• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Noninvasive imaging of hepatic dysfunction: A state-of-the-art review

    2022-06-11 07:35:34TingDuanHanYuJiangWenWuLingBinSong
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2022年16期

    Ting Duan,Han-Yu Jiang, Wen-Wu Ling, Bin Song

    Abstract Hepatic dysfunction represents a wide spectrum of pathological changes, which can be frequently found in hepatitis, cholestasis, metabolic diseases, and focal liver lesions. As hepatic dysfunction is often clinically silent until advanced stages, there remains an unmet need to identify affected patients at early stages to enable individualized intervention which can improve prognosis. Passive liver function tests include biochemical parameters and clinical grading systems (e.g.,the Child-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score). Despite widely used and readily available, these approaches provide indirect and limited information regarding hepatic function. Dynamic quantitative tests of liver function are based on clearance capacity tests such as the indocyanine green (ICG)clearance test. However, controversial results have been reported for the ICG clearance test in relation with clinical outcome and the accuracy is easily affected by various factors. Imaging techniques, including ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, allow morphological and functional assessment of the entire hepatobiliary system, hence demonstrating great potential in evaluating hepatic dysfunction noninvasively. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art summary of noninvasive imaging modalities for hepatic dysfunction assessment along the pathophysiological track, with special emphasis on the imaging modality comparison and selection for each clinical scenario.

    Key Words: Hepatic dysfunction; Ultrasound; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging

    INTRODUCTION

    Hepatic dysfunction is a common result of a wide variety of diseases, including hepatobiliary disorders and systemic diseases. The clinical symptoms of hepatic dysfunction (e.g., jaundice, anorexia, and abdominal pain) are varied and nonspecific[1 ]. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for hepatic dysfunction currently. Accurate as it is, liver biopsy is invasive, and susceptible to sampling errors and interobserver variation. Besides, liver biopsy is limited by various complications and operator expertise.Therefore, the introduction of noninvasive diagnostic approaches is pivotal to addressing the above limitations of liver biopsy. Hepatic dysfunction usually manifests as biochemical abnormalities of serum markers, typically involving hepatocyte damage, cholestasis, bilirubin, synthesis function, and liver fibrosis[2 ,3 ]. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that not all patients with abnormalities in the above markers have primary liver disease, highlighting the wide differential diagnosis spectrum of abnormal liver chemistry and metabolic functions[2 ]. Considering the limited value of single serum markers in hepatic dysfunction evaluation, clinical grading systems integrating biochemical parameters and clinical symptoms have been developed to reveal impaired liver function. Among them, the Child-Pugh score is a widely adopted clinical scoring system that is particularly useful in selecting surgical candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis[4 ]. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was initially developed to predict short-term survival in patients undergoing transcutaneous intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures and has been later expanded to stratify patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting transplantation[5 ]. Nevertheless, the performances of these clinical grading systems are suboptimal in mild liver injuries. Furthermore, despite widely used and readily available, biochemical parameters and clinical grading systems only provide indirect information about the hepatic function[6 ]. In contrast, dynamic quantitative tests, such as the indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test[7 ], allows direct measurements of liver clearance capacity and hence has become a routine test in preoperative liver function evaluation. However, discrepancies have been reported on the performances of ICG clearance test in clinical outcome prediction[8 ]. In addition, the accuracy of ICG clearance is affected by operator’s proficiency and the concentration of blood oxygen and other competitive agents[9 ].

    Noninvasive imaging techniques, including ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), allow morphological and functional assessment of the entire hepatobiliary system (Table 1 ). These techniques permit qualitative and quantitative evaluation of hepatocyte quantity and function, fibrosis degree, type and severity of metabolic disorders, and excretory function of the biliary system. Therefore, through accurate hepatic dysfunction measurement and identification of affected individuals at early diseases stages, noninvasive imaging modalities offer appeal in individualized clinical decision-making and improving patient prognosis. Therefore, this review provides a state-of-the-art summary of noninvasive imaging modalities for assessing hepatic dysfunction along the pathophysiological track in various clinical situations.

    HEPATITIS-INCLUDED HEPATIC DYSFUNCTION

    Hepatitis is a major global public health problem affecting hundreds of millions of people. The common causes are the virus, bacteria, amoeba, and other infections. Other relatively rare causes include drug and food poisoning. Most deaths from viral hepatitis are due to hepatitis B and hepatitis C. An estimated 257 million people were living with hepatitis B and 71 million people were living with hepatitis C[10 ].

