• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Theoretical research on gas seepage in the formations surrounding bedded gas storage salt cavern

    2022-09-23 08:16:58XingShengChenYinPingLiLongJingYunXiLiuToZhng
    Petroleum Science 2022年4期

    Xing-Sheng Chen , Yin-Ping Li , Y-Long Jing , Yun-Xi Liu ,c, To Zhng

    a State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring and Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi,China

    b State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan 430071,Hubei, China

    c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    Keywords:Gas storage salt cavern Seepage Tightness Non-Darcy's law Leakage

    ABSTRACT When constructing salt cavern gas or petroleum storage in lacustrine sedimentary salt formations rich in mudstone interlayers, the influence of the sealing performance of interlayers and salt-mud interface on the storage tightness should be considered adequately. In order to reveal the gas seepage in deep formations surrounding bedded salt cavern underground storage,a leakage analysis model was established based on the characteristics of a low dip angle and the interbedded structure of bedded rock salt.The gas seepage governing equations for one-dimensional and plane radial flow were derived and solved. A gas seepage simulation experiment was conducted to demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the theoretical calculation results. The error of the seepage range was approximately 6.70%, which is acceptable. The analysis and calculation results indicate that the motion equation of gas in deep formations satisfies a non-Darcy's law with a threshold pressure gradient and slippage effect.The sufficient condition for the gas flow to stop is that the pressure gradient is equal to the threshold pressure gradient.The relationship between the leakage range and operating time is a positive power function, that is, the leakage range gradually increases with time and eventually stabilizes.As the seepage range increases,the seepage pressure decreases sharply during the early stage, and then decreases gradually until the flow stops.Combining the research results with engineering applications, three quantitative evaluation indexes named the maximum admissible leakage range, leakage volume and leakage rate are proposed for the tightness evaluation of gas storage salt cavern during their operating stage. These indexes can be used directly in actual engineering applications and can be compared with the key design parameters stipulated in the relevant specifications. This work is expected to provide theoretical and technical support for the gas loss and tightness evaluation of gas storage salt caverns.

    1. Introduction

    The structure of energy consumption in China is still dominated by coal, which accounts for more than 60% of the primary energy.The basic characteristics of the energy structure of China are rich in coal and lack natural gas and petroleum (Hao et al., 2015; Li and Leung, 2012; Shaikh et al., 2017). This leads to a series of problems such as a low utilization of coal, severe pollution and dust generation, and an inadequate petroleum and gas reserve system.Therefore, in response to the thirteenth Five-Year Plan for Energy Development, the National Energy Administration of China indicated that the proportion of coal consumption should be reduced to less than 58% from 2016 to 2020. The proportion of natural gas consumption should reach 10%, while the consumption of nonfossil energy should increase to over 15% (Liu et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2020). Furthermore, the energy consumption should be transformed into a clean, low-carbon, safe, and efficient system to reduce the greenhouse effect and promote the healthy and stable development of energy. In the context of energy transformation and clean energy utilization, ensuring a smooth transition from coal to gas and guaranteeing a safe supply of clean energy has become the primary problem faced by many countries (Burke and Yang, 2016; Dilaver et al., 2014).

    Salt rock underground storage is a cavern leached from salt domes or salt-bedded formations,it is used to store oil,natural gas or other hydrocarbons (Fan et al., 2019, 2020; Li et al., 2017; Pinto et al., 2021). Owing to the advantages of a large storage capacity,seasonal peak regulation,flexible storage and low investment costs,gas storage salt caverns feature the most rapid rate of increase of working gas and daily gas production among all types of underground storages. As an underground engineering for deep energy storage, the most important problem of salt cavern storage is ensuring its tightness and stability(Chen et al.,2021).As shown in Fig. 1, because of the difference between the ground stress and time-varying operating pressure, the storage may not only suffer roof collapse because of lack of structural stability, but it may also may face the risk of gas leakage due to tightness failure. Surface subsidence, fire and explosions caused by accidents seriously threaten the lives and property of nearby residents. The results in literature and leakage accident statistics show that between 1969 and 2019, there were approximately 20 leakage accidents of gas and petroleum in salt cavern underground storages (B′erest et al.,2019; Evans, 2009; Osnes et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2013). The causes of leakage include casing rupture, interlayer and cap rock fracture, surface facility damage and human errors.

