• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of 24×20 mm2 swept-source OCTA and fluorescein angiography for the evaluation of lesions in diabetic retinopathy

    2022-11-14 06:12:06QiaoZhuZengSiYingLiYuOuYaoEnZhongJinJinFengQuMingWeiZhao
    International Journal of Ophthalmology 2022年11期

    Qiao-Zhu Zeng, Si-Ying Li, Yu-Ou Yao, En-Zhong Jin, Jin-Feng Qu, Ming-Wei Zhao

    1Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044,China

    2Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Retinal and Choroid Diseases, College of Optometry, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100044, China

    Abstract

    ● KEYWORDS: ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography; fluorescein angiography;comparison; diabetic retinopathy

    INTRODUCTION

    Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the second most common microvascular complication of diabetes and the main cause of preventable blindness in working-aged adults from 20 to 74 years old[1]. Reliable identification of vascular abnormalities promotes early intervention of DR and helps avoid visual impairment.

    Fluorescein angiography (FA) has been the gold standard imaging technique for the evaluation of DR for 50y.However, it is invasive, time-consuming and relatively expensive. It may also cause several side effects, including nausea, vomiting, and even anaphylaxis. In addition, an inherent limitation of the technique is the leakage of dye from pathologic vessels, which could mask the underlying fluorescence.

    Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) can depict retinal and choroidal microvasculature abnormalities in DR with highly detailed depth-resolved visualization. It is a quantitative, noninvasive, and dye-free technique that allows for the imaging of different layers without obscuration by dye leakage[2-3]. We have been investigating swept-source OCTA (SS-OCTA) extensively since its first report in 2006[4].

    The wavelength of infrared light is longer than that of the spectral domain OCT, bringing faster scans and increased tissue penetration[5]. With the advent of widefield sweptsource OCTA (WF SS-OCTA), the field of view (FOV) has significantly increased to 50°-80° of the retina surface.

    An ultra-widefield SS-OCTA device is available from TowardPi Medical Technology (TowardPi Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China): BM400K. It is a 400 kHz SS-OCTA instrument that uses a laser at a central wavelength of 1060 nm with a bandwidth of 100 nm and FOV of 81°×68°, which may potentially change the paradigm of diagnosis and follow-up of DR based on FA.

    To date, there have been limited studies comparing SS-OCTA,especially ultra-widefield SS-OCTA with FA, for the evaluation of DR lesions[5-10], such as the foveal avascular zone (FAZ),nonperfusion area (NPA), microaneurysms (MAs), intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs), and neovascularization(NV). Therefore, we aimed to compare ultra-widefield SSOCTA with traditional FA for detecting DR lesions and to explore the substitution possibility of ultra-widefield SS-OCTA for FA.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Ethical ApprovalThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University People’s Hospital, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.All procedures adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

    PatientsThis prospective, observational study was conducted at Peking University People’s Hospital from September 1,2021, until December 31, 2021. Patients with treatment-na?ve DR were consecutively recruited. Age and gender matched healthy controls were also incorporated.

    Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or more with type 1 or 2 diabetes who were clinically diagnosed with DR. Exclusion criteria included eyes with significant media opacities, other chorioretinal diseases that could impact imaging of the retinal vasculature (e.g., central serous retinopathy, retinal vein occlusions, myopic degeneration,history of glaucoma or uveitis, presence of an epiretinal membrane, or vitreomacular traction syndrome); or history of treatments [e.g., intravitreal therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) or steroids, macular laser treatment, panretinal photocoagulation; pars plana vitrectomy,etc.]; signal strength index of SS-OCTA<7; or images with severe artifacts preventing accurate analysis. DR was graded according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale[11].

    All included patients underwent a full ophthalmic examination,including measurement of best corrected distance visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), slit lamp examination, and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Data on baseline demographics (sex,age, type of diabetes, diabetes duration, glycated hemoglobin,etc.) and current ophthalmologic examination findings were collected.