    Acute hepatitis

    In mild hepatitis, edema of hepatocytes and inflammatory cells gather in the portal area at pathology. Atthis stage, the imaging findings are generally nonspecific, such as enhanced echo on US, slightly decreased density on CT, or increased signals on T2 -weighted imaging.

    Table 1 Noninvasive imaging modalities for hepatic dysfunction

    With the aggravation of inflammation, histologic changes become more pronounced, including lobular disarray, acidophilic degeneration of hepatocytes, focal lobular necrosis, disruption of bile canaliculi with cholestasis, and portal and parenchymal infiltration of inflammatory cells (predominantly lymphocytes and macrophages)[11 ], as well as hypertrophy and hyperplasia of Kupffer cells and macrophages. These changes can lead to heterogeneous appearances of the liver parenchyma on precontrast imaging. Meanwhile, the microcirculation in the liver deteriorates, causing patchy enhancement or wedge-shaped enhancement pattern of the liver parenchyma on contrast-enhanced imaging. In addition, the “halo-ring sign” or “track sign” appears around the portal vein as a result of increased lymph inflow and blocked lymph backflow[12 ]. The transient portal hypertension (PH) leads to increased pressure in the gallbladder vein, causing subsequent subserosal edema of the gallbladder wall. With the gallbladder wall thickening and protruding into the cavity, a typical sign of “centripetal edema” appears[13 ]. Enlarged lymph node can be detected on US, CT, or MRI[14 ].

    A high proportion of severe acute hepatitis cases can result in significant liver failure[15 ,16 ]. In these cases, extensive hepatocyte necrosis can lead to substantial bridging. Irregular necrosis is depicted as map-like low density on CT images. On contrast-enhanced images in the portal venous phase, the necrotic areas usually become hyper-attenuating compared with adjacent liver parenchyma due to infiltrates of inflammatory cells, increased arterial blood supply, and widened intercellular space. This sign is called “reverse enhancement”, which is a characteristic manifestation of severe hepatitis. In addition, ascites can be detected frequently[15 ] (Figure 1 ). Grillet et al[15 ] reported that heterogeneous liver parenchyma on CT would be particularly beneficial for patients with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis as histological examinations could be technically challenging due to complications. They also reported heterogeneous CT features of severe alcoholic hepatitis, indicating that these imaging features were mainly associated with transient heterogeneous steatosis and liver perfusion disorders[15 ].Furthermore, Tanaet al[17 ] used texture analysis to quantify the heterogeneity of the liver parenchyma,and showed that texture features of the liver could provide important quantitative information in predicting the severity and outcomes of patients with acute alcohol-associated hepatitis.

    Figure 1 Ultrasound and computed tomography images of a 19 -year-old man with severe drug-induced hepatitis. A: High frequency ultrasound image showing increased and heterogenous echo intensity of the liver parenchyma; B: Pre-contrast computed tomography image showing map-like hypodense area in the liver parenchyma and moderate ascites; C: The hypodense areas on (B) became hyperattenuating on portal venous phase image, showing “reverse enhancement”.

    In summary, ultrasound is recommended as the first-line imaging modality for morphologic evaluation in patients with acute hepatitis. Contrast-enhanced CT or MRI should be considered when intrahepatic necrosis is suspected.

    Chronic hepatitis

    Chronic hepatitis refers to a morphologic pattern that is usually observed in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, drug-induced hepatitis, and alcoholic hepatitis. Chronic hepatitis is characterized by several pathologic changes. These include inflammations of the portal veins and sometimes of the bile ducts; periportal injury and inflammation; several degeneration and apoptosis of intra-acinar hepatocytes secondary to inflammatory response; and different forms of fibrosis[18 ]. The end-stage progression is cirrhosis. The image findings of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis are described in later sections.

    Typical imaging characteristics of chronic hepatitis include unsmooth liver margin, blunt edge,widened portal vein, enlarged spleen, and thickened gallbladder wall[19 ] (Figure 2 ). Unfortunately,when the above signs appear, liver injury has usually occurred for a long time and become irreversible.

    Many efforts have been devoted to capturing the early hepatic microcirculation and perfusion changes of chronic hepatitis using imaging techniques. The deposition of collagen in the space of Disse and sinusoidal capillarization result in increased resistance to incoming sinusoidal blood flow, leading to a decrease in portal venous flow to the liver and an increase in hepatic arterial flow, and subsequently the formation of intrahepatic and portosystemic shunts. Caoet al[20 ] reported a significant correlation between the ICG clearance rate and MR-based portal venous perfusion, suggesting that MR-based portal venous perfusion could be used as a surrogate for liver function assessment.