    Because of the different depositional environments of bedded rock salt and salt domes (Fig. 2), researchers have focused on studying leakage accidents and tightness evaluations in gas storage salt cavern.With regard to salt dome storage,research has focused on the damage, dislocation and interface slippage of rock salt crystals, based on which relevant theories have been proposed(Alkan, 2009; Hunsche, 1998). For example, Stormont (1997)divided the excavation damage zone and undisturbed zone according to the on-site permeability of rock salt. The permeability parameters of the rock salt in the excavation damage zone increased, while the undisturbed zone maintained its original sealing ability. Müller et al. (2018) simulated the damage of rock salt on the crystal scale using the discrete element method. Their analysis results were verified by uniaxial compression and acoustic emission tests. Osnes et al. (2007) discussed a case history of a casing failure in a gas storage salt cavern,and confirmed that strains of sufficient magnitude can cause tensile failure in the lower portion of the cased well. Evans (2009) collected statistics on the leakage accidents, casualties and economic losses of salt dome storages,and described the entire process of these accidents.

    Compared with the salt dome formed by marine sedimentation,the bedded rock salt has more interlayers,thinner salt strata and a higher content of insolubles, which complicates the evaluation of tightness and stability (Zhang et al., 2017). For bedded salt cavern storage,one needs to pay more attention to the leakage range and rate of storage media such as petroleum and natural gas, and the study of the permeability of interlayers is an indispensable part of the tightness evaluation (Huang and Xiong, 2011; Wang et al.,2018). Based on Darcy's law and porous media seepage theory,Wang et al.(2015a),Liu et al.(2016)and Xiong et al.(2015)analyzed the pressure distribution and seepage of gas in formations by means of numerical simulation,and pointed out that the interlayers will accelerate gas leakage.A large number of test results show that although the permeability of well-integrated interlayers is slightly higher than that of rock salt,it is fully capable of sealing petroleum and natural gas(Li et al.,2014;Liu et al.,2015;Yin et al.,2017).Their permeability range is about 10-17to 10-20m2. The formations surrounding storage salt cavern are dense porous media, and the gas flow in such formations is extremely slow and does not satisfy Darcy's law. Many factors affect gas seepage and leakage, such as the threshold or critical pressure gradient, Klinkenberg effect,effective volume of storage cavern, permeability and mechanical parameters of formations. The threshold pressure gradient is the threshold at which the fluid starts to flow in a tight formation.This phenomenon often occurs in low-permeability formations and is an influencing factor that must be considered for fluid seepage in such formations(Kong,1999).

    Fig.1. Schematic diagram of gas leakage and roof collapse in salt cavern underground storage (B′erest, 2017; B′erest et al., 2019).

    Fig. 2. Bedded rock salt formations of lacustrine depositions and salt dome of marine depositions.

    The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term and large-scale seepage of gas in formations surrounding salt caverns,and thus propose several quantitative indexes for tightness evaluations during the operating stage.A leakage analysis model of a gas storage salt cavern was established and a gas seepage governing equation considering the threshold pressure gradient and slippage effect was derived. The validity of this theoretical model and the calculation results were verified base on a seepage simulation experiment. Finally, an on-site bedded gas storage salt cavern in Jintan,China,was selected for the gas loss and tightness evaluation based on the leakage analysis model. Combined with operational conditions and calculation parameters, the tightness evaluation indexes, such as gas leakage range, leakage volume and rate were obtained.The research contents and results provide theoretical and experimental support for site selection, key design parameters(typically pillar width and thickness of salt roof) and tightness evaluation of bedded gas storage salt cavern.

    2. Leakage analysis model of bedded gas storage salt cavern

    Considering the low dip angle and the interbedded structure of bedded rock salt, a leakage analysis model for gas seepage in formations surrounding bedded salt cavern was established.As shown in Fig.3,this model includes not only rock salts and interlayers,but also the salt roof, salt bottom and cap rock. The roof is the salt retained at the top of a salt cavern after leaching,and the bottom is the undissolved salt at the bottom of the salt cavern.The gas stored in salt caverns usually is natural gas, ethylene or hydrogen. The stored gas seeps along the surrounding formations into pores and fractures under the action of the operating pressure.Rock salts and interlayers with poor sealing performance may become potential channels for gas leakage.

    Fig.3. Leakage analysis model for gas seepage in formations surrounding a salt cavern,hi indicates the thickness of a certain formation, Ri represents the cavern radius at a certain formation, pin and p0 are the operating pressure of salt cavern and initial pore pressure in the formation.

    2.1. Equivalent permeability of bedded rock salt

    As an interbedded rock mass, the mechanical and permeability characteristics of bedded rock salt are determined by the interlayers and rock salt.Yang et al.(2005)and Li et al.(2014)found that the salt-mudstone interface of bedded rock salt is well cemented and is unlikely to open or slip according to extensive mechanical property tests.This is different from the joints or weak structural surfaces of other layered rocks. Furthermore, the mudstone interlayers can effectively restrain the creep shrinkage of a salt cavern because of its high elastic modulus compared with that of rock salt. Similarly, the permeability of bedded rock salt is not only related to the interlayer and rock salt,but also depends on the seepage direction of the penetrating fluid. As shown in Fig. 4,the vertical and horizontal seepage can be used as examples to establish an equivalent permeability model for bedded rock salt.The length, width and height of this model are l, w and h,respectively.The horizontal seepage in the equivalent permeability model refers to the gas flow in which the seepage is parallel to the formation. The pressure gradient ?p of the gas flowing through each formation is the same, and the total flow rate Q is the sum of the flow rate Qiof each formation.Assuming that the total flow rates of the interlayers and rock salts are Qmand Qs, the following relationship can be obtained based on Darcy's law:

    Fig. 4. Equivalent permeability model of bedded rock salt.

