• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Biocrust-induced partitioning of soil water between grass and shrub in a desert steppe of Northwest China

    2023-02-08 08:03:44YANGXinguoWANGEntianQUWenjieWANGLei
    Journal of Arid Land 2023年1期

    YANG Xinguo, WANG Entian, QU Wenjie, WANG Lei

    1 Northwest National Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration, Ningxia University,Yinchuan 750021, China;

    2 Key Laboratory of Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystems, Ministry of Education, Ningxia University,Yinchuan 750021, China;

    3 Ecology and Environment College, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China

    Abstract: Maintaining the stability of exotic sand-binding shrub has become a large challenge in arid and semi-arid grassland ecosystems in northern China. We investigated two kinds of shrublands with different BSCs (biological soil crusts) cover in desert steppe in Northwest China to characterize the water sources of shrub (Caragana intermedia Kuang et H. C. Fu) and grass (Artemisia scoparia Waldst. et Kit.) by stable 18O isotopic. Our results showed that both shrublands were subject to persistent soil water deficiency from 2012 to 2017, the minimum soil depth with CV (coefficient of variation) <15% and SWC (soil water content) <6% was 1.4 m in shrubland with open areas lacking obvious BSC cover, and 0.8 m in shrubland covered by mature BSCs. For C. intermedia, a considerable proportion of water sources pointed to the surface soil. Water from BSCs contributed to averages 22.9% and 17.6% of the total for C. intermedia and A. scoparia, respectively. C. intermedia might use more water from BSCs in rainy season than dry season, in contrast to A. scoparia. The relationship between shrub (or grass) and soil water by δ18O shown significant differences in months, which partly verified the potential trends and relations covered by the high variability of the water source at seasonal scale. More fine roots at 0-5 cm soil layer could be found in the surface soil layer covered by BSCs (8000 cm/m3) than without BSCs (3200 cm/m3), which ensured the possibility of using the surface soil water by C. intermedia. The result implies that even under serious soil water deficiency, C. intermedia can use the surface soil water, leading to the coexistence between C.intermedia and A. scoparia. Different with the result from BSCs in desert areas, the natural withdrawal of artificial C. intermedia from desert steppe will be a long-term process, and the highly competitive relationship between shrubs and grasses also determines that its habitat will be maintained in serious drought state for a long time.

    Keywords: desert steppe; biological soil crusts; water resource; Caragana intermedia; Artemisia scoparia

    1 Introduction

    In northern China, arid and semi-arid grassland ecosystems are threatened by desertification, and use of desert shrubs as sand-binding vegetation to restore such areas has been carried out in around 6×106hm2over the past 60 a. However, sand-binding vegetation can reduce the soil water content of deep soil layers, leading to its dieback and mortality due to water stress (Li et al., 2014). Thus,maintaining the stability of exotic sand-binding shrub has become a large challenge (Li et al., 2013).

    The senescence of exotic sand-binding species and the reappearance of native species might not be avoidable (Li et al., 2014). However, the process may vary in different regions. For example,the inflection point of shrub-grass replacement, wherein the senescence of exotic shrubs is followed by the reappearance of native grasses, has been recorded at around 30-40 a after shrub plantings where the annual precipitation is about 200 mm (Li, 2005), or 10-20 a where annual precipitation is around 400 mm (Zuo et al., 2009). However, in desert steppes with the precipitation of around 300 mm where shrub (C. intermedia) has been replanted to restore sandy grassland,the shrub has remained the dominant species for more than 40 a without a significant increase in plant diversity (Yang et al., 2015). As a result, a binary vegetation structure dominated by the shrub and grass (A. scoparia) is common in the region (Zhao et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2019).

