• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Data Centric Design: A New Approach to Design of Microstructural Material Systems

    2022-06-11 09:04:12WeiChenAkshyIyerRminBostnd
    Engineering 2022年3期

    Wei Chen*, Akshy Iyer Rmin Bostnd

    a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA

    b Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA

    Keywords:Materials informatics Machine learning Microstructure Reconstruction Bayesian optimization Mixed-variable modeling Dimension reduction Materials design

    ABSTRACT Building processing, structure, and property (PSP) relations for computational materials design is at the heart of the Materials Genome Initiative in the era of high-throughput computational materials science.Recent technological advancements in data acquisition and storage,microstructure characterization and reconstruction (MCR), machine learning (ML), materials modeling and simulation, data processing,manufacturing, and experimentation have significantly advanced researchers’ abilities in building PSP relations and inverse material design. In this article,we examine these advancements from the perspective of design research. In particular, we introduce a data-centric approach whose fundamental aspects fall into three categories: design representation, design evaluation, and design synthesis.Developments in each of these aspects are guided by and benefit from domain knowledge. Hence, for each aspect, we present a wide range of computational methods whose integration realizes datacentric materials discovery and design.

    1. Introduction

    Computational materials science provides a platform to achieve a deeper understanding of materials behavior across different length scales.This advancement is of particular interest to various industrial sectors,as it enables the cost-effective design of materials with engineered properties. The significance of computational materials science is also highlighted by the Materials Genome Initiative [1–4] and by the emergence of tools and frameworks such as materials by design [5,6], microstructure-sensitive design[7], and integrated computational materials engineering [8]. Since a material’s morphology heavily affects its properties [9,10], the central theme of these frameworks is inverse materials design,where the link between processing, structure, and property (PSP),also known as PSP relations, is elucidated in order to engineer materials with unprecedented properties [5,11]. The nonuniqueness of inverse PSP relations, while providing design flexibility,challenges the forward development of PSP maps(Fig.1(a)).

    For most of the 20th century, materials science research and development relied on the expensive and time-consuming Edisonian approach, which involves many trials and errors. This reliance delayed the deployment of emerging materials in commercial applications. To achieve a quantum leap in materials design, we need to shift the focus of materials research from simply explaining observed phenomena to developing scientific and predictive models that explain and predict materials behavior with quantitative factors that can be controlled in order to meet the desired objectives of industrial applications. To this end, the socalled high-throughput computational materials science [12] has been developed(Fig.1(b)).Here,the central concept is to first create a massive database that stores microstructural characteristics and properties of materials. Then, this dataset is used to train a machine learning(ML)model that can predict(or assist in the prediction of) PSP relations.

    A holistic design strategy for the bi-directional traversal of PSP relations relies on addressing some key challenges: cost-effective processing techniques, microstructure representation and reconstruction, dimensionality reduction, and tractable optimization methods. The emergence of open-source materials databases[13–17] and the recent technological advancements in ML techniques[18]are accelerating our ability to address some of these challenges using a data-centric approach for materials design (Fig. 2).From the perspective of design research, the fundamental aspects of this approach fall into the categories of design representation,design evaluation, and design synthesis. Each of these aspects is guided by the knowledge gained from the PSP data stored in databases.

    Fig.1. (a)Forward and inverse PSP links in the Materials Genome Initiative is not unique;(b)data-driven materials design via high-throughput simulations and experiments.

    Fig. 2. Data-centric framework for materials design. SMILES: simplified molecular-input line-entry system.

    ·Design representation.This encompasses methods that characterize the control factors in design—that is, the variables that influence materials’ behavior. These factors depend on the material system; hence, domain knowledge can greatly help their identification. For example, the band gap of inorganic compounds is entirely determined by the composition;thus, composition is itself a suitable representation. As another example, the electrical properties of polymer nanocomposites depend on composition and microstructure.Since these two factors are high dimensional,microstructure representation methods such as spectral density function (SDF) or physical descriptors must be used for dimensionality reduction.

