• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A New Index Developed for Fast Diagnosis of Meteorological Roles in Ground-Level Ozone Variations

    2022-04-02 03:02:30WeihuaCHENWeiwenWANGShiguoJIAJingyingMAOFenghuaYANLianmingZHENGYongkangWUXingtengZHANGYutongDONGLingbinKONGBuqingZHONGMingCHANGMinSHAOandXuemeiWANG
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年3期

    Weihua CHEN, Weiwen WANG, Shiguo JIA, Jingying MAO, Fenghua YAN, Lianming ZHENG,Yongkang WU, Xingteng ZHANG, Yutong DONG, Lingbin KONG, Buqing ZHONG,Ming CHANG, Min SHAO, and Xuemei WANG*

    1Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality,Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

    2School of Atmospheric Sciences, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies,Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

    3Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China

    ABSTRACT China experienced worsening ground-level ozone (O3) pollution from 2013 to 2019. In this study, meteorological parameters, including surface temperature (T2), solar radiation (SW), and wind speed (WS), were classified into two aspects, (1) Photochemical Reaction Condition (PRC = T2 × SW) and (2) Physical Dispersion Capacity (PDC = WS). In this way, a Meteorology Synthetic Index (MSI = PRC/PDC) was developed for the quantification of meteorology-induced ground-level O3 pollution. The positive linear relationship between the 90th percentile of MDA8 (maximum daily 8-h average) O3 concentration and MSI determined that the contribution of meteorological changes to ground-level O-3 varied on a latitudinal gradient, decreasing from ~40% in southern China to 10%-20% in northern China. Favorable photochemical reaction conditions were more important for ground-level O3 pollution. This study proposes a universally applicable index for fast diagnosis of meteorological roles in ground-level O3 variability, which enables the assessment of the observed effects of precursor emissions reductions that can be used for designing future control policies.

    Key words: ground-level ozone, meteorology synthetic index, photochemical reaction condition, physical dispersion capacity

    1. Introduction

    Ground-level O3, a secondary pollutant, is formed by sunlight-initiated chemical reactions between nitrogen oxides(NOx= NO + NO2) and volatile organic compounds(VOCs). O3controls the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere and causes damage to vegetation growth and human health (Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998). Aircraft observations have revealed an increase in tropospheric O3across the Northern Hemisphere since the mid-1990s (Gaudel et al., 2020).While ground-based observations indicate that ground-level O3has declined in large urban regions across the United States and Europe owing to the effective control of NOxand VOC emissions since the 1990s (Cooper et al., 2012; Paoletti et al., 2014), the situation is still severe in China. The spread and worsening of ground-level O3in most urban areas of China has become one of the top environmental issues in recent years (Lu et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019; Liu and Wang, 2020a, b; Wang et al., 2020). Lu et al. (2020) concluded that MDA8-O3levels increased by 2.4 ppb (5.0%)yr-1in China during the warm season (April-September) for the period 2013-19. More importantly, worsening O3pollution with a greater frequency of high-concentration events is predicted to continue due to the combined effects of emission variations and climate change (Wang et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2015; Cao and Yin, 2020).

    Precursor emissions and meteorological conditions are the most important factors controlling the levels and trends of ground-level O3(Lu and Chang, 2005; Lu et al., 2019a,b). Stringent clean air actions have been implemented in China since 2013, leading to significant decreases in anthropogenic emissions of NOxwith a relative change of -21%from 2013 to 2017, and further abatement is expected, while VOC emissions increased by 2% in 2017 relative to 2013 and have remained stable since 2017 (Zheng et al., 2018;Dang and Liao, 2019; Li et al., 2020). Significant progress has been made in understanding ground-level O3formation from precursor emissions under different meteorological conditions (Steiner et al., 2010). Extensive studies have pointed out that anthropogenic emissions are the dominant factor driving the increase in ground-level O3(Lu et al.,2018, 2019a; Li et al., 2019, 2020; Liu and Wang, 2020b),while meteorological conditions have also exerted considerable influence on ground-level O3variability (Li et al.,2013; Fu and Tian, 2019; Gong and Liao, 2019; Li et al.,2019, 2020; Han et al., 2020; Le et al., 2020; Zhao et al.,2020). In general, higher surface temperatures and stronger solar radiation, coupled with lower relative humidity (RH),collectively linked with lower cloud fraction, favor the chemical production of O3(Peterson and Flowers, 1977; Xu et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2014; Coates et al., 2016; Gong and Liao, 2019; Li et al., 2020; Dang et al., 2021), whereas lower wind speed (WS) and planetary boundary layer height(PBLH) are conducive to the accumulation of O3(Haman et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017; Liu and Wang, 2020a), which results in higher O3concentrations. The quantification of meteorology-induced ground-level O3is of great importance since meteorological variation may mask the trends in O3concentration caused by precursor emissions and influence the development of further mitigation policies (Lu and Chang,2005; Wang et al., 2018; Liu and Wang, 2020a; Ordó?ez et al., 2020). Dang et al. (2021) and Li et al. (2020) reported that meteorological change favored MDA8-O3increases,with respective contributions of ~40% and 80% in northern and eastern China during 2012-19.