    Another important cause for hepatic dysfunction in chronic hepatitis is the impaired hepatocytes.Active transport of MR hepatobiliary contrast agents (e.g., gadoxetate and gadobenate dimeglumine)into the hepatocytes can reflect hepatocyte functions. Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images can be acquired at about 20 min after contrast administration for gadoxetate and 1 -2 h for gadobenate dimeglumine,with signal intensity on HBP images providing important information regarding liver function[21 ,22 ].On this basis, studies further showed that T1 mapping could eliminate signal deviation and allow accurate liver function quantification[23 -25 ].

    Without proper and timely intervention, chronic hepatitis may progress to liver fibrosis (LF) and PH,which would be discussed in later sections.

    CHOLESTASIS

    Acute cholestasis

    Figure 2 Gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance images of a 70 -year-old man with chronic hepatitis B. T2 -weighted image (A) shows signal loss of the liver parenchyma, suggesting iron overload. T1 -weighted pre-contrast (B), arterial phase (C), and portal venous phase (D) images show nodular contour and patchy enhancement of the liver parenchyma. Hepatobiliary phase image demonstrates diffuse hyperintense nodules (E, black arrows) without diffusion restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (F), indicating regenerative nodules. Moderate ascites was also noted.

    Acute cholestasis is characterized with mechanical biliary obstruction of any cause, such as choledocholithiasis, strictures (e.g., neoplastic, inflammatory, or postoperative), pancreatitis, choledochal cysts,parasitic diseases (e.g., ascariasis and fascioliasis), or even extrinsic pressure from enlarged lymph nodes[26 ]. US is promising for diagnosing early-stage acute cholestasis. However, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is more sensitive in assessing the location, severity, cause, and extent of biliary obstruction[27 ]. MRCP images of a patient with suspected acute cholestasis can help: (1 ) Confirm the obstruction; (2 ) exclude other causes of jaundice; (3 ) determine the location of obstruction (intra- or extrahepatic ducts); (4 ) measure the approximate length of the biliary stricture; and (5 ) reveal the status of proximal bile ducts[28 ] (Figure 3 ).

    Apart from MRCP, gadoxetate-enhanced MRI can also aid in evaluating acute cholestasis. Although less widely available than MRCP, it has a unique role in detecting bile leaks after biliary surgery or liver trauma[29 ].

    Recently, elastography has also been applied in acute cholestasis. Kimet al[30 ] reported that liver stiffness measured by MRI elastography (MRE) is elevated with the increase of cholestasis, and can be predictive for the sufficiency of biliary decompression after biliary drainage.

    Chronic cholestasis

    Most chronic cholestatic disorders are insidious in onset, and chronic cholestasis progresses slowly over the course of years before it becomes clinically apparent. The most frequent causes of chronic cholestasis are primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Furthermore, allograft rejection can lead to bile duct damage and subsequent chronic cholestasis in patients who have undergone liver transplantation.

    Characteristic imaging features of PSC include thickened concentric mural wall involving the extrahepatic biliary duct, with segmental intrahepatic biliary duct dilatation, preferentially affecting the left hepatic lobe. Gallbladder luminal sludge or stones and inflammatory polyps can also be depicted[31 ]. On MRCP, PSC can have typical features of biliary ductal changes, such as intrahepatic and extrahepatic short segmental bile duct strictures alternating with normal or mildly dilated bile ducts,giving rise to a beading appearance. At times, mild diffuse dilatation of the entire intrahepatic biliary system with a branching-tree appearance can be observed[32 ] (Figure 4 ).

    On the other hand, PBC is characterized by chronic, non-suppurative lymphocytic cholangitis that predominantly affects small and interlobular bile ducts in the portal triads, leading to vanishing bile duct syndrome[33 ]. Diffuse hepatomegaly is the most pronounced morphological change. Patients usually develop micronodular or liver fibrosis. Most early PBCs had normal appearances on MRCP. As disease progresses, intrahepatic bile ducts become irregular. Thereafter, most peripheral branches of the intrahepatic bile ducts gradually become invisible, while medium-sized bile ducts present with reduced caliber and irregularity. These findings could be explained pathologically by destruction and disappearance of small intrahepatic bile ducts in PBC[34 ]. The assessments of liver function in PSC is similar to those in cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis[35 ].

