Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 lnfection and Follow-up of Neutralizing Antibody Levels＊

CUI Shu Juan,ZHANG Yi,GAO Wen Jing,WANG Xiao Li,YANG Peng,WANG Quan Yi,#,PANG Xing Huo,ZENG Xiao Peng,and LI Li Ming,#

1. Institute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control,Beijing 100013, China; 2. General Administration of Customs (Beijing) International Travel Health Care Center,Beijing 100013, China; 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China

Abstract Objective To investigate neutralizing antibody levels in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at 6 and 10 months after disease onset.Methods Blood samples were collected at three different time points from 27 asymptomatic individuals and 69 symptomatic patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2). Virus-neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 in both groups were measured and statistically analyzed.Results The symptomatic and asymptomatic groups had higher neutralizing antibodies at 3 months and 1-2 months post polymerase chain reaction confirmation, respectively. However, neutralizing antibodies in both groups dropped significantly to lower levels at 6 months post-PCR confirmation.Conclusion Continued monitoring of symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 is key to controlling the infection.

Key words: SARS-CoV-2; Symptomatic; Asymptomatic; Neutralizing antibody

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a singlestranded, positive-sense, non-segmented enveloped RNA virus belonging to the genusBetacoronavirusof the familyCoronaviridae. It causes the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in humans. Identified in December 2019[1], COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic beginning from March 2020. As per the report by the World Health Organization (WHO), there are 599.8 million confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 6.4 million confirmed deaths globally as of September 1, 2022(https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novelcoronavirus-2019). The symptoms of COVID-19 include dry cough, fever, sore throat, and loss of taste and smell, and serious complications such as septic shock, severe pneumonia, renal failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and presentations may range from asymptomatic to pneumonia and ARDS[2,3]. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is through contact, droplets, fomites, or airborne or fecal-oral routes.

In general, symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive patients are detected when they seek medical attention; however, without imperative testing,asymptomatic carriers can be missed and contribute to the spread of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, for any region where testing is not required for all individuals, asymptomatic cases can compromise the control programs implemented. Therefore,asymptomatic carriers are believed to be the main drivers of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic[4,5]. Many studies have reported the detection of SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals among different populations,including healthcare workers, children, pregnant patients, cruise ship passengers and staff, airplane passengers, close contacts of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, and individuals from homeless shelters,nursing facilities, military quarantine facilities,rehabilitation facilities, and jails[6-26](Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, available in www.besjournal.com).Several factors, including the total number of testing populations and conflation of true asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic individuals, affect the percentage of SARS-CoV-2-positive asymptomatic individuals in the defined populations.

Although many studies have reported the detection of SARS-CoV-2-positive asymptomatic populations in different countries, immune responses in asymptomatic individuals are understudied, and data have been inconsistent. In addition, the durability of the protective immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. A seroprevalence study from the United States using an immunoassay to detect antibodies to the SARSCoV-2 nucleocapsid protein showed that 6.6% (4,094 of 61,910) of asymptomatic population was seropositive[27]. A study from China reported that of 63 asymptomatic individuals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 utilizing both molecular tests and immunoglobulin (Ig) M- and IgG-based serological tests, 39 (61.9%) produced low titers of neutralizing antibodies, which started as early as 7 days postexposure, peaked between 10 and 25 days postexposure, and subsequently dropped rapidly. In contrast, 45 of 51 patients with mild symptoms produced higher neutralizing antibodies, which peaked around 22 days post-symptom onset and were maintained for at least 65 days[28].

In the present study, we measured the neutralizing antibodies of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals with COVID-19 at three time points post-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)confirmation and summarized meta-analysis studies on asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

Patients and Sera

In this study, 69 symptomatic [42 males and 27 females, average age of 43.4 years (standard deviation = 16.5)] and 27 asymptomatic [13 males and 14 females, average age of 35.8 years (standard deviation = 13.9)] patients were confirmed SARSCoV-2-positive by a PCR assay targeting theORF1abandNgenes. These individuals were infected during the outbreak period from June to December 2020,and their serum samples were collected at different time points from June 2020 to October 2021 in Beijing. The symptomatic patients were hospitalized with no previous medical history and characteristic chest computed tomography (CT) findings of COVID-19 pneumonia. These symptomatic patients had respiratory symptoms and pneumonia on CT and were SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive, whereas the asymptomatic patients were only PCR-positive without the respiratory symptoms or pneumonia.Blood samples were collected from symptomatic patients at 3, 6, and 10 months post-PCR confirmation and from asymptomatic patients at 1,2, and 6 months post-PCR confirmation. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention(2020026). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Microneutralization Assay

A SARS-CoV-2 microneutralization assay was performed using Vero cells as previously described[29,30]. Serum samples were heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min. The serum samples were subsequently serially diluted two fold and equally added to 100 μL of cell medium containing 100 cell culture infectious dose. The serum-virus mixture was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2.Subsequently, 96-well cell culture plates with semiconfluent Vero cell monolayers were inoculated with 100 μL of the mixture at each dilution, in duplicate.The plates were incubated for 5 days at 37 °C and subsequently examined for cytopathic effects. The highest serum dilution that inhibited at least 50% of the cytopathic effects was considered as the neutralization titer.

Virus antibody mix was subsequently added to cells in 96-well plates, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C with microscopic examination for cytopathic effects after 5-day incubation.

