• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Development and experimental validation of kinetic models for the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation of Mg/Al based metal waste for energy storage

    2022-12-26 02:35:38PssingPistiddCpursoJepsenMetzDornheimKlssen
    Journal of Magnesium and Alloys 2022年10期

    M.Pssing,C.Pistidd,?,G.Cpurso,J.Jepsen,b,O.Metz,M.Dornheim,T.Klssen,b

    a Institute of Hydrogen Technology,Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon,Max-Planck-Stra?e 1 D,Geestacht 21502,Germany

    b Institute of Materials Technology,Helmut Schmidt University,Holstenhofweg 85 D,Hamburg 22043,Germany

    Abstract With the increased use of renewable energy sources,the need to store large amounts of energy will become increasingly important in the near future.A cost efficient possibility is to use the reaction of recycled Mg waste with hydrogen as thermo-chemical energy storage.Owing to the high reaction enthalpy,the moderate pressure and appropriate temperature conditions,the broad abundance and the recyclability,the Mg/Al alloy is perfectly suitable for this purpose.As further development of a previous work,in which the performance of recycled Mg/Al waste was presented,a kinetic model for hydro-and dehydrogenation is derived in this study.Temperature and pressure dependencies are determined,as well as the rate limiting step of the reaction.First experiments are carried out in an autoclave with a scaled-up powder mass,which is also used to validate the model by simulating the geometry with the scaled-up experiments at different conditions.

    Keywords:Thermo-chemical energy storage;Hydrogen storage;Metal hydride;Magnesium based waste;Recycling.

    1.Introduction

    In the last decades,the awareness of the influence of greenhouse gasses on the climate grew significantly[1].This led the European council in 2018 to approve unprecedentedly strict regulations aiming at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the European area[2].The goal of these regulations is to keep the average temperature rise(i.e.global warming)well below 2 °C compared to the pre-industrial level.

    To achieve this goal,a swift shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is mandatory.Due to their intermittent nature and uneven distribution on earth,the exploitation of the energy produced by renewable sources is challenging.In this scenario,the development of energy storage systems that allow an efficient and synergic exploitation of these energy sources is of primary importance.

    Hydrogen is considered as one of the most attractive future energy carriers[3].Hydrogen possess a gravimetric energy density(i.e.33.3 kWh/kgH2)that is higher than those of common fossil fuels,like natural gas(i.e.13.9 kWh/kg)or gasoline(i.e.11.5 kWh/kg)[4].Unfortunately,due to its low specific weight,the volumetric energy density of hydrogen is relatively poor even when compressed(i.e.1.3 kWh/l at 700 bar and ambient temperature)and or liquefied(i.e.2.3 kWh/l at 2 bar and-253 °C),compared to the value of 8.8 kWh/l of gasoline[4].

    Owing to the high-energy storage densities achievable by storing hydrogen in solid-state,metal hydrides have been intensively investigated as potential hydrogen storage media for mobile and stationary applications[5–7].Moreover,the possibility to employ this class of materials,for heat storage purposes has been also probed.In fact,the so called“high temperature metal hydrides”(e.g.CaH2,LiH,MgH2,etc.)are characterized by chemical reactions with heat storage capacities that are largely higher than those of the sensible heat fromcommonly used molten NaNO3/KNO3salts mixtures,i.e.up to 8 MJ/kg and~0.5 MJ/kg,respectively[8,9].Furthermore,due to the low energy density of molten salts mixtures,considerably large storage tanks are required to store adequate energy quantities[10,11].In Table 1,different molten salts materials,like nitrates,chlorides and fluorides as well as metal hydride systems are listed according to their gravimetric and volumetric energy densities.

    Table 1Comparison of different storage materials regarding the gravimetric and volumetric energy density as well as the specific costs as listed in[29,30].

    Magnesium hydride is considered as a suitable material for hydrogen storage applications,due to a hydrogen content of 7.6 wt.%[12]associated with hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reaction enthalpy of about 74 kJ/molH2[13–16],and to a high degree of reversibility(if doped with selected transition metalbased additives or in the presence of alloying elements)[17–24].Already in 1990 Bogdanovic et al.,[12]reported about the possibility to use MgH2as a reversible chemical energy storage system.Furthermore,direct steam generation inside the metal hydride reactor is technically possible[25].

    As several authors stated,in order to maximize the profitableness of the heat storage system,the storage material must be cost efficient[9,10,17].Facing this issue,in this work,the use of magnesium-based wastes is proposed as a potential cost-effective solution,as it is presented in Table 1.For Mg alloys,mainly processed as die-castings and alloyed with Al,no independent recycling pathway exists yet.Because of its light weight,Mg alloys are separated into the lightweight scrap fraction that is dominated by aluminum parts during the general scrap treatment.Since Mg is not of significant interest for recovery,a great part of end-of-life products made of Mg alloys ends up in landfills[26].As Mg is nowadays considered as a critical raw material by the European Union,the development of an efficient recycling route is desirable[27].The use of Mg swarf and wastes as raw material for the synthesis of metal hydride systems for energy storage applications can be one part of a Mg recycling concept[28].

    In previous works of Pistidda et al.,[38]and Hardian et al.,[39],the use of waste magnesium alloys for hydrogen storage purposes was proposed.The utilized material in the work of Hardian et al.was stored in air for several weeks before it was milled together with 5 wt.%graphite in argon atmosphere[39].Upon hydrogenation,MgH2forms and about 6 wt.% of H2can be stored into the material.At 350 °C and 13 barH2the Mg waste based system could store up to 90% of the overall hydrogen capacity in about 10 min.The dehydrogenation process was completed in about 10 min at 0.5 barH2and 350 °C.The system’s stability was tested for over 70 hydrogenation/dehydrogenation cycles without any deterioration of material storage properties[39].The work of Pistidda et al.reports the investigation of the hydrogen storage properties of two different Mg waste alloys,namely AZ91 and the Mg-10 wt.%Gd alloy[38].The overall hydrogen storage capacity of the AZ91 material was measured at 6.25 wt.%,compared to a theoretical capacity of 6.9 wt.%.Furthermore,using highenergy reactive ball milling,the waste material was successfully employed as a starting reactant to synthesize magnesium amide.The hydrogenated waste was also used for substituting high purity MgH2in the LiBH4+MgH2reactive hydride composite system[38].