    Eq. (3) shows that the equivalent permeability of bedded rock salt under horizontal seepage is equal to the sum of the product of the permeability kiand thickness ratio ωiof rock salts and interlayers, which means that the high permeability formation controls the equivalent permeability of the bedded rock salt. The tightness of a salt cavern is determined by the interlayer because of its relatively poor sealing performance compared with that of rock salt.

    Vertical seepage in the equivalent permeability model refers to the gas flow in which the seepage direction is perpendicular to the formation. Its characteristics are that the flow rate Q of the gas flowing through each formation is the same, and the pressure gradient ?p is the sum of the pressure gradients Δpiof each formation. The flow rate can be expressed as follows:

    The equivalent permeability of bedded rock salt in the case of vertical seepage is determined by the low permeability formation,which means that the tightness of a salt cavern can be guaranteed as long as a certain formation does not leak.

    Most formations surrounding bedded salt cavern storage are approximately horizontal because of the lacustrine deposition of these bedded salt formations (Chen et al., 2019; Lankof and Tarkowski, 2020; Zhang et al., 2015). Hence, the gas seepage in the formations surrounding a salt cavern can be regarded as a plane radial flow,that is,horizontal seepage.The vertical seepage mainly exists in the top and bottom of a salt cavern.

    2.2. Klinkenberg effects of gas flow in porous media

    The gas flow in porous media is different from that of liquid,which is mainly manifested in the compressibility and slippage effect. In 1941, Klinkenberg (1941) revealed the gas slippage phenomenon in porous media based on his theoretical seepage analysis of ideal gas flow, thus the slippage effect is also called the Klinkenberg effect.Many scholars have also found this phenomenon by means of permeability tests on cores (Al-Jabri et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2019). The test results indicate that the Klinkenberg effect increases the apparent permeability of porous media,and the denser the rock and the lower the seepage pressure,the more obvious the Klinkenberg effect. Because the formations surrounding salt caverns are tight porous media, the Klinkenberg effect cannot be ignored when analyzing gas seepage in them.

    The Klinkenberg effect is the result of frequent collisions between the gas molecules and the pore wall of porous media, such that the gas velocity on the pore wall is not zero, that is, the nonslip condition is not satisfied. The influence of the Klinkenberg effect on gas seepage can be described by the following equation(Klinkenberg,1941):

    2.3. Boundary conditions

    The depth of gas storage salt cavern in China is approximately greater than or equal to 800 m,hence the formations surrounding the salt caverns are deep and tight.The flow velocity of the fluid in these formations is extremely low, resulting in the equation of motion that does not satisfy Darcy's law. The precondition of fluid flow in low-permeability formations is that the seepage pressure gradient exceeds the threshold pressure gradient in the formation,otherwise the fluid cannot flow(Li et al.,2020; Wang et al., 2011).The equation of motion of gas seepage in a tight formation can be expressed as:

    where v is the seepage velocity or Darcy's velocity, μ denotes the dynamic viscosity of the flowing gas,and λ denotes the threshold or critical pressure gradient, with a positive value.

    For Newtonian fluids,the above equation of motion can only be applied at low speeds, which usually occurs in low-permeability formations. In the running stage of a gas storage salt cavern, the operating pressure changes dynamically with the gas injection and production. Assuming that the operating pressure and the initial pore pressure of the formations are pinand p0, then the pressure boundary conditions can be obtained based on the gas seepage characteristics of one-dimensional flow and plane radial flow(Fig. 3).

    Pressure boundary conditions of one-dimensional flow:

    where x and r are the distance of one-dimensional flow and plane radial flow, pinand p0are the operating pressure and initial pore pressure in the formations, respectively.

    2.4. One-dimensional flow

    Before the theoretical analysis,considering that the complexity of the underground environment and the uncertainty about the actual situation will make the theoretical solution difficult, the following basic assumptions are proposed.

    1. Bedded rock salt formations are interbedded structures, in which the gas seepage direction is mainly horizontal.

    2. The gas satisfies the ideal gas state equation and the seepage is isothermal.

    3. Equation of motion of gas satisfies non-Darcy's law taking into account the Klinkenberg effect and threshold pressure gradient.

