• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Transport mechanism of eroded sediment particles under freeze-thaw and runoff conditions

    2022-05-27 10:11:54WANGTianLIPengHOUJingmingTONGYuLIJingWANGFengLIZhanbin
    Journal of Arid Land 2022年5期

    WANG Tian, LI Peng, HOU Jingming, TONG Yu, LI Jing, WANG Feng,LI Zhanbin

    1 State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China;

    2 Key Laboratory of National Forestry Administration on Ecological Hydrology and Disaster Prevention in Arid Regions, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China

    Abstract: Hydraulic erosion associated with seasonal freeze-thaw cycles is one of the most predominant factors, which drives soil stripping and transportation. In this study, indoor simulated meltwater erosion experiments were used to investigate the sorting characteristics and transport mechanism of sediment particles under different freeze-thaw conditions (unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes) and runoff rates (1, 2, and 4 L/min). Results showed that the order of sediment particle contents was silt>sand>clay during erosion process on unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes. Compared with original soils, clay and silt were lost, and sand was deposited. On unfrozen and shallow-thawed slopes, the change of runoff rate had a significant impact on the enrichment of clay, silt, and sand particles. In this study, the sediment particles transported in the form of suspension/saltation were 83.58%–86.54% on unfrozen slopes,69.24%–84.89% on shallow-thawed slopes, and 83.75%–87.44% on frozen slopes. Moreover, sediment particles smaller than 0.027 mm were preferentially transported. On shallow-thawed slope, relative contribution percentage of suspension/saltation sediment particles gradually increased with the increase in runoff rate, and an opposite trend occurred on unfrozen and frozen slopes. At the same runoff rate,freeze-thaw process had a significant impact on the relative contribution percentage of sediment particle transport via suspension/saltation and rolling during erosion process. The research results provide an improved transport mechanism under freeze-thaw condition for steep loessal slopes.

    Keywords: freeze-thaw; runoff conditions; erosion process; sediment particles; transport mechanism

    1 Introduction

    During slope erosion process, the form of movement and transport distance of eroded sediment particles are not only associated with the hydrodynamic characteristics of slope runoff, but also depend on the characteristics of sediment itself, especially in terms of particle size and density(Blott et al., 2001; Issa et al., 2006; Hao et al., 2019). At present, with the in-depth study of erosion mechanisms, the characteristics of particle separation during soil erosion process have received extensive attention (Blott et al., 2006; Ding et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2020). Numerous studies have shown that the distribution of eroded sediment particle size is determined by a combination of many factors, such as soil properties (texture and clay content), soil surface conditions before rainfall (soil aggregates, soil moisture, soil particle size, etc.), and type of water flow (thin layer flow or rill flow) (Chaplot and Lee, 2003; Defersha et al., 2011; Deviren et al.,2019; Wang et al., 2021). For an in-depth understanding of the distribution characteristics and transport mechanism of eroded sediment particles, it is necessary to clarify the roles and interrelationships of various factors involved in the erosion process.

    Eroded sediment is composed of original particles and aggregates (Martínez-Mena et al., 2002;Shi et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2015; Deviren et al., 2019). Distributed soil particle (commonly known as effective particle distribution) can reflect the sediment transport more accurately(Slattery and Burt, 1997; Shi et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2020). Numerous studies have shown that aggregates are the dominant factor for effective particles, and most of the eroded sediment particles are transported in the form of agglomerates, rather than as original particles (Wang et al.,2015; Hao et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2020). During slope erosion process, the composition of eroded sediment particles is closely related to the water flow state (Asadi et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2014).Generally, the sorting characteristics of sediment particles are affected by both erosion power and source supply (Asadi et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2012; Kiani-Harchegani et al., 2018). The erosion rate of coarse particles is limited by the carrying capacity of slope runoff, while that of fine particles is limited by the sediment supply (Durnford et al., 1993; Malam Issa et al., 2006; Asadi et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015). When erosion power and source supply are no longer the limiting factors, the sediment particles lose their ''sortability'' during erosion process (Durnford et al., 1993;Wang et al., 2015). At present, research studies showed that the early soil water content, soil properties, and exogenous forces may affect the distribution of eroded sediment particles, but the effects of freeze-thaw and meltwater compound on soil particle size distribution are not well studied.

