• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Theoretical research on gas seepage in the formations surrounding bedded gas storage salt cavern

    2022-09-23 08:16:58XingShengChenYinPingLiLongJingYunXiLiuToZhng
    Petroleum Science 2022年4期

    Xing-Sheng Chen , Yin-Ping Li , Y-Long Jing , Yun-Xi Liu ,c, To Zhng

    a State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring and Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi,China

    b State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan 430071,Hubei, China

    c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    Keywords:Gas storage salt cavern Seepage Tightness Non-Darcy's law Leakage

    ABSTRACT When constructing salt cavern gas or petroleum storage in lacustrine sedimentary salt formations rich in mudstone interlayers, the influence of the sealing performance of interlayers and salt-mud interface on the storage tightness should be considered adequately. In order to reveal the gas seepage in deep formations surrounding bedded salt cavern underground storage,a leakage analysis model was established based on the characteristics of a low dip angle and the interbedded structure of bedded rock salt.The gas seepage governing equations for one-dimensional and plane radial flow were derived and solved. A gas seepage simulation experiment was conducted to demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the theoretical calculation results. The error of the seepage range was approximately 6.70%, which is acceptable. The analysis and calculation results indicate that the motion equation of gas in deep formations satisfies a non-Darcy's law with a threshold pressure gradient and slippage effect.The sufficient condition for the gas flow to stop is that the pressure gradient is equal to the threshold pressure gradient.The relationship between the leakage range and operating time is a positive power function, that is, the leakage range gradually increases with time and eventually stabilizes.As the seepage range increases,the seepage pressure decreases sharply during the early stage, and then decreases gradually until the flow stops.Combining the research results with engineering applications, three quantitative evaluation indexes named the maximum admissible leakage range, leakage volume and leakage rate are proposed for the tightness evaluation of gas storage salt cavern during their operating stage. These indexes can be used directly in actual engineering applications and can be compared with the key design parameters stipulated in the relevant specifications. This work is expected to provide theoretical and technical support for the gas loss and tightness evaluation of gas storage salt caverns.

    1. Introduction

    The structure of energy consumption in China is still dominated by coal, which accounts for more than 60% of the primary energy.The basic characteristics of the energy structure of China are rich in coal and lack natural gas and petroleum (Hao et al., 2015; Li and Leung, 2012; Shaikh et al., 2017). This leads to a series of problems such as a low utilization of coal, severe pollution and dust generation, and an inadequate petroleum and gas reserve system.Therefore, in response to the thirteenth Five-Year Plan for Energy Development, the National Energy Administration of China indicated that the proportion of coal consumption should be reduced to less than 58% from 2016 to 2020. The proportion of natural gas consumption should reach 10%, while the consumption of nonfossil energy should increase to over 15% (Liu et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2020). Furthermore, the energy consumption should be transformed into a clean, low-carbon, safe, and efficient system to reduce the greenhouse effect and promote the healthy and stable development of energy. In the context of energy transformation and clean energy utilization, ensuring a smooth transition from coal to gas and guaranteeing a safe supply of clean energy has become the primary problem faced by many countries (Burke and Yang, 2016; Dilaver et al., 2014).

    Salt rock underground storage is a cavern leached from salt domes or salt-bedded formations,it is used to store oil,natural gas or other hydrocarbons (Fan et al., 2019, 2020; Li et al., 2017; Pinto et al., 2021). Owing to the advantages of a large storage capacity,seasonal peak regulation,flexible storage and low investment costs,gas storage salt caverns feature the most rapid rate of increase of working gas and daily gas production among all types of underground storages. As an underground engineering for deep energy storage, the most important problem of salt cavern storage is ensuring its tightness and stability(Chen et al.,2021).As shown in Fig. 1, because of the difference between the ground stress and time-varying operating pressure, the storage may not only suffer roof collapse because of lack of structural stability, but it may also may face the risk of gas leakage due to tightness failure. Surface subsidence, fire and explosions caused by accidents seriously threaten the lives and property of nearby residents. The results in literature and leakage accident statistics show that between 1969 and 2019, there were approximately 20 leakage accidents of gas and petroleum in salt cavern underground storages (B′erest et al.,2019; Evans, 2009; Osnes et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2013). The causes of leakage include casing rupture, interlayer and cap rock fracture, surface facility damage and human errors.