    Based on these promising results for the low cost Mg waste material,a next step is taken in this work.Trying to understand the hydrogen storage properties of larger batches of MgH2obtained from waste alloys,Mg-Al waste powders were prepared and their properties investigated in anin-housebuilt reactor.To describe the powder behavior,a specific simulation model that takes into account the materials rate limiting processes has been developed and validated for a broad range of experimental conditions.

    2.Materials and methods

    The as-received Mg-Al waste,taken as swarf and chips from the Hereonin-houseworkshop,was stored in air forseveral months before starting this work.The material was milled in aSimoloyer CM08industrial mill fromZOZ GmbHfor two hours under Argon atmosphere,with milling balls made of 100Cr6 chromium steel with a diameter of 5 mm and a ball to powder ratio of 1:20.Milling was perfomed in a cyclic process of 700 rpm/30 s and 300 rpm/30 s.After the milling treatment,the powder was kept under controlled atmosphere with oxygen and moisture concentration below 5 ppm.The milled powder was sieved for one hour in anAnalysette 3 Pro-sieving machine(Fritsch GmbH)with a sieve mesh size of 63 μm.For the analysis of the hydrogen sorption kinetics anin-housebuilt Sievert apparatus was used.For each measurement about 200 mg of material were utilized.To match the experimental conditions utilized by Hardian et al.,the hydrogen absorption measurements were done at a pressure of 13 bar[39].The chosen temperatures range between 260 °C and 360°C.The hydrogen desorption measurements were carried out in the temperature range between 335 °C and 375 °C at 1 bar of hydrogen backpressure,after previous hydrogenation at 350 °C and 13 bar for 2 h.

    Fig.1.Picture of the autoclave with installed setup(left)and inlet which contains the powder(right.

    For the experimental validation of the developed simulation model,a stainless steel reactor was used,shown in Fig.1.The inner volume of the reactor is 250 ml.The reactor is thermally regulated by a heating jacket of 3 kW electrical power and equipped with a hydrogen mass flow controller with a measuring range between 2 and 100 std°l/min.The temperature is measured with a type K thermocouple inserted in the powder bed.For the experiments,a powder batch of 90 g was loaded into the reactor inlet.The quantity of hydrogen absorbed or released by the powder bed is determined by the use of the above mentioned mass flow meter.For the cycling experiments,the set hydrogen pressure and temperature conditions match those utilized in the Sievert apparatus.For the absorption measurements,the hydrogen supply was set to 13 bar at the pressure reducer,filling the line up to the volume flow controller.By starting the measurement,the valve of the volume flow controller is opened to 100%,to obtain the maximum hydrogen loading rate.For desorption conditions,the pressure in the reactor is held by the volume flow controller and opened to 100% at the beginning of the experiment.To have comparable starting conditions,after each desorption measurement,the reactor is kept for 10 min under dynamic vacuum(10-2bar)to fully unload the powder bed.

    To determine the material apparent activation energy for the hydrogen desorption process,a high pressureDSC 204from the companyNETZSCHwas utilized.Therefore,four temperature ramps of 1,3,5,and 10 K/min are used to desorb the material at 1 bar of hydrogen pressure.

    The materials effective thermal conductivity was measured with aTPS 1500fromHot Disc ABunder argon atmosphere using a kapton-insulated sensor of 6.4 mm diameter.The overall powder handling was performed in gloveboxes under a continuously purified argon atmosphere(O2and H2O levels<5 ppm).X-ray powder diffraction(XRD)was used to characterize the material composition.For this purpose a diffractometerD8 DiscoverfromBrukerequipped with a Cu Kαradiation source(λ=1.5406?A)was utilized.SEM micrographs were acquired using aQuanta SEMfrom the companyThermoFischer Scientific.

    The finite element method(FEM)simulation performed in this work was carried out using the software COMSOL Multiphysics? 5.5 and its physic modules heat transport in porous media,Brinkman-Equation and transport of diluted species.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Reaction model

    The role and influence of Al on the hydrogen storage properties of Mg have been discussed in several publications,in which a two-step reaction for the hydrogenation process of the Mg17Al12phase is proposed[40–44].

    Mg17Al12+9 H2→9 MgH2+4 Mg2Al3

    Upon hydrogenation,first Mg17Al12forms Mg2Al3and MgH2,and then the freshly formed Mg2Al3leads to the formation of additional MgH2and pure Al[40].

    Mg2Al3+2 H2→2 MgH2+3 Al

    Both reaction steps are fully reversible.In terms of thermodynamics,two plateaus can be seen in the PCI plot that correspond to the two reactions mentioned above.The equilibrium pressures for both reactions are higher than for the pure Mg/MgH2system,as the addition of Al was observed to destabilize the MgH2decomposition.This can be explained by the exothermic formation of Mg-Al compounds,while the desorption of MgH2is occurring[41,44].The reaction enthalpy of the two step hydrogenation reaction that can be calculated for the first and the second plateau are-77.7 kJ/molH2and-62.7 kJ/molH2,respectively,which indicates only an observable enthalpy reduction in the second reaction step[41].The inclusion of Al into the Mg/MgH2system improves the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation rates as Al works as a heat transfer phase[44].Due to the destabilizing effect of Al onthe MgH2phase and the elevated equilibrium pressure,faster desorption reaction kinetics appear for Mg-Al systems,having lower activation energies than for the pure Mg/MgH2system[40–42,44].Some kinetic models describing the de-/hydrogenation reaction of Mg-Al-based systems are currently available,but none for MgH2systems containing only minor amounts of Mg/Al alloys and other alloying elements and impurities.As a result,novel reaction kinetic models for describing the de-and hydrogenation properties of Mg/Al-based waste materials for energy storage purposes are developed in this work.

    In order to obtain a reaction model that can be applied and continuously adapts to the actual temperature and pressure conditions,the intrinsic rate-limiting step of the reaction must be identified.According to the slowest reaction step of the complete gas-solid reaction,different models can be chosen to describe the overall reaction kinetic.The selection of reaction modelsf(α),which are considered in this work,can be found in the supporting information(A).Four main sets of models are available,namely nucleation and growth models,geometrical contracting models,diffusion models and autocatalytic models(which are not considered in this work)[45].The best fit indicates the rate-limiting step of the reaction and can be used to further derivate the thermodynamic dependencies.The integral of the reaction rate functionF(α)is used to obtain an equation that can be directly used,to fit the experimental data set,which is recorded as the consecutive sum of absorbed hydrogen.Therefore,the equation for the reaction ratedα/dt(α=reacted fraction andt=time)is rearranged to:

    The reduced time method,by Jones et al.and Sharp et al.,[46,47]is used in this instance,as it gives more precise indications for the goodness of fit than standard fitting functions.By having 3 quality parameters,namely the slope,the intercept and the coefficient of determination of the fitted curve,the model can be chosen according to the number of parameters that are the closest to the ideal fit.The applied approach can be found in the work of Julián Atilio Puszkiel[45].After obtaining the reaction kinetic constantk,the activation energyEaand the frequency factorAare determined by using the Arrhenius function.

    Different pressure dependency functions are available in literature for the Mg/MgH2system[48,49]as well as for the Mg-Al alloy system[41].Due to the unsatisfactory results obtained by the use of the activation energy values reported in literature,new pressure dependency functions are derived in this work[48,50–55].

    3.1.1.Absorption

    The maximum achieved hydrogen storage capacity during the absorption measurements was 5.8 wt.%.To model the reaction kinetics,only the dimensionless fraction of the reaction productαis used.The attempt to fit the overall reacted fraction with the reaction models proposed in literature[45,47,56](see supplementary data(A)),led to unsatisfactory results.Therefore,a new approach is proposed and implemented here.The reaction is subdivided into two regions.The first region includes the reaction fractions between 10%and 50%,whereas the second region includes the reaction fractions between 50% and 90%.The fitting results obtained for the different reaction regions for all temperature ranges are summarized in the supporting data(B).Obviously,that for the investigated range of temperatures,the rate limiting steps of the two regions are different.In the first region,the fitting results indicate that the rate limiting step is the nucleation and growth mechanism following the one-dimensional Johnson-Mehl-Avrami(JMA 1)model.For the second region,the fitting results indicate that the rate limiting step changes to a diffusion controlled process.Table 2 gives an overview of the kinetic constants and of the best fitting models,depending on the temperature.Independently from the applied temperature,the first reaction region fits the JMA 1 model the best.Instead,for the temperatures 280 °C,300 °C,320 °C,and 340 °C the second reaction region fits the best the diffusion controlled(D 3)model,whereas for the temperature 360 °C the D 4 model fits better.The D 4 model is an improvement of the D 3 model obtained by additionally taking into account the Fick’s law for radial diffusion for solid spheres with increasing product layer[57].However,since the D 3 model of Jander[58]fits best for a greater part of the absorption reactions,it is selected for the modeling of the second reaction region for all reactions studied here for direct comparison.

    Table 2Best fitting reaction models regarding the temperature for absorption,the reaction regime and reaction rate constants.

    Table 3Absorption activation energies and frequency factors according to the used pressure functions from literature and by derivation in this work.

    These results show that the rate limiting process changes as the reaction proceeds.This finding can be explained by the fact that in the initial state,the material consists mainly of pure Mg and some Mg17Al12particles(as shown in the XRD pattern in the supporting information(C)),in whose crystal lattices hydrogen can diffuse easily.However,after a hydride layer is formed at the topmost surface of the particles,further hydrogen diffusion is constrained.This behavior is well known for Mg-based materials,and can explain the change of the reaction model observed in the two reaction regions[59–62].

    To determine the parameters for the Arrhenius term,it is important to exclude the pressure dependency function.Therefore,different pressure functions from literature are used.For each function,the activation energy is calculated and interpreted.Hence,the model equation is rearranged as follows:

    Fig.2.Determination of absorption activation energy and frequency factor with isobaric kinetic measurements for different pressure functions and reaction regimes.(A)First region and(B)second region.

    The equilibrium pressures at the measured temperatures are taken from the pure Mg/MgH2system obtained by Oelerich et al.[61]The results of the linear fitting are shown in Fig.2 and the used pressure functions in Table 3 for the first and second reaction regions.The values obtained for the activation energies lie far apart for each pressure function,whereas the differences among the two separate reaction regions,are small.

    Table 4Best fitting reaction models regarding the temperature for desorption and the reaction rate constants.

    Table 5Desorption activation energies und frequency factors according to the used pressure functions from literature and by derivation of this work.

    Typical values for the activation energy of pure Mg systems are according to literature in the range between 90 and 140 kJ/molH2for the absorption[48,50–52,60].Since the resulting activations energies are outside this range,the pressure functions from literature obtained for pure Mg[48,49]as well as for Mg/Al alloys[41]are considered not suitable to model the reaction kinetics of recycled Mg/Al based waste from this work.Hence,the pressure functionf(p)=p/peq-1 is proposed,since it gives a reasonable activation energy comparing to the pure Mg system and leads to a good fitting of the kinetic curves.

    3.1.2.Desorption

    In contrast to the absorption reaction,the fitting results obtained for the desorption kinetics indicate that the overall reaction process can be described using just a single model.Thus,the model fitting is applied for the full range between 10%and 90% of the reaction.The reaction model that fits best is the CV 2 model,meaning a geometrical description of the reaction rate by a contracting area of a cylinder towards the cen-ter at constant interphase velocity[45,56].The decomposition kinetic of the MgH2system has been accurately described by Stander[60].In this work,a change of the reaction-limiting step for various temperatures is identified.For high temperatures,a constant Mg-MgH2interface velocity model describes the rate-limiting step.The bi-dimensionality of the process is explained by the change from the tetragonal structure of the hydride to the hexagonal close-packed structure of the Mg metal.This leads to a cylindrical shape of the MgH2-Mg interface.As the hydride core decomposes,the H atoms diffuse through the metal lattice and recombine to the gas at the particle surface,so that no diffusion through hydride phases limits the reaction.For the Mg17Al12system,similar results are present in literature,describing the decomposition as a bi-dimensional interphase transformation process[41].

    Table 4 provides an overview of the best fitting reaction models for the desorption and the resulting reaction rate constants at different temperatures.The desorption curves are best described by the CV 2 model,although for the desorption reaction at 335 °C,the JMA 2 model provides slightly better fitting parameters.This could result from the proximity to the equilibrium condition,so that the low temperature limits the reaction to start.For this reason,the nucleation and growth phenomena start limiting the reaction.The same was also observed by Stander,who reported the change of the limiting process with increasing temperature[60].Similarly to the absorption process,the Arrhenius plot resulting from the reaction rate constants and estimated pressure dependency determines the activation energy for the desorption process,as shown in Fig.3.

    Fig.3.Determination of desorption activation energy and frequency factor with isobaric kinetic measurements for different pressure function.

    The pressure functions taken from literature and proposed in this work are listed in Table 5.Taking the pressure functions from literature,values for the activation energy between 41.7 and 91.4 kJ/molH2are obtained,which seem too low for the dehydrogenation of a Mg-based system.For this reason,in contrast to the absorption reaction modeling,the activation energy for the desorption process was determined based on DSC measurements using the Kissinger method(see supplementary data(D)).As it can be seen from Fig.31,the DSC traces recorded at 1,3 and 5 K/min appear to be constituted of two overlapping signals.Whereas,for the measurement acquired with a heating ramp of 10 K/min a single endothermic signal is observed.The reason for the presence of two overlapping signals at low heating rates is most likely due to inhomogeneity in the material particle size distribution(as visible in Fig.32 in the supplementary data(D))that leads to the dehydrogenation of the bigger MgH2particles at higher temperatures.We expect that this phenomenon is not visible for the measurement carried out at 10 k/min because of the coalescence of the two signals while shifting to higher temperatures.The occurrence of agglomeration and coarsening events during material cycling at high temperatures can explain the presence of particles of significantly varied sizes.From the DSC results,an activation energy of 168.7 kJ/molH2is obtained from the Kissinger plot using the peak temperatures.Comparing the activation energies resulting from the fitting of the kinetic measurements with the value from the

    Fig.4.Measured and simulated hydrogen(A)absorption and(B)desorption reaction kinetic.

    Kissinger method,a high discrepancy is observable.Therefore,the pressure functions from literature are not considered for the desorption reaction model and a new function off(p)=is implemented,to achieve a more precise activation energy.As the result,the obtained activation energy value(listed in Table 5)is in a better agreement with the results obtained via DSC.Additionally,the typical values for the activation energy of desorption in the Mg/MgH2system are in the range of 120–170 kJ/molH2,which confirm the validity of the new pressure function[51,53–55,63].According to Li et al.,adding 10% Al to the Mg/MgH2system reduces the activation energy from 173 kJ/molH2in the pure system to 164 and 158 kJ/molH2in the 20 h ball milling and as-casted systems,respectively[40].The literature values fit together quite well when compared to the value obtained for the Mg/Al based waste material studied in this work.

    In Fig.4,the measured kinetic curves(represented by symbols)for absorption and desorption processes are plotted together with the simulated reaction kinetic(represented by lines)obtained from the developed reaction model.For the absorption reaction,the change of the reaction model at the 50% of the reacted fraction is clearly visible from the discontinuity in the slope.In general,the simulated curves fit the experimental data well,although for high temperatures a small mismatch for the second reaction regime occurs.For the desorption reaction,a good match between experimental and simulated data is observed.For lower temperature,the simulation predicts a faster reaction rate than the measured one.A reason for this inconsistency could be found in the small reaction driving force under conditions close to the equilibrium.

    To obtain a reaction model that unambiguously describes the kinetic pressure dependencies,a large number of measurements in a broad range of temperature and pressure conditions should be taken into account.In this work,even though a limited number of kinetic data is available,a model that adequately describes the reaction kinetic for recycled Mg is developed.

    3.2.Simulation model

    For simulating the heat distribution as well as the hydrogen uptake and discharge during the bulk reaction via FEM,a 2D axisymmetric model of the reactor geometry is chosen.By rotating the 2D axisymmetric model for 360 ° around the symmetry axis,a 3D model is generated,whose slices are behaving equal for all angles.The governing heat transport equation for general balances of a specific domain regarding a volume ele ment given now in W/m3can be written as:

    The change of temperature inside a domain is dependent on the sum of thenconvective heat fluxes,which go into or out of the domain by mass transportation,the sum of themheat transitions by conduction or transfer and the sum of thepheat sources or sinks,withn,mandpas integers.For each domain of the simulation geometry,different terms can be neglected,as for solid parts like the body of the autoclave no heat sources or convective heat transportation occurs.However,for the domain of the storage material(i.e.Mg-Al waste),all terms are considered.The heat sources and/or sinks are given by the reaction enthalpy and the reaction rate for the absorption or desorption processes.

    In the following section,the reaction kinetics are modeled and derived with respect to the material transformed fraction.To obtain the quantitative amount of absorbed hydrogen per volume unit,the maximum possible capacityxmaxin wt.%is considered and multiplied by the bulk densityρbulkof the Mg-Al waste[64].

    The convective heat transport can be described by:

    Fig.5.SEM micrographs of cycled Mg-Al waste from A)loose top part and B)sintered fraction in the lower part of the autoclave.

    Due to the low density of hydrogen,the convective heat transported into or out of the system has a low impact on the overall balance[65].More crucial is the heat transport by conduction through the powder bed,which is given by:

    The effective thermal conductivitykeffis assumed homogeneous over the powder bed,with a combination of gas and solid heat conduction.In this simulation model approach,the semi-empirical model of Zehner and Schlünder[66–68]is used and modified to match certain properties of the metal hydride bed at higher temperatures.The model describes a cylindrical unit cell,in which two solid particles are in contact surrounded by a gaseous phase,as shown in Fig.6.The heat conduction is separated into two regions:The thermal conduction through the inner core of the cell,in which non-continuous gas conductionkcand solid-solid conduction through the contact areakpappears and the continuous gas conductionkGsurrounding the inner core.A radiation termkradis also considered within the gas phase.

    The decisive factor for this subdivision is the porosityψ,which can also be used to describe the geometric conditions in the unit cell.In the Zehner model,the fraction of solid conduction in the inner core is given by the flattening coefficientφ.Since the powder bed gets sintered in the high temperature bottom region of the reactor(see Fig.33,in the supplementary data(E)),the contact areas between the particles lower their thermal resistance.In Fig.5,SEM micrographs of the cycled material from different regions of the reactor are shown.The small particles in the loose powder are shown on the left(A),whereas on the right hand side,the growth of the agglomerates,due to sintering,becomes obvious(B).These bigger chunks were scraped off of the bottom part of the sintered material specimen(In Fig.33 SI a picture of the complete sintered material for the whole cross section is shown.).

    Fig.6.Unit cell according to Zehner with increased particle contact area regarding the flattening coefficient[66,67].

    During the sintering process in the high temperature region in the reactor,a solid connection grows between the particles surfaces,leading to a higher portion of thermal conduction through the solid phase.By measuring the effective thermal conductivity after the cycling,the flattening coefficient is adapted to fit the modeled values to the measured ones.In Fig.6,the adapted flattening coefficient is illustrated in the frame of the unit cell of Zehner’s model,adapted from[66,67].The red full-tone color at the upper projected area marks the projected increased junction of the sintered particles.The measured effective thermal conductivity value(measured in an argon atmosphere and at room temperature)of the sintered Mg-Al waste powder is 1.5 W/(mK),whereas for a bed of loose powder this value would be only 0.2 W/(mK).The flattening coefficient is found to be 0.036 and 0.004,respectively.Typical values for loose and fine granular materials lie between 0.001 for broken particles and 0.025 for round spheres.Variables like pressure,temperature or particle size are considered in this model.

    During hydrogen absorption,a material volume expansion of 30% is considered,that,in turn,leads to a dynamic decrease in porosity[69,70].The complete set of equations for the determination ofkeffcan be found in Ref[68]together with the derivation from[66,67].

    For the complete heat balance of the simulation,the external heat source of the reactor is required for domains with external boundaries.Therefore,a PID controller of the heating jacket was also implemented in the software with the parameterskP=10W/°C,kI=0.001W/(s°C)andkD=0(Ws)/°C.The maximum power output is limited to 3 kW.At thesurface of the autoclave,which is not covered with the heating jacket,the boundary condition is set to a natural convection surrounding with a heat transfer coefficient of 1 W/(m2K)to a room temperature of 20 °C.

    Between the Mg-Al waste particles and the wall of the container,the thermal conduction is limited,due to a higher porosity and low solid-solid contact areas at the wall of the reactor inlet.Commonly,a thermal contact resistance can be defined at this boundary.In literature,a broad range for thermal contact resistances or rather heat transfer coefficients from the wall to the powder can be found from 30 to 2500 W/(m2K)[71–73].These values are strongly dependent on the porosity,absorption state,gas pressure and general material properties.Within this work,the thermal contact resistance is set to 1000 W/(m2K),which allow achieving a good agreement between the simulated and the experimental data,by performing a parametric sweep.Besides the direct powder-wall interface,also a solid-gas-solid interface area must be considered between the powder container and the reactor wall.This boundary is modeled as a thin layer of gaseous hydrogen in a 100 μm thick gap with the gas properties implemented in the COMSOL Multiphysics? database.An overview of the domains and the boundary conditions as well as the used material properties,variables and equations for the simulation can be found in the supplementary data(F,G and H).The temperature dependent material properties for the different steels,like specific heat capacity or thermal conductivity,of the autoclave are taken from the work of Richter[74].In contrast to the experimental reactor design,for the simulation model the hydrogen inlet is shifted to the center for simplicity reasons(which does not matter here,because a 2D axisymmetric model is used).In addition,the reactor pressure sensor and bursting disk are not implemented in detail,only the connecting pieces are considered in this model design.Regarding the simulation starting conditions,a timeframe of 5 h is simulated to get a constant temperature distribution field within the system,in which the PID controller reaches a stable output value.For the mass transport the Brinkmann equations are used,as they are implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics?,considering free gaseous flow and flow in porous media including the permeability of the powder bed.The permeability is calculated with the Carman-Kozeny equation,depending on the particle sizes and the porosity[75].

    3.3.Scaled-up system results

    3.3.1.Absorption experimental results

    For all the performed absorption experiments,the hydrogen flow is given on left side of Fig.8(A)for the first two minutes and Fig.9(A)for the following 30 min.The temperature profiles for each absorption experiment are plotted in Fig.7(A–dotted lines).The temperature of the powder beds rises within about two minutes to their maxima and then decreases with different rates,depending on the initially applied temperature.

    Fig.7.Absorption measurements with the autoclave:Temperature development inside the powder bed for(A–dotted lines)the experiments and(B–solid lines)the simulations.

    Fig.8.Absorption measurements with the autoclave:Initial hydrogen flow into the autoclave for different initial temperatures for(A)the experiments and(B)the simulations in the first 2 min.

    The rise of the powder bed temperatures for the experiments performed at an initial temperature of 260 °C,280 °C,300 °C and 320 °C leads to peak temperatures of 348 °C,362 °C,373 °C and 375 °C respectively.This phenomenon is the consequence of the large amount of heat released during hydrogen absorption.The peak temperature values are naturally below the equilibrium temperature at the applied hydrogen pressure(386 °C at 13 bar),as the hydrogenation process is thermodynamically self-regulating in the two-phase region[76].The temperature governs the reaction kinetics,as observable in Fig.8,which displays the increasing hydrogen flowrate for the experiments at initially low temperatures.The flowrate accelerates for one minute for the absorption starting at 260 °C and for 30 s for the one starting at 280 °C.Due to the heat up of the powder bed,more favorable temperatures for the reaction kinetic are reached,leading to the accelerating absorption reaction.For the experiments at 300 °C the increasing flowrate last about 15 s and for the starting temperature at 320 °C only a few seconds of rising flowrateare identified.The reason for this is the smaller temperature difference between the starting temperature and the equilibrium temperature.However,for the measurements performed at powder bed starting values higher than 320 °C,the hydrogen flowrate continuously drops,caused by an overall sensible decrement of the hydrogenation kinetics.This is due to the increases of the beds temperature to values that are close the equilibrium temperature.

    Fig.9.Absorption measurements with the autoclave:Hydrogen flow into the autoclave for different initial temperatures for(A)the experiments and(B)the simulations until 30 min.

    Indeed,for the experiments at 340 °C and 360 °C starting temperatures,the peak temperatures reached inside the powder beds are 378 °C and 379 °C,respectively.After 30 s the hydrogen flow of the 360 °C experiment becomes the lowest compared to the other starting temperatures whereas after 60 s the flowrate of the 260 °C experiment becomes the fastest.It changes over time,which is indicated in Fig.9,that the flowrate of the highest initial temperature 360°C becomes the fastest again after 27 min and the flowrate of the lowest initial temperature gets the slowest after 11 min.By achieving the favorable kinetic temperature with the own heat generation of the reaction,the fast absorption is only maintained as long as the heat is sufficient to keep this temperature.This is valid for lower initial powder bed temperatures,whereas at high initial temperatures,the resulting heat prevents an ideal temperature level.

    Since the heat of reaction is not actively dissipated,the temperature remains at high values,prolonging the overall reaction time.As an example,for the experiment performed at an initial powder bed temperature of 360 °C,after 30 min from the starting of the experiment,the temperature is still above 370 °C as shown in Fig.7(A–dotted lines).Since the heating jacket has a set point of 360 °C,in this case the temperature difference between the powder bed and the wall of the reactor remains small,thus reducing the heat transport out of the system.For this reason,due to the reduction of the overall reaction rate,the hydrogen flowrate into the reactor(Fig.9(A))decreases the fastest in the case of the experiment performed at an initial powder bed temperature of 360 °C.

    3.3.2.Absorption simulation results

    In Fig.7 the temperature profiles from the experiments(A–dotted lines)are compared to the results from the simulation model(B–solid lines).The comparison between the measured and the simulated temperature trends shows a good agreement between the two sets of data.However,in the experimental data,the powder bed temperatures,after reaching the peak temperatures,seem to decrease back to the starting value faster than in the simulated measurements.This tendency is better recognizable for the measurements performed at a lower starting temperatures of the powder bed.In fact,for the measurements performed at initial temperature values between 260 °C and 300 °C,the powder bed reaches a stable temperature level within 30 min from the starting of the process,whereas in the simulated data longer time intervals are needed for reaching a stable temperature value.In addition,the measured and simulated hydrogen flow are in good agreement,as shown in Figs.8 and 9.For the measurements performed at different starting temperatures,a clear trend of the initial hydrogen flowrate is clearly visible.In fact,this value increases faster in the first minute when decreasing the initial temperature.Although the simulated data resembles the one of the experiments,it is possible to notice that the hydrogen flow for lower temperatures is decreasing faster than in the experimental data,Fig.9.The measured hydrogen flow at the 260 °C after 10 min absorption is 2.25 mg/s,whereas the simulated data show a flow of 1.47 mg/s.In contrast,after 25 min,a small hydrogen flow of 0.48 mg/s is still indicated in the simulated data whereas no hydrogen flow is detected after the same time in the experimental data.The small differences,observed in the simulated hydrogen flow of Figs.8 and 9,lead to obtaining small discrepancies between the simulated and the experimentally measured temperatures of the powder bed(Fig.7).In fact,in the simulated data,the temperature values remain 10 to 20 °C higher after 25 min from the starting of the experiment.For absorptions at temperatures higher than 300 °C,the results of simulation and experiment are in perfect agreement.

    3.3.3.Desorption experimental results

    In Fig.10(A–dotted lines)and Fig.11(A),the powder bed temperatures and the hydrogen flowrates are shown for the desorption processes at different starting temperatures.During these processes,depending on the initial starting temperature values,different minimum peak temperatures are reached,as displayed in Fig.10(A–dotted lines).

    It must be mentioned that,in contrast to the absorption measurements,during the desorption measurements the hydrogen pressure,inside the reactor,is maintained constant at quasi-ambient conditions.Since the reactor is connected with the gas release line to the outside of the laboratory,a certain pressure drop in the piping must be overcome.This pressure drop is proportional to the volumetric flow through the pipe.The general definition to the pressure drop is given as[68]:

    Fig.10.Desorption measurements with the autoclave:Temperature development inside the powder bed for(A–dotted lines)the experiments and(B–solid lines)the simulations.

    Fig.11.Desorption measurements with the autoclave:Hydrogen flow out of the autoclave for different initial temperatures for(A)the experiments and(B)the simulations.

    The factoragives the type of the flow phenomenon andζthe drag coefficient.With rising velocity of the flow,a higher pressure gradient must be provided as a driving force.At higher starting powder bed temperature,the material begins to release hydrogen with higher initial flow,see Fig.11(A).For this reason,the pressure that sets itself in the autoclave is higher than the experiments with lower initial temperature.As a result,this might causes the minimum peak temperature values to differ within the desorption measurement series.The desorption pressure of the system varies from 1.5 to 2.4 bar at 325 to 345 °C,respectively[61].Delhomme et al.,[77]already discussed the great influence on the equilibrium temperature of small pressure variations at low system pressures for the MgH2system,especially in the desorption process.The measured pressure development can be found in the supplementary data(I).

    Fig.12.Schematic reaction progress following the desorption measurements with the autoclave at 375 and 365 °C initial temperature in a pressuretemperature diagram.

    Moreover,the temperature profiles of the measurements display a prior shoulder before the minimum peak is reached,see Fig.10(A–dotted lines).By comparing the hydrogen flow(Fig.11)with the temperature development,their relevant points(maximum flow and minimum temperature)are synchronous for each experiment.After the first drop of the flow,coming from the gaseous phase,the hydrogen flowrate increases in the first minutes as the reaction is accelerating,see Fig.11(A).For the measurements at 375 °C,365 °C 355 °C and 345 °C the maximum flowrate is reached after 8,11,19 and 31 mins,respectively.During the acceleration of the hydrogen flow,an increasing pressure drop has to be overcome,therefore the pressure inside the system rises consequently.For this reason the reaction rate is hindered,retarding the temperature drop.This reflects in the shoulder noticeable before the actual peak.This behavior is illustrated in Fig.12.The lower the initial temperature of the experiment is,the more pronounced is the shoulder that precede the peak temperature.The 335 °C desorption measurement shows no shoulder before the peak temperature.The motivation for this is found in the low initial temperature,which starts already close to the thermodynamic equilibrium.Because of this,the driving force is too small to accelerate the reaction and to build up enough pressure to observe the same behavior seen in the other measurements.Nevertheless,it is possible to claim that the higher the initial powder bed temperature,the faster the overall desorption reaction occurs.

    Although the intrinsic kinetic of the desorption is faster than the one of the absorption,the scaled-up system needs longer times for the hydrogen release than for the loading.The fast pressure drop leads to a sudden decrease of the effective thermal conductivity inside the hydride bed,which limits the heat transportation into the system.The heat,coming from the autoclave wall,only slowly recovers the temperature of the bed.Moreover,the heating jacket,which determines the amount of heat going into the system,is controlled by the temperature of the reactor wall.This last value does not change at all,so that no surplus heat is provided,which would be needed for the desorption reaction.If the controllermeasures the decrease in the wall temperature,more heat is applied to the system.

    3.3.4.Desorption simulation results

    By comparing the experimental and simulated data,it becomes obvious that the discussed phenomena are not reproduced with the same accuracy as for the absorption reaction.For the temperature profiles,a good agreement to the peak temperatures and the overall slope of the temperature is achieved(Fig.10(B–solid lines)).Although the interaction between the hydrogen flowrate,the pressure drop and the pressure level in the vessel is not implemented in the simulation,the peak temperatures could be precisely predicted by setting the measured pressure from the experiment as desorption pressure in the simulation.Focusing on the minimum peak shape,the measurements show a prior shoulder,which does not appear in the simulation results.The reason for the mismatches lies in the fixed value of the desorption pressure in the simulation.Although the values are taken from the experiments,no dynamic increase or decrease is allowed.For this reason,a dynamic change for the pressure is not possible,no matter if the desorption reaction accelerates and the pressure drop of the piping system rises caused by the increased hydrogen flow.The simulated conditions represent the ideal case,in which every released hydrogen molecule directly leaves the system.That is why,the initial temperature drop is reaching the lowest possible temperature directly with no delay.Looking at the hydrogen flow in Fig.11,the simulation data do not show an initial limitation in the flow,as indicated by the experiments.The slope of the flowrate is continuously decreasing instead.This missing limitation could be explained by the absence of the pressure increase during the first minutes,which leads to a smaller dehydrogenation driving force.Another reason could be the setting of the PID controller in the simulation.In the experiments,an inertia between the temperature decrease and the response of the heater is recognized.Since the controller settings of the heating jacket were self-optimized and not accessible,the settings for the simulation were identified during the setup of stationary heat up simulations.For this reason,the controller could have undetected finer control characteristic.For small temperature drops the controller could directly react and heat up the system faster.Even with these hindrances,in general,the magnitude of the flows and the trend for the different desorption experiments are in good agreement.