    In cold regions, the runoff from melting ice and snow accounts for 66% of the total runoff, and is an important driving force for soil loss (Ragettli et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020). Freeze-thaw cycles can produce strong soil erosion through the action of melting water, wind, and gravity(Wang et al., 2014b; Wang et al., 2017; Rui et al., 2018). The essence of soil frozen and thawing is the frozen and thawing process of water in the soil (Müller-Lupp and B?lter, 2003; Li and Fan,2014; Wang et al., 2019). During this process, water transforms into liquid and solid phases in cycles, and the difference between water and ice densities causes the soil water to change phase(Yi et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2019). Volume expansion and contraction occur, which in turn lead to the interaction between soil frost heave and thawing settlement, causing the modification of soil physical property (Kamei et al., 2012; Li and Fan, 2014). At the same time, freeze-thaw cycles can destroy the cohesive force existing between soil particles, resulting in their easy separation (Oztas and Fayetorbay, 2003; Li and Fan, 2014; Wang et al., 2014b; Musa et al., 2016;Xiao et al., 2019). Generally, the sorting characteristics of eroded sediment particles under hydraulic and freeze-thaw forces, are different from those under a single erosive force. Therefore,freeze-thaw cycles destroy the soil structure and change the properties of soil porosity, water content, and aggregates. Eroded sediment particles with a weak soil aggregate stability usually show a unimodal distribution, while those with a strong soil aggregate stability show a bimodal distribution (Legout et al., 2005). Due to the differences in the fragmentation mechanism of various soil aggregate types, eroded sediment particles are enriched in particles with sizes between 20.0 and 200.0 μm, and possibly between 4.3 and 13.2 μm (Pieri et al., 2009). Zhang et al. (2017) found that clay and coarse silt are more easily transported on frozen than on unfrozen slopes, because in the former the runoff erosivity is relatively small, and unfrozen slopes have a better sorting of eroded sediment particles. On frozen slopes, the frozen soils lead to the low infiltration capacity (Sharratt et al., 2000), rapid collection of slope runoff, large runoff erosion power, and strong transport capacity of runoff to coarse particles (Asadi et al., 2011; Wang et al.,2017; Zhang et al., 2017). Therefore, during rainfall events, the thawing of frozen soils continuously releases particles, resulting in a relatively stable composition of sediment particles in the runoff. Frozen soils affect the sorting of sediment particles eroded by runoff and change their sorting characteristics to a certain extent.

    Freeze-thaw cycles affect the physical properties of soils, and runoff scouring is one of the driving forces of soil stripping and transportation. The combined action of freeze-thaw and runoff has an important impact on the separation, transportation, and deposition of soil particles. The interaction between freeze-thaw and water erosion destroys soil aggregates, affects the redistribution of original particles in composite erosion, and further affects the transport of eroded sediment particles. Therefore, eroded particles present different transport forms in different particle sizes. In this study, indoor simulated meltwater erosion experiments under different runoff rates and frozen conditions were designed to explore sediment sorting characteristics during erosion process and reveal the erosion and different sediment particle transport mechanisms.

    2 Materials and methods

    The indoor simulated meltwater erosion experiments were carried out at the State Key Laboratory of Ecological Water Conservancy, Xi'an University of Technology, northwestern China. Three slope states were established: unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes with three runoff rates of 1, 2, and 4 L/min. The experiments for each group were performed in three replicates.