    Figure 3 Magnetic resonance images of a 63 -year-old man with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Axial (A) and coronal (B) portal venous phase images demonstrate thickened hilar bile duct wall (white arrows). The extrahepatic bile duct is absent on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography image (C, white arrowhead), and the intrahepatic bile ducts are dilated and distorted (“vine-sign”).

    Figure 4 Computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography images of a-42 -year-old woman with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Minimum density projection computed tomography image of portal venous phase (A) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography image (B) show a “beading appearance” of the intrahepatic bile ducts (white arrowheads).

    In summary, when cholestasis is suspected, ultrasound is recommended for screening. When biliary obstruction or stricture is confirmed, MRI (MRCP in particular) is the preferred modality for further examinations.

    METABOLIC DISEASES

    Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

    Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as liver fat exceeding 5 %-10 % by weight and exists as a spectrum from steatosis (usually stable) to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (characterized by cellular ballooning, necroapoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis)[36 ]. Early detection and treatment of NAFLD can help prevent its progression to NASH and cirrhosis[37 ].

    Among the imaging methods which enable liver fat quantification, transient elastography (TE) is the most widely studied US approach. A recent meta-analysis revealed that in NAFLD patients, the areas under the curve (AUC) of TE were 0 .819 for S0 vs S1 -S3 and 0 ·754 for S0 -S1 vs S2 -S3 [38 ]. Another metaanalysis reported superior result of TE in the diagnosis of mild steatosis (AUC, 0 .96 ) compared with severe steatosis (AUC, 0 .70 )[39 ]. Thus, an insufficient performance for TE in the diagnosis of moderate to severe steatosis should be noted.

    The sensitivity and specificity of CT in detecting hepatic steatosis were reported ranging from 46 % to 72 % and from 88 to 95 %, respectively[40 ]. However, given the potential additive radiation exposure, CT is not typically utilized as a screening test for NAFLD.

    In addition, chemical-shift-encoded MRI-based proton density fat-fraction (PDFF) is increasingly accepted as an effective imaging modality in evaluating liver steatosis. A recent meta-analysis which included 2979 patients showed that MRI-PDFF offered pooled sensitivities of 0 .71 -0 .91 and specificities of 0 .88 -0 .93 for staging liver steatosis[41 ], with the optimal diagnostic performance achieved for detecting ≥ S1 (sensitivity, 0 .92 ; specificity, 0 .93 ) steatosis. Choi et al[42 ] compared the performance of MRI-PDFF and TE-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) in staging liver steatosis, and they found that MRI-PDFF correlated far better with hepatic fat measured (r= 0 .978 ) than with CAP (r=0 .727 ). Besides, several clinical randomized controlled trials have shown that PDFF can be used to monitor and predict the therapeutic effect of NAFLD[43 -45 ].

    NASH is also characterized with a distinctive increase in liver extracellular fluid, which can be measured by an increase in T1 relaxation time. However, the accumulation of excess iron in liver tissue can be a confounding factor for T1 relaxation time. In this context, iron-corrected T1 can be generated to correct for this potential bias[46 ,47 ]. In a study of 50 patients undergoing standard-of-care liver biopsy for NAFLD, iron-corrected T1 has been demonstrated to correlate with ballooning and could accurately distinguish between steatosis and NASH patients[48 ].

    Collectively, given the costs, availability, and diagnostic performances, US may be an appropriate modality to detect NAFLD. If accurate quantification of liver fat or monitoring of efficacy is needed,MRI PDFF should be a better choice.

    Iron storage disorders

    Iron storage disorders are characterized by unregulated iron increase or decrease in the liver[49 ]. An increase in systemic iron can be a consequence of: (1 ) Hereditary hemochromatosis; (2 ) ineffective erythropoiesis or chronic liver disease; and (3 ) parenteral iron administration. Excessive intracellular deposition of iron ultimately results in tissue and organ damage. The diagnosis of iron overload relies on serum iron studies (elevated transferrin saturation and elevated serum ferritin levels), genetic testing, and sometimes liver biopsy to assess the hepatic iron concentration and degree of liver injury[50 ].

    The paramagnetic effect of liver iron on the neighborhood protons affects T2 and T2 * relaxation times by accelerating the signal decay. Therefore, the presence of iron results in tissue signal loss on T2 and T2 * weighted images that is proportional to iron content, which is the basic principle of MRI in evaluating liver iron overload[51 ]. The MRI methods for liver iron quantification can be divided into signal intensity ratio methods and relaxometry methods.