    Soil water deficiency would drive the competition between shrubs and grasses for shallow soil water (Ehleringer et al., 1991), with upper and lower layer coexistence strategy (Le Roux et al.,1995) weakened. As a result, shrub degradation is not always avoidable. However, differences in root configuration among different shrub species and across life stages lead to variable use of water sources among individual shrubs in adapting to arid and semi-arid grassland ecosystems(Jia et al., 2012; Huang and Zhang, 2015; Zheng et al., 2015). For example, shrubs growing in the Mu Us Sandy Land of China can successfully compete to delay the emergence of grasses as the dominant species during later successional stages (Liu et al., 2010). In addition, the succession process is also related to disturbances, environmental factors such as precipitation, soil type, and other variables, indicating specificity of eco-hydrologic processes in different regions (Li et al.,2017). The different succession processes mentioned before reflect possible differences in the intensity and mode of shrub-grass competition for shallow soil water among different regions.However, to our knowledge, there are still few studies on the water source and competitive relationship between exoticC. intermediaand native grasses, especially in combination with stable isotope studies.

    In arid regions, biological soil crusts (BSCs) are important factors affecting hydrological process and vegetation succession. Studies have shown that compared with bare soil, soil water infiltration decreases when the soil was covered by BSCs, and more water from precipitation being constrained in the shallow soil layers (i.e., shallowing soil hydrological processes) (Li et al.,2010; Zhang et al., 2015). In the Tengger Desert of China, the appearance of BSCs accelerates the decline of re-vegetated shrubs and the recovery of local shallow-rooted grasses (Li, 2005).However, in the Negev Desert of Southern Israel, moss crusts scarcely influence precipitation infiltration, and do not lead to shrub death (Kidron, 2014a). During severe droughts, BSCs even can provoke the death of certain annual plant species (Kidron, 2014b). Due to the differences in soil properties and crust types, the influence of BSCs on vegetation-hydrological processes are highly variable in different regions (Li et al., 2010; et al., 2012), and debate remains regarding the vegetation-hydrological effect of BSCs. The effects of BSCs on the exotic shrubC. intermediaand native species in the desert steppe of China have yet to be specifically analyzed.

    C. intermediais an important species for restoring sandy grassland, now which also faces the challenge of stability maintenance in the desert steppe. The different processes of shrub-grass replacement reflect potential specificity of ecological-hydrological mechanisms in this region. In order to investigate these mechanisms, we selected two examples of exoticC. intermediashrublands with notable differences in BSCs coverings, and examined soil hydrological processes and water sources for the shrub and dominant grassA. scoparia. We aimed to describe the effect of BSCs on water sources ofC. intermediaandA. scoparia, and deeply understand the stability of the exotic shrub in the region.

    2 Materials and methods

    2.1 Study area

    The study area was located in a semi-arid desert steppe of Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of China (37°47′-37°57′N, 107°22′-107°33′E; Fig. 1). The annual mean temperature is 8.1℃ and mean annual precipitation ranges from 250 to 350 mm, with more than 62% of total precipitation occurring between July and September. Annual sunlight is 3124 h and potential evaporation is 2897 mm. The frost-free period lasts about 165 d. The main soil types of the region are sierozem, loess, and aeolian sandy soil. In general, the growth season for plants is from April to October, the precipitation and soil water condition often changed significantly before and after July. The period before July is called dry season with little precipitation and shallow soil water deficiency, except for more water in deep soil just from the supplies of precipitation in last year. The period after July is therefore called rainy season with more precipitation and good soil water condition in shallow layers.

    Fig. 1 Location of the experimental site (a), landscape and habitat characteristics of the shrubland (b and c). (b),S-CK, shrubland without BSCs (biological soil crusts) cover; (c), S-BSC, shrubland with BSCs cover.

    The region is a typical transition zone between the Mu Us Sandy Land and the Loess Plateau.While there is considerable heterogeneity of climate, soil, and plants in the region, there has also been serious environmental destruction caused by human activity such as overgrazing of livestock.C. intermediawas extensively planted to restore these areas beginning in the 1970s, and the areas presently are more than 2×105hm2. Most ofC. intermediaplanted before the 1990s have reached maturity, and soil water deficiency and individual senescence has followed (Song et al., 2014;Yang et al., 2015).

