• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Outcome of percutaneous drainage for septic complications coexisted with COVID-19

    2022-06-02 03:14:50MohamedDeifAhmadMounirSherifAboHedibahAhmedAbdelKhalekAliElmokadem
    World Journal of Radiology 2022年4期

    INTRODUCTION

    Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction that happens due to dysregulated host response to an infection[1]. In the bacterial type of sepsis, which is the most frequent etiology, early and rapid therapy by the appropriate antibiotic is essential to reduce the incidence of complications and mortality rates. Most patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) present no severe symptomatology, but almost 5% of patients show severe lung injury or even multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, with mortality at the ICUs between 8% and 38% depending on the country[2,3]. Patients admitted to ICU showed a dysregulated host response in the form of hyperinflammation, changes in the coagulation profile, and dysregulation in the immune response[4], similar to what happens in bacterial sepsis[5,6]. The body’s adaptive protection mechanism is formed by a moderate inflammatory response and immune suppression, and if any of them become excessive or uncontrolled, this protective compensation will transform into destructive and decompensated status, then sepsis develops[7-9]. Accordingly, most deaths in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are caused by sepsis[10,11].

    Hematological examinations for COVID-19 patients show elevated cytokines, C-reactive protein (CRP), abnormal liver and myocardial enzymes decreased lymphocytes, declined platelets, and increased D-dimmer[12]. These findings are similar to sepsis caused by bacterial infections. So, severe COVID-19 could be a sepsis-induced by viral infection causing severe systemic inflammatory response (so-called inflammatory storm)[13,14]. Inflammatory storms are not unique to COVID-19 but also happen in other respiratory viral infections that mimic COVID-19[15,16], such as influenza, SARS, avian influenza, swine flu, and MERS[17-19]. Additionally, specimen cultures in about 80% of COVID-19 patients with septic complications show no bacterial or fungal infection, and the viral infection seems to be the only cause for sepsis[20,21]. Accordingly, sepsis is expected to be responsible for worsening the clinical conditions of these critically ill COVID-19 patients. Our objective was to describe the clinical, radiological, and laboratory characteristics of a small cohort of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 who underwent percutaneous drainage and their post-procedural outcomes. We hypothesized that septic complication associated with severe COVID-19 has a poor outcome despite adequate percutaneous drainage and antibiotic therapy.

    The princess s body was lain the same day in a plain wooden chest, and set in the chapel16 of the castle, and on that night and every night after it, a sentinel was posted in the church, to keep watch over the chest

    All, that is, except for a few irreplaceable bulbs. For years, Arnoldus had been trying to cultivate a black tulip, something no gardener had ever been able to do. He was now very close. By careful selection, he had created a dark-purple tulip. These few bulbs he guarded vigorously to prevent people from stealing them for food. He did not even give them to his family to eat, because they would make just one meager4() meal, and eating them would destroy his chance of restarting his business and restoring his village after the war.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patient selection

    A local institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and waivers of consent of medical record review were received. COVID-19 patients who underwent image-guided percutaneous drainage for suspected septic complications were identified. Patient demographics and clinical and radiological reports were obtained through electronic medical records and picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The severity of the pulmonary parenchymal involvement and distribution of the pulmonary lesions secondary to COVID-19 was assessed by chest X-ray in 4 patients and chest CT in 7 patients. Flow chart of the study is shown in Figure 1.

    Patients demographics

    Eleven patients (10 males and 1 female) who were confirmed to have COVID-19 by RT-PCR test required drain placement for septic complications. The mean age ± SD of the patients was 48.5 ± 14 years (range 30-72 years). Three patients underwent cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis (Figure 2). Percutaneous drainage was performed in seven patients; two peripancreatic collections (Figure 3); two infected bile leaks in hepatic donor and after resection of hepatic hemangioma; one recurrent hepatic abscess after eight days of surgical evacuation (Figure 4), one psoas abscess (Figure 5) and one lumbar abscess. One patient underwent percutaneous nephrostomy for acute pyelonephritis (Figure 6).

    This retrospective study consisted of 11 patients who were confirmed to have COVID-19 by RT-PCR test and required drain placement for septic complications. The mean age ± SD of the patients was 48.5 ± 14 years (range 30-72 years). Three patients underwent cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis.Percutaneous drainage was performed in seven patients; two peripancreatic collections; two infected leaks after hepatic resection; one recurrent hepatic abscess, one psoas abscess and one lumbar abscess.One patient underwent a percutaneous nephrostomy for acute pyelonephritis.