    With signal intensity ratios, studies showed that although these methods tended to overestimate mild to moderate hepatic iron overload, it might be more precise in severe iron overload, particularly on 3 T MRI[52 ,53 ]. On the other hand, relaxometry techniques measure the MR signal decay resulting from the shortening of T2 or T2 * relaxation times. For practical purposes, the inverse of T2 or T2 * (the relaxation rates, R2 or R2 *) is generally used instead, because the elevation in liver iron concentration directly increases the R2 and R2 *[54 ]. The most known R2 relaxometry method is commercially available as FerriScan and is FDA-approved for 1 .5 T machines[55 ]. Well validated across different sites and platforms, liver R2 has an excellent correlation with liver iron concentration, with low inter-exam variability and good inter-machine reproducibility[56 ]. However, major limitations of this technique include long acquisition times and high cost. In contrast, R2 * relaxometry is performed with fast, single breath-hold spoiled GRE multi-echo sequences in most MR scanners. Several studies demonstrated an excellent linear relationship between R2 * and liver iron concentration[57 ,58 ] (Figure 5 ). However, R2 *measurements may be affected by liver fibrosis and the coexistence of fat[59 ].

    Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) was first used in the nervous system. It is based on the concept of transforming hypointense blooming artifacts into precise quantitative measurements of spatial biodistributions. Therefore, it is not affected by liver fibrosis and the coexistence of fat[59 ].Tipirneni-Sajjaet al[60 ] applied a multispectral autoregressive moving average model in QSM to liver iron concentration. They found that autoregressive moving average-QSM showed a good association with an iron concentration in both phantom study andin vivocohort, indicating that autoregressive moving average-QSM could provide a potentially confounder-free assessment of hepatic iron overload[60 ].

    Therefore, the influence of iron on MRI signal makes MRI the most appropriate imaging modality for quantifying liver iron concentration, and QSM may be the most potential sequence to serve this purpose.

    PROGRESSION OF DIFFUSE LIVER DISEASE

    Liver fibrosis is a scarring response that occurs in almost all chronic liver injuries mentioned above.Ultimately, liver fibrosis can lead to cirrhosis, in which PH is a common and lethal complication. Early diagnosis and accurate staging of these conditions can facilitate timely patient care and optimize prognoses.

    Figure 5 Magnetic resonance images of a 26 -year-old man with hemochromatosis. Pre-contrast T1 -weighted image (A), portal venous phase T1 -weighted image (B), T2 -weighted image (C), and SWI image (D) showed signal intensity in liver parenchyma, while R2 * mapping (E) shows increased signal intensity in the liver, demonstrating severe iron overload. R2 : Relaxation rate.

    Liver fibrosis

    With the deposition of collagen in the extracellular space, liver parenchyma stiffness increases as the disease progresses. These alterations can be measured by elastography techniques.

    Among all elastography techniques, TE is the most widely used method to determine liver stiffness and may serve as a potential surrogate to assess liver fibrosis. The pooled AUC of TE for diagnosing liver fibrosis was 0 .859 for NAFLD, 0 .860 for chronic hepatitis B, and 0 .830 for alcohol-related liver disease in previous meta-analyses[61 -63 ]. In addition, shear wave elastography (SWE) was also reported with a high diagnostic accuracy for detecting early-stage liver fibrosis[64 -66 ]. Petzold et al[67 ] found that a cutoff value of 8 .05 kPa could differentiate patients with advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3 ) from those with no or mild fibrosis (F0 -F2 ) with AUCs ranging between 0 .995 and 1 .000 . A meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between TE and SWE in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis,and cirrhosis, but the proportion of failed measurements was over ten-fold greater with TE than SWE[68 ].

    In addition to ultrasound-based elastography techniques, the MR-based elastography technique MRE is another promising noninvasive modality to assess liver fibrosis[69 ,70 ]. A prospective study of 67 PSC patients revealed a high sensitivity (87 .5 %) and specificity (96 %) of MRE in detecting cirrhosis[71 ]. In another study, a significant discriminatory ability of MRE was confirmed when distinguishing between early to moderate and advanced liver fibrosis, shedding light on the incremental values of liver stiffness measurements on MRE in prognosis stratification[72 ]. Fu et al[73 ] found that the efficacy of MRE was superior compared with TE in detecting significant fibrosis (AUC: 0 .965 vs 0 .906 ) and advanced fibrosis(AUC: 0 .957 vs 0 .913 ). These results were confirmed by a meta-analysis in which the pooled AUC of MRE (0 .97 ) was significantly higher than that of SWE (0 .88 ) in detecting significant fibrosis[74 ].