Statistical Analysis

SPSS software (version 19.0) was used for statistical analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the neutralizing antibody titers of the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups at different time points after PCR confirmation. Statistical significance was set at aPvalue ＜ 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

All symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by PCR.Neutralizing antibodies of 69 symptomatic patients peaked (83.3 ± 105.9) at 3 months post-PCR confirmation and significantly dropped at 6 (22.9 ±22.6) and 10 months (7.7 ± 10.1) post-confirmation(Figure 1). Neutralizing antibodies in 27 asymptomatic patients showed a similar trend with relatively higher levels at 1 month post-confirmation (103.1 ± 64.8),lower levels at 2 months post-confirmation (81.2 ±64.1), and significantly lower levels at 6 months postconfirmation (19.6 ± 10.3) (Figure 1). Compared with the symptomatic group, the asymptomatic group had relatively lower levels of neutralizing antibodies at 2 and 6 months post-confirmation.

Overall, our data showed that neutralizing antibodies gradually dropped to lower levels in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19, and symptomatic patients had relatively higher levels of neutralizing antibodies at 6 months post-confirmation, consistent with the previous findings that the levels of neutralizing antibodies were correlated with disease severity[31]. A study from South Korea analyzed antibody status in seven asymptomatic individuals and 11 patients with pneumonia at 2 and 5 months after symptom onset[30]. This study showed that both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients had neutralizing antibodies at 2 and 5 months after infection, and antibody levels decreased from 219.4 at 2 months post-infection to 143.7 at 5 months postinfection. At 8 months post-infection, 4 of 7 asymptomatic individuals were still positive for neutralizing antibodies[32,33]. In the aforementioned study, neutralizing antibody titers decreased more in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients[30], which differs from our finding that neutralizing antibody titers of asymptomatic patients decreased in a similar trend as those of symptomatic patients. A follow-up study of 31 asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 showed that 74% of the patients did not have circulating immunoglobulins against SARS-CoV-2 at 8 weeks post-testing. Over 40% of these patients had no detectable immunoglobulin at either time point with an 8-week interval[34].

Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers at three different time points (Statistical significance was set at P ＜ 0.05). (A) 3, 6, and 10 months post-PCR confirmation for symptomatic patients. (B) 1, 2,and 6 months post-PCR confirmation for asymptomatic patients.

In the present study, we observed that the neutralization titers of both asymptomatic and symptomatic groups dropped to very low levels at 6 months post-PCR confirmation. This indicates that higher levels of neutralizing antibodies elicited through one-time infection of SARS-CoV-2 only persist for less than half a year. Therefore, SARSCoV-2 immunization would be still required for protection against future infection.

The data of the present study were obtained from SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in Beijing, China. The present study has a few limitations. First, our study was not prospectively controlled, and patient demographic factors, such as drug history and radiology findings in the symptomatic group, were not evaluated. Second, the evaluation periods post-PCR confirmation for the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were different, which made data analysis between the groups difficult. Third, the sample sizes of the groups (n= 27 andn= 69) were not sufficiently large. Fourth, the study could not include data related to the immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

In contrast to the limited number of studies on immune responses of asymptomatic patients with COVID-19, there are several studies on the prevalence of asymptomatic infection[35]. There have been seven meta-analyses on the prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 infection. These seven studies analyzed the data from 6-390 published studies, and reported the percentage of asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 to be 15.6%(41 studies)[36], 17% (13 studies)[37], 20% (79 studies)[38], 24.2% (6 studies)[4], 25% (28 studies)[39],35.1% (390 studies)[40], and 48.2% (16 studies)[41](Table 1). Among these, the meta-analysis with 16 studies indicated a significant heterogeneity amongthe studies, and the actual proportion of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases was reported to be 31.1%[41]. Subgroup analysis of different age groups showed similar percentages of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases in children (27.7%) and older adults (28.3%)in one study[36]; however, this was significantly higher in children than in older adults in two studies(46.7%vs.19.7%, and 49.6%vs.16.9%)[40,41]. In addition, one study analyzed the radiology results in patients with COVID-19 and revealed that individuals with normal radiology results were significantly younger 19.59 ± 17.17 years than those with abnormal radiology results 39.14 ± 26.70 years[4].Overall, these studies suggested that asymptomatic individuals accounted for 15.6%-35.1% of the total number of SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals.

Table 1. Meta-analysis studies on asymptomatic COVID-19 cases

Two of the three above-mentioned meta-analysis studies showed that children had a higher percentage of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection than older adults[40,41]. The asymptomatic group of children could be a main concern as they may spread the virus to classmates and family members if no active testing and quarantine program is in place.Data used in the present and previous studies were collected from the pre-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination period. With more people immunized with SARSCoV-2 inactivated vaccines since late 2020, the number of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals will be higher. These asymptomatic individuals can be either vaccinated or nonvaccinated. Therefore, continued monitoring of asymptomatic groups is essential for controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in humans.

CONCLUSION

Neutralizing antibodies in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups with COVID-19 dropped significantly to lower levels at 6 months post-PCR confirmation, and continued monitoring of both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals will be vital in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

CUI Shu Juan designed the study, performed the serological assays, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. ZHANG Yi collected the samples,analyzed, and interpreted the data. GAO Wen Jing designed the study and analyzed the data. WANG Xiao Li collected the samples and interpreted the data. YANG Peng designed the study. WANG Quan Yi designed the study, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. PANG Xing Huo and ZENG Xiao Peng designed this study. LI Li Ming designed the study, interpreted the data, advised the manuscript, and funded the research. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Received: July 16, 2022;

Accepted: October 8, 2022