    4. The compressibility of the rock skeleton is much smaller than that of gas, hence any strata deformation is ignored.

    Taking the volume element dV of the surrounding formations for mass conservation analysis of the gas,the continuity equation of gas seepage is as follows:

    where ρ denotes the density of the gas, φ is the porosity of the porous media.

    Based on the above assumptions,substituting the ideal gas state equation and the motion equation in Eq. (10) into Eq. (13), the following equation is obtained:

    2.5. Plane radial flow

    The analysis of the plane radial flow of gas in formations is similar to that of one-dimensional flow. Taking the volume ring element for fluid mass balance, the continuity equation of the unsteady plane radial flow can be obtained:

    Wu et al.(1998)obtained an approximate analytical solution of seepage pressure under a plane radial flow by using to the heat conduction problem (Carslaw and Jaeger,1992).

    where J0and Y0are the Bessel functions of order 0 of the first and second kind,respectively,r and R are the radial distance and cavern radius, and u is the integral variable.

    3. Results and validation of the theoretical model

    Because the gas seepage in deep formations is more complicated and does not satisfy Darcy's law, the analytic solution cannot be found in the continuity equations.In order to verify and analyze the feasibility of the theoretical model for bedded salt cavern underground gas storage leakage analysis,this model needs to be solvednumerically. The operating conditions and calculation parameters are taken from an in-service gas storage salt cavern in China, as shown in Table 1.

    Table 1 Calculation parameters and strata information.

    The target salt cavern is located in the eastern coastal area of China. The salt formation is distributed from northeast to southwest, and the salt formation is thick in the middle and thin in the periphery. The nitrogen leak test (NLT) was used for the tightness test. It can evaluate the leakage of salt cavern based on leakage velocity and gas-liquid interface displacement.This salt cavern has five interlayers and six rock salt formations. The corrected sonar detection data show that the maximum radius and effective volume of this cavern are 31.40 m and 152010.51 m3. The correction method takes the mean value from multiple measurements. The interlayers are gray mudstone of varying thickness, with a maximum thickness of 2.54 m and a minimum thickness of 0.90 m.The average gas permeability kg, average porosity φ, threshold pressure gradient λ and other parameters required for leakage analysis of the selected gas storage salt cavern are listed in Table 1.

    3.1. Pressure drop

    The design range of the operating pressure of the selected salt cavern is 8-16 MPa, and its service life is 30 years. To reduce the number of repeated calculations, the initial operating pressure is taken as the average of the maximum operating pressure and the minimum operating pressure, that is, 12 MPa. By substituting calculation and operation parameters into Eq. (14) and Eq. (17)respectively, the pressure drop of the gas in deep formations can be obtained by numerical calculation. Figs. 5 and 6 show the pressure drop curves of gas in mudstone 1 (interlayer 1) and rock salt 1 under one-dimensional flow and under plane radial flow,respectively.As the flow distance increases,the seepage pressure of the gas decreases sharply in the early stage, and then decreases gently until the flow stops.Because the sealing performance of the rock salt is better than that of the mudstone interlayers, the pressure drop in the salt rock is more severe.In the same formation,the pressure drop of gas under plane radial flow also changes more drastically than that under one-dimensional flow.

    3.2. Leakage range

    Because the gas flow in deep formations does not satisfy Darcy's law,the sufficient condition for gas flow to stop is no longer that the pressure gradient is equal to 0,but that it is equal to the threshold pressure gradient of the targeted formation. In other words, the leakage range of gas in the formations is equal to the flow distance when the pressure gradient becomes equal to the threshold pressure gradient. The basis of the judgment is as follows:

    Fig. 5. Pressure drop curve of gas in mudstone 1 under one-dimensional flow and plane radial flow.

    Fig. 6. Pressure drop curve of gas in rock salt 1 under one-dimensional flow and plane radial flow.

    Fig. 7. Fitting curve of gas leakage range in interlayer and rock salt under one-dimensional and radial flow.

    The results indicate that the leakage range of gas in the surrounding formation has a positive power function relationship with the operating time (Fig. 7), the leakage range increases with time and eventually becomes stable. When the operating pressure and time are 12 MPa and 30 years, the leakage range in the interlayer and rock salt are respectively 69.00 and 22.58 m under plane radial seepage, hence the leakage range of gas in an interlayer is approximately 3.06 times that in rock salt. In the case of the same formation and operating conditions,the leakage range of gas under one-dimensional flow is approximately 1.55 times to 1.65 times that under plane radial flow. These results are consistent with the pressure drop trends (Figs. 5 and 6). According to the distribution characteristics of bedded rock salt and the shape of gas storage salt cavern (Fig. 1), it is known that the plane radial flow or twodimensional axisymmetric flow is more in line with the actual situation than one-dimensional flow. Therefore, the subsequent studies in this paper are based on the plane radial flow, and no longer discuss one-dimensional flow.

