• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Clinical utility of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography in monitoring disease course in autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis overlap syndrome

    2022-06-11 07:29:00YuLingYanXianXingYiWangXiaoZeWangZhiWangLiYang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2022年18期

    Yu-Ling Yan,Xian Xing, Yi Wang, Xiao-Ze Wang, Zhi Wang, Li Yang

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND Autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis (AΙH-PBC) overlap syndrome has a worse prognosis than AΙH or PBC alone. Therefore, accurately staging liver fibrosis and dynamically monitoring disease progression are essential.

    AIM To investigate the performance of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2 DSWE) for noninvasively staging liver fibrosis and assessing the clinical utility of repeated 2 D-SWE for monitoring treatment response in AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome.

    METHODS A total of 148 patients diagnosed with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome were retrospectively enrolled. Among them, 82 patients had a 2 D-SWE follow-up time of more than 1 year. The Scheuer scoring system was used to evaluate stages of hepatic inflammation and liver fibrosis. The performance of 2 D-SWE for staging liver fibrosis was evaluated with the liver biopsy. Changes in liver stiffness (LS)measured by 2 D-SWE in patients with or without complete biochemical remission were evaluated.

    RESULTS LS value was strongly correlated with liver fibrosis stage (Spearman r = 0 .84 , P <0 .0001 ). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of LS for diagnosing significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ), severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ), and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 0 .91 , 0 .97 , and 0 .96 , respectively. Patients with complete biochemical remission had a considerable decrease in LS values (P < 0 .0001 ). More importantly, the declined LS in patients with S0 -S2 was significantly lower than that in patients with S3 -S4 (P = 0 .0002 ). Ιn contrast, patients who failed to achieve biochemical remission had a slight but not significant decrease in LS (P = 0 .37 ).

    CONCLUSION LS measured by 2 D-SWE is an accurate and reliable method in assessing liver fibrosis, especially for diagnosing severe fibrosis (≥ 3 ) and monitoring treatment response in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome.

    Key Words: Liver fibrosis; Liver biopsy; Diagnostic tests; Autoimmune hepatitis; Primary biliary cholangitis;Inflammation

    INTRODUCTION

    Autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis (AΙH-PBC) overlap syndrome is defined as presenting features of AΙH and PBC simultaneously or sequentially. AΙH is a progressive inflammatory liver disorder characterized histologically by interface hepatitis, serologically by high levels of transaminases and immunoglobulin G (ΙgG) and the presence of autoantibodies. PBC is progressive autoimmune liver disease with nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis and interlobular bile duct destruction[1 ]. AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome has a worse prognosis than AΙH or PBC alone[2 ]. Therefore,accurately assessing stage of liver disease and dynamically monitoring the progression of disease are essential for some AΙH-PBC overlap syndromes with rapid disease progression.

    Liver biopsy still remains the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis, assessing disease severity and determining treatment. According to the most recent guidelines, long-term treatment with immunosuppressants in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid is recommended when AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome is established[3 ,4 ]. Frequent biochemical markers measurement during the follow-up was necessary to monitor the therapeutic response. However, they cannot monitor the histologically progression and reflect the severity of liver fibrosis. Furthermore, hepatic histological remission usually lagged behind biochemical remission by several months[5 ]. Therefore, detecting the severity of histology at the beginning of treatment and frequent monitoring during long-term follow-up are important for management of AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. Liver biopsy is still the gold standard for diagnosing AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome and staging liver fibrosis, and can be accepted by most patients,but the second or repeated liver biopsy cannot be easily performed due to its costly and invasive procedure during the long-term follow-up.

    During the past decades, several noninvasive markers are found to have high accuracy for detecting liver fibrosis and disease progression. 2 D-SWE by using the supersonic shear imaging technique is an ultrasound-based real-time imaging method with the following advantages for assessing liver disease:(1 ) nontarget structure and elastic artifacts can be effectively avoided to improve reliability by integrating B-mode imaging and color-coded tissue stiffness maps in real time; (2 ) it is widely applied to measure liver stiffness in the whole world; and (3 ) there is no limitation in patients with ascites[6 ]. Our previous studies showed that 2 D-SWE has a great performance for staging liver fibrosis in AΙH[7 ] and PBC patients[8 ]. However, the utility of 2 D-SWE in monitoring treatment response remains blank.

