.2006; Malhietal.2011).McDanieletal.(2014) observed that cover crops significantly increased the C sequestration rate compared to no cover crops.Similarly,Stewartetal.(2007) did not observe any significant change in the SOC pool after applying organic amendments in organic C-saturated soil.Conversely,chemical fertilizer positively affected C sequestrationviareturning crop residues (e.g.,roots and stubbles) to the field.Inorganic fertilization alone increased C inputs by approximately 2.06–3.25 t ha–1in southern China (Zhangetal.2012).In a recent study,C sequestration was higher with the incorporation of organic manure than under chemical fertilization alone from a paddy field under a rice–rice cropping system (Tangetal.2022).These contrasting results,however,suggested the need for further studies on responses of carbon sequestration rate to the long-term partial substitution of chemical fertilizers by organic manure.

    Nitrogen is generally considered the most limiting soil nutrient for crop growth and development (Abbruzzinietal.2019); thus,chemical N fertilizers are significant for attaining high crop yields and sustaining food security (Suttonetal.2013).However,excessive chemical N fertilization could trigger soil acidification (Hayatuetal.2020b; Huangetal.2021),increase surplus N accumulations,reduce nitrogen use efficiency (NUE),and accelerate soil N losses (Guoetal.2010).Annual N runoff loss from the rice–rice cropping pattern reached 2.2 kg ha–1yr–1(Liuetal.2020),elucidating why improving NUE is requisite in managing paddy fields.To buttress this,European Union Nitrogen Expert Panel (2015) suggested NUE as a suitable indicator of ecosystem efficiency.Nitrogen input is a key agricultural management strategy to augment soil mineral N,but it could also serve as a hot point for increasing greenhouse gas emissions (Lietal.2020).Veraetal.(2022) reported that high and low nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were linked to low NUE (at a high N fertilizer rate) and high NUE (at a low N fertilizer rate),respectively.Rates and types of chemical fertilizer used play vital roles in regulating NUE and N2O emissions under managed agroecosystems (Cardenasetal.2019; El-Soradyetal.2022).To mitigate problems caused by excessive consumption of chemical fertilizers,the Chinese government targeted “zero growth in the use of chemical fertilizer” by 2020.The goal was realized through the balanced and efficient use of organic amendments (Tongetal.2022).Therefore,it is vital to advance management approaches to decrease chemical fertilizer usage and mitigate N loss while sustaining crop yields (Veraetal.2022) and increasing NUE.One of the promising strategies for improving NUE without necessarily increasing fertilizer input (Tangetal.2022) is the partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure.

    The application of chemical fertilizers (e.g.,urea) to increase grain crop yield has received lesser attention in the last decades due to their negative effects on N loss and global warming (Sunetal.2020).The substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure has been receiving considerable attention because it could improve soil fertility,crop yield,and NUE (Chenetal.2020) by maintaining the SOC pool (Sharmaetal.2021) while mitigating N2O emissions and promoting environmental safety (Abdullahietal.2011; Cardenasetal.2019; Jiangetal.2021; Tangetal.2022).Such a substitution could improve NUE due to the increase in total N uptake following the mineralization of organically bound N from organic fertilizers (Xiaetal.2017).Contrarily,such a substitution does not necessarily increase crop yield and NUE (Hijbeeketal.2017).There is no unanimous conclusion regarding the optimum substitution ratio (Tongetal.2022).For example,Subehiaetal.(2013) found that substituting 50% of chemical fertilizer with organic manure increased crop yield under the wheat–rice cropping system,whereas substituting 30% of chemical fertilizer with organic manure (compost) led to the highest maize yield (Zhang Setal.2016; Zhang Yetal.2016).Similarly,while Xiaetal.(2017) reported an increased NUE following substituting 25% of chemical fertilizer with organic manure,Zhangetal.(2019) asserted that a 40% substitution would increase NUE in the rice-base system.Therefore,there is a need for further long-term studies on the optimum substitution ratio of organic manure on NUE under the rice–rice cropping system.

    The subtropical area of China is predominantly under the rice–rice cropping pattern and plays a key role in China’s grain production (Liuetal.2021).It is a subvariety of hydromorphic paddy soils with a land area of about 200 000 km2spread over hilly areas and plains within reaches of the Yangtze River (Liuetal.2019).However,low soil fertility coupled with soil acidification (Caietal.2015) could limit CSR and NUE in the region.Under improved soil fertility and SOC contents,increased crop yields and NUE were observed,suggesting a close link between SOC accumulation and NUE (Jinetal.2020; Tangetal.2022).The incorporation of organic manure increases SOC contents and other soil nutrients such as N,phosphorus (P),and potassium (K)viathe soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization (Caietal.2019; Sharmaetal.2021).Increasing the C sequestration rateviaoptimized fertilization is a recent global priority for mitigating climate change and fostering food security,which is crucial to sustaining soil nutrient supply and nutrient use efficiency.Tangetal.(2018) observed apparent changes in bulk density (BD),pH,and carbon content under different fertilizer regimes that could affect C sequestration.Substituting chemical fertilizer with organic manure has been accepted as a yardstick for decreasing the N application rate,increasing C sequestration,and improving NUE (Tangetal.2022).However,the longterm effects of different substitution ratios on rice yield,CSR,and NUE of the rice–rice cropping system in southern China remain unclear.Therefore,this study hypothesized that the long-term substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure could be a more effective management strategy to increase CSR and NUE than chemical fertilizer alone.The specific objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate the long-term effect of different fertilizer treatments on rice yield,CSR,and NUE and (ii) determine the optimum substitution ratio under the rice–rice cropping system in southern China.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Experimental site and cropping system