    Study outcomes

    The primary outcome measures were technical and clinical success. The technical success was achieved by completion of the procedure without procedural complications, while the definition of clinical success was the resolution of symptoms without the subsequent need for operative drainage or patient mortality secondary to related sepsis. Secondary outcomes included the amount of drained fluid, microbial analysis of drained fluid, the period of tube drainage, and changes in laboratory findings before and after drainage.

    Percutaneous drainage procedures

    Septic complications were diagnosed by ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Two interventional radiologists at two institutions with 10 and 13 years of experience performed all percutaneous drainage procedures. All procedures were done after administration of local anesthesia. Percutaneous access into the collections, inflamed gall bladder, or kidney was achieved under sonographic guidance with an 18- or 21-gauge needle. Using the Seldinger technique and micro-puncture set, following serial dilatations, a drainage catheter was placed. The drainage catheters used ranged from 8-French to 10-French. In all cases, no immediate complications were noted.

    His despair at being so late bewildered him so entirely57 that he appeared in his natural form and attempted to sprinkle some black liquid over the bride and bridegroom, which was intended to kill them, but the Fairy stretched out her wand and the liquid dropped on the Magician himself

    Antibiotic therapy was started once the symptoms of septic complications presented on the patients. The antibiotics regimen was readjusted according to the drained fluid culture results. The drained fluid for each patient was analyzed regarding its character and maximum possible volume when the tubes were initially placed. Then a fluid sample was sent for bacterial culture and gram stain evaluation. Patients were observed for any major complications requiring surgical intervention till the last date of follow-up.

    18.Red:Red is a color of passion and brilliance68. It demands attention, which the sisters are hoping for in their pursuit of the prince for marriage.Return to place in story.

    Statistical analysis

    Data were analyzed with SPSS

    V. 21 (IBM Corp., New York, NY, United States; formerly SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). The normality of data was first tested with the Shapiro test. Qualitative data were described using numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD for parametric data and median (range) for non-parametric data. Finally, the laboratory findings were compared with Wilcoxon test.

    RESULTS

    Fever and abdominal pain were the most common presenting symptoms, and acute kidney injury (AKI) was the most frequent comorbidity. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients, while clinical success was achieved only in 4 of 11 patients (36.4%). Despite percutaneous drainage, one patient (9%) needed exploratory laparotomy five days after drainage that revealed perforated sigmoid colon, which was managed by resection followed by patient improvement and discharge after 18 d. Six other patients (54.5%) died within a month after proper percutaneous drainage and adequate antibiotic coverage, all of them were admitted to ICU and put under mechanical ventilation. The cause of death was overlapped between COVID-19 related respiratory failure and sepsis. One patient needed cystogasterostomy for peripancreatic collection after 21 d of tube insertion. Two patients (18.2%) had two drainage procedures to drain multiple fluid collections. Two patients (18.2%) had recurrent fluid collections and repeated percutaneous drainage procedures. The average volume of the drained fluid immediately after tube insertion was 85 mL. The average duration of drainage was 16 d. Follow-up scans showed a reduction of the retained content and associated inflammatory changes after tube insertion in all patients. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes are listed in Table 1.

    All of a sudden, there, at the back of the store, in gleaming silver, full of lifejackets, paddles and fishing stuff, sat the exact canoe of my husband s picture. I gasped7 and blinked three times. Yup. It was still there. The Supremo Numero-Uno blah, blah. My heart beat wildly. I elbowed my way through the crowds, scrambled8 over junk in the aisles and darned near fell into the canoe looking for the price tag.There it was - a little tattered9, with the manufacturer s suggested retail10 price at $6,750 plus tax crossed out and a handwritten TO CLEAR $750 AS IS. NO RETURNS. Must be a mistake. $6000 off? Salesman. I had to talk to a salesman.I spotted11 a young fellow with a Hi. I m Mathew tag trying to hide out from the mob of bargain hunters. I clutched his sleeve. Mathew. Tell me about this El Supremo canoe. What s wrong with it? Why is it only $750?

    The nature of drained fluid was reported in all cases. The fluid was reported as “dark green” or “pus” in cholecystostomy cases, “serosanguinous” and “infected bile” in complicated hepatic resection cases, “brownish” in the peripancreatic collection, “clotted blood” in the hepatic abscess, and “pus” in the other collections. After all procedures, samples from drained fluid samples were sent for microbial analysis. Peripheral blood culture was performed for 9 out of 11 patients. In three cases (27.3%), fluid culture results were negative for bacterial growth; however, in one of them, the peripheral blood culture was positive for

    pneumonia. Eight cases (72.7%) were found to have positive fluid culture, with Escherichia coli being the most common isolated pathogen followed by

    pneumonia.