    Because of the different depositional environments of bedded rock salt and salt domes (Fig. 2), researchers have focused on studying leakage accidents and tightness evaluations in gas storage salt cavern.With regard to salt dome storage,research has focused on the damage, dislocation and interface slippage of rock salt crystals, based on which relevant theories have been proposed(Alkan, 2009; Hunsche, 1998). For example, Stormont (1997)divided the excavation damage zone and undisturbed zone according to the on-site permeability of rock salt. The permeability parameters of the rock salt in the excavation damage zone increased, while the undisturbed zone maintained its original sealing ability. Müller et al. (2018) simulated the damage of rock salt on the crystal scale using the discrete element method. Their analysis results were verified by uniaxial compression and acoustic emission tests. Osnes et al. (2007) discussed a case history of a casing failure in a gas storage salt cavern,and confirmed that strains of sufficient magnitude can cause tensile failure in the lower portion of the cased well. Evans (2009) collected statistics on the leakage accidents, casualties and economic losses of salt dome storages,and described the entire process of these accidents.

    Compared with the salt dome formed by marine sedimentation,the bedded rock salt has more interlayers,thinner salt strata and a higher content of insolubles, which complicates the evaluation of tightness and stability (Zhang et al., 2017). For bedded salt cavern storage,one needs to pay more attention to the leakage range and rate of storage media such as petroleum and natural gas, and the study of the permeability of interlayers is an indispensable part of the tightness evaluation (Huang and Xiong, 2011; Wang et al.,2018). Based on Darcy's law and porous media seepage theory,Wang et al.(2015a),Liu et al.(2016)and Xiong et al.(2015)analyzed the pressure distribution and seepage of gas in formations by means of numerical simulation,and pointed out that the interlayers will accelerate gas leakage.A large number of test results show that although the permeability of well-integrated interlayers is slightly higher than that of rock salt,it is fully capable of sealing petroleum and natural gas(Li et al.,2014;Liu et al.,2015;Yin et al.,2017).Their permeability range is about 10-17to 10-20m2. The formations surrounding storage salt cavern are dense porous media, and the gas flow in such formations is extremely slow and does not satisfy Darcy's law. Many factors affect gas seepage and leakage, such as the threshold or critical pressure gradient, Klinkenberg effect,effective volume of storage cavern, permeability and mechanical parameters of formations. The threshold pressure gradient is the threshold at which the fluid starts to flow in a tight formation.This phenomenon often occurs in low-permeability formations and is an influencing factor that must be considered for fluid seepage in such formations(Kong,1999).

    Fig.1. Schematic diagram of gas leakage and roof collapse in salt cavern underground storage (B′erest, 2017; B′erest et al., 2019).

    Fig. 2. Bedded rock salt formations of lacustrine depositions and salt dome of marine depositions.

    The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term and large-scale seepage of gas in formations surrounding salt caverns,and thus propose several quantitative indexes for tightness evaluations during the operating stage.A leakage analysis model of a gas storage salt cavern was established and a gas seepage governing equation considering the threshold pressure gradient and slippage effect was derived. The validity of this theoretical model and the calculation results were verified base on a seepage simulation experiment. Finally, an on-site bedded gas storage salt cavern in Jintan,China,was selected for the gas loss and tightness evaluation based on the leakage analysis model. Combined with operational conditions and calculation parameters, the tightness evaluation indexes, such as gas leakage range, leakage volume and rate were obtained.The research contents and results provide theoretical and experimental support for site selection, key design parameters(typically pillar width and thickness of salt roof) and tightness evaluation of bedded gas storage salt cavern.

    2. Leakage analysis model of bedded gas storage salt cavern

    Considering the low dip angle and the interbedded structure of bedded rock salt, a leakage analysis model for gas seepage in formations surrounding bedded salt cavern was established.As shown in Fig.3,this model includes not only rock salts and interlayers,but also the salt roof, salt bottom and cap rock. The roof is the salt retained at the top of a salt cavern after leaching,and the bottom is the undissolved salt at the bottom of the salt cavern.The gas stored in salt caverns usually is natural gas, ethylene or hydrogen. The stored gas seeps along the surrounding formations into pores and fractures under the action of the operating pressure.Rock salts and interlayers with poor sealing performance may become potential channels for gas leakage.

    Fig.3. Leakage analysis model for gas seepage in formations surrounding a salt cavern,hi indicates the thickness of a certain formation, Ri represents the cavern radius at a certain formation, pin and p0 are the operating pressure of salt cavern and initial pore pressure in the formation.

    2.1. Equivalent permeability of bedded rock salt

    As an interbedded rock mass, the mechanical and permeability characteristics of bedded rock salt are determined by the interlayers and rock salt.Yang et al.(2005)and Li et al.(2014)found that the salt-mudstone interface of bedded rock salt is well cemented and is unlikely to open or slip according to extensive mechanical property tests.This is different from the joints or weak structural surfaces of other layered rocks. Furthermore, the mudstone interlayers can effectively restrain the creep shrinkage of a salt cavern because of its high elastic modulus compared with that of rock salt. Similarly, the permeability of bedded rock salt is not only related to the interlayer and rock salt,but also depends on the seepage direction of the penetrating fluid. As shown in Fig. 4,the vertical and horizontal seepage can be used as examples to establish an equivalent permeability model for bedded rock salt.The length, width and height of this model are l, w and h,respectively.The horizontal seepage in the equivalent permeability model refers to the gas flow in which the seepage is parallel to the formation. The pressure gradient ?p of the gas flowing through each formation is the same, and the total flow rate Q is the sum of the flow rate Qiof each formation.Assuming that the total flow rates of the interlayers and rock salts are Qmand Qs, the following relationship can be obtained based on Darcy's law:

    Fig. 4. Equivalent permeability model of bedded rock salt.