    The trial was started in 1984 at the Research Farm in Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Nanchang County,Jiangxi Province,China.The research farm was located at latitude 28°57′N,longitude 115°94′E,and has an altitude of 25 m.For this research,long-term data from 1984–2018 were used.The farm is located within the mid-subtropical zone with a mean annual temperature of 18°C,mean annual rainfall of 1 600 mm,mean annual evaporation of 1 800 mm,and a frost-free period of about 280 days per annum.The paddy soils of the long-term experimental site were under a double-rice cropping system and were classified as Ferralic Cambisol (WRBIUSS 2014).The initial surface soil depth (0–20 cm) properties determined prior to the commencement of the study in 1984 are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1 Basal characteristics of the long-term experimental site in 0–20 cm soil layer in 1984

    2.2.Treatments,experimental design,and fertilizer use

    The experiment consisted of five different long-term fertilizer treatments: (i) NPK0,unfertilized control,(ii) NPK1;100% chemical NPK fertilizer; (iii) NPKM1,70% chemical NPK fertilizer and 30% organic manure; (iv) NPKM2,50% chemical NPK fertilizer and 50% organic manure; and (v) NPKM3,30% chemical NPK fertilizer and 70% organic manure.The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design.The treatments were replicated three times,bringing the number of plots to 15 with an area of 33.3 m2each.The plots were separated from one another using 0.45 m deep and 0.5 m wide cemented hedge barriers.Table 2 shows the rate of NPK application for all the fertilizer treatments for both early and late rice periods.Chemical fertilizers were substituted by organic manure at three different ratios (i.e.,30,50,and 70%).The sources of synthetic N,P,and K were urea [CO(NH2)2],calcium superphosphate [(Ca(H2PO4)2],and potassium chloride (KCl) fertilizers,respectively.Urea was applied in three doses: (i) 50% as basal dose,(ii) 25% as the first top dressing,and (iii) 25% as the second top dressing.The KCl was applied in two doses: (i) 50% as the first top dressing and (ii) 50% as the second top dressing.Before transplanting,Ca(H2PO4)2and fresh pig manure were applied both as basal doses.The organic fertilizer during the early rice cropping season was milk vetch and was applied at the rate of 3.80 Mg ha–1(NPKM1),2.72 Mg ha–1(NPKM2),and 1.63 Mg ha–1(NPKM3).The milk vetch had a moisture content of 90.2% and nutrient composition of 3.03 g N kg–1,0.8 g P kg–1,2.3 g K kg–1,and 60.5 g C kg–1.During the late rice cropping season,chemical fertilizer was substituted with pig manure with a moisture content of 80.5% and applied at the rate of 4.45,3.18,and 1.91 Mg ha–1for NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3,respectively.The pig manure has a nutrient composition of 4.5 g N kg–1,1.9 g P kg–1,6.0 g K kg–1,and 87.0 g C kg–1.

    Table 2 Description of nitrogen (N),phosphorus (P),potassium (K) application rates of early rice and late rice under different long-term fertilization treatments (1984–2018)

    2.3.Crop sampling and analysis

    At the harvest stage of both early and late rice,five mounds of rice were randomly collected from each plot to measure rice grain and straw biomass N contents.The rice grain yield (t ha–1) was determined after the harvested rice was air-dried (about 12–14% moisture content) and threshed manually.The sampled grain and straw biomass of rice were digested using H2SO4-H2O2solution at 260–270°C on a heating block.Their N content was measured using the micro-Kjeldahl digestion method (Morganetal.1985).

    2.4.Soil sampling and analysis

    Soil samples were collected in October after the late rice harvest since the beginning of the study.Five soil cores were randomly collected and pooled to form a composite sample.The soil samples were put in an ice box and conveyed to the laboratory.Before the analysis,all visible plant debris,stones,and roots were removed.The soils were then thoroughly mixed,air-dried,ground,and passed through a 2-mm mesh.The prepared samples were portioned into two: (i) fresh samples: stored at 4°C to determine the biological properties,and (ii) dry samples: used to determine the physical and chemical soil properties.Briefly,pH was measured using a soil/water (1:2.5) suspension ratio.Soil organic carbon content was measured using the potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) oxidation method (Nelson and Sommers 1996).Soil total N and total P were determined following the methods of Nelson and Sommers (1996) and Murphy and Riley (2002),respectively.Humic substances (i.e.,humic,humin,and fulvic acids) were analyzed according to the recommendations of agricultural chemical analysis (Faithfull 2002).The concentration of soil microbial groups was determined using the phospholipid-derived fatty acids (PLFAs) method,and the results were expressed as μmol g–1dry soil (Wuetal.2009).The earlier testified biomarkers included: (i) Gram-positive (G+) bacteria: i15:0,a15:0,i14:0,i16:0,i17:0,and a17:0; (ii) Gram-negative (G–) bacteria: cy19:0,16:1v9c,cy17:0,16:1v5c,17:1v8c,and 18:1v7c; (iii) fungi: 18:2 w6c and 18:2 w9c; and (iv) actinomycetes: 16:0 (10 Me),17:0 (10 Me),and 18:0 (10 Me).These biomarkers were followed to group the total PLFAs (Aietal.2012).Invertase activity was measured using 15 mL of 80 g kg–1sucrose as substrate (Ohshimaetal.2007).Protease activity was measured following the method used by Laddetal.(1976).However,urease and catalase activities were measured in citrate-acid buffer (pH 6.7) solution (Hoffmann and Teicher 1961) and by the permanganimetric method (Johnson and Temple 1964),respectively.