    ·Design evaluation.This comprises the methodologies that are employed to evaluate PSP relations.The chosen method heavily depends on both the material and the spatiotemporal scales at which the underlying phenomenon takes place. For example, density functional theory (DFT) [19,20] calculations capture atomic-level properties such as band gap; molecular dynamics (MD) simulations model an ensemble of molecules[21–23];and continuum mechanics is suitable for phenomena occurring at higher length scales. Each of these methods require the calibration of embedded parameters and the validation of property predictions,which is accomplished through experimental data contained in the database. ML approaches,trained on experimental data or simulated data, have been widely used to build surrogate models that replace expensive physics-based simulations.

    ·Design synthesis.This involves searching the design space to identify (feasible) optimal designs that meet the targeted properties. The choice of optimization method depends on the nature of the design variables—whether there are qualitative and quantitative design variables, the presence of uncertainty or noise in property evaluations,and the computational cost of the method. To account for manufacturing feasibility and consistency with fundamental laws and known material behaviors, constraints and bounds are often imposed during optimization to ensure feasibility.

    It should be noted that the aforementioned three aspects are interrelated,as marked in Fig.2.For example,the choice of design representation—whether mixed variable (both qualitative or quantitative) or quantitative only—will impact the choice of ML technique in design evaluation and the choice of search algorithm in design synthesis.In this article,after first providing an overview of the role of data resources, we will review the challenges and state-of-the-art methods under each of these three aspects.

    2. Materials data resources

    Recent years have seen a rapid expansion of efforts toward building large data resources to accelerate materials discovery and design. The majority of such data resources are focused on metallic material systems and computational materials data,where software prediction tools can rapidly sweep through compositional space to predict specific structures and properties of interest.Examples of these data resources can be found in a recent perspective article [24]. We have been involved in developing a data resource for the design of soft materials in the field of polymer nanocomposites, called NanoMine [13,14,25] (Fig. 3). NanoMine has in-built data curation, exploration, visualization, and analysis capabilities, with curated data on over 2500 samples from the literature and individual laboratories.In principle,NanoMine offers a findable,accessible, interoperable, and reusable(FAIR) platform in which the data published in papers become directly findable and accessible via simple search tools, with open metadata standards that are interoperable with larger materials data registries; the platform also allows the easy reuse of data,such as benchmarking against new results.

    At the core of developing a materials data resource is the creation of a data schema particularized for the domain of interest.The materials vocabulary used to organize the metadata framework for NanoMine forms part of the high-level ‘‘polymer data core” [26]and is compatible with the indexing from other data stores such as the materials data facility (MDF) [27,28]. Built on the MDF, we have developed an ontology-enabled knowledge graph framework[14]that helps NanoMine establish relationships between the data that falls into the following six categories:

    · Data resource. The data in this category are the metadata of the source of the literature guided by Dublin core standards,which includes the digital object identifier (DOI) of the cited source, the authors, title, keywords, time, and source of the publication.

    ·Materials.The data in this category involve material constituent information, including the filler particle, polymer matrix,and surface treatments. The characteristics of pure matrix and filler, such as the polymer chemical structure, molecular weight, and particle density, can be entered along with the compositions (i.e., volume/weight fraction).

    Fig. 3. NanoMine: an online data resource for polymer nanocomposites (www.materialsmine.org).

    ·Processing.The data in this category are a sequential description of chemical syntheses and experimental procedures. The current template provides three major categories: solution processing, melt mixing, and in situ polymerization. For each processing step, detailed information such as temperature,pressure, and time can be entered.

    · Characterization. The data in this category provide information on the material characterization equipment, methods,and condition used.This information includes details on common microscopic imaging(scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy), thermal mechanical and electrical measurement, and nanoscale spectroscopy.

    · Properties. The data in this category are measured data of material properties,including mechanical,electrical,thermal,and volumetric properties. The property data can be in the format of a scalar or a higher dimension such as twodimensional (2D) spectroscopy or three-dimensional (3D)maps.

    · Microstructure. The data in this category comprise raw microscopic grayscale images capturing the nanophase dispersion state. Geometric descriptors can also be included to describe the statistical characteristics of the microstructure.