    Image AcquisitionPatients were imaged with a 400 kHz SSOCTA instrument (BM400K, TowardPi Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) that uses a laser at a central wavelength of 1060 nm with a bandwidth of 100 nm. Images of 24×20 mm2areas were obtained. Vascular layers were autosegmented using the built-in software. We carefully verified the accuracy of automatic segmentation with B-scans. The slab used for comparison with FA was the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) slab, which is between the inner limiting membrane (ILM) and 9 μm above the inner plexiform layer(IPL).

    Color fundus photographs (CFP) and FA imaging were performed using an Optos 200Tx (Optos plc, Dunfermline,United Kingdom). Early-phase FA images captured at 30-45s with high quality were acquired for analysis. SS-OCTA and FA was performed the same day.

    Image Processing and AnalysisEn face SCP SS-OCTA images and representative FA images were exported in PNG and TIF formats, respectively. They were aligned using Photoshop CS6 (version 13.0.0.0, Adobe, San Jose, CA,USA). Three user-specified landmarks on both modalities were accurately matched by translation, rotation, and rescaling of the target images. A representative algorithm of registering images is presented in Figure 1.

    All images were coded and randomized to avoid measurement bias. Two masked ophthalmologists (Zeng QZ and Li SY)independently evaluated CFP, FA, and SS-OCTA images. A third trained ophthalmologist (Zhao MW) adjudicated cases with discrepancies. CFP and FA were used for DR severity grading. Registered SS-OCTA and FA images were imported into Image J in the format of PNG (bundled with Java 1.8.0_172) for quantitative analysis.

    The FAZ area (mm2) and perimeter (mm) were measured by manually outlining the FAZ margin by means of Image J (Figure 2A, 2B). NPA was represented as an area of the fundus lacking retinal arterioles, venules, and capillaries,with a pruned appearance of adjacent vessels on FA, and on SS-OCTA, it was defined as the deficiency of capillary bed between terminal arterioles and a proximal venule or larger vessels[9]. NPAs were manually traced and measured in each image using Image J (Figure 2C, 2D). MAs were defined as pinpoint hyperfluorescent spots with or without leakage on FA and as various morphologic patterns, including fusiform,saccular, curved and rarely coiled shapes, in SS-OCTA images[12](Figure 2E, 2F). IRMAs were intraretinal new vessels adjacent to the areas of capillary loss, which were tortuous, dilated and looped (Figure 2G, 2H). NVs were defined as extraretinal vessels present in the vitreoretinal interface (VRI) slab and shown as Figure 2I-2J on en face SCP and FA.

    Statistical AnalysisAll statistical analyses were performed with Stata/SE 15.0 (V.15.0; Stata, College Station, TX,USA). For patient characteristics, descriptive methods, with standard summary statistics including the mean (SD), median,interquartile range (IQR), and proportions were applied. For DR lesion comparisons between SS-OCTA and FA images,Student’sttest was performed to compare normally distributed quantitative variables, while the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for nonnormally distributed quantitative variables. We applied the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the agreement between SS-OCTA and FA pairwise for continuous variables. The ICC (range, 0-1) was deemed as good agreement (ICC 0.75 to 1), moderate agreement (ICC 0.5 to 0.75), and poor agreement (ICC<0.5)[13]. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between the two imaging techniques.P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    DemographicsForty-six eyes of 23 patients with treatmentna?ve DR were included in the study, as well as twenty-three age and gender matched healthy subjects. Demographics and clinical characteristics are provided in Table 1. There were 10 eyes with proliferate DR (PDR) and 36 eyes with nonproliferate DR (NPDR; 6, 17 and 13 eyes with mild, moderate and severe DR). Mean age of DR patients was 50.3±11.9y.The male:female ratio was 3:1. Twenty-one (91.3%) of the 23 patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean duration of diabetes was 8.6±4.6y, and the mean glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c) was 9.8%±4.6%. Hypertension was more common in patients with DR than in normal controls (56.5%vs8.6%,P<0.001). Three eyes (6.5%) had diabetic macular edema. The median BCVA in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution(logMAR) was 0.2 (range, 0.1-0.3), and the mean IOP was 15.3±2.6 mm Hg.

