• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Risk of critical limb ischemia in long-term uterine cancer survivors:A population-based study

    2023-01-04 07:59:24MinChiChenJungJungChangMiaoFenChenTingYaoWangCihEnHuangKuanDerLeeChaoYuChen
    World Journal of Clinical Cases 2022年36期

    Min-Chi Chen, Jung-Jung Chang, Miao-Fen Chen, Ting-Yao Wang, Cih-En Huang, Kuan-Der Lee, Chao-Yu Chen

    Min-Chi Chen, Department of Public Health, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

    Min-Chi Chen, Chao-Yu Chen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 612, Taiwan

    Jung-Jung Chang, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 612, Taiwan

    Miao-Fen Chen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Change Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou,Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

    Ting-Yao Wang, Cih-En Huang, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 612, Taiwan

    Cih-En Huang, Chao-Yu Chen, Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan

    Kuan-Der Lee, Department of Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 100,Taiwan

    Kuan-Der Lee, Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan

    Kuan-Der Lee, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan

    Chao-Yu Chen, Department of Early Childhood Care and Education, Shu-Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management, Kaohsiung 821, Taiwan

    Abstract BACKGROUND The risk of critical limb ischemia (CLI) which causes ischemic pain or ischemic loss in the arteries of the lower extremities in long-term uterine cancer (UC) survivors remains unclear, especially in Asian patients, who are younger at the diagnosis of UC than their Western counterparts.AIM To conduct a nationwide population-based study to assess the risk of CLI in UC long-term survivors.METHODS UC survivors, defined as those who survived for longer than 5 years after the diagnosis, were identified and matched at a 1:4 ratio with normal controls. Stratified Cox models were used to assess the risk of CLI.RESULTS From 2000 to 2005, 1889 UC survivors who received surgery alone or surgery combined with radiotherapy (RT) were classified into younger (onset age < 50 years, n = 894) and older (onset age ≥ 50 years, n = 995) groups. While compared with normal controls, the younger patients with diabetes, hypertension, and receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT) were more likely to develop CLI. In contrast, the risk of CLI was associated with adjuvant RT, obesity, hypertension, and HRT in the older group. Among the UC survivors, those who were diagnosed at an advanced age (> 65 years, aHR = 2.48, P = 0.011), had hypertension (aHR = 2.18, P = 0.008) or received HRT (aHR = 3.52, P = 0.020) were at a higher risk of CLI.CONCLUSION In this nationwide study, we found that the risk factors associated with CLI were similar in both cohorts except for adjuvant RT that was negligible in the younger group, but positive in the older group. Among the survivors, hypertension, advanced age, and HRT were more hazardous than RT. Secondary prevention should include CLI as a late complication in UC survivorship programs.

    Key Words: Uterine cancer; Critical limb ischemia; Radiotherapy; Survivorship

    INTRODUCTION

    Uterine cancer (UC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed areas[1]. The incidence of UC is increasing at a rate of 1%-2% per year in Western and Asian countries[2,3]. In Western populations, 15% of UC patients are under the age of 50 years[4,5], however, around 40% of UC patients in Taiwan are younger than 50 years of age[3]. The patients with loco-regional disease in the United States, which comprises 89% of all cases of UC, have a great prognosis since the 5-year survival rates for local disease and regional disease are 95.3% and 67.5%, respectively[4,5]. Due to the high survival rate, UC survivorship care should include the management of many health issues, such as late side effects in post-treatment cancer survivors. The long-term survivors are commonly defined as patients who are alive for more than 5 years after diagnosis[6]. The well-being of long-term cancer survivors may be as well as persons with similar age and demographic characters[7]. However, even 5 years or more after diagnosis, patients can continue to face the physical effects related to treatment. Thus, concerns have been raised about the detrimental impact of late complications owing to treatment in their survivorship[7,8].

    Surgery is the principal treatment for local-regional UC, and radiotherapy (RT) has become the standard adjuvant treatment of choice for patients with high-risk factors[9]. Major pelvic surgery may result in lympho-vascular complications such as deep vein thrombosis or lymph edema[10,11]. In addition, RT can cause local inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrosis and in-field cardiovascular disease[12]. Several studies have reported that RT increased the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with head and neck cancers[13,14].

    Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a cardiovascular disease that encompasses all chronic arterial occlusive diseases of the arteries other than coronary arteries and the aorta caused by atherosclerosis. The most prevalent sites of PAD are the lower extremities, which may cause leg or pelvic pain, intermittent claudication, and limited mobilization. Women with PAD have been reported to have an increased prevalence of coexisting coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke, and higher all-cause mortality[15]. The risk of PAD has been reported in cervical cancer patients[16,17], however few studies have investigated the risk of PAD in UC survivors. A study from the US using the SEER Utah Cancer Registry revealed that among the UC patients treated with surgery alone or surgery with adjuvant RT, the risk of PAD was 24% higher in the patients with RT than in those who received surgery alone during the first 5 years of follow-up. However, no long-term effect of adjuvant RT was observed 5 years after the diagnosis[2].

    These previous studies took a broad definition of PAD, however, delayed diagnoses are common in the PAD patients especially when the symptoms are mild. In this study, we focused on critical limb ischemia (CLI) which presents a relatively severe clinical syndrome related to PAD and causes ischemic pain or ischemic loss in the arteries of the lower extremities. Furthermore, Asian patients with UC are younger on average, the risk of PAD in younger survivors may be different from that in Western patients. Therefore, a nationwide population-based study was conducted to assess the risk of CLI in UC long-term survivors, defined as patients who survived for more than 5 years after diagnosis. We also assessed whether age, treatment modality, income level, comorbidities, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are associated with the risk of CLI.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Data sources

    The data used in this study were sourced from the Registry of Catastrophic Illness (RCI) and Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 (LHID2005), which are two subsets of records from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). The NHIRD is a nationwide database containing longitudinal medical records of beneficiaries enrolled in the National Health Insurance (NHI) program, which provides comprehensive health care coverage for over 98% of the Taiwanese population. The evaluation process for patients in the RCI database is conducted by a panel of specialists who follow a strict process of reviewing medical records, imaging, and pathology reports, therefore, it was used to identify patients with UC or other cancers. The LHID2005 contains original claims data for 1000000 beneficiaries randomly sampled from the entire population in 2005. All information on comorbidities and treatment modalities (for UC cases) from 1995-2012 was available for analysis from inpatient and outpatient records. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Chang Gung Medical Foundation (201600205B0). This study is based in part on data from the NHIRD provided by the NHI Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare and managed by National Health Research Institutes. This is a secondary use of individuals' healthcare data and all personal information has been removed by de-identification, so that specific persons and their identities cannot be re-identified or be linked to other database. In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, this study did not increase the risk of participants, and the IRB approves the waiver of the informed consent form.

    Study design

    The primary endpoint of this study was the development of CLI during the follow-up period (2005-2012). CLI was identified if the patients were hospitalized with a major or minor diagnosis of the following International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes: 440.0x, (atherosclerosis of the aorta), 440.2x (atherosclerosis of native arteries of the extremities), 440.8x (atherosclerosis of other specified arteries), 440.9x (generalized and unspecified atherosclerosis), 443.9x (peripheral vascular disease, unspecified), 444.0x (arterial embolism and thrombosis of the abdominal aorta), 444.2x (arterial embolism and thrombosis of other specified arteries), 447.8x (other specified disorders of arteries and arterioles), 447.9x (unspecified disorders of arteries and arterioles).

