• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Health-related quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using transaortic, transfemoral approaches and surgical aortic valve replacement—a single-center study

    2018-12-11 12:24:22AleksandraStaskaDariuszJagielakMaciejKowalikMaciejBrzeziskiRafaPawlaczykJadwigaFijakowskaWojciechKarolakJanRogowskiPeterBramlage
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2018年11期

    Aleksandra Stańska, Dariusz Jagielak, Maciej Kowalik, Maciej Brzeziński, Rafa? Pawlaczyk,Jadwiga Fija?kowska, Wojciech Karolak, Jan Rogowski, Peter Bramlage

    1Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland

    2Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland

    3Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg, Germany

    Abstract Objective To evaluate short- and long-term changes in quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to assess differences in patient QoL when using the TAVI transaortic (TAVI TAo) approach compared with the transfemoral approach (TAVI TF) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods Ninety-seven patients were assessed. Thirty-two patients underwent TAVI TAo, 31 underwent TAVI TF and 34 patients underwent SAVR. QoL was assessed using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire at baseline, after one month and one year. Results Mean patient age was 80 years (range, 61–92 years) and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 12.45% (range, 1.39%-78.98%). Declared health state at baseline was significantly lower in TAVI TF (P < 0.001) and after one month there were no differences between the three groups (P = 0.99). After one year, SAVR patient results of the EQ-5D-3L index value were lower in comparison to both TAVI patient groups (P < 0.05). The analysis also showed significant differences between the results of EQ-5D-3L index value over the one month and one year follow-up (TAVI TAo, P < 0.001; TAVI TF, P < 0.05; SAVR, P < 0.05). In all groups, the values significantly increased after one-month and one-year of follow-up in comparison to baseline value. Significant differences were also demonstrated between Visual Analogue Scale values (VAS). Conclusions A significant improvement in QoL was observed in all three patient groups. Regardless of the TAVI approach, EQ-5D-3L and VAS values were significantly increased after one-month and one-year follow up; the SAVR patients however, reported lower health status when compared to the TAVI patients.

    Keywords: Aortic valve stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; The elderly; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Quality of life

    1 Introduction

    With an aging population, the number of patients presenting with symptoms of aortic stenosis (AS) is increasing.[1–4]Since its introduction, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a well-established procedure for correcting severe symptomatic AS in elderly patients at high risk for surgery and it is now globally recognized as an effective alternative to open heart surgery.[5–7]

    Over recent years, growing experience with TAVI has been accompanied by the development of several alternative vascular approaches.[6]Although the choice of approach depends mainly on the patient’s clinical characteristics and the physician’s preference, most centers today use the‘transfemoral first’ (TAVI TF) approach as this is generally considered to be a less invasive method for high-risk patients[8–10]and approximately 70% of TAVI procedures are performed using this approach.[11]However, there are a number of contraindications for TAVI TF, including the presence of severe peripheral atherosclerosis and physiological abnormalities of the vasculature,[12,13]thus necessitating an alternative access route.

    While the transapical (TA) TAVI approach is commonly used as a second-line option for patients who are ineligible for TAVI TF,[14]it also has limitations: it is not recommended for patients with multiple comorbidities (which include chronic lung disease and poor left ventricular function) and it may also be associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications.[15–18]Therefore, the transaortic approach (TAVI TAo) has been proposed as an alternative to both TAVI TF and TAVI TA.[19–21]TAVI TAo involves insertion of the catheter via an upper reversed L-ministernotomy—a safe and well-established procedure in classic cardiac surgery—followed by valve implantation through the ascending aorta.[12,21,22]Advantages of this procedure include greater visibility for the surgeon and allows a more rapid recovery time for most patients.[22]

    Elderly patients with AS and a typical symptom burden that includes exertional dyspnea, dizziness and syncope represent the typical target population for TAVI.[23–25]These patients generally experience a reduction in physical, psychological and social functioning and wellbeing, leading to a reduction in quality of life (QoL).[26]Alongside clinical outcomes, QoL is a crucial factor for these patients, and improvement in QoL should be considered as if not more important than increased survival.[27]Despite the wealth of studies showing a rapid and significant improvement in QoL following TAVI,[28–31]there remains a lack of evidence on QoL outcomes following TAVI TAo. The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare short- and long-term changes in the QoL status of patients undergoing TAVI TAo, TAVI TF and surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR).