    The NanoMine ontology serves as an extensible knowledgerepresentation platform for materials science and allows the tools we develop for search, visualization, and data sharing to extend across multiple domains and interoperate with existing standards for scientific metadata. In addition to physical data, a collection of modular tools (for microstructure characterization and reconstruction (MCR) and for simulation software to model bulk nanocomposite material response) augment the knowledge generated by experiments.Integrating these different data sources to create new knowledge is critical for materials design. However,generating experimental or simulated data for the vast design space defined by the infinite combinations of constituents,microstructure morphology,and processing conditions is impractical.This signifies the need for data-centric methodologies that can effectively interrogate existing data and interpolate between them to support design representation, design evaluation, and design synthesis in discovering new high-performing materials.

    3. Design representation: Microstructure characterization and reconstruction

    Due to the high dimensionality of material microstructure, in microstructure-mediated design, microstructure representation is critical to ensure tractable design strategies.A good microstructure representation will ①provide significant dimension reduction;②embody salient morphological features; ③be physically meaningful in a way that can be easily mapped to the processing conditions; and ④provide a computationally efficient reconstruction procedure so that statistically equivalent microstructures can be created for assessing structure–property relations and quantifying the uncertainty associated with materials heterogeneity.

    MCR,coupled with ML and materials modeling and simulation,is an important component in discovering PSP relations and inverse material design in the era of high-throughput computational materials science.Given the vast diversity of microstructures observed in engineered materials,developing an MCR technique that is universally applicable is challenging.In our review article[29],we provide a comprehensive review of a wide range of MCR techniques and elaborate on their algorithmic details, their computational costs, and how they fit into the PSP mapping problems. Therein, interested readers may find detailed descriptions of multiple categories of MCR methods relying on statistical functions(such as n-point correlation functions), physical descriptors, SDF, texture synthesis, and supervised/unsupervised learning.

    Sample MCR techniques applied to heterogeneous microstructures are illustrated in Fig. 4. Perhaps the most well-known MCR method is based on spatial correlation functions (Fig. 4(b))[30,31], which provide probabilistic representations of the morphology but rely on a computationally intensive simulated annealing (SA) algorithm for reconstruction. The descriptor-based method(Fig.4(a))[32,33]represents microstructures using a small set of uncorrelated descriptors that embody significant microstructural details. Reconstruction involves a hierarchical optimization strategy to match the descriptors of reconstructed microstructures to targeted values. However, the usage of regular geometrical features and the assumption of ellipsoidal clusters deter its application for microstructures with irregular geometries. Other versions of descriptor-based MCR have been reported in the literature, as the choice of descriptor varies across materials systems and depends on the property of interest. The descriptor of nearest neighbor plays an important role in transport processes in particulate heterogeneous systems [9], microstructural evolution during recrystallization [34], particle coarsening [35], and liquid-phase sintering [34]. In fiber composites, the volume fraction (VF), size,shape, and spatial distributions of the fibers affect the mechanical properties of the composite,such as the Young’s modulus,ultimate strength,and fracture toughness[36–42].In crystalline structures,intergranular corrosion is sensitive to grain boundaries [43], so these boundaries must be used as descriptors for accurate design representation.

    ML and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, with their superior capability to learn and reconstruct complex features from isotropic/anisotropic microstructures, have gained popularity as a reconstruction tool. Applications of instance-based learning using support vector machines [44], supervised learning (Fig. 4(c))[45,46], and transfer learning (Fig. 4(d)) [18,47] have shown good reconstruction accuracy for complex materials morphology.Transfer learning-based methods, in particular, reconstruct statistically equivalent microstructures from only one given target microstructure by leveraging a pre-trained deep convolutional neural network (CNN), Visual Geometry Group 19 (VGG-19) [48], and a loss function that measures the statistical difference between the original and the reconstructed microstructures.Knowledge obtained in the proceeding model-pruning process is then leveraged in the development of a structure–property predictive model to determine the network architecture and initialization conditions.While deep learning-based approaches are powerful for handling complex microstructure morphology, these methods often do not provide the physical meaning in microstructure characterization,which hinders their use in materials design. Deep learning methods such as convolutional deep belief networks[49]and generative adversarial networks (GANs) [50] are being studied in ongoing research to provide a low-dimensional microstructure characterization that could be used as design variables.