    To evaluate the risk of CLI in UC survivors (ICD-9-CM code: 179 or 182), subgroup analysis was performed according to the age at the diagnosis of UC: < 50 years (younger group) and ≥ 50 years (older group). For each group, two study cohorts were compared: a UC survivor group and a matched control group. The survivors were defined as those who survived for longer than 5 years after the diagnosis of UC, and the first day after 5 years of survivorship was defined as the index date. Originally, the UC group comprised 4022 patients who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2005. However, 2133 patients were excluded due to any one of the following criteria: aged < 20 or > 80 years at diagnosis of UC, survived for less than 5 years, developed second cancers during follow-up or CLI before the index date, incomplete individual information, and received treatment modalities other than surgery alone and surgery with adjuvant RT. Finally, 894 younger and 995 older survivors were eligible for this study. Normal controls were matched using propensity score, calculated as the probability of being a case (UC) according to baseline variables, including age at the index date, sex, urbanization level, and incomerelated insurance payment. At a ratio of 1:4, four corresponding controls were selected for each UC case based on the closest propensity score. Thus, a total of 7556 controls aged 25-85 years without any history of cancers or CLI before the index date were selected from the LHID2005. The index date of each control was assigned to be the same as that of the corresponding UC survivor. The survival time for all groups was defined as the number of years from the index date to a new diagnosis of CLI, withdrawal from the NHI program (mostly due to death, and a few cases owing to immigration, imprisonment, and others), or December 31st, 2012, whichever occurred first. Comorbidities related to CLI including hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity and smoking-related diseases, and diagnoses of these comorbidities were confirmed by at least three clinical visits or at least one hospitalization during the 12 mo prior to the index date. We identified HRT (G03C, G03F) according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification system, and retrieved prescription data from NHI files. The dosage of HRT was defined as the average number of days of taking HRT per year from the diagnosis of UC to the date of last follow-up.

    Statistical analysis

    Baseline characteristics are presented as means with standard deviations or frequencies with percentages. Comparisons between UC survivors and controls were performed using generalized estimating equations[18] which takes into account correlations within each cluster (1 UC case and 4 matched controls). Similarly, stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of CLI between two groups, and the results are presented as crude hazard ratios (HRs) and adjusted HRs (aHRs) withPvalues. In addition, the cumulative incidence rates of CLI were calculated and compared between groups by applying a competing risk model proposed by Kalbfleisch and Prentice[19] and Gray[20]. Among the UC survivors, risk factors related to CLI were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards models. Data were managed and analyzed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, United States). All statistical tests were two-sided at 0.05 Level of significance.

    RESULTS

    Characteristics of the study participants

    From 2000 to 2005, a total of 1889 eligible UC 5-year survivors were identified from the RCI, and 7556 controls were selected from the LHID2005. The baseline characteristics are listed and two cohorts were comparable with respect to sex, age, and income-related insurance payment (allP≥ 0.600) for both age groups (Table 1). In the younger group, the UC survivors had higher rates of comorbidities including hypertension (27.39%vs14.15%,P< 0.001), diabetes (18.34%vs5.54%,P< 0.001), hyperlipidemia (10.63%vs5.87%,P< 0.001), obesity (4.92%vs3.19%,P= 0.010) and duration of HRT (percentage of > 1 mo: 15.44%vs6.10%,P= 0.033) than the matched controls. However, the controls had a higher rate of smoking-related diseases than the survivors (9.82%vs4.36%,P< 0.001). In contrast, compared with the older controls, the UC survivors had similar prevalence rates of all comorbidities, except for lower rates of morbid obesity (1.81%vs3.09%,P= 0.031) and smoking-related diseases (7.33%vs18.52%,P< 0.001), and a higher rate of diabetes (23.72%vs20.50%,P= 0.026).

    Risk factors for a CLI event in the younger survivors

    The crude incidence rates of CLI were higher in the younger survivors than in the matched controls, but the difference was not significant (198.21vs117.17 per 100000 person-years,P= 0.212, Table 1). In univariate analysis, those who received HRT for longer than 1 mo (HR ≥ 3.67,P≤ 0.027) or had any one of the following comorbidities were at a higher risk of developing CLI: diabetes (HR = 4.49,P= 0.002), hypertension (HR = 2.89,P= 0.007), hyperlipidemia (HR = 3.12,P= 0.010) (left panel, Table 2). The adjusted HRs also revealed that the younger patients with diabetes (aHR = 2.93,P= 0.033), hypertension (aHR = 2.93,P= 0.033), and receiving HRT (aHR ≥ 2.89,P≤ 0.038) were more likely to develop PAD (right panel, Table 2). In contrast, both the surgery alone and surgery + RT subgroups had a similar risk to the normal controls (aHR = 0.75 and 0.34, respectively, bothP≤ 0.083).