    C. intermediais typically planted in a belt with two lines, spaced 1 m apart and 6-8 m between belts, and oriented perpendicular to the primary wind direction in winter and spring (Zuo et al.,2006). The native vegetation of the area varies greatly due to differences in the degree of desertification and grazing disturbance. In general, most native species are annual plants adapted to sandy environments, such asA. scoparia. Most perennial grasses are only found in small soil patches scattered within the sandy grassland matrix.

    2.2 Sampling design

    TwoC. intermediashrublands with different BSCs covering were considered (Fig. 1). One shrubland lacked obvious BSCs cover (S-CK), while open areas of another shrubland were covered with BSCs (S-BSC). Shrub coverage was 23.5% in S-CK and 21.8% in S-BSC, without obvious differences (Table S1). Reduction of shrubs individuals was more obvious in S-BSC,with light damage to the canopy.A. scopariawas the dominant grass species in both shrublands,forming a single binary community withC. intermedia. Both shrublands had sandy calcareous soil in surface with similar qualities (Table S2). BSCs in S-BSC were composed primarily of moss, with traces of lichen, and covered 57% of the ground with an average thickness of 2 cm.Their color differed between the arid and rainy seasons, becoming gray in the dry season and green in the rainy season. Within each shrubland, we selected three 100 m×100 m sampling plots,and randomly chose fiveC. intermediaindividuals and five subplots within different belts (one every other belt), 1.5 m from the edge of the belt. As shown in Figure 1, the belt just means the planting lines of shrub.

    Both shrublands were planted in the 1980s over about 10 a. The oldest shrubland was around 40 a. Although these areas were subject to a mean grazing intensity of 1 sheep/hm2, this varied widely over space and time. According to our investigation in the study area, when herders are reliant on livestock as their main income, higher grazing intensity is common, and BSCs in the shrubland are rare, such as in S-CK. However, some herders may give up grazing temporarily due to economic or other factors, or may sublease meadow to achieve rotation grazing. Therefore,these shrublands may be temporarily idle, giving BSCs a chance to develop, such as in S-BSC.

    2.3 Soil moisture monitoring

    In the sampled plots, 6 transparent plastic pipes for time-domain reflectometry (TDR) probes(HD2-TRIME/T3, IMKO Device Ltd., Ettlingen, Germany) were vertically installed in the soil,1.5 m from the edge of the belt, to measure soil moisture from 0-300 cm layer in 20 cm intervals.Measurements were made every 15 d during the growing seasons from 2012 to 2017. Natural grassland withoutC. intermediawas also sampled to serve as control (CK). At the same sites,surface soil moisture was monitored from August 2015 at layers of 3 and 8 cm. These measurements were used to obtain average soil moisture at 0-5 and 5-10 cm, respectively. These sensors have a resolution of 0.001 m3/m3, estimated accuracy 0.02 (±0.03) m3/m3, ranging from 0 to 1 m3/m3. Installation of probes followed a protocol outlined in Chamizo et al. (2013), and was completed in August 2015. At each site, a U30 Soil Moisture Logger system was installed, and data was collected every 30 min using a HOBO Micro Station system (Onset Co., Bourne,Massachusetts, USA). Standard calibration equations were used to obtain measures of volumetric water content (Cobos and Chambers, 2010). Daily soil moisture was considered the average of the 30-min soil moisture records in a day.

    2.4 Water sources for C. intermedia and A. scoparia

    To further determine the role of BSCs in the water sources, and according to the main sources of soil water for plants based on the pre-test results and the limitation of the linear mixed model (the sources should be less than five; Dawson, 1993), we adjusted the sampling method of soil water during 2016-2017 based on four sources: (1) BSCs at 0-2 cm layer, (2) shallow soil from 2-30 cm layer, (3) middle soil from 30-70 cm layer, and (4) deep soil more than 70 cm layer, until reaching the impermeable parent material horizon. During 2016-2017, 9 sampling events in different months were completed. The sampling dates in dry season were May, June, and early July, then in rainy season were end July, August, and September. For each sampling event, three replicate samples of plants or soil were collected, yielding 27 samples in all.

