• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    BMPR-IB gene disruption causes severe limb deformities in pigs

    2022-06-07 10:50:08QiangYangChuanMinQiaoWeiWeiLiuHaoYunJiangQiQiJingYaYaLiaoJunRenYuYunXing
    Zoological Research 2022年3期

    Qiang Yang, Chuan-Min Qiao, Wei-Wei Liu, Hao-Yun Jiang, Qi-Qi Jing, Ya-Ya Liao, Jun Ren, Yu-Yun Xing,*

    1 State Key Laboratory of Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, China

    ABSTRACT In an attempt to generate g.A746G substitution in the BMPR-IB gene, we unexpectedly obtained BMPR-IB homozygous knockout piglets (BMPR-IB-/-) and heterogeneous knockout piglets with one copy of the A746G mutation (BMPR-IB-/746G) via CRISPR/Cas9 editing.Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing revealed complex genomic rearrangements in the target region.All BMPR-IB-disrupted piglets showed an inability to stand and walk normally.Both BMPR-IB-/- and BMPR-IB-/746G piglets exhibited severe skeletal dysplasia characterized by distorted and truncated forearms(ulna, radius) and disordered carpal, metacarpal, and phalangeal bones in the forelimbs.The piglets displayed more severe deformities in the hindlimbs by visual inspection, including fibular hemimelia,enlarged tarsal bone, and disordered toe joint bones.Limb deformities were more profound in BMPR-IB-/-piglets than in the BMPR-IB-/746G piglets.Proteomic analysis identified 139 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in the hindlimb fibula of BMPR-IB-/746G piglets compared to the wild-type (WT)controls.Most DEPs are involved in skeletal or embryonic development and/or the TGF-β pathway and tumor progression.Gene Ontology (GO) and protein domain enrichment analysis suggested alterations in these processes.Of the top 50 DEPs, a large proportion, e.g., C1QA, MYO1H, SRSF1,P3H1, GJA1, TCOF1, RBM10, SPP2, MMP13, and PHAX, were significantly associated with skeletal development.Our study provides novel findings on the role of BMPR-IB in mammalian limb development.

    Keywords: BMPR-IB; A746G; Pigs; Limb deformities

    INTRODUCTION

    Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), members of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) family, play important roles in the formation of bone and cartilage and the development of other organs, such as muscle, kidney, and blood vessels (Katagiri & Watabe, 2016).BMPs transduce their signals through type I and type II serine-threonine kinase receptors (BMPRI and BMPRII) (Miyazono et al., 2010).Perturbations of BMP signaling via BMPRI have been linked to multiple diseases in bone, cartilage, and muscles (Lin et al.,2016).As a type of BMPRI, activin-like kinase 6 (ALK6, also calledBMPR-IB) is a critical regulator of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis (Lin et al., 2016).Patients with missense (I200K and R486W) or deletion (del359-366) mutations inBMPR-IBsuffer severe limb deformations, including short stature, fibula aplasia, severe brachydactyly, and ulnar deviation of thehands, which are mainly caused by chondrodysplasia during skeletal development (Demirhan et al., 2005; Lehmann et al.,2003).In addition, null mutations ofBMPR-IBin mice result in limb abnormalities, demonstrating thatBMPR-IBis required for chondrocyte proliferation, differentiation, and maturation(Baur et al., 2000; Yi et al., 2000).In vitrostudies have shown that continuous expression of activeBMPR-IBinduces mineralized bone matrix formation, while inhibition of endogenousBMPR-IBblocksBMP2-induced osteoblast differentiation and mineralized bone matrix formation,suggesting thatBMPR-IBis required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation (Chen et al., 1998).Mice expressing truncated dominant-negativeBMPR-IBin target osteoblasts exhibit impaired postnatal bone formation (Zhao et al., 2002).Thus, osteoblasticBMPR-IBappears to play a necessary role during postnatal bone modeling and remodeling.

    TheBMPR-IBgene also affects prolificacy in sheep and plays a vital role in the control of follicular growth and development (Davis et al., 2006; Reader et al., 2012).The A746G mutation inBMPR-IBis reported to be highly associated with increased ovulation rates and litter size in sheep (Mulsant et al., 2001; Wilson et al., 2001).As theBMPR-IBA746G mutation was not detected in any pig breeds in our collection, we introduced the 746 GG mutation into the porcine genome via traditional transgenic technology in a previous study (Zhao et al., 2016), aiming to improve reproductive performance.Though the resulting transgenic boar exhibited stronger spermatogenic ability (Zhao et al.,2016), an important functional gene,NAGLU, was disrupted due to random insertion (Yang et al., 2018).

    To avoid random integration of exogenous vectors, we used the CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing platform (Cong et al., 2013)to edit AA746 into 746GG of theBMPR-IBgene in porcine fetal fibroblasts (PFFs) using a polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-amplified donor, with cloned pigs then generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT).Unexpectedly, all nine cloned piglets from four deliveries showed severe limb deformities and were unable to walk and stand normally.Based on these ubiquitous limb deformities, we proposed that accidental gene disruption may have occurred.In this study,we first genotyped the target region across the donor sequence and found that theBMPR-IBgene was disrupted in these piglets.We then dissected the limb phenotypes and investigated molecular regulation in these pigs.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Animals and ethics statement

    The PFFs were isolated from one-month-old large white pig fetuses using 200 U/mL collagenase type IV (Sigma-Aldrich,USA).Surrogate sows were housed individually according to standard procedures.All experiments involving animals were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals formulated by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China.The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangxi Agricultural University.All animal operations were performed under anesthesia to minimize suffering.Sixteen cloned piglets (nine individuals with deformed limbs and seven normal individuals) aged 3-5 days were used in this experiment.

    Construction of CRISPR/Cas9 vector and double-stranded DNA donor template

    The pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP (PX458, #48138) plasmid used in this study was purchased from Addgene (http://www.addgene.org/CRISPR/, USA).Single-guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting exon 8 of porcineBMPR-IBwas designed using the Benchling online tool (https://www.benchling.com/).Here, 5'-TCATTGCTGCAGACATCAAA-3' was selected as the sgRNA,and the corresponding protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)sequence was GGG (Figure 1A).Paired synthesized oligonucleotides containing theBMPR-IB-sgRNA sequence(Supplementary Table S1) were ordered from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.(China); the DNA pair were annealed and ligated into theBbsI-digested PX458 vector to generate the recombinant plasmid.The recombinant plasmid DNA was transformed into Trans5ɑ competent cells (TransGen, China), and then extracted using an EndoFree?Plasmid Maxi Kit (Qiagen,Germany).

    Figure 1 Generation of BMPR-IB-modified PFFs and piglets

    Linear double-stranded donor DNA was obtained by bridgeoverlap-extension PCR.First, we used primer pair two(Supplementary Table S1) to amplify the region harboring the sgRNA sequence targetingBMPR-IBin large white pigs by routine PCR, and DNA of the individual with the GGC sequence at the PAM site was selected as a template for the next amplification.Two PCR assays using primer pairs three and four (Supplementary Table S1) were then performed in a thermocycler under the following conditions: 94 °C for 2 min;35 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 68 °C for 3 min; and 72 °C for 10 min.We mixed the two PCR products at a ratio of 1:1, and then conducted bridging PCR using primer pair five(Supplementary Table S1).The bridging PCR products were subjected to a final round of amplification using a touch-down PCR protocol (primer pair six for detection, Supplementary Table S1) under the following conditions: 94 °C for 5 min; 26 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 68 °C (-0.5 °C/cycle) for 45 s, 72 °C for 2 min; 14 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 2 min; and 72 °C for 10 min.Finally, the amplified PCR product (donor DNA containing A746G mutation) was gel purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen,Germany).

    PFF transfection and selection

    To obtainBMPR-IB746G mutation cell clones, 25 μg of Cas9-sgRNA plasmid, 25 μg of purified donor DNA, and 12.5 μg of PX459 v2 plasmid were co-transfected into 3×106PFF cells using the BTX ECM 2001 (USA) electroporation system (200 V, 1 ms, 3 pulses, 1 repeat).The electroporated PFFs were transferred into a 10 cm Petri Dish with growth medium containing Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 15%fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and SCR7 (Xcessbio, USA) to a final concentration of 1 μmol/L.After 30 h, PFFs were selected using 3.5 μg/mL puromycin (Sigma, Japan) for two days.The cells were then plated into 40 Petri Dishes (10 cm) at various cell densities for an additional 6-8 days of culture at 37 °C.The single-cell colonies in the Petri Dishes were collected and seeded in 24-well plates.After reaching 90% confluency, the cells in each colony were passaged in 6-well plates and subcultured at 37 °C for 48 h.About 20% of each colony was digested (56 °C, 60 min; 95 °C, 10 min) in 10 μL of lysis buffer(0.5% NP40 and 2 μg/μL of Proteinase K) to extract DNA, and the remaining cells were stored in liquid nitrogen for SCNT.Primer pair seven (Supplementary Table S1) was first used to identify the A746G locus in cell clones.The sgRNA sequence region was amplified using primer pair two (Supplementary Table S1) for A746G positive clones.The PCR products were sequenced on a 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystem, USA).Colonies carrying 746GG were selected as donor cells for SCNT, and cells carrying AA746 were used as controls.

    SCNT and embryo transplantation

    Five cell colonies (Figure 1E) were used as nuclear donors to produce cloned pigs via SCNT, as described previously (Gong et al., 2004).Briefly, cumulus-oocyte complexes werecollected and matured at 38.5 °C for 20 h in maturation medium comprised of M199 (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.01 U/mL basal follicle stimulating hormone(bFSH), 0.01 U/mL basal luteinizing hormone (bLH), 1 μg/mL estradiol, and 1% (v:v) penicillin/streptomycin.The first polar body was then aspirated from the mature oocytes using a glass pipette, and, finally, the donor cells were fused with enucleated oocytes using BTX ECM 2001 (USA) electrofusion equipment.The reconstructed embryos were cultured in embryo-development medium at 38.5 °C for 24 h and then transferred surgically into the oviducts of estrus-synchronized pig surrogates (each recipient receiving approximate 350 embryos).Pregnancy status was determined by ultrasonography 30 days after embryo transfer.All cloned piglets were delivered by natural birth.

    Genotyping cloned piglets

    Genomic DNA was extracted from the ear tissues of cloned piglets using a cell/tissue genomic DNA extraction kit(Generay Biotech, Shanghai, China).Primer pair eight(Supplementary Table S1) was used for long-range PCR amplification across the donor sequence inBMPR-IB.The PCR protocol included 25 μL of 2×Gflex PCR Buffer (TaKaRa,Japan), 1 μL of each forward and reverse primer (10 μmol/L),100 ng of genomic DNA, and ddH2O to a final volume of 50 μL.Cycling parameters were: 94 °C for 1 min; 30 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 15 s, 68 °C for 5.5 min; and 68 °C for 10 min.After sequencing the PCR products, the mutant piglets were all found to beBMPR-IBdisrupted, eitherBMPR-IB-/-orBMPR-IB-/746G, as described below.

    To detect whether the CRISPR plasmid vectors were integrated into the cloned piglet genomes, DNA of the cloned piglets was used as a template for PCR amplification with primer pairs nine and ten, respectively (Supplementary Table S1).The touchdown PCR conditions were 94 °C for 5 min; 26 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 68 °C (-0.5 °C/cycle) for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s; 14 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s; and 72 °C for 10 min.To detect whether off-target mutations existed in theBMPR-IB-disrupted piglets, the top 15 predicted off-target sites (OTS) were selected using online software (https://www.benchling.com/).Amplicons were subjected to Sanger sequencing.The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

    Phenotype analysis

    OneBMPR-IB-/-, twoBMPR-IB-/746G, and two wild-type (WT)cloned piglets were used for skeletal phenotype analyses.We used the Digital Diagnost system (Philips, Netherlands) to take X-ray pictures of the whole-body skeletons of cloned piglets.The images were taken at 50 KV with 3 mA exposure.We further analyzed the anatomical structure of limbs in theBMPR-IB-disrupted and WT cloned piglets.Briefly, we used a scalpel, scissors, and tweezers to peel and remove the skin,muscle, and related adhesion tissues of the limbs.The limb skeletons of theBMPR-IB-/-(n=1),BMPR-IB-/746G(n=2), and WT (n=2) cloned piglets were then collected and stored at-80 °C.Both forelimbs and hindlimbs of each piglet were analyzed using the Micro-CT system (Nemo NMC-100,Pingseng Healthcare Inc., China) at a resolution of 50 μm,voltage of 90 kV, and current of 60 μA.Quantification of trabecular bone was assessed by measuring a 2 mm section starting 2 mm distal to the growth plate of the forelimb radius and hindlimb tibia.For cortical bone, 3 mm sections above the midshaft of the forelimb radius and hindlimb tibia were analyzed.Based on threshold segmentation and threedimensional (3D) measurements, quantitative analyses of trabecular and cortical bone (BV/TV, ratio of segmented bone volume to total volume; BS/TV, ratio of segmented bone surface to total volume; Tb.Sp, mean distance between trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods; Tb.N, average number of trabeculae per unit length, a key parameter for trabecular bone architecture; Tb.BMD, bone density measure,reflecting strength of bones as represented by calcium content; Ct.BMD, cortical bone mineral density; Ct.Th,average cortical thickness; Ct.ar/Tt.ar, cortical area fraction) in the radius and tibia were performed using Avatar v1.6.5(Pingseng Healthcare Inc., China).

    Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blot analyses

    Total RNA was extracted from the liver, kidney, testicle,forelimb and hindlimb cartilage, forelimb ulna, and hindlimb fibula ofBMPR-IB-disrupted (BMPR-IB-/-,n=1;BMPR-IB-/746G,n=3) and WT (n=3) piglets using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen,USA).The mRNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScriptTMRT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara,Japan).qRT-PCR was performed using the ABI 7 900 HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA), and the thermal parameters were 50 °C for 2 min; 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 50 s; 95 °C for 15 s; 60 °C for 15 s; and 95 °C for 15 s.The 2-??Ctformula was used to determine relative gene expression, which was normalized to the level ofGAPDHmRNA.Each reaction was performed in technical quadruplicate.Primer pairs eleven and twelve for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

    Total protein was extracted from the liver and kidney ofBMPR-IB-/-piglets (n=1) and forelimb ulna and hindlimb fibula ofBMPR-IB-/746G(n=3) and WT piglets (n=3) using a protein extraction kit (Applygen, China).Protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay, and 30 μg of protein from each sample was resolved by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE) (Angle Gene, China) and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, USA).After blocking with Quick Block? Blocking Buffer (Beyotime,China) for 1 h at room temperature, the membranes were washed in Tris Buffered Saline with Tween 20 (TBST) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies, including:rabbit polyclonal anti-BMPR-IB antibody (1:500; Sino Biological, China), mouse monoclonal antibodies for C1QA,SRSF1, P3H1, GJA1, TCOF1, RBM10, MMP13, and PHAX(1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), and β-actin (1:1 000;Abcam, UK).The membranes were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies (1:2 000; Abcam, UK) for 1 h at room temperature.β-actin was used as the loading control.The bands were visualized with an ECL chemiluminescent kit (Beyotime, China) and scanned usingthe ChemiDocTMMP imaging system (Bio-Rad, USA).Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ (Rawak Software,Germany).The relative amounts of BMPR-IB, C1QA, SRSF1,P3H1, GJA1, TCOF1, RBM10, MMP13, and PHAX were calculated after normalization to β-actin.

    4D label-free quantitative proteomic analysis

    Proteomic analysis was conducted by PTM Bio Co., Ltd.(China).Hindlimb fibula samples from theBMPR-IB-/746G(n=3)and WT piglets (n=3) were ground into powder in liquid nitrogen and thoroughly homogenized in 8 mol/L urea containing 1% protease inhibitor cocktail.After insoluble debris was removed by centrifugation at 12 000gfor 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected and protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime,China).For digestion, the protein solution was reduced with 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol for 30 min at 56 °C and alkylated with 11 mmol/L iodoacetamide for 15 min at room temperature in the dark.The protein samples were then diluted with 100 mmol/L triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) to a urea concentration of 2 mol/L.Finally, trypsin was added at a 1:50 trypsin-to-protein mass ratio for the first digestion overnight and a 1:100 trypsin-to-protein mass ratio for the second digestion of 4 h.

    The tryptic peptides were dissolved in 0.1% formic acid and 2% acetonitrile (solvent A) and loaded onto a home-made reversed-phase analytical column (15 cm long, 75 μm i.d.).The gradient was increased from 6% to 23% solvent B (0.1%formic acid in 90% acetonitrile) over 38 min, 23% to 35% in 14 min, and to 80% in 4 min, then held at 80% for the last 4 min,all at a constant flow rate of 550 nL/min on an EASY-nLC 1 000 ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system(Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).The peptides were subjected to nanospray ionization (NSI) source followed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in a Q ExactiveTMPlus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) coupled to the UPLC system.The electrospray voltage applied was 2.3 kV.The m/z scan range was 400 to 1 200 for full scan, and intact peptides were detected using Orbitrap at a resolution of 60 000.Peptides were then selected for MS/MS using normalized collision energy (NCE) setting as 28 and the fragments were detected using Orbitrap at a resolution of 17 500.Standard datadependent acquisition (DDA) procedures were implemented to detect and quantify peptides, including one MS acquisition at a mass/charge ratio (m/z) of 400-1 500, with the top 20 intense precursor ions subjected to MS/MS scans with 15.0 s dynamic exclusion.Automatic gain control (AGC) was set at 5×104and fixed first mass was set to 100 m/z.

    The resulting MS/MS data were processed using the MaxQuant search engine (v.1.5.2.8).Tandem mass spectra were searched against the Sus_scrofa_9823 database concatenated with the reverse decoy database.Trypsin/P was specified as the cleavage enzyme allowing up to four missing cleavages.Mass tolerance for the precursor ions was set to 20×10-6in the first search and 5×10-6in the main search, and mass tolerance for the fragment ions was set to 0.02 Da.Carbamidomethyl on Cys was specified as fixed modification and acetylation modification and oxidation on Met were specified as variable modifications.The false discovery rate(FDR) was adjusted to <1% and minimum score for modified peptides was set to >40.

    Functional enrichment analysis

    Proteins were classified by Gene Ontology (GO) annotation into three categories: biological process, cellular component,and molecular function.For each category, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was employed to test differentially expressed protein (DEP) enrichment against all identified proteins.GO terms with a correctedP<0.05 were considered significant.For each DEP, the InterPro (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/)database was searched and two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was employed to test its (domain) enrichment against all identified proteins.Protein domains with a correctedP<0.05 were considered significant.

    Target proteomic analysis

    Parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) analysis was performed to verify and quantify the DEPs.One or two unique peptides of each target protein were selected from proteomic measurements based on thresholds of detection frequencies>50%, missed cleavage=0, andP<0.05.Finally, a spectral library of 10 selected proteins represented by 18 peptides was created.Proteins extracted from the hindlimb fibula ofBMPRIB-/746G(n=3) and WT piglets (n=3) were alkylated and digested, as described in “4D label-free quantitative proteomic analysis”.Protein (1 μg) was injected into the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)system for the PRM assay (2.1 kV electrospray voltage and 35 000 resolution (AGC target 3×106, maximum injection time 50 ms)).The isolation window for MS/MS was set at 2.0 m/z.Peptide settings were: enzyme, trypsin [KR/P]; peptide length,8-25; variable modification, carbamidomethyl on Cys and oxidation on Met; and max variable modifications, 3.Transition settings: precursor charges, 2 and 3; ion charges, 1 and 2; ion types, b, y, and p; product ions, ion 3 to last ion; and ion match tolerance, 0.02 Da.Skyline software (v3.6) was used for relative quantification for PRM study (Henderson et al.,2018).

    Statistical analysis

    All data are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD).Statistical analysis was performed using an independent twotailed Student’st-test.A null probability ofP<0.05 was considered statistically significant.SPSS v17.0 was used for all analyses.

    RESULTS

    CRISPR/Cas9-mediated BMPR-IB A746G mutation in PFFs

    To convert A746 of theBMPR-IBgene to 746G, we designed one sgRNA and 1 977 bp linear double-stranded donor(template) DNA for homology-directed repair (HDR)-mediated genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 (Figure 1A).The linear double-stranded donor DNA, obtained from bridging PCR(Supplementary Figure S1A-C), encompassed the target point mutation (A746G) and sgRNA sequence, and was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Figure S1D).The donor DNA carried an altered PAM (GGG to GGC, Figure 1A;Supplementary Figure S1D).The Cas9/sgRNA expressionvector and template DNA were both co-transfected into an early passage of PFFs.A total of 113 single-cell clones were obtained after 48 h of puromycin selection and subsequent subculture.These clones were genotyped via short-range PCR and Sanger sequencing.Of these 113 clones, 39 contained the A746G mutation (16 homozygotes and 23 heterozygotes), 30 contained homozygous or heterozygous deletions, and 44 were WT (Supplementary Table S3).

    Generation of BMPR-IB-edited pigs

    We selected twoBMPR-IB/746GG and threeBMPR-IB/AA746 cell colonies identified by short-range PCRs for SCNT,obtaining approximately 3 500 embryos.All embryos were surgically transferred to 10 surrogate sows, six of which carried to term and gave birth to 16 cloned piglets (Figure 1E).The genotypes of the cloned piglets were determined by Sanger sequencing of long-range PCR products across the 1 977 bp donor sequence.As shown in Figure 1B-F, seven cloned piglets carried the expected 746G mutation at the target locus, but all had a 1 365 bp heterozygous deletion of theBMPR-IBgene (referred to as “BMPR-IB-/746G”).Two piglets had a 2 bp deletion on one allele and a 2 431 bp deletion on the other allele of theBMPR-IBgene (referred to as “BMPR-IB-/-”).Piglets carrying either of the two genotypes were considered asBMPR-IB-disrupted pigs.

    To detect whether the CRISPR plasmids were integrated into the host genome, we genotyped the Cas9 and sgRNA domains, and no integrations were found in any of the cloned piglets (Supplementary Figure S2).As off-target effects are a major concern when using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, we performed PCR amplification and sequencing for the top 15 potential OTS.No off-target effects were found in theBMPRIBmutant piglets (Supplementary Table S4).

    Phenotype characterization of BMPR-IB-disrupted pigs

    TheBMPR-IB-disrupted piglets were unable to stand normally,with their splayed limbs only able to move in a “paddling”motion (Video 1: https://figshare.com/s/966c57aee3cf5147 604c).Close examination revealed different malformed shapes of the forelimb and hindlimb.As shown in Figure 2A,the forelimbs ofBMPR-IB-disrupted piglets (BMPR-IB-/746GorBMPR-IB-/-) were severely distorted towards the abdomen,and the wrist joints could not be flexed or extended normally.In the hindlimbs ofBMPR-IB-disrupted piglets, the knee joints were moderately rigid and the ankles and toes were severely bent backwards.

    Radiographic and anatomical examinations showed marked skeletal hypoplasia of the limbs inBMPR-IB-disrupted piglets.In the forelimbs of theBMPR-IB-/746GandBMPR-IB-/-piglets,the ulna and radius were severely deformed and shortened.The carpal, metacarpal, and phalangeal bones ofBMPR-IB-disrupted piglets were disorderedly arranged and partially absent.Moreover, bone in the wrist joint was hardened,rendering the joint unable to flex (Figure 2B, C;Supplementary Figure S3).In the hindlimbs ofBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets, the fibula was largely absent, tarsal bones were enlarged and partially absent, and phalangeal bones showed disordered arrangement.In addition, the ankle joint was swollen, with a large joint gap and collapsed third proximal phalanx (os compedale) (Figure 2B, D; Supplementary Figure S3).Of note, theBMPR-IB-/-piglets had nearly the same hindlimb deformity phenotypes as theBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets,except for complete loss of the fibula inBMPR-IB-/-piglets(Figure 2B, D).

    Figure 2 Phenotypic characterization of BMPR-IB-disrupted piglets

    High-resolution micro-CT scans generated clearer visualization of limb bone morphology and skeletal arrangement, as well as quantitative bone morphometry(Figures 3, 4).Quantitative analysis of the forelimb radius(Figure 3C) revealed a 42% and 15% reduction in BV/TV in theBMPR-IB-/-andBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets, respectively,compared with the WT piglets.Furthermore, trabecular BS/TV was 28% lower in theBMPR-IB-/-group than in the WT group,with no significant difference observed in theBMPR-IB-/746Ggroup.In addition, compared with the WT piglets, Tb.Sp was 24% and 61% larger in theBMPR-IB-/746GandBMPR-IB-/-groups, respectively.BMPR-IBdisruption did not appear to have a negative effect on Tb.BMD or Ct.BMD.In addition, no significant effects were observed in Ct.Th or Ct.ar/Tt.ar due to the large variations in WT piglets.Regarding the hindlimb tibia(Figure 4C), theBMPR-IB-/746GandBMPR-IB-/-groups had distinctly lower BV/TV (-26% and -35%, respectively)compared to the WT group.Trabecular BS/TV was 11%higher in theBMPR-IB-/-group compared to the WT, while no significant difference was found in theBMPR-IB-/746Ggroup.Furthermore, Tb.BMD was lower in both groups (-8% and-11%, respectively), but there was no significant difference in Ct.BMD.There was a 35% reduction in Ct.Th in theBMPR-IB-/-group, while the decrease in Ct.Th was not significant in theBMPR-IB-/746Ggroup (Figure 4C).In general, theBMPR-IB-/-group showed poorer morphometric deterioration than theBMPR-IB-/746Ggroup.

    Analysis of BMPR-IB expression in cloned piglets

    The qRT-PCR results showed thatBMPR-IBgene expression was lost in all examined tissues of theBMPR-IB-/-piglets.In theBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets,BMPR-IBexpression was normal in the forelimb cartilage and ulna but was significantly elevated(P<0.05 orP<0.01) in the hindlimb cartilage and fibula, as well as the liver, kidney, and testes (Figure 5A).

    Western blot analysis confirmed the loss ofBMPR-IBin the liver and kidney ofBMPR-IB-/-piglets (Figure 5B, C).The western blots showed no significant difference in BMPR-IB protein expression in the forelimb ulna between theBMPR-IB-/746Gand WT piglets.However, BMPR-IB protein expression in the hindlimb fibula in theBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that in the WT piglets(Figure 5B, C).

    Figure 3 Micro-CT analyses of forelimb bones of piglets

    Figure 4 Micro-CT analyses of hindlimb bones of piglets

    Identification of DEPs

    Hindlimb fibula samples fromBMPR-IB-/746G(n=3) and WT piglets (n=3) were analyzed using the LC-MS/MS platform.A total of 6 412 proteins were identified and 5 957 proteins were quantified.Based on cut-off criteria (P<0.05, number of peptides>1, fold-change>1.5), a total of 139 proteins with one or more unique peptides were significantly differentially expressed in the hindlimb fibula between the two groups,including 51 down-regulated and 88 up-regulated in theBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets (Figure 6A; Supplementary Table S5).

    GO and protein domain enrichment analysis

    To obtain a better mechanistic understanding of the protein networks that may be related to limb deformity formation inBMPR-IBdisrupted piglets, we used GO analysis to categorize DEPs.The DEPs in the hindlimb fibula were primarily involved in bone development regulation, such as regulation of bone remodeling, positive regulation of bone resorption, positive regulation of bone remodeling, regulation of bone mineralization, osteoblast differentiation, and regulation of biomineral tissue development (Figure 6B).

    Protein domain enrichment analysis was performed to identify functional domains of the DEPs.As shown in Figure 6C, secreted phosphoprotein 24 (Spp-24), high mobility group (HMG) box, chromo shadow domain, transferrin, and serpin (serine protease inhibitor) were significantly enriched in the hindlimb fibula.

    Analysis of target proteins using PRM

    To verify the changes in differential expression identified by 4D label-free quantitative proteomic analysis, PRM was employed using the same samples.Ten up-regulated proteins with potential involvement in bone development regulation were selected and a panel of seven proteins with one or two unique peptides were successfully detected and quantified.All seven proteins were significantly up-regulated in the hindlimb fibula ofBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets (P<0.05,BMPR-IB-/746G/WT ratio>1) (Table 1).Thus, the PRM results were highly consistent with those from the 4D label-free quantitative phase(Table 1).

    Validation of expression levels of selected DEPs

    To validate the 4D label-free quantitative proteomic results,the expression levels of several DEPs in the hindlimb fibula were detected via western blotting.As shown in Figure 7, the protein expression levels of C1QA, SRSF1, TCOF1, RBM10,and MMP13 in the hindlimb fibula were significantly higher in theBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets (P<0.01 orP<0.05) than in the WTpiglets, and GJA1 expression was higher in theBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets than in the WT piglets, but with a weakly significant effect (P=0.096).PHAX protein expression in the hindlimb fibula was significantly lower inBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets (P<0.01)than in WT piglets (Figure 7).Thus, the expression levels of the selected DEPs detected by western blotting were highly consistent with the 4D label-free quantitative proteomic data(Figure 7; Supplementary Table S5).

    Table 1 PRM-verified DEPs in hindlimb fibula of BMPR-IB-/746G piglets compared with WT individuals

    Figure 5 qRT-PCR and western blot analyses of BMPR-IB expression levels

    DISCUSSION

    In this study, we originally planned to produce cloned pigs with aBMPR-IB746GGmutation.We isolated cell clones carrying this mutation via CRISPR/Cas9 techniques using bridge PCR-amplified products as the HDR template.However, our primary design had two significant defects.First, we attempted to avoid re-cutting the repair template by changing GGG(PAM) to GGC (Figure 1A).However, we overlooked the fact that an extra NGG PAM was introduced by the A746G mutation (Figure 1A), enabling Cas9 to re-cleave the repair template.Second, we implemented short-range PCR(Supplementary Figure S1) rather than long-range PCR across the whole donor region to identify isolated cell clones.This led to unknown genome rearrangements in theBMPR-IBgene in the selected colonies (Figure 1F).These two factors resulted in the accidental production of piglets carrying a disruptedBMPR-IBgene, which, to the best of our knowledge,is the first report on the generation ofBMPR-IBgene disruption in pigs.Recent evidence indicates that complex rearrangements are frequently observed in CRISPR/Cas9 editing (Alanis-Lobato et al., 2021; Canaj et al., 2019;Skryabin et al., 2020).In this study, theBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets carried a discontinuous 1 365 bp deletion with short fragments of intron 8 and exon 9 retained in the gene (Figure 1F).RegardingBMPR-IB-/-piglets, a 2 431 bp segment was deleted in one allele and a 2 bp segment was deleted in the other (Figure 1F).Both the 1 365 bp and 2 431 bp deletions spanned the donor region.Our study indicated that multiple PCR procedures may be a better option for detecting repair donor and flanking regions.This is because complex rearrangements can occur during genome editing, and a particular pair of primers may amplify only one allele of the target gene in cases where the other allele contains a deletion.

    In our study,BMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets harboring compoundmutations (g.746G and 1 365 bp del, Figure 1E) in theBMPRIBgene displayed phenotypes typically observed in limbs with skeletal dysplasia.The g.746A>G mutation in theBMPR-IBgene has been previously identified in domestic sheep and is suggested to increase ovulation rates and litter size (Chu et al., 2007; Mahdavi et al., 2014; Reader et al., 2012; Roy et al.,2011; Zhou et al., 2018).In the current study,BMPR-IBmRNA and protein expression levels in five of the seven examined tissues were significantly higher inBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets than in WT piglets (P<0.01 orP<0.05; Figure 5), suggesting that the expression levels of single intactBMPR-IBallele (carrying the746Gvariant without deletion) inBMPR-IB-/746Gindividuals exceeded the sum of the transcript levels of the two alleles in the WT individuals.We speculate two possible reasons for this phenomenon.First, the A746G mutation may be located on acis-acting element that regulatesBMPR-IBexpression, and it may alter the function of this element, thereby affecting gene expression.Second, genetic compensation may be induced due to deleterious mutations (El-Brolosy & Stainier, 2017).Indeed, bioinformatic analysis in this study indicated that the A746G mutation in the highly conserved intracellular kinase signaling domain of the BMP-IB receptor is likely to damage its structure and function, and intriguingly, cause distinct alterations in secondary structures in pigs and sheep(Supplementary Figure S4).As the function of the mutant BMPR-IB protein was greatly reduced but not necessarilycompletely lost, theBMPR-IB-/746Gindividuals may exhibited a genetic compensation response, in which the intact mutant allele and its translated protein were overexpressed to compensate for its functional deficits.This may also explain whyBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets are anatomically and pathologically similar toBMPR-IB-/-individuals but show less severe deformities in skeletal development (Figures 2D, 3, 4).

    Figure 6 DEPs in hindlimb fibula between BMPR-IB-/746G and WT groups

    Figure 7 Western blot analyses of DEP expression levels in hindlimb fibula between BMPR-IB-/746G and WT groups

    Disruption ofBMPR-IBin mice and humans often results in severe limb abnormalities.For example, in BMPR-IB-/-mice,the proximal and middle phalanges are reduced and fused,the radius, ulna, and tibia lengths are normal, but the metacarpals/metatarsals are shorter, and several carpal/tarsal bones are affected (Yi et al., 2000).In the current study,however, mutant piglets not only exhibited malformation in the carpal, metacarpal, and phalangeal bones, but the ulna and radius were also severely distorted and shortened (Figures 2B, C, 3A).In humans, both I200K and R486W missense mutations are reported to cause brachydactyly type A2(Lehmann et al., 2003).Furthermore, loss-of-function mutation(del359-366) can cause acromesomelic chondrodysplasia and genital anomalies, with hypoplasia of the femoral neck and head (Demirhan et al., 2005).The severe skeletal defects in ourBMPR-IBmutant (BMPR-IB-/746GorBMPR-IB-/-) piglets,such as loss of fibula, abnormally developed tarsal bones,disorderedly arranged phalangeal bones, and severely distorted and shortened ulna and radius, are analogous to many clinical phenotypes.We also found that the forelimb wrist joint inBMPR-IBmutant piglets was hardened and could not be flexed, the hindlimb ankle joint inBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets was malformed, and the third proximal phalanx (os compedale) was collapsed (Figure 2C, D).However, no defects were found in other parts of the skeleton.

    As the hindlimb fibula was completely missing inBMPR-IB-/-piglets (Figures 2B, D, 4A), we obtained fibula samples fromBMPR-IB-/746Gand WT piglets for proteomic analysis.In total,139 DEPs (88 up-regulated, 51 down-regulated) were identified (Figure 6A; Supplementary Table S5).PRM analysis was performed to verify the quantitative data of seven randomly selected proteins (Table 1).Most DEPs were significantly involved in one or multiple functions of skeletal development, embryonic development, TGF-β pathway, and immune system, especially tumor progression (Supplementary Table S5).These results are consistent with the known functions of theBMPR-IBgene (Dituri et al., 2019; Rahman et al., 2015).A large proportion of genes in the top 50 DEPs were significantly associated with skeletal or embryonic development (Supplementary Table S5), includingC1QA,MYO1H,SRSF1,P3H1,GJA1,TCOF1,RBM10,SPP2,MMP13, andPHAX.C1QAis a subunit chain of C1q, which is implicated in osteoclast development from monocytes (Teo et al., 2012).Polymorphisms inMYO1Hare associated with mandibular retrognathism (Arun et al., 2016) and sagittal and vertical craniofacial skeletal patterns (Cunha et al., 2019).SRSF1is a prototype member of the serine/arginine (SR) rich family of splicing proteins and may modulate pattern formation(including cartilage formation) by inhibiting transcription of tissue-specific genes during embryogenesis (Lee et al., 2016).P3H1, also known asLEPRE1, forms a complex with cyclophilin B in the endoplasmic reticulum (Vranka et al.,2010).P3H1-null mice display abnormalities in fibrillarcollagen-rich tissues, including bones (Vranka et al., 2010),and mutations inP3H1can cause non-lethal (Takagi et al.,2012) and lethal recessive (Cabral et al., 2012) osteogenesis imperfections.Mutations inGJA1can lead to human oculodentodigital dysplasia, including face, eye, tooth, and limb deformities (Paznekas et al., 2009; Sargiannidou et al.,2021).TCOF1encodes the nucleolar phosphoprotein treacle,and its mutation is responsible for Treacher Collins syndrome(Dai et al., 2016; Grzanka & Piekie?ko-Witkowska, 2021).Mutations inRBM10can lead to splicing changes that affect mouse palate development (Rodor et al., 2017).SPP2is a highly phosphorylated and glycosylated sialoprotein and a prominent component of mineralized extracellular matrices in bone.Full-length SPP2 (24 kD) inhibits BMP-induced bone formation, while its degradation product (18.5 kD) (designated spp18.5) appears to be pro-osteogenic (Brochmann et al.,2009; Sintuu et al., 2008).We speculate that the biological function of SPP2 may be finely regulated by proteolysis, and this process may be altered inBMPR-IB-disrupted pigs.MMP13is considered to play a crucial role in bone formation and remodeling and is expressed in both terminal hypertrophic chondrocytes in the growth plate and in osteoblasts (Li et al.,2017; Stickens et al., 2004).MMP13is up-regulated at the onset of osteoarthritis (Li et al., 2017), andMMP13-deficient mice show abnormal development of the skeletal growth plate(Stickens et al., 2004).A research suggests thatPHAXis associated with Pierre Robin syndrome, which is characterized by congenital micrognathia, glossoptosis and airway obstruction (Ansari et al., 2014).Here, GO analysis showed noticeable enrichment in biological pathways related to bone and embryonic development, including regulation of bone remodeling, positive regulation of bone resorption,positive regulation of bone remodeling, regulation of bone mineralization, osteoblast differentiation, and regulation of biomineral tissue development.

    In summary, theBMPR-IB-disrupted piglets obtained via CRISPR-Cas9 and SCNT exhibited walking difficulties and severe developmental deformities in the forelimbs and hindlimbs.TheBMPR-IB-/746GandBMPR-IB-/-piglets showed similar phenotypes.We identified 139 DEPs in the hindlimb fibula ofBMPR-IB-/746Gpiglets with limb deformities, most of which are involved in skeletal and (or) embryonic development.Our study provides novel insights intoBMPR-IBdeficiency in a large mammal.

    SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online.

    COMPETING INTERESTS

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

    Conceptualization, Y.Y.X.and Q.Y.; formal analysis and experiment, Q.Y.and C.M.Q.; investigation, W.W.L.and H.Y.J.; methodology, Q.Q.J.and Y.Y.L.; resources, Y.Y.X.and J.R.; visualization, Q.Y.and C.M.Q; writing-original draft, Q.Y.;writing-review & editing, Y.Y.X.All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We would like to thank Prof.Lu-Sheng Huang at Jiangxi Agricultural University for kind suggestions during the experimental design process.

    日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 黄色成人免费大全| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲无线在线观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 免费看a级黄色片| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 女警被强在线播放| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 国产久久久一区二区三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品福利观看| 午夜福利18| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产精华一区二区三区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 99国产精品99久久久久| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 搡老岳熟女国产| www.999成人在线观看| 俺也久久电影网| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 一本精品99久久精品77| ponron亚洲| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品高清国产在线一区| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 成人手机av| 免费看日本二区| 看免费av毛片| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 精品高清国产在线一区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 91在线观看av| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产色视频综合| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 日本免费a在线| av福利片在线| 91在线观看av| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久久久久大精品| 99久久国产精品久久久| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 此物有八面人人有两片| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 精品日产1卡2卡| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 一本一本综合久久| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日本 av在线| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 不卡一级毛片| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 精品久久久久久久末码| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 丁香欧美五月| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲无线在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 伦理电影免费视频| 18禁观看日本| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 三级毛片av免费| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 亚洲九九香蕉| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 怎么达到女性高潮| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 在线国产一区二区在线| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 怎么达到女性高潮| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 黄频高清免费视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产三级在线视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 国产主播在线观看一区二区| svipshipincom国产片| 看片在线看免费视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产三级黄色录像| www国产在线视频色| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| www日本黄色视频网| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品电影一区二区在线| 一本久久中文字幕| 久久青草综合色| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| www.www免费av| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 青草久久国产| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 91国产中文字幕| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 黄频高清免费视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 99热只有精品国产| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 免费av毛片视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 不卡av一区二区三区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 午夜福利高清视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 两个人看的免费小视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 91大片在线观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| av视频在线观看入口| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| av在线播放免费不卡| 俺也久久电影网| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 91成年电影在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产三级在线视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| www.999成人在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 丁香欧美五月| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 老司机靠b影院| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| cao死你这个sao货| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 成人欧美大片| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产激情久久老熟女| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲全国av大片| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 99re在线观看精品视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| www国产在线视频色| 黄色 视频免费看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲最大成人中文| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久香蕉国产精品| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 人人澡人人妻人| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产av不卡久久| 校园春色视频在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产免费男女视频| 99热只有精品国产| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 午夜免费激情av| 91在线观看av| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 黄色视频不卡| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 97碰自拍视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 满18在线观看网站| 9191精品国产免费久久| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 日本五十路高清| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久香蕉激情| 久久国产精品影院| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| svipshipincom国产片| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 手机成人av网站| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久人妻av系列| 国产又爽黄色视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| av电影中文网址| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 看免费av毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产精品九九99| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 日韩欧美三级三区| 成人三级做爰电影| 此物有八面人人有两片| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 午夜免费观看网址| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| av在线播放免费不卡| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日韩免费av在线播放| 一区二区三区精品91| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 老司机靠b影院| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 男人舔奶头视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 男女那种视频在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 国产精品,欧美在线| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 露出奶头的视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 99热只有精品国产| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 国产一区二区激情短视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美在线黄色| 国产视频内射| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 曰老女人黄片| cao死你这个sao货| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 色在线成人网| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 此物有八面人人有两片| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 在线看三级毛片| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| tocl精华| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 一本一本综合久久| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 男人操女人黄网站| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产黄片美女视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 无限看片的www在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 丁香欧美五月| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 制服诱惑二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 黄色 视频免费看| 久99久视频精品免费| 日韩免费av在线播放| 午夜免费激情av| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| netflix在线观看网站| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| a级毛片在线看网站| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久香蕉精品热| tocl精华| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| avwww免费| 欧美日本视频| 1024手机看黄色片| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 成年版毛片免费区| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 精品高清国产在线一区| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 大型av网站在线播放| 此物有八面人人有两片| 黄片播放在线免费| av视频在线观看入口| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 黄片播放在线免费| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产高清激情床上av| 91九色精品人成在线观看|