    Risk factors for a CLI event in the older survivors

    In the older group, the crude incidence rates of CLI were not different between two groups (436.25vs380.54 per 100000 person-years,P= 0.599, Table 1). Consistently, univariate analysis also showed that the survivors were at a higher but not significant risk of CLI compared with the controls (HR = 1.17,P= 0.503). However, obesity, diabetes, hypertension and receiving HRT for longer than 6 mo increased the risk of CLI (HR = 6.00,P= 0.001; HR = 1.67,P= 0.021; HR = 2.24,P= 0.002; HR = 5.24,P= 0.002, respectively) (left panel, Table 3). Furthermore, the aHRs revealed that the older UC survivors who received RT after surgery had at least a 2-fold higher risk of CLI compared to the matched controls after adjusting for confounders (aHR = 2.12,P= 0.019) (right panel, Table 3). In addition, obesity (aHR = 5.55,P= 0.003), hypertension (aHR = 2.06,P= 0.005) and HRT for ≥ 180 d (aHR = 4.54,P= 0.013) were still positively associated with the risk of developing CLI.

    Table 1 Characteristics of uterine cancer survivors and matched normal controls

    Table 2 Crude and adjusted hazard ratios for the occurrence of critical limb ischemia in the younger group using a stratified Cox model with withdrawal as a competing risk

    1Morbid obesity (ICD-9 code: 278, 278.00, 278.01, and V778).2Smoking related diagnoses (ICD-9 code: 305.1, 491.2, 492.8, 496, 523.6, 959.84, 649.0, and V15.82).3Number of days of taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) per year during the follow-up period. HRT was identified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system and included estrogen only (G03C) and an estrogen-progesterone combination (G03F).4Incidence per 100000 person-years. Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.UC survivors and the comparison group were matched by 5-year age group, sex, urbanization level, and income-related insurance payment. All P values were obtained from generalized estimating equations models. UC: Uterine cancer; RT: Radiotherapy; HRT: Hormone replacement therapy; CLI: Critical limb ischemia.

    The risk of CLI in the UC survivors

    Among the 1889 UC survivors, a comparison between treatment modalities revealed that RT increased the risk of CLI by 39%, but this was not significant after adjusting for other confounders (aHR = 1.39,P= 0.247). However, the risk of CLI was significantly increased among the survivors who were older (age at the index year > 65 years; aHR ≥ 2.48,P< 0.011), had hypertension (aHR = 2.18,P= 0.008), and received HRT for longer than 6 mo per year from the diagnosis of UC (aHR = 3.52,P= 0.020) (Table 4).

    Table 3 Crude and adjusted hazard ratios for the occurrence of critical limb ischemia in the older group using a stratified Cox model with withdrawal as a competing risk

    Table 4 Adjusted hazard ratios for the occurrence of critical limb ischemia in the uterine cancer survivors using a Cox proportional hazards model (n = 1889)

    DISCUSSION

    In this nationwide study, we found that the risk factors associated with CLI were similar in both cohorts except for adjuvant RT that was negligible in the younger group, but positive in the older group. In our study population, the younger patients accounted for 47% of the total (894/1889), which is much higher than that reported in Western populations[2,5]. Among the survivors, hypertension, advanced age, and HRT for longer than 180 d per year were more hazardous than RT.

    PAD in the general population usually appears after the age of 50 years, and the prevalence then increases with age[21]. This trend was also observed in the UC survivors with CLI in the present study. RT is a known cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The long-term effects on vascular endothelial damage and the possible mechanism of ionizing radiation on the progression of atherosclerotic plaque have been reported[22,23]. Although studies on the late vascular effects induced by RT have been performed in preclinical models, no clear correlations between individual changes and their time course after conventional fractionated RT have been identified. Accordingly, further studies are needed to investigate whether RT for UC increases the risk of CLI. In our analysis, RT did not cause CLI to occur earlier, but it increased the incidence of CLI in the older patients. People over 65 years of age often have multiple cardiovascular risk factors, and atherosclerosis can be accelerated by radiation[24].