    Ultra-widefield SS-OCTA and FA images were available in all 46 eyes of 23 participants. FA images were successfully aligned to the 24×20 mm2SCP SS-OCTA images and were included in the subsequent analysis.

    Quantitative Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Lesions Foveal avascular zoneRepresentative SS-OCTA of DR patients and normal controls were shown in Figure 3. The size of FAZ on OCTA were compared between normal and DR eyes (Table 2). Area of FAZ was larger in cases than controls(0.34±0.069 mm2vs0.287±0.108 mm2,P=0.006).

    In DR eyes, the mean FAZ area was 0.34±0.069 and 0.334±0.087 mm2on SS-OCTA and FA, respectively(P=0.428), while the median FAZ perimeter was 2.382(IQR, 2.201-2.59) and 2.333 (IQR, 2.138-2.6) mm on SSOCTA and FA images (P=0.733; Table 3). FAZ area ICCs were significant between SS-OCTA and FA [0.767 (0.615-0.864),P<0.001], suggesting good agreement between the two imaging techniques. The ICCs of the FAZ perimeter were also statistically significant between SS-OCTA and FA [0.881(0.795-0.932),P<0.001], which indicated that the repeatability was good (Table 4). The above reproducibility results were also demonstrated using Bland-Altman plots (Figure 4A, 4B).Nonperfusion areaNPAs were detected in 22 patients(95.7%). There was no significant difference in the size of the NPA between the images on SS-OCTA and FA (12.389, IQR 4.96-28.3vs11.125, IQR 5-28.31 mm2,P=0.197), as presented in Table 3. The ICC of NPA size was also high [0.999 (0.998-0.999),P<0.001]. A Bland-Altman plot comparing the NPA between SS-OCTA and FA is shown in Figure 4C.

    Figure 2 Representative DR lesions on corresponding FA and SS-OCTA images A, B: FAZ; C, D: NPA; E, F: Cluster of MA; G, H: IRMA; I, J:NV. DR: Diabetic retinopathy; FA: Fluorescein angiography; SS-OCTA: Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography; FAZ: Foveal avascular zone; NPA: Nonperfusion area; MA: Microaneurysms; IRMA: Intraretinal microvascular abnormalities; NV: Neovascularization.

    Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of included patients and controls

    Table 2 Comparison of FAZ on SS-OCTA between DR eyes and controls

    Figure 3 Representative SS-OCTA of healthy controls (A) and DR eyes (B).

    Figure 4 Bland-Altman analysis of FAZ area (A), FAZ perimeter (B), NPA (C), counts of MA, IRMA and NV in SS-OCTA and FA (D-F)FAZ: Foveal avascular zone; NPA: Nonperfusion area; MA: Microaneurysms; IRMA: Intraretinal microvascular abnormalities; NV: Neovascularization; SS-OCTA: Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography.

    Table 3 Detection of DR lesions on SS-OCTA versus FA

    Counts of microaneurysms, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities, and neovascularization Measurements of MA,IRMA and NV count are also shown in Table 3. MAs were detected in all eyes using the two techniques. The median total MA count was 35 (IQR, 19-46) and 73 (IQR, 43-93) on SS-OCTA and FA, respectively (P<0.001). The ICC of MA count indicated that the repeatability of the difference between SS-OCTA and FA was stable [0.875 (0.785-0.929),P<0.001; Table 4].

    Table 4 The ICCs of DR lesions between SS-OCTA and FA

    The detection rate of IRMAs was 80.4% on both the modalities.There were 31 and 29 eyes with NV in SS-OCTA and FA,respectively. No significant difference in IRMA count was found between the images on SS-OCTA and FA (4, IQR, 1-7vs4,IQR, 1-8,P=0.061), as well as the NV count (0, IQR 0-1vs0, IQR 0-1,P=0.561). The repeatability of IRMA and NV count was good (ICC=0.987 and 0.829) in SS-OCTA and FA (Table 4). All the results are also presented as Bland-Altman plots in Figure 4D-4F.