    2 Methods

    2.1 Patients and study design

    In this prospective, single-center study, conducted between 2014–2017 at the Medical University of Gdańsk in Poland, patients with severe symptomatic AS were assigned to TAVI TAo, TAVI TF or SAVR procedure by the local Heart Team, which included a cardiac surgeon, an interventional cardiologist and a cardiologist. All TAVI patients were ineligible for open heart surgery. SAVR patients were chosen randomly from among all patients over the age of 70 years, while patients with abnormalities of the vasculature were ineligible for TAVI TF and were therefore assigned to TAVI TAo. Patients who required an additional surgical procedure, such as coronary artery bypass or another valve replacement or repair, were excluded from the study. All the patients were able to and signed an informed consent form.The study design was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Gdańsk.

    Baseline evaluation of all patients included physical examination, laboratory testing, and assessment of aortic annulus diameter, aortic topography, and ascending aorta morphology by computed tomography angiography. Healthrelated QoL was assessed at baseline, at one-month and one-year post-surgery using the EQ-5D-3L instrument. The one-month and one-year follow-up interviews were conducted over the telephone or in the outpatient clinic.

    2.2 TAVI procedure

    The local heart team in a hybrid operating room equipped with an accessible heart-lung machine performed all TAVI procedures.

    Transaortic implantations were performed under general anesthesia. An upper L-ministernotomy down to the second or third intercostal space was performed. Implantation spot was secured with two purse string sutures. Pre-dilatation was mandatory in all cases. The position of the prosthesis was confirmed using a contrast medium. After implantation,a further bolus of contrast medium was given to assess the position of the valve and allow simultaneous estimation of paravalvular leak (PVL) and coronary status. The decision of whether to carry out post-dilatation was made after estimating the shape of the valve and after quantification of PVL.Procedure was completed after hemostasis and placement of a single chest tube. Sternum was closed by placement of 2 or 3 stainless steel wires. Patients were extubated 2–3 h after admission to intensive care unit.

    Transfemoral implantations were done under local anesthesia without sedation. Vascular access was performed percutaneously and, in all cases, percutaneous vascular closure devices were used. Valve positioning and implantation control was similar to the transaortic access.

    2.3 SAVR procedure

    All procedures were performed under general anesthesia using a median sternotomy. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established with ascending aortic cannulation and right atrial venous cannulation, flow rate of 2.4–2.8 L/min per square meters and a perfusion pressure of 60–80 mmHg were used. Procedures were performed under mild hypothermia (30–32°C). Crystalline cardioplegia delivered direct ostial or retrograde provided myocardial protection. The left ventricle was vented via the right upper pulmonary vein.The native aortic valve was resected with removal of annular calcifications, in all cases, a biological prostheses was implanted. Procedure was completed after careful hemostasis and chest tubes were placed to control postoperative bleeding. Sternum was closed by standard stainless steel wires. Patients usually were extubated 6–8 h after admission to intensive care unit.

    2.4 Health-related QoL

    The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health-related QoL.[32]It consists of five dimensions, namely mobility,self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each of these dimensions has three levels (3L)indicating no problems (level 1), some problems (level 2)and extreme problems (level 3). In this study, health-related QoL was assessed using a validated Polish version of the EQ-5D-3L.[33]Patients were asked to complete the paper-and-pencil questionnaire either on their own or with the help of a family member or the interviewer, if needed. There are 243 possible health states in the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire and each of them is referred to by a five-digit code.For example, state 11111 indicates no problems in any of the five dimensions, while the state 12233 indicates no problems with mobility, some problems with self-care and usual activities, and extreme pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The health states were converted into a single summary index using a formula that attaches values to each level in each dimension. Health-related QoL was also assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D-3L, in which a score of 100 indicates perfect health and 0 indicates the worst imaginable health.

    2.5 Statistical analysis

    Categorical data are presented as frequencies (percentages); continuous variables are presented as means or medians, as applicable, and were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Changes in categorical variables between baseline and follow-up were assessed using the χ2test.P < 0.05 were considered significant. Differences in continuous variables were analyzed using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (independent variables) and Friedman’s ANOVA (dependent variables). Multivariate post-hoc tests were also performed. Statistical analyses were performed using STATISTICA 12.0 PL (StatSoft, Krakow, Poland).