    Eq. (3) shows that the equivalent permeability of bedded rock salt under horizontal seepage is equal to the sum of the product of the permeability kiand thickness ratio ωiof rock salts and interlayers, which means that the high permeability formation controls the equivalent permeability of the bedded rock salt. The tightness of a salt cavern is determined by the interlayer because of its relatively poor sealing performance compared with that of rock salt.

    Vertical seepage in the equivalent permeability model refers to the gas flow in which the seepage direction is perpendicular to the formation. Its characteristics are that the flow rate Q of the gas flowing through each formation is the same, and the pressure gradient ?p is the sum of the pressure gradients Δpiof each formation. The flow rate can be expressed as follows:

    The equivalent permeability of bedded rock salt in the case of vertical seepage is determined by the low permeability formation,which means that the tightness of a salt cavern can be guaranteed as long as a certain formation does not leak.

    Most formations surrounding bedded salt cavern storage are approximately horizontal because of the lacustrine deposition of these bedded salt formations (Chen et al., 2019; Lankof and Tarkowski, 2020; Zhang et al., 2015). Hence, the gas seepage in the formations surrounding a salt cavern can be regarded as a plane radial flow,that is,horizontal seepage.The vertical seepage mainly exists in the top and bottom of a salt cavern.

    2.2. Klinkenberg effects of gas flow in porous media

    The gas flow in porous media is different from that of liquid,which is mainly manifested in the compressibility and slippage effect. In 1941, Klinkenberg (1941) revealed the gas slippage phenomenon in porous media based on his theoretical seepage analysis of ideal gas flow, thus the slippage effect is also called the Klinkenberg effect.Many scholars have also found this phenomenon by means of permeability tests on cores (Al-Jabri et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2019). The test results indicate that the Klinkenberg effect increases the apparent permeability of porous media,and the denser the rock and the lower the seepage pressure,the more obvious the Klinkenberg effect. Because the formations surrounding salt caverns are tight porous media, the Klinkenberg effect cannot be ignored when analyzing gas seepage in them.

    The Klinkenberg effect is the result of frequent collisions between the gas molecules and the pore wall of porous media, such that the gas velocity on the pore wall is not zero, that is, the nonslip condition is not satisfied. The influence of the Klinkenberg effect on gas seepage can be described by the following equation(Klinkenberg,1941):

    2.3. Boundary conditions

    The depth of gas storage salt cavern in China is approximately greater than or equal to 800 m,hence the formations surrounding the salt caverns are deep and tight.The flow velocity of the fluid in these formations is extremely low, resulting in the equation of motion that does not satisfy Darcy's law. The precondition of fluid flow in low-permeability formations is that the seepage pressure gradient exceeds the threshold pressure gradient in the formation,otherwise the fluid cannot flow(Li et al.,2020; Wang et al., 2011).The equation of motion of gas seepage in a tight formation can be expressed as:

    where v is the seepage velocity or Darcy's velocity, μ denotes the dynamic viscosity of the flowing gas,and λ denotes the threshold or critical pressure gradient, with a positive value.

    For Newtonian fluids,the above equation of motion can only be applied at low speeds, which usually occurs in low-permeability formations. In the running stage of a gas storage salt cavern, the operating pressure changes dynamically with the gas injection and production. Assuming that the operating pressure and the initial pore pressure of the formations are pinand p0, then the pressure boundary conditions can be obtained based on the gas seepage characteristics of one-dimensional flow and plane radial flow(Fig. 3).

    Pressure boundary conditions of one-dimensional flow:

    where x and r are the distance of one-dimensional flow and plane radial flow, pinand p0are the operating pressure and initial pore pressure in the formations, respectively.

    2.4. One-dimensional flow

    Before the theoretical analysis,considering that the complexity of the underground environment and the uncertainty about the actual situation will make the theoretical solution difficult, the following basic assumptions are proposed.

    1. Bedded rock salt formations are interbedded structures, in which the gas seepage direction is mainly horizontal.

    2. The gas satisfies the ideal gas state equation and the seepage is isothermal.

    3. Equation of motion of gas satisfies non-Darcy's law taking into account the Klinkenberg effect and threshold pressure gradient.