    Chemical transport models (CTMs), one of the most widely used methods to quantify the contribution of meteorological variation, can provide a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of meteorology on the temporal variation of ground-level O3; however, the large consumption of computational resources and high uncertainties in O3simulations(e.g., emission inventory, chemical mechanisms) could make the application of CTM inconvenient (Foley et al.,2015; Lu et al., 2019a; Butler et al., 2020; Liu and Wang,2020b). Statistical models that develop a relationship between O3and meteorological parameters represent another approach to quantify the contribution of meteorological variation to O3trends (Kova?-Andri? et al., 2009).Among them, multiple linear regression (MLR) is one of the most frequently employed methods for predicting O3concentration as a function of meteorological parameters(Zhong et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019, 2020; Yang et al.,2019). MLR models often consider a certain number of meteorological parameters, which could cause an overfitting issue when the model is too complex and produce misleading R (Correlation Coefficient)-squared values, regression coefficients, and p-values that represent noise rather than genuine relationships. It is known that ground-level O3formation and evaluation are comprehensively influenced by multiple meteorological parameters, and the processes of each individual meteorological parameter on ground-level O3are quite different and could have specific physical implications (Kayes et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020). Although great effort has been devoted to elucidating the complex interaction between ground-level O3and meteorological conditions in recent years (Kova?-Andri? et al., 2009; Otero et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2019), a fast and effective method is still urgently needed to better describe and quantify the comprehensive effects of meteorological conditions on groundlevel O3variation in the face of the worsening O3situation,and ultimately to determine the gaps between precursor emissions controls and the desired reductions in peak O3levels.

    In this study, a Meteorology Synthetic Index (MSI), as a function of surface temperature, solar radiation, and wind speed, was developed for fast diagnosis of meteorological roles in ground-level O3formation by integrating groundbased measurements and outputs from a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model (Weather Research and Forecasting model, WRF). The index was further applied to evaluate the meteorology-induced ground-level O3changes in China during 2013-19 based on the linear relationship established between the meteorology index and O3. The meteorology index established in this study not only enables a fast method for quantitative assessment of meteorological influences on ground-level O3variability but also provides meteorological insight into the formation and evaluation of ground-level O3pollution through chemical and physical aspects. This study facilitates an in-depth understanding of meteorology-induced ground-level O3variations and urges a re-examination of the significance of meteorology for the responses of O3pollution to precursor emissions in the face of climate change.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the materials and methods used in this study, section 3 presents the status of ground-level ozone, section 4 quantifies the contribution of meteorological conditions to annual ozone enhancement and section 5 provides a brief conclusion and discussion.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Data

    2.1.1. Observed ground-level ozone data

    Hourly observational ground-level O3concentration data for 2013-19 were obtained from the public website of the China Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE)(http://www.mee.gov.cn/). Five key regions that have been experiencing the most serious O3pollution in China were targeted in this study (Fig. 1). These five regions were categorized as follows: Beijing-Tianjin-Heibei (BTH, 55 cities, 280 sites), Fenwei Plain city cluster (FWP, 11 cities, 59 sites),Yangtze River Delta (YRD, 41 cities, 243 sites), Sichuan Basin (SCB, 16 cities, 68 sites), and Pearl River Delta(PRD, 9 cities, 56 sites). A total of 568 air quality stations were used in this study.