    3.3. Leakage rate

    In addition to the pressure drop and leakage range,the leakage rate of gas in gas storage salt cavern can be roughly calculated according to the leakage analysis model. Absolute leakage mass and rate are the key indicators for leakage risk prevention,and play an important role in the safety evaluation of underground gas storage salt cavern.However,since the service life of gas storage salt cavern is approximately 30 years, the gas leakage risk evaluation and prediction are long processes. The maximum admissible leakage rate is different at different operating stages.There are some limitations in using absolute leakage indicators to evaluate the tightness of salt cavern,which cannot fully reflect the leakage situation,especially the leakage causes and types.Therefore,the leakage rate of gas in this study is not the leakage velocity,but is defined as the percentage of the total leakage volume of a gas storage salt cavern to the storage capacity. The introduction of relative leakage indicators can distinguish storage leakages of different sizes and operating pressures, and can compensate for the lack of absolute indicators. If the two are used in combination, a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the effect of leakage can be achieved.

    The storage capacity of a salt cavern can be defined as the gas reserve under the maximum allowable operating pressure. The value converted to standard atmospheric pressure is as follows:

    where Csdenotes the storage capacity of a salt cavern,Veand psare the effective volume of the salt cavern and standard atmospheric pressure.

    As shown in Fig.8,most of the leaked gas remains in the pores and cracks of the formations.According to the law of conservation of mass, we can obtain the leakage mass of gas in a certain formation.

    where Lmdenotes the leakage mass of gas, R and rcare cavern radius and leakage range,h and φ are the thickness and porosity of the formation, respectively.

    Based on Boyle's law, the leakage volume at standard atmospheric pressure can be expressed as follows:

    where LVand LVTare the leakage volume of a certain formation and the total leakage volume of the gas storage salt cavern, n denotes the number of formations surrounding the salt cavern.

    We obtain a tightness evaluation index of the total leakage volume of the gas storage salt cavern as a percentage of storage capacity, that is, the leakage rate.

    Fig. 8. Plane radial flow of gas in a formation surrounding a gas storage salt cavern.

    Fig. 9. Leakage rate of this gas storage salt cavern.

    Fig.10. Leakage volume and leakage volume ratio of interlayers and rock salts,leakage volume ratio refers to the total leakage volume of gas in interlayers divided by that in rock salts.

    where Lrdenotes leakage rate.

    Substituting the pressure drop(Figs.5 and 6),the leakage range(Fig. 7) and the calculation parameters (Table 1) into Eq. (25), the leakage rate of the gas storage salt cavern is obtained (Fig. 9). The gas leakage rate of gas storage also has a power function relationship with the operating time,which is similar to the variation of the gas leakage range. Under an operating pressure of 12 MPa, the leakage rate(the percentage of the total leakage volume of this salt cave gas storage to the storage capacity)of the selected gas storage salt cavern for 1,10,15, 20, 25 and 30 years is 0.51%,1.63%,1.89%,2.01%,2.24%and 3.61%,respectively.Fig.10 shows that although the total thickness of rock salts is 11 times that of interlayers,the total leakage volume of gas in interlayers is approximately 2 times that in rock salt owing to the influence of the leakage range.Therefore,for a bedded gas storage salt cavern,the sealing performance of the interlayers often determines the overall tightness of the storage.

    Fig.11. Structural schematic and physical diagram of seepage simulation device.

    3.4. Model validation

    Fig.12. Experimental data and theoretical calculation results of a seepage simulation test.

    To confirm the validity of the leakage analysis model of bedded gas storage salt cavern, it is necessary to verify the reliability and accuracy of the calculation results, such as the pressure drop and leakage range. For this purpose, a seepage simulation experiment was carried out using a seepage simulation device, as shown in Fig.11.This seepage simulation device has eleven pressure sensors and three temperature controllers,and has a length of 1.5 m and a diameter of 0.1 m. The cores used in this experiment are two long cores with a length of 0.5 m and a diameter of 0.1 m, hence a combined length of 1.0 m.In order to guarantee the homogeneity of the core, the cores used in this seepage simulation test are compressed synthetic salt rocks.Hence, the lithology and physical and mechanical parameters are not significantly different.The end face of the cores was polished by sandpaper and was wrapped by rubber sleeves to ensure the flatness and connection.In order to avoid the uneven seepage pressure at the joint, the pressure sensors were arranged to avoid the interface,so as to ensure the accuracy of data collection. The seepage medium is nitrogen, and the temperature and confining pressure are 328.15 K and 18 MPa,respectively.