    2.1 Experimental materials

    The soil samples to be used in the experiment were collected within a 0–30 cm surface layer, and were air-dried and passed through a 5-mm sieve to remove stones, plants, and other debris. A Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) was used to measure the mechanical composition of soil samples, which was reported as follows: 0.17%(±0.03%) clay particles, 64.23% (±0.43%) silt particles, and 35.60% (±0.24%) sand particles. The thickness of the soil layer was 0.15 m, the soil moisture content was maintained at about 15%,and the bulk density at about 1.25 g/cm3. First, a part of the filled soil tank was placed in a laboratory at a room temperature set between 5°C and 8°C to prepare the unfrozen slope experiment; then, a second part of the soil tank was placed into an ultra-low temperature freezer,and was kept at –22°C– –20°C for 24 h until it was completely frozen in preparation for the frozen slope experiment; finally, a part of the completely frozen soils was placed on the 15° slope and melted at room temperature. During the melting process, a probe was used to test insert on the upper, middle, and lower parts of the slope every 15 min until the melting depth reached 3 cm(upper melting) for preparing the condition of shallow-thawed slope test.

    2.2 Experimental design

    A schematic diagram of the simulation device structure is shown in Figure 1, and it includes the runoff collection device, soil tank, water tank, steady flow tank, and water supply device. A wooden soil trough (2.0 m in length, 0.2 m in width, and 0.2 m in depth) was placed on a 15°slope, and the water tank (2.00 m in length, 0.20 m in width, and 0.05 m in depth) was connected to the top of the soil tank. In order to avoid the influence of the tank's side wall on the tests, we designed the soil surface to be low in the center and high on the two sides. The total length of the experimental slope was 4 m to ensure that the water flow reached a stable state during the experiment. The flow was adjusted by a valve, which was divided into two parts by an orifice plate. A drainage hole was set on the upper part of the water tower to ensure water pressure stability during the experiment.

    In each set of experiment, when the erosion depth of any part of the soil trench reached 0.15 m,the test is stopped. Once the discharge scouring flow was calibrated, the experiment could be started. After the flow production was activated at the slope outlet, the muddy water was here collected every minute. A small amount of muddy water samples should be collected with a wide mouth bottle, which is known volume and number, and then all the remaining muddy water was collected with a plastic bucket of uniform specification. The sediment concentration of runoff per minute was measured using the drying method, and the slope erosion per minute was obtained by multiplying the sediment concentration of runoff by the total muddy water volume. The discharge runoff per minute was obtained by subtracting the sediment volume from the total muddy water volume. Based on the slope bottom, we divided the flow velocity into five sections along the slope surface of the experimental soil trough. Flow measurements were conducted along the following five slope sections: 0.0–0.5 (D1), 0.5–1.0 (D2), 1.0–1.5 (D3), 1.5–2.0 (D4), and 2.0–2.5 m (D5). The KMnO4dye tracer method was used to measure the surface runoff flow velocity in each slope section of the test soil through slope in different periods, and the average runoff flow velocity in each slope section was obtained by multiplying the surface flow velocity by the correction coefficient (0.75).

    2.3 Data analysis

    2.3.1 Enrichment rate (ER)

    We evaluated the enrichment status of eroded sediment particles based on ER. After dispersion,ER is defined as the ratio of particle content of a particle size of eroded sediment to that of undisturbed soil. When ER>1, the content of this particle size in eroded sediment is higher than that in undisturbed soil, and is enriched; when ER=1, the content of this particle size in eroded sediment is similar to that in undisturbed soil, and there is no obvious erosion or deposition; when ER<1, the content of this particle size in the eroded sediment is less than that in the undisturbed soil, which means that this particle size is deposited during erosion process.

    2.3.2 Sediment transport mechanisms

    The particle size content is divided into 10 particle sizes and equals to 10%. When the content of a certain particle size in the eroded sediment is less than 10%, the particles of this size are easily eroded and transported during erosion process; in contrast, when it is greater than 10%, the particles of this size are easily deposited during erosion process. Moss et al. (1979) divided the transport of eroded sediment particles into 3 modes: suspended load, saltation load, and rolling load, based on the fact that the difference in terms of transport mechanism and modes corresponds to particles of a specific size range. Researchers classified the suspension/saltation and rolling transport mechanisms based on the size class with the lowest sediment transport (LST) value.