    During each sampling event, nine xylem samples were collected from two-year-oldC.intermediatwigs without green parts. Nine xylem samples of root and stem joints from differentA. scopariaindividuals were also randomly selected. All bark and phloem were removed, and samples were pooled and transferred to glass vials sealed with parafilm, and stored in a portable cooler. At the same time, different layers of soil were sampled using a hand auger with 35 mm diameter, sealed, and stored. All samples were subsequently kept in a -20°C freezer prior to water extraction.

    Water extraction and isotopic18O analyses were performed at the China Academy of Forestry.Eighteen samples forC. intermedia(seven in the dry season and eleven in the rainy season), and twelve samples forA. scoparia(five in the dry season and seven in the rainy season) were used to analyze water sources, meeting the requirements of the linear mixed model. IsoSource software package (Phillips and Gregg, 2003) was used to quantify the contributions of multiple water sources of different soil layers forC. intermediaorA. scoparia.

    2.5 Fine root distribution in 0-10 cm soil layer for C. intermedia

    The fine roots distribution ofC. intermediain S-BSCat layers of 0-5 and 5-10 cm was investigated in 2016. To examine the relative effects of BSCs, we established two kinds of root sampling plots away from the shrub belts used in the above experiments. One used three replicate 4 m×4 m plots with BSCs reserved, and the other used three replicate plots with BSCs removed completely in April 2016. To avoid the influence of grasses, we removed all grasses within each plot in August 2016. The plots were regularly maintained by manually removing new seedlings prior to root sampling. In October 2016, three 0.2 m×0.2 m subplots in each plot were established,and whole soil samples from 0-5 and 5-10 cm layers were collected. Fresh fine roots ofC.intermediawith0.5-2.0 mm diameterwere extracted, and the root length was measured in field.Parts of fine roots less than 0.5 mm in diameter were discounted due to the associated difficulty in recognizing and collecting them (Fig. S1).

    2.6 Statistical analyses

    Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v.20.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago,USA). T tests were used to determine statistically significant differences (α=0.05) in root length between plots, and the differences of δ18O among soil and plants. A time-depth contour map of soil moisture in different years was created using the Surfer v.13.0 software (Golden Software Inc., Colorado, USA), and used to analyze dynamics and trends in soil moisture during 2012-2017.

    CV (coefficient of variation) values of soil moisture in the upper layers were greater than in deeper layers in general, for the disturbance of seasonal precipitation. We defined the soil moisture of some soil layer as relatively stable when the average value of CVi(the coefficient of variation in soil moisture at theithsoil layer) during 2012-2017 was lower than 15%. According to the variation of soil moisture in 0-300 cm layer during 2012-2017, the depth of the uppermost soil layer, whose average CViduring 2012-2017 was lower than 15%, and SWC (soil water content) was lower than 6%, was considered empirically the maximum depth affected by precipitation, or the starting depth for soil water deficiency in the study area. When this depth was lower, soil water deficiency was regarded as more serious.

    The daily difference in soil moisture in surface soil (0-5 cm layer) relative to the lower layer(5-10 cm layer) was calculated as follows:

    where ISSM is the daily increment of surface soil moisture (%); SWC5is the percent volumetric soil water content at 0-5 cm layer, and SWC10is the percent volumetric soil water content at 5-10 cm layer. When the surface soil has a higher water holding capacity, precipitation infiltration will be delayed, leading to a higher water content relative to the lower layer for a certain duration.Under continuous monitoring of soil moisture, ISSM could be considered a simple indicator to measure dynamic changes in hydrological states in the surface soil, e.g., shallowing soil hydrological processes.

    3 Results

    3.1 Soil moisture dynamics in 0-300 cm layer from 2012 to 2017

    There were significant spatial and temporal differences among S-CK, S-BSC, and CK (grassland)(Fig. 2). From 2012 to 2017, soil water contents both in S-CK and S-BSC showed continuous decreasing trends, while natural grassland did not show similar changes. Soil water content in 0-60 cm layer in S-BSC was higher than that in S-CK, but the relation was opposed when the layer was more than 60 cm. Mean values during 2012-2017 indicated that the minimum soil layer with CV<15% and SWC<6% was 1.4 m for S-CK, and 0.8 m for S-BSC (Fig. S2). During most of the observation period, soil water deficiency was most evident in S-BSC, where the moisture of the soil layers below 1.0 m was always reliably within <6%.