    3 Results

    3.1 Patients

    A total of 97 patients were included in the study; 32 patients underwent TAVI TAo, 31 underwent TAVI TF and 34 received SAVR. All patients were included in the analysis. Patient demographics and characteristics at baseline are presented in Table 1.

    3.2 Health-related QoL

    The percentages (frequencies) of patients experiencing problems in EQ-5D-3L dimensions at baseline, one-month and one-year are shown in Table 2.

    3.3 EQ-5D-3L

    Table 3 shows EQ-5D-3L index values at baseline,one-month and one-year according to patient group (TAVI TAo, TAVI TF and SAVR). At baseline, the total population had a markedly depressed QoL, as demonstrated by a mean EQ-5D-3L index of 0.64 ± 0.33.

    Table 1. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics.

    Table 2. Frequency of patients reporting problems in EQ-5D-3L dimensions at baseline, one month and one year (all patient groups).

    Table 3. EQ-5D-3L index values at baseline, one month and one year according to patient group.

    Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA confirmed significant differences between the three patient groups at baseline (H(2,97)=17.76, P = 0.0001) and at one year (H(2,97)= 10.82, P =0.0045). Multiple-comparison tests were used to confirm the differences. At baseline, EQ-5D-3L index values were significantly lower for patients in the TAVT TF group than for those in either the TAVI TAo group (P = 0.006) or the SAVR group (P < 0.001). Between-group differences were also found at one year, when index values for the SAVR were significantly lower than for the other two patient groups (P = 0.04 vs. TAVI TAo; P = 0.01 vs. TAVI TF)(Figure 1).

    Further analysis focused on dependent samples. Friedman’s ANOVA found significant differences between EQ-5D-3L index values at baseline and at one-month and one-year for all three procedures (TAVI TAo, χ2(2,32)=21.49, P < 0.001; TAVI TF, χ2(2,31)= 44.12, P < 0.001;SAVR χ2(2,34)= 40.51, P < 0.001). Multiple comparison tests were used to determine the differences between baseline and both follow-up time points (Figure 2).

    3.4 Visual analogue scale

    Similar analyses were performed for the EQ-5D-3L Visual Analogue Scale (Table 4). Analysis by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA showed significant differences between the three groups at baseline (H(2,97)= 25.63, P < 0.001), after onemonth (H(2,97)= 30.23, P < 0.001) and after one-year (H(2,97)= 39.53, P < 0.001). Multiple-comparison tests were performed to assess the differences between the groups.

    At baseline, significant differences in VAS scores were found between the TAVI TAo and TAVI TF groups (P =0.03) and between the TAVI TAo and SAVR groups (P <0.001). At one-month and one-year, VAS scores were significantly lower in the SAVR group than in both the TAVI TAo and TAVI TF groups (P < 0.001 for all comparisons)(Figure 3).

    Figure 1. Comparison of EQ-5D-3L index values at baseline (A), one month (B) and one year (C) in TAVI-TAo, TAVI TF and AVR groups. AVR: aortic valve replacement; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation with transaortic approach (TAVI TAo) or transfemoral approach (TAVI TF).

    Figure 3. Comparison of EQ-5D-3L VAS results at baseline (A), one-month (B) and one year (C) in TAVI-TAo, TAVI TF and AVR groups. AVR: surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation with transaortic approach (TAVI TAo)or transfemoral approach (TAVI TF).

    Analysis of dependent samples showed significant differences in EQ-5D-3L VAS scores at one-month and oneyear vs. baseline in all patient groups (TAVI-TAo, χ2(2,32)=31.45, P < 0.001; TAVI-TF, χ2(2,31)= 48.65, P < 0.001;AVR χ2(2,34)= 32.91,P < 0.001). Again, multiple comparison tests were used to confirm these differences (Figure 4).

    4 Discussion

    Figure 4. Comparison of EQ-5D-3L VAS results in TAVI-TAo, TAVI-TF and AVR groups at baseline, after 1-month and 1-year follow-up. AVR: surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation with transaortic approach (TAVI TAo) or transfemoral approach (TAVI TF); VAS: Visual Analogue Scale values.

    Table 4. EQ-5D-3L VAS scores at baseline, one month and one year according to patient group.