    Fig. 4. Representative MCR techniques. (a) Physical descriptors; (b) statistical functions; (c) supervised learning; (d) deep convolutional network; (e) SDF. L-BFGS-B: a limited-memory quasi-Newton code for bound-constrained optimization;VGG-19:Visual Geometry Group 19,a convolutional neural network(CNN)that is 19 layers deep,trained on more than a million images from the ImageNet database.

    The SDF (Fig. 4(e)) [9,51–55], a frequency domain microstructure representation, has received significant attention for its capability to provide low-dimensional and physically meaningful descriptions of quasi-random material systems with complex morphology. For isotropic materials, SDF is a one-dimensional (1D)function of spatial frequency and represents the spatial correlations in the frequency domain. Although information contained in the SDF is equivalent to a two-point autocorrelation function,Yu et al.[51]have shown that the SDF provides a more convenient representation that can be easily and sensibly mapped to both processing conditions and properties. However, the computational cost and time for reconstructing high-resolution 3D microstructures using existing approaches [56–58] remains a challenge.Moreover,while existing SDF techniques are restricted to isotropic material systems, anisotropy is highly desired in some material systems, especially where the performance is a manifestation of an underlying transport phenomenon,such as in organic photovoltaic cells (OPVCs), batteries, thermoelectric devices, and membranes for water filtration. In our recent work [59] (Fig. 5), an anisotropic microstructure design strategy that leverages the SDF for the rapid reconstruction of high-resolution, two-phase, isotropic or anisotropic microstructures in 2D and 3D is developed that quantifies anisotropy via a dimensionless scalar variable termed the anisotropy index. Application to an active layer design case study for bulk heterojunction OPVCs shows that an optimized design with strong anisotropy outperforms isotropic active-layer designs. The physics-aware SDF approach also offers significant dimension reduction in design evaluations for understanding PSP links.

    Fig. 5. (a) Schematic representation of OPVCs. Inset shows excitons (orange)dissociating into protons(blue)and electrons(green),which travel to the anode and cathode, respectively. (b–d) Quantifying anisotropy for microstructures with elliptical SDF using anisotropy index α.

    4. Design evaluation: ML of PSP relations

    In physics-based materials design,ML techniques have become popular surrogates for costly PSP simulators.Recent review articles on using ML and AI techniques in materials design can be found for both molecular and polymer systems [60] and metallic systems[61,62].As shown in Fig.6,while a wide range of statistical models such as neural networks (NNs), random forests (RFs), trees, and Gaussian processes (GPs) [63] may be considered to create surrogate models,feature identification plays a critical role in obtaining a trustworthy statistical model with good predictive capability.

    The‘‘curse of dimensionality”(i.e.,the large number of descriptors or parameters)makes it extremely challenging to build predictive models with moderate sample data sizes. Hence, a combined feature-selection and feature-extraction approach is often used for dimension reduction by integrating these ML methods with materials science domain knowledge. In general, the objective of feature selection is threefold: improving predictive performance,providing more cost-effective predictors, and facilitating the discovery of underlying probabilistic principles of data generation[64]. Variable ranking is one of the most common techniques for feature selection, which enables the identification of the most informative features for building parsimonious predictive models.We have developed a range of techniques for microstructure feature selection. For example, Xu et al. [65] employed a two-step feature-selection process using descriptor pairwise correlation analysis (unsupervised learning based only on images) and the relief for regression (RReliefF) variable ranking approach [66](supervised learning based on structure–property relations) to select the physical descriptors that best control the damping property of polymer composites. Exploratory factor analysis [67] is another technique for identifying the important features by grouping the correlated descriptors together to build a set of latent common factors. We employed factor analysis into a structural equation-modeling approach for the design of dielectric polymer composites[39].In short, with feature selection,redundant statistical features can be dropped before further analyses are conducted.

    Different from feature selection, feature extraction transforms the feature space into a lower dimensional one in which the physical interpretations are diminished. While not preserving as many physical interpretations as feature-selection methods do, featureextraction techniques are advantageous in lowering the dimensionality of the space and are more easily trained to achieve a higher predictive accuracy [68,69]. Principle component analysis(PCA) is perhaps the most well-known linear dimensionality reduction method that can convert the high-dimensional feature space of 3D microstructure images to lower dimensional approximations [70]. It has also been demonstrated that PCA can effectively reduce the dimensionality of a two-point correlation function (commonly used in microstructure characterization) to only a few parameters [71–73]. Recent years have seen the rapid utilization of nonlinear embedding methods for feature extraction in materials design due to advances in ML techniques. One set is the bottom-up approach, in which it is assumed that a nonlinear manifold(embedded in the original feature space)governs the data distribution [74,75]. The second major set is the top–down approach, which attempts to preserve the geometric relations at all scales [76].

    Fig. 6. Feature identification and ML in materials engineering. PCA: principle component analysis.

    A wide range of ML techniques can be chosen for building a statistical model considering multiple factors,such as ①the nature of physical behavior (nonlinearity and irregularity); ②the type of input variables (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed); ③ the response of interest (continuous or classification); ④the data source(an experiment with noise,deterministic simulation,or stochastic simulation); and ⑤the amount of data(big or small data).Due to the need to understand causal relations in PSP mappings,supervised learning methods are commonly used. While linear regression is the most straightforward approach to apply and interpret the results, methods such as decision trees [77], k-nearest neighbors (k-NNs) [78], support vector machines [79,80], and RFs[81] are better suited for more complex behavior and mixedvariable inputs; they are also flexible for creating both regression and classification models.

    Recent research at the interface of ML and materials engineering has exponentially grown as big materials data are becoming increasingly available. NNs are networks connected by layers of artificial neurons, mimicking a human brain. A single neuron outputs weighted inputs through a so-called activation function.Deep neural networks (DNNs) are special NNs with more than one hidden layer that have superior learning power.For inorganic materials, crystal graph CNNs [82] have been used to model highly nonlinear behaviors using DFT-calculated thermodynamic stability entries taken from the Open Quantum Materials Database(OQMD)for accelerated materials discovery [83]. For nanocomposites, we have demonstrated that, while CNNs provide the capability of microstructure reconstruction and structure–property learning[47], GANs can be trained to learn the mapping between latent variables (LVs) and microstructures [50]. Thereafter, the lowdimensional LVs serve as design variables, and a Bayesian optimization (BO) framework can be applied to obtain microstructures with the desired material properties. For organic materials, the simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES) [84] provides a meaningful representation for large molecules and has been used to design synthetic molecules using variational autoencoders [85] and reinforcement learning [86].

    In the presence of small data,especially those from deterministic simulations such as DFT that require hours and days to compute one materials design,GPs provide a very viable approach.Fig.7 is a 1D example of a GP model fitted to the collected data of f(·). At each input x, the output f(x) is regarded as a normally distributed random variable,and the GP model predicts its mean and variance.The 95% prediction interval in the figure reflects the confidence bounds of the prediction [87,88].

    Standard GP methods were developed under the premise that all input variables are quantitative,which does not hold in materials systems that involve both qualitative and quantitative design variables representing material compositions,microstructure morphology,and processing conditions.We recently proposed a latent variable Gaussian process(LVGP)[89]modeling method that maps the levels of the qualitative factor(s)to a set of numerical values for some underlying latent unobservable quantitative variable(s). In other words,the qualitative variables are ‘‘converted”to quantitative ones, and traditional GPs modeling can then be applied to obtain the desired model.The LV mapping of the qualitative factors provides an inherent ordering and structure for the levels of the factor(s), which leads to substantial insight into the effects of the qualitative factors.Unlike most supervised ML methods,LVGP does not require hand-crafted features to describe qualitative variables.Rather, it learns the underlying ‘‘LVs” (Z) influencing response (y)by maximizing the likelihood function.

    Fig. 7. A 1D example of a GP model fitted to the collected data of f(·).

    Alleviating the need for feature engineering makes LVGP attractive for materials design applications.As conceptually illustrated in Fig. 8, the three qualitative levels of tj∈ {l1, l2, l3} of atom M in the family of M2AX phases are associated with points in the underlying high-dimensional space of {v1, v2, ...}, defined by physical parameters such as atomic radius, ionization energy, and electron affinities. LVGP provides a nonlinear manifold mapping z(t ) = g(v1(t ), v2(t ), ...from v to the latent space Z,and the distances between the three points indicate the differences between the three levels with respect to their impact on the property of interest. The mixed-variable LVGP approach has been tested and validated for a wide range of microstructural systems such as concurrent materials selection and microstructure optimization for optimizing the light absorption of a quasi-random solar cell [90],a combinatorial search of material constitutes for optimal hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite design[90],and concurrent composition and microstructure design of nanodielectric materials [91].Materials discovery and optimization are accomplished through the integration of the LVGP approach with BO for design synthesis,which is introduced next.

    5. Design synthesis: Goal-oriented BO

    Fig. 8. Qualitative material composition selection modeled using mapping from the true high-dimensional underlying quantitative variables to the 2D LVs Z.

    Materials discovery often takes years and decades, due to several challenges associated with design synthesis: ①Even though large datasets become available,the properties of known materials are far from the desired targets. The ML models created using the existing data are not capable of predicting behavior in the ‘‘extrapolated” regions. ②Vast combinations of candidate designs exist.In the design of organic materials,such as in polymer nanocomposite design, there are numerous choices of material constituents(e.g., the types of filler and matrix) and processing conditions(e.g., the type of surface treatment); each combination follows drastically different physical mechanisms with significant impact on the overall properties.In the design of inorganic materials such as microelectronics,the possible options of atomic structure–composition variable spaces are in the order of millions,defined by different structure prototypes (crystal graphs), composition (choice of chemistry elements), and stoichiometry (ratio of elements).③The existence of both quantitative and qualitative material design variables results in multiple disjointed regions in the property/performance space.The combinatorial nature poses additional challenges in materials modeling and the search for an optimal solution.

    During the past half decade, the BO approach has emerged as the most effective approach to materials design synthesis [92–95], due to its capability of locating the global optima for highly nonlinear functions within tens to hundreds of objective-function(i.e., material property) evaluations. Starting from a small dataset,BO relies on an adaptive sampling technique to approach the global optimum efficiently—an attractive feature for materials design.Fig.9 shows our proposed on-demand goal-driven data augmentation framework,integrating curated material databases with material property simulations and ML. The framework is initiated from a database of curated experimental and simulated data describing material properties with appropriate attributes.Based on PSP relationships, one identifies a subset of attributes that are known to influence material properties and act as design variables in BO.These attributes may be quantitative(e.g.,microstructure descriptors or interphase descriptors) or qualitative (e.g., type of filler,polymer, or a combination of both).

    Using the predictions and uncertainty quantification of the ML model, Bayesian inference determines the design that shows the most ‘‘potential” for improvement in terms of material property.There are several metrics—commonly known as acquisition functions—for evaluating ‘‘potential” improvement. The acquisition function strikes a balance between exploration (reducing prediction uncertainty) and exploitation (optimizing the design objective) of the design space. The most commonly used acquisition functions are expected improvement (EI) [96] and probability of improvement [97]. Once a promising design is identified by the acquisition function, its corresponding material property is evaluated using ‘‘on-demand” experiments, simulations, or both. The nature of simulations depends on the material system and property under consideration, often requiring the calibration of parameters. For example, finite-element simulations for the prediction of dielectric properties in nanocomposites require the calibration of interphase-shifting parameters [98]. Once the property evaluation is complete, the design is added to the database and the above steps are repeated. The termination criterion is usually the maximum number of iterations, which depends on the cost and time required for the simulations or experiments.

    Fig.9. The BO approach treats the existing dataset as prior knowledge,chooses new samples,and builds ML models using curated and new experimental and simulation data to capture PSP relations for optimization.

    By integrating the mixed-variable LVGP model introduced in Section 4 and the BO framework, we have successfully applied the BO approach to designs of organic,inorganic,and hybrid materials. For example, in concurrent composition and microstructure design [91], the design of electrically insulating nanocomposites is cast as a multicriteria optimization problem with the goal of maximizing the dielectric breakdown strength while minimizing the dielectric permittivity and dielectric loss (Fig. 10). The SDF is selected as the microstructure representation,with the underlying function type identified based on experimental images. Within tens of simulations and using the multi-response LVGP approach,our method identifies a diverse set of designs on the Pareto frontier indicating the tradeoff between dielectric properties. This method was shown to be much more efficient than using genetic algorithms.

    The generality of BO using LVGP is further exemplified by a combinatorial search for an ABX3hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite with optimal binding energy to solvents[90].The design space consists of three choices each for the A and X sites and eight choices for the type of solvent,while the B site remains unchanged.In addition, the three X’s can be chosen independently. Out of the 648 possible ABX3-solvent combinations, 240 are stable and constitute the search space for BO.Fig.11(a)shows that BO converges to the optimal combination faster with LVGP,as compared with the multiplicative covariance(MC)[99,100]GP model commonly used for qualitative variables hitherto. Furthermore, the latent space estimated by LVGP provides insights into the nature of the levels for each qualitative variable. The positioning of solvent choice 1 and 7 far from the others in Fig. 11(b) indicates that their effects on the binding energy are distinct.This insight is validated by analyzing the distribution of binding energies in Fig. 11(c), which shows that combinations with solvents 1 and 7 result in higher binding energies.Several materials design applications can be cast as a combinatorial optimization problem.For example,we recently demonstrated that the search for functional electronic materials design with metal–insulator transitions (MITs) [101] can be expedited with LVGP-based multicriteria BO. These findings indicate that integrating mixed-variable LVGP models with BO is an effective approach for design synthesis in the design of engineered material systems.

    6. Conclusions

    Here,we presented a data-centric approach for materials design that integrates state-of-the-art computational techniques for microstructural analysis and design. These techniques fall into the categories of design representation, design evaluation, and design synthesis. Realization of this approach is supported by the creation of materials data hubs such as NanoMine, where a wide range of data resources and tools are developed for microstructural analysis and optimal materials design. As we have illustrated, this development consists of the systematic integration of image preprocessing, microstructure characterization, reconstruction,dimension reduction, ML of PSP relations, and multi-objective optimization.

    A key question for achieving a seamless integration of design representation, design evaluation, and design synthesis is: What is the proper microstructure representation for the materials systems of interest? We presented a range of microstructure representation techniques based on correlation functions, physical descriptors, SDF, supervised learning, and deep learning. While the merits of these different techniques vary from one system to another, it is evident that stochasticity plays a critical role and must be considered in materials representation and property predictions.

    Fig. 10. Concurrent composition and microstructure design for nanocomposites. (a) SDF characterizes nanoparticle dispersion using parameter θ and nanoparticles loading using the VF.(b)Multicriteria mixed-variable BO using LVGP identifies the Pareto frontier displaying significant improvement with respect to randomly selected initialization samples (P stands for polymer type; S stands for type of surface treatment. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; PS: polystyrene).

    Fig.11. (a)Comparing the convergence BO with the EI acquisition function for MC-EI and the LV-EI GP.(b)Latent space for the‘‘solvent type”categorical variable with eight levels. (c) Distribution of binding energy categorized by ‘‘solvent type.”

    For design evaluation, ML approaches have played an increasingly important role in knowledge discovery and in building surrogate models that replace physics-based simulations.Since big data and lack of data co-exist in materials informatics, care must be exercised to ensure that the selected ML technique, such as NN,RF,or GP,is consistent with the data availability.As more materials data are being generated, deep learning is gaining popularity for image-based materials informatics, in which interpretation of the learned microstructural features relies on developing explainable deep models.

    Finally, ML should not be viewed as an isolated component in materials discovery. For example, its integration with information-theoretic approaches such as BO can provide a significant speedup. As materials discovery is combinatorial in nature, it requires mixed-variable models such as LVGP that can handle both qualitative and quantitative design variables. These models provide quantitative measures of ‘‘distances” for different materials concepts based on their influence on the desired material properties. More research is needed to extend the current methods to handle high-dimensional materials design problems with millions or billions of combinations.The same information-theoretic framework can be extended to guide the design of batch samples and high-throughput experiments.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Cyberinfrastructure for Sustained Scientific Innovation program (OAC-1835782), the NSF Designing Materials to Revolutionize and Engineer Our Future program(CMMI-1729743), Center for Hierarchical Materials Design (NIST 70NANB19H005) at Northwestern University, and the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (APAR-E, DE-AR0001209).Collaborations from Drs. Daniel Apley, Catherine Brinson, and Linda Schadler and their students on the presented methods and materials design case studies are greatly appreciated.

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Wei Chen,Akshay Iyer,and Ramin Bostanabad declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    精品人妻1区二区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 高清在线国产一区| 美女高潮的动态| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产美女午夜福利| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 毛片女人毛片| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产三级黄色录像| 综合色av麻豆| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产色婷婷99| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 一夜夜www| 色在线成人网| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 黄色配什么色好看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 欧美激情在线99| www.999成人在线观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 在线免费观看的www视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 嫩草影院精品99| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 一进一出抽搐动态| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 精品福利观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 黄色女人牲交| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美午夜高清在线| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲av美国av| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 欧美日韩黄片免| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产在线男女| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 高清在线国产一区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 特级一级黄色大片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 久久久久久久久中文| 91麻豆av在线| 成人av在线播放网站| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久久成人免费电影| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产野战对白在线观看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 简卡轻食公司| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲av熟女| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 国产精品影院久久| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 色在线成人网| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲激情在线av| 宅男免费午夜| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲av成人av| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 有码 亚洲区| 乱人视频在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲第一电影网av| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 在线a可以看的网站| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 成人精品一区二区免费| 欧美潮喷喷水| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 日本一本二区三区精品| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 校园春色视频在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产色婷婷99| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 校园春色视频在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 欧美激情在线99| 舔av片在线| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美性感艳星| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 精品午夜福利在线看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 毛片女人毛片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 色在线成人网| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 内射极品少妇av片p| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产高潮美女av| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美zozozo另类| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 午夜免费激情av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| av专区在线播放| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产av在哪里看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久6这里有精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 黄色配什么色好看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久九九热精品免费| 不卡一级毛片| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 精品人妻1区二区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 99热6这里只有精品| 九色国产91popny在线| 成人国产综合亚洲| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 国产高清激情床上av| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 午夜a级毛片| 舔av片在线| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 9191精品国产免费久久| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久久久九九精品影院| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲色图av天堂| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 88av欧美| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 成人无遮挡网站| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 欧美3d第一页| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产高潮美女av| 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | av天堂中文字幕网| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 色播亚洲综合网| 极品教师在线视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产成人福利小说| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 极品教师在线视频| 久久人妻av系列| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 日韩欧美免费精品| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 99热精品在线国产| 午夜两性在线视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 赤兔流量卡办理| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 色哟哟·www| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 一夜夜www| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产av不卡久久| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 久久这里只有精品中国| 深夜a级毛片| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 一本一本综合久久| 精品久久久久久成人av| 在线播放无遮挡| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| av在线蜜桃| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日本 av在线| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久久精品影院6| 久久性视频一级片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 一区福利在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 日韩有码中文字幕| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 香蕉av资源在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| .国产精品久久| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| xxxwww97欧美| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 伦理电影大哥的女人| 精品一区二区免费观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲综合色惰| 一本一本综合久久| 91在线观看av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 欧美潮喷喷水| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 欧美日韩黄片免| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 91久久精品电影网| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产精品三级大全| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲最大成人av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美日韩黄片免| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 身体一侧抽搐| 露出奶头的视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 99热精品在线国产| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久香蕉精品热| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 成人国产综合亚洲| 床上黄色一级片| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 色综合婷婷激情| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 色视频www国产| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产av在哪里看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美午夜高清在线| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 久久久久久大精品| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产av在哪里看| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| ponron亚洲| 嫩草影院入口| 在线播放无遮挡| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | h日本视频在线播放| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品久久国产蜜桃| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| netflix在线观看网站| 免费av毛片视频| 欧美3d第一页| 国产高潮美女av| 日韩高清综合在线|