    3 Results

    3.1 Effect of freeze-thaw water erosion on sediment particle content

    The eroded sediment particles were divided into three levels: clay (<0.002 mm), silt (0.002–0.005 mm), and sand (>0.050 mm). The cumulative percentage of soil particle was ordered by silt>sand>clay from Figures 2, 3, and 4 on unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes with different runoff rates.

    Fig. 2 Changes in the contents of silt, sand, and clay on unfrozen (a), shallow-thawed (b), and frozen slopes (c)with 1 L/min runoff rate

    Fig. 3 Changes in the contents of silt, sand, and clay on unfrozen (a), shallow-thawed (b), and frozen slopes (c)with 2 L/min runoff rate

    Fig. 4 Changes in the contents of silt, sand, and clay on unfrozen (a), shallow-thawed (b), and frozen slopes (c)with 4 L/min runoff rate

    Clay content in original soils was 0.17%. At 1 L/min runoff rate, clay content of eroded sediment on unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes increased by 0.13%, 0.12%, and 0.13%,respectively. At 2 L/min runoff rate, they increased by 0.14%, 0.06%, and 0.08%, respectively.And they increased by 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.10%, respectively, at 4 L/min runoff rate. Smaller increments at high runoff rate indicate that only a small portion of clay particles dispersed during erosion process, and that clay particles in the form of sediment aggregates were still predominant at the same runoff rate.

    Silt content in original soils was 64.23%. At 1 L/min runoff rate, silt content of eroded sediment under unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes increased by 9.43%, 0.47%, and 8.64%, respectively. At 2 L/min runoff rate, they increased by 9.69%, 6.00%, and 7.08%,respectively. At 4 L/min runoff rate, they increased by 1.72%, 7.00%, and 6.43%, respectively,which had the similar trend with that of clay.

    Sand content in original soils was 35.60%. At 1 L/min runoff rate, sand content of eroded sediment under unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes decreased by 9.57%, 0.48%, and 8.76%, respectively. At 2 L/min runoff rate, they decreased by 9.84%, 6.06%, and 7.16%,respectively. At 4 L/min runoff rate, they decreased by 1.77%, 7.09%, and 6.53%, respectively.Throught-test, we found that under unfrozen and frozen slopes at different runoff rates, the changes of clay, silt, and sand content with scouring duration were significantly different from original values (P<0.01).

    3.2 Effect of freeze-thaw water erosion on particle enrichment in eroded sediment

    By analyzing ER of sediment particles, it is possible to understand their sortability during erosion process. The reason for this is that the loss of clay and silt particles causes the soil on the slope to coarsen, while the capacity of runoff to transport sand particles is limited.

    On unfrozen slope, no significant differences were detected between ERs at 1 and 2 L/min runoff rates (P>0.05), while at 4 L/min runoff rate, significantly different was found (P<0.05)(Table 2). At 4 L/min runoff rate, the minimum ERs of clay and silt were detected, and the maximum ER of sand was observed (Table 2).

    On shallow-thawed slope, ERs of clay particles differed significantly at different runoff rates(P<0.05), and ER was the highest at 4 L/min runoff rate (Table 2). No significant difference was detected between ERs of silt particles at 2 and 4 L/min runoff rates (P>0.05), while at 1 L/min runoff rate, ER was significantly different (P<0.05), and the minimum ER was observed (Table 2).

    On frozen slope, no significant differences were detected among ERs of clay, silt, and sand at different runoff rates (P>0.05), which indicates that on this slope, the runoff rate has no significant effect on the enrichment of these sediment types (Table 2). In terms of ER of sand, the single-factor variance test did not show any significant difference at 2 and 4 L/min runoff rates(P>0.05), while ER of sand was significantly different at 1 L/min runoff rate (P<0.05), and the minimum ER was observed (Table 2).