    2.5.Calculation

    Agronomic NUE (%) was calculated using the below equation:

    where NUTand NUCK(kg ha–1) represent N uptake (NU) under fertilizer treatment T and control treatment CK,respectively.Finput(kg ha–1) represents the amount of nitrogen applied (from inorganic and organic sources).

    Nitrogen uptake (kg ha–1) of the crop samples was estimated by multiplying plant N content with rice yields:

    Annual C input was extrapolated using C appliedviamanure (Cm; t ha–1),belowground biomass (Cr),and incorporated stubbles (Cs),as shown below:

    where the residue of roots (Rr; t ha–1yr–1) was estimated to be 30% of above-ground biomass (Bhattacharyyaetal.2008).The carbon content in rice grain (CR) was 418 g kg–1.The stubble content of rice fields (SR; t ha–1yr–1) was estimated to be 5.6% of rice straw biomass (Huangetal.2015).The carbon content in rice straw (CS) was 445 g kg–1.

    Annual soil organic carbon stock was estimated using the below equation:

    where SOCsrepresents soil organic C stocks (t ha–1yr–1),C represents soil organic carbon content (g kg–1),BD represents bulk density (g cm–3),and d represents soil layer (cm).

    This study estimated the soil organic carbon sequestration rate (CSR) using the equation proposed by Zhangetal.(2012):

    where SOCtand SOCorepresent stocks of SOC (t ha–1) during the current year of study (t) and at the initial year of study (0),respectively.T represents the difference between the initial year (1984) and the current (2018) year of study.

    Geometric mean (GMea) was a comprehensive index of enzyme activities (García-Ruizetal.2008),which was calculated as:

    where Inv,Ure,Cat,and Oxi represent invertase,protease,urease,catalase,and phenol oxidase,respectively.

    2.6.Determination of optimal fertilization

    To evaluate the best fertilizer treatment that stabilizes the negative impacts of soil properties on CSR and NUE and benefits rice grain yield (GY),this study used the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) (Lai and Hwang 1994).TOPSIS is a multi-objective optimization method involving the following steps:

    Establish the contribution matrix of the evaluation indices (herein GY with SOC and NUE with CSR):

    wheremis the number of fertilizer treatments;nis the number of the evaluation objectives;Xijis the contribution value of theith fertilizer treatment to thejth evaluation index.

    Calculate the normalized matrix:

    Calculate the weighted normalized matrix:

    where positiveVijis ideal best,while negativeVijis ideal worst;Wjis weight of thejth criterion such thatfor this work,CSR and NUE were given the weight of 0.5,and GY was set to be 0.5 to balance their respective contributions.

    Calculate the Euclidean distances:

    Calculate the performance score of the fertilizer treatments:

    whereSiis the ideal solution;Si+andSi–are the ideal best and worst solutions,respectively.

    2.7.Statistical analysis

    All statistical data analyses and graphs were performed using SigmaPlot (version 12.5).All data in the tables were expressed as mean±SE.Treatment mean values were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 5% significance level.Significant (P<0.05) means separation was performed using Tukey’s HSD test.Before the ANOVA,the data were subjected to the Shapiro–Wilk normality test.Furthermore,ANOVA on ranks was performed on data that failed the normality test at a 5% significance level.Redundancy analysis (RDAplot) was performed using Canoco Software (version 5.0) to ascertain the relationship between soil properties,CSR,and NUE.Fig.1 summarizes the present study’s methodological steps.

    Fig.1 Flowchart of the research methodology.N,nitrogen; P,phosphorus; K,potassium; NUE,nitrogen use efficiency; CSR,carbon sequestration rate; TOPSIS,technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution.Humic substances indicate humic acid and fulvic acid; microbial community indicates Gram positive bacteria,Gram negative bacteria,fungi and actinomycetes; enzyme activity indicates catalase,urease,invertase and phenol oxidase.

    3.Results

    3.1.Grain yield of the rice–rice system

    The different long-term fertilizations have a significant (P<0.05) effect on rice grain yield (Fig.2).Grain yield (early-rice season) under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3treatments were significantly (P<0.05) higher than that under NPK0and NPK1treatments.During the early rice season,grain yield increased by 103,100,and 107% under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3,respectively,compared to NPK0.Also,grain yield increased by 7.3,5.5,and 9.1% under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3,respectively,compared to NPK1.On the other hand,grain yield (late-rice season) was statistically the same under NPK1,NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3,significantly (P<0.05) higher than that under NPK0.During the late rice season,grain yield under NPK1,NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3increased by 82.1,82.3,85.7,and 85.9%,respectively,compared to NPK0.