    Then the boy would try his strength with the rest, but he threw the quoit so far that it went beyond what had ever been thrown before, and fell in the crowd, striking a man so that he died

    Only three patients had imaging features of severe pulmonary parenchymal disease attributed to COVID-19 at drainage tome, nevertheless three other patients were admitted to ICU and put under ventilator due to progression of respiratory symptoms. The parenchymal lesions were ground-glass opacities and consolidations with the basal and peripheral predominant distribution. In addition, pleural effusion was reported in three patients. The median time between confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 by RT-PCR test and drainage of septic complications (time to drainage) was 8 d (range 0 d to 48 d). Table 2 shows data of drainage procedure, drained fluid, outcome, and chest imaging.

    Deif MA and Elmokadem AH designed the research study; Deif MA and Mounir AM performed the research; Elmokadem AH, Abo-Hedibah SA and Abdel Khalek AM analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    DISCUSSION

    Prospective, larger multicentric study is needed to validate our results.

    This study included different types of septic complications as acute acalculous cholecystitis, acute pancreatitis, post-operative infection, abscesses in different locations, and acute pyelonephritis. Several reports described acute acalculous cholecystitis in COVID-19 patients[25-30] and raised the possibility of underlying dysregulated immune response or presence of viral RNA within the gall bladder wall as a culprit factor[28-30]. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for COVID-19 patients is recommended by multisociety position statement in case of surgical contraindication and after the failure of conservative therapy with antibiotics[31]. It is generally a preferred non-surgical procedure due to its relative safety, simplicity of execution, and reduced costs. Mattone

    [25] reported clinical failure of percutaneous cholecystostomy after 3-d from tube insertion; the patient was shifted to surgery that revealed gangrenous cholecystitis. In this study, clinical success was reported only in one of three patients had cholecystostomy drainage of acute cholecystitis. Contrary to this result, cholecystostomy improved the clinical status of patients presented by acute acalculous cholecystitis co-existed with COVID-19[26,27]; however, the period of hospitalization was prolonged (25-67 d) compared to the mean hospitalization period in non-COVID-19 patients (10.5 d)[32].

    COVID-19 associated pancreatic injury and acute pancreatitis are thought to be a result of direct cytopathic effect mediated by local viral replication or indirect mechanism related to either a systemic response to a harmful immune response or respiratory failure induced by the SARS-CoV-2[33]. COVID-19 patients with acute pancreatitis are more likely to experience admission to the ICU, peripancreatic fluid collections, pancreatic necrosis, persistent organ failure, prolonged hospital stay, and higher than usually reported 30-d mortality[34]. We encountered two cases of pancreatitis in the current study, one of them died 28 days after drainage.

    In a meta-analysis performed by Abate

    [35], twenty-three articles with 2947 participants were included. The meta-analysis showed a very high global rate of postoperative mortality among COVID-19 patients of 20%. Percutaneous drainage was performed for two patients after complicated hepatic resection for hemangioma and liver donor, only the second patient survived and was discharged 18 days after drainage. The good outcome in this patient is attributed to the non-inflammatory nature of the drained fluid, lower inflammatory marker and less severity of COVID-19 as compared to the other patient.

    Hepatic abscesses have been described in association with COVID-19[36,37]. While García Virosta

    [36] reported clinically successful percutaneous drainage for hepatic abscess and patient discharge after ten days from tube insertion, Elliot

    [37] reported a rapidly progressive severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, which was complicated by multiorgan failure and severe sepsis that ended by death after percutaneous drainage of hepatic abscess in a patient with COVID-19. One patient in this study presented with a large lumbar region abscess secondary to sigmoid colon perforation as proved by laparotomy. Bowel perforation secondary to COVID-19 has been attributed to microcirculation thrombosis[38] or direct insult to the colonic cells by the SARS-CoV-2 itself[39].

    There is scanty literature on the association between COVID-19 and acute pyelonephritis. van 't Hof

    [40] described an unusual course of acute pyelonephritis in a young female with persistent fever and multiple blood clotting and hemorrhagic events one week after recovery from COVID-19. Similar to our results, pyelonephritis was managed successfully by percutaneous nephrostomy. More frequently, AKI is encountered among critically ill patients with COVID-19, affecting approximately 20%-40% of patients admitted to the hospital and particularly to the ICU[41]. AKI was the most frequent comorbidity (5/11) in this study. A significantly higher in-hospital death rate for patients with kidney abnormalities and AKI was reported by a study consisting of 701 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients[42].