    Table 1 Average particle contents of clay, silt, and sand on unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes at different runoff rates

    Table 2 Enrichment rate (ER) of clay, silt, and sand on unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes at different runoff rates

    At 1 and 2 L/min runoff rates, the order of ERs of clay and silt was unfrozen slope>frozen slope>shallow-thawed slope, and that of sand was shallow-thawed slope>frozen slope>unfrozen slope. At 4 L/min runoff rate, the order of ERsof clay and silt was shallow-thawed slope>frozen slope>unfrozen slope, while that of sand was unfrozen slope>frozen slope>shallow-thawed slope.

    3.3 Effect of freeze-thaw water erosion on the transport of eroded sediment particles

    The percentages of 10 classes of grain-size particles in eroded sediments under different slope types, times (3, 6, 9, and 15 min), and runoff rates are shown in Figures 5, 6, and 7. The dotted line represents the particle size content when the 10 particle sizes of original soils are equal to 10%. Figures 5–7 showed that the percentage of particles smaller than 0.027 mm was greater than 10%, indicating that particles smaller than this size were preferentially transported, and they accounted for about 40% of the total particle percentage. The difference in the distribution of eroded sediment in different particle sizes is the result of the performance of sediment transport mechanism in the erosion particles. During erosion process, sediment particles present unimodal and multimodal distributions.

    Fig. 5 Percentage of 10 classes of grain-size particles in eroded sediments under different slope types and times at 1 L/min runoff rate. Dotted line represents the particle size content when the 10 particle sizes of original soils are equal to 10%. (a), unfrozen slope; (b), shallow-thawed slope; (c), frozen slope.

    Fig. 6 Percentage of 10 classes of grain-size particles in eroded sediments under different slope types and times at 2 L/min runoff rate. Dotted line represents the particle size content when the ten particle sizes of original soils are equal to 10%. (a), unfrozen slope; (b), shallow-thawed slope; (c), frozen slope.

    Fig. 7 Percentage of 10 classes of grain-size particles in eroded sediments under different slope types and times at 4 L/min runoff rate. Dotted line represents the particle size content when the ten particle sizes of original soils are equal to 10%. (a), unfrozen slope; (b), shallow-thawed slope; (c), frozen slope.

    On unfrozen and frozen slopes, the sediment particles with the LST of 0.066 mm presented a bimodal distribution during erosion process, indicating that the eroded sediment particles smaller than 0.066 mm were mainly transported via suspension/saltation mode, while those larger than 0.066 mm were mainly transported by rolling. The first and second peak particle sizes of the unfrozen and frozen slopes were 0.020 and 0.083 mm, respectively.

    On shallow-thawed slope, the sediment particles showed a bimodal distribution during erosion process, and the LST was 0.033 mm at 1 L/min runoff rate (Fig. 5), indicating that the eroded sediment particles smaller than 0.033 mm were mainly transported via suspension/ saltation,while those larger than 0.033 mm were mainly transported by rolling. The first and second peak particle sizes were 0.011 and 0.149 mm, respectively. At 2 L/min runoff rate, the LST was 0.056 mm (Fig. 6). And the first and second peak particle sizes were 0.020 and 0.066 mm, respectively.At 4 L/min runoff rate, the LST was 0.066 mm (Fig. 7), and the first and second peak particle sizes were 0.020 and 0.083 mm, respectively.