    Fig.2 Effects of different long-term fertilizations on the grain yield of early and late rice in a double-rice cropping system.NPK0,control; NPK1,100% inorganic fertilizers; NPKM1,70% inorganic and 30% organic fertilizers; NPKM2,50% inorganic and 50% organic fertilizers; NPKM3,30% inorganic and 70% organic fertilizers.Bars are SE (n=3).Different lowercase letters indicated significant (P<0.05) differences among fertilizer treatments.

    3.2.Soil properties and geometric means of enzyme activities

    The different long-term fertilization treatments have significant (P<0.05) effects on soil BD (Table 3).The BD in manure amended treatments was statistically lower compared to control and chemical fertilizer alone treatment.However,among the manure-amended treatments,BD was statistically lower under NPKM2and NPKM3than under NPKM1.Soil pH,total N,total P,and stoichiometric ratios were significantly (P<0.05) influenced by the different long-term fertilizations (Tables 3 and 4).Soil pH under NPK0,NPK1,NPKM2,and NPKM3was statistically higher than that under NPK1.Soil TN and TP varied among treatments and ranged between 1.22 to 1.76 g kg–1and 0.44 to 1.13 g kg–1,respectively.Soil TN content under NPK0,NPK1,NPKM1,and NPKM2decreased by 31.1,17.0,8.5,and 5.1%,respectively,compared to NPKM3.

    Table 3 Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on bulk density (BD),total nitrogen (TN),total phosphorus (TP) contents and soil pH during 1984–2018

    Soil TP content increased by 118,134,and 157% under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3,respectively,compared to NPK0.Similarly,soil TP content under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3increased by 22,30,and 43%,respectively,compared to NPK1.Soil C:N ratio under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3was statistically higher than that under NPK0and NPK1.Contrarily,soil C:P and N:P ratios under NPK0and NPK1were statistically higher than those under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3.Different long-term fertilizations had a significant (P<0.05) effect on GMea (Table 4).The GMea values were significantly (P<0.05) higher under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3than under NPK0and NPK1.GMea increased with an increase in the substitution ratio.

    Table 4 Effects of different long-term fertilizer treatments on soil nutrients stoichiometry (C:N:P ratios) and geometric mean of enzyme activities (GMea) during 1984–2018

    3.3.Carbon sequestration rate and nitrogen use efficiency

    Different long-term fertilizations had significant (P<0.05) effects on SOC content,SOC stocks,carbon sequestration rate,and C input (Table 5).Soil organic carbon under different fertilizations varied from 13 to 20 g kg–1and was statistically (P<0.05) higher under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3than under NPK0and NPK1.Soil organic carbon under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3increased by 38,32,and 54%,respectively,compared to NPK0.Similarly,SOC content under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3increased by 13,19,and 25%,respectively,compared to NPK1.Soil organic carbon stocks followed a similar trend with SOC content.Soil organic carbon sequestration rate under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3increased by 175,181,and 218%,respectively,compared to NPK0.Conversely,soil C sequestration rate increased by 140,160,and 280% under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3,respectively,compared to NPK1.

    Table 5 Soil organic carbon (SOC),soil carbon stocks (SOCs),carbon sequestration rate (CSR) and annual carbon (C) input at a plough layer during 1984–2018

    Annual C input significantly (P<0.05) varied among the different long-term fertilizer treatments as in the following order: NPKM3>NPKM2>NPKM1>NPK1>NPK0.During the early-rice season,NUE was significantly (P<0.05) higher under manure-amended treatments than under the chemical fertilizer alone treatment (Fig.3).NUE increased by 19,11,and 10% under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3,respectively,relative to NPK1.The NUE during the late-rice season followed a similar trend as that in the early season,except that NUE was significantly (P<0.05) lower under NPKM2and NPKM3than under NPKM1.NUE decreased by 10 and 14% under NPKM2and NPKM3,respectively,compared to NPKM1.

    Fig.3 Effects of different long-term fertilizations on nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of early and late rice in a double-rice cropping system.NPK1,100% inorganic fertilizers; NPKM1,70% inorganic and 30% organic fertilizers; NPKM2,50% inorganic and 50% organic fertilizers; NPKM3,30% inorganic and 70% organic fertilizers.Bars are SE (n=3).Different lowercase letters indicate significant (P<0.05) differences among fertilizer treatments.

    3.4.Relationship between soil properties,grain yield,CSR,and NUE

    Grain yield had a significant (P<0.0001) and positive relationship with C sequestration rate during early rice (R2=0.44) and late rice (R2=0.38) growing seasons (Fig.4-A and B).Linear regression fitting between grain yield and CSR showed that for every 0.1 increase in CSR,grain yield increased by 6.33 and 5.29 t ha–1in early and late seasons,respectively (Fig.4-A–C).Nitrogen content in rice grain had a non-significant (P<0.0001) but positive relationship with CSR during early rice (R2=0.18) and late rice (R2=0.11) growing seasons (Fig.5-A and B).Linear regression fitting between grain N content and CSR implied that for every 0.1 increase in CSR,grain N content increased by 0.85 kg ha–1(early-rice season) and 0.95 kg ha–1(late-rice season) (Fig.5-A–C).According to the RDA plot,CSR had a close positive relationship with C input,total N,soil C:N ratio,soil catalase activity,and humic acid concentration,whereas NUE had a closer relationship with grain yield,grain N content,and phenol oxidase activity.Both CSR and NUE were negatively related to humin acid concentration and soil C:P and N:P ratios.Furthermore,soil pH and C input had a strong positive relationship with fungi,actinomycetes,and fulvic acids.By and large,RDA-1 explained 71.2%,whereas RDA-2 explained 14.8% of the total variation (Fig.6).