    As fibrosis progresses, the deposition of fibroglia can lead to enlarged extracellular space. Therefore,liver extracellular volume (LECV) measured by CT or MR T1 mapping can also be used to assess liver fibrosis[75 -77 ]. In a cynomolgus monkey model of NASH, Lyu et al[78 ] found that LECV was significantly correlated with the fibrosis score (r= 0 .949 ), and demonstrated an AUC of 0 .945 in diagnosing liver fibrosis.

    Diffusion-weighted imaging is a noninvasive technique based on the Brownian motion of water molecules in biological tissue and has shown potential in assessing liver fibrosis[79 ]. Studies showed that in chronic liver diseases, apparent diffusion coefficients in diffusion-weighted imaging decreased as the degree of fibrosis increased, but this relationship was not statistically significant due to confounding factor of blood microcirculation in the capillaries[80 ,81 ]. Recent studies have explored various diffusion models to avoid this influence. Lefebvreet al[82 ] reported that intravoxel incoherent motion parameter with 10b-values was reproducible for liver tissue characterization and that perfusion fraction (f)provided good diagnostic performance for distinguishing dichotomized grades of inflammation. Parket al[83 ] showed that the distributed diffusion coefficient from the stretched exponential model was the most accurate diffusion-weighted imaging parameter for staging liver fibrosis as it could avoid the confounding effect by steatosis.

    Besides, liver fibrosis can result in changes in hepatic microcirculation and perfusion. Fanet al[84 ]found that MR perfusion parameters, time to peak, and mean transit time in particular could reflect the degree of liver fibrosis. Similarly, Yoonet al[85 ] also found that portal blood flow was significantly lower in clinically significant hepatic fibrosis and that mean transit time and extracellular volume increased in cirrhosis.

    In general, TE is the modality preferred for LF. SWE can be considered in patients who fail in TE examination. As a modality which is gaining increasingly popularity, MRE is preferred over sonographic elastography in patients with ascites and obesity, or requiring more comprehensive liver workup.

    PH

    PH is defined by values of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) > 5 mmHg, whereas clinically significant PH could be diagnosed if HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg. HVPG has been widely-validated as associated with variceal bleeding, hepatic decompensation, and mortality. However, its measurement is invasive and requires extensive expertise[86 ].

    Characteristic imaging features of PH include portosystemic shunts, splenomegaly, ascites, and widening of the portal vein. However, these findings are often detectable at end stages of the disease,thus demonstrating limited sensitivities for diagnosing PH.

    For quantitative methods, similar to liver fibrosis, elastography techniques have gained increasing attention in the assessment of PH[87 ]. Among ultrasound-based elastography techniques, TE was the most validated method for PH assessment. A meta-analysis involving 12 studies showed that liver stiffness measured on TE was well correlated with HVPG and demonstrated a sensitivity of 91 .2 % and specificity of 81 .3 % in diagnosing clinically significant PH (cut-off values 13 .6 -18 .6 kPa)[88 ]. In contrast,despite much less applied than TE, SWE also exhibited encouraging profiles in predicting PH and esophageal varices (AUC: 0 .86 -0 .89 )[89 -93 ].

    Liver and spleen stiffness measured by MRE also showed promising performances in predicting PH and esophageal varices. A recent meta-analysis found that liver and spleen stiffness on MRE could serve as supplemental noninvasive assessment tools for detecting clinically significant PH and that spleen stiffness might be more specific and accurate than liver stiffness (AUC: 0 .88 vs 0 .92 )[94 ].