    Fig. 2 Soil water contents in 0-300 cm (a-o) layer from 2012 to 2017. S-CK, shrubland with BSCs (biological soil crusts) cover; S-BSC, shrubland with BSCs cover; CK, natural grassland without replanted Caragana intermedia.

    3.2 Daily surface soil moisture dynamics

    The relative water content of the surface soil layer (0-5 cm) was consistently higher than the lower layer (5-10 cm) in S-BSC, but was lower or nearly equal to the lower layer in S-CK (Fig.3). The relative increment in the ISSM was higher under the covering of BSCs (S-BSC: 14.67%in mean, varying from -59.26% to 355.19%), indicating that BSCs retained more precipitation and led to greater relative residence time of water at the surface. Where there was no BSC cover,ISSM was greatly reduced (S-CK: -5.08% in mean, varying from -32.74% to 37.49%). This was a typical case of shallowing soil hydrological process under the covering of BSCs.

    Fig. 3 Daily time series of relative increment in surface soil moisture (ISSM) in S-CK and S-BSC (biological soil crust) plots in the growth seasons (from May to October) during 2016-2017. (a), ISSM in S-CK and S-BSC;(b), SWC (soil water content) in 0-5 and 5-10 cm soil layers in S-CK; (c) SWC in 0-5 and 5-10 cm soil layers in S-BSC. S-CK, shrubland without BSCs cover; S-BSC, shrubland with BSCs cover.

    3.3 Water uptake for C. intermedia and A. scoparia

    To further understand the role of BSCs in water resource used byC. intermediaandA. scoparia,we collected water samples of BSCs (0-2 cm layer) and restricted soil water sampling to the shallow (2-30 cm layer), middle (30-70 cm layer), and deep (>70 cm) layers from 2016 to 2017(Table 1). On average, BSCs were a source of 22.9% of water forC. intermediaand 17.9% forA.scoparia. The water from 0-30 cm contributed nearly 60% of the resources forbothA. scopariaandC. intermedia.

    Table 1 Average proportional water uptake from four potential soil sources for Caragana intermedia and Artemisia scoparia

    More variation inC. intermediawater resource use was observed in the dry season than in the rainy season (Fig. 4).On average, more water was taken up from BSCs byC. intermediain the rainy season, but not byA. scoparia. The greater uptake byA. scopariafrom BSCs occurred in the dry season. The differences of water sources ofA. scopariabetween rainy season and dry season was related with its root growth dynamics (Fig. S3). However, the water resources in dry season betweenC. intermediaandA. scopariawere significantly different (P<0.05; Fig. S4).

    Fig. 4 Water uptake percentage from different potential sources for Caragana intermedia and Artemisia scoparia in the rainy and dry seasons during 2016-2017. Water sources were defined as BSCs (biological soil crusts) ranging from surface (0-2 cm), shallow (2-30 cm), middle (30-70 cm) to deep (>70 cm). SWC, soil water content. Bars are standard errors.

    3.4 Root length distribution of C. intermedia in 0-10 cm soil layer

    BSCs also affected root distribution ofC. intermedia(Figs. 5 and S1). More fine roots occurred in 0-5 cm layer in the presence of BSCs than without them (P<0.05), but this difference was not observed in 5-10 cm layer (P>0.05). Overall, more fine roots were found in 0-5 cm layer than in 5-10 cm layer in both plots, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05).

    Fig. 5 Fine root length density in 0-10 cm soil layer for Caragana intermedia in plots with (BSCs reserved) and without biological soil crusts (BSCs removed). Fine roots were defined as roots with a diameter within 0.5-2.0 mm. *,P<0.05 level. Bars are standard errors.