    Fig. 12 shows the results of the leakage range obtained from theoretical calculation and from seepage simulation tests. The red and blue data points represent the experimental and theoretical results, respectively. When the injection pressure of nitrogen is 0.45 MPa,the experimental and theoretical results indicate that the time required to penetrate the cores is about 12 and 11.2 s,with an error of 6.7%.Therefore,the theoretical model of leakage analysis of bedded gas storage salt cavern has good applicability and accuracy,and is in good agreement with the experimental results. Although the theoretical equation of gas seepage in deep formation surrounding the gas storage salt cavern is derived in this paper, it is also applicable to the case of Darcy's law, as long as the threshold pressure gradient λ is equal to zero.

    4. Application to actual gas storage salt cavern

    The tightness evaluation of gas storage salt cavern is a comprehensive safety problem that covers multiple aspects and stages. It not only includes the evaluation of formation tightness,sealing ability of cap rock, wellbore integrity and surface facilities,but also involves several stages such as leaching, operating(working)and closing,which leads to a large number of evaluation indexes for tightness evaluation. In the early site selection and leaching stage,the tightness evaluation of a cavern storage mainly includes some qualitative evaluation indexes such as strata continuity, reservoir depth, regional stability, hydrogeological characteristics and cover sealing.(Canadian-Standards-Association,2014).In the closing stage, the operating pressure of the salt cavern is relatively stable, and it is not easy to fluctuate compared with the operating stage.

    There have been few studies on the tightness evaluation of cavern storage in the operating and closing stage.On the one hand,it is difficult to obtain the quantitative evaluation indexes because of the high operating pressure and deep formations; on the other hand, there are many types and causes of leakage, which makes it difficult to quantitatively evaluate the tightness. For this purpose,based on the engineering geological conditions,operating pressure,operating time and leakage type, combined with the above theoretical and numerical calculation results, two quantitative evaluation indexes of leakage range and leakage rate are proposed. The reference values and suggested value are detailed below.

    4.1. Maximum admissible leakage range

    To avoid gas leakage and connection accident to adjacent salt caverns,some key design parameters need to be considered during the design and construction of an underground gas storage salt cavern,such as pillar width (Wp),distance from faults(Wf), height of open hole (Ht) and thickness of the salt roof (Hs). As shown in Fig.13,the pillar width is the shortest horizontal distance between the two adjacent storage caverns.Distance from faults refers to the distance between the cavern and wellbore and any nearby fault system. The height of the open hole is an important measure to eliminate or limit the impact of creep shrinkage of the salt cavern on wellbore integrity.The thickness of the salt roof is mainly set to prevent cap rock breakthrough due to the high operating pressure.The setting of these parameters is based on the principle of ensuring the tightness and safety of the storage.

    The technical safety specification of salt cavern underground gas storage in China stipulates that the distance between the cavern and fault system should be more than 2.5 times the diameter of the salt cavern (National-Energy-Administration-of-China, 2011),hence the leakage range of gas in formations cannot exceed the distance from faults (Wf).

    where rc,Wfand D are the leakage range,distance from faults and the diameter of the salt cavern, respectively.

    The pillar width is a safety distance set to prevent the adjacent gas storages from being connected due to the gas leakage, and its value depends on the size of the cavern diameter.

    where Wp,D and ? are the pillar width,diameter of the salt cavern and safety factor, respectively.

    Generally speaking, the safety factor ? of pillar width of salt dome cavern storage is approximately 1.5-3.0,and that of bedded storage salt cavern is approximately 2.0-4.0 (Wang et al., 2015b,2015c;Zhang et al.,2021).In special and extreme situations such as when the gas storage salt cavern encounters a weak interlayer or remains at the lowest operating pressure for a long time(requiring a large gas supply) or is used as the strategic reservoir, it is recommended that the maximum safety pillar width can be increased to five times the diameter of the salt cavern. Because the stability and tightness of the pillar are not easily guaranteed at this time,engineering accidents have been encountered in Jintan, Jiangsu,China gas storage salt cavern (Li et al., 2019; Yin et al., 2020). In principle,the maximum admissible leakage range cannot reach the salt boundary,faults or adjacent caverns,hence its value should be controlled within the pillar width (Wp), distance from faults (Wf),height of the open hole(Ht)and thickness of the salt roof(Hs).The difference is that the thickness of the salt roof is the reference of the gas leakage range in rock salt, while the pillar width and the distance from faults are the references of the gas leakage range in interlayers. The relational expression can be defined in the following form:

    Fig. 13. Key design parameters that affect salt cavern tightness, Wp, Wf, Ht, and Hs are the pillar width, distance from faults, height of open hole and thickness of salt roof,respectively.

    Fig.14. Quantitative evaluation system of tightness of bedded gas storage salt cavern during operating stage.

    where rcidenotes gas leakage range in different formations.