    Hemodynamic alteration is another distinct feature in PH. In patients with cirrhosis, decreased portal and total hepatic perfusion were observed[95 ,96 ]. Studies showed that mean portal vein velocity in cirrhosis was lower than that in normal subjects and decreased with the severity of liver cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices[97 ,98 ]. The portal vein velocity measured by doppler US could be used as noninvasive triage tests before referral to endoscopy (sensitivity, 84 %-97 %), but the cutoff value varied from 16 -19 cm/s[99 ,100 ]. Several MR techniques have also been proposed for liver hemodynamic assessment in PH. Chouhanet al[101 ] used phase-contrast MR to assess the portal vein and the infrahepatic and suprahepatic inferior vena cava. The hepatic artery flow was estimated by subtracting infrahepatic from suprahepatic inferior vena cava flow and portal vein flow, which showed significant positive correlations with HVPG[101 ]. Additionally, 4 D flow MRI also demonstrated promising capacity in quantifying blood flow in the hepatic and splanchnic vasculature[102 ,103 ]. Motosugi et al[104 ] found that azygos flow > 0 .1 L/min and portal venous flow less than the sum of splenic and superior mesenteric vein flow were useful markers to stratify the risk of gastroesophageal varices bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Another study revealed that the combination of liver stiffness measured by MRE and perfusion metrics measured by contrast-enhanced-MRI had an AUC of 0 .903 for diagnosing PH,and an AUC of 0 .785 for detecting clinically significant PH[105 ].

    In summary, TE and SWE are promising noninvasive approaches for preliminary PH screening.Nevertheless, for patients with increased risk for esophageal and gastric varices, multiparametric MRI may be a more accurate and comprehensive modality.

    FOCAL LIVER LESIONS

    Focal liver lesions include benign tumors, malignant tumors, and hepatic echinococcosis. The impact of focal liver lesions on liver function includes the decrease of normal liver volume and the reduced hepatocyte function, especially in surgical candidates with malignant liver tumors. Previous studies have shown that a high residual to total liver volume ratio (≥ 40 %) was required for patients with an impaired liver function to tolerate resection[106 -108 ]. Gadoxetate-enhanced MRI is also used to evaluate the hepatic function of patients with focal liver lesions. Yoonet al[109 ] reported that T1 mapping on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI provided information on global liver function and demonstrated functional heterogeneity in patients with HCC. Other studies have combined liver volume with hepatocyte function, and their results showed that combined T1 mapping and residual liver volume on gadoxetateenhanced MRI could assess liver function with good diagnostic accuracy in patients with liver tumors[110 -112 ]. Kim et al[113 ] and Wang et al[114 ] reported that the combination could predict post hepatectomy liver failure better than the ICG clearance test in patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy.

    To sum up, CT can be used to calculate the residual liver volume for surgical candidates. Gadoxetateenhanced MRI can not only reflect residual liver volume, but also reveal the functional information of hepatocytes.

    CONCLUSION

    In this article, we provide a summary of noninvasive imaging modalities for assessing hepatic dysfunction in various clinical situations and case scenarios (Figure 6 ). Several challenges still exist in noninvasive imaging of hepatic dysfunction. First, many imaging parameters have inconsistencies on the device. Therefore, a unified threshold cannot be adopted. Second, quantification of sensitivity and specificity usually requires an effective reference standard (e.g., liver biopsy) which may not be readily available. Furthermore, most of the current studies focus on the role of a single method or sequence,with limited multiparametric, multimodal, and multidisciplinary approaches to evaluate liver dysfunction.

    The long-term goal in hepatic dysfunction imaging is to develop reliable, noninvasive, and comprehensive methods which could reveal not only the disease severities but also etiologies using safe and clinically available techniques. However, to accomplish this goal will require advances in imaging sciences (improved image modalities standardization and quantitation, further exploration of US, CT,and MR imaging methods, and combination of multiparametric and multimodal imaging techniques).On this basis, radiomics and artificial intelligence may provide further assistance in quantifying highlevel imaging features beyond human eyes and help in constructing effective predictive models. A better understanding of the human genetic variation underlying differences in the liver will further contribute to this field. Furthermore, the potential value of combining imaging and serum biomarkers should also be explored.

    Figure 6 Noninvasive imaging modalities for assessing hepatic dysfunction. The TextTitle modalities are recommended and should be the first-line methods. US: Ultrasound; CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; TE: Transient elastography; SWE: Shear wave elastography; MRE: MRI elastography; MRCP: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PDFF: Proton density fat-fraction; CAP: Controlled attenuation parameter; CECT: Contrast-enhanced CT; CEMRI: Contrast-enhanced MRI.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Duan T wrote the manuscript; Jiang HY contributed significantly to manuscript preparation and revision; Ling WW helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions; Jiang HY and Song B contributed to the conception of the study; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Supported byScience and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province, No. 2021 YFS0021 and 2021 YFS0141 .