    In this study, we found that HRT was more associated with an increased risk of CLI than RT. A previous study reported that estrogen can regulate injury-induced chemokines and oxidative stress and that it has a vascular protective effect, but that it has no vascular protective effects on aging blood vessels[25]. The “timing hypothesis” suggests that because the estrogen signaling pathway in older women has changed, estrogen has no vascular protective effect in patients with subclinical vascular diseases[25]. Compared with the slow decline of estrogen levels in natural menopause over time, bilateral oophorectomy for UC treatment can lead to a sudden decrease in estrogen and menopause. This dramatic decline in estrogen has been associated with a higher cardiometabolic risk[26,27]. This may explain why HRT does not have a protective effect in UC patients, and even showed toxic effects on blood vessels in this study.

    In this study, the UC survivors all had common risk factors for CLI, such as smoking, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Previous studies have reported that hypertension is a major risk factor for PAD regardless of age[2]. In addition, the prevalence of PAD has been shown to increase with age and to be higher in people with metabolic syndrome and diabetes[15]. We also found that the influence of diabetes and hyperlipidemia was more prominent in the younger group. This may be due to the fact that younger UC patients usually have type I endometrial cancer, which is associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome. These are common risk factors for symptomatic PAD and can lead to chronic atherosclerosis[4,15].

    The UC survivors in this study were defined as those who were diagnosed with UC between 2000 and 2005, and who survived for longer than 5 years. Although details of the surgical methods were not available in the dataset, we believe that they all underwent traditional surgery. At present, current surgical methods including a laparoscopic or robotic approach and sentinel lymph node evaluation are considered to be minimally invasive surgery which can improve the short-term quality of life. However, no significant difference in overall survival according to the initial surgical management has been reported between traditional laparotomy and these minimally invasive techniques[28]. In addition, sentinel lymph nodes can reduce the risk of lower limb lymphedema, which may influence circulation in the lower limbs. Further studies to evaluate differences in treatment techniques are suggested. In addition, compared with Western women, Asian women have a higher grade of histology, more advanced stage and worse 5-year survival rate. Therefore, Asian women are more likely to receive lymphadenectomy, which may result in more aggressive surgery leading to a higher risk of complications[29,30].

    There are several strengths to this study. It is the first study examining RT effect on long-term UC survivors, and the use of a nationwide database allowed for a large sample size, homogeneous population, and long follow-up period. In addition, we could evaluate the temporal relationship regarding the use of HRT. Nevertheless, the major limitation is that data on other covariates including body mass index, use of contraceptives, self-pay medications, reproductive history, smoking status, details of treatment such as volume of radiation are not provided in NHIRD. We also lacked information of histology and staging at the initial diagnosis, which are major factors for survival. However, endometrial adenocarcinoma comprises approximately 90% of all UC[4] and we only included patients who had surgery alone or surgery combined with adjuvant RT, which are the main treatments for loco-regional disease. Finally, limited incidences due to restrict criteria of CLI may cause overfitting in statistical modeling. Using a public dataset for research has inevitable limitations, and therefore we aim to use other data sources for more persuasive comparisons in the future.

    CONCLUSION

    We used a nationwide population-based database to explore the risk of CLI among long-term UC survivors. Among them, the correlation between adjuvant RT and CLI was far weaker than the correlations of hypertension, diabetes, and long duration of HRT. Therefore, younger patients should pay special attention to monitoring CLI when using HRT. The development of CLI is an important risk factor for severe vascular diseases, such as ischemic stroke and coronary artery disease. Consequently, future survivorship care should include CLI as a late complication to ensure proper prevention and management.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Uterine cancer (UC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed areas. The long-term survivors are commonly defined as patients who are alive for more than 5 years after diagnosis. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a cardiovascular disease and the most prevalent sites of PAD are the lower extremities. In this study, we focused on critical limb ischemia (CLI) which presents a relatively severe clinical syndrome related to PAD.

