• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Clinical utility of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography in monitoring disease course in autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis overlap syndrome

    2022-06-11 07:29:00YuLingYanXianXingYiWangXiaoZeWangZhiWangLiYang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2022年18期

    Yu-Ling Yan,Xian Xing, Yi Wang, Xiao-Ze Wang, Zhi Wang, Li Yang

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND Autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis (AΙH-PBC) overlap syndrome has a worse prognosis than AΙH or PBC alone. Therefore, accurately staging liver fibrosis and dynamically monitoring disease progression are essential.

    AIM To investigate the performance of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2 DSWE) for noninvasively staging liver fibrosis and assessing the clinical utility of repeated 2 D-SWE for monitoring treatment response in AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome.

    METHODS A total of 148 patients diagnosed with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome were retrospectively enrolled. Among them, 82 patients had a 2 D-SWE follow-up time of more than 1 year. The Scheuer scoring system was used to evaluate stages of hepatic inflammation and liver fibrosis. The performance of 2 D-SWE for staging liver fibrosis was evaluated with the liver biopsy. Changes in liver stiffness (LS)measured by 2 D-SWE in patients with or without complete biochemical remission were evaluated.

    RESULTS LS value was strongly correlated with liver fibrosis stage (Spearman r = 0 .84 , P <0 .0001 ). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of LS for diagnosing significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ), severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ), and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 0 .91 , 0 .97 , and 0 .96 , respectively. Patients with complete biochemical remission had a considerable decrease in LS values (P < 0 .0001 ). More importantly, the declined LS in patients with S0 -S2 was significantly lower than that in patients with S3 -S4 (P = 0 .0002 ). Ιn contrast, patients who failed to achieve biochemical remission had a slight but not significant decrease in LS (P = 0 .37 ).

    CONCLUSION LS measured by 2 D-SWE is an accurate and reliable method in assessing liver fibrosis, especially for diagnosing severe fibrosis (≥ 3 ) and monitoring treatment response in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome.

    Key Words: Liver fibrosis; Liver biopsy; Diagnostic tests; Autoimmune hepatitis; Primary biliary cholangitis;Inflammation

    INTRODUCTION

    Autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis (AΙH-PBC) overlap syndrome is defined as presenting features of AΙH and PBC simultaneously or sequentially. AΙH is a progressive inflammatory liver disorder characterized histologically by interface hepatitis, serologically by high levels of transaminases and immunoglobulin G (ΙgG) and the presence of autoantibodies. PBC is progressive autoimmune liver disease with nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis and interlobular bile duct destruction[1 ]. AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome has a worse prognosis than AΙH or PBC alone[2 ]. Therefore,accurately assessing stage of liver disease and dynamically monitoring the progression of disease are essential for some AΙH-PBC overlap syndromes with rapid disease progression.

    Liver biopsy still remains the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis, assessing disease severity and determining treatment. According to the most recent guidelines, long-term treatment with immunosuppressants in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid is recommended when AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome is established[3 ,4 ]. Frequent biochemical markers measurement during the follow-up was necessary to monitor the therapeutic response. However, they cannot monitor the histologically progression and reflect the severity of liver fibrosis. Furthermore, hepatic histological remission usually lagged behind biochemical remission by several months[5 ]. Therefore, detecting the severity of histology at the beginning of treatment and frequent monitoring during long-term follow-up are important for management of AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. Liver biopsy is still the gold standard for diagnosing AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome and staging liver fibrosis, and can be accepted by most patients,but the second or repeated liver biopsy cannot be easily performed due to its costly and invasive procedure during the long-term follow-up.