    Relative contribution percentages of suspension/saltation and rolling transportation modes on different slopes at various runoff rates are shown in Table 3. More than 60% of the sediment particles were transported via suspension/saltation. For the unfrozen and frozen slopes, as runoff rate increased, the relative contribution percentage of suspension/saltation transportation showed a decreasing trend. For the shallow-thawed slope, an opposite trend was shown, where, with the increasing runoff rate, the relative contribution percentage of suspension load/saltation transportation also increased. This is mainly due to the double-layer structure of shallow-thawed slope. The particle stability is enhanced due to thawing influence. With the increasing runoff rate,the damage to the particle is enhanced, so that fine particles transported by suspension/saltation transportation can be supplemented to a certain extent from crushed particle. This increased the relative contribution percentage of suspension/jump mass transport.

    Table 3 Relative contribution percentage of suspension/saltation and rolling transportation modes in soil sediments

    4 Discussion

    4.1 Accumulation of sediment particles during erosion process

    The above analysis showed that, in various scenarios, before and after erosion, the variation of clay particles is the smallest, while silt particles showed an increasing trend, and sand particles showed a decreasing trend, indicating that soil particles caused by runoff is mainly represented by the conversion between silt and sand (Sigrun and Lillian, 2006). At 1 and 2 L/min runoff rates, the runoff erosion on unfrozen slope presented a strong separation of silt particles. At the beginning of scouring, the surface layer of floating soil was stripped and sorted. As the scouring continued,rills were gradually formed, which increased the runoff energy and released soil aggregates, so that more sediment particles were sorted and transported (Wang et al, 2014a; Behzadfar et al.,2017). Due to the limited runoff energy, runoff had a weaker ability to transport sand particles of larger sizes, but it was greatly able to sort silt particles. On shallow-thawed slopes, due to the freezing and thawing of shallow areas, a certain degree of thawing generally occurs, and it limits the sorting of aggregates in the early scouring stages. The soil on frozen slopes enhances the cohesive force between particles when the soil water undergoes a phase change and solidifies, and its aggregates are not easily sorted (Kamei et al., 2012; Dagesse, 2013). Due to the poor permeability of frozen slopes, a larger runoff is here easily formed. Under its action, rills are quickly formed on the slopes, producing a strong effect on the sorting of aggregates; then, as the runoff stabilizes, the subsequent sorting appears a relatively stable trend. In the present study, the coefficients of variation of clay, silt, and sand particles were the smallest on shallow-thawed and frozen slopes at 4 L/min runoff rate, indicating that, as runoff rate increased, the sorting process on these two slopes tended to be stable (Wang et al., 2020). This result also showed that the runoff carrying capacity was strong, and more and more particles were sorted and removed from the slope with a larger runoff rate. As the runoff carrying capacity increased, enrichment rates of clay and silt increased, while that of sand decreased, which was opposite to that occurred on unfrozen slope.

    Young (1980) found that if the silt content in original soils exceeds 33.00%, a large amount of silt will be presented in the eroded sediment. In this experiment, silt content in original soils was 64.23%, and the increase of silt particles in the eroded sediment was relatively obvious under various scenarios, which is consistent with the results reported in previous studies (Rienzi et al.,2013). Under various situations in this experiment, the coefficient of variation of silt particles was smaller than that of clay particles (Table 4), which indicates that the variation of the former was not significantly affected by freeze-thaw effects. The results showed that the sorting of sediment particles depended not only on the physical properties of tested soils, but also on the runoff energy required for the sorting. Therefore, the difference in the distribution characteristics of eroded sediment is comprehensively affected by the different combinations of runoff energy and soil characteristics.

    Table 4 Coefficient of variation (CV) of clay, silt, and sand particles on unfrozen, shallow-thawed, and frozen slopes at different runoff rates