    DISCUSSION

    In this study, we compared the differences between ultrawidefield SS-OCTA (24×20 mm2) and traditional FA in detecting microvascular lesions in treatment-na?ve DR patients,including FAZ, NPA, MA, IRMA and NV.

    Ophthalmic imaging modalities are increasingly significant in the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of DR. For several decades, FA has been the gold standard in the clinical assessment of DR lesions. With advances in imaging techniques, OCTA may serve as a three-dimensional, depth-resolved, rapid, and noninvasive imaging modality as an adjunct for assessing microvascular changes[14]. Due to a fast-tuning laser source and balance detection, SS-OCT can achieve higher spectral resolution than SD-OCT and therefore leads to increased tissue penetration[5,15-16]. In this study, a scan size of 24×20 mm2area was obtained with a 400 kHz ultra-widefield SS-OCTA instrument (BM400K, TowardPi Medical Technology Co.,Ltd., Beijing, China). Among all the commercially available SS-OCTA devices, BM400K can achieve the largest scan range, which may potentially change the current paradigm of FA-based diagnosis and follow-up of DR.

    To our best knowledge, this is the first prospective report to assess the potential use of ultra-widefield SS-OCTA as a noninvasive adjunct to traditional FA in DR and to explore the substitution possibility of ultra-widefield SS-OCTA for FA.

    Our findings indicated that there was no significant difference in the FAZ area, FAZ perimeter, NPA, IRMA count or NV between SS-OCTA and FA. Good agreement between FA and SS-OCTA in the evaluation of those lesions was also confirmed. It is admitted that the FOV in FA is wider than that of ultra-widefield SS-OCTA; however, SS-OCTA may be clinically useful enough because the majority of lesions in PDR cases are observed within the mid periphery of the retina,which is covered by OCTA images[17]. In addition, SS-OCTA could be performed as a first-line examination in all diabetic patients without a risk of adverse effects. Moreover, SS-OCTA could be an important tool with segmentations for follow-up,which can provide quantitative indexes.

    Consistent with previous studies, FAZ measurement was found to be similar between the two imaging modalities[18]. In a study including 20 eyes of 14 patients with non-proliferative and proliferative DR, Couturieret al[19]proposed that compared with FA, OCTA allowed better visualization of the FAZ,although their study did not quantitate this observation. As our results showed, the mean size of the FAZ in the same eye was measured to be slightly larger in SS-OCTA than in FA,which was comparable to that of other studies[16,20-22]. Overall,measurement of the FAZ with SS-OCTA is valuable in the clinical routine in detecting ischemic maculopathy and DR progression.

    NPA was another common finding on both imaging techniques.The published literature has proposed that OCTA detects NPA to nearly the same or even better extent than FA[7,9,23-27].Nevertheless, the FOV for traditional OCTA is restricted compared with that for FA. The SS-OCTA employed in our study widens the FOV to 24×20 mm2, which is the largest yet.In the study by Sawadaet al[7], they applied panoramic OCTA images (OCTA, PLEX Elite 9000 system) for NPA assessment in DR patients, with 2.4 times enlargement of the single-center OCTA FOV. It was concluded that wide-angle OCTA was likely to be clinically useful to detect NPAs, although they did not quantitate the size of NPAs. For the detection of IRMA and NV, SS-OCTA also showed similar counts to FA, consistent with some previous studies[8]. FA could differentiate NVs from IRMA because the latter shows no signs of leakage[28].However, it is not necessary to perform invasive FA simply to distinguish between IRMAs and NVs.

    MAs are the first detectable sign of early DR, manifested as hyperfluorescent spots in FA. The extent and location of MAs are an essential component of the fundus evaluation when assessing DR severity and progression risk. MAs at the posterior retina have been extensively investigated, and ultra-widefield SS-OCTA (UWF-SS-OCTA) has also gained added importance due to the ready visualization of the retinal periphery. To date, the relative ability of UWF-SS-OCTA versus UWF-FA to visualize MAs has not been fully evaluated. In our study, MA count differed significantly between images on SSOCTA and FA. FA identified more MAs than SS-OCTA, which was consistent with some previous studies[15-16,23-24]. Elnahry and Ramsey[15]reported that significantly more MAs were identified on FA images (102±27.5) compared with OCTA(47.5±11.7,P<0.0001). Salzet al[23]also found that OCTA was able to identify a mean (SD) of 6.4 (4.0) MAs, while FA identified a higher mean (SD) of 10 (6.9) MAs. In Enderset al[16]study, the mean MA count was 14 in FA and 13 in OCTA.

    There could be several reasons for the discrepancies in MA identifications in FA and UWF-SS-OCTA. In FA, the dye remains in the abnormally dilated blood vessel, leading to the brightly hyperfluorescent appearance of MAs; leakage of some MAs can also highlight and exaggerate their appearance[23],resulting in more MAs detected in FA. However, the SS-OCTA segmented images do not show leakage, which may explain the smaller and less prominent MAs on SS-OCTA than FA. In addition, high-speed SS-OCTA could limit the identification of low-flow lesions such as MAs, some of which are completely occluded[29]. Histopathologic studies reported that the lumen configuration in MAs consists of thickened, hyalinized, fibrous,laminated, and lipid-containing basement membrane, as well as hypercellular or multilayered endothelial cells[29]. Hence,the turbulent blood flow inside some types of MAs may not be perfectly displayed in OCTA[24]. It has to be admitted that FA appears to be the preferred modality over UWF-SS-OCTA for the assessment of MAs. When using SS-OCTA, MAs may be detected more readily with 6×6 mm2angiography rather than montage or UWF-SS-OCTA[30-31]. Continued evolution of UWF-SS-OCTA is needed with further research. UWFSS-OCTA and FA should be combined to better evaluate DR microvasculature lesions. On the other hand, the agreement between MAs in SS-OCTA and FA was good, suggesting that the difference in visualizing MAs between the two techniques was stable and reliable.

    There are several limitations in our study. First, we included only a small number of eyes, and larger prospective series are needed to further confirm our encouraging results. Second,only taking the SCP into account in SS-OCTA may limit the significance of our results. Third, SS-OCTA has its intrinsic restrictions. In clinical practice, bias could be introduced due to increased heterogeneity with diverse axial lengths and patient cooperation, which could be studied in our future research[32].The manual segmentation and registration methods could also be a factor that may have introduced bias in the results.Additionally, we could carry out further studies to examine not only the differences in evaluation of retinal microvasculature using SS-OCTA and FA imaging but also assess both interand intra-observer variability of interpretation by graders with diverse levels of experience, the impact of SS-OCTA guided treatment for DR andetc.

    In conclusion, ultra-widefield SS-OCTA (24×20 mm2) can clinically assist in evaluating FAZ, NPA, IRMA and NV counts compared with traditional FA. Good or moderate agreement between FA and SS-OCTA in the evaluation of those lesions was also confirmed. Due to the limitations of signal processing and thresholding techniques, SS-OCTA detects fewer MAs.Overall, SS-OCTA represents a reliable, noninvasive, timesaving, easy-to-use and quantitative imaging technique in the assessment of microvasculature in DR, which offers a potential substitute for FA in DR evaluation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Authors’ contributions:Conceptualization (Zhao MW);Data curation (Zeng QZ); Formal analysis (Zeng QZ, Li SY); Funding acquisition (Zhao MW); Investigation (Qu JF);Methodology (Zeng QZ, Li SY, Yao YO, Jin EZ); Project administration (Zeng QZ, Li SY); Resources (Zhao MW);Software (Zeng QZ, Li SY); Supervision (Qu JF, Zhao MW);Validation (Yao YO, Jin EZ); Visualization (Zeng QZ, Li SY);Roles/Writing - original draft (Zeng QZ, Li SY); Writingreview & editing (Zhao MW).

    Foundation:Supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No.2020YFC2008200).

    Conflicts of Interest: Zeng QZ,None;Li SY,None;Yao YO,None;Jin EZ,None;Qu JF,None;Zhao MW,None.

    99热这里只有精品一区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 大香蕉久久网| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 精品久久国产蜜桃| 日本黄大片高清| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产精品,欧美在线| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 欧美日本视频| 一本精品99久久精品77| 成人二区视频| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 免费大片18禁| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产成人福利小说| 黑人高潮一二区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 1000部很黄的大片| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产成人一区二区在线| 成人综合一区亚洲| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久九九热精品免费| 日日撸夜夜添| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产在线男女| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| a级毛色黄片| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产av不卡久久| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 97超碰精品成人国产| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产高清三级在线| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 特级一级黄色大片| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产av不卡久久| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 深夜精品福利| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久性生活片| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 99热精品在线国产| 内射极品少妇av片p| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 欧美色视频一区免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 久久国产乱子免费精品| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产高潮美女av| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品一及| 久久中文看片网| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 免费观看人在逋| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产日本99.免费观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 一本精品99久久精品77| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 大香蕉久久网| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 身体一侧抽搐| 日本五十路高清| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久草成人影院| 久久草成人影院| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 久久久国产成人免费| 久久久国产成人免费| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 午夜免费激情av| 六月丁香七月| 六月丁香七月| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 午夜a级毛片| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产视频内射| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 精品久久久久久久末码| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 一级av片app| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 一区福利在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 18+在线观看网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 综合色丁香网| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 色av中文字幕| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久久久久久久久成人| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲国产色片| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 有码 亚洲区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲无线观看免费| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 三级毛片av免费| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 一级黄片播放器| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产亚洲欧美98| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 日本成人三级电影网站| 色在线成人网| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产成人aa在线观看| 成人二区视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 欧美+日韩+精品| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久久久久久久大av| 日韩欧美免费精品| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 午夜精品在线福利| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 久久人妻av系列| 91狼人影院| 在线观看66精品国产| 全区人妻精品视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 22中文网久久字幕| av中文乱码字幕在线| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 九九热线精品视视频播放| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产成人freesex在线 | 免费大片18禁| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 一本久久中文字幕| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产不卡一卡二| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 一本精品99久久精品77| 极品教师在线视频| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲色图av天堂| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| av在线老鸭窝| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 久久久久久久久中文| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久久久国产网址| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| .国产精品久久| 免费观看在线日韩| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久久午夜欧美精品| avwww免费| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产在视频线在精品| 亚洲图色成人| 天堂网av新在线| 国产成人a区在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产在线男女| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 尾随美女入室| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 久久热精品热| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 欧美日本视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| h日本视频在线播放| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 久久精品人妻少妇| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲av成人av| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 69人妻影院| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产91av在线免费观看| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产精品无大码| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 精品福利观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 美女大奶头视频| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲18禁久久av| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 一级毛片电影观看 | 午夜福利18| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 毛片女人毛片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 精品午夜福利在线看| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 在线国产一区二区在线| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲av成人av| 美女高潮的动态| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 老司机福利观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| av在线播放精品| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 美女免费视频网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 欧美人与善性xxx| 草草在线视频免费看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 99热全是精品| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日韩欧美 国产精品| av视频在线观看入口| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲18禁久久av| 高清毛片免费看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 嫩草影院入口| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 少妇丰满av| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 22中文网久久字幕| 老司机影院成人| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 日本a在线网址| 国产在线男女| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产三级在线视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲性久久影院| 乱人视频在线观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| av黄色大香蕉| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 美女高潮的动态| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 99热全是精品| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 成人三级黄色视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 免费看av在线观看网站| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 一区福利在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 午夜a级毛片| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 波多野结衣高清作品| 中文字幕久久专区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| or卡值多少钱| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 永久网站在线| 久久精品夜色国产| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩中字成人| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 97在线视频观看| 免费av观看视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 禁无遮挡网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产精华一区二区三区| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 久久久久国内视频|