    Fig.4 Effects of carbon sequestration rate (CSR) on grain yield under different long-term fertilizations at the early rice (A),late rice (B) and double-rice cropping season (C) in a rice–rice cropping system.

    Fig.6 Redundancy analysis (RDA) showing the relationship amongst soil properties,grain yield (GY),carbon sequestration rate (CSR) and nitrogen content; BD,bulk density; SOC,soil organic carbon; TN,total N; TP,total phosphorus; G+,Gram positive bacteria; G–,Gram negative bacteria; Actinomc,actinomycetes; Humin,humin acids; Humic,humic acids; Fulvic,fulvic acids; Oxidase,phenol oxidase; Invertas,invertase.Red lines indicate the response variables,and blue lines indicate the explanatory variables.

    3.5.Assessment of the optimum fertilization

    The TOPSIS analysis results of the different long-term fertilizer treatments are shown in Tables 6 and 7.After balancing grain yield with SOC,the highest performance (Pi=0.649) and lowest performance (Pi=0.351) were recorded under NPKM3and NPK1,respectively.Similarly,after balancing NUE with CSR,the highest performance (Pi=0.743) and the lowest performance (Pi=0.321) were recorded under NPKM3and NPK1,respectively.Overall,using the TOPSIS procedure,the different long-term fertilizer treatments could be ranked in the following order: NPKM3>NPKM2>NPKM1>NPK1.Therefore,NPKM3could be considered as the optimum fertilizer strategy for increasing CSR rate and NUE while sustaining higher grain yield of rice in the acidic paddy soil of southern China.

    4.Discussion

    4.1.Effect of different fertilizations on soil properties and grain yield

    In our study,rice grain yield during the early season was lower under the chemical fertilization alone treatment than under the manure-amended treatments (Fig.2),which is consistent with previous studies.It has been found that limited soil nutrient availability,rooting depth,and reduced C input reduce the SOC accumulation output of grain yield under chemical fertilization alone (Zhangetal.2020; Tangetal.2022).Tianetal.(2015) found that long-term manure addition increased SOC content and C sequestration rate by increasing crop yield and SOM return from crop residues.Another possible reason for the low rice grain yield under NPK1is the low soil C:N ratio coupled with higher soil C:P and N:P ratios (Table 4),which suggests a deficiency of soil C and P contents.Soil C:N:P ratios have been accepted as suitable indicators of soil nutrient status and availability,SOM decomposition rate,nutrient immobilization,and/or mineralization (Zhangetal.2015; Abraretal.2021).Kunduetal.(2007) ascribed differences in SOC sequestration to differences in soil C:N ratio and SOM decomposition rate.This is because farmyard manure (FYM) management strategy with steadier C constituents has been reported to favor higher soil C sequestration (Bhardwajetal.2019).The present study observed a strong,significant (P<0.0001),and positive association between grain yield and CSR (Fig.4).Long-term cultivation without any exogenous C input was found to decrease grain yield and lead to negative C sequestration (Ananthaetal.2018; Gogoietal.2021).

    Our results showed that SOC content was significantly higher under manure-amended treatments than under chemical fertilizer and control treatments (Table 5).These findings are consistent with Nayaketal.(2012),who observed an increase in SOC content under the combined application of FYM with synthetic NPK fertilizer compared to sole NPK fertilization.Applying organic amendments stabilizes SOM and soil aggregates directly,increasing C input and C sequestration (Chenetal.2020; Tangetal.2022).This could partly explain the higher C sequestration rate under NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3relative to other treatments (Table 5).Organic amendments are basically C-source for soil microorganisms,the turnover of which increases C-pool and SOC sequestration (Sharmaetal.2021).Incorporating exogenous organic materials into paddy fields can reduce mineralization and loss of native SOC by enhancing organo-mineral exchanges and increasing macroaggregate formation (Wengetal.2020; Zhangetal.2020).Additionally,paddy soils are subjected to seasonal flooding,which could reduce the decomposition and mineralization rate of native SOC content due to a lack of oxygen (O2) and decrease the production of oxidative enzymes (Huang and Hall 2017; Fanetal.2020).This probably occasioned an extended residence time of organic materials and benefited soil C sequestration rate (Caietal.2003).

    In the current study,the same rates of N,P,and K were applied under manure-amended treatments,but C input under NPKM3was 93.8 and 26.6% higher than that of NPKM1and NPKM2,respectively (Tables 2 and 5).This could be due to differences in the ratio of substituted organic manure.NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3received 30,50,and 70% manure,respectively.Likewise,the SOC sequestration rate under NPKM3was 58.3 and 46.2% higher than that of NPKM1and NPKM2,respectively,suggesting the vital role of C input in SOC sequestration.C input varied with crop types,cropping patterns,soil nutrient status,fertilizer strategies,and climatic situations (Fanetal.2008; Zhangetal.2010).Our findings are consistent with Zhang Yetal.(2016),who observed increased SOC accumulation under long-term manure applications due to increased C input.