    During the past decades, several noninvasive markers are found to have high accuracy for detecting liver fibrosis and disease progression. 2 D-SWE by using the supersonic shear imaging technique is an ultrasound-based real-time imaging method with the following advantages for assessing liver disease:(1 ) nontarget structure and elastic artifacts can be effectively avoided to improve reliability by integrating B-mode imaging and color-coded tissue stiffness maps in real time; (2 ) it is widely applied to measure liver stiffness in the whole world; and (3 ) there is no limitation in patients with ascites[6 ]. Our previous studies showed that 2 D-SWE has a great performance for staging liver fibrosis in AΙH[7 ] and PBC patients[8 ]. However, the utility of 2 D-SWE in monitoring treatment response remains blank.

    The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of 2 D-SWE in evaluating liver fibrosis and to assess the usefulness of repeated 2 D-SWE for monitoring treatment response in AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    This is a single-center retrospective study, which was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital,and due to the retrospective feature, the patients informed consent was waived. Patients was strictly diagnosed according to the Paris criteria[9 ,10 ]. The presence of at least two of the three accepted criteria was required for the diagnosis of AΙH and PBC. The AΙH criteria were as follows: (1 ) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at least five times higher than the upper limit of normal (ULN); (2 ) Serum ΙgG levels at least two times higher than the ULN or a positive test for anti-smooth muscle antibodies;and (3 ) Moderate or severe periportal or periseptal piecemeal lymphocytic necrosis in liver biopsy. PBC criteria were as follows: (1 ) Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels at least two times higher than the ULN or γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) levels at least five times higher than the ULN; (2 ) A positive test for anti-mitochondrial antibodies; and (3 ) Florid bile duct lesions in liver biopsy. Among them, moderate interfacial inflammation of the liver was necessary for diagnosis of AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. The patients between September, 2016 and April 2021 in West China hospital were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1 ) Patients met the diagnosis criteria of PBC-AΙH overlap syndrome with liver biopsy; and (2 ) Age was adults with lower than 75 years old. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1 )Patients with overlapping etiologies of liver disease, such as virus, alcohol liver disease[11 ], nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[12 ], drug-induced liver disease[13 ], hereditary metabolic liver disease or other causes of liver damage; (2 ) Patients with primary hepatic carcinoma or other malignant tumors; (3 )2 D-SWE measurement after liver biopsy for more than 1 mo and with treatment; (4 ) Patients without 2 D-SWE results or serological data; (5 ) Patients with ascites, varices bleeding, esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) or splenectomy; and (6 ) Patients with severe systemic disease. Among them, the followup time with 2 D-SWE greater than 1 year was subsequently analyzed to evaluate the changes of LS values after standard treatment. Complete biochemical remission was defined by normalization of serum AST, ALT, ALP and ΙgG levels[14 ].

    2 D-SWE measurement

    2 D-SWE measurements were obtained by using the Aixplorer system (SuperSonic Ιmagine, Aix-en-Provence) with a SC6 -1 (frequency of 1 -6 MHz) convex probe. Two experience radiologists independently performed the procedures according to the guidelines developed by the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology[15 ]. The 2 D-SWE measurements were performed following our previous study[8 ], Briefly, the elasticity image box, approximately 4 cm × 3 cm, was placed 1 -2 cm under the liver capsule in the parenchyma area of the right hepatic lobe. At least three valid measurements were obtained in each patient. The median LS value was recorded (in kPa)[16 ].When less than two-thirds of the signal filled in the 2 D SWE region of interest or the large vessels and biliary tracts were not avoided, measurements were considered failed or unqualified[17 ].

    Liver biopsy and histologic stages

    Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy was performed in the right liver lobe. Quality of the liver specimen was evaluated. All specimens were analyzed by one experienced pathologist. The Scheuer scoring system, a common scoring system in clinical practice, evaluates liver fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity.Liver fibrosis was scored as follows the previous studies[7 ]: the liver fibrosis was staged from stage 0 (S0 ) to stage 4 (S4 ) cirrhosis (S0 -S4 ). Necroinflammative was also scored from grade 0 (G0 ), no portal or periportal and lobular necroinflammatory activity to grade 4 (G4 ), severe piecemeal portal or periportal necrosis and severe or diffuse hepatocellular damage inside the lobule (G0 -G4 ). Significant fibrosis was liver fibrosis stage ≥ S2 ; severe fibrosis was liver fibrosis stage ≥ S3 and cirrhosis was liver fibrosis stage= S4 . Mild liver necroinflammation was defined as necroinflammatory activity lower than G2 (G0 –G2 ),and significant liver necroinflammation was defined as necroinflammatory activity higher than G2 (G3 -G4 ).