    4.2. Maximum admissible leakage rate

    There is no unified regulation on the maximum admissible leakage rate of gas storage salt cavern in the current specifications and engineering, because the maximum admissible leakage velocity varies with the size, depth and type of storage caverns. In general, the smaller the storage capacity of the salt cavern, the lower the admissible leakage velocity, and the larger the storage capacity of the salt cavern, the greater the admissible leakage velocity. The leakage velocity is an important evaluation index for evaluating leakage risk in a gas storage salt cavern.

    The evaluation of the gas leakage rate can refer to the requirements of a nitrogen leak test (NLT), a common tightness test method in oil-gas well engineering (Belgian-Standards, 1998;B′erest et al., 2002). Judgement criterion 1 of the NLT is that the leakage rate gradually decreases with time,and eventually reaches a stable value. However, the NLT does not provide a specific value for the maximum admissible leakage rate. Crotogino (1995)mentioned the minimum detectable leakage rate and the maximum admissible leakage rate using the NLT method at the Solution Mining Research Institute. He suggested that when the operating pressure and temperature were 17 MPa and 300 K, the maximum admissible leakage velocity was approximately 150 kg/day or 270 m3/a. Thiel (1993) has a similar proposal that the maximum allowable leakage velocity of gas storage salt cavern was 160 m3/a.It can be seen that the maximum allowable leakage rate of a gas storage salt cavern is related to the operating pressure,ambient temperature,storage capacity and formations,and there is currently no specific value.

    Gas leakage risk evaluation and prediction are long processes,and the maximum admissible leakage varies under different operating stages. There are some limitations in using absolute leakage indicators to evaluate the tightness of a salt cavern,which cannot fully reflect the leakage situation, especially the leakage causes and types. The definition of the gas leakage rate of gas storage salt cavern in this study is different from that of Thiel(1993)and Crotogino (1995). It is defined as the percentage of the total leakage volume of a salt cave gas storage relative to the storage capacity(in Section 3.3),which is a relative quantity rather than an absolute quantity.

    This definition not only considers the size of the storage capacity, but also analyzes the influence of operating pressure,ambient temperature and other factors on the leakage rate,which has a good significance for the tightness evaluation of gas storage salt cavern. Based on the calculation results and trends of the gas leakage rate (Fig. 9), it is recommended that the total gas leakage volume of the gas storage salt cavern within the service life cycle should not exceed 5%of the storage capacity.As time increases,the leakage rate gradually increases and eventually stabilizes, but it does not exceed 5% in the end. In addition, when the operating pressure and temperature are 12 MPa and 328.15 K, the average annual leakage velocity is approximately 253.35 m3/a, which is in good agreement with the recommended values of Crotogino(1995)and Thiel (1993). The conversion equation between the leakage velocity and leakage rate of gas storage salt cavern is as follows:

    4.3. Quantitative evaluation system of tightness

    According to the above-mentioned research contents and results,the tightness evaluation of gas storage salt cavern during the operating stage can be divided into two parts: salt cavern and surrounding formations. As shown in Fig. 14, the factors of salt cavern influencing the tightness mainly include: operating pressure(pin),service life(Tlc),ambient temperature(Tc),depth(Hc)and effective volume (Ve). The factors of surrounding formations influencing the tightness mainly include: seepage parameters(permeability and porosity),breakthrough pressure(pb),number of formations (n), thickness of formations (hi). All the influencing factors listed in Fig.14 are related to the leakage range (in Section 3.2), leakage rate (in Section 3.3) and leakage volume (in Section 3.3), which are also the key quantitative indexes for tightness evaluation during salt cavern operation.

    5. Conclusions

    (1) One-dimensional and plane radial gas seepage governing equations in deep formations surrounding underground storage salt caverns have been derived and solved by theoretical and numerical methods. The gas seepage governing equation in this type of deep formation is different from Darcy's law. The effects of gas slippage, threshold pressure gradient in the formation must be considered. These governing equations can also be used for seepage analysis in other deep underground engineering facilities, such as geological sequestration of carbon dioxide, oil and gas extraction.

    (2) As the seepage distance increased, the seepage pressure in the formations decreased sharply during the early stage,and then decreased gently until the flow stopped. Because the seepage parameters of rock salt are lower than those of interlayers, the pressure drop of gas in the rock salt is more severe. The leakage range of gas in formations surrounding the salt cavern has a positive power function relationship with the operating time. When the operating pressure and service time are 12 MPa and 30 years,the maximum leakage range of gas in the selected salt cavern under the plane radial flow is approximately 69.00 m, which is within the safety permission range stipulated in the safety technical specification of salt cavern underground gas storage in China.

    (3) A seepage simulation experiment was carried out using selfdeveloped seepage test equipment to verify the reliability and applicability of the built model. The comparison results show that the theoretical calculation results are highly consistent with the experimental data of the seepage simulation, and the calculation error of the seepage range was approximately 6.70%. Therefore, the leakage analysis model and seepage governing equation can accurately reflect the gas seepage in formations surrounding the bedded gas storage salt cavern, which has guiding significance and application value in actual engineering.