    4. The compressibility of the rock skeleton is much smaller than that of gas, hence any strata deformation is ignored.

    Taking the volume element dV of the surrounding formations for mass conservation analysis of the gas,the continuity equation of gas seepage is as follows:

    where ρ denotes the density of the gas, φ is the porosity of the porous media.

    Based on the above assumptions,substituting the ideal gas state equation and the motion equation in Eq. (10) into Eq. (13), the following equation is obtained:

    2.5. Plane radial flow

    The analysis of the plane radial flow of gas in formations is similar to that of one-dimensional flow. Taking the volume ring element for fluid mass balance, the continuity equation of the unsteady plane radial flow can be obtained:

    Wu et al.(1998)obtained an approximate analytical solution of seepage pressure under a plane radial flow by using to the heat conduction problem (Carslaw and Jaeger,1992).

    where J0and Y0are the Bessel functions of order 0 of the first and second kind,respectively,r and R are the radial distance and cavern radius, and u is the integral variable.

    3. Results and validation of the theoretical model

    Because the gas seepage in deep formations is more complicated and does not satisfy Darcy's law, the analytic solution cannot be found in the continuity equations.In order to verify and analyze the feasibility of the theoretical model for bedded salt cavern underground gas storage leakage analysis,this model needs to be solvednumerically. The operating conditions and calculation parameters are taken from an in-service gas storage salt cavern in China, as shown in Table 1.

    Table 1 Calculation parameters and strata information.

    The target salt cavern is located in the eastern coastal area of China. The salt formation is distributed from northeast to southwest, and the salt formation is thick in the middle and thin in the periphery. The nitrogen leak test (NLT) was used for the tightness test. It can evaluate the leakage of salt cavern based on leakage velocity and gas-liquid interface displacement.This salt cavern has five interlayers and six rock salt formations. The corrected sonar detection data show that the maximum radius and effective volume of this cavern are 31.40 m and 152010.51 m3. The correction method takes the mean value from multiple measurements. The interlayers are gray mudstone of varying thickness, with a maximum thickness of 2.54 m and a minimum thickness of 0.90 m.The average gas permeability kg, average porosity φ, threshold pressure gradient λ and other parameters required for leakage analysis of the selected gas storage salt cavern are listed in Table 1.

    3.1. Pressure drop

    The design range of the operating pressure of the selected salt cavern is 8-16 MPa, and its service life is 30 years. To reduce the number of repeated calculations, the initial operating pressure is taken as the average of the maximum operating pressure and the minimum operating pressure, that is, 12 MPa. By substituting calculation and operation parameters into Eq. (14) and Eq. (17)respectively, the pressure drop of the gas in deep formations can be obtained by numerical calculation. Figs. 5 and 6 show the pressure drop curves of gas in mudstone 1 (interlayer 1) and rock salt 1 under one-dimensional flow and under plane radial flow,respectively.As the flow distance increases,the seepage pressure of the gas decreases sharply in the early stage, and then decreases gently until the flow stops.Because the sealing performance of the rock salt is better than that of the mudstone interlayers, the pressure drop in the salt rock is more severe.In the same formation,the pressure drop of gas under plane radial flow also changes more drastically than that under one-dimensional flow.

    3.2. Leakage range

    Because the gas flow in deep formations does not satisfy Darcy's law,the sufficient condition for gas flow to stop is no longer that the pressure gradient is equal to 0,but that it is equal to the threshold pressure gradient of the targeted formation. In other words, the leakage range of gas in the formations is equal to the flow distance when the pressure gradient becomes equal to the threshold pressure gradient. The basis of the judgment is as follows:

    Fig. 5. Pressure drop curve of gas in mudstone 1 under one-dimensional flow and plane radial flow.

    Fig. 6. Pressure drop curve of gas in rock salt 1 under one-dimensional flow and plane radial flow.

    Fig. 7. Fitting curve of gas leakage range in interlayer and rock salt under one-dimensional and radial flow.

    The results indicate that the leakage range of gas in the surrounding formation has a positive power function relationship with the operating time (Fig. 7), the leakage range increases with time and eventually becomes stable. When the operating pressure and time are 12 MPa and 30 years, the leakage range in the interlayer and rock salt are respectively 69.00 and 22.58 m under plane radial seepage, hence the leakage range of gas in an interlayer is approximately 3.06 times that in rock salt. In the case of the same formation and operating conditions,the leakage range of gas under one-dimensional flow is approximately 1.55 times to 1.65 times that under plane radial flow. These results are consistent with the pressure drop trends (Figs. 5 and 6). According to the distribution characteristics of bedded rock salt and the shape of gas storage salt cavern (Fig. 1), it is known that the plane radial flow or twodimensional axisymmetric flow is more in line with the actual situation than one-dimensional flow. Therefore, the subsequent studies in this paper are based on the plane radial flow, and no longer discuss one-dimensional flow.