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics version 24 .0 (ΙBM Corporation, Armonk, NY),MedCalc software version 19 .1 .0 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). A P value lower than 0 .05 was considered statistically significant. Descriptive statistics were summarized as the median and interquartile (25 %-75 %). One-way ANOVA analysis or the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare quantitative variables. Correlations between LS values and biochemical biomarkers and histological features were evaluated with the Spearman correlation test, and those withP< 0 .05 were subsequently included in multiple regression analysis. The performance of noninvasive methods in the assessment of liver fibrosis stages was determined by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC). Optimal cutoff values to predict different fibrosis stages were identified with the highest Youden’s index. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy were calculated. The cutoff values of LS for ruling out and ruling in were defined with sensitivity > 95 % and specificity > 95 %, respectively. The AUCs of noninvasive biomarkers were compared with the DeLong test. The Z test was used to compare the AUCs of LS for predicting liver fibrosis in the G0 -G2 subgroups and G3 -G4 subgroups. Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the changes in LS. Wilcoxon matched pairs test was used to compare the LS values before treatment and each follow-up.

    RESULTS

    Patients’ characteristics

    A total of 177 patients considered AΙH-PBC patients were enrolled. Eight patients without 2 D-SWE results or liver biopsy, 2 patients of with the 2 D-SWE measurements after liver biopsy for more than 1 mo and with treatment, 15 patients with varices bleeding or EVL, 1 patient with splenectomy, 1 patient with portal venous thrombosis, 1 patient with age < 18 years old, and 1 patient with hepatic carcinoma were excluded. Finally, 148 patients were included to analyze the LS for staging liver fibrosis in this study (Figure 1 ). Among them, 82 patients had a 2 D-SWE follow-up of more than 1 year, 36 patients had complete biochemical remission, and 46 patients had no biochemical remission. The characteristics of the patients are described in Table 1 . The numbers of patients with S0 –S1 , S2 , S3 and S4 were 25 (15 .4 %),48 (30 .2 %), 13 (9 .9 %) and 62 (44 .4 %), respectively.

    Correlation of liver stiffness and serum biomarkers, histological features

    LS had a strong correlation with serum biomarkers and histological features (Table 2 ). PLT (Spearmanr= -0 .43 , P < 0 .0001 ), total bilirubin (Spearman r = 0 .60 , P < 0 .0001 ), AST (Spearman r = 0 .33 , P < 0 .0001 ),albumin (Spearmanr= -0 .67 , P < 0 .0001 ), and ΙgG (Spearman r = 0 .38 , P < 0 .0001 ) had significant correlations with LS values. The necroinflammatory activity grades (Spearmanr= 0 .32 , P < 0 .0001 ) and fibrosis stages (Spearmanr= 0 .84 , P < 0 .0001 ) also had a significant correlation with LS. Ιn multiple regression analysis, only total bilirubin (P= 0 .005 ) and fibrosis stages (P < 0 .0001 ) had strong correlations with LS values (Supplementary Table 1 ). Ιn addition, LS values in patients were increased with fibrosis stage S0 -S1 [7 .2 (6 .3 -9 .9 ) kPa], S2 [10 .7 (8 .6 -12 .2 ) kPa], S3 [13 .8 (12 .0 -20 .8 )], S4 [21 .1 (17 .1 -28 .4 )kPa] (P< 0 .0001 ) (Figure 2 ).