    (4) Based on the theoretical analysis and calculation results of the pressure drop and leakage range, a new quantitative index named leakage rate was defined for salt cavern tightness evaluation.The leakage rate in this study was defined as the percentage of the total leakage volume of gas to the storage capacity,which is a relative quantity that can reflect the gas leakage degree regardless of the influence of the size of the cavern storage.Under an operating pressure of 12 MPa,the leakage rate of the selected salt cavern for 1,10,20 and 30 years was 0.51%,1.63%, 2.01% and 3.61%, respectively.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors wish to acknowledge the financial supports from Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No.20212BAB214009, 20212BAB214014), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51874273), the Key Science and Technology Research Project in Jiangxi Province Department of Education (Grant No. GJJ200634, GJJ200637), the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grant No.Z020016).The authors are sincerely grateful to Jaak J Daemen, Mackay School of Earth Sciences and Engineering,University of Nevada,for his thoughtful proofreading of this paper.

    日韩欧美三级三区| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 在线免费观看的www视频| 91成年电影在线观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 久久精品91蜜桃| 搡老岳熟女国产| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 色综合站精品国产| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产99白浆流出| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 久久中文字幕一级| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 黄色成人免费大全| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲第一青青草原| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 在线视频色国产色| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久99久视频精品免费| 窝窝影院91人妻| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产高清videossex| 熟女电影av网| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 此物有八面人人有两片| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 91国产中文字幕| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 哪里可以看免费的av片| xxxwww97欧美| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 又大又爽又粗| 久久人妻av系列| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 美女免费视频网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产精华一区二区三区| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 中国美女看黄片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 99国产精品99久久久久| www日本黄色视频网| 欧美zozozo另类| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产三级黄色录像| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| www.www免费av| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 九色国产91popny在线| 热re99久久国产66热| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 不卡一级毛片| 老司机靠b影院| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 午夜福利18| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 亚洲中文av在线| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产高清videossex| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| www国产在线视频色| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲成人久久性| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| av在线天堂中文字幕| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 久久国产精品影院| 午夜a级毛片| 日本免费a在线| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 91字幕亚洲| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久性视频一级片| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲无线在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久亚洲真实| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 午夜福利18| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| 成人国语在线视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 91在线观看av| av有码第一页| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 1024手机看黄色片| 日本熟妇午夜| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 国产片内射在线| 精品人妻1区二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 色综合婷婷激情| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产精品久久视频播放| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 黄片小视频在线播放| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 免费av毛片视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 丁香欧美五月| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 美女免费视频网站| 黄频高清免费视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 成人国语在线视频| 91老司机精品| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 不卡av一区二区三区| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| cao死你这个sao货| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 草草在线视频免费看| 俺也久久电影网| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久精品影院6| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产色视频综合| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 成人精品一区二区免费| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 中文资源天堂在线| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 久久九九热精品免费| 不卡av一区二区三区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 午夜久久久久精精品| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 9191精品国产免费久久| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 熟女电影av网| 嫩草影院精品99| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 身体一侧抽搐| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲 国产 在线| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 级片在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| av视频在线观看入口| 国产1区2区3区精品| avwww免费| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 91成人精品电影| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 免费看十八禁软件| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精品久久视频播放| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲 国产 在线| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 精品日产1卡2卡| 自线自在国产av| 俺也久久电影网| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 美国免费a级毛片| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 超碰成人久久| av有码第一页| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 久久九九热精品免费| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| netflix在线观看网站| 黄色视频不卡| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产成人av教育| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产视频内射| 波多野结衣高清无吗| av福利片在线| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲五月天丁香| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 一本综合久久免费| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产精品九九99| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 色播亚洲综合网| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 91国产中文字幕| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产精品免费视频内射| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产激情欧美一区二区| cao死你这个sao货| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 91成人精品电影| 九色国产91popny在线| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 在线看三级毛片| 午夜免费观看网址| 香蕉久久夜色| 成人手机av| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 成人国产综合亚洲| 久99久视频精品免费| avwww免费| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久亚洲真实| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 丁香欧美五月| 成人欧美大片| 精品久久久久久久末码| av中文乱码字幕在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲无线在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| tocl精华| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 999久久久国产精品视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 91老司机精品| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 18禁观看日本| 99热6这里只有精品| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 69av精品久久久久久| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| avwww免费| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 欧美黑人巨大hd| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲片人在线观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧美日韩精品网址| 又大又爽又粗| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产高清激情床上av| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产av在哪里看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 色综合婷婷激情| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 久久这里只有精品19| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 51午夜福利影视在线观看|