    We performed percutaneous drainage for septic complications of COVID-19 and wanted to report our experience.

    COVID-19 requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment with interventional radiology procedures that have contributed to worldwide patient care. In a study consisting of 92 patients who underwent 124 interventional procedures[43] [abscess drainage (12), percutaneous cholecystostomy (8), and nephrostomy tube (4)], the mortality rate in this study was 16.3 % (15/92). However, there was no specific data as regards clinical, laboratory, and radiological data of the included patients or correlation between specific IR procedures and mortality. In this study the poor outcome was related to the combined burden of severe COVID-19 pneumonia, presence of other co-morbidities and extent of sepsis.

    This study has several limitations. First, our study cohort is small. Second, this study was retrospective in nature. Third, our results were not compared to a negative SARS-CoV-2 group with matched age, complication, and comorbidities; this may have overestimated the poor outcome of percutaneous drainage in this study group.

    CONCLUSION

    The current study demonstrates relatively poor clinical outcomes for patients having suspected septic complications associated with COVID-19 despite technically successful tube drainage and adequate antibiotic therapy. This study emphasizes the need for a large-scale comparative study on the relationship between septic complications, COVID-19, and comorbidities that might lead to poor clinical outcomes and clarifies the necessary precautions for percutaneous drainage in such patients.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    The resulting tissue hypoxia and increased inflammation secondary to severe coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) combined with viral load, and other baseline risk factors contribute to an increased risk of severe sepsis or co-existed septic condition exaggeration.

    Research motivation

    14.When a star falls, a soul ascends to God: A folklore40 superstition41. A corollary superstition states that a shooting star represents a soul escaping purgatory42.

    Research objectives

    To describe the clinical, radiological, and laboratory characteristics of a small cohort of patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 who underwent percutaneous drainage for septic complications and their post-procedural outcomes.

    Research methods

    Mike, seated beside me, shook his head sadly, I wish just one of them could have won, he said. They have a lot of potential, but losing like this could take the heart right out of them.

    Research results

    Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients, while clinical success was achieved in 4 out of 11 patients (36.3%). Six patients (54.5%) died despite proper percutaneous drainage and adequate antibiotic coverage. One patient (9%) needed operative intervention. Two patients (18.2%) had two drainage procedures to drain multiple fluid collections. Two patients (18.2%) had repeat drainage procedures due to recurrent fluid collections. The average volume of the drained fluid immediately after tube insertion was 85 mL. Follow-up scans show a reduction of the retained content and associated inflammatory changes after tube insertion in all patients. There was no significant statistical difference (P = 0.6 and 0.4)between the mean of WBCs and neutrophils count before drainage and seven days after drainage. The lymphocyte count shows significant increased seven days after drainage (P = 0.03).

    In very ancient times there lived a King, whose power lay not only in the vast extent of his dominions1, but also in the magic secrets of which he was master

    Research conclusions

    In this study, patients having septic complications associated with COVID-19 showed relatively poor clinical outcomes despite technically successful percutaneous drainage.

    He had his pocket full of money, and treated them, and drank with them and boasted and made game of the good-for-nothings who were afraid to stand on guard, because they were frightened that the dead princess would eat them

    Research perspectives

    This study presents the clinical, radiological, and laboratory data for patients who underwent percutaneous drainage to manage septic complications associated with COVID-19 infection. The main finding is that patients with suspected septic complications associated with COVID-19 show relatively poor outcomes with 36.4% clinical success of percutaneous drainage despite 100% technical success. This finding was confirmed by the insignificant difference between the inflammatory markers before and after tube drainage insertion. Severe sepsis related to COVID-19 viral infection may be related to a decrease in mitochondrial efficiency and dysfunction of the respiratory chain[22,23]. In addition, autopsies have confirmed hyperinflammatory state with organ fibrosis, especially in high metabolic cells with high mitochondrial volume such as pneumocytes, endothelial cells, hepatocytes, and renal cells[24]. The resulting tissue hypoxia and increased inflammation, viral load, and other baseline risk factors contribute to an increased risk of severe sepsis or co-existed septic condition exaggeration.