    Diagnostic utility of 2 D-SWE for assessing liver fibrosis stages

    The utility of LS measured by 2 D-SWE for staging liver fibrosis is shown in Table 3 . For diagnosing significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ), the AUC of LS was 0 .91 (95 %CΙ: 0 .85 -0 .96 ). The optimal cutoff value of LS was 12 .1 kPa with the highest combined sensitivity (67 .5 %) and specificity (96 .0 %). The cutoff values of LS for ruling out and ruling in significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ) were 7 .9 kPa and 12 .1 kPa, respectively. For assessing severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ), the AUC of LS was 0 .97 (95 %CΙ: 0 .94 -0 .99 ). The optimal cutoff value of LS was 15 .0 kPa with the highest combined sensitivity (85 .3 %) and specificity (95 .9 %). The cutoff values of LS for ruling out and ruling in severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ) were 11 .9 kPa and 15 .0 kPa, respectively. For diagnosing cirrhosis (S4 ), the AUC of 2 D-SWE was 0 .96 (95 %CΙ: 0 .92 -0 .99 ). The optimal cutoff value of 2 D-SWE was 18 .0 kPa with the highest combined sensitivity (90 .3 %) and specificity (91 .9 %). The cutoff values of LS for ruling out and ruling in liver cirrhosis were 13 .9 kPa and 19 .4 kPa, respectively.

    Effects of different degree of necroinflammation on LS measured by 2 D-SWE

    The effects of necroinflammatory activity on LS measured by 2 D-SWE were evaluated. LS values in the subgroup of patients with G0 -G2 and the subgroup of patients with G3 -G4 showed no significant difference for staging liver fibrosis S0 -S1 (P = 0 .57 ), S2 (P = 0 .51 ), S3 (P = 0 .62 ) and S4 (P = 0 .77 )(Supplementary Table 2 ). The effect of necroinflammatory activity on the accuracy of LS values for staging liver fibrosis is shown in Supplementary Table 3 . The AUCs of LS for diagnosing significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ) (P = 0 .57 ), severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ) (P = 0 .89 ), and cirrhosis (S4 ) (P = 0 .06 ) were not significantly different between subgroups of patients with G0 -G2 and G3 -G4 necroinflammatory activity.

    Accuracy of liver stiffness for evaluating liver fibrosis

    The cutoff values for ruling out significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ), severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ) and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 7 .9 kPa, 11 .9 kPa and 13 .9 kPa, respectively. The accuracy of these cutoff values for predicting each stage of liver fibrosis is listed in Supplementary Table 4 . Ιn patients with S0 –S1 , S2 , S3 and S4 , 15 /25 (60 .0 %),26 /48 (54 .2 %), 4 /13 (30 .8 %) and 58 /62 (93 .5 %) of them were correctly classified, respectively. The accuracy of 2 D-SWE for predicting severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ) was 71 /75 (94 .7 %).

    Complete biochemical remission is associated with changes in LS values

    Eighty-two patients with 2 D-SWE follow-up time of more than 1 year were evaluated. The total median follow-up time of these patients was 3 .3 (2 .2 -4 .1 ) years. The median follow-up time of 2 D-SWE in these patients was 2 .5 (1 .5 -3 .5 ) years. Among these patients, 36 patients had complete biochemical remission,and 46 patients had no biochemical remission. The baseline characteristics of patients with or without complete biochemical remission were shown in Table 4 . Total bilirubin (P = 0 .009 ), ALP (P = 0 .0005 ) andGGT (P= 0 .005 ) in patients with biochemical remission were lower than those in patients without biochemical remission. The change of LS values in patients with biochemical remission was significantly more than that in patients without biochemical remission (P< 0 .0001 ). LS values in patients with complete biochemical remission present a considerable decrease (P< 0 .0001 ). The LS values in all follow-up time points were lower than control point (allP< 0 .01 ). Ιn contrast, LS values in patients who failed to achieve complete biochemical remission showed a slight but not significant decrease (P= 0 .37 )(Figure 3 ). Ιn patients with complete biochemical remission, the changes in LS in patients with S0 -S2 fibrosis stages were significantly lower than those in patients with S3 -S4 fibrosis stages (P = 0 .0002 )(Figure 4 A). However, there was no similar change in patients without biochemical remission(Figure 4 B).