    Conflict-of-interest statement:The authors have no conflict of interests related to this study.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4 .0 ) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4 .0 /

    Country/Territory of origin:China

    ORCID number:Ting Duan 0000 -0001 -6694 -4520 ; Han-Yu Jiang 0000 -0002 -7726 -1618 ; Wen-Wu Ling 0000 -0002 -6449 -3831 ; Bin Song 0000 -0001 -7007 -6367 .

    S-Editor:Chang KL

    L-Editor:Wang TQ

    P-Editor:Chang KL

    久久精品人妻少妇| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 热99在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产精品一及| 97超视频在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 性欧美人与动物交配| 精品久久久久久成人av| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 久久久精品大字幕| 免费在线观看日本一区| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久久精品大字幕| 男女那种视频在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产免费男女视频| 黄色日韩在线| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产午夜精品论理片| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产精品影院久久| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 88av欧美| 欧美性感艳星| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 午夜激情欧美在线| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 校园春色视频在线观看| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产精品一及| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 免费在线观看日本一区| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 久久草成人影院| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 99热精品在线国产| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 88av欧美| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 此物有八面人人有两片| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久久久性生活片| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产高清激情床上av| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 不卡一级毛片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 亚洲内射少妇av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 成人精品一区二区免费| 免费看a级黄色片| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产在视频线在精品| 欧美日韩黄片免| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 久久这里只有精品中国| a在线观看视频网站| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久草成人影院| 黄色日韩在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 在线天堂最新版资源| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产日本99.免费观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产精品一及| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 91麻豆av在线| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| or卡值多少钱| 国产在视频线在精品| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 露出奶头的视频| 免费看日本二区| 小说图片视频综合网站| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美区成人在线视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 久久久久性生活片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 极品教师在线免费播放| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| or卡值多少钱| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 91av网一区二区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产三级黄色录像| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 久久精品人妻少妇| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 简卡轻食公司| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲片人在线观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日本免费a在线| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲 国产 在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 一级黄色大片毛片| 69人妻影院| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产老妇女一区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 中国美女看黄片| 18+在线观看网站| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 69人妻影院| 脱女人内裤的视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| xxxwww97欧美| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 午夜精品在线福利| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 99久久精品热视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 午夜免费激情av| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 69人妻影院| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产精品,欧美在线| 91麻豆av在线| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产成人欧美在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 久久久色成人| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久久人妻av系列| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 久久久久九九精品影院| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久午夜福利片| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 草草在线视频免费看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 三级毛片av免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 小说图片视频综合网站| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲av美国av| 99热这里只有是精品50| 欧美午夜高清在线| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 精品福利观看| 久久午夜福利片| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久久久久大精品| 在线国产一区二区在线| 嫩草影院精品99| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | а√天堂www在线а√下载| 色5月婷婷丁香| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 宅男免费午夜| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 特级一级黄色大片| 宅男免费午夜| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 美女黄网站色视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美性感艳星| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 嫩草影视91久久| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| www日本黄色视频网| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 少妇高潮的动态图| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 午夜福利18| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 久久九九热精品免费| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 此物有八面人人有两片| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 俺也久久电影网| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 一本久久中文字幕| av天堂中文字幕网| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 深夜精品福利| 国产高清三级在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 91麻豆av在线| 午夜免费成人在线视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 88av欧美| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 高清在线国产一区| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲第一电影网av| av欧美777| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 天堂√8在线中文| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久人人精品亚洲av| bbb黄色大片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 我要搜黄色片| 91在线观看av| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久中文看片网| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 日韩中字成人| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 熟女电影av网| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 变态另类丝袜制服| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 少妇丰满av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | av国产免费在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| av天堂在线播放| aaaaa片日本免费| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久久久国内视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 老女人水多毛片| 宅男免费午夜| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 校园春色视频在线观看| 91av网一区二区| 精品日产1卡2卡| av欧美777| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 直男gayav资源| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 色av中文字幕| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 一级av片app| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 欧美日韩乱码在线| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 少妇的逼好多水| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 丁香六月欧美| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 美女大奶头视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 嫩草影院入口| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 久久精品人妻少妇| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产日本99.免费观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 色av中文字幕| 欧美午夜高清在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 91狼人影院| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 成人三级黄色视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产成人影院久久av| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲av.av天堂| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产精品,欧美在线| 欧美潮喷喷水| 免费观看人在逋| 免费av不卡在线播放| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲av成人av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久6这里有精品| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产不卡一卡二|