    The geometric mean,an index of soil enzyme activity quality (Liuetal.2013),is suitable for shrinking enzyme activity values into a single numerical value (García-Ruizetal.2008).The GMea values under organic manureamended treatments were statistically higher than those in the chemical fertilizer alone and control treatments (Table 4),possibly due to increased SOM,N availability,and uptake,which thus increased NUE and grain yield.Sharmaetal.(2021) opined that improving soil N-pool reserve is beneficial for reducing soil N competition amongst plant uptake and microbial assimilation (Wangetal.2018).Long-term paddy field trials with organic manure treatments recorded higher soil TOC and TN contents than inorganic fertilization alone due to improved availability of soil N and NUE (Tangetal.2022).In the current study,increased grain yield and NUE coincide with the increase in SOC and TN contents (Tables 3 and 5),stressing the importance of soil C and N content in rice growth hitherto N use efficiency.

    4.2.Effect of different fertilizations on carbon sequestration rate

    The carbon sequestration rate under manure-amended treatments was higher than that in the chemical fertilizer alone treatment (Table 5),possibly due to manure addition and higher turnover of crop residues.Carbon sequestration rate is the balance between the C input and decomposition rate of organic carbon (West and Six 2007; Zhang Setal.2016; Zhang Yetal.2016),such that the C sequestration rate can either be positive or negative.Zhangetal.(2012) reported a wide range of C sequestration rate values varying from 0.20 to 0.88 t ha–1yr–1under manure-amended treatments in southern China.In our study,C sequestration rate values under manureamended treatments were lower and varied from 0.12 to 0.19 t ha–1yr–1,possibly due to differences in location and cropping system.Similarly,the C sequestration rate in our study was relatively lower than those reported by Zhangetal.(2007) from southern China paddy soils and Wangetal.(2013) from northeast China.This could also be ascribed to differences in location and rate of fertilizer applied.

    Increased SOC content and CSR in this study coincide with higher C input and lower bulk density under manureamended treatments.This result agrees with Caietal.(2019),who observed that C input increased soil nutrient availability by improving soil pH,SOC content,and BD.Earlier long-term field experiment studies in China and elsewhere have reported a linear relationship between SOC sequestration and C inputs (Kongetal.2005; Zhangetal.2012; Zhang Setal.2016; Zhang Yetal.2016).The current study found that substituting chemical fertilizer with organic manure is an effective strategy for increasing C sequestration.This is because organic manure could increase SOC accumulation by providing C and N substrates for use by soil microbes (Gogoietal.2021) and in the growth of plant roots and shoots (Babhulkaretal.2000).The highest CSR under NPKM3reflects the efficacy of organic amendment to accumulate soil C,possibly due to the availability of more C in humified and recalcitrant forms (Gogoietal.2021).

    4.3.Effect of different fertilizations on NUE

    During both early and late rice seasons,NUE under manure-amended treatments was higher relative to the chemical fertilization alone treatment (Fig.3),possibly due to improved soil fertility and soil quality by providing adequate soil nutrients for rice growth (Tables 3 and 5).Our result is consistent with earlier findings (Sharmaetal.2021; Tangetal.2022).Redundancy analysis showed a strong and significant positive correlation between soil nutrients and biochemical properties of the soil (Fig.6).Thus,the mechanism can be summarized as follows: the incorporation of organic amendments favored NUE due to improved nutrient availability and N uptake by changing soil chemical properties (SOC,pH and soil C:N ratio),humic substances (humic and fulvic acids),PLFAs (G+and G–bacteria,fungi,and actinomycetes),and soil enzyme activity (catalase,invertase,phenol oxidase,and urease).Increased NUE under manure-amended treatments was attributed to the increase in soil TN content (Singhetal.2021),N input (Janssensetal.2010; Freyetal.2014),and lower N losses (Yadavetal.2000; Bietal.2009; Tangetal.2022).The aerobic condition of paddy fields during milk vetch (AstragalussinicusL.) cultivation in our study could be beneficial to soil aeration.SOM decomposition and microbial N assimilation thereby increase available soil N for plant uptake (Chenetal.2017).Redundancy analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between NUE with BD and soil C:N and N:P ratios (Fig.6).Overall,the lower NUE under NPK1compared to manure-amended treatments could be ascribed to lower available N content,higher soil C:P and N:P ratios,and higher BD.

    4.4.lmplications of environmental response to different fertilizations

    The considerable increase in SOC content (Table 5) in the present study under manure-amended treatments could lead to concomitant increase in the soil inorganic carbon (SIC) content confirming previous findings.Gogoietal.(2021) observed a significant positive correlation between SOC content and soil inorganic content and attributed it to SOC accumulation following the substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure.Generally,SOC breakdown increases CO2concentration in the soil (Yangetal.2017),which could lead to the production of the carboxyl group (HCO3–).When ionizes,R-COOH releases a proton (H+) and negatively charges oxygen that combines with available cations to stabilize soil inorganic carbon content (Meyeretal.2014; Mongeretal.2015).We observed a negative C sequestration rate under NPK0,possibly due to a lack of physical protection of SOC content and its loss to the environment.Gogoietal.(2021) attributed negative C sequestration and stabilization efficiency under the unfertilized control treatment to lower root biomass and gaseous losses of soil carbon as CO2and methane (CH4) emission.Therefore,it implies that incorporating organic amendments (especially a 70% ratio) can help provide physical protection to SOC,stabilizing itviamaximum SOC sequestration and reducing SOC loss in the form of CO2and/or CH4emission.

    In our study,the decrease in bulk density under organic-amended treatments was a good sign of resilient soil structure (Table 3).Low BD not only influences soil structure and aggregation (Liangetal.2021) but also affects soil nutrient availability and nutrients C:N:P ratios.Redundancy analysis indicated a significant positive relationship between BD with soil C:P and N:P ratios.It also revealed a significant negative correlation of BD with SOC,TN,TP,and soil C:N ratio (Fig.6).Generally,cultivation practice could increase SOM mineralization by increasing oxidative loss of SOC (Gogoietal.2021),disturbance on soil aggregation,soil aeration and affecting microbial processes (Doran 1980; Lehmannetal.2007; Liangetal.2017; Yadavetal.2017).Macroaggregate formation in soil systems plays vital ecosystem functions,such as reducing soil compaction and improving soil water infiltration and nutrient availability (Adnanetal.2020).In the present study,substituting chemical fertilizer with organic manure could have been more efficient in macroaggregate formation and contributed to better soil physical conditions,such as reduced bulk density and soil compaction (Baietal.2018).

    NUE under manure-amended treatments increased with increasing SOC content during early- and laterice seasons,compared to chemical fertilization alone (Fig.3).Earlier findings suggested that increasing SOC sequestration and NUE through organic manure addition (Tangetal.2022) in the paddy system is vital for managing and supporting sustainable growth and,by extension,aids in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions (Chenetal.2020).Our present study revealed that organic manure-amended treatments could increase SOC stocks by 2–5 t ha–1compared to chemical fertilization alone (Table 5).It implies that paddy soils are good soil C-sink as they cover a land area of approximately 9.3 million ha (Jiangetal.2021) and can improve SOC accumulation under manure addition by 18.6 to 46.5 t ha–1relative to chemical fertilization alone.Paddy soils were attributed to the emission of ammonia (NH3) and N lossesviarunoff,but organic manure incorporation can mitigate these negative environmental effects (Tangetal.2022).

    In our study,urea was used as a source of chemical N fertilizer in all treatments,and the soil total N content had a positive correlation with urease activity (Fig.6).Nitrous oxide,on the one hand,is largely emitted from soil to the atmosphereviamicrobial nitrification and denitrification processes (Bremner 1997).On the other hand,urea requires ample activity of urease enzyme to be hydrolyzed to NH3,converted to nitrite (NO2–),and then to nitrate (NO3–) through the nitrification process (Prosser 1990).It shows that urease activity is at the core of two dynamic mechanisms: (i) reducing the rate of N loss from urea and (ii) reducing N2O emissions.This,coupled with high NUE in the manure-amended treatments,could probably lead to lower N2O emissions in our study,agreeing with earlier studies.Nitrous oxide emissions are produced owing to N fertilizer application and low NUE and,therefore,can be mitigated by increasing NUE under long-term N fertilization (Cardenasetal.2019).

    Overall,high NUE under manure-amended treatments in our results has,by implication,a greater tendency to reduce N2O emissions to the atmosphere.Many earlier studies have studied the impacts of long-term fertilization single-handedly on C sequestration,NUE,or greenhouse gas emissions,and few other ones relate C sequestration to NUE (Tangetal.2022) or NUE to GHGs emissions (Veraetal.2022).Yet,there is a need for long-term studies to relate C sequestration to NUE and GHGs emissions.In our present study,while grain yield and NUE increased with increasing C sequestration,there is also a tendency for mitigation of GHGs emissions,especially in the manure-amended treatments.Increased NUE was found to reduce N2O emissions but with negative penalties on sugarcane yield (Veraetal.2022).

    4.5.Optimized long-term fertilization approach

    Based on the grain yield results,NPK1,NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3(early-rice season) and NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3(late-rice season) treatments were statistically similar.Each treatment could be considered as optimum fertilization.However,TOPSIS indicated NPKM3treatment as the optimum fertilization after balancing grain yield with SOC content (Table 6).Similarly,based on the NUE results,NPKM1,NPKM2,and NPKM3treatments (early rice season) were statistically the same,and NPKM1treatment (late rice season) was superior to NPK1,NPKM2,and NPKM3treatments.All manureamended treatments (early rice season) and NPKM1treatment (late rice season) could be considered as the optimum fertilization.However,TOPSIS showed that NPKM3treatment is the best option for improving NUE at maximized soil CSR (Table 7).Tangetal.(2022) found that substituting 70% of chemical fertilizer with organic manure was the optimum fertilization for increasing grain yield,carbon storage,and NUE.Our present results have a wider scope than the former since they consider a single substitution ratio (70% organic manure),but we consider three different substitution ratios (30,50,and 70% organic manure).Different sources of organic amendments (rice straw residue and organic manure) in the latter are worth noting.Equally,our study also comprises green manure (i.e.,milk vetch (early rice season) and pig manure (late rice season)).Milk vetch and pig manure are organic materials with a high C:N ratio,and their application can bind together microaggregates to form macroaggregates (Subehiaetal.2013).

