• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Black locust coppice stands homogenize soil diazotrophic communities by reducing soil net nitrogen mineralization

    2022-08-11 04:03:56KunLiHuimeiTianKeithMoserStevenOverySottBaggettRuiqiangNiChuanrongLiWeixingShen
    Forest Ecosystems 2022年3期

    Kun Li, Huimei Tian, W. Keith Moser, Steven T. Overy, L. Sott Baggett,Ruiqiang Ni, Chuanrong Li*, Weixing Shen

    a Mountain Tai Forest Ecosystem Research Station of State Forestry Administration, Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration for Silviculture of the Lower Yellow River, Forestry College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, Shandong, China

    b Rocky Mountain Research Station, United States Forest Service, 2500 S. Pine Knoll Dr., Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, USA

    c Rocky Mountain Research Station, United States Forest Service, 240 West Prospect Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA

    d Mount Tai Scenic Spot Management Committee, Tai'an, 271000, Shandong, China

    Keywords:Black locust plantation nifH gene Nitrogen mineralization Coppice Soil nutrient

    ABSTRACT

    1. Background

    Black locust(BL,Robinia pseudoacacia)is considered a promising tree species for reforestation programs due to its rapid growth rate and ability to fix nitrogen (Medina-Villar et al., 2016). Reproduction of BL plantations is primarily vegetative through root suckering and stump sprouting(Carl et al., 2019), allowing vigorous regeneration after coppicing and disturbance. Unfortunately, BL coppice plantation productivity declines after two or three harvesting rotations (Cierjacks et al., 2013; Li et al.,2021). Other adverse effects have also received widespread attention,such as soil fertility degradation,trunk bending,and limited tree height(Li et al.,2021).

    Abbreviations BL Black locust F First-generation seedling plantation stand S First-regeneration coppice stand T Second-generation coppice stand FR Rhizosphere in first-generation seedling plantations SR Rhizosphere in first-generation coppice stands TR Rhizosphere in second-generation coppice stands FNR Bulk soil in first-generation seedling plantations SNR Bulk soil in first-generation coppice stands TNR Bulk soil in second-generation coppice stands C Total soil carbon N Total soil nitrogen P Total soil phosphorus C/N Ratio of soil carbon and nitrogen C/P Ratio of soil carbon and phosphorus N/P Ratio of soil nitrogen and phosphorus NO3--N Soil nitrate NH4+-N Soil ammonium AN Soil available nitrogen MBN Microbial biomass N MBC Microbial biomass C MBC/MBN Ratio of MBC and MBN Rn Soil nitrification rate Ra Soil ammonification rate Rm Net soil N mineralization rate RDA Redundancy analysis PCoA Principal coordinate analysis OTUs Operational Taxonomic Units GLMMs Generalized Linear Mixed Models BNF biological nitrogen fixation

    BL roots are colonized with nitrogen-fixing microorganisms (diazotrophs)and thus enhance the nitrogen(N)content in soil organic fraction through N2-fixation(Cierjacks et al.,2013),which is an essential source of N to ecosystems (Reed et al., 2011). Nitrogen fixation reduces molecular nitrogen to ammonia and other nitrogen-containing compounds(Meng et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019), mediated by bacteria and archaea that possess the enzyme nitrogenase (Reed et al., 2011; Ouyang et al.,2018). The nifH gene regulates nitrogenize synthesis by producing an enzymatic compound that catalyzes the N2-fixation to NH4+-N in the plant(Gaby and Buckley, 2011; Zhou et al., 2021). Therefore, diazotrophic abundance,diversity,and community composition have been recognized as biotic factors crucial to determining soil nitrogen-fixing capacity(Stewart et al., 2011;Zhao et al.,2021). These factors have been extensively investigated,employing the nifH gene as a molecular marker(Fan et al.,2018;Chen et al.,2019a,2019b).Generally,the rates of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) are related to diazotrophic abundance and community composition (Hsu and Buckley, 2009; Stewart et al., 2011).The community composition, in turn, is influenced by land use, soil physical properties, nitrogen quantity, and availability (Calderoli et al.,2017; Chen et al., 2019a; Wang et al., 2021). Diazotrophs and nitrogen mineralization have a significant impact on soil nitrogen availability.Nevertheless, we still do not understand how they responded to converting BL seedling plantations to coppice stands.

    Most researchers have focused on the bacteria and fungi communities,but little attention has been paid to functional genes,for instance,the nifH gene.For example,one study found that converting an Amazon rainforest to a cattle pasture altered the diazotrophic composition(Mirza et al.,2014).Another study found that forest conversion may directly or indirectly affect soil nitrogen mineralization rate by affecting soil biotic and abiotic factors such as available N(Rigby et al.,2016).Therefore,a study of the nifH gene and N mineralization can provide an insight into the influence of N dynamics on BL coppice plantations. Nitrogen is a crucial nutrient for plant and microbial growth that influences plant productivity and microbial decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems(LeBauer and Treseder, 2008). Soil N availability for plant growth is dependent on the rate of soil N mineralization,in which soil organic N is converted to inorganic N by soil microorganisms and invertebrates(Chapin III et al.,2011; Murphy et al.,2017). Such processes,including ammonification and nitrification, convert organic N (proteins, sugars,cellulose, lignin, etc.) to available inorganic forms (NH4+and NO3-) (Fu et al., 2019). Soil N mineralization directly affects nitrification by providing substrates to nitrifying microorganisms(Petersen et al.,2012).The quantity of NH4+-N is the rate-limiting step in soil nitrification. The soil abiotic properties, such as soil pH, soil moisture, and soil depth,could describe the N mineralization rate (Urakawa et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018; Thapa et al., 2021). At the same time, many recent studies have found that the vegetation type and microbial community also substantially affect N mineralization(Li et al.,2019).This process affects the quantity and quality of organic materials, soil biological activity,microbial community composition, and N plant-use efficiency (Rachid et al., 2013; Rahman et al., 2017; Kong et al., 2019; Yao et al., 2019).Therefore, studying vegetation types and soil properties is relevant to understanding nitrogen mineralization.