    3.3. Leakage rate

    In addition to the pressure drop and leakage range,the leakage rate of gas in gas storage salt cavern can be roughly calculated according to the leakage analysis model. Absolute leakage mass and rate are the key indicators for leakage risk prevention,and play an important role in the safety evaluation of underground gas storage salt cavern.However,since the service life of gas storage salt cavern is approximately 30 years, the gas leakage risk evaluation and prediction are long processes. The maximum admissible leakage rate is different at different operating stages.There are some limitations in using absolute leakage indicators to evaluate the tightness of salt cavern,which cannot fully reflect the leakage situation,especially the leakage causes and types.Therefore,the leakage rate of gas in this study is not the leakage velocity,but is defined as the percentage of the total leakage volume of a gas storage salt cavern to the storage capacity. The introduction of relative leakage indicators can distinguish storage leakages of different sizes and operating pressures, and can compensate for the lack of absolute indicators. If the two are used in combination, a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the effect of leakage can be achieved.

    The storage capacity of a salt cavern can be defined as the gas reserve under the maximum allowable operating pressure. The value converted to standard atmospheric pressure is as follows:

    where Csdenotes the storage capacity of a salt cavern,Veand psare the effective volume of the salt cavern and standard atmospheric pressure.

    As shown in Fig.8,most of the leaked gas remains in the pores and cracks of the formations.According to the law of conservation of mass, we can obtain the leakage mass of gas in a certain formation.

    where Lmdenotes the leakage mass of gas, R and rcare cavern radius and leakage range,h and φ are the thickness and porosity of the formation, respectively.

    Based on Boyle's law, the leakage volume at standard atmospheric pressure can be expressed as follows:

    where LVand LVTare the leakage volume of a certain formation and the total leakage volume of the gas storage salt cavern, n denotes the number of formations surrounding the salt cavern.

    We obtain a tightness evaluation index of the total leakage volume of the gas storage salt cavern as a percentage of storage capacity, that is, the leakage rate.

    Fig. 8. Plane radial flow of gas in a formation surrounding a gas storage salt cavern.

    Fig. 9. Leakage rate of this gas storage salt cavern.

    Fig.10. Leakage volume and leakage volume ratio of interlayers and rock salts,leakage volume ratio refers to the total leakage volume of gas in interlayers divided by that in rock salts.

    where Lrdenotes leakage rate.

    Substituting the pressure drop(Figs.5 and 6),the leakage range(Fig. 7) and the calculation parameters (Table 1) into Eq. (25), the leakage rate of the gas storage salt cavern is obtained (Fig. 9). The gas leakage rate of gas storage also has a power function relationship with the operating time,which is similar to the variation of the gas leakage range. Under an operating pressure of 12 MPa, the leakage rate(the percentage of the total leakage volume of this salt cave gas storage to the storage capacity)of the selected gas storage salt cavern for 1,10,15, 20, 25 and 30 years is 0.51%,1.63%,1.89%,2.01%,2.24%and 3.61%,respectively.Fig.10 shows that although the total thickness of rock salts is 11 times that of interlayers,the total leakage volume of gas in interlayers is approximately 2 times that in rock salt owing to the influence of the leakage range.Therefore,for a bedded gas storage salt cavern,the sealing performance of the interlayers often determines the overall tightness of the storage.

    Fig.11. Structural schematic and physical diagram of seepage simulation device.

    3.4. Model validation

    Fig.12. Experimental data and theoretical calculation results of a seepage simulation test.

    To confirm the validity of the leakage analysis model of bedded gas storage salt cavern, it is necessary to verify the reliability and accuracy of the calculation results, such as the pressure drop and leakage range. For this purpose, a seepage simulation experiment was carried out using a seepage simulation device, as shown in Fig.11.This seepage simulation device has eleven pressure sensors and three temperature controllers,and has a length of 1.5 m and a diameter of 0.1 m. The cores used in this experiment are two long cores with a length of 0.5 m and a diameter of 0.1 m, hence a combined length of 1.0 m.In order to guarantee the homogeneity of the core, the cores used in this seepage simulation test are compressed synthetic salt rocks.Hence, the lithology and physical and mechanical parameters are not significantly different.The end face of the cores was polished by sandpaper and was wrapped by rubber sleeves to ensure the flatness and connection.In order to avoid the uneven seepage pressure at the joint, the pressure sensors were arranged to avoid the interface,so as to ensure the accuracy of data collection. The seepage medium is nitrogen, and the temperature and confining pressure are 328.15 K and 18 MPa,respectively.