    FOOTNOTES

    The mean WBCs and neutrophil counts show reduction 1 d and 7 d after drainage however there was no significant statistical difference (

    = 0.6) between the mean of WBCs count before drainage (15.4 × 10

    /L) and seven days after drainage (12.1 × 10

    /L) and between the mean count of neutrophil (

    = 0.4) before drainage (82.8 × 10

    /L) and seven days after drainage (70.9 × 10

    /L). The lymphocyte count shows significant increased seven days after drainage (

    = 0.03). Five patients had AKI manifested by elevation of the serum creatinine and urea levels. Total bilirubin level was elevated in eight patients and showed no significant reduction after drainage (

    = 0.2). The CRP values were not significantly different (

    = 0.06) before (182.0 mg/dL) and one week after tube insertion (133.0 mg/dL). Other inflammatory markers as D-dimer, procalcitonin and LDH were elevated in all patients before drainage and showed variable degree of non-statistically reduction and increase after drainage. The laboratory findings are listed in Table 3.

    The study was reviewed and approved by the Mansoura university Institutional Review Board (R.21.12-1545).

    A local institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and waivers of consent of medical record review were received.

    All authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset available from the corresponding author at mokadem83@yahoo.com.

    8. Alone in the wood: Julius Heusher states that the woods represent the loss of security and previous values (Heuscher 1974).Return to place in story.

    This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Egypt

    Mohamed A Deif 0000-0002-8486-2622; Ahmad M Mounir 0000-0002-3322-7960; Sherif A Abo-Hedibah 0000-0002-1863-9828; Ahmed M Abdel Khalek 0000-0002-7751-7660; Ali H Elmokadem 0000-0001-5119-9548.

    Gao CC

    A

    Gao CC

    1 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD,Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL,Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

    2016; 315: 801-810 [PMID: 26903338 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287]

    2 Carter C, Notter J. COVID-19 disease: a critical care perspective.

    2020; 1: 100003

    3 Quah P, Li A, Phua J. Mortality rates of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the emerging literature.

    2020; 24: 285 [PMID: 32498689 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03006-1]

    4 Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK.COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression.

    2020; 395: 1033-1034 [PMID: 32192578 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0]

    5 Ding R, Meng Y, Ma X. The Central Role of the Inflammatory Response in Understanding the Heterogeneity of Sepsis-3.

    2018; 2018: 5086516 [PMID: 29977913 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5086516]

    6 Nedeva C, Menassa J, Puthalakath H. Sepsis: Inflammation Is a Necessary Evil.

    2019; 7: 108 [PMID:31281814 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00108]

    7 Gentile LF, Cuenca AG, Efron PA, Ang D, Bihorac A, McKinley BA, Moldawer LL, Moore FA. Persistent inflammation and immunosuppression: a common syndrome and new horizon for surgical intensive care.

    2012; 72: 1491-1501 [PMID: 22695412 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318256e000]

    8 Rosenthal MD, Kamel AY, Rosenthal CM, Brakenridge S, Croft CA, Moore FA. Chronic Critical Illness: Application of What We Know.

    2018; 33: 39-45 [PMID: 29323761 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10024]

    9 Liu Y, Mao B, Liang S, Yang JW, Lu HW, Chai YH, Wang L, Zhang L, Li QH, Zhao L, He Y, Gu XL, Ji XB, Li L, Jie ZJ,Li Q, Li XY, Lu HZ, Zhang WH, Song YL, Qu JM, Xu JF; Shanghai Clinical Treatment Experts Group for COVID-19.Association between age and clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19.

    2020; 55 [PMID: 32312864 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01112-2020]

    10 Thomas-Rüddel D, Winning J, Dickmann P, Ouart D, Kortgen A, Janssens U, Bauer M. [Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19): update for anesthesiologists and intensivists March 2020].

    2020; 69: 225-235 [PMID: 32189015 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-020-00758-x]

    11 Alhazzani W, M?ller MH, Arabi YM, Loeb M, Gong MN, Fan E, Oczkowski S, Levy MM, Derde L, Dzierba A, Du B,Aboodi M, Wunsch H, Cecconi M, Koh Y, Chertow DS, Maitland K, Alshamsi F, Belley-Cote E, Greco M, Laundy M,Morgan JS, Kesecioglu J, McGeer A, Mermel L, Mammen MJ, Alexander PE, Arrington A, Centofanti JE, Citerio G, Baw B, Memish ZA, Hammond N, Hayden FG, Evans L, Rhodes A. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

    2020; 46: 854-887 [PMID:32222812 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5]

    12 Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, Du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY,Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P,Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

    2020; 382: 1708-1720[PMID: 32109013 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032]

    13 Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X,Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

    2020; 395: 497-506 [PMID: 31986264 DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5]

    14 Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

    2020; 323: 1239-1242 [PMID: 32091533 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648]

    15 Elmokadem AH, Batouty NM, Bayoumi D, Gadelhak BN, Abdel-Wahab RM, Zaky M, Abo-Hedibah SA, Ehab A, El-Morsy A. Mimickers of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on chest CT: spectrum of CT and clinical features.