    Table 6 TOPSIS score and ranking of fertilizer treatments based on balancing rice grain yield (GY) and soil organic carbon (SOC) content during 1984–20181)

    Table 7 TOPSIS score and ranking of fertilizer treatments based on balancing nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and carbon sequestration rate (CSR) during 1984–20181)

    5.Conclusion

    The present study proved that the partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure greatly enhanced the overall soil quality and could potentially sustain soil fertility.The three substitution ratios studied are an alternative to improve soil biochemical properties and potentially mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from acidic paddy soils under the rice–rice cropping system in southern China by increasing soil pH and soil organic carbon content.Our study also indicated that substituting chemical fertilizer with organic manure (especially at the 70% substitution ratio) would be more effective in increasing soil organic carbon sequestration rate and nitrogen use efficiency.The present results are significant in sustainable paddy soil management in terms of enhancing carbon sequestration,nitrogen use efficiency,and subsidiary effects on soil quality and fertility.However,future studies should focus on greenhouse gas emissions-elevated soil organic carbon sequestration and nitrogen use efficiency vis-a-vis microbial mechanisms involved based on long-term positioning studies.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank all the staff for their valuable work associated with the National Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Effects Longterm Monitoring Network in China.This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41671301),the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0300901),and the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund,China (GY2022-13-5,G2022-02-2,G2022-02-3 and G2022-02-10).

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 色综合站精品国产| 久久久久国产网址| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| h日本视频在线播放| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| av福利片在线观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 永久网站在线| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 在线播放无遮挡| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 中文资源天堂在线| 毛片女人毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲图色成人| 简卡轻食公司| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 中文欧美无线码| 九九在线视频观看精品| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| av线在线观看网站| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 搡老乐熟女国产| 九色成人免费人妻av| 日本色播在线视频| 91狼人影院| 精品久久久久久成人av| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 大香蕉久久网| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 看黄色毛片网站| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| freevideosex欧美| av天堂中文字幕网| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 日韩欧美三级三区| 熟女电影av网| 午夜视频国产福利| 久久久久性生活片| 日韩av免费高清视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 免费少妇av软件| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 男女国产视频网站| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美+日韩+精品| 精品久久久噜噜| 成人二区视频| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 男女边摸边吃奶| 赤兔流量卡办理| 五月天丁香电影| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| videossex国产| av在线天堂中文字幕| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 九草在线视频观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲精品视频女| 亚洲图色成人| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产精品无大码| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美成人a在线观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲国产色片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| av一本久久久久| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产淫语在线视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 三级毛片av免费| 六月丁香七月| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 熟女电影av网| 特级一级黄色大片| 直男gayav资源| 久久人人爽人人片av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 在现免费观看毛片| 69人妻影院| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 永久网站在线| av天堂中文字幕网| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 婷婷色综合www| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 搞女人的毛片| 色综合站精品国产| 天堂√8在线中文| 黄片wwwwww| 午夜日本视频在线| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 免费观看av网站的网址| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 美女国产视频在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 如何舔出高潮| 日本一本二区三区精品| 少妇的逼水好多| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| av播播在线观看一区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 有码 亚洲区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 男女那种视频在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 日韩中字成人| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 一本久久精品| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 特级一级黄色大片| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久6这里有精品| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 久久久久久久久中文| 伦精品一区二区三区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 精品午夜福利在线看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 综合色丁香网| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 久久热精品热| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 午夜精品在线福利| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 日本与韩国留学比较| av在线天堂中文字幕| 一级黄片播放器| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产成人精品福利久久| 免费看a级黄色片| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| av免费观看日本| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品久久视频播放| 直男gayav资源| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日本免费a在线| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 大香蕉久久网| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 久久草成人影院| 三级经典国产精品| av免费在线看不卡| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 中国国产av一级| 一级黄片播放器| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 有码 亚洲区| 久久久色成人| videos熟女内射| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 老女人水多毛片| 色综合色国产| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 内射极品少妇av片p| av在线观看视频网站免费| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 日日啪夜夜撸| 日韩强制内射视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 麻豆成人av视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 一夜夜www| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美激情在线99| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 精品午夜福利在线看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产乱人视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日韩电影二区| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品一及| 国产美女午夜福利| kizo精华| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 精品久久久久久电影网| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 中文字幕久久专区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 日日啪夜夜爽| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 欧美日本视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久97久久精品| 在线观看人妻少妇| 91久久精品电影网| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 色视频www国产| av.在线天堂| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 五月天丁香电影| www.av在线官网国产| 一级片'在线观看视频| 成人二区视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| av在线老鸭窝| 日本与韩国留学比较| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 中文资源天堂在线| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 全区人妻精品视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产在视频线在精品| 中文欧美无线码| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 看免费成人av毛片| 天堂√8在线中文| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 日本一二三区视频观看| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 午夜福利高清视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久这里只有精品中国| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 综合色丁香网| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 一级黄片播放器| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 一本一本综合久久| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 人妻一区二区av| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 日本色播在线视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产永久视频网站| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲无线观看免费| 久久久久久久久大av| 成人av在线播放网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| www.色视频.com| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲精品视频女| 六月丁香七月| 伦精品一区二区三区| 色哟哟·www| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| xxx大片免费视频| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产三级在线视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 日韩电影二区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 97热精品久久久久久| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 男女国产视频网站| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产不卡一卡二| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久久色成人| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日本三级黄在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| av福利片在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产探花极品一区二区| av一本久久久久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲国产av新网站| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久午夜福利片| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 69人妻影院| 人妻一区二区av| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 色视频www国产| 国产av在哪里看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 麻豆成人av视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 七月丁香在线播放| videos熟女内射| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 99久久人妻综合| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产乱来视频区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 韩国av在线不卡| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 成年免费大片在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 成年版毛片免费区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av|