    Fig. 12 shows the results of the leakage range obtained from theoretical calculation and from seepage simulation tests. The red and blue data points represent the experimental and theoretical results, respectively. When the injection pressure of nitrogen is 0.45 MPa,the experimental and theoretical results indicate that the time required to penetrate the cores is about 12 and 11.2 s,with an error of 6.7%.Therefore,the theoretical model of leakage analysis of bedded gas storage salt cavern has good applicability and accuracy,and is in good agreement with the experimental results. Although the theoretical equation of gas seepage in deep formation surrounding the gas storage salt cavern is derived in this paper, it is also applicable to the case of Darcy's law, as long as the threshold pressure gradient λ is equal to zero.

    4. Application to actual gas storage salt cavern

    The tightness evaluation of gas storage salt cavern is a comprehensive safety problem that covers multiple aspects and stages. It not only includes the evaluation of formation tightness,sealing ability of cap rock, wellbore integrity and surface facilities,but also involves several stages such as leaching, operating(working)and closing,which leads to a large number of evaluation indexes for tightness evaluation. In the early site selection and leaching stage,the tightness evaluation of a cavern storage mainly includes some qualitative evaluation indexes such as strata continuity, reservoir depth, regional stability, hydrogeological characteristics and cover sealing.(Canadian-Standards-Association,2014).In the closing stage, the operating pressure of the salt cavern is relatively stable, and it is not easy to fluctuate compared with the operating stage.

    There have been few studies on the tightness evaluation of cavern storage in the operating and closing stage.On the one hand,it is difficult to obtain the quantitative evaluation indexes because of the high operating pressure and deep formations; on the other hand, there are many types and causes of leakage, which makes it difficult to quantitatively evaluate the tightness. For this purpose,based on the engineering geological conditions,operating pressure,operating time and leakage type, combined with the above theoretical and numerical calculation results, two quantitative evaluation indexes of leakage range and leakage rate are proposed. The reference values and suggested value are detailed below.

    4.1. Maximum admissible leakage range

    To avoid gas leakage and connection accident to adjacent salt caverns,some key design parameters need to be considered during the design and construction of an underground gas storage salt cavern,such as pillar width (Wp),distance from faults(Wf), height of open hole (Ht) and thickness of the salt roof (Hs). As shown in Fig.13,the pillar width is the shortest horizontal distance between the two adjacent storage caverns.Distance from faults refers to the distance between the cavern and wellbore and any nearby fault system. The height of the open hole is an important measure to eliminate or limit the impact of creep shrinkage of the salt cavern on wellbore integrity.The thickness of the salt roof is mainly set to prevent cap rock breakthrough due to the high operating pressure.The setting of these parameters is based on the principle of ensuring the tightness and safety of the storage.

    The technical safety specification of salt cavern underground gas storage in China stipulates that the distance between the cavern and fault system should be more than 2.5 times the diameter of the salt cavern (National-Energy-Administration-of-China, 2011),hence the leakage range of gas in formations cannot exceed the distance from faults (Wf).

    where rc,Wfand D are the leakage range,distance from faults and the diameter of the salt cavern, respectively.

    The pillar width is a safety distance set to prevent the adjacent gas storages from being connected due to the gas leakage, and its value depends on the size of the cavern diameter.

    where Wp,D and ? are the pillar width,diameter of the salt cavern and safety factor, respectively.

    Generally speaking, the safety factor ? of pillar width of salt dome cavern storage is approximately 1.5-3.0,and that of bedded storage salt cavern is approximately 2.0-4.0 (Wang et al., 2015b,2015c;Zhang et al.,2021).In special and extreme situations such as when the gas storage salt cavern encounters a weak interlayer or remains at the lowest operating pressure for a long time(requiring a large gas supply) or is used as the strategic reservoir, it is recommended that the maximum safety pillar width can be increased to five times the diameter of the salt cavern. Because the stability and tightness of the pillar are not easily guaranteed at this time,engineering accidents have been encountered in Jintan, Jiangsu,China gas storage salt cavern (Li et al., 2019; Yin et al., 2020). In principle,the maximum admissible leakage range cannot reach the salt boundary,faults or adjacent caverns,hence its value should be controlled within the pillar width (Wp), distance from faults (Wf),height of the open hole(Ht)and thickness of the salt roof(Hs).The difference is that the thickness of the salt roof is the reference of the gas leakage range in rock salt, while the pillar width and the distance from faults are the references of the gas leakage range in interlayers. The relational expression can be defined in the following form:

    Fig. 13. Key design parameters that affect salt cavern tightness, Wp, Wf, Ht, and Hs are the pillar width, distance from faults, height of open hole and thickness of salt roof,respectively.

    Fig.14. Quantitative evaluation system of tightness of bedded gas storage salt cavern during operating stage.

    where rcidenotes gas leakage range in different formations.