    2021; 12: 12 [PMID: 33533965 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00956-6]

    16 Elmokadem AH, Bayoumi D, Abo-Hedibah SA, El-Morsy A. Diagnostic performance of chest CT in differentiating COVID-19 from other causes of ground-glass opacities.

    2021; 52: 1-10 [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-020-00398-6]

    17 Penn R, David-Sanchez RY, Long J, Barclay W. Aberrant RNA replication products of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses and its impact in the mammalian associated cytokine storm.

    2019; 1 [DOI:10.1099/acmi.ac2019.po0457]

    18 Spencer JV, Religa P, Lehmann MH. Editorial: Cytokine-Mediated Organ Dysfunction and Tissue Damage Induced by Viruses.

    2020; 11: 2 [PMID: 32038654 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00002]

    19 Boomer JS, To K, Chang KC, Takasu O, Osborne DF, Walton AH, Bricker TL, Jarman SD 2nd, Kreisel D, Krupnick AS,Srivastava A, Swanson PE, Green JM, Hotchkiss RS. Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure.

    2011; 306: 2594-2605 [PMID: 22187279 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1829]

    20 Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S,Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan,China: a retrospective cohort study.

    2020; 395: 1054-1062 [PMID: 32171076 DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3]

    21 Abo-Hedibah SA, Tharwat N, Elmokadem AH. Is chest X-ray severity scoring for COVID-19 pneumonia reliable?

    2021; 86: e432-e439 [PMID: 34429790 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2021.108172]

    22 Brealey D, Brand M, Hargreaves I, Heales S, Land J, Smolenski R, Davies NA, Cooper CE, Singer M. Association between mitochondrial dysfunction and severity and outcome of septic shock.

    2002; 360: 219-223 [PMID:12133657 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09459-X]

    23 Singer M. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis-induced multi-organ failure.

    2014; 5: 66-72 [PMID:24185508 DOI: 10.4161/viru.26907]

    24 Shenoy S. Coronavirus (Covid-19) sepsis: revisiting mitochondrial dysfunction in pathogenesis, aging, inflammation, and mortality.

    2020; 69: 1077-1085 [PMID: 32767095 DOI: 10.1007/s00011-020-01389-z]

    25 Mattone E, Sofia M, Schembari E, Palumbo V, Bonaccorso R, Randazzo V, La Greca G, Iacobello C, Russello D, Latteri S. Acute acalculous cholecystitis on a COVID-19 patient: a case report.

    2020; 58: 73-75 [PMID:32895611 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.027]

    26 Ying M, Lu B, Pan J, Lu G, Zhou S, Wang D, Li L, Shen J, Shu J; From the COVID-19 Investigating and Research Team.COVID-19 with acute cholecystitis: a case report.

    2020; 20: 437 [PMID: 32571224 DOI:10.1186/s12879-020-05164-7]

    27 Wahid N, Bhardwaj T, Borinsky C, Tavakkoli M, Wan D, Wong T. Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis During Severe COVID-19 Hospitalizations.

    2020; 115: S794 [DOI: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000708300.51603.f0]

    28 Alhassan SM, Iqbal P, Fikrey L, Mohamed Ibrahim MI, Qamar MS, Chaponda M, Munir W. Post COVID 19 acute acalculous cholecystitis raising the possibility of underlying dysregulated immune response, a case report.

    2020; 60: 434-437 [PMID: 33224493 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.031]

    29 Bruni A, Garofalo E, Zuccalà V, Currò G, Torti C, Navarra G, De Sarro G, Navalesi P, Longhini F, Ammendola M.Histopathological findings in a COVID-19 patient affected by ischemic gangrenous cholecystitis.

    2020; 15: 43 [PMID: 32615987 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00320-5]

    30 Balaphas A, Gkoufa K, Meyer J, Peloso A, Bornand A, McKee TA, Toso C, Popeskou SG. COVID-19 can mimic acute cholecystitis and is associated with the presence of viral RNA in the gallbladder wall.