    Research motivation

    The risk of CLI which causes ischemic pain or ischemic loss in the arteries of the lower extremities in long-term UC survivors remains unclear, especially in Asian patients, who are younger at the diagnosis of UC than their Western counterparts.

    Research objectives

    A nationwide population-based study was conducted to assess the risk of CLI in UC long-term survivors, defined as patients who survived for more than 5 years after diagnosis. We also assessed whether age, treatment modality, income level, comorbidities, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are associated with the risk of CLI.

    Research methods

    UC survivors, defined as those who survived for longer than 5 years after the diagnosis, were identified and matched at a 1:4 ratio with normal controls. Stratified Cox models were used to assess the risk of CLI. The data used in this study were sourced from the records from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.

    Research results

    From 2000 to 2005, a total of 1889 eligible UC 5-year survivors were identified from the RCI, and 7556 controls were selected. In the younger group, the UC survivors had higher rates of comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity and duration of HRT than the matched controls. In the younger survivors, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) also revealed that the younger patients with diabetes (aHR = 2.93,P= 0.033), hypertension (aHR = 2.93,P= 0.033), and receiving HRT (aHR ≥ 2.89,P≤ 0.038) were more likely to develop PAD. Furthermore, the aHRs revealed that the older UC survivors who received radiotherapy (RT) after surgery had at least a 2-fold higher risk of CLI compared to the matched controls. The risk of CLI was significantly increased among the survivors who were older (age at the index year > 65 years; aHR ≥ 2.48,P< 0.011), had hypertension (aHR = 2.18,P= 0.008), and received HRT for longer than 6 mo per year from the diagnosis of UC (aHR = 3.52,P= 0.020).

    Research conclusions

    We found that the risk factors associated with CLI were similar in both cohorts except for adjuvant RT that was negligible in the younger group, but positive in the older group. Among UC cancer survivors, the correlation between adjuvant RT and CLI was far weaker than the correlations of hypertension, diabetes, and long duration of HRT. Therefore, younger patients should pay special attention to monitoring CLI when using HRT.

    Research perspectives

    Using a public dataset for research has inevitable limitations, and therefore we aim to use other data sources for more persuasive comparisons in the future.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Chen MC, Chang JJ, Chen CY, and Lee KD designed the research study; Chen MC and Lee KD performed the study concept and collected data; Chen MC analyzed the data; Chen MC, Chang JJ, and Chen CY drafted the manuscript; Chang JJ and Chen CY interpreted the data; Lee KD, Chen MF, Wang TY, and Huang CE edited and reviewed the manuscript; Chen MC and Chang JJ contributed equally to this paper; Lee KD and Chen CY contributed equally to this paper; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Supported bythe Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taiwan, No. CMRPD1J0101-0102.

    Institutional review board statement:This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation (201600205B0).

    Informed consent statement:The IRB approves the waiver of the informed consent form.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

    Data sharing statement:Technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset available from the corresponding author at b9002031@cgmh.org.tw.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Country/Territory of origin:Taiwan

    ORCID number:Chao-Yu Chen 0000-0001-6111-2602.

    Corresponding Author's Membership in Professional Societies:Taiwan Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology, No.3235.

