Avoiding second donor site and the second set of neck vessels in a case of absent peroneal skinperforators

Aditya Narayan Choudhary, Rajan Arora, Kripa Shanker Mishra, Ravi Kiran Naalla, Saket Srivastava,Ajay Kumar Dewan

1Department of Reconstructive and Microvascular Surgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi 110085, India.

2Department of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi 110085, India.

Abstract

Keywords: Free fibula flap, peroneal vessels, posterior tibial vessels, mandible reconstruction, flaps in series

INTRODUCTION

The free fibula flap has become one of the most commonly used vascularized bony flaps to reconstruct bony defects in the body[1], particularly the mandible.It has a reliable blood supply and a sizable bone stock.It enables the surgeon to harvest bone, skin, muscle, and fascia together and manipulate these components to tailor them for various defects.

The peroneal vessel provides vascularity to both the skeletal and the cutaneous components.The fibula receives its blood supply through the nutrient artery and periosteum, and at the same time, the skin is perfused by septocutaneous/musculocutaneous perforators.Rarely, these skin perforators may arise from posterior or anterior tibial vessels[2].

Here we present a peculiar case where lateral leg skin perforators originated from only the posterior tibial vessels.

CASE REPORT

A 64-year-old male was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma at the right lower gingivobuccal sulcus by our head and neck oncology team.The surgical plan was right segmental mandibulectomy with bilateral modified neck dissection and reconstruction with free fibula osteo-musculocutaneous flap.The fibula flap harvest started through the anterior approach.Perforator dissection revealed that its origin was from the posterior tibial artery rather than peroneal artery.

The skin paddle was harvested on this perforator separately.The perforator was dissected untill its origin from the posterior tibial artery was reached.The total length of this pedicle was around 8 cm.After considering the short pedicle length, we decided to anastomose it with the distal end of the fibula.The skin paddle was designed in eccentric fashion and the short limb was kept towards the distal end of the fibula for easy anastomosis.In this whole process, the posterior tibial vessels were left intact and limb vascularity was not compromised anywhere.At the same time, the required fibula along with the flexor hallucis longus muscle was raised on the vascular pedicle of the peroneal vessels [Figure 1].Single osteotomy was done in the parasymphyseal region to contour the fibula in accordance with the bone defect.The bone was fixed using mini-recon plates and screws.

After bony fixation, the proximal end of the peroneal artery was anastomosed end-to-end to the right superior thyroid artery using intermittent 9-0 nylon sutures [Figure 2].Out of the two venae comitantes, the one with the best outflow was anastomosed end to end to the common facial vein using a 3 mm coupler.

The skin flap vascular pedicle was anastomosed to the osteo-muscular flap in series.The arterial anastomosis was performed to the distal end of the peroneal artery in an end-to-end manner using intermittent nylon 9-0 sutures [Figure 3].The venae comitantes of the skin paddle were anastomosed endto-end to the peroneal venae comitantes.Both flaps were well perfused at the end of the procedure.

In follow-up period, both the donor leg and flap recipient sites healed uneventfully [Figures 4-6].

Figure 1.Black arrow: supply to the bony component of free fibula flap from the peroneal artery.Yellow arrow: septocutaneous perforator from posterior tibial vessels.

Figure 2.Black arrow: the distal end of peroneal vessels.Yellow arrow: anastomosis between superior thyroid artery and the proximal end of peroneal artery.Blue arrow: perforator to skin paddle, dissected to its origin.

Figure 3.Black arrow: anastomosis between the distal end of peroneal vessels and the proximal end of the perforator to the skin paddle.Red arrow: skin paddle.

Figure 4.Intra-oral view of viable flap, six weeks follow-up.

Figure 5.Frontal view of patent with good aesthetic outcome, six weeks follow-up.

Figure 6.Well healed donor area of leg, six weeks follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Tayloret al.[3]evaluated microvascular fibula flaps used to reconstruct tibial bone gaps.The work of Weiet al.[4]established the reliability of the skin paddle of the osteo-septocutaneous fibula flap.Since then,the skin has served a critical role as a cutaneous component.It serves a dual purpose, reconstruction of thedefect as well as monitoring of the bone component[4].In 1989, Hidalgo[5]was the first to report a series of vascularized fibula flaps for mandibular reconstruction.Common vascular supply to the skin paddle of the flap is through the septocutaneous perforators[4]arising from the peroneal vessels.There is considerable variation in the number, course, and origin of these perforators[6,7].

Previously, authors that have encountered a situation similar to ours did one of the following:

1.Returned the skin paddle to the lower limb and used only the bony component for reconstruction[7].

2.Performed two separate sets of anastomoses to the neck vessels[8-10].

3.Used fibula for bony reconstruction and used another flap for skin and soft tissue from different donor sites[11].

In our case, we used skin paddle based on perforator of posterior tibial vessels as a second free flap from a single donor site.The distal end of the peroneal vessels was used for anastomosing vesesls of the skin paddle without sacrificing another set of neck vessels for anastomosis.

Two lessons learned from this case:

(1) Harvesting bone and skin paddle as a separate free flap can save another potential flap donor area from being wasted.

(2) The distal end of the peroneal vessels can be used as a recipient for a second free flap in vessel depleted neck.

DECLARATIONS

Authors’ contributions

Drafting of the manuscript, important intellectual content, and technical support: Choudhary AN

Drafting of the manuscript and critical revision of the manuscript: Arora R

Drafting of the manuscript and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content:Mishra KS

Drafting of the manuscript and technical support: Nalla RK, Srivastava S

Drafting of the manuscript and supervision of the manuscript: Dewan AK

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was performed following the Declaration of Helsinki.Appropriate consents were taken.The approval for the study was waived off by the ethical committee of Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research centre, Rohini, as the case was a part of the routine care.

Consent for publication

Valid, detailed, informed, and written consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Copyright

? The Author(s) 2022.