    Data processing followed the strict criteria presented in the work of Lu et al. (2020) and Song et al. (2017). In brief,1-h O3concentration at each site in a specific city was averaged first, and then the values in certain cities in a specific region were averaged to represent regional results. O3exceedance was defined as the number of days with MDA8-O3exceeding the Chinese Grade-II (urban/industrial and surrounding rural areas) National Air Quality Standard(160 μg m-3) (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, and Standardization Administration, 2016).

    2.1.2. Observed meteorological data

    Observational daily meteorological data, including 2-meter temperature (T2), wind speed (WS), relative humidity(RH), and pressure for China from 2013 to 2019 were obtained from the National Meteorological Information Center, China Meteorological Administration (CMA) (http://data.cma.cn/). A total of 103 meteorological stations were used in this study (Fig. 1). It is worth noting that only 10 stations were available for observed solar radiation, which located in different provinces across all of China (Fig. 1). Hourly observational solar radiation (SW) and planetary boundary layer height (PBLH) obtained by Jinan University (JNU,23.015°N, 113.419°E), Guangzhou, China, from October 2019 to May 2020 were also collected in this study.

    Fig. 1. Map of study regions and locations of O3 (red dots) and meteorology (blue dots) monitoring sites in China. The Jinan University (JNU) and Panyu Middle School (PYMS) sites are indicated by green stars. The 10 observed solar radiation sites are indicated with rose triangles. Key regions in jade, olive, medium blue, pink,and gray represent the Beijing-Tianjin-Heibei (BTH), Fenwei Plain city cluster(FWP), Yangtze River Delta (YRD), Sichuan Basin (SCB), and Pearl River Delta(PRD) regions, respectively.

    2.1.3. Simulated meteorological data

    Owing to the small amount (only 10 sites) of available contemporaneously measured public data for SW, T2, and WS in China, simulated meteorological results from numerical models were applied in this work. Simulated daily meteorological data at a horizontal resolution of 27 km × 27 km,including T2, SW, WS, RH, PBLH, pressure, and precipitation for the period 2013-19, were obtained from the WRF model (Grell et al., 2005). Detailed information for the WRF model configuration is provided in our previous study(Ma et al., 2020). The WRF-derived data can characterize the meteorological properties of China at a finer scale better than the coarse-resolution reanalysis data that have been used in previous studies, such as the 1° × 1° National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Final (FNL) reanalysis data (Han et al., 2020), the 1° × 1° ERA-Interim reanalysis dataset (Cao and Yin, 2020; Mousavinezhad et al.,2021), and the 0.5° (lat) × 0.625° (lon) NASA Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) product (Li et al., 2019, 2020).

    2.2. Development of the meteorology index

    Apart from precursor emissions, the formation of ground-level O3is controlled by multiple meteorological parameters through different physical and chemical processes. Previous studies have revealed that T2and SW are the critical factors determining O3photochemical reactions since they respectively affect the reaction kinetic rates and drive photolysis to trigger chain reactions, irrespective of season or region (Peterson and Flowers, 1977; Hsu, 2007; Im et al.,2011; Xu et al., 2011; Jing et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2014;Pusede et al., 2015; Coates et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017;Ding et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2021), while the WS and PBLH control the horizontal dilution and vertical mixing of O3and its precursors, respectively (Haman et al., 2014;Wang et al., 2017; Liu and Wang, 2020a). In addition, RH,cloud fraction, precipitation, and wind direction also show impacts on ground-level O3(Li et al., 2019, 2020; Han et al., 2020; Dang et al., 2021).

    Previous studies have also pointed out that high temperatures, strong solar radiation, weak wind, and high pressure are usually followed by O3episodes, although the meteorological factors affecting ozone formation and accumulation depend on the region (Mousavinezhad et al., 2021). The meteorological factors interact with each other and are not independent variables: temperature can be a surrogate for pressure; solar radiation can be a surrogate for other factors such as relative humidity, cloud fraction, and precipitation;and wind speed can be a surrogate for PBLH (Gong and Liao, 2019). Therefore, T2, SW, and WS were selected as the most important meteorological parameters impacting ground-level O3concentration. PBLH should not be a strong predictor for atmospheric pollutants (e.g., PM2.5, O3)(Banta et al., 2011; Su et al., 2018) since the relationship between PBLH and atmospheric pollutants is quite complex and is believed to be nonlinear (Wang et al., 2018;Dong et al., 2020); for example, Wang et al. (2020) demonstrated that variation in PBLH was not the driving factor that led to the increase in ground-level O3over China from 2013 to 2017. As an example, observed data from JNU revealed that MDA8-O3was positively and significantly correlated with daily T2[Pearson correlation coefficient (R) =0.37, p-value (P) < 0.01] and daily SW (r = 0.56, P < 0.01),and negatively associated with daily WS (r = -0.28, P <0.01) during the monitored period (Fig. S1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material, ESM), while it showed no significant correlation with PBLH and RH.

    The meteorological parameters selected above were classified into two terms, one defined as Photochemical Reaction Conditions (PRC), which is a function of T2and SW, to indicate the effect of meteorological conditions on the photochemical production of O3. Observed data from JNU showed that MDA8-O3has a stronger positive correlation with PRC (R = 0.82. P < 0.01) than that of T2and SW. Physical Dispersion Capacity (PDC), represented by WS, is defined to characterize the capability of O3dispersion. With higher values of PRC and PDC, meteorological conditions are more conducive to photochemical reactions and dynamic ventilation of ground-level O3, respectively. Based on the linear relationships between MDA8-O3, PRC, and PDC, and the MSI, a function of PRC and PDC, is here introduced as a new indicator to comprehensively describe the effect of meteorological variability on ground-level O3concentration. MSI can be described as follows:

    The meteorological parameters used in Eq. (1) were first nondimensionalized to make them comparable. In contrast to mean normalization-one of the methods for dimensionless parameters that use the mean value of a specific vector as the denominator, which cannot characterize the geographic and seasonal differences in meteorology-a specific value is used as the denominator in this study to characterize the geographic and seasonal differences in meteorology. It is worth noting that the specific value of the denominator neither affects the trends of meteorological parameters nor the relative contribution of meteorology to O3variation,although the magnitude of the meteorological factors will be different. Therefore, the specific values were set to be 25°C, 300 W m-2, and 3 m s-1for T2, SW, and WS, respectively, which are the average values in southern China.Higher values of MSI denote favorable meteorological conditions for the formation of O3and result in higher groundlevel O3concentrations. Days with rain events were removed from the analysis because O3concentration is relatively lower during a rain event, and precipitation is an obvious meteorological parameter affecting O3concentration(Wang et al., 2018).

    2.3. Evaluation of the meteorology index

    The limited hourly observational data obtained from JNU were used to evaluate the performance of MSI in predicting ground-level O3concentration. Hourly O3concentration data were derived from the nearest (straight line distance is ~10 km) air quality monitoring site at Panyu Middle School (PYMS, 22.948°N, 113.352°E). In addition,observed meteorological parameters at the 10 sites across all of China were also used to evaluate MSI performance.Observed O3concentration at these 10 meteorological sites was derived from the nearest air quality monitoring site because O3observation stations are not collocated with meteorology observation stations. To evaluate MSI, the correlation coefficients between MDA8-O3concentration and individual meteorological parameters (i.e., T2, SW, PBLH, WS,and RH), MSI, and other possible configurations of MSI at JNU and the 10 sites were calculated, as illustrated in Figs.2 and 3. The other possible configurations of MSI include:T2×SW, T2×SW/RH, T2×SW/(WS×RH), and T2×SW/(WS×RH×PBLH).

    At JNU sites (Fig. 2), the correlation coefficient between MDA8-O3and MSI with a value of 0.77 and 0.94 during the whole period and polluted period, respectively,was higher than that between MDA8-O3and the individual meteorological parameters; meanwhile, the corresponding coefficient for MSI was also higher than that of other configurations of MSI, except for T2×SW/(WS×RH). In terms of the 10 stations (Fig. 3), the corresponding coefficients for MSI were again higher than that of individual meteorological parameters, except for T2, which was comparable with MSI. As compared with other configurations of MSI, 6 out of 10 sites showed the highest coefficients for MSI, whereas only Kunming presented the lowest coefficient for MSI.The coefficient for MSI was comparable with T2×SW in the rest of the three sites. Overall, the results at JNU and the 10 stations suggested that the MSI developed in this study can better represent the meteorological influences compared with single meteorological parameters and other configurations of MSI.

    2.4. Quantitative diagnosis of meteorology-induced ozone variation

    The regional-scale MSI was calculated through simulated historical meteorological parameters from the WRF model during 2013-19. The simulated data were first evaluated by comparison with ground-based measurements (Fig.S2 in the ESM). The statistical results for meteorological parameters are presented in Table S1 in the ESM. Figure S2 illustrates that most data points fall around the 1:1 line for T2,and most are within the twofold range for WS. The root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.66°C-2.33°C for T2and 1.20-2.66 m s-1for WS. Overall, modeled meteorology trends closely resembled the observed trends, with a R of~0.99 for T2and 0.31-0.74 for WS (P < 0.01). Solar radiation data collected from JNU and 10 sites over China were also used to evaluate the simulation results (Fig. S3 in the ESM). While the WRF model underestimated SW at JNU from October 2019 to May 2020 with an RMSE of 145 W m-2,it captured the tendency well, with an R of 0.5 (P < 0.05).Simulated SW over China agreed well with the observations for the period 2013-19, with an RMSE and R of 18 W m-2and 0.85 (P < 0.01), respectively. Overall, the WRF model reasonably captured the magnitude and spatiotemporal distribution of meteorological parameters in China during 2013-19.

    To quantify the meteorology-induced ground-level O3variation, a linear regression model between the monthly 90th percentile MDA8-O3and MSI was established and further applied to quantify the contribution of meteorology to ground-level O3variability over China for historical(2013-19) periods. The fitting parameters for the linear regression model are listed in Table S2 and shown in Fig. S4 in the ESM. The determination coefficient (R2) represents the percentage of the variance in the observed data explained by the model. R2ranged between 0.47 and 0.82 in the regression (P < 0.01), indicating that the meteorological variables selected in this study can explain 47%-82% of the variance of the 90th percentile MDA8-O3for the period 2013-2019.The discrepancy between the meteorology-induced 90th percentile MDA8-O3variation and the observed changes in the 90th percentile MDA8-O3might be attributed to contributions from other meteorological parameters not considered in this study (e.g., RH, pressure, cloud fraction), precursor emission variations, PM2.5level, etc. (Zhong et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019).

    Fig. 2. Correlation coefficients for MDA8-O3 concentration and each meteorological factor at the JNU site during the whole period (hollow bars) and during a heavy O3 pollution period (solid bars).

    Fig. 3. Correlation coefficients for monthly MDA8-O3 concentration and each meteorological factor at the 10 sites across China during 2013-19. The correlation coefficients between MDA8 -O3 and MSI at the 95% confidence level are shown in each plot. The Y-axis in each plot ranges from -1 to 1.

    3. Status of ground-level ozone

    The 12-month moving average for the 2nd, 50th, and 90th percentiles of MDA8-O3showed significant positive trends (P < 0.05) in China for the entire period (Fig. 4a),with a rate of 0.22, 0.28, and 0.32 μg m-3month-1, respectively. The growth rate for MDA8-O3increased with the percentiles, indicating that heavy O3pollution has been getting worse across all of China. Accordingly, significant enhancement in the magnitude and frequency of high O3events was observed (Fig. S5 in the ESM), with the annual average O3exceedance rapidly increasing from 8 days (2%) in 2013 to 36 days (10%) in 2019 at the rate of 5 d yr-1(P < 0.05) over China. To be more specific, relatively higher growth rates occurred in the BTH and FWP regions, with values ranging between 0.35 and 0.61 μg m-3month-1, followed by the YRD and SCB regions with a value of 0.13-0.37 μg m-3month-1, while MDA8-O3climbed with fluctuation in the PRD region at a rate of 0.16-0.29 μg m-3month-1. The O3exceedance was the most serious in the BTH region, where it reached up to 40-60 days (10%-15%) since 2017 with a growth rate of 8 d yr-1, followed by the FWP, YRD, and PRD regions, with a value of 20-30 days (10%) since 2017 and a growth rate of ~5 d yr-1; however, SCB had relatively slight exceedance (< 10 days), with a growth rate of~2 d yr-1.

    It is worth noting that there was a rightward shift in the histogram of daily MDA8-O3across the five key regions relative to the periods of 2013-16 and 2017-19 (Fig. 5), and the corresponding values for peak frequency of daily MDA8-O3increased by about 20 μg m-3during these two periods, suggesting that a wide range of worsening O3pollution has been particularly prominent since 2017 across all of China.In addition, the frequency of high O3events with daily MDA8-O3above 160 μg m-3has grown by 3.6% from 2013-16 to 2017-19 on average, varying between 1.9% in the SCB region and 9.9% in the BTH region. More importantly, an elevated frequency of extremely high O3events(MDA8-O3> 200 μg m-3) was also detected, with a value of+1.2% on average, and the situation was the most serious in the BTH region with a corresponding value of +4.7%. From the perspective of anthropogenic emissions, lower O3titration by NO resulting from the continuous reduction in NOxemissions could have resulted in the enhancement of ground-level O3since 2017 under conditions where VOC emissions remained stable after 2017 (Zheng et al., 2018;Dang and Liao, 2019). Meteorological conditions are likely to have been another important factor contributing to the more severe O3pollution during 2017-19 compared with that during 2013-17 (Li et al., 2020).

    Fig. 4. Trends of monthly and 12-month moving average 2nd, 50th, and 90th percentile values of MDA8-O3 concentration. (a) China; (b) BTH; (c) FWP; (d) YRD; (e) SCB; (f) PRD. The shaded areas represent the corresponding standard deviations. For reference, 160 and 200 μg m-3 concentrations are indicated by black dashed lines, which correspond to the Chinese Grade-II and Grade-I National Air Quality Standards, respectively. The slopes for the linear regression at the 95% confidence level are shown in each plot.

    Fig. 5. Histograms of daily MDA8-O3 in the study regions for the period 2013-2016(light-colored areas) and 2017-2019 (dark-colored areas), respectively.

    4. Meteorological conditions contributing to annual ozone enhancement

    Long-term trends of the meteorology indices presented in Fig. S6 reveal that statistically significant upward trends(0.07%-0.29% month-1, P < 0.05) and downward trends(-0.17%-0.04% month-1, P < 0.05) were observed for PRC and PDC (P < 0.05) from 2013 through 2019, respectively,except for PDC in the BTH region, where WS remained stable. Consequently, significant positive changes in MSI have been noted in the study regions (0.15%-0.44%month-1, P < 0.05). This illustrative analysis suggests that meteorological conditions with stronger photochemical reaction conditions and weaker physical dispersion conditions could have progressively increased ground-level O3concentrations in recent years.

    Figure 6 summarizes the variation of 90th percentile MDA8-O3(hereafter referred to as Δ90th MDA8-O3) for the period 2013-19 caused by meteorological changes. Overall, Δ90th MDA8-O3caused by meteorological changes was estimated to be 1.4 ± 0.4 μg m-3yr-1, accounting for 28% of observed Δ90th MDA8-O3over China. Interestingly, the contribution of meteorological changes to Δ90th MDA8-O3varied on a latitudinal gradient, decreasing from ~40% in southern China (YRD, SCB, and PRD regions) to ~20% in the FWP region and ~10% in the BTH region. Upon further analysis, a region-specific difference in the relative importance of PRC and PDC to MSI was detected across China. Among them, the weakening of wind speed (PDC) played a more important role in the increment of MSI in the SCB region,where the blocking effects of the terrain can lead to stagnant conditions and thermal inversion (Wang et al., 2018;Miao et al., 2019), while the influences of PRC and PDC were comparable in the FWP and YRD regions. The intensification of ambient conditions favoring photochemical reactions, with increasing PRC, was more crucial than that of physical dispersion conditions for the growth of MSI in the PRD and BTH regions. The results demonstrate that meteorology exerted a larger influence on ground-level O3pollution in southern China and less influence in northern China.This is because, on the one hand, the variation in MSI was much lower in northern China (0.0011 per month in the BTH) than in southern China (0.0033 per month in the PRD), as shown in Fig. S6c; on the other hand, the amount and variation of anthropogenic emissions were more obvious in northern China than in southern China (Ding et al.,2019; Liu and Wang, 2020b), resulting in the relatively lower contribution of meteorology in northern China. Previous studies have also proven that anthropogenic emission variation showed a more predominant role in ground-level O3in northern China (Li et al., 2020; Liu and Wang, 2020a, b;Mousavinezhad et al., 2021).

    Fig. 6. Variation of 90th percentile MDA8-O3 (Δ90th MDA8-O3) attributed to meteorology (MET) and other factors(OTHERS) in the study regions across China during 2013-2019. Pies with dark green and grey represent the relative contribution (%) of MET and OTHERS to the Δ90th MDA8-O3 concentration. Variation rates (μg m-3 yr-1) of Δ90th MDA8-O3 are inserted below the pies and characterized by the size of the pies. Bars indicate the variation rates (% yr-1) of the normalized meteorological indices.

    The contribution of meteorological variation estimated in this study was compared with results from previous studies that used chemical transport models or statistical methods, as is summarized in Table S3 in the ESM. In general,the magnitude and direction of meteorology-induced O3variation were quite different, depending on the study region and methods used. Most studies concluded that meteorological conditions favored the incremental increase in O3concentration in China, except for Ma et al. (2016) and Li et al.(2020), who found that meteorological variation led to a decrease in O3in northern China and the SCB region. In contrast, Ding et al. (2019) and Lou et al. (2015) pointed out that the negative effect of changes in emissions was offset by meteorological variation, and the O3incremental changes were caused mainly by changes in meteorological conditions, with a contribution higher than 100%, rather than by emissions in China based on the CMAQ and GEOS-Chem models, respectively. Specifically, the contribution of meteorological factors (10%-20%) in northern China estimated in this study was relatively lower than that calculated in previous studies (32%-80%). The corresponding value was ~40% in eastern China, which was comparable to or relatively lower than that derived from previous studies (43%-84%). In southern China, the contribution was~40%, which was comparable with previous studies in the range of 15%-92%. Overall, the meteorological contribution was underestimated in this study compared with some previous studies since this study included only three dominant meteorological factors while previous studies considered many more meteorological parameters.

    5. Conclusion and discussion

    Severe ground-level O3pollution with significant enhancement in the magnitude and frequency of high O3events was observed in China from 2013 to 2019. In this study, the most important meteorological parameters, including T2, SW, and WS, were selected and classified into two terms, defined as PRC = T2× SW and PDC = WS, to separate the meteorological influences on O3through different aspects. Then a MSI was developed as a function of PRC and PDC to better outline and quantify the comprehensive impacts of meteorological conditions on ground-level O3variability. The results demonstrated that the change in meteorology-induced 90th percentile MDA8-O3was estimated to be 1.4 ± 0.4 μg m-3yr-1on average. Adverse meteorology,with stronger photochemical reaction conditions and weaker physical dispersion capacity, accounted for 10%-40% of the increase in 90th percentile MDA8-O3, with a higher(lower) contribution in southern (northern) China.

    This study is subject to high uncertainty. First, only three meteorological parameters were considered, which cannot fully represent the influences of meteorological conditions since O3is controlled by multiple meteorological parameters, such as PBLH, RH, cloud fraction, pressure (Li et al., 2019, 2020; Zhao et al., 2021). Second, ground-level O3is affected not only by local meteorology, but also by largescale weather circulation conditions (Gong and Liao, 2019;Liu et al., 2019; Liao et al., 2021), such as typhoons (Wei et al., 2016), the East Asian monsoon (Zhou et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2014), the western Pacific subtropical high (Liao et al., 2017; Zhao and Wang, 2017), the mei-yu front (Han et al., 2020), and El Ni?o-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)(Sekiya and Sudo, 2014). Third, this study did not consider chemical reactions that also affect ground-level O3since precursor emissions are also impacted by meteorological conditions (Lu et al., 2019b; Liu and Wang, 2020b; Dang et al.,2021). Although high uncertainty exists, the meteorology index established in this study not only enables fast diagnosis of meteorological roles in ground-level O3formation but also provides insight into meteorological influences on the formation and evaluation of ground-level O3pollution through its chemical and physical aspects. Results in this study signify that precursor emission reductions will need to be more stringent to counteract the adverse effects of long-term meteorological variation on ground-level O3pollution in the face of climate change.

    Acknowledgements.This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (Grant No.2017YFC0210105), the second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (Grant No. 2019QZKK0604), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.41905086, 41905107, 42077205, and 41425020), the Special Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2019B121205004), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M683174), the AirQuip(High-resolution Air Quality Information for Policy) Project funded by the Research Council of Norway, the Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change, Jiangsu Province, China, and the high-performance computing platform of Jinan University.

    Electronic supplementary material:Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1257-y.

    麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 不卡一级毛片| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| av国产免费在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 综合色丁香网| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 黄色一级大片看看| 三级毛片av免费| avwww免费| 97超碰精品成人国产| 简卡轻食公司| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 精品福利观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产高潮美女av| 如何舔出高潮| 嫩草影院精品99| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 国产精品野战在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 久久久久久伊人网av| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 一级av片app| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久精品人妻少妇| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 99久国产av精品| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 久久人人精品亚洲av| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 成年免费大片在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲av熟女| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 级片在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 99热这里只有是精品50| videossex国产| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 18+在线观看网站| 久久午夜福利片| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲不卡免费看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| eeuss影院久久| 精品福利观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 色在线成人网| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 高清毛片免费看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产高清三级在线| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 成人欧美大片| 成年免费大片在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 大香蕉久久网| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 老司机影院成人| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲av一区综合| 97碰自拍视频| 久久久久国产网址| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲四区av| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 欧美bdsm另类| 男人舔奶头视频| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产在线男女| 成年av动漫网址| a级毛色黄片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 91狼人影院| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 久久久久久大精品| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 精品久久久久久成人av| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 日韩强制内射视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲在线观看片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产综合懂色| 美女高潮的动态| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日本一本二区三区精品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 色播亚洲综合网| 欧美zozozo另类| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| or卡值多少钱| 香蕉av资源在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 天堂网av新在线| 精品久久久噜噜| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产精品野战在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产视频内射| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 有码 亚洲区| 99热只有精品国产| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产三级在线视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 久久久欧美国产精品| av专区在线播放| av专区在线播放| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 三级毛片av免费| 老女人水多毛片| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 观看美女的网站| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 老女人水多毛片| 国产在线男女| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美潮喷喷水| 午夜久久久久精精品| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 色在线成人网| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| av卡一久久| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 99久国产av精品| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 欧美bdsm另类| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日韩欧美免费精品| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产成人freesex在线 | 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 黄片wwwwww| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 色综合色国产| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 天堂√8在线中文| 久久久国产成人免费| 精品久久久噜噜| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 十八禁网站免费在线| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 午夜视频国产福利| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲av成人av| 久99久视频精品免费| 一本精品99久久精品77| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 日韩中字成人| 中国美女看黄片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | ponron亚洲| videossex国产| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 禁无遮挡网站| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| av天堂在线播放| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | av在线观看视频网站免费| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 美女高潮的动态| 国产免费男女视频| 此物有八面人人有两片| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国内精品宾馆在线| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 99热全是精品| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 精品午夜福利在线看| a级毛色黄片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 97超视频在线观看视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| videossex国产| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 久久久久久大精品| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| a级毛色黄片| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 午夜a级毛片| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产av在哪里看| 69av精品久久久久久| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 免费大片18禁| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产日本99.免费观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 日本 av在线| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产精品一及| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 高清毛片免费看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 黑人高潮一二区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| or卡值多少钱| 22中文网久久字幕| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲无线在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产免费男女视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 搞女人的毛片| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产在线男女| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 男人舔奶头视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| a级毛片a级免费在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 免费观看精品视频网站| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美色视频一区免费| 91狼人影院| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲av熟女| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 少妇的逼好多水| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 老女人水多毛片| 色在线成人网| 三级毛片av免费| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 久久精品影院6| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| av黄色大香蕉| 小说图片视频综合网站| 精品一区二区免费观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 51国产日韩欧美| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产单亲对白刺激| 美女大奶头视频| 99热全是精品| 久久久久久久久大av| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 日韩欧美免费精品| av.在线天堂| 欧美色视频一区免费| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 日本一本二区三区精品| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 色吧在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 中文资源天堂在线| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 97碰自拍视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲综合色惰| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 三级毛片av免费| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久九九热精品免费| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美3d第一页| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页|