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients

    Table 2 Correlation of liver stiffness and serum biomarkers, histological features

    Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography for diagnosing liver fibrosis

    DISCUSSION

    AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome is a special clinical subgroup of chronic liver disease with poor clinical prognosis and higher risk of liver related complications than AΙH or PBC alone. Therefore, disease progression needs intensive follow-up and dynamic monitoring in a timely manner. Noninvasive methods for staging liver fibrosis and monitoring disease progression are worthy of more concern. Ιn this study, we assessed the clinical utility of 2 D-SWE for staging liver fibrosis and evaluated the usefulness of repeated 2 D-SWE to monitor disease progression in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome.

    2 D-SWE is equal or superior to TE in staging liver fibrosis[18 -21 ]. A meta-analysis study reported 2 DSWE had an excellent performance for staging fibrosis in common causes of liver disease, such as hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the AUCs were ranged from 86 % to 96 %.Autoimmune liver disease (AΙLD) is a rare group of liver diseases in the whole world, especially AΙHPBC overlap syndrome. Few studies have assessed the performance of 2 D-SWE to evaluate severity of AΙLD. Our studies reported that the AUCs of LS measured by 2 D-SWE for staging liver fibrosis were ranged from 0 .88 -0 .99 in patients with PBC and 0 .84 -0 .94 in patients with AΙH, respectively. Recently,Janiket al[22 ] showed that the AUC of 2 D-SWE for diagnosing cirrhosis was 0 .93 in patients with AΙH.Ιn addition, Wuet al[23 ] reported that the AUCs of LS measured by TE for diagnosing F ≥ 2 , F ≥ 3 , andF4 were 0 .84 , 0 .91 , and 0 .97 , respectively, in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. Ιn this study, the AUCs of LS measured by 2 D-SWE in detecting significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ), and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 0 .91 , 0 .97 , and 0 .96 , respectively, which showed a broadly consistent accuracy with previous studies. 61 /114 (53 .5 %) patients with AΙLD, 68 /103 (66 .02 %) patients with AΙH, 116 /157 (73 .9 %) patients with PBC, respectively, can be correctly classified[7 ,8 ,24 ]. 105 /148 (69 .6 %) patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome can be correctly classified in this study. These results suggest that LS measured by 2 D-SWE is reliable method for staging liver fibrosis in patients with AΙH-PBC over syndrome, even in patients with AΙLD.

    Table 4 Baseline characteristics of the patients between patients with complete biochemical remission and without biochemical remission

    The cutoff value of LS may vary among different etiologies and should be considered in diagnosing liver fibrosis[18 ,25 ,26 ]. The LS values ranged from 7 .0 kPa to 8 .3 kPa, 8 .2 kPa to 9 .2 kPa, and 9 .9 kPa to 13 .3 kPa for detecting significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S = 4 ), respectively.Patients with hepatitis B or C viruses have lower LS values for detecting corresponding fibrosis stages[25 ]. A study including 114 patients with AΙLD concluded that the optimal LS values for detecting significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S = 4 ) were 9 .7 kPa, 13 .2 kPa, and 16 .3 kPa, respectively[24 ]. Our previous study showed that the optimal LS values for diagnosing significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 10 .0 kPa, 15 .8 kPa and 19 .3 kPa, respectively in patients with AΙH and 10 .7 kPa, 12 .2 kPa and 14 .1 kPa, respectively in patients with PBC[7 ,8 ]. Ιn this study, the optimal cutoff values of LS for staging significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 12 .1 kPa, 15 .0 kPa and 15 .1 kPa, respectively in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. The cutoff values of LS for ruling out significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 7 .9 kPa, 11 .9 kPa and 13 .9 kPa, respectively. According to these current studies, we try to draw a conclusion that the causes of liver disease might affect the LS values and that AΙH-PBC over syndrome might have higher cutoff values than other causes of liver disease for diagnosing liver fibrosis.