    Reforestation decreases soil erosion and improves soil fertility,potentially affecting soil N fractions(Guillaume et al.,2018).Because of its effect on recovering N cycling processes,BL was used as a pioneer tree species for afforestation Mount Tai to preserve soil (Meng et al., 2020).Generally, different N requirements of specific plant species may be an underlying driver of the diazotrophic communities (Kong et al., 2019).However,the specific composition of diazotrophic communities and their associations with soil N availability under black locust coppice plantations are largely unknown,limiting our ability to evaluate the effectiveness of reforestation.Previous studies have confirmed that the conversion from seedling to coppice stands reduced soil quality and led to decreasing the relative abundance of Rhizobium in coppice plantations(Li et al.,2021).However, the impact of coppice plantation on nitrogen fixation and nitrogen mineralization is unknown.Accordingly,this study hypothesized that the coppice diazotrophic community negatively impacts soil fertility in the BL coppice plantations. Our objectives were to (1) determine the effects of conversion from seedling to coppice stands in BL plantations on the composition structure of diazotrophic community; (2) examine the effect of conversion on net N mineralization,and(3)explore the driving factors for the conversion in the diazotrophic communities.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Study area

    The study site is on Mount Tai,Shandong Province,China.The mean annual temperature is 12.8°C, and the mean annual precipitation is 1,124.6mm.The existingBLstandsaremostlycoppiceplantations,mainly distributed on south-facing slopes at elevations of 500–1,000 m.The study was carried out in: i) a first-generation seedling plantation stand (from now on referred to as“First”or“F”,36°16′45′′N,117°3′26′′E),ii)a firstregeneration coppice stand generated after clear-cutting of a seedling stand(referred to as“Second”or“S”,36°16′40′′N,117°03′21′′E)and iii)a second-generation coppice stand generated after clear-cutting of a firstgeneration coppice stand (referred to as “Third” or “T”, 36°16′40′′N,117°3′22′′E). The principal species in the understory vegetation community are Vitex negundo, Oplismenus undulatifolius, Digitaria sanguinali,Paspalum thunbergii,Rubia cordifolia,and Oxalis corniculate.The soil type is classified as Alfisols. We sampled plants and collected rhizosphere and bulk soil samples for further analysis for each stand.Detailed information about the plots can be found in Li et al.(2021).

    2.2. Sampling design

    Three 20 m×20 m plots were randomly selected in each seedling and coppice stand for a total of nine plots. The bulk soil and rhizosphere soil were sampled in the nine plots in August 2018.Bulk soil was sampled at 10 cm from the soil surface using a soil auger(length 50 cm,diameter 5 cm,volume 100 cm3). Rhizosphere soil samples were collected by brush (5 samples per plot).The soil samples were transported on ice to the laboratory,where they were sieved(mesh size 2 mm)and divided into two parts,one air-dried and stored at room temperature before chemical analysis,and the other stored at-80°C and-4°C for further analysis.In this article,FR,SR,and TR refer to the rhizosphere of F,S,and T,respectively;and FNR,SNR,and TNR refer to bulk soil of F,S,and T,respectively.

    2.3. Soil physicochemical property analysis

    A subsample of 50 g of soil was stored at-4°C and later used for the determination of microbial biomass C(MBC)and N(MBN)by the method of chloroform fumigation extraction (Margesin and Schinner, 2005).During chloroform fumigation, soil incubation in gaseous CHCl3was extended from 24 to 48 h in our experiment to thoroughly kill all soil microorganisms(Tian et al.,2017).After chloroform fumigation,the soil samples were extracted using the solution of 0.5 mol?L-1K2SO4.The soil extraction solution was then analyzed by Multi N/C 3100 using the high-temperature combustion method(Analytik Jena AG,Germany).The factors in the transformations from the detected soil total organic carbon and nitrogen to microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen were 0.45 and 0.54,respectively(Margesin and Schinner,2005).

    The second subsample of 10 g was air-dried and used to determine soil nitrogen mineralization rates.N mineral fractions(NH4+-N and NO3--N) were determined using the aerobic incubation method (Hart et al.,1994).For this purpose,10 g soil through a 2-mm sieve was adjusted to 40%of the maximum water holding capacity.Samples were incubated in a constant temperature incubator at 25°C, and N extractions were performed at 0 and 14 d after incubation. The NH4+-N and NO3--N contents were extracted using 50 mL of 2 mol?L-1KCl solution. The soil mineralization ratio was obtained by subtracting the initial(zero-day)and final(14 days)ammonium(NH4+-N)and nitrate(NO3--N)concentrations(Hart et al.,1994).Net N mineralization rates were calculated as the changes in mineral N contents and reported in mg N dry soil per 14 d.

    The third subsample of 30 g was air-dried and used to determine soil nutrient content, including total soil carbon (C), total soil nitrogen (N),soil nitrate(NO3--N),soil ammonium(NH4+-N),and soil phosphorus(P).The C and N contents were measured by combustion in an elemental analyzer(Costech ECS4010,Italy).NO3--N and NH4+-N were extracted by shaking 20 g of fresh soil in 100 mL of 2 mol?L-1KCl solution for 1 h and were analyzed with a continuous flow analytical system(AA3,German).Available N (AN) was a sum of NO3--N and NH4+-N. P content was extracted using the Olsen method and measured by a continuous flow analytical system(AA3,German).

    2.4. DNA extraction, nifH gene amplification

    Microbial DNA was extracted from soil samples (frozen at -80°C)using the E.Z.N.A.? soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, US)according to the manufacturer's protocols. The final DNA concentration and purification were determined by NanoDrop 2000 UV–vis spectrophotometer(Thermo Scientific,Wilmington,USA),and DNA quality was checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The primer pair PolF (5′-TGCGAYCCSAARGCBGACTC-3′) and PolR (5′-ATSGCCATCATYTCRCCGGA-3′) was used for amplifying the nifH gene. Each reaction was carried out in a 25-μL volume which included 0.5 μL of each primer(10 μmol?L-1),2 μL DNA template(1–10 ng),12.5 μL of Premix Taq?(2× ) (Takara) and 9.5 μL ddH2O. The PCR conditions were as follows: 5 min at 95°C,and then 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C,30 s at 58°C,and 45 s at 72°C,and a final extension at 72°C for 6 min(Wang et al.,2018b).With three replicates, each sample was amplified. Then, three PCR replicates of the same sample were mixed with the same quality based on concentration and purified with AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences,Union City,CA,USA).

    2.5. Illumina MiSeq sequencing

    Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar and paired-end sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA)according to the standard protocols by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered with 97%similarity cutoff using UPARSE(version 7.1,http://drive5.com/uparse/), and chimeric sequences were identified and removed using UCHIME.The taxonomy of each nifH gene sequence was analyzed by the RDP Classifier algorithm (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/)against the Silva(SSU123)nifH database using a confidence threshold of 70%(Gaby and Buckley,2014).

    2.6. Statistical analysis

    All responses were modeled as two-way factorial designs using Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) that included the main effects of soil, generation, and soil × generation interaction. A random heteroscedasticity component for each soil × generation combination was also included for all models. Each model utilized the appropriate conditional distribution of the response based on the response range.Specifically, C/N, C/P, MBC, MBC/BN, MBN, N/P, NH4+-N, and NO3--N were modeled as Gamma with a log link,Ra,Rm,and Rn were modeled as Gaussian with an identity link,and C,N,P were modeled as Beta with a logit link. In addition, we computed Hill Numbers analogous to Shannon's Diversity Index(q=1)for each treatment combination(Hill,1973;Chao et al., 2014). The responses are thus defined as effective species counts and modeled as a Poisson distribution with a log link.

    All model prediction confidence bounds were controlled for familywise experiment rates using the Sidak adjustment method with α =0.05(Westfall and Young,1993).In addition,multiple comparisons were adjusted for family-wise experiment rates using Tukey's HSD method,with α=0.05(Kramer,1956).Data were analyzed using the R statistical environment version 4.0.5 (R Core Team, 2021) using R packages glmmTMB(Brooks et al.,2017)and emmeans(Lenth,2021).

    To illustrate the clustering of different samples and to further determine the microbial community structure, Principal coordinate analysis(PCoA),Permutational multivariate analysis of variance(PERMANOVA)based on Bray-Curtis distance were used to analyze the diazotrophic communities at the genus level. Redundancy analysis (RDA), Random Forest, and Mantel tests were used to link the variation within the microbial community, functional structure, and soil properties to environmental variables. Spearman correlation analysis examined the relationships between the abundance of the nifH gene,soil nutrients,and net N mineralization. PCoA, RDA, PERMANOVA, Mantel tests were conducted using the vegan package with R software. Random Forest analysis was conducted using the randomForest package with R software.Circos plot was created with the Circo-0.67-7 software (http://circos.c a/). Data analysis and graphing were performed with SPSS version 26.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, USA) and R software (version 3.6.1).

    3. Results

    3.1. Effects of conversion on soil properties

    Bulk soil and rhizosphere soil properties of seedlings and coppice plantations were significantly different(Fig.1).NO3--N is the main form of available soil N in BL plantations,ranging from 59.28%to 76.01%.We found that TN,MBN,and MBC in both bulk soil and rhizosphere soil were significantly higher in seedlings plantations than coppice plantations(23.32%–80.24%and 18.71%–58.30%,respectively).

    3.2. Effects of conversion on soil nitrogen mineralization rate

    The bulk soil and rhizosphere nitrification(Rn),ammonification(Ra),and net N mineralization (Rm) were significantly higher in seedling plantations than in coppice plantations (Fig. 2). In addition, we found that the Rn and Rm were positive, while the Ra was negative. For example, in bulk soil of F, Rn, Ra, and Rm of seedling plantations were 30.89, -5.45 and 25.44 mg N?kg-1?14 d-1. Rn, Ra, and Rm in the rhizosphere were 30.16, -8.10 and 22.05 mg N?kg-1?14 d-1, respectively. Conversion from seedling to coppice plantations resulted in decreases of 31.98%, 40.18%, 47.44% in bulk soil, and 25.00%,130.12%,81.95%in the rhizosphere, respectively.

    Fig.1. Bulk soil and rhizosphere physicochemical properties in seedlings plantations and coppice plantations.Appropriate 95%confidence intervals were constructed from estimates derived from the GLMM. F, S, and T represent seeding plantations, first-generation coppice plantations, and second-generation coppice plantations,respectively. Different letters in columns show significant differences as determined by Tukey's HSD method (p <0.05).

    3.3. Diversity and community structure of soil diazotrophs

    The Hill diversity indices of soil diazotrophs ranged from 22.35 to 39.84 and were significantly different between the seedling and coppice plantations (Fig. 3a). The diazotrophs Hill diversity indices in the seedling plantations were 29.02 and 35.34,significantly higher than those in the coppice plantations (p <0.05, S (22.35 and 24.30), T (29.56 and 39.84), respectively)for bulk soil and rhizosphere.

    The relative abundance of the soil diazotrophs at the genus level based on the nifH gene is displayed in Figs. 3b and 4. There were significant differences in soil diazotrophic communities between seedling and coppice plantations for bulk soil and rhizosphere soil(PERMANOVA,bulk soil, p = 0.001, Rhizosphere, p = 0.001). Overall, the BL soil diazotrophic communities in the seedling plantations were dominated by Proteobacteria at the phylum level (Fig. S1), unclassified-c-Alphaproteobacteria (22.37% and 29.28%), unclassified-o-Rhizobiales (15.40% and 13.31%),and Bradyrhizobium(12.00%and 11.74%)for rhizosphere and bulk soil at the genus level(Fig.3b),respectively.However,in the firstgeneration coppice plantations (S), the dominant genus was Rhodopseudomonas(43.56%and 41.84%),followed by Bradyrhizobium(17.47%and 22.72%). In the second-generation coppice plantations (T), the dominant genus was Bradyrhizobium(45.95%and 47.86%),followed by unclassified-k-norank-d-Bacteria (16.40% and 14.92%) for rhizosphere and bulk soil at the genus level,respectively.The relative abundances of Rhodopseudomonas and Bradyrhizobium were close to half of the total in coppice plantations (Fig. 3, Fig. S2), suggesting an increasingly homogenized composition of diazotrophic communities.

    We used Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) to evaluate the similarity of diazotrophic communities in bulk soil and rhizosphere. The PCoA plot(Fig.4) exhibited the Bray-Curtis distance for nitrogen-fixing microorganism communities found in seedling and coppice plantations for bulk soil and rhizosphere. In bulk soil, the distribution of the nitrogen-fixing microorganism communities in the seedling plantations was clearly separated from coppice plantations; the same results appeared in rhizosphere soil. Based on Adonis tests, a significant difference was observed between the BL seedling and coppice plantations,bulk soil(R2=0.586,p <0.001),and rhizosphere(R2= 0.625,p <0.001).

    Based on the composition and abundance of OTUs, the dominant diazotrophic communities are clustered into four categories (Fig. 5).Spe01 includes Rhodopseudomonas and Bradyrhizobiaceae;Spe02 includes Alphaproteobacteria, Rhizobiales, and Mesorhizobium; Spe03 includes Bradyrhizobium; and Spe04 include Beijerinckiaceae, Rhodospirillaceae, Azospirillum,Skermanella,unclassified-k-norank-d-Bacteria,and unclassifiedp-Proteobacteria. Spe02 and Spe03 are significantly correlated with soil properties (Fig. 6). Notably, Spe02 consists of only the Bradyrhizobium community,a special group in the nitrogen-fixing bacteria community of Robinia pseudoacacia.

    3.4. Relationships among soil properties, soil N mineralization rate, and diazotrophic communities

    Fig. 2. Bulk soil and rhizosphere mineralization rate in seedlings plantations and coppice plantations. F, S, and T represent seeding plantations, first-generation coppice plantations, and second-generation coppice plantations, respectively. Subfigures a, b, and c represent nitrification (Rn), ammonification (Ra), and net N mineralization(Rm).All data are presented as boxplots calculated from six biological replicates.Multiple comparisons were adjusted for family-wise experiment rates using Tukey's HSD method, also with α = 0.05. The lower and upper hinges correspond to the first and third quartiles (the 25th and 75th percentiles), and the centerline corresponds to the median.The upper whisker extends from the upper hinge to the largest value no further than 1.5×IQR from the hinge(where IQR is the inter-quartile range or distance between the first and third quartiles).Likewise,the lower whisker extends from the lower hinge to the smallest value no further than 1.5 × IQR from the hinge. Different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments by Tukey's HSD method at (p <0.05). The same is below.

    Fig. 3. Hill diversity indices (a) and Taxonomic classification of nifH gene reads (b) of bulk soil and rhizosphere in seedling plantations and coppice plantations at the genus level, using RDP classifier.Rhodocyclaceae: unclassified_f_Rhodocyclaceae;Alphaproteobacteria: unclassified_c_Alphaproteobacteria; Rhizobiales: unclassified_o_Rhizobiales; Bacteria:unclassified_k_norank_d_Bacteria; Proteobacteria:unclassified_p_Proteobacteria; Beijerinckiaceae: unclassified_f_Beijerinckiaceae; Rhodospirillaceae:unclassified_f_Rhodospirillaceae.

    Fig. 4. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the relative abundances of diazotrophs at the genus level based on Bray-Curtis distance.Red Circle and blue triangle represent the bacterial community of rhizosphere and bulk soil in seedling plantations(FR and FNR);Green diamond and yellow square represent the bacterial community of rhizosphere and bulk soil in first generation coppice stands (SR and SNR); Purple cross and orange triangle represent the bacterial community of rhizosphere and bulk soil in second generation coppice stands(SR and SNR). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend,the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

    The Spearman rank-order correlation was used to evaluate the relationships between soil properties and the diazotrophic communities(Fig. 6). N mineralization was closely correlated with soil properties.Nitrogen had a positive correlation with Rn(r=0.78,p <0.01)and Rm(r = 0.77, p <0.01), but negative correlation with Ra (r = -0.59, p <0.01).Ra was positively correlated with C/N(r=0.48,p <0.01)and N/P(r=0.50,p <0.01).The soil properties exhibited a significant correlation with Mesorhizonium, f_Beijerinchiaceae, o_Rhizobiales, c_Alphaproteobacteria, and Bradyrhizobium. c_Alphaproteobacteria was significantly and positively correlated with MBN,Rn,Ra and Rm(r=0.713,p <0.001;r=0.636,p <0.001;r=0.70,p <0.001;r=0.77,p <0.001,respectively).Bradyrhizobium was significantly and negatively correlated with MBN,Rn,Ra and Rm(r=-0.592,p <0.001;r=-0.524,p <0.01;r=-0.455,p <0.01;r= -0.566,p <0.001,respectively).

    Thirteen variables were selected to perform RDA on diazotrophic community composition. The RDA analysis for the soil attributes explained 64.33% of the data variability in the first two axes (Fig. 7).There were obvious differences in type and quantity of factors affecting community compositions among samples. For FR and FNR samples,diazotrophic communities were closely related to C,P,N,MBN,MBC,Rn,Ra, and Rm. In terms of SR and SNR samples, four factors affected the diazotrophic structures including NO3--N, N/P, NH4+-N, C/P and MBC/MBN.However,only C/N factor has an influence on the communities of TR and TNR samples (Fig. 7). The Mantel test analysis showed that Rn,Ra,Rm,and MBN were the important factors in shaping the diazotrophic communities(Table 1).In addition,the results of random forest analysis also showed that Rn, Ra, Rm, and MBN were the most important environmental variables linked to changes in diazotrophic community composition(Fig.S3).

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Multi-generation coppice plantations affect the soil nutrients

    Black locust is an ideal tree species for short-rotation biomass production with many advantages such as rapid growth, high drought tolerance, and nitrogen-fixation, as well as the ability to reproduce via stump shoots in response to harvest(Carl et al.,2019).Nevertheless,the multi-generation coppice plantations on Mount Tai negatively impacted soil quality(Li et al.,2021).Our study supports previous observations of the adverse effects of forest conversion on soil properties,soil microbial communities,and enzyme activities(Wang et al.,2017;Cai et al.,2018;Yang et al.,2018).Additionally,our results revealed that the plantation conversion from seedling to coppice stands significantly decreased the concentration of soil N, P, MBC, and MBN, while increased soil NH4+-N and C/N concentrations(Fig.1).There were no significant differences in other soil variables,indicating that the impact of forest conversion on soil nutrients is inconsistent,partly in line with the results of Li et al.(2021).These outcomes may be associated with complex nutrient pools in forest ecosystems(Yang et al.,2018)and negative ammonification(Fig.2).

    Forest conversion has a specific effect on soil C and N transformations(Yang et al., 2018). Our results showed that plantation conversion increased the rhizosphere carbon and decreased bulk soil carbon by including N-fixers that improved the soil C,but the response may be siteand species-specific(Hoogmoed et al.,2014).As a light-demanding tree species, black locust growth is limited if the light availability is weak(Carl et al.,2019).In BL coppice plantations,the density of black locust regeneration is higher. Due to the already-established root systems, BL grows faster and obtains energy from light. Subsequently, the microbial community may require higher amounts of rhizosphere C for their energy consumption that in turn fixes more gaseous N2. An earlier study found that the N content in plantations' soils decreased remarkably following the conversion from natural forests (Xu et al., 2010), and our results support this finding (Fig. 1). In BL plantations, soil nitrogen input primarily comes from the decomposition of plant detrital input and roots and biological nitrogen fixation(Yang et al.,2011).The outputs are the harvesting and removal of the plant (a loss from the ecosystem) and nitrogen leaching to groundwater or emission to the atmosphere(Li et al.,2012). BL coppice plantations have lower net mineralization and decreased nitrogen inputs,further decreasing soil nitrogen.

    Fig. 5. Hierarchical clustering tree on OTU level using Weighted-UniFrac distance. Spe01 include Rhodopseudomonas, Bradyrhizobiaceae; Spe02 include Alphaproteobacteria, Rhizobiales, Mesorhizobium; Spe03 include Bradyrhizobium; Spe04 include Beijerinckiaceae, Rhodospirillaceae, Azospirillum, Skermanella,Bacteria, Proteobacteria. Spearman correlation coefficients between soil properties and dominant diazotrophic communities were calculated for all soil samples. Colors indicate the direction of the correlation. Blue cells correspond to significant negative correlations and red cells correspond to significant positive correlations. Only the relative abundance of diazotrophic communities >1% was shown in the plot. C: total carbon, N: total nitrogen, P: total phosphorus,C/N:C:N ratio,C/P:C:P ratio,N/P:N:P ratio,NH4+-N: soil ammonium, NO3--N: soil nitrate, Ra:ammonification rate, Rn: nitrification rate, Rm: net N mineralization rate, MBC: soil microbial biomass carbon, MBN: soil microbial biomass nitrogen, MBC/MBN:MBC:MBN ratio. *0.01 <p ≤0.05,**0.001 <p ≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend,the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

    Fig. 6. Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between soil properties and soil net nitrogen mineralization rates. Mantel test of the relationships between soil environmental factors and the diazotrophic community structure were based on hierarchical clustering tree. * Significant at p <0.05, ** Significant at p <0.01, ***Significant at p <0.001.

    Fig. 7. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the relationships of soil environmental variables with the diazotrophic communities' structure at the genus level. The environmental variables are indicated with arrows and include C(total carbon),N (total nitrogen), P (total phosphorus), C/N (C:N ratio), C/P (C:P ratio), N/P(N:P ratio), NH4+-N (soil ammonium), NO3--N (soil nitrate), Ra (ammonification rate),Rn(nitrification rate),Rm(net N mineralization rate),MBC(soil microbial biomass carbon),MBN(soil microbial biomass nitrogen),MBC/MBN(MBC:MBN ratio). Red Circle and blue triangle represent the bacterial community of rhizosphere and bulk soil in seedling plantations(FR and FNR);Green diamond and yellow square represent the bacterial community of rhizosphere and bulk soil in first generation coppice stands (SR and SNR); Purple cross and orange triangle represent the bacterial community of rhizosphere and bulk soil in second generation coppice stands (SR and SNR). The negative data (Ra) uses a log format technique by y′ = log(y + 1). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

    Table 1 Mantel test of the relationships of soil environmental variables with the diazotrophic community structure at the genus level.

    Phosphorus is an essential nutrient for BL trees (Carl et al., 2018),which could affect the nitrogen fixation of plants(Augusto et al.,2013).Our results suggest that the decrease in soil P was caused by plantation conversion,which was in accord with carbon and nitrogen reduction(Li et al.,2021).The same trend also appeared in MBN and MBC,which are considered indicators of soil quality and as a measure of N availability for plants due to their sensitivity to soil disturbance by land-use changes and tillage activities(Yang et al.,2010).MBC and MBN provide the basis for the survival of soil microbes(Vitali et al.,2016;Moghimian et al.,2017).Additionally, our results showed that MBN and MBC were negatively correlated with soil C/N ratio and positively with total N,results which were in line with the findings of Moghimian et al.(2017)and Hoogmoed et al. (2014). The C/N ratio can be a critical indicator for determining biological processes. Earlier work has shown that soil C/N ratio decreased after planting black locust(Cao et al.,2017).By contrast,our results revealed soil C/N ratio increased in coppice plantations due to lower soil nitrogen content.Lower soil C/N will reduce the turnover and retention of soil nutrients(Ng et al.,2014).

    4.2. Multi-generation coppice plantations reduce the soil N mineralization

    Net N mineralization rate and mineral N content in seedling plantations were significantly higher in coppice plantations(Fig.2),and Rn and Rm were positive,while Ra was negative.The results suggest that soil net nitrogen mineralization decreased in coppice plantations. Our results demonstrated that nitrification exceeded the net mineralization, consistent with earlier observations (Wei et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2019).Typically,soil microorganisms are C limited,and it has been shown that increased N can depress total microbial biomass. Generally, net soil N mineralization rate decreases with a decrease in root biomass (Wang et al., 2018a) due to the immobilization of inorganic N to satisfy the microbial N demand.Furthermore,a lower soil C/N ratio accelerates the activities of microorganisms(Usman et al.,2000;Wei et al.,2011),which would explain our experimental results.In seedlings plantations,the C/N ratio was lower than that of coppice plantations. We found that NH4+-N content in coppice plantations was higher than that in seedling plantations, and the higher NH4+-N level in the soil might inhibit soil N mineralization rate(Geisseler et al.,2010).

    As microbial communities drive soil net nitrogen mineralization,the reductions in soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) were positively related to N mineralization rates(Geisseler et al.,2010;Wu et al.,2021).Our results showed that the MBC was lower in coppice plantations(Table 1), which can increase the efficiency of soil N mineralization (Li et al., 2020). Still, we found lower N mineralization in coppice plantations, suggesting that the N cycle was limited. N mineralization of soil depends strongly on the substrate contents,including total N,soil organic C, water-soluble N, and dissolved organic C (Zhang et al., 2016). Our results also showed that the Rn and Rm had positive correlations with soil C, N, and P, consistent with Booth et al. (2005). Therefore, it might be that the BL coppice plantation grows faster,requiring a large amount of nutrients,and the uptake of mineral N by roots may result in decreased mineral N(Kong et al.,2019).

    4.3. Multi-generation coppice plantations normalize soil diazotrophic communities

    The diazotrophic microorganisms are primary drivers of soil BNF that may be significantly correlated with the communities' attributes,including abundance, composition, and activity (Reed et al., 2011;Pogoreutz et al., 2017). Our results show that diazotrophic community composition was significantly altered by the coppice plantations. In our study, the Proteobacteria phylum was the most dominant diazotrophic group (Fig. S1), generally similar to results from other studies (Wang et al.,2017;Chen et al.,2019a).However,the diazotrophic communities'structures at the genus level were significantly different in seedling and coppice plantations(Figs.3-5 and Fig.S2).Our results suggest that forest conversion-induced variation in diazotrophic β-diversity and reduced α-diversity (Hill index) is consistent with Peerawat et al. (2018). At the genus level, the diazotrophic communities in coppice plantations commonly transition to Rhodopseudomonas or Bradyrhizobium-dominated communities(Fig.3 and Fig.S2),but in seedling plantations,there were higher relative abundances of several diazotrophic genera, including

    Rhodopseudomonas, Bradyrhizobium, o_Rhizobiales, and c_Alphaproteobacteria, which could favor distinct subsets of diazotrophic communities,suggesting that there is a tendency of simplification of diazotrophs in coppice plantations. The change in beta diversity in response to forest conversion is an indication of biotic homogenization,and the process by which the similarity of communities increases over time and/or space(Rodrigues et al., 2013). In our results, the increasing similarity in the beta diversity of coppice plantations(Fig.S4)shows the soil diazotrophic homogenization in coppice plantations. The homogeneity of this characteristic will change the function of the ecosystem and reduce the ecosystem's ability to recover from disturbances.

    Generally, BNF is carried out by the Rhizobia in the anaerobic environment of the nodule.The Rhizobiales are well known for forming root nodules with legumes and conducting symbiotic nitrogen-fixation(Schmidt et al., 2017). In our results, the relative abundance of Rhizobiales in seedling plantations was higher than that in coppice plantations,which indicated it had more root nodules and, to some extent, it had a stronger BNF ability. Therefore, it would produce more ammonium.Because of the lower nitrification in coppice plantations, the rate of ammonium transferring to nitrate decreased, which would lead to the accumulation of ammonium (Fig. 1). It has also shown that increased available soil N inhibits colonization by Rhizobia.If the plant demands for N are being met by available soil N, then the need for the symbiotic relationship with Rhizobia is no longer advantageous to the plant.

    4.4. Nitrogen mineralization and soil properties affect the diazotrophic community composition

    Soil nutrient content has been recognized as a key determinant for soil microorganism survival and species compositions (Kerfahi et al.,2016; Meng et al., 2017; Wood et al., 2017). The composition and abundance of the diazotrophic communities in soil may be correlated with several environmental factors and vegetation types (Rodríguez--Blanco et al.,2015;Saleem et al.,2018;Chen et al.,2019a).In our study,the soil nutrient (N and P) was significantly correlated with the diazotrophs. Mantel test results showed that the diazotrophic community presence was explained mainly by nitrogen mineralization, MBN, MBC,N, and P (Table 1). Nitrogen mineralization was the most significant contributor to diazotrophs in measured variables.Previous studies have shown that soil N and MBC drive diazotrophic community structure dominance (Chen et al., 2019a; Zhao et al., 2021). Our results showed that the soil nitrogen had a significantly positive correlation with diazotrophic community structures, consistent with the results of Che et al.(2018). In our study, coppice plantations had higher levels of inorganic nitrogen (NH4+-N and NO3--N), which may reduce the activity of diazotrophs (DeLuca et al., 1996; Xu et al., 2019) and reduce nifH gene expression (Mirza et al., 2014), and finally lower the BNF (Chen et al.,2019b). Along with the growth of BL, more rRNA is needed to increase the protein synthesis, which leads to an increase in the N content of leaves(Xu et al.,2019).Our results showed that coppice plantations had a lower P and higher N/P ratio, further inhibiting the BNF. The reason was that phosphorus is one of the critical factors limiting nitrogen fixation due to the high adenosine triphosphate(ATP)demand of BNF(Bell et al., 2014) and P deficiency-induced more restrictive effects on diazotrophic communities (Tang et al.,2017).

    Bradyrhizobium is a common slow-growing bacterium(Koponen et al.,2003), which plays an essential role in the nitrogen cycle in forest ecosystems(Meng et al.,2017).However,Bradyrhizobium can only fix N and increase N input after inoculating legume plants (Liu et al., 2019). We found that the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium in coppice plantations was higher than that in seedling plantations (Figs. 3 and 4, and Fig. S2), which suggests that coppice could increase its abundance. The explanation may be that the low nitrogen content and higher C/N in the soil of the coppice plantations stimulated the increase in the activity of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms (Nie et al., 2021). Studies have found that Bradyrhizobium has a pronounced capacity for N2fixation (Straub et al.,2004;S'anchez et al.,2011).However,its nitrogen fixation function is not sufficient to meet the growth needs of coppice plantations. In addition, we found that the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium was negatively correlated with N,MBN,MBC,Rn and Rm(Fig.5),which was consistent with the results of Hu et al.(2018).Therefore,it may be that N inhibits the activity of Bradyrhizobium(Xu et al.,2019),and soil nutrient availability was the most dominant factor in shaping diazotrophic community structure(Wang et al.,2017).

    5. Conclusions

    Our results suggest the conversion of black locust plantations impacts nifH microorganism communities, N mineralization, microbial biomass N,and soil properties.We found that the dominant species changed from

    Rhodopseudomonas, Bradyrhizobium, o_Rhizobiales, and c_Alphaproteobacteria in seedling plantations to Bradyrhizobium and Rhodopseudomonas in coppice plantations. This outcome suggests that the coppice stand can normalize diazotrophic soil communities, which in turn affects the function of diazotrophic communities.

    As the forest converted to different plantation types,the tendency of dominant species varied. Rm, Rn, and MBN were the most sensitive factors to diazotrophic microorganisms. Converting seedling plantation to a coppice plantation decreased the soil MBN,MBC,Rn,Rm,N,and P,but significantly increased the concentration of NH4+-N, demonstrating that plantation conversion had a positive impact on inorganic N, while the effects on soil mineralization and nifH were negative. NH4+-N produced by biological nitrogen fixation is more synthesized into organic nitrogen. Therefore, to increase the nitrogen fixation and nitrogen use efficiency of black locust, reducing the proportion of the multigeneration coppice plantations in this region is advisable.

    Authors’contributions

    KL and HMT conceived and designed the experiment; RQN and KL analyzed the data;HMT and WXS obtained the data in the field;KL and CRL wrote the first draft of the paper and WKM,STO and LSB contributed to the writing and data analysis. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    This work was supported by the Agricultural Science and Technology Fund for Forestry Sci-tech Innovation Project of Shandong Province(No.2019LY005), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31570705), Shandong Province Higher School Science and Technology Plan Project (No. J16LF09), and Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation(No. ZR2018PC006).

    Availability of data and materials

    The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    aMountain Tai Forest Ecosystem Research Station of State Forestry Administration, Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration for Silviculture of the Lower Yellow River, Forestry College of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China;bRocky Mountain Research Station, United States Forest Service, 2500 S. Pine Knoll Dr.,Flagstaff,AZ 86001,USA;cRocky Mountain Research Station,United States Forest Service,240 West Prospect Fort Collins,CO 80526,USA;dMount Tai Scenic Spot Management Committee, Tai'an 271000,Shandong,China.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Acknowledgments

    We are very grateful to all the students who assisted with data collection and the experiments. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on this paper.

    Appendix A. Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://do i.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100025.

    街头女战士在线观看网站| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 伦理电影免费视频| 久久久久精品性色| tube8黄色片| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| av在线app专区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 午夜日本视频在线| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 简卡轻食公司| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日本免费在线观看一区| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产在线男女| av播播在线观看一区| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 有码 亚洲区| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 黄片wwwwww| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 免费看日本二区| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲最大成人中文| 99热网站在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 黄片wwwwww| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 久久影院123| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日本wwww免费看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 如何舔出高潮| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| av免费在线看不卡| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲精品一二三| 日本与韩国留学比较| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久久久久人妻| 免费av不卡在线播放| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 久久久色成人| 日韩成人伦理影院| 99久久精品热视频| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 一级片'在线观看视频| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产综合精华液| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 久久这里有精品视频免费| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 高清毛片免费看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 在线观看国产h片| av不卡在线播放| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 日韩强制内射视频| 五月天丁香电影| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 男女国产视频网站| av黄色大香蕉| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 久久影院123| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 97在线视频观看| 少妇 在线观看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 欧美日本视频| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 日本av免费视频播放| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 成人二区视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 永久免费av网站大全| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲不卡免费看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 男女国产视频网站| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 免费观看的影片在线观看| av黄色大香蕉| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 色吧在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| .国产精品久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| av不卡在线播放| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 成人影院久久| 色视频www国产| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 日韩中字成人| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| tube8黄色片| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| av专区在线播放| 成人国产麻豆网| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产极品天堂在线| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 少妇丰满av| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久久色成人| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| av一本久久久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美zozozo另类| 老熟女久久久| av.在线天堂| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| av在线播放精品| av线在线观看网站| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 嫩草影院新地址| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 久久久久久久久久成人| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| tube8黄色片| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 人妻系列 视频| www.av在线官网国产| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 春色校园在线视频观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久影院123| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久久久久久国产电影| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产精品一区www在线观看| .国产精品久久| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 九色成人免费人妻av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 九草在线视频观看| 久久青草综合色| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| a 毛片基地| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久6这里有精品| 日韩成人伦理影院| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产在线男女| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| av国产免费在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本色播在线视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| av国产免费在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 成人二区视频| 美女主播在线视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 久久精品夜色国产| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 99热6这里只有精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 老司机影院成人| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产在视频线精品| 在线看a的网站| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 免费看av在线观看网站| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 直男gayav资源| 精品久久久久久电影网| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 97在线视频观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 99热6这里只有精品| freevideosex欧美| 一级av片app| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 最黄视频免费看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 免费少妇av软件| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 七月丁香在线播放| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 中国三级夫妇交换| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 黄色日韩在线| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 午夜免费观看性视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品.久久久| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| av不卡在线播放| 午夜福利高清视频| 成人二区视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 免费少妇av软件| 一级毛片电影观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 欧美性感艳星| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久久久久久久大av| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 午夜免费鲁丝| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久久久网色| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 免费大片18禁| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 久久午夜福利片| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 美女福利国产在线 | 成人无遮挡网站| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 在线播放无遮挡| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 18+在线观看网站| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 国产探花极品一区二区| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精品酒店卫生间| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产高清三级在线| 国产综合精华液| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 身体一侧抽搐| 一级av片app| 亚州av有码| 欧美日本视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产在线视频一区二区| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产在视频线精品| 国产精品无大码| 国产成人精品一,二区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 永久网站在线| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲色图av天堂| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 黑人高潮一二区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 五月天丁香电影| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 香蕉精品网在线| 多毛熟女@视频| 色网站视频免费| 欧美3d第一页| 国产男女内射视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产成人精品婷婷| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久久久性生活片| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲在久久综合| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 日本免费在线观看一区| 毛片女人毛片| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产永久视频网站| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 成人国产av品久久久| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产成人a区在线观看| 在线观看国产h片| 岛国毛片在线播放| 性色avwww在线观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久人人爽人人片av| 最黄视频免费看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲综合精品二区| 中文天堂在线官网| 欧美3d第一页| 久久久久久伊人网av| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡|