• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Data Centric Design: A New Approach to Design of Microstructural Material Systems

    2022-06-11 09:04:12WeiChenAkshyIyerRminBostnd
    Engineering 2022年3期

    Wei Chen*, Akshy Iyer Rmin Bostnd

    a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA

    b Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA

    Keywords:Materials informatics Machine learning Microstructure Reconstruction Bayesian optimization Mixed-variable modeling Dimension reduction Materials design

    ABSTRACT Building processing, structure, and property (PSP) relations for computational materials design is at the heart of the Materials Genome Initiative in the era of high-throughput computational materials science.Recent technological advancements in data acquisition and storage,microstructure characterization and reconstruction (MCR), machine learning (ML), materials modeling and simulation, data processing,manufacturing, and experimentation have significantly advanced researchers’ abilities in building PSP relations and inverse material design. In this article,we examine these advancements from the perspective of design research. In particular, we introduce a data-centric approach whose fundamental aspects fall into three categories: design representation, design evaluation, and design synthesis.Developments in each of these aspects are guided by and benefit from domain knowledge. Hence, for each aspect, we present a wide range of computational methods whose integration realizes datacentric materials discovery and design.

    1. Introduction

    Computational materials science provides a platform to achieve a deeper understanding of materials behavior across different length scales.This advancement is of particular interest to various industrial sectors,as it enables the cost-effective design of materials with engineered properties. The significance of computational materials science is also highlighted by the Materials Genome Initiative [1–4] and by the emergence of tools and frameworks such as materials by design [5,6], microstructure-sensitive design[7], and integrated computational materials engineering [8]. Since a material’s morphology heavily affects its properties [9,10], the central theme of these frameworks is inverse materials design,where the link between processing, structure, and property (PSP),also known as PSP relations, is elucidated in order to engineer materials with unprecedented properties [5,11]. The nonuniqueness of inverse PSP relations, while providing design flexibility,challenges the forward development of PSP maps(Fig.1(a)).

    For most of the 20th century, materials science research and development relied on the expensive and time-consuming Edisonian approach, which involves many trials and errors. This reliance delayed the deployment of emerging materials in commercial applications. To achieve a quantum leap in materials design, we need to shift the focus of materials research from simply explaining observed phenomena to developing scientific and predictive models that explain and predict materials behavior with quantitative factors that can be controlled in order to meet the desired objectives of industrial applications. To this end, the socalled high-throughput computational materials science [12] has been developed(Fig.1(b)).Here,the central concept is to first create a massive database that stores microstructural characteristics and properties of materials. Then, this dataset is used to train a machine learning(ML)model that can predict(or assist in the prediction of) PSP relations.

    A holistic design strategy for the bi-directional traversal of PSP relations relies on addressing some key challenges: cost-effective processing techniques, microstructure representation and reconstruction, dimensionality reduction, and tractable optimization methods. The emergence of open-source materials databases[13–17] and the recent technological advancements in ML techniques[18]are accelerating our ability to address some of these challenges using a data-centric approach for materials design (Fig. 2).From the perspective of design research, the fundamental aspects of this approach fall into the categories of design representation,design evaluation, and design synthesis. Each of these aspects is guided by the knowledge gained from the PSP data stored in databases.

    Fig.1. (a)Forward and inverse PSP links in the Materials Genome Initiative is not unique;(b)data-driven materials design via high-throughput simulations and experiments.

    Fig. 2. Data-centric framework for materials design. SMILES: simplified molecular-input line-entry system.

    ·Design representation.This encompasses methods that characterize the control factors in design—that is, the variables that influence materials’ behavior. These factors depend on the material system; hence, domain knowledge can greatly help their identification. For example, the band gap of inorganic compounds is entirely determined by the composition;thus, composition is itself a suitable representation. As another example, the electrical properties of polymer nanocomposites depend on composition and microstructure.Since these two factors are high dimensional,microstructure representation methods such as spectral density function (SDF) or physical descriptors must be used for dimensionality reduction.

    ·Design evaluation.This comprises the methodologies that are employed to evaluate PSP relations.The chosen method heavily depends on both the material and the spatiotemporal scales at which the underlying phenomenon takes place. For example, density functional theory (DFT) [19,20] calculations capture atomic-level properties such as band gap; molecular dynamics (MD) simulations model an ensemble of molecules[21–23];and continuum mechanics is suitable for phenomena occurring at higher length scales. Each of these methods require the calibration of embedded parameters and the validation of property predictions,which is accomplished through experimental data contained in the database. ML approaches,trained on experimental data or simulated data, have been widely used to build surrogate models that replace expensive physics-based simulations.

    ·Design synthesis.This involves searching the design space to identify (feasible) optimal designs that meet the targeted properties. The choice of optimization method depends on the nature of the design variables—whether there are qualitative and quantitative design variables, the presence of uncertainty or noise in property evaluations,and the computational cost of the method. To account for manufacturing feasibility and consistency with fundamental laws and known material behaviors, constraints and bounds are often imposed during optimization to ensure feasibility.

    It should be noted that the aforementioned three aspects are interrelated,as marked in Fig.2.For example,the choice of design representation—whether mixed variable (both qualitative or quantitative) or quantitative only—will impact the choice of ML technique in design evaluation and the choice of search algorithm in design synthesis.In this article,after first providing an overview of the role of data resources, we will review the challenges and state-of-the-art methods under each of these three aspects.

    2. Materials data resources

    Recent years have seen a rapid expansion of efforts toward building large data resources to accelerate materials discovery and design. The majority of such data resources are focused on metallic material systems and computational materials data,where software prediction tools can rapidly sweep through compositional space to predict specific structures and properties of interest.Examples of these data resources can be found in a recent perspective article [24]. We have been involved in developing a data resource for the design of soft materials in the field of polymer nanocomposites, called NanoMine [13,14,25] (Fig. 3). NanoMine has in-built data curation, exploration, visualization, and analysis capabilities, with curated data on over 2500 samples from the literature and individual laboratories.In principle,NanoMine offers a findable,accessible, interoperable, and reusable(FAIR) platform in which the data published in papers become directly findable and accessible via simple search tools, with open metadata standards that are interoperable with larger materials data registries; the platform also allows the easy reuse of data,such as benchmarking against new results.

    At the core of developing a materials data resource is the creation of a data schema particularized for the domain of interest.The materials vocabulary used to organize the metadata framework for NanoMine forms part of the high-level ‘‘polymer data core” [26]and is compatible with the indexing from other data stores such as the materials data facility (MDF) [27,28]. Built on the MDF, we have developed an ontology-enabled knowledge graph framework[14]that helps NanoMine establish relationships between the data that falls into the following six categories:

    · Data resource. The data in this category are the metadata of the source of the literature guided by Dublin core standards,which includes the digital object identifier (DOI) of the cited source, the authors, title, keywords, time, and source of the publication.

    ·Materials.The data in this category involve material constituent information, including the filler particle, polymer matrix,and surface treatments. The characteristics of pure matrix and filler, such as the polymer chemical structure, molecular weight, and particle density, can be entered along with the compositions (i.e., volume/weight fraction).

    Fig. 3. NanoMine: an online data resource for polymer nanocomposites (www.materialsmine.org).

    ·Processing.The data in this category are a sequential description of chemical syntheses and experimental procedures. The current template provides three major categories: solution processing, melt mixing, and in situ polymerization. For each processing step, detailed information such as temperature,pressure, and time can be entered.

    · Characterization. The data in this category provide information on the material characterization equipment, methods,and condition used.This information includes details on common microscopic imaging(scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy), thermal mechanical and electrical measurement, and nanoscale spectroscopy.

    · Properties. The data in this category are measured data of material properties,including mechanical,electrical,thermal,and volumetric properties. The property data can be in the format of a scalar or a higher dimension such as twodimensional (2D) spectroscopy or three-dimensional (3D)maps.

    · Microstructure. The data in this category comprise raw microscopic grayscale images capturing the nanophase dispersion state. Geometric descriptors can also be included to describe the statistical characteristics of the microstructure.

    The NanoMine ontology serves as an extensible knowledgerepresentation platform for materials science and allows the tools we develop for search, visualization, and data sharing to extend across multiple domains and interoperate with existing standards for scientific metadata. In addition to physical data, a collection of modular tools (for microstructure characterization and reconstruction (MCR) and for simulation software to model bulk nanocomposite material response) augment the knowledge generated by experiments.Integrating these different data sources to create new knowledge is critical for materials design. However,generating experimental or simulated data for the vast design space defined by the infinite combinations of constituents,microstructure morphology,and processing conditions is impractical.This signifies the need for data-centric methodologies that can effectively interrogate existing data and interpolate between them to support design representation, design evaluation, and design synthesis in discovering new high-performing materials.

    3. Design representation: Microstructure characterization and reconstruction

    Due to the high dimensionality of material microstructure, in microstructure-mediated design, microstructure representation is critical to ensure tractable design strategies.A good microstructure representation will ①provide significant dimension reduction;②embody salient morphological features; ③be physically meaningful in a way that can be easily mapped to the processing conditions; and ④provide a computationally efficient reconstruction procedure so that statistically equivalent microstructures can be created for assessing structure–property relations and quantifying the uncertainty associated with materials heterogeneity.

    MCR,coupled with ML and materials modeling and simulation,is an important component in discovering PSP relations and inverse material design in the era of high-throughput computational materials science.Given the vast diversity of microstructures observed in engineered materials,developing an MCR technique that is universally applicable is challenging.In our review article[29],we provide a comprehensive review of a wide range of MCR techniques and elaborate on their algorithmic details, their computational costs, and how they fit into the PSP mapping problems. Therein, interested readers may find detailed descriptions of multiple categories of MCR methods relying on statistical functions(such as n-point correlation functions), physical descriptors, SDF, texture synthesis, and supervised/unsupervised learning.

    Sample MCR techniques applied to heterogeneous microstructures are illustrated in Fig. 4. Perhaps the most well-known MCR method is based on spatial correlation functions (Fig. 4(b))[30,31], which provide probabilistic representations of the morphology but rely on a computationally intensive simulated annealing (SA) algorithm for reconstruction. The descriptor-based method(Fig.4(a))[32,33]represents microstructures using a small set of uncorrelated descriptors that embody significant microstructural details. Reconstruction involves a hierarchical optimization strategy to match the descriptors of reconstructed microstructures to targeted values. However, the usage of regular geometrical features and the assumption of ellipsoidal clusters deter its application for microstructures with irregular geometries. Other versions of descriptor-based MCR have been reported in the literature, as the choice of descriptor varies across materials systems and depends on the property of interest. The descriptor of nearest neighbor plays an important role in transport processes in particulate heterogeneous systems [9], microstructural evolution during recrystallization [34], particle coarsening [35], and liquid-phase sintering [34]. In fiber composites, the volume fraction (VF), size,shape, and spatial distributions of the fibers affect the mechanical properties of the composite,such as the Young’s modulus,ultimate strength,and fracture toughness[36–42].In crystalline structures,intergranular corrosion is sensitive to grain boundaries [43], so these boundaries must be used as descriptors for accurate design representation.

    ML and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, with their superior capability to learn and reconstruct complex features from isotropic/anisotropic microstructures, have gained popularity as a reconstruction tool. Applications of instance-based learning using support vector machines [44], supervised learning (Fig. 4(c))[45,46], and transfer learning (Fig. 4(d)) [18,47] have shown good reconstruction accuracy for complex materials morphology.Transfer learning-based methods, in particular, reconstruct statistically equivalent microstructures from only one given target microstructure by leveraging a pre-trained deep convolutional neural network (CNN), Visual Geometry Group 19 (VGG-19) [48], and a loss function that measures the statistical difference between the original and the reconstructed microstructures.Knowledge obtained in the proceeding model-pruning process is then leveraged in the development of a structure–property predictive model to determine the network architecture and initialization conditions.While deep learning-based approaches are powerful for handling complex microstructure morphology, these methods often do not provide the physical meaning in microstructure characterization,which hinders their use in materials design. Deep learning methods such as convolutional deep belief networks[49]and generative adversarial networks (GANs) [50] are being studied in ongoing research to provide a low-dimensional microstructure characterization that could be used as design variables.

    Fig. 4. Representative MCR techniques. (a) Physical descriptors; (b) statistical functions; (c) supervised learning; (d) deep convolutional network; (e) SDF. L-BFGS-B: a limited-memory quasi-Newton code for bound-constrained optimization;VGG-19:Visual Geometry Group 19,a convolutional neural network(CNN)that is 19 layers deep,trained on more than a million images from the ImageNet database.

    The SDF (Fig. 4(e)) [9,51–55], a frequency domain microstructure representation, has received significant attention for its capability to provide low-dimensional and physically meaningful descriptions of quasi-random material systems with complex morphology. For isotropic materials, SDF is a one-dimensional (1D)function of spatial frequency and represents the spatial correlations in the frequency domain. Although information contained in the SDF is equivalent to a two-point autocorrelation function,Yu et al.[51]have shown that the SDF provides a more convenient representation that can be easily and sensibly mapped to both processing conditions and properties. However, the computational cost and time for reconstructing high-resolution 3D microstructures using existing approaches [56–58] remains a challenge.Moreover,while existing SDF techniques are restricted to isotropic material systems, anisotropy is highly desired in some material systems, especially where the performance is a manifestation of an underlying transport phenomenon,such as in organic photovoltaic cells (OPVCs), batteries, thermoelectric devices, and membranes for water filtration. In our recent work [59] (Fig. 5), an anisotropic microstructure design strategy that leverages the SDF for the rapid reconstruction of high-resolution, two-phase, isotropic or anisotropic microstructures in 2D and 3D is developed that quantifies anisotropy via a dimensionless scalar variable termed the anisotropy index. Application to an active layer design case study for bulk heterojunction OPVCs shows that an optimized design with strong anisotropy outperforms isotropic active-layer designs. The physics-aware SDF approach also offers significant dimension reduction in design evaluations for understanding PSP links.

    Fig. 5. (a) Schematic representation of OPVCs. Inset shows excitons (orange)dissociating into protons(blue)and electrons(green),which travel to the anode and cathode, respectively. (b–d) Quantifying anisotropy for microstructures with elliptical SDF using anisotropy index α.

    4. Design evaluation: ML of PSP relations

    In physics-based materials design,ML techniques have become popular surrogates for costly PSP simulators.Recent review articles on using ML and AI techniques in materials design can be found for both molecular and polymer systems [60] and metallic systems[61,62].As shown in Fig.6,while a wide range of statistical models such as neural networks (NNs), random forests (RFs), trees, and Gaussian processes (GPs) [63] may be considered to create surrogate models,feature identification plays a critical role in obtaining a trustworthy statistical model with good predictive capability.

    The‘‘curse of dimensionality”(i.e.,the large number of descriptors or parameters)makes it extremely challenging to build predictive models with moderate sample data sizes. Hence, a combined feature-selection and feature-extraction approach is often used for dimension reduction by integrating these ML methods with materials science domain knowledge. In general, the objective of feature selection is threefold: improving predictive performance,providing more cost-effective predictors, and facilitating the discovery of underlying probabilistic principles of data generation[64]. Variable ranking is one of the most common techniques for feature selection, which enables the identification of the most informative features for building parsimonious predictive models.We have developed a range of techniques for microstructure feature selection. For example, Xu et al. [65] employed a two-step feature-selection process using descriptor pairwise correlation analysis (unsupervised learning based only on images) and the relief for regression (RReliefF) variable ranking approach [66](supervised learning based on structure–property relations) to select the physical descriptors that best control the damping property of polymer composites. Exploratory factor analysis [67] is another technique for identifying the important features by grouping the correlated descriptors together to build a set of latent common factors. We employed factor analysis into a structural equation-modeling approach for the design of dielectric polymer composites[39].In short, with feature selection,redundant statistical features can be dropped before further analyses are conducted.

    Different from feature selection, feature extraction transforms the feature space into a lower dimensional one in which the physical interpretations are diminished. While not preserving as many physical interpretations as feature-selection methods do, featureextraction techniques are advantageous in lowering the dimensionality of the space and are more easily trained to achieve a higher predictive accuracy [68,69]. Principle component analysis(PCA) is perhaps the most well-known linear dimensionality reduction method that can convert the high-dimensional feature space of 3D microstructure images to lower dimensional approximations [70]. It has also been demonstrated that PCA can effectively reduce the dimensionality of a two-point correlation function (commonly used in microstructure characterization) to only a few parameters [71–73]. Recent years have seen the rapid utilization of nonlinear embedding methods for feature extraction in materials design due to advances in ML techniques. One set is the bottom-up approach, in which it is assumed that a nonlinear manifold(embedded in the original feature space)governs the data distribution [74,75]. The second major set is the top–down approach, which attempts to preserve the geometric relations at all scales [76].

    Fig. 6. Feature identification and ML in materials engineering. PCA: principle component analysis.

    A wide range of ML techniques can be chosen for building a statistical model considering multiple factors,such as ①the nature of physical behavior (nonlinearity and irregularity); ②the type of input variables (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed); ③ the response of interest (continuous or classification); ④the data source(an experiment with noise,deterministic simulation,or stochastic simulation); and ⑤the amount of data(big or small data).Due to the need to understand causal relations in PSP mappings,supervised learning methods are commonly used. While linear regression is the most straightforward approach to apply and interpret the results, methods such as decision trees [77], k-nearest neighbors (k-NNs) [78], support vector machines [79,80], and RFs[81] are better suited for more complex behavior and mixedvariable inputs; they are also flexible for creating both regression and classification models.

    Recent research at the interface of ML and materials engineering has exponentially grown as big materials data are becoming increasingly available. NNs are networks connected by layers of artificial neurons, mimicking a human brain. A single neuron outputs weighted inputs through a so-called activation function.Deep neural networks (DNNs) are special NNs with more than one hidden layer that have superior learning power.For inorganic materials, crystal graph CNNs [82] have been used to model highly nonlinear behaviors using DFT-calculated thermodynamic stability entries taken from the Open Quantum Materials Database(OQMD)for accelerated materials discovery [83]. For nanocomposites, we have demonstrated that, while CNNs provide the capability of microstructure reconstruction and structure–property learning[47], GANs can be trained to learn the mapping between latent variables (LVs) and microstructures [50]. Thereafter, the lowdimensional LVs serve as design variables, and a Bayesian optimization (BO) framework can be applied to obtain microstructures with the desired material properties. For organic materials, the simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES) [84] provides a meaningful representation for large molecules and has been used to design synthetic molecules using variational autoencoders [85] and reinforcement learning [86].

    In the presence of small data,especially those from deterministic simulations such as DFT that require hours and days to compute one materials design,GPs provide a very viable approach.Fig.7 is a 1D example of a GP model fitted to the collected data of f(·). At each input x, the output f(x) is regarded as a normally distributed random variable,and the GP model predicts its mean and variance.The 95% prediction interval in the figure reflects the confidence bounds of the prediction [87,88].

    Standard GP methods were developed under the premise that all input variables are quantitative,which does not hold in materials systems that involve both qualitative and quantitative design variables representing material compositions,microstructure morphology,and processing conditions.We recently proposed a latent variable Gaussian process(LVGP)[89]modeling method that maps the levels of the qualitative factor(s)to a set of numerical values for some underlying latent unobservable quantitative variable(s). In other words,the qualitative variables are ‘‘converted”to quantitative ones, and traditional GPs modeling can then be applied to obtain the desired model.The LV mapping of the qualitative factors provides an inherent ordering and structure for the levels of the factor(s), which leads to substantial insight into the effects of the qualitative factors.Unlike most supervised ML methods,LVGP does not require hand-crafted features to describe qualitative variables.Rather, it learns the underlying ‘‘LVs” (Z) influencing response (y)by maximizing the likelihood function.

    Fig. 7. A 1D example of a GP model fitted to the collected data of f(·).

    Alleviating the need for feature engineering makes LVGP attractive for materials design applications.As conceptually illustrated in Fig. 8, the three qualitative levels of tj∈ {l1, l2, l3} of atom M in the family of M2AX phases are associated with points in the underlying high-dimensional space of {v1, v2, ...}, defined by physical parameters such as atomic radius, ionization energy, and electron affinities. LVGP provides a nonlinear manifold mapping z(t ) = g(v1(t ), v2(t ), ...from v to the latent space Z,and the distances between the three points indicate the differences between the three levels with respect to their impact on the property of interest. The mixed-variable LVGP approach has been tested and validated for a wide range of microstructural systems such as concurrent materials selection and microstructure optimization for optimizing the light absorption of a quasi-random solar cell [90],a combinatorial search of material constitutes for optimal hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite design[90],and concurrent composition and microstructure design of nanodielectric materials [91].Materials discovery and optimization are accomplished through the integration of the LVGP approach with BO for design synthesis,which is introduced next.

    5. Design synthesis: Goal-oriented BO

    Fig. 8. Qualitative material composition selection modeled using mapping from the true high-dimensional underlying quantitative variables to the 2D LVs Z.

    Materials discovery often takes years and decades, due to several challenges associated with design synthesis: ①Even though large datasets become available,the properties of known materials are far from the desired targets. The ML models created using the existing data are not capable of predicting behavior in the ‘‘extrapolated” regions. ②Vast combinations of candidate designs exist.In the design of organic materials,such as in polymer nanocomposite design, there are numerous choices of material constituents(e.g., the types of filler and matrix) and processing conditions(e.g., the type of surface treatment); each combination follows drastically different physical mechanisms with significant impact on the overall properties.In the design of inorganic materials such as microelectronics,the possible options of atomic structure–composition variable spaces are in the order of millions,defined by different structure prototypes (crystal graphs), composition (choice of chemistry elements), and stoichiometry (ratio of elements).③The existence of both quantitative and qualitative material design variables results in multiple disjointed regions in the property/performance space.The combinatorial nature poses additional challenges in materials modeling and the search for an optimal solution.

    During the past half decade, the BO approach has emerged as the most effective approach to materials design synthesis [92–95], due to its capability of locating the global optima for highly nonlinear functions within tens to hundreds of objective-function(i.e., material property) evaluations. Starting from a small dataset,BO relies on an adaptive sampling technique to approach the global optimum efficiently—an attractive feature for materials design.Fig.9 shows our proposed on-demand goal-driven data augmentation framework,integrating curated material databases with material property simulations and ML. The framework is initiated from a database of curated experimental and simulated data describing material properties with appropriate attributes.Based on PSP relationships, one identifies a subset of attributes that are known to influence material properties and act as design variables in BO.These attributes may be quantitative(e.g.,microstructure descriptors or interphase descriptors) or qualitative (e.g., type of filler,polymer, or a combination of both).

    Using the predictions and uncertainty quantification of the ML model, Bayesian inference determines the design that shows the most ‘‘potential” for improvement in terms of material property.There are several metrics—commonly known as acquisition functions—for evaluating ‘‘potential” improvement. The acquisition function strikes a balance between exploration (reducing prediction uncertainty) and exploitation (optimizing the design objective) of the design space. The most commonly used acquisition functions are expected improvement (EI) [96] and probability of improvement [97]. Once a promising design is identified by the acquisition function, its corresponding material property is evaluated using ‘‘on-demand” experiments, simulations, or both. The nature of simulations depends on the material system and property under consideration, often requiring the calibration of parameters. For example, finite-element simulations for the prediction of dielectric properties in nanocomposites require the calibration of interphase-shifting parameters [98]. Once the property evaluation is complete, the design is added to the database and the above steps are repeated. The termination criterion is usually the maximum number of iterations, which depends on the cost and time required for the simulations or experiments.

    Fig.9. The BO approach treats the existing dataset as prior knowledge,chooses new samples,and builds ML models using curated and new experimental and simulation data to capture PSP relations for optimization.

    By integrating the mixed-variable LVGP model introduced in Section 4 and the BO framework, we have successfully applied the BO approach to designs of organic,inorganic,and hybrid materials. For example, in concurrent composition and microstructure design [91], the design of electrically insulating nanocomposites is cast as a multicriteria optimization problem with the goal of maximizing the dielectric breakdown strength while minimizing the dielectric permittivity and dielectric loss (Fig. 10). The SDF is selected as the microstructure representation,with the underlying function type identified based on experimental images. Within tens of simulations and using the multi-response LVGP approach,our method identifies a diverse set of designs on the Pareto frontier indicating the tradeoff between dielectric properties. This method was shown to be much more efficient than using genetic algorithms.