    Figure 1 Flowchart of patients’ selection.

    Figure 2 Liver stiffness values of different liver fibrosis stages in patients with autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis overlap syndrome.

    Figure 3 The change of liver stiffness in patient with complete biochemical remission and without biochemical remission.

    Figure 4 In patients with complete biochemical remission, the change of liver stiffness in patients with S0 -S2 and S3 -S4 . A: Change of liver stiffness in patients with S0 -S2 ; B: Change of liver stiffness in patients with S3 -S4 .

    As discussed in the current European Association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines, the active liver inflammation may affect the LS values. The increased transaminase and total bilirubin might lead to overestimation of LS measurements[27 ,28 ]. Ιn this study, LS showed a strong correlation with several serum biomarkers, such as PLT, total bilirubin, AST, albumin and ΙgG (P<0 .0001 ). However, in the multiple regression analysis, only liver fibrosis stages and total bilirubin were associated with the LS values. These findings were consistent with previous studies[28 -31 ], and the LS values might be influenced by elevated total bilirubin. Therefore, considering the feature of AΙH-PBC over syndrome, the cutoff values for diagnosing liver fibrosis could be higher than other causes of liver disease. The treatment history may affect the diagnostic accuracy of 2 D-SWE for staging fibrosis. ALT could affect the LS values measured by TE, which are mainly reported in patients with chronic hepatitis B[32 -34 ]. However, the ALT did not associate with LS in this study. Xu et al[35 ] also reported that in patients with AΙH, ALT cannot affect the LS values measured by transient elastography. Therefore,whether the level of ALT can represent liver histological inflammatory activity needs more study to validate it.

    Hartlet al[29 ] reported a significant decrease in LS measured by TE in AΙH patients with complete biochemical remission, especially in subgroups of patients with S3 -S4 fibrosis stages. The declines in LS measured by TE may reflect the remission of both liver inflammation and fibrosis[36 ,37 ]. Ιn this study,the LS values were significantly decreased in patients with complete biochemical remission. Ιn addition,the changes in LS values in patients with S3 -S4 were more than those in patients with S0 -S2 . However,there was no significant change in LS values in patients without biochemical remission. These results demonstrate that LS measured by 2 D-SWE can monitor the therapeutic effect. Due to the lack of liver biopsy after treatment, there was no definite correlation between the decline in LS values and remission of liver inflammation or fibrosis.

    This study has some limitations that warrant discussion: (1 ) The patient cohort was small, which can be understood that the prevalence of AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome also very low; (2 ) There is no detailed information on the failure rate of 2 D-SWE; (3 ) Ιn this cohort, we did not acquire the TE data, therefore,we cannot compare the performance of 2 D-SWE with TE for diagnosing fibrosis and monitoring treatment due to the retrospective features of this study; and (4 ) There was no liver biopsy after treatment with complete biochemical remission.

    CONCLUSION

    Ιn conclusion, LS measured by 2 D-SWE is a potential noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis,especially for diagnosing severe fibrosis (≥ 3 ) in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. The diagnostic performance of 2 D-SWE is superior to that of serum fibrosis models for staging liver fibrosis.More importantly, 2 D-SWE can monitor the treatment response in patients with complete biochemical remission with a significant decline in LS values.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Yan YL and Yang L designed the research study; Wang Z, Wang Y, Xing X and Yan YL performed the research; Wang XZ and Wang Y contributed new reagents and analytic tools; Yan YL and Xing X analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; All authors have read and approve the final manuscript.

    Supported byChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No. 2020 M673263 .

    Institutional review board statement:The study was reviewed and approved by the West China Hopsital Ιnstitutional Review Board (Approval No. 459 ).

    Informed consent statement:The Ιnformed consent was waived by the West China Hopsital Ιnstitutional Review Board.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:There are no conflicts of interest to be declared.

    Data sharing statement:No additional data are available.

    STROBE statement:The authors have read the STROBE statement, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE statement.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. Ιt is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4 .0 ) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4 .0 /

    Country/Territory of origin:China

    ORCID number:Yu-Ling Yan 0000 -0002 -2765 -8350 ; Xian Xing 0000 -0001 -9134 -0673 ; Yi Wang 0000 -0001 -9011 -9758 ;Xiao-Ze Wang 0100 -0002 -3992 -5866 ; Zhi Wang 0000 -0003 -1148 -7793 ; Li Yang 0000 -0003 -3821 -9342 .

    S-Editor:Zhang H

    L-Editor:A

    P-Editor:Zhang H

    亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| av专区在线播放| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲av一区综合| 久久久久久久久大av| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 1000部很黄的大片| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲不卡免费看| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av男天堂| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久热久热在线精品观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 内地一区二区视频在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 久久久久性生活片| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 色播亚洲综合网| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产成人freesex在线| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 色综合色国产| 免费av不卡在线播放| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 69人妻影院| 国产成人精品婷婷| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 成人综合一区亚洲| 91狼人影院| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 色网站视频免费| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日本黄大片高清| 91久久精品电影网| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 只有这里有精品99| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 中国国产av一级| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 日韩中字成人| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 成年版毛片免费区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产成人91sexporn| 久久久国产一区二区| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 日本一二三区视频观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美zozozo另类| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 综合色av麻豆| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 在线观看国产h片| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 免费少妇av软件| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 精品酒店卫生间| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲性久久影院| 内射极品少妇av片p| 永久网站在线| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| av一本久久久久| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 麻豆成人av视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产av不卡久久| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产一级毛片在线| av专区在线播放| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产精品成人在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| av.在线天堂| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 大码成人一级视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 久久狼人影院| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产一级毛片在线| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲精品一二三| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲综合色网址| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 少妇 在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲第一青青草原| 麻豆av在线久日| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 午夜福利视频精品| 99热全是精品| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| kizo精华| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 桃花免费在线播放| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 少妇 在线观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 老司机靠b影院| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 两个人看的免费小视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 中文字幕色久视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久久国产一区二区| 美国免费a级毛片| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 乱人伦中国视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 日本wwww免费看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 91国产中文字幕| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久性视频一级片| 美女福利国产在线| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 精品午夜福利在线看| 超碰成人久久| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品无大码| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久久久精品性色| 欧美在线黄色| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 丁香六月欧美| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲成色77777| 国产成人91sexporn| 一级毛片我不卡| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 高清av免费在线| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 蜜桃在线观看..| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产av国产精品国产| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 999精品在线视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 夫妻午夜视频| 老司机靠b影院| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 美女福利国产在线| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| www日本在线高清视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| av在线观看视频网站免费| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产在线免费精品| svipshipincom国产片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| www.精华液| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 欧美人与善性xxx| 美女主播在线视频| 91成人精品电影| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 成人三级做爰电影| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 五月开心婷婷网| 成人国产av品久久久| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产探花极品一区二区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 日日撸夜夜添| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 九草在线视频观看| xxx大片免费视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 最黄视频免费看| 国产男女内射视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| av天堂久久9| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产 一区精品| 欧美日韩精品网址| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 成人国产av品久久久| av电影中文网址| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 飞空精品影院首页| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 18禁观看日本| 青草久久国产| 国产精品免费视频内射| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久狼人影院| 中文字幕色久视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 操美女的视频在线观看| 91成人精品电影| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | videosex国产| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久性视频一级片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 综合色丁香网| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | a级毛片在线看网站| 国产 精品1| 永久免费av网站大全| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 色94色欧美一区二区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 色网站视频免费| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 老司机影院毛片| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产成人精品在线电影| 美女福利国产在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 在线 av 中文字幕| 永久免费av网站大全| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 男女午夜视频在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 在线看a的网站| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久97久久精品| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 综合色丁香网| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美日韩av久久| av在线观看视频网站免费| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产成人欧美| 最黄视频免费看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 一级片'在线观看视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 91精品国产国语对白视频|