    2020; 73: 1566-1568[PMID: 32890595 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.08.020]

    31 Campanile FC, Podda M, Arezzo A, Botteri E, Sartori A, Guerrieri M, Cassinotti E, Muttillo I, Pisano M, Brachet Contul R, D'Ambrosio G, Cuccurullo D, Bergamini C, Allaix ME, Caracino V, Petz WL, Milone M, Silecchia G, Anania G,Agrusa A, Di Saverio S, Casarano S, Cicala C, Narilli P, Federici S, Carlini M, Paganini A, Bianchi PP, Salaj A, Mazzari A, Meniconi RL, Puzziello A, Terrosu G, De Simone B, Coccolini F, Catena F, Agresta F. Acute cholecystitis during COVID-19 pandemic: a multisocietary position statement.

    2020; 15: 38 [PMID: 32513287 DOI:10.1186/s13017-020-00317-0]

    32 Popowicz A, Lundell L, Gerber P, Gustafsson U, Pieniowski E, Sinabulya H, Sj?dahl K, Tsekrekos A, Sandblom G.Cholecystostomy as Bridge to Surgery and as Definitive Treatment or Acute Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis.

    2016; 2016: 3672416 [PMID: 26839538 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3672416]

    33 Wang F, Wang H, Fan J, Zhang Y, Zhao Q. Pancreatic Injury Patterns in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 19 Pneumonia.

    2020; 159: 367-370 [PMID: 32247022 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.055]

    34 Pandanaboyana S, Moir J, Leeds JS, Oppong K, Kanwar A, Marzouk A, Belgaumkar A, Gupta A, Siriwardena AK,Haque AR, Awan A, Balakrishnan A, Rawashdeh A, Ivanov B, Parmar C, M Halloran C, Caruana C, Borg CM, Gomez D,Damaskos D, Karavias D, Finch G, Ebied H, K Pine J, R A Skipworth J, Milburn J, Latif J, Ratnam Apollos J, El Kafsi J,Windsor JA, Roberts K, Wang K, Ravi K, V Coats M, Hollyman M, Phillips M, Okocha M, Sj Wilson M, A Ameer N,Kumar N, Shah N, Lapolla P, Magee C, Al-Sarireh B, Lunevicius R, Benhmida R, Singhal R, Balachandra S, Demirli At?c? S, Jaunoo S, Dwerryhouse S, Boyce T, Charalampakis V, Kanakala V, Abbas Z, Nayar M; COVID PAN collaborative group. SARS-CoV-2 infection in acute pancreatitis increases disease severity and 30-day mortality: COVID PAN collaborative study.

    2021; 70: 1061-1069 [PMID: 33547182 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323364]

    35 Abate SM, Mantefardo B, Basu B. Postoperative mortality among surgical patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    2020; 14: 37 [PMID: 33062056 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-020-00262-6]

    36 García Virosta M, Ortega I, Ferrero E, Picardo AL. Diagnostic Delay During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Liver Abscess Secondary to Acute Lithiasic Cholecystitis.

    2020; 98: 409 [PMID: 32408994 DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.04.010]

    37 Elliott R, Ohene Baah N, Grossman VA, Sharma AK. COVID-19 Related Mortality During Management of a Hepatic Abscess.

    2020; 39: 271-274 [PMID: 32982611 DOI: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2020.09.001]

    38 Nahas SC, Meira-Júnior JD, Sobrado LF, Sorbello M, Segatelli V, Abdala E, Ribeiro-Júnior U, Cecconello I. Intestinal perforation caused by COVID-19.

    2020; 33: e1515 [PMID: 33237160 DOI:10.1590/0102-672020190001e1515]

    39 De Nardi P, Parolini DC, Ripa M, Racca S, Rosati R. Bowel perforation in a Covid-19 patient: case report.

    2020; 35: 1797-1800 [PMID: 32458395 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03627-6]

    40 van 't Hof LJ, Pellikaan L, Soonawala D, Roshani H. An Unusual Presentation of Pyelonephritis: Is It COVID-19 Related?

    2021; 1-6 [PMID: 33937632 DOI: 10.1007/s42399-021-00909-0]

    41 Revzin MV, Raza S, Srivastava NC, Warshawsky R, D'Agostino C, Malhotra A, Bader AS, Patel RD, Chen K, Kyriakakos C, Pellerito JS. Multisystem Imaging Manifestations of COVID-19, Part 2: From Cardiac Complications to Pediatric Manifestations.

    2020; 40: 1866-1892 [PMID: 33136488 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200195]

    42 Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, Zhang M, Wang Z, Dong L, Li J, Yao Y, Ge S, Xu G. Kidney disease is associated with inhospital death of patients with COVID-19.