    4.2. Maximum admissible leakage rate

    There is no unified regulation on the maximum admissible leakage rate of gas storage salt cavern in the current specifications and engineering, because the maximum admissible leakage velocity varies with the size, depth and type of storage caverns. In general, the smaller the storage capacity of the salt cavern, the lower the admissible leakage velocity, and the larger the storage capacity of the salt cavern, the greater the admissible leakage velocity. The leakage velocity is an important evaluation index for evaluating leakage risk in a gas storage salt cavern.

    The evaluation of the gas leakage rate can refer to the requirements of a nitrogen leak test (NLT), a common tightness test method in oil-gas well engineering (Belgian-Standards, 1998;B′erest et al., 2002). Judgement criterion 1 of the NLT is that the leakage rate gradually decreases with time,and eventually reaches a stable value. However, the NLT does not provide a specific value for the maximum admissible leakage rate. Crotogino (1995)mentioned the minimum detectable leakage rate and the maximum admissible leakage rate using the NLT method at the Solution Mining Research Institute. He suggested that when the operating pressure and temperature were 17 MPa and 300 K, the maximum admissible leakage velocity was approximately 150 kg/day or 270 m3/a. Thiel (1993) has a similar proposal that the maximum allowable leakage velocity of gas storage salt cavern was 160 m3/a.It can be seen that the maximum allowable leakage rate of a gas storage salt cavern is related to the operating pressure,ambient temperature,storage capacity and formations,and there is currently no specific value.

    Gas leakage risk evaluation and prediction are long processes,and the maximum admissible leakage varies under different operating stages. There are some limitations in using absolute leakage indicators to evaluate the tightness of a salt cavern,which cannot fully reflect the leakage situation, especially the leakage causes and types. The definition of the gas leakage rate of gas storage salt cavern in this study is different from that of Thiel(1993)and Crotogino (1995). It is defined as the percentage of the total leakage volume of a salt cave gas storage relative to the storage capacity(in Section 3.3),which is a relative quantity rather than an absolute quantity.

    This definition not only considers the size of the storage capacity, but also analyzes the influence of operating pressure,ambient temperature and other factors on the leakage rate,which has a good significance for the tightness evaluation of gas storage salt cavern. Based on the calculation results and trends of the gas leakage rate (Fig. 9), it is recommended that the total gas leakage volume of the gas storage salt cavern within the service life cycle should not exceed 5%of the storage capacity.As time increases,the leakage rate gradually increases and eventually stabilizes, but it does not exceed 5% in the end. In addition, when the operating pressure and temperature are 12 MPa and 328.15 K, the average annual leakage velocity is approximately 253.35 m3/a, which is in good agreement with the recommended values of Crotogino(1995)and Thiel (1993). The conversion equation between the leakage velocity and leakage rate of gas storage salt cavern is as follows:

    4.3. Quantitative evaluation system of tightness

    According to the above-mentioned research contents and results,the tightness evaluation of gas storage salt cavern during the operating stage can be divided into two parts: salt cavern and surrounding formations. As shown in Fig. 14, the factors of salt cavern influencing the tightness mainly include: operating pressure(pin),service life(Tlc),ambient temperature(Tc),depth(Hc)and effective volume (Ve). The factors of surrounding formations influencing the tightness mainly include: seepage parameters(permeability and porosity),breakthrough pressure(pb),number of formations (n), thickness of formations (hi). All the influencing factors listed in Fig.14 are related to the leakage range (in Section 3.2), leakage rate (in Section 3.3) and leakage volume (in Section 3.3), which are also the key quantitative indexes for tightness evaluation during salt cavern operation.

    5. Conclusions

    (1) One-dimensional and plane radial gas seepage governing equations in deep formations surrounding underground storage salt caverns have been derived and solved by theoretical and numerical methods. The gas seepage governing equation in this type of deep formation is different from Darcy's law. The effects of gas slippage, threshold pressure gradient in the formation must be considered. These governing equations can also be used for seepage analysis in other deep underground engineering facilities, such as geological sequestration of carbon dioxide, oil and gas extraction.

    (2) As the seepage distance increased, the seepage pressure in the formations decreased sharply during the early stage,and then decreased gently until the flow stopped. Because the seepage parameters of rock salt are lower than those of interlayers, the pressure drop of gas in the rock salt is more severe. The leakage range of gas in formations surrounding the salt cavern has a positive power function relationship with the operating time. When the operating pressure and service time are 12 MPa and 30 years,the maximum leakage range of gas in the selected salt cavern under the plane radial flow is approximately 69.00 m, which is within the safety permission range stipulated in the safety technical specification of salt cavern underground gas storage in China.

    (3) A seepage simulation experiment was carried out using selfdeveloped seepage test equipment to verify the reliability and applicability of the built model. The comparison results show that the theoretical calculation results are highly consistent with the experimental data of the seepage simulation, and the calculation error of the seepage range was approximately 6.70%. Therefore, the leakage analysis model and seepage governing equation can accurately reflect the gas seepage in formations surrounding the bedded gas storage salt cavern, which has guiding significance and application value in actual engineering.