    The generality of BO using LVGP is further exemplified by a combinatorial search for an ABX3hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite with optimal binding energy to solvents[90].The design space consists of three choices each for the A and X sites and eight choices for the type of solvent,while the B site remains unchanged.In addition, the three X’s can be chosen independently. Out of the 648 possible ABX3-solvent combinations, 240 are stable and constitute the search space for BO.Fig.11(a)shows that BO converges to the optimal combination faster with LVGP,as compared with the multiplicative covariance(MC)[99,100]GP model commonly used for qualitative variables hitherto. Furthermore, the latent space estimated by LVGP provides insights into the nature of the levels for each qualitative variable. The positioning of solvent choice 1 and 7 far from the others in Fig. 11(b) indicates that their effects on the binding energy are distinct.This insight is validated by analyzing the distribution of binding energies in Fig. 11(c), which shows that combinations with solvents 1 and 7 result in higher binding energies.Several materials design applications can be cast as a combinatorial optimization problem.For example,we recently demonstrated that the search for functional electronic materials design with metal–insulator transitions (MITs) [101] can be expedited with LVGP-based multicriteria BO. These findings indicate that integrating mixed-variable LVGP models with BO is an effective approach for design synthesis in the design of engineered material systems.

    6. Conclusions

    Here,we presented a data-centric approach for materials design that integrates state-of-the-art computational techniques for microstructural analysis and design. These techniques fall into the categories of design representation, design evaluation, and design synthesis. Realization of this approach is supported by the creation of materials data hubs such as NanoMine, where a wide range of data resources and tools are developed for microstructural analysis and optimal materials design. As we have illustrated, this development consists of the systematic integration of image preprocessing, microstructure characterization, reconstruction,dimension reduction, ML of PSP relations, and multi-objective optimization.

    A key question for achieving a seamless integration of design representation, design evaluation, and design synthesis is: What is the proper microstructure representation for the materials systems of interest? We presented a range of microstructure representation techniques based on correlation functions, physical descriptors, SDF, supervised learning, and deep learning. While the merits of these different techniques vary from one system to another, it is evident that stochasticity plays a critical role and must be considered in materials representation and property predictions.

    Fig. 10. Concurrent composition and microstructure design for nanocomposites. (a) SDF characterizes nanoparticle dispersion using parameter θ and nanoparticles loading using the VF.(b)Multicriteria mixed-variable BO using LVGP identifies the Pareto frontier displaying significant improvement with respect to randomly selected initialization samples (P stands for polymer type; S stands for type of surface treatment. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; PS: polystyrene).

    Fig.11. (a)Comparing the convergence BO with the EI acquisition function for MC-EI and the LV-EI GP.(b)Latent space for the‘‘solvent type”categorical variable with eight levels. (c) Distribution of binding energy categorized by ‘‘solvent type.”

    For design evaluation, ML approaches have played an increasingly important role in knowledge discovery and in building surrogate models that replace physics-based simulations.Since big data and lack of data co-exist in materials informatics, care must be exercised to ensure that the selected ML technique, such as NN,RF,or GP,is consistent with the data availability.As more materials data are being generated, deep learning is gaining popularity for image-based materials informatics, in which interpretation of the learned microstructural features relies on developing explainable deep models.

    Finally, ML should not be viewed as an isolated component in materials discovery. For example, its integration with information-theoretic approaches such as BO can provide a significant speedup. As materials discovery is combinatorial in nature, it requires mixed-variable models such as LVGP that can handle both qualitative and quantitative design variables. These models provide quantitative measures of ‘‘distances” for different materials concepts based on their influence on the desired material properties. More research is needed to extend the current methods to handle high-dimensional materials design problems with millions or billions of combinations.The same information-theoretic framework can be extended to guide the design of batch samples and high-throughput experiments.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Cyberinfrastructure for Sustained Scientific Innovation program (OAC-1835782), the NSF Designing Materials to Revolutionize and Engineer Our Future program(CMMI-1729743), Center for Hierarchical Materials Design (NIST 70NANB19H005) at Northwestern University, and the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (APAR-E, DE-AR0001209).Collaborations from Drs. Daniel Apley, Catherine Brinson, and Linda Schadler and their students on the presented methods and materials design case studies are greatly appreciated.