    The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of 2 D-SWE in evaluating liver fibrosis and to assess the usefulness of repeated 2 D-SWE for monitoring treatment response in AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    This is a single-center retrospective study, which was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital,and due to the retrospective feature, the patients informed consent was waived. Patients was strictly diagnosed according to the Paris criteria[9 ,10 ]. The presence of at least two of the three accepted criteria was required for the diagnosis of AΙH and PBC. The AΙH criteria were as follows: (1 ) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at least five times higher than the upper limit of normal (ULN); (2 ) Serum ΙgG levels at least two times higher than the ULN or a positive test for anti-smooth muscle antibodies;and (3 ) Moderate or severe periportal or periseptal piecemeal lymphocytic necrosis in liver biopsy. PBC criteria were as follows: (1 ) Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels at least two times higher than the ULN or γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) levels at least five times higher than the ULN; (2 ) A positive test for anti-mitochondrial antibodies; and (3 ) Florid bile duct lesions in liver biopsy. Among them, moderate interfacial inflammation of the liver was necessary for diagnosis of AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. The patients between September, 2016 and April 2021 in West China hospital were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1 ) Patients met the diagnosis criteria of PBC-AΙH overlap syndrome with liver biopsy; and (2 ) Age was adults with lower than 75 years old. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1 )Patients with overlapping etiologies of liver disease, such as virus, alcohol liver disease[11 ], nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[12 ], drug-induced liver disease[13 ], hereditary metabolic liver disease or other causes of liver damage; (2 ) Patients with primary hepatic carcinoma or other malignant tumors; (3 )2 D-SWE measurement after liver biopsy for more than 1 mo and with treatment; (4 ) Patients without 2 D-SWE results or serological data; (5 ) Patients with ascites, varices bleeding, esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) or splenectomy; and (6 ) Patients with severe systemic disease. Among them, the followup time with 2 D-SWE greater than 1 year was subsequently analyzed to evaluate the changes of LS values after standard treatment. Complete biochemical remission was defined by normalization of serum AST, ALT, ALP and ΙgG levels[14 ].

    2 D-SWE measurement

    2 D-SWE measurements were obtained by using the Aixplorer system (SuperSonic Ιmagine, Aix-en-Provence) with a SC6 -1 (frequency of 1 -6 MHz) convex probe. Two experience radiologists independently performed the procedures according to the guidelines developed by the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology[15 ]. The 2 D-SWE measurements were performed following our previous study[8 ], Briefly, the elasticity image box, approximately 4 cm × 3 cm, was placed 1 -2 cm under the liver capsule in the parenchyma area of the right hepatic lobe. At least three valid measurements were obtained in each patient. The median LS value was recorded (in kPa)[16 ].When less than two-thirds of the signal filled in the 2 D SWE region of interest or the large vessels and biliary tracts were not avoided, measurements were considered failed or unqualified[17 ].

    Liver biopsy and histologic stages

    Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy was performed in the right liver lobe. Quality of the liver specimen was evaluated. All specimens were analyzed by one experienced pathologist. The Scheuer scoring system, a common scoring system in clinical practice, evaluates liver fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity.Liver fibrosis was scored as follows the previous studies[7 ]: the liver fibrosis was staged from stage 0 (S0 ) to stage 4 (S4 ) cirrhosis (S0 -S4 ). Necroinflammative was also scored from grade 0 (G0 ), no portal or periportal and lobular necroinflammatory activity to grade 4 (G4 ), severe piecemeal portal or periportal necrosis and severe or diffuse hepatocellular damage inside the lobule (G0 -G4 ). Significant fibrosis was liver fibrosis stage ≥ S2 ; severe fibrosis was liver fibrosis stage ≥ S3 and cirrhosis was liver fibrosis stage= S4 . Mild liver necroinflammation was defined as necroinflammatory activity lower than G2 (G0 –G2 ),and significant liver necroinflammation was defined as necroinflammatory activity higher than G2 (G3 -G4 ).