    (4) Based on the theoretical analysis and calculation results of the pressure drop and leakage range, a new quantitative index named leakage rate was defined for salt cavern tightness evaluation.The leakage rate in this study was defined as the percentage of the total leakage volume of gas to the storage capacity,which is a relative quantity that can reflect the gas leakage degree regardless of the influence of the size of the cavern storage.Under an operating pressure of 12 MPa,the leakage rate of the selected salt cavern for 1,10,20 and 30 years was 0.51%,1.63%, 2.01% and 3.61%, respectively.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors wish to acknowledge the financial supports from Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No.20212BAB214009, 20212BAB214014), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51874273), the Key Science and Technology Research Project in Jiangxi Province Department of Education (Grant No. GJJ200634, GJJ200637), the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grant No.Z020016).The authors are sincerely grateful to Jaak J Daemen, Mackay School of Earth Sciences and Engineering,University of Nevada,for his thoughtful proofreading of this paper.

    不卡av一区二区三区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 99九九在线精品视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| www.999成人在线观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 我的亚洲天堂| av免费在线观看网站| 国产精品影院久久| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 婷婷成人精品国产| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 老司机影院毛片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 国产在线视频一区二区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品 国内视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 婷婷丁香在线五月| 一级黄色大片毛片| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 久久久久久久精品精品| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 69av精品久久久久久 | 日本91视频免费播放| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| av片东京热男人的天堂| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 另类精品久久| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产麻豆69| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| av天堂久久9| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| avwww免费| 日本a在线网址| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 美国免费a级毛片| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 天堂8中文在线网| 99热全是精品| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久av网站| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 黄片播放在线免费| 欧美成人午夜精品| 宅男免费午夜| 又大又爽又粗| 成人影院久久| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品999| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| netflix在线观看网站| www.自偷自拍.com| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 日日夜夜操网爽| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 精品国产一区二区久久| 十八禁人妻一区二区| bbb黄色大片| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 成人av一区二区三区在线看 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 曰老女人黄片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美97在线视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 一本综合久久免费| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 久久久精品94久久精品| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| av线在线观看网站| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产精品免费大片| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| av免费在线观看网站| 岛国毛片在线播放| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| www.自偷自拍.com| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 9热在线视频观看99| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲av男天堂| 蜜桃国产av成人99| av网站免费在线观看视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 桃花免费在线播放| 精品少妇内射三级| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 亚洲欧美激情在线| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 精品福利永久在线观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| av电影中文网址| 深夜精品福利| 成人影院久久| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久久视频综合| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲伊人色综图| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 91成年电影在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 午夜免费观看性视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 99热全是精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 丝袜喷水一区| 大香蕉久久网| 日本91视频免费播放| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 五月天丁香电影| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| svipshipincom国产片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 美女中出高潮动态图| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 窝窝影院91人妻| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 久久青草综合色| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产精品 国内视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 亚洲天堂av无毛| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| kizo精华| 国产高清videossex| 久久狼人影院| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 成年动漫av网址| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 老司机靠b影院| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久精品成人免费网站| 99热全是精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 电影成人av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 免费观看人在逋| 美女福利国产在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| av欧美777| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 成人国语在线视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 嫩草影视91久久| 一进一出抽搐动态| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 丁香六月欧美| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久国产精品影院| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 婷婷丁香在线五月| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 超色免费av| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 少妇精品久久久久久久| www.精华液| 蜜桃在线观看..| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 乱人伦中国视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久9热在线精品视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 成人国产av品久久久| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 免费观看人在逋| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产精品成人在线| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 精品亚洲成国产av| 日韩有码中文字幕| 9191精品国产免费久久| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 永久免费av网站大全| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 久久免费观看电影| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 成人国产av品久久久| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 99九九在线精品视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久这里只有精品19| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 久久99一区二区三区| 国产av又大| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产av新网站| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 飞空精品影院首页| 大香蕉久久成人网| 性色av一级| 香蕉国产在线看| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 91精品三级在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| av福利片在线| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 中文字幕制服av| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 色94色欧美一区二区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 黄色视频不卡| 脱女人内裤的视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产1区2区3区精品| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 中文字幕高清在线视频| www.av在线官网国产| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 十八禁网站免费在线| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 一区福利在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲av美国av| av国产精品久久久久影院| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 成人影院久久| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 免费不卡黄色视频| 丁香六月天网| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产成人欧美| 男女边摸边吃奶| 9热在线视频观看99| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | av一本久久久久| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 丁香六月欧美| 免费观看人在逋| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 成人国语在线视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 大码成人一级视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产激情久久老熟女| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 欧美大码av| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 热99re8久久精品国产| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产精品成人在线| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | av在线app专区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www|