    4.Conclusions

    Mg/Al-based waste combined with hydrogen is a potential candidate for thermal energy storage,since the waste material is cost neutral,can be stored in air until it is milled to fine powder and has very good thermodynamic and kinetic properties for the hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reaction.By absorbing 5.8 wt.% hydrogen,the storable amount of energy,regarding the reaction enthalpy of the Mg/MgH2system,is more than 2.1 MJ/kg of Mg waste.Kinetic measurements are done under absorbing pressures of 13 bar and desorbing pressures of 1 bar at temperatures between 260 °C and 375 °C.By taking thermodynamic data from the pure MgH2system,the kinetic models for ab-and desorption are derived.In the absorption reaction,a shift of the rate limiting process along the reaction process is identified and modeled accordingly.Consequently,new pressure functions for the Mg/Al based waste system are implemented in this study and activation energies of 134–136 kJ/molH2for the absorption and 164–169 kJ/molH2for the desorption reaction are determined.The desorption activation energy is confirmed by DSC measurements that show a shoulder after the main peak temperatures,which is concluded to origin from a bigger particle fraction that results from sintering and agglomeration after cycling the material.A higher activation energy will lead to a lower reaction rate regarding the temperature level of the system.This effect will have a lower overall impact since the main limiting parameter of the system remains the thermal conductance of the bed.As a crucial value for the overall performance of the tank system a modified model for the effective thermal conductivity is implemented,which considers partially sintered powder beds.Experiments in an autoclave with an enlarged powder mass are carried out under identic thermodynamic conditions as for the measurements in the Sieverts apparatus,but in scaled-up conditions of a tank system.From the medium scale experiments,important new insights are obtained,like the limitation of the kinetics by limited heat transfer,or the interaction between the pressure drop,caused by hydrogen flow,and the reaction behavior.These effects are not observable in lab-scale experiments.The geometry of the autoclave and the developed reaction model are implemented into a FEM simulation tool.Differences between the simulations and the experiments are identified,which,however,could be well justified like the unexpected turning point in the temperature development during the desorption reaction in the experiment that is not visible in the simulation results,due to a fixed pressure value.The conclusions drawn from the comparison of real experiments and predictive simulations help to develop a better understanding in view of system design.This work presents the first ever made model for the hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reaction of recycled Mg/Al-based waste on a medium scale system size.The simulation model is an approach for a method to predict even larger systems.Based on this,it can now be utilized for sensitivity analysis and to design tank systems for energy storage purposes for application scale.

    Declaration of Competing Interest

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are thankful to Thomas Breckwoldtbfrom the Helmut-Schmidt University in Hamburg for the support with the SEM measurements.

    Supplementary materials

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found,in the online version,at doi:10.1016/j.jma.2021.12.005.

    欧美中文综合在线视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| kizo精华| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| av一本久久久久| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 一个人免费看片子| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| videosex国产| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费在线观看日本一区| 免费不卡黄色视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 不卡av一区二区三区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| av天堂久久9| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 久久久国产成人免费| 操出白浆在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 99热网站在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| av天堂久久9| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 岛国毛片在线播放| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲全国av大片| 久久久久网色| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 国产区一区二久久| 美女主播在线视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 黄色视频不卡| 欧美日韩黄片免| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 性少妇av在线| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产麻豆69| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 1024香蕉在线观看| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 欧美日韩黄片免| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | www.精华液| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 精品福利永久在线观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| av国产精品久久久久影院| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 久久这里只有精品19| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 男女免费视频国产| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产精品成人在线| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 考比视频在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 黄频高清免费视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久久国产成人免费| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 日本wwww免费看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产精品成人在线| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 飞空精品影院首页| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 三级毛片av免费| 久久中文字幕一级| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 男人操女人黄网站| 午夜老司机福利片| 99香蕉大伊视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 中文欧美无线码| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 免费在线观看日本一区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 丁香六月天网| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 91av网站免费观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 一区二区三区精品91| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 大码成人一级视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 免费少妇av软件| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产1区2区3区精品| 欧美日韩精品网址| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 免费观看人在逋| 美女主播在线视频| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久 成人 亚洲| 欧美成人午夜精品| 天天影视国产精品| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产成人欧美| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 中文字幕色久视频| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| av在线播放精品| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美大码av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| videos熟女内射| h视频一区二区三区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 一区二区三区精品91| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| av国产精品久久久久影院| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 91精品三级在线观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久这里只有精品19| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久人人爽人人片av| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 久久中文看片网| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产麻豆69| 久久久久视频综合| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 99热全是精品| av天堂在线播放| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久九九热精品免费| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| www.自偷自拍.com| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 91av网站免费观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产精品成人在线| 夫妻午夜视频| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 又大又爽又粗| 国产激情久久老熟女| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 美女主播在线视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 在线观看www视频免费| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 91国产中文字幕| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 久久久精品区二区三区| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| a 毛片基地| 宅男免费午夜| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 97在线人人人人妻| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 另类精品久久| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品影院久久| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久久久国内视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产精品影院久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 中文字幕色久视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 又大又爽又粗| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产淫语在线视频| 91av网站免费观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 黄色 视频免费看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 老司机影院成人| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品成人在线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久 | 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 视频区图区小说| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费少妇av软件| 69av精品久久久久久 | 久久免费观看电影| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 成在线人永久免费视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲精品在线美女| 免费观看人在逋| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| a在线观看视频网站| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 一区福利在线观看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久久久国产一区二区| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 丁香六月欧美| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 五月天丁香电影| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产成人精品在线电影| 欧美另类一区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 老司机影院成人| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 美女主播在线视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产成人精品在线电影| av一本久久久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 国产黄频视频在线观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 久久久久久久精品精品| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 午夜久久久在线观看| 91成人精品电影| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 99国产精品99久久久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久久国产一区二区| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 久久久久网色| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲中文av在线| 脱女人内裤的视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 脱女人内裤的视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 手机成人av网站| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 成人国产av品久久久| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| tocl精华| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 中文欧美无线码| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 成人手机av| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 超色免费av| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 自线自在国产av| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 欧美午夜高清在线| 91老司机精品| 老司机影院毛片| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 亚洲色图综合在线观看| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 男女免费视频国产| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 电影成人av| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 成人手机av| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久久久网色| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃|