Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer: No longer young, but not yet old

Giandomenico Roviello, Daniele Lavacchi, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Martina Catalano, Enrico Mini

Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The treatment strategy employed in CRC patients is becoming highly dependent on molecular characteristics present at diagnosis and during treatment. Liquid biopsy is an emerging field in the management of this cancer, and its relevance as a potential diagnostic,prognostic, monitoring, and therapeutic tool makes it a viable strategy in the clinical management of CRC patients. Liquid biopsy also has certain limitations,but these limitations seem to be at the reach of near-future technological development. In this letter, we focus on the clinical perspectives of liquid biopsy in CRC with particular regard to the various biomarkers recently identified that have been shown to be potentially useful in multiple aspects of early stage or metastatic CRC.

Key Words: Colorectal cancer; Liquid biopsy; Circulating tumor DNA; Diagnosis;Prognosis; Targeted therapy

INTRODUCTION

The strategy employed for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is becoming highly dependent on molecular characteristics at diagnosis and during the course of treatment. New therapeutic options have been shown to be effective for metastatic disease, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, chemotherapy-free regimens for BRAFV600-mutated tumors, and new agents targeting the RAS signaling pathway[1,2].

In recent years, peripheral blood has been extensively studied as a new source of information and alternative to tumor biopsy samples, but its potential has not yet been elucidated. Among the most studied components, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and, more recently, exosomes have been considered promising biomarkers for monitoring treatment response,longitudinal molecular profiling, prognostication, and detection of minimal residual disease[3].

These advances coincided with the progressive increase in the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and with the development of new therapeutic approaches, including tumor-agnostic treatments[4].

LIQUID BIOPSY APPLICATION

CTC detection and enumeration have been studied as prognostic markers in several cancers. Sastreet al[5] evaluated the prognostic effect of the presence of CTCs detected using the CellSearch System in CRC patients (n= 97). The authors showed an association between CTC detection and stage. With a mean number of 3.4/7.5 mL CTCs, a higher rate of CTC positivity was observed in patients with stage IV disease (60.7%) than in those with stage II-III disease (20.7%-24.1%). Interestingly, no CTCs were detected in the healthy population[5]. Although CTC determination could represent a reliable surrogate for tumor burden, the possibility of longitudinal profiling of the disease offers far greater advantages for clinical practice than mere enumeration.

One of the most promising applications of liquid biopsy is the detection of early-stage CRC. For this purpose, CTC detection and quantification were studied with conflicting results regarding the discrimination of cancerous, precancerous, and other benign lesions[6]. Then, epigenetic changes were investigated to achieve a greater specificity. Methylated SEPT9 promoter DNA has been shown to be a potential biomarker with some limitations[7]. The interpretation of the results was, indeed, highly dependent on the choice of a favorable balance between sensitivity and specificity[8]. The detection of methylated SEPT9 promoter DNA through a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was validated in a prospective study and recently received FDA approval for CRC screening[9]. However, several limitations deserve to be considered, including the rates of false-positive and negative results, reproducibility, need for confirmatory tests, and schedule of tests over time.

In the last few years, ctDNA has been extensively studied to identify minimal residual disease. A prospective multicenter study conducted by Henriksenet al[10] evaluated the preoperative and postoperative ctDNA status in stage I-III CRC. Overall, postoperative ctDNA was associated with relapse-free survival (P＜ 0.001). In addition, the detection of ctDNA made it possible to anticipate radiological relapse by approximately eight months[10]. Consistent with this finding, Kasiet al[11]evaluated the ctDNA status in a cohort of 250 patients using Signatera liquid biopsy. The ctDNA detection rate was significantly associated with stage and response to treatment[11].

Figure 1 Potential clinical uses of liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer. ctDNA: Circulating tumor DNA; CTC: Circulating tumor cell; CRC: Colorectal cancer.

Another application of liquid biopsy for the treatment of metastatic CRC involves the monitoring of RAS mutational status to select patients for anti-EGFR rechallenge. In the CRICKET trial, no responses were observed with cetuximab-based chemotherapy in RAS and RAF wild-type mCRC patients who had RAS-mutated ctDNA at the time of progression. Given that RAS mutations in ctDNA could be detected in approximately half of the patients at the beginning of third-line treatment[12], longitudinal monitoring of the disease is essential to offer potentially effective treatments to patients with few residual therapeutic opportunities. In addition, molecular selection in chemorefractory patients allows us to avoid unnecessary side effects for ineffective treatments. However, at the time of diagnosis, the molecular alterations in tissue biopsy cannot be replaced with those in liquid biopsy until the key issue of the concordance of RAS mutational status between plasma and tumor tissue is completely resolved.The results may differ depending on the methods used. To date, several prospective trials have demonstrated a high concordance between the two techniques that is approximately equal to 85%-95%[13,14].

Exosome quantification was initially studied as a prognostic factor associated with clinical and pathological parameters and, consequently, survival outcomes[15]. Then, several studies analyzed specific exosomal miRNAs. Among these, Matsumuraet al[16] showed that CRC patients had higher levels of exosomal miR-17-92a than the control group. In addition, the authors identified the expression of exosomal miR-17-92a in peripheral blood as a prognostic factor for CRC patients[16]. Additionally,exosomal RNAs are used in the early diagnosis of cancers. For example, a panel consisting of two mRNAs (KRTAP5-4 and MAGEA3) and one lncRNA (BCAR4) serves as a promising candidate for CRC diagnosis[17-19].

Other studies are exploring the possibility of detecting other predictors of response, including microsatellite instability status and tumor mutational burden. The noninvasive detection of biomarkers predictive of response to ICIs is eagerly awaited to personalize treatments. However, their identification is profoundly limited by the amount of ctDNA and validation of specific assays. To date, there are no data to support their routine use[20,21].

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, liquid biopsy is no longer considered a mere surrogate of tumor biopsy with minimal invasiveness (Figure 1). New perspectives could radically change clinical practice[22]. Further advances will include refining serum sequencing techniques to gain a deeper understanding of tumor temporal heterogeneity and promote accessibility to tumor-agnostic treatments. In addition, the real-time monitoring of drug resistance beyond RAS may offer the opportunity to guide and monitor new therapies, such as anti-RAS agents, BRAFV600-directed or HER2-directed treatments, and ICIs. In addition, monitoring plasma with amplicon-based NGS in CRC patients may offer high sensitivity in detecting low-frequency mutations and promote the identification of clones with potentially targetable alterations. All these aspects will be crucial to ensure the paradigm of a continuum of care for metastatic CRC patients.

FOOTNOTES

Author contributions:All authors contributed to this paper; Roviello G designed the overall concept and outline of the manuscript; Antonuzzo L and Mini E contributed to the discussion and design of the manuscript; Lavacchi D and Catalano M contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript, illustrations, and literature review.

Conflict-of-interest statement:All authors have nothing to disclose.

Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Country/Territory of origin:Italy

ORCID number:Giandomenico Roviello 0000-0001-5504-8237; Daniele Lavacchi 0000-0001-9749-9511; Lorenzo Antonuzzo 0000-0003-3349-5604; Martina Catalano 0000-0003-1856-2848; Enrico Mini 0000-0003-1853-8557.

S-Editor:Fan JR

L-Editor:A

P-Editor:Fan JR