    4.2 Transport mechanism of sediment particles during erosion process

    The results showed that particles smaller than 0.027 mm were preferentially transported under different flow rates and freeze-thaw conditions. The enrichment rate of fine particles is high in the eroded sediment, which is mainly due to the fact that the dissipation of aggregates caused by the rapid infiltration of runoff leads to a large number of fragmentations, resulting in the release of more fine particles, especially in the initial stages of erosion (Oztas and Fayetorbay, 2003;Dagesse, 2013). Wang et al., (2015) found that the lower the clay content in the soil, the weaker the sorting of eroded sediment. Compared with unfrozen and frozen slopes at 1 and 2 L/min runoff rates, the upper limit for particle sizes transported by suspension/saltation on the shallow-thawed slope was smaller. This may be due to the thawing sedimentation of freeze-thaw,which causes the condensation of fine particles with each other at wet areas to form large particles,and condensation and falling. Large particles (complex particles) were dispersed into original small particles (single particles) after ultrasonic dispersion via laser particle sizer, resulting in the small LST value of shallow-thawed slope. For shallow-thawed slope, as the runoff rate increased,the LST value also gradually increased, indicating that the upper limit of particle size that can be transported via suspension/saltation presented a slightly increasing trend. This is explained by the fact that the increase in runoff led to the modification of transportation mode from rolling to suspension/saltation for some of the particles, which is consistent with the results reported in Asadi et al. (2011). Loch and Donnollan (1983) found that the range of particle size for the transition from suspension to saltation is 0.125–0.250 mm. Asadi et al. (2011) pointed out that the particle size range corresponding to the lowest sediment transport rate for alluvial sand is 0.180–0.380 mm. In addition, Wang et al. (2015) researched the sorting characteristics of soil particles under different soil qualities through simulated rainfall experiments, and found that loess soil, black loess soil, loess soil from Ansai District, and loess soil from Suide County,corresponded to the diameters at the LST value, with the following ranges: 0.071–0.117,0.068–0.106, 0.053–0.067, and >0.061 mm, respectively. The present study used loessal soil and the particle size at the lowest sediment transport rate ranged from 0.056 to 0.066 mm, which is in line with the results of Wang et al. (2015).

    At 1 and 2 L/min runoff rates, the relative contribution percentage of suspension/saltation transport on different slope types was frozen slope>unfrozen slope>shallow-thawed slope. On unfrozen and frozen slopes, more than 86% of particles are generally transported by suspension/saltation. As permeability is weaker on frozen than on unfrozen slopes, the actual runoff rate is relatively large, while the runoff energy consumption is relatively small, so the relative contribution percentage of suspension/saltation transportation is large. In the present study, at 4 L/min runoff rate, the relative contribution percentage of suspension/saltation transport on different slope types was frozen slope>shallow-thawed slope>unfrozen slope. At this runoff rate,the erosion modulus of shallow-thawed slope was the largest, under the same runoff energy consumption, indicating that greater damages are produced to aggregates at this runoff rate compared with those of 1 and 2 L/min runoff rates.

    5 Conclusions

    In this study, the influence of freeze-thaw water erosion on the transport and sorting characteristics of eroded sediment particles was investigated, and the following main conclusions were drawn. The results showed that the order of sediment particle content was silt>sand>clay during erosion process. The clay and silt particles were enrichment. The sediment particles transported in the form of suspension/saltation was more than 69.24%. Sediment particles smaller than 0.027 mm were preferentially transported. On shallow-thawed slope, the upper limit of the particle size transported by suspension/saltation also increased with the increasing runoff rate.The relative contribution percentage of suspension/saltation on unfrozen and frozen slopes showed a decreasing trend with the increasing runoff rate, while that on shallow-thawed slope showed an opposite trend.

    Due to climate and soil conditions in the loess hilly-gully region of Loess Plateau, it is essential and practical to analyze freeze-thaw and meltwater compound erosion in the long term. This study enhances our understanding of the compound erosion mechanisms. Through the study, we found the main sorted and transported sediment particles and the transport mode of those particles under different freeze-thaw and runoff conditions, which provides reference value for erosion model development.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2040208, 52009104, 52079106,42107087) and the Shaanxi Province Innovation Talent Promotion Plan Project Technology Innovation Team(2020TD-023). In addition, we thank the reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions.