    4 Discussion

    4.1 Surface soil water use by C. intermedia

    WhetherC. intermediacan use more of the surface soil water when BSCs covered depends on two conditions, one is the availability of water, and another is the fine roots in the surface soil.Firstly, the relative availability of surface soil water was increased when BSCs covered (Fig. 2),as has been similarly observed in desert regions (Li et al., 2010). Secondly, more fine roots ofC.intermediawere found in 0-5 cm layer in the presence of BSCs (Fig. 5). Although BSCs exacerbated the degree of soil water deficiency in 0-300 cm layer, BSCs also increased the possibility forC. intermediato use more of the surface soil water, just as didCaragana korshinskiiKom. in the desert (Zhang et al., 2006) andC. intermediain a loess region (Lu et al.,2017).

    The hydrological role of BSCs and their ecological impacts on plant communities in arid and semi-arid grassland ecosystems are still under debate (Kowaljow and Fernández, 2011; Kidron et al., 2012). The water use pattern ofC. intermediainduced by BSCs in the desert steppe, just as previous debates, reflects the complexity and particularity of the relationship between soil and vegetation across different regions as BSCs existing. Moss, as the main component of BSCs, are often associated with a high water-holding capacity, which increases the residence time of water in the surface soil, resulting in greater availability for plants with shallow roots (Li et al., 2010).However,C. intermediais a typical shrub with distinct vertical and horizontal roots, which are highly plastic in their response to different soil and water conditions (functionally dimorphic root system, Grossiord et al., 2017). Many shrub species develop horizontal roots in drier soil habitats(Zhang et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2010) so as to utilize shallower soil water (Jia et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2012). As has been previously reported (Zhou et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2017), water used by both shrubs and grass may be obtained from different soil layers according to changes in water availability during different seasons. In our study, the distribution of fine roots in 0-5 cm soil layer indicates thatC. intermediaalso has the ability to use the surface soil water.

    However, due to limitations in observational techniques, we do not have direct evidence of the existence ofC. intermediafine roots in BSCs themselves. It is also possible that the dense structure of moss does not allow the roots ofC. intermediato enter (Galun et al., 1982). In fact,the isotope18O signal between BSCs (0-2 cm) and the surface soil layer (0-5 cm) may be indistinguishable, due to the close physical and hydrological connection between them (Chamizo et al., 2012). Therefore, the water source indicated by the isotope analysis may reflect the utilization of water in the surface soil layer (possibly including BSCs) byC. intermedia, which is more consistent with the distribution of water and roots.

    4.2 Seasonal water use patterns of coexisting plants

    In arid regions, most plants preferentially use shallow soil water, and too deep soil water might be only used as a supplementary source (Eggemeyer et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2014), depending on the relationship between supply (distribution of soil water) and demand (distribution of root system).At the same time, the extensive distribution of roots in the surface layer can compensate for the relative deficiency of soil water and minimize energy expenditure (Ogle and Reynolds, 2004;Schenk, 2008). That is, spatial overlap of water source for most species in arid regions generally cannot be avoided (Ehleringer et al., 1991). In our study, water in the 0-30 cm soil layers is the main source for bothC. intermediaandA. scoparia, accounting for close to 60% of total usage.This indicates spatial overlap in the shallow soil layer and therefore water competition between the shrub and grass are not avoided.

    However, there are obvious differences in water sources between dry season and rainy season both forC. intermediaandA. scoparia. ForC. intermedia, 13.7% of water was obtained from BSCs and 33.5% was drawn from the shallow soil layer during dry season; the same values are 30.2% and 31.9% forA. scoparia. Meanwhile, in the rainy season, these values are 31.8% and 25.7% forC. intermedia, and 10.5% and 48.1% forA. scoparia. The competitive relationship between species for water resources is related to the soil hydrological environment and seasonal changes in precipitation in arid areas, as well as to life history characteristics of various species(Asbjornsen et al., 2007). In the dry season,C. intermediasprouts earlier thanA. scoparia(Liang et al., 2008), and has chances to use the deeper soil water coming from the storage of precipitation in the late autumn (Niu et al., 2003; Lu et al., 2017). However, the early growth ofA. scopariamainly occurs in the roots as an annual plant (Chen et al., 2019), and its soil water use gradually increases in layer. Therefore, there may not be many opportunities for the fine roots of the two plants to directly interact in the early dry season. Other studies have shown that under drought conditions, herbs generally adopt physiological adaptation to reduce water consumption, while shrubs would search more of water sources so as to more actively respond to drought (Angert et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2017). Therefore, in cases of water source overlap in space,C. intermediaandA. scopariamay still coexist through various means such as seasonal water division and life history differences.