    Patients with severe AS commonly have symptoms of angina, syncope, dyspnea and/or heart failure and without rapid medical intervention they face a life expectancy of 2–3 years.[23–25]Interventions for AS, which are usually selected as a result of the patient’s clinical characteristics and the physician’s expertise, include SAVR and TAVI, with different access routes for TAVI including TAVI TF, TAVI TA and, more recently, TAVI TAo.[10]There is substantial evidence in the literature of the feasibility, safety and mortality benefits of TAVI and the QoL associated with TAVI TA and TAVI TF,[5,28–31]but to the best of our knowledge there is little information about the QoL associated with the TAVI TAo approach.

    This study showed that patients in the SAVR, TAVI TF and TAVI TAo treatment groups had significant improvements in QoL in all parameters assessed by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire between baseline and one-month of follow-up and baseline and one-year of follow up. The biggest improvements were seen in the mobility, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions. This data is in line with previous QoL studies showing that TAVI via different access routes was associated with an improvement in QoL.[28,34–36]Patients treated with SAVR, TAVI TF and TAVI TAo also had increased VAS values after one-month and one-year follow up. Compared with TAVI TF and TAVI TAo, patients in the SAVR group showed an improved in QoL but reported a lower overall health status.

    In this study, intervention for AS resulted in a comparatively small increases in QoL for the self-care and usual activities dimensions. Patients with AS are typically elderly,[4]which mirrors the median age of patients across all groups in this study (80 years, range 61–92 years). In the general population, increased age and service use (including visits to healthcare practitioners) are significantly associated with transitions to sheltered accommodation.[37]It is realistic to consider that patients at the elderly age of the spectrum in this study likely have assistance for their care and have a reduced number of daily activities. Keeping this in mind,the impact of TAVI on these aspects of their lifestyles may be less apparent.

    While all interventions were associated with an overall improvement in QoL, our study showed that TAVI TF and TAVI TAo provided more improvement in QoL compared with SAVR. The selection of patients for treatment with SAVR in this study was random. Interestingly, the baseline characteristics showed that patients in SAVR group were generally younger, with a lower EuroSCORE value and had a higher number of patients with NYHA class II and III(compared with the TAVI TF and TAVI TAo groups which had nine and three patients with NYHA class IV, respec-tively). Although we have not reported data on the vascular characteristics of individual patients and how this may have influenced the choice of treatment intervention, the overall demographic data could suggest that patients in the SAVR group were medically fitter than those in the TAVI TF and TAVI TAo groups. With reference to this hypothesis, it may be possible that treatment with TAVI TF and TAVI TAo is medically more advantageous than SAVR as it is associated with a greater improvement in QoL in our specific patient population. The impact of TAVI on QoL is well documented,[38,39]and our findings that TAVI is associated with better patient outcomes in terms of QoL compared to SAVR is also supported by other studies.[5,40]

    Some dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, including mobility (where patients reported being confined to bed), pain/discomfort (moderate) and anxiety/depression(either no anxiety/depression or extreme anxiety/depression)showed that QoL was better at one-month follow up compared to one-year follow up. A study by Hiltrop, et al.[41]reported similar findings—treatment with TAVI resulted in a significant improvement in QoL in the short-term, but as follow up time increases, the QoL data becomes similar to baseline values. Longer-term follow up in our study would determine whether the values in these QoL dimensions also become closer to baseline values or plateau at one-year.

    4.1 Limitations of the study

    The findings of our study are based on data from a single center and, although our population is currently one of the largest populations reporting on this issue, the patient size is still quite small. As a result, the data from this study should be interpreted with caution.

    There is currently no aortic stenosis-specific questionnaire that exists to assess QoL. The EQ-5D questionnaire is a general questionnaire that assesses various aspects of the patient’s life to put a numerical value on their quality of life and has been widely used in the cardiology field in patients with heart failure, those undergoing heart transplants and for patients in rehabilitation programs.[42–45]The EQ-5D model used in this study was the EQ-5D-3L version, which assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, using the three levels (no problems,some problems and extreme problems), is currently one of the best available tools to measure QoL in these patients.

    The TAVI procedure is associated with a relatively high(about 15%) one-year mortality[46]and, as a result, the proportion of patients with available data will diminish over time. As expected, the study shows that the TAVI TAo procedure improves QoL, but this data is based on the surviving (and potentially fitter) patients. The data, however,can be considered to be representative of the clinical picture in patients post the TAVI procedure.

    4.2 Conclusions

    Aortic stenosis is a debilitating condition that significantly impacts patient’s quality of life. Intervention is provided to these patients with the aim of improving their health and wellbeing—both in terms of increasing their ability to perform day-to-day activities and increasing their life expectancy. Assessing the impact of different interventions on the patient’s QoL will help clinicians to make informed decisions about the best possible treatment approaches for their patients.

    Conflict of interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Acknowledgements

    Not applicable.

    亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国内精品宾馆在线| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产综合精华液| 777米奇影视久久| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| videos熟女内射| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久免费观看电影| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 91精品三级在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 五月天丁香电影| 免费大片18禁| 多毛熟女@视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| av.在线天堂| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲在久久综合| 91精品三级在线观看| 久久av网站| 蜜桃在线观看..| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久99精品国语久久久| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 老司机影院毛片| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 飞空精品影院首页| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产视频内射| 自线自在国产av| 飞空精品影院首页| 久久青草综合色| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 桃花免费在线播放| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲天堂av无毛| www.色视频.com| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产在视频线精品| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产 精品1| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 性色av一级| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产视频内射| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 天天影视国产精品| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 免费少妇av软件| 久热这里只有精品99| 考比视频在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日本av免费视频播放| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 97在线视频观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 精品久久久精品久久久| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 中文字幕制服av| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲在久久综合| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 美女内射精品一级片tv| a级毛片黄视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲不卡免费看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 麻豆成人av视频| av有码第一页| 欧美精品一区二区大全| av福利片在线| 免费av中文字幕在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 婷婷成人精品国产| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久婷婷青草| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 午夜av观看不卡| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久午夜福利片| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 伦精品一区二区三区| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美日韩在线观看h| av一本久久久久| 99久久综合免费| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 另类精品久久| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久久久精品性色| 成人二区视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 看免费成人av毛片| freevideosex欧美| 成人国产av品久久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲av综合色区一区| av在线app专区| 麻豆成人av视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 国产在线视频一区二区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 久热这里只有精品99| 伦精品一区二区三区| 免费看不卡的av| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 男女国产视频网站| av不卡在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 免费看不卡的av| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 久久av网站| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 在线观看三级黄色| 久久青草综合色| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲图色成人| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 成人国语在线视频| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 免费观看在线日韩| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 婷婷色综合www| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久免费观看电影| 亚洲综合色网址| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 日本wwww免费看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产成人91sexporn| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 麻豆成人av视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 日本91视频免费播放| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| a级毛色黄片| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 天天影视国产精品| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 在线观看国产h片| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 少妇 在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 观看av在线不卡| av在线播放精品| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 日本午夜av视频| 高清不卡的av网站| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日本wwww免费看| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 在线观看国产h片| 飞空精品影院首页| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 在线观看三级黄色| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 精品国产一区二区久久| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 国产毛片在线视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| av黄色大香蕉| 22中文网久久字幕| 免费观看性生交大片5| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 99热6这里只有精品| 熟女av电影| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 欧美人与善性xxx| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国内精品宾馆在线| 美女中出高潮动态图| av播播在线观看一区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久久久精品性色| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 精品一区二区免费观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 日本午夜av视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 久热这里只有精品99| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 免费看光身美女| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 9色porny在线观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 9色porny在线观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 青春草国产在线视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲不卡免费看| 91久久精品电影网| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 中文字幕久久专区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产毛片在线视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 精品久久久精品久久久| 18+在线观看网站| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 午夜福利视频精品| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 最新中文字幕久久久久| a 毛片基地| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 99九九在线精品视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲av男天堂| 老熟女久久久| av播播在线观看一区| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲不卡免费看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日日撸夜夜添| 老熟女久久久| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 永久免费av网站大全| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 成人影院久久| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久久久久人妻| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久影院123| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 男女免费视频国产| 精品少妇内射三级| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 精品久久蜜臀av无| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| av视频免费观看在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲综合精品二区| 九草在线视频观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 一区在线观看完整版| 99热全是精品| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 精品午夜福利在线看| 91成人精品电影| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲图色成人| 一区二区av电影网| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 男人操女人黄网站| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 免费看光身美女| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产亚洲最大av| 久久久欧美国产精品| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| av专区在线播放| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 天天影视国产精品| 97超视频在线观看视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 日韩伦理黄色片| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 18+在线观看网站| 综合色丁香网| www.av在线官网国产| 99九九在线精品视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 嫩草影院入口| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲综合精品二区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国内精品宾馆在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 最黄视频免费看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 欧美97在线视频|