    亚洲国产精品一区三区| av在线播放精品| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 欧美bdsm另类| av播播在线观看一区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 全区人妻精品视频| av有码第一页| 午夜福利,免费看| 熟女av电影| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产成人精品一,二区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 五月开心婷婷网| 午夜免费观看性视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 久久久久久久国产电影| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 99久久人妻综合| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲综合精品二区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 老司机影院成人| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| av不卡在线播放| av不卡在线播放| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 51国产日韩欧美| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 丁香六月天网| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 亚洲国产精品999| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 久久影院123| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲四区av| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 欧美日韩av久久| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久久久久人妻| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 老熟女久久久| 免费少妇av软件| 18+在线观看网站| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久免费观看电影| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 亚洲四区av| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 内地一区二区视频在线| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产在线免费精品| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 欧美日韩av久久| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久久久久网色| 香蕉精品网在线| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 精品久久久久久久久av| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 天天影视国产精品| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 尾随美女入室| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产精品成人在线| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| av福利片在线| 精品久久蜜臀av无| av天堂久久9| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 插逼视频在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 人人澡人人妻人| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 久久久久精品性色| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 天堂8中文在线网| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 日韩成人伦理影院| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 中国国产av一级| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产视频内射| 日本欧美视频一区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲图色成人| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久99一区二区三区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久午夜福利片| 成人二区视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 日韩伦理黄色片| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 51国产日韩欧美| 美女中出高潮动态图| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产视频内射| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 免费少妇av软件| 色网站视频免费| 午夜av观看不卡| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产亚洲最大av| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| kizo精华| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 在线观看三级黄色| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产亚洲最大av| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 满18在线观看网站| 大码成人一级视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 桃花免费在线播放| 一级毛片我不卡| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 9色porny在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 日本黄色片子视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 69精品国产乱码久久久| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| av在线播放精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 人妻系列 视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲精品视频女| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| av一本久久久久| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| a级毛片在线看网站| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| av福利片在线| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产综合精华液| 成人二区视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一级毛片 在线播放| 老司机亚洲免费影院| h视频一区二区三区| 只有这里有精品99| av在线播放精品| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 有码 亚洲区| 国产视频内射| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 一区在线观看完整版| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产永久视频网站| 国产综合精华液| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 美女国产视频在线观看| 欧美日韩av久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 青春草视频在线免费观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 九草在线视频观看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 制服诱惑二区| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 内地一区二区视频在线| 永久网站在线| av免费观看日本| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 精品一区二区免费观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 蜜桃在线观看..| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产精品无大码| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲综合精品二区| kizo精华| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 少妇 在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 91精品国产九色| 永久网站在线| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 观看美女的网站| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 久久婷婷青草| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲中文av在线| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 日韩成人伦理影院| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 性色av一级| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 黄片播放在线免费| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| videos熟女内射| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| freevideosex欧美| 国产在视频线精品| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产精品免费大片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品一二三| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| kizo精华| 中国三级夫妇交换| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 18+在线观看网站| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 成人免费观看视频高清| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 少妇丰满av| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产成人精品无人区| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| av不卡在线播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 18禁观看日本| 午夜av观看不卡| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 精品久久久精品久久久| 成人免费观看视频高清| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 91国产中文字幕| 在线观看www视频免费| 超色免费av| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产永久视频网站| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲中文av在线| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 欧美性感艳星| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久婷婷青草| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 赤兔流量卡办理| 伦理电影免费视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲国产色片| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 乱人伦中国视频| 中国三级夫妇交换| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲综合色网址| 午夜免费观看性视频| 9色porny在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| av在线播放精品| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 一级毛片我不卡| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 91国产中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| av线在线观看网站| 在线观看三级黄色| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 中国国产av一级| 黄色一级大片看看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 九九在线视频观看精品| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 在线看a的网站| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 91成人精品电影| 久久久精品94久久精品| 午夜福利,免费看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久久久精品性色| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式|