    2020; 97: 829-838 [PMID: 32247631 DOI:10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.005]

    43 Lee KS, Talenfeld AD, Browne WF, Holzwanger DJ, Harnain C, Kesselman A, Pua BB. Role of interventional radiology in the treatment of COVID-19 patients: Early experience from an epicenter.

    2021; 71: 143-146 [PMID:33259979 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.048]

    欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 久久这里只有精品中国| eeuss影院久久| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| av在线蜜桃| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品三级大全| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产综合懂色| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 午夜免费激情av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| av专区在线播放| 国产在线男女| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 美女免费视频网站| 色吧在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 97热精品久久久久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 精品人妻1区二区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久草成人影院| 一夜夜www| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日韩有码中文字幕| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 88av欧美| 国产三级在线视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲av一区综合| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产精品永久免费网站| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 免费观看精品视频网站| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 午夜福利欧美成人| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 午夜精品在线福利| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产精华一区二区三区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久久精品大字幕| av天堂中文字幕网| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 热99在线观看视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 毛片女人毛片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲片人在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 在线国产一区二区在线| av在线蜜桃| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 91在线观看av| ponron亚洲| www.色视频.com| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产高清三级在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| .国产精品久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美黑人巨大hd| xxxwww97欧美| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 丁香六月欧美| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 三级毛片av免费| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 午夜免费激情av| 老司机福利观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产精品,欧美在线| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产av不卡久久| 久久久久九九精品影院| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 露出奶头的视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 久久香蕉精品热| 一区福利在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 99热这里只有精品一区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 免费高清视频大片| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 欧美日韩黄片免| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 99热这里只有是精品50| 小说图片视频综合网站| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 一区二区三区免费毛片| av在线老鸭窝| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 91狼人影院| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 高清在线国产一区| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 一夜夜www| 欧美3d第一页| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 免费av毛片视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 少妇的逼水好多| av国产免费在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 一本久久中文字幕| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 一区福利在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 久久久久久久久久成人| av欧美777| 1024手机看黄色片| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲精品在线美女| 免费观看人在逋| 国产视频内射| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 免费高清视频大片| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 在线a可以看的网站| av欧美777| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 一级黄色大片毛片| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 一区二区三区激情视频| or卡值多少钱| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 欧美性感艳星| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 天堂动漫精品| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 哪里可以看免费的av片| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 欧美激情在线99| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 不卡一级毛片| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | www.999成人在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 精品人妻1区二区| 青草久久国产| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 级片在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日本一二三区视频观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| www.www免费av| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 九九在线视频观看精品| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 三级毛片av免费| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 精品午夜福利在线看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| av黄色大香蕉| av欧美777| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| www日本黄色视频网| 日本一二三区视频观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | www.熟女人妻精品国产| www.色视频.com| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 九色成人免费人妻av| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 91久久精品电影网| 精品久久久久久久末码| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| www日本黄色视频网| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产三级中文精品| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 老司机福利观看| 美女免费视频网站| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 色综合站精品国产| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 高清在线国产一区| 久久香蕉精品热| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 很黄的视频免费| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 天堂√8在线中文| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲片人在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产精品三级大全| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久中文看片网| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 天堂√8在线中文| xxxwww97欧美| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 色吧在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 99热这里只有是精品50| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 毛片女人毛片| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 日本熟妇午夜| 综合色av麻豆| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 男人舔奶头视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产精品野战在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 一本综合久久免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 久久草成人影院| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产不卡一卡二| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲av成人av| 99久国产av精品| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 赤兔流量卡办理| 日韩中字成人| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 欧美色视频一区免费| 一本综合久久免费| 久久精品影院6| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产三级在线视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| av视频在线观看入口| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 精品久久久久久,| 日本黄色片子视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 老司机福利观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 哪里可以看免费的av片| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 精品人妻视频免费看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 欧美日韩黄片免| 成年免费大片在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产亚洲欧美98| www.色视频.com| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 全区人妻精品视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 少妇丰满av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产av不卡久久| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 长腿黑丝高跟| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 99热精品在线国产| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 美女黄网站色视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲18禁久久av| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | a级毛片a级免费在线| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 丁香六月欧美| 变态另类丝袜制服| 丁香六月欧美| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 在线播放无遮挡| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| www.色视频.com| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 免费看日本二区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| av在线天堂中文字幕| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 免费在线观看成人毛片| avwww免费| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 天堂网av新在线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看|