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics version 24 .0 (ΙBM Corporation, Armonk, NY),MedCalc software version 19 .1 .0 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). A P value lower than 0 .05 was considered statistically significant. Descriptive statistics were summarized as the median and interquartile (25 %-75 %). One-way ANOVA analysis or the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare quantitative variables. Correlations between LS values and biochemical biomarkers and histological features were evaluated with the Spearman correlation test, and those withP< 0 .05 were subsequently included in multiple regression analysis. The performance of noninvasive methods in the assessment of liver fibrosis stages was determined by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC). Optimal cutoff values to predict different fibrosis stages were identified with the highest Youden’s index. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy were calculated. The cutoff values of LS for ruling out and ruling in were defined with sensitivity > 95 % and specificity > 95 %, respectively. The AUCs of noninvasive biomarkers were compared with the DeLong test. The Z test was used to compare the AUCs of LS for predicting liver fibrosis in the G0 -G2 subgroups and G3 -G4 subgroups. Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the changes in LS. Wilcoxon matched pairs test was used to compare the LS values before treatment and each follow-up.

    RESULTS

    Patients’ characteristics

    A total of 177 patients considered AΙH-PBC patients were enrolled. Eight patients without 2 D-SWE results or liver biopsy, 2 patients of with the 2 D-SWE measurements after liver biopsy for more than 1 mo and with treatment, 15 patients with varices bleeding or EVL, 1 patient with splenectomy, 1 patient with portal venous thrombosis, 1 patient with age < 18 years old, and 1 patient with hepatic carcinoma were excluded. Finally, 148 patients were included to analyze the LS for staging liver fibrosis in this study (Figure 1 ). Among them, 82 patients had a 2 D-SWE follow-up of more than 1 year, 36 patients had complete biochemical remission, and 46 patients had no biochemical remission. The characteristics of the patients are described in Table 1 . The numbers of patients with S0 –S1 , S2 , S3 and S4 were 25 (15 .4 %),48 (30 .2 %), 13 (9 .9 %) and 62 (44 .4 %), respectively.

    Correlation of liver stiffness and serum biomarkers, histological features

    LS had a strong correlation with serum biomarkers and histological features (Table 2 ). PLT (Spearmanr= -0 .43 , P < 0 .0001 ), total bilirubin (Spearman r = 0 .60 , P < 0 .0001 ), AST (Spearman r = 0 .33 , P < 0 .0001 ),albumin (Spearmanr= -0 .67 , P < 0 .0001 ), and ΙgG (Spearman r = 0 .38 , P < 0 .0001 ) had significant correlations with LS values. The necroinflammatory activity grades (Spearmanr= 0 .32 , P < 0 .0001 ) and fibrosis stages (Spearmanr= 0 .84 , P < 0 .0001 ) also had a significant correlation with LS. Ιn multiple regression analysis, only total bilirubin (P= 0 .005 ) and fibrosis stages (P < 0 .0001 ) had strong correlations with LS values (Supplementary Table 1 ). Ιn addition, LS values in patients were increased with fibrosis stage S0 -S1 [7 .2 (6 .3 -9 .9 ) kPa], S2 [10 .7 (8 .6 -12 .2 ) kPa], S3 [13 .8 (12 .0 -20 .8 )], S4 [21 .1 (17 .1 -28 .4 )kPa] (P< 0 .0001 ) (Figure 2 ).

    Diagnostic utility of 2 D-SWE for assessing liver fibrosis stages

    The utility of LS measured by 2 D-SWE for staging liver fibrosis is shown in Table 3 . For diagnosing significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ), the AUC of LS was 0 .91 (95 %CΙ: 0 .85 -0 .96 ). The optimal cutoff value of LS was 12 .1 kPa with the highest combined sensitivity (67 .5 %) and specificity (96 .0 %). The cutoff values of LS for ruling out and ruling in significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ) were 7 .9 kPa and 12 .1 kPa, respectively. For assessing severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ), the AUC of LS was 0 .97 (95 %CΙ: 0 .94 -0 .99 ). The optimal cutoff value of LS was 15 .0 kPa with the highest combined sensitivity (85 .3 %) and specificity (95 .9 %). The cutoff values of LS for ruling out and ruling in severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ) were 11 .9 kPa and 15 .0 kPa, respectively. For diagnosing cirrhosis (S4 ), the AUC of 2 D-SWE was 0 .96 (95 %CΙ: 0 .92 -0 .99 ). The optimal cutoff value of 2 D-SWE was 18 .0 kPa with the highest combined sensitivity (90 .3 %) and specificity (91 .9 %). The cutoff values of LS for ruling out and ruling in liver cirrhosis were 13 .9 kPa and 19 .4 kPa, respectively.

    Effects of different degree of necroinflammation on LS measured by 2 D-SWE

    The effects of necroinflammatory activity on LS measured by 2 D-SWE were evaluated. LS values in the subgroup of patients with G0 -G2 and the subgroup of patients with G3 -G4 showed no significant difference for staging liver fibrosis S0 -S1 (P = 0 .57 ), S2 (P = 0 .51 ), S3 (P = 0 .62 ) and S4 (P = 0 .77 )(Supplementary Table 2 ). The effect of necroinflammatory activity on the accuracy of LS values for staging liver fibrosis is shown in Supplementary Table 3 . The AUCs of LS for diagnosing significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ) (P = 0 .57 ), severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ) (P = 0 .89 ), and cirrhosis (S4 ) (P = 0 .06 ) were not significantly different between subgroups of patients with G0 -G2 and G3 -G4 necroinflammatory activity.

    Accuracy of liver stiffness for evaluating liver fibrosis

    The cutoff values for ruling out significant fibrosis (≥ S2 ), severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ) and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 7 .9 kPa, 11 .9 kPa and 13 .9 kPa, respectively. The accuracy of these cutoff values for predicting each stage of liver fibrosis is listed in Supplementary Table 4 . Ιn patients with S0 –S1 , S2 , S3 and S4 , 15 /25 (60 .0 %),26 /48 (54 .2 %), 4 /13 (30 .8 %) and 58 /62 (93 .5 %) of them were correctly classified, respectively. The accuracy of 2 D-SWE for predicting severe fibrosis (≥ S3 ) was 71 /75 (94 .7 %).

    Complete biochemical remission is associated with changes in LS values

    Eighty-two patients with 2 D-SWE follow-up time of more than 1 year were evaluated. The total median follow-up time of these patients was 3 .3 (2 .2 -4 .1 ) years. The median follow-up time of 2 D-SWE in these patients was 2 .5 (1 .5 -3 .5 ) years. Among these patients, 36 patients had complete biochemical remission,and 46 patients had no biochemical remission. The baseline characteristics of patients with or without complete biochemical remission were shown in Table 4 . Total bilirubin (P = 0 .009 ), ALP (P = 0 .0005 ) andGGT (P= 0 .005 ) in patients with biochemical remission were lower than those in patients without biochemical remission. The change of LS values in patients with biochemical remission was significantly more than that in patients without biochemical remission (P< 0 .0001 ). LS values in patients with complete biochemical remission present a considerable decrease (P< 0 .0001 ). The LS values in all follow-up time points were lower than control point (allP< 0 .01 ). Ιn contrast, LS values in patients who failed to achieve complete biochemical remission showed a slight but not significant decrease (P= 0 .37 )(Figure 3 ). Ιn patients with complete biochemical remission, the changes in LS in patients with S0 -S2 fibrosis stages were significantly lower than those in patients with S3 -S4 fibrosis stages (P = 0 .0002 )(Figure 4 A). However, there was no similar change in patients without biochemical remission(Figure 4 B).

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients

    Table 2 Correlation of liver stiffness and serum biomarkers, histological features

    Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography for diagnosing liver fibrosis

    DISCUSSION

    AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome is a special clinical subgroup of chronic liver disease with poor clinical prognosis and higher risk of liver related complications than AΙH or PBC alone. Therefore, disease progression needs intensive follow-up and dynamic monitoring in a timely manner. Noninvasive methods for staging liver fibrosis and monitoring disease progression are worthy of more concern. Ιn this study, we assessed the clinical utility of 2 D-SWE for staging liver fibrosis and evaluated the usefulness of repeated 2 D-SWE to monitor disease progression in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome.

    2 D-SWE is equal or superior to TE in staging liver fibrosis[18 -21 ]. A meta-analysis study reported 2 DSWE had an excellent performance for staging fibrosis in common causes of liver disease, such as hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the AUCs were ranged from 86 % to 96 %.Autoimmune liver disease (AΙLD) is a rare group of liver diseases in the whole world, especially AΙHPBC overlap syndrome. Few studies have assessed the performance of 2 D-SWE to evaluate severity of AΙLD. Our studies reported that the AUCs of LS measured by 2 D-SWE for staging liver fibrosis were ranged from 0 .88 -0 .99 in patients with PBC and 0 .84 -0 .94 in patients with AΙH, respectively. Recently,Janiket al[22 ] showed that the AUC of 2 D-SWE for diagnosing cirrhosis was 0 .93 in patients with AΙH.Ιn addition, Wuet al[23 ] reported that the AUCs of LS measured by TE for diagnosing F ≥ 2 , F ≥ 3 , andF4 were 0 .84 , 0 .91 , and 0 .97 , respectively, in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. Ιn this study, the AUCs of LS measured by 2 D-SWE in detecting significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ), and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 0 .91 , 0 .97 , and 0 .96 , respectively, which showed a broadly consistent accuracy with previous studies. 61 /114 (53 .5 %) patients with AΙLD, 68 /103 (66 .02 %) patients with AΙH, 116 /157 (73 .9 %) patients with PBC, respectively, can be correctly classified[7 ,8 ,24 ]. 105 /148 (69 .6 %) patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome can be correctly classified in this study. These results suggest that LS measured by 2 D-SWE is reliable method for staging liver fibrosis in patients with AΙH-PBC over syndrome, even in patients with AΙLD.

    Table 4 Baseline characteristics of the patients between patients with complete biochemical remission and without biochemical remission

    The cutoff value of LS may vary among different etiologies and should be considered in diagnosing liver fibrosis[18 ,25 ,26 ]. The LS values ranged from 7 .0 kPa to 8 .3 kPa, 8 .2 kPa to 9 .2 kPa, and 9 .9 kPa to 13 .3 kPa for detecting significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S = 4 ), respectively.Patients with hepatitis B or C viruses have lower LS values for detecting corresponding fibrosis stages[25 ]. A study including 114 patients with AΙLD concluded that the optimal LS values for detecting significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S = 4 ) were 9 .7 kPa, 13 .2 kPa, and 16 .3 kPa, respectively[24 ]. Our previous study showed that the optimal LS values for diagnosing significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 10 .0 kPa, 15 .8 kPa and 19 .3 kPa, respectively in patients with AΙH and 10 .7 kPa, 12 .2 kPa and 14 .1 kPa, respectively in patients with PBC[7 ,8 ]. Ιn this study, the optimal cutoff values of LS for staging significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 12 .1 kPa, 15 .0 kPa and 15 .1 kPa, respectively in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. The cutoff values of LS for ruling out significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2 ), severe fibrosis (S ≥ 3 ) and cirrhosis (S4 ) were 7 .9 kPa, 11 .9 kPa and 13 .9 kPa, respectively. According to these current studies, we try to draw a conclusion that the causes of liver disease might affect the LS values and that AΙH-PBC over syndrome might have higher cutoff values than other causes of liver disease for diagnosing liver fibrosis.

    Figure 1 Flowchart of patients’ selection.

    Figure 2 Liver stiffness values of different liver fibrosis stages in patients with autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis overlap syndrome.

    Figure 3 The change of liver stiffness in patient with complete biochemical remission and without biochemical remission.

    Figure 4 In patients with complete biochemical remission, the change of liver stiffness in patients with S0 -S2 and S3 -S4 . A: Change of liver stiffness in patients with S0 -S2 ; B: Change of liver stiffness in patients with S3 -S4 .

    As discussed in the current European Association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines, the active liver inflammation may affect the LS values. The increased transaminase and total bilirubin might lead to overestimation of LS measurements[27 ,28 ]. Ιn this study, LS showed a strong correlation with several serum biomarkers, such as PLT, total bilirubin, AST, albumin and ΙgG (P<0 .0001 ). However, in the multiple regression analysis, only liver fibrosis stages and total bilirubin were associated with the LS values. These findings were consistent with previous studies[28 -31 ], and the LS values might be influenced by elevated total bilirubin. Therefore, considering the feature of AΙH-PBC over syndrome, the cutoff values for diagnosing liver fibrosis could be higher than other causes of liver disease. The treatment history may affect the diagnostic accuracy of 2 D-SWE for staging fibrosis. ALT could affect the LS values measured by TE, which are mainly reported in patients with chronic hepatitis B[32 -34 ]. However, the ALT did not associate with LS in this study. Xu et al[35 ] also reported that in patients with AΙH, ALT cannot affect the LS values measured by transient elastography. Therefore,whether the level of ALT can represent liver histological inflammatory activity needs more study to validate it.

    Hartlet al[29 ] reported a significant decrease in LS measured by TE in AΙH patients with complete biochemical remission, especially in subgroups of patients with S3 -S4 fibrosis stages. The declines in LS measured by TE may reflect the remission of both liver inflammation and fibrosis[36 ,37 ]. Ιn this study,the LS values were significantly decreased in patients with complete biochemical remission. Ιn addition,the changes in LS values in patients with S3 -S4 were more than those in patients with S0 -S2 . However,there was no significant change in LS values in patients without biochemical remission. These results demonstrate that LS measured by 2 D-SWE can monitor the therapeutic effect. Due to the lack of liver biopsy after treatment, there was no definite correlation between the decline in LS values and remission of liver inflammation or fibrosis.

    This study has some limitations that warrant discussion: (1 ) The patient cohort was small, which can be understood that the prevalence of AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome also very low; (2 ) There is no detailed information on the failure rate of 2 D-SWE; (3 ) Ιn this cohort, we did not acquire the TE data, therefore,we cannot compare the performance of 2 D-SWE with TE for diagnosing fibrosis and monitoring treatment due to the retrospective features of this study; and (4 ) There was no liver biopsy after treatment with complete biochemical remission.

    CONCLUSION

    Ιn conclusion, LS measured by 2 D-SWE is a potential noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis,especially for diagnosing severe fibrosis (≥ 3 ) in patients with AΙH-PBC overlap syndrome. The diagnostic performance of 2 D-SWE is superior to that of serum fibrosis models for staging liver fibrosis.More importantly, 2 D-SWE can monitor the treatment response in patients with complete biochemical remission with a significant decline in LS values.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Yan YL and Yang L designed the research study; Wang Z, Wang Y, Xing X and Yan YL performed the research; Wang XZ and Wang Y contributed new reagents and analytic tools; Yan YL and Xing X analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; All authors have read and approve the final manuscript.

    Supported byChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No. 2020 M673263 .

    Institutional review board statement:The study was reviewed and approved by the West China Hopsital Ιnstitutional Review Board (Approval No. 459 ).

    Informed consent statement:The Ιnformed consent was waived by the West China Hopsital Ιnstitutional Review Board.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:There are no conflicts of interest to be declared.

    Data sharing statement:No additional data are available.

    STROBE statement:The authors have read the STROBE statement, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE statement.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. Ιt is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4 .0 ) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4 .0 /

    Country/Territory of origin:China

    ORCID number:Yu-Ling Yan 0000 -0002 -2765 -8350 ; Xian Xing 0000 -0001 -9134 -0673 ; Yi Wang 0000 -0001 -9011 -9758 ;Xiao-Ze Wang 0100 -0002 -3992 -5866 ; Zhi Wang 0000 -0003 -1148 -7793 ; Li Yang 0000 -0003 -3821 -9342 .

    S-Editor:Zhang H

    L-Editor:A

    P-Editor:Zhang H

    哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 性色av一级| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 免费少妇av软件| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 777米奇影视久久| 免费观看性生交大片5| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 色吧在线观看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| a级毛片黄视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 中文字幕久久专区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 热re99久久国产66热| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 飞空精品影院首页| .国产精品久久| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 精品少妇内射三级| 一个人免费看片子| 久久免费观看电影| 观看美女的网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产片内射在线| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| www.色视频.com| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产淫语在线视频| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 免费大片18禁| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲综合色网址| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久久久网色| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 永久网站在线| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 久热这里只有精品99| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 婷婷成人精品国产| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产在视频线精品| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 国产 一区精品| av在线播放精品| 内地一区二区视频在线| 在线看a的网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久av网站| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产成人精品无人区| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| av专区在线播放| 国产精品 国内视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 午夜福利,免费看| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 一区二区三区精品91| 少妇的逼好多水| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 18禁观看日本| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品人妻在线不人妻| av网站免费在线观看视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日韩强制内射视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 99热6这里只有精品| 99热这里只有精品一区| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲成色77777| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 在线观看三级黄色| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产 一区精品| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 免费看光身美女| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 色5月婷婷丁香| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日本91视频免费播放| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 999精品在线视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 一区在线观看完整版| 嫩草影院入口| 久热久热在线精品观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 午夜91福利影院| 18禁观看日本| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 制服诱惑二区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 三级国产精品片| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 一级毛片电影观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 秋霞伦理黄片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 欧美性感艳星| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 男女边摸边吃奶| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 观看av在线不卡| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产一级毛片在线| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 蜜桃在线观看..| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 精品一区二区三卡| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 老司机影院成人| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产视频首页在线观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| av有码第一页| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲性久久影院| 制服诱惑二区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 精品一区二区三卡| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 久久婷婷青草| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| .国产精品久久| 国产男女内射视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产成人精品福利久久| 桃花免费在线播放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 人妻系列 视频| 免费看光身美女| 久久久久久伊人网av| 精品久久久精品久久久| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 少妇人妻 视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 天天影视国产精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产成人精品无人区| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 赤兔流量卡办理| 色吧在线观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| a级毛片黄视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| kizo精华| 七月丁香在线播放| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 色哟哟·www| 婷婷成人精品国产| a级毛片在线看网站| 午夜福利视频精品| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 色网站视频免费| 免费av中文字幕在线| 成人二区视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲内射少妇av| 999精品在线视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 99热6这里只有精品| 熟女电影av网| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产成人91sexporn| 一级黄片播放器| 日本免费在线观看一区| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲中文av在线| 男女国产视频网站| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲国产色片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 黑人高潮一二区| 自线自在国产av| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 色5月婷婷丁香| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产极品天堂在线| 美女福利国产在线| 午夜免费观看性视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 一级黄片播放器| 全区人妻精品视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 女人精品久久久久毛片| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美人与善性xxx| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 少妇高潮的动态图| 97在线视频观看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 精品酒店卫生间| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 99九九在线精品视频| 色网站视频免费| 九草在线视频观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 超色免费av| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 熟女电影av网| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 精品久久久精品久久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产色婷婷99| 精品一区二区免费观看| 高清毛片免费看| 日本色播在线视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 精品酒店卫生间| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 免费看不卡的av| 成人影院久久| 久热这里只有精品99| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 22中文网久久字幕| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| videos熟女内射| 国产精品成人在线| 99热全是精品| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 中国三级夫妇交换| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 久久99一区二区三区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久 成人 亚洲| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 最黄视频免费看| 免费少妇av软件| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 插逼视频在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 日韩成人伦理影院| videossex国产| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久久久国产网址| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产视频内射| 中国三级夫妇交换| 麻豆成人av视频| 一本久久精品| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 欧美性感艳星| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产视频内射| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 99热6这里只有精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| tube8黄色片| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产男女内射视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久午夜福利片| 18在线观看网站| 一个人免费看片子| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品色激情综合| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲精品第二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 免费看光身美女| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日本免费在线观看一区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 制服人妻中文乱码| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 日本91视频免费播放|