    At the same time, the existences of BSCs significantly affected the hydrological characteristics and water environment of the surface soil, which made it possible to further divide the shared soil water resource forC. intermediaandA. scoparia. In the study area, the biological activity and hydrological characteristics of BSCs were significantly different between the arid and rainy seasons. In general, the water-holding capacity of BSCs is greater in the dry season; contrastingly,the water-infiltrating capacity of BSCs is greater in the rainy season (Zhang et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2018). More precipitation may be contained in the surface soil in the dry season, and thereforeA. scopariahas a chance to use the water, rather thanC. intermediain the dry season. However,for bothC. intermediaandA. scoparia,more fine roots are invested in the surface soil layer during the rainy season to intercept water filtering through the BSCs, with the improvement of surface soil moisture conditions.

    Here, different with the classic shrub-grass coexistence mechanism of ''upper and lower layers''(it means that shrub use the water in lower soil layers, and grass use that in the upper soil layers),the division of water resources between the shrub and grass still can be realized based on the differences of their life history when BSCs are present, even if the main sources of water for shrubs and grasses are highly concentrated in the shallow soil layers.

    5 Conclusions

    When the surface soil was covered by BSCs, it exacerbated the average degree of soil drought in 0-300 cm layer as a whole, but the relative availability of water in the surface soil layer (0-5 cm)also increased, since more water was contained in the layer. The surface soil, including BSCs

    where possible, might be a key water source used byC. intermedia.In cases where the main sources of water forC. intermediaandA. scopariawere both concentrated in the shallow soil layer (0-30 cm), division of water resources also can be achieved forC. intermediaandA.scopariabased on the differences of life history. The coexistence forC. intermediaandA.scopariaaround the competition of shallow soil water with the covering of BSCs, breaks through the "up and down" mode of shrub-grass coexistence in arid areas. Different with the result from BSCs in desert areas, the natural withdrawal of artificialC.intermediafrom desert steppe will be a long-term process, and the highly competitive relationship between shrubs and grasses also determines that its habitat will be maintained in serious drought state for a long time.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32060313, 31760707). We sincerely appreciate Mr. GU Junlong, Mr. YANG Dongdong, and Mrs. MIAO Fan, whose significant contributions to field investigations made the manuscript possible.

    Appendix

    Table S1 Shrub morphological characters and biodiversity in S-CK and S-BSC

    Table S2 Information of surface soil (0-20 cm) in S-CK and S-BSC

    Fig. S1 Upper-direct growth of roots in 0-20 cm soil layer for C. intermedia in the rainy season in 2018

    Fig. S2 Soil water content and its CV (coefficient of variation) values in different soil layers during 2012-2017.CV-S1, CV values of soil water contents during 2012-2017 in S-CK plot; CV-S2, CV values of soil water contents during 2012-2017 in S-BSC plot; CV-CK, CV values of soil water contents during 2012-2017 in CK plot; AV-S1, average values of soil water contents during 2012-2017 in S-CK plot (shrubland without BSCs cover); AV-S2, average values of soil water contents during 2012-2017 in S-BSC plot (shrubland with BSCs cover); AV-CK, average values of soil water contents during 2012-2017 in CK plot (grassland without shrub).