    S-Editor:Gong ZM

    L-Editor:A

    P-Editor:Gong ZM

    免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲av.av天堂| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 韩国av在线不卡| 18禁观看日本| 乱人伦中国视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 在线观看人妻少妇| 老女人水多毛片| 久久狼人影院| 国产毛片在线视频| 大香蕉久久网| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| freevideosex欧美| 成人国产麻豆网| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久久久久人妻| 午夜影院在线不卡| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 最黄视频免费看| 男女国产视频网站| 99九九在线精品视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 一个人免费看片子| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 大香蕉久久成人网| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲综合色网址| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 高清不卡的av网站| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久久精品94久久精品| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 少妇 在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| 少妇的逼水好多| 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产精品一国产av| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 超碰97精品在线观看| 午夜影院在线不卡| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 嫩草影院入口| 香蕉精品网在线| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 免费观看在线日韩| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久久久国产网址| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 丝袜美足系列| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产精品成人在线| 九色成人免费人妻av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 蜜桃在线观看..| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 日日撸夜夜添| 黄片播放在线免费| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 中文字幕制服av| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产 一区精品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 中文字幕久久专区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 97在线人人人人妻| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 九草在线视频观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 一级a做视频免费观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 九草在线视频观看| 日本午夜av视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久久精品区二区三区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 欧美另类一区| 成人无遮挡网站| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 伦理电影免费视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 另类精品久久| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产成人freesex在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 色94色欧美一区二区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 精品久久久久久久久av| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久热精品热| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 男女国产视频网站| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| av天堂久久9| 亚洲国产色片| 内地一区二区视频在线| 91精品三级在线观看| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 午夜免费观看性视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 各种免费的搞黄视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 在线观看www视频免费| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 乱人伦中国视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产成人一区二区在线| 大码成人一级视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 日韩强制内射视频| 曰老女人黄片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久久国产一区二区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产男女内射视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 一级毛片 在线播放| 精品国产国语对白av| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 五月开心婷婷网| 日韩伦理黄色片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 全区人妻精品视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 18在线观看网站| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 黑人高潮一二区| 如何舔出高潮| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| www.av在线官网国产| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 婷婷色综合www| 国产成人freesex在线| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 中文欧美无线码| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产精品三级大全| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 多毛熟女@视频| 老女人水多毛片| 最黄视频免费看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久狼人影院| 777米奇影视久久| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 一本久久精品| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久久久久久精品精品| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 午夜影院在线不卡| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲av男天堂| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| av福利片在线| 如何舔出高潮| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| av有码第一页| 日韩中字成人| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 男女免费视频国产| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产高清三级在线| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 五月天丁香电影| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 免费看光身美女| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久狼人影院| 只有这里有精品99| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产av国产精品国产| av黄色大香蕉| 国产精品 国内视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 亚洲av男天堂| 精品久久久精品久久久| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 老熟女久久久| av.在线天堂| 国产视频首页在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 国产在线视频一区二区| 一级毛片 在线播放| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久热久热在线精品观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 婷婷色综合www| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 乱人伦中国视频| 美女主播在线视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 如何舔出高潮| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 婷婷成人精品国产| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 日本wwww免费看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| av在线app专区| 久久久久久久久大av| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 黑人高潮一二区| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 制服人妻中文乱码| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产永久视频网站| 天堂8中文在线网| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 91国产中文字幕| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 99久久人妻综合| 久久免费观看电影| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| videos熟女内射| 满18在线观看网站| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日本wwww免费看| 日本91视频免费播放| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 日韩视频在线欧美| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 在线天堂最新版资源| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 日本91视频免费播放| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 性色av一级| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 午夜视频国产福利| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 99热这里只有精品一区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| a 毛片基地| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产视频首页在线观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产av国产精品国产| 尾随美女入室| 国产片内射在线| 精品一区二区三卡| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 中国国产av一级| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 制服诱惑二区| 成人二区视频| 18在线观看网站| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 考比视频在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| tube8黄色片| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| www.色视频.com| av线在线观看网站| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 日本欧美视频一区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产一级毛片在线| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲av福利一区| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 成人无遮挡网站| 色网站视频免费| av电影中文网址| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 在线 av 中文字幕| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 曰老女人黄片| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 精品久久久噜噜| 在线观看国产h片| 人妻一区二区av| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 一区二区三区精品91| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 在线观看三级黄色| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 美女福利国产在线| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 美女中出高潮动态图| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 日韩中字成人| av线在线观看网站| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 在线观看三级黄色| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久青草综合色| 国产在线免费精品| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 观看美女的网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 日本91视频免费播放| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| tube8黄色片| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 超色免费av| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 观看av在线不卡|