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Wei Chen,Akshay Iyer,and Ramin Bostanabad declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    亚洲av.av天堂| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产精品无大码| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 成人二区视频| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 日韩av免费高清视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 免费av不卡在线播放| 99久久人妻综合| 日日啪夜夜爽| 在现免费观看毛片| 97热精品久久久久久| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 久久6这里有精品| 免费观看性生交大片5| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 久久草成人影院| 在线播放无遮挡| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 高清毛片免费看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美另类一区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 免费大片18禁| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 简卡轻食公司| 免费av观看视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 一本一本综合久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 在线 av 中文字幕| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 黄色一级大片看看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 综合色丁香网| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产视频内射| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 人妻系列 视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 黄色一级大片看看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 国产成人aa在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 91久久精品电影网| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 欧美bdsm另类| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 精品久久久噜噜| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| av免费观看日本| 日本免费a在线| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | av免费观看日本| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 搞女人的毛片| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产永久视频网站| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产视频首页在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 99视频精品全部免费 在线| xxx大片免费视频| 插逼视频在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美3d第一页| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产成人精品一,二区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 91久久精品电影网| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 成年版毛片免费区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产高清三级在线| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲av福利一区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 久久草成人影院| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产单亲对白刺激| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 麻豆成人av视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | av在线天堂中文字幕| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲18禁久久av| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 99久国产av精品| 色5月婷婷丁香| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 91精品国产九色| av国产免费在线观看| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 久久这里只有精品中国| 高清av免费在线| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 中文字幕久久专区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 天堂√8在线中文| 禁无遮挡网站| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 岛国毛片在线播放| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 欧美性感艳星| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲在线观看片| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产成人福利小说| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 丝袜喷水一区| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 看免费成人av毛片| 男女国产视频网站| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 搞女人的毛片| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| eeuss影院久久| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲国产色片| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 成人av在线播放网站| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 只有这里有精品99| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 床上黄色一级片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 美女大奶头视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲av男天堂| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 日韩av免费高清视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 永久免费av网站大全| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 成年版毛片免费区| 精品一区在线观看国产| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 深夜a级毛片| 五月天丁香电影| 岛国毛片在线播放| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 色综合色国产| 天堂√8在线中文| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲av一区综合| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久久久国产网址| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 久99久视频精品免费| 观看免费一级毛片| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 精品一区二区免费观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产精品无大码| 久久久久九九精品影院| av专区在线播放| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 69人妻影院| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产精品久久视频播放| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲国产av新网站| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 色5月婷婷丁香| 一级片'在线观看视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 老司机影院成人| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 全区人妻精品视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| freevideosex欧美| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲在线观看片| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产在视频线精品| 尾随美女入室| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产在视频线精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 高清av免费在线| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 免费观看在线日韩| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 身体一侧抽搐| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | av免费在线看不卡| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| av在线天堂中文字幕| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 日日啪夜夜撸| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 免费av不卡在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 色吧在线观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 免费看日本二区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 在线观看人妻少妇| 91av网一区二区| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 尾随美女入室| 国产亚洲最大av| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 成年免费大片在线观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 午夜免费观看性视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久久久九九精品影院| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产单亲对白刺激| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 99久久精品一区二区三区| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 欧美潮喷喷水| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 特级一级黄色大片| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日本熟妇午夜| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 老司机影院毛片| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产美女午夜福利| 在线天堂最新版资源| 简卡轻食公司| freevideosex欧美| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 99久久精品热视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 99热网站在线观看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 草草在线视频免费看| 午夜久久久久精精品| av免费在线看不卡| 国产成人a区在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲最大成人av| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲av男天堂| 搞女人的毛片| 综合色av麻豆| 在线a可以看的网站| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚州av有码| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| av免费在线看不卡| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 99热网站在线观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 美女国产视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 在线免费十八禁| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美成人a在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产精品无大码| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| www.色视频.com| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产永久视频网站| 久久99热6这里只有精品| eeuss影院久久| av在线老鸭窝| 久久久精品94久久精品| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 黄片wwwwww|