    Fig. S3 Root growth of A. scoparia from May to September

    Fig. S4 Percentage of water uptake from four potential soil water sources for Caragana intermedia and Artemisia scoparia in the rainy and dry seasons during 2016-2017. Water sources were defined as BSCs(biological soil crusts) ranging from surface (0-2 cm), shallow (2-30 cm), middle (30-70 cm) to deep (>70 cm).Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between C. intermedia and different water sources at P<0.05 level. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between A. scoparia and different water sources at P<0.05 level. * indicates significant differences between C. intermedia and A. scoparia at P<0.05 level.Bars are standard errors.

    www.999成人在线观看| 舔av片在线| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 久久亚洲真实| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 日本在线视频免费播放| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 舔av片在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 高清在线国产一区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产综合懂色| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 欧美午夜高清在线| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 在线a可以看的网站| 91av网一区二区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产熟女xx| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 老女人水多毛片| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久热精品热| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 露出奶头的视频| 很黄的视频免费| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 极品教师在线视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 久久精品人妻少妇| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 1000部很黄的大片| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 免费看日本二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 午夜激情欧美在线| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 草草在线视频免费看| 中国美女看黄片| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 91av网一区二区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 成人午夜高清在线视频| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 免费高清视频大片| 国产亚洲欧美98| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 69av精品久久久久久| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| www.999成人在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 热99在线观看视频| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲最大成人中文| www.999成人在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 欧美+日韩+精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 欧美3d第一页| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 欧美激情在线99| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 身体一侧抽搐| av视频在线观看入口| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久6这里有精品| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 免费观看人在逋| 国产在视频线在精品| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 欧美性感艳星| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 在线看三级毛片| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 有码 亚洲区| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久午夜福利片| 欧美潮喷喷水| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | aaaaa片日本免费| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| www.www免费av| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产69精品久久久久777片| av福利片在线观看| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 内地一区二区视频在线| av天堂在线播放| 久久久久国内视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产精品,欧美在线| 一级黄片播放器| h日本视频在线播放| 国产三级黄色录像| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久性视频一级片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 观看美女的网站| 中文字幕久久专区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 久久久久久久久大av| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 丁香六月欧美| 精品午夜福利在线看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 搞女人的毛片| 舔av片在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 免费av毛片视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 在线a可以看的网站| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久久久久久久大av| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 美女高潮的动态| 91在线观看av| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久久久国内视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品影院久久| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 免费在线观看成人毛片| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲成人久久性| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 精品日产1卡2卡| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| av国产免费在线观看| av视频在线观看入口| 免费观看精品视频网站| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 欧美zozozo另类| 怎么达到女性高潮| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久久精品大字幕| 日本五十路高清| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 直男gayav资源| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲无线在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 小说图片视频综合网站| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 老司机福利观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久精品影院6| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲18禁久久av| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| eeuss影院久久| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| av国产免费在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 91av网一区二区| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 午夜a级毛片| 成人av在线播放网站| 成人国产综合亚洲| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看 | 嫩草影院入口| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 在线观看一区二区三区| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产真实乱freesex| 特级一级黄色大片| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 午夜久久久久精精品| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久久久国内视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 少妇高潮的动态图| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 丁香六月欧美| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久性视频一级片| 国产免费男女视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 久久6这里有精品| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲综合色惰| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 有码 亚洲区| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产日本99.免费观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 宅男免费午夜| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚州av有码| 亚洲不卡免费看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 精品福利观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 青草久久国产| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 色哟哟·www| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲av成人av| 国产精品永久免费网站| 91av网一区二区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲成人久久性| 精品午夜福利在线看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 久久精品影院6| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 热99在线观看视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 成人无遮挡网站| 色5月婷婷丁香| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 悠悠久久av| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲av一区综合| 午夜视频国产福利| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 色在线成人网| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | h日本视频在线播放| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 床上黄色一级片| 国产在视频线在精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 一级av片app| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 在线观看66精品国产| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| www.www免费av| 小说图片视频综合网站| a在线观看视频网站| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| ponron亚洲| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 99久久精品热视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产三级在线视频| 久久久久国内视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚州av有码| 看免费av毛片| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久成人| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美性感艳星| 日本熟妇午夜| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 97碰自拍视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| av黄色大香蕉| 88av欧美| 国产在线男女| 亚洲av一区综合| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲av熟女| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产真实乱freesex| 此物有八面人人有两片| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 亚洲自拍偷在线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 日本在线视频免费播放| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产精品一及| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美+日韩+精品| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 简卡轻食公司| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲最大成人av|